WEBVTT - Estée Lauder in Talks to Buy Puig to Create Beauty Giant 

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Kind of a merger Tuesday, if you will. Es Da

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Latter Companies is in talk to buy pooge brands and

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>a deal that would create a cosmetic giant about twenty

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in annual sales. Here, let's get some more

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>details on this transaction. We're joined by Clara Lizarraga. She

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>is company's reporter for Bloomberg News. She is based in Madrid.

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Clara tell us a little bit about pooge brands. Who

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 2>are they and why do you think Esday Lauder is

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 2>in talks to acquire them?

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Paul, thank you for having me.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Pooje On, like Estilos, gets most of its revenues from fragrances.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 3>It owns major brands like Carolina Raban, brands that have

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 3>products that have consistently been amongst the top ten best

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>selling fragrances. So for essay Loader, it would help strengthen

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>their position in this category of fragrances where they currently

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>get about seventeen percent of their revenues, And as you said,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>it would create a much larger company with a stronger

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>exposure to Europe and Latin America and help it compete

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 3>more efficiently against rivals like Laurel for example.

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 5>So, Clara, I guess the thing with essay latter is

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 5>that this is a company in reorganization mode. It's got

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 5>this plan to focus on niche luxury price fragrances. Does

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 5>buy and Boots fit into that very specific strategy.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Well exactly, So this is These are some of the

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 3>questions that have that have been asked to so whether

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 3>this is the right time for a stayloader because they're

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 3>in the middle of streamlining operations. They were at some

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 3>point reviewing underperforming brands to see if they could divest

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 3>from some of them and focusing on higher and more

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 3>profitable products. So there are questions about whether a deal

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 3>with Pooje now would one be the right fit and

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 3>also would be the right timing considering these other complex

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 3>problems need to be resolved. The reaction so far so

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 3>stay Lads shares have been falling yesterday and again today,

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 3>So it would seem that these concerns are are definitely

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 3>weighing in.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>And Push is a family owned I know the CEO,

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Mark Push, a member of the founding family, did give

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 2>up that role, but he is executive chairman.

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 6>What role does the family play in this company?

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 3>So the family owned most of the capital and over

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent of the voting rights. This is the third

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>generation of the family and part of the reasons behind

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the IPO that happened less than two years ago was

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 3>that they wanted to plan succession and prevent any tensions

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 3>that could arise relating to generational change by listing the

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 3>company and making sure that the you know, the future

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.839
<v Speaker 3>generations would be owners of the company, but not necessarily

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>in operational roles. So in that sense, a deal could

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 3>go in further in that direction. But it also is

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 3>surprising to think that the family would relinquish control over

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 3>this company, which is over one hundred years old.

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there's so many things to have to kind of

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 5>reconcile here. We talked about how Essay latter would want

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 5>to add to its fragrance line to widen that portfolio.

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 5>But the thing about Pooge is that it also operates

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 5>as you mentioned Carolina Herrera and Nina Ricci. These are

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 5>all fashion brands. They present collections during the Paris Fashion Week.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 5>Is that something st a Lotter wants to get into

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 5>or is it that something that say Lotter might I

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 5>don't know divest or would that be part of the acquisition.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it would because so in essence, the poo

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 3>strategy has been to buy brands. They make fashion, but

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 3>they also create this image around the brand, and then

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 3>thanks to that they sell the fragrances. So it sort

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.239
<v Speaker 3>of goes together and it's hard to separate the fashion

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 3>from the fragrances. I think in that sense it would

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 3>be complimentary to estay Loader. I guess the question is

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 3>Pooge also has a smaller part of the business that's

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 3>called niche brands, so things like bi Redo, another one

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 3>called Latis on Perfumer and these are much smaller brands

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 3>with higher price higher prices that the company has been

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 3>wanting to scale. But they currently account for roughly ten

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 3>to fifteen percent of revenues according to analysts. So that's

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 3>something that would be interesting to essay Loader that there

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>are questions about really how much can that grow and well,

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>would they want all of these kinds of fragrances or

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 3>only certain brands?

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Is there any regulatory concern here about this deal getting approved?

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 3>There's some concerns on the makeup side, so Pooh Jones

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 3>are Charlotte Tilbury, which I believe is the third largest

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 3>makeup brand in the US, and so there could be

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 3>issues on that front. But on the f grons front,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's it's not a problem.

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 5>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on our Billcarclay and

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that the Bloomberg Intelligence folks are

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>looking at is gaming out a recession scenario. That may

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit more on the front burner now

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 2>with what's happening in Iran.

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 6>And one of those industries.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>That you really have to be on the outlook for

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 2>should the economy soften is the US auto business. And

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Steve Man joins us here Global Autos and Industrials Research

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 2>channels for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us live here in our

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg at Directive Broker studio. So, Steve, I mean the

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 2>auto business. I mean cyclical business, but also one that's

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>undergoing profound transformation, trying to make this transformation to electric vehicles.

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 6>Probably not a lot of spare capital.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Lining around the cushion during if the economy were to soften.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 6>How do you guys think about it?

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 7>Well, yeah, the industry did take a lot of write

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 7>offs because you know, the EV sales are not going

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 7>to be what it expected, especially in the UA. And

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 7>we were actually coming into twenty twenty six relatively positive

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 7>for the auto the big Detroit Big three because Trump eliminated,

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, the penalties on gas guzzlers. We thought, you know,

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 7>they're gonna you know, these these automakers are going to

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 7>push out these you know, pickup trucks and shuvs with

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 7>high margins. And that's how we came in looking at

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 7>the industry at the being twenty twenty six. And then

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 7>this the war broke out right, and gas prices are

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 7>at where they're at. If you talk to the people

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 7>that actually buy and sell gas oil, it's like one

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 7>hundred and fifty bucks right on the ground. So it's

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 7>gonna it's having a huge impact. Gasoline prices are up

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 7>thirty forty percent where I'm at. So now the talk is,

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 7>you know, are they going to sell that many pickup

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 7>trucks and SUVs?

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Especially with interest rates rising. That means auto loans also

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 5>become more expensive for consumers. But people will still need

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 5>cars and they will still need to upgrade or replace

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 5>their aging vehicles. Where does that leave the automakers? I mean,

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 5>do people go to secondhand cars? Do they take another

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 5>look at hybrids and evs in this environment?

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a combination of both. The third thing

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 7>that could happen is they keep their cars a little

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 7>bit longer. You know, that's going to benefit companies like

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 7>O'Reilly AutoZone that actually sells after market parts. You know,

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 7>a lot of a lot of consumers, especially in this

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 7>k economy, those are looking who are looking for value

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 7>in affordable vehicles'll will hold off, you know, even if

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 7>interest rates are lower. You know, they they want to

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 7>make sure, you know, the jobs are stable and before

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 7>they spend twenty thirty forty thousand.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Dollars how much is a new car again on average.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 7>Average is fifty thousand.

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'll tell you my boy Joe is car

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 2>in his car repair shop in mask on his lot

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 2>is packed, man. I mean he's got more business what

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to do with. So that goes to your point. Yeah,

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 2>people are keeping the cars longer. You know, if we

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 2>get higher for longer fuel prices, does that revive maybe

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 2>some demand in EV's and the hybrids.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 7>It might look We actually looked at figure out when

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 7>looked at what the worst case scenario is. We looked

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 7>at past oil shock all the way back to you know,

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 7>the Iranian revolution back in the seventies, and we're coming

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 7>up with Okay, worst case sales in the US could

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 7>drop as much as fifteen percent. Now the pie is shrinking,

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 7>but even within that pie, the split is changing definitely.

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 7>I think it's no surprise if oil prices are high,

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 7>it has happened in the past, people will be more

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 7>interested in hybrids and this time around, you know, battery

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 7>evs as well.

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:56.599
<v Speaker 6>Up after this.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Cocklay and Android

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App, listen on demand wherever

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the issues from an M and A perspective

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 2>with the second Trump administration is this is going to

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>be a very good time to get M and A done.

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 6>The regulation the regulators.

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Whether it be the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice,

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe be more accommodative. And I was certainly the expectation,

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and I from what I understand, that's turning out to.

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 6>Be the truth.

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>And we want to focus on one particular deal because

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 2>it's a deal that I'm very familiar with having covered

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the media industry for a while, and that is next Star,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 2>big TV station owner, buying Tegna. Another big TV station owner,

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer re joins us. She's senior litigation and analyst from

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us live here in our studio. So

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 2>as I understand it, Next Star again, a huge owner

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 2>of TV stations across the country, hundreds of them close

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>its purchase of Tech, which are the old TV stations

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 2>owned by Gannett Company, the newspaper company that closed. Yes,

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 2>from the regulators like the Federal Communication Commission, the Justice Department.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 6>Blessed the deal as people thought they would.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's this administration. But there's still some suits

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 2>going on. What's going on with.

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 8>That right, So that expectation that the Department of Justice

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 8>and Federal Communications Commission will go ahead and allow that

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 8>deal to go forward, I think ramped up a group

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 8>of states to be ready to try to go after

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 8>this deal. And it's because the states have been saying

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 8>many states have been saying, and not just democratic state

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 8>attorneys general, but in a bipartisan way. The states have

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 8>been saying, if this administration lacks anti trust enforcement, if

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 8>they start allowing a lot of consolidation across many industries,

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 8>we're going to pick up the slack because states have

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 8>the right to enforce federal anti trust laws and they

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 8>have the right to go after a merger that they

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 8>believe is unlawful under the anti trust laws, just as

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 8>the Department of Justice or Federal Trade Commission do. So

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 8>that's what we're seeing here. You have eight states that

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 8>have said this wasn't right for different reasons. The FCC

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 8>approval was improper for certain reasons, the Department of Justice

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 8>clearance was improper for other reasons, and we're going to

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 8>go ahead and go to court to try to see

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 8>what we can do here.

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 2>I've been doing this mediam and a thing for a

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 2>long time. I've never really seen this before. I'm sure

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>it's been out there. So this is basically the state saying,

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 2>for what a reason the federal governments from our perspective,

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>from our point of view, is not as as strong

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 2>a regulators it needs to be there for, We're going

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 2>to pick up the slack and do it from a

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 2>state level.

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 6>Yes, have we seen this before? Not a lot.

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 8>Normally, the states are sort of aligned with the Department

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 8>of Justice or any of these agencies that are reviewing

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 8>a deal.

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 6>We have one.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 8>Example from several years ago when T Mobile and Sprint

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 8>merged that they settled with the Department of Justice. They

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 8>divested some assets to Dish and the Department of Justice

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 8>went ahead and cleared the deal. The FCC cleared the deal,

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 8>and the states went to court. A group of states

0:12:58.040 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 8>I don't remember exactly how many, I think it might

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 8>have been round ten went to court to try to

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 8>block that deal. And you know a lot of people

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 8>would say, and I'll say in this case too for

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 8>next Star, that once you have the federal regulators that

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 8>have approved these deals. It is very difficult for the

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 8>states to then go into court and convince a judge

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 8>that the experts that cleared the deal were wrong. The

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 8>states lost in the T mobile sprint effort, and you know,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 8>we don't know yet what's going to happen with Nextstar,

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 8>but they do go in with a tough case to

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 8>make once the FCC and dj have approved, which they have.

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>So are they doing this these states? And you say

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>it's bipartisans So it's not just democratic states that maybe

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 2>wanted to just go against this administration's regulatory policy.

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 8>I think in this case it may simply be democratic

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 8>states the ones that have sued Nextar. We also have

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 8>states that have are continuing litigation against Live Nation that

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 8>originally the Department of Justice had joined them with was

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 8>the lead plaintiff. The Department of Justice settled with one

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 8>week of trial. The states on a bipartisan in a

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 8>bipartisan way, have gone forward to continue that litigation. So

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 8>we are seeing bipartisan efforts in that area. With the

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 8>Next Star Tegna, I'd have to look at those eight

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 8>states to see the attorney generals whether they are Democrats,

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 8>or Republicans.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 2>If your Next Star you close this deal, if you

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 2>pay Tegna the money.

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 6>Yes, Is there any risk to Next.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Star that somebody, some judge could say you got to

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>unwind this thing.

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 6>I think that risk is low.

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 8>I think actually getting an order saying you must unwind

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 8>this is low. If there's some kind of a liability

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 8>decision yet this deal was anti competitive, my guess would

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 8>be the more likely outcome would be some divestitures of stations,

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 8>which is honestly what I thought would have happened with

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 8>this deal with the Department of Justice to start, if

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 8>it had followed kind of its long standing tradition with

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 8>respect to TV broadcaster deals. Usually, the Department of Justice

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 8>would ask these companies, including Nexttar, which has divested all

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 8>sorts of stations doing deals in the past, to divest

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 8>in a local area called a DMA in this case,

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 8>to divest if they would own more than one of

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 8>the local affiliates of the Big Four, which are NBCCBS, Fox, ABC.

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>And that rule today, having done a million broadcasting M

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>and A deals in my life, seems so antiquated to

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 2>that it was antiquated twenty years ago. But now with

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 2>all the streaming, and I mean it's like, who cares.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's the argument the defendants will make, and that's

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 8>what the Federal Communication Said Commission said in part in

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 8>approving this deal. But I will say that there was

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 8>an Eighth Circuit decision about the FCC's every four years

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 8>it reviews its rules, about its review of its rules,

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 8>and that narrow market definition focused on those broadcast stations

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 8>in the Big Four was challenged, and the Eighth Circuit

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 8>didn't reject that. They rejected rules changes for different reasons,

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 8>but not because of that market definition. And the thing is, Paul,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 8>I know viewership has changed radically, right in the last

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 8>ten twenty years. You've got all the cord cutters. You

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 8>have people who've never even heard of a cable subscription.

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 8>But you still have a set of consumers that get

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 8>those cable subscriptions or FiOS or whatever it is. They

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 8>want those local stations, if they want sports, they want

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 8>the local programming they can get. And if you have

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 8>a discrete set of consumers that could be harmed because

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 8>prices go up, it can still be an ag trust harm.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Switch gears. We'll go to healthcare, as we like to do.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>There's always news coming out of the healthcare business. There's

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 2>always M and A trades and this is no different.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Pfizer trying new They've been working on a line disease

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 2>drug here and they recently had I think they had

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a study. It didn't really impress too much, but I'll

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>tell you, in this part of the country, lime diseases

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 2>no joke, boy, A lot of people.

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 6>Get it debilitated.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and it affects you for life, even if you

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 5>get over the worst of it in the first two years.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 6>So there's just another air.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 2>We're kind of waiting for the great science of the

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 2>pharmaceutical and biotech industry to come to the rescue.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 6>Sam Fazelli joints just Bloomberg Intelligence, director.

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Of Research for Global Industries and a senior pharma analyst

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg. So, Sam, what's going on with Pfizer, What's

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 2>going on broadly with this little niche field of limes disease.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 4>Lime disease, Paul.

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 9>So all those farmers and folks who go out into

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 9>fields have a risk of that. Of course, anyone who

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 9>goes out into a into a green space, and you

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 9>know I've got a bit of a garden, I'm sure

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 9>you do. And those ticks, man, they do like your

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 9>legs and anything that's nice and hidden in there to

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 9>go and have a bite at. And all your animals

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.479
<v Speaker 9>suffer from it, et cetera. So those animals can take

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 9>drugs to prevent ticks, but there's really no such thing

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 9>for humans. And I mean the vaccines have been around,

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 9>but lime disease vaccine is something that would really be

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 9>quite an attractive option for those who are at risk.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 9>The question is would take a lime this vaccine? But

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 9>these guys had some data. It's data from a vaccine

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 9>that they're developing with a French partner called Valeva. It

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 9>has been in development for a while and I'm just

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 9>reading the details here again off the screen on the

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 9>blueberog terminal seventy three percent effective against the tickborne illness,

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 9>which of course can be as bad as in supply

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 9>tast and causing major then longer term issues. So the

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 9>few problem with seventy three percent, I mean, you know,

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 9>is that good enough these days? I mean, think about

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 9>the COVID. COVID vaccines now are in background of people

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 9>having lots of COVID infections, are in the fifty to

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 9>sixty seventy percent range effective against hospitalization. Now that's on

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 9>the background of lots of COVID infections. Here you're not

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 9>you're testing it literally against somebody having no immunity. So

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 9>seventy percent is not particularly high. So it'd be very

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 9>interesting to see what they're regulator to say about this.

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 6>Sam. I'm kind of confused.

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 5>Why are there no current human vacs scenes from lime

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 5>disease on the market. I mean, there was something I

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 5>believe back in on late nineteen nineties from GSK, But

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 5>this seems like something that's there's a real demand for efficacy.

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 4>We need efficacy, we need the effectiveness.

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 9>Sorry, in vaccine world, I've forgotten now all those years

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 9>of writing about COVID you need vaccine effectiveness, which is

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 9>how much does it protect you, how long does it

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 9>protect you for? So this is something that I think

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 9>would be interesting to see whether this result is better

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 9>than what folks had been used to. But again, if

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 9>you took this, you're only three quarters of the way.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 9>Let's say protect it and I'd like to see the data.

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 9>How long does it last? Do you need another shot?

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 9>Who takes this? I mean, do we want to everybody?

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean people are hardly taking infectious vaccines where they

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 9>can pick it up in the subway.

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 4>Are they going to worry about this? Take this?

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Those are questions right astim At the beginning of President

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 2>trump second term, there really a lot of threats towards

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 2>universities and maybe some of their medical research. Has that

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>in fact come to fruition. Our funds being withheld or

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 2>funds being pulled. Is that impacting university research?

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 9>There has been some more uncertainty created funds not being released.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 9>There's been a lot of those situations arising. Of course,

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 9>it's not just grants going to universities. It's also direct investments,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 9>for instance by the NIH which has a huge budget

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 9>and age gives us grounds.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 4>But they also have research institutes, Institute for this, institute

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 4>for that. So there has been some effects. People are worried.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 9>The number of people seeking to do PhDs in the

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 9>STEM world has declined. I don't know what the latest

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 9>statistic is, but has definitely declined. And that's really not

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 9>helpful because it is this foundation of science that then.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Builds the future innovations. Right.

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 9>I don't think that that's I don't think that's rocket science, right.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 9>So I don't know why this became such a big thing,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 9>but I'm wondering whether it was just noise and it

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 9>was playing to the public and this kind of eventually

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 9>going to dissipate and go back to what it normally was.

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 4>And of course Congress needs to get in there.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 9>You've seen him, for instance, Quurt's coming back saying what

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 9>the HCHS has done isn't right for vaccines, et cetera.

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 4>So maybe this will happen here too.

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal