WEBVTT - BOJ, Ukraine, Markets, and AI (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Abigail Doolittle, thank you

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Markets correspondent for Bloomberg televisis

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>joining us here and our Bloomberg Interactor Broker studio. All right,

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>let's stop currencies here. I'm looking at my Bloomberg Dollar Index.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It's up slightly today. Um, you know, the yen has

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>been the story. It's off a little bit today, but

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the yen has been the story over the last couple

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of days, with the Bank of Japan saying all right,

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll let interest rates go higher. We'll fight this

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>inflation thing. We'll be like everybody else around the world.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Audrey Child Freeman, she's a chief FX strategist. She focuses

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on the G ten country. She does that with Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>She's based in London. She's actually in our London studios.

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So you get a virtual gold star for me, Audrey

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for being in the office. We appreciate that. UD give

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>us your sense of what you know. Your takeaway is

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>from what we saw from the Bank of Japan over

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of days. Hi, good morning everyone. So

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it is the game changer, even though we

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of we all saw it coming, but there was

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this element of surprising in terms of the timing, and

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and that element of surprise probably exacerbated the price action.

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But the b o J action is basically a first

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>step towards right normalization, and that means that we are

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>moving away from the you know, the era of negative

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>rates for for for Japan, and it is the game

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>changer for the currency. I mean, um, the YenS cubtainly

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>reacted uh with a massive move yesterday, and I think

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just the beginning. I think we will see more

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>strength and of the end in the weeks to come,

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.559
<v Speaker 1>and that will most likely be a theme that dominates

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>early early in twenty twenty three at least. Well, speaking

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of some of the currency fluctuations, I'm curious about currency intervention.

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the issues that the b J, it feels like,

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>has had as they've been exercising the reserves for far

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>too long. And if they don't use this um kind

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of yield curve control and whide in the bands even

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>further in the face of inflation, to what extent are

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they going to be forced to entertain the idea of intervention. Well,

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I think when it comes to intervention, the message on

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the currency front is very clear. Uh, and it's not

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>just the b O G it's the G seven view

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that excessive moves in the front exchange market are not welcome.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So you could argue that, you know, yesterday's move where excessive,

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>but uh, let's let's see what happens, you know, in

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the days and weeks to come. But certainly in the

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>current macro context, you know, we are now in a

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>position where a stronger year it's actually kind of welcome

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for for the Japanese economy. We have moved away from

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the deflationary world that that we were, that would be

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>used to for so many years, and we have now

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a pick up in inflation. And and that's why the

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>bo J had very little option but moving away from

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the monetary policy environment that had been in place for

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so long, and that may have been justified, and that's

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>debatable by the way over the past few years, but

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly not justified in twenty twenty two and going into

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. UM So I think effects intervention unless

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the magnitude of the move continued in the

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of place that we've seen in the past few days,

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think they will. I think it's not

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>likely for for now, it's not the subject for for

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>next year. We speaking about Audrey Child Freeman effect strategist

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence, and Bloomberg Intelligence, in my opinion, is

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>among the best and certainly most comprehensive investment research on

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street bar none. And if you want to argue

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>with that, you know where to find me. Audrey. You've

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>got a research report out saying dollar agen may fall

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>one five boy, and that's a that's a big move.

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got the the end here one thirty two spot one.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>What will drive it down? So, I mean you said

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a bit cool, but you know some people

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>may go even more aggressive. I'm saying one twenty five

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>by the first half of next year. So just think

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>about the numbers. I think when you you know, when

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you make some calls. It's always relevant to just look

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>back at what happens and where we are and how

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>much of the movie we've seen. So Dolligan is now

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>down about twelve percent from the high that we had

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>by late October. Remember we're trading near one fifty, so

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent in just six or seven weeks. But Dolan

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is still about above the ten year moving average, which

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is around one ten dollar. Yan is also about seventy

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>above the pre abnomics level of eighty. And we have

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>our own model an intelligence are be our model valuation model,

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>which you know I like to refer to on occasions.

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh And and that's that's telling us that fair value

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>on Dolloyan is at around one eleven UM. So what

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to say here is that yeah, miss miss

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and punchy, but it isn't in the wake of the

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>move that we've seen on Dollyan this year, and where

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>where we are on on on valuation and on historical levels,

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and and beyond the bo j story, there's also a

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>wide range of other reasons why you could argue for

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>a week a dollar yen. And actually, even before the

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>bog action yesterday, that was my strongest conviction for for

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the year for early next year. It's just coming early.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>So let's see what I can. All right, if it

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>gets there, I'm giving you all the credit. Audrey Child, Freeman,

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Chief G ten strategist currencies for Bloomberg Intelligence and again,

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Terminal users can find all of the world class

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>investment research of Bloomberg Intelligence at b I go on

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. Historic day in Washington, DC today is Ukrainian

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>President Vladimir Zelenski arrives in Washington, d C. To meet

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.679
<v Speaker 1>with President Biden UH Joint Session of Congress UH and

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, really making the case for the war in

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine if a continued support. So our next guest is

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely critical to that discussion. Tamila to Shiva. She is

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>the permanent representative of the President of Ukraine for the

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Autonomous Republic of Crimea. Tamila, thank you so much for

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>joining us. We really appreciate you taking the time, which

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>I know which is just a critical period of time

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in Kiev and in Ukraine. I'd love to get your

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of way you think the objectives the

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>aims are of your President Zelensky as it comes to Washington,

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>d C. Hello, everyone many thanks for inviting me. Actually

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not my mandate to committigate a visit of our president,

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's really very important for Ukraine because it's a

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>first visit of our president and of course the United States,

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's our strategic partner, and all our Ukrainian citizens really

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>UH enjoy and really happy for this UH visit of

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>our president, and of course we're waiting for all statements

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of our president and this meeting with President Biden and

0:07:55.680 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>with State Congress. Of course, for Ukraine is really very

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>support to have more support on military sphere especially and

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>financial support from US government. UH to me like, could

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you you're in Kiev, could you give us a sense

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of how things are today on the ground, uh in

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in Kieva. Uh. Today we have the two alarums in Kiev.

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But during the last a few months sexually Russian Federation

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately destroyed our energetic infrastructure, electricity and to we have

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>huge problems with water supply CELSO in Kiev and it's

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>our daily based unfortunately problems in all cities, not only

0:08:55.400 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Kiev, but in Reef also region internalbly Jian

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in her In Harkief and Herson Region which is elaborated.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Now you're the representative. In further, President of Ukraine in

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the Autonomous Republic of Crimea talked U a little bit

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about the conditions there. Yes, unfortunately, we always say that

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>war is not starting this Fabruary, yes, two, but eight

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago and in half years ago and now situation

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in Crimea also dramatically change. But because Russia used Crimia

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as a military base, huge military base, they used this UH,

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this territory Crimea to launch sale attacks. During this ten

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>months of a huge war, big war, Russia attacked from

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Black Sea region and from Crimea territory and NIA eight

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred missiles against Ukraine on the territory of Ukraine. UH.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>They stole our grain from territory of mainland of Ukraine

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in Herson region and the Parisia, and they used Crimea

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>for stalling this grain. They use our people in a

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>temporary occupied Crimea for UH for this battlefield. Because they

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>mobilized our Ukrainian citizens to this war against their own

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>country and their own people, and of course we understand

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a war. Crimes. They prosecute our people. According to

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>testimonies of Crimeans Nia UH two hundred and fifty cases

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of criminal or administ rates of persecutions of Cramians and

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to our activists, it's a lot of cases. We have

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty five criminal persecutions, it's a political

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>prisoners and one hundred and nine from them. UH, it's

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a crimean data. They persecute crimean dators. It's a huge

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and massive persecutions and human rights abuses in Cramia Tamila.

