WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Playing for Future?

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Clubs. Are you ready for

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a Break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>It is Tuesday, November third, two, twenty, season sixteen, episode

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>number fifty seven. Welcome to the latest edition of The Break.

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 1>We're life from the s WBC Mortgage studios at the Star.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Got Nick here, got Amber here, got Dave here, and

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we got a forty five minutes show to be able

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you guys about the Cowboys. We're gonna

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>do some big picture um analysis of this team. It's

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the midway point. Cowboys are two and six. The midway point.

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of us expected that going into

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>this season, but I'll have some questions for these guys

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to kind of recap what's happened in the first half

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season and to look forward not only at

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season, but going beyond that, and

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>how the Cowboys should be looking at their team at

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>this point. The deadline. Trade deadline happens today at three

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>pm around the NFL, but the Cowboys have already made

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a trade for one Eli Ankou with Houston Dave. What

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>did they give up for him and what's the scouting

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>report on him? They gave up a seventh round pick

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two, so it's not even this coming draft,

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the next draft. You know, basically nothing. I mean,

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>who knows what they might get in compics in that

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>time frame. And it's also a seventh round pick. It's

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>not very valuable. So they they wanted a run stuffing

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>one technique, they don't really have one, and this allows

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>them to get it. Eli has been He's been on

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and off of teams. He was just with the Texans,

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but he was with the Colts at the start of

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the season. I believe he spent training camp with the Browns.

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of kicked around six three three thirty. Mike

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy said it himself last night, like this is a

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>guy who can sit down an anchor. I think they

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>got him with an idea and trying to improve their

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>run defense. That's what he's here to do. Is he

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a guy that immediately steps in Nick as the starter

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>or that looks like they got one of these, so probably,

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know if he's ready to play,

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, this game against Pittsburgh, but I would think

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that after a bye week he would be. You know,

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>as Dave said, I mean that they need to somebody

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to stop the run. There's guys are just getting you know,

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>blown off the ball, and they don't really have that guy.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>They were hoping that, obviously Don Tarpeo would would be

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>there for them, and that didn't work out obviously. So yeah,

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that he comes right in. I don't know

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>if he's got all the terminology and ready to play

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>almost every but and again those one techniques don't play

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>every snap, but I think he probably will step in

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and contribute immediately. According to Stephen Jones, it doesn't look

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like the Cowboys are going to be looking to do

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>much here before the trade deadline. Beyond that, his quote was,

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're basically in a mode that if something

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>came to us and made a lot of sense, then

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>we'd certainly look at it. I don't know that we're

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>aggressively out here right now, either trying to get somebody

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or move somebody. What we want. What we want to

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>do right now is play some of these young guys

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>that we have, give them the reps that they need,

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>see what we have as we move through the rest

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of the season. And but does it sound like to

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you that they are basically, I guess relacable, way better

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>way to put it, that they're conceiving the rest of

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the season and really looking forward to twenty twenty one.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And if so, is at the right approach. I think

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it might sound like that given what we've seen from

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the season. But usually when you look at what the

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys normally do, they don't tend to make these kind

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of traits. So it's just part of who they are,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and they usually like to stick to the guys that

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they already have. Now this is a season that this

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is the first time I would say that I actually

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>agree with that mentality, just given the fact that there's

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just so many issues this year that I don't think

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that a simple trade will change anything. So I do

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>think that this is the time to give this younger

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>guys some good game reps. And when you know, I've

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>been seeing on Twitter all these possible trades, you know,

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>you start talking about Michael Gallup Amari Cooper, even as

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Ze Gil Elliott. And I'm not on board of making

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>any of those kinds of traits or trading any of

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>those guys. So as of right now, I am for

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of let these young guys play. You agree, Nick, Yeah,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that they're going to go and

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>try to win games. I kind of think this is

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be like a preseason mentality where

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>you try to win games, you're just not using all

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>of the resources that you have available. Um and and

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that's probably not fair either. The healthy guys are gonna

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to play, but I think when it's close,

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you kind of defer to a younger guy here. But

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know they're gonna they're gonna still try to win.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's value in winning games. I really do.

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that, um, you know, I'm not

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be mad if they win a game. Now, the

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>fans will be, but to me, that's stupid. But if

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if they think that it's you know, clearly better to have,

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sixth pick over the ninth pick, I'd

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>rather win games. Personally, it doesn't sound like I mean,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like they aren't necessarily like winning games. It's important,

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think Jerry said even on his call this

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>morning that with one or five out three, the fan

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he was he was making talking about it

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>more from the standpoint of, Yeah, this doesn't have anything

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to do with the players that are on the field,

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the expectations. They're going to play hard, and we expect

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>them to play hard, and they will play hard. But

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>when you start thinking about it from the standpoint of

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>who's getting the playing time, you kind of opt more

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>toward letting the guys who you want to see from

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a contract standpoint, guys you want to see because you

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're young and they need their reps. That's not

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily leading toward, you know, giving your best opportunity to

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>win all the time. Are you saying that you would

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>opt for doing like keeping the best guy on the

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>field at the best moment at all moments to make

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that you win, as opposed to maybe looking at

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>some younger talent. Yeah, yes, trying to win. I'm trying

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to win games, that's what. Yeah, I would do that, Dave.

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever been more frustrated by a

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline than I am this year, and that's saying

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot, because every year it gets frustrating, you know,

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about this type of stuff, even though the trade

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>deadline just historically is not this crazy day and it

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>never really has been. I mean, there's more activity in

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the last five years than before that, but it's still

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not baseball. And what makes it frustrating for me

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is like people people expect these grand movements when it's

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>really not. It's not necessary, Like the Cowboys don't need

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to trade anybody away. They don't need to come out

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and say we're tanking, we're not winning any more games,

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Like who who on earth does that in the first place?

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>In the NFL, Like nobody says that. But you also,

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>like you don't need to deal anybody away to know

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that this team probably isn't gonna win a boatload more games,

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you can just evaluate the guys that you have,

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>get some young players from playing time, play the good

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>players that you still do have, And I mean, what

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>do we think is the realistic ceiling for the number

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of games they're probably gonna win the rest of the way,

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Like six and ten seems like it would be a

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>fantastic effort in the second half. Guess what. That's what

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, Like six and ten is probably a best

0:07:54.680 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>case scenario, the more realistic, So they don't need to

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>do anything to tank. They're already compromised to the point

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>where it's not going to matter and you're up. You know.

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Then on the other side of the coin, there's people

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that are like, well, if you're not conceding the season,

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>go do something about it, Go get somebody like you

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>did with Amari Cooper. Why on earth would they want

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to do that. They're not gonna go far even if

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they make the playoffs. They don't have Dak, they don't

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have an offensive line, their defense is historically bad. There

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a trade that they could do to significantly

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>improve their fortunes, unless, you know, Kansas City for some

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>reason wanted to deal Pat Mahomes. It's not happening. So

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand what people want them to do, like

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't they as it is right now, this team

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to acquire anybody because they're not going to

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>accomplish their goal of winning the Super Bowl. They also

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>don't need to have a fire sale because it doesn't

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>make any sense to do so, So just shut up, Honestly,

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's gonna be fine. The team, they're gonna

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna fight hard, they're gonna win a few more games,

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have a nice draft pick. But like all

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this handwringing about the trade deadline is so tiresome. Well,

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this, David, If that's where I'm at,

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I get your point on that, But there are there

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>could be trades out there that maybe are not necessarily

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>about this year, right, I mean, that's the one. I

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's kind of like we put him in

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>these two categories of it's all or nothing. Either you're

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>trading because you think you got a shot at the

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl, or you're not trading because you don't. And

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an in between. There could be players

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>out there that you look at and you say, if

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity becomes available, this is a player that is

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>not just good for us for right now, which would

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>be a marginal change because it's probably not going to

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>change your fortunes this year, but he could be a

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>really nice piece for you in coming years. If you

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>trade for him now, you are not wrong. But like,

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>how many of those guys exist? Like how many? How

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>many players that can be building blocks for several years

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that the team actually wants to get rid of them, Like,

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it can't be more than three or four. Like a

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>perfect example is the Chargers put Desmond King on the

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>trade block yesterday. Tennessee only had to give up a

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>sixth round pick to get him, and people are like,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>why can't the Cowboys do that? Well, he's only under

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>contract for eight more games, so you get eight games

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>out of him in a lost season before now you've

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>got to worry about paying him a longer term deal.

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense for the Tennessee Titans because they're gearing

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>up to make a playoff push. This team's not. And

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I'm only I would only be interested in

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>doing a trade if it was for a guy that

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>had several years left on his deal. If the purported

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Quinnin Williams trade was really a reality, sign me up.

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>But I never like that. That was never gonna happen.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Guys like that don't get traded. Doesn't even I don't

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you, I just don't think those those players

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>are They're very few, and Fron doesn't make sense for

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers because they're going to get a better compensatory

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>pick if he goes and signed somewhere else instead of

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>trading him, trading him for a sixth round pick. I'd

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like to think you get a better compensatory if he

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>goes somewhere and plays well. Yeah. So, now so the

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Titans give a sixth maybe they sign them, maybe they don't.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>They probably get a better deal out of it, and

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and and help and have a better player down the

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>stretch because they're making a playoff run. Yeah, so there's

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Dave's right, there's there's not a lot of situations that

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>are that, you know, like the Raiders said, all right,

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get rid of Amari Cooper, you know, because

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to get rid of some good players

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and try to stockpile some picks and stuff like that.

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>But Cowboys wouldn't dare apart with a high pick this year.

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't know how good it's gonna be. Yeah, exactly.

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna take our first break a little early.

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we're gonna get into our midyear reviews.

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I got some questions for these guys. Will give you

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a good recap, an overview of what's happened the first

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, how the Cowboys need to look

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at the second half, and how they need to look

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>at their team going forward. We'll do all that when

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we come back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio.

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>We're back in a tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>taste buds. It's new Doctor Pepper and creep Soda. Let's

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>take a listen. Is he a new combone that's music

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to my years? Okay, doctor time, music to my ears

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and mouths, New Doctor Pepper and cream Soda. What delasis

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>do bay want to use? What the pros us? How

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>about the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now, you can get the Jack Black Starter,

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites plus a full size intense therapy lip bomb.

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>use the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys. The Jack Black Starter ten bucks,

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:47.119
<v Speaker 1>free shipping since eighteen sixty five. Stetson hats are American

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>maid with pride Right here in Texas and Stepson is

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Want

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to show your Texas and Team pride two, You can

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>by purchasing your own Stepson. You can look just like

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>how the flag guys do on field at every home game.

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and your favorite football team. Get yours today at Shop

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It's funny as we travel places, often we find the

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 1>places we want to travel aren't really places at all.

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>They're people, their grandparents, moms, old friends, and new nephews.

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>That's why at American Airlines we've been using enhanced cleaning

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>measures so you can feel confident every step until you

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>get to them. So, as always, our people can't wait

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to take you to yours American Airlines, you are why

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>we fly back to the break Welcome back. It is

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the final set, I mean, in second segment of the

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Break life from the SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to do a little midyear reviewing here

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of this Cowboys team. They are two and six at

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the halfway point. Again, as I said at the beginning

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of the show. I don't think any of us, and

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I certainly will speak for myself. I had no There

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>was no way anybody would have convinced me when the

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>season was beginning that would get to the midway point

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys would be two and six. But that's

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>where they are, and they are what they are at

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this point. They are a bad team, and there's not

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>really a lot that you can salvage from that from

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the standpoint of wins. There are some things though, that

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>they can look at down the stretching ways to maybe

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>get this culture changed and maybe get more familiar with

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the coach and the coach trying to figure out what

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>he can do with this team to get him back

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>on a winning path heading into next year. So here's

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do. I have a list of questions here.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to run through the questions, and you guys

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to give answers. Everybody will give an answer

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for each question. Question Number One, position most in need

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of a postseason makeover, and this is top to bottom,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole position, Like, there may be a guy you

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>want to keep, but what position has the biggest need

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for multiple parts? Does that make sense, here are the

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>ones I'll give you, cornerback, offensive line, line back, or

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle. Let's start first with you, Dave. I think

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the easy answer is cornerback, and I mean that's just

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the reality of the situation is you're gonna turn the

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of that over. You know, Ab and Trayvon

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Diggs are the only guys with long term futures here.

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to cop out because I think

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the more important answers linebackers. That's the biggest problem to

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>sort out. You know, I don't want to hate too

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>much on Layton vander esh I thought he played pretty

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>well the other night. He's still coming back from injury.

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But as it stands right now, they got to figure

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>out what they want to do with Jalen Smith. They

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>either got to figure out how to make him a

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>more viable player or figure out how to get out

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>from under that contract. Obviously, you assume Sean Lee and

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Thomas aren't going to play forever, so they got

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of big decisions to make their for sure, Amber,

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a tough one because I mean, you can

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>are you every single one of those positions, But I

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>think I would go with this secondary, either cornerback or safety,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean those positions. Last game, yes, there were some

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>good plays here and there, but just in general overall

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at the season so far, that position has just

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>been constantly terrible. There has been so many bad coverage,

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>bad huge separation between the corners and the receivers that

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just absolutely unacceptable. And then this is an area

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>where we have talked about all off season and clearly

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>just didn't work out with the Cowboys giving these bringing

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and sticking with the younger guys and all that. So

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a position that just absolutely needs help, whether

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it's coaching or the player, the talent itself. It just

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>needs an absolutely shaken up and brings some help there. Yeah,

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the safety position. You didn't mention that, but

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think safety is one that you know, I don't see.

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't really see Xavier Woods coming back maybe, but

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I just you gotta get somebody better there. It like

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Wilson are like how he's playing, Um, you don't

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>really see a lot of You don't really see a

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of him on tape for negative things. He's making

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>some some some nice plays, but you don't really see

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of others. So I like that there.

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think I think the secondaries the issue

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to me because I Layton's going to be there at linebacker.

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Jalen will be there at linebacker, now I do.

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know he might. Don't think the money

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. I'm not going to get rid of him

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for nothing. I don't know. I just I wouldn't do that,

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not this year, now the next, I mean after this season,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>but the next season. Maybe I don't know what a

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>wash really does for your team, but I look at

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it like this Nick on the linebacker. The money make

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>may make me make the decision as to who's on

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>my team, it doesn't make me make the decision on

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>who's playing. Okay, And for that reason, I think if

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Cowboys, there's no way possible I'm going into

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>next season with Jalen penciled in as a starter linebacker

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>for me. Now, he might be a guy that comes

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in and plays if somebody gets hurt, which having Layton,

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a real possibility, right. But I do think that

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>when you look at at what Jalen Smith has done,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>what he used to put on film the last few years,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Like I just don't think that would be prudent for

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys to go into the season expecting him to

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>be their starter. He is just not playing at the

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>level that you need a starting linebacker in the NFL

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to play. And I guess to go back to your

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>point about the safety position, I agree with you. I

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>think Donovan Wilson, I think he might actually have some

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>whereas well. I could see him staying a little bit long.

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I could see him being a starting safety here next year.

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you on Woods though, And so that's

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>why I didn't really go that one out is because

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking that's not really a makeover. I think there's

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>one position there it's up for grab. I think Donovan

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Wilson will be a starting safety for your team next year.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You agree with that on Donald Wilson, Yes, And then

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that point to linebacker and say, I think

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the linebacker spots is going to be there

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>with Layton vander esh So, you know, I look at

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it like you know, Jalen, I think be there too.

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>He's just gonna have to draft a guy and hope

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>he's good. You have to draft the guy in the

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>third or fourth round maybe, and hope that he's good

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like Anthony Hitchins and say maybe he's he's better, But

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I personally think if you've got two defensive tackles that

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>were actually good and couldn't get moved off the ball,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Jalen Smith would be a much better player.

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I really do. There's a reason he made the Pro Bowl.

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not just because he plays for the Cowboys. He

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>made the Pro Bowl because he can make some plays.

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I just think he needs a little bit better help

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in front of him, and I think that that some

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of that is true. I think the part I have

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>a problem with, though, is he just doesn't run in

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the way that I need my linebacker to run, right.

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are situations where he has an opportunity

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>to get to the ball character there's no defender in

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>his way, and he just doesn't have the speed to

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>get there. And that's where I look at at Jalen

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>certain I'm just like, I don't know if it's his

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>ankle or not. All I know is he's not He's

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>not capable from what I've seen consistently, of doing the

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>job that you need your linebackers to be able to do.

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>And that makes me a little bit, you know, sour

0:19:58.040 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 1>on having him be a starter next year. Let's move

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>want to next question. Didn't he go ahead? Didn't he

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>make the Didn't he make the Pro Bowl as a backup?

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's still the Pro Bowl? Yeah, but not

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>as a backup. But he was like the fifth alternative

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, like, yeah, one of the alternatives. He was

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.719
<v Speaker 1>way down. They it took them a while to call him.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's put it that way. So I'm just saying, I'm

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>just saying it was I'm not gonna take that away.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, let me ask you this, how many

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>calls is it going to have to make a few

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 1>guys off first? But I'm just saying, how many guys

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is it? How many? How many phone calls is it

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna take to get a defensive player in the Pro

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Bowl this year? Like, yeah, nobody on this team makes

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Bowl offense or defense. That's true. Yeah, who's

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>making the Pro Bowl? No? True? Yeah, Zach Martin. That's

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Zack Zach. Yeah, Zach will make it. Yeah,

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>he's missed one. Zach will make it. And they didn't

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>know about that. Honestly, I think no, he will just

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>because offensive line is all about reputation, and you know,

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, people know who he is. His

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>tape is still good. By the time the season's over,

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe he'll play some more tackle we can get to that.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I think Zach will make it.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Um the interesting, Jalen's gonna be interesting. Jalen's gonna be

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting because he leads the league in tackles right now.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>He leads the league in tackles, which means absolutely nothing.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>It means absolutely nothing. But the Pro Bowl is very stupid,

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the way that people decide on who gets into

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Bowl is ridiculous. So I will be uh,

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I will be intrigued to see, like stats first tape,

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what works in Jalen Smith's favor or not

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>because they're not playing lead the league in tackles some

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, that's true to but you know that's gonna matters,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>but they're not playing the game yeah this year? Yeah,

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>which good. Let's go out to the next question. Um,

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>if you had to trade one wide if you had

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to trade one wide receiver to get draft capital to

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>fix another area of the team, who would it be

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and why? Obviously your your choices, and I don't want

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to go to the depth. Guys. I'm thinking about your

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>top three Amari, Cooper, Ceedee Lamb, and Michael Gallup. Let's

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>start first with Unick Michael Gallup. I'll trade him. I mean,

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.719
<v Speaker 1>because I keep my two best guys. I still think

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I can get some value there. Um, you didn't mention

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>anything about money, so you're just talking about I mean

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>this contract. Yeah, it's money money in fact. Yeah, I

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>mean if you can, if you can get rid of

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the contract. I mean, I don't know this next year,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it might be kind of hard to get out from

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the the Amari deal. But um, you know, I think

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Gallups is a good player that needs some some good

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>guys around him. Um, I don't see Michael Gallup being

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a real number one type guy. But um, you could

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>get by with Lamb and Gallop. But I think I

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>think the best the best guys you've got is Cooper

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and Lamb, So I would probably trade him. See what

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I could get for him Amber if if I was

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>doing that. I don't need to do that, though. Yeah,

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying you have to. I'm saying if you wanted to,

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to look at this team and say Okay,

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we got a lot of areas we gotta fix. What's

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>an area where we felt we have a lot of

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>extra where we can maybe leverage some of that to

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>get some some picks. Yeah, great, amble Um. I'm gonna

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have to take out the money part in the equation

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>because that's not my area of expertise when he comes

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to contract and money. So just based on merely the

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>what they've done so far, I would say, Mr Cooper,

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love the guy. He's a very talented player,

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and he can definitely make some place. But this year

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and including last year, I mean, you know, we always

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>talked about the games that he was good and then

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the away games where he just didn't bring it. But

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, I honestly have not seen much from him,

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's like every game we just see less and

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>less And it's not his fault or anything, but at

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the same time, I just feel like I'm not getting

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>much out of it. And yes, good player, talented player, bud,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>if it's not producing, if it's not producing on the field,

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>then I'm gonna have to say bye and just take

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>advantage of these younger guys that have shown talent as well.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>In the ability to make plays. Dave, I refuse. You

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>can't make me. You cannot make me answer this question

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's terrible. And this kind of goes

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>back to my point. No, I see your face and

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. This goes back to my point about

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>people overreacting to the trade deadline like this is such

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a knee jerk reaction. The Cowboys don't have their quarterback,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and the quarterbacks that are left don't have an offensive line.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the offense is going to look terrible, that

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is a given. But think about where this team is headed.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>They're probably gonna pick in the top ten, so they're

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have four picks inside the top one hundred. They're

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a comp three for Byron Jones, They're gonna

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>get a cop four for Robert Quinn. They're gonna pick

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>six times in the first one hundred and thirty hundred

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and forty picks. That's all the ammunition you need to

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>improve your team via the draft. So why am I

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.479
<v Speaker 1>dealing away Michael Galloper or Marii Cooper when my Pro

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Bowl quarterback will be back next year to throw them

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball. And my offense, by the way, is still

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be my best bet at being successful. It's

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a knee jerk reaction to think you need to take

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>talent off of this team because they're struggling right now.

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>There's no chance in hell I would deal any of

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the three of them. Sorry, if I'm not playing along,

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>that's me leaning his way, Derek. Sorry, I agree. Okay, yeah, okay, No,

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean like, I get it, I get it. We're

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>doing to share on Tuesday on a bad football team.

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I get it, we're trying to play on I understand that.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>But but makes good points. Don't you think it's important

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to flesh out the other side of that? Like again,

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like the team's bad and we got to talk about it,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and we got eight more weeks to get through it.

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But don't blow up the good things about your team,

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>because this season's not going the way that you want

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to know. But here's the point. Here's the point. Here's

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the point that's not blowing up the team that is. Wait,

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll put it to you like this, The most memorable

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>trade the Cowboys have ever had in the history of

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>their franchise was this kind of move. You say, I

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have a bad team, I have what is the area

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>where I have a really good player an area where

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I can take that really good player and I can

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>leverage that into more that can help my team get

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>better faster. And that's the question. The question is, and

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not assuming that you guys are making this. I'm

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>saying if the people that are making decision in the

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>building decided, hey, this is an opportunity for us to

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>take an area that we think of as a real

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>strength where we have extra parts and turn that into

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.959
<v Speaker 1>value that we can use in other areas, which, by

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the way, we could probably list right now. We could

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>probably list five or six different positions where the Cowboys

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>need I'm talking absolutely need to upgrade this offseason. And

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>if they say, if that can give us value to

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to do that, to be able to make

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>our ascension faster, then who would be that guy that

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you would want to trade? You know, I think it

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>all comes down to one player, and that's Cedric Wilson.

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>If Cedric Wilson has shown this team that he is

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>capable of being a third receiver, which he has done,

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>He's shown some flashes of that before. He's more of

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a receiver than he is a passer, I think, and

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a reverse guy and all that kind of stuff, I

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>think if I think that actually shows, Okay, now we

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>have four receivers that we really like, and maybe we

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>could trade somebody away. From that standpoint, I still, to

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>me would be Gallup if I had to do that.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with Dave. I like what I've got

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on offense there, and I just have to think that

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll get better on defense to free agency in the draft,

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>mainly to the drafts real quick. The other another thing

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you need to point out is, and it

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>gets talked about a lot, is you know, choosing between

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Gallup and Cooper. Stop trying to create problems for yourself

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time because you know everybody's like, well, you

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>can't pay them all. You can't pay them all. That's fine.

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Gallup has a season and a half left on his

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Cooper's guid teaser done at the end of the twenty

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>any one season, you don't have to make that choice

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time. You could get you can get away

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>from the Amar contract in the same year that Gallup

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>needs a new deal. You don't have to make that

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>choice right now. And if there's anything I've learned this season,

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's you really can't afford to look more than like

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a few months ahead of time in the NFL, because

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>two years from now, who on earth knows. Yeah, But

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>what you also just said a little bit earlier. What

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you said a little bit earlier is you, as a

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>person that would be talking about trade options, would not

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>be looking at trade for somebody in the final year

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of their deal. So the value if you were going

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to continue consider maybe getting value out of one of

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>those two guys, would be right now. It wouldn't be

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>next year. Oh yeah, no, no, absolutely, I'm not ever.

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna deal either one of them. I'm gonna

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>play them for the I'm gonna play them for the

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>next year and a half. And in twenty twenty two,

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, do I let Michael Gallup walk in

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>free agency and get a COMPIIC for him, or do

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I cut Amari Cooper and signed Michael Gallup? Like that's

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>what I would do. All Right, We're gonna take our

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>final break. When we come back, we got more questions.

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna roll through here. We'll right back. This is

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio since eighteen sixty five. Stetson

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>hats are American maid with pride, right here in Texas,

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and Stetson is proud to be on the field with

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>America's team. Want to show your Texas and team pride too?

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You can by purchasing your own Stetson. You can look

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>just like how the flag guys do on field at

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>every home game. Stetson hats the official crown of all

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>self respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>today at Shop Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com. I'm Jay Novachek, former tight end for the

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day, I was the guy

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>who always got the tough yards and that's why I

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>run with John Deer today. In fact, I have a

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.239
<v Speaker 1>John Deer three zero twenty five E tractor that can

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>handle any yardwork I need to do, even the tough

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>yards way out back. So if you have one acre

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or a thousand, John Deer has the equipment that's just

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>right for you. Visit a John Deer dealer today and

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>run with us. We are the official tractor provider of

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>your Dallas Cowboys. I want to use what the pros use.

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>How about the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black right now you can get the Jack Black Starter,

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Clack skincare favorites, plus a full sized and tense therapy

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>whip bomb. Go to get Jack Black dot com slash

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and use the code word team JB. That's Get

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys. The Jack Black Starter

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks, free shipping. We're back in a tasty treat

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor pepper

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor Bad Cream Soda.

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Is he a Newcombonet's music to my ears? Okay, Doctor

0:30:54.920 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>bath Time? Put it in a glass, into my ears

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and mouth, New Doctor pepper and cream Soda. Let's just

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do bad. Back to the break, Hey, PBR fans, that

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>includes you, Derek. Lock it in your seats now for

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty PBR unleashed the Beast World Finals and

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>don't miss a second of the action. PBR lands in

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the heart of Texas at at and T Stadium November

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>twelveth through the fifteenth. Get your tickets now at PBR

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com or SeatGeek dot Com. Welcome back. It is

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the final segment of The Break live from the s

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.719
<v Speaker 1>WBC Mortgage studios at the Star. We're doing our media

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>review on the Cowboys. Next question I have for you guys,

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>compare to expectations for Blake Jarwin Dalton Schultz has been good,

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean as good, better or worse. Let's start with

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you Amber. Definitely better, I mean better than what you

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>thought of. No, no, no, let me make sure I

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>got you got the question right. You're saying he's better

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>than what you thought Blake Jarwin would be. Oh no, okay,

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm asking. I'm saying, based upon the expectations

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for Blake Jarwin, Dalton has been better than that, the

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>same as that, or worse, I would say worse, worse.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say worse because Blake Jarwin is a guy

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that I absolutely expected him to have a killer season.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately it didn't work out. I think he only got

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to play a couple of plays or one and then

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>got injured. But everything that I saw from him at

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>training camp, what I was seeing from him last year

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>when he was given the opportunity to be on the field,

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it just everything pointed upwards, and I was really excited

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to what he could possibly do. As far as Dalton Sholes.

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>He was a guy that I was ready to say

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>bye to cut him straight away, but definitely impressed me.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And he has been able to make it and make

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it work on the field and do a lot better

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>than I personally expected. Now to say he's been better

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>than my expectations for Blake Jarwin, absolutely not, but I

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's been able to at least handle the job

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and make some really good plays for the Cowboys at

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a time that they really needed a tight end to

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>make plays. Dave. If you look at the production, I

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>would say it's pretty similar. You know. I'm sorry. Schultz

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is on pace for like seven hundred yards and four

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>or five touchdowns, which when you think about all the

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>other elements of this offense, that's probably what I thought

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for Jarwin. But I think my expectations were for Jarwin.

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>We're higher because I just I see him as a

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>guy that can stretch the field. You think about the

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>plays he's made down the seams with Dak, I saw

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that, so I you know, I saw

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>him being more of a big play guy. So I

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>think Jarwin. My expectations are still higher, but I'm so

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>impressed by what I've seen from Schultz, which I said

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this the other night, like that is, you know, if

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for something to be happy about for this season,

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely one of them. Like, you know, we're sitting

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>here talking about next season and all this stuff they

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta fix. I don't think they need to draft a

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>tight end, at least not super high. I'm sky high

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>on Jarwin even still. And Schultz looks like a badass.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So you give me those two guys and you know,

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>throw in a third guy. You don't even have to

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>draft one, Like I feel pretty solid about that position.

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, nick Um, this is about

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the same because when they look at what I expected

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at a Jarwin, I would have if you would have

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>said sixty two catches, I would have been like, that's

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that's probably pretty good there for all the other receivers

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and Zeke getting the ball. Sixty two catches, so he's

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>at thirty one right now. That's that's about what I thought. Now,

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe a higher average down the field a little

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>bit more because he you know, he can stretch to

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>feel more than than Schultz. I think the one thing

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that I'm forgetting I think people forget about, though, is

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, you just don't have that complete

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>tight end, that guy that is on the line that

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>can help you as a blocker and also can go

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>down the field and make those catches. You know, he's

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>still I still think blocking is an issue for all

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the time, and so UM I would maybe draft one

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>if there was a you know, he had a good situation.

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's been good. I mean, he's been

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>better than I thought. Schultz has been better than I

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>thought he would be. But but I but I think

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>this this production is about what I thought the starting

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>tight end would get give. You do you think that

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the blocking would have been better with Um with Jarwin

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 1>than with Schultz and Blake Bell? Uh? I think? Yeah?

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Jarwin and Blake Bell are better blockers than

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Schultz and Blake Bell. Yeah. I don't think Schultz is

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a good blocker. I don't either, But ultimately I don't.

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I think that Blake is a

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>great block No, I no, I don't, And I agree

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>with you. I think I think they don't have a

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>good block. They haven't had a good blocking tight end

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>really for I mean, I mean maybe the first five

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>or six years of Jason Witten's squere he was he

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>was okay at it, but then he kind of I

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>mean he struggled there a little bit. He knew how

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>to get in the way, and that's what a good

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end, you know. I think he's taught those guys

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>how to do it, but they get you know, you

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>can't just match them up with a defensive end sometime.

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:00.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're gonna get through around. Yeah. They played

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve personnel quite a bit of the game last week,

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>probably more than I've seen them playing since McCarty's been here.

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Um and and even with them playing twelve personnel, they

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>were still not being able to slow down that that

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>front all the time, even when they had those extra

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>tight ends staying back to blocks. So yeah, I don't

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they got a good blocking tight

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>end right now. And for that reason, I do think

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot left to be gained. I do

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>think Schultz is well ahead of what I thought he

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>would be when when I when when we first heard

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that Blake Jarwin was going down. That's one of the

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>next question with all that's happened. You know what. Yeah,

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, training camp it's very difficult to

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 1>fully judge because it's training camp. But I kept my

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>eyes on Blake jar when this training camp, and he

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>did make some really impressive blocks during practices. And yes,

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a real game or anything, but it was

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>impressive enough for me to at least be excited as

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to thinking or expecting a tight end position to have

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a better blocker this year. He clearly didn't work out,

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but I felt like I saw some type of improvement

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at least during training camp compared to what we've seen

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>from Blake Jarwin in previous years. So maybe that's an

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>area that he was improving. Maybe, and I guess we

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>won't have a chance to find it out till we

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>get to next year. But maybe he's blocking guys on

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 1>a defense that can't get off blocks. Good point. I mean,

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I know all we could go off. All we could

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>go off is trading camp. But I'm just saying, boy,

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I sat there with all you guys like, man, it's

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a party at the quarterback all Smith over here,

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Dal all over here. Yeah, it wasn't quite because Terrence

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Steele I mean, yeah, it wasn't just Steel, I mean

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.439
<v Speaker 1>it was there was some everybody. I mean, you didn't

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:48.879
<v Speaker 1>have your two I mean, well you didn't have Yeah,

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have those guys that you would that you

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>were expecting you were going to have once the season

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>got here, and it just it showed. I think the

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 1>biggest theme of the whole year is that other than

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe tight end, everybody else every key injury they've had,

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they've had multiple at that position. It's not just Cheeto.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>It was Cheeto and Anthony Brown. It's not just you know,

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the one left tackle, it's the right tackle and the

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>backup tackle. And now it's not just the quarterback, it's

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the backup quarterback. Everybody that's been hurt. That's significant. In

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the linebackers too, Shaun Lee and Layton Vanderish. It's just

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>been one tight end. But I mean, you know, I

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>think for the most part, the injuries have hit positions

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple times. And now you can't even say the same

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thing about defensive tackle. I mean, you lost before the

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>season even got it, and then you lost christ Riston Hill, right,

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's go out. I mean I'm just saying,

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like you lost the guy you thought you were fiding.

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. All right, let's on to the

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.959
<v Speaker 1>next question. U. With all that's happened this season while

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Dak played and since his injury, the price you'd be

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>willing to pay him has increased, decreased, or stayed the same.

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you, Dave. I mean, I can't. I

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>can't completely to that question until we know more about

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.479
<v Speaker 1>his recovery. And I it seems like it's going fine.

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any reason to suspect that's not. But

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I would like to know more about how he's looking

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and what his prognosis is. But if we are to

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>assume that he will be just fine, I'll say it

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>stays the same. But that's because I was always willing

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to pay him more in the first place, you know,

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.359
<v Speaker 1>like I was already comfortable with the idea of paying

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>him forty million in a year anyway. So if he's

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>healthy and ready to go, I feel the same way. Nick. Yeah,

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have to sign him. You can't sign

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>him to the franchise tag. I mean, that's just impossible.

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I don't think you can do that.

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>You might, you might tag him, but you certainly can't.

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>He can't go off a tag like that. If the

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:48.919
<v Speaker 1>tag is not number, is not going to go down.

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>But the salary cap is, which I don't understand that.

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But if that's the way it is, then he's got

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>You gotta get a deal done with him. And yeah,

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you see his value. You're seeing

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>his value even more with him not being here. Um,

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know it's it's gonna be hard for the

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys to pay him more than Russell Wilson. But that's

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's more of a Seattle problem than anything I think it.

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's gonna get paid like Deshaun Watson, and

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 1>you know that's scary because the Shaun Watsons is hoping,

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Houston is hoping Deshaun Watson carries that team

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>and you can't do it. You can't do it when

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>when you you know, so it's gonna I don't know,

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be tough. But also, where are the Cowboys picking?

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Because I think if the Cowboys are picking on the

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>top five, you gotta open this. Gary and Stephen aren't

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>doing their job if they don't open up that discussion

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and be like, well, what are we gonna have to

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to discussion at least, Yeah, you have to. Yeah, I

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>think it stays the same. But the big difference for

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>me personally is that now when I'm giving him his contract,

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a big smile on my face and I

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 1>feel better about it instead of being like, oh man,

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 1>here you go, just sign it. Just go ahead and

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 1>sign it. Now we're we're all buddies and now we're

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we're happy around here and we can celebrate. So I

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 1>think money wise, it just makes me feel better thinking

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and expecting that he's gonna fully recover from this injury.

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And based on what we did get to see from

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>him this year, I think he made a huge step

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>from last year and we saw how. And my biggest

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>thing with Dak Prescott has always been the whole thing

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>about can he carry the team without him needing so

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>many key guys around him, And given the injuries in

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the old line and the struggles that they had, I

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>think that I feel that Dak proved that he can

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>be that guy and he can't carry the team and

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:46.320
<v Speaker 1>just give that extra push that you needed. Sometimes it

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out with them getting a win, but we

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>saw the change and the and the the ability of

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:57.439
<v Speaker 1>him to make really important place under pressure. So yes,

0:41:57.600 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>now I just give it to him with a big

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:02.800
<v Speaker 1>camber just made in my opinion, the best point of

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the day. And because I think going into this year

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and really going into the contract negotiations, think the vast

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>majority of Cowboys fans and observers felt like Dak was

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>not the main thing that they did. They felt like

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the running game was the main thing they did. They

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>felt like what the offensive line was the best thing

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that they had, and Dak was just a complimentary piece,

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good complimentary piece, but he was a complimentary piece.

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think we found out at the beginning of

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this season is even without his two tackles, even with

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a running game that I think we all agree hasn't

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>been up to par and what we expected, Dak was

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>able to have this offense running at a rate that

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 1>was really, really somewhat historic, Like they were putting up

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>tons of yards and tons of points. You can call

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it whatever you want to call it about you know,

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, garbage time, but I'll tell you this that

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>garbage time, those garbage time points and yards aren't happening now.

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And so I think we all come away from this

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>with a different perspective of Dak Prescott. That's not about

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's a guy. That's a complimentary Right,

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we come away with the understanding that Dak is the

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>straw that stirs the drink. At this point, in my opinion,

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's even close. He is the reason

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>why this team will have success if they're going to

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>move forward with him. All right, let's go on to

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the final question that we have before we end the show.

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Who has been a bigger problem slash disappointment this season?

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Smith, Chris Jones or Xavier Woods. Let's start with

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Nick Um on of those three. I mean, if you

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:33.879
<v Speaker 1>have another one you'd like to write in, Phil Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about today or tonight or yeah. I don't

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>know what you're referring to now. I think that I

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>think Jayalen. I mean it's probably Jalen. I mean, because

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the punter doesn't make that much of a difference. I mean,

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>does he well he not really. No, he's been a disappointment.

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>He's been a disappointment, but it's hard to say that

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the center of your defense versus the punter relatively. Yeah,

0:43:57.520 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not as hard on Jalen as you

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>guys are. But I no, I'm not. I don't think

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>he's I don't think he's the true problem. I guarantee

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you if he didn't dress and swipe and do all

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the stuff like that, I guarantee people wouldn't hate him

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>as much. No, that has nothing whatsoever to do with it.

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, it does not for me. It doesn't

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>for me. It's about just watching him play. I just

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't see where someone watches him play and they

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think that he is a big part of the

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>problem with this step the answer, I mean, I think

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the answer zeke huh okay, I think that's the answer

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.840
<v Speaker 1>on the most disappointing. And it's not all his fault

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>because he's he thought he'd have a different supporting cast.

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, to not have one hundred yard game

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>after eight games, I mean, that's surprising, you knowsappointing him. Yeah.

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think he ranks though? In the NFL?

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you know this? I know this. I'm guessing he's

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and fourteen yards, guessing he's probably around twelfth, thirteen, seventh, seventh.

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have guessed the same wow, but still he's

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>been most of this point. I'm gonna say, Zeke, if

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I could do a write in ballot, vote for them, Zeke,

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>all right, Amber Europe Anya, That's exactly what I was

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna say. I was gonna see. I was gonna say

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a Zequel because Jamen Smith he's never been a guy

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that has been impressive enough to me in my eyes.

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>He started changing my opinion during training camp. And again

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it was training camp, but we were all blah, you know,

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out to be what we saw at training camp.

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>So there's that. So my expectations weren't very high for

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Jalen to begin with based on previously or not this

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>training camp. Anyways, point is it would be Ezekiel Elia

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 1>because he just like I talked about Dark Prescott, he

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was the guy that I've always seemed to be the

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>person to be able to carry the offense. He was

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the guy that I always saw the Cowboys being able

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to run lean on, lean on with the running game

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>and him being able well to create plays where it

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>was just really messy and you didn't think he could

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:06.879
<v Speaker 1>get much and then there he goes pushing for those

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>extra two four yards and this year it just unfortunately

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been that. He hasn't been able to not just

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>make the explosive place that we've used to see, but

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:23.439
<v Speaker 1>just protect the ball. You know, he's given the ball

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:27.880
<v Speaker 1>away and that that has cost the Cowboys touchdowns and

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 1>losing games. And that's very important and something that you

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>don't expect a veteran guy like him to do, not

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 1>just once multiple times. So it would just have to

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>be Ezekiel Elliott I would say, definitely the disappointment this year, Dave,

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it's jail and I don't think it's particularly close. Then.

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Zeke's been disappointing for sure, Like he's not living up

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to that contracts. He's not having a great season by

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>his standards, but running backs are a product of their environment.

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:01.880
<v Speaker 1>If he ad Dak and a healthier offensive line, I

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 1>think he'd be just fine. And that is a fair

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>conversation about whether or not it's worth to pay a

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:10.400
<v Speaker 1>running back that much money, But that's neither here nor there. Like,

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried about Zeke being good next season if

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the offense is healthier. I am worried about Jalen Smith

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 1>ever being good again based on what we've seen and yeah, Nick,

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I get your point. Like the way that he carries

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 1>himself rubs a lot of people the wrong way. But

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:29.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm with Derek, Like his instincts seem bad. He gets

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>fooled a lot, he's out of position a lot. He

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:35.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to have the burst that he had in

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen. Whenever he's asked to move in space, it

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>usually looks really, really rough. And the Cowboys are paying

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 1>him to be this centerpiece of their defense. He doesn't.

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:49.880
<v Speaker 1>More often than not, he looks like an average to

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>below average linebacker and they're paying him to be at

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the top of the position. And not only is it

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously bad for the team right now, but there's

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.439
<v Speaker 1>big financial ramifications about that. You know, if he can't

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>get it done. That's why I said, like, they got

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to figure out a way to make him a better player,

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>or figure out how they can cope with carry and

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that contract on the books like that. It's one of

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problems facing them for twenty twenty one in

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. And it's just not where I thought they

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>would be when they agreed to that deal a year ago.

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 1>All Right, that's a rap. We appreciate you guys, you guys,

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back tomorrow. Wouldn't start getting ready for Cowboys

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>versus Steelers? What Bucky Brooks? You join us. We'll talk

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about the Steeler offense tomorrow versus the Cowboys defense. Till then.

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>For Nick Eatman, Dave Helm and Amber Garcia, I'm Derek Eagleton.

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>This has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.359
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.