WEBVTT - 2019 Week 12 Preview

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, the Pro Bowl Vote is here and awesome

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl starts with awesome players, and your vote help

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>decides who gets a spot on the a f C

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and NFC rosters. So show your love, cast your vote,

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and make sure your favorite players make it to the

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl. Vote today and be entered to win exclusive

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>prizes at NFL dot com slash Pro Bowl Vote. Be

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Around the NFL Podcast Doesn't Know about fantasy Football. Welcome

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.639
<v Speaker 1>to another edition of the Around the NFL Podcast, presented

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>by the United States Marine Or. My name is Dan

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Hands as I'm joined in a room filled with heroes,

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark Sessler, Chris Westling, and Greg Rosenthal. What is up? Boys? Hey?

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's be real about something. What most of

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.319
<v Speaker 1>us have stepped off the idea of playing fantasy football? Right?

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't play it. But if you just dropped any

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>one of us, and I'm not trying to be a

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>braggart here into a group of civilians and gave us

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>time to prepare, draft and and work on a fantasy

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>team week to week, we would incinerate individuals. That's how

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel. It doesn't feel it isn't. I'll tell you one,

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'll tell you one thing that you're showing, uh

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a lack of understanding of I will have a follow

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>up to that comment. Um, you are still completely, on

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>some level vulnerable to things that you cannot control, even

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>if you have a great draft, like, for instance, I'll

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>use my own team this year where I am buried

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the standings, where I drafted Ben Roethlisberger and Juju

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Smith Schuster and uh t y Hilton and x y Z.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, sometimes things don't work out. You know,

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz made perfect sense as a draft pick for me.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>My I'm just I never talked about your fantasy team,

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but in this case, I'm honey. You know that you

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>could pick a great team in August and you could

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>supplement it with pickups during the year, but it could

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>really haunt you where you can't have a dominant team

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that you and I are different. The last time I participated,

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I dropped an absolute mega ton bomb on nine other

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>haughty individuals who thought that they were all that I

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>played under the guise of my wife's identity and absolutely

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>obliterated the competition. That was five years ago. I've not

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>touched it since. I was gonna say do it again. Well, no,

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>because then my then my theory would be blown to bits.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd come in seventh place. I don't actually think it.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Almost always I'm in the playoffs in competitive and that

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is obviously the help because of all the NFL work

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we do. But you're not. You're not involved, invulnerable, You're

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>just not. I would I you know when I when

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we did Fantasy West, but we would often say or

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I would at least, you know, the most important equation,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of fantasy is luck. It's just like gambling,

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Like sixty seventy of it is luck and the really

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>good players you work on that other thirty percent, which

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>over time gives you a pretty significant, you know, advantage.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>But in any one given season, forget about. Luck is

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>mostly the thing. Also, one other thing we learned is

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that fantasy football analysts aren't really great at fantasy football,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>not all of them. Some are, some are good, some

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>are bad. You can you can join an expert league

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>and win right away if you're good at fantasy football. UM.

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Can't wait for the hate tweets to roll in on

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this one. Wait, but I thought you just said it's

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a luck No, that's I think it's like I'm just

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>saying that this camp over here is sort of standing

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that you draft Big Ben. Well, no,

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Big Jen is not someone I draft to begin with.

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's start right there. What are you up to yesterday?

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Fired out of a cannon right now? I don't know.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, it's gonna be an interesting show With Mark Sessler.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>We are at week twelve. The preview show. Tonight, Wes

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and Greg will be handling Thursday night football recap called Texans.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>After that we just did before we started to a

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>lovely interview with Cynthia Freeland, the analytics expert UH and UM,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, star of many NFL media programs, both on

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the network and digital side. So we had a nice

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>talk with her about how UM she's built her career

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and also how she uses her model as it's called

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>UH to figure out what's going on in a league

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that's often difficult to figure out. I feel like it

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>was one of those, you know, Marvel movie or some

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing where you introduce a new character to

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the audience. Has got like a guest role today, but

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's a promise of future appearances to come.

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>It's like, here's here's Cynthia Freeland you guys are gonna

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>get used to her. Now get ready for her model

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and her computer to take over your life at some point.

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Skynet baby, That's that's what um alright. So, as we

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>always do, it's a draft, it's a snake draft, and Greg,

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you have the first overall pick. Uh this week we

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.239
<v Speaker 1>have we have a thirteen games to get to. Uh,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>so let's do it. M hmmm, fourteen games. Excuse me?

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I really wish I had, uh, you know, known that

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>going in. No. UM, let's common theme here, like, let's

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>go Seahawks Eagles ten am on Sunday, that first big

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>slate of games. Want to make sure I'm watching a

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>fun one, and I'm fascinated to see this Seahawks team

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 1>coming off of by and an Eagles team that you

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>know desperately needs a win. And if they don't have

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Lane Johnson, who has missed practiced now for the first

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>uh two days of this week, which usually is a

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad side if you're coming off a concussion. I

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>do worry about them because to me, that was their

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>identity running the ball on the right side of their

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, you know, turning into a run first team,

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think it is the worst strategy against

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks defense, which has been having some holes. If

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>he's out that that's where Jenevan Clowney's gonna be lining

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of the time. He'll be on both sides.

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Jason Peters isn't a hundred percent either, and Clowney as

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>after that performance, they just he's turned into one of

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the most fascinating players in the league to watch snap

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to snap. Oh yeah, I don't know about this Eagles offense's.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Is this the worst wide receiver corps in the league.

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I think when they're banged up. Yes, they have the

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>second most drops and we heard Romo last week called

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders special, called him outstanding. Why are they not

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>making him the focal point of this offense? If the

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>receivers are so bad and he's so good, it's a

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>good question. I mean, I I feel like the Eagles

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>right now. They do have the Dolphins, Giants and Redskins

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>after this game, But if you want to be taken

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>seriously in the NFC at home, I need to see

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>them put up a fight because they have been one

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of the more lackluster dullard teams. And I totally agree

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that Clowney in a season of trades that have worked

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for good teams like Minka Fitzpatrick, Marcus Peters, Laramie Tunsil Clowne.

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>He's right at the top of the list with those

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>guys because he has fit right into a Seahawks defense

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that is not great at all by but they've got

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>some players that have been They got some pass rush

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>going against the Niners last week. I just trust this

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>team to go anywhere in the country and be there

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter and win. And I think they're

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna take care of the Eagles. I mean they If

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Seahawks fan, I'm so excited about that performance

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>defensively because that was their best defensive game of the season,

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and so can that carry over Because if this defense

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>turns into a Peak Carroll type defense, which is at

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>least closer to being a top ten defense, then watch out.

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>This team has a really good chance to win a

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. And one of the things that was different

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that week was their addition of Quandary Diggs, who had

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a great game. And now their safety position, which has

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>been a problem for much of the year, maybe is

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>solidified with quadri Digs and McDougald together, who is now

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>healthy again, and it's like, Okay, you're starting to fix

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the problems you had. But they the the

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>defense worth talking about this game is Philadelphia's, which is

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the best in the NFL over the last three weeks,

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>enforcing punts consistently. Almost every possession, they're forcing punts. This

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>defense has been turned around, and I really think they're

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna lose two games in a row at home.

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I really I like the Eagles in this interesting way

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that is that's very interesting. I mean, what do you

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>see Because you could make this statement and you were

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>just saying Eagles one point favorites. I think you were

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>just saying that the uh, the wide receiver groups as

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>bad as you get the feeling that this offense might

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>be a little busted. I worry about their ability to

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>score points against the Seahawks, and really anybody at this

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>stage I agree. I think it'll be a low scoring game.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the Eagles defense is the best

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>unit in this game. Every week Carson Wentz gets the

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>ball at the end of the game, and that it's

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>become like a trope in Philadelphia. Now, it's like, well,

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>here's Carson Wentz's chance to make a signature drive, like

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he needs that signature drive, like we need that holds

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>onto the brake, and they haven't. They haven't had that moment.

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the Seahawks, like every week is the signature drive.

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't know how to do anything but win close

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>games in the fourth quarter. That's all they do. I

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>just say conversely, the Seahawks, who keep losing tight ends,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for instance, turned Jacob Hollister in to a star player

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>over the cause. I feel like Dan could go into

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks offense and put up an eight line without

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>any issues. And then you know, Josh Gordon showed up

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of that Niners game and could be

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a factor for that team. They're adding these players at

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the right time. I I trust the Seahawks until they

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>show me that they should not be trust. Tyler Lockett

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is uncertain for this game. Pete Carroll believes he will play,

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>but Pete Carroll has been overly optimistic about players before.

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>He didn't practice Wednesday. That's huge because, as West mentioned,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it is a different Eagles defense since they've gotten Jurnagain back,

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>they're better upfront, and then Ronald their cornerbacks are healthy,

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Mills and Darby and Darby especially played really well last

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>week against the Patriots. Alright, uh, I thought about locking

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>up the Seahawks. There, go for it. Kind of talk

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>me out of it. I should do it together. I mean,

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>don't listen. No, they were on different sides of the defenser.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't listen to the guy that's four and seven. Let

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>letting you talk. I'm gonna six game streak. Mark. What

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>about the idea that the Eagles, even though they've been

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of on and off this season, they have a

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>couple like out of nowhere big wins at Green Bay

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>at Buffalo as another one coming. I I said that

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles would open six and oh, and I thought

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>they were the most complete team in the NFC, and

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they just have been very underwhelming. I think that they're

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>unpredictable and untrustworthy. It's a it's a weird lock. But

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if you and I went down Seahawks lock Boulevard, the

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing I say is, I just don't care if

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks are on the road. I don't care if

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you put them in the middle of Russia. Out. Let's

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>lock it up. Let's double lock up. There another double

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>lock that. I feel like that is becoming a theme

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of the season, and it's nice. I think it's a

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>nice thing. We're gonna win, all right, Next up, West,

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>you have the second overall pick, West, who every time

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>he would play in an expert league would come out

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with a W every time. First and the title. It's

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna a lot of part of fantasy. I'm gonna let

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that stand as the narrative because it's true. So, yes,

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we we got those those flat screens West from that

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I won, the league, got a flat screen. West took

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>over the spot. The road spot got a flat screen.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Still have it? You got the hardware, You're winning prizes,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>expensive valuable prizes. What do you get for winning it

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>every year? Or winning it once? They won? You just

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>had to keep passing it along the line to new

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>road to World people because the road World people kept

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>winning it. No, it was not a violation of company

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>policy at road World where they didn't have rules. All right, West,

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you're up. I'm a little flam mixed, a little non

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>plushed by Greg bypassing cowboys at Patriots. And the only

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>explanation I have for it is that he's afraid of

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the cowboys. And does not want to watch the Patriots

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>losing this game. You gotta learn how this game works,

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the picking the There's only two games in the afternoon,

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so it does. I'm gonna be watching it regardless. That's

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>how you know. You gotta play the game in good

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>faith though. That's all Okay, no, no, no, I'm saying

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it is. Just My point is there's a way to tritchy.

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure I have the ten am

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>games that I want because ultimately I'll work it that

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm covering this game. I miss red, Greg. He has

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confidence in his quarterback, who has a

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>lower touchdown to interception ratio and passer rating than Mitchell

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Trabiskie and Mason Rudolph over the last seven games. Seven games.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That is quite a sample size, Greg Rosenthal, and I

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think Brady is the problem. I think he's playing fine.

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's everything else around him. Last last week,

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he was part of the problem. But that

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>would be the first time I thought that all year

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that I think he had a really poor I think

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>weather played more into that than we could see on TV,

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and I was I was thinking, Okay, this week, you know,

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe you get healthier, you do get Isaiah win back.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be activated left tackle. Uh yeah, Isaiah

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Munus And that's fine. It's not really the past protection

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that's totally killed them. It's the running game. And to me,

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Burkehead is not an asset, and they need to get

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle going because he's the only one that can

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>make people miss maybe on a running down, but the line.

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, your boy, Dante Scarnecki is having a tough

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>year with some of these injuries that they've had, and

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been able to overcome it. In theory, this

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>should be a matchup. Maybe you can run the ball

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. If I'm the Cowboys, I would be

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a little concerned that I saw both Scarborough and Jeff

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>drisk Will be able to run it so well, especially

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Scarborough in the red zone. And I think what Tom

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Brady said about wanting to play to their defense, you

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:28.719
<v Speaker 1>need to have a running game for that. I mean

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you need if you want to have some longer drives

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>like they are to one dimensional. I'm not saying that's

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>everything they've gotten by with this. Okay running games over

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the years, but their thirtieth in the league and yards

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>per carry and it's just it's hard to watch that

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they can't survive these second and eleven's third in in

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in Nines because they don't have guys on the outside

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>who can catch and fillip their setser and Mohammed Sanu

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>hurt his ankle that looked like a pretty serious ankle injury.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I do not expect him to play multiple I mean,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you're right, the Patriot, it's and you've been harping on

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this and I just naturally, because of we've been watching

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>New England do this forever. I just expended expecting to

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>round out and get through whatever known on paper issues

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 1>they have. But their last four games on the ground

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy four, seventy nine, seventy four and seventy four yards,

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and it looks that way they they even the past,

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have been able at this time of year to start

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to pound on teams with a hundred and sixty a

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty two hundred yard performances where they dominate

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the time of possession, they dominate the clock, and I

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's obviously led to some of Tom Brady's issues.

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we can always point to Tom Brady

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is the guy unlike Peyton Manning back in the early

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousands that had no talent around him and still

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>made it work. You get to a point where they

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>their roster and their injuries and the depletion around him

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is is gonna put too much pressure on him to

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>make plays that he's not making right now. Statistically, I

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>think they can still turn it around though. And this yeah,

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if the Cowboys are an easy matchup

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>or hard matchup on paper. You know there there, Look,

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>they look pretty good up front to me. They certainly

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of talent. Defensively, it's really on their defense.

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots are fighting ways to win games. I do

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think they can get better offensively, but their defense, who

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we've talked a lot about this year, They're gonna be

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>tested here in the span of five weeks, they play

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens, the Cowboys in the Chiefs. For my money,

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>those are the three best offenses in the league. Kyle

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Vannoy is their best player up front, which is wild on.

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>On a defense this good, they're gonna have to find

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a way to get pressure on Dak Prescott because there's

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just so many weapons. I I always trust offense in

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, not defense. That's why I don't I don't

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>feel great about this game, at least not them as

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a heavy favorite. If you figure what Belichick usually does,

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine he puts Gilmore on Gallop and double

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>teams of Marie Cooper and then says, beat me with

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb and Jason Witten. Sounds that sounds about right. Well,

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Zeke Elliott might beat you because you're getting up like

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>five point two yards per carry. I think that is

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>probably the risk they would take. You gotta try to

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>stop this Cowboys passing attack. And I'm not saying Zeke

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>looks bad, but he led the NFL and yards per

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>game in his first season, is a rookie as a

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in his second season and in his third season, and

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>he's nowhere nearer that this season. Second level, they're not

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>as good a running team. They're they're a good running team.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>They're fine, but they're not what they used to be.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And the Patriots at home, they have four held teams

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to fourteen points or fewer in seventh straight and it's

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that is legite not going to happen. I'm not sure.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I'm with you that this is a

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>tougher matchup the most. But what they've done to quarterbacks

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns to nineteen picks this season, and their defense

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is not the defense earlier in the year that was

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>scoring points left and right. But I love the matchup

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of Kellen Moore verse, not Bill Belichick, but Kellen Moore

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>versus Steve Belichick. This is the future of the NFL

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>coming at us right, more vers there you go more

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Verse the moment, perhaps it's perhaps it's an injury, but

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>why are we in week twelve and Zeke Elliott is

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>still not Why is he not making people miss? Like?

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>What what's changed right now? I don't know. That's a

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>good question. I don't think he looks as explosive. I

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>also think some of those linemen are not blocking a

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>ty Tyrant Smith find as a pass blocker according to

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ProFootball Focus, not having a good run blocking, and he's

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>not healthy either. Trey Flowers really beat him pretty good

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>last week. And Lyle Collins is questionable for this game,

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>which I think is big for the Cowboys. Yeah, last week,

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 1>watching the game, I thought you gotta keep Pollard in

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there because you can do a few things that Zeke can't,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely including make people miss that easily in the open field.

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>That is a great backfield, But you gotta keep Pollard

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in the mix. That see money right now. That had

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the takeaways from last week's Cowboys game,

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>as Pollard is underutilized. Moving on, I am going to

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>go with a game in the NFC South, a Dirt

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Knapp game for one team. They gotta win the game,

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's a really tough assignment because they got the Saints.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's the Panthers and Saints, um matchup between were

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>the best young running backs in the league. Oh, that

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>was the other mistake I made. You know, in hindsight

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a mistake, but picking third, I took Alvin Kamara,

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>picking fourth Christian McCaffrey. One guy has a high ankle sprain,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do anything all year. The other guy can't. Can't

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>beat yourself up for that one. If you got the

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara of last week starting a week one till now,

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>it would have been exactly He's back for the money

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>time of the fantasy season. Um. Anyway, so you got

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Kamara versus McCaffrey. The problem, I guess is Drew Brees

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is against Kyle Allen. If you're a Panthers fan, and

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen is coming off um a game where he

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>was not competitive. It was a twenty nine three loss

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Falcons. And I know Atlanta's revitalized on defense magically,

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>almost suspiciously over the last two weeks. But you you

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>wonder if if Kyle Allen this version, this slumping version

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of Kyle and Allen. Remember it wasn't so long ago

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>we saw him in London. They had won five of six.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>He little juice to him. Maybe he wasn't, you know,

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>playing extremely well, but he was part of a winning team.

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Do they have it in them to go to the

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Superdome and keep their season alive against the Saints? Team

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>eight and two got back on track a little bit

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, uh in Tampa thanks to Jamis Winston a

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of help from him in that game. UH So,

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this could be a good game because one

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>team is very desperate. Uh And we'll see how it

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>plays out. I don't think they can the Panthers, to

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>answer your question, because the Saints are superior in the ways, uh,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like on the offensive line and the toughness of their

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>defense and even rushing the passer. I would say that

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers used to be better than the Saints. These

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>two teams have played a lot of good games over

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the years. They played in the playoffs a few years ago,

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and that was the Panther's edge was they were a

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>little tougher, they could protect pretty well. And now it's

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. To me that Okay, Breeze throws those sideline

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>creepers that uh that West said, and I gotta I

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>gotta give West credit because there were a couple last

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>week that back to back outs that he threw to

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the opposite halts that you were like, oh wow, I

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>mean that was interesting. Uh. And they didn't try anything

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>like that the rest of we But it sort of

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. They they have turned the ball over less

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>than any team in the league. They have a great

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. They now got Kamara running in full flow.

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a very complete team. I'm not that worried about

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>breeze arm strength because I think it's just a really

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>good team so much more completely. I throw in Jared Cooked.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Two looked healthy and athletic last week and they needed

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they needed that. And you know, they've gone through this

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>stretch with a with Kamara not at full strength, without

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook without Drew Brees. They're getting healthy at the

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>right time. And they when they went up twenty nothing

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Bucks last week. I mean, there's a lot

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of Tampa Bay issues going on there, but to me,

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I that was the Saints team I've been waiting to

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>see all year and you have. I don't if Carolina

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>wins this and you're I think teams are getting more

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and more tape on the quarterback there, and and that's

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>different than when he was making his second or third start.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>They're learning about how to get to him and how

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>to deal with You know, if you're Christian McCaffrey is

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.479
<v Speaker 1>their entire offense, and if you can if you can

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>keep that in check, you're good. I don't want to

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>see any more Curtis Samuel breakout articles next offseason. I'm

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>done with the Curtis Samuel break out. How come d J.

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Moore can get a hundred yards every week with Kyle

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Allen at quarterback, but Curtis Samuel hasn't gotten a hundred

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>yards in a game all season. Well, mars a more complete,

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>solid receiver. He's the guy that you know, Steve Smith said,

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of me. Uh and he's I don't know

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>if he's a top ten in the NFL receiver at

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>any point, but he's a really good about runner and

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>a solid starting receiver. He makes more sense to me

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as a true number one type of guy for them,

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>And and David Tepper says he doesn't want to do

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>with mediocrity. This isn't mediocrity there five and five, But

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they're twenty seven in d v O A. They're down

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>there with the dregs of the league. It's not a

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>special defense. And to you know, to defend Allen a

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit, it's like Greg Little. They put back in

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the lineup last week and left tackle and he just

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>got destroyed. I think They're line has struggled, and sometimes

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that is partly on the quarterback, Like I think Donald's

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>ruggles some of this year at least like a little

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>bit on because when you're that young, you're not used

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to being able to set protections and do all these

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things that a veteran like Cam Newton could do,

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and you don't. You just don't even expect a second

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>year guy like Alan or Donald to be experts at

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>doing at this point, Uh, did we fork the Panthers

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>on two yeah with with without looking back, no no concerns.

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>They go and Mark, you're up all right? Well, uh,

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna just say this and you can disagree with me.

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>This slate of games this week is I feel like

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the first time we've hit a point where there is

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.719
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of hotness to choose from. Some of

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>these are matchups between two teams. All the good ones

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>are in the prime time games are great. I think

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>there's some time there are five great games for once,

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but that means that there's a lot of well they've

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.239
<v Speaker 1>been picked at this point. So I I'm gonna go

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>where my heart is, and it's you know, we talked

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>about another team right on the edge of existence and

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially close to extension extinction if they don't make it happy,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and is the Browns at home against Miami, and I

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what I want to see is how they respond to

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously a Steelers game full of tumult full of chaos,

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and what came out of it was the tipping point.

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And I've expected this in many ways, and it's not everyone,

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>but for those who wanted to just finally unleash on

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the Browns experience of this season for multiple reasons. The

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Miles Garrett scenario at the end of Thursday Night Football,

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>which was a total circus, gave you full right to

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>because this is a team that the B line and

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>I look at the Dolphins and the Browns is very

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>different in a couple of ways. The Dolphins, you can

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>look at them the first couple of months and say

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>they were an absolute mess. You look at the last month.

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>They are disciplined. The Browns are not disciplined. The Dolphins

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>do not kill themselves with penalties. The Browns have been

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>doing that up until a couple of weeks ago. I

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I truly wonder who the better coach in this game

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>is because what I'm seeing week to week and having

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>tracked the Dolphins, you know, just out of curiosity, is

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 1>that Brian Flores is one thing they can build on

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>now that can change by next season. I just believe

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in that coach and Freddie Kitchen's week after week in game,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe has been outdueled and their defense was dominant

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>against a bad quarterback Mason Rudolph and again at Pittsburgh

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>last week. What they had to do in this one

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is make up for the fact that you lost in

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the course of three hours, Miles Garrett, Larry Ogunjobi your safety,

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Burnett and I realized this player is not valuable,

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and they made the decision on their own. But depth

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of wide receiver in Antonio callaway. You've lost three core

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>defenders who were starters and major contributors. Myles Garrett had

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a higher pressure rate than basically anyone in the league.

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I was doing more for Cleveland than almost any defensive

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>player is doing for their own team. At this point,

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he is a huge unmask double loss. And at this

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>point you just take Nick Chubb and say we're gonna

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>run you and use Kareem Hunt the wave in using him,

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and you attack Miami from start to finish on the ground.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>That's my guests, and I think it's gonna be a

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>closer game than anyone in Cleveland would want, and they

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>will take care of business. But they're not gonna win

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>games and blowouts. They're just not gonna do it. If

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>we lowered the bar of the Texans when J. J.

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Watt went out, I feel like it's fair to do

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with the Browns. How important Garrett is

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to that defense, I'd say even more so, though, But

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not this game. The Dolphins have an XFL caliber

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, they are brutal, they are terrible, and all

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>those players you mentioned the Browns missing, so now they're

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>only five times as talented as as the Dolphins, and

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they've not been living up to their drive. That's my

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>issue with Cleveland. I don't care about the talent, they've

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not lived up to it outside of the running backs.

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>But I understand what Mark saying, because if you have

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Garrett and Ogan job, this is a game that because

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of that defensive line, and because Fitzpatrick, even when it's

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>going well, has to overcome so much. That's why I

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>think he's really just played outstanding this year, even a

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>game like last week. I mean, he this year is

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a feather in his kid. He did what he could.

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You would just think the Browns would dominate it so much,

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like they did against Pittsburgh. Then it almost

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter what happens on offense, they'll get enough. Whereas

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>now you're missing a couple of pieces. Could Fitzpatrick make

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>up the plays and and make this one uncomfortable? I

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I respect Floris enough to think it can. He's he's

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't found many players to to hold onto for

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>next year. But one of them that he has his

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Nick need Him, an undrafted free agent rookie who since

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Week seven is tied for the number one cornerback in

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the NFL in Pro Football focuses ratings, And so how

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>about the need Him Beckham matchup? That would be big time.

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>One of them is not Calin Balage. I watched him,

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and I want a refund. I want to watch a

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>real running back. Nine carries for nine yards. I believe

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this week he has a chance to set the all

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>time record for yards per carry. No one over a

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>certain threshold, maybe it's a hundred. Uh has ever averaged

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>under two yards per carry? Which is where he is

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>at for the season, So he can make some history. Uh.

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And let's give a little credit to DeVante Parker after

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>seven different making the leaps, uh, you know offseason tropes,

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he's finally made the leap in his sixth season. I

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>believe Mark Walton was a big loss in their backfield

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>when he's been did well. They needed to after what

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>happened last week. And then yeah that he had a

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence incident that he was connected to which led

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to his release. And I'm just seeing four hours ago

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>posted on TMZ nfls Mark Walton bizarrely skips and sprints

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>out of jail after battery arrests. So, uh, that's no

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>something's going on there. And to be clear, we're taping

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this before we know the appeal. Uh answer on Ogan

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Job and Garrett, which the league plans to put down

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>or notify everyone before this game, so they'll probably have

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>an answer for it on Friday. Maybe there's a chance

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>oken Job plays. By the way, I think I thought

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>open Jovis was held up, but they are waiting still.

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>On Miles Garrett, I have been I am corrected. Let's

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>do a little breaking news. As we were taping Myles Garrett,

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>it's indefinite band has been upheld and Markue's pouncey of

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers had his reduced to two games. So little date.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>There you go, Uh, Mark, let's go through it. They

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have six games to play, they've won two in a row. There,

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>four and six. Just give me win or loss? You ready,

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>home Miami at Pittsburgh. That game is gonna be crazy.

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Um loss? Okay? Five and seven home Cincinnati? Oh yeah,

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>six and seven at Arizona win. I don't feel great

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>about even in seven home Baltimore loss, seven and eight?

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you going against Cincinnati on the road win? Oh? Yeah,

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so eight and eight is what you say? Yeah, I

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're a playoff team with the way that

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they've gone through this season. That's not exactly going out

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on a limb. All right, it's snakes to you. Where

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>do I claim? Right? Just what I see? Uh wow?

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>In another just a corner copy of excitement to pick

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>from here. But I'm gonna do this and I'm gonna

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>take the late Jacksonville at Tennessee game out and now

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm good. Yeah, you guys are critical

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of my uh four pm? Anyways, go ahead, No, I mean,

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I hope that didn't step on your toes with that pick.

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But I'm interested in this, and you know this is

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>low hanging fruit. But I want to see Nick Foles

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh him progressing. You know, I thought about one

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>thing is that to go through what Nick Foles went through,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to suffer broken bones and come back and want everyone

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>wanting him to light it up right away and be

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl nick Foles on a team that he

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>was with the Eagles that had the greatest you know,

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>tight end duo in a while to play in the

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, and he's got nothing at that position right now.

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>They just lost Josh Oliver has been sent to I R.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>They've got nobody playing at that position, and D D.

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook is not expected. Well, he didn't practice Thursday, so

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>he could be out. So it's Fules and DJ Shark.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And what concerns me about the Jaguars is how they

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>were absolutely run over stampeded last week to run defense

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>two sixty four yards by the Colts. And now you

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>got Derrick Henry and I just trust Tennessee's I will

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>almost wanted to lock up the Titans, which I don't

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>think I've ever done on this show. But we have

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to lock a game. We do at some point you do.

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But I, I just this feels to me. If Tennessee

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to go flip flop win loss, win lost, if

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you at one point want to start to build some momentum,

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>this is where you do with with Derrick Henry and

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you get the job done. And Ryan Tannehill has been

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>more of a big play quarterback than we've really ever

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>seen from person number two in that position up the Titans. Yes,

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I I lost the lock on Titans Jaguars back in

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Week three, very different teams back then, Gardner Minshew and

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariota in a rainstorm that Jack's d had Jalen

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey back then, and although they didn't because he was

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>sitting out right, who knows. I think they really miss

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>even as much as Jalen Ramsey Telvin Smith. Uh, that's

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>part of like the read like their linebacker core has

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>been totally victimized in the running game and sometimes in

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the passing He Miles Jack is a guy who they

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>believe in as a core guy who's not having his

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>best season, and maybe it's partly because he doesn't have

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>his tag team partner Telvin Smith, he retired out of nowhere,

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>who just made so many plays in pursuit for that team.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And you're right there. Their defense just isn't it's not

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>even it's an average defense. And it's just another reminder

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to build around epic defenses because who have

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>been the most epic defenses in the last few years.

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars in seventeen, Bears in eighteen. You know, those those

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>were one time thing. It's so hard to ruin it

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>back the next right, they ran it back that as

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>good and then now they're just now, they're just back

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.959
<v Speaker 1>to kind of normal. Even when the Jaguars had Telvin

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Smith and they were the best defense in the league,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they had issues with the Titans. The eight and eight,

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>nine and seven Titans whatever they were, would go in

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and beat sweep them when they were at their best.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think that Derrick Henry is gonna be a

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>handful for this defense, which allows I believe, five point

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>three yards per carry on the season. One the reason

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Henry where Henry went off. Henry's had a good year,

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I think they lean on him now more

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>than ever. They don't even play Deon Lewis barely. And

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why I worry about Nick Foles

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>keeping up in a shootout is just Cam Robinson and

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Joan Taylor. Their two tackles are ranked fifty two and

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine out of about eighty, you know, tackles, So

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what that's also one of the worst tackle groups

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in the league. And if you wanted to make an

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>argument for Minshew, it's it's Foals getting hit last week,

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>which he did quite a bit, just kind of standing

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>there and it reminded me of that kind of trope

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>where people are always like those running quarterbacks. You know

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a risky they're gonna get hurt at some point.

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just like guys who get hit hard a lot

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>are the guys who get hurt. And it's like, now

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no rule to it, because like Tom Brady doesn't

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>get hit because he gets rid of the ball or

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he moves. Peyton Manning was good at that. The guys

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like foals who have no mobility but stand there and

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>choke some courage but then just get destroyed. I mean,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that's one way to get hit hurt too. Derrick Henry

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>feels underrated. He is since last December he leads the

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>league in rushing and touchdowns. He's also I believe set

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a free agent. Seems like a guy that

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the Titans up. There's some Leonard four Nette to his game,

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>where the script has to be to his liking in

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>order for him to dominate, and he can disappear for

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>long stretches of time. Better version than of four net

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>though he's shown. Um all right to the old Zeuser

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Raiders at Jets is my pick easy for a couple

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. Um, I do want to see the Raiders

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in a trap game once. The last time the Raiders

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have been in a trap game two two. It was

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>week fifteen of two thousand two. The Raiders were in

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the trap. No they it's been it feels like it's

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>been a minute and uh last week. That may actually

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>be the case, unless you go back to the playoff

0:33:57.640 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>year from a couple and they play the Bengals last week,

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to make a case for that. But

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a trap game and you're looking ahead to the next opponent,

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that's good. Isn't that what a trap game is? Well,

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I view a trap game, is you, Yeah, you look

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>at they would look past the Jets. I mean the

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Bengals slung around that. It's just like a game you're

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>expected to win, but this much more dangerous because the

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Jets actually have a quarterback and it's on the road. Alright,

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So here we are here, here are the Raiders. Yeah,

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>coming off a game against Cincinnati. Cincinnati gave up more

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>points than anyone in the league on a weekly basis,

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and somehow at home, the Raiders scored seventeen and squeaked

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>by UM. And I wonder what that's about, um, Because

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>as good as a story as the Raiders are are

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>they a team that could be vulnerable to I know

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they're six and four, um, but on the road against

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a Jets team that is by no means a good

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>team but has shown flashes of confidence. And they're coming

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>off back to back wins off teams that are combined

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 1>three and seventeen, So that's important to keep in mind.

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But also, um, it seems like we're starting to get

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>some actual progress on the offensive side of the ball.

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Their offensive line has been better. Ryan Khalil to two

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>big swings and missus by Joe Douglas, which I don't

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>kill him for because he kind of had to hit

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the ground running and improvised to try to find ways

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to improve the line, and neither move worked. Colletchi assembly

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't work at guard and then it led to behind

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the scenes drama about an injury and he eventually was released.

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Matt Khalil. They gave him eight million dollars, said we

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>need a veteran center to stabilize the line and also

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>work with our young quarterback. And on paper again and

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and logically it was like, oh, this is a good move,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this was a smart It was a disaster. Not only

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>was Khalil Uh not close to the player he was

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>UH with the Panthers. Apparently his his style of play

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in his the way he goes about the position. UH

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>led to some confusion and was part of the reason

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>why that line seems so out of sync is what

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing coming out of the Jets. So Jonathan Harrison

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 1>has replaced him at center. So there's some stability now

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>UH on that line, which should help again against the Raiders.

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Max Crosby as a guy to look out for it.

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>You want to talk about this the baby Raiders man

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>every week It's it sounds like a tired storyline, but

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it keeps happening every week. These guys come out and

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have big games. And Max Crosby had four sacks last week.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>He had a huge Thursday night game the week before UH.

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>In terms of pressures. UH. He is a rising guy

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and just another example of what Mike Mayock and John

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Gruden have been able to do building a young core

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. I feel like that's the difference between like

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders and the Jets is having a rookie class

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>come in on both sides of the ball and stay

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, outside of the safety, stay healthy, and contribute

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>every one of them. They what would the Raiders be

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 1>without Josh Jacobs right now? I mean they they They

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>are leaning on these guys and they're contributing. He runs

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>downhill like the field is tilted. I get more impressed

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>with him. Every week there's six and one in one

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>score games the Raiders, which means they haven't won a

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>single game all year UH by more than eight points,

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>which to me is a sign of a team that's

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, had the right schedule and has learned how

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to win close games, but is beatable, that has had

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>some good fortune. And I do think this is the

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>trap game. I picked the Jets uh in my game

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Picks column because I don't think the Raiders have much

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>of a pass rush. I think if you've got a

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>pass rush, I just don't trust this Jets offense to

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>do anything. But I don't think the Raiders really do.

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I think Crosby has been really good, but he's not

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep me up at night. He did a lot

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of his damage against one of the worst tackles in

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the league last week, and it was nice to seem

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald do Sam Donald things last week. A lot

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.919
<v Speaker 1>of beautiful throws. They got him on the move more,

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 1>they're throwing the ball short more. You know, it's less

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Robby Anderson, which is, you know, bad for him, he's

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>having a terrible free agent uh contract a year if

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>he was looking to get paid next year. Good for

0:37:57.320 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the community. But I just think it's is like a

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>coin flip game. In the Raiders luck is, uh is

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>they don't feel like a team that's gonna like win

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>every single week. It's where don't I mean, I don't

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>feel that good about typical trap game because next week

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders are at Kansas City, and think about that.

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>If they don't, if they stumble and get beat by

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, they're staring at six and six, uh potentially

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>if they don't um stage a big win on the

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>road in Kansas City. So this is a big They

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>did a nice job. They had that home stand out

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of that long, long, long road trip, and they swept

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the homestand against Lions, Chargers Bengals. But now this will

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>be a real challenge, well know, three weeks from now,

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>whether the Raiders are a team that you know could

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>make suse I would say this flip forget. On the

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>other side of the trap game is the Jets, who

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>are probably in the wrong division because they just went

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>three and one against the NFC East, But you could

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>change the vibe of a season that's gotten pretty dark

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>at times if the Jets knockout Oakland. I'm not saying

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that there are answers here or that you necessarily want

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the coach to stick around and outa casee. But if

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 1>they can pick up from here, and the Raiders have

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>been one of the teams that have given up more

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus completion yards and forty plus you can you

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can strike on them through the air. Would be a

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>three game winning and by the way, after that, they

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>go at Cincinnati whole Miami, So yes, everything changed. The

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>whole narrative around this Jet season changes. If they win

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>against Oakland's would make me lock them up like I'm

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that this week? Well oh yeah, let's I want to

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 1>see if if this game shows us exactly why Levian

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Bell did not get traded, did not get the paid

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a he thought he was gonna get because Josh Jacobs

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is so much better than him. I don't know if

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>there's a more boring running back in the league to

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>watch right now than Levion Bell. A lot of three

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>yard runs a year. There's just doesn't have a yard

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>run uh this year. I mean you're right when you

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>when you saw Billy Powell and last week you're like

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that a little extra Josh Adams gotta gotta carry and

0:39:57.719 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it was called back on penalty, but he

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>shot out of a cannon compared to Levy on Bill. Alright,

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>moving on, it is now time for Chris Wesley to

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>make a selection. I'm gonna go with the Broncos at

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the Bills. Broncos at the Bill. Fun game. It could

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>be a fun game, and the Bills might be right

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for the picking. I liked how well they played last week,

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.959
<v Speaker 1>but they are riding so high, beating a bad team

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to a pulp, talking about comparing it to a Thanksgiving feast.

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.799
<v Speaker 1>That's how much we ate out there today against the Dolphins.

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Give me a break, Bills. That's the that's the only

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>offensive line that could make your defensive line look good.

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow. And they were talking up this Tremaine Edwin's

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>speech speech and I like a second year linebacker kind

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of you know, stepping into a leadership role. But after

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the game they were talking about it like it was

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was new Rockney or something. Uh, yeah,

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you're playing the Dolphins, like if they if they beat

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. I mean, it's the best team they've beaten.

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this the best team they've beaten all year? I

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I guess they beat the Titans. The Titans

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>would be the best team they do. And I I

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>expect the Bills to win at home, but I just

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>don't think it'll be easy. I think the I think

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>these teams are much closer than their records would suggest

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>they are. I think Denver's offense. So we've all seen

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this and talked about it over the last couple of weeks.

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Their parts are starting to play the way that you

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>would have hoped with Philip Lindsay, Cortland, Sutton has been

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>awesome obviously. Noah font finally has woken up and had

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>big plays. You know, this is a tough game for

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bills and they've only crossed thirty points twice all year,

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's to the Dolphins built times, to your to

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.399
<v Speaker 1>your point right there, and you just can't trust them. Yeah,

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they had long touchdown drives last week and it's really

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the only time all season where you could count on

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>them to score touchdowns versus field goals. But the Broncos

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 1>can make this tough. I could see this being like

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to thirteen. Buffalo ekes it out, and Stephen House

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>has not exactly been an ace in the whole either.

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the aggressiveness though. Two things that the Bill's

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff did, which is just they blitz a lot more.

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>They're not getting much pass rush pressure, and you have

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>such a good veteran secondary get creative, which I think

0:41:57.600 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you can do against Brandon Allen in a in a

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad offensive line. And then more importantly, I think

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.280
<v Speaker 1>they leaned into Josh Allen's running nobility a little more elastic.

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what he does best, and he sells the hell

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>out of a fake. You know, I'm always killing Josh Allen,

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:12.439
<v Speaker 1>but man, he is one of the best that those

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>run action plays where the defense gets confused because he's

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>so great at faking it. He's very good at running.

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why they're so good in the red zone. It's like,

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what he does the best. Just lean into it.

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Let him be Cam Newton, you know, not right, label

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was creative, Like that's when they've been at their most fun,

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's when I'd be the most afraid of them

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is when they're running him as much as possible. Sixteen

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of their twenty two first downs came by his arm

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>or his legs. He was sort of a one man gang.

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, John Browne had a great game too, but

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that was Devin Singletary's worst game, I think. And he's

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>playing snaps and I think four straight weeks, which means

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore has used, like Greg said, only in short

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>yardage unsolicited advice to the Bills. They bought themselves a

0:42:57.320 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>nice little bit of rope here with the seven and

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 1>three start. Win this game, get the eight and three

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because it closes out pretty tough at Dallas home, Baltimore

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>at Pittsburgh at New England home Jets. Get yourself that

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>eighth win and give yourself a little bit of wiggle

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 1>room if things get hairy in December. I think it's

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a big week for the a f C wild Card

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>race because of that. The Bills and the Raiders both

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:19.919
<v Speaker 1>in spots where if they don't win this week where

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they're favored, then that they could really fall off the map.

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 1>And team like teams like Mars Brown's rise up. Who knows,

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:29.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Jets do it with that. We talked about

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>potentially forking the Browns. They're not dead yet. Like wait,

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I thought you just said there eight and eighth this year. Yeah,

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>but that's a month plus from now. That's not forking

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 1>them yet. And I, by the way, I could either

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 1>for either. Well, what a lucky guy I am. I've

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 1>got the best team in football still on the door.

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the Atlanta Falcons at home that I can here

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 1>about this. Well, technically we haven't gotten to it. We

0:43:56.800 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten to the first ones. That was Dan, that's

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:04.839
<v Speaker 1>on you. You just look sleepy. When I looked over

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to you. Dan immediately name drops the producer. I'm just

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 1>in the comments section. Oh, what's going on over there?

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's take a quick pause, Greg to check in

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>with the comments. This is streaming live on YouTube. Get excited. Yeah,

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>someone said I lock up Greg giving a hot take

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and then backing out of locking it up, and they

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>were correct. WHOA, what do you mean? No? I mean,

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:29.800
<v Speaker 1>how is that that's not a hot time. I'm just

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>saying they're gonna win a game. He doesn't mean you could?

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Was that? Nick Wesley also trying to get right up

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the you know they want a lock so bad. They

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 1>want a spicy lock. Here we go. How about let's

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>go down to lock up the Falcons. You know I

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was doing that the whole time. When you can lock

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>up a three and seven team, you gotta do it

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>every time. Twice on Sunday. The Falcons have a plus

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 1>sixty scoring differential since halftime of the Seahawks game to

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>half weeks ago. How about that. I don't think they'll

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily keep that up, but I do like the matchup

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>against as the fantasy heads would say, a pass funnel

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>as strong as the Bucks, which is like you've gotta

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta running. You know, great run defense, but terrible passing.

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>That's a pass funnel. Oh you want to invite Matt

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Ryan to throw the ball fifty times? I love it.

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make sure Julio Jones is playing in

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>this game. He did return to practice on Thursday. That's huge.

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>They still without Austin Hooper, which worries me, but I

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 1>do think they're just a much more complete team than

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks. Maybe they're not gonna dominate defensively the rest

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of the year, but I do think Matt Ryan and

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the offense is gonna be really good, and they're going

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>up against Jameis Winston and they'll get pressure on him.

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think the most disappointing thing as a Winston fan,

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:45.800
<v Speaker 1>based on what I thought about him as a rookie,

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>is his pocket presence. As West would put it, he

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>called him a gangly giraft back there. I thought his

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:54.959
<v Speaker 1>pocket presence was kind of one of his strengths because

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>on some place he does have that great movement where

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:00.439
<v Speaker 1>he buys time for himself. But I think as he's

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten more mature in the league, he seems more frenetic, uh,

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and that skill set has gotten worse. And I think

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna work. Mark that. I mean no disrespect.

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>You know I love you. I'm jumping out of our

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>lock and I'm jumping over to Falcons Nation. I'm I'm excited.

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I want it. I love this game for the Falcons.

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, you know what else he needs

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to be known right here? He's going for a double lock. Wait, no,

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not a thing. What needs to be remembered here,

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Not only there is the Atlanta Falcons defense. Now West

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 1>bears some people, Um, Jamison Winston is coming up on

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a very Uh, sobering century milestone. He has ninety eight

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 1>turnovers in less than five seasons. He's gonna set that

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>mark in the building where you can get a hot

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>dog and a beer for five bucks in the in

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the modern risk averse NFL, it's hard to have that

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.280
<v Speaker 1>many turnovers, uh, and not get bench. They've had endless

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.439
<v Speaker 1>um faith in Winston to turn around. He just he's

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>just so sloppy. And it's it's proven now that Bruce

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>arians as respected as he is as an offensive he

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 1>couldn't fixed him either. One of my not looking too

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:15.439
<v Speaker 1>far ahead and we're in the middle of the seas still,

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but who is gonna buy in on Jameis Winson in

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the offseason? And what will they buy in him as

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as a backup quarterback or like the guy like A

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>with a first round pick that's ultimately gonna be the guy.

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:30.839
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see him at some point with

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>like A. I don't think he's the worst starter in

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the league. He's just he's closer to that. He does

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of places. He's just they've given up twenties.

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's another record breaking day that they could have on Sunday.

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>They've given up twenty seven points in eight straight games.

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 1>They're only the third team ever to do that. They

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 1>can break the record by giving up twenty seven on Sunday.

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what reminds me the Bucks. To me, they are production,

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>not wins, points not wins. It's like you get you

0:47:57.440 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>get these big numbers years in a row, and they

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:01.760
<v Speaker 1>see to be the same thing. This year, you're getting

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>pass rush, but it's not changing the game either. Went

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to your point on Winston, his eighteen picks are the

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>second most by any player through ten games in over

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>two decades. I mean he's killing them with his blackup

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:18.439
<v Speaker 1>pocket presence with you never keep your job this long

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to be able to throw thirty interceptions. It's it's got

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a couple of different factors in place to

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 1>let it happen. And that could be where we like

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:28.839
<v Speaker 1>his tenure, unless he does get benched. Uh finally, but

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>who knows. If his tenure ends with a thirty interception season,

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be so fitting uh and the and two

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Bucks, as as bad as that is, and

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>as the idea of oh my god, we invested so

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:44.439
<v Speaker 1>much time in this guy and believe them for there's

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>no decision It's like, we're not gonna be on the

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>fence about this guy anymore. It just didn't work and

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 1>you gotta move on. You get a compensatory pick for him.

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>How about that one question, Greg about your Falcons as

0:48:56.080 --> 0:49:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of week? Do you have more confidence in their defense

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>or in an offense with no running game and no

0:49:03.560 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper. I would say the offense still because it's

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan and Julio Jones and Calvin Ridley, trust that

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 1>passing game, trust that quarter. And I never thought I'd

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>be asking that question, but but here we are. Don't

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>get them to what back out of this lock that

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 1>is due? Feel really good? I felt conflicted about that one.

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Are our lock? Mark this one? There weren't a lot

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of obvious ones on the board. I don't feel this

0:49:28.960 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't the safest one in the world. I'll agree with

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that Mark. Coming out of Sunday, people are gonna be

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:36.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about Brian Schottenheimer was getting head coach interviews after

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they wax the Eagles. All right, now we snake back.

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and um, I really did not do a

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>good job drafting. I take I take take it back, West.

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I should have just taken that Cowboys. Uh, I didn't

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>see whole that's your whole story. Yeah, I blew it

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>because I'm taking because I didn't realize I'd be owned

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>up with three ten am games and now I'm doing.

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm doing Assessler strategy and taking the worst game

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:14.240
<v Speaker 1>possible and that's Lions Redskins. And I'm sorry that Jeff

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Driscoll that I'm saying you're involved in the worst game

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>possible because you know what, You've given me a little something.

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You've made these game passes experiences without Matthew Stafford enjoyable.

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:27.240
<v Speaker 1>You made a lot of throws last week. Jeff Driscle

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>made more quality throws last week than eight, ten, twelve

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>starters out there in the NFL. So credit to him

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and Darryl Bevil And uh, I think Jeff Dristle is

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:38.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a win as a starting quarterback this week.

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Why not? You can move to ate some plays with

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>his feet. Oh, he moved the Bengals moved him the

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. At some point, he might be the most Scarborough.

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:53.240
<v Speaker 1>He might be the most athletic quarterback other than Lamar Jackson, Hawk,

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray Hawk with you know Andrew Hawkins who does

0:50:57.200 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the game to have you show with me. Bengals player,

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bead mcgost players would just like rave about drifts

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>call on the basketball court and just like everything insane

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:09.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that he was just like the best athlete on that.

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So he's the new Josh McCown. There you go. The

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Redskins have the worst home field advantage in the NFL.

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes or no, Yeah, because you can get We have

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>people telling us and tweeting and us saying that they're

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>getting into the game for like thirty bucks. This is

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a you know, in whatever. But the Redskins feel like

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>an operation that almost needs to be taken over by

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the Commissioner's office at this point. The same way, wasn't

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that a Milwaukee Brewers thing that happened way back when

0:51:32.680 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in baseball? Uh No, he was just the owner. He was, Yeah,

0:51:36.120 --> 0:51:39.720
<v Speaker 1>well that was weird too, and finding nothing about baseball.

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:41.799
<v Speaker 1>But they've done it, and I think they've done it

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in all the major sports at one time or another.

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:46.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a crisis bubbling up in so many different ways

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:48.719
<v Speaker 1>on the field, off the field, in terms of a

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>great fan base that's been left by the side of

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the road like a dead corpse. I mean, come on,

0:51:53.239 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I would like to make a an apology to the

0:51:57.760 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Lions and their fans my theory that the line should

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:04.239
<v Speaker 1>be flexed out of Thanksgiving. People do not like that.

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:09.240
<v Speaker 1>It's unfair. Dave Feldman, uh, big social shadowy league figure

0:52:09.680 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 1>here um and fellow Peloton rider. He came after me

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:16.360
<v Speaker 1>really hard. He was not happy with me, and it

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was a similar Everyone that has been upset has the

0:52:19.200 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Don't take this from us. And then I

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:25.399
<v Speaker 1>thought to myself, the Lions, you know, sad franchise, my team,

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. What if the Jets got Thanksgiving? Would I

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>want that taken away? Now? I wouldn't. So I'm sorry

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and I and listen, would it be better if Would

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it be better if the Cowboys and Patriots, for example,

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.799
<v Speaker 1>this week we're playing on Thanksgiving like a game of

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that caliber. Yeah? Probably, But um, I understand traditions. So

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. There's no there's no jokes. I just I

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:57.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean to backhanded compliment. Well, I think you're your strategy.

0:52:57.360 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>There are your comm initial comment and I got off

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Scott for because I strongly back to you and didn't

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:05.439
<v Speaker 1>hear about it from anyone. But uh so I thank

0:53:05.480 --> 0:53:07.839
<v Speaker 1>you for apologizing for both of us. But I thought

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:11.279
<v Speaker 1>that was earnest and well done. Yeah, thanks man, I

0:53:11.320 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>know you mean it too, I do. I know you

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:15.360
<v Speaker 1>mean it. No, I like I'm I'm happy that the

0:53:15.440 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>fans of Detroit have that. I know you mean it.

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Back to this game for a second. I think Haskins

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:23.840
<v Speaker 1>has replaced Mason Rudolph as the hardest quarterback to watch.

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:26.399
<v Speaker 1>He makes a couple of plays, though, but yeah, they

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>at least I don't think he knows what he's doing

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 1>back there. They need a developmental league for guys like

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:33.240
<v Speaker 1>him because he is not ready to play in the NFL.

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 1>This would be the week to get a win, though.

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Trey Flowers is hurt. He's been the only pass rush

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that they've had. He's played pretty well over the last month,

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like he's gonna miss the game. They're

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 1>missing another starter up front, and I don't know this

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 1>line's defense. You got Darius guys in there. Your boy

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson, I don't know if he's ever gonna break that.

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Walter Payton now he's not getting snaps and now he's hurt.

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't think they'll bring him back as a sometimes

0:53:57.200 --> 0:53:59.279
<v Speaker 1>starter for next season two, and well, he's not done

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 1>for this season. He's just gotta I mean, I think

0:54:03.760 --> 0:54:07.439
<v Speaker 1>he entered the season three behind Peyton for the touchdown mark.

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not even first place. And I don't know if

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>he's gotten a touchdown you this season. Maybe one. They

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 1>might want to take that outside pitch out of the playbook.

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 1>He's not making anybody miss laterally, it's fair dog Lighten

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>lines released tackle dance skipper. I want you guys to

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 1>know that he came across my wire. Game changer. All right,

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>up next, Chris westling Oh back to me. I'll take uh,

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll take my boy Mason Rudolf, who like, how many

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 1>different ways can the We can West take the Broncos

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and Mason Rudolph every single week? Well, you guys are

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:42.319
<v Speaker 1>just gonna leave him out there. I mean, what did

0:54:42.320 --> 0:54:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the other options take? M r Bisky? How about the West?

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 1>The guy on the roof, Um, he's still there. He

0:54:49.040 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 1>needs that he needs that w to get off the

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 1>roof in Cincinnati. I'm not see I'm so not plugged

0:54:54.520 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>into this story. Everyone keeps sending me this guy. It's

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a copycat. This happened in with wild Man Walker

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:05.880
<v Speaker 1>who lived on a billboard for sixty one days. Wild

0:55:05.880 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Man Walker a famous local entertainer. This guy just some

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>jamoke walker. It's happened a few times, stuff like it

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was a trope in very Yeah, late eighties, early nineties

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 1>attention Grabber West, usually for a radio promotion. Yeah. West

0:55:19.719 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 1>sent me a photo um of wild men walk around

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the roof and he actually had a mailbox on the roof.

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a really nice touch, with the

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 1>lightful touching. You're right that that is commitment to the bit.

0:55:31.280 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And wild Man Walker was that kind of personality where

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>he was from the roof. I believe he did well,

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:41.799
<v Speaker 1>what's the point endless hits up to the billboard in

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the business place he had, they had built like a

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:46.280
<v Speaker 1>man cave up there for him. He was actually living

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on the billboard. It was amazing. So West, does he

0:55:49.560 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 1>come off the roof? This guy whoever this jamoke is

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this chooch, this guy that's just taken off the wild

0:55:55.640 --> 0:56:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Man Walker's angle. I don't think so, because because Ryan

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Finley's bad uh Bengals quarterback. I mean, he's as bad

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 1>as Mason Rudolph. Probably all their throws are scripted one

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 1>read quick throws early in the game designed you know,

0:56:11.480 --> 0:56:13.279
<v Speaker 1>this is what good coaches do, get the ball out

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of the rookie quarterback's hands, and those coaches don't go,

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 1>those players don't go anywhere. He's off the mark on

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:22.320
<v Speaker 1>his checkdowns like it's it's a awful offense to watch.

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know Greg tweeted about this. They are Zach

0:56:26.200 --> 0:56:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Taylor didn't really answer the question when they asked if

0:56:28.360 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he's playing his best quarterback. He's certainly not playing his

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:34.879
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback, not even by a long shot. So I mean,

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I understand why they wanted to get a glimpse at him,

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's probably what like late December is for. What

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 1>was his answer? So they asked him, does Ryan Finley

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 1>give the team the best chance of winning? And his

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:51.800
<v Speaker 1>answer was, we wouldn't play Ryan if we didn't feel

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like he gave us a chance to win, which is,

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a clear non answers. It's not a bad answer,

0:56:57.600 --> 0:57:00.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's of course he can't say that he is

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:01.919
<v Speaker 1>him the best chance to win because his players would

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:04.680
<v Speaker 1>know he's lying. I mean, of course Andy Dalton's better.

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I was willing to be surprised by Finley, but then

0:57:07.040 --> 0:57:09.320
<v Speaker 1>he threw you know, under four yards per attempt against

0:57:09.320 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, so that you know, Andy Dalton could have

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:13.799
<v Speaker 1>probably won that game if you wanted to. You know, really,

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he would have too. And I've killed Dalton

0:57:16.560 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and I and it's a sort of a be careful

0:57:18.160 --> 0:57:20.439
<v Speaker 1>what you wish for, because I've wanted to see someone

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 1>else play quarterback. But I like quarterback switches, when you

0:57:23.200 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>go from type of quarterback A to something drastically different

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and try to liven up an offense that they brought

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in Zach Taylor. You know, it couldn't be more of

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:34.840
<v Speaker 1>an opposite Sean McVeigh effect if you tried, because nothing's

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>changed has gotten worse. He seems relatively powerless to me.

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 1>The team is so ultra lifeless and also looks no

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>different than the same issues and the same cast of

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 1>characters as last year. And I don't need Trent Green

0:57:47.320 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 1>telling me thirty five times during the game that Joe

0:57:50.160 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Mixon's family all bought tickets and how great it is

0:57:52.440 --> 0:57:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and how they believe in the Bengals. It's like, give

0:57:54.520 --> 0:57:57.680
<v Speaker 1>me a break. This team is going nowhere. So annoyed

0:57:57.720 --> 0:58:00.280
<v Speaker 1>at Tred Green all last Sunday for Blow and Well,

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:04.160
<v Speaker 1>because they refused to even criticize an operation that is

0:58:04.400 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that is launchly saying we are not going to keep

0:58:08.280 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 1>up with thirty one other teams. We're gonna do it

0:58:10.240 --> 0:58:11.920
<v Speaker 1>our way, and it's gonna be a problem for if

0:58:11.920 --> 0:58:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you're a fan of this. I don't think they're chanking.

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're trying to lose. But as upset

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:21.280
<v Speaker 1>as everyone was in September about Miami, I think playing

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback that's worse and maybe they do think that

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>he could have had a future and you want to

0:58:25.480 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 1>evaluate him and now is the time to find out,

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:28.920
<v Speaker 1>or else you get the number one pick. It's kind

0:58:28.960 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of like win win if you're the Bengals, or I

0:58:32.080 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's a little more egregious that you're you're you're

0:58:34.600 --> 0:58:36.960
<v Speaker 1>playing a guy that you pretty much know is not

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to hurt your team's chances of winning if

0:58:40.640 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not tanking, and we haven't heard that connected to Cincinnati,

0:58:44.560 --> 0:58:47.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly not even close to the level of Miami. Uh,

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 1>then it was just a huge mistake to bench Dalton

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>because you got well, I think they are. I think

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy's this head coach has to win a game.

0:58:54.440 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're now they put themselves in position by

0:58:57.160 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 1>putting this kid in the quarterback where they can potentially

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 1>go own sixteen and that that sticks with the organization forever.

0:59:03.760 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's in its Cat Tarrell, who once covered the Bengals,

0:59:09.240 --> 0:59:11.640
<v Speaker 1>suggested after I tweeted about it and now she covers

0:59:11.640 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the Saints doesn't does an awesome job on the athletic

0:59:14.400 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that it suggested to her just from the outside that

0:59:18.240 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 1>he's the one not making that he's not the one

0:59:20.160 --> 0:59:23.320
<v Speaker 1>making the decisions. That's the type of answer you make

0:59:23.520 --> 0:59:26.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're not the one that making the decisions. And

0:59:26.120 --> 0:59:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that made a lot of sense to me. And that

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:31.640
<v Speaker 1>goes back to why Chris Wesseling quit and on the

0:59:31.680 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Bengals all those years ago and made that dossie. I

0:59:34.600 --> 0:59:37.280
<v Speaker 1>give Brian Flora has a lot of credit for playing

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 1>his best quarterback when the Redskins are not, the Bengals

0:59:41.560 --> 0:59:46.480
<v Speaker 1>are not, the Steelers arguably are not. I mean, yeah,

0:59:46.600 --> 0:59:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we gotta see a little more a Duck Hodges, but

0:59:48.840 --> 0:59:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but but definitely, the Bengals and Redskins are not playing

0:59:51.720 --> 0:59:57.439
<v Speaker 1>their best quarterbacks and the Dolphins are, um right, yeah,

0:59:57.600 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>how many games and rude off by the way. Erase

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that stingfest that you made us watch last week, Missa Rudolph,

1:00:05.200 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>please the demon two and eight at the Bears. Ooh,

1:00:12.320 --> 1:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a rough one. This one will not be

1:00:14.680 --> 1:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of love nationally, so I will try

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to do my best for our national podcast to give

1:00:22.360 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it the respect it deserves as a game that features

1:00:26.000 --> 1:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>professional football players giving it. They're all, um, Mr Rbiski

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>has a hit pointer, but apparently he will be playing

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>this week, looks like, so we'll see where that goes. Now.

1:00:40.200 --> 1:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Is the toothpaste out of the old container, as they say,

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the tube by taking him out of the game, um,

1:00:49.200 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>because he could have I still think that something was

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>still weird about all that. And they said, oh, he

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>was injured, but the the intimate sideline exchange between Naggie

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and Trabiski and fact that you know he could have

1:01:01.280 --> 1:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>played for three more minutes of game time and survived.

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think there was some naggy dr Shall win

1:01:07.560 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in on that. What did Shall say? I need to

1:01:09.880 --> 1:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>other quarterbacks with more egregious aches and pains played through

1:01:14.880 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>them least so James and Mitchell Trobinsky. The injury occurred

1:01:18.720 --> 1:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in the second quarter. Right, So Peggy's explanation made sense.

1:01:22.520 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>He pulled Trabinsky once he saw the injury started to

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>affect the quarterback's decision making. Okay, that made sense to me.

1:01:30.640 --> 1:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>All Right, well, let's hope it's better because if this

1:01:33.840 --> 1:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>hip pointer comes back, I guess he'll be taken out

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of the game again with an injury. But I just

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>wonder if if this is just the beginning of the end.

1:01:41.680 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll remember the Sunday night game and as kind of, oh,

1:01:46.160 --> 1:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they are not going to get better with him. And

1:01:48.640 --> 1:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this is just because that was kind of like a

1:01:50.360 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>referendum game. I know they had the season had already

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of spun into a bad place already, but maybe

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they could have kind of gotten it back together in

1:01:58.120 --> 1:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>prime time and they didn't even come close. So I

1:02:00.520 --> 1:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>think we're seeing the end of the Trabinsky era obviously. Uh.

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And then on the Giant side of it, there's been

1:02:06.880 --> 1:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk this. You know, we've had our

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>disagreements with the injury stuff, Greg about whether you should

1:02:13.440 --> 1:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>say a guy should you know, rest a little bit

1:02:15.720 --> 1:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>longer that I am all anti this. Let's shut down

1:02:19.120 --> 1:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>se kuon Barkley for the rest of the year talk,

1:02:21.800 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>because no one is saying that he's actually um still injured.

1:02:25.200 --> 1:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where that came from. That was just

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>something that was being brought up a lot, I guess

1:02:30.080 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>by the media and they were being asked it, and

1:02:32.720 --> 1:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>both side, both the head coach Pat Shermer and Sae

1:02:35.800 --> 1:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Juan Barkley shot it down and said that we have

1:02:37.960 --> 1:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>no interest in in um shutting this thing down. So

1:02:40.760 --> 1:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it will be interesting, I guess, to see how Barkley looks,

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>because that has been one thing that's been missing from

1:02:45.680 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this season compared to last season, was how explosive and

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>exciting on a week by week basis. Sat kuon Barkley

1:02:52.560 --> 1:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is maybe he gets back his mojo against the Bears.

1:02:54.720 --> 1:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Bears defense that is good but not great. Sterling Shepherd

1:02:59.120 --> 1:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>is on act at least to return for this game.

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not official. He's gotten close before and then there

1:03:04.000 --> 1:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was a setback, so we'll see. That would help Daniel

1:03:06.520 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Jones a lot. Uh. I don't I don't think it

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>matters like picking this game, whether Trabiski plays or not,

1:03:12.960 --> 1:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>there's not much of a difference. They they're last in

1:03:14.760 --> 1:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the league and explosive plays. They're not using Alan Robinson

1:03:18.280 --> 1:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>nearly to the you know, full capability. Like Blake Bortles

1:03:21.640 --> 1:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>did a better job hooking up Allen Robinson with with

1:03:24.000 --> 1:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>big plays than than the Bears are doing. With that said,

1:03:26.640 --> 1:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bears could be the ultimate false hope team because

1:03:29.960 --> 1:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I still think they're the favorite in this game, and

1:03:32.160 --> 1:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>then they're on Thanksgiving Day against old Jeff Driscoll get

1:03:35.400 --> 1:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>ready for that at nine thirty. Uh, and you know

1:03:39.160 --> 1:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they're Bears are capable of losing any game, but they're

1:03:42.120 --> 1:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>probably favorites right now to go six, to get to

1:03:44.560 --> 1:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>six and six and still be just hanging around before

1:03:47.200 --> 1:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the schedule gets very hard and then the bottom falls out.

1:03:50.200 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So in a in a painful season for Bears fan,

1:03:52.680 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they might tease them a little more

1:03:55.400 --> 1:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of weeks by beat a couple

1:03:57.280 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of bad teams. My boldest note was this game makes

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>me sad, because it does because it's it's you know,

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Giants. So the Giants, and we're probably looking

1:04:06.600 --> 1:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>at the final weeks of Patch Shermer and I I

1:04:09.440 --> 1:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>always felt like he was brought into carry forth the

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>message of ELI and the ownership and do all that,

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'd also think that it's been a tough situation

1:04:16.520 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for him, and I don't I hope that doesn't happen

1:04:19.280 --> 1:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to him. Giants fans may disagree, but Matt Nagy, I mean,

1:04:22.840 --> 1:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we are not too far removed from a last season

1:04:25.920 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and Andy Reid prior to last season singing long songs

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>about the creativity and what Matt nig brings to offense

1:04:33.840 --> 1:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>no matter who the players are, and this has been

1:04:35.800 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the least interesting attacks in the league. And

1:04:39.760 --> 1:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to look at the regression from last year to this,

1:04:42.800 --> 1:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>when you brought in Matt Nigi to light a spark

1:04:45.480 --> 1:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>under a Bears offense that was that fired the previous

1:04:48.360 --> 1:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>coach because the offense was so boring. He was brought

1:04:51.320 --> 1:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in to fix mr business. He won Coach of the

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Year doing it, and every cause of the defense, every

1:04:57.000 --> 1:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>single position. He was one of the best coaches in

1:04:59.520 --> 1:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the league. It's Trabinsky was not one of them. Not fixed.

1:05:02.040 --> 1:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>The whole point is Nega did an amazing job creating

1:05:05.480 --> 1:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>opening every single position on this offense is worse than

1:05:11.000 --> 1:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it was last year. It's one of the craziest I

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>just think it's on Trabisky, though sometimes it's not on

1:05:16.800 --> 1:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the coach. I want to see him get a chance

1:05:18.560 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with the different quarterbacks. One of the craziest storylines of

1:05:21.880 --> 1:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>this week is when you saw it popped up. He

1:05:23.680 --> 1:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was being asked, Naggie, are you going to give up

1:05:25.280 --> 1:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>play calling? This guy a year ago was being He's

1:05:28.120 --> 1:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>part of that, Sean McVeigh. The young coaches that are

1:05:30.720 --> 1:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>gifted with their offensive game planning. That just to me,

1:05:33.920 --> 1:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in a nutshell is how awfully this season has gone.

1:05:36.520 --> 1:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why I don't need two weeks from now. Oh

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>there's six and six and they're back in the shut

1:05:41.320 --> 1:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it down. It's like this, I don't need the bear.

1:05:43.680 --> 1:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>It's they need an off They need an off season

1:05:46.400 --> 1:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>as much as any team out there right now. All

1:05:48.160 --> 1:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>right time now for Road to Victory, presented by the

1:05:52.080 --> 1:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>United States Marine Corp. I love our Marines are troops

1:05:59.000 --> 1:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>both here and abroad. Okay, the Packer the excuse me Packers, Yes,

1:06:06.760 --> 1:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>oh man, the Green Bay Packers. They travel to the

1:06:09.560 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Big Ballot Bottom to face the Niners eight and two

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>against nine and one. What else needs to be said?

1:06:15.640 --> 1:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris Westling, This is has potential to be one of

1:06:18.600 --> 1:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the games of the year. If the forty Niners have

1:06:22.480 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>some semblance of health, sure, but I don't think they're

1:06:25.280 --> 1:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the same team they were three or four weeks ago.

1:06:27.760 --> 1:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>When George George Kittle's not playing, Matt Breed is not playing,

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders is banged up. Um, Deebo Samuel has banged

1:06:35.280 --> 1:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>up in Deebo Samuel, I think you had eight for

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and back to back games, first time in

1:06:41.200 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>franchise history. That guy was playing well, he's like a

1:06:44.480 --> 1:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>running back with the ball in his hands. I just like,

1:06:47.080 --> 1:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>who are the forty Niners? If all these guys are

1:06:49.280 --> 1:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>are out? Their defense has not been dominant for three

1:06:52.080 --> 1:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>straight weeks. I think the defense has been great, really,

1:06:55.600 --> 1:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're given up twenty five points a week now. Well,

1:06:57.920 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean against Seattle they basically didn't have up an

1:07:00.480 --> 1:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>offensive touchdown until late in the fourth quarter. This the

1:07:03.160 --> 1:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks had twelve thirteen drives. They couldn't move the ball

1:07:05.680 --> 1:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>at all. That the turnovers are putting them in a

1:07:08.080 --> 1:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>bad spot there. They're not compare that when they were

1:07:10.680 --> 1:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>giving up three, seven and zero. Right, They've they've stepped

1:07:13.880 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>up in class in terms of opponent and the Cardinals,

1:07:16.160 --> 1:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason have played them well, but even the

1:07:18.040 --> 1:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals have punted the ball a ton, and to me,

1:07:20.720 --> 1:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been more on their offense. But I've got some

1:07:22.840 --> 1:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>news for you West. George Kittle and Deebo Samuel returned

1:07:26.120 --> 1:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to practice Thursday wearing non contact jerseys, so it sounds

1:07:31.560 --> 1:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's a baby step and they're neither one of

1:07:34.360 --> 1:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>them is guaranteed to play. Emmanuel Sanders did play through

1:07:37.760 --> 1:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that injury. Not you know, you didn't finish the game.

1:07:42.320 --> 1:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But if you have those three guys on the field

1:07:44.560 --> 1:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and Kittles, the key one Kittle, to me is is

1:07:47.120 --> 1:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>gronk because it not only kills their passing game, it

1:07:50.400 --> 1:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>kills their running games. You know, some some people were

1:07:53.040 --> 1:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>pointing out just how the tight ends that replaced Kittle

1:07:55.400 --> 1:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>doing well catching some passes, but have been blown up

1:07:57.720 --> 1:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in their running game and they have not run the

1:07:59.360 --> 1:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>ball very well. We haven't seen Green Bay in a

1:08:00.920 --> 1:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>ball because that there was that snow game before their

1:08:03.040 --> 1:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>bye week, and they two things. I thought their pass

1:08:06.160 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>rush came back to life in that attack a little

1:08:08.760 --> 1:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>bit against Carolina, and they ran the ball well. They

1:08:11.680 --> 1:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>slashed Carolina's defense. And they're not the first or last

1:08:14.240 --> 1:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>team to do that, but that's a good formula for

1:08:17.120 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>taking care of business against San Francisco. Will not be

1:08:19.439 --> 1:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as easy to do that against the front of the

1:08:21.400 --> 1:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Niners defense. I know. Jimmy Garoppolo had a couple of

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:28.639
<v Speaker 1>turnovers UM, including the second pick pick, which was credit

1:08:28.680 --> 1:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Niners defense for getting that three and out,

1:08:30.920 --> 1:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>because if they don't get a three and out, the

1:08:34.000 --> 1:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>game is over and the Cardinals have a huge win.

1:08:36.160 --> 1:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And everyone's looking at both teams a lot differently, but

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>credit to Um that stop and then Garoppolo making the

1:08:45.080 --> 1:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>big drive and beating the blitz the zero blitz at

1:08:48.200 --> 1:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the end for the touchdown to Wilson. So he's just

1:08:50.280 --> 1:08:53.479
<v Speaker 1>been a lot more fun to watch UM for me

1:08:53.600 --> 1:08:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks, and I just wanted he's becoming

1:08:55.880 --> 1:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a storyline to me, like not Kirk Cousins esk West,

1:08:59.360 --> 1:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>but kind like all right, let's figure out who Garoppolo is.

1:09:03.560 --> 1:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Is he a kind of premier field general type guy.

1:09:07.280 --> 1:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Is he below a Kirk Cousins type guy, Like where

1:09:10.320 --> 1:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>does he fit in? And we're starting to get, for

1:09:12.160 --> 1:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the first time ever, an actual sample size of this

1:09:15.280 --> 1:09:17.719
<v Speaker 1>guy because he's either been a backup to Tom Brady

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>or an injured quarterback. We're finally getting a collection of

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>games that is lasting months upon months, and he's just

1:09:24.400 --> 1:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of a fun guy to see develop. He's now

1:09:26.960 --> 1:09:30.599
<v Speaker 1>started more games this year or equal than he did

1:09:30.600 --> 1:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the entire rest of his career. I mean he's he's

1:09:32.960 --> 1:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>started the same amount of games as Donald. That's just

1:09:36.200 --> 1:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>where he is. And and I think you're right that

1:09:38.520 --> 1:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>he's getting better each week. And I give the four

1:09:40.680 --> 1:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Niners a ton of credit if you think about what

1:09:42.600 --> 1:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>they've lost throughout the year. It's not just this week.

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean they played without their tackles for a while.

1:09:47.200 --> 1:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Remember Jerick McKinnon. I mean he was supposed to be

1:09:49.320 --> 1:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>part Remember Jason Barette, he was supposed to be part

1:09:51.439 --> 1:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of it. Kwalan Alexander's long gone and Kelly with Witherspoon,

1:09:55.040 --> 1:09:57.519
<v Speaker 1>their starting cornerbacks been in and out. Ronald Blair's on

1:09:57.560 --> 1:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>injured reserve. It's like d Ford's hurt. Deford's barely played

1:10:01.160 --> 1:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and this team has battled through it to get to

1:10:03.120 --> 1:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>nine and one. That's why I've been leaning Packers all week.

1:10:06.479 --> 1:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And now this news that Kittle and Samuel are back

1:10:08.840 --> 1:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>at practice, I think they've been the better team for

1:10:11.360 --> 1:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the most part this year because of all they've withstood.

1:10:13.400 --> 1:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>The Packers are the exact opposite, maybe the healthiest team

1:10:16.160 --> 1:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Have had virtually no significant injuries in

1:10:20.160 --> 1:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the entire season, which is which is almost impossible. At

1:10:23.680 --> 1:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>least right now, all the guys on their team are

1:10:25.439 --> 1:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>healthy and they haven't lost anyone of real value for

1:10:28.200 --> 1:10:30.519
<v Speaker 1>the whole season. I want to see how their defense

1:10:30.560 --> 1:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>plays in this game. We were down on their defense

1:10:32.920 --> 1:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>before the bye, uh before that Panthers game, and they

1:10:36.560 --> 1:10:38.599
<v Speaker 1>were all right against the Panthers. But I I want

1:10:38.600 --> 1:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to see in this game this defense played like they

1:10:41.240 --> 1:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>did in September and not in October and early November.

1:10:44.280 --> 1:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we're getting that defense again. We'll see.

1:10:46.680 --> 1:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I got some news for you guys. If the Packers

1:10:50.840 --> 1:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>do win this week and then moved to night and two,

1:10:54.360 --> 1:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you're there the first seed in the NFC

1:10:56.640 --> 1:11:00.479
<v Speaker 1>after this game at Giants home, Red Skins home Bears,

1:11:00.640 --> 1:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the forty Niners, who play three straight

1:11:03.520 --> 1:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>teams that currently have an eight and two record. The

1:11:07.280 --> 1:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Ravens and the Saints are after them, and and there's

1:11:11.160 --> 1:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these matchups. We also who's after that?

1:11:13.960 --> 1:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Say it? You could say it all the Falcons the

1:11:17.000 --> 1:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>toughest game on the schedule, yet I didn't even know that.

1:11:20.800 --> 1:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And uh and we also have Seahawks forty. It's great

1:11:23.880 --> 1:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that all these BY teams are all playing each other

1:11:26.439 --> 1:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch, tasty Sunday night game. If you noticed

1:11:29.160 --> 1:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that BY teams have not been playing well coming out

1:11:31.439 --> 1:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of the By, especially the London ones. I think there's

1:11:34.479 --> 1:11:36.599
<v Speaker 1>I think no one won coming out of there by

1:11:36.720 --> 1:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>after London. But if you look a lot of people

1:11:39.160 --> 1:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>were tweeting. If you look at who some of those

1:11:41.800 --> 1:11:46.639
<v Speaker 1>teams played, it wasn't like the we weren't crazy. Results

1:11:46.680 --> 1:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>were like suddenly an a f C title type team

1:11:49.400 --> 1:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't show Goodbye in general is overrated as like a

1:11:52.400 --> 1:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>positive factor. I mean, of course it gets you healthier,

1:11:54.960 --> 1:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>but there's no like stats over the years that say

1:11:57.840 --> 1:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it makes you better. It's just you're just the same

1:12:00.760 --> 1:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>team when you come back. If you if you got

1:12:02.280 --> 1:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to take a week vacation, everyone's like, oh, are you

1:12:04.320 --> 1:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>were fresh now? It's like no, now, I just know

1:12:06.200 --> 1:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that I want more vacations. You don't come back doing

1:12:08.439 --> 1:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>your job better, said you know who should have gotten

1:12:11.320 --> 1:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a bye coming out of London. You're on the NFL podcast.

1:12:15.920 --> 1:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>Didn't happen, not gonna happen, did not happen. We have

1:12:19.600 --> 1:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a bye coming up. We have a bye week schedule.

1:12:22.880 --> 1:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what they want to hear from us. Uh. Next

1:12:26.360 --> 1:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>year they it's like, not only send us, Yeah, we're

1:12:30.920 --> 1:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna take that next week off. Sorry, stay in London

1:12:33.800 --> 1:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for another week. And that was the road to victory

1:12:36.280 --> 1:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>presented by the United States Marine Corps supporting your troops. Uh. Finally,

1:12:41.720 --> 1:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night football, the Baltimore Ravens eight and to travel

1:12:46.400 --> 1:12:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to the Coliseum to face the Rams. So the Rams

1:12:48.680 --> 1:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>get back to back primetime games here Sunday night. Last week,

1:12:53.960 --> 1:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>got the win against the downtrodden not quite moribund, but

1:12:58.800 --> 1:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>down trodden Chicago of Bears. Uh, and now they get

1:13:02.240 --> 1:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens another game. I thought very hard Mark about

1:13:04.960 --> 1:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>locking up, because God, I mean, for who, what do

1:13:08.800 --> 1:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you mean the team that wins every week and has

1:13:11.320 --> 1:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterback in the league this season. I don't

1:13:14.040 --> 1:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>think you could look yourself in the mirror locking up

1:13:15.920 --> 1:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens against the Rams. I agree with Mark on that.

1:13:18.400 --> 1:13:23.559
<v Speaker 1>I go, I go by the Vegas test and no,

1:13:23.680 --> 1:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I always go by the field goal to look in

1:13:26.000 --> 1:13:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the mirror. Well, that would be controversial, but more per

1:13:29.080 --> 1:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I've always done it. I disagree just because because of that,

1:13:32.000 --> 1:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Like we think it's so predictable. But there's a reason

1:13:34.600 --> 1:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're like halfway on the Rams payroll. So there's

1:13:37.280 --> 1:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a reason though, there's a reason why. Let's say, for instance,

1:13:41.040 --> 1:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rams or the Ravens are not that heavily favored

1:13:45.000 --> 1:13:48.599
<v Speaker 1>in this game, because the Rams are at home, and

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>there are six and four team that has something going

1:13:51.439 --> 1:13:54.479
<v Speaker 1>on to them, and it really wouldn't be that crazy

1:13:54.560 --> 1:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to me to see the Rams and the Ravens in

1:13:56.960 --> 1:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter of this game. I know you can

1:13:58.960 --> 1:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>take every game apart like this and say the other

1:14:01.080 --> 1:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>team is a chance, right, because it's almost always true,

1:14:04.640 --> 1:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So like we should just be able to lock every one.

1:14:07.439 --> 1:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I say, if it's it's more than I would say

1:14:09.800 --> 1:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this the Rams. The Rams are are the Ravens at

1:14:12.880 --> 1:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this point, thirty thirty seven in a row. They had

1:14:17.680 --> 1:14:19.679
<v Speaker 1>some issues at times. They are playing at the height

1:14:19.680 --> 1:14:22.759
<v Speaker 1>of their powers right now, issuing death blows to teams

1:14:22.960 --> 1:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>midway through the second quarter. And if you tell me.

1:14:25.880 --> 1:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>You look at Jared Goff at this point in the

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>season and what happened against Chicago last week, and you

1:14:31.040 --> 1:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>give me Lamar Jackson, and which one of these two

1:14:33.520 --> 1:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is changing the lives of every single person inside the

1:14:36.200 --> 1:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>organization and about to have two hundred people fitted for

1:14:40.200 --> 1:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl rings. That's much closer to Lamar Jackson than

1:14:42.880 --> 1:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff right now. And I hear you, Greg, it's

1:14:45.000 --> 1:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in l A. But that doesn't feel like huge November.

1:14:47.960 --> 1:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I think is is the bigger thing. Not that the

1:14:49.880 --> 1:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Ravens need to be worried about you. It's not like

1:14:52.000 --> 1:14:54.679
<v Speaker 1>they need to play worse, but they're peaking right now

1:14:54.920 --> 1:14:57.639
<v Speaker 1>and two months from now, you know, will they still

1:14:57.760 --> 1:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be peeking. Teams change? And I think the Rams especially

1:15:01.520 --> 1:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>tried to change last week. It was against the Bears.

1:15:03.920 --> 1:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna go crazy, but I think they max protected.

1:15:07.320 --> 1:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>They changed the way they did some of their running game.

1:15:09.760 --> 1:15:11.639
<v Speaker 1>The offensive line played well, they had a good game,

1:15:11.960 --> 1:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and they opened up some holes. And so if you're

1:15:13.920 --> 1:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the Rams there now kind of it's funny. They were

1:15:16.280 --> 1:15:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the eight team a year ago at this point when

1:15:18.640 --> 1:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they were on Monday NFL. Now the Ravens are the

1:15:20.920 --> 1:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>team and the Rams to me, are kind of just

1:15:23.280 --> 1:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to, you know, play to their defense and run

1:15:27.000 --> 1:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball and not turn the ball over, and that's

1:15:29.120 --> 1:15:31.679
<v Speaker 1>probably their best route of of winning this game. Robert

1:15:31.680 --> 1:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Woods not in the building right now. Practice on He

1:15:35.280 --> 1:15:41.639
<v Speaker 1>returned Thursday. He returned Thursday. Brandon Cooks is going to play. Uh.

1:15:41.680 --> 1:15:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley said, I guess I felt like the old

1:15:44.520 --> 1:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Todd after the game, and I thought the first half

1:15:48.240 --> 1:15:51.519
<v Speaker 1>was his best half of football all year. And then

1:15:51.680 --> 1:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I went and watched Christian McCaffrey right after. Todd Gurley said,

1:15:56.080 --> 1:15:58.559
<v Speaker 1>that's not the old Todd, Like, that's not the old Todd,

1:15:58.600 --> 1:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>because Christian McCaffrey looked like totally different player than than

1:16:02.400 --> 1:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>than two thousand nineteen Todd Gurley, So that guy's gone.

1:16:05.479 --> 1:16:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Can the guy that's in his place be productive he

1:16:07.520 --> 1:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was last week? I think you have total yards? Like

1:16:10.439 --> 1:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg said, they changed some things up. They went with

1:16:12.320 --> 1:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Munt their third string tight end as as kind

1:16:15.040 --> 1:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of a lead blocker on a lot of plays, which

1:16:16.840 --> 1:16:19.439
<v Speaker 1>they never did in the past. So they were trying

1:16:19.439 --> 1:16:21.479
<v Speaker 1>some new things and Gurley did look good, and they

1:16:21.520 --> 1:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>protected goffwell for maybe the first time all year, and

1:16:24.840 --> 1:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that was what that said. Well,

1:16:27.000 --> 1:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they barely passed for That's maybe not the worst idea ever.

1:16:31.200 --> 1:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>If if you're ahead in the game or competitive, how

1:16:33.720 --> 1:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>about a legit revenge game Marcus Peters revenge game. I

1:16:37.680 --> 1:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>think this is closer than some of the ones that

1:16:39.640 --> 1:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have been tossed around as anyone who have employee play.

1:16:43.240 --> 1:16:45.519
<v Speaker 1>I blew it because my favorite revenge game of the

1:16:45.640 --> 1:16:47.719
<v Speaker 1>year was the one before. I'm still going to talk

1:16:47.760 --> 1:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. Kyle Sanahan, I mean, Matt Lafleur tried to

1:16:53.000 --> 1:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>hire Mike Lafleur, his brother over the We're back in

1:16:58.000 --> 1:17:00.599
<v Speaker 1>the road. Let's get on the road. Give up the Marines.

1:17:01.400 --> 1:17:03.639
<v Speaker 1>He tried to hire his brother. What a great story,

1:17:03.800 --> 1:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Lafleur. We're gonna be the la Fleur brothers and

1:17:06.120 --> 1:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>take over the Kyle Shannon said, Nope, I've got the

1:17:10.040 --> 1:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>best la Fleur. I know. Mike is better than Matt.

1:17:13.040 --> 1:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>He's the La Fleur I want. I'm keeping him in

1:17:15.320 --> 1:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, maybe even against his wishes. He's gonna be

1:17:18.360 --> 1:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>my co ordainer. And now Matt Lafleur gets to commit

1:17:21.800 --> 1:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>trat side against his brother he's gonna kill him. I

1:17:28.080 --> 1:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>don't care. Hey, we have bits. Can we close out

1:17:31.280 --> 1:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this Rams Ravens thing with a what's more likely? Before

1:17:33.960 --> 1:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we do that, can we just give Marcus Peters a

1:17:35.920 --> 1:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit love for how how incredible he's been on

1:17:39.240 --> 1:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>this events, because that was another trade that didn't get

1:17:42.360 --> 1:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that much pub when it happened, was like, oh, Marcus Peters,

1:17:44.840 --> 1:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rams aren't gonna sign him anyway, the Ravens go

1:17:47.280 --> 1:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>get him and he's He's not been making Fitzpatrick great

1:17:50.120 --> 1:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary, but he's been an impact player. Good

1:17:53.320 --> 1:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>teams stay good. Bad teams stay bad. Wes, Wow, this

1:18:01.240 --> 1:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>one is kind of geared towards Mark Sessler. What's more likely?

1:18:05.920 --> 1:18:09.599
<v Speaker 1>Wink Martindale wins Assistant Coach of the Year, Greg Roman

1:18:09.680 --> 1:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>wins Assistant Coach of the Year, another or John Harball

1:18:12.960 --> 1:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>wins NFL Head Coach of the years One. Well, I

1:18:16.479 --> 1:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think two out of three is very possible. Assistant coach.

1:18:19.439 --> 1:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>There a voters. I don't know how if they ever

1:18:25.040 --> 1:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>went Wink Martindale and not Greg Roman and Lamar Jackson

1:18:29.640 --> 1:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>pipes this up, there would be a revolt. Just this

1:18:32.720 --> 1:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is someone I think Greg Roman has not had to

1:18:35.320 --> 1:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>reinvent himself, just that he was a hot commodity kind

1:18:38.680 --> 1:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of vanished into the mist, and that was back with Lamar,

1:18:41.400 --> 1:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a superpowered version of anything Colin Kaepernick would have ever

1:18:45.040 --> 1:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>given you times ten in Lamar Jackson and Greg Roman

1:18:48.240 --> 1:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>was ten, let's calm down. Colin Kaepernick took the league

1:18:50.960 --> 1:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>by arm for six games. It's not a Colin Kaepernick thing.

1:18:56.439 --> 1:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But I would say the reason that John Harbaugh deserves

1:18:59.640 --> 1:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>it is because John Harbaugh, unlike a lot of coaches,

1:19:03.160 --> 1:19:05.519
<v Speaker 1>was able to look in the mirror and say let's

1:19:05.720 --> 1:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>change everything and have the boldness to do it. And

1:19:08.439 --> 1:19:11.519
<v Speaker 1>the whole staff at least looked at Lamar Jackson had

1:19:11.520 --> 1:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>said he's a quarterback. I know there was the press

1:19:13.960 --> 1:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>release that like Greg enjoyed very much this week about uh,

1:19:17.160 --> 1:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>their former offensive aid. But Lamar Jackson is a quarterback

1:19:20.479 --> 1:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna roll with it when a bunch of

1:19:22.280 --> 1:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>other teams didn't. And also, by the way, oh Joe Flacco,

1:19:25.040 --> 1:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>who we are all married to and the owner loves,

1:19:27.280 --> 1:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is broken down at this point. He's gone. Har Jackson well,

1:19:31.800 --> 1:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but he They always were backing Flacco and it took

1:19:34.439 --> 1:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it took some guts that some head coaches don't have

1:19:37.479 --> 1:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to make the changes they did last year and become electrifying,

1:19:40.439 --> 1:19:42.479
<v Speaker 1>and then a full off season of saying this will

1:19:42.520 --> 1:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>never carry over, Lamar Jackson doesn't do enough. Well, everyone's

1:19:46.000 --> 1:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna figure it out and bang there twice as powerful.

1:19:48.560 --> 1:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So give everyone coach a year, rum and hard Boswe Martindale.

1:19:52.920 --> 1:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Martindale's defense is number one in UH efficiency according to

1:19:57.360 --> 1:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Football Saider since Week seven, So since week seven they

1:20:00.000 --> 1:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have the number one defense in the NFL and the

1:20:02.320 --> 1:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>number one offense. I have no idea how long assistant

1:20:06.439 --> 1:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>coach has been around that award, but no one's ever

1:20:08.880 --> 1:20:12.599
<v Speaker 1>no team's ever swept this, right, that's impossible, not yet.

1:20:12.720 --> 1:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's only been around for a few years years.

1:20:19.040 --> 1:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean very important. This is very like. I want

1:20:21.840 --> 1:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to say that the Ravens are playing incredibly right now,

1:20:25.200 --> 1:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps we're getting caught up in the excitement of

1:20:28.520 --> 1:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that that they they're so unstoppable and perfect right now.

1:20:32.200 --> 1:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I would worry that they're peaking. Well maybe not, maybe

1:20:34.760 --> 1:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>they keep winning. That's finally, I totally hear what Greg

1:20:37.560 --> 1:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and you were saying that it's not gonna go week

1:20:39.479 --> 1:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>after week after week here, But why are we starting

1:20:43.040 --> 1:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to diminish them? I would never do that. I think

1:20:46.360 --> 1:20:49.599
<v Speaker 1>it's more common on like how awesome they are right

1:20:49.640 --> 1:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>now that you could have this conversation and you could say, oh,

1:20:52.800 --> 1:20:54.759
<v Speaker 1>I pick all three of them, and West would agree,

1:20:54.800 --> 1:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and that the Ravens are the talk of the league.

1:20:58.120 --> 1:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Right well, how awesome are they? They beat Russell Wilson,

1:21:00.760 --> 1:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady and Deshaun Watson by double digits. Bang. To

1:21:04.760 --> 1:21:08.599
<v Speaker 1>answer your question, Dan, the assistant Coach of the Year

1:21:09.040 --> 1:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>has been around for five years, and uh, the Bears

1:21:12.240 --> 1:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>swept it last year. Next year, Naggy and Fonio. There

1:21:16.479 --> 1:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you go right there, that's not special and uh, the

1:21:19.320 --> 1:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>first time it ever was an award. Sweet. It was

1:21:22.280 --> 1:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>also a sweep back in two thousand fourteen. Bruce Arians

1:21:25.680 --> 1:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and your boy Todd Bowles. Wow for the two thousand

1:21:29.680 --> 1:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>four I would call it especially narrative driven. Well, it

1:21:33.160 --> 1:21:35.759
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. The teams that have a great coaching staff,

1:21:35.840 --> 1:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they you know, they get awards or they have a

1:21:37.720 --> 1:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>great year I mean assist and you go on to

1:21:40.640 --> 1:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>become head coach typically too. Yeah, I think almost except

1:21:47.360 --> 1:21:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for way to think you have to be a coordinator. No,

1:21:52.640 --> 1:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>because Scarneckia got some votes. You know there was a

1:21:55.320 --> 1:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>there was like a year of some dark course. You

1:21:57.320 --> 1:22:00.719
<v Speaker 1>know SCARNECKI a buzz, but uh, I don't think beat bowls.

1:22:00.760 --> 1:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>When you got him to your New York Jets, they

1:22:02.960 --> 1:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't and that didn't work out so well. Greg Roman

1:22:05.160 --> 1:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is the prohibitive favorite right now, whereas I think for

1:22:08.840 --> 1:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the Coach of the Year, Sean Payton would be right

1:22:10.840 --> 1:22:13.519
<v Speaker 1>up there for me with John Harbor. Um, all right,

1:22:13.680 --> 1:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we will be back uh tonight, as I said, Colts

1:22:17.240 --> 1:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Texans and then Cynthia Freeland. That's fun. And then on

1:22:21.160 --> 1:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Sunday we will recap every game we just previewed. Here

1:22:25.000 --> 1:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the wheel goes round and round. Stand hands to signing

1:22:33.479 --> 1:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>off for a quiet storm, the mailman, the old Boss,

1:22:37.960 --> 1:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Ricky Hollywood, right on, Marlin, Christie Zack, who all is

1:22:42.280 --> 1:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>back there? Tell Sunday s