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>From the US perspective, we are reading headlines and news

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>stories about the amount of assistance that is going to

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine right now as President Joe Biden due to unveil

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly two billion dollars in assistance and UH further moves

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to deliver things like missiles and weapons in addition to

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>more funding. But at the same time, we do have

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>sanctions that are underway globally against Russia. Do you feel

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like on the ground those things are making an impact. Yes,

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, even for human rights defenders. UH, these sunctions

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is really work on the level of economical and economic

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>but also for ordinary people. For example, when we proposed

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions for our partners from US government or for

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>European our partners, and they do these sanctions against for example,

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>those persecutors of Crimeans. They stopped some persecutions in prison

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in Cramian prisons against Crimans who now in prison or

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in predicential centers, and they really understand it. And for Cremia,

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of course itself so very important because according to sanction

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>regime UH, Crimea lens UH now easilated. And for Russia

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to get some investments, for example to Crabia.

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And they really understand that Crania it's not really part

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of Russia according to yes, no, it's just and and

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>t mel I just want to before we have to

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>let you go, which want to get a sense of

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>how is the morale of the Ukrainian people, the people

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in Crimea that have been dealing with us for so long. Um,

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the fighting has been so brave by the Ukrainians against

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>seemingly insurmountable odds. What's the morale on the ground of

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the average Ukrainian, all Ukrainians. We really understand that now

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>we fight in UH for our values, for our freedom,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and we fighting not only for territories but for people.

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Elsa and our people in Crania is really understand it,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and they say that we waiting. Our Ukrainians are forces

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>also in Crimia. And according to Russian view, they say

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that Cremia is always Russia, but it's not true. And

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>yes it's a Ukrainian lens, it's a Crimean lands. And

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>now our president also always say ye, all right, Tamila,

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us to really appreciated

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Tamila to Shave a permanent representative of the President of

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine for the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. Please stay safe

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in Kiev. We've got some good earnings today. We had

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>FedEx put up some good numbers. Um, we had who

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>was it, Ni Nike put up some some really good numbers.

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's not really responding. So we're gonna break that down.

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with FedEx and Lee Glasgow. He's the analyst

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence. He fills FedEx railroads, trucks, shipping companies, logistics,

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>air freight, all that stuff, all those companies that moved

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff around. One of the best beats. Yeah, and I

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that was my beat back in the day, you know,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>starting in seven covered a little bit of everything I have,

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and I have I've made money every step along the way.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention um, you know, humble brig there Hayley, you're

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the expert here FedEx. I mean, I don't know. I

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>was sitting in front of the Starbucks and Summit yesterday.

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>To the right of me is ups. To the left

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of me was the FedEx door. Both places headlines out

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the door, people you know jump, you know, juggling boxes.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>What did FedEx have to say today, Well, hey, Paul,

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me, and I hope you helped those

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>people with all those boxes. FedEx had really a mixed

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>message last night. You know, there was some good news.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>They did beat expectations, which is fantastic. You know, they

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>beat it by about thirty eight cents, which is which

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is great. They also announced another billion dollars in savings.

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>But what they also did is reset earnings expectations for

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the second half lower about fourteen to fift at the

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>high end of the range um. And the reason is

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is that volume for them is slowing more considerably. There's

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>two things going on. Uh there's the obviously we're we're

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>going you know, we kind of like the pendulum swung

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>really far during the pandemic where everyone was ordering stuff,

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and now the pendulum is coming back uh to you know,

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>uh to to be for when we're talking about e commerce,

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>e commerence demands going to be above pre pandemic level,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but not at the peaks that we saw during the pandemic.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So the volume from there is going away. And then

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you have, you know, global economic issues, whether if we're

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about in the United States, obviously we're having our

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>economic growth is moderating, humor, competence is waning, Inflation is

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>impacting how much stuff people are buying. Europe you have

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a much weaker economic backdrop. And then China, China, you know,

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there's some headlines out there that they're opening up their economy,

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>but the reality is it's it's really a slow opening

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh, there's a lot of issues there. And so

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>what FedEx is doing is their parking planes. They're you know,

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of putting off some some projects maybe into later

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>into next year to see where the economy is heading.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And and part of also the good news, you know,

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the beats that they've been doing on

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the earning side, was that they were able to raise

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>rates that you know, they still have pricing power, which

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is which is which is a good sign, especially you

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>know when when volumes are are coming in and so

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they announced a billion dollars more in in

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>cost savings. I think those cost savings are more reactive

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to the volumes, uh, and so they're probably more flexible,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>meaning that when volumes come back on, they're going to

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>probably bring on some of those costs. But they're also

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at about four billion dollars in structural costs that

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they're looking to uh totally get out of their system.

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff from FedEx. We also and presumably some of

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>those FedEx boxes were carrying Nike shoes and apparel. Put

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>them Coil. She covers all the retail stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>A teammate of Lee classgow there and Bloomberg Intelligence put

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>them talk to us about Nike. Some pretty good numbers there.

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>The markets seem to like what we heard from Nike. Yeah,

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they continue to execute and their innovation remains a key driver.

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Told better sale that fool price, even after passing on

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>price increases earlier this year. UM, it was really encouraging

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to see the constant currency sales games of about twenty

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>seven fix consis quarter, and they raised guidance for the

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>full year from low double digits to low team. So

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think overall, they just continue to show that they

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>can execute. It's a team that can use innovation and

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>execution at their advantage to really deliver in me customer demand.

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Well put them let me ask you about that and

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>then like ly to to hop into this as well.

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But when we talk about things like price increases for example,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>or and um for for for Nike, but also I

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>mean you cover up I mean other retailers as well.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>We talk about price increases and the future of whether

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>or not those price increases are gonna stay sticky. It's

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not like when inflation comes down all of a sudden,

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these retailers or even shipping companies like

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>FedEx are going to decrease their prices. So if that's

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the view, then shouldn't the stop just go up and

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>up and up from here? I mean, yes, they can

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>hold the price increases, especially for NIKEE for the innovation

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that they have, the new products, especially their strong footwear franchises.

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>But um, there is margin concern right They have actiss inventory.

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Their inventory was up north to forty percent at the

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the quarter. It was down three percent from

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>last quarter and night signal digits on a unit basis,

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 1>which is a sign that they're making products, but a

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>lot more work still needs to be done. We will

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 1>see more discounting, not against those products that are just

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.719
<v Speaker 1>being introduced, but you know some of the age inventory

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>people like to call it that. Um, there will be

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>more promotions. They're gonna be selling more into all price

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to clear that inventory. And that's kind to what I'm

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>watching for, because that's all we the catch two when

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.959
<v Speaker 1>you have to be careful how you sell an all

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>strife under Armour went through this and too much inventory

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>there isn't good for brand Heat in the long term.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's great to have put them goil and

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in class go on at the same time because we

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>can really you know, circulate and talk about the consumer here.

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>We had the conference board released some data this morning.

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Consumer competence data came in much better than expected for

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the month of December and the expectations Stata point was

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>also a big improvement from last month. So UM consumers

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.239
<v Speaker 1>still seem to be in decent shape. So leaves. As

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you listen to the Fedexes of the world, how do

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they view the consumer as they look out to next year?

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think they they they they from their outlook,

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're looking for, you know, global economic moderating growth,

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and so you know that is obviously being driven for

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>their businesses by the consumer. UM. And I think that

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're kind of outlooked for decreasing costs. Even

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>more is based on that outlook that volumes are probably

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>going to be pretty weak in the first half of

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the year, with you know, fingers cross a better outlook

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 1>for the second half of the year. Um, because you know,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>with all the moves that the Fed is making, it

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is pretty clear that you know, is gonna tamp down

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the brakes on the economy eventually and put them again

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>just from the consumer, just give us a sense of

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you think this this holiday season will be about. Seconds. Sure,

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so far the holiday season looks good. There will be promotion,

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 1>but the consumer they're spending. Um. Not everyone will win

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the season. There will be mixed results, but we think

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the strong brand will continue to show out performance over

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. One all right, good stuff. I have no

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>intention of shopping, but that's just me put them Goyle.

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>She's on a T day and folks here in Bloomberg speak,

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that means she's on vacation today. But she still talked

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the time to come check in with us and give

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of what's going on there with the

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>retailers and Nike in particular, put them Goyle. She covers

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>retail for Bloomberg Intelligence, and Class Cow covers all the

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>transportation and logistics stuff for Bloomberg Intelligence again for world

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>class investment research. B I go r J. Gellow. He

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is with Federated Hermes. He's been doing this for a while.

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>He's the senior portfolio manager there. R J. I. I'm

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna take just a second here and we'll look back

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna move forward. But looking back on

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I bet even in your esteemed career, you haven't seen

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a year in fixed income like we did in two

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you kind of put that in context? Well,

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty much nobody has the the the Bloomberg you know index,

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Ags so to speak. Uh, currently is down

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>on a year today basis because we've had a bit

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of a recovery lately, but it's still down a whopping twelve.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the worst performance in the history of the index.

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>The index only goes back to. As a result, there

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>has been some academic takes on you know, how bad

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of bond return has been and I've seen a couple

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of different stories from different sources basically saying that since

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>basically the Washington administration, like George Washington administration, we haven't

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>seen treasuries perform as badly as they just did. Treasuries

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>are down eleven point six five until the return this year.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So this has been an astounding experience. And it's all

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>directly linked to the surgeon inflation to over forty year highs,

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Central Bank, the FED and others efforts to

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>counter what has it essentially been a global inflation shock

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>as the pandemic eased and the world surged, often spurred

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>by monetary and fiscal policy. All right, not only do

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>we have r. J. Gallo from Federate Hermes here, but

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>we also have Katarina Semonetti, Senior VP at Morgan Stanley

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Private Wealth Management joining us here and Katarina, you know,

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>as we just heard from r J. Brutal, brutal as

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>it relates to fixed income, Marco, what are you telling

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>your clients here looking forward to Well, it certainly has

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>been challenging year. You know, it's is getting seemingly close

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>to the end of the tightening cycle. We probably are

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>going to get another rate high Confebruary first, you know,

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>but that might be it. And when you think about

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, the twenty two twenty two was defined by

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the FED and inflation and interest rates, and we think

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be a different story in twenty three.

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>We think that there are two major stories to watch

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty three, and one, of course, this recession, whether

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get a recession and what kind of

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>recession is going to be and hopefully short and shallow,

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know, of course that means to be seen.

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And the second one, you know, I would even say

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a bigger story would be earnings revisions and this could

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>result in significant downside before we can comfortably call the

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>end of this bear market and might catch some investors

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>by surprise. So we're telling our clients to be ready

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for it, to be ready for a continued volatility before

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.959
<v Speaker 1>things get better. But what does continued volatility even look like?

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>It kind of makes me think that if things have

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>been so volatile in two, is the tolerance for volatility

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three that much higher? So for example,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a VIX of twenty for example two years ago, um

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>or even three years ago, pre COVID would have been

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>um an extreme number to look at. Now it's completely normal.

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the tolerance for volatility has increased and

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>will increase in Well, there is there is a chance

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that that might be the case, because you know, we

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>get used to things that we get used to, you know,

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the volatility, you know, but the question is what will

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it take to actually get us out of the spare market.

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>And once the earnings are significantly revised, you know, they

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>will actually reflect this the true state of our economy

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and we will set the earnings expectations to a more

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>realistic level and this might you know, be the path

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that will allow the companies to actually beat earnings and

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>exceed earnings and will be that pivot that we're looking

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for into the next bol market. So volatility, you know,

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>can look in various different ways, and things might get worse,

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>significantly worse before they get better. But we do think

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that the end is inside and there are things that

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we can do, you know, to r G point. You know,

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are higher, you know, there's value you know

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in sixed income. You know, this is you know, it

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>was unbelievably challenging environment in twenty two you know. To

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>my in my view, I think it's a better environment,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, going forward, but we should still stay defensive.

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Investors should, you know, pivot and look for the dividend

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>things stock sectors like health care, financial industrials, and look

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for the dips in the market to improve both the

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>quality of their investment portfolios, but also as opportunists advise.

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey r J. Just following up on Katarina's point there.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm an equity analyst by trade, so you know, when

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I see or when I hear experts like you say, hey,

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen this kind of underperformance and fixed income

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like ever, my simple responses, all right, I'm jumping in

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the deep end of the pool. Um, if I want

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to go along some fixed income in three where should

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I start? Well, it's a good question, and I think

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Katerina hit the nail on the head. I mean, typically

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in this business, you do better off and you buy

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>low right. Uh. And the largest losses since the Washington

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>administration and Treasury suggests it's pretty low. Uh. The the

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>yield on the egg, just to go back to it again,

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>UH is now around four and a half percent. UH.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>It was well below one percent in July. There's been

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a big, big move, and I think opportunities are being created.

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Gave a presentation recently here in Pittsburgh that the bond

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>storm clouds are starting to clear, which suggests that we've

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>gone back to UH to slightly short and sometimes neutral

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>over the last three or four months. We were much

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>more aggressively short and our actively managed fixing and come

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>portfolios for most of the last eighteen months. So we're

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of the view now that we're getting to a position

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>where the FED is nearly done, the FED terminal rates

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be give or take around five. The

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>bond markets probably still touch rich for that. That's partly

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>because I think the expectations of her session are so widespread.

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>UM bottom line, we think you should be legging into

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>fixed income UM getting out of UH you know, short

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>term or even cash. Cash has been great. Cash gave

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you a positive nominal return in two and beat everything else.

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Cash was king. We think it's gonna lose its crown

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, and fixed incomes getting more attractive. We have

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>at our firm intermediate and total return bond funds at

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>various sectors that are taking more duration risk, and people

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>thought they were comfortable with in two for sure, but

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>we think that they're getting much more appealing as we

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>look forward as into twenty three. Well. R J talked

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit more about the bond market here.

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>If you start to see FED cuts priced later than

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the back half of which is where they stand right now,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>how high could yields go? Now? It's a great question.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>You know a lot of people are very focused on

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the terminal rate, and oftentimes that even the ten year

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>treasury didn't seem to flash value until it hit the

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>terminal rate. And if the turn rate is going to

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>be five, the ten years due low it's a three

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>sixties seven. But the reason for that is, UH, the

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>shocking pace of monetary tightening UH is apt to take

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>some prisoners in terms of creating recession in the U.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>S economy and elsewhere we're seeing the same type of risk.

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why the Vaughan market is pricing right now with

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the trajectory of FED yields out say ten years that

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a five handle, doesn't even have a four handle,

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>because the expectation is that the shocking monetary tightening that

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we've gone through and is nearly complete, is not going

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to characterize the next ten years. Um. The two years

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and the three year are particularly interesting. They're around four

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>round four. They're probably a little too low to be

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>frank Um, I would think the two years should be

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>closer to four forty or four fifty, which would suggest

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the Fed gets to five, it holds it there and

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>by their own dots, by their own dots, which people

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>think the dots go back. The dots wily got back

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>ten years. So you know, we got to use them.

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>There are a new tool. They allow you to shape

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>some expectations. And in the marketplace, of course, they move

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>as facts change. But by the Fed's own plan in

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the dots, they're easing to around four percent in so

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>so the two years shouldn't be at five, It should

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>be four fifty or four forty. We're almost there. Most

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of the bond losses are behind you. You should. Bonds

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to start behaving in the manner that we

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>as investment professionals county to believe they should behave, which

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is an anchor to your portfolio, a bit of a

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>hedge to your equities that didn't work this year, We

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>think it will start working going forward. All right, Catarina,

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>just real quick thirty seconds. When you when you hear

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>from your clients today these days here at the end

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of the year, what are they asking you about, Well,

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>they're asking for the outlook for twenty three and here's

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what we tell them. We tell them that they need

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to be more strategic with their views of economy, policy,

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>earnings and valuations and use tactical rollies, free balancing and

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>negative you know, downturns for tact loss harvesting. You know,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So we just will have to be more selective. But

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely a stock picker's market that offers a

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity. Like Katerina, thanks so much for joining

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>us as always, Katerina Semenetti, Senior vice president and Morgan

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Private Wealth Management and R. J. Gallo, Senior portfolio Manager,

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it UH Federated Hermes joining us here. A little roundtable,

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>little fixed income, a little broader markets here. Um, you know,

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I think kind of the message we're hearing from some

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the smart people that we talked to is there's

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>some light at the end of the tunnel. But um,

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't get too aggressive too quickly here. But

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when I see fixed income returns like

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that I'm thinking, Wow, I might want to jump in

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>there stock Evies, you know, because I'm not a car

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>geek like Matt Miller. But I did drive the Ford

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>f one fifty thanks to Matt Miller hooking me up

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>with his Ford buddies, like three or four days. It

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>was awesome strength for you. And he told me he

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:51.479
<v Speaker 1>would take me to like test drive cars and that

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>never happened. He needs to make good on some of

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lamborghini stuff that he talks about, but let's talk Evies.

0:31:55.880 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>It is really an interesting business, totally upending the auto

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>industry around the world. Xeno Mercer joins us here in

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studios, so he gets a gold star.

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a research channels for Robot Global Zino. Thanks so

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here. I mean, give us a

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>sense of where we are, like in a nine inning

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>ball game. Where are we in the transformation from you know,

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>internal combustion engines to e VS Do you think? Good question?

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for having me on today. Um, I mean

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>right now the US, you know, if we're looking at

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>markets and penetration rates of e VS two ice internal

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>combustion engines globally we're at five percent, California is at

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>FI EU is way ahead. You've got you know, Norway

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I think has a majority of sales as e V s,

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and then China's you know, even higher still, so we're

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:45.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of lagging behind. So if you kind of look

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>at from a global perspective, I mean, we're in the

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>second ending and you know, you have people who've never

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>even been in e V today, So that's a lot

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of them until just just recently, well in the EV space,

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think electrification, I immediately think China the leader

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. And it's interesting when we talk about China,

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about Deero, COVID, we talk about your political tensions,

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't necessarily talk about competition for the e V space.

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your take, Yeah, so I mean competition in the

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>e V space. I mean, think about the timeline here.

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Ten years ago the Model S was released by Tesla,

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>so we're just ten years into this. Yeah, so happy

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>anniversary to the Models. But I mean, right now, you've

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>got Ford, You've got GM, You've got incumbents that are

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>retooling and rebuilding, manufacturing plants, pouring billions in the new plants.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Fords putting their biggest Campex investment into building plants such

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>as their Blue Oval city outside of Memphis, Tennessee. Right now, Um,

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and that that's happening. So I think you're seeing, Um,

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be seeing lots of competition. Tesla's market SHARE's

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>job from around sev down to six and um, you

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>know it's I think. And then you look at global

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers and other manufacturers worldwide, Um, you're gonna see a

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.959
<v Speaker 1>more I guess even ball field and playing field when

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all these other UH car manufacturers get up the speed

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>from that production lines. But that's gonna take some time

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and investment into these robotics, manufacturing automation lines. UH to

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>build that out. Took us about some of the raw

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>materials and the rare materials that are required for e

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>v s. Where are the choke points. Somebody was telling

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>me recently that you've gotta go to Africa to get

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these rare metals. And in China is really

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>investing in Africa, the US is not. That might be

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a risk for the whole electrification of the global auto fleet.

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>What's the risk here for some of those UH raw

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>materials needed? Sure? Yes, So I mean right now a

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 1>majority of batteries used in cars are you know, based

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on lithium, cobalt other materials like that. And yes, there

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are specific kind of choke points there, which is why

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of interest and intriguing and kind of just

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>from a sourcing and sustainability, cost and environmental perspective, they're

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for ways to use other battering materials and reduced

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it dependence on those materials. So I think when you're

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at looking forward how the industry is going to evolve,

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>They're going to use different materials. You've got companies coming up,

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, IBM, You've got top AI companies around the

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>world that are trying to figure out how to kind

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of eliminate that that sourcing risk. But most of the

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that are building pipelines of evs have already sourced

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and secured direct pipeline from providers of those So I mean,

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>at least for the medium term length that they're they're

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>all pretty much squared away. Paul, I have a fun

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fact for you. When Tesla was first uh rising in

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever you saw the stock just kind of go up

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and up and up, um cobalt prices and Tesla prices.

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.240
<v Speaker 1>If you overlaid. The charts were identical. For this exact reason,

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea that EV batteries required cobalt and I think

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>for the time lithium as well. It was like a

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>way to play Tesla through the commodities angle. Just a

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 1>little fun fact for you, but then talk to us

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>again about the sourcing there because one of the things

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>another fun fact that Ed Ludlow or Bloombrick technology anchor

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and correspondence spoke to me about was that Tesla one

0:35:57.719 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of the things that they do really well is build

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>their factory right where the commodities are kind of located.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 1>So the supply chain issues you saw on the rest

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>of the car industry, Tesla didn't necessarily have to deal

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.800
<v Speaker 1>with them on the same scale. Is that a type

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of model that you think might be adopted more broadly. Yeah,

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's not just you know, source materials for batteries,

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of the whole component. I mean right now, Uh,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>these car manufacturers are building their their their plants with

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, additive manufacturing, three D printing, I mean for

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 1>different parts. So yes, the whole world saw semiconductor shortages

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and then nie products that that that really impacted their

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ability to UM the liver products at a at a

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and make margin. And I think I think it was

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Toyota decided to slow down and their ramp up because

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they just the component costs got too high. So ultimately, uh,

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you will see more streamline production and manufacturing and you know,

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>custom builds for their for all the parts and components

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>to go into these plants. Robotics people tell me that's

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a big part of this new wave of auto manufacturing. Right,

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, there are a couple of

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>reasons why we're seeing re shoring in the US. And

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think yesterday Tesla announced a new

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Giga factory in Mexico, but UM increased automation. So this

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is just designing the system to be more automated, safer.

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You've got robot arms that are able to manipulate and

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>move large pieces of the vehicles. Now, automation and robots

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in the warehouse and manufacturing plants isn't new. That's been

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>around for fifty years. But they're getting better. They're getting faster.

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>They're able to do things that UM at a lower

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>cost and faster cycle rate to enable uh, you know,

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>better economies of scale. So while you know, for example,

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>China has been leading manufacturing globally for many many years.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.399
<v Speaker 1>The ability and a lot of that was just human

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>labor cost they were they had better, you know, lower

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>input costs on that end, and they had some materials.

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>But in the US, we're looking at cobots which can

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do kind of some more some more of the fine tuning,

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the more manipulation and placements things like that, not just

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>assembling together. So UM, these robot companies like Pinook, Terra

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>dyne Um, they're they're getting major placements and orders by

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>these car manufacturers that not just cars. You've got UM

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>battery plants, You've got solar energy plants. So the Inflation

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Reduction Act that just came out earlier this year, UM

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of money. There's benefits. There's UH loans

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>available for building these manufacturing plants, so we have less

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>risk from depending on other countries. Thirty seconds, just your

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>overview of charging stations. Where are we It seems like

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we need a lot more of those over the next

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>coming years. Yeah. So, I mean you've got the government

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and individual car manufacturers and batteries that are all looking

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to build this out. Since they're kind of all going

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>all in looking to get you know, fifty percent of

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>their their sales. You've got the EU looking to get

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles by um. Yes, there's gonna be lots of

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>level three level four charging, which you know, level four

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>charging really isn't out yet. That's one mega watt. But

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>once you can charge you know, entire semi trucks in

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes, thirty minutes, etcetera, then we're gonna have, um,

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, major major adoption, major adoption. That's kind of

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of folks are looking for. Zeno Mercer,

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Zenni Mercery's the research channels,

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>robo Global joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:34.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller three. Put on ball Sweeney I'm on

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast. You can always

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio