WEBVTT - Good Call/Bad Call: Bari Weiss as CBS’s New Editor-in-Chief

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:28.564
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:28.604 --> 0:00:31.884
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova and I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:32.724 --> 0:00:34.884
<v Speaker 2>Today on the show, Maria, I gotta be honest, this

0:00:34.924 --> 0:00:37.644
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be a little bit of a media naval

0:00:37.724 --> 0:00:41.444
<v Speaker 2>gazing kind of episode. People love talking about this stuff.

0:00:41.484 --> 0:00:43.244
<v Speaker 2>Some of them do, some of them don't write. But

0:00:43.284 --> 0:00:46.444
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna be talking about the recent acquisition by paramount

0:00:46.724 --> 0:00:50.564
<v Speaker 2>of the subset publication the Free Press, Barry Weis's publication

0:00:50.644 --> 0:00:53.084
<v Speaker 2>for one hundred and fifty million dollars. Barry Wise also

0:00:53.164 --> 0:00:56.044
<v Speaker 2>now the editor in chief of CBS News. I kind

0:00:56.084 --> 0:00:58.564
<v Speaker 2>of can't resist this topic because, as you'll hear, like

0:00:59.084 --> 0:01:02.644
<v Speaker 2>I just know and you know this landscape pretty well.

0:01:02.684 --> 0:01:04.244
<v Speaker 2>I used to work for ABC News, I used to

0:01:04.244 --> 0:01:05.524
<v Speaker 2>work for the New York Times where Barry is. I

0:01:05.604 --> 0:01:08.124
<v Speaker 2>have my own substack that doesn't compete quite with the

0:01:08.124 --> 0:01:10.364
<v Speaker 2>Free Press, but like, I know all this stuff really well.

0:01:10.604 --> 0:01:12.924
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's too close to the bone for me

0:01:13.004 --> 0:01:15.644
<v Speaker 2>not to have opinions about it. And there is some

0:01:15.724 --> 0:01:18.044
<v Speaker 2>strategy work too, as far as as far as what

0:01:18.084 --> 0:01:19.604
<v Speaker 2>CBS wants to get out of this. How do you

0:01:19.684 --> 0:01:22.204
<v Speaker 2>build a differentiated media brand? How do you know when

0:01:22.204 --> 0:01:24.044
<v Speaker 2>you're hiring a good editor in chief and they will

0:01:24.044 --> 0:01:25.244
<v Speaker 2>do a good called bad call, right?

0:01:25.444 --> 0:01:25.724
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:25.764 --> 0:01:28.124
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, to say at the end of the day, is

0:01:28.164 --> 0:01:30.724
<v Speaker 1>this a good decision for CBS, the acquisition of a

0:01:30.764 --> 0:01:33.924
<v Speaker 1>free press making Barry wise editor in chief? Is this

0:01:34.044 --> 0:01:37.404
<v Speaker 1>good for the brand? Is this good for the future

0:01:37.444 --> 0:01:40.524
<v Speaker 1>of media?

0:01:42.284 --> 0:01:44.204
<v Speaker 2>Would you like to have one hundred and two million dollars, Maria,

0:01:44.284 --> 0:01:45.924
<v Speaker 2>I would love to have one hundred and fifty dollars

0:01:45.964 --> 0:01:46.204
<v Speaker 2>a night.

0:01:46.524 --> 0:01:50.284
<v Speaker 1>So let's uh, let's dive in and just talk about

0:01:50.324 --> 0:01:54.204
<v Speaker 1>this decision. It's heavily tax you know what, Nate, I

0:01:54.244 --> 0:01:56.244
<v Speaker 1>will happily pay taxes.

0:01:56.444 --> 0:01:57.724
<v Speaker 2>You just pay what taxes.

0:01:58.204 --> 0:02:01.004
<v Speaker 1>I will happily pay more taxes. If someone were to

0:02:01.084 --> 0:02:03.884
<v Speaker 1>offer me one hundred and fifty million dollars, why night

0:02:03.924 --> 0:02:04.484
<v Speaker 1>are you offering?

0:02:04.604 --> 0:02:07.084
<v Speaker 2>If I had one hundred and fifty billion dollars, I

0:02:07.164 --> 0:02:10.284
<v Speaker 2>might offer you like a really ice birthday gift.

0:02:11.324 --> 0:02:15.644
<v Speaker 1>Ah, that's so sweet. This is where this is where

0:02:15.684 --> 0:02:19.804
<v Speaker 1>friendships come to die right on this podcast, ladies and gentlemen.

0:02:20.764 --> 0:02:25.404
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about Barry Weiss's appointment. So with that

0:02:25.564 --> 0:02:30.884
<v Speaker 1>acquisition for one hundred and fifty million dollars, Barry Weiss

0:02:30.964 --> 0:02:35.084
<v Speaker 1>has become the editor in chief of CBS News, which

0:02:35.124 --> 0:02:38.444
<v Speaker 1>is now part of Paramount. Right, because there was just

0:02:38.564 --> 0:02:44.044
<v Speaker 1>a big deal where Paramount, which is owned by David Ellison,

0:02:44.164 --> 0:02:47.524
<v Speaker 1>who is I don't know how many billions he has,

0:02:47.564 --> 0:02:49.164
<v Speaker 1>but he has many of them.

0:02:49.564 --> 0:02:53.084
<v Speaker 2>Not enough, not enough, clearly, not enough clearly.

0:02:53.884 --> 0:02:58.604
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so now she will be running CBS News. Nate,

0:02:58.684 --> 0:03:01.204
<v Speaker 1>you say everyone has opinions. I certainly have opinions, but

0:03:01.644 --> 0:03:04.524
<v Speaker 1>let's start. Let's start with your opinions. What do you

0:03:04.604 --> 0:03:08.484
<v Speaker 1>think about this decision? And then I will I will

0:03:08.524 --> 0:03:11.084
<v Speaker 1>speak to someone who formally worked in news.

0:03:11.284 --> 0:03:13.284
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and look, I should also say, like, you know,

0:03:13.364 --> 0:03:15.644
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand the whole I have a substack. I'm

0:03:15.644 --> 0:03:18.404
<v Speaker 2>an investor in substack. Just disclosing on my conflict of interest. Right.

0:03:19.924 --> 0:03:22.084
<v Speaker 2>I've met Barry once or twice. I had nice interactions

0:03:22.084 --> 0:03:24.044
<v Speaker 2>with her. I've talked about collaboration with the Free Press

0:03:24.084 --> 0:03:26.404
<v Speaker 2>different times. But I don't think i've any like conflicts

0:03:26.404 --> 0:03:30.004
<v Speaker 2>that make this awkward officially, or maybe awkward, but not

0:03:30.084 --> 0:03:32.044
<v Speaker 2>more than awkward, which is kind of always how it

0:03:32.124 --> 0:03:34.724
<v Speaker 2>is with this naval gazing, insight journalism and stuff. So

0:03:35.164 --> 0:03:39.684
<v Speaker 2>I have a few thoughts. Right, number one, the purchase

0:03:39.724 --> 0:03:44.444
<v Speaker 2>price of one hundred and fifty million dollars is actually

0:03:44.844 --> 0:03:48.124
<v Speaker 2>not ridiculous, right. And the reason I know this is because,

0:03:48.204 --> 0:03:52.724
<v Speaker 2>like I've spent a lot of time looking at multiples

0:03:53.444 --> 0:03:57.164
<v Speaker 2>of based on the number of paid subscribers that you have, Right,

0:03:57.204 --> 0:03:59.764
<v Speaker 2>what does that tend to sell for in the market,

0:03:59.844 --> 0:04:02.684
<v Speaker 2>for example? You know, the reason I'm interested in this

0:04:02.724 --> 0:04:04.564
<v Speaker 2>is that from time to time I get you know,

0:04:04.644 --> 0:04:07.044
<v Speaker 2>people want to have something to do with my substack,

0:04:07.164 --> 0:04:10.124
<v Speaker 2>silver bulletin invest capital in it. And it's weird because,

0:04:10.164 --> 0:04:14.244
<v Speaker 2>like when you accept money, there are a lot of

0:04:14.404 --> 0:04:16.804
<v Speaker 2>strings attached. Right. It's like not like you're just buying

0:04:16.884 --> 0:04:20.364
<v Speaker 2>like an annuity in whatever revenue that you have in

0:04:20.404 --> 0:04:22.684
<v Speaker 2>the future. Right, You're expected to give up some control,

0:04:22.764 --> 0:04:26.004
<v Speaker 2>You're expected to work a certain amount of time, maybe harder.

0:04:26.404 --> 0:04:29.044
<v Speaker 2>You're expected to you know, give up some of the

0:04:29.044 --> 0:04:33.964
<v Speaker 2>profit yourself. But like you know, they are the top

0:04:34.004 --> 0:04:38.164
<v Speaker 2>selling substack on the platform, I believe by some margin.

0:04:38.204 --> 0:04:40.044
<v Speaker 2>I do have some knowledge that I'm going to try

0:04:40.044 --> 0:04:43.604
<v Speaker 2>not to reveal, But like you know, they have well

0:04:43.644 --> 0:04:47.524
<v Speaker 2>over a million total subscribers right at typical rate that

0:04:47.604 --> 0:04:52.044
<v Speaker 2>translates probably into low six figure paid subscribers. The growth

0:04:52.044 --> 0:04:54.164
<v Speaker 2>has been solid. They have been spending a lot of

0:04:54.204 --> 0:04:56.084
<v Speaker 2>money on staff. It's not like, you know, I have

0:04:56.164 --> 0:04:59.444
<v Speaker 2>two people I hire. They have dozens, right, But like

0:04:59.524 --> 0:05:01.564
<v Speaker 2>you know, depending on whether it's a time for like

0:05:02.324 --> 0:05:04.684
<v Speaker 2>hot or cold kind of valuations in the market, I

0:05:04.684 --> 0:05:06.884
<v Speaker 2>feel like there's gonna be like a more scientific way

0:05:06.924 --> 0:05:09.364
<v Speaker 2>to put that, but like it's not inherently ridiculous.

0:05:09.484 --> 0:05:11.124
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was. Actually that was one of the things

0:05:11.124 --> 0:05:13.004
<v Speaker 1>that I was curious to hear your opinion on because

0:05:13.044 --> 0:05:15.364
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything about the financials, and when I

0:05:15.404 --> 0:05:17.244
<v Speaker 1>saw that amount, I was like, wow, that seems like

0:05:17.284 --> 0:05:17.604
<v Speaker 1>a lot.

0:05:17.804 --> 0:05:20.724
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, I mean you know when I was talking

0:05:20.724 --> 0:05:23.164
<v Speaker 2>with John Skipper, who was on the president of ESPN

0:05:23.244 --> 0:05:27.604
<v Speaker 2>when when they purchased the five thirty eight brand, right,

0:05:27.964 --> 0:05:30.004
<v Speaker 2>you know, he said, in my philosophy's in North Carolina,

0:05:30.084 --> 0:05:34.044
<v Speaker 2>got my philosophy and negotiations is always that it's worth

0:05:34.044 --> 0:05:35.804
<v Speaker 2>one dollar more the next guy is willing to pay

0:05:35.844 --> 0:05:37.604
<v Speaker 2>for it, right. So, and there's some of that, right.

0:05:37.964 --> 0:05:42.044
<v Speaker 2>But the thing about subscription models, and it's nice to

0:05:42.124 --> 0:05:47.684
<v Speaker 2>have myself, right, is if they are cash flow positive, right,

0:05:48.124 --> 0:05:50.764
<v Speaker 2>you can get a big burst of subscribers upfront, they're

0:05:50.764 --> 0:05:53.804
<v Speaker 2>paying for the whole year or the whole month in advance. Right,

0:05:53.844 --> 0:05:55.964
<v Speaker 2>So it's like not some future we're going to build

0:05:55.964 --> 0:05:58.524
<v Speaker 2>this brand up and then later on converted to advertising

0:05:58.564 --> 0:06:01.764
<v Speaker 2>revenues or make it a brand consultancy or something else.

0:06:01.924 --> 0:06:02.124
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:06:02.524 --> 0:06:05.844
<v Speaker 2>You know if free press has north of one hundred

0:06:05.964 --> 0:06:11.004
<v Speaker 2>thousand paid subscribers, right and they're paying on average, after

0:06:11.284 --> 0:06:14.604
<v Speaker 2>after stripe fees and things like that, eighty dollars a

0:06:14.684 --> 0:06:17.524
<v Speaker 2>year or whatever, right, I mean that is like that's

0:06:17.564 --> 0:06:21.764
<v Speaker 2>like actual freaking money. You know, whether it justifies one

0:06:21.844 --> 0:06:26.164
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty billion, you get into multipless can be billion,

0:06:26.964 --> 0:06:29.244
<v Speaker 2>it can get to multiples. Multiples can be subjective.

0:06:29.404 --> 0:06:29.564
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:06:30.324 --> 0:06:33.804
<v Speaker 2>There's maybe some notion that, like all those subscription businesses

0:06:33.804 --> 0:06:37.404
<v Speaker 2>get off to a fast start, you know, in theory

0:06:37.444 --> 0:06:41.044
<v Speaker 2>they have some upside cap, right. Yeah, Typically there's like

0:06:41.124 --> 0:06:45.364
<v Speaker 2>kind of a S curve sign you at first, you

0:06:45.404 --> 0:06:47.764
<v Speaker 2>have trouble finding anybody because I don't know about you. Right,

0:06:48.164 --> 0:06:50.724
<v Speaker 2>the developed brand awareness and you reach everybody in your

0:06:50.724 --> 0:06:54.124
<v Speaker 2>potential audience, the people who are the most excited about

0:06:54.124 --> 0:06:56.604
<v Speaker 2>your product, subscribed first rate and then probably encounter some

0:06:56.684 --> 0:06:59.044
<v Speaker 2>diminishing returns. And the point is that, like where do

0:06:59.084 --> 0:07:01.004
<v Speaker 2>you find yourself on that. You know, when do those

0:07:01.004 --> 0:07:04.204
<v Speaker 2>inflection points hit potentially right, you start to get more churn,

0:07:04.604 --> 0:07:10.164
<v Speaker 2>it gets harder. Right. One criticism that's and levied against

0:07:10.164 --> 0:07:15.924
<v Speaker 2>the Free press is that it focuses on some particular issues,

0:07:18.724 --> 0:07:22.964
<v Speaker 2>some of which, in various ways are becoming less relevant. Right.

0:07:23.404 --> 0:07:27.924
<v Speaker 2>You know, it focused a lot on woke excesses in

0:07:27.964 --> 0:07:30.684
<v Speaker 2>the kind of the liberal sphere. Right, I'm not going

0:07:30.764 --> 0:07:32.164
<v Speaker 2>to put woke in quotation marks. I think it was

0:07:32.164 --> 0:07:35.604
<v Speaker 2>a real thing. Barry Weiss quit The New York Times

0:07:35.604 --> 0:07:37.924
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty at a time when there was a

0:07:37.924 --> 0:07:40.364
<v Speaker 2>lot of peer pressure and group think, and so this

0:07:40.404 --> 0:07:42.764
<v Speaker 2>place sucks, right, I'm not going to be here anymore,

0:07:42.764 --> 0:07:48.244
<v Speaker 2>even though she'd been brought in to solicit conservative opinion pieces.

0:07:48.604 --> 0:07:51.644
<v Speaker 2>And part of what happens with these substacks is when

0:07:51.684 --> 0:07:55.404
<v Speaker 2>there is like a market inefficiency when for whatever reason,

0:07:55.964 --> 0:08:00.724
<v Speaker 2>because because there's peer pressure in newsrooms, because corporate big

0:08:00.764 --> 0:08:05.884
<v Speaker 2>wigs are cow towing to a particular opinion to Trump

0:08:06.004 --> 0:08:10.204
<v Speaker 2>maybe for example, you know, substack feels that vuli where

0:08:10.404 --> 0:08:11.844
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of people who were like, yeah,

0:08:11.884 --> 0:08:14.524
<v Speaker 2>I'm liberal but I'm not woke. This shit seems ridiculous.

0:08:14.724 --> 0:08:18.404
<v Speaker 2>And so here's a free press that, like the free press,

0:08:18.844 --> 0:08:21.484
<v Speaker 2>which are called common sense, that like speaks to those

0:08:21.484 --> 0:08:24.724
<v Speaker 2>issues in a way that other publications don't write. I

0:08:24.764 --> 0:08:26.404
<v Speaker 2>think it's been more of a struggle for like, how

0:08:26.444 --> 0:08:30.044
<v Speaker 2>does this audience feel about like covering the Trump administration? Right?

0:08:30.724 --> 0:08:34.884
<v Speaker 2>Trump is president and therefore, you know he makes most

0:08:34.884 --> 0:08:38.004
<v Speaker 2>of the news. If you're kind of covering politics, right,

0:08:39.084 --> 0:08:41.804
<v Speaker 2>I think probably you're gonna see some Well, I'm speaking

0:08:41.804 --> 0:08:44.804
<v Speaker 2>my own book here, right, I think these blogs are

0:08:45.044 --> 0:08:46.884
<v Speaker 2>interesting but partisan. I think they tend to suck when

0:08:46.884 --> 0:08:49.844
<v Speaker 2>it comes to, like actually covering elections. I think they

0:08:49.844 --> 0:08:52.124
<v Speaker 2>tend to be extremely partisan and not good at like

0:08:52.404 --> 0:08:55.044
<v Speaker 2>keeping their arms legs from polls. But no doubt, like

0:08:55.044 --> 0:08:57.084
<v Speaker 2>if you kind of got in early that like there's

0:08:57.084 --> 0:08:58.284
<v Speaker 2>a lot of desire for it, and a lot of

0:08:58.284 --> 0:09:01.364
<v Speaker 2>the best commentary about what's going on right is on

0:09:01.404 --> 0:09:04.684
<v Speaker 2>substeck now and not in the Washington Post, for example. Right,

0:09:04.764 --> 0:09:06.764
<v Speaker 2>so you know, this creates a market were you no

0:09:06.804 --> 0:09:12.004
<v Speaker 2>longer have have gate keepers, and in some sense, like

0:09:12.124 --> 0:09:17.124
<v Speaker 2>I admire anybody who says fuck you, I don't care

0:09:17.164 --> 0:09:19.284
<v Speaker 2>about the gatekeepers. Right, I'm going to do my own thing,

0:09:19.524 --> 0:09:21.244
<v Speaker 2>and I'm going to prove it with the fact that

0:09:21.284 --> 0:09:24.484
<v Speaker 2>I've developed, you know, the largest audience on this very

0:09:24.764 --> 0:09:26.924
<v Speaker 2>competitive platform. I've been talking for a while, Maria, what

0:09:26.924 --> 0:09:29.324
<v Speaker 2>do you I haven't even I have you have Wooden

0:09:29.444 --> 0:09:31.724
<v Speaker 2>edge Wise, what do you? What do you think?

0:09:32.404 --> 0:09:37.884
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I, I frankly probably find the choice

0:09:38.684 --> 0:09:44.684
<v Speaker 1>more concerning than you do. For you know, I think

0:09:44.724 --> 0:09:50.284
<v Speaker 1>that the free press has changed a lot since it

0:09:50.404 --> 0:09:55.484
<v Speaker 1>was since its inception, right. I actually I was much

0:09:55.724 --> 0:10:00.724
<v Speaker 1>more sympathetic to a lot of Barry Weiss's pieces earlier on,

0:10:01.524 --> 0:10:06.004
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like it has gone from like actually

0:10:06.244 --> 0:10:10.644
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be free press to being a little bit

0:10:11.404 --> 0:10:14.644
<v Speaker 1>too much on the other side, so to speak, right,

0:10:14.724 --> 0:10:19.844
<v Speaker 1>and now actually being quite biased. Like whenever Trump is

0:10:19.884 --> 0:10:23.804
<v Speaker 1>suddenly singing your praises, you should probably be just a

0:10:23.804 --> 0:10:26.604
<v Speaker 1>little bit worried that maybe you're not the champion of

0:10:26.684 --> 0:10:31.244
<v Speaker 1>free speech that that you once were. So so there,

0:10:31.324 --> 0:10:35.924
<v Speaker 1>there's that, and then this is CBS News, right, and

0:10:36.404 --> 0:10:43.284
<v Speaker 1>that's and so so let's talk about that, right, Let's

0:10:43.364 --> 0:10:46.964
<v Speaker 1>talk about the fact that Barry Wise has zero experience

0:10:47.524 --> 0:10:49.804
<v Speaker 1>running a newsroom running.

0:10:49.484 --> 0:10:51.444
<v Speaker 2>Now you're making Now you're making the bad of the bargainment.

0:10:51.564 --> 0:10:52.004
<v Speaker 1>But that's true.

0:10:52.044 --> 0:10:52.604
<v Speaker 2>But it's true.

0:10:52.644 --> 0:10:56.084
<v Speaker 1>It's not a bad it's hold on, hold on. I've

0:10:56.244 --> 0:10:59.604
<v Speaker 1>so she's never worked in television, right, and let me

0:10:59.724 --> 0:11:02.684
<v Speaker 1>just say one of the first things she did when

0:11:02.724 --> 0:11:06.484
<v Speaker 1>she started was send out a memo telling everyone to

0:11:07.404 --> 0:11:12.364
<v Speaker 1>take time to write a memo to her detailing how

0:11:12.404 --> 0:11:15.524
<v Speaker 1>they spend their entire day so that she could read that.

0:11:16.164 --> 0:11:19.764
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that's like, that's not even a red flag.

0:11:19.844 --> 0:11:23.884
<v Speaker 1>That's like flaming red fires. If someone asked me to

0:11:23.924 --> 0:11:27.324
<v Speaker 1>do that, I would probably be like, I'm very sorry,

0:11:27.404 --> 0:11:31.644
<v Speaker 1>but with all due respect, fuck you. Like, as someone

0:11:31.644 --> 0:11:34.924
<v Speaker 1>who actually worked on a daily news show and who

0:11:34.964 --> 0:11:39.044
<v Speaker 1>has worked in a magazine, you know, corporate world, which she,

0:11:39.084 --> 0:11:40.964
<v Speaker 1>by the way, didn't do on the editorial side. She

0:11:41.084 --> 0:11:44.084
<v Speaker 1>was just an opinion columnist, and then she started her

0:11:44.084 --> 0:11:48.004
<v Speaker 1>own thing. It is very, very different. Running CBS News

0:11:48.044 --> 0:11:52.124
<v Speaker 1>is not running the Free Press on substack and being

0:11:52.164 --> 0:11:56.324
<v Speaker 1>put in charge of that. It's you know, imagine if

0:11:56.364 --> 0:11:59.764
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, like let's imagine I'm still at

0:11:59.764 --> 0:12:02.924
<v Speaker 1>The New Yorker and we're told that, hey, David Remnick

0:12:03.044 --> 0:12:06.964
<v Speaker 1>is leaving and instead we're going to get I don't

0:12:06.964 --> 0:12:09.164
<v Speaker 1>even know who. Elon Musk. He's very smart, and he's

0:12:09.164 --> 0:12:10.604
<v Speaker 1>gonna be your editor in chief.

0:12:10.964 --> 0:12:12.884
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, but Ria, this is getting more Libby.

0:12:13.004 --> 0:12:14.684
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't have to be at Elon Musk. It

0:12:14.724 --> 0:12:17.124
<v Speaker 1>could be Bill Gates. I don't care who it is,

0:12:17.164 --> 0:12:21.764
<v Speaker 1>but someone who has zero experience running a magazine. But now,

0:12:21.844 --> 0:12:24.164
<v Speaker 1>even if David Remnick were to go to CBS News,

0:12:24.164 --> 0:12:27.364
<v Speaker 1>that would be a little bit weird, and he probably

0:12:27.364 --> 0:12:30.804
<v Speaker 1>still isn't particularly qualified for that because even though he's

0:12:30.884 --> 0:12:34.764
<v Speaker 1>run something that's much more similar to that kind of organization,

0:12:34.884 --> 0:12:36.924
<v Speaker 1>it's still incredibly different.

0:12:36.964 --> 0:12:38.444
<v Speaker 2>I mean, first, first of all, if you want to

0:12:38.484 --> 0:12:40.644
<v Speaker 2>talk about qualified, like a lot of the presidents of

0:12:40.644 --> 0:12:42.164
<v Speaker 2>these network news organizations, this.

0:12:42.164 --> 0:12:45.084
<v Speaker 1>Is a president, she's she's not the president though, right,

0:12:45.124 --> 0:12:46.924
<v Speaker 1>This is someone who is in charge of the content.

0:12:47.164 --> 0:12:49.564
<v Speaker 2>Those are very very she's act.

0:12:49.444 --> 0:12:50.964
<v Speaker 1>But it's those are different roles.

0:12:51.084 --> 0:12:52.764
<v Speaker 2>She reports to Ellison, right, right.

0:12:52.644 --> 0:12:53.804
<v Speaker 1>But those are different roles.

0:12:54.644 --> 0:12:57.084
<v Speaker 2>The role of editor can mean a lot of different things.

0:12:57.204 --> 0:12:59.724
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I'm not talking about politics. I'm just talking

0:12:59.724 --> 0:13:03.164
<v Speaker 1>about like, who are you putting in charge of a

0:13:03.244 --> 0:13:06.844
<v Speaker 1>news organization? Do you are you putting someone who actually

0:13:06.924 --> 0:13:08.884
<v Speaker 1>understands how to run a newsroom.

0:13:09.204 --> 0:13:12.044
<v Speaker 2>And yes, she has run she has run a newsroom

0:13:12.124 --> 0:13:15.604
<v Speaker 2>with like several dozen people. That is one of the

0:13:15.724 --> 0:13:17.484
<v Speaker 2>few successful businesses.

0:13:17.764 --> 0:13:21.564
<v Speaker 1>But it's not television. It's a very different medium. Podcasts

0:13:21.604 --> 0:13:25.084
<v Speaker 1>are different from newsletters, are different from daily TV shows

0:13:25.404 --> 0:13:27.844
<v Speaker 1>are different from screenwriting, are differs.

0:13:27.964 --> 0:13:30.204
<v Speaker 2>So you want you want more superficiality.

0:13:30.364 --> 0:13:33.124
<v Speaker 1>No, I want someone who I think is qualified. If

0:13:33.164 --> 0:13:37.044
<v Speaker 1>you look at her resume, just pretend you don't even

0:13:37.044 --> 0:13:39.164
<v Speaker 1>see her name, right, and you see resumes of people,

0:13:39.164 --> 0:13:41.804
<v Speaker 1>this is not someone who would ever get that job, right, Like,

0:13:41.884 --> 0:13:45.724
<v Speaker 1>she just lacks some basic qualifications, some basic stepping stone.

0:13:45.804 --> 0:13:49.244
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead and look at like who is hired to

0:13:49.324 --> 0:13:54.964
<v Speaker 2>these senior level positions at ABC, CBS, NBC. Right. Sometimes

0:13:54.964 --> 0:13:58.244
<v Speaker 2>it's longtime TV executives. Sometimes it's people with the journalism background.

0:13:58.764 --> 0:14:02.364
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it's somebody who's a big name brought in from

0:14:02.564 --> 0:14:06.484
<v Speaker 2>the outside. Right. Sometimes it's somebody who who was a

0:14:06.524 --> 0:14:10.964
<v Speaker 2>star producing a different type of television, might producing sports

0:14:11.044 --> 0:14:13.804
<v Speaker 2>or something like that. Sometimes it's somebody who kind of

0:14:13.844 --> 0:14:16.084
<v Speaker 2>came up the corporate length since kind of like a bureaucrat.

0:14:16.404 --> 0:14:18.924
<v Speaker 2>The range of things that you do is like an editor,

0:14:19.244 --> 0:14:21.884
<v Speaker 2>including bureaucratic task, editorial task, and most of the people

0:14:21.884 --> 0:14:24.324
<v Speaker 2>have not been very successful or good. It's a kind

0:14:24.324 --> 0:14:26.604
<v Speaker 2>of high turnover. At least in the curtent environment. Used

0:14:26.644 --> 0:14:29.204
<v Speaker 2>to have like long standing people who would have this

0:14:29.284 --> 0:14:32.004
<v Speaker 2>job for years, right, but the turnover is very high.

0:14:32.044 --> 0:14:34.364
<v Speaker 2>And like, why wouldn't you want to pick somebody who

0:14:34.444 --> 0:14:38.684
<v Speaker 2>has actually built a successful news product before?

0:14:38.924 --> 0:14:41.604
<v Speaker 1>Well, I would want someone who at least understands how

0:14:41.644 --> 0:14:45.204
<v Speaker 1>my medium works, someone who has worked in screen and

0:14:45.244 --> 0:14:48.044
<v Speaker 1>who understands that writing for the screen is very different

0:14:48.124 --> 0:14:51.644
<v Speaker 1>from writing for the page. Who understands that what it

0:14:51.724 --> 0:14:54.444
<v Speaker 1>takes to succeed in television is not what it takes

0:14:54.684 --> 0:14:58.244
<v Speaker 1>to succeed in print journalism. Who understands how all of

0:14:58.284 --> 0:15:01.484
<v Speaker 1>these different media products work together. I want someone with

0:15:01.684 --> 0:15:06.764
<v Speaker 1>a demonstrated capacity to make that sort of a transition,

0:15:07.284 --> 0:15:09.764
<v Speaker 1>and she I would at least have won her in

0:15:09.764 --> 0:15:13.764
<v Speaker 1>a more junior position to demonstrate that she's capable of

0:15:13.804 --> 0:15:17.284
<v Speaker 1>creating sixty minutes, right, of producing a show like that.

0:15:17.644 --> 0:15:20.004
<v Speaker 1>And let me tell you from having actually worked as

0:15:20.004 --> 0:15:23.484
<v Speaker 1>a television producer, it is not anything like what I

0:15:23.524 --> 0:15:26.444
<v Speaker 1>do as a print journalism. The things that you write

0:15:26.444 --> 0:15:29.884
<v Speaker 1>for it are vast, Like it's just a completely different

0:15:29.884 --> 0:15:32.764
<v Speaker 1>skill set, and to think that it's the same skill

0:15:32.804 --> 0:15:37.364
<v Speaker 1>set just is basically ignorant, to be perfectly honest. Like

0:15:37.484 --> 0:15:38.764
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like saying this.

0:15:38.764 --> 0:15:41.924
<v Speaker 2>News is not a tell it doesn't want to be

0:15:41.964 --> 0:15:44.044
<v Speaker 2>a television company. It wouldn't have the valuation.

0:15:44.204 --> 0:15:47.484
<v Speaker 1>And yet and yet so much of it is television.

0:15:47.524 --> 0:15:50.564
<v Speaker 1>And to bring in someone who does not understand television

0:15:50.884 --> 0:15:54.324
<v Speaker 1>and has no background in it, I think is just

0:15:55.204 --> 0:15:56.884
<v Speaker 1>a jaw dropping decision.

0:15:58.124 --> 0:16:02.324
<v Speaker 2>I'm just dealt with enough like corporate suits at these

0:16:02.364 --> 0:16:06.404
<v Speaker 2>companies specifically, where like the bar is pretty low. Somebody

0:16:06.444 --> 0:16:08.924
<v Speaker 2>who's bright and hard working and has built a successful

0:16:08.964 --> 0:16:14.284
<v Speaker 2>editory brand right and understands video, you know, I mean,

0:16:14.324 --> 0:16:16.724
<v Speaker 2>their kindent is pretty tech steady, right, But like it's

0:16:16.724 --> 0:16:18.564
<v Speaker 2>not an easy thing to like build a brand when

0:16:18.564 --> 0:16:19.524
<v Speaker 2>you kind of start out.

0:16:19.684 --> 0:16:21.964
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to I'm not trying. I'm not trying

0:16:22.004 --> 0:16:26.484
<v Speaker 1>to say that Barry Weiss does not you know, is

0:16:26.524 --> 0:16:28.884
<v Speaker 1>not good at what she does. I'm not, you know,

0:16:29.284 --> 0:16:31.724
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to say that, but I'm saying that

0:16:31.764 --> 0:16:35.004
<v Speaker 1>what she does is not necessarily what I'd be looking

0:16:35.084 --> 0:16:39.324
<v Speaker 1>for in the editor in chief, not the president of

0:16:40.004 --> 0:16:44.044
<v Speaker 1>CBS News, someone who's in charge of the editorial decisions

0:16:44.484 --> 0:16:49.764
<v Speaker 1>of this brand and the editorial decisions across the board.

0:16:50.124 --> 0:16:53.004
<v Speaker 1>So potentially, like what a CBS News saying, are we

0:16:53.084 --> 0:16:54.964
<v Speaker 1>saying we don't want to be a television company at all?

0:16:55.044 --> 0:16:57.404
<v Speaker 1>Are we gonna shut down sixty Minutes? Are we going

0:16:57.444 --> 0:17:00.804
<v Speaker 1>to shut down all of our flagship shows and we're

0:17:00.844 --> 0:17:03.324
<v Speaker 1>not gonna do TV We're gonna do We're just gonna

0:17:03.324 --> 0:17:06.484
<v Speaker 1>become the free press or or whatever it is. If

0:17:06.484 --> 0:17:08.604
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're saying, Okay, well that's one thing. But

0:17:08.884 --> 0:17:11.324
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's what they're saying. I mean, I

0:17:11.324 --> 0:17:13.724
<v Speaker 1>think they still want to produce some of the best

0:17:13.804 --> 0:17:18.884
<v Speaker 1>quality television. That is some of the best quality news television.

0:17:18.884 --> 0:17:21.484
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're known for. I keep saying sixty Minutes

0:17:21.524 --> 0:17:23.564
<v Speaker 1>because it's one of the most respected brands, not just

0:17:23.604 --> 0:17:26.124
<v Speaker 1>in the United States but in the world. And a

0:17:26.124 --> 0:17:28.404
<v Speaker 1>lot of the people in sixty Minutes quit right over

0:17:28.444 --> 0:17:30.644
<v Speaker 1>the last year because there's been a lot of turmoil

0:17:30.724 --> 0:17:33.404
<v Speaker 1>and CBS has shown that it doesn't have a backbone

0:17:33.444 --> 0:17:36.284
<v Speaker 1>in terms of protecting the quality of it of its

0:17:36.404 --> 0:17:40.244
<v Speaker 1>editorial content. And the independence of its journalists. And so

0:17:40.444 --> 0:17:46.564
<v Speaker 1>this is to me just another reason to be skeptical

0:17:46.644 --> 0:17:49.764
<v Speaker 1>and alarmed. Now she I would be so thrilled, Nate,

0:17:49.764 --> 0:17:51.884
<v Speaker 1>if Barry Wies were to prove me wrong and were

0:17:51.924 --> 0:17:54.764
<v Speaker 1>to come in there and prove that, like you know what,

0:17:55.804 --> 0:17:58.924
<v Speaker 1>she's the best editor in chief CBS has seen. She

0:17:59.044 --> 0:18:02.804
<v Speaker 1>revolutionizes it. She ends up being a free, independent voice

0:18:02.844 --> 0:18:06.444
<v Speaker 1>who speaks truth to the Trump administration just as much

0:18:06.444 --> 0:18:09.764
<v Speaker 1>as she spoke truth to the woke left, and who

0:18:09.884 --> 0:18:13.204
<v Speaker 1>ends up making really good decisions, great hiring decisions, and

0:18:13.284 --> 0:18:15.964
<v Speaker 1>makes CBS News vibrant and relevant. I would love for

0:18:16.004 --> 0:18:19.404
<v Speaker 1>that to be the case CBS News. No, but we

0:18:19.484 --> 0:18:23.324
<v Speaker 1>need someone good, and it has become much less vibrant.

0:18:23.724 --> 0:18:27.644
<v Speaker 1>We need someone You're not even you're not engaging with

0:18:27.684 --> 0:18:31.164
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. You're you're picking one little thing, and

0:18:31.524 --> 0:18:34.084
<v Speaker 1>you need someone. As I said, CBS News has been

0:18:34.124 --> 0:18:37.124
<v Speaker 1>falling for the last year, and this is actually more

0:18:37.284 --> 0:18:39.764
<v Speaker 1>of the same. Right, it has lost some of its

0:18:39.924 --> 0:18:43.204
<v Speaker 1>most prominent voices who have left or been forced out,

0:18:43.604 --> 0:18:46.284
<v Speaker 1>and now they've hired Barry Weiss, which kind of doubles

0:18:46.324 --> 0:18:50.204
<v Speaker 1>down on that. And I don't think Ellison has any

0:18:50.244 --> 0:18:53.444
<v Speaker 1>desire to do anything other than make sure he gets

0:18:53.484 --> 0:18:55.284
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money and gets the deals that he

0:18:55.324 --> 0:18:59.324
<v Speaker 1>wants to go through and be approved by the Trump administration. Now,

0:19:00.004 --> 0:19:03.484
<v Speaker 1>once again, as someone who has worked in television, I've

0:19:03.524 --> 0:19:07.484
<v Speaker 1>worked for good producers bad producers. Like there's a huge difference, right,

0:19:07.524 --> 0:19:10.884
<v Speaker 1>the shows don't just make themselves. You need good people

0:19:10.924 --> 0:19:14.604
<v Speaker 1>there otherwise you're going to get absolute shit. And if

0:19:14.644 --> 0:19:17.364
<v Speaker 1>you want a good CBS News, if that's the goal,

0:19:17.804 --> 0:19:22.044
<v Speaker 1>then you know, is this was this the correct hire?

0:19:22.484 --> 0:19:26.684
<v Speaker 1>And what is the future of a news organization where

0:19:26.964 --> 0:19:30.444
<v Speaker 1>it seems like those values are being put aside for

0:19:30.684 --> 0:19:36.644
<v Speaker 1>something that looks like instead of editorial freedom, editorial oversight.

0:19:39.284 --> 0:19:40.444
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back right after this.

0:19:49.724 --> 0:19:53.044
<v Speaker 2>The one I really got my goat was like John Oliver.

0:19:53.324 --> 0:19:55.444
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure some of the readers like John Oliver. Maybe

0:19:55.444 --> 0:19:57.684
<v Speaker 2>some don't fight them to their taste. I'm in the

0:19:57.924 --> 0:19:59.644
<v Speaker 2>latter camp, even though I probably agree with him on

0:19:59.724 --> 0:20:02.884
<v Speaker 2>some stuff, right, I find them kind of hectoring in luxury.

0:20:03.404 --> 0:20:07.164
<v Speaker 2>So John Oliver was making them the same complaint you

0:20:07.244 --> 0:20:10.764
<v Speaker 2>were that like Shay's dead and walked in excuse an

0:20:10.844 --> 0:20:13.724
<v Speaker 2>editorial journalist, right, And like sometimes the facts are wrong,

0:20:13.764 --> 0:20:17.764
<v Speaker 2>and it's like okay, Like you know, John Oliver takes

0:20:18.004 --> 0:20:24.324
<v Speaker 2>predictable opinions from one side of a spectrum, mixes them

0:20:24.364 --> 0:20:28.644
<v Speaker 2>with facts to a degree where it's sometimes ambiguous, kind

0:20:28.644 --> 0:20:31.604
<v Speaker 2>of like what's an opinion and what's the fact? Right,

0:20:32.004 --> 0:20:35.844
<v Speaker 2>and then states to them very confidently, and like, you know,

0:20:36.004 --> 0:20:38.084
<v Speaker 2>for you to criticize Barry Wise of that, which I

0:20:38.084 --> 0:20:40.444
<v Speaker 2>think might be a good characterization of some of what

0:20:40.484 --> 0:20:44.284
<v Speaker 2>they do, right, it just seems like kind of hypocritical,

0:20:44.324 --> 0:20:47.164
<v Speaker 2>And all these opinion journalists are like all his opinion journalists,

0:20:47.524 --> 0:20:49.244
<v Speaker 2>Like why is in York Times have an opinion page?

0:20:49.284 --> 0:20:53.444
<v Speaker 2>I write sometimes in your Times opinion page, right, you know,

0:20:53.564 --> 0:20:56.684
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, right the opinion is actually a vertical

0:20:56.724 --> 0:20:59.284
<v Speaker 2>It sells pretty well for the most part, and like,

0:20:59.324 --> 0:21:02.964
<v Speaker 2>but it just seems to me like a lot of publications,

0:21:03.004 --> 0:21:05.124
<v Speaker 2>including the big three networks pre Trump. I think a

0:21:05.124 --> 0:21:08.084
<v Speaker 2>lot of things have changed now in the Trump era, right,

0:21:08.124 --> 0:21:14.564
<v Speaker 2>but like there is an implicit is sometimes explicit, but

0:21:14.644 --> 0:21:18.964
<v Speaker 2>an implicit left leaning bias, not far left, not Bernie

0:21:18.964 --> 0:21:23.964
<v Speaker 2>Sanders Zoran bias left, their corporate right, maybe not quite

0:21:24.004 --> 0:21:27.284
<v Speaker 2>my kind of center left either, but like on cultural issues.

0:21:27.724 --> 0:21:32.004
<v Speaker 2>They're very progressive, and like what Barry does is kind

0:21:32.004 --> 0:21:37.324
<v Speaker 2>of like give the progressive left, not the zoran left,

0:21:37.364 --> 0:21:39.324
<v Speaker 2>the progressive kind of center left. I call it the

0:21:39.324 --> 0:21:42.604
<v Speaker 2>indgo blob, this merger between on the one hand, non

0:21:42.684 --> 0:21:45.764
<v Speaker 2>partisan media and then kind of like partisan institutions of

0:21:46.004 --> 0:21:48.844
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic Party and the left. Right, she is taking

0:21:48.844 --> 0:21:54.164
<v Speaker 2>that formula to produce on average center right leaning opinions

0:21:54.724 --> 0:21:58.004
<v Speaker 2>with high production guyues, meaning you know, the stories are

0:21:58.084 --> 0:22:00.044
<v Speaker 2>edited well in a sense of like they have a

0:22:00.084 --> 0:22:02.204
<v Speaker 2>good lead paragraph, they have a good headline, they get

0:22:02.204 --> 0:22:05.044
<v Speaker 2>promoted well on social media, they have attractive art to

0:22:05.084 --> 0:22:07.524
<v Speaker 2>the extent that's possible depending on the type of story,

0:22:07.564 --> 0:22:10.324
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. Right, And like that's kind of what

0:22:10.404 --> 0:22:12.684
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of these brands do on the left.

0:22:12.684 --> 0:22:15.004
<v Speaker 2>And is there some implicit or I would say, in

0:22:15.004 --> 0:22:19.444
<v Speaker 2>some cases fairly explicit bias, yes, But like it's the

0:22:19.484 --> 0:22:23.004
<v Speaker 2>same game that you've been seeing on in the progressive

0:22:23.084 --> 0:22:25.084
<v Speaker 2>left for like for a long time now.

0:22:25.164 --> 0:22:29.444
<v Speaker 1>Right, I wouldn't want John Oliver to head CBS News either, Right,

0:22:29.524 --> 0:22:33.644
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that someone who's an opinion columnist, slush,

0:22:33.764 --> 0:22:37.164
<v Speaker 1>an opinion show host, you know, whatever it is, should

0:22:37.164 --> 0:22:40.244
<v Speaker 1>be heading a news organization. That's just me, right, I

0:22:40.244 --> 0:22:44.644
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want Stephen Colbert running CBS News like I and

0:22:44.684 --> 0:22:48.484
<v Speaker 1>I love him. I don't think that that's that we should.

0:22:48.684 --> 0:22:50.964
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're saying that, what you're I'm not

0:22:51.004 --> 0:22:54.724
<v Speaker 1>saying you personally, Nate. If one is saying is that

0:22:55.044 --> 0:22:57.284
<v Speaker 1>one wants to be a bastion of free speech and

0:22:57.364 --> 0:23:02.284
<v Speaker 1>try to kind of protect that and be an organization

0:23:02.804 --> 0:23:07.764
<v Speaker 1>that espouses the values of editorial integrity, then at least

0:23:07.804 --> 0:23:10.004
<v Speaker 1>you should try to hire someone who's not an op

0:23:10.164 --> 0:23:14.484
<v Speaker 1>ed columnist with a left or right leaning viewpoint. Right,

0:23:15.924 --> 0:23:20.324
<v Speaker 1>she was, but she was right. But you're saying that

0:23:20.364 --> 0:23:21.884
<v Speaker 1>the wait, hold on, you were just saying that the

0:23:21.924 --> 0:23:25.484
<v Speaker 1>way that her formula was the same right that you

0:23:25.524 --> 0:23:27.564
<v Speaker 1>That's what you were just talking about. You were saying

0:23:27.564 --> 0:23:30.244
<v Speaker 1>that the formula is to have an opinion with some

0:23:30.364 --> 0:23:33.124
<v Speaker 1>facts presented, leaning some direction.

0:23:33.284 --> 0:23:35.804
<v Speaker 2>It's more compliated than that. Right that she did something

0:23:35.884 --> 0:23:39.164
<v Speaker 2>that was ambiguity. If you listen to John Oliver, right,

0:23:39.524 --> 0:23:42.724
<v Speaker 2>like every eight ten things he does are true, says

0:23:42.724 --> 0:23:45.604
<v Speaker 2>are true, but they're cherry picked and spun, and it's

0:23:45.684 --> 0:23:48.604
<v Speaker 2>kind of the same thing right, where like it's taking right.

0:23:48.484 --> 0:23:50.164
<v Speaker 1>Which is why we don't want either one of them.

0:23:50.244 --> 0:23:52.364
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the work that Free Press does, we.

0:23:52.324 --> 0:23:55.004
<v Speaker 1>Don't want either one of them as head of CBS News.

0:23:55.284 --> 0:23:57.404
<v Speaker 2>You think you're not getting out CBS News now. I remember,

0:23:57.444 --> 0:24:00.884
<v Speaker 2>I remember watching in the Pandemic, we had a prinned

0:24:00.924 --> 0:24:02.604
<v Speaker 2>up to her house and they had a story about

0:24:02.644 --> 0:24:06.884
<v Speaker 2>like how Ron DeSantis, the evil governor of Florida, was

0:24:06.924 --> 0:24:11.444
<v Speaker 2>distributing a vaccine at Public which is a giant supermarket

0:24:11.484 --> 0:24:13.644
<v Speaker 2>chain throughout Florida and the South, which to me, she

0:24:13.764 --> 0:24:16.604
<v Speaker 2>was like a fucking fantastic idea, you know, and where

0:24:16.604 --> 0:24:19.804
<v Speaker 2>you turn in Florida there is is an alligator and

0:24:19.844 --> 0:24:23.324
<v Speaker 2>a Public's basically and like you know, like to me, like,

0:24:23.364 --> 0:24:25.124
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that was an example of like, you know,

0:24:25.204 --> 0:24:28.884
<v Speaker 2>we're things narrowly fact sexually, fact chextually, that's not a

0:24:28.924 --> 0:24:31.484
<v Speaker 2>word wrong. Probably some things that sant As people were

0:24:31.484 --> 0:24:32.844
<v Speaker 2>mad about the story. And believe me, I'm not a

0:24:32.844 --> 0:24:34.684
<v Speaker 2>fan of run the Santa Say at all, but like

0:24:34.844 --> 0:24:36.604
<v Speaker 2>that was a story that was a it was a biased,

0:24:36.604 --> 0:24:37.284
<v Speaker 2>fucking story.

0:24:37.364 --> 0:24:40.244
<v Speaker 1>Right now, of course you're misunderstanding me. I'm saying that

0:24:40.244 --> 0:24:42.284
<v Speaker 1>that's not a good that's not a good thing. Right,

0:24:42.444 --> 0:24:46.164
<v Speaker 1>We're we're not We're not saying that those that cherry

0:24:46.164 --> 0:24:48.444
<v Speaker 1>picking to the left or to the right is a

0:24:48.484 --> 0:24:52.724
<v Speaker 1>good thing. And so why would you pick someone whose

0:24:53.004 --> 0:24:56.844
<v Speaker 1>entire mo O was to create a publication like that

0:24:56.844 --> 0:25:00.164
<v Speaker 1>that has become much more right leaning. Don't you want

0:25:00.164 --> 0:25:03.444
<v Speaker 1>to at least start off with you know, Okay, fine,

0:25:03.484 --> 0:25:06.044
<v Speaker 1>maybe there there will end up being some bias, because

0:25:06.804 --> 0:25:10.044
<v Speaker 1>there always is. There's no such thing as an unbiased

0:25:10.084 --> 0:25:15.164
<v Speaker 1>piece of storytelling ever, because even the most factually correct

0:25:15.604 --> 0:25:18.164
<v Speaker 1>story is going to have a point of view on

0:25:18.244 --> 0:25:20.604
<v Speaker 1>which order to present the facts. You know, we can

0:25:20.684 --> 0:25:23.124
<v Speaker 1>get all philosophical about this, but there's no such thing

0:25:23.244 --> 0:25:25.644
<v Speaker 1>as an objective piece of writing. Like it just does

0:25:25.684 --> 0:25:28.924
<v Speaker 1>not exist. And we can, you can, I will, I

0:25:28.964 --> 0:25:32.004
<v Speaker 1>will die on that hill. True objectivity is impossible.

0:25:32.164 --> 0:25:32.524
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:25:32.844 --> 0:25:36.004
<v Speaker 1>Now, if we are saying that we still we want

0:25:36.044 --> 0:25:38.884
<v Speaker 1>to be a place that is open to all viewpoints,

0:25:38.884 --> 0:25:41.284
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera, don't you at least want to

0:25:41.324 --> 0:25:44.524
<v Speaker 1>start with someone in charge of that organization whose whole

0:25:44.684 --> 0:25:46.644
<v Speaker 1>mo wasn't something different.

0:25:55.164 --> 0:25:57.084
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break.

0:26:09.844 --> 0:26:11.924
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if CBS was like, hey, Maria, you

0:26:11.964 --> 0:26:14.404
<v Speaker 1>should be our editor in chief, I'd be like, absolutely not.

0:26:14.604 --> 0:26:17.964
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what I'm doing when it comes

0:26:17.964 --> 0:26:21.764
<v Speaker 1>to saidthing like that. You know, I know some specific

0:26:21.804 --> 0:26:24.044
<v Speaker 1>parts of the business from having worked on them, but like,

0:26:24.724 --> 0:26:27.084
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that person, right, that's not my world.

0:26:28.604 --> 0:26:32.644
<v Speaker 2>This is the weird part. Right. If if CBS paramount

0:26:32.684 --> 0:26:35.884
<v Speaker 2>came to me and said, we'll offer to buy Silver

0:26:35.924 --> 0:26:39.244
<v Speaker 2>bulletin for one hundred and fifty million dollars, and how

0:26:39.284 --> 0:26:41.924
<v Speaker 2>much of that is my what are the terms, et cetera,

0:26:42.004 --> 0:26:45.044
<v Speaker 2>But I'd be very pleased to have that. Please have

0:26:45.044 --> 0:26:46.924
<v Speaker 2>that offer, Marie. You're after to playing some high rollers

0:26:46.924 --> 0:26:50.364
<v Speaker 2>in the World Series next summer. If they then said

0:26:51.004 --> 0:26:53.044
<v Speaker 2>you have to be editor in chief of CBS News,

0:26:53.084 --> 0:26:55.764
<v Speaker 2>I'd be like, no fucking way, right, it's a really

0:26:55.804 --> 0:26:59.404
<v Speaker 2>bad job you have. These are big bureaucratic news organizations

0:26:59.404 --> 0:27:01.644
<v Speaker 2>that like have a lot of people. They were once

0:27:01.764 --> 0:27:06.004
<v Speaker 2>highly secured jobs and now they're becoming less so, right,

0:27:06.044 --> 0:27:08.844
<v Speaker 2>and so you have kind of like the old guard

0:27:08.964 --> 0:27:12.044
<v Speaker 2>journalist too, are terrified for their livelihood. You have the

0:27:12.124 --> 0:27:15.324
<v Speaker 2>kind of younger, progressive, woke staff. You have ownership who's

0:27:15.364 --> 0:27:19.084
<v Speaker 2>trying to please Trump. You have a perpetually declining, although

0:27:19.124 --> 0:27:21.164
<v Speaker 2>these networks still give more audience. You might think their

0:27:21.404 --> 0:27:24.564
<v Speaker 2>for their Sunday shows, right and their evening shows right

0:27:25.004 --> 0:27:28.444
<v Speaker 2>in perpetual decline. Right. And you kind of come into

0:27:28.484 --> 0:27:31.844
<v Speaker 2>a job where a lot of people, probably not all

0:27:31.924 --> 0:27:34.004
<v Speaker 2>the staff, maybe not most of the staff, but a

0:27:34.004 --> 0:27:36.444
<v Speaker 2>lot of people kind of publicly hate your guts. I mean,

0:27:36.444 --> 0:27:39.444
<v Speaker 2>that sounds like a fucking terrible job. For one hundred

0:27:39.444 --> 0:27:42.964
<v Speaker 2>and fifty million dollars, I do it, But like I

0:27:42.964 --> 0:27:44.884
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't do that job for two million dollars a year.

0:27:44.924 --> 0:27:46.684
<v Speaker 2>I'm not fucking kidding, right, Like, I mean, that job

0:27:46.804 --> 0:27:50.204
<v Speaker 2>is like it's a terrible fucking job. Which makes me wonder,

0:27:50.324 --> 0:27:54.484
<v Speaker 2>is that this Barry want that to reshape the newsroom?

0:27:54.484 --> 0:27:57.164
<v Speaker 2>Where does Ellison want that for her?

0:27:57.284 --> 0:27:57.364
<v Speaker 1>Or?

0:27:57.484 --> 0:27:59.364
<v Speaker 2>I mean she's very ambitious, right, And one, you know,

0:27:59.364 --> 0:28:00.884
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little bit older than her, not that much older,

0:28:00.924 --> 0:28:02.324
<v Speaker 2>I don't think, but like a little bit older. And

0:28:02.404 --> 0:28:04.444
<v Speaker 2>like one thing, it's nice, it's like I got my

0:28:04.524 --> 0:28:08.564
<v Speaker 2>phase where I wanted to like dominate and take over

0:28:09.484 --> 0:28:12.284
<v Speaker 2>the media landscape out of the way with five thirty

0:28:12.324 --> 0:28:16.164
<v Speaker 2>eight at a big corporate news organization called ABC.

0:28:16.484 --> 0:28:16.644
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:28:16.644 --> 0:28:18.364
<v Speaker 2>And also you know she is used to being an

0:28:18.404 --> 0:28:21.884
<v Speaker 2>environment where like she is the equity holder, and therefore,

0:28:21.964 --> 0:28:25.484
<v Speaker 2>when you grow, then you capture those proceeds. You can

0:28:25.564 --> 0:28:27.444
<v Speaker 2>choose to reinvest those pro seeds. You can choose to

0:28:27.484 --> 0:28:30.204
<v Speaker 2>take a nice, you know, vacation somewhere, you can choose

0:28:30.204 --> 0:28:34.564
<v Speaker 2>to hire more staff or whatever else. Right, And my

0:28:34.644 --> 0:28:36.724
<v Speaker 2>advice to her would be like, when you go from

0:28:36.804 --> 0:28:40.724
<v Speaker 2>kind of being the owner to being kind of the patron,

0:28:41.324 --> 0:28:46.444
<v Speaker 2>then that changes the incentives quite as absolutely absolutely.

0:28:46.764 --> 0:28:49.484
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, one of the things, this is

0:28:49.524 --> 0:28:52.684
<v Speaker 1>something that we haven't really talked about, but from her perspective,

0:28:52.804 --> 0:28:57.644
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a really interesting question because she's someone who

0:28:57.724 --> 0:29:00.644
<v Speaker 1>left The New York Times. She wasn't fired. She chose

0:29:00.684 --> 0:29:03.404
<v Speaker 1>to quit because she felt like she at least the

0:29:03.404 --> 0:29:06.084
<v Speaker 1>way that she phrased it. Obviously, I have zero insider information.

0:29:06.124 --> 0:29:08.924
<v Speaker 1>I've never met Barrywise, but the way that she publicly

0:29:08.964 --> 0:29:12.564
<v Speaker 1>framed it is, you know, I want to be even

0:29:12.564 --> 0:29:15.084
<v Speaker 1>though like no one's forcing me out, and I was

0:29:15.204 --> 0:29:18.684
<v Speaker 1>hired for kind of express it to express more conservative

0:29:18.684 --> 0:29:20.684
<v Speaker 1>opinions like I want to be even more free, right,

0:29:20.764 --> 0:29:23.124
<v Speaker 1>Like I want to be in an environment where I

0:29:23.124 --> 0:29:25.164
<v Speaker 1>feel like I can do like my my own thing

0:29:25.284 --> 0:29:28.444
<v Speaker 1>and like really frame the conversation. So, you know, so

0:29:28.564 --> 0:29:30.644
<v Speaker 1>she left the New York Times to be you know, free,

0:29:30.724 --> 0:29:33.644
<v Speaker 1>to be even more herself. She founds the Free Press,

0:29:33.844 --> 0:29:36.964
<v Speaker 1>which is her own publication, right where she makes the

0:29:37.084 --> 0:29:41.724
<v Speaker 1>editorial decisions. She chooses what they cover, she chooses how

0:29:41.764 --> 0:29:44.444
<v Speaker 1>they cover it, you know, when they host presidential debates,

0:29:44.444 --> 0:29:48.044
<v Speaker 1>she chooses, you know, exactly how she wants to do it.

0:29:48.524 --> 0:29:53.284
<v Speaker 1>And you know, being being someone who was always so

0:29:53.484 --> 0:29:57.684
<v Speaker 1>vocal about needing to be fiercely independent, you then get

0:29:57.684 --> 0:30:01.604
<v Speaker 1>on Ellison's payroll, right, and there's no other way of

0:30:01.644 --> 0:30:04.484
<v Speaker 1>putting it right, Like you that that is that is

0:30:04.644 --> 0:30:09.004
<v Speaker 1>actually literally what is what is happening? I hate to say, like, Barry,

0:30:09.044 --> 0:30:11.044
<v Speaker 1>are you out like hell? For one hundred and fifty

0:30:11.244 --> 0:30:14.404
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, I'd sell out and go and probably go

0:30:16.004 --> 0:30:18.524
<v Speaker 1>do something like that. It's a lot of money. No

0:30:18.684 --> 0:30:22.444
<v Speaker 1>judgment in terms of people taking life changing money. Maybe

0:30:22.484 --> 0:30:28.164
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of judgment, we'll see, but you know,

0:30:28.204 --> 0:30:31.284
<v Speaker 1>it's in terms of her own goals, in terms of

0:30:31.324 --> 0:30:34.284
<v Speaker 1>like what are you going to be able to do?

0:30:34.924 --> 0:30:38.764
<v Speaker 1>You're being put in a position where maybe what you said,

0:30:38.844 --> 0:30:42.004
<v Speaker 1>you know, five years ago, that was the thing that

0:30:42.044 --> 0:30:45.684
<v Speaker 1>you stood for is not compatible necessarily with the role

0:30:45.724 --> 0:30:48.524
<v Speaker 1>that you chose and the way that you will now

0:30:48.604 --> 0:30:52.124
<v Speaker 1>have to be answering to kind of corporate powers that

0:30:52.164 --> 0:30:58.044
<v Speaker 1>be and political forces that are strong, and that hired

0:30:58.084 --> 0:30:59.484
<v Speaker 1>you for a very specific reason.

0:31:00.604 --> 0:31:03.924
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, she is the number one publication free press,

0:31:04.204 --> 0:31:06.164
<v Speaker 2>which is a lot of people on sub stack. Right.

0:31:06.884 --> 0:31:10.564
<v Speaker 2>Number two was Heather Cox Richardson, who just sends out

0:31:10.604 --> 0:31:13.764
<v Speaker 2>a newsletter at one am every day, lives in Maine,

0:31:14.484 --> 0:31:16.724
<v Speaker 2>has no real staff, as far as I can tell,

0:31:16.764 --> 0:31:21.524
<v Speaker 2>has no real format a right, occasionally does a media appearances. Right,

0:31:21.604 --> 0:31:24.524
<v Speaker 2>And she's making I know how much she's making, but

0:31:24.604 --> 0:31:27.484
<v Speaker 2>I can't say, right, but like she's just making all

0:31:27.524 --> 0:31:32.044
<v Speaker 2>that money and like apparently keeping it for her and

0:31:32.124 --> 0:31:34.484
<v Speaker 2>her I think she's like a hot like lobster man

0:31:34.564 --> 0:31:38.924
<v Speaker 2>husband in Maine or something, right, not the one running

0:31:38.924 --> 0:31:43.484
<v Speaker 2>for Yeah, and like yeah, no, I mean not a

0:31:43.524 --> 0:31:46.764
<v Speaker 2>bad life, right, But the point is that like no,

0:31:46.844 --> 0:31:48.364
<v Speaker 2>and look, I guess it's like a little bit personal

0:31:48.364 --> 0:31:49.724
<v Speaker 2>because like, you know, and I'm kind of in this

0:31:49.804 --> 0:31:52.844
<v Speaker 2>in between zone right where I I you know, I

0:31:52.964 --> 0:31:57.844
<v Speaker 2>hired uh, you know, Eli my politics analysts became full

0:31:57.884 --> 0:32:00.244
<v Speaker 2>time we hired a sports analyst. I'm probably looking to

0:32:00.364 --> 0:32:03.444
<v Speaker 2>looking ahead to next year and like probably gonna have

0:32:03.484 --> 0:32:05.364
<v Speaker 2>to hire another person, right, But I don't want to

0:32:05.364 --> 0:32:08.764
<v Speaker 2>recreate five thirty eight where I had like thirty people,

0:32:08.764 --> 0:32:11.524
<v Speaker 2>because yeah, look, even if you're nominally the editor in

0:32:11.604 --> 0:32:13.684
<v Speaker 2>chief and I have been an editor in chief, right,

0:32:14.644 --> 0:32:18.764
<v Speaker 2>then between corporate ownership and the staff, right, I mean

0:32:18.804 --> 0:32:21.284
<v Speaker 2>the point if I had thirty people, then it becomes,

0:32:21.404 --> 0:32:22.964
<v Speaker 2>you know, all of a sudden, the work I do

0:32:23.084 --> 0:32:25.004
<v Speaker 2>is representative of them, and like you kind of lose

0:32:25.084 --> 0:32:27.964
<v Speaker 2>control over over the hiring process.

0:32:28.044 --> 0:32:28.124
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:32:28.204 --> 0:32:30.204
<v Speaker 2>So like my objective not that people should necessarily care,

0:32:30.284 --> 0:32:31.844
<v Speaker 2>is like, you know, I want to keep thinks kind

0:32:31.884 --> 0:32:36.844
<v Speaker 2>of more close knit, right, whereas is Barry is kind

0:32:36.844 --> 0:32:42.044
<v Speaker 2>of like let's take a big shot, right, Let's I mean,

0:32:42.084 --> 0:32:48.004
<v Speaker 2>she's got maybe more of the high risk entrepreneurial spirit.

0:32:48.164 --> 0:32:50.484
<v Speaker 2>I guess it is, right, but you know, the juxposition

0:32:50.564 --> 0:32:54.164
<v Speaker 2>of like that with like these dodgy old media companies

0:32:54.164 --> 0:32:56.644
<v Speaker 2>that I know a lot a lot about in my

0:32:56.724 --> 0:32:59.084
<v Speaker 2>own way too, having worked for ABC, is just like

0:32:59.444 --> 0:33:05.764
<v Speaker 2>I predict that she is going to become extremely frustrated, right,

0:33:06.204 --> 0:33:07.844
<v Speaker 2>And like the other thing that bugs me too, is

0:33:08.164 --> 0:33:10.644
<v Speaker 2>you know, I kind of hate the fact that, like,

0:33:11.244 --> 0:33:16.644
<v Speaker 2>why can't things just be medium sized and good and profitable?

0:33:16.684 --> 0:33:19.044
<v Speaker 2>Why is everything have to blow up so much?

0:33:19.204 --> 0:33:19.324
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:33:19.524 --> 0:33:21.924
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to say, Okay, the free press, we're

0:33:21.924 --> 0:33:25.324
<v Speaker 2>doing very well. Right, We'll continue to expand the user base,

0:33:25.444 --> 0:33:28.244
<v Speaker 2>and then we're gonna kind of generate a lot of income.

0:33:28.284 --> 0:33:29.924
<v Speaker 2>We can do with income what we want. We can

0:33:30.004 --> 0:33:32.484
<v Speaker 2>invest in the business and other business. Just keep the money.

0:33:32.524 --> 0:33:34.684
<v Speaker 2>It's capitalism. I have no problem with like people having

0:33:34.724 --> 0:33:37.644
<v Speaker 2>money at any point whatsoever, Right, but like, why do

0:33:37.684 --> 0:33:41.084
<v Speaker 2>we have to like fucking always like take over everything

0:33:41.084 --> 0:33:42.924
<v Speaker 2>and take over the world and not just say, like

0:33:43.164 --> 0:33:44.764
<v Speaker 2>we're at one of the you know, we have over

0:33:44.804 --> 0:33:48.324
<v Speaker 2>one hundred thousand subscribers. We're bigger already than paid subcribers, right,

0:33:48.324 --> 0:33:50.804
<v Speaker 2>We're bigger already than like terms of the print circulation

0:33:51.044 --> 0:33:56.044
<v Speaker 2>all but like one or two newspapers right in digital circulation,

0:33:56.204 --> 0:33:59.124
<v Speaker 2>you know, getting pretty far up there. And instead it's like, okay,

0:33:59.164 --> 0:34:00.564
<v Speaker 2>why do you you know, it's just a little bit

0:34:00.564 --> 0:34:03.204
<v Speaker 2>baffling to me that like there's so much emphasis and

0:34:03.204 --> 0:34:05.724
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these entrepreneurs and media I don't run

0:34:05.724 --> 0:34:08.964
<v Speaker 2>a shit about like I would trust Barry Weiss before Ellison.

0:34:09.564 --> 0:34:12.484
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean? A million times over, that's

0:34:12.484 --> 0:34:13.204
<v Speaker 2>not saying much.

0:34:13.564 --> 0:34:20.444
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so so okay, let's let's wrap up here then,

0:34:21.004 --> 0:34:24.164
<v Speaker 3>So if we're gonna frame this, you know, with what

0:34:24.204 --> 0:34:26.764
<v Speaker 3>we sometimes do on the show, like good call, bad call,

0:34:27.804 --> 0:34:31.924
<v Speaker 3>the hiring of Barry Weiss as editor in chief of

0:34:32.044 --> 0:34:34.124
<v Speaker 3>CBS News, and you can't hedge.

0:34:34.124 --> 0:34:35.804
<v Speaker 1>It has to be good call or bad call? Is

0:34:35.804 --> 0:34:38.564
<v Speaker 1>it a good call or is it a bad call?

0:34:38.604 --> 0:34:43.564
<v Speaker 2>What are his objectives? Too? Well?

0:34:43.764 --> 0:34:46.564
<v Speaker 1>His objective is to make lots of money for himself personally,

0:34:47.324 --> 0:34:53.684
<v Speaker 1>I think. But let's say to have a vibrant news organization.

0:34:53.884 --> 0:34:56.524
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's uh take him out as word that the

0:34:56.604 --> 0:35:00.324
<v Speaker 1>objective is to make CBS a vibrant news organization and

0:35:00.404 --> 0:35:04.684
<v Speaker 1>a bastion of true free speech that protects free speech

0:35:04.804 --> 0:35:07.684
<v Speaker 1>on all sides of the political spectrum and is a

0:35:07.804 --> 0:35:11.324
<v Speaker 1>relevant voice in media and a respected voice in media.

0:35:11.564 --> 0:35:12.404
<v Speaker 1>Good call, bad call?

0:35:13.204 --> 0:35:16.604
<v Speaker 2>Those are like different objectives, right, like I I you know,

0:35:16.844 --> 0:35:20.324
<v Speaker 2>they'll probably get better at avoiding a certain type of

0:35:20.364 --> 0:35:23.164
<v Speaker 2>progressive bias sometimes involve shutting down speech and substing with

0:35:23.244 --> 0:35:26.284
<v Speaker 2>it their own various kind of biases right now, Look,

0:35:26.324 --> 0:35:28.444
<v Speaker 2>I think it's if they are doing this for purely

0:35:29.444 --> 0:35:34.084
<v Speaker 2>journalistic reasons, then it's high risk, probably leaning bad. Right,

0:35:34.164 --> 0:35:37.484
<v Speaker 2>for financial reasons, I think the evaluation is quite reasonable.

0:35:37.644 --> 0:35:37.764
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:35:38.044 --> 0:35:42.124
<v Speaker 2>If it's for political reasons, then then who knows, right,

0:35:42.244 --> 0:35:44.124
<v Speaker 2>I mean Trump, I mean it's a weird model because

0:35:44.164 --> 0:35:48.004
<v Speaker 2>like Trump certainly does rather explicitly play favorites.

0:35:48.884 --> 0:35:51.364
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so so give me, give me a final give

0:35:51.404 --> 0:35:52.204
<v Speaker 1>me a final judgment.

0:35:52.324 --> 0:35:52.444
<v Speaker 2>Night.

0:35:52.604 --> 0:35:54.604
<v Speaker 1>I started off by saying no caveats, and that was

0:35:54.724 --> 0:35:58.404
<v Speaker 1>what one big caveat is the buying.

0:35:58.164 --> 0:36:00.964
<v Speaker 2>The Free Press good call? Having her be editor in

0:36:01.124 --> 0:36:03.084
<v Speaker 2>chief bad call?

0:36:03.324 --> 0:36:04.964
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's a that's a.

0:36:07.084 --> 0:36:08.204
<v Speaker 2>Are you bad call? Back call?

0:36:08.364 --> 0:36:13.564
<v Speaker 1>I'm bad call bad? I think I think for for

0:36:13.764 --> 0:36:17.324
<v Speaker 1>reasons that I've already that I've already made quite clear.

0:36:17.524 --> 0:36:19.844
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, this is not a not a

0:36:19.964 --> 0:36:22.564
<v Speaker 1>dig on barrier what she accomplished at Free Press. I

0:36:22.724 --> 0:36:26.044
<v Speaker 1>just think it's it's a bad sign for the types

0:36:26.084 --> 0:36:29.964
<v Speaker 1>of lofty goals of editorial integrity, free speech, et cetera,

0:36:30.004 --> 0:36:34.924
<v Speaker 1>et cetera that CBS was once known for and hopes

0:36:35.004 --> 0:36:37.884
<v Speaker 1>to be known for years ago. Hopes to be yeah,

0:36:38.404 --> 0:36:41.044
<v Speaker 1>hopes to be known for once again. So yeah, I

0:36:41.084 --> 0:36:45.324
<v Speaker 1>think I think bad call, bad call, But I would love, love,

0:36:45.724 --> 0:36:49.124
<v Speaker 1>love to be wrong, like I really would, because I

0:36:49.524 --> 0:36:53.404
<v Speaker 1>want journalism to thrive, and I want the people at

0:36:53.444 --> 0:36:56.404
<v Speaker 1>CBS to thrive, and I want good people to be hired.

0:36:56.764 --> 0:36:59.724
<v Speaker 1>And so I really, I really hope that Barry Weiss

0:36:59.764 --> 0:37:02.324
<v Speaker 1>will pleasantly surprise me and will end up being a

0:37:02.404 --> 0:37:04.604
<v Speaker 1>much better editor in chief than I think she's going

0:37:04.684 --> 0:37:08.444
<v Speaker 1>to be. And if so, I will happily, you know,

0:37:08.644 --> 0:37:11.724
<v Speaker 1>come on Riskyusiness and say I was wrong. Yay, I'm

0:37:11.844 --> 0:37:24.884
<v Speaker 1>very happy that I was wrong. Let us know what

0:37:24.964 --> 0:37:26.884
<v Speaker 1>you think of the show. Reach out to us at

0:37:27.044 --> 0:37:31.844
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business at pushkin dot FM. Risky Business is hosted

0:37:31.884 --> 0:37:33.764
<v Speaker 1>by me Maria Kanakova.

0:37:33.484 --> 0:37:36.244
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show was a cool

0:37:36.244 --> 0:37:40.204
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:37:40.244 --> 0:37:44.564
<v Speaker 2>by Isaac Carter. Our associate producer is Sonya gerwit Lydia

0:37:44.684 --> 0:37:47.564
<v Speaker 2>Jean Kott and Daphne Chen are our editors, and our

0:37:47.604 --> 0:37:51.484
<v Speaker 2>executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Brubert.

0:37:52.204 --> 0:37:54.444
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:37:54.484 --> 0:37:57.124
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too. But once again,

0:37:57.284 --> 0:37:59.084
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:37:59.124 --> 0:38:01.244
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.