1 00:00:03,440 --> 00:00:06,960 Speaker 1: On this episode of Newtsworld. The discussion about whether the 2 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:10,600 Speaker 1: District of Columbia, or Washington d C. As its better known, 3 00:00:10,960 --> 00:00:13,920 Speaker 1: should become the fifty first state in Nited States has 4 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:17,960 Speaker 1: been ongoing for years. Congresland Eleanor Holmes Norton, who has 5 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,520 Speaker 1: been representing the District of Columbia for thirty years in Congress, 6 00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:24,840 Speaker 1: has been the leading champion of the bill HR fifty one, 7 00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:28,800 Speaker 1: known as the Washington d C. Admission Act. It was 8 00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:31,800 Speaker 1: passed by the United States House Representative yesterday in a 9 00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:35,720 Speaker 1: vote straight down party lines, with no Democrats voting no 10 00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:40,000 Speaker 1: and no Republicans voting yes. The bill now moves to 11 00:00:40,040 --> 00:00:43,839 Speaker 1: the Senate. However, the way our founders wrote the Constitution, 12 00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:48,000 Speaker 1: they had the express intent to never allow Washington d C. 13 00:00:48,159 --> 00:00:52,440 Speaker 1: To become a state. On April thirteenth, Attorney General Wilson 14 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:55,400 Speaker 1: and twenty one Attorneys General sent a letter to President 15 00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:58,880 Speaker 1: Biden and the leaders of Congress opposing the bill to 16 00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:01,800 Speaker 1: make the District of Columbia state. The letter from the 17 00:01:01,800 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 1: Attorney's General first and foremost is an effort to uphold 18 00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:09,200 Speaker 1: the US Constitution. I'm pleased to welcome my good friend 19 00:01:09,200 --> 00:01:21,759 Speaker 1: and our guest Alan Wilson, South Carolina's Attorney General. First, 20 00:01:21,840 --> 00:01:23,600 Speaker 1: I thought I would tell our listeners I do not 21 00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:26,760 Speaker 1: agree with the dish of Columbia becoming a state, and 22 00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 1: my reasons are grounded in the way our founders wrote 23 00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:33,440 Speaker 1: the Constitution. But I'm a historian, not a lawyer, So 24 00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:36,120 Speaker 1: I wanted to have Attorney General Allen Wilson on to 25 00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:39,880 Speaker 1: really explain the issue and why HR fifty one should 26 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:43,520 Speaker 1: be defeated. He's done a tremendous amount of research looking 27 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:48,160 Speaker 1: at the issue from both a legal and political perspective. Alan, welcome. 28 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:51,600 Speaker 1: I'm curious just to start, how did you bring the 29 00:01:51,640 --> 00:01:54,960 Speaker 1: other twenty one attorney generals together around this issue of 30 00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:59,160 Speaker 1: opposing d statehood. Well, mister speaker, first, thank you for 31 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:01,040 Speaker 1: having me on the pod cast today as honor to 32 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:04,920 Speaker 1: always be with you and to discuss important issues like this. First, 33 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:07,840 Speaker 1: I was watching the news one night about some of 34 00:02:07,840 --> 00:02:09,880 Speaker 1: the bills coming down the pipeline that a lot of 35 00:02:09,919 --> 00:02:12,280 Speaker 1: vags were engaged in. One of the bills that came 36 00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:16,400 Speaker 1: up was a bill called the Washington DC Statehood Bill, 37 00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:19,400 Speaker 1: and so I found it interesting. I went and pulled 38 00:02:19,480 --> 00:02:21,200 Speaker 1: up the bill and I read it. I did one 39 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:22,919 Speaker 1: thing that a lot of members of Congress probably don't 40 00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:24,880 Speaker 1: do that with a vote on bills. But I read 41 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:27,480 Speaker 1: the thing and it was clear to me it was 42 00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:29,679 Speaker 1: evident on the face of the bill that this is 43 00:02:29,720 --> 00:02:33,480 Speaker 1: an unconstitutional act by Congress. And I always want to say, 44 00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:38,440 Speaker 1: first and foremost, I disagree fundamentally with this bill to 45 00:02:38,520 --> 00:02:42,160 Speaker 1: make Washington, DC at the fifty first state on constitutional grounds, 46 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:45,320 Speaker 1: long before you get the policy or political grounds. We 47 00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:47,799 Speaker 1: know this is a neckd ambitious grab of power by 48 00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:50,679 Speaker 1: the left to pack the Senate like they're trying to 49 00:02:50,720 --> 00:02:52,680 Speaker 1: do with the Court. But I don't even have to 50 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:56,959 Speaker 1: get to that. My concern is that this is unconstitutional 51 00:02:57,000 --> 00:02:59,200 Speaker 1: first and foremost, before it's even get to the bad 52 00:02:59,240 --> 00:03:02,400 Speaker 1: policy question. And so I felt like the states needed 53 00:03:02,440 --> 00:03:05,800 Speaker 1: to speak up on this because of the unconstitutionality of 54 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:07,840 Speaker 1: the act, and that we needed to let Congress know 55 00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:11,200 Speaker 1: that if they blow up the filibuster and ran this through, 56 00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:14,280 Speaker 1: that we're going to be there to sue. I sent 57 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:16,720 Speaker 1: the letter to President Biden and leaders of Congress had 58 00:03:16,720 --> 00:03:19,360 Speaker 1: twenty one colleagues signed the letter to let them know 59 00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:21,240 Speaker 1: that if you pass this, we will see you in 60 00:03:21,280 --> 00:03:24,120 Speaker 1: Supreme Court and here's why we will be successful. I 61 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:26,760 Speaker 1: think that the whole concept of this letter was really 62 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:31,560 Speaker 1: very important because at the time, I think the left 63 00:03:31,639 --> 00:03:34,120 Speaker 1: just felt they were on a roll. They'd won the 64 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:38,680 Speaker 1: presidential election, and their activist wing was really pushing this. 65 00:03:39,320 --> 00:03:42,400 Speaker 1: But one of the things I'm fascinated by here you 66 00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:45,720 Speaker 1: really go to the heart of the whole issue and 67 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 1: the nature of why the Founding fathers felt the way 68 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:53,080 Speaker 1: they did. Can you sort of walk us through why 69 00:03:53,120 --> 00:03:56,240 Speaker 1: the founding fathers were so determined and what they had 70 00:03:56,280 --> 00:04:00,840 Speaker 1: experienced that led them to want to have the udition 71 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:06,160 Speaker 1: of Columbia remained independent from any state. Well, absolutely, And 72 00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 1: you're a student of history, and you know firsthand, and 73 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 1: anyone that's ever read about the founding of our nation 74 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:15,640 Speaker 1: knows that the founders were deeply affected by the events 75 00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:19,040 Speaker 1: of their day and it directed their views on how 76 00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:21,840 Speaker 1: our republic should be set up. And you know, there 77 00:04:21,839 --> 00:04:23,919 Speaker 1: were a number of things that occurred early on in 78 00:04:23,920 --> 00:04:26,120 Speaker 1: the revolution and towards the end of the Revolution that 79 00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:29,920 Speaker 1: affected their decision to create an independent district as the 80 00:04:29,960 --> 00:04:33,279 Speaker 1: seat of government for our nation. They wanted a republic 81 00:04:33,560 --> 00:04:36,479 Speaker 1: built on the foundation of federalism that they wanted the 82 00:04:36,520 --> 00:04:38,880 Speaker 1: states to be independent from the federal government, and they 83 00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:41,239 Speaker 1: wanted the federal government to be independent from the states, 84 00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:43,720 Speaker 1: and they needed a federal district to be the bridge 85 00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:46,800 Speaker 1: between the two. And they didn't want to create a superstate, 86 00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,279 Speaker 1: and they didn't want to create a territory. They didn't 87 00:04:49,279 --> 00:04:52,320 Speaker 1: want to occupy it already established city. They wanted to 88 00:04:52,360 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 1: create a new and independent seat of government. One of 89 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 1: the main reasons is if you go back and you 90 00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:01,280 Speaker 1: study the end of the Revolutionary War, there were a 91 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:05,040 Speaker 1: lot of disgruntled, disaffected members of the militia who were 92 00:05:05,120 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 1: upset that they weren't getting paid, and so they marched 93 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:10,960 Speaker 1: on Philadelphia to demand that the Continental Congress pay them. 94 00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:15,240 Speaker 1: The Continental Congress called on the State of Pennsylvania to 95 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:20,400 Speaker 1: protect them, and the State of Pennsylvania refused to protect them, 96 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:23,160 Speaker 1: and therefore they had to flee the building before that 97 00:05:23,279 --> 00:05:26,800 Speaker 1: little uprising could be quelled. So that was an example 98 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:30,480 Speaker 1: of something James Madison referred to when he was writing 99 00:05:30,480 --> 00:05:33,040 Speaker 1: in The Federalist forty three and then other found the 100 00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:37,720 Speaker 1: Forefathers talked about. They wanted a federal seat of power 101 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:41,600 Speaker 1: that could not be under the control of the General Assembly. 102 00:05:41,640 --> 00:05:43,479 Speaker 1: From one of the states. They wanted something that they 103 00:05:43,520 --> 00:05:46,920 Speaker 1: could completely control when they met. One of the first 104 00:05:46,920 --> 00:05:49,280 Speaker 1: things they did was they set up a federal seat 105 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:51,440 Speaker 1: of power, and it was basically most people talk about 106 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:53,720 Speaker 1: Article four, section three when it comes to the creation 107 00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:56,440 Speaker 1: of new states. The authority for the creation of the 108 00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:58,600 Speaker 1: District of Columbia. The Federal seat of Power is an 109 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:02,320 Speaker 1: actually Article one section in a Claw seventeen, and it 110 00:06:02,320 --> 00:06:05,840 Speaker 1: basically gave Congress to create a seat of government which 111 00:06:05,839 --> 00:06:09,000 Speaker 1: shall become the Federal District, and that Congress shall have 112 00:06:09,040 --> 00:06:12,720 Speaker 1: the authority to have exclusive legislation over whatever district shall become. 113 00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:17,040 Speaker 1: Congress can no more abdicate its authority to give up 114 00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:19,120 Speaker 1: its power to tax, and they can give up its 115 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:21,720 Speaker 1: authority to legislator over the district. If they want to 116 00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:24,039 Speaker 1: do that, they will have to do so through a 117 00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:28,920 Speaker 1: constitutional amendment. They can't do it through statutory effect. They 118 00:06:28,960 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 1: have to pass a constitutional amendment. And so the founders 119 00:06:32,279 --> 00:06:34,479 Speaker 1: wanted it that way because they didn't want Congress to 120 00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:38,320 Speaker 1: scrowl around with the operation of the District of Columbia 121 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:40,760 Speaker 1: once it was created. They wanted to remain the federal 122 00:06:40,839 --> 00:06:43,719 Speaker 1: district and that Congress could be able to legislate over it. 123 00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:46,760 Speaker 1: The Congress could not change the makeup of the district 124 00:06:46,839 --> 00:06:51,080 Speaker 1: once it was created. So the whole system that was 125 00:06:51,120 --> 00:06:55,599 Speaker 1: being involved was a deliberate effort to block any single 126 00:06:55,680 --> 00:07:00,480 Speaker 1: state from having dominance over the federal government absolute. They 127 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:02,960 Speaker 1: did not want to have a super state. They debated this, 128 00:07:03,120 --> 00:07:05,880 Speaker 1: and obviously in New York, Philadelphia, there were other cities 129 00:07:06,240 --> 00:07:09,600 Speaker 1: that were basically powerhouse cities back in that day. They 130 00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 1: didn't want to put the federal district on top of 131 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:13,560 Speaker 1: one of those that would be the capital city of 132 00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:16,640 Speaker 1: another state. They wanted to have an independent seat of 133 00:07:16,680 --> 00:07:20,120 Speaker 1: power for the United States. I'm sure you're familiar with 134 00:07:20,160 --> 00:07:23,880 Speaker 1: this alleged to dinner that Thomas Jefferson had between Alexander 135 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:28,400 Speaker 1: Hamilton and James Madison. Obviously, Jefferson and Madison were from Virginia. 136 00:07:28,480 --> 00:07:32,200 Speaker 1: Hamilton came from the North, and there was a concern 137 00:07:32,240 --> 00:07:35,600 Speaker 1: about the North had a lot of debt and the 138 00:07:35,640 --> 00:07:37,640 Speaker 1: Southern states from the Revolution did not have a lot 139 00:07:37,680 --> 00:07:39,640 Speaker 1: of debt, and the South did not want the federal 140 00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:43,120 Speaker 1: government assuming the debt. James for assumption of the debt. 141 00:07:43,480 --> 00:07:47,280 Speaker 1: The South cut a deal with Alexander Hamilton, Will assume 142 00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:49,760 Speaker 1: the debt, but you have to move the capital city 143 00:07:49,800 --> 00:07:53,120 Speaker 1: to the shores of the Potomac between Maryland and then Virginia. 144 00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:55,320 Speaker 1: And that was the deal that they cut in exchange 145 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:58,360 Speaker 1: for assuming the debt of the North. So that deal 146 00:07:58,440 --> 00:08:01,440 Speaker 1: was struck, and the founders gave some parameters. If you 147 00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:04,560 Speaker 1: read the constitution, they said the only restriction was that 148 00:08:04,600 --> 00:08:08,160 Speaker 1: it shall not exceed ten miles square. At that time, 149 00:08:08,440 --> 00:08:12,200 Speaker 1: they said the states of Virginia and Maryland have to 150 00:08:12,200 --> 00:08:15,200 Speaker 1: basically agree to it, which they did, and that's how 151 00:08:15,280 --> 00:08:18,520 Speaker 1: the Federal District was created. And of course we can 152 00:08:18,560 --> 00:08:20,600 Speaker 1: talk about the full history of the district, but the 153 00:08:20,640 --> 00:08:24,280 Speaker 1: bottom line is Congress cannot advocate its authority to give 154 00:08:24,280 --> 00:08:27,080 Speaker 1: away the district and can make it a state because 155 00:08:27,160 --> 00:08:29,080 Speaker 1: that is not allowed in the Constitution. They would have 156 00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:31,800 Speaker 1: to do it through a constitutional amendment. And mister speaker, 157 00:08:31,920 --> 00:08:34,160 Speaker 1: you already know this. But the twenty third Amendment, which 158 00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:38,079 Speaker 1: was past in nineteen sixty one, it basically gives the 159 00:08:38,120 --> 00:08:40,920 Speaker 1: residence of the District of Columbia the ability to vote 160 00:08:40,960 --> 00:08:45,760 Speaker 1: for electors to the Electoral College. The Congress at the 161 00:08:45,800 --> 00:08:49,240 Speaker 1: time knew that they could not pass a federal law 162 00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:53,480 Speaker 1: giving Washington DC electors the Electoral College because Washington DC 163 00:08:53,760 --> 00:08:56,320 Speaker 1: is distinct from a state or a territory. It is 164 00:08:56,440 --> 00:08:59,080 Speaker 1: very different, and so they knew that they had to 165 00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 1: do this through astitutional amendment. They had to give the 166 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:05,359 Speaker 1: electors to Washington DC through an amendment to the Constitution. 