WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2020 Week 2 NFL Guessing Lines Show with Chris Andrews

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man Now Down Man, Good Monday Morning,

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Tude and take numbers. Getting right here a Visa the

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Sports Spending Network series SEXM Channel two, O four, Visa

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, Visa app, Fubo Sling and Game Plus Gil

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Jason Cohn Producer number seven alongside Good Morning to Jason,

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>How you doing? Good morning Gil. UH. For those who

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are just landing on this show for the first time.

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>On a Monday during football season, we do a little

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>something here called Guessing Lines. UH. It is a tribute

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to the old Stardust radio show featuring the great Roxy

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Rocksborough UH. And this is an exercise designed to extract

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>value from the upcoming week's NFL lines. Because I will

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>put myself out there. I have been in a cocoon

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>since yesterday. I do not know any of the lines

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for a week two and I Am going to guess

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>what they are. Chrissie Andrews Mysa who runs the South

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Point Hotel cause Sports Book is going to produce the matchup.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>I will guess what I think the line should be.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about yesterday's games, of course in the process,

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and then he'll tell me what he'll be posting here

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>at the South Point Hotel Casino. That's how this works.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I will put myself out there. I will be incredibly

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong on some of these lines inevitably, and I will

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>let the hate wash over me. How about that? And

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>with that said, let's bring him in Chris Andrews. Everybody.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Good morning to you, Chrissie. How you doing. I'm doing great,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>jolly and I could see something's never change. You're still

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>pulling the more Murphy Brown act with a new producer

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>every week. And yes that's true sports doing that. Thanks

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for noticing. Yeah, but yeah, I listen that this is

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>uh like my favorite two hours of the week, talking

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to you on Monday mornings. We've been doing this for

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>many years now, so I'm looking forward to, uh, you know,

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>another another year. We know we're getting started. You know,

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I hope we can standish, is all I keep saying. Yeah,

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, and mind to my favorite two

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>hours of the week as well. And for those looking

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>for you know, we will touch on other sports here

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>briefly today, but really we dive back into the uh

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the mix of sports and what a day across sports yesterday.

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll touch on that briefly, but really we'll get back

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in earnest on it tomorrow. Uh, let us begin without

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>further ado, because we have a full slate to get

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to and we'll need all the time. So without further ado, Chris, Uh,

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>let us begin. You provide the I. I suppose we're

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>starting with a Thursday night matchup and we'll go from there. Yeah,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night, we got the Cincinnati Bengals at the Cleveland

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Brown Cincinnati at Cleveland. Boy, we're starting with a real

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>barnburn on Thursday, week two. Anyway, last week's UH, you

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>know game aside, all right, So Cincinnati coming off their

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>loss to the l A Chargers, a game they were

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in every position to win at the end yesterday, UH

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get it done. There was an offensive p I

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>called late in the game on the final uh play,

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and then Randy Bullock. I don't know if he pulled

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a calf muscle or if he or if he only

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>feigned pulling it after he missed what could have been

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a game tying field goals at the end of that

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>game against the Chargers. But the Bengals lose. Joe Burrow

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and his debut twenty three or thirty six for one

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>nine three no touchdowns, one pick, was sack three times twice.

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>He overthrew open receivers what would have been touched for

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>what would have been touchdowns. Yesterday, UH, he did move

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals as I mentioned the twenty three yard line

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>closing minutes, made a rookie mistake. UH forced to shovel

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>pass that Ingram picked off Melvin Ingram. That was before

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the last sequence. UH the in character finished where A

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>J Green was called for the UH O p I

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone. And then Randy Bullock missing a

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty one yard and when I say missing a thirty

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>one yard with two seconds left, I mean really missing it,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>grabbing his left his left calf which he said cramped

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>when he planted. That effected the kick. According to Bullock says,

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's never happened to him before the Browns. UH. Maybe

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the most disappointing of all teams in Week one, Christie,

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure not only getting beat by the Ravens,

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>no shame in that, but just getting destroyed by the

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Ravens UH thirty eight to six final. In that one,

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield thirty eight, one touchdown, one pick, sack twice.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland still hasn't opened with the victories since two thousand four.

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>All that said, UM, I don't think the Bengals are

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>any good. I think the Chargers just gave them every

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>opportunity obviously is outlined to win that game. And we

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>have a rookie quarterback in Joe Burrow not only coming

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>off his very first game, but now on a short week,

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterback, short week from game one to game two.

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>That can't be good. I'll say Cleveland by a touchdown.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland minus seven. Well, here a little high. It's mostly six.

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>I can see, UM. I can see your logic, but

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I like to lower number. You know, I went to UM,

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I have like a very you know, I have a

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>very elementary, let's say grading system, you know for the

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>game games, and the Browns by far had the worst

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>grade of the week. And you know, I bought into

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it because I'm in a couple of contests and I

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>had the Browns I think in every one of them too,

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and I fell into that trap of thinking, you know,

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>here an all off season boys, this team has tons

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of talent. If they gets the stuff together, look out

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>rest of the NFL, because they're really dangerous. I bought

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>into all of that they look like the worst team,

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and well from the Jets will probably give a run.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of teams out there look that, but

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>they look absolutely horrible. Um So you know, my power

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>rating comes to a lot less than that. But I

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.679
<v Speaker 1>do understand your logic. A rookie quarterback or a coach

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>who I have a tremendous amount of questions about for Cincinnati, Uh,

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they didn't show, you know. I kept saying, you know,

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>coaches like players should get better from year one to

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>year two. You know, I mean we're one game in.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I wanted, you know, sole throw this

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>guy completely under the bus. But I haven't seen any

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>improvement in his coaching or in the team. And I

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's the team that has some underrated talent. So

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>my power rings come to a lot lower than six.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But I do understand the reasoning. And as bad as

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the Browns are, at least they do have more talent

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and they do have a more experienced quarterback, So I

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>can see the six. That's what I'm gonna open here

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>at the south Point. Okay, No, no, no, huge issue

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with that Cleveland. I don't know what it is. And

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I've said this for a better part of a year now.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>About Baker Mayfield. I don't know if it's the arrogance

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>that puts me off, but at some point you have

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to show something on a football field, and at some

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>point the fingers have to point at you. I don't

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>know if we're at that point yet, but it's creeping

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>up that way. So this is a matchup on a Thursday.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland should be able to roll this team on Thursday.

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>We will see if that's the case or not. So

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you got six there, I got six. Like I said,

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I I think it's a shade high, but I understand

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the reasoning because of everything we just said, and I

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think it could. You know, you just can't affego

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's a wokie quarterback playing in his

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>second game on a short week after you know. I mean,

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>he didn't look terrible, which war is my numbers here.

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I was a cube yard though twenty point two. That's

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad. Um, it was passer rating sixty six point one.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I always like to look at yards per tempt five

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>point four and that's pretty terrible. Um, But he's playing

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>another team that looked pretty bad too, so I'd probably

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>lean towards taking the points, but I don't think they'd

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>be uh going hard hog wild on twenty point two QBR. Remember,

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for folks that scored out of a hundred fifty is

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>an average performance. Twenty point two for Baker Mayfield. I

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I had in games on the Chargers, for for for Borrow.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry for Joe Burrow. Yeah not good. Yeah, don't worry.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there wasn't much better thirty three point four right, yeah,

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>semantics And when it comes to those numbers, um, yeah,

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I had to end games on the Chargers against the Bengals.

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Have no idea how they got there, but based on

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>what we just outlined, somehow it did with mistakes from

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the rookie quarterback and then the Shenanigans at the game

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at the end with the O p I and also

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>with the shank to field goal. Let's go to Sunday. Okay, Sunday,

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we have the Rams at the Eagles, Rams at the Eagles,

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Rams beat the Cowboys last night for those who missed it,

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 1>for those who were exhausted, like we we typically get

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of an NFL football day, but maybe

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>because we're not used to it more so than anything

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday I had a real hard time getting locked into

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that game last night. I don't know if it was

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the nature of it or just the game flow, but

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the Rams end up beating the Cowboys seventeen. That one

0:08:55.920 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>also featured of p I that came into play very prominently.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>An offensive p I Cowboys with thirty one seconds left,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Dak Deep to Mike Gallup looked like a completed pass,

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but he shoved off Jalen Ramsey apparently just enough to

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>draw the flag, and Jalen Ramsey sold it. So the

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Rams end up preserving the seventeen win. We'll get to

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys and their play calling and some questionable play

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>calling at that momentarily, but the Rams win that. The

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Eagles lose to the Washington football team. We said it

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Washington football team. We'll talk about them later.

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>They have a certain strength. If they held the other

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>team to a certain amount of points, maybe they can

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>win football games. They played it perfectly. But the Eagles,

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they played perfectly to that script. The Eagles were up

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game seventeen to nothing. So all that said,

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you think you can win a game where you're up

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and nothing, where your win probability in game per

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>next Gen Stats was nine for the Eagles. I don't

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>know if I I that one so much. By the

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>way I buy what I buy baseball win probabilities, I'm

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not sure if I buy, but that's what they said.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Wentz was for two seventy two touchdowns, two picks. He

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was sacked Chrissie eight times, eight times through his first

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>interception in attempts going back to last December one, but

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>right tackled Jack Driscoll and right guard Nate Herbick there

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>starting there, we're starting their first career games. They were missing.

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles were three time Pro Bowl right tackle Lane

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and three time Pro Bowl right guard Brandon Brooks.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So much of the Eagles lack of success yesterday can

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of be focused on that and that alone. Rams

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>at Eagles. You got a one and no team and

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>an O and one team. The Eagles will still be favorite.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll say by two and a half. Yeah, you're right on.

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It's two and a half. But this open higher. In

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of spots last night I saw like three

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half and four. It's not a two and

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a half. A little bit of juice on the favorite,

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh see a three with money on the dog. My

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>numbers are a lot closer to pick. And I'll tell

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you why. You know, you really hit on it. People

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>look at injuries, and the first thing they look at it,

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, his quarterback. But after that they started looking

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>at receivers running backs, probably receivers more nowadays than than

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years passed. But everybody overlooks those offensive

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>line injuries and during the course of the season. And

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I had Washington and a bunch of

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>those contentests yesterday and the watch guys. Actually it's weird

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that because I saw wise thats on both sides of

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>that of the Washington Philly game yesterday. But I had

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Washington and it really wasn't a bet on Washington. Was

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>more of a bet against Philadelphia really for the exact

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>reason you mentioned. With the right side of their line,

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>they went from two all pros, the two guys starting

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.599
<v Speaker 1>their very first game. I mean, and whence, what do

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 1>you say, has how many sacks did he have with

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in my notes here yet? Uh? Eight sacks? But besides

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the eight acts, I mean, he was pressured the whole game.

