WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2018 NFL MegaPod Week 14 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Check it down, Man Down Now Thursday morning, except for

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>six twenty eight teens defeating the Book podcast Kill Alexander

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Megapod time Week fourteen in the National Football League. As always,

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the show brought to you by the score X T

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>A T S C O r e X dot com.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Four weeks left before Marco and as we have a

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>guest on the wild Card megapod because of course, if

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you signed up at the score x with the promo

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>code guilt, you were entered into the beating the book

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>pool of score xers. That's the old stock market thing

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that I've been talking about, stock market football thing that

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about for years and years on the show.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Right now, in the lead, Profitable, Profitable is in the lead,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and Profitable let me just say this, Profitable has extended

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>his lead. I assume it's a him. I shouldn't assume

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that could be a she. I don't know what profitable is.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>But Profitable is in the lead over thirty three percent

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of a portfolio gain for Profitable at the score x

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Congratulations, and it's a big lead at this

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>point is the next closest portfolio gain. So the lead

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>has extended. Profitable the Man Debate or the Woman Debate

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>over at the score x dot com. Check it out.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Great vehicle for sports spending on the show today, of course,

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is always the pillars of the show. Thirty nine years

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in the business. Marco d Angelo from Wager Talk. Good

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>morning Marco, Good morning, Gil. How are you today? I'm

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>doing very well, Marco. Here's the story. I get texts

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>from buddies of ours texting me the food you're eating

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>before the megapod. Hey, this is a very tough show.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. We gotta go Monday night, Sunday night, best

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that upset who I don't want to play, and then

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night and we do all that in an hour.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I need to be properly Field, Yeah, good little where'd

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you go today? Was the restaurant of his restaurant, shoutout

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>pigs glorified ham and eggs. Pigs glorified ham and eggs.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, never been but hey, it's so good, Gil.

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It's so good that Mark and I I didn't know

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the other one was going there, and we both were there.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>He was leaving as I was coming. Oh that wasn't planned.

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>That was not planned. No, al right, by the way,

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>because I you could tell I was searching frantically for

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the score X contest Danny's, which disappeared from my screen

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>as we were talking. But Profitable is up thirty three

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>point one percent, Dio the Greek up twenty six percent,

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Top sch Left up seven percent, the Wick up twenty

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>three point three percent, Liam Converse in fifth, up twenty

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>two point five percent. So Profitable well in the lead

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on my left, out of the sports betting diaspora, Ladies

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen as taste. All right, thanks for having me, brother.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>You got another win last week, did you not? No, no,

0:02:56.400 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>no no. I gave up Atlanta Atlanta yesterday, blunt weight.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Fortunately we agreed on Atlanta, but they did

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>not come through. They did not come through. I was

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>on them as well. Uh yeah, that was not good.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson and the Ravens getting themselves another win again.

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.119
<v Speaker 1>The conversation that's taking place between John Harbaugh and Joe

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Flacco goes a little something like this, Hey, Coach Harbaugh,

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>my hips fine, Uh no, it's not, Joe. You know, seriously,

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to play. Actually, I think your hip still hurts.

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go with Lamar this week and on the

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>show for the first time ever. He hosts a podcast

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>called The Better Life, and of course that's spelled b

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>E T T O R. We'll get an explanation from

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>him just on what that's about. Specifically, ladies and gentlemen,

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I present to you Tim Lawson. Good morning, Tim, Hello Gil.

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for for thinking of me. It's

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it's exciting after listening to the show for so long

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to now be a contributing member. So yeah, I do

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the opportunity. Yes, and Tim for for those who

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't don't know. Off air, just before the show, he

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh my god, my self is so excited

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. And I'm like, oh, it's so like your

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>current self doesn't really give And he's like, well, just

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just a little different, is what he was saying. It's yeah,

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a little different. What's the Better Life about? So?

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>The Better Life launched just under a year ago as

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a podcast about gambling and more more uh more, specifically

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the betters that are that are living this life as gamblers,

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh we learned about a gamblers sort of how

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>they were first exposed to gambling, their for their the

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>first bets they may have may knew their first visit

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to casino whatever their games of choice are, whether it's sports, betting, poker,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>table games, whatever it may be, slots, video poker, um.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And then sort of learned about like how their family responded,

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>what their what their approach to playing is now, and

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>um and and and in the midst of all that,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we still have conversations with sort of in general about

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>about gambling, but the real focus of the show is

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to learn about the stories of gamblers, how they've developed

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>as a gambler in uh, sort of just enjoying that

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>discussion of recreational gambling that so much so many of

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>us enjoy like it. You do have somebody on the

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>show coming up this weekend though, right, that's right. I

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was just before you hit record, I just mentioned that

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, this is really good timing on on on

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>my my appearance here on the megapod, because in the

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>next twenty four hours I will be releasing an interview

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>that I did with with your with our own VR.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is like you uncensored on this

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>show a pretty much. I yeah, it was a little

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>while back. We did it, you know, but I had

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun, you know me. I love talking

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this sports betting. Okay, yeah, so it was. It's the

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>interview we recorded a little while back November. Got a

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>little little busy formula. It actually worked out on sort

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of the timing and when it's gonna be released really

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>excite a lot of people looking forward to that interview.

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think it's one of the um

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know we got. We got a lot of unique

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>perspectives from people, but I think this is one that

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of This is a perspective that not

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have heard about a person that

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people know. I like, yeah, I like it, Marco,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>You and me should tune into. Maybe we're gonna learn

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>some about a said we didn't know. Also, the Better Life,

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Ace is not only a man of mystery now Aces everywhere.

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Just I just want to point that out. We've already

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of hinted at where as is Aces on Goalie

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can Wingo. Ace got some UFC thing coming up big time,

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>so we're very excited for him. So we'll check out

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the episode of the Better Life with haste this weekend,

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>available where all podcasts are distributed. Let us begin with

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the Monday night game Gentlemen Minnesota at Seattle. This is

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a big game. Minnesota six five of one, Seattle is

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>seven and five right now. If the playoffs were to

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>start in the NFC, Seattle be the number one wild card,

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota be the number two. So this has big time

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>implications Seattle right now, A let's call the three point

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite across the board. Yeah, that's about right, three point favorite.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Extra juice total in this game is forty five. Vikings

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>coming off a loss, a fourteen point loss, I believe

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>it was to the New England Patriots. Minnesota could not

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>get the win. They could not get the cover. Typical

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins through a up the late picks. Uh, it's

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of what he does, some bad decision making, perhaps

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>late not all his fault for sure. Uh. It is

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>at New England, and those things happen when you face

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. But Minnesota now in a year where they

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>were expected to do oh so much, six five and one.

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It should be noted that case Kingdom no longer the

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Vikings quarterback six and six over in never not much

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of a difference. And then there's Seattle. Seattle crushes the

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Niners last week, crushes them, and Russell Wilson just the

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>model of efficiency eleven of seventeen for four touchdowns. Note

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>picks in the first half. I just want to point

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this out. First half last week four completions, three for

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns sports Radar sport Radar, I should say Wilson throwing

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns on four completions made for the fewest touchdowns

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>per completion in a first half dating back to when

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they first are able to get these stats. The previous

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>low was six completions for three touchdowns. So this is

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just off the charts what he did last week. And

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that's just kind of how his season has been. Seattle

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>favored by three total forty five tim your thoughts, well, uh,

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Gil I I originally prevail from the the Great Pacific Northwest,

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh and I am a huge Seahawks fan. It's

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that I that I have kept with

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>me and all of my travels and moving stuff like that.

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I've always been a Seahawks fan. And um, you know,

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>going into this season, Seahawks fans in general, we were

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of we also, uh, we're sort of we're we

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>weren't sort of agreeing with the narrative, but we accepted

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the narrative that the Seahawks probably weren't gonna be much

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this year, that this was gonna be a rebuilding year, uh,

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and that they were going to be they got written

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>off really early in the season, like this is gonna

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>be a competitive team, that we're not going to see

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>them in the playoffs. And then I think they've shocked

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody and how competitive they've been in their their ability

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to to be playoff to have a potential playoffs spot

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>while being in a division that was clearly going to

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>get be dominated by by the Rams Minnesota coming off

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that tough loss against our disappointing loss, I guess, or

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to say against the Patriots have to go all the

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>way across the country to kind of go into Seattle

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and compete with a Seahawks team that is pumped about

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>where they are on their opportunity to really get one

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>step further towards landing a wild card seed. All that said, though, uh,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I like either side enough to

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to to make a wager, but I am actually gonna

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>be looking at some player props if you don't mind

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>me taking that angle. Yes, so the Seattle defense is

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty uh, it's it's it's efficient enough on running that

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are probably not gonna look towards anything on that, but

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they leave a little bit to be desired on their

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.599
<v Speaker 1>passing defense, and where they especially have tough difficulty is

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with the wide receiver one position. And so Adam Feeling

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>was on fire for the first half of the season.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>He has been uh since not quite as as potent

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as he has been, But I will be looking UH

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>towards some Adam Feeling player props, specifically over under on

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>receptions and over under on yards. Earlier, we've been seeing

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of UH one five yards over under on

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>on Adam Feeland. It's slowly going down as he UH

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>as he's had a twenty eight yard game sixty six,

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. A lot of that because the Stefon Diggs

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>coming back and taking some of those targets. But um,

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be looking both at Adam Feeling and UH

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and Stefon Diggs on both receptions and yards, and I'm

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna see where the lines are gonna give, which players

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to give the most benefits, and try to

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of of taking an over on Adam Feeland

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on both receptions and yards. If if it if if

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the if the line's right, Tim by the way, wasn't

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that easy? Wasn't that good? Eight years in the making,

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>your first capsule on the show? Well done. It's like

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like you've been here the whole time, even adding

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a prop, Yeah, we was. I guess you'd say I'm

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>looking towards Adam Feeling in the sense that I think

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs was already gonna have too exaggerated a line

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>because he is Stefon Diggs, and because theeland is coming

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>off of three or four games that have been under

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven yards. So I think Feeling is probably where

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna not only get some value on the line,

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but also have the opportunity to maybe break away. I

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>mean his yards after catchers on real right, So, and

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the Seahawks may have a difficult than me

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a challenge containing that. So that he's the way I'm

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>looking on on that. Valen stats are certainly that of

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver one that's for sure. This year it's

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>just been unbelievable. A little bit less in recent weeks,

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but um, just an amazing season for Feeling. Kirk Cousins

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>last weekend defeat by the Way thirty two or two

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>oh one one touchdown, two picks, sacked twice. Against the Patriots,

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings were three for twelve on third downs. That

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>was their achilles CeAl in that game against Patriots. Minnesota

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>now has lost two of its past three. They entered

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 1>that game against New England allowing the third fewest rushing

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>yards in the league ninety three point six yards per game,

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and then New England spread him out rushed for one sixty. Meanwhile,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks again against the Niners, they're just killing it

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and Bobby Wagner capping the blowout with a ninety eight

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>yard interception return first to his career longest and franchise history.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>In that game, they held the Niners in check. Obviously,

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks have been on fire, Marco. They have just had

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>an amazing run here against a really tough midseason schedule.

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Here they get a break here down the stretch where

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they get the Niners without Garoppolo a couple of times,

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but Minnesota sandwiched in between here, good Monday night game.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>What you got it is a good Monday night game.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna disagree with one thing you said. They're yeah,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>they're hot, but you talk about a tough schedule. Well,

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the tough schedule was the Rams, the Chargers, and the Rams,

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 1>and they lost all three of those games. They lost

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>them all. Okay, the teams they've beaten, the only team

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that they've beaten in this seven and three run was

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Dallas and that was the third week of September, when

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas's offense was non existent. May interrupt you, may interrupt you.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>They played the Packers, They played the Packers when the

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Packers are still viable. They they played the Panthers. Your casual,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you're casually going past the Packers have a winning record.

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh now, we're only talking about teams with winning records. Now,

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh got you? I believe you just out of that ahead.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry they did. But the fact is green Bay's

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>four and six and Caroline is six and six. Not

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a winning record. They haven't beaten. The only team they've

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>beaten the No. Seven right now that has a winning

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>record is Dallas. That's the fact. I'm sorry. And for

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a numbers guy, don't you have a show that's you

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>know something about numbers? Okay, alright, alright, well remembers don't

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>mean anything, I guess. All right, but I'm looking at

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota here and I'm not sold on Seattle. And believe me,

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Pete Carroll, with what he's had talent wise

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this year, you know, has done Coach of the Year

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>type performance. But there's a couple other guys that are

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna overshadow him for sure. But he's done and I

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>think one of his best coaching jobs this year getting

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the most out of the least because I mean, you

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>look at that offense on paper, what they had at

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the season, and go back to what

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they lost on defense. Uh, this is a team that's

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 1>definitely overachieved. Now we look at Minnesota and again the

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Sharks lined up on him against New England last week

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and Brady and uh Belichick did what they always do.

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But that game, once again was a kai game late

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in the third quarter, and then New England did what

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>they did. They got two scores. Kirk Cousins, you know,

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>has his you know turnover. You can always count on

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>him at least one bad one a game and they

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>lose the game. But I look at this one here,

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and although both teams are in the playoffs right now,

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>if Minnesota loses this one, the season is over as

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>far as any hope for the division UM and it's

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a it was a slim shot as it was, but

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they do get Chicago at home the final game of

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the season. They still had hope there. But if they

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>lose this one, it's done. Not only that, but then

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they fall into that big pief of teams trying to

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>get that last wild card spot and they don't have

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the tiebreaker against some of them. This is a spot

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>where I'm looking for Minnesota and Kirk Cousins to finally

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>deliver a big game performance in a big game. That's

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the one thing we haven't seen from Kirk Cousins, and

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the knock on them. But this is still a

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>top defense. They're not what they were last year, but

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>there are number seven defense and yards per play UH,

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>number five in UM, yards per rush, UH, number seven,

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe in total yards rushing. And the reason why

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I keep honing in on the rushing is FICTI to

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Seattle has been when they get the running game going,

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>look at this, As you said last week, the pass

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is just to complement the running game. They have been

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>putting up big numbers on the ground. If they don't

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>do that this week against this Minnesota defense, I think

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see the Seattle offense bogged out. I like Minnesota.

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the old adage take the better

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>defense getting and I'll take the Vikings. And they're still

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>are three and a half out there that I think,

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>if you what Minnesota it, you need to grab it

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>now because I think Monday it's gonna be solid threes.

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>When the season first started, though, I often talked about

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the Giants first seven games of the season being a gauntlet,

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, that's what it was, and the Giants

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>went one in six in those first seven games. The

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>other team that we talked about was at the end

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the season that the Seahawks last nine games were

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the gauntlet that they absolutely we're gonna get crush because

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>think about this before the season, here's what, here's what.

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Their last nine games was home Chargers at Rams, home

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Packers at Panthers, home Niners, Garoppolo home Vikings at Niners,

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo home Chiefs before ending with the Cardinals. So really

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>eight out of their last nine. But the Garoppolo injury

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>happened all of a sudden, those two games got far easier,

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to say the least, and then they started they loose

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Charges, and they loose to the Rams, but

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>then they beat a four four and one Packers. They

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>beat the Panthers on that ridiculous end of game sequence

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>where the Panthers just couldn't get it done and Russell

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Wilson just made an unbelievable worth down past. So that's

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>really I mean, you talk about having this ridiculously hard

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>schedule and things not only breaking your way in terms

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of opponent injuries, but then winning a couple of those

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in dramatic fashion. And remember the refs helped out in

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.239
<v Speaker 1>that Packers game, like how Bobby Wagner wasn't whistled for

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a clothesline pass interference and like Toryo was like, yeah,

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you can't call that. I'm like, in what world can't

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you call that? Like what are you talking about? But anyway,

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, the genius, the magic of Russell Wilson's an

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>amazing season I think for the Seahawks. But you'll take

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the three and a half with the Vikings for all

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the reasons you stated ace all right, well, it's pretty

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>simple why Seattle is so good this year against the spread.

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>If you remember, coming into this season, both these teams

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>are surprising us. And what I mean by that is

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota got bet over if you remember that season win

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>total open nine and a half got bet up to

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>ten over. So there was a lot of anticipation for

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota to take over that division and you know, represent

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>them in the playoffs. And on the flip side of that,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at sea Attle. Not only did they come

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>out with the eight under favored, but it got that

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>down the seven and a half under favor. This is

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>a team that wasn't even expected to be, you know,

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>an eight and eight football team with Seattle, and the

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that they're getting it done is impressive. But I mean,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we know that in the NFL. We see that a

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of the reason the Rams are a one lost

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>team and so good against this so not good against

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the spread, where Kansas City is pretty much the same

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>one loss more um but did so well against the

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>spread because we saw one coming, we didn't see the

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>other coming. So I mean, I think that's why Seattle

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>has been so impressive, at least spread wise. Now with

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that said, um our listeners are in for a tree

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>because I absolutely love these primetime games this week Saturday,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night and Monday Night football, and yeah, you gotta

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>come out double fisted all on both these games. I

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>love Minnesota in this spot against Seattle, and I'm gonna

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>continue right off for what Marco said, because nailed it. Um.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>With Minnesota, it's pretty simple, you run the football. If

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they could run the football, they're gonna have success. And

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they just don't run enough. But against the Seattle defense,

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>here's the defense you could run the football against. I

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>mean home they allow five point six yards per rushing

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>attempt and five point one overall. UM. So I mean

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a team you could easily run on it.

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And then you look at Seattle, and Marco nailed it again.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>For Seattle to have success, they have to run the

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>football and that's what they've done, running it for thirty

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>plus time in five of the last seven games. And

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, that's allowed them to protect the football. They

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>only have three turnovers in their last seven games. Um.

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Never had more than one in any of those. Where

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at Minnesota, it's turnovers has been costly for them.

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a team that's had two or more turnovers

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>in five of their last seven games. So they just

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't been protecting the football. So we're gonna do on

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Monday night. I think they will listen, shut down this

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Seattle running game a little bit and forced them to throw.

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be in some trouble, especially against a Minnesota

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>defense which doesn't allow quarterbacks to do all that much.

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I look over to the last seven ten games.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Other than New England putting up three hundred against them,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Arizona put up two hundred. No one else even broke

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>two hundred in their last seven games. Um So, for me,

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna give some troubles to that Seattle offense.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I love the three and a half. I like the

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>three and I think this has money line sprinkle written

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>all over it. I don't think you're gonna eat points

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>at all. Just take Minnesota to get that win in Seattle.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>You know what's funny what no one talks about? And

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I had to throw this out real quick. Where's all

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this talk with the Seattle home field advantage? Home field advantage?

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>You ever noticed? Home field advantage only matters when teams

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>are good they have a good home field advantage, and

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>then when they suck, we say, oh, their home field

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>advantage sucks. And then when they're real good at home again. Oh,

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they have great home field advantage. I mean, think about it.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.719
<v Speaker 1>No one's been talking about When was the last time

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>anyone's talking about Seattle's home field advantage? We used to

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have years ago. We used to a guy who came

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>on this show who used to harp on things like that.

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>If I can only remember his name, I'm telling it.

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>What's happened now we don't know longer talk about that.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It's always like, you know, how how great a team's

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>home field advantages or how much it sucks. Um, But

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's all reflective of the record. They have a good

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>record this year, they're probably gonna have a good home

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>field advantage. So, I mean, most of that is just nonsense.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>You hear too much home field advantage talk, and to me,

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty much the same round. If they're having a

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>good season, they're probably gonna have a pretty good season

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>at home. Right, what's gonna do? What's gonna change? All right?

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Two very strong votes from Minnesota. I'm with you both.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You get a hook there? Well, yeah, um, Minnesota plus

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the three and a half would be wonderful. There still

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are some out there, certainly some in town. Nugget when

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>coast stations. There's a lot of three and a half

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>far away places. Let's see what we got out there

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>for far and away places. Not as many, not as many, Oh, Chris,

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>though bookmakers got three and a half out there. Let

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>me run and make that right now, hold on, please

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>make that bet while you guys are telling serious after

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you gave me all that shit about me saying they

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't beaten a winning team. Because because that's not because

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not the reason, that's not the reason for why

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it. I think your reasoning is flawed because

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 1>you went after the Seahawks, and I think I eloquently

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>explained what their schedule. To quote a great guy that's

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>been on this podcast almost every week, there as a

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>three dollar wow. Indeed, who is who would say such

0:22:55.600 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a thing? I wonder, UMC Marco, would you like to

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>hear about my fantasy football team? Or do you want

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to take a pass on that? Can you have thirty

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>seconds series? Okay, there is a numbers game, Gil, you know,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>all down to business. You know you tune in, you

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>know every weekday from seven to nine Pacific, and you

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>know all that stuff. Visa, you know you forgot to

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>plug yourself deal, so I'll do that for you. I

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>know you're slipping, but then you uh, then you have

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>megapod Gill a little more laid back, you know and

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>correcting jokes and everything. Then there's Monday Night Deal. He's

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's fun, he's eating, you know, he's eating

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>with us, he's doing breakfast burritos during the game and

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>everything else. And then there's the fourth and last Gil.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, this one doesn't come out that often, and

0:23:55.400 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>thank god he is a knutser the new Fantasy Gilt, yes,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know what that other than you know,

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the product that actually was on the screen with the

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Washington Redskins Monday, that was painful. Painful Fantasy Gil came

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>out because once Mark Santez got in that game, it

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was like, where am I really gonna watch this? Like

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna win this game? Like any Redskin bets are

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna cash. And let me just explain, it doesn't come out,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but it came out because I engineered. Let me use

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that word because it sounds powerful. I engineered a one

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in five fantasy football team to a seven and six

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>record and into my fantasy playoffs, knocking Clay Travis out.

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>May I just say that, which is of course a

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>metaphor for good overcoming evil and uh. And in the

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>playoffs now as the team, the proverbial team that no

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>one wants to play, so we'll see what happens. I

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to point that, and the way I got

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in was just by like two points. It was dramatic.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, I apologize, Marco Um. You know, I say

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>very nice things about you, but clearly you don't feel

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 1>that way about me. So let's move on to the

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night game, just messing with you. Uh, we have

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a flexed game Rams at the Bears, Rams favored by

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>three on the road. Mitch Trabinsky is a go Mitch

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Drabinsky is playing and Bears fans everywhere should be rejoicing

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in that because Chase Daniel not good at football, not

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>good at all. Rams with the Lions. They end up covering,

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>even though Todd Gurley messed around for a little bit

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>north the two minute warning where he was like, yeah,

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna score yet, let's see what happens. But

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>they do end up winning by fourteen thirty sixteen. They

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:37.719
<v Speaker 1>cover against the Lions. Bears force overtime miraculously against the

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Giants and then losing overtime by a field goal that

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>would have been if the If the Bears had pulled

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that off, that would have been one of the most

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous wins in the in the modern day history of

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. The Bears had six fumbles in that game

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and lost one of them, and they fumbled three times

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>on that last drive and recovered all of them. Like,

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just amazing that they would have had the possibility

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of winning that game anyway, they didn't. Giants win. Bears

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are eating for they leave the NFC North. Rams have

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>already clinched the NFC West. But of course the Rams

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the best record throughout the playoffs in

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the National Football Conference. Marco Ago, you look at this

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>one and obviously the Rams with their flashy offense, and

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll steal one of the lines that I know that

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the v R will come with. You know, styles make

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>fights and everything, and you talk about it here. This

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is the classic. You've got an offensive team against the

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>defensive team, and which one's gonna you know, win? Out here.

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I look at the Rams scheduling lies. They're in a negative.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>They're playing their second consecutive week on the road. UH.

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Last week on the road. Uh, they played indoors at Detroit,

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to deal with any weather elements and didn't

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 1>really have to deal with a football team either because

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, UM have not done anything. And this game,

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>like we talked about an earlier game in Lay, in

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter, this was a three point game and

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>then Stafford does what Stafford does. It throws a pick.

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>UH sets the Rams up, and then the Rams get

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the two touchdown margin and UH kill me and UH

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>play that I had on the Lions. And I'm shaking

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>my head while I did debt, but I did. I

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>just thought it was a horrible spot in between the

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City game in this Chicago game. Now they've got

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to come back play in the Windy City night game

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be you know, a little chillier at night obviously

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Windy City. I like the defense here to

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>win over the Rams have not been super impressive on

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the road. UM, this is a defense that gives up

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points. I know, it's it's hard to

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>say not been super impressive because the team, you know,

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>only has the loss to uh the to the Saints.

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>But They've given up a lot of points, and I

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>don't see Chicago being able to win a shootout, but

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I see Chicago being able to slow them down enough.

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And Trabinsky back in the lineup is the X factor. Um,

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>he's a bigger threat at this point of his career

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>with his feet than he is with his arm. But

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>he has had some good games and he traded points

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>with New England earlier in the year, a game that

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was you know, thirty thirty one. They went toe to

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>toe with them yardage wise, they outgained the Patriots, but

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 1>a couple of special teams plays turned that game around

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Patriots. I think Chicago gets the win here. Um,

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I like them is the home dog here. Uh, playing

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago in December for you know, warm weather team

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>advantaged Chicago. Scheduling back to back weeks on the road.

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Advantage Chicago. Let's go ahead and take them. For what

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is seems like an endless array of statement games for

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, this is their last statement game, uh, in

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>front of a national audience. I'm gonna go ahead and

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>go with them. Take Chicago outright, twenty seven to three.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Score rams catching a bit of a break. It's gonna

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be at least here as we do this Thursday morning

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>forecast calling for thirty four degrees at night. During that

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>game in Chicago Soldier Field, Sunday night game that was

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>flexed in by the way the Steelers and the Raiders

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was the game that was flexed out. And again about

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that Todd Gurley play. Girlely converted the third down late

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in the game against the Lines, and after breaking free,

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>chose not to score to run more time off the

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>clock force Detroit take time outs, and ultimately proved to

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>be a good move because Girley ran for a two

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>yard score with one fifty four left and the Lines

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>were left with no time outs on their final drive,

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>so Girley knew what Girley was doing. Bettors wanted to

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>kill him at that moment who had the rams, but

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>ended up working out for them anyway. He said, quote

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to waste some time unquote yeah, I like

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this Sunday night game day. I'm not even gonna waste

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the listeners time. They just want the winner. I'm gonna

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>give it to you right now, Chicago Bears. Take the points.

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna meet them, but take it because it's

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>generous and also we bet the under at fifty four

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and also add uh fifty three as I look, Yes,

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>so those are legit moves on the under. A couple

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of groups hit those I agree with them, but but

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I really like Chicago in this spot. Also, Uh, I'm

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>high on this Rams team. I talked about them a

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>lot why they're not covering spreads, but I think there's

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a good spot for Chicago coming off back to back

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>road games now at home, um and listen, they again

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a team that unfortunately turned the ball over

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a little too much for my liking. Uh, but I

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>so like how they produced turnovers with Chicago. UM, that's

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>why they've given us some points. But I think this

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>total was a little bit too high because you're paying

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>more for the names, um than anything else. And Marco's

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>right styles make fights and they make games as well.

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Rams are gonna have some trouble

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on offense here. I mean, as efficient as they are offensively,

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they've done their most damage UM when they're not one dimensional,

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>when they've been able to run successfully, and that's always

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>how them throw the ball successfully. But I don't think

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be able to run on this defense that

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>allows only eighty six yards per game on the ground,

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and more importantly only sixty six at home. At three

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>point one yards per rushing attent, You're not gonna run

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on this defense. And any time I say you become

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>one dimensional makes it easier for defenses, even against an

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>offense as efficient as the Los Angeles Rams. Again, I

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like Chicago in this spot, no reason to take up

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>more time. I think the points are a gift, and

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go ahead and and take Chicago and

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the under in what should be a much lower scoring

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>game than that total reflects. So give me the Bears.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm on board with Marco fifty one and a half

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>consensus on the total, right there, Tim, Uh, Yeah, obviously

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this is probably it's possibly my favorite game of the

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of the week from a fans perspective, when I'm really

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>interested in in watching um, even even with the good

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks game of the following nights. Uh. The the angle

0:31:57.760 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking at on this one, Gil, going back

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to some props, I'm I'm interested to see what they're

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna set Todd Gurley's rushing yards. Uh for going up

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>against that that great Chicago run defense. That just gave

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>up a hundred twenty five yards to stay Kwon Barkley. Um,

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of hoping that there ma that uh they

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>lower it a little bits, uh, but maybe a chance

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for the over. But if Todd Reerley gets too much credit, UM,

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I may be even looking for the under on on

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>believing in that Bears defense. But the next step if

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't like anything that Todd Gurley is giving, if

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that that line set, I'm gonna be looking

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>at Jared Goffe's completions. Um. In games where they've had,

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>where they've played uh, some quality run defenses, Todd Gurley

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>has been held to under a hundred yards and Jared

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Goff's completions have gone uh north of twenty three. So uh,

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley rushing yards and Jared goff completions are going

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the two player of props. And I'm looking

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>towards uh. And I'm probably gonna include the Bears and

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of my teasers teasing the Bears to nine

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>or ten depending on a six point seven point teaser.

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>We're six and a half a night and f I'd

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>go seven. Yeah, a lot of teaser opportunities Minnesota. Also

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>UM again as a dog at Seattle. Pretty darn tempting

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>as well, even though again you're going through the UH

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>seven and perhaps the ten if you do a seven

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>pointer as well as opposed to three and seven that is,

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but still huge on that one. Let's do Sunday Day games.

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Dibbs to you, Ace, what you got? This is so difficult,

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I swear I feel I could get out four sides

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and four totals and then feel confident about turning a profit. Uh.

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Narrowing it down. I'm gonna go ahead and uh go

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to New Orleans at Tampa Bay, just because this is

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a game I like to side and the total. We're

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna use the side for our best bet, but I'll

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>give the total out as well. This is one we

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>bet the total real quickly. Already bet deondre. Bet deondre

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.239
<v Speaker 1>at fifty six UM with New Orleans Tampa Bay. It's

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>why I's sitting at fifty five fifty five and a

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>half right now. I like Tampa getting the points as well.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And the number one reason for that is this UM revenge.

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be the talk revenge for the Saints

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for losing game one. UM of the season to this

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>same Tampa Bay team that, let's not forget New Orleans

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was a ten point favorite against them at home. At home,

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they were ten, and now they're eight and a half

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>on the road even nine at some spots. UM doesn't

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>make sense, specially when they're doing exactly what they're supposed

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. And this is what I mean by why

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>bring up what were the season win totals? You look

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>at the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, exactly where they're supposed to be,

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much right. The season win total was six and

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 1>a half with the over favor that went off six

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half with the younger favor their five and seven,

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 1>right where they should be. You look at New Orleans,

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a team that we were really high on coming into

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the season. I bet all those futures on they've come

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>through already hit their season win total over um. But again,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>they're they're doing pretty much what they're supposed to. Maybe

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they should be at nine and three right now, one

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>more win based on that. But with that said, this line,

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if you compare it, and again so many games have passed,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but still the fact that these teams are doing what

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to, and yet this point spread when compared

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>to that Week one game, not much of adjustment, even

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>though it's being played at a completely different location. Um.

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So for me, there's line value there automatically, And and

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprise you're not going to get New Orleans

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>at any discount just because they didn't cover against the

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys on Thursday Night football. When you cover as

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>many games as they did in a row, believe me

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that that taste is left in the book's mouth, just

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's left in the better's mouth. And how we

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 1>say betters remember what they saw last, rest of short books,

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>remember who hurt them last. So knowing New Orleans been

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those teams that they know is going to

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>get action on Sunday and you're not going to get

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>them at a discount. Um. And I think this is

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those spots where where that really holds true.

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And let's not forget man. I mean, Tampa's played them

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>tough in Tampa Bay. They beat them there last year

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>at six point home underdogs. They beat them there in

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>also straight up, Um, they play they play New Orleans

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>tomp I mean you look at the last hand four

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>games they really show up against the New Orleans Saints.

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I think only once in the last five have they

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.919
<v Speaker 1>lost by more than this point spread um And again,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I always say this about Tampa They could go down

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.959
<v Speaker 1>the field and score on anybody when it doesn't matter.

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>And when that's the case, that back door stays open

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>for a team like this. I'll take the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Give me the eight, eight and a half, whatever it is.

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're gonna need it. They'll keep it

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 1>within a touchdown. Well, I sprinkle, why not they beat

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>them once? They could beat them again? And I always

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 1>sprinkle if I'm gonna bet it, so my money's on

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay plus two points and the under double sprinkle

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>on the show. New Orleans giving eight at Tampa Bay

0:36:55.719 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>this week, ten days after their debacle at Dallas, they

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>were giving seven against the Cowboys. That was the most

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bizarre performance of the entire football season in terms of Okay,

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Maybe you thought the Cowboys wouldn't cover,

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe even thought the Cowboys are gonna win. But good lord,

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>if I told you before that game the Cowboys were

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>going to score thirteen points, how much of your bank

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 1>account would you have unloaded on the New Orleans Saints

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>headed into that game. Crazy performance from the Saints. We'll

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>see how they do against the Bucks. Aces taken the

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>points with Jamis Winston, who, by the way, last week

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.959
<v Speaker 1>filled up statuet very nicely twenty thirty for two forty

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>nine two touchdowns. Note picks five carries for forty eight

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>yards as well for Jamis in that ball game for

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks. Timmy, what you got? Uh? So I'm actually

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna piggyback off of Ace and go with that same game.

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a It's a game that I um that

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking looking towards, and it's probably the only game

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that I'm probably been in the side I look. I

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>think that if you're the New Orleans Saints and you

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>know that you you're fighting to possibly have to get

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that first place spot in the inn the NFC. Uh.

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Not only is this like a is this a revenge

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>game based on early in the season against the Bucks,

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but this is definitely a uh no, we really are

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>better than most of you. In response to how they performed,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>uh in Dallas what had been it was like what

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees is like second worst performance in half a

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>decade or something like that. Um, it's I think Drew

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Brees is gonna come out firing. That Tampa defense uh

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>leaves much to be desired. UM, anybody who listens to

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>my podcast, it's probably laughing right now because I gushed

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Saints last week and then of course they

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>uh they completely dropped the ball on on on performing.

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:37.439
<v Speaker 1>But I like them again this week. I've there They're

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in all of my teasers. I've probably gonna

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:42.879
<v Speaker 1>take the I may pass on the on the side

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because I missed the best missed the best number, but uh,

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>it was I teased it right away with a number

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of other games like uh like with the Chiefs and

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 1>UH and the Bears. UM. But I'm definitely going back

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to some player props. I am looking at Trey Kwan Smith. Um,

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at his receptions. He has sort of uh

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he had, he had an egg and then he had

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a huge game and then he didn't perform well. But

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers are are an inefficient passing defense,

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>and especially against number of the wide receiver one and two.

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>UH trade Kuwan Smith often is undervalued because his name

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>is that Michael Thomas in UH player props, and so

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I usually you can usually get a lot of value,

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>especially on the receptions over under on receptions um and

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>then going on the other way. Uh. The New Orleans

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Saints are actually the most inefficient defense against a wide

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>receiver too, according to our friends over at Football Outsiders.

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.959
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna be if Deshan Jackson apparently he didn't

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>he didn't practice uh um, I think yesterday with a thumb,

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>assuming he's good to go, I'm gonna definitely be looking

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at Deshan Jackson for all sorts of player props on

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on uh not on receptions uh past receiving yards and

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>then probably even longest longest reception I think, because this

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>could turn turn into a a shootout with Tampa Bay

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to keep up, I think they're gonna go deep

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a few times into Sean Jackson could be the beneficiary

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. Alright, Football Outsiders backing up a lot of

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what Timmy saying. New Orleans. By the way, Drew Brees

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.720
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday night, eighteen of twenty eight for one twenty

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>seven eighteen of twenty eight, one seven, one touchdown, one pick,

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventies six total yards of offense for

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the Saints a week after Thanksgiving. And remember all those

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>stats about how few third three and ounce they've had

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>all season long. They were three of eleven on third

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.320
<v Speaker 1>downs in that game against the Cowboys, Cowboys winning it

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:37.720
<v Speaker 1>again thirteen ten. Marco, Which way you're going on Sunday

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 1>going ugly? Guys going ugly. We're going to head out

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>West Detroit in Arizona. This might have been a game. Hey,

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>what's the one game you don't want to play? Exactly

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>what I was thinking, Yeah, this could be a great one.

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, it has been a bad, bad

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>run for our Johnny Detroit's Detroit Lions. They just finished

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>three games in a row at home and you're saying, okay,

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they you know, crap the bed at home. Why you

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:11.479
<v Speaker 1>want him on the road. You know what, when things

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>are going as bad as they are going, there's the

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>best place to be is away from home. You don't

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>have to listen to the local talk shows, you don't

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.919
<v Speaker 1>have to read the local newspapers. Get on the road,

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 1>just play a game. And I think that's the best

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>thing for the Lions. And let's face it, Arizona. Last

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>week's win against Green Bay was that the ugliest performance

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you ever saw from an NFL team, UM, Aaron Rodgers.

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, if he's heart wise, he even playing

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>all right? Uh you know, if we're gonna go with

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that card. This is a team to me last week

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that mailed everything in after what it happened the last

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>few weeks and then the discontent uh with the Aaron

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers and UH coach McCarthy and everything that unfolded after

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that game. I'm not putting any stock in the Arizona win.

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the team. Last week they were able to

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>put up a hundred and eighty two yards on the ground.

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>That's their offense passing wise the last three weeks, uh

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen a hundred twenty eight yards passing, eighty seven

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>yards passing dred and thirty three uh net yards. No,

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going with Arizona here. I'm gonna take Detroit

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>if they have any pride at all to show up

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in dismantle a bad Arizona football team. If they have

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>any pride at all, That is the caveat Marco that

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the one thing. They've lost five of six have

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 1>the Lions since Uh they had a winning record back

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in late October. If you can believe that another four

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and eight. That's not good, Josh Rosen, As you said,

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>eleven for one forty nine last week. But third and

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what was it, third and twenty three? You know that

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was the that was the big play of the game.

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals patchwork offensive line Rosen hits Larry Fitzgerald for sliding

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>thirty two yard completion helped set up Zane gonzalez Is

0:42:59.840 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>game winning forty four yard field goal with one forty

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.479
<v Speaker 1>one left against the Packers. Eventually, it was game winning

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>because Mason Crosby missing a forty nine yard attempt as

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>time expired. By way, that's what I say about the

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCarthy firing that that I haven't heard anybody else say,

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>which is because everybody's debating, Oh is it respectful to

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>do it now and not, you know, even at the

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the season. Here's my question. If Mason Crosby

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>makes that field goal, is he not fired? Like? How

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>result oriented is that? You know? I that's the point

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 1>that I can't get over. It's like, oh, it's because

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>he missed the field goal. Again, you got so upset

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that you decided to fire him then in there anyway,

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:34.760
<v Speaker 1>just a thought before we get too thoughts on Thursday

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 1>game and the final two questions. Remember, as always, support

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.320
<v Speaker 1>for today's show brought to you by the good folks

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>over at Bookmaker dot eu. Bookmaker dot eu I swear

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>by it. I wouldn't know what to do anymore. Seriously,

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't. I wouldn't bet anymore Without Bookmaker dot eu

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.280
<v Speaker 1>industry leader for close to thirty years, pro players consider

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 1>them a must, rightfully so, because their first post odds

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>take the highest limits and pride themselves on never having

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>kicked out a winning player. I'm telling you, I'm in

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>there betting replays all kinds of wacky things that they

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.720
<v Speaker 1>make market for its phenomenal Bookmakers, a high volume sports

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 1>book best suit of a sophisticated player who understands sports

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>betting as well as large recreational players as well. Catered

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to them and their motto where the lines originate. Chances

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 1>are your sports book follows their line once again. If

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>you visit Bookmaker dot eu slash gil that's Bookmaker dot

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>eu slash G I l l visit them today, join

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and claim an exclusive welcome bonus of up to three

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars. That's Bookmaker dot eu slash GIL with two

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>l's to join and claim your welcome bonus of up

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>to three hundred dollars. Really sincerely check it out at

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Bookmaker dot e. They are at the place to be. Yes.

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what else you can do with Bookmaker was

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that at half time of a bad bet, you can

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>get out of it, you know, like Monday night when

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you know people were jumping out of that Washington bet

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, getting out with Philadelphia you can do that,

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that, right? Yeah, as I was contemplating, I

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 1>was like, shoot, I bet Philadelphia minus four and a

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>half here. Yeah, because I had I had watched listen

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to Marco. Look how gleefully is. He's like he's like,

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>he's like he's making I got out. You sat there,

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. I tried to lead you down the promised

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>rail there, buddy, you were you were too busy with that.

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It was my idea, as I recalled, But I was like, yeah,

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna mess around with it. And I should have,

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but I was, of course, uh too much into my

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football team that I was kind of distracted. So anyway,

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:31.279
<v Speaker 1>thank you Zach Brown on fourth and goal. That's all

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to say. What if I send Zach Brown

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a fruit basket with a note attached and just said, hey, man,

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I just want to thank you for getting my fantasy

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 1>football team. Man, what do you think you would say

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 1>to that? He'd be like, what the hell is this guy?

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Who is that? Who the hell is that? What is

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the fruit basket? Alright? Thursday? And I thought it's not

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 1>very sexy, but it's Jacksonville at Tennessee. Tennessee is favored

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>by five and a half. It means a lot to

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee because they're six and six and they're in the

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>scrum for the wild card second wild card spot in

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the a f C. The total, to me here is

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting thing. The total is thirty seven. This

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 1>to me feels like and I've said this before on

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>some other games, this to me feels like the artificial

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>floor that we often see in baseball where there was

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>always a time in baseball where no totals would be

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>posted below sevens That were very rare. You know, do

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you never even see a six? Then after that and

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 1>then like only in recent times have you seen five

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And I always used to say, like

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>during the playoffs, I remember it was like Lindsey comin

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Oswalt where they wouldn't put it below six, and I

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 1>always just say this is an artificial flour. They just

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>won't go lower than this. This feels to me in

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>an era now where the average NFL totals are in

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the high forties, this thirty seven is particularly low. I

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's low enough. Curious as to your thoughts

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>on that, you know, I agree with you, Yes, they

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>can't in today's market, they can't go any lower than this.

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 1>They're just because, especially with the teasers too, you know

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:00.480
<v Speaker 1>how many people are gonna tease it ger and go

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>over and you know it could be a mistake. I mean,

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 1>look last week the six nothing game. But the only

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm gonna point out on this game on paper,

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to play Tennessee. I just find it really

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>intriguing that we finally saw the Jacksonville defense of two

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven team last week, and let's face it, the

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>cults were rolling going into there. And is it a coincidence?

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Does anybody tech the coincidence that the defense came to

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>play the first week that they actually benched Blake Bortles.

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>This was the locker room that I think was being

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>fractured offensive versus defensive. The defensive guys were tired of

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>carrying the team, tired of the Blake Bortles. You know scenario,

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:46.319
<v Speaker 1>They finally bench them and they get a big game.

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a primetime game for a team that has

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>nothing to play for. I've talked about it many many times.

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>If they're gonna come to play, this is the game

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they come to play for. So if you put the

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>old gun to my head, and that's the beauty. If

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 1>we don't off the bed every game, but the gun

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to my head, I would lean to Jacksonville. Yeah. I

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't bet this game, just to be completely honest with

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:09.759
<v Speaker 1>our listeners. Not a game I really love. But I

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:13.399
<v Speaker 1>agree with Marco. Um, I'm not high on this Tennessee team.

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Not comfortable lane the points, not sure why this line's

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 1>going up. But again, not a game that I have

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>touched so far. Uh. Yeah, I I agree with everything

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that's been said. I especially agree with I don't think

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>this is under is low enough. I think I think

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we're running back, is gonna get a lot of actions.

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this is gonna be a short game. Um.

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And so when you when you pair that with you know,

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:35.359
<v Speaker 1>who's actually gonna score points in this game. I think

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that that total could even be a little bit lower.

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:42.959
<v Speaker 1>I think Derrick Henry UH, Derrick Henry under rushing yards

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is a player of problem. I'm looking at tonight and

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:47.879
<v Speaker 1>U with that. With that total, I may be doing

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>some live betting. If there's a score early, I may

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>try to take advantage of a of a spike in

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>UH in the total and take the under UH in

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the in life betting, depending on how I see. But

0:48:57.840 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 1>there's also a good chance skill. But I don't watch

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 1>one into the there is that. I used to say

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that during baseball season, like a random Wednesday, uh, the

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>games were so bad, like in July, like really horrible,

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you are not required to watch this major League baseball game.

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say the same about this. But I do

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be a live betting fest for me

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in this game tonight. Let's go to the final two questions, gentlemen,

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 1>as always, by the way, before we do that, let

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:24.359
<v Speaker 1>me let me quote Jeff Fogel. Jeff Fogel, who does

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:26.919
<v Speaker 1>analytics over at Visa, is the author of the Visa

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>City Newsletter. And never give Jeff a shout on this

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>particular podcast, but he does something called drive points. It's

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>his own proprietary stat. It's a Visa exclusive stat. It

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 1>refers to drives of sixty yards or more. So basically

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you throw out short drives and you're trying to get

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 1>an assessment of which offenses can sustain drives and which

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:52.120
<v Speaker 1>defenses can you not sustain drives against. Well, Jacksonville currently

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>ranks is the fourth worst drive point offense through that

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 1>lens in the NFL that tabulates point scored or allowed

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to get on drives of sixty yards of more, just

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>nine point eight drive points per game this season for

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the Jags offense. Tennessee, on the other hand, ranks third

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 1>best on defense in that stat, allowing just eleven point

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 1>zero drive points per game. So basically, start with an

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>offense that struggles in Jacksonville. Then you throw in the

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that they have a backup quarterback here in Cody Kessler,

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 1>who I guess technically won his first start and the

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sixth nothing went over the Colts last week. He's got

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a short prep week here, first road game as a

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Jag against a pretty darn good Tennessee Titans defense at

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 1>least through that prison. So just to throw that in

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the mix as a nod to the Tennessee side anyway

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in this ball game. Alright, final two questions then, as promised.

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 1>First question is always which of the big favorites in

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:45.440
<v Speaker 1>your opinion is the most likely to lose? Outright? In

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Week fourteen? Your candidates are Kansas City Chiefs six and

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:52.239
<v Speaker 1>a half point consensus favorites at home against the Baltimore

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Ravens New Orleans, as we mentioned, eight point favorites on

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the road at Tampa Bay, New England, seven and a

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites on the road against my Amma Chargers,

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>fourteen point favorites at home against since Senata and Pittsburgh

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 1>ten point favorites on the road ten and a half

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>somewhere as well, on the road at Oakland. Timmy, start

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:13.840
<v Speaker 1>with you, who's the most likely to lose that? Right?

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I'm sorry if I did? You include Atlantic,

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>include Landing. Okay, well, then I think I want to go.

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Chiefs. I think, um, I think the Ravens. Uh.

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the Ravens proven that they that they're uh

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they could be competitive, and that they can uh,

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:31.879
<v Speaker 1>they can play. The Chiefs have had enough close games

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:35.920
<v Speaker 1>again in enough have played teams close enough in some

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:37.920
<v Speaker 1>games where I thought they'd really get some separation to

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 1>show that, you know, you know, I think that there

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>could be an opportunity for for Baltimore here. I'm not

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:46.440
<v Speaker 1>betting it, but that's my answer. Chief's first game without

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt against the legitimate NFL football team because we're

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 1>throughout the Raiders and the Raiders and the Raiders got

0:51:53.080 --> 0:51:56.360
<v Speaker 1>within three late in that game last week against the Chiefs.

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So Kareem Hunt no longer in the league as every

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and he knows after TMZ showed a video of him

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 1>shoving and kicking a girl and even at home, even

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:10.279
<v Speaker 1>at home against Arizona, I mean ended up being team

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>but like they're for a good part of that game.

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 1>It looks like Arizona was in it, right, And who's

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Arizona especially going on in Kansas City And that's with

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt right, So um yeah, I think I think

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is a live dog there. I'm gonna agree Baltimore,

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got the best defense getting a touchdown here basically,

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is gonna be I think the coming out

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>party of Lamar Jackson. The game plan has to be

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to take the reins off him in this game. They

0:52:37.000 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 1>can't win with him making just a handful of passes,

0:52:40.840 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in him running the football. They're gonna have

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:44.799
<v Speaker 1>to let him go downfield. And this is the best

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 1>defense for that to happen against UM And I think that, uh,

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:51.799
<v Speaker 1>if he does do that, we will officially have seen

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the last of Joe Flacco. I think that's probably true.

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 1>My big one, I'm god, you know, I already gave

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 1>ut Tampa Bay, but let's give an all one that

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I like, I think really has a shot of winning

0:53:02.040 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the game out right, and that's Miami Dompins against New England. Again,

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't get rich going against New England, but I

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>do think this is a spot that Miami could get

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it done in. I grabbed the points already, and anytime

0:53:13.520 --> 0:53:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I grabbed the points, I'm gonna sprinkle a little something

0:53:15.560 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 1>something sprinkle, And I after losing by thirty one to

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 1>them back in September, maybe Miami shows up and gets

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 1>it done for us. Is that a world record? Three

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:27.239
<v Speaker 1>sprinkles on one show? I think it is Miami that

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 1>has ar written all over it. Miami. Could you imagine

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a three team Sprinkle parlay hidden on that man, Jeremy Sprinkle.

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Shout out Miami by the way, six and six. They

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:40.960
<v Speaker 1>need this to they're in the scrum of teams for

0:53:41.040 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that wild card, that second wild card in the a

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>f C Division game at Miami. Good choice right there.

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Final question, if we live in the bizarro world, you

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>got to, uh, you had to make a pick in

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>every one of these games on the side you got

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 1>one free pass, though, which game would you pass on? Tim? Uh?

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's a there's several games here that

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are that are kind of ugly and that would but

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I could talk myself into at least one

0:54:02.280 --> 0:54:06.479
<v Speaker 1>of those sides except four Giants Redskins. Giants Redskins. Yeah,

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I want no part of that game. That's that's an

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting one. When I went from Colt McCoy and Mark Stanchez,

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:13.919
<v Speaker 1>it went from one point Redskin favorite to a four

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:17.880
<v Speaker 1>point Giants through the three. Right now, it's settling in

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a Giants minus three and a half on the road

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 1>against the sad Shiz and you're Washington Redskins, Marco, You're

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Washington Redskins. But I don't I wouldn't want to. I

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to back you lie either, right right? That

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 1>BAMA defense is gonna be tough. Marcom Hey, for the

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>New York Giant fans out there, got a stat for you.

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Think about this, chillab on this one. Odell Beckham Jr.

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Has to touchdown passes of forty plus yards this year.

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how many eli have one? None. I'm

0:54:56.160 --> 0:55:01.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to the l A Super Charger super and

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:03.400
<v Speaker 1>say that I don't want any part of this because

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:06.880
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. First of all, you cannot give me

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:10.319
<v Speaker 1>enough money right now to bet the Cincinnati Bengals. There

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no situation that I think I could find myself

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 1>on them with unless maybe the last game of the

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:18.239
<v Speaker 1>season when they play the Steelers. If they're in a

0:55:18.320 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 1>spoiler's role. Uh, this team is toast Martin Lewis's toast.

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:25.920
<v Speaker 1>But do you really want to lay double digits with

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers in the ultimate of sandwich games. They had

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:33.479
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers on Sunday night, and look at what they've

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 1>got up in four days people, four days, Kansas City,

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. I'm all about the charges. I gotta to

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:44.160
<v Speaker 1>win the a f C future on them. I think

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:48.759
<v Speaker 1>they are sneaky good, and I don't think there is

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a flawless team in the a f C. I really don't. Plus,

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I haven't met seven to one plus seven ten actually,

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>which again I know if you parlay them through the playoffs,

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.759
<v Speaker 1>you'll get a number higher than that. Uh there are

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>no more plus seven tents out there as far as

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I know. That was before the Steelers game. So glad

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I got that in my pocket because I really believe

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that team is when they get Melvin Gordon back to

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they got Bosa, They're gonna have their whole team together,

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:15.400
<v Speaker 1>probably the most balanced team in the a f C.

0:56:15.840 --> 0:56:19.320
<v Speaker 1>We shall see in five the last four games straight

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:22.360
<v Speaker 1>up nineteen and five straight up? What do you not

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:25.959
<v Speaker 1>want here? Real quickly? That that four team money line

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 1>parlay we touched on, which was Minnesota, Vikings, Bears, Tampa

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Bay and Miami actually a hundred dollars paced back like

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Dred just tossed it in just because we said it.

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:40.279
<v Speaker 1>What happens if it wins, um So if you guys

0:56:40.360 --> 0:56:42.880
<v Speaker 1>want to follow, it will pay about for a hundre. Right,

0:56:43.360 --> 0:56:46.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna go Jets versus Buffalo, uh nine, A

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>game I want to touch Buffalo just beat them two

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:51.879
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. Was its three weeks ago by thirty one

0:56:52.040 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 1>points as seven point road dogs. Um now they're home favorite. Yeah,

0:56:56.600 --> 0:56:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills a home favorite. Um yeah, nothing I want

0:56:59.920 --> 0:57:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to get out in front of Yeah. Yeah, watch the

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Jets show up for that. That's true. I don't want

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:07.279
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with that either. All right, gentlemen, we've

0:57:07.320 --> 0:57:10.040
<v Speaker 1>done all we can do. Week fourteen in the National

0:57:10.160 --> 0:57:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Football League. As always, thank you Marco, thank you, Ace,

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the time, and Tim a better life the podcast

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>bailable everywhere that podcasts are distributed, and this weekend featuring

0:57:22.320 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 1>our own Ace, so we look forward to that. Thank

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you all for listening, Tim, thank you appreciate it, and

0:57:28.960 --> 0:57:30.840
<v Speaker 1>as always, good luck with all your bets. Week fourteen

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Thank you so much for listen.