WEBVTT - CFB Live on Spotify (10/6): That Does/Don't Impress Me Much

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. He'll that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm a man, I'm forty.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be happy. You want to be happy for a day?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Edith state is that?

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:15.239
<v Speaker 2>Whoo whoo? And no.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Dan and Tye, welcome back to the solid verbal. Boys

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and girls. My name is ty Hildebrandt.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 3>You will hear Dan's beautiful voice here momentarily because this

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>is an excerpt from.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>College Football Thursdays.

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>It's the live show we do on Spotify every Thursday

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 3>five pm East, two pm West. You can listen to

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 3>it for free and live next Thursday courtesy offliverble dot

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 3>com slash Spotify. My voice sounds differently right now. I

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 3>don't have my normal mic. That is because I am

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>recording this on my onboard Mac microphone from a closet

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 3>of a hotel room in Manhattan. Dan and I are

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 3>both here. Say hello, Dan, Yo, we are getting amped,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 3>We're getting psyched. We were getting prepped for our live

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 3>show tomorrow. College Football The Game Show Live Chelsea Music Hall,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 3>eight pm Eastern Time. Grab your tickets if you're going

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 3>to be in the area. If you haven't done so already.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 3>This excerpt here. We expanded on the Shanaia Saturday concept

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 3>that we trotted out on our Week six preview episode,

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 3>which you could also hear now if you go on

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 3>back to our RSS podcast feed and downloaded in your

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>app of choice. Teams that have impressed us, teams that

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 3>have not impressed us so far through this college football season.

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>We did this show because we're here in person live

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 3>at Spotify HQ overlooking all of Manhattan, so a really

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>cool experience. Was great to do it in person. We

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>got so much great interactivity. We hope if you weren't

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 3>able to join us this Thursday, that you can do

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 3>so next week. In the meantime, if we don't see

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>you at the live show, which again Soliverblive dot com

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 3>tickets still available, and if you weren't able to join

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the Spotify live show, we hope we can see you

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 3>next week in the chat on the virtual stage. And

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 3>if not, if nothing more, talk to you again after

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 3>week six to talk about all that was in the

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 3>world of college football. Have a great weekend. ESPN did

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 3>this thing. Gosh, I don't know how long ago. They

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 3>still do it. They do it for basketball, they do

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 3>it for football. They'll do it about week eight in

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 3>football season, and they come up with a catchy bit

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 3>of a literation to label separation Saturday, show me Saturday

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 3>if there's maybe like a big Bazoo game or something like.

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 3>They have these I don't know, these hackneyed line literative nicknames,

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 3>just these lines they trot out. We thought many years

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 3>ago we could be a little bit more creative. So

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 3>we do it every Saturday, or we do it in

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 3>preparation for every Saturday.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 3>And this week I've seen some folks posting in the

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 3>chat here they know what's coming here.

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to lay the groundwork for this game? Yeah?

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Once again, we're a month into the season and they

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>are all sorts of results that would have us thinking,

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, this team's frisky, this team's good, this

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>team's excellent, this team has what it takes to do

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>incredible things. But it's based on one game, two games,

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not sold on really anything dramatic a month in.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 2>But there are some teams that I've been impressed with,

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 2>but also there are some results that just I don't know,

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 2>they don't impress me much.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Sut don't impress me much.

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 2>So I'm here to ask you a number of questions,

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>and I have a number of teams that I'd like

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 2>to review.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Do these teams impress you much?

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Shut don't impress name much?

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Or do they not? Shout out Eileen Edwards Akaashania Twain.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 4>That don't impress name?

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Just one more time to really drive it home. No,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I hear you.

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I wish she sang an alternate version of that song

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>talking about what she is impressed by. Yeah, that would

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>have been nice for her soundboard, so we could just

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 2>hit that impresses me, John, But she didn't.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So would you like to start with some teams? I

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>would absolutely love to.

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with the Texas Longhorns ahead of this, I

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>mean we talked about the news of quin yours returning

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the totality of the Texas Longhorns twenty twenty two experience.

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Does it impress you? The close loss to Alabama, some

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>slow starts, some defensive improvement at times, some development of

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 2>receivers obviously, some interesting ways to get John Robinson the ball,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 2>but also you're tossing in a loss to Texas tech

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 2>in there, does Texas impress you much?

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Texas is very much thematic with that song? Okay, impress

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>me much.

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>There is a line in.

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 2>There about Jordan, about Jatavian Sanders, about.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Who No, I mean, you're you're one of those guys

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 3>likes to shine his machine. Oh okay, make me take

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 3>off shoes. Are you looking at buff zone dot com

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>right now? Now?

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>This is this is Google?

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Something on Google. You make me take off my shoes

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 3>before you let me get in. Okay, it's hit or

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>miss with Texas. It's a little bit of both. I've

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 3>been impressed with a little bit we've seen a Quinn yours,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 3>but very little bit that we seen a quin yours

0:04:58.360 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 3>before he got hurt.

0:04:59.600 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I hear.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm very impressed by that version of Texas, and I

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 3>think from what we've seen so far after that Alabama game,

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 3>granted we're going to turn a blind eye to the

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 3>defense for the purposes of my argument, I think, all

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 3>things considered, I am at least impressed by the offense

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>at Texas seemingly taking a bit of a step forward,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 3>seemingly incorporating more weapons as they've gotten healthier, as they've

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of grown into this sark system. I feel like,

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 3>at least on that level, I've been impressed. Defensively, No

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 3>So that's the hit or misquality. Right.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>It's great you've got the shiny car.

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but there is a qualifier there that makes me

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 3>not as impressed. I'm right down the middle. I am

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 3>both impressed and not impressed about Texas Longhorns.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, fair enough, let's I think I'm going to go

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 2>with impressed. I'm just because I'm saying either something impressed

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 2>as you or it doesn't. I'm going to say I'm impressed,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>not within the context of Texas's expectations for being excellent,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 2>but impress that going to a backup quarterback as Hudson

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Card has gotten healthier, he's looked better and better, and

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 2>to not really lose a step with your backup quarterback

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 2>who looks of starting quality, I'm impressed.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely impressed.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 3>By the way Catherine in the chat says, just to

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of put a fine point on this thing. Yeah,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 3>things that don't impress Shanaiah per the song are rocket

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 3>scientists having a car in Brad Pitt. Okay, So just

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 3>like kind of put that away and we come back

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>to it, do we have to.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 2>But it's a lot to unpack there, because I think

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>having a car can be impressive. I mean, you might

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>have your act together. Brad Pitt, I don't know. He

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>hasn't had a great year necessarily, hasn't. I'm not that

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 2>impressed with the things that have come out about Bread

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>and don't impress name that I did like his performance

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and once upon a time in Hollywood, right, rocket scientist,

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty impressed with, Like, how to be honest with you,

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>it's an impressive We have.

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Rocket scientists who listen to the show, so we have

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 3>to say nice things about them.

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>What's what's all team here? All Miss?

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Does Ole Miss impress you much? Coming off of their

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>win in a different kind of way?

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 2>It's not throwing the ball down field, It's not electricity

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>with speedy receivers all over the place and play making quarterbacks,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 2>but defense and running the ball and being creative within

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 2>those two things?

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Does Ole Miss impress you much?

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Ole Miss is favored in every game still on their schedule,

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 3>and they're only a one touchdown dog at home per

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:30.679
<v Speaker 3>some of these projections against Alabama when they play second

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 3>week of November. So the stats are pressed by Ole

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Miss and I am as well. I've said this on

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 3>the podcast a number of times now, I'll reiterate it again.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 3>I like the running game. I like the defense that

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 3>is almost completely counters. Yeah, that is almost completely counter

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 3>to what old Miss used to be, which was they're

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 3>going to throw it a million times and maybe play

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of defense. Yeah, this team is different

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>now under Lane.

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>See, I think they've quietly run it really well. I

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 2>mean you look at some of the recent names, obviously

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Henry Parrish, Snoop Connor, Jerry and Ely two sports star

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 2>like they've quietly had those guys who've been playmakers.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>How about Dexter mccluster. If you just want to sit

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>around naming ole Miss running back, talk some wildcat quarterback.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's just talk guys buff zooned dot com. I

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 2>think ole Miss has actually done a really nice job

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>being balanced. And perhaps they're less so this year, and

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 2>perhaps there's less trust with Jackson Dart at this stage

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 2>in his career with ole Miss running a more balanced offense.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 2>But look whin how you can win and ole Miss's

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 2>defense was a nightmare three four years ago and right

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>now they were full on, very effective and strong against Kentucky,

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think they will continue to do so. It's

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>just at this point, The question is if they do

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 2>have to throw the ball, if you can put eight

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>dudes in the box most of the game, what do

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>they look like in terms of that outpitch throwing the

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 2>ball downfielder adjusting at halftime with Jackson Dart, I'm impressed

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>by Ole Miss.

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am as well.

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 3>The thing to watch with Old Miss though, and I

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 3>suspect we will see it a little bit more as

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 3>we go through their schedule now the rest of the way.

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe not this week at Vandy, maybe a little bit

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 3>next week against Auburn, but certainly as we get into

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>like LSU and Alabama and even Mississippi State a little

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 3>bit later on. Sure, the one thing that's really lagged

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 3>behind on the defensive side is the rush defense.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, last year too, for at least the first half

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the year behind.

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 3>So they will play some teams with good offensive lines.

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 3>They will play some teams that could run the ball,

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 3>and that I think will be a pretty big test

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 3>for him. But we're I think we're in agreement. We're

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 3>both impressed by All Miss.

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>We're both impressed.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Although let's like the teams that they've played thus far

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 2>are who exactly right, It's UCF.

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a guy named Troy, buff Zone dot Com, Troy, Central, Arkansas,

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 3>Georgia Tech, Tulsa, and Kentucky.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>So we look at that and we say, all right,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>they beat Kentucky. Do we know how impressed we should

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 2>be with the Kentucky win? Not fully, but I'd like

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 2>to see more of a catalog of wins at this point.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm impressed, maybe not impressed much.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 3>How about that that sounds let us know in the chat,

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 3>mister pizza coolisas ain't played nobody.

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's it's a relatively reasonable criticism.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Jason says, eight dudes, okay.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Eight dudes in the box. Yeah I understand.

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, wheels are turning in the comments section, we

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 2>all get it.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I saw the first part and not the last part.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 3>What's our next team?

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me look at the list. I made up

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>my haphazard list. How about the Michigan Wolverines. So Michigan

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>with a very nice win. I will say, it's still

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 2>a very nice win to go to Iowa City, a

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 2>place they haven't won in what seventeen years? They haven't

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 2>won in Kinnick since two thousand and five.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>House of horrors.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>The expectation was they were going to struggle to score,

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 2>but they managed to, you know, by the end of

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 2>the game, get to twenty seven points and one in

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 2>a sensical way. They didn't push too much against a

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 2>strong Iowa defense, and their own defense did absolutely what

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 2>it needed to do against Iowa to win that game.

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>That said, didn't.

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Really play anybody in the non conference portion of their

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 2>schedule back and forth against Maryland. So right now against

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe the worst offense relative to winning and expectations in

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 2>America Iowa. Has Michigan impressed you much with how they've

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 2>performed against their schedule, I think so.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, you and I had a lengthy discussion

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 3>where I believe you called me a silly bitch last

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 3>week because that look, look, I just I just want

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 3>to get that on the record. We have it on

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 3>the record elsewhere. I just for the Spotify folks that

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>are here in attendance.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying you are a silly bitch. I'm saying

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 2>you were acting like I was acting. Okay, Okay, important clarifications. No,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean they look fine at Iowa. I thought they

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 2>would look a little bit better on offense, but beggar

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 2>scampy choosers.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 3>JJ McCarthy was not put in a position where he

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 3>had to go out there and win the football game

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 3>he was calling. He was composed, the game plans seem good.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Granted the defense did most of the work or didn't

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>have to do much of the.

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Work right at Spencers.

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know how you know the what the

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 3>proper construction is to label the Iowa offense and how

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 3>it performs, But you know, the defense did its job,

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 3>kept that one relatively low scoring on the Iowa side,

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 3>as most defenses do. And JJ McCarthy was good, played

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 3>within himself. I do think there was a part of

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 3>me wanting more from the Michigan offense, and I am

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 3>curious to see as they get into some better games,

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 3>name Lee, Penn State, and Ohio State, if it's something

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>that comes back to bite them.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going to say they don't impress me much.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 2>And it's not because of anything they've specifically done. It's

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 2>there's something that it's just looking at their schedule. So

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 2>you beat that non conference schedule, so you beat Iowa

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 2>with somehow the worst Iowa offense in history. You know,

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>worse than some other pretty notable ones beating Mary and

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 2>by you know, seven points or whatever. I'm going to say,

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>what Michigan has done has not impressed me much. I

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>think they are impressive, if that makes any sense, But

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 2>their accomplishments don't impress me much.

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>How about that?

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, we've got a comment here in the

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 3>chat that Michigan has handled business at every turn. There

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 3>are countless examples of good teams letting bad ones hang

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 3>around this year. That's true, and I think that in

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 3>and of itself is grounds to be impressed. I think,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 3>look my takeaway after the Iowa game, and I said

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>this on a radio show that I did with some

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 3>folks back home.

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I could see Michigan being vulnerable.

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I can see I can see a world in which

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 3>there's defense that can truly hold down JJ McCarthy confuse

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>him that you're left wanting that extra gear for your.

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Remembering is it in a big game?

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 3>That being said, yeah, they're undefeated. That being said, they've

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 3>taken care of business, as our comments are said, at

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 3>every turn. And so it's hard to not be impressed

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>by Michigan. That doesn't mean that I don't have questions,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 3>it's about you know what it looks like the rest

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 3>of the way.

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>So basically what you're saying, and if I may put

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 2>words in your mouth, Penn State or Illinois before Ohio State,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Penn State or Illinois. As for who that team is

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 2>when you say eventually there will be a defense, who X,

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Y and Z. Illinois defense has been very good against

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of teams, and Penn State has looked

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>at times strong on offense, Auburn game, at times strong

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 2>on defense, Northwestern game.

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I mean per the sp plus.

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there are three top ten defenses remaining on Michigan

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 3>schedule in the form of Penn State, Ohio State, and

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 3>I cannot believe we're saying Illinois but Illinois.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 2>We're on the Walters wagon here at the solid verbal Yeah.

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So all right, so not impressed.

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 3>I am next team, by the way, at the answers Illinois,

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Illinois look ahead spot Brett bi Illema, big ten weird,

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Iowa tattoo.

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying right now, there's something about that game

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 2>that should be very scary to Michigan fans. I'm on

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the record right now, and if Michigan blows out Illinois.

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I was never on the record.

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>You're making this okay? Oh ex so bitch, the USC Trojans,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Men of Troy. Do they impress you much?

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Another team who is undefeated, who has taken care of

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>business at every turn. Now, there are some underlying reasons

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 2>to say, I don't know if this is a sustainable

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 2>way of winning. Some close scores at halftime, a lot

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 2>of turnovers, which again, if you can turn a team over,

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you should, and that's what good teams do.

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you impressed by USC.

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Or USC's accomplishments or however you're interpreting that question, you

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and Shania, me and Shania.

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 3>If only because I said I am impressed by all

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 3>the other teams and half impressed by Texas, I will

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 3>say no on USC, okay, for a couple of reasons.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 3>First off, the defense. The questions about defense persist. It

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 3>doesn't go anywhere, right, it's still giving up points. Yeah,

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 3>you can score on USC. You can push them around

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 3>up front, you know, Like I actually think this week

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 3>against Washington State it's going to be an interesting go

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 3>buy for US because I don't think's got the best offense,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 3>but he's got interesting players on offense who could make

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 3>some magic against USC.

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So from the defensive side of the ball, no, I'm not.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Offensively, they were always going to be really good with

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the players that they've had, and so it's hard to

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 3>impress me on offense because I set a very high

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>bar before the season, right, So I think on the

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 3>overall sentiment side, I would say, no.

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 4>That don't impress the name.

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 3>No, No, I mean they're turning the ball over like

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 3>crazy in a good way, right.

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>The defense is turning opposing off The.

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Defense is having a lot of success when it comes

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 3>to turning the ball over or getting turnovers, and that

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 3>in and of itself is really really good for you know,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 3>your prospects of winning. It's going to bode well for them.

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that's sustainable. Oftentimes it is not,

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 3>but that part of their defense has been good. But

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 3>they're still giving up a lot of points, still giving

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 3>up yards.

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 3>In order for them, I think to really be taken

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 3>seriously as like a true contender in this thing and

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 3>not just a really good offense with a lot of

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.479
<v Speaker 3>nil money. Sure, you got to play a little bit

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 3>more defense. They could get there. By the way they

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>could get there before the end of the season. But

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 3>they're not there yet.

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if they're going to get there in

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>that specific way by the end of the year. I'm

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 2>actually going to say USC is impressive. And I go

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 2>back and forth on this, I'm going to say they're

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>impressive because what they go last year, four and eight?

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>What are they right now? I believe they're undefeated.

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 2>They're undefeated, They're five and l They struggled our offense

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 2>last year, they were injured, they had guys leaving the program,

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 2>There was discord within the locker room. There were all

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 2>sorts of issues that plagued the USC. Hire a new coach,

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 2>bring in all these players, and sure there is a

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 2>mercenary aspect to USC and the way that they've constructed

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 2>this roster.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But to throw all these players together.

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, to throw last year's Oklahoma quarterback, to throw last

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 2>year's pit wide receiver, to throw last year's Oregon running back,

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 2>all in the same locker room and expected to succeed.

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 2>They've done it immediately. Now that's on offense. Caleb Williams.

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Does he hold onto the ball too long? Perhaps?

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to cause four issues against Utah or whoever?

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>They end up playing.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>If they end up in the PAC twelve Championship game, sure,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 2>but if they're going from a program in complete disrepair

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 2>under Clay Helton to a program that looks like a

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 2>ten win program over the course of a matter of months,

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean you have to give some credit there, right,

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Even if the underlying numbers and stats are not necessarily sustainable.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It's still impressive. They'll blow it.

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's Notre Dame in Utah. Oh right, you

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 2>know they'll blow it. Yeah, but it's year one now.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I know their expectations, given the high profile nature of

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>the hire and bringing in Caleb Williams and Mario Williams

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and Jordan Att all these guys, but certainly winning is

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 2>better than losing. It is so that impresses me that

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 2>throwing in all of those pieces and ending up with

0:18:57.880 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the zero in the lost column, I'm impressed.

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, Sam urges a little bit of patience in saying

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 3>that we should wait to December to truly judge where

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 3>all things are on the US. See Alexander in the

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 3>chat saying Caleb Williams is impressive. Yeah, I would agree,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 3>because Caleb Williams is really, really good, certified dude, I

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 3>would encourage folks, if you are ever so inclined, send

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 3>in your speaker requests now, if you've got something to

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 3>say on this matter, or if you've got picks that

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 3>you want to give us as part of ty versus

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the world. What we're going to do here in just

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. We've got a lot to cover yet.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 3>On our Week six show, I want to throw out

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Clemson to you. Okay, where do we stand on Clemson.

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm impressed.

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm impressed with Clemson because I'm willing to throw out

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>recent history with Clemson. I'm willing to throw things out.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>They're winning games, they're beat up on defense, their corners

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 2>gave up a ton against Wake Forest. I'm not going

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 2>to say I'm impressed necessarily with the results. I think

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm impressed with finding different ways to win, to beat

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 2>NC State like they did back and forth early on.

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 2>The defense, tightened up the offensive game plan I think

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>was pretty sound. I don't think Clemson is on the

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 2>level of Alabama, Georgia, Ohio State. I think they're a

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 2>tier a tier and a half below. But I think

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 2>all things considered, it could have been a worse start.

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 2>They could have lost to Wake, they could have lost

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>to NC State, they could have played and I know

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 2>they were pretty close to Georgia Tech early on, which

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>is not necessarily the best result, but that was Week

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>one whatever.

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to throw out a lot of that.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not impressed with the five star rating that was

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 2>attached to DJU coming out of high school, but again,

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not really his fault necessarily. I think they're winning

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 2>in spite of the coordinators leaving and all that kind

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 2>of stuff. I'm going to say they impressed me, but

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily within the context of Clemson fan expectations.

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I'm not impressed with wide receiving core no,

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 3>but I'm pretty much impressed with everything else. And I

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 3>think you're right to point out DJU five star. But

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 3>DJU has been a lot better this year.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>He has been.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 3>Dju is not turning the ball over the way he

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 3>did a year ago. He's got an eleven to one

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 3>touchdown to interception ratio, sixty five percent of his passes

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 3>are completed. Will Shipley when they use him as doing

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 3>an effective job, I think they're doing a good enough job.

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 3>I like what they're doing with DJU. By the way,

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 3>in the running game, I like that we're seeing a

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 3>little bit more designed runs for him. He's not going

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 3>to blow anybody away with his speed, but he's a

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.959
<v Speaker 3>big dude. He's big dude to bully over. He can

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 3>get those hard yards and I think that's really important.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 3>So I think they're kind of growing into this thing

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 3>as they go with new coordinators and some new faces

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 3>across the board there. For Clemson, defensively, they're stout. They're

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 3>not as good as I think we thought they might be.

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Like we gave the stat out about a week ago,

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 3>how they're not necessarily generating the pressure right, and they're

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 3>also giving up a lot in the intermediate passing game,

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 3>like you're just very good at doing whatever it is

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 3>that they do, but they're not necessarily a havoc team. Yeah,

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 3>So I think that makes them impressive across the board.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 3>I think they are getting better, and that's what impresses

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 3>me the most about the Tigers, the fact that there

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>is still room to grow here.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 3>The schedule, I mean, look, there's not a whole lot

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 3>of teams on here that really frighten me. I think

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Clemson's probably better than most of these teams. I also

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 3>don't think Clemson is impregnable. I think one of these teams,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 3>whether it's at Notre Dame or you know, a weird

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 3>game at Florida State in a couple of weeks, like

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I could see that being an interesting scenario for Clemson

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 3>where you know, maybe things don't go their way and

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 3>suddenly they're trailing late in the game.

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think generally I'm pretty impressed by this team.

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Could I jump in real quick, awesome use of impregnable,

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 2>like you absolutely nailed it.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 2>I had to look it up to make sure that

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you didn't talk about somebody not being able to get

0:22:58.400 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 2>pregnant or.

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 3>WYDI we're talking about buffs that would be impregnate.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 2>That's I understand what you're saying. But I'm just saying, credit,

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 2>where credits? Do you absolutely nail that?

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thank you, thank you.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 3>M