WEBVTT - Putin's Potential Nuclear Threat and Women in Crypto

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily changes San Francisco, and this is

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. With Russia's

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>invasion faltering, could Putin be about to get more brazen

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>even make a nuclear threat. We'll speak to a security

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>expert who says it is time for a no fly zone,

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>plus a tech founder who's helped a hundred thousand people

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>flee Ukraine with a single Google doc. Plus more and

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>more women are flooding into crypto and most of them

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>are hoddlers. How women are making their way into the

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest new tech trend to make sure they get a

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>piece of the pie. And the NBA presents its first

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>game in the metaverse. While they call it the net

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a verse, was it a slam dunk? We'll take you

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to the virtual report. I want to continue this conversation

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>now with security expert Jamial Jaffer. Jamille, I have to

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>get your reaction to what Jody just had to say.

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>There this quote from the U. S. Devents Intelligence Agency

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Director Scott Barrier saying that Putin will increasingly rely on

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>its nuclear deterrent to signal the West. How serious is

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this to you? Well, look, I think it is obviously

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>a serious concern. Any time you're dealing with a nuclear

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>weapons state that is engaged in aggression towards another nation,

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>you've got to measure are they going to rely on

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>their nuclear capability? But I think the main point take

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>away from from general barriers point is that it's a signal. Right,

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing they're gonna use nuclear weapons. Is they're making

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a point that hey, we have new clew weapons, don't

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>mess with us. The problem, of course, is that if

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that's always our position, we can't do anything. You can't

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>respond to the Russians that essentially because they have nuclear

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>weapons that is suchually gives letter prudent clear one way

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever he wants where that's in Ukraine or elsewhere.

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>We can't be afraid to engage and show military sturtch

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the Russians when they were begun crossing lines, they crossed.

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>They crossed the line back in fourteen Crimea. They didn't

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>stop there. Then we thought well maybe if they just

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>take donascan luhance that would be enough. They didn't stop there.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Now they're going to keep Where are the Russians gonna stop?

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen them escalate civilian buildings, schools, hospitals, tremendous

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>number of casualties increasing over time. We can't always be

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>afraid of the Russian nuclear to turn to prevent us

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>from stopping the kind of killing is taking place here. Emily, Well,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>why shouldn't we be afraid to meal because we see

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the escalation continuing to happen. You are now calling for

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a no fly zone, which President Biden has clearly said

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll lead to World War three. Why is that a

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>risk work taking in your view? Well? Look, I think Emily,

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the challenge here is that we're not necessarily gonna avoid

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>World War three by doing nothing right. We've seen that

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>every return when we have not shown strength, and latter Reputin,

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he's tried to take the next thing right, whether that

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>was Crimea, whether that was the Eastern provinces, and now

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we see him doubling down on his rhetoric and his

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>actual actions against Ukrainians. The Ukrainians of all know about

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>the esculatory dynamic with vander Putin, and they're the one

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>saying no flies and will bring this conflict to a

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>more rapid and what we're doing now, supplying more weapons

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and the like, will absolutely help Ukrainians, But it's like

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this continue the conflict at the cost of more civilian life.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure America is showing strength actually leaves

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the World War three. It might actually get Putin realized

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>he's gone to conflict he doesn't want and cause him

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to come to a peaceful resolution this sooner rat and later.

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you think it's gonna get to that nuclear level? Though?

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you think it'll mean World War three? Well,

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there have always been talking about

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if you get in a conflict the nuclear weapons state,

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>right he is there always a chance to go in

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>nuclear Of course, that's true. But the real situation is

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that I think we've seen now or the course of

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>at fifties, sixties, seventy years, that nuclear weapon states don't

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>actually use nuclear weapons because they recognize the catastrophic consequences

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of engaging in such activity. And so if the US

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>where to begin enforce your no flies him, it's much

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>less likely in my view, that we're going to go

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to a nuclear consept and more likely we come to

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a conventional resolution. Look, letter Puttin doesn't want war with

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States, he doesn't want nuclear war. He wants

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to get his prestige back. He wants to get some

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>deal in Ukraine that gives him a win, and he

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>wants to be out of this. He doesn't want me.

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>This conflict need longer than he has to. We need

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring into a close. If we allowed to continue,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>there will be more civilian deaths, more schools, more hospitals,

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>more unnecessary suffering. Now, we haven't necessarily seen cyber attacks

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>on this scale that some expected. Why is that? And

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean the defenses are working or could the

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>worst be yet to come, because obviously cyber attacks can

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>also be fairly devastating, though on a you know, in

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a much different way. Yeah, no, absolute, Emily. Look, I

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>think we have seen some cyberttacks in Ukraine. We've seen

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>the the deployment of the whisper Gate malware. We've seen

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>other mal were recently deployed in the Ukrainian theater um

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And of course remember what happened not pet in seventeen

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>uh mal we're similar to Whispergate leaked out and spread

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and actually harmed American and other international Western companies to

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the tune of two to three million dollars each ten

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>million dollars worldwide. So there is the potential for not

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>only damage in Ukraine, but collateral damage the cyber activities.

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>And I think we also have to assume that lighter

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Putent estimates that he can engage in at least some

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>level cyber activity against US in our allies without incurring

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>too big a cost, because he's done it year after year,

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, using proxies like criminal hacker games. Now, why

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't we seen it yet? I think he estimates it

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. He doesn't needed to play that capability. The

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>US is largely stayed out of the fight directly, and

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they've only engaged in this supplying weapons. He is getting

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>tired of it, he's getting tired of the sanctions. He's

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly under pressure at home. So there is a high

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>likeli that if he's gonna turn to something, it's less

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>likely to be nuclear or kem bio and it's more

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>likely to be cyber and an escalation of civilian campaign.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's the most troubling thing because you point out

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>an attack of the cyber domain couz cod damage and

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so We've got to be cleared him not only that

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he should not do that, but if he does that,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there will be a significant response. Right now, we're taking

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.119
<v Speaker 1>military options off the table. We gotta put those military

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>options back on the table. Emily, all right. Jamal Jaffer,

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity expert, founder and executive director of the National Security Institute, Jamil,

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks for sharing your perspective here. The war on Ukraine

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>has showed the power of the kindness of strangers. Roughly

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>three million Ukrainians have been forced from their homes and country,

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>many with just the clothes on their back. My next

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>guest helped create an open access Google doc that helps

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>with every step of the way, from what to do

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>when leaving the Ukraine, what resources are available and where

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to go, how to enter neighboring countries. Joining me now,

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Elena Vandenberg. She is also the co founder of the

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>meeting software company Chili Piper. Elena, thank you so much

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. So this Google doc is incredibly detailed.

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Anyone can open it. You've got information about traffic, lights

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and traffic and transportation, medical aid, accommodations, food. What sparked

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea to do something like this? As tech companies. Uh.

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to figure out what we can do to

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>stop something that of this great proportion a war. It

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is hard to stop when you're working on tech and software. UM.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>But as we saw the attack on Ukraine unfolding, and

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>our own employees in these regions UM in such great distress,

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we started that Google document immediately to see what would

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>be the best path to get them to save shelter. UM.

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>We started sharing it with our partners and our community,

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and we realized that many more people needed it than

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we thought initially. UM. So it just started growing from

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>there uh to the place where it's at now ninety

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>pages or so UM, and it's access by tens of

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>thousands uh um and and keeps growing. Now. I know

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>when you started this it was just you and one

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>or two other people. How many people are working on

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this now? How constantly are you updating it? It's a

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>real time updates UM. A lot of people are contributing

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>from different countries. UM. As new policies are being added

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in Australia or in Germany or in UK. You the

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>policies are updated in the Google doc UM. There are

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>thousands of contributors, and we look at every information that's

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.359
<v Speaker 1>being put to make sure that it's vetted. Obviously, it's

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>very important that the information gets UM gets a veget

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>so that they this is life in the situation, so

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it has to be accurate. We're actually looking at scrolling

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>through this Google doc right now. Are there any stories

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that stand out to you of the people who have

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>been helped by this. I'm sure you've got stories flooding in.

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, people who you know who wouldn't maybe wouldn't

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>know what to do. It's heartbreaking. UM. I UM am

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>part of thousands of what's up groups and telegram groups

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>where people are asking left and right for help on

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>how to get to certain borders, how to make sure

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're UM, they're not in their lines of fire,

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and that they get shelter. On the other sides, most

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>people in Ukraine, as you can tell, have UM stayed

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>behind to fight, including our own employees. The ones that

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>are going out and looking for shelter are mostly women

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>and children and elderly UM. So it's harder for them

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to access something like a Google doc because they're not

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>typically that used to just to kind of format. So

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens is that there's one leader out of three

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or four groups that tells them, Okay, there's this document,

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>we can rely on it to find shelter, and that

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>person usually leads them to their way. UM. I was

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>family recently. They just got with twelve kids in Romanian

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>hotel and they send me a picture with them being

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>crowded on mattresses. Um. It's it's constant outpouring of of

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of messages like that you yourself grew up under a

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>dictatorship in Romania, where now so many Ukrainians are fleeing.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>What are you hearing from family and friends in Romania

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>about what that's like seeing all of these people come

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>across the border. Ukraine and Romania are quite similar in

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that they've lived under some oppression of some kind from Russia,

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time there's there are some friendships

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that have formed. I don't thing that anyone feels like

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a war between Russia and Ukraine. Um, it's mostly

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's a war between Puttin and Ukraine. Um. Everybody

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is at Everybody who's um on the more educated front

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>on on Russia feels that, even though they're not allowed

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it, that this is not a sentiment

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that they share that they should be attacking. And in

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Romania there's this looming fear that is reminiscent of communism,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of dictatorship um, where everybody was afraid to speak out,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody was in a state of fear um and and

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>constantly propaganda played on TV. So it's a it's a

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that's familiar with Well. Grateful for the heart and Sawyer

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>putting into this document that is now helping so many

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>people in Vandenberg, co founder of Chili Piper, thank you.

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we're gonna be talking about software. Page your

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Duty shares soaring after their results. CEO Jennifer Tahatta is

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with us. Next, this is Bloomberg. Pagere Duty is seeing

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a big boost after reporting a better than expected outlook

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>for the year, but the stock still struggling. You're to

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>date along with the rest of software, joining us now

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to discuss page Duty. CEO Jennifer ta Hatta Jennifer shares

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>jumping here. What do you think it's going to drive

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the next year of growth as we come out of

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic but are facing all of these macro economic headwinds. Well,

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for having me, Emily, And first of all,

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm really proud of our results. We saw accelerated growth

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in the last year, ending the year growing revenue at

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty and we see a lot of momentum coming into

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the new year on the back of really strong performance

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in our enterprise mid market segments with customers spending over

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a million in a r are with US growing sixty

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and customers spending over a u K growing UM. You know,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the macro is has been really challenging over the last

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of years and that continues. If you had asked

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>me five years ago did I think I'd be dealing

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>with a new crisis almost every quarter as a CEO,

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have you know, I would have thought that

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>was a crazy question. And now here we are, I

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>will say that, UM, in the macro environment, we are

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>not seeing a change in what so far as a

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong buying signal because a lot of our long

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>term tail winds are still in play. We see customers

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>adopting the cloud, We see DevOps transformation happening all over.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Digital acceleration in particular still going on. It's not just

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a COVID thing, as as companies realize that the primary

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>way they're going to engage with their customers is through

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a digital experience, and increasingly we're seeing inflation and some

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of the broader macro and certainty we can talk about Europe,

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that as a potential driver for increased appetite

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 1>in automation, which has been a big part of our platform.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>What are the global trends that stand out to you,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>because in general, it certainly seems like we're seeing a

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>reset on big tech, on enterprise software, and I wonder

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>if if this is something that's going to continue for

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable future, or if we get back to the

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>multiples that so many tech investors had gotten used to

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>ordainitely seeing some you know normalization. You had some multiples

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that were very very high and hard to rationalize, and

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>then you had some companies that were not playing in

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the same range. What I would tell you is every

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>company is becoming a software company. That's a reality. So

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think software is going away anytime soon,

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that investors are going to continue

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to look for, you know, a path to profitability. And

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were we were chilled to share with

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>our our investors this week that we intend to be

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>profitable by f y twenty four that you know, we're

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to gain operating leverage as the company scales,

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and we see that as you know, a way to

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>become true durable grower um from from a broader perspective.

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think you know, if you look at what's

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>going on in the macro, one thing that is certain

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the way customers and the way employees work

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:24.239
<v Speaker 1>has changed. Is a lot more interrupt work, unpredictable, unstructured

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>work coming at employees now, and some of the more

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>traditional platforms to getting queues, etcetera don't serve that type

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of work very well. Page Your Duty is designed for

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>technical crises, to start incidents, and increasingly we're seeing it

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>be used for crisis management, which you know is unfortunately

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>becoming a really important practice in most companies today. So

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you think this will all mean for Page

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Duty stock? I mean, obviously we've seen the stock under

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>pressure despite these strong results. What's what's next? Quickly? Well,

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I I you know me, I'm a long game player.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I have been at the company for six years. You're

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to carry me out in a box. And

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I actually have a lot of confidence in both the

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>team and the company, and we have very sticky customer base,

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, or our gross retention has been consistently above

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a dollar. Retention has been above twenty percent. We expect

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep that pace going. So I actually think there's

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of upside and growth. And you know, we're

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>very focused on our purpose and our mission to revolutionize

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>operations and we think this is what modern companies need.

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, frankly, if you look at what's going

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on in the backdrop, that that remains true. So I

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>feel good about the direction. Jennifer had a CEO of

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Page Your Duty Always good to have you on the show, Jennifer,

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for stopping by. Welcome back to Bloomer Technology.

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm emily changing in San Francisco well, between inflation and

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>rate hikes, the war on Ukraine, the pandemic, the consumer

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>landscape has changed dramatically over the last few months and years.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Here to talk with me about where the consumer is

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>going and more. Kirsten Green, founder of four Runner Ventures.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Kirsten is great to have you back here on the show.

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. You've spent to you decades

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>focusing on the consumer. Walking through malls in the early

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>days of your career as an analyst. I'm curious where

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you think the consumer is going now, facing all of

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>these shocks, all of this uncertainty, higher gas prices, What

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>does that tell you about where they're going to be

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>wanting to spend their money. There's a whole new list

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of things on the macro level that are impacting us today,

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about the economy and the last two

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>years has been probably the unprecedented time of change and disruption.

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So this consumer has really been through a lot the

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, and I think, you know, as

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>much as anything we've been, it's been demonstrated that they're resilient.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>People are resilient, consumers are resilient. UM. We definitely have

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>had you know, kind of higher savings rate, lower spending

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>during this time period and sentiment kind of fluctuating and

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>going up and then most recent period down again. So

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>here we are back on another leg of the roller coaster.

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think that, like you know, as we entered

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this year, UM, I really was looking forward to seeing

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>like what are the new norms people are establishing, And

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're trying to keep our focus on, which

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is out of this period, what is kind of re emerging,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's not going back to where we were before.

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously not being where we've been for the last

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>two years, but it's really thinking about what is the

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>future look like and how are people going to be

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>impacted by the recent events going forward. Now you throw

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in you throw in a war, you throw an inflation,

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you throw an interest rate increases, and that's just a

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of uncertainty, and you're seeing that show up in

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lower consumer sentiment and consumer confidence numbers. So what does

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that mean for the next leg of the roller coaster

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and where you are going to be putting your money

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>because your job is to figure out those early bets

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that none of us right don't. So we've been we've

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>been investing, and we've been looking at a consumer who

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>has been, you know, cautious for the last two year.

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Savings rates have been highered, spending has been lower, They've

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>been more particular about what they're buying, when they're buying,

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>how they're buying, just like they are with their time.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that continues. If we thought this year was

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be the year to re emerge and for

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>everything to kind of come back on, I think now

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you've got a whole other host of reasons for people

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a bit cautious. That being said, people are

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>fully healthy. This is you know, some of that. We're

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 1>we had higher savings rates definitely over the last two

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>years than we've had in decades. Um. While peep spending

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>has started to take back up, savings rates are still higher.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>The job market is incredibly it's favorable to people looking

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for jobs, so there's kind of a counterbalance to some

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things that feel threatening out there. And I

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>think you just see people proceeded with caution, but also

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>feeling like they want to get out and spend a

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more and get out and do things again.

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>What's happening in the venture capital environment? Because there has

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>been a ton of money flooding into the ecosystem and

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>valuations have been high. I'm hearing that valuations are starting

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to come down given this uncertainty. What are you say

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>that that is the hearing. I don't know how many

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>people have seen it yet, but I think it seems

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like the practical or the expected thing to have happened,

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think everybody's life has been different for

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the last two years. We talked about the consumer's life

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>being different for the last couple of years, investors have

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>been too. I think we we went home on March

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and thought like, we can't do our jobs because it's

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>such an in person type of job, and we learned

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>how to do that in a remote environment. Last year

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was a record year for investing in the venture ecosystem.

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It was almost more than two x the year before,

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>and so it was just like people at work focused

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and just cranking, you know, cranking out making new investments.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I think this year, end of this year,

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and you have a lot of new investments to navigate

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in an uncertain environment, it's a good time to sort

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of take a pause, make sure people are set up

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for success, think about how you are going to set

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>priorities for this year. And the changing landscape. UM and

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>thing were frothy last year on a lot of levels.

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:04.959
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, it's never all across the board. I mean,

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of innovation and there's a lot of

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>newness driving opportunity. So but the pause moment does give

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>people a chance to kind of reset a little bit.

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you know, that's probably healthy. It's

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>healthy for everybody. It's healthy for the ecosystem in general.

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's more of a conversation right now and sort

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of like how do we expect that to play out

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>than it is I think actual deal pricing. You've now

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>raised over a billion dollars in our last fund, and

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you are celebrating the ten year anniversary of Forrunner Ventures. Yes,

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>what if the next ten years going to look like?

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you put those hundreds of millions of dollars

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to work? Yeah? I actually, um, you know, I feel

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>so invigorated to be entering this next decade with ten

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>years of experience working together as a team and still

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>being as excited about what we do and as ambitious

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in the face of a tremendous amount of opportunity. So,

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've been covering the tech industry for two

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of decades. I've been investing in it, but

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in so many ways like it is out of place

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>now where it is ubiquitous, it is part of not

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>just business but people's lives, and we're really seeing a

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of more useful cases for it and really shaping

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>people's lives in different ways. I think there's been this

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>happened because of because of technology, because of connectivity UM,

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and it was sort of catapulted forward, I think in

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the face of the pandemic, which is this idea of

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>like I want to do, I want to be more

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>self reliant, I want to take more things into my

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>own hands. UM, maybe I want more flexibility in my life.

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>So people are changing their career paths, or they're changing

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>how they make money or how they seek opportunity, and

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that is feeling like a whole new landscape of potential

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>across the board and UM and that's also shifting how

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>people are spending money. So I think there's just a

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity happening. I think there's more conversation about sustainability,

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>about kind of like how to do good in business

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for the future. There's obviously a lot of conversation about

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Web three or crypto and how that's going to influence things.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, our team feels definitely like

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>we're entering this year executing into a tremendous amount of

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and change. What are you most excited about when

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to crypto and web A lot of people

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>still don't understand it. Yeah, I mean, I you know,

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're all on a really steep learning curve.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Um we have made some early investments. I think the

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>area where we're focusing the most on is how do

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>we think about making it something that's more approachable and

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>more kind of you know, practical to people and to business,

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>so that it's not just a kind of a subsector

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. It's like, Okay, it's a new it's

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a new protocol, it's a new way of doing things.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>It will allow different kinds of access. How do we

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>think about leveraging that in the context of what we're

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>already doing. So does it you know, does it make

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>business transactions easier? Does it change kind of some of

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the goods you buy? Does it change how you interact

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in some ways? And so really thinking about how do

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you make that an approachable experience? Now, one thing that

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is not changing fast enough is the representation of women

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>in the tech industry. And the latest now here is

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this two percent that keeps getting thrown. Around two percent

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of venture capital funding last year went to women only teams.

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like when you look at mixed gender teams, but

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that still means more than of venture capital is going

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to only mail entrepreneurs. Something, isn't it? Changing faster what's

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>going It's incredibly disappointing and frustrating, particularly because that is

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a downtick from the year before, and that's just unacceptable

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on all kinds of levels. I do think on the

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>positive side, you have twelve percent of women, UM, twelve

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of partners at adventure firms are are women. That's

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>up from two percent a few years ago. Women led

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>firms raised seven billion dollars last year. That's up substantially

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>from any year in the past. UM. And you know, I,

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I sincerely hope and believe that like that changing landscape

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to flow through to a more diverse group

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of founders being funded. And I don't want to get

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>hung up on one year as a trend or as

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we can't accept that, right and so I, you know,

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm last year, let's call it an anomaly, and this year,

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>let's say that the inputs are going to drive better output,

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>because it is so obvious and clear when you look

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at results that multi gendered, multi ethnic teams are better

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>company cultures. And after having invested in a hundred and

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus companies private companies over the last decade, we

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>could definitely say that one of the biggest indicators, if

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not the biggest indicator of between a company that does

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>well versus a company that does really well, is the

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>culture that they built. Yes, it's the ability to get

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the right people engaged and to give them the right

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to flourish and do their best work. All right, Well,

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take a little dose of your optimism

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and hope that you're right that things will get better.

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Kirsten Green, founder for Runner Venture. Is always good to

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>have you here. It's good to see you in person.

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me, for joining us. All right,

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>coming up, talking about crypto, women in crypto. What block

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>five's latest survey tells us about the role of women

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the ever expanding blockchain ecosystem. They want a piece

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of that pie. We're going to talk to Flory Marquez,

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>co founder of block Fi. Next, this is Bloomberg Bitcoin

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>fluctuating after the FED signal, additional tightening and increasing interest

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>rates making risk assets potentially less attractive to investors. Let's

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>dive deeper into this with our crypto contributor Sinali Bossi Shinale.

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>How much will that deter potential investors given that some

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>people don't think of digital assets as a risk at all. Yeah,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I think to have this conversation, we really need to

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>take a long term view here, Emily, we have to

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>look at bitcoin over the last five years, because if

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>you bought bitcoin in the last year, yes, you had

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volatility, but five years ago you've made many,

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>many times your money. And you know, we're trading just

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>over forty thousand. Now, just back in ten we were

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>trading at like fourteen thousands, so you well more than

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>doubled your money. The reason you have to bring this

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>up also is in the context of you know, if

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you buy stocks or if you buy a house, the

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>idea is to build your wealth over time. Let's look

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>at the theory um, also a smaller by market cap

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>than bitcoin, but even ethereum also yes, volatile in the

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>near term, yes, down from its peak, but much much

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>higher than if you bought it five years ago. So

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the question still remains, where does it go five years

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>from now? Does it hit that five hundred thousand mark

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>that Mike Novergrats is talking about, or does it just

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>get a little higher than forty thousand. But either way

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you can see how people think the long term can

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>be a good investment. All right, well, let's talk a

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit about where women think the curve is going.

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Shall I hang on? Joining us now at Block five.

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Co founder A Floory Marquez, also senior vice president of operations,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>out with a new report on women and crypto and

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Floory the big concern is that women are going to

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be left behind in another big revolution, that crypto and

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto companies are already very male dominated. What is the

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>data telling you about the representation of women in crypto? I,

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Emily and Shannali, it's great to see both again, and uh,

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I am very very focused on making sure that while

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we are we are in the early stages of developing

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the technology behind crypto, we are paying attention to the

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>demographics and inclusion. So apt blocked five we ran a

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>survey where we asked a thousand individuals who identify as

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>women what they think about crypto, and what we learned

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was very interesting, which is of women had heard of crypto,

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and one in four actually slightly higher than the statistics

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw from the Biden administration actually own crypto. And

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very important to look at the trend line.

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So the statistics are not where I would like to

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>see them today. But we actually ran a survey six

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>months ago and today to track how how women how

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>many women knew to buy crypto? Did they know where

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to purchase crypto for the first time, And in the

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>last six months that number has doubled to nearly forty

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.479
<v Speaker 1>percent of women. So it definitely the statistics are not

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>where I'd like to see them today, but we are

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>trending in the right direction, and I think there's so

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>much more that we have to do to make sure

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're hitting an inclusion. Now. The majority of that

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>women you talked to, I noticed are hoddlers. They they're

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they're planning to hang on. And I'm curious, do you

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>think that crypto could be the great equalizer that some

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>are heralding? It could be. I think it definitely has

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>some promising aspects to it. So Shinali was just talking

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>about the five year returns in crypto, and so I

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think that what we see with women and investors in

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>general is that people who buy crypto do believe in

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>its long term value. So the majority of women that

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we interviewed actually are buying and holding onto those investments,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>believing in the long term of turns and in terms

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of equalizing access to digital assets. I think this comes

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>into play in two ways. One is there this is

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a brand new technology, no one's an expert, and so

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what that means is that we're all on the ground floor,

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and so we have a chance to bring inclusivity in

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>from the ground up, and I do think that lower

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>some barriers. The second aspect is just the fact that

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>crypto is allows financial access on a global scale. For

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the first time in history. You can access US grade

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>financial asset assets from overseas instantly on your phone, and

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that's extremely exciting. Flora, you came from a more traditional

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>finance background, fintech and then private asset manager. So how

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a common critique that women don't manage risk

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the same way, they don't think about risk the same

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>way as men. You know, that's constantly what we hear.

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So how then in crypto, one of the riskiest asset classes,

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>do women start to think about risk, get comfortable taking

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it on, and also not just go with the assumption

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.959
<v Speaker 1>of things go straight up but could also hit some

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>roadbumps along the way. I think that one of the

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting things that we found in our survey is that

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the majority of women. So about of women make financial

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>investment decisions off of conversations with friends and family. So

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>if you think about inclusivity from a structural perspective, if

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a demographic that historically has been excluded from

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the financial system and everyone's learning about their financial decisions

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>from their communities, um, that's going to perpetuate exclusivity. And

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>so the number one thing that we can do right

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>now as women working in crypto is to talk about

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the statistics and perpetuate education to our communities and our peers,

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>because I believe that for every single individual that I

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>can convert into the space for the first time, we

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>can bring that knowledge back to our communities and make

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>an exponential change on who gets to play in this space.

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And beyond the people who are investing in crypto, can

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.959
<v Speaker 1>you speak to the companies themselves when you look around

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>at these giant investment firms that have really done well

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years, do they have enough women

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>at the top and are their skills that women should

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>be presenting on the forefront and get themselves in those

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>top roles at this time. So Creston that you just

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>head On was talking about increasing representation, especially when you

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>look at partners in vcs, and I do think that

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>having women in leadership positions will perpetuate more inclusivity in

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the crypto space over time. And I think one thing

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting about the crypto space that many people

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>might not know is that you actually don't need crypto

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>experience to move into the space. What we're looking for

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is people with traditional experience to come into Block five,

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, and bring their traditional experience into the space

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. We will teach you about crypto.

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm hoping that if there are women out

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>there on the sidelines hoping to break into the space

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, that they can see me, hear me.

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And here you know, we have a hundred jobs posted online.

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>There are many crypto companies out there hiring. You should

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely look at making the jump. How would you describe

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>your own journey to this space and your experience rising

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>up within this industry that, by many accounts has been

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>so male dominated, even if it hopefully won't be so

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>male dominated in the future. I think my experience is

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely um biased by the people around me, and I

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>think what's so important about making a jump in any

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>industry is making sure that you're surrounded by a team

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that lifts you up. And so I think what's so

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>important in any interview process as you're looking at companies,

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>as in those conversations, are you talking to people who

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>can be your peer and who can propel you forward? UM.

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing that's really beautiful about the crypto

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>industry is that because we're in the early stages, there's

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>so much innovation to be had. And so my experience

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in traditional finance with some times that um, we were

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in a crowded room and there's a lot of sharp

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>elbows to compete for new ideas. In crypto, everything's a

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>new idea, and so there's a lot more camaraderie and

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>support in terms of being able to propel your own

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>career forward faster. Floory Marquez Block five co founder along

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>with our own Shinneli Bassik, thank you both for the

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>first time a live virtual broadcast of an NBA game.

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a peek into the future of what the

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>metaverse and sports could look like. An executive Disney calling

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.839
<v Speaker 1>it a video game come to life. That's how many

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>viewers felt as well. For more, I want to bring

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in a Bloomberg's Mark German, So some people thought this

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>was a slam dunk, others did not. Mark. What was

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>your take, Well, first of all, I'm glad to be

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>on here, Emily talking to you about the NBA and

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it is not a Lakers game. I you know, I

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>pledged to no longer watch Lakers games this season because

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>they're doing so terribly. It was the Nets Mavericks game,

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>two great teams. I thought it looked like a video game,

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like you said, straight out of NBA Live or NBA

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>two k it, but it really didn't look so great.

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what the advantages for consumers. I think

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a gimmick. I think it looks like

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>something you would play with the video game. That's when

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to see it. When you're watching a game

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on TV, you want to see it completely in real life.

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think this presents any benefits. Now, if

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you watch t NT through their Apple TV app or

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>some of their TV stations, what you can actually get

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is you can watch the game live view, not through VR,

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>with multiple angles. And I think that's really what the

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>future of watching sports is, being able to see four

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>or five different angles. Simultaneously versus watching it through VR.

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Now we have companies that are approaching this apple. For instance,

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Spot a company two years ago called next VR, and

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they develop technology that does just this what you're seeing

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>right now from ESPN. With that nets Mavericks Games. So

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly a direction that some companies are heading. I

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>don't see the benefit though. This was a partnership between ESPN, Disney, NBA,

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Canon as I understand, it's six separate feeds. I guess

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>you know. The question is how could some of this

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>technology spice up the future of of of the game experience.

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I agree I want to see players playing

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in real life, but is there something here that could

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>make it cool? I think the future of live sports

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is probably augmented reality right where you're wearing a R

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>glasses or your normal glasses of a R features to

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a game right and you're able to see stats or

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>other information while watching the game right. Some TV networks

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have a feature now where on top of the players,

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you'll get a little overlay that tells them what percentage

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>based on past history, is it like it? They'll make

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the shot based on where they are standing with the

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>ball at that particular or second right. So I think

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that is where you're getting real helpful in formation in

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>an A R or VR sense in terms of actually

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>watching this content in virtual reality. It looks cool, but

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly there's some work to be done on the cameras,

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>on the angles and such. People are pointing out that

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it really doesn't look so great. Books chopped up. It

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like players running into each other when they're not

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 1>so it's not looking so hot. Maybe in a couple

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of years of the technology advances, it will look better,

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not sure why anyone want to substitute real

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>life for virtual reality, especially in sports. Mark German, thank

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you fun to talk about the NBA, even if it's

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>not the Lakers. Always appreciate you taking the time to

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>join us. That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow we're gona have Colleen McQuary of a Credit Carma

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about the gender pay gap. Also, please re listen

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to our show on the new Bloomberg Technology podcast. Download

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it for when you're on the go. It is great.

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg