WEBVTT - Heavy Rotation

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Strap on your parachute. It's time for What Goes Up

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>with Sarah Ponzick and Mike Reagan. Hello and welcome to

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>What goes Up, a Boomberg Weekly markets podcast. I'm Sarah Pons,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>reporter on the Cross Asset team, and I'm Mike Reagan,

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a senior editor at Bloomberg. This week on the show,

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a rotation for the record books, positive vaccine

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>news sparks, some historic moves in stocks this week. Finally,

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>small caps value the reopening trade powered higher at the

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>expense of big tech, just after a week after election

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>results had investors thinking that the status quo leadership was

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>here to stay. Another head fake or is this time

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>actually different? Sara, One thing that will not be different

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>about this podcast is that we're all the fans of

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy things out there. We will conclude with our crazy

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Things segment, And Sarah, I've got a feeling that this

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>week's guest came in strong with the crazy things. If

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>history is any guide, if past performances indicative of future results,

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this week's guest is going to give us

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>some stiff competition. Do you a great I'd have to

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I have I have a feeling that

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we both might go down this week. Mike, all right, Well,

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>no pressure on you, guest, mystery guests whose name is

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Goodwin, economist and multi asset portfolio strategists at New

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>York Life Investments. But Lauren, you even pressed me with

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>your crazy things in the past. That's a compliment. By

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, the bar has been set high. The pressure

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is on. No pressure here, no pressure here, but there's

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>actually pressure every week. We know, go Laard. I guess

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>let's start with that rotation we saw early in the

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>week in the markets this week that was by all definitions,

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy in itself. I'm gonna give you my take

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on things with the caveat that. As you know, I'm

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of a cranky old man, and I this

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>could be way off base. So I'm gonna give you

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>my rent, and then I want you to tell me

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>if I'm right or wrong. But to me, I think

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>what happened and I started muchtion in the instruction. This

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>very well could be a head fake. You know, we

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>saw later in the weeks sort of a reversion back

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to to what it looked like before the vaccine news.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like investors are rotating out of growth

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>and into growth, just the growth that they expect should

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine come, should the economy reopen. And to me,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of you know, it sounds like semantics,

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's kind of an important distinction I think to

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>make because I don't think it's necessarily about a confidence

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in the value factor or the size factor with small caps.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just investors love growth. They see these

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>beaten down cyclical sectors perhaps rebounding very strongly next year.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>They want to get in on that growth that's coming.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that that alone sort of makes

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it sort of a temporary rotation, you know, a rented position,

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>rather than a sort of convicted owned position. Would you

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>agree with that sort of thing, And feel free to

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>tell me I'm crazy, I've I've heard it before. No,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I mean what you're describing as investors rotating

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>out of growth stocks and into economic growth these securities

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that tend to do well when economic tides are raising

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>all ships, so to speak. And you know, I think

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>investors are faced with you know what feels like and

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>really is a once in a decade potential actual rotation

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>into value. You know, we've discussed time and time again.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>How you know it's a head fake this time. It's

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a head fake this time. Unless we see durable economic growth,

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we might get that. That'd be great news, that'd be

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>super exciting. But the way we're positioning is thinking about

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it kind of like a barbell, you know, if you

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>think about the companies and the sectors that outperform over time,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>so over you know, years and decades rather than weeks

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and months, it's going to be those that are adding

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>new innovations to the economy, and then secondarily the ones

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that provide resources to those innovators. You've got to be

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>positioned to capture that, you know, equity growth or um

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, long term growth. But you know, next year,

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that we we get some boost from the

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>economic growth, and so we're we're dipping into that as

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>well for the first time, frankly in a long time.

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It feels good. It does. But something I think a

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>lot about, Lauren is the fact that before COVID nineteen hit,

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>before we were all discussing this earlier in the year,

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the narrative back then was not that we were going

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to see this unbelievable pickup in growth. Rather, people were

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>worried that we were at the end of an economic cycle,

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that the bull market was long in the tooth. Then

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>we had this exogenous factor just come in and take

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>over the entire year. We still don't know how long

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to last. We do have positive news on

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine front, which we are all very, very very

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>excited about. But what has truly changed in the backdrop

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>beneath COVID nineteen to make people believe that even after

0:04:55.240 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic, even after this exogenous caused recess shin that

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with that even though we were not expecting

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>growth prior to this, we should expect growth now. You know,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I think a couple of things. The first is that

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the markets aren't necessarily reflecting the real economy um in

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of what works and what doesn't work. And I

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>know it just said that we're excited about economic growth

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>raising tides for markets, but you know, there's certain aspects

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of the economy that are reflected in financial markets and

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>other aspects that are not. So you know, that's part

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of it. That the sectors and styles and securities that

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>have had access to capital are the ones in financial markets,

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a winners and losers aspect there that

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>I think is playing out in this dynamic. But the

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>other is that the economy has just been a lot

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>more resilient in part um in large part fixed to

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>government support over the course of the year than really

0:05:55.920 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>anybody expected. I mean, when unemployment benefits UM started to

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>taper off in July, we expected that August and then

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>September and then October would reflect just the true nature

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of economic pain that some of these service sector parts

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of the economy are feeling, and it just hasn't been

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the case. UM. You know, we see it in UM,

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in consumers that have been saving, we see it in

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the corporate sector companies that have been raising debt in

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>order to have cash on hand, dry powder to capture

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>really to bridge the gap created by COVID. But they

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>can now be used to capture the economic upswing if

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what they choose to do. And so there is

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>an underlying strength there that again the financial markets side

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of the economy can leverage. There are of course vulnerabilities

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>involved in that, and as investors we have to be

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>frankly very humble in the face of those vulnerabilities, whether

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.679
<v Speaker 1>it includes rising debt levels, vulnerabilities to the labor market,

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>which I'm particularly worried about. But it's it's just that

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the economic environment has been a bit more resilient than

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we anyone would have expected in March or April. I

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>was reading your notes before this conversation, Lauren, and I

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>know you're you're pretty optimistic, constructive antiquities. I'm a worry word,

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>So of course I I skipped right to those vulnerabilities

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. And one that's sort of caught my

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>eye is you you talk about stranded assets. What exactly

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>do you mean that that? I mean, I'm kind of

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>picturing maybe the energy sector spended assets if this move

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to renewables picks up steam. Is is that part of it?

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything else that that you would consider a

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 1>stranded asset that we should be on the look fo. Yeah,

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's a really really good way to think about it. Um,

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the energy sector, you know, I think suburban malls.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>We should be careful to point out that these aren't

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>really surprises. You know that the energy sector has struggled

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>for quite a while. Um, some of the some of

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>these aspects of real estate have struggled for a while,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and COVID has only accelerated those developments rather than creating

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>them out of nowhere. There could be some partially strained

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>assets if we think about um you know, focus on business, travel,

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>office space, these types of things. One of the things

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I try to point out though, when it comes to

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>these vulnerabilities is that as investors we have the enormous

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>challenge and and also privileged to think about the other

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>side of them, the opportunities that come from them. And so,

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you mentioned energy. Potentially there's oil and gas

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>assets that end up being stranded, you know, wells and

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>rigs that end up shut down. But of course there's

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>alternative energy infrastructure, battery power, solar wind that you know,

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>charging stations that become an opportunity. The same is true

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in in other strained assets like real estate. You know,

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>suburban malls can become virus testing centers or you know,

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>call centers, which has very much been the case. UM

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you can have you know, maybe folks use um less

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>office space in the future, but it's used more creatively.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 1>There's more spending done on virtual technology that integrates those

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of us who prefer to be in office versus those

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that don't. UM So we try to think all the

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>way around a problem when it comes to investment opportunities,

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than only focus on the stranded assets. You just

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>gotta be careful to make sure you're not overly invested

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in in the ones that end up being actually stranded.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Entire malls as virus testing centers. I mean, I hope

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't need that in a couple of years. It's

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a different um. I don't know

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>if you played, um, what was that board game like

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>malls game where you had to set up your stores

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in the right place. It looks a little bit different

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>if it's virus testing, not as glamorous. So I want

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to bring energy into the picture. Something I heard a

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>lot this week as of Wednesday, coming into the day

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.599
<v Speaker 1>or by the end the day Wednesday, energy stocks in

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the SMP on track for the best week on record.

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, I hear people bubbling up with

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasms saying, you know, this is the time for energy,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the time for banks. Do you truly believe

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to see growth enough to lift

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>those areas of the market as well, or do you

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>have to think about individual micro strategic the environment basically

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for each sector individually. Like energy, Yes, maybe you're going

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to get economic growth, but isn't the energy industry facing

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of indiscriminate challenges itself. The idiosyncratic nature of

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these value sectors is really important. So in

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in energy, of course, it's the you know, secular move

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>lower in oil prices that's made it very difficult for

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>energy capex. A lot of consolidation in energy as we

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>went through a manufacturing recession just a couple of years ago. Similarly,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 1>if you think about banks interest rates, the path of

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rates is a real challenge, you know, you have

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>if you expect economic growth to move up. If you

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>don't expect a major curve steepening or or maybe not

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a durable one, then you're probably not going to be

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>uh super jazzed about financials for the next several years. Um.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, as we've discussed, I think these

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are tactical moves. UM. I certainly have colleagues who I

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>very much respect to who who disagree, who say that,

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of these sectors have been so beaten

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>down that there can only be an upward move from here.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But I gotta tell you, sometimes I mean, we just

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about stranded assets. Sometimes securities are cheap for

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a reason. Um, and so as we as we look

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>through these value sectors and and and try to capture

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the part of the rising tide that raises some of

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the ships, it's really important not to fall into value traps.

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And I wouldn't say necessarily that energy or financials are

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, value traps across the board, But that's where

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>investors work is really cut out for them, is determining,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, where are there, you know, potential long term

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunities versus really just a few months worth of rotation

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't seen in value for for quite some time.

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up sort of the idea of

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a tactical trade versus a more fundamental long term trade,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like so much of this year and

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the current market positioning and and anything you hear people

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>talk about is kind of seeing through just trying to

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ignore this year completely, trying to focus on life getting

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>back to normal with the vaccine. We've got something resembling

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>clarity on the election, maybe uh, not quite crystal clear clarity,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe possibly a little more clear than it was. Maybe

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I do wonder about the rest

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of the year and early. I mean, this virus is raging.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Every hour there's another state announcing a new restriction, sort

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of going back in the semi lockdown mode. Does that

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have the potential in your opinion, to cause a deterioration

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and sentiment in the very near term, say between now

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and and when the vaccine is really available at your

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>your local CDs. I mean, this kind of brings back

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea that stimulus and the idea we're not It

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like we're getting another one at least until

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>say the middle of the first quarter of A lot

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of those unemployment benefits that the federal government gave to

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>gig workers and and some sort of that other stimulus

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is all rolling off at the end of the year.

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Those programs are expiring. I'm just worried about the next

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>few months. I mean, is is the market you know?

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Is everyone just gonna position for the other side of

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of the tunnel and not worry about what the next

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>few months are gonna look like, or do you see

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the potential for a little bit of volatility as the

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>case counts grow, the restrictions come, come on, people lose

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>those extended benefits and maybe after the time up in

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the savings that that high statements rate you're talking about,

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>or is it foolish even bother thinking about the next

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>three months if you're a long term investor, I mean,

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you think about this sort

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of near term compared to the Rosey outlook for say

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that the back half of yes to all of the

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>things you just said, that's right to answered. By the way,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just Mike is right, You're you're now officially a cranky

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>old man. He's going to be inviting you on the

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast every week from that one with but with the

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>mandatory discretion that you say that every time this podcast

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>has been brought to you by Mike Lauren to say

0:14:40.440 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that he's right. Affirmation bias is, you know, I think

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the cyclical trade, the value rotation, is the tactical trade.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that investors are, as we are, frankly,

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>starting to move in that direction on the expectation that

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you just can't time the vaccine announcement. Um, you know

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it's coming soon, you don't know exactly when, So you

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>move into some of these value and cyclical sectors. That

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is to a certain extent the tactical trade, because what

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>has worked during COVID is also to a certain extent

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>what worked over the last five ten years, which is

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that when you have a low interest rate environment, a

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>global search for yield. None of these, by the way,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are changing anytime soon. If you think, you know, in

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of years and decades, UM, that's that's a story

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for US growth, tech equity. UM. You know, there's no alternative,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and and that if you're seeking that yield, you have

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to look for it in these securities. I don't think

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that as a secular story that's likely to really change,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and so the value rotation is local move or the

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>i'm sorry, the tactical move, but I do think that

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be near term volatility. The little elf

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in the room, elephant Elf, the elephant of the room

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't discussed here of course. Elf, it's almost

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the holidays. I'm so scared of our elf on the shelf.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know if you've seen the the memes

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of elves on the shelf inside quarantine chambers, but I'm

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely doing that in my home. So the oh my gosh,

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the elf on the shelf in the in the room,

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of course is um. The is policy support, you know, UM,

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I do expect that we're going to have several fits

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and starts. Well we learn more about this vaccine, whatever

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it looks like, it's gonna be hard to distribute. It's

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>going to take, you know, a year and a half

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>before we get to anybody who isn't a health care

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>worker or vulnerable segment of the population. You know, any

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>number of things that could be challenging about the vaccine

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to cause fits and starts in this rotation.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we should just expect it. But I also

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think that those moments of weakness in the face of

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>policy support, not only from the FED but also potentially

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>on the fiscal side, those moments of weakness are going

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to be buying opportunities for investors who expect the second

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>half of one to have that real economic resurgence, and

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>so volatility is my base case scenario. But I don't

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think it will stop the rotation. And I do think

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that rotation is a tactical trade. That's your that's your

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, six to twelve month idea, it's not your

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>three to five year idea. So it's my turn to

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be the cranky one now, and maybe maybe it's maybe

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it's possible. Uh, maybe it's due to proximity or timing

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of headlines that have been coming out. But just before

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we began recording the podcast, we got headlines from Chicago

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about them starting to impose lockdowns. We have sharper restrictions

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that are going to begin over the weekend in New

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>York City. I mean, part of this does feel eerily

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>similar to back in March. Granted we know much more now,

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are at zero, but this sense that because

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a vaccine coming one day, there is plenty

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of enthusiasm from investors in markets. Oh, COVID nineteen, We're

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a lockdown to the extent that

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw it back then. Do you get the sense

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>at all, though, that people are being a little bit

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>too enthusiastic about the possibilities here? Uh? I mean, like,

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not completely convinced that no, we won't see lockdowns

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>like we saw back then, but that we could see

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>some pretty strict economic restrictions if these cases continue to rise.

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I put on my economist heet, which

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll also call my real person hat, although I don't

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>know if economists real people. UM, and you guys, I

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>hate being the optimistic one. I'm so used to being

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the doom and gloom in the room. Uh usually I am.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>But Mike's Mike's getting in my head. Um well, he

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>when he paid me off to say he's right, he

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>also paid me off to be optimistic in your stead.

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But if I put on my my real person, had

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>my economist set, this virus is completely out of control.

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a hundred and thirty thousand cases in a day,

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty thousand hospitalizations. I mean, this is this is an

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>enormous risk to human health. And you know, I think

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that we who were in New York or in other

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>cities that experienced um, really bad first waves. You just

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>you know what those ambulances feel like. Um. And the

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>impact to just real people and real families is happening,

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and it does frustrate me to a certain extent that

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't appear to be what market story or economic

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>story reflects. You know this, this virus is out of

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>role and it will have an impact. Um I And

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Sarah. I think that we will

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>see restrictions to activity, but the expectation that it's not

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna last forever is really important, you know it. It

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>helps companies to start making plans um, you know, saying Okay,

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>if we only need to make it six or nine

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>more months, then yeah, we you know, maybe we shutter

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>our doors, but we don't have to close down entirely.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Those expectations are really important. It might mean that you

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>can invest a little more in you know that you know,

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>factory or warehouse because you're going to be shipping more.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>It might mean as a household that you can plan

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>your trip. Um. You know, you stay inside for the

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>next six months and don't leave your house in Chicago

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's freezing, but you plan that trip to Hawaii

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for July. I mean, expectations are really really important. And UM,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>so I do think that there's you know, despite this

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>um you know, dark winter, there's you know, the dawn

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is coming, there's a light at the end of the tunnel, etcetera.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And and and that those expectations are what matter for markets.

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>UM And so real real person Lauren does get does

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit frustrated by that. UM, But I

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think we do have a case to be optimistic. Stand

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>clear of the craziest things we saw in markets this

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>week alright, Mike, I trust that you have something a

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more creative though this week, and I wonder if

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>we have a price is right? Maybe? Oh? Shoot, no

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>prices Okay, I can turn the cinema prices right, you

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>always can. I can turn the cinema prices right. All right.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>It's been a while since algorithms and high frequency trading

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>has made the news, which much to my sugrined because

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I love that stuff, I love all the controversy surrounding it.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>But we had a good story this week out of London.

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>UM Citadel Securities, the big hedgephone and market making firm

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>out of Chicago, is suing this former employee in London

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>because they allege he left to go to another hedge

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>fund and brought with him basically the secrets of one

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of their their main algorithms for trading stocks. Um, alright,

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>let me figure out how to make this as a

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>prices right. There's several there's several really interesting numbers. They're

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask us how much he's suing them for or

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is this going somewhere else before I we make that

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the prices right number. For one thing, they say, this algorithm,

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>this one algorithm and I guess maybe just calling it

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>an algorithm is a little too uh simplified. It's a

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a trading automated trading strategy. It's called the ABC strategy.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>They put a lot of time into this strategy, not

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time in the name of it though,

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So the ABC strategy is what it's called. They say

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>this one strategy alone makes hundreds of millions of dollars

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>a year for Citadel. It costs a hundred million to develop. Um.

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And what's really fascinating is the for that the guy

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was being recruited by g S, a uh London based

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>head firm, is uh basically saying it's not that valuable

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>to us. In fact, the guy who recruited him printed

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>out the document that it's based on, and his argument

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for why it's not that valuable is he said, um,

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, after I got this, I used to to

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>jot down some personal notes, including quote, the measurement of

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>a towel rail he was planning to fit at his house.

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, it's funny to me to picture

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 1>these hedge fun mesters of the universe, uh being like

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us. And you know, after a long

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>day of making millions of dollars. They go off, and

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>now I gotta hang a towel a towel rack in

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>my bathroom, and I'm gonna take the I'm gonna take

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the measurements on this this uh printed out algorithm worth?

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh how much is it worth? Sarah? That's the prices rate?

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>How much would you sort sue if you were Citadel?

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, so you said a hundred million went into

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>making it. If it makes them a hundreds of mill

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year, I mean I'm I'm going to

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>go that they suit a couple billion. Keep my poker

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>face on, Lauren. What would you sue for if that

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>was your algorithm plus lawyer's fees based on standard prices? Right? Roules.

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I got to give it to Lauren because I think

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>if you go over, if you go over your only

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>forty million there, I would go for a lot more. Really,

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe it isn't actually that valuable. I mean,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>forty million is obviously very valuable. All right, Lauren, Now

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the pressure really is on. What is the craziest thing

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>you have for us this week? Alright, guys, I have

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>three things to say, because if you know, the market

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>gives you this many gifts, you have to take advantage.

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So the first thing is that in my first attempt

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>to shock and awe I I failed miserably, which is

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that when I listened to this podcast and I hear

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Mike's voice say hold on to your parachutes, it's what

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.719
<v Speaker 1>goes up. I was like, I gotta find one of parachutes,

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and I just couldn't. There is nothing good about that's truly,

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that's not me. That's our very best impression.

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Stand clear the closings. That's the Charlie has the most

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>soothing voice. Yeah, he's the voice of the New York

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>City Subway system and he also works at bloom Big Radio.

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>So the second thing is we got to get to

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the sigmas UM six standard deviation rotation and value on Monday,

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Like that's crazy UM and fifth screen standard deviation move

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>out of momentum and UM as the Twitter's fear would say,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>um over the course of the week. When you see UM,

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you know a couple of six sigma moves in a

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>single career or a single decade um either you've lived

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a bazillion years or UM or the models are wrong. Yeah,

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter was blowing up a bit on Monday over over

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>these Yeah, you know, you could you could, um, you

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 1>could have argued on Monday that maybe it was a

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit overblown. UM. But we'll see, right, we'll see

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>if that rotation story ends up being true. And then

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>the one more thing I'll add, because the stigmas are

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a little too easy. Um. It's just kind of an interesting,

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>UM note about seasonality because I think a lot of

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>folks are going to focus on you know, usually the

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of months after an election are really positive, um.

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And historically that that does tend to be true. Um,

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and even not in election years, the November December months

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>team tend to be pretty positive for seasonality. UM. But

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we're already up um, you know, eight percent months to date,

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>so in the last couple of weeks, and that seasonality, UM,

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>when we think over the last thirty years, is has

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>been much you know, two to five um, over the

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>course of those couple of months. And so I'll we

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we do look at seasonality. We think it's interesting we've

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>already gotten a lot um. And so with all the

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 1>risks both political and economic, over the next couple of weeks,

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we expect a little bit of bumping nous headed into

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. Has anything this year? Yeah,

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>but has anything this year aligned with historical normality? Yeah?

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I love that six What was it? A fifteen sigma

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>move out of momentum. So we're going to read about

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>some hedge fund that had like the most out of

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the money puts on some momentum ETF or something that

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is up for the year. It will be the one

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund that's done well in the last ten years.

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll be looking for it. That'll be Mike's crazy thing.

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh what in a couple of months. Probably probably keep

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>an eye out for that. He'll be on the lookout.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>That was good. I give it to Lauren. I think

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>she came through. She lived, She lived up to the hype. No,

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 1>no parachute though, next time. Maybe a golden parachute next time.

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>If you can find a parachute related crazy thing, we

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.719
<v Speaker 1>will cancel whatever. Guess I'll call in. Oh please do,

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>please do. And that's a reminder for everyone else. We

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>already told you the number twice. But calling to you

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>if you have any ideas, if you let us say

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you're crazy things, you have any questions for Mike and

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I or our guests, we will happily play it on

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the show. But with that said, Lauren Goodwin, thank you

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us this week. Thanks for having me, guys,

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure to catch us What Goes Up. We'll

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>be back next week. Until then, you can find us

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Terminal, website and app, or wherever you

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. We'd love it if you took the

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>time to rate and review the show on Apple Podcasts

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>so more listeners can find us, and you can find

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>us on Twitter, follow me at Sarah plant Sec, Mike

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is that Reaganonymous, and you can also follow Bloomberg Podcast

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts. Also thank you to Charlie Pellett of Bloomberg

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Radio and the voice of the New York City Subway System.

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>What Goes Up is produced by Jordan Gospore. The head

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Podcast is Francesco Levie. Thanks for listening. See

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you next time.