WEBVTT - Leading Off May 23rd, 2025 (Ep. 1023)

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros MLB. This is leading

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>off live. It is me, Joey p Joe Pizafia with me,

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of course is the Welsh, and it's all of you,

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the Peanuts and the Crackerjacks here on our twitch twitch

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>dot tv slash Fantasy Pros Live every single day, Monday

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>through Friday noon Eastern RVD style. That's right, And of

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>course you can always watch us video on demand on

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>our YouTube channel Fantasy Pros MLB where we have the

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire video up, the trade video. Everything going on

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>right here at your fantasy baseball fingertips and Welsh. It's

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a big day because I was wrong. You were wrong.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Ronald acunia is back, baby, Holy crap, that happened fast.

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I woke up this morning. I was at an event yesterday.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>I really wasn't checking too much. I got up this

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>morning to get kind of reacclimated to all the baseball

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>comings and goings, and holy cow, Ronald Acunya is back

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and going to be playing for the Braves today. Well,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>how do you.

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Feel you just showed your sign of how early you

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 2>go to bed or stop paying attention to everything? Because

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>this was a yesterday thing. This was a late night

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 2>not even late night. This is an early evening thing

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 2>out here as wes.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Co graduation family thing to go do. There was also

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a wedding proposal. There was a lot going on last night.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>The wine we're flowing, no no, sir. But we also

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>with the kids last night caught up on the finale Survivor,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>so the rest of the evening was spent that's their

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite show. So I was watching that. I watched a

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>little quick pitch, but I must have missed the Yukunya

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>news like when I was doing it, and this morning

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>got up and went, oh, well look at that. Hello,

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>it's very good.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think you set that over under and

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I did say the under in the June numbers. So

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>we're here. As soon as he got to triple A

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>and started just getting those baseballs out, you knew that

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>this was gonna happen. You knew it was going to

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 2>be early. I'm not sure I quite thought it was

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be this early, but it was great.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>It's great.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I have a keeper league that I've been waiting for

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>a cunia to get back. It's great for fantasy, it's

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 2>going to be great for also the ranks getting him

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 2>back up. I love, you know, whenever I'm doing these

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>weekly rank adjustments to you know, get the best players

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 2>back up there. And really, it's such a weird year

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>last year in what he played of just you know,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>figuring out like the you know, the bounce back off

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 2>of the big year, what was going on, some of

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the weird contact and strikeout stuff.

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Like.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm just excited to see this version of Ronald Acuni again.

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>But he's back, and it is good for all of

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>us and the Braves.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>It's good for all of us. It's good for the

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Braves too, the Braves that are really rough April starting

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to play a little better. You've seen Austin Riley, You've

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>seen Drake Baldwin kind of be a little injection there.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried about the Striders start yet. I think

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the by low window. I thought it was

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>weird he didn't have a rehab start again. I just

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>think he he has bad numbers against the Nats historically,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and on top of that, it's probably just the feel

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>for pitching. And I'm hoping that he just gets back

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>into his routine and all is well for him going forward.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>But the Braves need a coon. Yeah, and now I

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think the East gets really interesting. The Mets have hit

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>their first wall after being really good, and of course

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone's hyper ventilating still in New York City about it.

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be fine. The pitching's been really good for

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the Mets. The pitching has been really good for the Phillies.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>That Phillies line up just crushing balls everywhere again yesterday,

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Harper and Schwarber are red hot. Lozardo has been a revelation.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So the East is getting really interesting, really fun from

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy perspective. I know everybody keeps talking about all

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>year while he's not gonna run as much, not going

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to run as much. Okay, we have one hundred games

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>left in the season. I'm gonna give you a stolen

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>based total. Here we go, Here we go. You're ready,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>stolen based total, Rondokunya. One hundred games. Let's go thirty

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>one and a half over under.

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 2>That's a good number. I am going to go under. Okay,

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go under. I think we're gonna sit at

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 2>like somewhere between twenty and thirty. I could be so

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 2>wrong about this. He could be hyper hyper aggressive on

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the bay's path base paths is I mean not stopping.

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 2>But I do think of like you know, when Tatis

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 2>came back and then you know, didn't really run, and

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>then this year he's like, I just feel healthy, I

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>feel good. Just don't think he's in that space yet

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 2>where they're gonna want to let him go like that.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 2>But you know what, they also need to manufacture runs.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Ozzie Alby's not hitting Matt Olsen doesn't look like Matt

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Olson fully, so maybe he does run more. But I'm

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna take the under thirty one and a half. Are

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 2>you over under?

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good number I set. That's why

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>I was going to try. I think I'm gonna go under.

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more like twenty nine. I think he

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just I think he's right under thirty there, and I

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's going to be more steals and people realize

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the people will think hes gonna steal ten bases. I

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>think are way off base. I really do shout out

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to black buguy O two. Just subscribe with Prime. Remember

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>when you subscribe with Prime, what do you get? You

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>get rid of all those ads and you get to

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>hang out with us and access to the home run

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>Call Channel, a lot of baseball to get to. I

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>seeal the peanuts and cracker jacks. We're gonna get to

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>questions today too, so keep dropping your questions. It's a

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>fun Friday. Thursday's always alight baseball day. We also have

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a fun thing to look at too, from the athletic

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they put out. But let's get to uh to Jose

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.119
<v Speaker 1>al Tuove. Two home runs for him yesterday, a really

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>good day. Certainly we needed that. He is six for

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>his last fifteen. Uh so good on Jose Altuve there

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and also wasn't the only guy who towo home runs.

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But I want to talk about Nady Evaldi, who we

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.679
<v Speaker 1>were discussing yesterday, being so good. You can't really believe

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>how good he's been his ERA after yesterday. He got

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>an unfortunate turn into the stick yesterday against the Yankees,

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but a one point six ERA now after six innings

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>where he gave up just a run, He's got seventy

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>one strikeouts to just nine walks. He's been incredible. Carlos

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Rodan also really good in that game too, not to

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>be overlooked. Six scoreless sittings. He had a rough start

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to the season. Rodin now has an ERA of one

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>point four to seven with a K per nine of

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>ten point nine to seven since the middle of April.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>So after that rough April you throw those numbers out.

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Rodan's been brilliant. So Rodan Eovaldi? Who would you rather have?

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Rest of season?

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Man? I just realized as you were doing that, I

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 2>had to show it, yeah, that you were gone. I'm

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna start looking because I'll give you my initial reaction.

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I know my answer. I can't wait to hear yours.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think I'm gonna stick with my initial reaction.

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 2>And it's Carlos Redon and that might be surprising, or

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's where you're at with it. The two eight

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 2>era fantastic, The sub one whip with him just speaks volumes.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I am worried about that K percentage. It's a ten percent.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>It hasn't been like that since twenty eighteen. But with

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 2>it has come elitd K percentage thirty one percent. I

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>really do think that this strikeout rate can continue with him,

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 2>where I don't quite buy it with Ivaldi. Ivaldi, though,

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>can go deep into games that team has been underperforming,

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>which really might might say a lot for him. Moving forward.

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 2>But I just think that Carlos for Redon in that K,

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that K number is just going to carry you through

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 2>the season. And I think you could get if you're

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 2>talking about a trade, I think you can get Redon

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe and maybe a little bit of a sweetener if

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you were trading Evaldi, because I think Ivaldi with you know,

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>almost into June, having like a sub two era, people

0:06:58.080 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>are losing their mind. So I think it's a really

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>tough one. I guess the value you probably have to

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>have Valdi like a couple of notches above Radon, but

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>I think rest of season I would take him. What

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 2>about you, I would take two.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I would also take Rodond. I would take him as well,

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>because I like where the Yankees are at. I think

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as Devin Williams pitch is better too. That's only good

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>news for the bullpen. We were well going to get

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>into that conversation too, because that's intriguing what's going on there.

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, Devin Williams does get that job back. We've

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>been so untouchable. Do you want to muck around with it?

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I believe more in the Yankee

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>offense and the Ranger offense to the range of offense.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Still we're waiting. We're gonna get you know, uh seeger

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>back eventually. You hope that Simeon has something this year,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>but man, we are deep into it right now. So

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I've just more faith basically in the Yankees. Let's talk

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>about our faith in George Kirby. Three and two thirds

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>innings yesterday, five runs allowed against the astro. So this

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was his first start of twenty twenty five. He hit

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Panya in this game. Then he got two scoreless innings,

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but after that things kind of fell apart. So when

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at this outing and you step back from it,

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy two pitches obviously first one out. Obviously not the normal,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know situation here that you would want a guy

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to make his debut, because it wasn't at the beginning

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of the season. It was injury. So do you take

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>too much out of this? Do you take nothing out

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of this? Like where are you at here with Kirby

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>after what you saw or maybe he didn't see from

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>him yesterday?

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't Okay, Yeah, there's actually something you didn't see

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 2>from him, which I think is actually the interesting part.

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you.

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Take anything out of it. His velo was where it

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>always is, So that's like a I think that's a

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>big key. I think it's probably like the number one

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 2>thing that you're looking for. You know, Kirby's a big,

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 2>big command guy, so it's like, what are you going

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 2>to read out of one start? What are you going

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to read out of his walks being up a little bit.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 2>But the pitch mix is kind of interesting. One little

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>caveat I'll give is the designation of pitches. Let's just

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 2>throw that out for a second, because you know, sometimes

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 2>sinkers and fastballs they just get designated weirdly or he's

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>throwing it. Because if you look, it shows he threw

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, primarily four seams last year, and then sinkers

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>were his second most used pitch. This shows he was

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 2>just all sinkers. Okay, so we singing the ball a

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, not throwing four seams. There's that last

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 2>year's slider was the third most used pitch, but his

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 2>cutter was way up this year, and I excuse me,

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that was about the designation cutters and sliders

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>can be used. So pitch mix looks different there. But

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>here's the big one. He didn't throw that split finger

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>at all, and that was a pitch that he added

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>last year to try to up his case and try

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>to be more of a strikeout pitcher. He didn't throw

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>one in that first start. He threws change up. Change up,

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 2>He didn't throw it all last year and he threw

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 2>twelve percent of the time. So did he scrap the

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>split finger for the change up? What is that going

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 2>to end up doing to the strikeout numbers at the

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 2>end of the day. Don't overreact, but the pitch mix change.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Kirby always does this. He's always weird about the stuff.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>We need to see a couple more of these and

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 2>what is going to be more successful at the end

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 2>of the day, because we don't know. He didn't, like

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I said, he didn't throw the change up last year.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>So that split finger, which had an almost thirty percent

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>with rate last year, is this change up going to

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>be better? It wasn't in the first start by the way.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>It got hit three point thirty three batting average against

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 2>with only a sixteen percent wiff rate on it. So

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't a good pitch in this first start. That

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>would be more of my worry than like first start,

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 2>out he just got kind of banged around or whatever.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there you go. All right, let's move on here

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully better things ahead for George Kirby as we look.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Better days for Christian Yelich two for three with a

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>pair of home runs. So we've called him out here

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>on the show last couple of days. We said the

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>counting stats were good at the same time, as always

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>concerns deep down. Look, if you want to sell Christian Yelich,

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the time, but still showing you some power.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It's by like a razor thin margin considering what some

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of the deeper stats look like. But a good day

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 1>for Christian Yelich. Nonetheless, Tan or Bibbey also a good

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>day for him turning things around. He needed this in

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the worst way. It was a big victory over the

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Tigers too, no slouch of a team. Seven innings, three

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>five seven r Right now, after all said and done,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>a one point two to one whip, forty three strikeouts

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen walks. So the strikeout for nine is still

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>not where you want it to be. So this is

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>also your sellaway windows for Bibby if you want. If

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't like what you've seen so far, and you

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>think this is the mirage. This is the start to

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>sell him off of Breton Doyle, another guy we called

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>out yesterday two for three. Boyt, we are magic on

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this show. Give us a player you want us to

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>call out that sucks for your fantasy team, we will

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>fix him.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I think Michael just did. Michael and the Chat literally

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 2>just called out a bunch of players like you, ell

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 2>and Langford.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, though, Ellie's killing me in the league too. I

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>just I need that. Where's that Ellie hot streak? Man?

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I need to see it. But Breton Doyle five for

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve since the dropping the order to four walks. See,

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's when a guy's getting right. I always

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about this. Are you seeing him hit the ball

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the opposit field? Are you seeing the walks? You're seeing

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that with Doyle, you're seeing the walks. He's a really

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>intriguing bilo for me because although Welsh does not necessarily

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>call himself a fan of Bretton Doyle, I like Doyle

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>last year. I was impressed by what I saw, but

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly not what I've seen this year. This is your

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>window if you want to try to pluck him away.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, problems, oh, well, I want to say it was

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.599
<v Speaker 2>real quick. You passed it. You say that, but I

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it was on a trade video or

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the live stream, because you're right. I was a huge

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 2>fader of Brenton Doyle in the draft season. But whatever

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 2>that show was, we just did. I said to buy

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 2>on him, even though you can kind of sell guy

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 2>on him that he is so low at the level

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 2>where people are just want to get out that you've

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 2>got to consider at this point because he still has

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 2>a really good profile. He is a big counting stats player,

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 2>and they're going to keep him at the top of

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the lineup because it sucks. So this has been a

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>by opportunity for Doyle, even though I don't.

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, they did drop him from that top spot, so.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but he can get back to it.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Sean m is going to get traded coming

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>back too soon, so you know that lineup might be fortified.

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to shout out, yeah sports too, who just

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Today with Prime? So I love this all

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>these people, these newbies, let's go, come on, come on

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the waters form. Here's a good question from Frov, which,

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>uh ray would you rather have? Rest of season? Todd

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Bradley or Ryan Peppio. I'd rather wesh.

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was gonna asked about Robie.

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, that's where I thought it was

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>going to. I read it when I was reading it,

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>That's how I read it. And then a second view

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I was cleaner with that. I go Pepio with this.

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's a better picture.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I want I think I want to say Bradley,

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, Bradley for six twenty expected is three to five.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 2>But the I need the keys to come out. I mean,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Pepio's probably safer. I'd have to look, I'd have to

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 2>go through Pepio stuff. You know what. Let's go with

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Pepio that I love.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>The other thing's more mind. I think Todd Bradley is

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the more exciting arm, but I think it's a picture.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I like what Pepio does more. I like the way

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he change fan beads. I like the way he is

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>commanding the strike zone better. I think it's less volatility.

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 1>I think TODs Bradley has more raw ability, but I'm

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>talking like fantasy productivity. I feel more confident in Pepio.

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it right now, but I also think the

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 2>upside belongs to TODs Bradley, but ten percent great stinks.

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Also his split finger really interesting. You want to kind

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 2>of deaden this thing almost like a change up to

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 2>and it's like he's added way more spin and velocity

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>on it and it just doesn't look as good. This

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 2>year had a thirty three percent wiff rate is twenty

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 2>one this year. Love them to dead that thing out

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 2>a little.

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Bit laser sharp. Is it time to worry about Junior Camonaro? Yeah,

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>sure you can worry. I mean, I don't want to

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>get rid of them right now, but I'm definitely worried. Yeah,

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>probably don't think.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I think there's some worries on it. One of the

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 2>things with Cammon Arrow it's interesting is if they just

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 2>released this new informent. I've talked about it like last

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>three days. But Baseball Savant they've got attack Angle. So

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 2>if you want to like start analyzing.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Are they paying you to talk about attack Angle? No?

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I just I'm super interested love that. No, you remember Max.

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this every single show?

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh have I I'm upset. I'm obsessed with it.

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>You are obsessed with it.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 2>But one of the things that you really pay attention

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>to on this the elite elite hitters like Otani and Judge.

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 2>They've got an attack angle of like fifteen degrees, a

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 2>fifteen degree attack angle, ten to fifteen, ten to eighteen,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 2>whatever they say, five to twenty. That's like the key

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 2>spot where you really want to be. Elite. Bat speed

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>with a really good attack angle and just a semi

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 2>decent vision creates some incredible things. The problem is Junior

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Cammanaro has the second best bat speed in all of baseball,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 2>but he has a five degree attack angle, so that

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>could be affecting some of the quality of contact. So

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that's interesting if you're trying to find like

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 2>a true reason behind it. But like, is it gonna

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>bounce back? Yeah, I think so. As expected batting average

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 2>is almost thirty points higher, he's still not striking out.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 2>It's just a little bit of a quality contact thing

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna pop next year. But I still believe in Camanaro.

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I still believe in the player. But it's okay, you

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>can panic. I just don't want you to make a

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>bad decision. Cody Nannheim has an interesting one. Doyle got

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>dropped in my league. Would you drop Taylor Ward for him?

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You know the problem with Ward is those home run totals, right,

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>want to the thirteen on the air? Fourteenth, yes, fourteen yesterday? Right? Yeah,

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I struggle. It's just the home run.

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:50.239
<v Speaker 1>I think overall productivity, Doyle is gonna give you theoretically

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>better batting average for sure, steals run scored, probably less RBI,

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and probably or maybe comparable. It is Colorado. You never

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>know if they get going eventually. I don't know. This

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is a tough one. I struggle with this one. I mean,

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>if he asked me this going into the season, this

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>would have been a slam dunk Doyle for me. So

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess I want to steal linge Doyle.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who is a todd in there? Said you just

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 2>can't drop Taylor Ward right now? He's not wrong. I

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>mean the profile, the profile looks great. They expect a

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 2>batting average is over two fifty and all of that aside.

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 2>He's hit fourteen homers. He's got fourteen homers, and he's

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 2>got some elite traits in there. I don't know if

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you were really chasing stolen bases. I think you could.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Those guys are probably a little bit interchangeable, but I

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know how you drop Taylor Ward right now.

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know if it's very difficult to do that,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure, all right. Uh Like people wondering about

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Max Velocity too, Max loves his attack angles. We all

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>know that at Max Vlo could be a Tom Cruise

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>type action star instead of adult films. He could be,

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's not as funny, Chief, it's not as funny.

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to Jeff Hoffman. Nothing's funny about this. If

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>your Blue Jay fan, another blow and say for him,

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>theres at six. He's allowed multiple runs in three of

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>his last eight appearances. We talked about Green anybody else

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about, because I don't think the

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jays want to talk about Hoffin right now. He

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is killing you in fantasy and he's killing the Blue

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Jays right now, who don't have a lot of room

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for error for winning games that are in the palm

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of their hand. You can't keep blowing games in the

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>ninth inning and keep pace with the Yankees and eventually

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox too. I just don't think it can happen.

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 2>No, And I think they they got to make a

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>move here at some point, like yeah, this this seems

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 2>like the catalyst for it to happen. So Chad Green,

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 2>if he's sitting out there, go pick him up.

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>It's Chad Green time, everybody, and look, just out of curiosity.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>You want to play the game. Let's play roster game,

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Chad Green. What's the ross percentage on CVS? CVS? What's

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>how I want to get a waiver wire claim and

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>a twelve foot receipt on Chad Green? No, what is

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the CBS ross percentage on Chad Green. Let's let's take

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a guess.

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say thirty five percent lower Bob Oh, he

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 2>actually is lower twenty.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Lower Bob twelve thirteen as Kluss thirteen. I was surprised.

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it'd be closer to thirty after the last

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>couple games for Hoffmann, but apparently not. Apparently not, which

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>brings us to another bullpen situation, which is the topic

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of today's Microsoft Chasing It Challengers. Everybody, I know you'll

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>love to chase the challengers, And of course, with Microsoft,

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the athletes who push boundaries and redefine what's possible and

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>business decision makers today are turning challenges into opportunities. And

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft meets you where you are with tools and guidance

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to help you make an impact with safe, secure AI solutions.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So whatever challenges you're facing, Microsoft empowers you with the

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>expertise to say bring it on. And in this segment,

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the challenge is faced by the Yankees bullpen and manager

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>right now, because what do you do with Luke Weaver,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>who's been absolutely brilliant in this closer role, brilliant for

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you in big spots last year, in the post season,

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch. Right now, he's got twenty two winnings

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 1>under his belt, just six walks. His whip is at

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>point five to three. He's got twenty five strikeouts an

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>ERA of point four zero. So although Devin Williams has

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>been better, it's kind of difficult to say, Okay, Luke Weaver, thanks,

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate your work in the last couple of weeks.

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Now get back to the eighth inning. I don't think

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees can do this, and I don't care what

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they trade it for Devin Williams until Luke Weaver proves otherwise.

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.959
<v Speaker 1>He has been the lockdown guy for you, and I

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>think the Yankees need to just stick with him. So

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I understand there's prestige and money and trade capital and

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>all these things that go into this. However, at the

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, the one thing that has to

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>be accounted for is performance, and the performance of Luke

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Weaver has been straight up dominant since the end of

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>last season and into the beginning of this one. So

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you got to leave him right where he is right now,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's closing games for the New York Yankees. So

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that's this week's Chasing Challenger segment. Remember, Microsoft AI solutions

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>empower you to take bold steps and make new ideas

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to help drive your business forward. With Microsoft as your

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>trusted partner, you can navigate your journey with confidence, finding

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>innovative solutions at reaching new possibilities. Visit Microsoft dot com

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Slash Challengers to learn more. Welsh, what's your take on

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Yankee bullpen.

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to hold to what I said a while ago,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 2>and my idea was Luke Weaver goes into the rotation

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 2>or goes into the bullpen as a closer, and he

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>holds it for a while. I think, I said he.

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I think he holds it for a month or two,

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 2>which could be a surprise for some people, especially at

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.719
<v Speaker 2>that time. There's a chance he holds it through the season,

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think like his success right now is showing

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 2>us why it can't. Here's what I do think happens.

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to continue rolling with this, but

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to get a day in the

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 2>near future where it's like, oh, Luke Weaver's not available

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 2>or he had pitched dot d a dot, and that's

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 2>going to be your opportunity to get Devin Williams in.

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Because Devin Williams has been really solid. He hasn't given

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 2>up a run since May fifth, so you know, he's

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 2>got two weeks plus and then and I know that

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 2>does might not sound a long time, but he's got

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 2>eight outings in here where he's been clean, lots of strikeouts,

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>stuff looks good. They're gonna give him a save opportunity,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 2>but it's not going to be in the vein of

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 2>like Weaver is out and then I think that'll start

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 2>to be that test period. But I agree, Luke Weaver

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>has been way too good. You can't just kick him

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 2>out just for Devin Williams. And if he doesn't have

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the job at all this year, I wouldn't be surprised

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 2>if Devin is kicked out of it. But I do

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 2>think you've got another month or so, and I think

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 2>in that month you're gonna get one or two instances

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 2>where Devin Williams is gonna get thrown in, and then

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 2>the fun is going to start after that of if

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 2>they decide to make.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>A move, Well, the fund's already begun in Boston because

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Noda is the newest first baseman to come over

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for depth from the Angels for Cash Considerations, which is

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>actually one of the film starring Max Velocity. I'm pretty sure,

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't it Cash con Yes, in Cash Considerations. I don't

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>look too much into this Ryan Noda deal, do you.

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is just depth as far as I'm concerned.

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you see it as more no depth?

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I think there. I will say, I wonder if this

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 2>is a telling piece of how uncomfortable they are with

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Christian Campbell, maybe at first because they've been making these

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 2>moves and then they bring it. But I think you

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 2>always need depth. This is like a super depthy move,

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 2>so I don't read much into it. Maybe he's going

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 2>to be a good on field type of coach for

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Christian Campbell to learn this position, and then we can

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 2>get Marcella Mayer.

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's a fun one, ki We Wizard, what's up Joe

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and Chris? First time on Twitch? Usually listen on Spotify.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Kiwi Wizard. I traded Edmund good job for Senga

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and Fairbanks earlier this year. Did I fleece myself?

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Please Weln fleece yourself. You've been great outfield. I had Trout,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Campbell and Buxton and well that's the problem. The problem

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>is the outfield is suffered. But the good news is

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Trout's on his way back. I don't think Christian Campbell.

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Christian Campbell finds his way back to things.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's just out of source right now. But

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I would, if I were you, kiw look for some

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>outfield depth. Maybe this is the exact kind of person

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that should be looking for a Brenton Doyle right now. Right,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>yeahs out of a mess by Low. He's available in

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a trade, or maybe he got dropped. That's the kind

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of guy. I'm adding, so Key, we appreciate you. I

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>saw mctunda resubscribe to We love the Peanuts and the

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Cracker Jacks. Here. We have the best of the best

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to our fan base here on the show.

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I love all the guys and gals who listen to

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>this show, especially every day. You guys are awesome. Robert

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Hassel nice MLB debut for him, pair of singles, two runs,

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a stolen base, and he's scored the winning run. Was

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a nice moment for mister Hassel. There, the Athletics plan

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to remote top outfield prospect Denzel Clark from TRIPAA. So

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Clark is twenty five, his slash is two eighty six,

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>four thirty six, four nineteen. Now no Homer's there, twenty

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>one RBI, seven steals. So prospect Guru, oh, prospect one,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>help us about Denzel Clark in the profile.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually surprised about this one. I thought this would

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>be Colby Thomas. Colby Thomas with them, or Henry Bolt.

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 2>They just got a glut of these great outfielders. Henry

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Bolt played in the AFL last year, Denzel Clark has

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 2>played in there. Colby Thomas might be the best of

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 2>that crew. Denzel Clark's super athletic outfielder. Actually him and

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence Butler played in the AFL together a couple of

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 2>years ago. Surprised about the Homers. The Homers have kind

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 2>of dissipated, but I think this also might be about

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Denzel who work because he's got like pure raw power.

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 2>But this might be kind of the Robert Hassel school

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 2>of changing the type of hitter you are. You guy's

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>got a four hundred OVP seven stolen bases. I think

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 2>there's more power projection in there. I just I don't

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 2>fully trust his ability to make contact. But he's also

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 2>changing as a hitter, and that little baby ballpark might

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 2>work well. But my shock was more that Henry Bolt

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Colby Thomas. I mean, Henry Bolt just almost like fell

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 2>shy of a cycle the other day. He's been killing

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 2>it in Triple A, and same thing. Colby Thomas is

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 2>a really complete player. I thought either one of those

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 2>might have been better, at least fantasy options. But Denzel

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Clark is probably in the Robert Hassel school of if

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 2>you're in a super deep league and you just got

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 2>waist down there and you want to take a shot

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 2>at it. That ballpark might benefit him a little bit,

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>but I think you're going to have some batting average

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 2>struggles with Clark.

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Rodriguez another one in the bright spots at tria

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>A for the Brewers. He got a little taste yesterday.

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>It got's first victory ever a Major league baseball That

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>was nice. Three runs of five hits over three and

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a third innings. He got optioned right again, which everybody

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>thought because they're just kind of cycling through arms right

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>now until further notice. Let's get to the three up

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and three down. Brent Rooker three for four with a

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>two run homer, Marcelo Zuna three for four with a

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>homer of his own. I wish I had picked Ozuna

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>yesterday instead, I didn't get a home run. Mad about that.

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And Taylor Ward three for four with a granny yesterday five.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Ribby's huge day for it. It's tough to drop Taylor Ward.

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And we just talked about him right on one of

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the shows. We got a big Taylor Ward discussion, and look,

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>man he was. He's under rostered in a lot. I

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>think it was like forty percent available still, which was

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of odd, we thought, considering where the home run

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>total was. The downs. Tyler Anderson, he stinks. He walked six,

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>gave up five runs, four and two third. Kyle Finn again,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>another blown save for him against the Bravos and aj

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Smith Shaver. Not a good night for him. Seven runs

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>eight hits, and it also knocked him out of the

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>top spot. He was actually going into the game number

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>one on the board on FanDuel for Rookie of the

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Year in the National League. Baldwin has leap frogged him.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of where you are, Welsh. I like Logan

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Henderson at seven to one right now. Maybe we just

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen the guy yet. Now that Matt Shaw's back

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>up too, he's intriguing and getting a great number on him.

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But so far I've yet to make a heavy investment,

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'm getting very close to wanting to make one

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in Logan Henderson because he's been so good out of

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the gate. What do you make of aj smith Shover's

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>performance last night?

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a bummer because he had been just like

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 2>lights out. He really it's pushed his ERA up over

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 2>three and a half. He's gotten expected era that's pushed

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 2>five so far. He's got away with a lot of stuff.

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those guys, you know. He had had

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 2>like three starts where he'd given up one earned run,

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 2>but walks were there. He got banged around and everything

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>looks pretty messy right now. So smith Shover kind of

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 2>went from a oh, maybe he really did click and

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 2>find it and we give him the ben for the

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 2>doubt regardless too, he goes into that range of the

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Logans and the the will Warrens and Hayden Birds songs

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 2>as players that like, eh, you know, maybe they're not

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 2>so invulnerable and maybe you you know, you not would

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.719
<v Speaker 2>potentially look at streaming. But the Rookie of the year stuff.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I said this not too long ago, but we legit

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>might not have who the NL Rookie of the Year

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 2>is in the majors right now, Like that's a level

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that it is.

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>It is, so who's still down that could make that

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>buzz because I think that's a.

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>A Chandler, a Bobba Chandler would be the number one guy.

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, as it is a little bit tougher for pitchers,

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 2>but the NL has just been blah. I mean, Dylan Cruz,

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 2>your number one at Matt Shaw, could definitely take this

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>if he gets going. Drake Baldwin is a catcher. He's

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 2>got to keep getting the playing time. And from a

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 2>war perspective, he's got it well.

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>He's at plus three eighty Logan Henderson's seven to fifty,

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Chandler's at twenty to one, Dylan Cruise is at twenty

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>five to one, Dalton Rushing is at twenty five to one,

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Shaw thirteen to one, Smith Shaw or four and

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a half, and Augustin is five to one right now.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 2>So man, I don't know. I think the it's I like.

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Logan at seven fifteen, Seawan laying the weeds.

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Sean Bubba are the two that stand out to me

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.479
<v Speaker 2>if I were making But I just I don't know

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 2>if we have it. I don't think we have any type.

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're getting decent odds, but I don't feel

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>confident about any of that.

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't either. It's got to go to somebody, though.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's gonna win that thing, and I want to win

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>some money off of it, so let's try to get that.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the injuries here, because we've got a

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of injury news to talk about as well. We've

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>got Logan Gilbert scheduled to throw a simulate a game

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.239
<v Speaker 1>today in Houston, so hopefully all goes well with that.

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Julio Rodriguez was scratched yesterday with tightness in the back.

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not good. Don't want to see that. Justin Verlander

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>did go to the ilet's retroactive to the May nineteenth.

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>With that PEX strain. Corey Seeger is a week away,

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>at least we've been told, So let's let's keep our

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>fingers crossed. I don't know, light a candle in church

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at Corey seegerback in the next two weeks. Chase de

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Lander fifteen day il right for him tightness. That's typically

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not a great indicator. Welsh, I know you're a Dolander guy,

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but that's got to be really bad news for you.

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 2>But for Dynasty, I mean Dolander, like Redraft, he just

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the Homers were too much of a problem that you know,

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 2>he had gone. He's put himself into the position where

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't like needed to be justifiably rostered in Redraft.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>So we were already beyond that. But this is brutal

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 2>because when he got drafted, he was coming off of

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to misspeak. I don't remember if it

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>was Tommy John or not, but it was a bad

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 2>injury and he didn't pitch and he was out for

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 2>a while, and this would be another one. I'm pretty

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>fearful this one's gonna this is gonna get him for

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 2>a while.

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Yep, probably will. Kumar Rocker is gonna make a rehab

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>start today as well. Carlos Korea is expected to be

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>activated today, and Tario with Strata begins his rehab a

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>time that we mentioned that. So if you have some

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>second base woes, that's another guy you can just stash

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. Let's we want to play the game with him.

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>We want to play the roster game with a strata.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you want to say, strata as ross percentage.

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Is Welsh, let's say twenty four percent.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Lower lower, eighteen fourteen percent.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it's a good time to pick

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 2>him up. He should be up there very very soon.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. Let's go, is what we're doing. We're helping

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you out here. All right, it's time, boys and girls

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>or everybody's favorite segment. It's time for the best.

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Bets of your Friday.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>With Joey p and the Welsh. Let's take a look

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at an enormous number here, the Yankees and the Colorado Rockies.

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Twelve runs. Now, I know it's Clark Schmidt and some

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>JABBRONI they've just thrown the ball to in Colorado, and

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I get it, but I think on principle. I'm just

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>going the under here. Twelve is a ridiculous number. I'm

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>just gonna I'm just gonna go under. I mean, even

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees win this one ten to one, still an under.

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It just I can't. I can't when you see a

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>number this high. I think it's just the discipline. Remember

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what we talked about on the show A lot, where

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we see a k prop at eight and a half,

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we like to go under on that one because typically

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna win out more times than not. This is

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that number for me. When you cross double digit it

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>gets a little tricky. But twelve is a number where

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just a matter of price enforcing. And of course

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees on their own to score twelve, the actual

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the run total for the Yankees is around eight right now.

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>They you couldn't even just do the team total because

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of absurd right now. So I'm gonna

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>go under minus one ten. That's where I'm gonna live

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez at home. I'm gonna take him with the

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>five and a half strikeouts minus one eighteen. I'm gonna

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>go over on that against Kansas City and tai Oscar

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Andrnandez is gonna take the RBI and plus one seventy

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>good spot here against the Mets, four forty four career

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.959
<v Speaker 1>batting average and nine at bats with a thirteen hundred

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>OPS for tioscar and Nandez, so I look for him

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to drive in a run. I also look for Juan

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Soto at home to get a nice ovation from a

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>crowd and love him and hang on to him and

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>say don't worry one, we're behind you. And I think

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>one responds against the Dodgers this weekend. Kershaw on the

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>mound tonight too, so that be entertaining for the Mets

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and Dodgers. Welsh, what do you have for the people

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on a fun Friday.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go with the Texas Rangers run line, so

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 2>not money line. It does say run line there, so

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 2>that's minus one point five, so them to win by

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 2>two runs against the Chicago White Sox. We got Tyler

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Molly who's been pretty good. Sean Burk has actually been

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty decent on the mound as well, but I think

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox are going to struggle getting to Molly.

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 2>The Rangers will not as much. They win by two

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 2>minus one fifteen. Usually you're gonna see plus money on this.

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 2>So this is really heavily in a favored market, favored

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>for the Texas or Rangers, the Mets and the Dodgers.

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 2>You said Kershaw's on the mound, that should be fun. Yeah,

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Kershaw's been getting hit hard. He got hit hard across

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 2>all his minor league assignments, saw these seventeen year old

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 2>kids hitting it right to the wall, even though he

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't give up any hits. I think he's going to

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 2>get hit up in this one by the Mets. So

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going over on the total runs also just because

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 2>of the you know, the pitching matchup in general, but

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Mets over eight and a half, Mets Dodgers over eight

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 2>and a half, it's big plus money so plus I

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:02.959
<v Speaker 2>don't did I write it was one fifty. Actually, now

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 2>that I'm looking at that, it's not. I don't know

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 2>where one fifty. It's minus one twenty. So that is

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 2>a Jay moment. It is mine one twenty for over

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half. That'd be awesome if it was

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 2>plus one fifty, and then I'm gonna go with Paul

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Skeens six and a half strikeouts over that one is

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 2>a plus money play. But I also think it is

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 2>plus one ten. It is not plus one hundred at

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 2>least I saw. But going against the Brewers, he struck

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 2>out more than seven in his last outing. He's getting going.

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Close one ten plus.

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's close. So I don't know where these

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 2>numbers came from. But Paul Skins plus one ten Mets

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers is minus one twenty on the total runs and

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the Texas Rangers run line. That's mine.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to mctundag just gifted five subs and frozen

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>coup laid. There's a little space there in between, so

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to walk in that bad boy. Resubbed with

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Prime again. Resubs hang out with us. We're not going anywhere.

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>It's wall to wall baseball here on the channel. Now.

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I will say, we won't be here

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. We are taking a day off on Monday.

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>It's Memorial Day. It's for family, it's for barbecues, it's

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for fun, it's for remembrance to of all of our

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>brave men and women in uniforms. So we're gonna take

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a day off. Plus, there's a ton of day baseball

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that we know you want to watch, and who wants

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to watch us when you can watch baseball instead. In

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the meantime. If you're gonna betting this weekend, bet responsibly

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and do it with fantasypros dot com slash Leading Off,

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>where new customers can bet five bucks, get two hundred

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen bonus bets if you win on FanDuel again.

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>That's Fantasybros dot Com Slash Leading Off end. We want

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>you to download the Betting Pros app so you can

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>use incredible tools like the prop bet cheat sheet that's

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>available right now. It shows you the best value plays

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>every single day. You get daily prop bet value rankings

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.919
<v Speaker 1>based on projections from our Fantasy overlords. You got strikeouts, hits,

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>home runs, you name it, we've got it. Use it

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>now at Bettingpros dot com slash Mlbprops, or just go

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Betting Pros app. And when you do download

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that bad boy, use that promo code leading Off and

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you get a free week with baseball with NBA with

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>NHL all going strong right now, A free week of

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the premium tools on Betting Pros. What's better than that? Nothing,

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So go download the Betting Pros app today. Let's take

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 1>a look at the home run board yesterday there were

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:06.959
<v Speaker 1>some double dips there. Marty's still at the top, tied

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 1>with Georgia twenty one, far out dj Osbourne and Patsy

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 1>at twenty. Wankye Penguin at eighteen, Welsh Holden is wrong

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen. I'm at eleven. I think I might be

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>close to this board by the end of the weekend.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Welsh the Sammy's Sosa jersey for Pristine Auction on the line.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to take Aaron Judge and Colorado for

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the weekend because it's not about making friends. HiT's about

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>making money, and I think Aaron Judge can at least

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>get me to this weekend. Where are you at? Well, SHEI,

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking for? Well?

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 2>And it's imperpetuity unless I make the change over the weekend,

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 2>but definitely today, I'm going with Pee Alonzo. So Pete

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Alonzo up against Clayton Kershaw. You know he's throwing it.

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 2>He's dropping an eighty seven mile per hour fastball, hopefully

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, the new Pee Alonzo, who doesn't want to

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 2>strike out as much and be a better player, doesn't

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 2>eat at a lot of those curve balls. But if

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 2>he gets that fastball in the zone. He should put

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 2>that thing a mile So Peter Alonzo today will watch

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the weekend. I gotta pick it up because I have not.

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 2>It is like close to two weeks Walkee was saying,

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 2>can't buy a Homer. I can't buy a Homer. I'm one.

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm honestly we can come back from more to day.

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I might be off this list. I'm one. Like good

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.839
<v Speaker 2>weekend for everybody from getting booted. And I've been on

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 2>this list for the majority of the year, so it'd

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 2>be quite sad, quite sad to get catch.

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 1>JD wants to know what's on the grill on Monday.

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you, JD. Here's the plan. Right now. I'm

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to Wegmans get some some stuff there. But

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, so we I'm gonna get some chicken.

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll do some marinated chicken, some veggies on the grill.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But also my girlfriend, she goes to this place and

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.479
<v Speaker 1>gets the most amazing Colombian teriso. We're gonna be putting

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that on the grill. And my my buddy, her her

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>sister is now fiance after yesterday, so shout out to them,

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>congratulations to them. He brings the most amazing Tarrasco, which

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is a Latin steak that's just unbelievable. It's like a

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>skirt steak that's marinated and seasoned that it's just it's unbelievab.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You put on the grill for like two minutes, you

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>flip it around two minutes more. Bro, It's one of

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the best things I've ever had.

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I've never heard of these words. You're like, oh, my

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 2>other cousin.

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Chariso, You've never heard of Teresa live in Arizona, like Pbrasco.

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Frrasco's Torrasco used to pitch.

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>For the Brewers, didn't he I'm pretty sure now before

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we go, I want to talk about this because we're

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a baseball show first and foremost fantasy. Yes, of course,

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>but the Athletic put out something fun, which was they're

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>all century to quarter century team, whatever the heck it is.

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, since the year two thousand. Before the show

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we were talking as I was depressed, I heard a

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:37.280
<v Speaker 1>stat that if you're to make Back to the Future today,

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the going back in time would be two thousand and five,

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and that just upset me. And I don't know how

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>you'd make that movie because I don't know how life

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:47.439
<v Speaker 1>is really vastly differentes eighty five to sixty five. That's

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>different now, I just not so much. But here you

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 1>go the quarter century team. I like this team. It's

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Barry Bonds, Mike Trout, Aaron Judge and the outfield. I'm

0:37:56.000 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>cool with that. The starting pitchers were Verlander, Kershaw, Holiday Schurzer,

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and Randy Johnson. Okay, cool with that, dh Ortiz, that

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Yeah, your Molina is the catcher, albl Poros

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>at first base, a'lll Twove at second, Adrian Beltra at third.

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>The Derek Jeter one I kind of struggled with because

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Marco Scutero he posted that he has more runs saved

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and shulot than Derek Jeter. You see, I thought that

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>was great, and I love Derek Jeter. He's a great player.

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a winner, three thousand hits, Hall of Fame or

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>first ballot, lock it up. But is he a better

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>all around player than Alex Rodriguez.

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I was just about to say, I didn't know if

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 2>you were going to drop Alex in this one out

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 2>and he.

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Can't say, well, we don't want to put guys on

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>story because Barry Bonds is on this list. So it's

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:43.399
<v Speaker 1>not that. So if we're just talking about in a vacuum, Yeah,

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Jeter over a Rod's just straight up dumb. You're right, Wonky.

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the Chad thinks about this, but Welsh,

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about it?

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? No, I as soon as I looked at this, well,

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to think, if I'm am I allowed

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 2>to put Rodriguez at shorter? Do I have to replace

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Beltray with Rodriguez? But either way I do it.

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I would put play more short in his career, didn't he?

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think I can. We can justify you got.

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>All the Seattle years, the Texas years, right, Yeah, I

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>mean I assume that's got accumulate. I got to go

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>back at the Yankee numbers over there.

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I saw somebody posting the DH one that

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 2>if you wanted to replace some people might want to

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 2>replace David Ortiz with Otani at this point, but kind

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 2>of arguing like, are we there yet that you would

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 2>want Otan? Can? Does Otani deservedly belong there over Ortiz?

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I think in what we've seen, I actually do think

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 2>so because of what he does on the on the ground,

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:35.760
<v Speaker 2>as far as how he can run.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>There's one more And now that you said that too,

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that's actually one more switch that I think we I

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:41.879
<v Speaker 1>would make, which this might upset a lot of people.

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's slide Aaron Judge over the center field and let's

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>put Echiro in right field. For the love of God,

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean Ei Ro.

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would have to put each row over.

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Echiro is not on here. I could

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>even make a case for each roll over Aaron Judge,

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 1>like if you want to take Judge and tro out

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and they're high points and have that conversation and fight

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it out all day, okay, but each your not being

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>on this one is kind.

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Of And what about Meggi? Multiple people posted Miguel Cabrera like,

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 2>where's Micky on this list?

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the thing is like you put him over Pooholes.

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, probably putting them on Beltray, you know,

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>because he was a third basement earlier in his career.

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 2>But if we're trying to finagle the roster, well, okay,

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 2>what about DH. If you have Otani, Ortiz or Meggi,

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:19.959
<v Speaker 2>who's your.

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Dh Otani or Teas or maybe he.

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Didn't really DH enough.

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you're taking each towards the end when he

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>was out of shape and he couldn't do it anymore.

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, Look, Miguel Cabrera is a better overall hitter

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>than our ties. So if you're just letting me take

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a free hitter in there, Primo, I'm going to take

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Miguel Cabrera. But th Otani is another one too, where

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like, how do you not put Altani on this

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>team at this point?

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I would have placed Atani. I would put

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 2>each year on. I would put Alex Rodriguez. The only

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 2>thing is this is it's probably right. But when I

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 2>look at the rotation, I feel like we're missing somebody.

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who. I don't know what it is

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 2>right now, it's not Terry Piazza.

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Better offensive catchers than you. You're Malina, but not defensively.

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, YACHTI is the you're talking about ketcher?

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Yea, I was talking about pitching. I'm just saying pitching one.

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.879
<v Speaker 2>There's one. I feel like we're missing a picture out

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 2>of this.

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>But I don't see the problem with Pedro Martinez, Like

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 1>his elite is like ninety eight ninety nine, so he

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>just misses this quarter century cut off. So I kind

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of get like that. I kind of understand it's a

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:22.240
<v Speaker 1>weird thing to like cut it off a two thousand,

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's also the beginning of Echiro, Like it's the

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>entire eight year old career. And to have him on

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the list or not on this team ahead of Mike

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Trout and Judge, I think it's just kind of foolish. Yeah,

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, as great as Judges and great as

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>they all are, Trow you can whip said, you can

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>just put Trout on the AOL and keephim on the roster.

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Stand Ah, that's a good one. I want to leave

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on that. That'll do it for us, But the story

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of the game goes on. We'll be back again on

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday for the Welsh I'm Joey p. We'll see you

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:53.360
<v Speaker 1>next time. Kids, Enjoy your holiday weekend.

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 3>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 3>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 3>or Spotify, Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 3>dot com. Slash Fantasy Pros MLB