Speaker 1: Welcome it as a verdict. With Senator Ted Cruz Ben
Speaker 1: Ferguson with you, Senator, We've got some victories to talk
Speaker 1: about that are big for this country coming up in
Speaker 1: just a moment. But before we get to that, an
Speaker 1: FBI special agent has come forward as a whistleblower, along
Speaker 1: with several other whistle blowers who have now gone before
Speaker 1: Congress on the House side Jim Jordan's committee, I want
Speaker 1: to get your just initial reaction to finally getting to
Speaker 1: see what these whistleblowers are saying.
Speaker 2: Well, the evidence keeps coming out every day about just
Speaker 2: how politicized and how weaponized the FBI and the Department
Speaker 2: of Justice has become under Joe Biden. Yesterday in the
Speaker 2: House of Representatives and hearing chaired by Jim Jordan, there
Speaker 2: was testimony from multiple FBI whistleblowers who heroically came forward
Speaker 2: at enormous risk to themselves, at enormous risk to themselves,
Speaker 2: to their career, to their livelihoods, to the ability to
Speaker 2: feed their families, and among other things. They testified that
Speaker 2: that risk was not theoretical, but it was it was
Speaker 2: very real, and yet they were so disturbed by the
Speaker 2: politicization by the corruption that they had witnessed at the
Speaker 2: FBI that they felt obliged to come forward, and it
Speaker 2: really was striking. This is a continuation of the two
Speaker 2: podcasts we did last week, the special Interview with Jim Jordan,
Speaker 2: where Jim previewed this testimony with us on the two
Speaker 2: podcasts last week, and and if you didn't listen to
Speaker 2: them last week, you should go back and listen to
Speaker 2: Jim walking through the evidence of weaponization that has been
Speaker 2: developed by the House to date. But the hearing yesterday, well,
Speaker 2: it started with Jim Jordan giving a warning to the
Speaker 2: FBI whistleblowers who could come forward. Listen to what Jim
Speaker 2: warned them as the hearing began. We've talked over two
Speaker 2: dozen workustle blowers. People have come to us.
Speaker 3: We've interviewed several of those, and today three of them,
Speaker 3: three of those brave whistle blowers and the lawyer who
Speaker 3: represents them, will tell us their story. They will tell
Speaker 3: us what happened, what they saw, and then what happened
Speaker 3: to them because they were courageous enough to report it
Speaker 3: to Congress. And I just want to tell you, guys,
Speaker 3: get ready, get ready, because these guys are going to
Speaker 3: come after you.
Speaker 4: You know they are last hearing we had.
Speaker 3: Last hearing we had we had two journalists Democrats, two
Speaker 3: Democrat journalists set right where you guys did, and these
Speaker 3: guys tried to get them to divulge their sources. Someone
Speaker 3: needs to tell them how the First Amendment works. And
Speaker 3: while mister Tayabe, one of those award winning journalists setting
Speaker 3: right where you're setting, was testifying, guess what else was happening.
Speaker 3: The irs was knocking on his door. So get ready.
Speaker 3: But I know you're up to the task because you
Speaker 3: came forward in the first place.
Speaker 1: Senator, you listened to Jim Jordan's warning, and it's clearly
Speaker 1: accurate based on what these whistleblowers have experienced, including the
Speaker 1: fact that this FBI whistleblower testified for the first time
Speaker 1: publicly that not only did he swear to defend this
Speaker 1: country from enemies both foreign and domestic, but he didn't
Speaker 1: realize that he was going to have to sacrifice his
Speaker 1: entire career after being a whistleblower when the FBI retaliated
Speaker 1: against him. And that's not what the law says it's
Speaker 1: supposed to happen.
Speaker 2: That's exactly right under federal law. If you come forward
Speaker 2: as a whistleblower, you're entitled to the protection of law,
Speaker 2: and it is illegal. It is a crime for your
Speaker 2: employer to retaliate against you for being a whistleblower for
Speaker 2: exposing corruption, especially when you're taking it to the United
Speaker 2: States Congress. The Congress has a responsibility under a constitution
Speaker 2: to engage in oversight. And yet the FBI sadly that
Speaker 2: they're so brazen in how politicized they are that they
Speaker 2: didn't hesitate to go after these guys directly and immediately. Well, here,
Speaker 2: listen to the testimony from one of the witnesses about
Speaker 2: how they went after him very directly.
Speaker 5: It's currently in place at the FBI are clearly inadequate
Speaker 5: and must be reworked to protect whistle blowers and others
Speaker 5: who are inappropriately targeted. The FBI can extract whatever they
Speaker 5: want from me. I'm willing to bear that burden. I've
Speaker 5: sworn to defend this country from enemies, both foreign and domestic,
Speaker 5: even if that means sacrificing my life. I've lived that
Speaker 5: oath out since first enlisting in the army, consistently saying here,
Speaker 5: am I send me my oath, however, did not include
Speaker 5: sacrificing the hopes, dreams, and livelihood of my family, my strong,
Speaker 5: beautiful and courageous wife and our four sweet and beautiful
Speaker 5: daughters who have endured this process along with me. In
Speaker 5: weaponized fashion, the FBI allowed me to accept orders to
Speaker 5: a new position halfway across the country. They allowed us
Speaker 5: to sell my family's home. They ordered me to report
Speaker 5: to the new unit when our youngest, a Or, was
Speaker 5: two weeks old. Then on my first day on the
Speaker 5: new assignment, they suspended me, rendering my family homeless. They
Speaker 5: refused to release our goods, including our clothes.
Speaker 4: For weeks.
Speaker 5: All I wanted to do was serve my country by
Speaker 5: stopping bad guys and protecting the innocent. To my chagrin,
Speaker 5: bad guys have begun running parts of the government, making
Speaker 5: it difficult to continue to serve this nation and protect
Speaker 5: the innocent. But I, for one, will never stop trying,
Speaker 5: and I'll never forget my oath.
Speaker 4: Sater.
Speaker 1: You hear him there, He gets choked up because it's
Speaker 1: obvious the FBI knew what they were doing. They decided, Okay,
Speaker 1: you're gonna whistle blow. You're not going to be one
Speaker 1: of us, you're going to tell the truth. Fine, we'll
Speaker 1: ship you off to a new job, and then when
Speaker 1: you get there on day one, we are going to
Speaker 1: suspend you, leave you home with and hold your goods hostage.
Speaker 1: Is that not the definition of retaliation?
Speaker 2: Well, it's petty, it's vindictive, and understand the timeline. And
Speaker 2: he laid out that they did this after he had
Speaker 2: come forward as a whistleblower. So they transfer him, he
Speaker 2: sells his house, he moves his family, and then boom,
Speaker 2: when he gets there, the job that he was transferred
Speaker 2: to do, he's prevented from doing. And that, you know,
Speaker 2: it reveals a lot that his supervisors seemingly have no
Speaker 2: fear of any consequences for this retaliation. They're in a culture. Look,
Speaker 2: this is the same culture that pervaded the FBI, that
Speaker 2: led the FBI to target Donald Trump when he was
Speaker 2: the Republican nominee for president and to feel like they
Speaker 2: needn't worry about whether there was any evidence of collusion
Speaker 2: with Russia. They needn't worry about whether the thing they
Speaker 2: were investigating, the Steel Dossier, was a fraudulent piece of
Speaker 2: opposition research paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign, which
Speaker 2: it was and which they had every reason to know
Speaker 2: that it was, because, unfortunately, it appears that these corrupt
Speaker 2: partisans in senior positions at the FBI believe they are
Speaker 2: impervious to the strictures of law or to any accountability.
Speaker 2: It's the same arrogance that pervaded the IRS, that led
Speaker 2: the IRS to come knocking on the door of journalist
Speaker 2: Matt Taibi literally while he is sitting testifying before Congress.
Speaker 2: They didn't have the good good sense to wait a
Speaker 2: day or a week and make it seem coincidental. They
Speaker 2: wanted you to know you rat on us, We're coming
Speaker 2: after you. That's the same vindictiveness the FBI is demonstrating here.
Speaker 1: You look at this testimony from this former FBI agent
Speaker 1: Center and not only do you serve in the US
Speaker 1: Army as an infantryman in Iraq and Afghanistan for a
Speaker 1: year each, but according to his testimony in the report,
Speaker 1: he received the combat infantryman bad just the man that
Speaker 1: believed in this country. He also the report alleges that
Speaker 1: the whistleblower testimony reveals quote that the FBI's partisan leadership
Speaker 1: is currently engaged in a purge of agents who hold
Speaker 1: conservative beliefs and I want to get your reaction to that.
Speaker 1: But first let me tell you about a friends at
Speaker 1: Augusta Precious Medals. You know what's been going on with
Speaker 1: the economy, with interest rates, with some bank failures, it's
Speaker 1: gotten pretty crazy. And if you want to be able
Speaker 1: to protect your heart earned dollars, now is the time
Speaker 1: to do it. With my friends at Augusta Precious Metals.
Speaker 1: They understand how to help you protect your heart earned
Speaker 1: dollars with a gold ira. If you want to reprotect
Speaker 1: your retirement savings and have diversification, you should talk to
Speaker 1: my friends at a gust of Precious Medals. If you've
Speaker 1: saved one hundred thousand dollars or more for retirement, they
Speaker 1: will actually pay you in pure gold, give you free
Speaker 1: gold just so that you understand and learn about a
Speaker 1: gold ira and how it can protect you. That's a
Speaker 1: big deal, a pure gold free coin. Reach out to
Speaker 1: Agusta Precious Medals today and get started with gold. Don't
Speaker 1: let the bank failures get you down. Get the free
Speaker 1: gold and get some peace of mind. Age seven to
Speaker 1: seven the number four gold Ira eight seven seven the
Speaker 1: number four gold Ira to learn how to protect your
Speaker 1: retirement and get your free gold coin augusta Precious Metals
Speaker 1: dot Com. Senator, you hear this whistleblower A ladds that
Speaker 1: the FBI's partisan leadership is currently engaged in a purge
Speaker 1: of agents who hold conservative beliefs. The whistleblower even disclose
Speaker 1: that many of their jobs, their career paths have been
Speaker 1: basically stunted on purpose to get them frustrated so they'll
Speaker 1: maybe just leave on their own.
Speaker 2: Well. Unfortunately, I think this is a pattern we're seeing
Speaker 2: throughout the Biden administration, but particularly in areas of the
Speaker 2: military and law enforcement. I think they're doing everything they
Speaker 2: can to try to drive conservatives out of government. We've
Speaker 2: talked on this podcast before. I think that was one
Speaker 2: of the major objectives of the Biden vaccine mandate for
Speaker 2: government employees is that they knew that those men and
Speaker 2: women who refused to take the vaccine were much more
Speaker 2: likely to be conservative, and their view was good riddance.
Speaker 2: Get them out of the FBI, get them out of DOJ,
Speaker 2: get them out of the military, get them out of
Speaker 2: the border patrol, get them out of the federal government.
Speaker 2: And it is part of turning all of the enforcement
Speaker 2: mechanism of the government into a weapon, a weapon to
Speaker 2: be used to target your enemies. And so that weapon
Speaker 2: is used against the individual employees who happen to be conservative,
Speaker 2: and it's also used against American citizens because when you've
Speaker 2: driven all the conservatives out, those who remain appear far
Speaker 2: more willing to be complicit in the abuse of power.
Speaker 2: And I got to tell you, as I am in DC,
Speaker 2: as i'm back in Texas, as I travel around, I
Speaker 2: regularly speak to employees at the Department of Justice, employees
Speaker 2: at the FBI, whether special agents, whether prosecutors, who are
Speaker 2: deeply dismayed at what they're seeing in the department. And
Speaker 2: they're dismayed, but they're afraid to speak out. They're afraid
Speaker 2: because the consequences, because they believe in their mission. Look,
Speaker 2: most people that are at DOJ or the FBI, they
Speaker 2: sign up because they want to stop bad guys. They
Speaker 2: want to lock up child predators, they want to lock
Speaker 2: up terrorists, they want to keep America safe. And there
Speaker 2: are thousands upon thousands of honorable heroes at DOJ and
Speaker 2: the FBI, but many of them right now are scared
Speaker 2: to speak. And I got to say, one of the
Speaker 2: more chilling exchanges in the testimony today was when one
Speaker 2: of the witnesses was asked would he advise another whistleblower
Speaker 2: to come forward.
Speaker 4: Listen to his answer, mister.
Speaker 6: Boyle, we just heard from your interaction with mister Gates
Speaker 6: and how all of this occurred and all of the
Speaker 6: hardships you've gone through. If one of your really good friends,
Speaker 6: your former colleagues, came to you and said, I have
Speaker 6: this thing that is being covered up and I think
Speaker 6: the American people need to know about it, what advice
Speaker 6: would you give them.
Speaker 5: I'll tell them first to pray about it long and hard,
Speaker 5: and I would tell them I could take it to
Speaker 5: Congress for them, or I could put them in touch
Speaker 5: with Congress, but I would advise them not to do it.
Speaker 6: So you would legitimately try to protect one of your
Speaker 6: colleagues from doing what you have done.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, and how do you think.
Speaker 6: That solves being able to shine light on corruption, weaponization,
Speaker 6: any kind of misconduct that exists with the American people.
Speaker 4: It doesn't solve it. But the FBI will crush you.
Speaker 5: This government will crush you and your family if you
Speaker 5: try to expose the truth about things that they are
Speaker 5: doing that are wrong, and we are all examples of that.
Speaker 6: I can't think of a more so wearing way to
Speaker 6: end a hearing.
Speaker 4: Iiel back, I.
Speaker 1: Mean, you hear that, and I do think it's shocking,
Speaker 1: But I think Democrats are proud of this moment Center.
Speaker 1: They're like, good, you should be scared, you should be terrified.
Speaker 1: This is intimidation, this is what they want.
Speaker 2: And I got to say, one of the more disappointing
Speaker 2: aspects of yesterday's hearing was the Democrat congress men and
Speaker 2: women who were perfectly happy to attack these FBI whistleblowers.
Speaker 2: They treat this as a partisan battle, our team versus
Speaker 2: their team, and in their view, if you dare dissent
Speaker 2: from the brutal repression of descent, then you're suddenly the enemy.
Speaker 2: And I got to say, look, I get that they're
Speaker 2: partisan battles in Washington, but I have to admit if
Speaker 2: the shoe were on the other foot, and this testimony
Speaker 2: about the weaponization of the FBI to target people because
Speaker 2: of their political views on the left, I'm quite confident
Speaker 2: I would be. Every bit is dismayed, and I wonder
Speaker 2: where is the Democrat who cares about the rule of law,
Speaker 2: even if the Democrat happens to you know, not like
Speaker 2: the conservatives who are the target of this persecution. Is
Speaker 2: is there not a single Democrat congressman who says, well, gosh,
Speaker 2: if the DOJ and FBI can be turned to attack
Speaker 2: the political opponents of the White House, you know, that
Speaker 2: could happen to us too. Now, mind you, they're rhetoric.
Speaker 2: They claimed it happened under Trump all the time. But
Speaker 2: if you actually look to evidence, the Department of Justice
Speaker 2: didn't do that. It didn't didn't go out and persecute
Speaker 2: the political opponents of the president. In fact, they should
Speaker 2: have done much more going after Antifa, violent criminals, but
Speaker 2: not for their political views. Look, you can be a
Speaker 2: leftist or an anarchist if you want. That's not criminal.
Speaker 2: But when you light cities on fire, and you loot stores,
Speaker 2: and you assault people and murder people, that is criminal.
Speaker 2: And if anything, I think that Trump DOJ should have
Speaker 2: been much more vigorous in going after violent criminals. But
Speaker 2: that's not politicization, that's actually doing your job. Where is
Speaker 2: the Democrat willing to defend the rule of law? And
Speaker 2: I'll point out when Congress a generation before heard the
Speaker 2: evidence of Richard Nixon, trying to politicize the Department of Justice,
Speaker 2: trying to politicize the FBI, trying to politicize the irs.
Speaker 2: Numerous Republicans stood up and said, this is beyond the pale,
Speaker 2: This is too much, this is not acceptable. Is there
Speaker 2: not one Democrat member of Congress with the same level
Speaker 2: of integrity that you saw Republican after Republican who called
Speaker 2: for Richard Nixon's investigation and ultimately resignation, Like, is there
Speaker 2: not one Democrat who cares about rule of law?
Speaker 1: One of the whistle blowers also said Senator that the
Speaker 1: FBI is quote currently cancerous and has let itself become
Speaker 1: enveloped in the politicalization and weaponization. And the example was
Speaker 1: the FBI classified every single this is the testimony January
Speaker 1: sixth case as a domestic terrorism case, according to the whistleblower,
Speaker 1: despite quote hundreds of them being resolved resolved as petty
Speaker 1: crimes like trespassing and or disorderly conduct. You were labeled
Speaker 1: as a domestic terrorist in a domestic terrorism case.
Speaker 2: Well, and that's politics, mind you. This is the same
Speaker 2: FBI that apparently has no resources to go after the
Speaker 2: people who are firebombing crisis pregnancy centers that apparently has
Speaker 2: no resources to go after the people who are breaking
Speaker 2: federal law brazenly night after night, protesting outside the homes
Speaker 2: of Supreme Court justices and implicitly threatening their lives and
Speaker 2: their families. They can't be bothered to devote their resources
Speaker 2: to doing that. But when it comes to criminalizing peaceful speech,
Speaker 2: that the FBI and DOJ have unlimited resources for. And
Speaker 2: to be clear, there's a fundamental difference between violence and
Speaker 2: peaceful speech. If you engage in violence, whether I agree
Speaker 2: with you or not. If you engage in violence, you
Speaker 2: should be prosecuted and go to jail. But if you're
Speaker 2: engaged in peaceful speech, whether I agree with you or not,
Speaker 2: that is protected by the First Amendment. And this Department
Speaker 2: of Justice under Joe Biden, and this FBI under Joe
Speaker 2: Biden wants to treat them as exactly the same and
Speaker 2: criminalize the speech of those who showed up on January
Speaker 2: sixth to support President Trump, but more broadly, the tens
Speaker 2: of millions of Republicans who vote on the other side.
Speaker 2: These are the same people that want to criminalize the
Speaker 2: speech of moms and dads going to school boards and indeed,
Speaker 2: the same FBI agents. They've got ample resources to go
Speaker 2: and interview dozens of parents for exercising their First Amendment rights.
Speaker 2: It's political intimidation, and it is deliberate, and it is
Speaker 2: from the very top. It is from Merrick Garland, the
Speaker 2: most political Attorney general this country's ever seen.
Speaker 1: The good news is, and I hope that what happens
Speaker 1: is other whistleblowers will be inspired by these people that
Speaker 1: have come forward and do the exact same thing, because
Speaker 1: this is how we change the tide of what's happening
Speaker 1: in Washington, which brings me to another big story center.
Speaker 1: A Biden appointed US Attorney for Massachusetts, someone that what
Speaker 1: you warned America about, is now resigning after a special
Speaker 1: counsel investigation. And before we get into that good news,
Speaker 1: let me tell you about our friends over at Chalk.
Speaker 1: If you're a guy and you have noticed a difference,
Speaker 1: you've noticed that you're starting to get tired and fatigued,
Speaker 1: having weakness and complacency, it's probably not your fault. There's
Speaker 1: a problem with men's soust frum levels falling off a
Speaker 1: cliff historically to an all time low. Thankfully, there's a
Speaker 1: company called Chalk and they're here to help real American
Speaker 1: men take back your masculinity, maximizing your masculinity by boosting
Speaker 1: your testosterrum levels up to twenty percent over ninety days now.
Speaker 1: I've been taking Chalk the Male Bactility Stack now for
Speaker 1: several months, and I can tell you it works. It's
Speaker 1: manufactured right here in the US. Chalk's natural herbal supplements
Speaker 1: are clinically proven to have game changing effects on your energy,
Speaker 1: on your focus, and they just make you feel like
Speaker 1: you are not, you know, as old as maybe you
Speaker 1: are right now. If you're ready to go back in time, well,
Speaker 1: then Chalk can help you do it. Use the promo
Speaker 1: code Ben for thirty five percent off any Chalk subscription
Speaker 1: for life. You can cancel any time. Go to chalkcchoq
Speaker 1: dot com use the promo code Ben for thirty five
Speaker 1: percent off. That's Chalk choq dot com for thirty five
Speaker 1: percent off. Senator, this Biden appointed US attorney. News broke
Speaker 1: about the Special Counsel's investigation and what they found, and
Speaker 1: this is how NBC News reported it. It was obviously
Speaker 1: big news.
Speaker 7: We have an update for you on Massachusetts US Attorney
Speaker 7: Rachel Rawlins a brand new report just out moments ago
Speaker 7: finds that she quote wilfully violated the Hatch Act on
Speaker 7: multiple occasions during.
Speaker 4: Her time as US Attorney Now.
Speaker 7: The report, published by the US Office of Special Counsel,
Speaker 7: comes one day after Rollins announced that she plans to
Speaker 7: resign from her post by the end of the week.
Speaker 4: So let's explain what this means here.
Speaker 7: The Hatch Act is critically important to our government and
Speaker 7: certain parts of our certain branches of our government being
Speaker 7: non partisan.
Speaker 4: It's designed to limit certain.
Speaker 7: Political activities of federal employees to ensure federal programs remain
Speaker 7: nonpartisan and not biased. Rollins is accused of attending a
Speaker 7: political party.
Speaker 4: Fundraiser while in office.
Speaker 7: The report also saying she tried to sabotage the campaign
Speaker 7: of a political candidate by leaking non public information to
Speaker 7: the media.
Speaker 1: I mean center. The worst part is Democrats and everything
Speaker 1: they could to save her. And finally, after violating the
Speaker 1: most egregious Hatch Act violations, she's now going to resign.
Speaker 2: Well, she has resigned, and I have to say this
Speaker 2: is an enormous victory for the role of law number one.
Speaker 2: We're talking about weaponizing the Department of Justice and abusing power.
Speaker 2: Rachel Rollins did all of that, and the report that
Speaker 2: came out is stunning. There were two reports that actually
Speaker 2: came out. One from the Office of the Special Council.
Speaker 2: That's an office that has exclusive jurisdiction investigating allegations concerning
Speaker 2: prohibited political activities under the Hatch Act. The Hatch AC
Speaker 2: specifically prohibits most government employees from engaging in partisan politics.
Speaker 2: So that was one report, and there was a second
Speaker 2: parallel investigation from the Department of Justice Office of the
Speaker 2: Inspector General. Both released reports and the reports were damning.
Speaker 2: So what they found she did is number one, and
Speaker 2: I'm quoting from the OIG report. Rollins assisted a candidate
Speaker 2: and a partisan political election and sought to influence an
Speaker 2: election by, among other things, disclosing non public sensitive DOJ
Speaker 2: information to the press. Rollins made false statements under oath
Speaker 2: and lacked candor about the disclosure during her OIG interview.
Speaker 2: And this concern. She had been the Suffolk DA District
Speaker 2: attorney before she was named US attorney, and there was
Speaker 2: a race to succeed her, and she wanted one really
Speaker 2: left wing Democrat candidate, Ricardo Arroyo, That's who she wanted
Speaker 2: in the primary, and in order to help her guy,
Speaker 2: she was trying to smear the other Democrats. So she
Speaker 2: was willing to break the law, not even to smear
Speaker 2: a Republican, to smear a Democrat who wasn't sufficiently left
Speaker 2: wing for her. And according to the OIG, she used
Speaker 2: her position as US Attorney and information available to her
Speaker 2: as US attorney in an ultimately unsuccessful effort to create
Speaker 2: the impression publicly before the primary election that DOJ was
Speaker 2: or would be investigating Hayden, the other Democrat, for public corruption.
Speaker 2: These efforts included, but were not limited to Rollins trying
Speaker 2: unsuccessfully to convince her first assistant US Attorney to issue
Speaker 2: a letter that would have created the impression that DOJ
Speaker 2: was investigating Haye and when that effort failed, disclosing non
Speaker 2: public sensitive DOJ information directly to a Herald reporter before
Speaker 2: the primary election. Afterwards, she falsely testified under oath during
Speaker 2: her OIG interview, she made false statements, which is a
Speaker 2: felony under eighteen USC. Section one thousand and one. And
Speaker 2: on top of that, she's the sitting US attorney, and
Speaker 2: she attended a Democrat fundraiser on July fourteenth, twenty twenty
Speaker 2: two with Jill Biden, Joe Biden's wife. Now, before she
Speaker 2: went to that fundraiser, she asked the Executive Office of
Speaker 2: US Attorney's the General Council's Office, could she go to
Speaker 2: the fundraiser, And they said, no, she can't go to
Speaker 2: the fundraiser. They said, if you want, you can meet
Speaker 2: Jill Biden outside of the location of the event and
Speaker 2: a brief meet and greet outdoors, but you can't go
Speaker 2: into a politically partisan fundraiser because you're the sitting US
Speaker 2: attorney and that is against the rules for a federal
Speaker 2: prosecutor to engage in partisan politics. Well, even after she'd
Speaker 2: received that explicit instruction from the General Counsel's office, contrary
Speaker 2: to the advice she gave it, I'll just read what
Speaker 2: the OIG concluded quote. Our investigation revealed that, contrary to
Speaker 2: the advice she received, Rollins attended the fundraising event. Based
Speaker 2: on Rollins's only only account of what she did. After
Speaker 2: she arrived at the fundraising location, Rollins went inside the home,
Speaker 2: mingled with the guest, and stood in the same receiving
Speaker 2: line as the other fundraising gets guests to meet doctor Biden.
Speaker 2: Rollinson's interactions with doctor Biden was identical to that of
Speaker 2: the other fundraising guests whose primary purpose for being at
Speaker 2: the event was to get in line and meet doctor Biden.
Speaker 2: That is stunning. It is a pattern of illegality. It
Speaker 2: is a pattern of a sitting US attorney committing multiple
Speaker 2: felonies so bad, and abusing her power as a federal
Speaker 2: prosecutor to try to influence an election, in particular, to
Speaker 2: try to smear a Democrat, not even a Republican, a
Speaker 2: Democrat who wasn't sufficiently left wing and radical. This report
Speaker 2: came out and Rachel Rollins is resigned. That's a big deal.
Speaker 2: It is a big deal.
Speaker 1: And you warned the American people about Rachel Rawlings and
Speaker 1: this was back gosh what over a year ago when
Speaker 1: you warned America. I want people to hear what your
Speaker 1: warning was. And before I play that for everybody, I
Speaker 1: want to tell you about our friends of our Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1: If you are sick and tired of woke agenda from companies,
Speaker 1: and you're sick and tired of giving them your money,
Speaker 1: there is an option now for you with your cell phone.
Speaker 1: For years, big mobile companies have been dumping millions and
Speaker 1: millions into leftist causes, and you had to deal with
Speaker 1: it because that was the only option that existed. Not anymore.
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile is a mayor because only conservative Christian wireless
Speaker 1: provider offering major, dependable nationwide coverage on all three networks,
Speaker 1: so you get the best possible service in your area
Speaker 1: without the loke propaganda, the looke agenda push by leftist
Speaker 1: working hard destroy this country. When you switch to Patriot Mobile,
Speaker 1: you support free speech and religious freedom, the sancty of life,
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment, and our military, our veterans or first responders.
Speaker 1: Plus they have one hundred percent US based customer service
Speaker 1: teams that make switching easy. You also get to keep
Speaker 1: your same cell phone number if you want to. You
Speaker 1: can keep your same cell phone or switch to a
Speaker 1: new one. Check them out and get free activation with
Speaker 1: the promo code Verdict. Go to Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict,
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile dot com slash verdict or eight seven eight
Speaker 1: Patriot that's eight seven eight Patriot or Patriotmobile dot com
Speaker 1: slash Verdict center. You blasted Democrats for confirming Rachel Rollins,
Speaker 1: and this is part of your warning, which well all
Speaker 1: became true.
Speaker 4: Listen.
Speaker 2: Rachel Rollins has been vocal and aggressive against prosecuting crime.
Speaker 2: She has been very clear that she came into the
Speaker 2: job of district Attorney as a crusader. She has said,
Speaker 2: and these are her words, if you want to change
Speaker 2: the criminal legal system, become a prosecutor, because they have
Speaker 2: the power to determine charges, what crimes to decline to prosecute.
Speaker 2: About a prosecutor, it's not taking bad guys off a street,
Speaker 2: it's not seeking justice for the victims of crime.
Speaker 4: No, it is the.
Speaker 2: Power to say I won't prosecute these crimes. And with
Speaker 2: mss Rollins, it's not hypothetical because she is a district
Speaker 2: attorney and as the Boston DA, she went so far
Speaker 2: as to write down am in quote the Rachel Rollins
Speaker 2: policy Memo, a list of fifteen crimes whose prosecution quote
Speaker 2: should always be declined or quote dismissed without conditions. Charges
Speaker 2: on this list of fifteen crimes should be declined or
Speaker 2: dismissed pre arraignment without conditions. The presumption is the charges
Speaker 2: that fall into this category should always be declined. So
Speaker 2: you've got a DA saying these are the crimes we
Speaker 2: don't prosecute always be declined dismissed without conditions. So you
Speaker 2: may say, Okay, maybe this is like some sort of
Speaker 2: criminal justice reform. Maybe this is low level nonviolent marijuana possessions.
Speaker 2: Teenager got caught with a joints. We're not going to
Speaker 2: prosecute those. Look reasonable people can actually disagree on that.
Speaker 2: We can have an intelligent conversation back and forth about that.
Speaker 2: But the beauty of it is we don't have to
Speaker 2: speculate because.
Speaker 4: You put it in writing.
Speaker 2: These are the fifteen crimes. They're upside down, as are
Speaker 2: her policies. These are the fifteen crimes where charges should
Speaker 2: be dismissed pre arraignment without condition. Number one trespass. So
Speaker 2: I want you to think about it. If you don't
Speaker 2: want to see people trespassing on your property, well, under
Speaker 2: Rachel Rollins, the Democrats US attorney, we don't prosecute trespass.
Speaker 4: What else?
Speaker 2: Shoplifting? Does anyone watch the videos of the people breaking
Speaker 2: into stores and stealing and stealing and stealing and looting.
Speaker 2: You know what, Joe Biden and Senate Democrats, they're bringing
Speaker 2: that to a neighborhood near you. Shoplifting, we don't prosecute.
Speaker 2: That's what she says, shoplifting, Ali Ali oxen free. You
Speaker 2: see a TV you like, pick that damn thing up
Speaker 2: and run out of the store because your friend, the
Speaker 2: fake prosecutor, is not going to charge you larsening, really larceny, larceny.
Speaker 2: We don't prosecute disorderly conduct. You're a single mom coming
Speaker 2: home at night. A drunk vagrant is yelling, screaming, cursing
Speaker 2: at your kids. You know what? Not a crime here?
Speaker 2: We don't prosecute that. What else? Receiving stolen property? Okay,
Speaker 2: this is at least intellectually consistent. You're going to legalize shoplifting,
Speaker 2: rob the hell out of the stores. At least the
Speaker 2: fence can be on the back end, so you can
Speaker 2: steal that TV goes straight to the fence. By the way,
Speaker 2: I guess you could do it in the parking lot.
Speaker 2: Set up a van right there. We fence stolen property.
Speaker 2: You run in and grab it, ill fence it right here.
Speaker 2: DA all good by us. Driving with a suspended license,
Speaker 2: well sometimes that might be okay. What was it suspended for?
Speaker 2: Was it suspended for DWI? Was it suspended because you're
Speaker 2: a drunk who's killed people? Was it suspended because you're
Speaker 2: this homicidal maniac in Milwaukee who murdered six people. You
Speaker 2: know what this DA says, Hey, driving was suspended license,
Speaker 2: no problem at all, No longer a crime. Raking and
Speaker 2: entering into a vacant property without property damage. So any
Speaker 2: property that's vacant, you can break in and you're fine.
Speaker 2: Locks don't matter. Burglar alarms don't matter. By the way,
Speaker 2: burglar alarm goes off, what the hell do you do?
Speaker 2: You show up? Hey, you don't prosecute it. I'm staying
Speaker 2: right here. You may say, well, at least there's something reasonable.
Speaker 2: It's without property damage. Right well now, except the problem
Speaker 2: is number eight on the list, breaking an entering into
Speaker 2: a vacant property with property damage. So it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: Break into the place, loot it, trash it, destroy it.
Speaker 2: All is good in Joe Biden's criminal friendly America. Number nine,
Speaker 2: wanting or malicious destruction of property. By the way, don't
Speaker 2: believe the Democratic talking points. This stuff isn't violent. Really,
Speaker 2: wanting or malicious destruction of property. I'm in Joe Biden's
Speaker 2: America threats, threats of violence. I want you to imagine
Speaker 2: right now, you've got an angry vagrant making threats of
Speaker 2: violence against your children. You call the DA saying, my
Speaker 2: family's being threatened. Protect our safety. And what does she say?
Speaker 2: Not a crime? Oh, well, stinks to be you. Threats
Speaker 2: are just a okay. Minor in possession of alcohol. Hey, great, kids,
Speaker 2: drink up. Actually, the beauty of it is in Joe
Speaker 2: Biden's America, the kids can get drunk, they can drive,
Speaker 2: they can have their license suspended, and apparently they'll get
Speaker 2: a gold star at the end of it. Minor possession
Speaker 2: of alcohol, we've got senate pages here. Just go down
Speaker 2: to the US Attorney's office. They're serving Margarita's marijuana possession. Okay,
Speaker 2: I said. We can debate marijuana possession. Reasonable people can
Speaker 2: disagree on that. Now doesn't specify the quantity. Teenager with
Speaker 2: a joint, You could say that that may be a
Speaker 2: good candidate for diversion to something else. Drug dealer with
Speaker 2: several kilos of pot in the back, Maybe you ought
Speaker 2: to be prosecuting that. Oh and by the way, how
Speaker 2: do we know she doesn't just limit it to the
Speaker 2: kids with a joint? Well, what's number thirteen on the list?
Speaker 2: Possession with intent to distribute? So drug dealers in Joe
Speaker 2: Biden's America, drug dealers, it is legal. You can sell
Speaker 2: booze to kids, you can sell drugs to kids, you
Speaker 2: can sell stolen televisions to kids. Prosecute drug dealers, but look,
Speaker 2: at least it's just pot. And come on, we know
Speaker 2: you know in states a lot of states, pot's not
Speaker 2: that bad, right, It's just pot? Uh oh? Number fourteen
Speaker 2: non marijuana drug possession. So for any Democrats ready to
Speaker 2: go home saying, hey, we just like pot because we're Democrats, Nope, heroin, cocaine, LSD, fentanyl,
Speaker 2: drug dealers who are poisoning our kids in Joe Biden's America,
Speaker 2: we don't prosecute you. And number fifteen is really the
Speaker 2: crowning jewel of this resisting arrest. So I want you
Speaker 2: to envision what this says. You can break and enter
Speaker 2: into vacant property and do damage. You can have a
Speaker 2: homeless person trespass on your front lawn, set up a tent,
Speaker 2: threaten your children, sell them drugs, and if a police
Speaker 2: officer shows up and tries to arrest them, they can
Speaker 2: violently resist arrest. And what does the DA say?
Speaker 4: All good by me, Senator.
Speaker 1: That policy memo is shocking, but it is the Democratic Party.
Speaker 2: Well, Rachel Rollins was the single most extreme US attorney
Speaker 2: in the country. She was a George Soros prosecutor. She
Speaker 2: effectively abolished the police for those fifteen crimes. Joe Biden
Speaker 2: nominated her. He's nominated a total of three of the
Speaker 2: leading advocates of abolishing the police to senior positions in
Speaker 2: the Department of Justice, including Rachel Rollins. That speech you
Speaker 2: just played I gave on the Senate floor, I don't
Speaker 2: know how you read that memo, how you look at
Speaker 2: those facts, and how you vote to confirm this person
Speaker 2: as the chief you be prosecutor in the state of Massachusetts,
Speaker 2: other than if you're a Democrat, you believe you'll never
Speaker 2: be held to account because no reporter will ever ask
Speaker 2: you about it. Well, you know what, every single Democrat,
Speaker 2: all of them, one hundred percent, voted to confirm Rachel Rollins.
Speaker 2: Joe Manchin, the supposed moderate, voted to confirm Rachel Rollins
Speaker 2: because they know the press will never ever ever hold
Speaker 2: them to account. And then after they voted for this radical,
Speaker 2: she went and lawlessly abused the office, committed crimes in
Speaker 2: the office, and now she's resigned so it's a victory
Speaker 2: for the rule of law, and it's reason to celebrate.
Speaker 1: It's reason to celebrate. It's also reason to keep fighting,
Speaker 1: and that's why you did that over a year ago,
Speaker 1: reminding people of what we're up against. Don't forget. We
Speaker 1: do Verdict three days a week, Monday, Wednesday, Friday. Make
Speaker 1: sure you hit that subscribe button wherever you're listening. Also,
Speaker 1: if you want to help us reach other people, share
Speaker 1: this episode on your social media platforms wherever you are
Speaker 1: and right it's a five star review. It helps us
Speaker 1: reach each more people. Thank you, guys always for listening.
Speaker 1: We'll see you back here in a couple of days.