167 00:09:05,640 --> 00:09:09,120 Speaker 1: That underscores the point I'm making that they can't create 168 00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:12,600 Speaker 1: a fifty first state. They can't truncate the district down 169 00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:15,760 Speaker 1: to the National Mall without a constitutional amendment. If they could, 170 00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:17,880 Speaker 1: then why do they need the twenty third Amendment to 171 00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:37,160 Speaker 1: give them electors to electoral college? I noticed so when 172 00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:42,120 Speaker 1: they tried in nineteen ninety three, the New columbiad mission 173 00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:45,319 Speaker 1: would be pretty badly in the House one fifty three 174 00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:49,280 Speaker 1: to two seventy seven. I'm not sure that that majority 175 00:09:49,320 --> 00:09:51,760 Speaker 1: is still there in your judgment. Why did it failed 176 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:55,800 Speaker 1: so badly at ninety three and what do you suspect 177 00:09:55,840 --> 00:10:00,360 Speaker 1: the vote is now? Well, if you love history, there 178 00:10:00,440 --> 00:10:02,800 Speaker 1: was a report that was given by the Attorney generals 179 00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:06,199 Speaker 1: when Edwin Meese was then Attorney General under the Reagan administration. 180 00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:08,000 Speaker 1: I think it was nineteen eighty six, and there was 181 00:10:08,000 --> 00:10:11,320 Speaker 1: a sixty seventy page report given and I've read this report. 182 00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:13,080 Speaker 1: I read a number of other reports, but if you 183 00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:16,080 Speaker 1: go back, but the report under the Mease administration in 184 00:10:16,080 --> 00:10:19,240 Speaker 1: the Justice Department goes into great detail the history of DC. 185 00:10:19,360 --> 00:10:22,240 Speaker 1: And what's interesting is back in the day the Carter 186 00:10:22,280 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 1: administration and going back to the Kennedy administration, even Robert 187 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:28,760 Speaker 1: Kennedy when he was Attorney General, all agreed. It was 188 00:10:28,760 --> 00:10:32,240 Speaker 1: a bipartisan belief. Outside of the partisans in the District 189 00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:35,880 Speaker 1: of Columbia, they all believe it would basically for the 190 00:10:35,920 --> 00:10:38,440 Speaker 1: intent of the founders to create a fifty first state, 191 00:10:38,520 --> 00:10:41,400 Speaker 1: or to do anything that would create or make Washington, 192 00:10:41,440 --> 00:10:43,480 Speaker 1: DC anything other than the federal sea to power. They 193 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:45,679 Speaker 1: were against this. So there was a lot of bipartisan 194 00:10:46,360 --> 00:10:49,800 Speaker 1: unanimity in that belief system. But in the last couple 195 00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:53,000 Speaker 1: of years, when the amendment to the Constitution to give 196 00:10:53,160 --> 00:10:56,520 Speaker 1: residents of DC a right to vote in federal elections, 197 00:10:56,559 --> 00:10:58,680 Speaker 1: like say in Maryland, there was this push to go 198 00:10:58,760 --> 00:11:02,240 Speaker 1: the DC direction. One thing that I've noticed is that 199 00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:04,679 Speaker 1: in the last five to ten years there's been a 200 00:11:04,679 --> 00:11:07,720 Speaker 1: hard push to go to the left by the Democratic Party, 201 00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:10,040 Speaker 1: by the leaders. Not all Democrats are like this, but 202 00:11:10,120 --> 00:11:12,480 Speaker 1: at the national level. You know, when you look at 203 00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:15,640 Speaker 1: the defund the police and the amnesty for all illegals 204 00:11:15,679 --> 00:11:18,520 Speaker 1: and the funding of illegals through healthcare and welfare and 205 00:11:18,559 --> 00:11:21,360 Speaker 1: all the other programs. They're going so hard to the left. 206 00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:24,559 Speaker 1: The idea that they're talking about packing for members to 207 00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:27,360 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, which they refer to as unpacking the Court. 208 00:11:27,400 --> 00:11:30,800 Speaker 1: This radical jerk to the left has caused them to 209 00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:33,679 Speaker 1: lose sight of their senses, and now they are making 210 00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:37,800 Speaker 1: an argument that even Edward Kennedy once thought was foolish, 211 00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:40,400 Speaker 1: that creating a fifty first state out of Washington, DC 212 00:11:40,679 --> 00:11:44,120 Speaker 1: was wrong. And so that is something that up until 213 00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:47,520 Speaker 1: a decade ago, was pretty universal. Now as to where 214 00:11:47,520 --> 00:11:50,440 Speaker 1: it Congress is, I imagine that as long as the 215 00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:53,400 Speaker 1: filibuster remains in place in the Senate, I think this 216 00:11:53,440 --> 00:11:56,319 Speaker 1: bill will fail. But if they blow the filibuster up, 217 00:11:56,760 --> 00:12:00,319 Speaker 1: you're going to possibly see HR one, which federal lies 218 00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:02,760 Speaker 1: as all state elections. You're going to see the packing 219 00:12:02,760 --> 00:12:05,280 Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court. You're going to see the packing 220 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:07,480 Speaker 1: of the US Senate and the Congress. By the creation 221 00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:09,800 Speaker 1: of the fifty first state, You're going to see a 222 00:12:09,800 --> 00:12:12,040 Speaker 1: lot of radical ideas come. But as long as I 223 00:12:12,160 --> 00:12:16,439 Speaker 1: filibusters in place, I feel confident that this won't pass. 224 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:18,800 Speaker 1: But the reason I sent the letter with twenty two 225 00:12:18,800 --> 00:12:20,640 Speaker 1: states on it was that I wanted to signal to 226 00:12:20,679 --> 00:12:23,479 Speaker 1: certain senators in the US Senate and members of Congress 227 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:25,160 Speaker 1: that if you pass this, you will be on the 228 00:12:25,160 --> 00:12:27,280 Speaker 1: losing side of history, because we will sue in the 229 00:12:27,320 --> 00:12:29,839 Speaker 1: Supreme Court, and I truly believe the court will side 230 00:12:29,840 --> 00:12:34,080 Speaker 1: with us. Well, that's where I thought the letter that 231 00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:40,160 Speaker 1: you sent on April thirteenth, having that many signatures from 232 00:12:40,600 --> 00:12:44,600 Speaker 1: eminent lawyers in the states who are attorneys general, you 233 00:12:44,760 --> 00:12:48,839 Speaker 1: really had laid down here a very high hurdle for 234 00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:52,240 Speaker 1: them to imagine that they can get over it. And 235 00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:55,080 Speaker 1: I thought it was a very well done letter. What 236 00:12:55,240 --> 00:12:59,040 Speaker 1: sort of reaction, if any, have you gotten so far? Well, 237 00:13:00,120 --> 00:13:02,520 Speaker 1: Homestate of South Carolina. I mean, I've received nothing but 238 00:13:03,120 --> 00:13:05,600 Speaker 1: positive feedback from everyone that I've spoken to, and I 239 00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:07,520 Speaker 1: mean most of my friends who are on the left 240 00:13:07,559 --> 00:13:09,520 Speaker 1: side of the aisle are and the Democratic Party really 241 00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:12,160 Speaker 1: aren't focused on this at the state level. I did 242 00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:15,200 Speaker 1: have a brief conversation with the DC Attorney General the 243 00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:18,360 Speaker 1: other day, and he obviously disagreed with my position. And 244 00:13:18,400 --> 00:13:20,160 Speaker 1: told me so, which he has a right to do. 245 00:13:20,679 --> 00:13:23,440 Speaker 1: Very polite in his disagreement, but everywhere I go, people 246 00:13:23,440 --> 00:13:26,720 Speaker 1: are one hundred percent agreement about our position. I do 247 00:13:26,840 --> 00:13:29,160 Speaker 1: want to point out one thing that I think will 248 00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:31,559 Speaker 1: be thrown in our faces, but I think it's easy 249 00:13:31,559 --> 00:13:35,600 Speaker 1: to basically dispel. And that is if you recall when 250 00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:38,080 Speaker 1: Washington DC was created on the shores of the Potomac, 251 00:13:38,559 --> 00:13:41,520 Speaker 1: about seventy percent of thet fell into Maryland and the 252 00:13:41,520 --> 00:13:46,080 Speaker 1: remaining thirty percent fell into Virginia. In eighteen forty six, 253 00:13:46,880 --> 00:13:50,120 Speaker 1: that portion of the District of Columbia that was in 254 00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:53,640 Speaker 1: Virginia was retroceeded back to the Commonwealth of Virginia. And 255 00:13:53,720 --> 00:13:55,560 Speaker 1: we even put a footnote in our letter for those 256 00:13:55,600 --> 00:13:58,640 Speaker 1: who've read the letter that acknowledges that that occurred. But 257 00:13:58,800 --> 00:14:02,440 Speaker 1: that was never challenge. That constitutional issue was never raised. 258 00:14:02,440 --> 00:14:04,720 Speaker 1: The court never weighed in on it, and we don't 259 00:14:04,720 --> 00:14:07,120 Speaker 1: think that's a legal precedent. They'll claim it is, but 260 00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:09,679 Speaker 1: it is not a legal president because it was never 261 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:12,000 Speaker 1: challenged at that time. And that is why Washington DC 262 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:14,600 Speaker 1: looks the way it does today. And here's another thing, 263 00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 1: mister Speaker, I would say, I would still disagree with 264 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:21,680 Speaker 1: Washington DC being converted into a fifty first state. But 265 00:14:21,800 --> 00:14:24,840 Speaker 1: let's say the Democrats in the House and Senate and said, hey, listen, 266 00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:32,560 Speaker 1: why don't we pass a constitutional amendment that retrocedes Maryland's 267 00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:35,920 Speaker 1: portion of the District of Columbia back to Maryland and 268 00:14:35,920 --> 00:14:38,640 Speaker 1: then allow everyone that is currently a resident of Washington, 269 00:14:38,720 --> 00:14:41,560 Speaker 1: d C. Now to be a voter in the state 270 00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:45,320 Speaker 1: of Maryland, and then just have the congressional representation that 271 00:14:45,360 --> 00:14:48,120 Speaker 1: they currently have in Maryland. I said, why aren't they 272 00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:50,840 Speaker 1: doing that, because that doesn't give them two extra seats 273 00:14:50,840 --> 00:14:52,840 Speaker 1: in the US Senate an extra seat in the House. 274 00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:56,040 Speaker 1: They could do that through constitutional amendment. I would have 275 00:14:56,080 --> 00:14:59,040 Speaker 1: no legal argument against them doing it that way. I 276 00:14:59,040 --> 00:15:01,560 Speaker 1: would have an apolo the argument because I think it's wrong. 277 00:15:01,960 --> 00:15:03,560 Speaker 1: But they don't want to do that because they are 278 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:06,720 Speaker 1: motivated purely out of a sense of packing Congress with 279 00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:10,520 Speaker 1: permanent members of their party. So that is the reason 280 00:15:10,560 --> 00:15:12,600 Speaker 1: they're doing this. People can claim I'm doing it for 281 00:15:12,640 --> 00:15:14,760 Speaker 1: political reasons, but I can at least point to the 282 00:15:14,800 --> 00:15:17,920 Speaker 1: Constitution and the intent of the founders on my argument. 283 00:15:17,960 --> 00:15:20,000 Speaker 1: They can't point to that, and so I like to 284 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:23,600 Speaker 1: always underscore that point. So the challenge they've got, it 285 00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:28,360 Speaker 1: seems to me, is that there's nothing in the historic 286 00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:31,800 Speaker 1: record going all the way back to seventeen eighty seven 287 00:15:31,960 --> 00:15:36,800 Speaker 1: seventeen eighty eight that would suggest that creating a state 288 00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:40,560 Speaker 1: out of the national capital was in any way seen 289 00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 1: positively by any of the founding fathers or by any 290 00:15:45,280 --> 00:15:49,080 Speaker 1: of the generations since them. There were discussions, I mean, 291 00:15:49,120 --> 00:15:52,400 Speaker 1: people talked about the residents of the District of Columbia 292 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:55,880 Speaker 1: having a right to vote representation in Congress. There were 293 00:15:55,920 --> 00:15:58,600 Speaker 1: discussions and there was a debate at that time. There 294 00:15:58,640 --> 00:16:01,000 Speaker 1: was an internal debate about how Washington, d C. Should 295 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:04,680 Speaker 1: govern itself as a territory, or should the president select 296 00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:07,320 Speaker 1: the mayor. I think it was in nineteen seventy three 297 00:16:07,480 --> 00:16:10,320 Speaker 1: that they implemented home rule and gave its own home 298 00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:13,240 Speaker 1: governance with the mayor and a city council, etc. But 299 00:16:13,400 --> 00:16:16,520 Speaker 1: from the eighteen seventies to the nineteen seventies there was 300 00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:20,640 Speaker 1: really no major push to change how Washington DC was run, 301 00:16:20,760 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 1: with the exception of the twenty third Amendment that gave 302 00:16:23,200 --> 00:16:25,720 Speaker 1: it three electoral votes in the electoral College, which was 303 00:16:25,720 --> 00:16:28,600 Speaker 1: past in nineteen sixty one. By the way, if I 304 00:16:28,680 --> 00:16:33,040 Speaker 1: may this is a somewhat of an absurdity. They do 305 00:16:33,080 --> 00:16:35,160 Speaker 1: want to eliminate the twenty third Amendment if they're given 306 00:16:35,480 --> 00:16:37,440 Speaker 1: statehood status. But I do want to say something I 307 00:16:37,440 --> 00:16:40,880 Speaker 1: thought was kind of clever in the bill. It doesn't 308 00:16:40,920 --> 00:16:44,640 Speaker 1: seek to convert all of Washington DC into a state. 309 00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:47,600 Speaker 1: What they want to do is they want to truncate 310 00:16:47,800 --> 00:16:50,280 Speaker 1: all of the parts of Washington, DC, all the way 311 00:16:50,320 --> 00:16:54,360 Speaker 1: down to the National Mall, the gardens, the National museums, 312 00:16:54,480 --> 00:16:57,680 Speaker 1: the Capital Complex with those federal buildings, the Supreme Court, 313 00:16:57,920 --> 00:17:01,480 Speaker 1: and then the White House complex and the old Executive 314 00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:04,760 Speaker 1: Office building. They just want that the gardens and museums 315 00:17:04,760 --> 00:17:07,720 Speaker 1: and the federal buildings to be the US Capital and 316 00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:11,640 Speaker 1: everything around it being the Washington Douglas Commonwealth, which would 317 00:17:11,640 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 1: be the new state. If you look at the map 318 00:17:14,119 --> 00:17:16,840 Speaker 1: what that would look like, it basically creates a donut 319 00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:20,080 Speaker 1: hole where the US Capital would be a complete enclave 320 00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:24,440 Speaker 1: within the new Washington Douglas Commonwealth state, and so it 321 00:17:24,440 --> 00:17:28,199 Speaker 1: would be completely encircled. But what's interesting about that, mister Speaker, 322 00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:31,879 Speaker 1: is I can't imagine any other residents living in that 323 00:17:32,119 --> 00:17:35,119 Speaker 1: enclave other than the first family. You might have another 324 00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:38,600 Speaker 1: family or two or three somehow that live within that enclave. 325 00:17:38,640 --> 00:17:40,880 Speaker 1: I can't imagine there'd be residence on the National Mall, 326 00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:45,080 Speaker 1: but there's certainly residents at sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue. I mean, 327 00:17:45,160 --> 00:17:49,720 Speaker 1: I'm not saying it would happen, but theoretically speaking, the 328 00:17:49,800 --> 00:17:53,360 Speaker 1: first family could register to vote at sixteen hundred Pennsylvania 329 00:17:53,440 --> 00:17:56,040 Speaker 1: Avenue and under the twenty third Amendment, be able to 330 00:17:56,119 --> 00:17:59,000 Speaker 1: vote for their own three electors to the Electoral College. 331 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:01,760 Speaker 1: Over the years, I've always said that I would have 332 00:18:01,800 --> 00:18:06,560 Speaker 1: been happy to have returned for voting purposes the residents 333 00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:09,760 Speaker 1: of Washington to Maryland. It would just mean the two 334 00:18:09,840 --> 00:18:13,600 Speaker 1: liberal Democrats from the Maryland Senate would have more votes. 335 00:18:13,800 --> 00:18:16,840 Speaker 1: I've never had anybody in Maryland who was excited by 336 00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:20,560 Speaker 1: the opportunity to have all of the residents of DC 337 00:18:20,680 --> 00:18:23,520 Speaker 1: vote in Maryland. The Democrats from Maryland will tell you 338 00:18:23,840 --> 00:18:27,000 Speaker 1: how much they're for DC statehood, but they don't particularly 339 00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:30,520 Speaker 1: want to have DC brotherhood in terms of allowing them 340 00:18:30,520 --> 00:18:33,480 Speaker 1: to vote in Maryland. And I think it's just the 341 00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:51,720 Speaker 1: nature of the business. Well, listen, I gather that if 342 00:18:51,760 --> 00:18:54,040 Speaker 1: it did for some reason past the House and Senate, 343 00:18:54,440 --> 00:18:59,520 Speaker 1: the U all would be prepared to file suit almost immediately. Absolutely, 344 00:18:59,640 --> 00:19:02,639 Speaker 1: we are prepared to file suit. And I suspect that 345 00:19:02,760 --> 00:19:05,040 Speaker 1: more than the twenty two signatures or not letter would 346 00:19:05,119 --> 00:19:07,320 Speaker 1: join US. I think other states have actually joined an 347 00:19:07,320 --> 00:19:10,439 Speaker 1: actual suit. I've taught to other officials and other states, 348 00:19:10,440 --> 00:19:13,280 Speaker 1: and I think you would see possibly a majority of 349 00:19:13,280 --> 00:19:16,199 Speaker 1: the states somehow in some form representative through governors are 350 00:19:16,240 --> 00:19:19,240 Speaker 1: at appointed ags who couldn't assign the letter because of 351 00:19:19,280 --> 00:19:22,760 Speaker 1: the internal processes of their respective states. But I do 352 00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:26,200 Speaker 1: want to address one other argument. There's this view that 353 00:19:26,800 --> 00:19:31,240 Speaker 1: there are people in Washington, DC who have taxation without representation. 354 00:19:31,280 --> 00:19:33,679 Speaker 1: In other words, they are taxed by Congress, but they 355 00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:36,320 Speaker 1: don't have representatives in Congress. They have Miss Holmes, who 356 00:19:36,400 --> 00:19:39,440 Speaker 1: is their delegate, that doesn't have voting privileges. First off, 357 00:19:39,440 --> 00:19:41,480 Speaker 1: it is a privilege to live in the US capital, 358 00:19:41,880 --> 00:19:45,120 Speaker 1: but you don't have the right to have voting representation 359 00:19:45,160 --> 00:19:48,320 Speaker 1: in Congress because you're a US citizen. You have a 360 00:19:48,400 --> 00:19:51,320 Speaker 1: right to have a voting member of Congress because you're 361 00:19:51,359 --> 00:19:54,840 Speaker 1: a citizen of a state. Okay, that is very clear 362 00:19:54,880 --> 00:19:57,560 Speaker 1: in the US Constitution. There are people going back one 363 00:19:57,640 --> 00:19:59,680 Speaker 1: hundred years, one hundred and fifty years one hundred and 364 00:19:59,680 --> 00:20:04,359 Speaker 1: eighty year who left states and migrated to territories to 365 00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:06,480 Speaker 1: carve out a new existence, and they gave up the 366 00:20:06,600 --> 00:20:09,840 Speaker 1: right to have voting representation in Congress. There are people 367 00:20:09,920 --> 00:20:12,119 Speaker 1: sitting in prison who don't get to vote any elections. 368 00:20:12,320 --> 00:20:15,159 Speaker 1: They get those rights from maybe reinstated, just like the 369 00:20:15,160 --> 00:20:17,480 Speaker 1: people who leave a state to go to a territory 370 00:20:17,840 --> 00:20:21,439 Speaker 1: might get that right reinstated once that territory became a state. 371 00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:24,520 Speaker 1: But having a voting member in Congress is not a 372 00:20:24,720 --> 00:20:27,720 Speaker 1: universal right. You have all the rights in the Constitution, 373 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:30,720 Speaker 1: the civil liberties, the freedoms and protections we have, and 374 00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:32,800 Speaker 1: the Bill of Rights are all there for all of us, 375 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:35,159 Speaker 1: but it's only those people who are members of states 376 00:20:35,160 --> 00:20:38,320 Speaker 1: and to those residents of DC. You can move to 377 00:20:38,400 --> 00:20:42,240 Speaker 1: a state. You don't have to be there. Your ancestors 378 00:20:42,240 --> 00:20:44,359 Speaker 1: may have chosen to raise you there and bring you 379 00:20:44,440 --> 00:20:47,159 Speaker 1: up there. But again, you also have the privilege of 380 00:20:47,200 --> 00:20:49,320 Speaker 1: living in the US capital with all of the things 381 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:51,119 Speaker 1: that go with that and all of the support the 382 00:20:51,200 --> 00:20:53,840 Speaker 1: Congress has to provide. So I don't feel like people 383 00:20:53,840 --> 00:20:56,560 Speaker 1: are not represented in Congress, and also feel like they're 384 00:20:56,560 --> 00:20:58,840 Speaker 1: not trapped there. They can vote with their feet and 385 00:20:58,920 --> 00:21:01,040 Speaker 1: go to another state where they will have voting privileges 386 00:21:01,080 --> 00:21:06,760 Speaker 1: in Congress. So you're offering a sense genuinely federalist view 387 00:21:07,440 --> 00:21:10,720 Speaker 1: of how the system works, as opposed to a centralized 388 00:21:10,840 --> 00:21:16,959 Speaker 1: nationalist view. Absolutely, federalism requires that you have fifty independent states. Obviously, 389 00:21:16,960 --> 00:21:19,159 Speaker 1: you have territories, and then you have the federal government, 390 00:21:19,160 --> 00:21:22,040 Speaker 1: which succeeded in Washington, d C. But there has to 391 00:21:22,080 --> 00:21:24,480 Speaker 1: be something distinct and unique from a state in the 392 00:21:24,600 --> 00:21:27,199 Speaker 1: territory and the federal government. You have to have a 393 00:21:27,280 --> 00:21:30,879 Speaker 1: federal district. The founders did not want the capital to 394 00:21:30,960 --> 00:21:33,119 Speaker 1: be nothing but a bunch of gardens and museums and 395 00:21:33,400 --> 00:21:37,160 Speaker 1: a couple of beautifully ornate federal buildings. They wanted a district. 396 00:21:37,440 --> 00:21:40,200 Speaker 1: When the leaders of other nations came and when people 397 00:21:40,200 --> 00:21:42,560 Speaker 1: would come to the United States Capital, they weren't coming 398 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:44,720 Speaker 1: to a couple of museums and a couple of buildings. 399 00:21:44,880 --> 00:21:47,879 Speaker 1: They were coming to a federal district, a capital city. 400 00:21:48,280 --> 00:21:50,359 Speaker 1: And what this bill seeks to do is to wipe 401 00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:54,119 Speaker 1: that away. Relegate Washington DC nothing more than basically like 402 00:21:54,240 --> 00:21:56,639 Speaker 1: a Vatican city, kind of like this capital on a 403 00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:59,280 Speaker 1: grassy knoll with a couple of federal buildings and gardens 404 00:21:59,600 --> 00:22:02,600 Speaker 1: and thoughts, what the founders created and for what they 405 00:22:02,600 --> 00:22:05,720 Speaker 1: intended for it to be. Washington, DC needs to remain 406 00:22:05,800 --> 00:22:08,920 Speaker 1: the federal seat of power and needs to remain a district, 407 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:12,080 Speaker 1: and we believe that's what the Constitution called for. Congress 408 00:22:12,080 --> 00:22:14,919 Speaker 1: cannot simply wipe that away through legislative FIAT. They have 409 00:22:14,960 --> 00:22:17,360 Speaker 1: to do it through a constitutional amendment. If they want 410 00:22:17,359 --> 00:22:19,639 Speaker 1: to attempt to do that, I'll switch to my argument 411 00:22:19,680 --> 00:22:21,520 Speaker 1: from a legal win to a policy win, and we'll 412 00:22:21,600 --> 00:22:23,840 Speaker 1: argue against it on policy grounds. But right now they 413 00:22:23,840 --> 00:22:26,040 Speaker 1: don't have the authority to do that under our constitution. 414 00:22:26,520 --> 00:22:29,720 Speaker 1: That's great. Well, listen, we are going to for our 415 00:22:29,760 --> 00:22:33,480 Speaker 1: listeners because this is a very impressive letter. We are 416 00:22:33,720 --> 00:22:37,920 Speaker 1: going to post it on our show page so that 417 00:22:38,080 --> 00:22:40,639 Speaker 1: people can see it. We also want to remind all 418 00:22:40,680 --> 00:22:44,600 Speaker 1: of our listeners that they can call their representatives in 419 00:22:44,640 --> 00:22:48,520 Speaker 1: Congress and let them know that they oppose DC. State 420 00:22:48,600 --> 00:22:52,840 Speaker 1: could HR fifty one, and they can call the US 421 00:22:52,960 --> 00:22:59,240 Speaker 1: Capital Switchboard two two two two four three one two one. 422 00:22:59,320 --> 00:23:02,359 Speaker 1: Let me just repeat that two O two two two 423 00:23:02,400 --> 00:23:05,960 Speaker 1: four three one two one, and the switchboard operator will 424 00:23:05,960 --> 00:23:09,400 Speaker 1: connect you directly to the House or Senate office you request. 425 00:23:09,440 --> 00:23:13,119 Speaker 1: So I think that what you've done, Alan has created 426 00:23:13,240 --> 00:23:16,520 Speaker 1: a great template for people to study the letter, get 427 00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:20,119 Speaker 1: on the phone and communicate directly with their members of 428 00:23:20,160 --> 00:23:23,639 Speaker 1: the House and Senate. And I really really appreciate you 429 00:23:23,720 --> 00:23:26,840 Speaker 1: joining me today. Thank you, mister Speaker. It's always a 430 00:23:26,840 --> 00:23:28,560 Speaker 1: privilege to talk with you, and I hope I get 431 00:23:28,600 --> 00:23:33,240 Speaker 1: to see you again soon. Thank you to my guest, 432 00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:36,880 Speaker 1: Alan Wilson, the Attorney General for South Carolina. You can 433 00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:40,800 Speaker 1: read more about why Washington, d c. Should not become 434 00:23:40,840 --> 00:23:44,640 Speaker 1: a state on our show page at newtsworld dot com. 435 00:23:44,800 --> 00:23:48,760 Speaker 1: News World is produced by Gingwich p sixty and iHeartMedia. 436 00:23:49,320 --> 00:23:54,639 Speaker 1: Our executive producer is Debbie Myers, our producer is Garnsey Sloan, 437 00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:59,320 Speaker 1: and our researcher is Rachel Peterson. The artwork for the 438 00:23:59,320 --> 00:24:03,280 Speaker 1: show was created by Steve Penley. Special thanks to the 439 00:24:03,280 --> 00:24:06,800 Speaker 1: team at Gingwish three sixty. If you've been enjoying Newtsworld, 440 00:24:07,200 --> 00:24:10,440 Speaker 1: I hope you'll go to Apple Podcast and both rate 441 00:24:10,520 --> 00:24:13,720 Speaker 1: us with five stars and give us a review so 442 00:24:13,840 --> 00:24:17,880 Speaker 1: others can learn what it's all about. Right now, listeners 443 00:24:17,880 --> 00:24:21,080 Speaker 1: of newts World can sign up from my three free 444 00:24:21,080 --> 00:24:25,760 Speaker 1: weekly columns at Gingwish Free sixty dot com slash newsletter. 445 00:24:26,160 --> 00:24:28,440 Speaker 1: I'm newt Gingwish. This is news world,