WEBVTT - The Story of Internet Explorer, Part 2

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tex Stuff from dot

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>com Either guys, it's Jonathan Strickland with tech Stuff, and

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we're about to jump right into part two of our

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>history of Internet Explorer, the full Internet Explorer's story, and

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we even have something to add to that story since

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we recorded this episode. When Nate and I were talking

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>about Internet Explorer, neither of us knew the name of

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the successor to Internet Explorer. We just knew the code

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>name was Project Spartan. But now we know that the

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>name is Microsoft Edge that's going to be the successor.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And I just wanted to throw that into the intro

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>before we got right back into the discussion. And now

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>let's rejoin that talk with Nate Langson from gloom Verb.

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>In August two one, Microsoft would launch Internet Explorer six,

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>which became a huge debacle. Um it was included in

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>copies of Windows XP, one of the most popular operating

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>systems of all time. I know people who still would

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>prefer to use Windows XP to any of the other

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>operating systems that have come out since then. There are

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of legacy systems that depend upon Windows XP,

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and you cannot migrate to a new operating system without

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>reinventing all these legacy systems that interact with it. Uh there.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>There used to be a joke about how people would

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>stay on Windows XP, and now it's kind of a

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>sad one. So I E six comes out bundled with

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Windows XP. That also means that I E six has

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>continued to be used long after you would expect people

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to have changed, you know, upgrade to some other version

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of Internet Explorer. UM. PC World this is where we

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>get the sad part. Called it the least secure software

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>on the planet because I had so many vulnerabilities. It

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>made the list of twenty five worst tech products of

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>all time from PC World. It was number eight and

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>number seven was a different Microsoft product, one that I

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>did a full episode of tech Stuff about Microsoft Bob

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Bob so it's named by Bill Gates wife. I believe

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we had a whole the episode. If you haven't listened

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to the episode of tech Stuff, I highly recommend you

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>go and check that out. Lauren Vogelbaumb was by co

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>host on that one, and we had a grand old

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>time dissecting Bob uh and and it was her first

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>time ever encountering Bob and boy. I mean the fact

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>that I E six ranked higher on the list, then

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Bob tells you how bad I E six was, because

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Bob was atrocious. So this was another one of those problem.

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>It was ripe with vulnerabilities that allowed hackers to get

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that same kind of level of access to a computer,

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever level the user was logged in at. So if

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you were a giant business and you only allowed your

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>employees to log in under a lower access level, then

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that was bad but probably manageable. If you were one

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of those businesses that allow employees to log in at

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the admin level, it was catastrophic. And because I E

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>six was lumped in with Windows XP, and because Windows

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>XP was so popular, it meant that it was a

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>target rich environment. Now, Nate, you you being a Mac user,

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you one of the Mac users who who very

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>smugly trumpets the fact that Max are largely UM free

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>from issues of viruses and malware. No, I'm one of

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the people that says that they are. Well, yes I

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>am in a way, I am actually completely But what

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I what I don't say is that MAX can't get

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>viruses or that they are more secure. Um. They are

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>in as much as everyone targets Windows and therefore far

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>far fewer people are targeting MAX. But on the other hand,

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>MAX can also be conduits for viruses, so you are

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>able to pass on a virus even if you are

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>immune to it. You can you can be a carrier

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but not be be affected by it directly. That said,

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't run antivirus because I don't care about Windows users.

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Well why get vaccinated, right, I mean, uh yeah, yeah,

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this this, this is a great but this is a

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>great point to make, and that again, PCs had so

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>much of the market share. I mean, we're still at

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the point where MAX had not really made a big debt.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It would be it wouldn't be until the mid to

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>late two thousand's that we really started seeing the Mac

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>take off on a on a true market share level,

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>which meant that if you're a hacker and you're designing

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>malware and you're trying to hit as many people as

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>possible that's your goal, then you go to where the

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>people are, and the people were at PCs on Windows

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>based machines, specifically Windows XP and Internet Explorer six had

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>all these vulnerabilities. It was open season for hackers, which

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why it made this this list of the words

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>tech products, I mean, if if it's a gateway, if

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft had not patch goal of vulnerabilities, it's a huge issue. Now,

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft did start to issue patches very quickly, but it

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>was still one of those things that became a black

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>eye for the company. Uh. In fact, the problem was

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>so serious that the United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>told people, Hey, if you don't have to use as

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer, don't use something else. And then the only

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>times you should use Internet Explorer is when you have

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>no other option, like it's it's something that's only compatible

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>with Internet Explorer. Um. I've had I've worked at companies

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>where the intranet would only be accessible through Internet Explorer.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Other browsers just could not render those pages. Um, which

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>could be a very frustrating experience for someone who doesn't

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>prefer to use Internet Explorer unless I can't I don't

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>have any other option. Nate, have you ever had that

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>issue too, where you've had to worked someplace where the

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>way a system was designed, you had to use a

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>specific type of browser to access it. Um. I'm I

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>work at one now, so I probably shouldn't say very much.

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's a very secure internal culprit environment. Sure, And

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and I mean that that's one of the reasons why,

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I still have a version of Internet Explorer

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that runs on my machine because, uh, there there are

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>certain internal technologies we use that it really only works

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with Internet Exploring. Now once once it's up on the web,

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>any browser can see the stuff, but for the internal

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>purposes we use things that will only work with Internet Explorer.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course we're also very concerned about security. So

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it's but it's one of those things that you know,

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>if if you had built it on Internet Explorer six,

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this would be a huge concern obviously because of those vulnerabilities. Um, Fortunately,

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think most companies don't rely on that, or they

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are relying on one that has been patched thoroughly so

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that those vulnerabilities are no longer an issue. But it was,

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, for someone who doesn't like Grandma, who doesn't

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily know how this stuff works, it's a problem, right.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not easy to explain to someone who hasn't

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>grown up around the world of software and software patches

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that this is an issue at all. It's I mean,

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it's hard enough just to explain that this is not

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, it's a browser. So yeah, so definitely. It

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was a black mark against Microsoft UM And it's funny

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>because I looked on Granted, it depends upon what source

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you use, but I looked at one uh resource that

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>looks at the market share various browsers, and three point

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>one of users in China, according to this source, are

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>still using Internet Explorers six three. It seems like a

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>small number, but that means hundreds of thousands of people

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>are still using Internet Explorers six and that's yeah, I

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>means incredible. China is an interesting one, and because of

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the rempants piracy that has taken place the over the

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>last couple of day cades, in particular when it comes

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:06.599
<v Speaker 1>to computer software, and there are so many old computers

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 1>out there, computers that physically can't run more recent operating

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>systems that for some machines that may be the limit

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of what they can even install because of how old

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the hardware is. The same in in in in parts

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of India, so that's probably a factor. The other The

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>other thing is that there are a lot of banks,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, that have this really old software installed.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that's the case in China particularly, but

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>just generally, there are a lot of a lot of

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>places and schools too. I mean, and that's the other thing,

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is that when you spend a lot of money and

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>energy and resources on building an infrastructure and it's using

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a particular particular suite of software or a particular operating system,

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, you've created this system that now we

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>call legacy system at the time. Of course, it's not

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a legacy. It's just what you built, and you built

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it because you needed something, and this, you know, the

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>suite did the stuff you needed. The problem is that,

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't necessarily have those resources to dedicate

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to reinventing that every time there's a new operating system

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that comes out, especially if you're talking about really big

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>systems where it would require a massive effort across multiple

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>locations in order for everyone to stay in communication with

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>each other. And that's where you run into these problems.

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there are no easy solutions, it's very

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>easy for us to say, hey, upgrade your operating system

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>or upgrade your browser, because on a user to user level,

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not as big a deal. I mean, it might

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>require some financial investment. If you're talking about having to

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>get a new machine that's capable of running a newer

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>version of that software. But ultimately, ultimately it's not as

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>big a deal as is telling a an industry or

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>even just a particular oller company within that industry, hey

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you need to do this. It's a much larger effort

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>on that their part. So as flippant as I'm being,

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I do realize that, you know, it's not so simple

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>as oh, we need to we need to install this

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>new program. It's you know, sometimes it's not the new browser.

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, Nate could require uh, more advanced hardware

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>or a more advanced operating system. Yeah, all right, So

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that was two thousand one. Now we're going to skip

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead to two thousand four because there were no updates

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in that time. But on November nine, two four, a

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:44.599
<v Speaker 1>big competitor to Internet Explorer would launch the Mozilla foundations

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Firefox one point Oh goes live now. Firefox was the

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>first real challenger to the dominance of Internet Explorer, uh,

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to to really you know, capture a lot of people's attention.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Before there had and devotees of other browsers, but they

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>were pretty small audiences. Firefox was one that actually threatened

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to take some real uh chunks out of Microsoft and

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>part of that was because there was still this ongoing

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>issue with Internet Explorer six and the security vulnerabilities that

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>had had such a you know, I had a pretty

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>bad reputation. Meanwhile, you might say, well, why why didn't

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft come out with a new version, Well, until Firefox

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>came out, there wasn't really a need for it, right,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there were no If you don't have a competitor,

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>then you don't have a lot of incentive to improve

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>your product. That's one of the problems, one of the reasons,

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the big reasons you don't want any monopolies

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>out there, because you would rather have competition that drives

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the various entities to continue to innovate and invest in

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>their technology so that you ultimately get better stuff out

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>of it. If there are no competitors, then you got

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to just hope that the entities are motivated enough to

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>continue that innovation and investment, which is not always the case,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't in this one. So October two thousand

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>six we see Microsoft launched Internet Explorer seven because Firefox

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>was starting to eat at Microsoft's heels. It was starting

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to take up some of that market share, and Microsoft

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>suddenly realized, hey, we might have a problem here. We

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>might need to to start really looking at innovating in

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>this space again, because we're not the only player in

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>town anymore. So this was a five year you know,

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>absence of updates, and then we finally get one in

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six. Um. So Internet Explore seven was also

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the first time they changed the name, because the previous

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>editions of Internet Explorer were all called Microsoft Internet Explorer whatever.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>This time they were called Windows Internet Explorer whatever. So

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Windows Internet Explorer seven u interesting because of the settlement

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>with the United States Department of Justice earlier about how

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they didn't really want to give the indication that Windows

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and Internet Explorer were so tightly integrated. But after the

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>settlement of that case, I guess they were. Microsoft was

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at it saying, look, if you if you use

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the Windows environment, this is the browser you want. I

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>guess that was their marketing push, I suppose, And it

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>became the bundled browser for a much maligned piece of software,

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Windows Vista. I think Windows Vista did more for Macintosh

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>sales than Apple ever did. Was it wasn't It wasn't

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>great to begin with. It was basically all right by

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the end, but yeah, it was. It was one of

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>those that did require patches to make it to the

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>point where people gave it that kind of damning praise. Right, well,

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it was all right by the end, it was okay,

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but when it came out, it was not okay. Uh.

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>There were a lot of issues. I mean, I remember

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>all the different permissions windows that would pop up whenever

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to do anything, and windows and staff and

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it was almost like Microsoft had overreacted to the problems

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it had experienced previously with products like Internet Explorer six,

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>where I said, well, we want to make sure that

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we are being really uh concerned with security and safety.

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So now you're going to have to go through five

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>permissions pages whenever you want to run anything on your machine,

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>every time you want to run it. So this was maligned,

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>probably justifiably when it first came out, but then, like

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>like we said, it got better with patches, although it

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>was too little, too late at that point, I think.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And essentially you had all these different people and companies,

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>school systems, everything saying you know what, we're gonna stick

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>with Windows XP because even though this operating system is

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the new one, it breaks everything. So I'm going to

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>use this older operating system. Uh. And I can say

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>like in my career, we went from Windows XP to

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven. We did not. We did not transition to Vista.

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I went Windows XP to Mac. Um not particularly because

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of Vista, to be honest, Um, but I but but

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the turning point for a lot

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of people. It was either ignore Vista and then moved

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to seven, or ignore Vista and moved to the Mac. Yeah.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, and I think even you know,

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at at some of the other operating systems out there,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>things like Lenox, I mean, you know, I don't think well,

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Lennox has its own like devotees who are all the

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>developers who who love to work with that operating system

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and help make it better. And it's almost like a

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>crowdsourced OS. Uh. But they you know, I think things

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like Vista definitely help fuel that kind of passion because

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at what is the product of a corporation

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>saying here's what we think at operating system should be

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>versus uh, something like uh Mac, which you know, Apple

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>has done a great job at positioning themselves as we

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>know that you think you know what you want, but

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>we're telling you what you want and you're gonna love it,

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and it works because it's designed so well. Uh. And

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>then you have the Linux approach, whereas we know what

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we want because we're the ones making it. Yes, well

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>there is that as well. And and and Linux is

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>so infinitely flexible from the you know, if you want

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to build your own operating system, you know version of

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Linux once that was designed in the style of an

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>anime series called Serial Experiments Lane, which is a very

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>weird techie anime if you want to check that out.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to point something out that we actually

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't discuss and put in show notes here, but it

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just occurred to me as we've been talking that there

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>was a there was a it's parallel chain in computer

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>usage at this point in the Internet Explorer lifestyle, which

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was the introducing and introduction and success of the netbook

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that did the opposite of what Microsoft would have wanted

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>with Vista, which required, you know, more of a high powered,

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>high spect machine. It was much visually it was much

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>more visually rich. Vista was that is versus XP and

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>then the netbook came out and became this giant pre

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>iPad pre tablet craze of hundred dollar little portable notebooks

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that needed to run really low power old stuff. So

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>they ran XP and they ran I six or they

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>ran Linux of course, um, you know, and I think

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that that that was such a popular choice of machine

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for admittedly only maybe a couple of years, but I

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>think it may have made a difference at the whole

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>XP thing. And definitely once two seven rolls around, you

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>had Apple introduced the iPhone, and that really changed the

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>game because suddenly you had well, at least here in

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the United States, I mean here in the US. This

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is where Nate can can kind of chuckle, because in

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the US the smartphone was adopted very late on the

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>consumer side, Whereas you know, in Europe you had some

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>some smartphones that had traction before the iPhone came out.

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Here in the US, the iPhone might as well have

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>been the first smartphone ever. The only people who had

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>any other type of smartphone were executives who had blackberries

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>here in the US. That was very kind of you.

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>It was very kind of you to to suggest that

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>we were far ahead of the game. I think really

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that the sort of we're in the realms of the

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of Nokia Communicate a sort of thing, and they

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>weren't they weren't particularly smart, but they were more feature

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>rich definitely than in some of the U S phones

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because because no kid didn't do anything really in North

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>America at the time, right, yeah, here, if you had

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>a phone that could browse the web via text like

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it was just a text based browser, then you were

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the game. And then but then the iPhone

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>comes out, and uh, suddenly you have a new way

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>of viewing the web, which would get improved considerably with

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.959
<v Speaker 1>future generations of the iPhone, and then with competitors like

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the Android phone, and ultimately with Windows Mobile, Windows Phone

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>and then just Windows for mobile devices. Um. But you know,

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that really change the game big time, to the point

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>where now if you look at market share of what's

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>being used to browse the web, the mobile devices are

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>killing it. And so you see things like iOS is

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge player in market share for web browsers if

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you're if you include mobile devices, if you look at

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just desktops, then Internet Explorer is still a large a

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>large player, especially once you factor in all the different

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>versions of Internet Explorer. They're still in use. But two

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven ends up being a big year because we

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>start seeing mobile become a true competitor, or at least

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a a potential competitor in the web browsing space. March

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine would be when Microsoft launched Internet Explorer eight,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>which was the first browser to pass the Acid too test.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Did not pass the acid three tests, but it passed

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the acid to test, which was that's a test designed

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to check a browser's ability to render a web page

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>based upon the intended design of that page. This goes

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>back to what I was saying before, where you just

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>painstakingly create a web page and you can't wait for

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>someone to see it. I mean by by can't wait,

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you if you could go back and

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>visit the web pages of the mid nineties, I guarantee

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you that more than eighty percent of them would have

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a counter somewhere on that web page that would tell

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you what number you were to visit that web page. Uh.

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Those were ubiquitous back in the day. Do you remember

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>those where you'll be like, oh, look, I I was

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the hundred and third thousand person to visit this website.

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I remember installing one of mine and just thinking like,

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>why do I do this? I can like, it's been

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>three months and I can still count the number of

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>people who have visited my website on two hands. But

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, that was one of those things where again,

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you put this care into it, and you

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to make sure that all the browsers were

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>going to render it properly. Uh. And it was very

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>important for Microsoft at the time because they were no

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>longer like no one version of Internet Explorer was now

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the dominant one because Firefox had done so well. So

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're the dominant player, then sure you could essentially

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>define how web pages should look. Your browser is the

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>one that people should be designing for because you're the

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one that most people are using, and anyone who's using

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a different web browser is going to have a potentially,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, a less than ideal experience. But who

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>cares because you're the one who's the biggest player in town.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>When you're no longer the biggest player in town or

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there are viable competitors out there, you have to start

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>rethinking that strategy. So Microsoft did a good thing here

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and building a web browser that was going to be

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>more true to the designs of the web page administrators

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>than what they had previously been doing and also benefited

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>those of us who actually used Firefox or some other

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>browser at that time, So that was that was good

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. It's an interesting period because all this time,

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>all this discussion, Opera was chugging along in the background

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>doing its thing. And just as we've been talking, I

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>just download and installed Uper on my map because I

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to see what it looks like these days.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Is based on Chromium UM, like like Google Chrome is.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Opera has always been this underdog. It's

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>just never done very well at market share wise, but

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's always had this incredibly loyal fan base and does

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>really innovative things on the mobile side, and always has.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And I remember and about two thousand and seven, I

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wrote an article of the c net saying Opera should

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>stop making desktop browsers and just focus on mobile as

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>its future. And I had one person who said that

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I should throw myself off the top of the c

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>NET building for saying something so heinous against the beloved

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Opera browser. Right, And I still, you know, nearly ten

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>years on, I stand by that they should focus on

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>mobile um and I hope that person revisits my article

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>from seven and says, oh, yes, you were right. Well,

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's very forward thinking because, as it turns out,

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, mobile browsing has become so important now that

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that's where everybody is looking. I mean, you know, not

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that desktop browsing has gone away, or that there aren't

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>other platforms. I mean, heck, I sometimes I browse the

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>web very rarely, but sometimes I browse the web on

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>my xbox so that I can watch certain content that

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't otherwise, or that I, um you know, might

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>want to have a podcast on in the background, and

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the easy, the best way for me to play it.

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Um so. But the mobile certainly is is at least

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as important, if not more important, than desktop browsing is

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>these days. So everyone really needed to be looking at mobile.

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you were really just giving some valuable advice, honestly,

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I really I was trolling for page views mostly,

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>but but it was based on it was based on

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>real opinion and a fact. I believe, you know, we

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we've all engaged in some clickbait at some point or another.

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, uh so. Internet Explorer eight is

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>currently the second most popular version of Internet Explorer as

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>far as market share goes. Keep in mind, we're up

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to eleven now, and in fact, in an Internet Explorer

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven is the current most popular version of i E

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on the market. I E eight is second, So that

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>means nine and ten didn't do quite so well. Uh.

0:25:56.359 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps I'm not saying this is nest necesarily the case,

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps one of the reasons that it has done

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>so well for so long is that is the last

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>version of Internet Explorer that's capable of running on a

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Windows XP machine. So it maybe that we have still

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a significant number of folks out there who are running

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the Windows XP operating system. They never upgraded to Vista

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>or seven or eight or ten now, Uh, and they're

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>they're staying with Windows XP for one reason or another,

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and they might be running Internet Explorer eight. That's a guess,

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's a fair one. Yeah. I mean,

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in the mobile world, it's I'm sure a lot of

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>people listening have had the experience of downloading an app

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and then downloading an update a week later, right firing

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>up the app and being told that your OS is

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>out of date and you need to update, and that's

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>because Apple or or Android or something has been up

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>has A has released an update in the time between

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you unloading the app and firing up the app, and

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you've updated the app in that time without firing it

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>up or updating your OS, and it's already out of date.

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Like it's crazy. Personally, I haven't had that issue, but

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that's because I use the Next of six, so I

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>get those updates like immediately. But then although iPhone users

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>out there like, yeah, that's regular uperating procedure for me, Yeah,

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I have an Next to six as well, to be fair,

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I do. Yeah, that's so sort of my Android sort

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of test phone thing, of course, because I I used

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that for your main phone has to be an iPhone night,

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I imagine. Yeah, alright, how do you like the Next

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of six? I know this is a tangient, but I

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have to ask. Um. I love it. I really like it. Um.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I use the iPhone six plus is my main phone.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>To the next is six just feels like an evolution

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of that. UM feel wise and the screens, the screens nice,

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the battery life for me has been pretty good, and

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the I don't know. I just like it, but I

0:27:57.920 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>don't use it that much, to be honest. It was

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>it's just like a like a uh, sort of a

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 1>dunny review unit type thing that's just been hanging around, right.

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I just wish it were a little bit larger, so

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that way, if I held it over my head on

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a sunny day, I could shade my entire body. It

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is a big phone. It isn't become but like I said,

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't use it that much. It's it's mostly there

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for me to test Android and if I need, if

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to review right about new apps, it's just there. Um, yeah,

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, Yeah, I understand. Well, getting back to Internet Explorer,

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>this is where we're starting to talk about some of

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the boring ones for me. So I guess that's why

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm so eager to go off on tangents. But March

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explore nine debuts, and I had the tagline the

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Beauty of the Web, so finally we could experience that.

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I was it was good that by two thousand eleven

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we could finally see the beauty of the web after

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>all that text and the red x is for images

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't load. Um, this one wasn't tied to the

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>premiere of any new operating system, which might be one

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why it's not as popular as I

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>E eight or I E eleven because it was not

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't bundled with an operating system UM, so it

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>could run on Windows Vista Service Pack two or later

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>versions of the Windows operating system. There was no support

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>for Windows XP. Like we said, I E eight was

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the last Internet Explorer to run on that platform. And

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you could do things like you could pen websites to

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the application bar, which would allow you to navigate straight

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to those right away. So if there were sites that

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you always go to, you know, you just you know there,

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there's always there's three that I always opened up first

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>thing in the day, as soon as I load up

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>my browser, then it would make sense to pen those

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>first three just to be able to click on whichever

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>ones or even pin them together. You could do that

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>as well, where you could open up multiple tabs and

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just associate the ones that you always go to first thing.

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>That way, you don't have to spend those precious that

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>calories typing in the first few letters of whatever you

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are l you go to each time. UM but a

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>very innovative approach at the time. And UH. It also

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>had a download manager that would allow users to pause

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>downloads and alert users to potentially malicious files, very important

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>as far security is concerned. Something that is pretty much

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>standardized throughout all browsers now, but with brand new back

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in at least for Internet Explorer anyway, and its includes

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>support for HTML five for audio and video tags. So

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we started to see that that migration, which is still

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>happening from four to five UM, so you know, it

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>was important. It just didn't make a huge impact. In fact,

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't even I don't think I've ever used I

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>E nine. I don't think I ever got to a

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>point where I used that. I yeah, I don't know.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I I think I will have done because

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I was I was all Mac at that point. My

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>machine I was at Wired at the time. My all

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>my my machines at Wired were all Max as well.

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But I did always have UM either a Parallels installation

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of Windows so I could do my browser test because

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I always did the browser reviews UM for seen it

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, and then Wired as well after that,

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>so I always sort of kept I kept them installed,

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so I must have used it at some point, but

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly I seven was the last one that I could

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>honestly say I really remember using possibly I E eighty.

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>That so no, no, no lasting impression here. Um yeah,

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that people with MAX would yeah, I run

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>boot camp, so I could run I E nine. That

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>would really shock me. I would not be I would

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>be a well why please tell me what? What's the

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you why you might want to do that.

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Max or some of the particularly quite a while was

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.479
<v Speaker 1>some of the best Windows machines you could buy, Like

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>buy a MacBook Air and put Windows on. It is

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a better experience for most Windows users who didn't want

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to use a map, or rather who didn't want to

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>use O S. Turn right, Well did you uh? Do

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you do? You find it amusing when PC users try

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to go the other way and create hackintosh is It

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>seems like a bit of a waste of time. But

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I suspect that there are people that are probably doing

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it more for the joy of making it work than

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's productive for them to do so.

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Once they've done it, you know what I mean. But

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I also say I mean I am a Windows user.

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean my gaming machine is a Windows PC. It's

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a big fat gaming rig with a twenty one nine

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>ultra y curved monitor that's all Windows but but it

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>literally loads Steam and most realistically, it really loads Elder

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Scrolls Online as soon as I turn it on like

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing else. I was gonna say, like, with that huge screen,

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be papers. Please, you're just playing papers please? Yeah, No,

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it's my immersive Elder Scrolls experience. Well that's that's good now.

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I know. I know what MMO. I could run into

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you if I ever, if I ever dive into that world.

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh please, do you all welcome? You would make a

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>fantastic nod. I'm still playing. Actually, I'm still playing Skyrim again.

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I keep playing it through. I don't know

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>why I've played. I finally actually finished the game. For

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the longest time, I was not finishing the game. I

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>was just doing all the side quests. So maybe I

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>need to Maybe I finally need to say goodbye to

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Skyrim and jump on. We should take this conversation offline,

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>because I definitely want to persuade you to get into

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Elder Scrolls Online. But we'll we'll save Elder Scrolls for

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.479
<v Speaker 1>a future tech stuff, perhaps because that in itself has

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a rich history as a franchise. We'll revisit. Yeah. I

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>actually I remember getting to play the early build of

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that at a c E three several years ago. But okay,

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll say that for the next one. Let's let's let's

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>power on through the end of Internet Explorer. April twelve, eleven,

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that's when Microsoft announces Internet Explorer ten. It was less

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>than a month from releasing Internet Explorer nine, so they

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>released nine, and less than a month later they say, Hey,

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explored ten is coming, which seems like a weird choice,

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>especially when Internet Explorer nine wasn't being bundled with an

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>operating system. So I don't know why they expected people

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to migrate to nine if they announced, hey, something even

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>better is coming really soon. That that to me is

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a very odd decision. Um. I honestly don't understand the

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>motivation behind that, unless they just probably for like accounting

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>purposes more than anything else to show in return on investment.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I mean that since Internet Explorer wasn't like a

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>product that you would go out and purchase, maybe they

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>just didn't care. It's kind of hard to say. Uh.

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>They showed a demo of an early build of I

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>E ten at the MIX eleven conference in Las Vegas,

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>d M i x UH conference in Vegas, I've never

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>been to that one. That's one of the few that

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I have not attended. UH. It was September two thousand eleven.

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>They showed the developer preview of Windows eight UM that

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>ended up becoming available to the general public. So if

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to get your hands on an early build

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>of Windows eight and then be one of the many

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:17.479
<v Speaker 1>people who complained about the metro uh layout, you could

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>have done that. Then I was one of those people. Yeah.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>We we actually just had a machine here at how

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works that was the Windows eight machine, and it

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>was a Windows eight machine that did not have a

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 1>well no one, no one was using it. Well, first

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>of all, there wasn't a whole lot of software we

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>could use with it, and secondly, we didn't have a

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>touch sensitive screen. So you were using this interface that

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>was clearly designed after the UI you would see in

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a tablet, but transmitted transferred rather to a desktop experience.

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you didn't have a touch screen monitor and

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you were navigating it through your basic keyboard and mouse,

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it was not a very satisfied experience, at least not

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for me. I could easily see why it would be

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>very attractive if you were using a touch screen device,

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>although I'm not big on touch screen monitors because I

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>don't like having big, old, greasy fingerprints all over my

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>monitor all the time. UM. I prefer my desktop to

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>be still keyboard and mouse until something better comes along.

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 1>What about you, do you use touch screen monitors? No point?

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah here, I don't see. I don't see. I don't

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>see a benefit to that, at least not in the

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>current hardware iterations that are out there. Yeah, I don't.

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the idea of having to reach across

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and touch the screen anyway. I'm also lazy, so anything

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that smacks of effort I would like to edge away

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>from unless it was absolutely necessary. I e. Ten would

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>end up being bundled with Windows eight and Window Windows

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Server in the fall, and it had two modes. I

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>had the Metro mode, so if you launched it in

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the Metro they they no longer call it Metro, but

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>at the time that's what we all referred to it as.

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>If you launched it when it was in the Metro layout,

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>which was that tiled layout of Windows eight, it had

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a limited limited features and it also ended up eliminating

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>uh pretty much the entire user interface was eliminated from

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 1>casual glance. You would have to swipe from the bottom

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or the top in order to pull things up, But

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>otherwise it was meant to give the website the entirety

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of your screens landscape. I can appreciate that on one level.

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I like the idea of slimming down your your frames

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>so that you're giving the website as much attention and

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>as much of the focus of the user as possible.

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:45.879
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I want to be able

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to easily navigate to other sites if I need to,

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not crazy about completely hiding it away. Ah.

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that might have been a bit much. If

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you launched it in the desktop version of Internet Explorer,

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a little more like the earlier versions, so

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it had more of the capabilities built into it. Um

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think Windows eight was really Microsoft's approach

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to trying to make the operating system as accessible to

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as broad range of people as possible, and I'm not

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sure clearly they weren't entirely successful. They The rapid development

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of Windows ten kind of points to that, and also

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>just the upgrade to Windows eight point one, which ended

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>up kind of reversing Microsoft decisions on a lot of

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>their original points. But Microsoft tends to do this. It

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of take talks between between big success and at

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 1>least the perception of complete disaster, which is Windows uh,

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Windows XP great success for our style, Windows

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Vista disappointment, Windows seven great success, Windows eight bits of disappointment.

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 1>So I sort of feel that they are due a

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 1>great success on the next on the next one, I

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>think so, uh, And I guess they'll go out on

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>a high point because it's the last one. Uh. You know.

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>It's also interesting because this to me parallels a similar

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>thing that happened with with Microsoft with the the announcement

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of Xbox one. I remember you and I had a

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>conversation about which console we thought one E three that

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>year when when the PlayStation four and the Xbox one

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we're both announced. Yes, I remember actually eating a very

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>messy hot dog with you while we had the conversation,

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and then we we talked about how Microsoft made all

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>these uh at the time, they sounded very bold and

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes slightly dangerous, you know, as far as they're there

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the the way people would view the Xbox One. They

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>made these these announcements that ultimately I think would have

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>benefited them had they stuck with them. But they listened

0:39:56.520 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to the initial reaction that gamers had and they reversed

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>some of their initial their initial pronouncements which ended up

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>negatively impacting certain features down the road. And I think

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it's very similar to the way Windows eight and Internet

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Explorer ten the same sort of situations, they went through

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of cycles. They went through this like

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna we're really trying to push innovation. The problem

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 1>was they were pushing the innovation in a direction that

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the the public just didn't get behind. And you know,

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this is really it's it is a problem

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>born out of the business model. And it's not to

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>blame Microsoft at all. This is just the way business is.

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>But they needed to They need to give people a

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>reason to go through what is a particular in the

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>corporate world, a massive, dramatic and expensive and disruptive decision

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to move operating systems through upgrade. So they have to

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>change something significantly, which is why it seems to go

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>from great too bad, too great, too bad to potentially

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>next great again, because basically what they then change is

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they go back to what people wanted in the first place.

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a it's the problem with if it

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>ain't broke, don't fix it. But if it ain't broke,

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>but you need to make more money because that's what

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>your business relies on, then maybe you don't fix it,

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>just try and do something to it and then fix that, right, right, Yeah,

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's that's a that's a great point. And

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to be endlessly frustrating to Microsoft

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>executives to really push for big, big changes, big risks

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and innovation and seeing it fall flat. And then watch

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Apple where it seems like Apple is able to make

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 1>that kind of declaration and uh and do really well

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>with it. Now that being said, there are clearly examples

0:41:56.080 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>in Apple's past where updates to certain operating systems or

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>software packages have been met with lots of criticism. Uh,

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 1>there're certain OS updates that people absolutely despised in the

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in the process of the evolution of mac os. There's

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 1>also I mean, anyone here at how stuff works who

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>works in video could go on and on about changes

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to certain video editing suites. I love that change is brilliant.

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I ditched Premier to move to final cut when they

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>change that. Really, everyone here with the other way. That's

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:35.720
<v Speaker 1>because they were probably doing it for for a living,

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>whereas I do it semi professionally, So for me it

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>actually sped up a lot of stuff, particularly things like multicam.

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't doing anything professionally professionally with it, like it

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>wasn't my sole job. But but but on the other hand,

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the big differences that Microsoft now does these big, giant,

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>huge overhauls and pushes it as the next big thing

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and like the latest innovation and leap in personal and

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>profess not computing. Apple makes a big deal about its

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 1>os is, but they're actually incremental them all like service

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>packs now and they are free and Apple will trump

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, this new innovative feature and that new innovative feature,

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and yeah they are convenient, but you know, would you

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>pay for it? Really? I mean people did, but it

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>never really felt like a big deal to Apple. It

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>more felt like just because they were making boxes and

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>putting them on shells and shipping them around the world,

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they should probably charge something for them. But once it's

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>all software and download based, it's just like it. So

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they're like completely different. It's they're not chicken and eggs,

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>not chicken egg Sorry, they're not chalking cheese. Now, they're

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 1>just we're not comparing apples to apples. By comparing os

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:44.720
<v Speaker 1>tend to windows updates wise. Was that chalk and cheese

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that I heard? Yeah, that's water past eleven at night.

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 1>I've been up there like eighteen hours at this point.

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm fried. I'm just curious if that's if that's a

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>common saying, or if that's just a yeah, okay, all right,

0:43:57.960 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's really common. Yeah, they're like chalking cheese, they

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>go together. I'll take your word for it. I I've

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>never heard that phrase, but I'm I'm a closet, you know.

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I've been very you know, sheltered my entire life. So

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it's quite possible. It just hasn't made its way to

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Deep South yet. All right, so we're in the

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>home stretch. October seventeen two, Microsoft releases the final version

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 1>of Internet Explorer Internet Explorer eleven, which had a lot

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of performance improvements it actually went when it came out,

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of reviewers who put it through

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:35.439
<v Speaker 1>various speed tests and said this was competitive against all

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the other browsers that were current at that time, faster

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>than a lot of them. That it had made some

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 1>incredible improvements and was a true contender in the browsers

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>space that if. In fact, I remember reading so many

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 1>reviews that said, hey, if you switched the Chrome because

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 1>you wanted it to load web pages faster, you don't

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:59.439
<v Speaker 1>have that reason anymore because Internet Explorer eleven was doing

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it as fast or faster than Chrome could. So it

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>suddenly became clear that Microsoft had really pushed too to

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:11.959
<v Speaker 1>not just have new features, but to improve the performance

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 1>so that it wasn't going to be viewed as, oh, yeah,

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it's this thing that everyone has because it's bundled with

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:22.359
<v Speaker 1>your operating system. It was actually valuable browser that could

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 1>stand on its own against uh, all these other competitors.

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So it was one of those things where you started

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>hearing some real positive thing, you know, reviews about Internet Explorer.

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And yet it's also the last Internet Explorer. Uh. Microsoft

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 1>announced this year that it is no longer going to

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:49.399
<v Speaker 1>be developing Internet Explorer. I sort of think that it's

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a necessary it's a necessary change because I think that

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the name I E. Is a lot worse than the

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>product itself. Internet Explorer is a perfect good, great, modern

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>fast browser now like it is, It's fine it's a

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>decent browser. And and if I feel that people said,

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 1>who you know, who say, oh, I use Internet Explorer,

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 1>most of us in the tech would kind of go

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>really really, But you know what if you if you're

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>using the latest I on Windows eight point one, it's

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>not a bad browser you might like. And I mean

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there's objectively speaking, not subjectively like. Objectively it's not a

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>poor browser. Um. But the word I E. Just it

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>just brings with it this history that you know, people

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 1>just associate with either bad technology or horrible compatibility issues

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>like you had with I E eight where you had

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:48.279
<v Speaker 1>to build basically a version of your website just for

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 1>one browser. Um, there was a lot of problems, and

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 1>obviously the security issues with I E six it's you know,

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>get rid of the name. It's it's a real problem.

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>It's why people don't really aimed that children after murderers

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of baggage there. Yeah, yeah, exactly. Yeah.

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And and so the the next one, and who knows,

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>by the time this podcast goes live, maybe they'll have

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.760
<v Speaker 1>officially announced the name. But it's code named Project Spartan,

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>which is built on different codes. It's code that if

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you trace it back. You know, it has roots that

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are common to Internet Explorer, but again it's a different

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary path um and it's going to uh be the

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:35.840
<v Speaker 1>new approach for browsers. There will be continued support for

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer for a while, but we're going to see

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that gradually taper off until we are left with whatever

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>project Spartan is named at the time. I am curious

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.360
<v Speaker 1>where they came up with that name because they have

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the personal assistant Cortana, and Cortana that's a character from

0:47:55.360 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the Halo franchise, which Microsoft owns. Now it's good. Yeah,

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 1>so its Halo is cool. Xbox is the coolest thing

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's ever done, named after the most popular thing that

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the most popular thing is named after. Yeah, I mean

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>they weren't going to call it master Chief, so master Chief.

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 1>The main character in Halo is a Spartan soldier. They

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the type of armor he wears is designated as Spartan.

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's possible that this is another Halo reference. It

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 1>could be that Spartan is totally is a Halo reference,

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>like it's Spartan either because it's a very bland, open

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>interface and then possibly but it's not, is it it's

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's halo. I still think they should call it

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Windows Grunt. Well, I guess, I guess they could call

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it elite. I mean that would be that would be

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>something I would have possibly a nicer connotation than grunt

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 1>would although honestly, depending upon what version of Windows you're running,

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>grunting might be your natural reaction to booting up your computer. Um,

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 1>because I remember running older visions of Windows on older

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 1>machines and thinking, all right, I've turned my computer on

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in about half an hour, I'll be able to do something.

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Ah at any rate. That's that's it. That is the

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the full blown history of Internet Explorer, from the early

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:17.720
<v Speaker 1>days before there were even web browsers to the current

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 1>situation where Internet Explorer is is surfing into the sunset.

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess since we're talking about the web and we're

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>going to get this this new type of browser in

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the future, Uh, it's an interesting story. I mean, you've

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>got so much drama there, from the the Anty trust lawsuits,

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole dot com bubble, the intense focus on the web.

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft getting a little maybe not lazy but complacent perhaps

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:50.839
<v Speaker 1>with its place. I mean, it's it's a you can

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>also look at this and the development of the you know,

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the company Microsoft as well, just what that company was

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 1>going through during that time. We could do a parallel

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>timeline and really see how there was a lot going on.

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh there really was, and and and the popularity of

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Windows of Internet Explorer six and by extension, Internet Explorer

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>six itself was both the best and the worst thing

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that happened to i E. As a franchise of browsers.

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's popularity. It accounted for over nine of

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:30.279
<v Speaker 1>all browser installations at one point around two thousand three,

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I think. And yet that was the one that effectively

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 1>caused the downfall you know, in terms of actual security issues,

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>public perception, um, you know, the the the need for

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 1>something to challenge the dominant, monopolistic looking i E. You know,

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff. It caused its own ultimate downfall,

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and the complacency just made that worse. Yeah, without without

0:50:55.640 --> 0:51:00.919
<v Speaker 1>i E. Six, you don't have necessarily the the incentive

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 1>for a group like the Mozilla Foundation to really push

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:09.839
<v Speaker 1>for an alternative like Firefox. And then Firefox ends up

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>becoming not just like first when it debuts it's it's

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely the underdog, but then very quickly in the grand

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things, became a true contender. Uh. Yeah, I

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 1>mean without without the problems of I six, there wouldn't

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 1>have been I don't think there would have been a

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 1>drive for the alternatives. Uh. And ultimately, when you look

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at the way things have shaken out now, again, like

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we we barely touched the mobile world. But it's also

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what helped drive the development of things like Chromium. Uh.

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And then therefore you could also say it helped drive

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>things like Android as well as chromos. Uh. You know,

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the world is definitely affected by Internet Explorer. Like we

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we would not have the same experiences that we have

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:00.440
<v Speaker 1>available to us now were it not for I e.

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's whether it's from Microsoft or from someone else

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that was trying to compete against them. So I agree.

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, broadly speaking, what a successful product, you know,

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and what a great product for you know, for the

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>last two decades. I mean, you know, I say this

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is a Mac user, but as someone has a deep

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of respect for Microsoft and and what it does

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and what it has done, and Internet Explorer has to

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 1>go down as one of the most popular, if not

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the most commendable piece of software ever made. You know,

0:52:33.400 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and I know that's a controversial statement, but but I

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think even the you know what I'm getting at that

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it has itself done so much for what the

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:44.839
<v Speaker 1>modern web is, even if it was by being too

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 1>popular or too bad at one point, it has been

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a driver of change for the modern Internet. Heck, I mean,

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:53.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I feel pretty safe in saying that if

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer had not been If it hadn't been for

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Internet Explorer, for one thing, more people would never have

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:05.000
<v Speaker 1>been introduced to the Worldwide Web because since it was

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:08.320
<v Speaker 1>bundled with the operating system, it took that barrier to

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 1>entry and and throw it out the door right. It

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:13.879
<v Speaker 1>made it. It became something that your computer could do

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you got it plugged up and connected

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Internet. There's still a bit of a barrier

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 1>because you still had to get connected, but once you

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:24.839
<v Speaker 1>got past that, it was already ready to go. And

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:27.240
<v Speaker 1>so there was that it helped remove that barrier to entry.

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And because of that, because it had this uh enabling

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>factor that drove more people to the Web, it allowed

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for the creation of things like websites like how Stuff

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com, which means that I ultimately was able

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to land my dream job. So like, I don't know

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that things would have unfolded the same way had Microsoft

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:53.799
<v Speaker 1>not gotten into this. I'm sure. I mean, it's undoubted,

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>there's it's impossible to say, but I mean, I'm pretty

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sure that there's no way the World Wide Web wouldn't

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 1>still be an incredibly influential part of our lives. But

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it would be to the same extent that it

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is now without Internet Explorer, I don't know. Um. I mean,

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:17.880
<v Speaker 1>something that powerful and useful and uh and and ultimately

0:54:18.040 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>profitable uh could not remain obscure forever, but it certainly

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>could have taken longer without Internet Explorer for it to

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:31.319
<v Speaker 1>to get the traction that it got. So well, here's

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to the next years. Yeah, who knows, who knows what

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:38.239
<v Speaker 1>you know? Maybe maybe we'll both be using a Microsoft

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>machine and at that time and Mac will be a

0:54:41.280 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>distant memory, and my my Chrome U my Chrome browser

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>will be seen as as antiquated and cute. Yes, I

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 1>doubt it, but we'll see. I'll be just I'll be

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:56.840
<v Speaker 1>passing through a midlife crisis and planning a sixtieth birthday. Yeah,

0:54:56.960 --> 0:55:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll be uh, I'll be through my midlife crisis and

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:04.320
<v Speaker 1>well into my decline. All right, So, Nate Lanks, and

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:07.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining me for these episodes.

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It has been a pleasure having you on the show.

0:55:10.800 --> 0:55:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I greatly appreciate you taking the time and as as

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 1>people have heard and maybe you maybe you didn't notice,

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 1>but Nate has stayed up, passed his bedtime to be

0:55:20.360 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on my show. So I appreciate that. Now it's much

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 1>if I if I can stay up for two podcast episodes,

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 1>time to talk about the history of a piece of software.

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is that is nerdtastic in my book,

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's I'm just about to relaunch an entire publication

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. And I am well past my bedtime definitely,

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and but but it's been a lot of fun and

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 1>kept me kept me awake despite what I probably should

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have been doing. Well. Well, Nate, I'm going to take

0:55:51.080 --> 0:55:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that as a positive and uh, I hope I can

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have you on the show again in the future. I

0:55:55.960 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 1>would love to have you back on and chatting about

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 1>well some some other great tech topics. Nate is incredibly

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:08.720
<v Speaker 1>well versed in tons of technology. Uh. He very graciously

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:11.880
<v Speaker 1>agreed to be on this episode next time. I promise

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I will give him the full list of choices and

0:56:15.400 --> 0:56:17.360
<v Speaker 1>just open up the option so he can pick whatever

0:56:17.360 --> 0:56:20.520
<v Speaker 1>he wants to Uh, because it was I was playing

0:56:20.760 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>unfairly this time. But guys, if you have any suggestions

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for future topics or potential future co hosts or interviews,

0:56:28.120 --> 0:56:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you want me to do anything along those lines, or

0:56:30.400 --> 0:56:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you just have some feedback that you want to send

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, you can send it via my email address

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:38.319
<v Speaker 1>that would be tech Stuff at how stuff works dot com.

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You can drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 1>or Tumbler. The handle it all three is tech Stuff

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:47.440
<v Speaker 1>hs W Nate Where can they find your stuff? Well,

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the best thing I can say, apart from Twitter, which

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is at Nate Lankson, is I do a weekly UK

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:57.680
<v Speaker 1>focused technology podcast. We did a big feature on the

0:56:57.680 --> 0:57:00.479
<v Speaker 1>most recent episode, episode thirteen, still quite a new show

0:57:01.200 --> 0:57:04.879
<v Speaker 1>where we put the world's electrical plug sockets against each other.

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Plug versus plug, Which nation has the best plug? Um

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the answers the English plug But there was a very

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:17.440
<v Speaker 1>good reason as to why and we know no. We

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:22.440
<v Speaker 1>spent fifteen minutes exploring exploring that. And I've also got

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a review coming up of the new super thin MacBook

0:57:26.560 --> 0:57:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and a big piece about the new Google mobile algorithm change.

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And the show is called Text Message. I should probably

0:57:34.560 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>say that um T E C H S message that is,

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And you can find that at Nate lengths and dot

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 1>com slash podcast. Definitely go check that out, guys. And

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I love it Nate that I asked you for a

0:57:44.600 --> 0:57:48.280
<v Speaker 1>plug and you plug a podcast about plugs. Oh yeah,

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think that's awesome. Yeah, that's that's really well done.

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, thank you guys. We will talk to

0:57:54.960 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. For more on this and thousands

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of other topics, is a how stuff Works dot com