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I still like wins quite a bit.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you had. Last year, he had all

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the skill position players around them suffered injuries. Now this

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>year he has all the offensive lineman or his key

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>offensive linemen have suffered huge injuries that I think are

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>really affecting this team. So my numbers, I'm gonna open

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this low as low as possible right now. I see

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>two and a half, like I said, with a little

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>juice from the favorite, but stays like this by the

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>end of the show. I'll just open the two and

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a half flat. If I see it dropped down even

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more, I'm gonna I'm gonna try to

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>stay under the market on this game at two. And

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know the Rams, we had a lot of sharp

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>money on their rams, and in fact, all the wise

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>guys were on the Rams last night. And again I

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>understand why you look back at just a few short

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago. This team was in the Super Bowl and uh,

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, their coach was like the hot guy in

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole league. And last year they fell back a

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit, not quite that much. I think they missed. Man,

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of them uh things with their salary

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>cap and that's that sort of thing. But there was

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>still a pretty good product that they have on the field,

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and I thought they looked good and they got a

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 1>little lucky to win, There's no doubt about it. I'm

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>not sure about that push off at the end um,

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but still a pretty good team may have some respect

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Rams that maybe it was overlooked by the

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>general public. So I put me down. I like the

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Rams in this spot. I think they that this game

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>should be no worse than pick them. Maybe even the

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Rams are very slight favors. I think fully has a

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ton of problems right now. Jared goff Wasy of thirty

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>one for two seventy five last night, no touchdowns, one pick,

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was sack once as biggest target was Robert Wood six

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>catches for one oh five, a lot of that early

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in the game. I didn't think the Rams were that

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>spectacular last night. I didn't think they were that noteworthy

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in any kind of way. So two games, no incidents

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>yet with the lines, Chrissy, give me a third. We'll

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>do one quick here before the break. Carolina at the

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Carolina loses to the to the Las

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Vegas Raiders. Seesaw game Bridgewater Teddy Bridgewater first start for

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers, twenty two of thirty four for two seventy

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown note picks with sack ones. Christian McCaffrey twenty

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>three carries ninety six yards, two touchdowns, three catches for

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight yards, or as defenses like to call it,

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we bottled him up pretty good with those numbers. Actually,

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Robby Anderson six catches for one fifteen and a touchdown.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But car Carolina has inexperienced secondary and they struggled that

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a rookie cornerback, Tony Pride, he missed one assignment that

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>resulted in Henry Ruggs going forty five yards later, same

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>corner allowed at twenty three yard touchdown past the Nelson

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Agalore uh, and it didn't happen. It obviously didn't help

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that Dante Jackson went down early in the first quarter

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>either their number one corner. UH. The Raiders did start

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>two rookies at wide receiver, but clearly those Carolina injuries

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and UH and lack of experience really might have been

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the rule of the day or might have actually been

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the difference, I should say, in that game. So Carolina

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>loses to Las Vegas in their opener. Tampa Bay loses

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to New Orleans. No real surprise there. Tom Brady and

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>his debuted twenty three or thirty six, two thirty nine,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns, two picks, one of which was a pick six,

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>sack three times. He did score on the on the

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>first drive of the UH of the season for Tampa Bay.

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>They went up seven and nothing, but they end up

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>losing to the Saints as uh. Let's call it four

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half now, four point closing dogs thirty four

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to twenty three. But it's the pick six. There was

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a mortar kick uh that ended up back in New

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Orleans hands as well. You take those two things out,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a completely different outcome. I don't think this

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is a down grade for Tampa Bay at all here

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>after that game, like, I don't think of them any differently.

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I will say, I'll guess ten points here, and we'll

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>go to the break here, Christie, and we'll get your reaction.

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'll guess ten points. It's a numbers game, it's

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>guessing lines. It's brought to you by bet MGM Sports

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Football's back obviously at bet MGM Sports Nevada, the premier

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>sports betting app from the same folks who bring you

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the best sports booking casino action in Las Vegas. Bet

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>MGM with all your favorite wagering options. Just download the

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>bet mgm app today, stop by any MGM casino on

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the strip with your state issued I d to open

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>an account and start placing sports bets for anywhere in Nevada.

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Whatever your sport, you're gonna love. Bet MGM state of

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the art technology and fan friendly specials every day of

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the week. Just visit bet mgm for terms and conditions.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Must be twenty one or older and physically located in Nevada.

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Please gamble responsibly as always, We'll get Chrissie's reaction to

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that guessing lines and numbers game at Visa the Sports

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Betting Network. Chrissie Andrews is here guessing lines in the

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>NFL for week number two. What about my reaction before

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the break? Then to the matchup you gave me between

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks and the Panthers. I got the Buck's mind

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is ten crazy? You're too high? Are you given teams

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a home field advantage? No, but I don't. I actually

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>don't downgrade the Bucks at all for yesterday. Well, I'm

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at my power raise and I don't let me see,

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I don't. I might have downgraded. Listen,

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of tricky. I downgraded them a point. Um.

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I expect them to be really good by the end

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of the year. It's I think it's just gonna take

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a little while for Brady. You know, we talked about

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield's qbr Brady was like one point higher, thirty

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>four point six, and Bakers was thirty three point four.

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, he doesn't have it together yet. I'm not,

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, bagging on Brady. I think he looks pretty good.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Some of the numbers want to reflect that, but I

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>think he still looked like the Brady of three, four

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>or five years ago, so which by the way, was

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>good enough to win Super Bowls. So I'm not bagging

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>on him, but I think it's just gonna take a

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>while for everything that come together for this team. You know,

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it's old news. Of course, we had no preseason or

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, so it might take a little bit

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of a while. And he's been known to start slow

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other years, although Steelers would dispute that.

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think you're just too high. Seven and a

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>half is what I see. I've see anywhere from seven

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a half to eight half, I'm gonna open seven half.

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I like that better. Um, you know, I thought the Panthers,

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they looked okay, kind of like right about

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>where I thought. You know, they had a very good

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>game against against Las Vegas UM, which I thought was

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>really a pretty good game. But Bridgewater I thought looked

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, which you know, it was a good thing.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I always really like this kid coming out of college.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>He had a devastating injury. I'm not sure, however, get

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>back to where he was, but I thought he looked

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty good and I think this team could stay within

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. And by the way, I mentioned

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the home field rating, which I've been talking for years

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think it was very much overrated, and this

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>year I think it has to be almost nil. But

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Ed saying, did uh a study on it, and he

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>put it out on Twitter a couple of weeks ago.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>In the NFL. Over the last couple of years, I

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>think his numbers for home field came like one point

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>seven points, and I think that's probably about right. But

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this year, I think it's gonna be nothing. And yesterday

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it was six dogs one out

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>right on the road. So I think I home field

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>just not gonna mean anything hardly at all. So I

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think you're a little high with this, And no, I

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that subconsciously got into your thought process.

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>For I think seven and a halfs plenty apps. Like

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, I then from seven half to eight and half,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>but I definitely like the lower end of the spectrum. Well,

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and you scared me. I thought you were gonna say

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>like six and a half, but at least you're over seven.

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not I'm not like egregiously laughably off, but

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I will say that it was it about home field.

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's about what I said before the break.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>If Carolina is playing Tony Pride at corner and if

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be banged up on the other side

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and not have Dante Jackson playing, If that's the possibility,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady is going to have a field day. So

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why I came up with the ten. But you know,

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, all right, I won't go crazy

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>about that, but I think I like Tampa Bay at

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that number Um show show. Yeah, that's but you're absolutely

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>right about home field. Drew Dinsick did a great job

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>with this when he was on the podcast earlier the summer.

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we will put this in podcast for

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>him of course at Beating the Book for those who

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>missed any parts of this and want to check back.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you do the study of all two fifty

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>six games this year, from the first lines that were

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>put out, even by the numbers itself, you can tell

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that home field baked into the lines is worth only

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>about a point and a half, you know, this season.

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh And of course besides Jacksonville, we had nobody in

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the stands yesterday. It should be noted Jacksonville couldn't sell

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 1>all eighteen thousand tickets. It was like just north of

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>sixteen thousand. We'll get to that momentarily. That is true.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that. We'll get the details on that.

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>We'll do more. We've only gotten through three games, so

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll step on it. Guessing lines for a week too

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in the National Football League with Christie Andrews at Andrew's

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Sports by the Way on Twitter right here at Visa

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the Sports betting network. On a numbers game, Let's get

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>some more lines with Chrissie Andrews. Let's continue, sir, we're

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>behind pace, Chrissie. Let's get it going. We've got the

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Broncos after Steelers, two teams playing tonight. Okay, so do

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we even have a line for this because neither team

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>has played obviously, Denver's playing Giants night numbers numbers, Yeah,

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:53.719
<v Speaker 1>well site unseen, Broncos playing Giants tonight, and uh, Pittsburgh

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, Pittsburgh playing the Giants tonight, Denver playing Tennessee tonight.

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Pardon me. Pittsburgh now a six point favorite after being

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a three point favorite against the Giants, Tennessee a three

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>point favorite after being a three point dog against the Broncos.

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would imagine that that pittsg I would

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>imagine Pittsburgh will be more than the three point favorite

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in less than a seven. I'll just put the no

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>man's land of five and a half as a placeholder.

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 1>I see between five and half and six and a half,

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna open six. I have a lot of questions

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>really about both teams. Um. You know, I hear Drew

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>lock sposedly looks really really good in the preseason, but

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know how much to buy into that.

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I hear Roethlisberger also looks really good, but he doesn't

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>have too many weapons right now. He doesn't have uh

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown, he doesn't have Lady on Bill, So I mean,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what else they have. The defense I

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think for Pittsburgh will be great, but yeah, I think

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>six and we'll start air and see where it goes.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Site unseen for both of those teams will have fun

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tonight on MSG plus on Primetime Action Matt Brown, Kelly Bidland,

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Dad Yelle Alvari and myself do doing a Giants game

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in front of the New York audience. That should be

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun. What's next? Atlanta at Dollar Atlanta Dallas. Atlanta

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>loses to the Seahawks. Mattie Ice, Matt Ryan thirty seven

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of fifty four for four fifty two touchdowns, a pick

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in two sacks. But but all of that, not all

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of that, but most of that was garbage time right

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>as Maddie Ice just pads the stats. Todd Gurley in

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>his debut with the Falcons fourteen and fifty six for

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, Julio nine for one fifty seven, Ridley nine

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>for one, thirty two touchdowns, Gauge nine for one fourteen.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>They could really fill up a statuet when they're trying

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to catch up in garbage time, but they were oh

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for four on fourth downs, So they lose to the Seahawks,

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and they sublime Russell Wilson, which we'll get to. Dallas,

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, loses to the Rams. Dac was twenty

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>five and thirty nine for two sixty six, one touchdown.

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Note picks sack three times, Zeke twenty two of ninety

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>six with a touchdown, excuse me, Cooper ten of eight

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>ten for eighty one Seedee Lamb and his debut five

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>catches for fifty nine yards. But Dallas managed only a

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>net of fifteen yards on its final ten plays of

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the game, fifteen netyards on its final ten plays. And

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I did mention earlier if you missed it, Michael Gallup

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>making a long catch that would have put the Cowboys

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in field goal range with twenty one seconds left, but

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>was called for O p I for contact with Jalen Ramsey.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey completely sold it. I'm not so sure it should

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>have been called, but let's go back earlier. Chrissie down three.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCarthy curiously goes for it on fourth and three

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>from the Rams eleven with about twelve minutes to play.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>There down three, they could have tied the game up

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>rams Rookie safety Jordan Fuller makes a great tackle on

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Cedee Lamb before the marker. I've said this before on

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>this show. I've said it often. I think we're in

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>an age where a lot of these coaches are listening

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to what they think they're supposed to do based on

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>analytics and have no real understanding of what they're actually

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do on analytics. And some of these play

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>calls and some of these decisions just appeared to me

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to be way too cool for school and it made

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>no sense of the time. This is not armchair quarterback

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.719
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't get it. But as they're doing I'm like,

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what is he doing? And you know, just added to

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the list of why the Cowboys end up losing this game.

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So also, I have to give a line. I forgot

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys minus four and all that said Cowboys minus four

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Yeah, I like your number much better.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like six. And I even see a six and

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a half out there. I like, actually hit a couple

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of six man the first Yeah. I never all off season,

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't buy into this Dallas craft. You know where

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>everybody's you know, it seems like every news show I

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>watched every day was talking about Dak Prescott and how

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Jones blew it by not signing him to some

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and some million dollar contract and everything else was

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>going to change with the nature of the team. Now

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that you know Herrit's out, the party's in. That was

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a horrible decision. I'm with you. I said the exact

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>same thing at the time. How could he not kick?

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we needed Dallas in the game, so, um yeah,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>men were quite a bit to us. We had quite

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of money on their ramps, um so. And

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and on the other side of the coin, we had

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money on the Falcons. Now, I know,

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know they lost, and I just don't understand about

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the statue. Uh they had three guys that over a

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards receiving and they really kind of we're number

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in the game, you know. Um, but a lot of

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>wise Guy money showed on Atlanta before that game. A

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of wise Guy money showed against Dallas before that game.

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that means something I really do And I,

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I did six six and a half.

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>This number is gonna come down. And I'm with you

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>on this side. I think four is much closer to

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>where we should be on this game. And uh, like

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I said, I'm not buying into this Dallas crap that

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we here pretty much every Let me interrupt you, Chrissy,

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>because we've got let me interrupt you because we've got

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.479
<v Speaker 1>to go to break. But that is the first one

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I really like. Give me. If you're giving me six

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half, give me Atlanta for goodness sake, Layton

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>vander esh collar bone injury, cam Irving Blake Jarwin both

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't return from the injuries. Give me Atlanta coming back.

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Guessing lines Chrisie Andrews a numbers game in visa these

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Sports Betting Network skill, Alexander, It's Christie Andrews. It's guessing lines,

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>y'all for Week two in the National Football League. It's

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>just like riding a bike. Um, and I have to say,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Krizzy when you when you you've already uttered the first

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I like your line better and somehow that just warms

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>my heart so much. So thank you for that on

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Dallas game. Let me just repeat at the

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>end because I think you had something to add at

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the end. If I'm not mistake mistaken, h Cowboys lost

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>starting linebacker Layton vander Esh to a collar bone injury

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter. He's gonna be out for a

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>long time with a collarbone injury. And then right tackle

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Cam Irving tight end Blake Jarwin both didn't return from

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>knee injuries in the second quarter. So add that into

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the mix. You had something to add about that game. Well,

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things real quick. Shawn Lee, who has

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>been a terrific linebacker for a long time for them,

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>did not dress yesterday, and he's had injury problems throughout

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>his career is getting a little long in the tooth.

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>But without vanderis where I think it's one of the

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>best linebackers in the league. They're really gonna need Lee,

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if there's a problem or not.

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I wanted to say, even more importantly,

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the big outfits and far away places just

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is starting to open up right now. They opened five

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So if you see a six and

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a half, if I were you, I would grab it

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>right away. Or I don't often advocate buying a half points,

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.479
<v Speaker 1>but you brought this up to seven. Might not be

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the worst thing in the world. That you could do,

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna open five and a half. I'm gonna

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>try to stay under the market as much as I

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>can in this game. Yeah, and again for those who

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>are like, hey, did you really stay in the cocoon?

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I had four and a half. I'm shocked that this

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>would be six and a half. Let's move on to

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the next one next week that the Niners at the Jets,

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Niners at the Jets, too, oh and one teams after

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Week one. The Niners lose outright UH to the Arizona

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals and do so as six and a half point favorites.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo nineteen two nine, two touchdowns, no picks. He

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was sacked three times. Rahe Moster fifteen for fifty six,

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>also caught four balls for yards and a touchdown, But

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Niners were two of eleven on third down and

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>oh for two on four and that'll usually do it

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in high leverage situations. Garoppolo led the Niners down to

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the sixteen yard line at the end of the game

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>before throwing an incomplete pass the Trent Taylor on fourth

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and five that ended their late comeback attempt. UH. And

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>then the Jets they lose to the Bills, and that

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>score probably wasn't as close as the final score indicates.

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald thirty five for two fifteen, one touchdown to

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>pick sack three times. Jamison Crowder was the big target

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>seven for one fifteen and a touchdown, but really most

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of that was on the touchdown, so that's a little misleading.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And Levian Bell was ruled out in the second half

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>due to a hamstring injury. The Jets managed one first

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>down on their first five possessions of this game, and

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that pretty much wrote the story for the day because

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bills went out to a big lead on the

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>strength of that. Only eighteen minutes and thirty eight seconds

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>total time of possession for the Jets in that game,

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So the final score of twenty seven to seventeen not

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>nearly as close as that score suggests. By the way,

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the Niners just to be thorough lost their game outright,

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>uh to twenties six and a half point favorites. But

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco will be favorite here and I have them

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>by a full touchdown. I had San Francisco minus seven here. Chrissie, Well,

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you're dead on at seven. I think that number is

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a little short myself. Um I think the Jets just

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>look horrible. Adam Gays looks totally clueless as a coach.

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald has regressed, and you know they have a

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a back oop. Evidently they thought quite a bit of

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the last couple of years. Although, like I said,

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>he's regrets. But this is when you're supposed to go

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>out and try to load your team with, you know,

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>free agents and guys that could get to to a

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. This has been the formula in the NFL

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. When you have that quarterback

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on the rookie deal, you have money to spend under

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>your cap. You know they did none of that. They're

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>totally mismanaged. That poorly coached Donald. I didn't like him

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>too much coming out of college. I thought he had talent,

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't protect the ball ow enough. He needed

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>good coaching. He's not getting that. But I you know,

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna open seven and I don't want to just

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>open seven half. I know it'd be an automatic play

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for guys, but this is what I'm gonna try to

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>stay above the market because I think the Jets are

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely horrible. And I didn't downgrade the Niners too much.

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>They've thrown in some clinkers in the last year or two,

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think they're gonna still be a really really

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>good team and uh, a playoff team and one of

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the NFC favorites to make the Super Bowl, one of

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>one of them. I'm with you on all that. Same

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>thing up the Niners. I don't downgrade them too much. Actually,

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals gonna be really good. And I'm with you about Donald.

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Same thing that I said about Baker Mayfield applies to Donald.

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>We might not be there quite yet, but we're getting

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>there pretty quick. Uh. As to focusing on maybe those

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>two guys aren't really gonna make it. Uh. And I

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly feel that way about Donald, even more so than

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to do about Mayfield. All right, let's move on to

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the next one here, Buffalo at Miami. All right, Buffalo.

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.959
<v Speaker 1>We just talked about Buffalo beating the Jets. Uh, Jared

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>out excuse me, Josh Allen, rather pardon me. Shallon in

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>victory thirty three for forty six for three twelve, two touchdowns,

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>no picks, uh, sack three times. But on the ground

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen doing Josh Allen things fourteen of fifty seven,

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>also scored on the ground. But when I say Josh

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Allen doing Josh Allen things, he also lost two fumbles.

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>First player to top three hundred yards as the Buffalo

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Bill starting quarterbacks through the air since to Rod, pardon

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>me not, Tyrod. To Rod Taylor had three twenty nine

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in a thirty one overtime lost to Miami back in

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you believe that Stephen Digs in his debut with the

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Bills eight captains eighty six yards and as I mentioned,

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Jets time of possession, Bills had it for

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>forty one minutes and twenty two seconds. Buffalo's d was

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a force in this game. They lost Matt Molana to

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a hamstring injury in the second quarter, and then after

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>outside linebacker or excuse, and then and then I believe

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>right after he uh he he injured it. I'm trding

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>he injured it right after he picked off Sam Donald's

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>pass over the middle. And then the Tremaine Edmonds didn't

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>return after hurting his shoulders. So the Bills sort of

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>overcame those injuries. Tyler Bass choppy day as a field

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>goal kicker missed two field goals. Um, and they're playing

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>who Miami? You said Miami was a real disappointment to me.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday I had them plus the points against the Patriots.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really look good at all. Ryan Fitzpatrick twenty

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of thirty, no touchdown passes, three picks, he was sacking ones,

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and they were two of ten on third down. They

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>only had two hundred sixty nine total yards of offense

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>did the Dolphins, and they lost DeVante Parker, their top receiver,

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>who left in the third quarter with a hamstring injury.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine Buffalo has got to be favorite here.

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if Miami is going to be this team

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that I chronically feel better about than the market does.

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I have Buffalo minus two and a half at Miami. WHOA,

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you're way low there, he goes, there's the first embarrassment

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the year. What is it? It's five and a

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>half And I even thought that was maybe a little light.

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking through the numbers here, Fitzpatrick no touchdowns, three interceptions.

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 1>This QBR was seventy two point seven. Yeah, figure that out,

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and I just double checked. That's when he's got you know,

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where they came up with that number.

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I had Miami two yesterday and I thought I thought

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they would really show. You know, their defense played pretty good.

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think this Patrick been good. And they're offense

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't look that good. And we're talking about Josh Allen,

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, wasn't. He's showing in progress, whereas um, you know,

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald is not. I mean, Alan is showing progress.

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>He's still wildly inconsistent at times. But he did have

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that three hundred yard game. I thought you were gonna

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>say they didn't have a three hundred your games is

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Jim Kelly, uh the way the Buffalo office. But yeah,

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that's another um. But I see improvement out of this kid,

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think he fits that team very very well.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So I see five and a half. I'm probably not

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>going to open it six, but I see a four

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half out there. I'm gonna stay high on

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the market in this game. I know you've you've been

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a big Miami man, and they've been pretty good catching

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>catching points, but I don't I don't particularly like him

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in this spot. I think I think that's a little cheap.

0:35:57.239 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm opening five and a half. But you know,

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll probably on Miami and this one. But there I

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>can't join you here. I'm on Miami. I'm not gonna

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>let one game sort of like take me off of

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 1>my entire feeling on that football team. So I like

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>much like I liked Atlanta in that earlier game. I

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>think I have a second pick here. I think I

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like Miami. If you're giving me all those points, I

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>will take the Dolphins. Let's squeeze in one more here

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>before the break. Minnesota at Indianapolis, Boy oh boy. Two

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>teams that lost. UM Minnesota loses to Green Bay Cousins

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen two sixty two touchdowns, a pick, sack twice. Feeling

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>was a big target six for one ten and two touchdowns.

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>They had the ball for for eighteen minutes and forty

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>four seconds, but an absence of a pass rush from

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings. Daniel Hunter was on the men with a

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>neck injury. Everson Griffin, now with Dallas after ten seasons

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>with the team, and gok Way didn't do anything in

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this game and they got rolled by the Packers. Then

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there's the Colts, who many a survivor pool went down

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Colts. Thirty percent of survivor pools went down

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Colts alone. By the way, forty two of

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>survivor pools already out of the circuit contest. But Colts

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>alone Rivers was thirty six or forty six for three

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty three and their loss to the Jaguars one touchdown,

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>two picks they lost Marlon Mack looks like a roughshert

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Achilles and uh. The theme of young rookie kickers not

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>playing well. I mentioned Bass missing two chippies for Buffalo

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Blanketship missed an easy, costly kick for the Colts yesterday

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. Rams kicker missed one early. Also, UM, I

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know what to make of this game. This to

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>me felt pick amish. We have thirty seconds here, Chrissy.

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I liked your number Bettergill. It's three. I uh, Colts

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>three and even higher I saw yesterday, but it's coming down.

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I said, if you see a three Flint, I would

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>go out and grab it. Yeah, and you know I

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>did that thing for Matt humans on quarterbacks. And the

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>first thing I said was why did they signed Philip Rivers.

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I I didn't take my chances with Jacko. We were

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>set and maybe try to draft one this year. I

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>would not go with Philip Rivers. I'm not going to

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>change my mind here this game. I think picked on

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this plenty here, and I would not be on the

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>colts under any circumstances. Colts By, it makes no sense

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to me. All right, let's just let's review the first hour.

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Chrissy likes two of my lines better, and then one

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of them Buffalo Miami he thought was ridiculous. My part, Uh,

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I like the vikings a lot right there, My goodness,

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, the whole it's all this whole exercise designed

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to extract value. I hope you're playing along with us.

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It's guessing lines. We continue with Chrissy Andrews right here

0:38:37.080 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in the numbers game at Visa, the sports betting network. Um,

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 1>let's bring him back, ladies and gentlemen. Here's the star

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of Guessing Lines. It's Christie Andrews, who runs the South

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Point Hotel Casino sports book here of course at the

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>tip of the strip he's the author of. Then one Day,

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>remember all those story times we used to do on

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Guessing Lines, both on the podcast uh and here on

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game. It's all in book form in a

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>much more fleshed out fashion, with extra stories as well.

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Then one Day, Chrissy available where all books are sold.

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Still I'd go to Amazon Best man a great honest answer.

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd go to Amazon. I don't know about where all

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.360
<v Speaker 1>books are so so they never got into Barnes and Noble.

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why we we We haven't occasionally at

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the south Point gift Shop, and it seems like they

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 1>sell out pretty quickly over there, which I guess a

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>good thing. But Amazon pretty safe. Yeah, well, it's your

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>constituency here at the south Point gift Shop, I would imagine. Yeah,

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's go to another one. By the way,

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>we're still in early games. What is the early late

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 1>game thing? Uh? How does that break out next week?

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>With yesterday? Were nine early and three late? Yeah, ten

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>early games. I have my TVs in my aneliminate one. Please?

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>All right? What's well? I lecross at the by the way,

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we said it before. If I said again, you like

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings plus three flat, go and grab it now,

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:26.760
<v Speaker 1>grab it disappearing. Uh. We have the Lions at the Packers.

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>We already did it, didn't didn't At the Packers we

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>talked about both of those teams opponents. Lions are oh

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and one after their loss to the Bears, which I

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.400
<v Speaker 1>have much to say about, and the Packers. Uh. Aaron Rodgers.

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:41.760
<v Speaker 1>This just in good at football. Beating the Vikings yesterday

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>and beating the Vikings by a score of forty three

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>to thirty four by far the highest scoring game in

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFL UH this weekend to fourteen. Thirty eight points

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>were scored in the fourth quarters the Vikings. Uh did

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot in garbage time there. But as far as

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the Packers are concerned, as I said, Aaron Rodgers thirty

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>two of forty four for three sixty four, four touchdowns,

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>no picks, wasn't sacked at all, his first full game

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he ever played anywhere in Minnesota without being sacked. Davante

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Adams is just his dude. Four team catches for one

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty six two touchdowns. Valdes Scanty had a good game too,

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>uh four four catches for ninety six and a touchdown,

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>five hundred twenty two total yards of offense for the

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Packers held the ball for over forty one minutes. Uh.

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>They had their way with Minnesota's defense. Minnesota's defense renovated

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this year. Minnesota's problems that gave you know, Kirk Cousins

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>got a big contract. Obviously Dalvin Cook did, so you

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>ended up with two quarterbacks named Mike Hughes and Holton

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Hill for Minnesota with their third round draft pick, Cameron

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Danceler saying, plenty of action all of them twenty three

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>years of age or younger. No Xavier Rose, no Trey Wayns,

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>no Mackenzie Alexander and Aaron Rodgers just feasted on him.

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So the Packers will want to know you think Aaron

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers remembers they drafted Jordan's Love their first round pick.

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, watch this Jordan Love. Um, Okay, Detroit, They're

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>up on Chicago twenty three to seven, and Chicago scores

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>makes it twenty excuse me, twenty three to six. Chicago

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>scores makes no problem there, right? Uh? Then Detroit is up.

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>They they trade a couple of drives, they punch a

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of times. Detroit Chrissy is up twenty three to

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>thirteen over the Bears with four oh seven left in

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the game. Just over four minutes left, they're up ten

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>points and Matt Patricia decides to attempt a fifty five

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>yard field goal. Now, how many times through the years,

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on guessing lines and on the megapod and on a

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>numbers game have I talked about this? When when they

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>kick these long field goals and miss We don't have

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a proper assessment in the National Football League as the

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>as to the damage that that does long term. Lombardi

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>talks about this too, right, I think Lobarti said there

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>were twelve of these attempted yesterday, only five were made

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>beyond fifty. So I'm not gonna I'm not gonna play

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>armchair quarterback and say that they're all bad, uh, that

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they're all wrong to try, because they're not all wrong

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to try. But when you are up ten points with

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>four oh seven left, you do not kick a fifty

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>five yard field goal attempt of fifty five yard field

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>goal against Mitch Trabinsky and the Chicago Bears, you just don't.

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>You punt it. And again, just like what we're talking

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>about with Mike McCarthy earlier, going forward on fourth down

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 1>with twelve minutes left, this is not coming, you know,

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>armchair quarterback, And this is at the moment I'm saying

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to myself, what in the world is he doing? And

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of course they missed the field goal. Chicago comes down,

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 1>they cut it to twenty three to twenty. Then Matt

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Stafford throws a horrific pick that gets batted up in

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the air and Uh, Chicago scores again give Trabisky credit,

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 1>but the Lions every bit as responsible for their demise

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in this game as anything. Uh. Matt Patricia now has

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:59.280
<v Speaker 1>blown a fourth quarter lead, Chris in eleven of thirty

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>three game he's coached. Think about that, thirty three percent,

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>one out of every three games he's coached, they've blown

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a fourth quarter lead. Stafford was seven one touchdown. The

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>costly pick I just mentioned was sack Juan's a p

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Adrian Peterson in his lines, they buw

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and ninety three just four days after signing. But

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that was the deal. At twenty three to six, they

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:24.959
<v Speaker 1>give up a touchdown, they miss a fifty five yard

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:27.240
<v Speaker 1>field goal, then they give up a touchdown, then a pick,

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 1>then gave up another touchdown. Uh. They did drive to

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago sixteen with a chance to win on their

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>final possession, even after all that, and then rookie running

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>back DeAndre Swift drops a pass in the end zone,

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.359
<v Speaker 1>just drops it. Uh, And so it's just the most

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Lions thing ever. And then the subsequent play, Stafford throws

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>another incomplete pass as time expires to complete the entire collapse.

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, that's Detroit Lions football, everybody. They opened

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>their season by blowing an eighteen point lead at Arizona

0:44:57.239 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>last year and having to settle for a tie. We

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>all remember that, and here they go yesterday. Remember they

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 1>finished three twelve and one last year with that one

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 1>being the opener, and now yesterday happens. All that said,

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 1>green Bay minus six, I'll make it just shy of

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. Uh, you're pretty much dead on. I see

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of five and a half as well.

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I like to six a little better, even though my

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>power ratings, I'm a shade lord. I think I'm gonna

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 1>have to downgrade Detroit even more. Though after yesterday, yes

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Swift dropped that ball in the end zone. We needed

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Detroit pretty good. It was kind of a weird thing.

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:38.799
<v Speaker 1>But he had a lot of heard a lot of

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>buzz in the off season about how destroy was a

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 1>team they had a big chance to upset that division,

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and I had a lot of money on their season

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>wins over etcetera, etcetera, all that sort of thing. But

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>then yesterday, for some reason, and I didn't see this

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>across the market, but I had a lot of guys

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that bet Chicago with me yesterday. Like I said, I

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 1>ain't see that everywhere else, but we definitely had it. Um,

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:04.439
<v Speaker 1>so I needed Detroit pretty good when Swift dropped that ball,

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and that was pretty unbelievable. On the other side, I

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>thought Aaron Rodgers looked so good. He looked as good

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 1>as he has at any time in his career. I

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 1>can't believe that this team made no moves in the

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:20.959
<v Speaker 1>off season to try to get Rogers to a Super

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Bowl one more time. They were on the doorstep last year,

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and I know they were much their record was much

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>better than they actually were, but they still made it

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:33.879
<v Speaker 1>to the NFC finals. Um and Rogers uh carried them

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 1>there pretty much, but they he needed a little bit

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 1>of help yesterday this year, and they just never gave

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it to him. Anyway. I see five in that stix.

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm an open six, even though my power rings come

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a little lower by like six. I just think people

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are gonna bet the Packers, And I don't know how

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>much confidence can you have in Alliance after you know,

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>just for everything you just said. Yeah, you know how

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I said earlier that the Eagles had a nine win

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>probability per next Gen Stats against the Skins, which I

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Washington football team, which I don't necessarily agree with.

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.959
<v Speaker 1>You know that that the whole algorithm with. But here's

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>what I do agree with. The Lions had a nine

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 1>eight percent win probability per next Gen Stats win probability algorithm.

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Meet Matt Patricia. That's exactly what happened yesterday. All right,

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what's next? Uh, dear lord? Uh Giants at the Bears? Alright,

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so Giants haven't played there, playing the Stillers tonight, your

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Stellers, um Chicago with that win, Chicago's want to know.

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'll say, you know, place holder without having seen

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, And obviously injuries can happen in that sort

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of thing. But I'll say, uh, Trabisky, by the way,

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty of thirty six for two forty two, three touchdowns,

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>no picks sacked once in that game. The Bears won

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that game in despite going two of eleven on third

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>downs and then Trabiskie throwing the three touchdown passes the

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter to rally them from the twenty three to

0:48:02.440 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>six UH deficit. I'll say Chicago as a placeholder by

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. Just for the heck of it. Well,

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>another time I liked your number better, but uh it's

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>five and a half and even a six out there.

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Well it looks awful steak to me. You know, I

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know what to ticket for Bisky, to be quite honest.

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>We did two years ago he looked like he was

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a coming quarterback. Last year he was horrible for three quarters.

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday he was horrible, horrible, And my dear, my darling

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>wife been on Detroit and texted are just as a joke,

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I should take a picture of Rabisky with his helmet

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>on because he'll be carrying a clipboard the rest of

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the year. And of course he scores three types after

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 1>eat me and her too, by the way. Uh so,

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they think that, you know, five

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and a halfs just looks too high to me. But

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know how bad the Giants are.

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of money showing against him tonight, but I

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:57.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of like him to night against Pittsburgh, and I've

0:48:57.719 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>got numbers gotten too high, so five and math. I'll

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 1>probably opened five as a placeholder and see if anybody

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>wants to do anything with that. You're so right about Drabiskuy, though,

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>if that fourth quarter doesn't happen, and obviously the fourth

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:09.799
<v Speaker 1>quarter did, so none of this is the narrative that

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about today. But after three quarters yesterday, he

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>was despite all the choppy performances yesterday in the league,

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 1>he was the worst of the worst, right, Like I mean,

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>he was missing passes that were just like you couldn't

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 1>believe some of the passes he was missing. But yet

0:49:24.200 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 1>he gets it done in the fourth quarter of a

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>big way. So let's give him credit. And he's got

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bears to a one one and no record, at

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>least with the assist to Matt Patricia. What's next Jaguars

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Titans. Well, you know, what do you make

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of the Jaguars? We were saying tanking for Trevor and

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, my buddy, he said, he goes, you know what,

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:47.839
<v Speaker 1>I still think they're taking for Trevor. I think the

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Colts gave them the idea that they could win this game,

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>which I think is an interesting take on it. Gardner

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Minshew Chris was nineteen of twenty for a hundred and

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy three yards. He had one incomplete pass, three touchdowns,

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 1>no pick, sacked four times, twenty two yard or to

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Quelling Cole was the game winner, the eventual game winner

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter. They only had two hundred and

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>forty one total yards of offense in victory against the

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts, as you know, touchdown dogs more than

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown dog in this game. And as I mentioned earlier,

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there were sixteen thousand, eight hundred tickets available. This was

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the only game that had spectators sixteen thousand, eight hundred

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>tickets available in Jacksonville. Only fourteen thousand, one hundred were

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 1>distributed for the league's loan game played with fans in

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the stands on Sunday. And then Tennessee they haven't played yet.

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>They played a night too. As we said, their three

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 1>point favorites now after being three point dogs against the Broncos.

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Will see how that goes. But placeholder ish, I'll say

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee by a full ten because there's nothing Jacksonville did

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that made me say to myself, well, they're good at football. Yeah,

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I see ten is the predominant number for sure. I

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>see as low as nine and a half and it

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>highs eleven. Um, No, I made tends a pretty good

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>place to start. Yeah, they got more than double a

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:13.280
<v Speaker 1>total yards. Did you realize that? Um so? And uh?

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:17.800
<v Speaker 1>First down twenty seven to seventeen against them Indianapolis Scott

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but in he got two turnovers. Anyway, we know who

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 1>won again. Mens, you, I thought it looked pretty good.

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I think the players on the field

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are tanking for Trevor. But you know, h spelling, fourteen

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:32.839
<v Speaker 1>thousand seats might have management tanking for Trevor. So we'll

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>see what happens there. But yeah, I think I think

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>tends Okay, they looked a lot better than I thought

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:40.799
<v Speaker 1>they would, but let's not go crazy yet. We still

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>look up and down that line up that they just

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:44.839
<v Speaker 1>don't have too many players. I think tends a good

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>spot to start here. Yeah, I'm not sure. I'm not

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 1>sure sold is the right word. I think it distributed.

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 1>They didn't even distribute all the taps. Yeah, I don't

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>even know how many how many of those were actual sales.

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea to look into it further. But

0:51:56.400 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the point is there were still three roughly just under

0:52:00.320 --> 0:52:03.879
<v Speaker 1>three thousand empty seats that were available. All right, let's

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>do another one here. Uh, the Washington football team at Arizona.

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I'm smiling because let me just say this.

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I've said this about the Washington football team maybe five

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>different times during the off season and and and I

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>think last year as well. This is the type of

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>team that is built with a really good front defensive

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>seven and if they can hold the opponent and then

0:52:31.600 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the number I always used was to seventeen points, they

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:38.000
<v Speaker 1>can win some games that way. Well, yesterday they held

0:52:38.000 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 1>their opponent to seventeen points. By the way, they were

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:43.320
<v Speaker 1>down seventeen to nothing against the Eagles, and they managed

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to win the football game. That is exactly the formula

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that will work for the Washington football team. And it's

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:53.759
<v Speaker 1>exactly what manifested yesterday because on offense there really hadn't

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:56.759
<v Speaker 1>much to say. Dwayne Haskins seventeen of thirty one for

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>one seventy eight touchdown note picks with sack three times

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>paid part. Peyton Barbera did score twice, but it was

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the eight sacks of Carson Wentz. On defense, two from

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Carrigan, who Skins Fans passes Dexter Manly for the

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>all time sacklist UH in Washington football team history, one

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half from Chase Young Chris one and a

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>half sacks from Chase Young, he forced a fumble, he

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:22.879
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of forced to. He is a disturbance back there.

0:53:23.120 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And as I said, all summer there, there was never

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a chance they weren't gonna pick him second at it

0:53:27.880 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>de Matha High school um ninety second career sack for

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Carrigan if you're scoring it at home, And I mentioned

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 1>they had the seven percent win probability they overcome the

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and nothing deficit and beat the Eagles too. If

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the Giants lose tonight to lead the NFC East by

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves at one and oh, if that happens, let's go

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Washington football team. By the way, Daniel Snyder mentioning that

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 1>they could keep the name Washington Football team permanently if

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:58.600
<v Speaker 1>fans decide that they like that, or as I like

0:53:58.719 --> 0:54:00.919
<v Speaker 1>to put it, that's his of not having to pay

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the investor who who got all those other names. That's

0:54:04.600 --> 0:54:08.320
<v Speaker 1>my hunch. It's called me crazy. Only two hundred and

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:10.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven total yards for the Skins offense. Two d

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven total yards. Haskins jumped in to give his

0:54:13.560 --> 0:54:16.680
<v Speaker 1>teammates a halftime speech because Ron Rivera was getting a

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 1>pre planned I V in his first game since learning

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:21.560
<v Speaker 1>has a form of skin cancer. Riverboat Ron he had

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a moment. He went for it on fourth and one

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>from the Eagles five with the score tied midway through

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, and then Barbara ran for the first

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 1>down and then scored from the three to give Washington

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen lead on their way to a twenty seven

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen victory. So good for the Washington football team,

0:54:37.440 --> 0:54:40.959
<v Speaker 1>but they're at Arizona. Kyler Murray is the real deal.

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Twenty forty two thirty. It doesn't look great on the

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 1>statuet one touchdown, one pick, you know, two time sacked,

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:51.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's thirteen carries for ninety one yards and a touchdown.

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:56.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the dimension. And DeAndre Hopkins Chrissy fourteen catches for

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.400
<v Speaker 1>one fifty one. I talked about this on Friday, just

0:54:59.440 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 1>howiculous that trade was once again. But you know the

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:05.319
<v Speaker 1>biggest one of those fourteen the throw that set up

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake's go ahead one yard score with five oh

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>three to play that led the Cardinals over the n twenty,

0:55:10.880 --> 0:55:13.719
<v Speaker 1>overcoming a pair of fourth quarter deficits to beat the

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 1>NFC champion Niners. I'll say the Cardinals by seven points

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:21.920
<v Speaker 1>full touchdown against the Washington football team. I see a

0:55:21.920 --> 0:55:24.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit of seven, but mostly six and a half.

0:55:24.280 --> 0:55:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what my power ladies come to. Before

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:30.800
<v Speaker 1>we get too far into it, I'm no art critic,

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:34.320
<v Speaker 1>God only knows, but in the end zone for yesterday

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they have Washington. Then in small owners football teaple, just

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:45.200
<v Speaker 1>call it. Just call it Washington. That looks so ridiculous. Anyway,

0:55:45.520 --> 0:55:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going off subject here. Uh, you know, Kyler Murray,

0:55:49.440 --> 0:55:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like him coming out of college. I'm gonna

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be the first who ad minute. He looked

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:55.360
<v Speaker 1>really really good. It looked really good last year. It

0:55:55.360 --> 0:55:59.160
<v Speaker 1>looked really good yesterday. Better than the stat sheet, uh projects.

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:02.880
<v Speaker 1>This team isn't bad. And I'm kind of with you

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 1>on Washington, by the way, I had both teams yesterday

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and my various contest very nice. I think Washington, Yeah,

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Washington in there in the trenches is pretty

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:17.560
<v Speaker 1>darn good, and we just tend to overlook that when

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't have the skill position players that make the headlines.

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they're not bad in the trenches. And

0:56:23.239 --> 0:56:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a good match up because I

0:56:24.520 --> 0:56:29.440
<v Speaker 1>thought Philly was particularly vulnerable in the trenches. Um, but uh,

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think six and naps are good number. And I

0:56:31.960 --> 0:56:35.439
<v Speaker 1>think both these teams might be well. Washington I had

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:38.279
<v Speaker 1>near the bottom of my power raying Arizona kind of

0:56:38.280 --> 0:56:40.879
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. But Washington might be a little better

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 1>than advertising. I think even Arizona might be a little

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 1>better than advertised too. That makes six naps a good number. YEP,

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I got no problem with it. We've got four games

0:56:48.520 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to get to. I assume we're in the afternoon next week,

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll get to uh the Sunday and Monday

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:57.399
<v Speaker 1>night affair only tonight the double header exists for Monday

0:56:57.440 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>night football. And again remember it's Pittsburgh and the Giants.

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh favored by six, up from three, and then in

0:57:02.160 --> 0:57:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the nightcap Tennessee and Denver, Tennessee now favored by three

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:08.319
<v Speaker 1>a mile high in the Mile High City, I should say, uh,

0:57:08.920 --> 0:57:12.440
<v Speaker 1>once being three point dogs, now three point favorites. Obviously,

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.000
<v Speaker 1>von Miller's injury having a lot to do with that.

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Courtland Sutton is still a game time decision for the

0:57:18.520 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Broncos in that one. So doubleheader coming tonight seven ten

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Eastern ten ten for the Tennessee Denver game. Three hours

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 1>after that, we'll get to more guessing lines. Four more

0:57:27.760 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 1>games to get to week two, not only here on

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game at Visa and the Sports Betting Network,

0:57:32.560 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 1>but also on the Beating the Book podcast. Coming right

0:57:35.720 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>back with Chris anders It's Gill Alexander. It's Chris Andrews

0:58:03.200 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 1>guessing lines for week two in the National Football League.

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:06.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're just landing on the show, it's a tribute

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to the old start up show. I'm in a cocoon.

0:58:09.480 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing lines. I've been on it more than most,

0:58:13.960 --> 0:58:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but there's been about three games already. We're I have

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 1>been woefully off on and I think in two of

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:22.480
<v Speaker 1>those three cases Chris said like my number better, but

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in a third the opposite. But nonetheless, the exercise is

0:58:26.520 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 1>designed to extract value first look at the upcoming week's

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>NFL lines, and that is the point of this entire exercise.

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I mentioned, you could very well be

0:58:36.240 --> 0:58:38.640
<v Speaker 1>playing this, or really should be playing this interactively with

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 1>us guests along with Chrissy once he gives the matchup.

0:58:41.560 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Guests along with me, uh Cliff Ritter one oh one.

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I also enjoyed talking to Chris and Gil for two

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hours every week, even though they never seem to hear me. Yeah, though,

0:58:49.560 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. We can't hear you. That's that is

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the one thing about the interactive thing that I left out. Um,

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, Chris, let's do one more here. Ravens at

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the Texas, Ravens at the Texas. Well. The Ravens couldn't

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 1>have looked any better as they crushed the Browns thirty

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:07.600
<v Speaker 1>eight to six, picking up right where they left all,

0:59:07.640 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess, not picking up right where they left because

0:59:09.240 --> 0:59:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they lost in the playoffs, but you know what I

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 1>mean from the regular season standpoint. And then there's Houston,

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>which will have extra rest. Hey, there's the first time

0:59:16.000 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we get to say extra rest after they're loss to

0:59:18.880 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs, which wasn't nearly as close as the final

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:26.560
<v Speaker 1>score suggested the fourteen point margin of defeat on this

0:59:26.600 --> 0:59:29.480
<v Speaker 1>past Thursday night to the Chiefs. But Baltimore yesterday against

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Browns. I mean, what do you say about Lamar

0:59:30.960 --> 0:59:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Jackson twenty of twenty five or two seventy five, three touchdowns,

0:59:35.320 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 1>no picks, sacked twice, but he led the team in

0:59:38.040 --> 0:59:41.360
<v Speaker 1>rushing also seven carries for forty five yards. Remember he

0:59:41.400 --> 0:59:45.400
<v Speaker 1>had thirty six touchdown passes last year. Marcus Brown was

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>his favorite target five for one oh one, but he

0:59:47.320 --> 0:59:49.320
<v Speaker 1>also got it to Snead four for sixty four and

0:59:49.360 --> 0:59:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. Mark Andrews two touchdowns on the tight end

0:59:52.640 --> 0:59:54.960
<v Speaker 1>position with five catches for fifty eight total. J K.

0:59:55.120 --> 0:59:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins added two touchdowns in his debut the criminally underrated

0:59:59.280 --> 1:00:01.320
<v Speaker 1>j K. Dobb Ins at Ohio State. Even as much

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>as hype as he got, I thought it was criminally underrated.

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And then there's Houston on Thursday night. Watson twenty of

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty two and defeat for two fifty three, one touchdown,

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>one pick, was sacked four times, got it to Fuller

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the fifth eight times or one twelve. But man, did

1:00:14.680 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they miss DeAndre Hopkins, who, as I mentioned, caught fourteen yesterday.

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, for the Cardinals, I'll say Baltimore, this is

1:00:21.920 --> 1:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>at Houston. I'll say Baltimore minus six. Give DeShawn Watson

1:00:26.880 --> 1:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>a little respect. You're a little like six and a half.

1:00:31.640 --> 1:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I even see one seven out there. I gotta tell you,

1:00:35.760 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I liked the seventh bet or here. Once again, I'm

1:00:38.320 --> 1:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it probably probably most of the year I'm

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>not giving anything for home field advantage to these teams.

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh yeah I had my notes. Boy, I think

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they could use DeAndrea Hopkins in the game. Um but anyway, Yeah,

1:00:53.840 --> 1:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Lamar Jackson, I thought last year, you know,

1:00:56.440 --> 1:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he deserved to be in the unanimous MVP, which he was.

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But I even do ast year, I always said I

1:01:01.800 --> 1:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>liked the Shawn Watson better long term, I'm not so sure, man.

1:01:07.120 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>This kid still looks really really good. And you know

1:01:11.160 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>what I think of John Harbazer coach. I think he's terrific. Uh.

1:01:15.480 --> 1:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, Texas have to say thank you, Mr schedule maker.

1:01:18.640 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Scheduled in the top two teams in the league. Wee

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>just oneed to Oh it gets worse and not worse,

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>but it continues to be tough for them for the

1:01:26.280 --> 1:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>first four to seven weeks of the season. It's a

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>brutal schedule for Houston. Yeah, they do they geez, they couldn't.

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't draw any worse for games one and two.

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But I made this number eight. You know, I think

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>even seven the shade blow. But I'm gonna open at seven. Um. Well,

1:01:44.840 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I just think this Raven team is really really good

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and I believe I don't thing much of Cleveland. They

1:01:49.680 --> 1:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>showed to be terrible yesterday, but a lot of that

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>had to do with just exactly how good Baltimore is.

1:01:56.720 --> 1:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were the best team, you know, weeks

1:01:59.560 --> 1:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>went through sixteen last year. They just lost in the playoffs,

1:02:03.040 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you can't make excuses they lost their loss,

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know they you know, they're my My grading

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>systems still have them the number one team in l

1:02:10.840 --> 1:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>A and I still have them at a tie with

1:02:13.600 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City right now. And uh, you know, I just

1:02:16.440 --> 1:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they should be more than a touchdown here.

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not crazy about land points, but I think the

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>favorites probably the late Tiger. I'm gonna open seven. You know,

1:02:25.040 --> 1:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I went through the mechanics again of that DeAndre Hopkins

1:02:27.920 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson trade, uh, this past Friday after the Texans

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>game on Thursday night, and again Bill Barna went when

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>he wrote the grading of that trade for Houston, he

1:02:37.800 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>gave it an F and he said, to DeAndre Hopkins,

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>lose a limb that I didn't know about. But it

1:02:41.760 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>really can be distilled. So I won't get into the

1:02:43.560 --> 1:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of the trade again, but it just can be

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>distilled to this one sentence. The Houston Texans, with apologies

1:02:48.560 --> 1:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun to Deshaun Watson, got rid of their best player

1:02:51.760 --> 1:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for a song. It's just unforgivable. Coming back Guessing lines

1:02:55.600 --> 1:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game at Visa these sports bending network Ye.

1:03:15.720 --> 1:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Guessing Lines continues week number two. Christie Andrews, who runs

1:03:18.480 --> 1:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the sports book here at the South Point Hotel casino

1:03:21.280 --> 1:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>at Andrew's Sports on Twitter. The name of the book

1:03:23.600 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is then one day, Chris, do we have by my account,

1:03:26.160 --> 1:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>do we have one more afternoon game on Sunday? Uh? Yeah,

1:03:31.280 --> 1:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>one more and Sunday and Monday night. All right, we'll

1:03:34.240 --> 1:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>get to the prime time after the break. What's the

1:03:35.800 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>last afternoon game? Chiefs at the Chargers. Chiefs set the Chargers. Okay,

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>so the Chiefs win, they're on extra rest. They beat

1:03:45.280 --> 1:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the Texas. We just talked about Patrick Mahomes of thirty

1:03:48.920 --> 1:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>two for two eleven, three touchdowns, no picks. He was

1:03:51.440 --> 1:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>only sacked once in in what you Know, I was

1:03:54.200 --> 1:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>doing the MSG plus show Primetime Action, which we do

1:03:57.560 --> 1:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Monday through Friday night for those who missed it. We

1:03:59.560 --> 1:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>started this last week. I'm doing double duty now, so

1:04:02.320 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>MSG plus if you have it in your cable package

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>or on your dish. We do in game betting Monday

1:04:08.640 --> 1:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>through Friday night seven to tend Eastern four to seven Pacific,

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And from my vantage point watching it live while doing

1:04:15.720 --> 1:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a show, which isn't always the most nuanced take, it

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>just looked like Andy Read and the Chiefs were like,

1:04:20.280 --> 1:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>let's not show much. Let's just kind of get out

1:04:22.120 --> 1:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of here with the win without injuries. We'll just do

1:04:24.240 --> 1:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>our thing. We won't really open up the playbook. Clyde

1:04:26.840 --> 1:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Edwards Hilaire twenty five for one, thirty eight in a

1:04:30.480 --> 1:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>touch and he was a bell cow. I think that

1:04:32.160 --> 1:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was the biggest surprise. I have him his Rookie of

1:04:34.240 --> 1:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the Year before the season started, but I didn't think

1:04:36.480 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he'd be a bell cow. Uh. Ten straight wins now

1:04:39.800 --> 1:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>dating to last season for the Kansas City Chiefs, the

1:04:43.320 --> 1:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>charges we mentioned hold on for dear life. Against the Bengals,

1:04:47.160 --> 1:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they get a really bad Joe Burrow decision late on

1:04:51.920 --> 1:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a shovel pass that Melvin Ingram picked off. Then they

1:04:55.400 --> 1:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>get an o P I called on a j Green fortuitously.

1:05:00.160 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Then they get Randy Bullock to either pull a calf

1:05:02.680 --> 1:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>muscle or not, but shanked what could have been a

1:05:05.480 --> 1:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>game tying field goal with thirty a thirty one yard attempt,

1:05:08.520 --> 1:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>just a thirty one yard attempt. So they overcome all that,

1:05:11.360 --> 1:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>they overcome Joe Burrow over just overthrowing two guys for

1:05:14.800 --> 1:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown as well, and they somehow win. But the

1:05:17.680 --> 1:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Chargers are just doing they just do Chargers things. To

1:05:20.320 --> 1:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Rod Taylor was sixteen and thirty for two oh eight.

1:05:22.720 --> 1:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>This team is way more talented, I think than their

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>performance suggests. But they just looked terrible to me yesterday.

1:05:29.720 --> 1:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, you know, Anthony Lynn with some

1:05:31.440 --> 1:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>strange decisions, we'll get we we have a full season

1:05:34.000 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to go. After Anthony Lynn, I'll say the Chiefs by ten,

1:05:37.200 --> 1:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it can't be less than ten, right, Wow,

1:05:41.280 --> 1:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I see eight and eight and a half, and that's

1:05:43.720 --> 1:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>just what my power ratings come through. I definitely like

1:05:46.840 --> 1:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the eight and a half a little better. Um and

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>might be a little much, but maybe not, maybe not.

1:05:53.840 --> 1:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And I always say Chargers tend to do chargery things. Well,

1:05:57.040 --> 1:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>they tried to do it yesterday. But don't worry because

1:06:00.240 --> 1:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers still big chargery things even though he's in

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Indian Appolis. Still, um, yeah, the Chiefs you know, yeah,

1:06:08.360 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>they dominated and looked like it was here. Yeah, okay, yeah,

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they dominated, you know, so I think they got a

1:06:16.080 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>lot more left in the tank. I don't know if

1:06:17.680 --> 1:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going to show it this week either, but they

1:06:20.040 --> 1:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>could win by ten standing on their heads. I like,

1:06:23.880 --> 1:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna use the higher number here like that not

1:06:26.640 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a power ratings uh number, but more like just thinking

1:06:31.840 --> 1:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>could easily happened. So I kind of like the Chiefs

1:06:34.560 --> 1:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit in this spot, but I like

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>getting half better than certainly Okay, yeah, I think it's

1:06:40.240 --> 1:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>one of those I mean, I'm with you, right, The

1:06:41.720 --> 1:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs could win by twenty and it wouldn't surprise me

1:06:44.040 --> 1:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they go with my seven. It wouldn't surprise me if

1:06:45.840 --> 1:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they just take their foot off the gas. But well,

1:06:48.800 --> 1:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to point this out from what I

1:06:50.840 --> 1:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>said right going into the break about DeAndre Hopkins, because

1:06:54.560 --> 1:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that sort of got lost going into commercial. I went

1:06:57.640 --> 1:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>through the mechanics of that DeAndre Hopkins trade at the

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>during Friday show after the Thursday night game against the Chiefs,

1:07:05.720 --> 1:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>But like I really mean when I said, like at

1:07:08.600 --> 1:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that moment when they made that trade. There are there

1:07:11.600 --> 1:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>were people defending that trade for the Houston Texans and I,

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I didn't get it at the time

1:07:17.840 --> 1:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and I still don't get it, and all it took

1:07:19.280 --> 1:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>us one game to bear it out. Obviously it's only

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one game, but like when you trade, this is the

1:07:24.320 --> 1:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the one sin you cannot justify. You can't trade

1:07:29.400 --> 1:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>your best player for nothing and then act like there's

1:07:33.200 --> 1:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>some football bases to it, like, because you completely lose

1:07:37.160 --> 1:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>your fan base doing that. If I was a Houston

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Texans fan, I would be so angry at that at

1:07:44.280 --> 1:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>allowing Bill O'Brien to make trades like that. And there

1:07:48.120 --> 1:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>seems to be this underlying thing with that football team.

1:07:50.480 --> 1:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I know we're not talking about the Texas anymore, but

1:07:52.080 --> 1:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to make this point. There just seems

1:07:54.040 --> 1:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to be something underlying with that football team or I

1:07:56.240 --> 1:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>just wonder it's like, do they really trust Bill O'Brien,

1:07:58.920 --> 1:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>like those those players is play for and wow, you

1:08:01.800 --> 1:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>trade me at any moment. Anyway, I just want to

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>say that the chi the Chiefs destroyed them, and I, uh, yeah,

1:08:07.160 --> 1:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I firmly believe they could roll the Chargers here. I

1:08:09.600 --> 1:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>could see them keeping it close. You have it at

1:08:12.040 --> 1:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half in the end, Chiefs Chargers. Yeah,

1:08:16.600 --> 1:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay, all right, we'll get to the primetime games.

1:08:20.439 --> 1:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll have one more break. We'll get to the Sunday

1:08:22.080 --> 1:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>night game next week. Uh and the Monday night game.

1:08:25.760 --> 1:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>So far, I like three of those. Still, Minnesota against Atlanta,

1:08:32.800 --> 1:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>that's the one I think that I like the most.

1:08:34.840 --> 1:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota against Indiana, Indianapolis, excuse me, Minnesota against Indianapolis. I

1:08:40.080 --> 1:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>like Atlanta getting all those points against the Cowboys, and

1:08:43.520 --> 1:08:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I like the Dolphins getting all those points against the Bills.

1:08:48.400 --> 1:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>That Ravens one was interesting though, against Houston getting more

1:08:51.120 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>than a touchdown. I have to rethink that one coming back.

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll wrap it up prime time right here, guessing lines

1:08:57.000 --> 1:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game at Visa these Sports Betting Network

1:09:11.320 --> 1:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Skill Alexander, it's chrisy Andrews. Let's do some primetime games

1:09:14.360 --> 1:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>guessing week two lines. Let's go Sunday night, Chris, New

1:09:19.080 --> 1:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>England at Seattle, New England at Seattle. Both teams want

1:09:22.560 --> 1:09:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to know New England behind Cameroon Newton, as tim As

1:09:26.880 --> 1:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Todd Wishnett was saying on the podcast this week, cameeron Newton.

1:09:31.840 --> 1:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Cam was fifteen of nineteen for one fifty five, no

1:09:36.600 --> 1:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns through the air, no picks, was sacked twice, but

1:09:39.520 --> 1:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he was fifteen of seventy five on the ground for

1:09:42.160 --> 1:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. The added dimension of having Cam Newton instead

1:09:46.960 --> 1:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of Tom Brady. It will take Tom Brady, but you

1:09:50.280 --> 1:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. Uh, And they get the win

1:09:52.360 --> 1:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>over Miami and do so in much greater fashion than

1:09:55.080 --> 1:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I certainly thought they would. Uh. Seattle beats Atlanta. Let

1:09:59.680 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>me just say this, Russell Wilson is the leader in

1:10:03.160 --> 1:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the clubhouse for National Football League MVP, a man who

1:10:06.320 --> 1:10:10.759
<v Speaker 1>has never received a single solitary vote in his entire

1:10:11.000 --> 1:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>career for m v P, which has to be the

1:10:13.840 --> 1:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>most ridiculous stat that exists in pro football. But yesterday

1:10:18.640 --> 1:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>he was thirty one of thirty five thirty one of

1:10:22.280 --> 1:10:26.599
<v Speaker 1>thirty five for three twenty two, four touchdowns, no picks.

1:10:26.640 --> 1:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>He was sacked three times. By the way he led

1:10:29.080 --> 1:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>his team in rushing tells you about Seattle's running game.

1:10:32.840 --> 1:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>He only had twenty nine yards rushing, but he had

1:10:35.080 --> 1:10:37.639
<v Speaker 1>a twenty eight yard led the team in rushing as well.

1:10:38.200 --> 1:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And may I just say his past the dk metcalf

1:10:41.560 --> 1:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>DK Metcalfe caught four passes for ninety five yards and

1:10:44.040 --> 1:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, but that touchdown was on a fourth and

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>five at the Atlanta thirty eight, and it made the

1:10:50.080 --> 1:10:54.479
<v Speaker 1>score twenty one to twelve. Russell Wilson lofted what might

1:10:54.560 --> 1:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>be the prettiest past you'll ever see all year. Could

1:10:58.240 --> 1:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have just walked up to him and placed it in

1:11:00.720 --> 1:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>his hands. It wouldn't have been any better than the

1:11:04.400 --> 1:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>passing through five hundred six total yards of offense for

1:11:08.360 --> 1:11:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the Hawks. Uh Seahawks are gonna be a favorite. I'm

1:11:11.520 --> 1:11:13.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna say they're more than a field goal favorite, Chris.

1:11:13.680 --> 1:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll say they're minus three and a half. They are four.

1:11:19.200 --> 1:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And I even see a little four and a half.

1:11:21.800 --> 1:11:26.479
<v Speaker 1>I think I like the four. That like the four better. Um,

1:11:26.920 --> 1:11:29.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, okay, first of all, you're talking about Russell Wilson,

1:11:30.400 --> 1:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they talked about in the obviously and

1:11:33.320 --> 1:11:34.599
<v Speaker 1>you heard a lot about it. Who would you start

1:11:34.600 --> 1:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>your team with? Almost everybody said Patrick Mahomes, you know, reasonable,

1:11:38.640 --> 1:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>uh ye statement, But if my number two picks would

1:11:42.360 --> 1:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>still be Russell Wilson because all these other young quarterbacks,

1:11:45.680 --> 1:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jackson Watson already run down the list. We

1:11:49.439 --> 1:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>hope they're going to be good, and they think they

1:11:51.600 --> 1:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>will be. But I know this kid's good. And when

1:11:54.680 --> 1:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I just read thing for Matt Humans about quarterbacks, if

1:11:58.320 --> 1:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>he never throws another path, that's like he's a he's

1:12:01.400 --> 1:12:05.599
<v Speaker 1>an automatic Hall of Famer. I can't believe how good

1:12:05.680 --> 1:12:08.639
<v Speaker 1>this kid has been. I just can't believe it. All

1:12:08.720 --> 1:12:13.479
<v Speaker 1>that being said, I think can't Cameron Newton. I think

1:12:13.560 --> 1:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be great for New England in the short term,

1:12:17.439 --> 1:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but you can't run the ball like that throughout the

1:12:20.479 --> 1:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>whole season at his age. I mean, you know, and

1:12:25.040 --> 1:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he's coming off injury problems, but right now he can.

1:12:29.360 --> 1:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, he certainly can, you know week one, and

1:12:32.880 --> 1:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll be able to do a week too.

1:12:35.120 --> 1:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's number a shade high and anything. Uh,

1:12:38.880 --> 1:12:41.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have to adjust these um according to

1:12:41.640 --> 1:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>how are they gonna play like right now? And right

1:12:44.120 --> 1:12:46.479
<v Speaker 1>now I thought three was actually a decent number. I

1:12:46.560 --> 1:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>think I have no beef with the four because I

1:12:49.680 --> 1:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think Seattle is really really good. But I think New

1:12:52.240 --> 1:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>England is gonna be very good as long as Newton

1:12:55.439 --> 1:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>could stay healthy. I just don't think he could do

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:01.919
<v Speaker 1>this for sixteen games at his age is history of injuries.

1:13:02.240 --> 1:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can, you know, but right now

1:13:06.040 --> 1:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>I do think you can. I would lean towards taking

1:13:08.600 --> 1:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the number in here. I want to jump all over.

1:13:10.880 --> 1:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>I think four might be a shade high, but it's

1:13:14.600 --> 1:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>four and four and a half. I'm gonna open four here.

1:13:16.960 --> 1:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you about New England, and I ain't got

1:13:18.720 --> 1:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>no beef with No. Four either. I guess three and

1:13:21.160 --> 1:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>a half. But if it's four or four and a half,

1:13:22.760 --> 1:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that that sounds probably even better to me. Uh, Seattle,

1:13:26.200 --> 1:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>New England. Maybe. I mean, that's a great Sunday night

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>game to watch though, that's for sure. Next week between

1:13:32.760 --> 1:13:38.519
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots and the Seahawks Monday Nights, Sir New Orleans

1:13:38.920 --> 1:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>at Plus Vegas. Another game between two one and oh teams.

1:13:43.560 --> 1:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans doing so by beating the Buccaneers. We talked

1:13:45.880 --> 1:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>about that earlier, in a game that probably again, if

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:50.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to pick six. I know it's ifs,

1:13:50.760 --> 1:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but if you don't have to pick six and you

1:13:51.840 --> 1:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have that mortar kick, maybe it's a completely different outcome.

1:13:55.280 --> 1:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But they get the win and then the Raiders in

1:13:57.960 --> 1:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a very back and forth game with the Panthers end

1:14:01.040 --> 1:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>up getting it done. Drew Brees for the Saints. Let's

1:14:03.560 --> 1:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>start there in a battle, uh, the historical battle of

1:14:07.040 --> 1:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the oldest quarterbacks ever to face each other in NFL history.

1:14:09.960 --> 1:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees really didn't light it up. Eighteen of thirty

1:14:13.479 --> 1:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>for one sixty two touchdowns note picks. He was sacked once.

1:14:16.840 --> 1:14:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas, two time All Pro wide receiver Michael Thomas

1:14:19.680 --> 1:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be limping in the fourth quarter in in

1:14:22.360 --> 1:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a game in which you only have three catches for

1:14:24.000 --> 1:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen yards. So and we've said this about Breeze for

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:31.559
<v Speaker 1>a while now, he kind of seems washed, a little

1:14:31.640 --> 1:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>washed up a little bit to me, like, I don't

1:14:33.840 --> 1:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>know if that's I really don't know if there's the

1:14:35.840 --> 1:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>arm strength Las Vegas Raiders. If you're a Raiders fan,

1:14:39.280 --> 1:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess you gotta be happy about this. Derek Carr

1:14:41.160 --> 1:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>twenty two of thirty for two thirty nine one touchdown

1:14:43.600 --> 1:14:47.519
<v Speaker 1>note picks, wasn't sacked. Josh Jacobs and ninety three, not one,

1:14:47.600 --> 1:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>not two, but three touchdowns. The Raiders scored on six

1:14:50.960 --> 1:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of their first eight possessions against the young Carolina defense,

1:14:54.280 --> 1:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned that started three rookies, but they needed

1:14:57.040 --> 1:14:59.799
<v Speaker 1>an offensive stop a defensive stop to seal the victory.

1:14:59.840 --> 1:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The we're trailing thirty four to thirty were the were

1:15:03.439 --> 1:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers, and then Panthers new offensive coordinator Joe Brady

1:15:07.320 --> 1:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>called a handoff to fullback Alex Arma instead of Christian

1:15:11.000 --> 1:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey on fourth and inches at midfield. He was stopped

1:15:14.360 --> 1:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>at the line with one minute eleven seconds left. McCaffrey

1:15:17.680 --> 1:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>racked up a hundred thirty four yards from scrimmage and

1:15:19.680 --> 1:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>scored two touchdowns, but the Panthers elect to go away

1:15:22.360 --> 1:15:24.559
<v Speaker 1>from him on the most crucial play of the game.

1:15:25.400 --> 1:15:27.759
<v Speaker 1>By the way, they lost both right tackles two injuries

1:15:27.800 --> 1:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>did the Raiders Trent Brown in the first quarter, Sam

1:15:30.439 --> 1:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Young in the third quarter? Um Saints are gonna be

1:15:34.360 --> 1:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite more than a field goal, less than touch I'll

1:15:36.920 --> 1:15:42.439
<v Speaker 1>say four and a half and five and a half,

1:15:43.840 --> 1:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>look a blanket. That's pretty much what I see. My

1:15:46.760 --> 1:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>numbers come to higher than that. And I'm kind of

1:15:49.160 --> 1:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>with you on Breeze. I think even last year, you know,

1:15:52.840 --> 1:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the offense and like, yeah, you know, I told you

1:15:55.360 --> 1:15:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I wonder about Roethlisberger's tools around them. I don't wonder

1:15:59.680 --> 1:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>about readers tools around those. You've got some really good

1:16:02.200 --> 1:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>ones um and a really good offensive coach. Defense looked

1:16:06.880 --> 1:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, I thought, but that may had just been

1:16:10.040 --> 1:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Brady getting used to his new offense. A lot of

1:16:12.960 --> 1:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>money showed on New Orleans yesterday, quite a bit, and

1:16:16.720 --> 1:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>all from money from players that I highly respected. And

1:16:20.800 --> 1:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>again I think that has to mean a little something.

1:16:23.760 --> 1:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>My power rings do come higher. Again. I'm not giving

1:16:26.360 --> 1:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>any for any home field, but I think this is

1:16:30.280 --> 1:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a shade light. I'm gonna wind up opening five and

1:16:33.240 --> 1:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a half, but if this number goes up, I'm gonna

1:16:36.240 --> 1:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>go up with it because I think a lot of

1:16:37.720 --> 1:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the public will be on the Raiders with their first

1:16:40.360 --> 1:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>game here in town, even though there's not gonna be

1:16:42.240 --> 1:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>any fans in the stand. Uh. But I think it's

1:16:46.120 --> 1:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a shade light. I think I kind of feeling New

1:16:49.920 --> 1:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Ralengs the right side here, all right, Chrissie, Just like

1:16:53.040 --> 1:16:55.679
<v Speaker 1>riding a bike. As I said earlier week two, guessing lines,

1:16:55.720 --> 1:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we got through it. I don't know how we did,

1:16:57.200 --> 1:16:59.479
<v Speaker 1>but we did. And let me just review and I'll

1:16:59.520 --> 1:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>get to you right after this. What you are looking

1:17:02.000 --> 1:17:07.799
<v Speaker 1>at um, but for me, Minnesota, Atlanta and Miami, Minnesota,

1:17:07.880 --> 1:17:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Indiana at Indianapolis. I thought that was ridiculous that you

1:17:11.600 --> 1:17:13.519
<v Speaker 1>said indian Apples was a three point favorite. You already

1:17:13.520 --> 1:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it's coming down, But if you can find the threes,

1:17:15.840 --> 1:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>grab it immediately for goodness sake. I like Minnesota. I

1:17:18.880 --> 1:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>like Atlanta. If I'm getting six and a half of dollars,

1:17:21.280 --> 1:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make any sense to me. And then Miami,

1:17:24.120 --> 1:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess two and a half. I was way off

1:17:25.760 --> 1:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on this guest as well, but this is the one

1:17:27.720 --> 1:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of the three that you weren't on my side with.

1:17:30.040 --> 1:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not gonna let one game sway me. I

1:17:32.120 --> 1:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like all those points for Miami against Buffalo, and the

1:17:34.960 --> 1:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>other one I'll can say, I'll say, I'll really I

1:17:37.200 --> 1:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>will reconsider. Pardon me that I said Baltimore minus six

1:17:40.360 --> 1:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>against Houston. You're saying you like it a little more

1:17:42.400 --> 1:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>than the seven. I might have been off on that,

1:17:44.880 --> 1:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but those are those first three for sure. What about you? Well,

1:17:50.439 --> 1:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you whole hardly on two of them.

1:17:52.880 --> 1:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Atlanta. I think that that number is way

1:17:55.040 --> 1:17:59.640
<v Speaker 1>too high. I like Minnesota. I think I don't know

1:17:59.760 --> 1:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>why the Colts will be the favorite. And I like

1:18:03.160 --> 1:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Rams against an equal team that I think just

1:18:06.439 --> 1:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>has way too many injuries right now, and I think

1:18:10.120 --> 1:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>this plays well into the Rams hands. So that's the

1:18:13.479 --> 1:18:15.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the three games I like quite a bit this week.

1:18:16.439 --> 1:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's and that's Chris andrew Yeah, that's the right,

1:18:20.520 --> 1:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the first of all, that's Chris Andrews, the contest player talking,

1:18:22.920 --> 1:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>not the bookmaker talking right there, right, and and yes

1:18:25.920 --> 1:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we should that's the caveat that we say every every

1:18:28.320 --> 1:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>time with Guessing Lines. We have an entire week now

1:18:31.720 --> 1:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to to just have our brains destroy what we thought

1:18:35.400 --> 1:18:38.519
<v Speaker 1>and initially and completely talk ourselves out of our initial

1:18:38.880 --> 1:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>reactions to this. But oftentimes the initial reaction is the

1:18:42.080 --> 1:18:45.559
<v Speaker 1>best for sure, Christie, I appreciate it man as always,

1:18:45.600 --> 1:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, my pleasure, Chris YouTube, Take care

1:18:51.439 --> 1:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris Andrews. Everybody Week two Guessing Lines will talk to

1:18:54.280 --> 1:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>him one week from today for Week three. Is the

1:18:57.439 --> 1:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>NFL is underweight? M Pa baba saga data back tu

1:19:05.840 --> 1:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>pa baba baaba b