WEBVTT - Big Tech, Markets, Energy, and Streaming (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Big Big Earnings Week

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>really focus on technology. Some disappointments out there for sure,

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>although Apple kind of maybe saved the day a little

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>bit at the at the end here with some decent numbers.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Let's kind of bring it all into perspective tied altogether,

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna round table at today with Cameron christ macro

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>strategists with Bloomberg News, plus Punum Goyle, senior e commerce

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts with Bloomberg Intelligence, covers all things retail. Cameron, let's

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>start off with you here, just you know, stepping back

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>from the Microsoft's, the Google's, the metas of the world.

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you still consider or should the market still consider

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>big tech as a driver as a market leader for

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>this global equity market. Well, I think you have to

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>just given the waiting in various indices. I mean, if

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the SNP or even m s c

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I Old Country World Index. I mean, who do you have?

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the familiar names, uh, most of which are

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>directly or tangentially technology related. I mean, technically Amazon is

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>considered discretionary these days, but I think we all know

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're valued as a as a technology stock. So

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, of course, um, when you're talking about anything

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but very ephemeral, short term moves, you you have to

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to consider the tech sector as as sort

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of the hegemonic driver almost, And when it comes to

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector, it's interesting you look at Apple, you

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>look at Amazon to opposite reactions. They're basically Apple canceling

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>out Amazon's loss on a points basis. If you look

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>at the SMP five hundred and potam, when you think

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>about the Amazon earnings that we've gotten, the wipe out

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing in the stock, what do you think

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is the bigger issue here? Was it the warning about

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the holiday period or is it what's happening in a

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>w S. I think it's a WS more so. We

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we know that holiday will be weaker than it has

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>been just because of inventories being high and inflation curving.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Consumers fund. But on the A W S front, that

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>was a surprise. Um, really just at the big delta

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that we saw versus estimates largely as you know, they

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>also said that they were exiting the quarter at a

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>mid twenties run rate, which is pretty weak considering the

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty one percent that they've been tracking for the past

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>four quarters. Cameron, I'd love to get your sense here.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>We're at about halfway through earnings here, any takeaways for

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you here? I mean, I know the big question for

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investors is, as I listened to some

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of these conference calls, is kind of the forward guidance

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and how bad will a recessionary environment be for some

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of these businesses? What? What? What have you learned so far? Yeah,

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean the there's a couple of a couple of

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>things to unpack. Uh, you know, there's the the actual

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>earnings we've seen relative to expectation. I mean, they've beaten,

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>but they always beat, right, I mean, under promise and

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>over deliver is sort of the business model of Wall Street. Um,

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the magnitude of surprise has been the more or less

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the slowest m on both the top and bottom line

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>basis since the advent of COVID, so that probably tells

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>us something. UH. I I do think that forward looking

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>UH guidance is significant UM, and I take what was

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>take on board what we said about a WS. But

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact is is that Amazon guidance UH for the

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter puts its overall year on your revenue growth

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>UH the second lowest in the company's history UH less

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>than five percent. If you take the midpoint of the

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>guidance range UM, that's less than inflation UM. And that's

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant because we're these companies at the top of

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the pyramid have valuations that are consistent with secular growth.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think what Amazon and Meta in particular are

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>saying is that these companies are actually significantly exposed to

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>cyclical vulnerability. And the question we have to ask is

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>should these companies have a secular valuation premium if they're

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>turning into more secularly cyclically vulnerable companies. I think that

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you can make a good argument that that no, there

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>there's some of this premium that has been given to

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>these firms over the last ten years maybe should should

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>be withdrawn. Well, there's some key differences between Meta and Amazon,

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>one of them being that Meta is just funneling billions

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>of dollars into the metaverse. I am so excited to

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>see how that turns out. Amazon, on the other hand,

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>PUNA is really looking at cutting costs here. What magnitude

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about and where? Sure, the costs are

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>largely going to be cut on the retail side, um

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>really when you look at technology as well as investments

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in fulfillment, logistics, transputation. So we heard from them that

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they were expected to cut a billion and the one

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>point five billion dollars from two Q to three Q.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>They only cut one billion, largely because they couldn't cut

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the costs and their productivity due to fulfilling demand for

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the additional prime day sales and early acts of sales

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that they had in three Q and four Q. UM.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be hard for them to cut costs.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>It will not come easy. They're going to have to

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>look at some of their strategic initiatives as well as

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>some of those experimental initiatives that they have to really

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>um expand those margins. But at the end of the day,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the margins are driven by a w S seven more

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>than seventy of the margins on an manual basis, or

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the profits, I should say come from it up us

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and in the latest quarter three Q over a hundred percent.

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.679
<v Speaker 1>So we need to see those a w S margins

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>extand again, and we think they will. It'll just be

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a matter of time. The next few quarters are challenging,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but a WS does have potential to expand again, both

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>from revenue and a margin standpoint. All right, put him

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>great stuff as always, put him boil. She's a senior

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>retail analysts Bloomberg Intelligence covering all the e commerce uh

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff as well. She's been there since the beginning of

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that evolution in retail. Plus Camraon Christ macro strategists with

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, giving us kind of just a holistic view

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of here of what we've seen from these tech earnings. UM,

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>some disappointments kind of across the board, maybe the exception

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of Apple, but according to Camera, no reason to think

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that they will no longer be market leaders, just given

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>their propensity and their big size in the indexes. Said Oakley.

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a founder managing partner to Oxbell Advisors. We've talked

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to him for a long time. He's down in Austin, Texas,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>US UM, but we've got them in our studio today

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for the first time ever. How cool is that? Ted?

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us here. Um, you know,

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We've we're coming through earnings here. I

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>got a market that's down, my fixed income portfolios down

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>double digits. What do I do from here? Is this

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the bottom? Can I start just loading in some stocks

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and bonds here? Well, I would say, Well, I would

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>not do that. I think, Uh, I think what what

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the Fed has given you is a little by time

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with the one in one year and maybe eighteen month

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>treasury at four and a half percent, now you can

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>afford to hold it, you know. And somebody tells me, now, hey,

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I can get a five percent dividend on something. I said,

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, how about four and a half on

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a treasury? We have no risk on it? And so

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what's going on. But I wouldn't step

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>into that. We really feel like this has probably two

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>or three quarters to go, maybe a little longer. Well,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>explain that timeline. What's going to happen in these two

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to three quarters. Are you waiting for the Federals or

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to take their foot off the gas a little bit? Well, Katie,

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>they could, but I think people if they look at history,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it always goes to show the market keeps on going down.

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>But here's why. For us, we think that earnings, if

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at deceleration, they're up, but it's been really

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>decelerating now for four quarters in a row. We think

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that's going to continue into negative territory over the next

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>three quarters. And as that happens, I think people have

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to readjust the level of what they're willing to pay

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>for stocks. You know they talk about multiples, Well, the

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>multiple is going gonna go up because your earnings are

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to go down, and I think they forget

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to factor that in here. All right, Ted, you're from Texas.

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech was your underground. I'm just gonna profile you,

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Ted and assume that you have a call on oil,

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>on energy, I got w TR crew to oil about

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight dollars a barrel. Here. What's your calling oil?

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And what's what are your I know you're good friends

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>when you're sitting around chatting down in Texas, you're talking oil.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>What's the call there? Well, you know oil companies can

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>make money at eight and they can make money at eight,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we own uh energy one production companies

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>on pipelines that sort of thing too. But what's happening is,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the large companies really have cut so far

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>back on capex so that it's changed the industry industry,

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and it has helped the independence quite a bit. I

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>think to do more. But for us, if you just

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>look out over the next two years, we think it

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>moves higher over time. Um, you know, we're we're getting

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to a point where it's supply to man is is

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>fairly equal. So uh and I understand it. And by

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm all for taking care of that, you know,

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the environment of green I really am. I just think

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the timeline is all a bit so that's that's where

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I think. So I think it it does go higher.

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>The only thing would would thwart it in the short run,

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>which we think could happen, by the way, is if

0:09:55.400 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>your economy is slow enough all over the world, there

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>will be a short period in there three to six

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>months where oil can can foll back. Something we'll see.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>And if we think about the energy sector for so

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>long it was winning by so much. When you translate

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that oil call into the stock market, has the energy

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>trade run its course? You know, Kedy probably has to

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a degree. I think you're you're onto something there. I

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people really focused on it, and

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they were too they had too much oil and their portfolios,

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the professional side. And what's happening if you

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the companies, they've sort of been trading those

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>highs now for you know, they had a high, they

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>fell off, came back, but they haven't made significant new

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>highs here. And so I think you, I think you

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you could be very right on that. It ted You've

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You've had a heck of a career here founding Oxbow Advisors. Uh,

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you've written nine books. You're also the chairman emeritus and

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>founder of Foster Angels of South Texas, the largest foster

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>child foundation in South Texas. Talk to us about that,

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>how's it, how's the environment down there as it relates

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to foster care and things like that, because there's always

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so much discussion. We hear in York, we hear about

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the border and all those types of things. What's it

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>really like feeds boots on the ground in South Texas well,

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we have to the two foundations are both the same side.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>There two separate foundations, but we also did Foster Angels

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of Central Texas, which is out of Austin. So between

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the two we cover about sixty five counties in Texas.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And but you know, having done that, have really helped

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>foster children for twenty five years. Our problem is is

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that since their wards of the state, foster children are

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately out of sight and so you you can't get

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>people to understand really apply to a foster child and

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>what we do at Foster Angeles and we try to

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>give them things very quickly within forty eight hours that

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>will help their staff to esteem if they want something.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But the problem in the state, to answer your question,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 1>is we have a lot of people who don't understand

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the system. They don't pay the people in the system,

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the CPS any money they have about at turnover rate

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>if you can imagine, and so uh, everything compounds on itself,

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and so you have the problem with foster families. We

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have near enough and part of the ones we

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>do have are actually not that good. Who have a

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of great ones, don't get me wrong, but a

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of them just do it for the money. And

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>then you have a lot of CPS workers that it's

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a tough job and that's just a turnover. We have

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>those two things going on. Then they've had a lawsuit

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>from UM that I don't agree with it necessarily, but

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>what's happened is it's really put a lot of pressure

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on the system because they am to respond to lawsuit

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 1>instead of helping instead of helping children. So it sounds

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of red tape like we have here

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and you have in Texas and every state. And I

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>am very familiar with the New York's floor is all

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the big state, right California. We all have the same problem.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>You have the same problem here too. All right, well,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate you doing all anything you can do to

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>help there. That that's great stuff. Ted Oakley, Founder and

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>managing partner Oxbow Advisers. I want to get to rate

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the our next guest because she is in studio. So

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's two guests in a row in studio. These are

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>folks that we've talked to before, but we have them

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in the studio. Solday, it's a Friday. There's no Bloomberg

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>employees here today, but other folks are coming in. Allison.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Right now, our CEO of Seventh Generation joins us in

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Allison, thanks so much for

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Tell us just give us the overview what

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>seventh generation is? What are you guys up to? Yeah, first,

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for having me. It's great to

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>see you all. Yeah, and a little bit about seven generations.

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So we are a household cleaning company that focuses on

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>our mission of transforming the world into a healthy, sustainable,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and equitable place for the next seven generations. So yeah, like,

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>no small goals for us. So I give us a

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of like some of your products, who

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you do business with, how you get your products at

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>here in the marketplace. Yeah, great, So I think you

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>will likely see us walking down any grocery store aisle,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Target aisle on Amazon dot Com, Walmart aisle in the

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>categories of laundry, detergent, household cleaners, and dish products and so. Um.

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>We really have distribution in you know, most everyday stores. Um,

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and so we're we're really part of everyone's households. This

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Radio. So I have to ask you about

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain it's always been talking about for two years.

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Tell us how the past two years have been for

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you in terms of managing that. Oh, my goodness, it's

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>been a wild ride. So UM we are we do

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>operate in the categories of cleaning and paper products. So

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the course of we saw record growth

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>behind those products and record inability to meet the demand

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of both our retailers and our consumers. And so that

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty wild ride for us to just really

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we could deliver on what consumers and

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>retailers were asking us for UM And then on the

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>other side of it, I think it has been a

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>combination of both figuring out how consumers are going to

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>be cleaning UM in today's world, and then also making

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>sure that we have a supply chain that is future

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fit for this type of volatility, because I will tell

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you that even today, while the demand is not as

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>high as it was, I think we're still working on

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>back tracking a lot of the supply chain decisions and

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>retrofitting our supply chain to make sure that we can

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can meet the day to day demands. So how did

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>your business and how did demand for your products kind

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of evolved during the pandemic, Because it seemed like for

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a while there we were cleaning everything, including the groceries

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we brought home from the supermarket and then leave them outside.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>God what we didn't know. Amazing, But anyway, here we are.

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>How did that impact your business? Yeah? Sure, so I think,

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>like like our our peers in the category, I think

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we just saw unprecedented demand for anything that cleans, and

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>so we do operate in the disinfecting cleaning category, So

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we do create a line of products that are UM

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that killed of germs, and so we really saw that

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>range of products UM flying off the shelves as soon

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as literally as soon as they were set UM. So

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was really it was really challenging for

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>us to track how high is high and bring us

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to now and bring us into the future. You know,

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned how people clean have has changed. How are

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you adapting to that and what trends have you noticed? Yeah,

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>so there's there's kind of two big things that are

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>emerging in our business right now. So one, I think

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>UM consumers first of all, are still sitting on quite

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit of product that they bought, and so I think, UM,

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we're still working through the tail end of product on hand. UM.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>They're also thinking about cleaning differently. I think the role

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of efficacy in what is clean has become much more prevalent.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Given our conversations around germs and safety even past COVID, Right, So,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of things happening in the

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>news now from a health perspective. Um this on top

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that we are a sustainable business, right,

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>so we really focus on the environmental aspect of the

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>products that we make. And the challenging thing right now

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>is that there's some very real concerns for the U.

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>S consumer between financial insecurity, UM inflation, or health and safety.

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And so we are seeing the environment slip a little

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>bit from what's the top of mind for consumers in

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>their day to day and so we've really had to pivot, right. So,

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things that we're working on

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>as a team is how do we make sure our

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>communication is super sharp from an efficacy perspective, so we

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>work as well as our conventional counterparts, So how do

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>we make that point really clear? And then also how

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>do we dial up the urgency around the environmental concerns

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like the earth is burning, we must do something about it,

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and so how can we just make sure that stays

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>top of mind. You mentioned inflation. Uh, it seems like

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we just we're getting through a big earning cycle here

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing from a lot of companies report earnings in

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>their inflation is right there. How has it impacted your business? Yeah, so,

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I think we certainly have not been immune to a

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of the challenges that most companies are facing in

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of rising costs for materials, and so we, like

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the categories, have had to adjust our pricing. But the

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I'm super proud to talk about is

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you know where we make our biggest

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>investment is in our product So we use a hunt

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>as much as plant based materials as we can, up

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred percent, and most of our products we

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>also focus on using as much better plastic as we can,

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>so we use a hundred percent post consumer recycled plastic

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in our packaging. UM and so those are expensive right there,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>are expensive before the pandemic. Right. It's the quality that

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 1>we're investment that we're making, and so the thing that

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we've had to really work for is how do we

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we maintain committed to that quality of ingredient,

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to that equality of environmental standard and make adjustments around that. UM.

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>So I think we really focus as a team to

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>say we have to keep the quality of the product

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>intact during this time, to what degree have you passed

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>on those higher costs? How much have you raised prices? Yeah,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so it really does vary by category, right, So I think, um,

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the sub segment that you're looking at.

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>But I think we do our absolute best to minimize

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the amount that we pass on. But at the end

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of the day, I need to make sure that this

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>financial model continues to make a sense. So UM as

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a company, we have certainly made it our priority to

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>ensure that sustainable products maintain as much accessibility from a

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>price point as possible. So one of our biggest priorities

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is dispelling the myth that natural products have to be

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>more expensive. Um. So, as a business, we always work

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we keep our pricing as accessible

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as we can. But I think that you know that's

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>really been tested during these times. Are you based? We are,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and every company that we talked to for the last

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>boy two and a half years site labor as a challenge.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>What's it like in Burlington, Vermont and the other places

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe where you operate? Yeah, great, so I think, um,

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually, one of the biggest changes that we've

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>made from a working perspective UM as well. Our headquarters

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>is based in Burlington, Vermont. We're really opening up a

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>wide net of remote working for our company. So we're

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>casting a wide net to make sure that we get

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most amazing talent into our company, no

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>longer letting our headquarter location dictate that. And so it's

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>actually been a great way for us to really rethink

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 1>talent strategy. We've got I've got a hundred um. But

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>remember we are owned by Unilever, so I think there's

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a much larger ecosystem that supports us. So UM, I

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like to think that there's millions of people out there

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>working for us. Alison, thank you so much for joining us.

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Allison written now our CEO of seventh Generation joining us

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>live in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, which we appreciate

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>making a trip down from Burlington and Yorth, home of

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the University of Vermont cat amounts. How about that? My

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>knowledge is my knowledge is just all over the past,

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>worthless trivia. I've got it. It's a big oil companies

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>reporting um some numbers, and boy, when those guys make money,

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>they make a lot. Yeah. So I mean, you know,

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>when we talk big energy. When we talk big oil.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>We talked to Fernando Valet. He's a senior oil and

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>gas analyst at Bloomberg intellig just another guest of ours

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. I don't know what's

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>going on to it. I think we're being punked. Are

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we giving something out at the door or something to

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>get we haven't gotten waiting for. Fernando's talked to us

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>about Chevron, talked us about Exxon. I mean, I gotta

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>assume at eighty eight bucks a barrel, they're making some

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>money here. Yeah, and they actually made some money because

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a catch up. Usually contracts for lerg loqual Financial

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Gas lag anywhere between three or six months, so they're

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>really getting into that peak of the oil price from

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter on the l n G side, and

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>that's probably going to last until the fourth quarter. And

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a reminder, cutter gas. It's Excellent's best asset

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>by far at points it contributes as much income, so

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they're very exposed to that, and it explains the record

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>profits in third the third quarter. Okay, so the superlatives

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>here are pretty amazing. Excen highest profit and it's a

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty two year history. Yeah, I'm reading a

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News story right in front of me. Chevron almost

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>almost second past quarterly result. Ever, I'm gonna be pessimistic.

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>When when does the boom time's ends? This can't last forever, Well,

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it can't, but it can get worse actually before it

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>gets better. I think in the short term, you're correct.

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>There might be some weakness we saw obviously towards the

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>end of the third quarter and start now the fourth quarter,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>weakness in oil prices. But then refining margins have taken

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>off again, especially led by diesel. We have an article

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>out talking about how diesel shortages are going to be

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>crippling to the East coast and UH and that will

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>benefit a lot of the refiners UM and and their

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>margins are going to continue to creep higher in the

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, and we're thinking to the first quarter. But

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>even if we go to a little bit lower and

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>we are about down from the highs and the second

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>quarter for Brent UH, we still think they generate a

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>significant excess cash flow. And the cash balance for Excell

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>now's the thirty billion dollars, and we think even if

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit lower, they still have to find

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a home for those uh dollars because their net debt

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is almost to net cash. So I mean, I'm just

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at Chevron Chevron US equity. Then I go f

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a function financial analysis. I mean, twelve billion of cash,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty six billion of debt. You know, the next couple

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of years, thirty five billion in free cash flow each year.

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Why aren't these guys doing two things? Drilling more holes

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in the ground for more supply, building more refineries so

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't have those diesel shortages in the Northeast. Not

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that I drive a diesel vehicle, that's Matt Miller's game.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>But are they investing back into their businesses? Well, but

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you do eat food that takes that diesel, and you

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>buy from Amazon, who uses that diesel as well, so

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>it's important for you as well. Uh, They're well, refineries

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>are just impossible to build in the US in the

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>current environmental climate and regulatory climate. Payback is very long

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and you need to have some assurances that you're actually

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to continue producing for fifteen to

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, and we're just not there today. Uh So

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>we don't expect those to be built. Um in the

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Middle Eastern Asia really where we're seeing a confinery capacity

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on the on the upstream side, we agree, and we

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think will mark yet another increase in spending from these guys. Uh,

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen a lot of exploration. We think exploration

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>will come back strong from three on deep water. Exxon

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>made more discoveries out in Guiana, which is a burgeoning

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>oil province there for them. Have you ever been down

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>on an oil rigging? Uh? Yeah, I've been to a

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>couple in Brazil back in because you're out in the

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>middle of nowhere on this rig offshore. And I've been

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in the I've been in the middle of the Amazon

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>as well, on an onshore rig in the middle of

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon. Rang. I don't think I would love that.

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe in the Amazon, I don't. I would climbing the

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>stairs on the side of a boat in the water.

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty interesting. You have to climb with your hands.

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>It's oh my god. I would probably panic. Is peak oil?

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that still a thing? I don't. We should talk

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>about it two or three or four years ago. I

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>think we need more oil, don't we. Well, that's our belief,

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, contrary to a contrary to the international

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>energy agencies forecast or we think we're still going to

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to to higher levels over the next several years. If

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at emerging markets, there are the main drivers

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of oil demand growth. Uh, and we haven't really found

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a solution for or. They're grit issues for their consumption

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and in order for them to improve their quality of life,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>they need to consume more energy and right now that

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>has to be fossil fuels. There are the alternatives. Aren't

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>enough to sustain an improvement in life for five billion people?

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Can let me ask you a question. Can the world

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>exist without Russian energy? Yes? But not without Russian energy

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and without seeing growth from other regions. We have a

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of resources in Canada, we have a lot of

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>resources in Venezuela. We have a lot of resources in

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the US, but they need to be developed. Can the

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>world exists this winter without Russian energy? Yes, but cartailing

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of industrial activities, So you're going to have

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to prioritize safety over the economy. And I think that's

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>what Europe has already done. That's how we got tomentary

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>fill was by cartailing economic activity OPEC plus How powerful

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is it today relative to maybe the past? I think

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>especially Saudi and the u A are extremely power powerful

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and they know uh, they know that, uh, and their

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>comments around Saudi first are really uh indicative of that. Um.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>We have given them some of that power by moving

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>offshoring energy production and energy security. So I think it

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>bhoos us to take some of that back and and

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>really look at North America as a source of clean

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>energy because it can be the cardboard, uh, the carboards,

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the carbonized and improved, and we have some of the

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>more strict environmental rules compared to other energy producers out

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in there. All right, good stuff, as always went back.

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I could talk energy all day. It's just like it's

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a global issue. It's a geopolitical issue. It's just our

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>good friends down to Texas and Oklahoma issue lots of

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff there. So Fernando Valet he does that for us. Uh.

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>He gets paid to do that for us, believe it

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>or not, climbing up on ships and going out the

0:27:57.720 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>oil rigs in the middle of the ocean. I mean,

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>who knows, but he does that for Bloomberg Intelligence and

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate it. Again. W t I crude oil it's

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>off a little bit today, a one point three, just

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>under eighty eight dollars in barrel it. This is a

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>treat for me, folks. Felix Dolett is in our studio

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and Katie another in studio. Guests, something's in the water today.

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know everybody's coming into the student they want

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to be in our presence. I guess it might be

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the last lunch here at Bloomberg ever. So Felix do

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that editor for Bloomberg News. Um. He's also the editor

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Bloomberg Entertainment vertical screen Time. You can find

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that on Bloomberg dot com. But he's got a big

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>take story and we love the big take stories, and

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this one's really right down my alley. So I turned

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to it right away on the train coming in, talking

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>about HBO and Netflix, and it's really goes to the

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>HBO story. Because Felix has got a new book out.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>It's coming out in just days. It's called It's Not

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>TV The Spectacular Rise, Revolution and Future of HBO, which

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I cannot read, wait to read because I was there

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of ground zero during all that stuff at time

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Warner really cool stuff. So I Feelix, thanks so much

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for coming in our studio here talk to us about

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of what you found in your deep reporting of

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the history of HBO. Yeah, I mean it's fifty years.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Incredible impact that HBO has had on uh TV, revolutionized comedy,

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>drama documentaries. Um and uh this is this piece for

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the big take was you know, the first extra from

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the book. Uh. You know, HBO is the protagonist of

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>our book, but we really kind of developed Netflix as

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the antagonist because I think there's such fascinating parallels and

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>contrast between these two companies. Um and you know we

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>really dug into that also. UM and this is this

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>exert focus is really on two thousand ten, two thousand

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and eleven, during the time when they went from being

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, copasetic business partners in the era too suddenly

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>during the switch to streaming, all of a sudden, realizing

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be huge intense rivals. Who would you

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>say is winning To ask a very simple question, I

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>think Netflix has a huge head start, especially if you

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>look overseas. I mean, one interesting thing about HBO is

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for all the incredible branding that they've done with HBO

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>over the years, where everything was about the HBO brand,

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>premium cable. You know, you're paying Actra for this. Um

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>all the shows feeding into that. Uh, you know, overseas

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>they did kind of the opposite, so um, you know,

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>overseas it was all about profit margins and licensing their

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>shows to other networks. So the HBO brand does not

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>actually have a huge amount of resonance outside the United States.

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And now as the global you know, the streaming wars

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are going global, I think that's where you see Netflix

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>having this incredible advantage. You know, I think about the

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>early days of HBO, and it was just so revolutionary

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>with Jeff Bucas did there because big budgets. Okay for

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>theatrical film, I get it, and you get a certain

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>quality of that. You don't get that on TV. He

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't get that on cable. But all of a sudden,

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>they put serious money behind some of these um series

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and I just watch for the first time after twenty years,

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>The Wire, and that was really the series that changed

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the entire ballgame what could be on the small screen. Yeah,

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean they made a big switch in the mid

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>nineties where you know, the early HBO series were very

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>cheap looking. You know, if you go back and look

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>at Tanner eighty eight or even Larry Sanders, which is

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>an incredible show, but they didn't put a lot of

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>money on the screen. Then it was you know, From

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the Earth to the Moon, which was a mini series

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks and Brian Grazer were doing. They said, you know,

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to do this mini series on HBO,

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it has to have real special effects. You guys cannot

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>cheap out. And so yeah, Jeff Buchaus at the time

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>as CEO, said, you know what, we are going to

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>put a huge amount of money in here. We're gonna

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>move to a more theatrical model where we'll spend a

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of money up front and then we'll figure out

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>ways to try and monetize on the back end. And

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>as it happened, that was also the period of time

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>where direct TV was coming in to play. They were

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>getting an extra money from direct TV, and also DVDs

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>were also hitting. And it turns out that those series

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that they created in the late nineties and early two thousands,

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Sex in the City, The Sopranos, six Ft Under the Wire,

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>incredible series, an incredible run they had, and not only that,

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>pulling a lot of subscribers, they could also take those

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>shows and they remember those box that's they used to

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>make a DVD box that those things were like pure gold,

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, by like one season the Sopranos was like

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars or something. It was absurd, but it

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>was a great extra revenue stream that they could just

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to plow into making their shows look, you know,

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>more like theatrical productions than anything else on TV. I

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta say, I haven't seen The Wire yet. I need

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to you do again. I just it was a twenty

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>year anniversary and I said, boy, I've always said to myself,

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I need to watch that. So I started. You can

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>now stream and binge it all the stuff that d

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to do, and it was awesome. Yeah, yeah, I have

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>seen the Sopranos, I will say that. But Felix, so

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the big take today. It's an excerpt from your book,

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>which is coming out next week, I believe remember on

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>November one, sorry, right after Halloween. So the I was

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>going to say, headline the title of your book, it's

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>not TV. It's a Spectacular Rise, Revolution and Future of HBO.

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the future. Does it look like it

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>looks pretty good right now? I think that, Um, you know,

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>three years ago when we started the book and A

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>T and T was taking Warner Media very slow, very

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>classic magazine writer. You gotta yeah, it looked, you know,

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>people were saying, oh, is this is this going to

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be the end of HBO. What's going to happen? Um.

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>HBO has had an incredible strong two thousand one, two thousand,

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. You think about you know, the White Lotus succession,

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Mayor of Easton um and just this year with the

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Game of Throne sequel House of the Dragon, which has

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>probably been the biggest thing in TV uple months. They're

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>doing great. You know, Discovery has come in a T

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and T spun spun off Warner Media. They have new

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 1>owners with Discovery. I think David Zaslav is a big

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>supporter of the brand. UM. So, actually HBO is doing

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>great and the method that they kind of perfected back

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties, you know, late eighties, nineties, two thousands,

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 1>still very powerful, still a great way of doing television.

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of competition. Like I used to think,

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know that the story was in Hollywood. If you

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>really want to do something really high quality, you go

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>to HBO. Now I've got Ted Surrandos and Netflix writing

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>huge checks. I've got lots of other I got Amazon,

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>appleple So how do they adapt? I guess they've had

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to adjust because you're right, in the old days, they

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>could outspend everybody if they wanted a project. They just

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have this thing in the book called

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the HBO shrug, which was like, you know, we were

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna pay eighty million dollars for Banded Brothers, Well, we'll

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>spend a hundred million. That's fine, And they didn't have

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to worry about it, and that was a huge advantage.

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they've adjusted in recent years because really, when

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Netflix came along and odd into programming in a big

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>way over the past decade, they kind of stole that

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>position in the marketplace from HBO because you know, the

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>paradigm of tech investing, it's been all about growth, hasn't

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>been about profits, and that positioned Netflix to really do

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the same thing to HBO that HBO used to do

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to everybody else, which was, like, you know, in the

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Expert in the Big Tape, we talk about Netflix swooping

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>in and buying House of Cards, which was like their

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>first big bed on the original program, and they offered

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million dollars two seasons without seeing a pilot

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy stuff, it's fun stuff. This is gonna be

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a great book. Felix, do you let editor Bloomberg News.

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.439
<v Speaker 1>He's got a new book coming out next week, which

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna buy. I'm not gonna take one of the

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>ones they have around here. It's entitled It's Not TV

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>The Spectacular Rise Revolution in Future of HBO. Thanks for

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Miller seventy three, and I'm fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:08.959
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio