Speaker 1: Today my friends a tale of two cities. In New
Speaker 1: York City, four hotels with over a thousand rooms were
Speaker 1: set up for coronavirus patients, but they're only twenty one
Speaker 1: occupants at these hotels, social service advocates are furious. According
Speaker 1: to The New York Post, they think the hotel room
Speaker 1: should be open to homeless people. Because the homeless, some
Speaker 1: of whom are infected, are living in the subways, are
Speaker 1: forced into nursing homes. Activists called the situation morally disgusting.
Speaker 1: Now Meanwhile, out on the Left Coast, advocates are losing
Speaker 1: patients with LA's handling of the homeless. The Los Angeles
Speaker 1: Times reports of homeless advocates and homeless people showed up
Speaker 1: at a swanky hotel. They asked to see some rooms,
Speaker 1: and once they gained access, they refused to leave until
Speaker 1: law enforcement made arrests. So the advocates are now demanding
Speaker 1: the city government simply seized the hotels and commandeer the
Speaker 1: rooms to house the massive homeless population on l a
Speaker 1: skid row. Legal exs say this is doable, but it
Speaker 1: might be too time consuming to satisfy these advocates. The
Speaker 1: process of seizing private property like hotels. It could take months.
Speaker 1: That's unacceptable. So there you have at Homeless advocates on
Speaker 1: both liberal coasts are ticked off. They say the homeless
Speaker 1: are getting the short end of the stick. Now, who
Speaker 1: runs these places? Yep, it's liberal Democrats. If this doesn't
Speaker 1: make sense to you, that's what