1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:12,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene 2 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: Jai Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:33,920 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. We 5 00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:35,559 Speaker 1: got some great guests in the studio here in New 6 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:38,360 Speaker 1: York with this Mark Chance. They works Harriman, global head 7 00:00:38,520 --> 00:00:42,000 Speaker 1: of Currency Strategy and Lakshman Action than he is of 8 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:45,960 Speaker 1: course of Economic Cycle Research, co founder and chief operations officer, 9 00:00:46,040 --> 00:00:47,879 Speaker 1: both of them joining us. Now, guys, great to have 10 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:49,320 Speaker 1: you with us. Mark. I'm gonna get a hard time 11 00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:51,720 Speaker 1: for the next two hours about taking a vacation, so 12 00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:54,320 Speaker 1: your support would be welcome for the next seven minutes. Okay, 13 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:55,800 Speaker 1: good to see you again. Good to see you, mate. 14 00:00:55,840 --> 00:00:57,640 Speaker 1: Let's start with the merchant markets. How do they catch 15 00:00:57,640 --> 00:00:59,840 Speaker 1: a break and where does the anchor come from? Because 16 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:02,320 Speaker 1: Agentine ran Turkey of both try and yeah, I think 17 00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:05,320 Speaker 1: there's the ironic thing. Argentina hyped rates sharply last week. 18 00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:08,959 Speaker 1: Currency sells off. Turkey reluctant to raise interest rates, currency 19 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:11,160 Speaker 1: sells off. I think that means to me We're in 20 00:01:11,200 --> 00:01:13,240 Speaker 1: a variosh market for emerging markets, and we're gonna stay 21 00:01:13,240 --> 00:01:15,600 Speaker 1: that way for quite a while. Concigion risk Mark, I 22 00:01:15,600 --> 00:01:18,000 Speaker 1: think there's some contagious I think when you're talking about 23 00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:20,920 Speaker 1: that earlier with India, I think it's primarily a contagion story. 24 00:01:21,160 --> 00:01:25,759 Speaker 1: But I think Argentina, Turkey, South Africa, Brazil, Russia, these 25 00:01:25,800 --> 00:01:28,920 Speaker 1: are policies, not just the federal reserve, but these are 26 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:33,240 Speaker 1: domestic policies, policy mistakes, or policies that repel investors as 27 00:01:33,280 --> 00:01:35,240 Speaker 1: opposed to attract them election man. When it comes to 28 00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:38,440 Speaker 1: emerging markets, that's a technical issues, liquidity issues, but there's 29 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:42,240 Speaker 1: fundamental ones. To South Africa entering a recession this morning. 30 00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:45,399 Speaker 1: What's happening with the fundamental to some of these big economies, Well, 31 00:01:45,440 --> 00:01:48,920 Speaker 1: I think it's really uh in our view, happening in 32 00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:52,800 Speaker 1: the context of a global industrial slowdown. So you have 33 00:01:53,800 --> 00:01:56,920 Speaker 1: a cycling down, a deceleration of global industrial growth, and 34 00:01:57,040 --> 00:02:00,880 Speaker 1: e m is Q to the industrial growth. They're very 35 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:04,520 Speaker 1: sensitive to that. They're big exporters, and that's the backdrop 36 00:02:04,760 --> 00:02:09,280 Speaker 1: on which a lot of these other structural vulnerabilities are 37 00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:12,799 Speaker 1: being exposed very quickly. Then a lot when you mentioned 38 00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:15,359 Speaker 1: this earlier the idea of a global slowdown and UH, 39 00:02:15,560 --> 00:02:17,840 Speaker 1: you're so vector based. What is the vector in the 40 00:02:17,919 --> 00:02:20,960 Speaker 1: U S economy? Now, given em weakness, given you know 41 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:24,760 Speaker 1: the dollar d X y five five dollar strength, I 42 00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:27,800 Speaker 1: think that our work shows the vector is to the downside. 43 00:02:27,840 --> 00:02:31,000 Speaker 1: We're we've we've peaked in growth and we're and we're 44 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:34,560 Speaker 1: beginning to decelerate. I think it's very hard to see 45 00:02:34,960 --> 00:02:39,040 Speaker 1: with that four GDP growth in Q two, but it 46 00:02:39,320 --> 00:02:42,240 Speaker 1: is there when you look at the broad coincident data 47 00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:46,680 Speaker 1: broader than GDP UH, and it makes sense in the 48 00:02:46,720 --> 00:02:50,120 Speaker 1: context of a global economy which is decelerating. So our 49 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:55,280 Speaker 1: view is that all of this great strength that we've 50 00:02:55,320 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 1: seen for the past over a year now, UH is cyclical. 51 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:02,880 Speaker 1: It's not a breakout, not a big structural breakout. And 52 00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:06,480 Speaker 1: that's probably the most important fundamental backdrop piece to discover, 53 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:10,519 Speaker 1: and that goes to the vector of the dollar strength. 54 00:03:10,600 --> 00:03:14,840 Speaker 1: We've had huge variants interview to interview, mark on the 55 00:03:14,919 --> 00:03:19,440 Speaker 1: dollar stronger, weaker, the impulse of the second derivative of 56 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:22,760 Speaker 1: dollar movement. What is the synthesis You have a Brown 57 00:03:22,800 --> 00:03:25,280 Speaker 1: Brother's Hareman on the dollar. Do we still look for 58 00:03:25,320 --> 00:03:28,239 Speaker 1: the dollar taste strengthen driven by the policy mix. In 59 00:03:28,240 --> 00:03:32,080 Speaker 1: the US, it's a tight tight monetary policy. Looser fiscal 60 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:35,320 Speaker 1: policy tends to be the best policy mix for country's currency. 61 00:03:35,640 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: You've got that positive for the US, which also boosts 62 00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 1: US growth, which lets us be strong enough to withstand 63 00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:43,600 Speaker 1: some of these trade tensions and the trade warriors we're picking. 64 00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:46,119 Speaker 1: And I said, I think that this coupled with these 65 00:03:46,280 --> 00:03:48,760 Speaker 1: problems and emerging markets and the slow downways thing, I 66 00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 1: think more's pronounced in Europe in the US right now. 67 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:53,560 Speaker 1: How do you respond then? And I'm beginning to see 68 00:03:53,560 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 1: this phrase plaza accord creep in here every once in 69 00:03:56,640 --> 00:03:59,920 Speaker 1: a while. The fact is, when dollar gets strong, it's 70 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:05,000 Speaker 1: chart gets pointy and abruptly reverses because of political reasons. 71 00:04:05,240 --> 00:04:08,920 Speaker 1: Are we anywhere near that where the politicians step in 72 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:12,080 Speaker 1: and say enough of a stronger dollar. But I think 73 00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:14,000 Speaker 1: that what happened at the plaza it's not just US 74 00:04:14,080 --> 00:04:16,600 Speaker 1: objecting to the dollar strength, but Europe was objecting, and 75 00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:19,480 Speaker 1: Japan was objecting to their currency's weakness. This was different 76 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:21,880 Speaker 1: this time, is that only the U s really is objecting. 77 00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:23,919 Speaker 1: Once in a while, Trump says something about the dollar, 78 00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:26,880 Speaker 1: but so far. I'd say Europe sees the weaker currency, 79 00:04:26,920 --> 00:04:29,360 Speaker 1: it's not so problematic. The same thing with Japan. I 80 00:04:29,360 --> 00:04:31,640 Speaker 1: think Japan would welcome a weaker yet. And so I 81 00:04:31,640 --> 00:04:33,880 Speaker 1: think that right now we haven't reached a paint specihold 82 00:04:34,040 --> 00:04:36,720 Speaker 1: is sufficient to get a coordinated response. But mark the 83 00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:38,599 Speaker 1: way we're framing this conversation at the moment is that 84 00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:41,120 Speaker 1: the dollar strength is despite the trade dispute. Could we 85 00:04:41,160 --> 00:04:43,080 Speaker 1: ask the question that it might be because of the 86 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:45,520 Speaker 1: tride dispute. The flow story has been really important to 87 00:04:45,560 --> 00:04:47,240 Speaker 1: buy America has been a big theme off the back 88 00:04:47,279 --> 00:04:49,120 Speaker 1: of this. Yeah, so I think the two are really 89 00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:52,880 Speaker 1: related in the sense that, uh, what's happening is partly 90 00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:55,280 Speaker 1: it's the flows out of emerging markets out of Europe 91 00:04:55,279 --> 00:04:57,000 Speaker 1: for I think three or four weeks in ago, flows 92 00:04:57,040 --> 00:04:59,719 Speaker 1: out of those markets into the US. That's helping strengthen 93 00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:01,560 Speaker 1: the dollar. And then you've got this policy mix, it's 94 00:05:01,600 --> 00:05:03,839 Speaker 1: helping draw this capital of the US. That's why I 95 00:05:03,839 --> 00:05:06,200 Speaker 1: really think that it's really hard for emerging market countries 96 00:05:06,440 --> 00:05:09,719 Speaker 1: or even countries like Australia to fund a current account 97 00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:13,320 Speaker 1: deficit when you've got the US raising interest rates and 98 00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:15,840 Speaker 1: sucking in the world savings. What does a strong dollar 99 00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:18,839 Speaker 1: launchment do within the economic cycles? I mean, it's not 100 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:22,039 Speaker 1: part of the discussion yet, it is a discussion of 101 00:05:22,160 --> 00:05:25,560 Speaker 1: everything we do. If if we get Chandler's strong dollar, 102 00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:30,839 Speaker 1: what does that due to the impulse of your economic cycles? Well, um, 103 00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:33,320 Speaker 1: it's a great question, and I don't exactly know the 104 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:34,800 Speaker 1: answer I have to I don't want to produce it. 105 00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:36,919 Speaker 1: I don't I don't want to put the Tuesday before 106 00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:40,800 Speaker 1: school starts. No one has any answers. What do you 107 00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:45,400 Speaker 1: mean that? I've heard that one? But UM, I don't 108 00:05:45,400 --> 00:05:48,279 Speaker 1: want to predict the predictors, but I would say, um, 109 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:52,960 Speaker 1: a possible surprise out there. Um, everybody's lined up one 110 00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:55,919 Speaker 1: way and they've been waiting all you know, years four 111 00:05:55,960 --> 00:05:58,359 Speaker 1: interest rates on the long end to go up because 112 00:05:58,440 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 1: of strong growth and strong and full right, And UM, 113 00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:04,120 Speaker 1: let's think about on this issue of the dollar. What 114 00:06:04,160 --> 00:06:06,200 Speaker 1: could happen? It might take the sting out of some 115 00:06:06,279 --> 00:06:09,640 Speaker 1: of the inflation. What if I'm just positing this and 116 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:12,320 Speaker 1: I'm seeing a little glimmer in the leading indicators. What 117 00:06:12,480 --> 00:06:17,040 Speaker 1: if UH inflation doesn't run away? What if inflation starts 118 00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:20,840 Speaker 1: to top out here? UH, and that that's down the line. 119 00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:23,800 Speaker 1: I think I'm typically the you know, our stuff is 120 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:26,239 Speaker 1: way out in front. I think that's down the line. 121 00:06:26,279 --> 00:06:29,719 Speaker 1: But if you have inflation not running away and topping out, 122 00:06:30,120 --> 00:06:33,040 Speaker 1: that starts to shift the dynamic a little bit. With 123 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:36,159 Speaker 1: us in the Mark Chandler to get this September started, 124 00:06:50,880 --> 00:06:53,200 Speaker 1: it's got to strength of story and J and and 125 00:06:53,320 --> 00:06:54,880 Speaker 1: d M. So let's get the thoughts. Now. We have 126 00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:58,599 Speaker 1: George Santa b Alos, Deutsche Banks Global Cohead of FX Research. George, 127 00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 1: good morning, to thank you for you wanting to guess. 128 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:02,560 Speaker 1: Just walk me through what you think underpins that dollar 129 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:06,200 Speaker 1: strength at the moment. A good morning from London. So 130 00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:09,560 Speaker 1: the big driver is obviously emerging market currencies that are 131 00:07:09,640 --> 00:07:13,960 Speaker 1: leading um this this weakness and the dollar strength. And 132 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:16,760 Speaker 1: if you look at what's going on in terms of flows, 133 00:07:16,840 --> 00:07:20,640 Speaker 1: you're seeing continued outflows from emerging market funds and a 134 00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:24,679 Speaker 1: very large rise in the influence of short term government 135 00:07:24,720 --> 00:07:27,680 Speaker 1: bond funds in the US. So there's really a portfolio 136 00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:30,400 Speaker 1: rebalancing story going on on the back of this higher 137 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:34,360 Speaker 1: risk free rate in the US. And what's interesting is 138 00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:36,840 Speaker 1: a lot of the e M external drivers have actually 139 00:07:36,880 --> 00:07:40,160 Speaker 1: turned slightly better e M data surprises, which were negative 140 00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:42,760 Speaker 1: of turned more positive over the summer months. US yields 141 00:07:42,760 --> 00:07:46,240 Speaker 1: are stabilized, So this really is about this ongoing portfolio 142 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:49,400 Speaker 1: rebalancing effect that kicked off in Q two of this year. George. 143 00:07:49,400 --> 00:07:52,400 Speaker 1: I spoke to Muhammad Alarian recently about this, and he 144 00:07:52,480 --> 00:07:54,760 Speaker 1: basically said, you can break this down into two parts. 145 00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:57,160 Speaker 1: You need a credible external anchor how from the RMF. 146 00:07:57,320 --> 00:08:00,680 Speaker 1: Argentina has done that. You need credible domestic dick policies. 147 00:08:00,760 --> 00:08:04,360 Speaker 1: Argentina is doing that, and yet Argentina still can't tighten 148 00:08:04,440 --> 00:08:08,520 Speaker 1: things up and stabilize things. Why do you think that is, George, Well, 149 00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:11,960 Speaker 1: let's see, because the latest round of announcements has only 150 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:14,280 Speaker 1: just happened, so I think the jury is still owed 151 00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:18,800 Speaker 1: in terms of whether this latest attempt at civilization will succeed. 152 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:21,200 Speaker 1: After all, we have to remember now interest rates are 153 00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:25,640 Speaker 1: at nearly six so it's extremely painful for someone to 154 00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:30,560 Speaker 1: be long dollars against the Argentina pesos. So I think 155 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:33,320 Speaker 1: they've done a lot more compared to two weeks ago. 156 00:08:33,920 --> 00:08:36,120 Speaker 1: And let's wait until over the next couple of weeks, 157 00:08:36,120 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 1: but it might look a bit more positive. George Survey 158 00:08:38,480 --> 00:08:40,760 Speaker 1: lets you do a lot of fancy PhD kind of 159 00:08:40,840 --> 00:08:45,240 Speaker 1: effects work in that. Would you explain what six zero 160 00:08:45,440 --> 00:08:48,880 Speaker 1: six interest rates? Or you know, John helped me here 161 00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 1: tw in Turkey? What do those interest rates mean to 162 00:08:53,240 --> 00:08:58,760 Speaker 1: mere mortals? Well, simply put, it's just extremely expensive for 163 00:08:58,800 --> 00:09:02,720 Speaker 1: a speculator to to be trying and pushing the dollar hiring. 164 00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:06,839 Speaker 1: What about against the pacer for the public, you know, 165 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:12,520 Speaker 1: small businessmen in instant what's it mean? Ultimately, if you 166 00:09:12,520 --> 00:09:15,200 Speaker 1: look at what's going on to emerging market currency this year, 167 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:18,840 Speaker 1: there is one simple message, which is the currencies and 168 00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:22,680 Speaker 1: economies that are running current account deficits just cannot attract 169 00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:25,720 Speaker 1: the capital anymore. If you're running a deficit, it means 170 00:09:25,840 --> 00:09:28,000 Speaker 1: you're buying more than you're selling to the rest of 171 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,200 Speaker 1: the world. So ultimately, part of this policy adjustment you 172 00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:34,560 Speaker 1: raise rates aggressively, which means you can press imports, you 173 00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:38,160 Speaker 1: compress domestic demand, you can press consumption. Simply put, you 174 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:40,640 Speaker 1: just have to buy less from the rest of the world. 175 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:43,440 Speaker 1: And part of that adjustment is the currency weakening as well. 176 00:09:43,520 --> 00:09:46,120 Speaker 1: And right now these rates aren't just sixty percent, they're 177 00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:49,440 Speaker 1: thirty percent. Real inflations running the thirty percent there's thirty 178 00:09:49,480 --> 00:09:52,120 Speaker 1: percent real interest rates. I mean, this is suffocan in 179 00:09:52,120 --> 00:09:54,720 Speaker 1: the economy. So we now have that classic EM dilemma. 180 00:09:54,920 --> 00:09:57,800 Speaker 1: Got an economy like South Africa slipping into a recession 181 00:09:57,800 --> 00:10:02,240 Speaker 1: this morning reporting negative GDP growth for a second consecutive quarter. 182 00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:04,400 Speaker 1: And George, my question basically is how much damage is 183 00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:07,400 Speaker 1: being done as these economies trying to manage what is 184 00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:10,160 Speaker 1: set before them, which is upside risk to inflation and 185 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:12,560 Speaker 1: downside risk to growth. And they're doing their best to 186 00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:16,480 Speaker 1: contain the upside risk to inflation. What happens to growth, Well, 187 00:10:16,520 --> 00:10:19,360 Speaker 1: there is definite damage to growth that's being done, and 188 00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:22,120 Speaker 1: you can see that in in the negative GDP numbers 189 00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:25,440 Speaker 1: out of South Africa, obviously, Argentina and Turkey. We're now 190 00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:29,960 Speaker 1: going to be seeing a stagflationary type of situation. However, unfortunately, 191 00:10:30,040 --> 00:10:32,560 Speaker 1: part of this damage is the solution that you need 192 00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:35,160 Speaker 1: growth to slow down, so imports slow down, and all 193 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:38,480 Speaker 1: of a sudden, your external balance starts to improve your 194 00:10:38,480 --> 00:10:41,920 Speaker 1: current account, which is very large in in deficit at 195 00:10:41,960 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 1: the moment in Turkey starts turning. And that is really 196 00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:47,960 Speaker 1: the key points one when one starts to look for 197 00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:51,480 Speaker 1: EM stabilization's two things. One is value, So when do 198 00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:54,199 Speaker 1: the currency start becoming very very cheap. They can't keep 199 00:10:54,200 --> 00:10:57,679 Speaker 1: falling forever. And two is the external account starting to improve? 200 00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:00,960 Speaker 1: So that process has begun. I'm not yet sure it's 201 00:11:01,120 --> 00:11:05,040 Speaker 1: enough for the op possibility, but we're definitely beginning the process. 202 00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:10,320 Speaker 1: Does the ex excess in this pending or maybe crisis 203 00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:14,719 Speaker 1: is it radically different than in previous upsets? I mean, 204 00:11:15,120 --> 00:11:18,880 Speaker 1: if we're massively floating, if we've got all this sophisticated 205 00:11:18,920 --> 00:11:21,920 Speaker 1: derivative stuff and fun flows and all the other creative 206 00:11:21,960 --> 00:11:25,480 Speaker 1: stuff you guys live every day, is it is it 207 00:11:25,559 --> 00:11:32,920 Speaker 1: a different timeline than it was other enjoyments that we've had. Well, 208 00:11:32,960 --> 00:11:37,600 Speaker 1: every every crisis has its similarities um and differences. But 209 00:11:37,679 --> 00:11:40,160 Speaker 1: I would say that the big difference at this time 210 00:11:40,200 --> 00:11:44,360 Speaker 1: if you look at a place like large external government 211 00:11:44,400 --> 00:11:47,760 Speaker 1: debt requirements, this is private sector funding. It's the private 212 00:11:47,800 --> 00:11:51,160 Speaker 1: sector that's too extended and as a result, the adjustment 213 00:11:51,160 --> 00:11:53,480 Speaker 1: needs to happen via the private sector as well, which 214 00:11:53,679 --> 00:11:56,120 Speaker 1: again goes all the way back to this need to 215 00:11:56,240 --> 00:11:59,520 Speaker 1: just shrink current account deficits to gather closer into balance. 