1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,200 Speaker 1: For seven years. Republicans have called the Affordable Care Act, 2 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:06,800 Speaker 1: popularly known as Obamacare, a disaster, and they vowed to 3 00:00:06,880 --> 00:00:10,280 Speaker 1: repeal and replace it, but doing so has not been easy. 4 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,720 Speaker 1: The Congressional Bust Budget Office scored the first two versions 5 00:00:13,720 --> 00:00:16,640 Speaker 1: of the Republicans American Health Care Act and said it 6 00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:18,720 Speaker 1: would result in both of them would result in twenty 7 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:22,000 Speaker 1: four million people losing health insurance. House leadership has had 8 00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:25,079 Speaker 1: to contend with protests by hardcore conservatives that the bill 9 00:00:25,079 --> 00:00:27,520 Speaker 1: doesn't go far enough, and it's also had to contend 10 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:30,440 Speaker 1: with complaints by other Republicans that the bill goes too far. 11 00:00:31,120 --> 00:00:33,680 Speaker 1: Changes made last night would eliminate the requirement that all 12 00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:37,360 Speaker 1: health insurance plans cover tennis cential health benefits, including hospitalization 13 00:00:37,400 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 1: of maternity care, but it isn't clear those changes will 14 00:00:40,159 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 1: get enough conservatives on board to pass the bill, and 15 00:00:42,800 --> 00:00:44,560 Speaker 1: the fate of the bill is up in the air 16 00:00:44,640 --> 00:00:47,120 Speaker 1: as we speak. With us to talk about the bill 17 00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:50,519 Speaker 1: and its chances of passage are Nicholas Bagley, a professor 18 00:00:50,560 --> 00:00:53,360 Speaker 1: at the University of Michigan Law School, and Alden Bianchi, 19 00:00:53,520 --> 00:00:59,640 Speaker 1: a member of MINTS. Levin Cone, Ferris Clouski, and Popio Nicholas. Um, 20 00:00:59,680 --> 00:01:03,760 Speaker 1: the the big change revolved at the last minute. You know, 21 00:01:03,800 --> 00:01:05,800 Speaker 1: the last round of changes seemed to revolve around these 22 00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:10,280 Speaker 1: essential health benefits um, that were required by Obamacare and 23 00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:13,600 Speaker 1: now seemed to be removed from requirements and health health 24 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:16,200 Speaker 1: insurance plans provide. Can you explain to us what this 25 00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 1: means for the bill? Sure? Uh? And I should say 26 00:01:20,959 --> 00:01:24,600 Speaker 1: right at the outset that it's actually not altogether clear 27 00:01:25,080 --> 00:01:28,520 Speaker 1: what the most recent changes mean for the bill. This 28 00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:31,760 Speaker 1: amendment was written in haste, and it is kind of 29 00:01:31,800 --> 00:01:35,120 Speaker 1: a train wreck of legislative language. Um. So let me 30 00:01:35,160 --> 00:01:38,800 Speaker 1: back up. The essential health benefits are those benefits that 31 00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:41,920 Speaker 1: health plans in the individual and small group markets have 32 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:45,039 Speaker 1: to cover, and they include things like maternity services and 33 00:01:45,120 --> 00:01:47,640 Speaker 1: mental health coverage that lots of plans prior to the 34 00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:51,840 Speaker 1: a c A didn't cover. And Republicans object to the 35 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:56,320 Speaker 1: price tag of those mandatory benefits, and they'd like to 36 00:01:56,360 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 1: make it easier for health insurers to strip them out. Um. 37 00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:03,120 Speaker 1: The Freedom calc has insisted on that as the price 38 00:02:03,160 --> 00:02:07,720 Speaker 1: of their vote, and so they got this funny amendment 39 00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:11,720 Speaker 1: to the bill into the bill last night that on 40 00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:14,680 Speaker 1: its face looks like it's an effort to strip out 41 00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:17,399 Speaker 1: the essential health benefits. It's not clear that it achieves 42 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:21,600 Speaker 1: that goal. The only goal that it definitely achieves is 43 00:02:21,600 --> 00:02:25,960 Speaker 1: to introduce still more uncertainty into the individual insurance markets 44 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:29,399 Speaker 1: for two thousand eighteen, it's um, like I said, kind 45 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:32,080 Speaker 1: of a train wreck where we see haste making real waste. 46 00:02:32,919 --> 00:02:39,000 Speaker 1: All din does that include as well stripping away benefits 47 00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 1: for drugs, prescriptions, and other things that are that seemed 48 00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:51,600 Speaker 1: essential to healthcare coverage, surgery, ambulance. It really could. Those 49 00:02:51,720 --> 00:02:55,440 Speaker 1: ten essential health benefits are are a laundry list of 50 00:02:55,440 --> 00:02:59,360 Speaker 1: things that include the items that you just mentioned. What's 51 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:02,440 Speaker 1: curious is is you could get a long way towards 52 00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:04,799 Speaker 1: the whole list of tenor cential health benefits if you 53 00:03:04,880 --> 00:03:07,400 Speaker 1: just leave in the four key ones are the drivers 54 00:03:07,440 --> 00:03:10,760 Speaker 1: of of a plan's actual real value in patient hospital, 55 00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 1: out patient hospital, imaging, and prescription drugs. But but that 56 00:03:15,440 --> 00:03:17,600 Speaker 1: could leave an awful lot of other things on the table, 57 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:20,679 Speaker 1: and then you wouldn't know what you're buying from from 58 00:03:20,760 --> 00:03:23,720 Speaker 1: state to state or or market to market. Does your 59 00:03:23,720 --> 00:03:27,120 Speaker 1: plan include this? And not that I agree with Nicholas, 60 00:03:27,120 --> 00:03:33,120 Speaker 1: this is is it's really confusing. Nicho let's uh say 61 00:03:33,200 --> 00:03:36,440 Speaker 1: that that the legislative language problems that you you cited 62 00:03:36,560 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 1: are taking care of, and this really does eliminate the 63 00:03:39,880 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 1: essential health benefits requirement. Donald Trump in the campaign talked 64 00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:45,760 Speaker 1: an awful lot about the idea of selling insurance across 65 00:03:45,840 --> 00:03:50,760 Speaker 1: state lines. How does does the essential health benefits provision 66 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:56,200 Speaker 1: affect that? It's a very good question, because what the 67 00:03:56,240 --> 00:03:59,400 Speaker 1: bill actually does is return authority to the states to 68 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:03,720 Speaker 1: establish their own essential health benefits. So the states will 69 00:04:03,760 --> 00:04:06,560 Speaker 1: be the ones deciding what sorts of health plans can 70 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:10,800 Speaker 1: be sold in their state. Well, how does that work 71 00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:15,720 Speaker 1: when you can sell plans across state lines? Then? You know, 72 00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:17,960 Speaker 1: I don't know how the two you know, I don't 73 00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:20,360 Speaker 1: know how the two requirements can play nicely with one another. 74 00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:23,440 Speaker 1: It seems like either a certain benefit is essential within 75 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:27,000 Speaker 1: a state or it's not essential within a state. Um, 76 00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:29,600 Speaker 1: But allowing sales across state lines, that suggests that you 77 00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:34,159 Speaker 1: can buy plans that have bare bones coverage requirements from 78 00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:37,839 Speaker 1: a far distant state, even where your state has chosen 79 00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:42,359 Speaker 1: to cover a more expansive roster of essential health benefits. Again, 80 00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:47,000 Speaker 1: it's an unholy mess. Um. The two kinds of policy 81 00:04:47,080 --> 00:04:50,240 Speaker 1: changes they want to make just don't work well together. Well. 82 00:04:50,279 --> 00:04:52,480 Speaker 1: Some more of the uncertainty is whether or not this 83 00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 1: bill is going to pass. Latest reports are that how 84 00:04:55,440 --> 00:04:57,760 Speaker 1: Speaker Ryan was going to the White House to speak 85 00:04:57,839 --> 00:05:00,839 Speaker 1: to the President about the prospects for passage, and there's 86 00:05:00,920 --> 00:05:04,120 Speaker 1: much speculation that he's telling the President that the votes 87 00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 1: may not be there for this bill to get through 88 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:10,680 Speaker 1: the House. There's also spec there's also some reports that 89 00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:14,040 Speaker 1: the President intends to blame Speaker Ryan if this does 90 00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:16,560 Speaker 1: not pass. So the politics of this seemed to be 91 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:19,880 Speaker 1: at least as complicated as the legislative language that um, 92 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:23,120 Speaker 1: we're having some trouble parsing out the meaning of