1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:04,040 Speaker 1: Runt you by Bank of America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality, 2 00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:09,719 Speaker 1: virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world 3 00:00:10,160 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: VI of a mL dot Com slash VR, Mary Lynch, 4 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:28,120 Speaker 1: Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated. Ye. Welcome to the Bloomberg 5 00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:32,360 Speaker 1: Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we 6 00:00:32,440 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 1: bring you insight from the best of economics, finance, investment, 7 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:42,200 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 8 00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:49,960 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg d 9 00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:51,800 Speaker 1: We beginning this point with the bias left Vich. He's 10 00:00:51,800 --> 00:00:54,320 Speaker 1: the chief US Equity Strategic City and joins us in 11 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:57,560 Speaker 1: our Bloomberg eleven three oh studios. We see the tweet 12 00:00:57,560 --> 00:01:00,480 Speaker 1: this morning piece together. What happened over these last nine 13 00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:03,480 Speaker 1: days between the business meetings in Saudi Arabia, moving on 14 00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:05,520 Speaker 1: to Europe, the Native Summit, at the g semit, at 15 00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:08,479 Speaker 1: seven Summit, after that, what's your takeaway from that about 16 00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:10,720 Speaker 1: the state of the integrity of the alliance between the 17 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:12,720 Speaker 1: US and Europe and what does that say to you 18 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:15,319 Speaker 1: about the direction of the U S economy. I'm not 19 00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:18,200 Speaker 1: sure the two are necessarily rely Yeah, I would say 20 00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:21,720 Speaker 1: probably the the alliance is you know, is fine. Um, 21 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 1: I think they're you know, ebbsom and flows of of 22 00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:29,200 Speaker 1: that alliance. And and there there's certainly differences between for example, 23 00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:32,400 Speaker 1: the way George Bush conducted himself, George W. Bush conducted 24 00:01:32,440 --> 00:01:35,000 Speaker 1: himself with Europe, the way Obama did, and now the 25 00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:38,039 Speaker 1: way Trump is doing it. And it tends to you know, 26 00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:42,560 Speaker 1: move along with the with the various people involved. I've 27 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:44,080 Speaker 1: always said that, you know, I've been going to Europe 28 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:46,600 Speaker 1: for you know, close to thirty years, and and there's 29 00:01:46,680 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 1: kind of this you're either neutral about the US off 30 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:52,480 Speaker 1: European or you're really negative about the US off your 31 00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:56,080 Speaker 1: European They're never almost a little bit positive about the 32 00:01:56,160 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 1: US because then I guess you have to get up 33 00:01:57,720 --> 00:02:01,160 Speaker 1: your European citizenship or something. Um. And I joke about 34 00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 1: it a little bit. But there tends to be a 35 00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:07,800 Speaker 1: lot of the political differences show up in the relationships 36 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:11,840 Speaker 1: that that are even conversation with investors. It's not even 37 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:15,120 Speaker 1: about the leaders of the country. So there's certainly a 38 00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:18,360 Speaker 1: more i don't know, progressive mindset maybe in Europe that 39 00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:22,320 Speaker 1: doesn't necessarily exist in the US. Fully, there's obviously different 40 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:25,240 Speaker 1: political sizes in the US, but it's much more entrenched 41 00:02:25,280 --> 00:02:27,200 Speaker 1: in Europe. And I think that tends to come to 42 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:31,120 Speaker 1: the four when you have different leaders who have different perspectives. 43 00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:34,120 Speaker 1: At this stage, four months into this this administration does 44 00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:35,640 Speaker 1: a tweet like the one this morning or the one 45 00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:40,040 Speaker 1: last week about UH automakers German automakers comment about German 46 00:02:40,040 --> 00:02:42,120 Speaker 1: automakers not a tweet, but but a common doesn't have 47 00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:44,520 Speaker 1: much of an effect on your your world, not really. 48 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:48,200 Speaker 1: I mean there there's there was. I think initially when 49 00:02:48,200 --> 00:02:51,519 Speaker 1: the tweets came out and the people were and I 50 00:02:51,560 --> 00:02:53,120 Speaker 1: don't know if those novel are knew it, just it 51 00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 1: had an immediate reaction in the markets. And then they've 52 00:02:56,080 --> 00:02:58,200 Speaker 1: been having fewer and fewer impacts in the market, and 53 00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:00,400 Speaker 1: that was kind of our thought process that have eventually 54 00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:02,680 Speaker 1: it would kind of fade into the background. Um, it 55 00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:05,959 Speaker 1: doesn't help, but it's I don't think it's a dominant feature. 56 00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:08,760 Speaker 1: I think we care more about economic progress. Jim Bullard 57 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:10,400 Speaker 1: of the St. Louis FID was never view by Bloomberg 58 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:12,640 Speaker 1: guests to Day and talked about how this new administration 59 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 1: will have to fill the expectations it's it's laid out 60 00:03:14,600 --> 00:03:17,160 Speaker 1: in the stock market has for what it intends to do. 61 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:19,800 Speaker 1: How heavily does that way on you. So, you know, 62 00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:21,880 Speaker 1: we we track a lot of different things in the 63 00:03:22,040 --> 00:03:25,320 Speaker 1: in the stock market, including let's say high tax versus 64 00:03:25,320 --> 00:03:29,079 Speaker 1: low tax performance stocks. We look at the um the 65 00:03:30,040 --> 00:03:33,880 Speaker 1: interest expense deductibility potentially being removed. You know, how's that 66 00:03:33,919 --> 00:03:37,600 Speaker 1: affecting stocks that have that kind of exposure. And most 67 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:39,560 Speaker 1: of the Trump trades have pretty much rolled off. So 68 00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:42,960 Speaker 1: the idea that this is being priced in the market UM, 69 00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:45,760 Speaker 1: I think is antiquated. With all due respect to Mr Bullard, 70 00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:47,960 Speaker 1: I think he's wrong on that on that front. To 71 00:03:48,920 --> 00:03:52,440 Speaker 1: the city up, good morning, every good morning, David, Tom 72 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:55,560 Speaker 1: glad you survived the three weekend, made it up with 73 00:03:55,640 --> 00:03:58,480 Speaker 1: that incident and we watched all Pirates of the Caribbean. 74 00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:00,960 Speaker 1: You did. It's like there's eight of our Yeah, not 75 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:03,120 Speaker 1: the new one, I hope, Yeah, I got I got 76 00:04:03,200 --> 00:04:07,600 Speaker 1: ice shadow on that. It's great for radio. The one 77 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 1: thing on the data screen that's there, and I know 78 00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 1: the record highs inequities and all that sp and not 79 00:04:12,640 --> 00:04:16,839 Speaker 1: the doubt yet is curve flattening? What is kurve flattening 80 00:04:16,880 --> 00:04:19,719 Speaker 1: signal to a guy like you. In my mind, it's 81 00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:22,520 Speaker 1: more about global flows of money than it is about 82 00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:26,400 Speaker 1: economic trend. Now I'm probably not. I can find people 83 00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:28,240 Speaker 1: who will say the other side of that argument, that 84 00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:32,320 Speaker 1: there's something wrong economically. Um. The reason I say that 85 00:04:32,440 --> 00:04:35,320 Speaker 1: is because what is what's your competition to a tune 86 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 1: a quarter tenure yield in the world today? Point oh 87 00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:41,040 Speaker 1: four and J G B's uh point for on a 88 00:04:41,080 --> 00:04:44,560 Speaker 1: bund yield of equivalent duration um. And I think if 89 00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:47,720 Speaker 1: there's a problem, chances are tenure treasuries would rally or 90 00:04:47,760 --> 00:04:50,160 Speaker 1: the dollarwood rally. So if you're a foreign investor, buying 91 00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:53,240 Speaker 1: the US isn't a particularly bad trade. And just very quickly, folks, 92 00:04:53,279 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 1: that's price up, yield down. So the curve is flatter 93 00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:01,760 Speaker 1: from the land of Lefkovitch because the tenure yield is 94 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:05,480 Speaker 1: lower rather than higher. Would you be a steeper curve 95 00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:08,280 Speaker 1: we have all the fet is also raising rates on 96 00:05:08,320 --> 00:05:10,080 Speaker 1: the short end, So okay, we need to have a 97 00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:13,120 Speaker 1: moment of silence. David, it's the crunch time for the 98 00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:18,680 Speaker 1: cif A exams. It's coming up this weekend. All cf 99 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:21,360 Speaker 1: A candidates had a miserable Memorial Day weekend and we 100 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:24,000 Speaker 1: say good morning to all of them. They haven't slept. 101 00:05:24,279 --> 00:05:26,360 Speaker 1: They say best of luck as well. There's like eight 102 00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:28,400 Speaker 1: thousand of them at City Group. Right, did they get 103 00:05:28,400 --> 00:05:30,360 Speaker 1: the week off? I don't think they have the week off, 104 00:05:30,360 --> 00:05:32,560 Speaker 1: And I've had associates who've definitely taken a couple of 105 00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:36,160 Speaker 1: days off for it. Uh. They're going back to your 106 00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:39,240 Speaker 1: points about the yield curve flattening. I think it's it's 107 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:42,800 Speaker 1: less from my perspective about the economy. UM, most of 108 00:05:42,839 --> 00:05:45,560 Speaker 1: the data that I look at UM is still pretty supportive. 109 00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:48,120 Speaker 1: The one area that's squishy, call it is the autos. 110 00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:52,000 Speaker 1: But if I look at capital spending, intention, hiring intentions, 111 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:55,599 Speaker 1: new order trends, UM, consumer sentiment, all the kinds of 112 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:58,560 Speaker 1: things that you'd like to be seeing are are suggesting 113 00:05:58,760 --> 00:06:01,840 Speaker 1: that we aren't necessarily in the economy. And again, autos 114 00:06:01,640 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 1: is an area that there's been a little bit of 115 00:06:04,279 --> 00:06:09,560 Speaker 1: tension around prime subprime loans and uh and and retail 116 00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:12,520 Speaker 1: sales trans inventory. There is some issues in autos and 117 00:06:12,600 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 1: we're monitoring carefully. Yeah, this great note out a couple 118 00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:18,280 Speaker 1: of weeks back on growth. Looking at growth as you've 119 00:06:18,279 --> 00:06:20,080 Speaker 1: been thinking about it chewing it over as we've seen 120 00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:22,240 Speaker 1: the White House continue to reiterate, we're gonna see three percent? 121 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:24,920 Speaker 1: What what new? What? What new things have you come 122 00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:27,040 Speaker 1: to inclusion on what what have you learned here? Thinking 123 00:06:27,080 --> 00:06:29,600 Speaker 1: about growth in such detail. So we were we were 124 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:31,479 Speaker 1: thinking about a longer term perspective when were wroth at 125 00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:33,640 Speaker 1: the pieces called growth, and the one you're highlighting was 126 00:06:33,720 --> 00:06:36,880 Speaker 1: called growth growth My kingdom for growth, UM and and 127 00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:39,320 Speaker 1: the idea was more around what are the long term 128 00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:42,240 Speaker 1: drivers of growth? And historically it's been things like population growth, 129 00:06:42,320 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 1: income growth, productivity, and innovation. Now I think innovation is 130 00:06:46,120 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 1: still pretty darned healthy out there. UM. I was out 131 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:51,440 Speaker 1: in California last week, and you know stle Com values 132 00:06:51,480 --> 00:06:55,800 Speaker 1: humming UM. But if you look at the demographics, they've 133 00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:58,960 Speaker 1: clearly weakened the The birth rates are down, population growth 134 00:06:59,080 --> 00:07:02,479 Speaker 1: is down, still adding eighty two million people globally every year, 135 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:06,640 Speaker 1: but off off of larger base, the percentage increases decline UM. 136 00:07:07,440 --> 00:07:09,920 Speaker 1: Income growth was a big story in emerging markets over 137 00:07:09,960 --> 00:07:13,120 Speaker 1: the past decade plus and and it's still happening. It's 138 00:07:13,200 --> 00:07:15,240 Speaker 1: not as aggressive, but it's still happening again off a 139 00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:18,600 Speaker 1: higher base. UM. And the one area that's probably the 140 00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:20,640 Speaker 1: most disturbing and I think is the one that causes 141 00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:24,200 Speaker 1: angst amongst economists around the world is productivity is just 142 00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:28,360 Speaker 1: seemingly not there despite all this investment in technology. And 143 00:07:28,440 --> 00:07:30,080 Speaker 1: I'm not sure if it's because people are sitting at 144 00:07:30,200 --> 00:07:32,400 Speaker 1: you know, watching you know, looking at their Facebook feeds 145 00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:34,720 Speaker 1: h during the day and seeing what their friends had 146 00:07:34,760 --> 00:07:37,600 Speaker 1: for lunch, um, or you know, or they're playing candy 147 00:07:37,640 --> 00:07:40,800 Speaker 1: Crush instead of working at their desks. I just don't know, um, 148 00:07:41,400 --> 00:07:43,200 Speaker 1: But but there there is some you know, you made 149 00:07:43,200 --> 00:07:47,080 Speaker 1: a common earlier in on TV Tom about Marty Felstone. 150 00:07:47,160 --> 00:07:49,240 Speaker 1: I know that Harvard there are spending a lot of 151 00:07:49,320 --> 00:07:51,680 Speaker 1: time trying to understand why we're not seeing all this 152 00:07:51,760 --> 00:07:55,800 Speaker 1: productivity benefits. Maybe we're measuring widgets per man hour correct 153 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:59,000 Speaker 1: incorrectly in this kind of service based economy with with 154 00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:02,240 Speaker 1: new digital tech achnology. And I have sympathy to that 155 00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:05,440 Speaker 1: view because it does seem like things are much more productive. 156 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:07,600 Speaker 1: You can sit there in the cab, pay your bills, 157 00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:10,680 Speaker 1: you know, off your phone through your bank account with 158 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:13,360 Speaker 1: mobile so I mean that that's much more productive than 159 00:08:13,400 --> 00:08:15,280 Speaker 1: sitting at home at night writing check Okay, but David, 160 00:08:15,280 --> 00:08:17,200 Speaker 1: where are you on this? Because to me, it's a 161 00:08:17,280 --> 00:08:20,400 Speaker 1: partition of American society as much as we saw on 162 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:23,360 Speaker 1: the reporting of a mobile day weekend, there's a group 163 00:08:23,400 --> 00:08:26,880 Speaker 1: of society that's taking advantage of what Tobias just mentioned 164 00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:29,200 Speaker 1: as a whole another group that's just being loved by 165 00:08:29,240 --> 00:08:31,880 Speaker 1: the wayside. And I suppose too, there's the argument as well, Tobias, 166 00:08:32,920 --> 00:08:34,559 Speaker 1: how are we getting any better at measuring this? Do 167 00:08:34,559 --> 00:08:37,040 Speaker 1: you do you see signs that we are? No, I 168 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:38,800 Speaker 1: don't see any. But I don't see signs we're getting 169 00:08:38,800 --> 00:08:40,839 Speaker 1: better at measuring And I think this is I think 170 00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:43,199 Speaker 1: this is where economists are struggling. I've talked to a 171 00:08:43,280 --> 00:08:45,280 Speaker 1: number of them and they have not kind of found 172 00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:48,679 Speaker 1: the holy grail on this um. But you know, to 173 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:52,000 Speaker 1: your point, time, I think innovation over time has always 174 00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:53,959 Speaker 1: left some people behind. I mean, when I went back 175 00:08:53,960 --> 00:08:57,160 Speaker 1: in the ninet thirties, I think was close to um 176 00:08:57,440 --> 00:08:59,920 Speaker 1: of the American workforce was working down on the form. 177 00:09:00,120 --> 00:09:02,360 Speaker 1: Today it's less than two percent. Productivities up more than 178 00:09:02,400 --> 00:09:06,520 Speaker 1: tenfold through a whole bunch of measures, including mechanized farming, 179 00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:12,360 Speaker 1: including anti fungus type UM pesticides including UH modified c 180 00:09:12,640 --> 00:09:15,320 Speaker 1: that can that can survive different temperature swings. So there's 181 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:19,040 Speaker 1: a lot of different things going on that allows people 182 00:09:19,760 --> 00:09:21,559 Speaker 1: to to kind of move elsewhere. The question is, and 183 00:09:21,600 --> 00:09:23,520 Speaker 1: I think this is the fair one, are we retraining 184 00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:26,079 Speaker 1: people fast enough well for that new economy? And the 185 00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:28,280 Speaker 1: answer is probably know in The answer is that's where 186 00:09:28,360 --> 00:09:32,480 Speaker 1: every article ends upgoing. Is this mystery of retraining and 187 00:09:32,600 --> 00:09:36,120 Speaker 1: almost career shift, which is a theme under its own, 188 00:09:36,679 --> 00:09:51,480 Speaker 1: Or Tobias Levkovich of sitting David Gurr and and with 189 00:09:51,640 --> 00:09:54,400 Speaker 1: you on a Tuesday, four day workwate somebody said a 190 00:09:54,520 --> 00:09:57,880 Speaker 1: younger soul, David said, what's a holiday length and work week? 191 00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:01,120 Speaker 1: And you know, I said, well, you gotta live it. 192 00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:03,199 Speaker 1: You know how it is. Folks, you're like working five 193 00:10:03,320 --> 00:10:05,679 Speaker 1: days and you work four days and they tell you 194 00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:08,240 Speaker 1: to squeeze in five days or six days, and that's 195 00:10:08,280 --> 00:10:10,800 Speaker 1: how you get to a holiday length and at work week. 196 00:10:10,840 --> 00:10:14,480 Speaker 1: He knows about that. He's an academic professor. That was 197 00:10:14,559 --> 00:10:22,920 Speaker 1: a little sarcasm there, Professor Calamarus at Columbia University Hard Work, CHERYLS. Calamaris, 198 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:27,880 Speaker 1: who's planning a sixth sabbatical reforming financial regulation after Dodd 199 00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:31,760 Speaker 1: Frank is a small but important book. If you wrote 200 00:10:31,840 --> 00:10:36,280 Speaker 1: this book for the believers in a more conservative free 201 00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:39,920 Speaker 1: market take on regulation, what's in this book for liberals? 202 00:10:40,320 --> 00:10:44,320 Speaker 1: What's in this book for Democrats that support UM? Senator 203 00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:48,760 Speaker 1: Warren Speaker Pelosi? Why do they need to read this book? Actually, Tom, 204 00:10:48,920 --> 00:10:51,000 Speaker 1: at the end of the book, I try to argue 205 00:10:51,080 --> 00:10:55,839 Speaker 1: that it's exactly directed to them, because, UM, some of 206 00:10:55,920 --> 00:10:59,920 Speaker 1: the concerns the ineffectiveness of regulation, not just the high 207 00:11:00,040 --> 00:11:03,640 Speaker 1: costs of regulation, and also the collapse of due process 208 00:11:03,720 --> 00:11:08,319 Speaker 1: in regulation should particularly be concerns for Democrats, especially now 209 00:11:08,440 --> 00:11:11,480 Speaker 1: that they're not in power. So we've had eight years 210 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:14,120 Speaker 1: of the Obama administration. They don't worry about process the 211 00:11:14,200 --> 00:11:16,600 Speaker 1: Democrats when they're in control, but they're not in control 212 00:11:16,720 --> 00:11:19,240 Speaker 1: right now. Trump is going to point, for example, at 213 00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:21,640 Speaker 1: least five and maybe all seven of the governors of 214 00:11:21,679 --> 00:11:26,439 Speaker 1: the FED, and now the discretion the unlimited discretionary uh 215 00:11:26,679 --> 00:11:30,319 Speaker 1: sort of moment to moment cough cask process of regulation 216 00:11:30,800 --> 00:11:34,880 Speaker 1: is going to be in the people's hands that he appoints. 217 00:11:35,200 --> 00:11:38,359 Speaker 1: So I think that it's an attractive time for Democrats 218 00:11:38,440 --> 00:11:41,920 Speaker 1: to be thinking about due process given that, UH, some 219 00:11:42,120 --> 00:11:44,520 Speaker 1: of their concerns about the Trump administration. So I I 220 00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:47,840 Speaker 1: really do feel that this is a bipartisan story. Um. 221 00:11:48,440 --> 00:11:51,079 Speaker 1: And I wouldn't even describe this as a conservative set 222 00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:53,280 Speaker 1: of principles. I would just describe it as a rational 223 00:11:53,360 --> 00:11:56,800 Speaker 1: set of principles. The the the academic literature over the 224 00:11:56,880 --> 00:12:02,319 Speaker 1: past nine years has now evaluated the regulatory reforms, and 225 00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:06,920 Speaker 1: the evaluation is very negative. The regulatory reforms aren't accomplishing 226 00:12:07,000 --> 00:12:10,520 Speaker 1: what they wanted to accomplish by their own lights. They're 227 00:12:10,559 --> 00:12:13,960 Speaker 1: doing it at very high cost and having pretty much 228 00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:18,000 Speaker 1: destroyed due process uh in the regulatory sphere. So I 229 00:12:18,080 --> 00:12:20,599 Speaker 1: think it's a it's a failure across the board. What 230 00:12:20,760 --> 00:12:22,559 Speaker 1: lessons can we can we learn? What lessons can we 231 00:12:22,679 --> 00:12:25,280 Speaker 1: draw from what's happened with the so called fiduciary rule. 232 00:12:25,360 --> 00:12:27,480 Speaker 1: This is something that was in the prominence of Department 233 00:12:27,520 --> 00:12:28,920 Speaker 1: of Labor for some time. We have a new Labory 234 00:12:28,960 --> 00:12:31,040 Speaker 1: Secretary who has expressed some desire for the sec to 235 00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:35,160 Speaker 1: take on a role in its implementation and oversight. Uh. Indeed, 236 00:12:35,160 --> 00:12:36,920 Speaker 1: it seems like we may be headed in that that direction. 237 00:12:37,120 --> 00:12:39,360 Speaker 1: What does that city about the level of complexity associated 238 00:12:39,360 --> 00:12:41,800 Speaker 1: with financial regulation now that you have two different agencies 239 00:12:42,320 --> 00:12:44,559 Speaker 1: fighting this truth war over who's gonna oversee a rule 240 00:12:44,679 --> 00:12:46,800 Speaker 1: like that one? It's an excellent question. I mean, I 241 00:12:46,880 --> 00:12:49,480 Speaker 1: think there are two things that leap to mind. One is, 242 00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:54,720 Speaker 1: once people are used to something and have already gone 243 00:12:54,800 --> 00:12:58,880 Speaker 1: through spending the costs to adopt it, especially the large players, 244 00:12:59,320 --> 00:13:01,280 Speaker 1: they want to keep with the status quo. So you're 245 00:13:01,320 --> 00:13:04,559 Speaker 1: seeing that having already implemented some changes or about to 246 00:13:04,640 --> 00:13:07,480 Speaker 1: implement them, having paid the cost of it, they now 247 00:13:07,559 --> 00:13:10,040 Speaker 1: don't want to have to think again about whether the 248 00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:13,520 Speaker 1: fiduciary rule makes sense. Um. I think that there's another 249 00:13:13,679 --> 00:13:18,760 Speaker 1: piece to it, which is that specific to the fiduciary rule, 250 00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:21,640 Speaker 1: that there are some arguments in favor of it. Um, 251 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:23,800 Speaker 1: it's a trade off. It's not clear that it's a 252 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:26,000 Speaker 1: good idea, but it's not clear that it's a terrible idea. 253 00:13:26,040 --> 00:13:30,640 Speaker 1: So I think I was very encouraged that, um, we're 254 00:13:30,720 --> 00:13:33,760 Speaker 1: now going to have from the Labor Department, uh, a 255 00:13:33,920 --> 00:13:36,560 Speaker 1: sort of thoughtful review. That's what they should be doing. 256 00:13:36,760 --> 00:13:39,400 Speaker 1: Is the president on board. I can't figure out if 257 00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:45,880 Speaker 1: he's a conservative liberal, regulationist deregulationist. Depends on the tweet, Yeah, 258 00:13:46,280 --> 00:13:47,960 Speaker 1: what is it? You gotta you gotta are you gonna 259 00:13:48,040 --> 00:13:51,240 Speaker 1: join his staff. Can we make some news here this morning? UM, 260 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:55,800 Speaker 1: I have not been approved. Let's just leave it at that. 261 00:13:56,160 --> 00:13:59,160 Speaker 1: And but I would say that I would be willing 262 00:13:59,240 --> 00:14:01,520 Speaker 1: to because I think that this is a time where 263 00:14:01,559 --> 00:14:04,520 Speaker 1: we have to come together. And I think that the 264 00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:08,599 Speaker 1: President is uh not fully formed. His views are not 265 00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:11,960 Speaker 1: fully formed on exactly what to do in financial regulation. 266 00:14:12,040 --> 00:14:15,960 Speaker 1: But I think his instinct is right, which is that there's, um, 267 00:14:16,480 --> 00:14:19,880 Speaker 1: there's been a lack of discipline in terms of cost 268 00:14:19,920 --> 00:14:23,640 Speaker 1: benefit analysis on regulation, and so I think that his 269 00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:27,800 Speaker 1: his action so far on the regulatory front um have 270 00:14:27,920 --> 00:14:32,080 Speaker 1: actually been very encouraging. And as I would emphasize, you 271 00:14:32,160 --> 00:14:34,120 Speaker 1: have to also ask who's in charge now in the 272 00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:37,920 Speaker 1: Treasury Department. Mutan doesn't really seem to know much about 273 00:14:38,160 --> 00:14:42,160 Speaker 1: financial regulation yet, and he doesn't have an under secretary. 274 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:44,560 Speaker 1: In fact, now I don't even think there's one that's 275 00:14:44,600 --> 00:14:48,800 Speaker 1: been named. Because can you pass the litmus test? I'm 276 00:14:48,840 --> 00:14:53,400 Speaker 1: not sure. Well, you know, I think Nick Burns, who 277 00:14:53,480 --> 00:14:57,840 Speaker 1: joined policy, are you on the ugly list? I maybe 278 00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:02,600 Speaker 1: I don't know. I did know. I criticized the idea 279 00:15:02,640 --> 00:15:06,600 Speaker 1: of Chinese currency manipulation in two thousand and fifteen, that's 280 00:15:06,640 --> 00:15:09,080 Speaker 1: been the main, the main thing. So you never know, 281 00:15:09,600 --> 00:15:11,760 Speaker 1: how do you teach finance differently than you did in 282 00:15:11,880 --> 00:15:14,000 Speaker 1: two thousand six. You don't need a face lift to 283 00:15:14,040 --> 00:15:17,360 Speaker 1: do that, but how do you teach the troops differently 284 00:15:17,440 --> 00:15:20,480 Speaker 1: than you did in June or in April of two 285 00:15:20,520 --> 00:15:25,440 Speaker 1: thousand seven. You know, UH finance has sort of um 286 00:15:25,880 --> 00:15:31,000 Speaker 1: fallen off a cliff UH in NBA curriculums, mainly because 287 00:15:31,160 --> 00:15:36,120 Speaker 1: of the change in UH jobs that happened in two 288 00:15:36,200 --> 00:15:39,240 Speaker 1: thousand seven, and so a lot of the teaching has 289 00:15:39,320 --> 00:15:43,880 Speaker 1: to do with trying to think through UM how crises occur. 290 00:15:44,320 --> 00:15:46,960 Speaker 1: And I've been teaching, of course for twenty years called 291 00:15:46,960 --> 00:15:52,000 Speaker 1: emerging financial markets, which is all about how things tectonic 292 00:15:52,480 --> 00:15:56,120 Speaker 1: shifts happen in different countries. So it was very natural 293 00:15:56,240 --> 00:15:58,680 Speaker 1: for me. I I feel like it actually helped my 294 00:15:59,160 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 1: class because it made risk and systemic risk really was 295 00:16:04,960 --> 00:16:07,000 Speaker 1: brought to life by the crisis. So for me it 296 00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:11,080 Speaker 1: was actually good news. But for much of our teaching 297 00:16:11,160 --> 00:16:13,800 Speaker 1: and finance, I have to say, I think that it 298 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:17,240 Speaker 1: was a little bit overconfident that we thought that it was. Ah, well, 299 00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:23,440 Speaker 1: it's also normal and it's also just about technical details, 300 00:16:23,840 --> 00:16:27,440 Speaker 1: whereas In fact, people started asking very basic questions, do 301 00:16:28,080 --> 00:16:32,360 Speaker 1: do banks know what they're doing? Um? Do people have 302 00:16:32,520 --> 00:16:35,520 Speaker 1: a way to quantify risk on a forward looking basis 303 00:16:35,600 --> 00:16:39,440 Speaker 1: that's useful? So these were really fundamental questions. I think 304 00:16:39,480 --> 00:16:42,520 Speaker 1: the curriculum has been affected. But from my class, this 305 00:16:42,800 --> 00:16:46,240 Speaker 1: was really grisp from my mills, because that's that's really 306 00:16:46,280 --> 00:16:48,120 Speaker 1: what I like to teach. I wanna ask you about 307 00:16:48,440 --> 00:16:50,760 Speaker 1: Alan Meltzer. He passed away on May the eighth. We 308 00:16:50,800 --> 00:16:53,160 Speaker 1: were very closely do something on the show, and then 309 00:16:53,480 --> 00:16:56,600 Speaker 1: the president fired as FBI director and things got busy 310 00:16:56,640 --> 00:16:58,400 Speaker 1: the following morning. I know that you you knew him 311 00:16:58,440 --> 00:17:00,280 Speaker 1: well and every worked on the shadow Open Market Committe 312 00:17:00,360 --> 00:17:02,000 Speaker 1: with what should we know about him? And in his 313 00:17:02,120 --> 00:17:04,440 Speaker 1: legacy Again, he passed away on May the eight. Well, 314 00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:09,200 Speaker 1: Allen was an amazingly diverse and hard working person. I 315 00:17:09,320 --> 00:17:11,639 Speaker 1: was with him in the hospital. Uh just you know 316 00:17:11,840 --> 00:17:13,920 Speaker 1: a couple of days before he died, and he was 317 00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:16,560 Speaker 1: working in the I c U. He was working on 318 00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:20,080 Speaker 1: his new book with pen and paper, with the oxygen 319 00:17:20,280 --> 00:17:24,119 Speaker 1: hooked up and very very weak. UM. So he was 320 00:17:24,240 --> 00:17:27,840 Speaker 1: just somebody who had an incredible dedication. He worked on 321 00:17:28,119 --> 00:17:32,280 Speaker 1: issues as diverse as um what's the link between monetary 322 00:17:32,359 --> 00:17:37,240 Speaker 1: policy and inflation or the political economy of elections? Why 323 00:17:37,480 --> 00:17:42,160 Speaker 1: sometimes growth versus redistribution wins in an election. He also 324 00:17:42,280 --> 00:17:45,920 Speaker 1: worked on reform of the international financial institutions, the I 325 00:17:46,080 --> 00:17:49,840 Speaker 1: m F, the World Bank, etcetera. UM. He worked though 326 00:17:50,320 --> 00:17:55,600 Speaker 1: on many other issues. UM he founded the Shadow Open 327 00:17:55,680 --> 00:18:00,320 Speaker 1: Market Committee. UM. You know, just an amazing contribute. What 328 00:18:00,480 --> 00:18:03,639 Speaker 1: was his work with Carl Brunner of the University of Rochester. 329 00:18:04,160 --> 00:18:08,280 Speaker 1: The Carnegie Rochester series was legendary for all in economics. 330 00:18:08,680 --> 00:18:11,760 Speaker 1: What was Carl Brunner Elor Meltzer's legacy. Well, you know, 331 00:18:12,240 --> 00:18:16,280 Speaker 1: I was at Allen's apartment and I noticed several pictures 332 00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:19,480 Speaker 1: in his office of Carl Brunner. Still so, Carl Brunner 333 00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:22,800 Speaker 1: was an incredible influence on Allen and not all of us. 334 00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:27,000 Speaker 1: And it was a personal partnership of dedication to public 335 00:18:27,080 --> 00:18:32,159 Speaker 1: policy old school style, right people who saw problems at 336 00:18:32,200 --> 00:18:35,560 Speaker 1: that time in the seventies, people were saying that inflation 337 00:18:35,720 --> 00:18:39,560 Speaker 1: wasn't caused by monetary policy, and Carl and Alan, I 338 00:18:39,680 --> 00:18:43,760 Speaker 1: think we're absolutely dedicated to showing that wasn't true. In 339 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:49,520 Speaker 1: the Carnegie Rochester Public Policy series was really unique very valuable. 340 00:18:49,560 --> 00:18:52,480 Speaker 1: Charles Collenyers, thank you so much for Columbia. David. My 341 00:18:52,720 --> 00:18:56,760 Speaker 1: great Allen Meltzer memory was somebody holding an umbrella over 342 00:18:56,840 --> 00:18:59,480 Speaker 1: his head in the pouring rain at Jackson Hole and 343 00:18:59,600 --> 00:19:02,280 Speaker 1: his lee upset that he's wasting time. My TV said 344 00:19:02,880 --> 00:19:05,639 Speaker 1: Mr Meltzer. There's too many panels, aren't there? In heat? 345 00:19:05,720 --> 00:19:08,719 Speaker 1: God fear Tom. That used to be simpler, there were 346 00:19:08,840 --> 00:19:14,320 Speaker 1: fewer panels. In honor of Allan Meltzer. Charles calumeres with 347 00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:23,200 Speaker 1: thoughts there. This is Bloomberg Brunt you by Bank of 348 00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:27,840 Speaker 1: America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality, virtually everything will change. 349 00:19:28,359 --> 00:19:32,920 Speaker 1: Discover opportunities in a transforming world. VI of a mL 350 00:19:33,040 --> 00:19:38,600 Speaker 1: dot Com, slash VR, Mary Lynch, Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated. 351 00:19:44,080 --> 00:19:47,879 Speaker 1: There's something new from Bloomberg. It's called Lens. Starting right now, 352 00:19:48,040 --> 00:19:51,360 Speaker 1: you can use the Bloomberg iOS app off your iPhone 353 00:19:51,520 --> 00:19:56,120 Speaker 1: or iPad, or our new Google Chrome extension to read 354 00:19:56,160 --> 00:19:59,919 Speaker 1: any news story on any website, scan it, and then 355 00:20:00,200 --> 00:20:04,280 Speaker 1: instantly see the news stories relevant market data from Bloomberg. 356 00:20:04,640 --> 00:20:07,680 Speaker 1: In addition, see all the bios of the key people 357 00:20:08,160 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 1: mentioned in the story. It's called Lens, and it is 358 00:20:11,440 --> 00:20:14,480 Speaker 1: just that a lens into the people and the data 359 00:20:14,640 --> 00:20:18,879 Speaker 1: of any story you may be reading. Again, Lens brings 360 00:20:18,880 --> 00:20:22,119 Speaker 1: you the power of Bloomberg's news and data. Download or 361 00:20:22,200 --> 00:20:25,520 Speaker 1: io s app or search for the Bloomberg extension at 362 00:20:25,560 --> 00:20:28,879 Speaker 1: the Chrome Store to try lens out. Learn more at 363 00:20:28,920 --> 00:20:37,680 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com slash lens. David Harrow with US from Chicago. 364 00:20:37,800 --> 00:20:41,920 Speaker 1: He invests in large cap internationals and is known he'll 365 00:20:41,960 --> 00:20:44,200 Speaker 1: have an off You're here and off You're there, but 366 00:20:44,760 --> 00:20:49,240 Speaker 1: has put together just a terrific long term track record. David, 367 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:52,880 Speaker 1: good morning. What is your appetite for international stocks right now? 368 00:20:53,320 --> 00:20:57,359 Speaker 1: Has all the easy money been made? No? First of all, 369 00:20:57,400 --> 00:21:00,880 Speaker 1: it's never easy to make money time. You know that. Um, 370 00:21:01,200 --> 00:21:05,000 Speaker 1: there's always the beauty of having the globe at your disposal, 371 00:21:05,080 --> 00:21:07,920 Speaker 1: as you are always able to find a place or 372 00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:12,840 Speaker 1: a pocket where there's value where perhaps fear and fright 373 00:21:12,960 --> 00:21:16,080 Speaker 1: have caused opportunity. And I think if you're looking at 374 00:21:16,119 --> 00:21:20,480 Speaker 1: the differential that European equities still sell at from evaluation 375 00:21:20,560 --> 00:21:24,560 Speaker 1: differential perspective to US equities as an example, there's still 376 00:21:24,640 --> 00:21:28,720 Speaker 1: some opportunity there. So we're not seeing fire sale prices 377 00:21:28,920 --> 00:21:32,520 Speaker 1: like we did after Brexit or in February. But we're 378 00:21:32,560 --> 00:21:37,360 Speaker 1: seeing some reasonable valuations, especially in some of the European 379 00:21:37,520 --> 00:21:41,240 Speaker 1: continental blue chips and financials. Where are the other places 380 00:21:41,280 --> 00:21:45,120 Speaker 1: and pockets you're you're looking at outside of the Eurozone. Well, 381 00:21:45,240 --> 00:21:47,920 Speaker 1: we have increased our m exposure a little bit, but 382 00:21:48,000 --> 00:21:51,760 Speaker 1: again this is all driven from bottom up valuation. Uh, 383 00:21:52,160 --> 00:21:55,919 Speaker 1: some places are easier than others. UM, we have an 384 00:21:55,920 --> 00:21:59,479 Speaker 1: exposure to I've got a few good quality Mexican stocks 385 00:21:59,520 --> 00:22:03,200 Speaker 1: Group or all of Visa is an example. UM. And 386 00:22:03,359 --> 00:22:06,399 Speaker 1: we we actually have in our large camp strategy at 387 00:22:06,520 --> 00:22:09,320 Speaker 1: Chinese stock I do which is not of course the 388 00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:12,399 Speaker 1: leading search engine in China, but one of the leaders 389 00:22:12,480 --> 00:22:16,120 Speaker 1: and artificial intelligence, one of the top two or three 390 00:22:16,160 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 1: players and artificial intelligence in the world. So, and they're 391 00:22:20,560 --> 00:22:24,879 Speaker 1: not owned, there's not a direct government ownership, which always 392 00:22:24,920 --> 00:22:28,479 Speaker 1: scares us. Of course, there are some government influence because 393 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:32,840 Speaker 1: of how the Chinese regulates the Internet, but it's it's 394 00:22:32,920 --> 00:22:36,600 Speaker 1: not owned by government entities, which is which is the 395 00:22:36,800 --> 00:22:40,800 Speaker 1: case for a great deal of the Chinese stocks. Is 396 00:22:40,880 --> 00:22:42,840 Speaker 1: China a place you're looking to more and more for 397 00:22:43,400 --> 00:22:45,960 Speaker 1: companies that are innovative. You mentioned that company doing work 398 00:22:46,040 --> 00:22:49,639 Speaker 1: on yes search, but also AI and I wonder if 399 00:22:49,680 --> 00:22:52,040 Speaker 1: if if that's increasingly the place you look to for 400 00:22:52,280 --> 00:22:56,240 Speaker 1: for new novel technology. Well, it's kind of tough because 401 00:22:56,359 --> 00:22:59,959 Speaker 1: of this government involvement. What I mean by government involved 402 00:23:00,160 --> 00:23:03,119 Speaker 1: mentis the government basically tells them what to buy and 403 00:23:03,200 --> 00:23:06,280 Speaker 1: what to sell and wow to expand. And even with 404 00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:09,600 Speaker 1: some of the tech companies, uh, you just don't really 405 00:23:09,720 --> 00:23:13,639 Speaker 1: have it independence that you want that you could get elsewhere. 406 00:23:14,080 --> 00:23:16,800 Speaker 1: And so this is a major problem. I mean, you 407 00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:20,280 Speaker 1: could talk all he wants about globalization, but when you're 408 00:23:20,560 --> 00:23:23,760 Speaker 1: a European automaker and you want to build a plant 409 00:23:23,840 --> 00:23:28,360 Speaker 1: and they want your battery technology for free, that's not globalization. 410 00:23:28,840 --> 00:23:32,280 Speaker 1: Where we on use of cash and if we finally 411 00:23:32,400 --> 00:23:35,359 Speaker 1: get interest rate normalization, I guess the first question is 412 00:23:35,400 --> 00:23:38,760 Speaker 1: do you predict that how will use of cash change 413 00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:42,639 Speaker 1: in a more normal rate environment. I mean, that's a 414 00:23:42,680 --> 00:23:45,000 Speaker 1: great question, Tom. I do think there will be interest 415 00:23:45,119 --> 00:23:48,120 Speaker 1: rate normalization. I think this has just been a long cycle. 416 00:23:48,600 --> 00:23:53,800 Speaker 1: But eventually you'll start to see interest rates uh reflect 417 00:23:54,000 --> 00:23:56,920 Speaker 1: you know, inflation levels, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. So I do 418 00:23:57,080 --> 00:24:01,400 Speaker 1: think you'll see some interest rate normalization, that the central 419 00:24:01,440 --> 00:24:05,480 Speaker 1: banks will realize that these low negative rates haven't really 420 00:24:05,560 --> 00:24:08,920 Speaker 1: had the desired impact. And one of the reasons why 421 00:24:09,000 --> 00:24:12,000 Speaker 1: they haven't is remember Irving Fisher's quantity theory of money 422 00:24:12,119 --> 00:24:15,560 Speaker 1: and the equals p Q will The problem is that 423 00:24:15,960 --> 00:24:19,240 Speaker 1: velocity you know, has which was supposed to be stable, 424 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:21,960 Speaker 1: has fallen, and this is what you're getting at uses 425 00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:24,120 Speaker 1: of money. Well, at some point you're going to see 426 00:24:24,160 --> 00:24:26,920 Speaker 1: the velocity of money pick up and you're going to 427 00:24:27,040 --> 00:24:29,480 Speaker 1: see kind of back to the quantity theory of money. 428 00:24:29,880 --> 00:24:33,919 Speaker 1: But because of technology and financial technology, I would assume 429 00:24:34,080 --> 00:24:38,359 Speaker 1: actual uses of cash continue to decline, though of course 430 00:24:38,440 --> 00:24:42,960 Speaker 1: the black market loves the use cash. When you when 431 00:24:42,960 --> 00:24:44,800 Speaker 1: you talk about the length of the cycle, that's being 432 00:24:44,800 --> 00:24:46,560 Speaker 1: along the cycle, what are the signs you see that 433 00:24:46,640 --> 00:24:50,000 Speaker 1: it may be coming to an end? Well, I think 434 00:24:50,000 --> 00:24:53,760 Speaker 1: in the United States in particular, you're starting to see um, 435 00:24:54,720 --> 00:25:01,199 Speaker 1: the easing cycle turn um, we see interest rates lifteeing um, 436 00:25:01,720 --> 00:25:04,040 Speaker 1: talk of what to do with the FENS balance sheet. 437 00:25:04,600 --> 00:25:06,920 Speaker 1: These are all little signs that we're gonna start to 438 00:25:06,960 --> 00:25:11,160 Speaker 1: see back to a pickup in a normal interest rate environment. 439 00:25:11,280 --> 00:25:14,440 Speaker 1: Even in Europe, I think there's some some talk about 440 00:25:14,640 --> 00:25:17,960 Speaker 1: we're getting getting towards the end of using monetary policy 441 00:25:18,480 --> 00:25:20,760 Speaker 1: as an end all and be all tool. And I 442 00:25:20,840 --> 00:25:23,119 Speaker 1: think that's also something that needs to be mentioned, is 443 00:25:24,440 --> 00:25:28,800 Speaker 1: we have around the globe relied far too much on 444 00:25:28,920 --> 00:25:32,920 Speaker 1: an imperfect tool, and that's monetary policy. I mean, monetary 445 00:25:33,040 --> 00:25:37,520 Speaker 1: policy is best used to provide a stable price level. 446 00:25:37,840 --> 00:25:41,920 Speaker 1: It is not meant to be used to to lift 447 00:25:42,560 --> 00:25:48,440 Speaker 1: employment level simultaneously everywhere to get the economic engine necessarily started. 448 00:25:48,800 --> 00:25:51,320 Speaker 1: Because of this whole notion that Kane says, you can't 449 00:25:51,400 --> 00:25:56,280 Speaker 1: necessarily push your strength if people don't have positive expectations 450 00:25:56,320 --> 00:25:58,399 Speaker 1: about the future or animal spirits that they are not 451 00:25:58,480 --> 00:26:00,919 Speaker 1: going to invest, they're not going to so so there 452 00:26:01,000 --> 00:26:04,240 Speaker 1: has to be something other than monetary policy. And this, 453 00:26:04,560 --> 00:26:08,280 Speaker 1: I think is one of the lessons that we're learning 454 00:26:08,560 --> 00:26:11,480 Speaker 1: post the Great Financial Crisis of two thousand and eight 455 00:26:11,520 --> 00:26:16,080 Speaker 1: and two thousand nine, is that monetary policy can facilitate growth, 456 00:26:16,400 --> 00:26:19,520 Speaker 1: but you need other policies to really ignite the engines 457 00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:23,000 Speaker 1: of growth. And there's been far too much reliance, in 458 00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:26,119 Speaker 1: my view, on monetary policy, and it's been used to 459 00:26:26,200 --> 00:26:28,760 Speaker 1: someone incorrectly. It is a blunt tool. It is not 460 00:26:28,920 --> 00:26:32,520 Speaker 1: a tool that you could find tune and use meticulously. 461 00:26:32,960 --> 00:26:36,240 Speaker 1: What have we learned about the promise of policy, about 462 00:26:36,280 --> 00:26:39,040 Speaker 1: optimism here over these last five six months since since 463 00:26:39,119 --> 00:26:41,920 Speaker 1: the election. Is you look at yourself and other investors 464 00:26:42,000 --> 00:26:44,360 Speaker 1: and how they reacted to the presidential election last year 465 00:26:44,359 --> 00:26:46,000 Speaker 1: and all that that could have ushered in or people 466 00:26:46,000 --> 00:26:48,240 Speaker 1: thought it would usher in. What have we learned now 467 00:26:48,280 --> 00:26:51,320 Speaker 1: a few months into the president's term. Well, I think 468 00:26:51,400 --> 00:26:54,400 Speaker 1: we haven't learned all that much quite yet. I think 469 00:26:54,440 --> 00:26:57,600 Speaker 1: what we're the biggest thing we've learned is this kind 470 00:26:57,640 --> 00:27:02,040 Speaker 1: of consistent bashing of success send capitalism and banks and 471 00:27:02,160 --> 00:27:05,040 Speaker 1: greedy bankers and all of us. You know, everyone's greedy 472 00:27:05,119 --> 00:27:08,360 Speaker 1: and everyone's out to get the world. At least we've 473 00:27:08,400 --> 00:27:10,480 Speaker 1: backed off of that, and I think there was a 474 00:27:10,560 --> 00:27:14,600 Speaker 1: realization that the private sector creates jobs, the private sector 475 00:27:14,680 --> 00:27:19,120 Speaker 1: creates opportunity, the private sector creates upward mobility, and it's 476 00:27:19,160 --> 00:27:23,920 Speaker 1: not this evil boogeyman. Perhaps that is the biggest lesson learned, 477 00:27:23,960 --> 00:27:26,399 Speaker 1: the biggest relief because prior to this, I mean, we 478 00:27:26,480 --> 00:27:29,639 Speaker 1: had eight years of of you know, the bashing of 479 00:27:29,680 --> 00:27:33,400 Speaker 1: the private sector and a free enterprise, and we still 480 00:27:33,480 --> 00:27:35,480 Speaker 1: have yet to see what's going to replace it. I 481 00:27:35,560 --> 00:27:38,240 Speaker 1: think there's still some uncertainty what's going to replace it? 482 00:27:38,640 --> 00:27:40,760 Speaker 1: But what we have seen is kind of an end 483 00:27:40,800 --> 00:27:45,800 Speaker 1: to the evil private sector rhetoric. Do you invest thinking 484 00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:49,760 Speaker 1: it's a double digit return world? Or is David Harrow 485 00:27:49,840 --> 00:27:52,960 Speaker 1: a single digit guy? Now? I think what you have 486 00:27:53,080 --> 00:27:55,320 Speaker 1: to invest is a you have to think of what's 487 00:27:55,359 --> 00:27:58,000 Speaker 1: inflation while it's one or two percent, and then you 488 00:27:58,040 --> 00:27:59,920 Speaker 1: know worship interest rate speed and you had a couple 489 00:28:00,080 --> 00:28:02,520 Speaker 1: points to that, and what's the equity risk premium when 490 00:28:02,520 --> 00:28:06,080 Speaker 1: you add it all together. I think equities through time, 491 00:28:06,720 --> 00:28:09,719 Speaker 1: if you have an inflation environment of one to two percent, 492 00:28:10,119 --> 00:28:13,080 Speaker 1: should be should do eight to ten percent through time 493 00:28:13,320 --> 00:28:17,720 Speaker 1: through time, And what you achieve is dependent on where 494 00:28:17,840 --> 00:28:21,439 Speaker 1: you enter in the evaluation cycle. So if stocks are 495 00:28:21,600 --> 00:28:24,440 Speaker 1: kind of rich and you enter there, you will get 496 00:28:24,520 --> 00:28:26,800 Speaker 1: less than that eight to ten percent. Stocks are kind 497 00:28:26,800 --> 00:28:30,240 Speaker 1: of average valuation, I would presume you would get around 498 00:28:30,280 --> 00:28:32,800 Speaker 1: eight to ten percent, and you could buy stocks at 499 00:28:32,840 --> 00:28:35,879 Speaker 1: a cheap valuation level and the cycle you will do 500 00:28:36,040 --> 00:28:38,760 Speaker 1: better than eight to ten percent. But I hope for 501 00:28:38,880 --> 00:28:41,920 Speaker 1: my shareholders that we could do close to double digit 502 00:28:42,000 --> 00:28:44,840 Speaker 1: and that we could beat the index that we compete 503 00:28:44,840 --> 00:28:50,520 Speaker 1: against by a measurable one one basis points and luckily, 504 00:28:50,680 --> 00:28:52,920 Speaker 1: over twenty years we've been able to beat it by 505 00:28:52,960 --> 00:28:56,080 Speaker 1: four hundred basis points, so we got we get bonus points. 506 00:28:56,400 --> 00:29:00,400 Speaker 1: David Harrow with US on International Investing. David, you more 507 00:29:00,720 --> 00:29:05,520 Speaker 1: buy and holding Now is your so called portfolio turnover rate? 508 00:29:06,080 --> 00:29:08,640 Speaker 1: Is it lower and lower or are you churning in 509 00:29:09,400 --> 00:29:13,560 Speaker 1: holding stocks for like ten minutes or ten months? Well, 510 00:29:13,640 --> 00:29:16,280 Speaker 1: we tend to be very much on the buy and 511 00:29:16,360 --> 00:29:18,880 Speaker 1: hold camp. If if you look at our strategy to 512 00:29:19,000 --> 00:29:21,400 Speaker 1: analyze the business, to price a business, to buy it 513 00:29:21,520 --> 00:29:25,560 Speaker 1: low and to sell it, dear, business valuation and the 514 00:29:25,720 --> 00:29:28,760 Speaker 1: creation of business value tends to be a lot more 515 00:29:28,880 --> 00:29:33,600 Speaker 1: stable than price. Price is very very volatile, whereas business 516 00:29:33,720 --> 00:29:37,400 Speaker 1: value even through cycle tends to be somewhat moving gentle fashion. 517 00:29:37,960 --> 00:29:40,760 Speaker 1: So we tend to be very long term shareholders. Some 518 00:29:40,920 --> 00:29:44,520 Speaker 1: stocks we've owned for over a decade as an example. Now, 519 00:29:44,600 --> 00:29:49,120 Speaker 1: when prices, when you have atility uh and prices that 520 00:29:49,400 --> 00:29:52,880 Speaker 1: may pick up our portfolio turnover rate. So the natural 521 00:29:53,040 --> 00:29:58,840 Speaker 1: rate is probably a year, but in very volatile periods, 522 00:29:59,120 --> 00:30:01,360 Speaker 1: and if you have a out of inflows and outflows, 523 00:30:01,640 --> 00:30:05,440 Speaker 1: it could drift up to thirty percent a year, probably 524 00:30:05,520 --> 00:30:08,640 Speaker 1: still well below the average fund which you know, some 525 00:30:08,840 --> 00:30:13,040 Speaker 1: funds literally are you know, trading every two days and 526 00:30:13,200 --> 00:30:17,720 Speaker 1: you see two portfolio turnover for us, it's a very 527 00:30:17,960 --> 00:30:22,280 Speaker 1: very different strategy. How does what President she unveiled at 528 00:30:22,320 --> 00:30:24,760 Speaker 1: his One Belt, One Road for UM change the calculus 529 00:30:24,880 --> 00:30:28,360 Speaker 1: for you or for investors more generally outline these ambitious 530 00:30:28,400 --> 00:30:32,040 Speaker 1: plans outlining the need for private investment, Does that change 531 00:30:32,080 --> 00:30:35,160 Speaker 1: the calculus for you at all? Well, again, you know 532 00:30:35,280 --> 00:30:38,960 Speaker 1: these are plans and these are mostly words, and what 533 00:30:39,080 --> 00:30:42,600 Speaker 1: you really need to see, for instance, is you know, 534 00:30:42,680 --> 00:30:46,800 Speaker 1: an increase infrastructure development as part of this plan really 535 00:30:46,920 --> 00:30:53,000 Speaker 1: suggests and more airports, ports, ports, railway, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, 536 00:30:53,120 --> 00:30:56,560 Speaker 1: more trade, more free trade. Now, if all this happens, 537 00:30:56,600 --> 00:31:00,760 Speaker 1: it's quite good, and it's really good for infrastructure. Uh, infrastructure, 538 00:31:00,800 --> 00:31:03,760 Speaker 1: which is kind of the oil that lubricates economic growth. 539 00:31:04,440 --> 00:31:07,040 Speaker 1: And you know we have we own shares and companies 540 00:31:07,120 --> 00:31:09,960 Speaker 1: like Lafarge Wholesome that is one of the leading cement 541 00:31:10,080 --> 00:31:12,360 Speaker 1: makers in the world. I mean, this would be very 542 00:31:12,440 --> 00:31:15,360 Speaker 1: good for Lafarge Wholesome, This would be very good for Glencore, 543 00:31:15,440 --> 00:31:18,600 Speaker 1: which is a big producer of copper. So I mean 544 00:31:18,680 --> 00:31:20,640 Speaker 1: it would be good for our portfolio. It would be 545 00:31:20,720 --> 00:31:23,640 Speaker 1: good for global growth, would be good for just about everyone. 546 00:31:23,840 --> 00:31:26,880 Speaker 1: But you know, these are politicians and often what they 547 00:31:26,960 --> 00:31:32,000 Speaker 1: say does not materialize. Where's the growthiness right now? Not 548 00:31:32,200 --> 00:31:34,800 Speaker 1: the value, but the growthiness. I see you at w 549 00:31:35,040 --> 00:31:38,600 Speaker 1: P P. Martin Searle's company at some point, but you know, 550 00:31:38,800 --> 00:31:42,320 Speaker 1: is it like an entertainment or cable or something. Where's 551 00:31:43,040 --> 00:31:47,040 Speaker 1: where's David Harrow's growthiness right now? Yeah? You know, you 552 00:31:47,160 --> 00:31:50,240 Speaker 1: don't see just these high pockets of growth. And maybe 553 00:31:50,360 --> 00:31:54,560 Speaker 1: you know, certain areas of financial technology, maybe certain areas 554 00:31:54,840 --> 00:31:59,280 Speaker 1: of UM credit expansion. You're starting to see a lending 555 00:31:59,400 --> 00:32:02,400 Speaker 1: pick up in Europe as an example. I mentioned it before. 556 00:32:02,560 --> 00:32:05,160 Speaker 1: Europe is looking a little better and part of that 557 00:32:05,320 --> 00:32:11,000 Speaker 1: manifests itself and better lending volumes. Um. You know, autos 558 00:32:11,080 --> 00:32:14,240 Speaker 1: aren't growing, but they're still selling at We're at a 559 00:32:14,320 --> 00:32:19,120 Speaker 1: pretty high level. Um. You know, even though you know 560 00:32:19,240 --> 00:32:23,880 Speaker 1: it's slowed down the auto global automobile sales are at 561 00:32:23,920 --> 00:32:28,880 Speaker 1: a high level. You still see respectable automobile sales even 562 00:32:28,880 --> 00:32:32,040 Speaker 1: in the United States, despite the fact that perhaps too 563 00:32:32,120 --> 00:32:34,920 Speaker 1: much incentive is needed to maintain those levels. But you 564 00:32:35,040 --> 00:32:38,080 Speaker 1: still see places in China and the emerging markets growing 565 00:32:38,880 --> 00:32:43,800 Speaker 1: um some consumer products luxury goods are growing. Soft goods 566 00:32:43,840 --> 00:32:48,920 Speaker 1: in particular, company carrying that owns Gucci and in Paris, 567 00:32:49,040 --> 00:32:53,840 Speaker 1: and Gucci is an Italian company carrying owner owner is 568 00:32:53,880 --> 00:32:56,720 Speaker 1: a French company. You go into a Gucci store in 569 00:32:56,960 --> 00:33:04,160 Speaker 1: London on Necessariday afternoon and mob seeing a mobs to 570 00:33:04,320 --> 00:33:10,440 Speaker 1: buy your wife Gucci is very hot. Thank you, Fastion. 571 00:33:10,520 --> 00:33:13,560 Speaker 1: Advice for the wise guy from David get one more 572 00:33:13,680 --> 00:33:16,040 Speaker 1: question and with David Harold before I hit him over 573 00:33:16,080 --> 00:33:18,239 Speaker 1: there very quickly, David, And light of the tweet from 574 00:33:18,240 --> 00:33:20,080 Speaker 1: the present this morning, light of the reports of the 575 00:33:20,120 --> 00:33:22,440 Speaker 1: new tension between Europe and the US, how much does 576 00:33:22,480 --> 00:33:25,520 Speaker 1: that matter to you as a global investor, global politics 577 00:33:25,640 --> 00:33:29,680 Speaker 1: and and the comedy between the US and Europe. Not 578 00:33:29,880 --> 00:33:33,080 Speaker 1: really too much, David, because what really matters is how 579 00:33:33,280 --> 00:33:37,920 Speaker 1: does this impact a company's ability to generate cash flow streams? 580 00:33:38,440 --> 00:33:41,800 Speaker 1: And so much of it again just ends up being noise. Now, 581 00:33:41,880 --> 00:33:44,920 Speaker 1: I said, I just saw the tweet about this trade deficit. Well, 582 00:33:45,640 --> 00:33:48,880 Speaker 1: the problem is that some of this is autos. But 583 00:33:49,720 --> 00:33:54,760 Speaker 1: the German car companies, namely BMW and Mercedes, have substantial 584 00:33:54,920 --> 00:33:59,800 Speaker 1: operations in the United States and are huge exporters. Every 585 00:34:00,400 --> 00:34:04,760 Speaker 1: X Serish truck literally around the world is made in 586 00:34:04,840 --> 00:34:07,760 Speaker 1: South Carolina. So when you when you go around the 587 00:34:07,800 --> 00:34:09,680 Speaker 1: world and seeing X five and X three and X 588 00:34:09,760 --> 00:34:12,560 Speaker 1: two and X one, those are all US cars, you 589 00:34:12,640 --> 00:34:15,920 Speaker 1: know made, And so I mean this is this is 590 00:34:16,120 --> 00:34:18,759 Speaker 1: again the problem with politicians. They just say things that 591 00:34:18,920 --> 00:34:21,600 Speaker 1: aren't always accurate. David, thank you so much. David here 592 00:34:22,160 --> 00:34:38,440 Speaker 1: greatly and Harriss Associates greatly appreciate that. This morning, it 593 00:34:38,600 --> 00:34:41,120 Speaker 1: is our great pleasure to bring you know a gentleman 594 00:34:41,160 --> 00:34:46,120 Speaker 1: who has changed worldwide how we get around, how we fly. 595 00:34:46,400 --> 00:34:49,719 Speaker 1: His effect has been profound. I can think of very 596 00:34:49,800 --> 00:34:52,759 Speaker 1: few people in the airline business even approaching the work 597 00:34:52,800 --> 00:34:55,719 Speaker 1: of Michael O'Leary and the impact he runs a small 598 00:34:55,800 --> 00:34:59,920 Speaker 1: shop called Ryan Air. I met you in the basement 599 00:35:00,120 --> 00:35:03,080 Speaker 1: of our London offices. I think the Right Brothers had 600 00:35:03,160 --> 00:35:06,680 Speaker 1: just landed and the Carolinis on the beach. You've been 601 00:35:06,760 --> 00:35:09,600 Speaker 1: doing this, Michael a long time? Is it still fun? 602 00:35:10,920 --> 00:35:12,560 Speaker 1: Thank you? Tom. I know you didn't say that I've 603 00:35:12,600 --> 00:35:17,160 Speaker 1: improved their form after the weekend we've had, but are 604 00:35:17,200 --> 00:35:20,680 Speaker 1: you still having fun? I'm having more any more. It 605 00:35:20,800 --> 00:35:22,320 Speaker 1: is the most fun you can have with your clothes 606 00:35:22,400 --> 00:35:26,280 Speaker 1: on tom in Europe bringing forward lower affairs, keep driving 607 00:35:26,360 --> 00:35:28,600 Speaker 1: down those air fairs and making it impossibly for other 608 00:35:28,640 --> 00:35:32,560 Speaker 1: airlines to compete. After what Mr Walsh and companies saw 609 00:35:32,719 --> 00:35:37,360 Speaker 1: this weekend, can you outsource I T. We don't think so. 610 00:35:37,520 --> 00:35:40,400 Speaker 1: I mean we've deliberately insourced the whole I T function 611 00:35:40,480 --> 00:35:42,560 Speaker 1: under Ryanair Labs for the last couple of years now. 612 00:35:42,600 --> 00:35:44,600 Speaker 1: To be fair, I don't think what happened this weekend 613 00:35:44,719 --> 00:35:47,440 Speaker 1: had to do withoutsourcing. But there's clearly something wrong with 614 00:35:47,520 --> 00:35:50,080 Speaker 1: their disaster recovery program. I mean there's no way that 615 00:35:50,200 --> 00:35:53,319 Speaker 1: any large company can operate with all of its data 616 00:35:53,320 --> 00:35:56,480 Speaker 1: in one center where some power surge takes it all out. 617 00:35:56,520 --> 00:35:59,120 Speaker 1: I mean, it's just it's beyond incompetent. And we've had 618 00:35:59,160 --> 00:36:01,319 Speaker 1: this three or four times now. Right to be fair 619 00:36:01,360 --> 00:36:04,440 Speaker 1: to British Airways, there are a small airline company in London. 620 00:36:04,480 --> 00:36:08,160 Speaker 1: You may ye vaguely. They carry about thirty million pastors 621 00:36:08,160 --> 00:36:09,800 Speaker 1: a year. We'd cary about a hundred and twenties, so 622 00:36:09,880 --> 00:36:12,279 Speaker 1: you know, but I think there's something wrong with the 623 00:36:12,360 --> 00:36:14,880 Speaker 1: disaster recovery program. We are in our data centers are 624 00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:17,480 Speaker 1: spread across five different data centers in Europe with disaster 625 00:36:17,560 --> 00:36:20,680 Speaker 1: recovery programs for each one, so if one thing goes down, 626 00:36:20,760 --> 00:36:23,480 Speaker 1: you switch to the other four um But you know, 627 00:36:23,640 --> 00:36:26,920 Speaker 1: ultimately these are just blips. Be A is doing a 628 00:36:26,960 --> 00:36:30,040 Speaker 1: reasonably good job. They're trying to lower their costs. Unfortunately 629 00:36:30,160 --> 00:36:32,080 Speaker 1: can't lower them down to where Ryan areas, so they're 630 00:36:32,080 --> 00:36:34,120 Speaker 1: still not able to compete with us on price. But 631 00:36:34,239 --> 00:36:37,200 Speaker 1: the good news is that we're continuing to expand rapidly. 632 00:36:37,640 --> 00:36:40,920 Speaker 1: We have produced guidance this morning. We see our fares 633 00:36:40,960 --> 00:36:43,000 Speaker 1: falling by another five to seven percent in the next 634 00:36:43,040 --> 00:36:45,400 Speaker 1: twelve months, but profits will rise by about eight percent, 635 00:36:45,480 --> 00:36:47,440 Speaker 1: and so good do you think is the business model? 636 00:36:47,800 --> 00:36:50,560 Speaker 1: We're buying back another six hundred million euros of our 637 00:36:50,600 --> 00:36:53,320 Speaker 1: shares in the next couple of months. What's the greatest 638 00:36:53,400 --> 00:36:55,200 Speaker 1: challenge that you face. You talked about the expansion of 639 00:36:55,239 --> 00:36:58,080 Speaker 1: the reducing fierce even more. What's the biggest challenge that 640 00:36:58,120 --> 00:37:00,600 Speaker 1: you face in the next six months. I think, without 641 00:37:00,600 --> 00:37:03,640 Speaker 1: doubt it's always cost discipline keeping. How do we get 642 00:37:03,719 --> 00:37:05,359 Speaker 1: the cost to come down again? And this is where 643 00:37:05,600 --> 00:37:07,919 Speaker 1: you know our new aircraft order with Boeing we're taking 644 00:37:07,960 --> 00:37:10,719 Speaker 1: delivery of fifty grade boweing seventies seven eight hundreds each 645 00:37:10,760 --> 00:37:13,000 Speaker 1: year for the next eight years. That's going to take 646 00:37:13,040 --> 00:37:16,160 Speaker 1: down our costs. We're talking to airports all over Europe 647 00:37:16,160 --> 00:37:18,600 Speaker 1: who are terrified that Anatally is now in chapter eleven. 648 00:37:18,640 --> 00:37:22,160 Speaker 1: Air Berlin, Yeah, Berlin's how do you get to Rome? 649 00:37:22,200 --> 00:37:24,480 Speaker 1: What are you gonna do about Rome? Where now the 650 00:37:24,800 --> 00:37:27,640 Speaker 1: second largest airline in Rome. We're have a big base 651 00:37:27,719 --> 00:37:29,799 Speaker 1: in Champago and with a big base in Film and Gino. 652 00:37:29,880 --> 00:37:33,200 Speaker 1: And I think what happens tom is as Alatali emerges 653 00:37:33,239 --> 00:37:36,440 Speaker 1: from chapter eleven. It would probably be more focused on 654 00:37:36,520 --> 00:37:39,200 Speaker 1: Longhold where they can make money. And I think they're 655 00:37:39,200 --> 00:37:41,279 Speaker 1: gonna have to cut their capacity on shorthold where they're 656 00:37:41,320 --> 00:37:43,560 Speaker 1: just unable to compete with Ryan there either on Italian 657 00:37:43,600 --> 00:37:46,359 Speaker 1: domestics or shorthold European routes. It's plainly a trip. That's 658 00:37:46,360 --> 00:37:48,359 Speaker 1: the sigma do you know? Yeah? No, Do you see 659 00:37:48,640 --> 00:37:52,440 Speaker 1: any indication that the American public wants anything but cheap price? 660 00:37:52,800 --> 00:37:55,920 Speaker 1: I keep hearing these theories. They want this, they want that, Bologna. 661 00:37:55,960 --> 00:37:57,680 Speaker 1: They just want the lowest price. And it's not just 662 00:37:57,800 --> 00:38:02,000 Speaker 1: the American public, the European customer as well. People booking 663 00:38:02,040 --> 00:38:04,040 Speaker 1: a trip, the first questions who's got the cheapest fairs. 664 00:38:04,680 --> 00:38:07,480 Speaker 1: They want safety, they want new aircraft, and they want punctuality. 665 00:38:07,600 --> 00:38:10,839 Speaker 1: But other than that, they're willing to trade almost every 666 00:38:10,920 --> 00:38:13,000 Speaker 1: element of customer service, which is if you look at 667 00:38:13,040 --> 00:38:15,239 Speaker 1: the Ryan Revolution, Tom in the last twenty years, we 668 00:38:15,280 --> 00:38:17,600 Speaker 1: were the first people to start charging for the onboard snacks, 669 00:38:17,880 --> 00:38:19,800 Speaker 1: the first people start charging you for checked in bags. 670 00:38:19,880 --> 00:38:21,759 Speaker 1: Not because we wanted your money. We wanted people to 671 00:38:21,800 --> 00:38:24,399 Speaker 1: start bringing checked in bags. And I've been transformational. I'm 672 00:38:24,480 --> 00:38:27,920 Speaker 1: on air on our surveillance golf stream. I'm paying people 673 00:38:28,080 --> 00:38:30,919 Speaker 1: not to bring the snacks to me. That's a gold 674 00:38:31,560 --> 00:38:34,080 Speaker 1: Michael Leary, thank you so much. With Ryan here, let's 675 00:38:34,120 --> 00:38:49,640 Speaker 1: speak in London. This is Bloomberg. David, why don't you 676 00:38:49,680 --> 00:38:52,160 Speaker 1: bring in our esteem? Gust very glad to looking forward 677 00:38:52,160 --> 00:38:54,759 Speaker 1: to this next conversation with Graham Allison. He is a 678 00:38:54,760 --> 00:38:57,040 Speaker 1: professor at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, 679 00:38:57,040 --> 00:38:59,880 Speaker 1: the director of the Belfry Center for Science and International Affairs, 680 00:39:00,239 --> 00:39:02,600 Speaker 1: the author of a new book, Destined for War. Can 681 00:39:02,680 --> 00:39:06,120 Speaker 1: America and China Escape the Cydities Trap? He joins us 682 00:39:06,160 --> 00:39:08,000 Speaker 1: now on our phone lines and running through his bio, 683 00:39:08,040 --> 00:39:10,920 Speaker 1: Theere failed to mention his role in government as well, 684 00:39:11,000 --> 00:39:14,600 Speaker 1: having served as Assistant Secretary of Defense previously as well. 685 00:39:14,719 --> 00:39:16,600 Speaker 1: Great to have you with us and help me with 686 00:39:16,719 --> 00:39:18,759 Speaker 1: the Greek term. First, I think we should begin there 687 00:39:18,760 --> 00:39:21,000 Speaker 1: at the Cydities trap? What is it and what can 688 00:39:21,040 --> 00:39:24,400 Speaker 1: we learn from it? Here in two thousand seventeen. Okay, 689 00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:26,719 Speaker 1: so it's a mouthful, and some people have a little 690 00:39:26,800 --> 00:39:31,400 Speaker 1: trouble saying Thucidities I practiced, I didn't practice before the Okay, 691 00:39:31,520 --> 00:39:35,240 Speaker 1: So Thucidities was the father of history. He wrote about 692 00:39:35,320 --> 00:39:40,240 Speaker 1: the great conflict in the Classic Greece between Athens and Sparta, 693 00:39:40,840 --> 00:39:46,200 Speaker 1: and the Thucidities trapped is when a rising power threatens 694 00:39:46,320 --> 00:39:51,239 Speaker 1: to displace a ruling power. Bad things happened, alarm bell 695 00:39:51,280 --> 00:39:55,680 Speaker 1: should sound danger ahead. In Thucydities case, it was, as 696 00:39:55,719 --> 00:39:59,120 Speaker 1: he said famously quote the rise of Athens and the 697 00:39:59,280 --> 00:40:03,320 Speaker 1: fear that this instilled in Sparta that made the war inevitable. 698 00:40:03,719 --> 00:40:05,879 Speaker 1: In this book, I look at the last five years, 699 00:40:05,920 --> 00:40:09,840 Speaker 1: I find sixteen cases in which a rising power threatened 700 00:40:09,880 --> 00:40:12,800 Speaker 1: to displace the ruling power. Twelve of them ended in 701 00:40:12,920 --> 00:40:17,799 Speaker 1: war four and not war, but in general, business as 702 00:40:17,880 --> 00:40:21,239 Speaker 1: usual will produce history as usual. And in the case 703 00:40:21,320 --> 00:40:25,040 Speaker 1: of the rise of China, which is now threatening to 704 00:40:25,239 --> 00:40:30,040 Speaker 1: displace the US in arena after arena, either we'll learn 705 00:40:30,120 --> 00:40:34,239 Speaker 1: the lessons of history or will be just to repeat it, 706 00:40:34,680 --> 00:40:37,640 Speaker 1: probably with the inevitability of that trap. If anything, that 707 00:40:37,760 --> 00:40:40,160 Speaker 1: the last presidential campaign taught us to look at this 708 00:40:40,239 --> 00:40:42,960 Speaker 1: relationship in a binary uh. And there are a lot 709 00:40:43,000 --> 00:40:45,960 Speaker 1: of people who fear the rise of China is conflict 710 00:40:46,040 --> 00:40:49,279 Speaker 1: with China, conflict between China and the US, and inevitability 711 00:40:49,280 --> 00:40:52,719 Speaker 1: as you see him in a word, No, okay. So 712 00:40:52,880 --> 00:40:57,359 Speaker 1: when Tucidity said made the war inevitable, if when read 713 00:40:57,480 --> 00:41:01,200 Speaker 1: it in context, as I say in the book, here's exaggerating. 714 00:41:01,320 --> 00:41:04,000 Speaker 1: He bent this to be hyperbole just for the purpose 715 00:41:04,040 --> 00:41:07,520 Speaker 1: of emphasis, just likely would be a more likely, more 716 00:41:07,680 --> 00:41:12,640 Speaker 1: more appropriate word. So if we look at the recent history, 717 00:41:12,719 --> 00:41:16,200 Speaker 1: as I say, just the last five hundred years, twelve 718 00:41:16,280 --> 00:41:19,320 Speaker 1: cases of war, four cases of not war. So that 719 00:41:19,440 --> 00:41:22,920 Speaker 1: clearly does not mean inevitable. That just means that's the 720 00:41:22,960 --> 00:41:27,680 Speaker 1: way to bid it. If people don't learn, Graham, you 721 00:41:27,840 --> 00:41:30,319 Speaker 1: founded the Kennedy School at Harvard. You were the force 722 00:41:30,440 --> 00:41:32,600 Speaker 1: that got it going and got it onto bigger and 723 00:41:32,680 --> 00:41:36,600 Speaker 1: better things. If you were lecturing today at Kennedy on 724 00:41:36,760 --> 00:41:40,080 Speaker 1: North Vietnam, what will be? This is the number one 725 00:41:40,200 --> 00:41:42,880 Speaker 1: question I get on excuse me a North Korea, A 726 00:41:42,960 --> 00:41:50,400 Speaker 1: little misstatement there by myself. Yeah, North Korea, what do 727 00:41:50,480 --> 00:41:54,320 Speaker 1: the how are the president's comments received in North Korea 728 00:41:54,400 --> 00:41:59,600 Speaker 1: by their leadership? Well? I think the North Korean's or 729 00:41:59,640 --> 00:42:01,680 Speaker 1: a puzz sol for all of us. And I don't 730 00:42:01,719 --> 00:42:04,040 Speaker 1: believe anybody has a good fix on him. I mean, 731 00:42:04,160 --> 00:42:08,360 Speaker 1: Kim Jongwin, at least until the past year, was clearly 732 00:42:08,920 --> 00:42:14,800 Speaker 1: the strangest, most erratic, most impulsive, most unpredictable character you 733 00:42:14,880 --> 00:42:16,960 Speaker 1: know on the on the global stage. And so this 734 00:42:17,120 --> 00:42:19,920 Speaker 1: is a guy who, uh, he looks at his local 735 00:42:20,160 --> 00:42:23,280 Speaker 1: things that he may be suspicious and gets a rocket 736 00:42:23,520 --> 00:42:28,719 Speaker 1: launcher that blessed him away in public, who killed his 737 00:42:28,760 --> 00:42:31,319 Speaker 1: half brother or had him killed in the recent event 738 00:42:31,400 --> 00:42:34,920 Speaker 1: in Malaysias. So it's a very strange guy. Nonetheless, I 739 00:42:35,040 --> 00:42:38,560 Speaker 1: think as he looks and listens to Trump, he may 740 00:42:38,640 --> 00:42:43,120 Speaker 1: at least think that things will change. What he's learned 741 00:42:43,239 --> 00:42:46,359 Speaker 1: from his father and from his grandfather is that North 742 00:42:46,440 --> 00:42:51,040 Speaker 1: Korea can just take one step after another and defy 743 00:42:51,920 --> 00:42:57,200 Speaker 1: the US and defy China in creating nuclear weapons, building 744 00:42:57,360 --> 00:43:02,880 Speaker 1: nuclear arsenal testing, miss being capable to now to deliver 745 00:43:02,920 --> 00:43:07,360 Speaker 1: a warhead against South Korea, also delivereral warhead against Japan, 746 00:43:07,800 --> 00:43:10,759 Speaker 1: and god forbid soon but in the next year or so, 747 00:43:11,280 --> 00:43:14,000 Speaker 1: as soon on the current path to be able to 748 00:43:14,080 --> 00:43:17,560 Speaker 1: deliver a warhead against San Francisco or Los Angeles. So 749 00:43:17,800 --> 00:43:20,120 Speaker 1: he hears Trump saying, no, I'm telling you, this is 750 00:43:20,560 --> 00:43:23,080 Speaker 1: not going to happen. Of course, that's the same thing 751 00:43:23,160 --> 00:43:26,000 Speaker 1: he heard from George W. Bush. That's the same thing 752 00:43:26,040 --> 00:43:28,520 Speaker 1: you heard from Obama. That's the same thing he heard 753 00:43:28,560 --> 00:43:31,040 Speaker 1: from Clinton. That's the same thing he heard from she 754 00:43:31,280 --> 00:43:34,080 Speaker 1: and his predecessors. So I suspect he thinks he can 755 00:43:34,120 --> 00:43:36,040 Speaker 1: get away with it, and that's why I think this 756 00:43:36,200 --> 00:43:39,360 Speaker 1: is going to be very dangerous. He's strange, He's dangerous. 757 00:43:39,400 --> 00:43:41,680 Speaker 1: How do you you counsel a student who wonders how 758 00:43:41,760 --> 00:43:44,680 Speaker 1: you engage with a leader like that. We've enjoyed talking 759 00:43:44,719 --> 00:43:47,279 Speaker 1: with your colleague, Ambassador Nicholas Burns from time to time 760 00:43:47,320 --> 00:43:49,680 Speaker 1: here on the show. Of course, he's dealt with these issues. 761 00:43:49,680 --> 00:43:52,040 Speaker 1: Ambassador Chris Hill, whom we've talked to as well, has 762 00:43:52,080 --> 00:43:54,480 Speaker 1: dealt with him as well, how do you engage how 763 00:43:54,520 --> 00:43:56,320 Speaker 1: do you deal with with with the leader who is 764 00:43:56,360 --> 00:44:01,239 Speaker 1: so erratic? Well, I get if an excellent question that 765 00:44:01,360 --> 00:44:04,239 Speaker 1: I would say that we've had great diplomats and great 766 00:44:04,520 --> 00:44:08,200 Speaker 1: secretaries of state try to deal with this little But 767 00:44:08,800 --> 00:44:11,640 Speaker 1: the truth is that if you look at the facts, unsuccessfully, 768 00:44:12,080 --> 00:44:15,759 Speaker 1: that is, the succession of efforts have not been successful 769 00:44:16,080 --> 00:44:18,600 Speaker 1: in dealing with either Kim Jolin or with his dad. 770 00:44:19,520 --> 00:44:23,280 Speaker 1: I think, Uh, I start by asking about all leaders 771 00:44:23,360 --> 00:44:25,920 Speaker 1: and their regimes, what do they really care about? What 772 00:44:26,080 --> 00:44:28,719 Speaker 1: matters most to him? And I think for him it's 773 00:44:28,960 --> 00:44:32,239 Speaker 1: his survival and the survival of the Kim regime. It's 774 00:44:32,360 --> 00:44:37,400 Speaker 1: essentially a dynasty. But I think that I think therefore, Uh, 775 00:44:37,760 --> 00:44:40,920 Speaker 1: to the extent that he feels that the regime is threatened, 776 00:44:40,920 --> 00:44:42,960 Speaker 1: if there was a credible way to do that, we 777 00:44:43,080 --> 00:44:45,080 Speaker 1: might be able to move him. A book that's getting 778 00:44:45,200 --> 00:44:50,359 Speaker 1: considered in Rave reviews, Destined for War Graham Allison, who 779 00:44:50,440 --> 00:44:53,279 Speaker 1: is at Harvard's Kennedy School, indeed was the founder and 780 00:44:53,360 --> 00:44:57,759 Speaker 1: the soul of the school. A guy named Kissinger says, 781 00:44:57,800 --> 00:45:00,400 Speaker 1: of this book, I read it with great interest. I 782 00:45:00,480 --> 00:45:04,160 Speaker 1: can only hope that the U. S. China relationship becomes 783 00:45:04,200 --> 00:45:08,239 Speaker 1: the fifth case to resolve itself peacefully. Speaking of peacefully, 784 00:45:08,800 --> 00:45:12,880 Speaker 1: let's talk NATO, Professor Allison, there was a thing called 785 00:45:13,000 --> 00:45:19,359 Speaker 1: the Truman Doctrine March twelfth, ninety seven. How scared were 786 00:45:19,440 --> 00:45:27,879 Speaker 1: we in March of nine? Extremely uh? The again hard 787 00:45:27,920 --> 00:45:31,920 Speaker 1: to remember the Cold War, but the Soviet Union emerged 788 00:45:32,000 --> 00:45:36,200 Speaker 1: from World War Two as the other great power. UH. 789 00:45:36,719 --> 00:45:40,680 Speaker 1: The Soviet Union was getting its act together and aggressively 790 00:45:41,239 --> 00:45:46,040 Speaker 1: reaching into Europe, including into Greece and into Turkey, into France, 791 00:45:46,160 --> 00:45:51,920 Speaker 1: into Italy, into their politics. And the Truman administration initially 792 00:45:52,280 --> 00:45:55,520 Speaker 1: with the Truman Doctrine, and then with the Marshall Plan 793 00:45:56,080 --> 00:45:58,960 Speaker 1: also in thy seven, and then with the creation of 794 00:45:59,080 --> 00:46:04,200 Speaker 1: NATO in pushed back and basically that's the reason why 795 00:46:04,280 --> 00:46:06,840 Speaker 1: we have a free Europe today. Let me ask you 796 00:46:06,840 --> 00:46:09,960 Speaker 1: about the message, the tone, the content of the President's 797 00:46:10,040 --> 00:46:12,600 Speaker 1: speech in Brussels last week. He received a lot of 798 00:46:12,680 --> 00:46:15,279 Speaker 1: criticism for focusing so much on funding and so little 799 00:46:15,360 --> 00:46:18,880 Speaker 1: on the alliance and its history and its importance. Let 800 00:46:18,920 --> 00:46:20,360 Speaker 1: me stick with the funding side of things for just 801 00:46:20,600 --> 00:46:22,960 Speaker 1: a second. Here. You've written about this before. I think 802 00:46:23,000 --> 00:46:26,840 Speaker 1: your agreement here that European nations, most allies should be 803 00:46:26,840 --> 00:46:29,319 Speaker 1: doing more to get to the two percent commitment they've 804 00:46:29,600 --> 00:46:32,560 Speaker 1: they've made. Why is that case so difficult to make? 805 00:46:32,640 --> 00:46:34,080 Speaker 1: Why does it have to be made? And such maybe 806 00:46:34,200 --> 00:46:36,680 Speaker 1: a ham handed way by the President in Brussels, it's 807 00:46:36,719 --> 00:46:39,560 Speaker 1: clearly something he cares a lot about. Why Why hasn't 808 00:46:39,560 --> 00:46:43,600 Speaker 1: he Why haven't previous presents made much traction there? Well, 809 00:46:43,719 --> 00:46:46,520 Speaker 1: I think it's a great question, and I think essentially 810 00:46:46,920 --> 00:46:50,400 Speaker 1: the President speaks for many Americans when he says, rightly, 811 00:46:51,160 --> 00:46:53,320 Speaker 1: Germans are as wealthy as the US, why should the 812 00:46:53,440 --> 00:46:57,680 Speaker 1: U S Citizens taxpayers pay more to defend Germans. The 813 00:46:57,840 --> 00:47:01,320 Speaker 1: Germans are prepared to pay for for themselves. And the 814 00:47:01,400 --> 00:47:04,280 Speaker 1: answer is, well, we've been doing that through the period 815 00:47:04,320 --> 00:47:08,040 Speaker 1: of the Cold War, when NATO was the pillar essential 816 00:47:08,320 --> 00:47:12,200 Speaker 1: for the defeat of the evil Empire. That was understandable 817 00:47:12,280 --> 00:47:16,200 Speaker 1: or at least explainable. But in the period the last 818 00:47:16,239 --> 00:47:18,000 Speaker 1: twenty five years since the end of the Cold War, 819 00:47:18,640 --> 00:47:22,000 Speaker 1: this becomes less and less plausible. From the European perspective. 820 00:47:22,840 --> 00:47:25,759 Speaker 1: A free writer's role is a good is a good role. 821 00:47:26,320 --> 00:47:30,920 Speaker 1: Uh And even though repeatedly presidents and secretaries of Defense 822 00:47:31,320 --> 00:47:34,799 Speaker 1: have said to the NATO counterparts this cannot continue. We're 823 00:47:34,840 --> 00:47:37,520 Speaker 1: not going to continue doing this. American tax players won't 824 00:47:37,560 --> 00:47:41,040 Speaker 1: continue supporting it. Basically they've said yes, yes, yes, but 825 00:47:41,160 --> 00:47:43,960 Speaker 1: they meant no, no, no. So I think I can 826 00:47:44,239 --> 00:47:48,839 Speaker 1: empathize with President Trump's frustrations, which you're shared by many people. 827 00:47:48,880 --> 00:47:52,000 Speaker 1: If you look at Gates's speech at his last NATO meeting, 828 00:47:52,360 --> 00:47:55,759 Speaker 1: it looks very similar to the to what Trump was 829 00:47:55,800 --> 00:47:58,960 Speaker 1: saying about. You know, look, guys, this cannot go on 830 00:47:59,239 --> 00:48:03,360 Speaker 1: in this fast but moving people from a position in 831 00:48:03,480 --> 00:48:07,800 Speaker 1: which you can't really exclude them from a defensive perimeter 832 00:48:07,960 --> 00:48:10,800 Speaker 1: because we care about their defense as well. Uh is 833 00:48:10,840 --> 00:48:14,200 Speaker 1: a dilimma. There will be some listening today who will 834 00:48:14,320 --> 00:48:17,960 Speaker 1: sympathize with what Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said mumbled 835 00:48:18,000 --> 00:48:20,520 Speaker 1: off Mike on his first trip to Europe as Secretary 836 00:48:20,600 --> 00:48:24,160 Speaker 1: of State. Why why is NATO relevant? What do you 837 00:48:24,200 --> 00:48:25,640 Speaker 1: say to them? How do you make the case to 838 00:48:25,800 --> 00:48:28,040 Speaker 1: to Americans this alliance, which is stories and has been 839 00:48:28,080 --> 00:48:31,840 Speaker 1: around for for so long, indeed, art triggered after nine eleven, 840 00:48:32,239 --> 00:48:35,239 Speaker 1: has done more than Yeoman's work in Afghanistan in our 841 00:48:35,280 --> 00:48:37,279 Speaker 1: war there. How do you make the case for its 842 00:48:37,320 --> 00:48:40,520 Speaker 1: continued relevance that Americans should continue to put billions of 843 00:48:40,560 --> 00:48:42,759 Speaker 1: dollars a year to pay for it. Well, I would 844 00:48:42,760 --> 00:48:46,840 Speaker 1: say that the three things. First is the historic fact 845 00:48:46,920 --> 00:48:49,600 Speaker 1: that it's been the greatest alliance in history that was 846 00:48:49,719 --> 00:48:53,719 Speaker 1: essential for the defeat of the evil empires. Secondly, it 847 00:48:54,200 --> 00:48:58,760 Speaker 1: is our closest set of colleagues for engagement in the world. 848 00:48:59,280 --> 00:49:03,280 Speaker 1: So NATO members are with the US in Afghanistan today. 849 00:49:03,800 --> 00:49:06,399 Speaker 1: NATO members were eager to be with the US after 850 00:49:06,560 --> 00:49:09,440 Speaker 1: nine eleven. So if the US wants any company in 851 00:49:09,480 --> 00:49:14,600 Speaker 1: the world in terms of values, interests, institutions, uh, it's NATO. 852 00:49:14,719 --> 00:49:17,600 Speaker 1: And then thirdly, as President Trump has said, for the 853 00:49:17,680 --> 00:49:22,560 Speaker 1: fight on terrorism, basically Europe is the heart of that. 854 00:49:22,840 --> 00:49:28,080 Speaker 1: Now as you see the populations that have come into 855 00:49:28,320 --> 00:49:30,640 Speaker 1: the European complies and not been fully intovated. What is 856 00:49:30,640 --> 00:49:34,280 Speaker 1: your quickly, what is your prescription professor for Secretary Madison, 857 00:49:34,360 --> 00:49:39,200 Speaker 1: Secretary Tillerson. Well, I think they have a hard job 858 00:49:39,560 --> 00:49:42,440 Speaker 1: dealing with the NATO counterparts because the NATO counterparts have 859 00:49:42,600 --> 00:49:46,759 Speaker 1: become accustomed to basically not being serious about defense, not 860 00:49:46,960 --> 00:49:49,719 Speaker 1: being serious about their own defense, not spending what they 861 00:49:49,760 --> 00:49:52,360 Speaker 1: should spend, and even worse than what they spend is 862 00:49:52,400 --> 00:49:55,200 Speaker 1: what they spend it on mainly on the headquarters and 863 00:49:55,960 --> 00:50:00,279 Speaker 1: bands and flyovers, not fighting capability. So trying to get 864 00:50:00,320 --> 00:50:04,400 Speaker 1: Pato to be a good partner is going to be 865 00:50:04,480 --> 00:50:07,600 Speaker 1: a long, hard shout. It has been. This has been wonderful. 866 00:50:07,640 --> 00:50:11,200 Speaker 1: Destined for war Graham Allison again. Robert D. Calpot writing 867 00:50:11,200 --> 00:50:13,360 Speaker 1: it up in the Journal today. I'm one money of 868 00:50:13,440 --> 00:50:18,880 Speaker 1: the constructive reviews. Destined for Ward is most thoughtful. He 869 00:50:19,040 --> 00:50:30,960 Speaker 1: is at Kennedy School, Harvard. Thanks for listening to the 870 00:50:31,000 --> 00:50:37,839 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 871 00:50:38,239 --> 00:50:42,000 Speaker 1: or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at 872 00:50:42,080 --> 00:50:46,719 Speaker 1: Tom Keene. David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, 873 00:50:47,080 --> 00:51:01,520 Speaker 1: you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio, brought 874 00:51:01,600 --> 00:51:05,120 Speaker 1: you by Bank of America Merrill Lynch. With virtual reality, 875 00:51:05,400 --> 00:51:10,800 Speaker 1: virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world. 876 00:51:11,239 --> 00:51:15,520 Speaker 1: Be of a mL dot Com, slash VR, Merrill Lynch, 877 00:51:15,640 --> 00:51:17,920 Speaker 1: Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated,