Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome back to another episode of The Mark
Speaker 1: Moss Show, where we talk about the decentralized revolution, the
Speaker 1: way the world is changing, trying to make sense of it. Man,
Speaker 1: it is a wild, wild world out there. Banking system
Speaker 1: is collapsing, censorship is happening all over the world. You know,
Speaker 1: war is breaking out. What the heck is going on? Well,
Speaker 1: if you look at it from this thesis of a
Speaker 1: decentralizing world, from the lens of three revolutions that are
Speaker 1: happening simultaneously, a political revolution, of financial revolution, and a
Speaker 1: technological revolution, it starts to make sense. And so, of
Speaker 1: course we look at it from the lens of those
Speaker 1: three things, and a lot of people still don't see it.
Speaker 1: It's like the don't see the forest for the trees
Speaker 1: kind of a thing right where it's like you're so
Speaker 1: close to it, you don't see it. But again, if
Speaker 1: you zoom out and you kind of understand this thesis,
Speaker 1: then it starts making sense. And so I like to
Speaker 1: look at some of the latest breaking news so we
Speaker 1: can start to see how this is working, right, how
Speaker 1: is how's it going through? So running through some of
Speaker 1: the latest breaking news headlines of this week, some things
Speaker 1: that were catching my eye was, you know, on this
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution. Desis for example, As I always say, technology
Speaker 1: is really the thing that changes the world more than anything,
Speaker 1: and of course Bitcoin is this decentralized technology. It's a
Speaker 1: technological revolution, it's groundbreaking, and it's allowing us to start
Speaker 1: reimagining the world in a decentralized way. So when the
Speaker 1: Internet first started, it was of course very decentralized. Me
Speaker 1: in my early days in nineteen ninety nine or ninety eight,
Speaker 1: when I first started this web company, I had to
Speaker 1: run my own server. There was no cloud services, there
Speaker 1: was no Amazon Web services. I had to run my
Speaker 1: own server. So everybody ran their own server. Is decentralized.
Speaker 1: But then as the Internet it was too difficult, it
Speaker 1: was too expensive, it was too costly. The Internet couldn't scale,
Speaker 1: and so then everything became very centralized. So then we
Speaker 1: had the rise of Google and Facebook and Amazon that
Speaker 1: centralized all of that. But now we see how bad
Speaker 1: that's become. Censorship and data minulation and behavioral modification, all
Speaker 1: these bad things. And so now we're swinging back to
Speaker 1: this decentralization. Now, I said, bitcoin kind of invented this
Speaker 1: is this breakthrough of decentralization by instead of having one database,
Speaker 1: now we have lots of databases and they have to
Speaker 1: achieve consensus. Not everything needs that. That's one big takeaway
Speaker 1: sort of in this cryptocurrency boom. Everything tries to kind
Speaker 1: of arbitrage the trend, right, they're trying to make money
Speaker 1: off of that trend, even though they're not really part
Speaker 1: of that. Nor. Like I said, does everything need to
Speaker 1: be decentralized. One of the things that seems like it
Speaker 1: does need to be decentralized though, is communication. Right, So
Speaker 1: we don't want our money to be seized or stolen
Speaker 1: or censored. If I want to send you money, I
Speaker 1: should able to send you money. If I want to
Speaker 1: send money to a woman who's being oppressed in Afghanistan
Speaker 1: by the Taliban, there's no way to do that normally
Speaker 1: because the Taliban controls the bank and they'll just take
Speaker 1: her money. So I want to be able to say,
Speaker 1: end her money without being censored. And I can do
Speaker 1: that with bitcoin, all right, but also our communication. We
Speaker 1: want our communication to be censored. Now, what all the
Speaker 1: crypto bros want to tell you is that all these
Speaker 1: blockchains are going to solve that. But we don't need blockchains,
Speaker 1: we don't need tokens in order to have decentralized social
Speaker 1: media or I should say conversations. And I've talked about
Speaker 1: before two different apps, but man, they are really rising.
Speaker 1: And one of them is a company called Zion, and
Speaker 1: Zion is an app that makes it super super easy
Speaker 1: to use where basically you can download an app in
Speaker 1: the app store right now, just go to Zion, and
Speaker 1: the information routes decentralized across the Bitcoin network. And it
Speaker 1: also has payments built in, so as I'm chatting with you,
Speaker 1: I can send you messages peer to peer over the network,
Speaker 1: and I can send you money directly without being censored.
Speaker 1: Now this is important for again, now from a US
Speaker 1: centric viewpoint, you might see, well, it's important for people
Speaker 1: like on only fans Like Only fans, which sort of
Speaker 1: kind of has this. It was it was creative for
Speaker 1: these creators who want to get you know, provide value
Speaker 1: to their followers and get paid directly. It's kind of
Speaker 1: been taken over by you know, adult adult content, let's
Speaker 1: just call it that, which interesting enough, is typically the
Speaker 1: first use case of technology, the very first use case
Speaker 1: for VCRs when they came out a long time ago
Speaker 1: was adult content. The very first thing that really took
Speaker 1: off on the Internet was adult content. And the thing
Speaker 1: that's taken off on these decentralized or like with only
Speaker 1: fans is adult content because it's kind of this uh,
Speaker 1: you know, the fringe of society whatever kind of takes
Speaker 1: off there. So it's sort of like this only fans
Speaker 1: except for the only fans pob because it's you know,
Speaker 1: sort of looked on, looked down upon on that side
Speaker 1: of the of the system. They had their credit card
Speaker 1: accounts shut down, right, they had their PayPal accounts shut down.
Speaker 1: Things like that, and so zions a way that you
Speaker 1: can be a creator and not have to worry about
Speaker 1: being censored because your followers that are in your community
Speaker 1: can pay you directly with bitcoin. The rise of another
Speaker 1: one is a Noster, and Noster is really taking the
Speaker 1: world by storm. Noster is a technology. It's it's a
Speaker 1: platform like a layer one. It's a protocol that it
Speaker 1: doesn't use a blockchain and set. It uses these decentralized relays,
Speaker 1: and these relays send information. Not to get into technical
Speaker 1: if you guys are old enough to remember, like BitTorrent,
Speaker 1: when you used to be able to download music and
Speaker 1: movies and software and things like that. And basically all
Speaker 1: of these computers around the world would store packets of data.
Speaker 1: They were sort of like relays, and then you could
Speaker 1: grab packets from all of them and put together a
Speaker 1: whole foul and that was censorship resistant. The music labels,
Speaker 1: the movie companies, they were never able to figure out
Speaker 1: how to shut that down, sort of like what Noster does.
Speaker 1: It's a little bit different. I don't want to get
Speaker 1: super detailed into it. And then that that's this protocol,
Speaker 1: and now there's applications being built on top of this
Speaker 1: Noster protocol that allow you to use it. One of
Speaker 1: the probably more popular ones is this Damis dam Us
Speaker 1: and Damis is sort of like a it looks like
Speaker 1: a Twitter client, and so it's like an app that
Speaker 1: uses this new network and it sort of looks like Twitter,
Speaker 1: and now me and all the other people that I
Speaker 1: follow on Twitter can connect independently. Another reason why this
Speaker 1: is important is because what happens is if my Twitter
Speaker 1: account gets shut down, if my YouTube account gets shut down,
Speaker 1: which by the way, you should follow me on both
Speaker 1: Twitter is at one Mark Moss and YouTube Beforce is
Speaker 1: just Mark Moss. But if either of those were to
Speaker 1: get shut down, I lose everybody. I mean, if my
Speaker 1: YouTube channel got shut down, that would greatly affect my life.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't be happy about that. But with Noster, I
Speaker 1: own the community and it's interoperable. So what does this mean?
Speaker 1: So noster is the network, but I use an app
Speaker 1: like Damis, right, Well, it gives me a public and
Speaker 1: a private key. And if Damis did something I didn't like,
Speaker 1: like for example, started sense me, or if they want
Speaker 1: to start charging me money, well I could just go
Speaker 1: to their competitor, which there's several out there right now,
Speaker 1: and I can keep all my followers, all my content.
Speaker 1: I own it. So I'm using their like Twitter like client.
Speaker 1: Then I can move to Twitter two or Twitter three
Speaker 1: and take my content and my followers with me. It's
Speaker 1: pretty amazing. It's a big breakthrough. It is going to
Speaker 1: change the world now. Damis is kind of like this
Speaker 1: Twitter client. Zion is different. Zions more of like a
Speaker 1: community client. So Zion is more for like sort of
Speaker 1: like a Facebook group or more like a Telegram group.
Speaker 1: So on Twitter you can't have groups obviously, where the
Speaker 1: groups can communicate between each other. So there's going to
Speaker 1: be lots of different applications of this network. Eventually there
Speaker 1: will be a YouTube client, and there's already I saw
Speaker 1: it yesterday, like a replacement for Medium or substack client.
Speaker 1: So again, if substack were to cut you off and
Speaker 1: you lost all your followers on Medium or substack, well
Speaker 1: you just move to the next client and you would
Speaker 1: keep all of your people. It's amazing. That's the way
Speaker 1: it's going to go. And of course it's being really
Speaker 1: pushed by bitcoin. Zion is built on bitcoin, uses the
Speaker 1: bitcoin to transfer money. Noster uses bitcoin as well, so
Speaker 1: we can transfer information and we can transfer money at
Speaker 1: the same time. What a time to be alive. And
Speaker 1: of course Bitcoin has been doing amazingly well. As this
Speaker 1: banking system has collapsed, everyone is rushing to bitcoin. Bitcoin's
Speaker 1: up was up to twenty five from twenty to twenty
Speaker 1: five thousand dollars. Gold, which doesn't move barely at all,
Speaker 1: was also up a massive bid. Everybody's realizing the banking
Speaker 1: system is collapsing. I better buy a bitcoin. I bought
Speaker 1: a better buy gold. If you're just tuning and listening
Speaker 1: to the Markmall Show, we're talking about some of the
Speaker 1: latest breaking news headlines of the week as we look
Speaker 1: through the decentralized Revolution. I gotta take a quick break.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna take a break for a minute. Don't go away,
Speaker 1: We'll be right back, all right, Welcome back. If you
Speaker 1: just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Mos Show.
Speaker 1: Of course, always talking about the decentralized Revolution, how the
Speaker 1: world is changing, and of course through the lens of politics, finance,
Speaker 1: and technology. And we're running through some of the latest
Speaker 1: breaking news headlines that came across this week. It has
Speaker 1: been a busy well, I was gonna say a busy week.
Speaker 1: It's really been a busy year. It's really been actually
Speaker 1: a pretty busy three years as a matter of fact.
Speaker 1: I mean, it has just been crazy. The world is
Speaker 1: just changing so fast, especially with this banking collapse. Because
Speaker 1: as I talk about politics, finance, and technology, because the
Speaker 1: three are so interweaved, right as soon as the banking
Speaker 1: system starts to fall, than the political system jumps in. Right,
Speaker 1: It's like all of this kind of ties in together.
Speaker 1: One of the big things that I like to talk
Speaker 1: about all the time is the need for building the
Speaker 1: parallel economy. I've been pounding the table on this for
Speaker 1: over a year and a half talking about the need
Speaker 1: for a parallel economy. This is how we change the world.
Speaker 1: We change the world through an economic through through an
Speaker 1: economic vote, We change it through capitalism. That means me
Speaker 1: and you as entrepreneurs need to start businesses to compete
Speaker 1: against the corrupt and decayed legacy system. That means you
Speaker 1: and I as consumers should be voting with our money
Speaker 1: and giving our money to businesses that are building in
Speaker 1: this parallel economy. It's the greatest opportunity that I've seen
Speaker 1: as an entrepreneur, and it's the greatest way that we
Speaker 1: can really affect change as consumers. So if you care
Speaker 1: about the way the world is going, then you should
Speaker 1: be voting with your money, and you need to be
Speaker 1: thinking about this parallel system. You know, it's never been
Speaker 1: more apparent. I like to reference a quote from Socrates.
Speaker 1: He said, focus all your energy not on fighting the old,
Speaker 1: but on building the new. So look, man, you can
Speaker 1: get all worn out online, you know, keyboard warrior and up,
Speaker 1: getting your quarter row levels all up, you know, all
Speaker 1: stressed out about what's going on in the media and politics,
Speaker 1: and you can be fighting and you can be going
Speaker 1: to parent teacher association meetings, and you can be doing
Speaker 1: all that, spending all your time and all your energy
Speaker 1: trying to fight that system, trying to change that system,
Speaker 1: or you cannot, and you can just take all your
Speaker 1: energy and go focus it on building something different. Forget
Speaker 1: trying to change the education system. Just pull your kids
Speaker 1: out and start a different school and start trying to
Speaker 1: fight against mainstream media. Just create your own media channels,
Speaker 1: sort of like I've done. And the need has never
Speaker 1: been bigger. I saw this week, you know some of
Speaker 1: these new outlets that are really trying to do this,
Speaker 1: you know, Charlie Kirk, you know, Turning Point USA, things
Speaker 1: like that. They were holding this event, Sepack, and one
Speaker 1: of the big one of the big things that happened
Speaker 1: there at the SEPACK event, a conservative event, conservative political
Speaker 1: action conference. It's a little bit trying to change the system.
Speaker 1: It's not quite the parallel economy that I see, But
Speaker 1: what they were talking about is basically that we need
Speaker 1: the parallel company. That was like one of the big
Speaker 1: themes they had because big tech is attacking the you know,
Speaker 1: the conservatives, the voices, what they're saying, and so we
Speaker 1: need this parallel economy. A couple of things I saw,
Speaker 1: you know. Rep. Lauren Bobert from Colorado said, quote, I've
Speaker 1: called for two hundred and thirty protections to be removed,
Speaker 1: for two thirty protections to be renewed from these big
Speaker 1: tech companies who are hiding behind section two thirty, and
Speaker 1: they're acting like editors rather than publishers. So two thirty
Speaker 1: is a protection that platforms get. They're not held legally
Speaker 1: liable for information that gets posted there as long as
Speaker 1: they stay neutral. But as soon as they start editing it,
Speaker 1: to her point, then they should lose their two thirty protection,
Speaker 1: and that's what she's calling. But what we can do
Speaker 1: is we can just not use those and we can
Speaker 1: start using our own decentralized protocols as I talked about before.
Speaker 1: Or we can use Noster, we can use Zion, we
Speaker 1: can you know, do things like that. And that is
Speaker 1: the parallel economy. All need to be leaving this corrupt
Speaker 1: legacy system and moving over into that. Now a lot
Speaker 1: of conservatives have braced this, it hasn't maybe moved as
Speaker 1: fast as as as we'd like it to, which is
Speaker 1: why I'm challenging you all as entrepreneurs to step up.
Speaker 1: Entrepreneurs are going to sleep at the wheel man. It's
Speaker 1: time for you to wake up and start building ands.
Speaker 1: As consumers, it's time for us to vote with our money,
Speaker 1: put our money where our mouth is, and starting to
Speaker 1: go support these businesses. We saw recently Donald Trump Junior,
Speaker 1: his company that he started, an alternative news, had their
Speaker 1: bank accounts shut down. Right, they want to build something
Speaker 1: to so big that big tech couldn't shut it down.
Speaker 1: But of course that's big headwinds. Trump Senior, the President
Speaker 1: Trump all so created truth social another way to go
Speaker 1: fight against this, Go build the world that you want.
Speaker 1: Elon Must did right. Elon Must He didn't build it,
Speaker 1: He went and bought it. He put his money where
Speaker 1: his mouth is building the world he wants. He bought Twitter,
Speaker 1: and he bought Twitter so that he could now create
Speaker 1: what he wants as free speech. Now, I'm not saying
Speaker 1: I agree with everything that Must does. I don't know
Speaker 1: everything that Must does, but I do like that and
Speaker 1: what I like more importantly, and I even respect with
Speaker 1: George Soros and Bill Gates as much as I dislike
Speaker 1: what they're doing. And that's very strongly I should. I
Speaker 1: could say it much stronger than that. But as much
Speaker 1: as I dislike what they're doing, what I do like
Speaker 1: what they're doing and we should all be copying them,
Speaker 1: is they're putting their money where their mouth is. They
Speaker 1: have a plan, they have a goal, it's written down.
Speaker 1: They're using their time, money and energy to building the
Speaker 1: world they want and what are you doing? What are
Speaker 1: you doing? So that was the big theme here at
Speaker 1: this Seapack event. I'm glad to see them saying that.
Speaker 1: I want to pound the table on that as well well,
Speaker 1: because it's never been more important. Now is the time
Speaker 1: for the entrepreneurs to wake up because you your voice
Speaker 1: is being silenced. And like I said, these people have
Speaker 1: a plan to change the world, and what are you doing?
Speaker 1: Ron de Sante's he's been in the news quite a
Speaker 1: bit this week. He's also trying to change the world.
Speaker 1: I saw a couple contradicting stories. There was a story
Speaker 1: of a teacher bragging about indoctrinating students with Marxist literature,
Speaker 1: and he says that revolutions have to involve violence. A
Speaker 1: self described communist teacher from Maryland bragged on social media
Speaker 1: about indoctrinating her students with Marxist literature and called for
Speaker 1: a fight against capitalism. M Now I wrote a book
Speaker 1: to counter that, so shameless plug here. Check it out.
Speaker 1: It's called The Uncommunist Manifesto. Check it out on Amazon,
Speaker 1: multiple best seller category. It's very affordable and you can
Speaker 1: read it in just about an hour hour and a half.
Speaker 1: Made it very accessible for everybody. So check that out,
Speaker 1: The Uncommunist manifest on Amazon. But as his teachers bragging
Speaker 1: openly about teaching that and teaching her kids that they
Speaker 1: should be not only commerce, but they should also be violent,
Speaker 1: we saw NBC's Chuck Todd criticized Ron de Santis by
Speaker 1: politicizing communism by teaching students about its evil history. So
Speaker 1: Ron de Santis signed into a law the Victims of
Speaker 1: Communism Day, which teaches students in the state the far
Speaker 1: left ideologies of murderous history. So when I was a
Speaker 1: kid growing up, I grew up when we still had
Speaker 1: the Cold War in the Berlin Wall, and I was
Speaker 1: taught what was going on in communism. I was taught
Speaker 1: that one hundred million people have died because of communism.
Speaker 1: But now we have these teachers praising its saying how
Speaker 1: good it is. Of course leaving out all the death
Speaker 1: and destruction that's in its wake, and so I applaud
Speaker 1: Ron de Santists for doing this. We should teach the truth.
Speaker 1: That's what I like, the truth. So it's okay apparently
Speaker 1: for this teacher to brag about distorting the truth and
Speaker 1: open the day and she's indoctrinating. But how dare the
Speaker 1: governor of Florida actually teach the truth and have a
Speaker 1: day for Victims of Communism Day which is still alive
Speaker 1: and well today, look at all the people trying to
Speaker 1: escape Cuba. It's still there. Anyway, if you're just tuning in,
Speaker 1: you're listening to the Markma Show, we're talking about the
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution, the way the world is changing, and I'm
Speaker 1: really pound on the table on the parallel economy. We
Speaker 1: need to go build the world that we want, and
Speaker 1: that's what's happening right now. That's what I'm challenging to do.
Speaker 1: Step up, build a business or support a business, and
Speaker 1: build the world you want. I gotta take a quick break.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna come back with more news headlines in a minute.
Speaker 1: Don't go away, I'll be right back, all right, Welcome back.
Speaker 1: If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Markma show.
Speaker 1: We're talking about the decentralized revolution. Of course, each end
Speaker 1: every week, who because the world is changing fast. You know,
Speaker 1: I talk about quite a bit the censorship of our
Speaker 1: freedom of speech. It's a big deal. It's a big
Speaker 1: deal for me, It should be a big deal for you.
Speaker 1: It's one of the things that is the foundation of society.
Speaker 1: It's the one thing that separates us from animals. We
Speaker 1: can communicate our ideas, and they want to take that away,
Speaker 1: the one thing that makes us so different than animals,
Speaker 1: and they want to take away our ability to communicate. Now,
Speaker 1: they don't want to take away our ability to communicate altogether.
Speaker 1: Of course, they'd love for us to sing the praises
Speaker 1: of the government. When you're in countries like you know
Speaker 1: well true communism through the USSR and even today like
Speaker 1: in North Korea, they want to destroy the family because
Speaker 1: they want you to worship the government. They want you
Speaker 1: to look at the leader of that country as like
Speaker 1: a deity, as a god. And so as long as
Speaker 1: you're singing the praises of the god small letter God,
Speaker 1: the leader, then they want they want that communication. But
Speaker 1: if you're saying anything against that, Well, then that's a
Speaker 1: big problem. And so of course they want to control speech.
Speaker 1: We talked about earlier in a segment how technology, when
Speaker 1: I say it all the time, technology changes things, and
Speaker 1: how the printing press and in the mid fourteen hundreds
Speaker 1: really led to the Protestant Reformation because they couldn't control
Speaker 1: the information, And how the Internet is doing the same thing.
Speaker 1: How dare you peasants be able to communicate without us?
Speaker 1: Do you think they want us to have that power?
Speaker 1: You think they want us to have the ability to
Speaker 1: get information on our own without their self approved narrative.
Speaker 1: Of course not, of course not. Look, I mean you
Speaker 1: don't have to be a genius to understand that they
Speaker 1: want to control a narrative. And they've used propaganda forever.
Speaker 1: In previous World Wars, we dropped flyers out of planes
Speaker 1: to get the propaganda out there. It's it's been done forever.
Speaker 1: It's just human psychology here, and of course they want
Speaker 1: to do that. I talked about the absurdity of having
Speaker 1: this banking collapse that we're in right now, and they're
Speaker 1: trying to blame it on the fact that Twitter might
Speaker 1: have caused it if only we didn't have free speech
Speaker 1: on Twitter, maybe the bank wouldn't have collapsed, So the
Speaker 1: answer would probably be to then Twitter should probably censor
Speaker 1: people that would say anything about a bank and collapse.
Speaker 1: That's that's what we should do. If anybody says anything
Speaker 1: about banks being risky or they could collapse, or that
Speaker 1: people should pull money out, we should certainly censor them.
Speaker 1: We should we should cut their accounts so that that
Speaker 1: would fix it, right, Or how about the banks just
Speaker 1: have our money so we could get it when we
Speaker 1: want it. Like if Peter Thiel caused the bank collapse
Speaker 1: of SVB because he tweeted out he was going to
Speaker 1: pull his money out, it seems like SVB was already
Speaker 1: ready to collapse. Now, of course that doesn't change the
Speaker 1: fact that that's not what they want. They can't fix
Speaker 1: the system, so instead they have to lie. When good
Speaker 1: ideas can't win on their own, they have no choice
Speaker 1: but to lie and censor. There's a saying It says,
Speaker 1: you don't prove a man wrong by ripping out his tongue,
Speaker 1: You only prove that you have something to hide. And
Speaker 1: so here we have a Gary Gensler, the head of
Speaker 1: the sec the Securities Exchange Commission, their only job is
Speaker 1: to protect consumers, which they have failed to do over
Speaker 1: and over and over again. In my opinion, they should
Speaker 1: shut down in disgrace. Gary Gensler should resign and the
Speaker 1: SEC should be shut down. But here they are, and
Speaker 1: now he's warning us that misconduct meta bank collapse will
Speaker 1: be prosecuted. Now they're not saying it exactly, but you
Speaker 1: get the gist of what they're saying. If you say something,
Speaker 1: it's it's sort of like the whole argument with freedom
Speaker 1: of speech, right is the thing, Well, you can't scream
Speaker 1: fire in a crowded theater. That's that's the line, right,
Speaker 1: So that's kind of like this point where freedom of
Speaker 1: speech kind of has its limits because you can't say
Speaker 1: something that would cause harm. So if if if we're
Speaker 1: in a crowd of theater and I screamed fire and
Speaker 1: then everybody rushed for the exits and one or two
Speaker 1: people got trampled to death, like I could be held liable.
Speaker 1: And so I guess what they're trying to say is, well,
Speaker 1: if you say that a bank is collapsing and you're
Speaker 1: pulling your money out, and that causes people to get
Speaker 1: their money out, and the bank does collapse, then you
Speaker 1: could be liable. I mean, where does this end? What
Speaker 1: type of injury is there? Right? Like, I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: responsible because I want to get my money out before
Speaker 1: it collapses. And I tell people that I know. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just insane, but of course that's where we are.
Speaker 1: You have to control the narrative at every chance. That's
Speaker 1: what the Protestant Reformation did, and of course they've failed miserably.
Speaker 1: I saw this week there was a big, big, big protest,
Speaker 1: of course, at a California college University California, Davis, and
Speaker 1: hundreds of masked protesters ANTIFA protesters, in my opinion, went
Speaker 1: there to prevent Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk from speaking. Now,
Speaker 1: he runs a big platform. He talks about very common
Speaker 1: sense things, and they don't want common sense because of
Speaker 1: course their ideas can't stand so, of course, because their
Speaker 1: ideas can't stand up, they have no choice but to
Speaker 1: censor what he's saying. That says here. The protesters were
Speaker 1: mostly wearing black. They clashed with law enforcement officers and students,
Speaker 1: including attendees of the event. They smashed windows, hurled eggs,
Speaker 1: used pepper spray, and blocked people from entering the university
Speaker 1: where the event was held. What you don't have to
Speaker 1: convince people like what you have to do again, you
Speaker 1: have to censor people. You have to prevent people from
Speaker 1: getting good information if you want your ideas to win.
Speaker 1: Otherwise they should be able to win in the court
Speaker 1: of public opinion. They should be openly discussed and there
Speaker 1: should be dialogue there. Elon Musk says quote not a
Speaker 1: peaceful protest at all. As he was looking at photos
Speaker 1: and videos of the protest as they surfaced, several people
Speaker 1: responded to must post a green. The protesters were violent,
Speaker 1: and some made comparisons to January six Capital protest. I
Speaker 1: didn't see that happening at the Capitol protest. I didn't
Speaker 1: see all. I didn't see hundreds of people spraying pepper
Speaker 1: spray and breaking all the windows. Maybe they did. Don't
Speaker 1: don't don't rely on any to do your own research there.
Speaker 1: But that's basically what's happened. And because they don't want
Speaker 1: free speech to happen, they can only censor. That's all
Speaker 1: they can do. And then, uh, we have we we
Speaker 1: do have a couple good politicians left. There are a couple. Uh,
Speaker 1: there's a small minority group on the Republican Party. That's
Speaker 1: pretty good. Now, overall, I'm not a big fan of politics. Overall,
Speaker 1: I don't like to get this red or blue, or
Speaker 1: red or left or right. At the end of the day, Uh,
Speaker 1: politicians want to tell me what to do. I believe
Speaker 1: that we should be free. I believe we're in the
Speaker 1: land of the free. And so you know, Ron de Santis,
Speaker 1: I like some of the stuff that he's doing, but
Speaker 1: he's still restricting my freedom and telling me what I
Speaker 1: can can't do. So I don't really like that. However,
Speaker 1: there are a couple of good guys, Jim Jordan being
Speaker 1: one of them, and he came heavy and hard. Of course,
Speaker 1: the Democrats hate him. He dropped the receipts. I like
Speaker 1: to call it the receipts, the proof. He dropped the
Speaker 1: receipts on the House Democrats talking about government censorship of course, right,
Speaker 1: and he was talking specifically about the Twitter files, talking
Speaker 1: about how the government was forcing Twitter to suppress free
Speaker 1: speech and in that it was a violation of the
Speaker 1: First Amendment. He said, rules for thee but not for me. Right,
Speaker 1: And so then the Democrat Party said, basically demanded that
Speaker 1: Jordan proved what he's talking about, so he said, I'd
Speaker 1: ask unanimous consent to enter into the record. The following
Speaker 1: email from Clark Humphrey, Executive Officer of the Presidency. That's
Speaker 1: the Biden administration. Hey, folks, this goes to Twitter. Hey
Speaker 1: wanted to they use the term, mister Goldman just used.
Speaker 1: They wanted to flag the below tweet and then wondering
Speaker 1: if we can get moving on the process for having
Speaker 1: it moved to asap. So he got their receipts directly
Speaker 1: from the Biden administration directly to Twitter saying want to
Speaker 1: flag the below tweet, wondering if we can get moving
Speaker 1: on the process for having it removed asap. How dare
Speaker 1: you say something about the presidency now? In Saudi Arabia
Speaker 1: they put people in prison for decades. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, there's two different cases I was reading about
Speaker 1: this week. I don't have them pulled up in front
Speaker 1: of me of people that were in the United States
Speaker 1: and used Twitter and said something negative about the Saudi
Speaker 1: Arabia government. They went back to Saudi Arabia for a
Speaker 1: business trip on one example. The other one I think
Speaker 1: was visiting family and they both were arrested and one
Speaker 1: of them serving like sixteen years in prison. That went
Speaker 1: serving like thirty years in prison because they said something
Speaker 1: critical of the government. This is where we're going. This
Speaker 1: is where it goes. First, they just sensor you on Twitter.
Speaker 1: After that they start putting you in jail. That's what
Speaker 1: Gary Gensler's promoting. Anyway, if you're just tuning in listening
Speaker 1: to the markmas Show, we're talking about some of the
Speaker 1: latest breaking news headlines of the week as we look
Speaker 1: through the decentralized Revolution. I gotta take a quick break.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna take a break for a minute. Don't go away,
Speaker 1: We'll be right back, all right, Welcome back. If you
Speaker 1: just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show.
Speaker 1: We're talking about the decentralized Revolution, and I'm running through
Speaker 1: some of the latest breaking news headlines of the week
Speaker 1: so you can see how this is changing. I call
Speaker 1: them the signposts. If I gave you directions to my house,
Speaker 1: and I said, oh, drive down the freeway to you
Speaker 1: see the sign make a ride, and then drive to
Speaker 1: you see this yellow fence and make a left, and
Speaker 1: when you see this mailbox, make it right. But I
Speaker 1: didn't tell you how far it was between those. You
Speaker 1: didn't know if it was going to be a ten
Speaker 1: minute drive or a ten hour drive. But what you
Speaker 1: do know is there's you know, ten or fifteen signposts,
Speaker 1: and as you're getting down towards the end, you know
Speaker 1: you're getting closer. And that's what these are, right, These
Speaker 1: news stories are the signpost to show us which direction
Speaker 1: we're going down. It's sort of how the FBI looks
Speaker 1: at terror threats and they look at the different threats
Speaker 1: on different scenarios that could happen, and they'd say, Okay, well,
Speaker 1: if this is going to happen, then this, this, this,
Speaker 1: this would have to happen. But if this was going
Speaker 1: to happen, then this set of events would have to happen,
Speaker 1: because they don't know exactly right, we don't know the future.
Speaker 1: And then they would go, well, these are the signs
Speaker 1: that are happening, so this must be the direction that
Speaker 1: we're going, and that's kind of what we're looking at.
Speaker 1: One that I just saw, I saw this warning that
Speaker 1: was just absolutely crazy to me was a new report
Speaker 1: says that crash test dummies aren't diverse enough. Crash test dummies,
Speaker 1: you know, like they put into cars as they crashed
Speaker 1: the cars to see if cars are safe. And supposedly
Speaker 1: because the dummies, you know, like the mannequin dummies that
Speaker 1: go in the car, because they're not diverse enough. It
Speaker 1: says that this lack of diversity and crash the dummies
Speaker 1: is costing people their lives. So apparently the color of
Speaker 1: the dummy in the car cost people in their lives. Hmm. Now,
Speaker 1: look the one the thing, the reason why this kind
Speaker 1: of hit my the thing that kind of caught my
Speaker 1: eye is because this tells us where we're at inside
Speaker 1: of the American Empire. So empires have about a two
Speaker 1: and fifty year timespan and they have about eight distinct
Speaker 1: kind of periods they go through, sort of like the
Speaker 1: Roman Empire. Right, So you can see where we're at
Speaker 1: in that by seeing what stage that we're in now.
Speaker 1: The last stages lead to decadence. Easy to see decadence
Speaker 1: when you see people spending last year with sixty eight
Speaker 1: million dollars for a for a for a jpeg. Right,
Speaker 1: we're in the age of decadence. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: just look at Still Valley Bank that just crashed. Ninety
Speaker 1: eight percent of those banks had those bank acounts had
Speaker 1: over two hundred fifty thousand dollars. That was the very
Speaker 1: very rich. We're in the age of decadence, but then
Speaker 1: it goes to the age of dependence. That's ubi, that's welfare,
Speaker 1: that's stimmy right, and then the final stage leads to bondage.
Speaker 1: And you can tell where we're at by the issues
Speaker 1: that we have. So if you went to a country
Speaker 1: like Turkey or Argentina or Lebanon where they're you know, starving,
Speaker 1: I don't think they care about the diversity of a
Speaker 1: crash dummy. You only care about the diversity of a
Speaker 1: crash dummy when you have nothing else to worry about.
Speaker 1: And that's where we're at. It's just it's just a
Speaker 1: sign this is where we're at. Man, it is crazy.
Speaker 1: A couple other headlines that I saw that I just
Speaker 1: kind of really illustrate this as well, was you can
Speaker 1: tell you can tell the stage of the empire by
Speaker 1: how they prosecute crimes. Do they prosecute crimes committed against
Speaker 1: other citizens more more firm or strong than they do
Speaker 1: crimes against themselves? What do I mean by that? So
Speaker 1: if I kill you, or I if I defraud your
Speaker 1: business are still from your business? How am I prosecuted
Speaker 1: versus how am I prosecuted if I defraud the government
Speaker 1: or set another way, what if I work for the government. Right, So,
Speaker 1: for example, if you're a you know, forty year old
Speaker 1: construction worker driving home after dinner and you had two
Speaker 1: glasses of wine, you get pulled over. Maybe you're just
Speaker 1: barely over the legal limit of alcohol, which I'm not
Speaker 1: saying is a good thing. Your life could be ruined.
Speaker 1: Your life could be ruined, right, I mean, you get
Speaker 1: your license taken away, your fins, you probably can't pay,
Speaker 1: you know, your truck gets impounded, all these things, or
Speaker 1: you know, hypothetic speaking, you could be like the husband
Speaker 1: of like a you know, speaker of the house or
Speaker 1: something like that, and get a dui and then get nothing. Hypothetically. Now,
Speaker 1: the irs we've been talking about how they want they're
Speaker 1: going dire. You know, all these new agents spend all
Speaker 1: this money to come do audits on you, and they
Speaker 1: want to know where every penny, well every six hundred
Speaker 1: dollars go. They want to shine a flashlight into your
Speaker 1: account and where did that six hundred dollars got from
Speaker 1: or go? Because they want to find out if your
Speaker 1: six hundred dollars is cheating on taxes, we need that money. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: an IRS audit finds out there's forty two thousand Feds
Speaker 1: cheating on their taxes. More than forty two thousand federal
Speaker 1: employees repeatedly failed to file their taxes with the IRS,
Speaker 1: according to a new audit that said the government is
Speaker 1: limited in its ability to punish the cheats, known as
Speaker 1: federal employee non filers. The cases are considered particularly us
Speaker 1: since they involve those paid by taxpayer money but shirking
Speaker 1: taxpayer obligations. But the IRS devotes little effort to targeting
Speaker 1: federal nonfilers, according to the Treasury Inspector General for the
Speaker 1: Tax Administration, and the law restricts how much information the
Speaker 1: IRS can share. So we're hiring all these dwe agents
Speaker 1: and we're gonna spend all this money to come after
Speaker 1: you and your six hundred dollars. But we have all
Speaker 1: these federal employees who don't file their taxes, and they're
Speaker 1: getting paid with your money. So you're paying them, you're
Speaker 1: paying their salary, they don't pay their taxes, and they
Speaker 1: don't get prosecuted. Meanwhile, you could go to prison. So again,
Speaker 1: you can tell where we're at in the age of
Speaker 1: an empire by the signs. These are a signpost. There
Speaker 1: want more signposts. So let's take a look at a
Speaker 1: couple we saw. Supposedly Tucker Carlson blew up his career
Speaker 1: because he showed video evidence of the January sixth thing.
Speaker 1: Apparently the Democrats say that he doctored the evidence. He
Speaker 1: doctored the information. Well, from what I saw, it just
Speaker 1: looked like video footage that I could draw my own
Speaker 1: conclusions off of. I didn't see any doctor in there.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's not there. I just didn't see it.
Speaker 1: The way that we would know is if they just
Speaker 1: released it all and we could just look at it ourselves.
Speaker 1: Of course they don't want to do that, but according
Speaker 1: to a January sixth attorney, they're alleging. The attorney representing
Speaker 1: Dominic Pizzola alleged that the FBI committed crimes by altering
Speaker 1: evidence and requested the court appoint a special master to
Speaker 1: review the evidence. So I ever heard of something called projection.
Speaker 1: It's when you you're the one doing something wrong, but
Speaker 1: then you try to say other people are the ones
Speaker 1: doing it right. Like if you're cheating on your business
Speaker 1: partner or your spouse, but then like you're accusing them
Speaker 1: of doing it, sort of like that, right, So they're
Speaker 1: saying that that it was Tucker who altered the evidence,
Speaker 1: but it looks like they were the ones altering the
Speaker 1: evidence all along. They were the ones that had the evidence.
Speaker 1: They were the ones that would never release the evidence.
Speaker 1: They were the one that kept it all so that
Speaker 1: they could show their own narrative. Remember, the truth is
Speaker 1: like disinfected. The truth is like a light. It shines
Speaker 1: into the darkness. They would not release the evidence because
Speaker 1: they want to control the narrative. Now that it's out there,
Speaker 1: we can see it for ourselves. Now we have all
Speaker 1: these court cases that I hope will get re reviewed,
Speaker 1: and I don't know. Look, I'm not I'm not here
Speaker 1: to say one way or the other because I don't
Speaker 1: have all the evidence. But what I would like is
Speaker 1: I would like for the information and the truth to
Speaker 1: be transparent. I would like that all of the evidence
Speaker 1: is out there, and I would like these court cases
Speaker 1: to be retried fairly. Everyone deserves a fair trial, and
Speaker 1: they should get the full information out there and it
Speaker 1: should be rereviewed in my opinion. But what am I.
Speaker 1: I'm just some guy on the radio listening out. By
Speaker 1: the way, if you're just doing it and you listen
Speaker 1: to the Mark Moas Show, we talk about the decentralized revolution.
Speaker 1: We were running through some of the biggest breaking news
Speaker 1: headlines of this week, so you can see how the
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution is playing out. I'm having a special live
Speaker 1: event next week. If you want to come hang out,
Speaker 1: just go to go dot one, markmass dot com, slash crash,
Speaker 1: Go dot one, markmass dot com, slash crash, hit me
Speaker 1: up on social media at one Mark Moss and that's
Speaker 1: what I got. Thanks for listening.