216 00:11:59,800 --> 00:12:04,240 Speaker 1: And then you'll see places like Turkey, India, Indonesia, They 217 00:12:04,320 --> 00:12:06,600 Speaker 1: look much better in a year, John, I'm bringing up 218 00:12:06,600 --> 00:12:10,800 Speaker 1: here Brazil in to day. It just moved in. I'm 219 00:12:10,840 --> 00:12:12,760 Speaker 1: just getting up a three day. Yeah, just spiked up 220 00:12:12,760 --> 00:12:15,840 Speaker 1: here at four point one eight. And if I go 221 00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:17,520 Speaker 1: over to the Bloomberg guess we can do on the 222 00:12:17,520 --> 00:12:19,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg terminal in your car. If I look at the 223 00:12:19,800 --> 00:12:23,640 Speaker 1: twenty four day chart, we're almost back to August. How 224 00:12:23,679 --> 00:12:26,679 Speaker 1: important is today, George, for Argentina assets when we open 225 00:12:26,800 --> 00:12:29,280 Speaker 1: up and we start trading at nine am Eastern the 226 00:12:29,280 --> 00:12:32,480 Speaker 1: official the formal start to pay, so trade inc. How 227 00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:36,960 Speaker 1: important is it that that pace rallies. Well, I think 228 00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:39,840 Speaker 1: it's very important. In the Argentina has been at the 229 00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:43,439 Speaker 1: forefront of of of this e mm wine since the 230 00:12:43,480 --> 00:12:46,120 Speaker 1: start of the year, so one of the first places 231 00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:49,120 Speaker 1: where we would need to see stability as a signpost 232 00:12:49,240 --> 00:12:53,440 Speaker 1: for for broader em stabilities. Really, Argentina, as you did mention, 233 00:12:53,880 --> 00:12:56,640 Speaker 1: Argentina has been trying to do most of the things right. 234 00:12:56,760 --> 00:12:59,880 Speaker 1: So um, it's the pacer can't stabilize and it will 235 00:12:59,920 --> 00:13:04,760 Speaker 1: be difficult for others. So every day, Um, every day 236 00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:07,359 Speaker 1: is of course important. I don't want to just overstress 237 00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:09,800 Speaker 1: the first day essentially when people are back from the 238 00:13:10,120 --> 00:13:12,520 Speaker 1: from the holidays, but into the rest of Q four 239 00:13:13,120 --> 00:13:16,719 Speaker 1: it is really important that Argentina stabilizers given how much. 240 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:19,439 Speaker 1: So final question George on this part of the conversation 241 00:13:19,520 --> 00:13:21,240 Speaker 1: is what is the feedback loop if there is one 242 00:13:21,559 --> 00:13:23,320 Speaker 1: into the U S economy from the mess that we're 243 00:13:23,320 --> 00:13:28,079 Speaker 1: experiencing in emerging markets right now. Well, it's a very 244 00:13:28,120 --> 00:13:30,559 Speaker 1: interesting question. And if you go back to taper tantrum, 245 00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:34,400 Speaker 1: essentially you had the initiation of of of the end 246 00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:38,000 Speaker 1: of que Initially the FED was sounding hawkish, It caused 247 00:13:38,080 --> 00:13:41,200 Speaker 1: huge amount of turbulus turbulence in em and then you 248 00:13:41,240 --> 00:13:44,040 Speaker 1: have the knock on impact in terms of FED policy. Um, 249 00:13:44,120 --> 00:13:46,000 Speaker 1: now it is a bit too early for that. I 250 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:48,400 Speaker 1: would argue that it's not showing up in the data yet. 251 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:50,680 Speaker 1: But if they starts continue until the end of the year, 252 00:13:50,960 --> 00:13:53,400 Speaker 1: we will very soon be hearing from the FED that 253 00:13:53,679 --> 00:13:57,000 Speaker 1: external headwinds are becoming stronger. And remember the approaching neutral 254 00:13:57,040 --> 00:14:00,520 Speaker 1: policy as well. So it's different to be sound polkish 255 00:14:00,600 --> 00:14:02,840 Speaker 1: when right to close it to two than zero. One 256 00:14:02,840 --> 00:14:04,800 Speaker 1: of the things we do here, folks, George, save OLiS 257 00:14:04,840 --> 00:14:20,960 Speaker 1: with us with Deutsche Bank. Well, in just under twenty 258 00:14:21,080 --> 00:14:25,800 Speaker 1: five minutes, the Senate Judiciary Committee will begin four days 259 00:14:25,880 --> 00:14:30,600 Speaker 1: of hearings on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U. S. 260 00:14:30,600 --> 00:14:34,200 Speaker 1: Supreme Court. Here to tell us about it is Kimberly Robinson, 261 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:38,400 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Law's Supreme Court reporter. Kimberly, thank you very much 262 00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:41,760 Speaker 1: for being with us. What exactly can we expect to 263 00:14:41,840 --> 00:14:48,000 Speaker 1: hear from these hearings? Will it be Republicans in concerted 264 00:14:48,080 --> 00:14:53,640 Speaker 1: support for the nomination and Democrats trying to score political points? 265 00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:58,720 Speaker 1: What will actually happen as a result of these hearings, Well, 266 00:14:58,800 --> 00:15:01,560 Speaker 1: we're going to drop four days of hearing. The first 267 00:15:01,640 --> 00:15:05,480 Speaker 1: day will just be introductions, So each of the one 268 00:15:05,920 --> 00:15:11,000 Speaker 1: been a Judiciary Committee members will uh introduce uh what 269 00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:13,600 Speaker 1: kinds of questions they are going to be asking him uh, 270 00:15:13,640 --> 00:15:17,160 Speaker 1: And those questions will take place on Wednesday and Thursday, 271 00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:19,760 Speaker 1: so we'll get a good sense of what we're likely 272 00:15:19,800 --> 00:15:24,400 Speaker 1: to hear from the senators later on today. What is 273 00:15:24,440 --> 00:15:27,240 Speaker 1: going to be the focus of the questioning, let's say 274 00:15:27,320 --> 00:15:31,160 Speaker 1: from the Democrats, Well, we're likely to hear a lot 275 00:15:31,240 --> 00:15:36,240 Speaker 1: about what Brett having on personal views and are on abortion, 276 00:15:36,560 --> 00:15:39,120 Speaker 1: on LGBT rights, and on healthcare. And these are all 277 00:15:39,200 --> 00:15:43,200 Speaker 1: issues where he's expected to move the Supreme Court once 278 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:47,840 Speaker 1: finally confirmed. And what do you believe his response will be? 279 00:15:47,920 --> 00:15:52,960 Speaker 1: Will be? Will it be to offer detailed, uh sort 280 00:15:52,960 --> 00:15:58,080 Speaker 1: of personal anecdotes or is it going to be you know, 281 00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:01,480 Speaker 1: kind of written from read from a state mint. Well, 282 00:16:01,520 --> 00:16:06,120 Speaker 1: since the nine nineties, uh, Supreme Court nominees typically don't 283 00:16:06,160 --> 00:16:09,600 Speaker 1: answer very many questions, will answer, uh, you know, what 284 00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:13,280 Speaker 1: they've previously ruled upon before, but they're not going to 285 00:16:13,360 --> 00:16:16,480 Speaker 1: be giving a lot of details on how uh they 286 00:16:16,600 --> 00:16:20,440 Speaker 1: view abortion and LGBT rights. And that's because they say 287 00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:22,760 Speaker 1: that they don't want to seem like they've already pre 288 00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:25,880 Speaker 1: judged an issue uh that might come before them while 289 00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:28,680 Speaker 1: they're on the Supreme Court. Let me ask you jaded 290 00:16:28,760 --> 00:16:32,760 Speaker 1: and cynical question, which is appropriate on this Tuesday. It's 291 00:16:32,880 --> 00:16:36,880 Speaker 1: all to me hugely predictable. Am I right about that? 292 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:41,320 Speaker 1: Or do you look for surprises along the way. Well, 293 00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:43,680 Speaker 1: we really haven't gotten a lot of surprises from Supreme 294 00:16:43,720 --> 00:16:46,640 Speaker 1: Court confirmation hearing since the nine nineties when we got 295 00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:50,080 Speaker 1: a bombshell on Clarence Thomas. You know, Brett Kavanaugh has 296 00:16:50,120 --> 00:16:53,480 Speaker 1: been practicing answer to these questions for weeks. He's been 297 00:16:53,480 --> 00:16:56,560 Speaker 1: through what they call murder boards where they simulate questions 298 00:16:56,560 --> 00:16:59,160 Speaker 1: from the senators. So all of these answers are likely 299 00:16:59,240 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 1: to be vetted and okay, so so the questions, the 300 00:17:03,040 --> 00:17:08,199 Speaker 1: questions are structured. He's been rehearsed, rehearsed, in veted. Should 301 00:17:08,280 --> 00:17:13,119 Speaker 1: our listeners tune in to these hearings or for a 302 00:17:13,200 --> 00:17:16,200 Speaker 1: pro like you, Kimberly, is it just you just know 303 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:19,840 Speaker 1: what's you know, you just know what's going to happen. Well, 304 00:17:19,920 --> 00:17:22,880 Speaker 1: if if the confirmation hearing for Neil Gorsus or any 305 00:17:22,880 --> 00:17:25,720 Speaker 1: sign it's going to be pretty predictable. We'll get a 306 00:17:25,720 --> 00:17:28,479 Speaker 1: lot of hard questions from from Democrats and a lot 307 00:17:28,520 --> 00:17:32,159 Speaker 1: of saucis from Republicans. And Brett Kavanaugh is likely to 308 00:17:32,200 --> 00:17:34,440 Speaker 1: do very well in these confirmation hearing. He's the very 309 00:17:34,480 --> 00:17:37,040 Speaker 1: likable guy. Will probably see a lot of that. But 310 00:17:37,119 --> 00:17:39,520 Speaker 1: I wouldn't expect to learn very much that we don't 311 00:17:39,560 --> 00:17:46,200 Speaker 1: already know. Well, Kimberly, if this is indeed the case, well, 312 00:17:46,240 --> 00:17:48,760 Speaker 1: the Democrats use this as a platform for the mid 313 00:17:48,920 --> 00:17:53,399 Speaker 1: term elections. Yes, we're seeing that very much. That the 314 00:17:53,480 --> 00:17:56,480 Speaker 1: issues that Democrats are really focusing on seemed to be 315 00:17:56,600 --> 00:18:01,520 Speaker 1: yeared towards uh, you know, energizing theirs for the midterm elections. Again, 316 00:18:01,560 --> 00:18:04,080 Speaker 1: abortion is going to be a huge issue during these 317 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:06,760 Speaker 1: confirmation hearing. Um, and we've already seen a lot of 318 00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:10,159 Speaker 1: opposition show up here. There's a rally over the Supreme 319 00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:13,560 Speaker 1: Court there women dressed up his handmaidens here in the 320 00:18:14,040 --> 00:18:16,959 Speaker 1: just outside the hearing room. Um. So Democrats very much 321 00:18:16,960 --> 00:18:20,440 Speaker 1: are using this as something to project into the midterm elections. 322 00:18:22,680 --> 00:18:24,679 Speaker 1: All right, Well, I guess this is something that's going 323 00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:27,320 Speaker 1: to go on for four days. And is there any 324 00:18:27,680 --> 00:18:32,160 Speaker 1: chance that we're going to get any kind of details 325 00:18:32,160 --> 00:18:35,880 Speaker 1: about his past opinions that would be let's say newsworthy 326 00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:39,080 Speaker 1: or has that already been released. Well, he will likely 327 00:18:39,119 --> 00:18:43,360 Speaker 1: get some questions about how he's used presidential powers. Uh 328 00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:45,639 Speaker 1: that's uh something that he's ruled on a lot and 329 00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:48,200 Speaker 1: something that he's written about a lot. So we can't 330 00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:51,359 Speaker 1: expect him to answer, uh some of those questions. And 331 00:18:51,480 --> 00:18:53,640 Speaker 1: like some of the questions will probably get on abortion. 332 00:18:53,880 --> 00:18:55,960 Speaker 1: And depending on what he says, it could be interesting, 333 00:18:56,359 --> 00:18:59,800 Speaker 1: um to see how he's gonna rule against the president 334 00:19:00,160 --> 00:19:03,040 Speaker 1: or with the president who nominated Thank you for the update. 335 00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:06,920 Speaker 1: Kimberly Robertson greatly appreciated Bloomberg government. I think it nailed 336 00:19:07,000 --> 00:19:12,360 Speaker 1: us that this is just like boiler plate, I mean, 337 00:19:12,480 --> 00:19:15,359 Speaker 1: is a general statement Pim. When you suggested post bark, 338 00:19:15,600 --> 00:19:33,640 Speaker 1: everything changed, David Kotuk with us, We've had a wonderful 339 00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:36,639 Speaker 1: eclectics set of guests to get us back into September 340 00:19:37,320 --> 00:19:39,600 Speaker 1: and in season, and it is good for surveillance to 341 00:19:39,760 --> 00:19:43,400 Speaker 1: end and end strong. With David Kotak, Cumberland and five 342 00:19:43,640 --> 00:19:48,720 Speaker 1: advisors synthesizing economics into what to do with your money? 343 00:19:48,760 --> 00:19:51,600 Speaker 1: Let's just start with a positioning, David, where are you 344 00:19:51,680 --> 00:19:58,320 Speaker 1: within your portfolios? Cash, bonds, equities, bonds um barbelled That's 345 00:19:58,320 --> 00:20:01,680 Speaker 1: an easy one and we've been in that mode for 346 00:20:01,720 --> 00:20:04,720 Speaker 1: a while. We're going to stay there. In our leveraged 347 00:20:05,000 --> 00:20:08,879 Speaker 1: volatility that's a high frequency trading strategy. Or a hundred 348 00:20:08,880 --> 00:20:13,480 Speaker 1: percent in cash in core US in cash, and in 349 00:20:13,600 --> 00:20:18,440 Speaker 1: the diversified US ten percent in cash. And they are 350 00:20:18,480 --> 00:20:24,600 Speaker 1: biased towards domestic US small mid cap and underweighted risk 351 00:20:24,680 --> 00:20:28,640 Speaker 1: elements in the international trade war sectors. Where do you 352 00:20:28,840 --> 00:20:32,160 Speaker 1: hide in equities? If somebody says I've got to be 353 00:20:32,240 --> 00:20:36,600 Speaker 1: in equities but I've got a risk profile, liked ko talk. 354 00:20:37,320 --> 00:20:40,080 Speaker 1: Where do you hide within sectors? And e t f 355 00:20:40,200 --> 00:20:44,160 Speaker 1: s in equities were overweight, healthcare were overweight, the banking 356 00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:49,800 Speaker 1: financial sectors focused in the United States or overweight defense 357 00:20:50,320 --> 00:20:56,240 Speaker 1: in the industrial sector. And we like transports because domestic 358 00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:59,520 Speaker 1: US transport, the t F is just on fire and 359 00:21:00,240 --> 00:21:03,479 Speaker 1: stays that way. There's a shortage of people. Prices are 360 00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:09,520 Speaker 1: gonna rise. There's pricing power in transportation, particularly truckers and rails. 361 00:21:09,880 --> 00:21:13,760 Speaker 1: David Kotalk, can you tell us what would change for 362 00:21:13,880 --> 00:21:18,360 Speaker 1: your clients and for your investing strategy if there were 363 00:21:18,400 --> 00:21:23,000 Speaker 1: to be changes to the capital gains tax code and 364 00:21:24,040 --> 00:21:27,040 Speaker 1: capital gains were index to inflation. Would that change anything 365 00:21:27,520 --> 00:21:29,879 Speaker 1: in the media term, Tim, I don't think so. I 366 00:21:29,920 --> 00:21:33,840 Speaker 1: think it makes a little bit of difference. After that, Uh, 367 00:21:33,880 --> 00:21:38,119 Speaker 1: it would make strategic changes. But we already had tax reduction. 368 00:21:38,640 --> 00:21:41,080 Speaker 1: We're already at a tax rate where a couple of 369 00:21:41,119 --> 00:21:44,760 Speaker 1: points difference I don't think makes much difference. I think 370 00:21:44,760 --> 00:21:46,879 Speaker 1: it's a bigger thing right now. It's right on our 371 00:21:47,000 --> 00:21:53,040 Speaker 1: radar screen. It's this expiration of the tax benefit of 372 00:21:53,160 --> 00:21:57,479 Speaker 1: funding and underfunded defined benefit pension liability. It's coming up 373 00:21:57,520 --> 00:22:01,240 Speaker 1: on the fift September and our view, it's been flattening 374 00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:05,000 Speaker 1: the yield curve because of the unusual appetite for strips. 375 00:22:05,480 --> 00:22:08,000 Speaker 1: There's a reason to explain how this, how this works, 376 00:22:08,000 --> 00:22:10,359 Speaker 1: and I mean because not many people necessarily have a 377 00:22:10,440 --> 00:22:14,240 Speaker 1: defined benefit plan. Quick summary, there's a tax code change. 378 00:22:14,280 --> 00:22:17,880 Speaker 1: So if you have an unfunded liability to define benefit 379 00:22:17,960 --> 00:22:21,320 Speaker 1: pension plan and you fund it today, you get a 380 00:22:21,400 --> 00:22:24,280 Speaker 1: deduction at a thirty five percent tax rate. If you 381 00:22:24,320 --> 00:22:27,880 Speaker 1: wait till the end of this month, it's that's a 382 00:22:27,960 --> 00:22:31,720 Speaker 1: huge incent of to fund it. Secondly, the pen pension 383 00:22:31,760 --> 00:22:36,080 Speaker 1: Benefit Guarantee Corps premiums are out and those premiums favor 384 00:22:36,640 --> 00:22:41,320 Speaker 1: using long term treasury strips, and the strip appetite has 385 00:22:41,400 --> 00:22:45,720 Speaker 1: exceeded in our estimate, the action of the thirty year 386 00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:49,560 Speaker 1: treasury in the last few months. That changes in a 387 00:22:49,640 --> 00:22:51,800 Speaker 1: manner of weeks. How what the effects will be will 388 00:22:51,800 --> 00:22:56,119 Speaker 1: see him in October. October is one of those months 389 00:22:56,680 --> 00:22:59,720 Speaker 1: that investors mark on their calendar in red. Isn't it 390 00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:03,639 Speaker 1: something about Halloween comes? Maybe this drop come early? Have 391 00:23:03,720 --> 00:23:06,200 Speaker 1: you been this much in cash? You know a blended portfolio, 392 00:23:06,280 --> 00:23:09,560 Speaker 1: you know a mutual funds typically for maybe outrageous is 393 00:23:09,600 --> 00:23:12,800 Speaker 1: five percent in cash? You do I understand two zero 394 00:23:13,600 --> 00:23:17,359 Speaker 1: in cash core, ten in the diversified, and then the 395 00:23:17,440 --> 00:23:21,920 Speaker 1: high frequency trading strategy, a hundred in cash. We sold 396 00:23:22,000 --> 00:23:27,560 Speaker 1: out of the high frequency trade strategy. It's mathematically driven, Tom, 397 00:23:27,720 --> 00:23:30,879 Speaker 1: It's not subject to human emotion. Oh, don't give me that. 398 00:23:30,920 --> 00:23:33,200 Speaker 1: Come on, you're sitting in a boat up in Maine fishing, 399 00:23:33,680 --> 00:23:35,440 Speaker 1: and you know you just said go to cas. That's 400 00:23:35,440 --> 00:23:39,480 Speaker 1: why he has no no that the high frequency trading 401 00:23:39,720 --> 00:23:41,840 Speaker 1: it can be run from a boat in Maine. It's 402 00:23:41,880 --> 00:23:47,199 Speaker 1: the math that drives. What did the math says? No, 403 00:23:47,359 --> 00:23:50,000 Speaker 1: you had it's it's a lot of computations of bottom 404 00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:55,640 Speaker 1: line was there was asymmetric risk, disproportionate in market based prices, 405 00:23:55,800 --> 00:23:59,800 Speaker 1: move and we moved and it's so far, great sale. 406 00:24:01,200 --> 00:24:03,919 Speaker 1: What's the bogey for this year for people? Are they 407 00:24:03,920 --> 00:24:08,320 Speaker 1: all looking for really sophisticated I think the bogies for 408 00:24:08,359 --> 00:24:12,119 Speaker 1: the next several years are mid single digit returns. I 409 00:24:12,160 --> 00:24:18,440 Speaker 1: think the long party of is over. We have headwinds. 410 00:24:18,760 --> 00:24:21,840 Speaker 1: We have to be satisfied. Don't be greedy, be satisfied 411 00:24:21,880 --> 00:24:25,760 Speaker 1: with Oh, take mid single digits, compound them and go 412 00:24:25,920 --> 00:24:29,120 Speaker 1: fishing more often. The biggest issue here is this. If 413 00:24:29,160 --> 00:24:33,920 Speaker 1: there is a settlement of trade war China US Canada, 414 00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:38,760 Speaker 1: peace breaks out, everything's wonderful. Trump actually finds a smile 415 00:24:39,000 --> 00:24:42,159 Speaker 1: to where when he looks in the mirror, then we 416 00:24:42,280 --> 00:24:46,040 Speaker 1: have a whole different arrangement. But I don't see that happening. 417 00:24:47,200 --> 00:24:49,160 Speaker 1: Would you learn up? And what'd you learn up? From 418 00:24:49,200 --> 00:24:51,919 Speaker 1: your really important guests? That you take the Leans lodge? 419 00:24:51,920 --> 00:24:55,640 Speaker 1: You go? Where is it firsts way north of Katadin? Right, Well, 420 00:24:55,720 --> 00:24:58,520 Speaker 1: it's a sort of at the distance of a Katad 421 00:24:58,560 --> 00:25:00,440 Speaker 1: and you have to think Bang or May and then 422 00:25:00,520 --> 00:25:04,959 Speaker 1: two hours north to the Canadian border. Takeaway with simple 423 00:25:05,600 --> 00:25:09,400 Speaker 1: I could summarize the takeaway. We have thirty forty years 424 00:25:09,440 --> 00:25:17,440 Speaker 1: of a numeracy driven decision tree inflation, earnings, numbers, pathways, 425 00:25:17,800 --> 00:25:22,119 Speaker 1: the central banks were used to new mercy. Trade is 426 00:25:22,280 --> 00:25:25,639 Speaker 1: cliffs and shocks. Cliffs and chocks. There are no z 427 00:25:25,960 --> 00:25:30,520 Speaker 1: scores on what happens with trade. This is a new regime. 428 00:25:30,720 --> 00:25:33,560 Speaker 1: We're not used to it and we haven't seen anything 429 00:25:33,560 --> 00:25:35,520 Speaker 1: like in a long time. How many people are up there? 430 00:25:35,600 --> 00:25:37,760 Speaker 1: Just as a general idea, you have ten minds, ten 431 00:25:37,840 --> 00:25:41,840 Speaker 1: smart people. Well, we this is the largest Labor Day 432 00:25:41,880 --> 00:25:47,960 Speaker 1: crowd ever twenty seven. Alright, I knew there had to 433 00:25:48,000 --> 00:25:50,520 Speaker 1: be an explanation. Well, and look how the Phillies are doing. 434 00:25:50,520 --> 00:25:54,320 Speaker 1: But but seriously, here does that crew look at the 435 00:25:54,400 --> 00:25:57,080 Speaker 1: moment we're in as a nation. Is a one off? 436 00:25:57,880 --> 00:26:01,840 Speaker 1: Or do they see a staying hour to Trump theocracy, 437 00:26:01,920 --> 00:26:08,240 Speaker 1: Trump theory? Well, massive, massive debate. We had everything, all 438 00:26:08,240 --> 00:26:12,240 Speaker 1: political views. The bottom line is no consensus in the group, 439 00:26:12,359 --> 00:26:19,760 Speaker 1: although risk elements rising, rising rising. If risk elements are 440 00:26:19,880 --> 00:26:22,359 Speaker 1: rising and that's the consensus view of what would it 441 00:26:22,400 --> 00:26:26,000 Speaker 1: do to get you to be contrary? I'd want to 442 00:26:26,119 --> 00:26:32,679 Speaker 1: see some movement away from belligerency and ugliness and some 443 00:26:32,840 --> 00:26:39,200 Speaker 1: diplomacy instead of bullying. We had Trump hard right Trump supporters, 444 00:26:39,280 --> 00:26:42,960 Speaker 1: we had Sanders, socialists there, we had everything in the mix. 445 00:26:43,440 --> 00:26:50,800 Speaker 1: One common theme is this hateful belligerency accomplishes nothing within 446 00:26:50,880 --> 00:26:54,520 Speaker 1: this One final question David One R. C. Whalen put 447 00:26:54,560 --> 00:26:59,199 Speaker 1: out a photo this weekend from Lean's Lodge Beauty. Is 448 00:26:59,240 --> 00:27:01,360 Speaker 1: that just like one of the stuff to fish off 449 00:27:01,440 --> 00:27:04,199 Speaker 1: the wall and you took it flipped? No, that we 450 00:27:04,240 --> 00:27:06,040 Speaker 1: had a great fish. Have you ever seen a fish 451 00:27:06,119 --> 00:27:09,879 Speaker 1: that big cat out of that? I have one. Yeah, 452 00:27:09,960 --> 00:27:12,760 Speaker 1: I have one mounted on the wall even bigger. Yes, 453 00:27:14,040 --> 00:27:16,440 Speaker 1: that was quite a sturgeon. That was quite a sturgeon. 454 00:27:16,480 --> 00:27:21,360 Speaker 1: Then I love your sturd to picture. Very good, David Kotalk, 455 00:27:21,520 --> 00:27:23,880 Speaker 1: Thank you so much for an updated That's the most 456 00:27:23,920 --> 00:27:34,560 Speaker 1: cautious pain I've heard, Mr Kotalk, and sometimes yes, thanks 457 00:27:34,560 --> 00:27:38,800 Speaker 1: for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen 458 00:27:39,040 --> 00:27:44,399 Speaker 1: to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform 459 00:27:44,480 --> 00:27:48,760 Speaker 1: you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. 460 00:27:48,840 --> 00:27:52,320 Speaker 1: You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio