WEBVTT - Airbnb's Record Plunge, Disney's Mixed Earnings

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Live from San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I sit down with the CEO of Lyft, president of Shopify,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 3>and COO of Reddit, and we break down those companies'

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>earnings results. Plus we stick with earnings as Airbnb sees

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 3>a record plunge on a week outlook, and we dig

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 3>into Disney as the Mousehouse offers a mixed picture in

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 3>its earnings. Let's check in on the markets and as

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 3>that one hundred up for a second consecutive day by actually, no,

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 3>I take that back, I'm wrong. It's down two tens

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 3>of percent. How things can change this session. The story

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>right there is really about monetary policy, you know, And

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>on a three day basis, we're flat, we're slightly hiring

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 3>the session. We're still thinking about Monday and the selloff

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 3>that happened on growth concerns and monetary policy intervention. So overnight,

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>the bank in Japan basically said we won't intervene with

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 3>a rate hike in the event that markets are unstable,

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 3>and that's kind of having it not much to do

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 3>with tech. There's one big tech name that is moving

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>and that's Airbnb.

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Check out this chart.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>So in the session, Airbnb is on track for its

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 3>biggest drop ever.

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 4>We're worried about the outlook.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>We're worried about what Airbnb had to say about its

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 3>peak holiday season, even though some executives took to the

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>social medias to tell us things, all right, let's talk

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 3>about Airbnb and bringing Bloomberg's man Deep Sing, senior analyst

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg Intelligence. So what they said was moderation sequentially

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>of growth, and the growth wasn't that good in the

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 3>courts have gone. So if you extrapolate, you're basically saying,

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 3>hold on, this is the best time of year normally

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 3>for Airbnb, the summer months. We're worried about what they're

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 3>saying about business traffic.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look, and you're right.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, given its Olympics and you know, a lot

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 5>going on in terms of holiday planning. They talked about

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 5>shortening booking windows. And to me, you know, the biggest

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 5>risk with Airbnb is not that they don't have a

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 5>great mode. It's more about the saturation in the alternative

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 5>accommodation's market and whatever new products that they have launched,

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 5>whether it's rooms or experiences which they have had for

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 5>a while, hasn't really driven incremental growth. So what they

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 5>told us last night was look, the room night growth

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 5>will be mid single digit and EBITDA growth will actually

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 5>taper off because they plan to invest more to expand

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 5>supply in new areas in Latin America and Asia pack

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 5>and I think all those are signs towards you know,

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 5>penetration being high in their existing markets and they just

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 5>have to find new markets if they want to keep

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 5>growing in alternative accommodations, or perhaps they need to make

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 5>an acquisition, which I want to all out given the

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 5>strength of Airbnb's balance sheet.

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so Mandy, your stocks down twelve to fourteen percent,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 3>the most on record. What do you do if you're

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 3>the CEO? You go on social media and say it's

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 3>a great time to buy. Would you agree with Brian

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:24.839
<v Speaker 3>Sheesky's thesis here?

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 5>I mean, he had a floor last night and during

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 5>the earnings call to talk about the plans, and nothing

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 5>we heard was very exciting. Look, long term, as I said,

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 5>this company has a great mode. It clearly is a

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 5>category leader in alternative accommodations, but can it keep growing

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 5>double digits? And I think there are question marks they

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 5>can do it at least in the next two to four.

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Quarters, Bloomberg's Mandep saying at Bloomberg Intelligence, thank you.

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 4>I want to get more on the market.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Outlook is equities trade broadly in the green with Bloomberg's

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Emily Graffeo. You know, I don't know about you, m

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of recovering a bit from Monday's the trauma

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 3>of a near three percent decline on the Nasdaq one hundred.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 3>But in the market there's the growth concern, there's the

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>central bank policy concern, and then there's probably earnings. What's

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the outlook of all of that in aggregate.

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, the outlook is that the volatility is not expected

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 6>to subside, even though we are seeing this market rally

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 6>yesterday and at least today. When you look at the

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 6>Vicks volatility index, typically when we see a spike like

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 6>we did on Monday, that means that for the next

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 6>several trading sessions and even up to weeks, we'll see

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 6>these big up days and these big down days. What's

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 6>interesting this is Bloomberg Technology we'd been talking so much

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 6>about a rotation into smaller cap names value names a

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 6>few weeks ago, and we're actually kind of seeing that

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 6>trade disappear now now that markets are rallying. Technology stocks

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 6>are rallying the most. You look at the Nasdaq one

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 6>hundred at least today, up almost two percent. The Russell

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 6>two thousand, which was outperforming tech, is only up about

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 6>zero point eight per right now. So you know, a

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 6>few days ago we were talking about, oh, is tech

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 6>no longer a safe haven? Is that no longer a

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 6>place that investors want to hide? But it actually seems

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 6>like we are still seeing an appetite to buy those

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 6>megacap tech stocks.

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 3>And we remind our audience in Vidia doesn't report until

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>August twenty eight, then everyone's kind of treading water till

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>that point. Bloomberg's Emily Graffeo, thank you very much. Aside

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 3>from this week's massive sell off, some of the world's

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 3>biggest equity hedge funds lost hundreds of millions of dollars

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 3>from piling in to popular tech stocks. Amid the stock

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 3>route that hit markets in around mid July, Bloomberg Temma

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Palmer has been tracking it. There are some specific single

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 3>names in that industry who were probably more hit than others.

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 4>Who are they and what happened?

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 7>Yes, so we saw a lot of pain over at

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 7>Light Street, down nine percent and one month alone of July,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 7>still up forty for the year, but definitely a difficult

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 7>month for them. That's likely due to their very big

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 7>position in the video As of March, that stock for

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 7>about seventeen percent of their portfolio. They also have sizeable

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 7>stakes and other of the Magnificent seven. When we look

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 7>across the world, you know the hedge fund space, specifically

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to the equity funds, you do see

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 7>this concentration in Microsoft, Amazon, Navidio, and some of the

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 7>other big tech names that have really struggled this month.

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's hemmapalma with the data and the hedge fund ownership

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 3>of big tech.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Really appreciate it. Thank you.

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 8>So.

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on Bloomberg Technology, we're going to be joined

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 3>by Reddits COO Gen Wong to discuss the company's results

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>and their outlook for sales growth and interesting conversation. Gen

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 3>really at the heart of some of the deals that

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Reddit is doing. One other name that I'm looking at

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 3>is in the chip sector, Micron in particular, let's bring

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>up the stock and take a look at it. There's

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 3>several stories out there, one of largely around share buybacks.

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 3>The company basically saying that they may resume a stock

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 3>buyback program to offset some dilution from their employee stock

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 3>comp programs.

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 4>The stock up two point seven percent.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Remember we've covered this really in the context of high

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 3>bandwidth memory recently, but also it's one that is in

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of end markets, smartphones, d ram and nan

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:14.679
<v Speaker 3>flash being one as well.

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Reddit beat analysts expectations on sales growth after expanding its

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 3>data licensing partnerships and investing in new advertising technology. The

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>company's revenue forecast for the third quarter also beat estimates.

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Delighted to say that Reddit's COO Gen Wong joins us

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 3>live here on Bloomberg Technology. You know that the stock

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>is lower an impressive set of numbers for a relatively

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 3>newly public company, and everyone's kind of looking at the

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 3>outlook and trying to extrapolate out understand the world that

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Reddit's operating in. Could you just get us a sense, Jen,

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 3>in your conversations with advertisers, what the rest of the

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 3>year looks like, the environment looks like, and why Reddit

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 3>may or may not fare better with those advertisers compared

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>to other social media platforms.

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, thanks for having me look at the markets of

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 9>the markets. But when we look forward to the back

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 9>half of the year, I think advertising is a pretty

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 9>stable market, and what drives our growth is what drive

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 9>our growth in Q two, which is delivering against our

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 9>consumer and ad roadmap and continue to drive value for advertisers.

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 9>So I think what's driven our user growth has been

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 9>the work of making Reddit better, making it easier access posts,

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 9>easier for people to connect with communities, easier for mods

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 9>to do their moderation. And that's when we make the

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 9>platform better, the users grow. And from an advertising perspective,

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 9>it's been all the investments we made in our ad

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 9>platform to improve usability and scalability so that we can

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 9>address and serve more advertisers and grow the advertising base.

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 9>Next is delivering quarter over quarter performance for our advertisers,

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 9>and then delivering things that only Ready can do that

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 9>are ready unique, like they ask me anything, format refresh,

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 9>or testing things like ads and comments. Those strategies are

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 9>working for us and will continue executing against that roadmap.

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 10>As we head into the back half of the year,

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 10>and we feel really good about the yield on that roadmap.

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Jen, you've been very busy since last week spoke,

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I think principally about the deals with NBA NFL. What

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to understand is how those kind of video

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 3>focused partnerships contribute to your ad revenue or ad growth

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 3>going forwards from this point.

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 9>So, Reddit is home to an incredible group of fan communities,

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 9>and the sports communities are some of the most active

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 9>engaged on the platform, and they're global, and so the

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 9>idea of having those partnerships with the sports leagues was

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 9>to bring in special content like highlights, like access to

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 9>players for amas or to insiders, for those communities to enjoy.

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 9>So that is really our starting place for it. Now

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 9>what's great is that does create an opportunity for advertisers.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 10>To support that content.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 9>Some of those advertisers support that content and are aligned

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 9>with that content on other platforms like television, et cetera.

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 4>So it is a.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 9>Really nice win win win for users and communities and

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 9>Reddit and advertisers. It's early, it's a program that we're testing,

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 9>and we've done some work with the NFL.

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 10>Now we've expanded it to more leagues.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 9>We are excited about it because I think the communities

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 9>are excited about getting access to that content. And if

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 9>you think about it, you know, we've done partnerships with

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 9>US based leagues, but there are so many more sports

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 9>and so many more global leagues that we could engage with.

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 9>And then the fan communities, they go beyond sports.

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 10>On Reddit, there a gem.

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I am a I am a long serving, suffering and

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 3>passionate Chelsea fan in football what you'd call soccer, and

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I dive deep into Reddit when I want to see

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 3>what the fan base wants to know you. And I've

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 3>discussed previously licensing of data to the AI companies Google

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Open Ai, but a few months have elapse and I'm

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 3>wondering if you now have a better sort of vision

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 3>for the long term potential of that business model away

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 3>from advertising.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 9>Look, I think that landscape is still emerging and it's

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 9>still early days for for AI, so it's a long arc.

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 9>We've been I think, very thoughtful about how we structure partnerships.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 10>Our view. They're not one year, they're not long term.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 9>They're sort of midterm partnerships that allow us to learn

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 9>and find a way to work with this new area.

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 10>And see how it goes.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 9>So I don't think, you know, I think we still

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 9>continue to learn in this process because I think it's

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 9>a very long mark. I do think some of the

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 9>things that we've done have established a foundation for having

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 9>these partnerships. So if you look at our public content

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 9>policy and you look at the changes.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 10>That we've made, I think we've made it really.

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 9>Clear how we want the ecosystem work because we are

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 9>stewards of Reddit data and user privacy, etc. Is really

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 9>important in allowing scaled access to Reddit disk.

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Jen.

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 3>When I sit at my computer in the morning, I

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 3>use various search functions. It's often a Reddit post that

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 3>will come up and it's quite easily discoverable, specifically Google Search,

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 3>but going forward, Chat, GPT, there are platforms where that's

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 3>not the case, being do you have a clear strategy

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>for search expansion for Reddit content.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 9>Look, we have been beneficiaries of the open Internet. We

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 9>believe in the open Internet and allowing people to get

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 9>access to important information and reddits. Corpus has some of

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 9>the best and most important answers regarding everything, product, services, life, etc.

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 9>So we want ready to be open but we have

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 9>to have a set.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 10>Of rules for doing that.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 9>And search and summarization and AI and data usage, they're

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 9>sort of all merging right.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 10>This is part of what's changing in the world right now.

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.599
<v Speaker 9>So I think our view is we will have a

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 9>conversation with anybody about having access to the data. But

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 9>we've been very clear and transparent about our rules, which

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 9>are our public content policy and protecting user privacies, being

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 9>good stewards of data, and that we have to have

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 9>a conversation where those policies and rules are respected.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 10>And then there's commercial alignment.

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 9>So we're having conversations with every player large and small,

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 9>and I think we've made it clear that what the

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 9>rules are and how to make this work, and the

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 9>fact that we've signed deals I think is a sign

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 9>that we're sensible.

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 10>There's a path here to do that.

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Jen, the stage is now very much set for a

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 3>presidential election race for November.

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 4>How does that impact Reddit?

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 3>Do you kind of foresee boost from political ads or

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 3>even just activity on the platform centered around the election.

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we actually are not a big player in political ads.

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 10>We never have been.

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 9>Politics is obviously a big area that our community is

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 9>engaged with on Reddit. So we do see conversation. But

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 9>what I would say is on Reddit, because we have

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 9>so many diverse communities, different communities have moments at different times.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 9>This is a presidential election year, so politics is going

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 9>to be a little bit bigger, but then Olympics was

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 9>a little bit bigger, and then there are seasons where

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 9>other communities kind of have their moment. What happens with

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 9>Reddit is that that kind of smooths out over time.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 9>So a community might be having a moment at one time,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 9>then another community than another community. But if you look

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 9>at the arc of Reddit's growth, it sort of is

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 9>all smooth over the trend reddits.

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>COO gen One, it's great to have you back here

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Technology.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much for your time. It's time for

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 4>talking tech.

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 3>And in the news, soft Bank announces a three point

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 3>four billion dollar buy back. The Tokyo based firm said

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 3>it would purchase up to six point eight percent of

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 3>its free floating outstanding shares through August seventh of next year.

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 3>The move comes as CEO Masayoshi's son prepares for a

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 3>large scale push into AI and semiconductor investments. Plus Hewlett

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Packard's fourteen billion dollar deal to buy Juniper Networks gets

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>the ok from UK watchdogs. The Competition of Markets Authority

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 3>cleared the purchase after investigating if it would lessen competition

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 3>in the UK.

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 4>The deal was similarly.

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Passed just last week by the European Union, and Sony

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 3>raises its revenue and profit forecast for the fiscal year

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 3>to March.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 4>The company saw a successful.

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Court in its music and gaming divisions, with operating profits

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 3>at one point nine billion dollars. It's PlayStation division saw

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 3>a lift, but it's PS five consoles sold just two

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 3>point four million units, significantly below the three million units

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 3>that analysts had expected. Let's get back to the earning

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 3>story and take a look at Shopify. The global commerce

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 3>company reported earnings results before the opening bell this morning,

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 3>beating estimates. Shopifive president Harley Finkelstein joins us now for more.

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Good morning to you, Harley.

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 3>It's good to catch up and then have you batch

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 3>on Boombog technology. Things are going right for Shopify. The

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 3>environment's hard to understand. Is there something specific that Shopify

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>is doing better or well in that environment?

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I think so. I think absolutely so.

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 11>First and foremost, I think we've earned the trust of

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 11>millions of merchants in business all over the world.

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 2>We announced a month ago month or so we all

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 2>go announced.

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 11>Then we have now powered over a trillion dollars with

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 11>a T in CUMULOGMVS and sart inception, which for us

0:16:59.920 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 11>is is really incredible. But I think we're not just

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 11>helping merchants compete. I think we're propelling them to victory.

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 11>And in terms of you know, how Shopify is doing

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 11>in particular, I think these results demonstrate that we can

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 11>do we can create the serious combination of both growth

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 11>and profitability. You know, when you exclude the sale of logistics,

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 11>revenue is up twenty five percent for the quarter to

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 11>two billion.

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, our fifth consecutive quarter at least twenty five percent.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 11>Top lane growth when you look at free cash low

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 11>or free CASHLW margin more than doubled from last year

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 11>from six percent to sixteen percent. Now, in terms of

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 11>sort of the more macro I guess you know, the

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 11>sort of macro questions you're asking. Look from our vantage point,

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 11>I'm hearing from other companies what you're hearing as well,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 11>But from our vantage point, our merchants, the merchants on

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 11>Shopify are outperforming others in the market.

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 2>They're growing at healthy rates.

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 11>We're adding more merchants every day, and I think as

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 11>a result, we're getting more market share.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Harley, real quick, I just want to jump in because

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 3>I you know, it did go well for me the quarter.

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 3>You've kind of been suffering from slowing growth in prior quarters,

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 3>and your emphasis was a marketing marketing, but something jumped out.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 3>You talked about a partnership with a social media platform

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 3>that really helped out.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 4>What platform was that, What.

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Were the specifics around that as a catalyst for.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 11>You, Yeah, I mean the truth is the way that

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 11>we think about marketing the same way we think about

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 11>product ed we don't necessarily it's all about data, and

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 11>so when we see a particular marketing opportunity, we take

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 11>that opportunity and the way that we think about all

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 11>our marketing channels that these are levers. So in Q one,

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 11>we did an experiment with a new emerging marketing channel,

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 11>emerging social platform. We put some money to work, we

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 11>saw a great return. We double that in Q two

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 11>and we saw about a fifty one percent increase in

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 11>new merchants from that channel. At the same time, we

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 11>saw other channels that historically did perform well, not perform

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 11>as well, so we pulled back on it. But the

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 11>way that we think about our marketing is as this

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 11>incredible data driven engine that allows us to not just

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 11>focus on SMBs in English speaking countries, but you think

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 11>about our point of sale business, our B to B business,

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 11>our international business. We're able to deploy capitals that have

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 11>the highest return on those investments, all within an eighteen

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 11>month average payback. And that's the sophistication that we've built

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 11>into the growth of members of Shopify.

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 4>So which big social platform was it.

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 2>We don't go into specifics on that.

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 11>It's just an example of something that we're constantly experimenting with.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 11>There's not that many emerging social platforms. I'm sure you

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 11>can figure out which one. But the point actually that

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 11>we want investors, we want the street to take away

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 11>is that we are always looking for new ways to

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 11>grow the business. And again, five consecutive quarters of above

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 11>twenty five percent top plane growth while being profitable. There's

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 11>not too many companies that can do that at our

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 11>size and growth their market share. And I think this

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 11>is the best version of Shopify you're seeing right now.

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I've spoken to so many businesses small and slightly bigger

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 3>that use Shopify, I get the benefit of it. So

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 3>this is about discoverability, right, adding new merchants or markets

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 3>to your platform. But let's do the math. If we

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 3>won't name the social platform, what ballpark was the spend

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 3>because turn on that campaign seems to have been very

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 3>definitive in the quarter.

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, think about this.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 11>When we started to we've been public now for just

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 11>over nine years. Initially we were focused on e commerce

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 11>for SMBs in very specific regions. We now have a

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 11>point of seale offering that surve passed one hundred billion

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 11>dollars in GMV International for example. Over fifty percent of

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 11>merchants that join in Q two on Shopify we're from

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 11>outside our core English speaking countries. You know, two years

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 11>ago we didn't have a B to B product, and

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 11>this past court a B to B Jimmy grew one

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 11>hundred and forty percent year on year. So it's not

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 11>just getting more people to use Shopify, it's more people

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 11>and more geography so to use different products, and that

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 11>is leading to the growth that you're seeing. At the

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 11>same time as being focused on on profitability.

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Harley, we enter the summer months and then we have

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 3>the holiday season here in North America. Do you kind

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 3>of market hard in the summer in the hopes of

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 3>having business transaction later in the year.

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 11>Real quick, Look, I think the key is that I

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 11>do think the holiday will be very good. But because

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 11>we have so many different verticals of merchants. We have

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 11>you know, Figs doing scrubs and pet products from bark Box.

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 11>We have Nestlie and Heinz and Mattel and Stables are

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 11>using Shopify. We're not relying on one particular type of merchant,

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 11>but I think the merchants that are on Shopify are

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 11>doing disproportionately well.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Harley Finkelstein, President of Shopify. Great to have you back

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Technology. Thank you so much. Welcome back to

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology. Ed Ludlow Here in San Francisco. Disney gave

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 3>a mixed picture as it reported third quarter results, with

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 3>weakness at its famed theme parks, though it made its

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 3>first ever profit in streaming, but with so many bundles

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 3>our consumers getting streaming fa Tegue. Disney CFO Hugh Johnston

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 3>joined Bloomberg earlier.

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Listen to this.

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Consumers do seem to appreciate having a limited number of bundles. Now,

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.239
<v Speaker 1>what we've tried to do with they're on offering is

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>offer the individual pieces or if people want to get

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>a discount by bundling, we're happy to do that.

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 4>So that said, I think you do see.

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>A trend where there's probably going to be a few

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>big competitors in the marketplace and streaming as we see

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>right now between Netflix, Amazon and ourselves, and then there'll

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 1>be some smaller competitors out there and they'll have to

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>decide how they're going to run their businesses.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 12>Are you concerned that consumers right now potentially are going

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 12>to shrug off the price increases, because what we hear

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 12>from a lot of companies is that we do see

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 12>consumers trading down. Why do you think they're willing to

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 12>pay for a higher price point?

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the biggest reason is it's always important

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to focus on this. The consumer receives value and what

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they pay is price. And because we're delivering so much value,

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, really an enormous amount of value in terms

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 1>of the hits that I just mentioned. But then in

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 1>addition to that, the combination of Disney plus Hulu and

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>then we're going to have an ESPN tile and ultimately

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>ESPN flagship on our streaming service. That's a huge amount

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of value for consumers, and as they're allocating their entertainment dollars,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to view US as as a

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>great place to put them.

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 4>That was Disney c FO Hugh Johnston. Take a look

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 4>at Disney shares.

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 3>We're off session lows, but we're down one point nine percent.

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 3>The company also commented on its negotiations with Hulu in

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 3>a filing today, saying it may have to pay five

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars more to acquire comcasts thirty three percent minority

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.479
<v Speaker 3>stake in Hulu. The two sides have disagreed over the

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 3>fair value of Hulu and entered into arbitration. Proceedings to

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 3>stock by the way down two percent so far in

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the year. Let's discuss all this with Lightshed partner Rich Greenfield.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's park Hulu for one second, first ever profit for streaming.

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Is this the Rich Greenfield slow clap? Or are you

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 3>not so overwhelmed by that news?

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 13>When you see subscriber growth slow of actively to a

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 13>halt and the price has gone up pretty traumatically, it's

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 13>you know, it's pretty clear. I guess in many ways,

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 13>it's sort of this, Hey, we don't know how to

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 13>get more subscriber growth, so we'll raise the price and

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 13>you know, hope that people won't and we'll even cut

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 13>back on programming. There's obviously a lot less programming. Disney's

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 13>essentially going to rely on their movies to drive the

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 13>streaming service and hope that the movies are strong enough

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 13>when they flow to the streaming service that people don't

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 13>cancel because they're not expecting a lot of growth in

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 13>subscribers over the next few quarters.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 14>And so it's.

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 13>Basically trying to you know, you know, get to profitability,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 13>drive profitability of the existing base. But it doesn't really

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 13>seem like there's a tremendous growth story here, and I

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 13>think that's.

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 14>Sort of you know, I mean, look, everyone's focused on

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 14>the parks.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 13>I don't think anyone's really focused on Disney Plus at

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 13>the moment.

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 14>The streaming is a nice data point.

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 13>I think it's less about getting to profitability and like

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 13>how big a business can this actually be ed? Like

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 13>can this be a multi billion dollar free cash flow

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 13>generating business the way Netflix? Or is this you know,

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 13>going to essentially tread water, you know, at a low

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 13>single digit margin.

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 14>I think that's what investors are really going to focus

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 14>on over time.

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean you and I have discussed the past, right,

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 3>achieving profitability by cutting you know, cutting cost out of

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 3>the equation.

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 4>So let's bring it back to you.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 10>Do.

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 13>What you really want to see is people. You really

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 13>want to see people who are so passionate. They love

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 13>this service. They're willing to pay more because they're spending

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 13>so much time. Like you want to see consumer love,

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 13>and based on that love, you can keep raising the

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 13>price getting more people to subscribe because there's great buzz.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 14>And word of mouth.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 13>That's not what's happening here nor any of these other

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 13>streaming services.

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 4>So then let's talk about Hulu.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I just finished Star Wars Acolyte on Disney Pass, and

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 3>like everyone else, I love the Bear on Hulu. You know,

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 3>we did the reporting on the negotiation for that, the

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 3>remainder of Comcast stay. Is it important if the idea

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 3>is to achieve volume and get stuff that people want

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 3>to watch? Do you see Hulu as being a sort

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 3>of something that needs to be resolved as part of that.

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 14>I mean, Hulu is going to be resolved. We're just

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 14>talking about the number now.

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 13>And I think investors are expecting several billion dollars.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 14>Whether it's four to five, we'll obviously see.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 13>But I don't think this is you know, I think

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 13>obviously it probably Comcasts would love more, Disney would love less.

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 13>But I don't think investors are stressing over what this

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 13>number ultimately is. Investors are just surprised that the option

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 13>was exercise last October.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 14>I think it's sort of crazy that.

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 13>We're still talking about this not resolved here in August.

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Rich If you could ask one thing of Bob Eiger,

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 3>or give one piece of advice to him to fix

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 3>this in a way that you think would be positive,

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 3>what would that be.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 13>Look, I think the bottom line is if Disney is

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 13>really serious about being a long term and you heard

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 13>Hugh saying they're going to be and the clip you

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 13>played earlier, if they want to be a long term

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 13>winner in the streaming game, it's not about discounting through bundling,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 13>it's not about cutting back on marketing. What they really

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 13>need to do is invest very aggressively. Stop playing this

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.479
<v Speaker 13>near term Wall Street game of trying to get earnings growth.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 13>They need to invest aggressively in making great content all

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 13>the time. That gets consumers to engage with the Disney

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 13>streaming platforms every single day for hours a day, Like

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 13>that should be their north star versus trying to figure

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 13>out alternative ways to manage churn.

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 14>That's what we'd like to see.

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 13>And look, you've got all of these theme park concerns

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 13>that are sitting with the company right now, Like that's

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 13>what investors are really worried about, is how did the

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.479
<v Speaker 13>theme park slow down this fast in the span of

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 13>just the last few months when Disney historically has pretty

0:27:57.880 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 13>good visibility.

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 4>I want to get some times talk about another name. Reddit.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 3>We had Gen Wong Coo on the show earlier, very

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 3>sort of patient, sanguine, calm about the ad environment, but

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 3>sees a lot of opportunity in sports.

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 4>I know that you like that name a lot.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 2>We do.

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 13>I mean, you know, if you think about what Reddit is,

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 13>they really understand what consumers are interested in. And they've

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 13>got one of the biggest companies in the entire world

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 13>alphabet Google is in their corner. You know, you can't

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 13>do a Google search and not see Reddit results rising

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 13>higher and higher and higher. Google's paying them for AI

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 13>Like Google is a firm believer in Reddit, If Google

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 13>believes in Reddit, everyone watching this show and investing should

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 13>believe in Reddit.

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 4>Like I think that is.

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 13>A really important data point, is that there is this

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 13>increasing visibility reddits getting within Google and Jen Wong, who

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 13>is now building out an ad business.

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 14>Reddit was very slow to get going. They've got it

0:28:59.040 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 14>going now.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 13>And we've seen other companies, whether it's Snap, Pinterest, go

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 13>back x which used to be Twitter when those companies

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 13>crossed a billion, Getting from one to three can happen

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 13>very very rapidly, and especially at Reddit, where they really

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 13>know who you are. They don't need third party cookies

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 13>or data. They know exactly who Ed and Rich are.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 13>They have all of this interest data because you are

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 13>searching Reddit for a topic, whether it's the giants or

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 13>whether it's video games, like, they really know who you

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 13>are and it allows for really well targeted advertising. I

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 13>think Reddit is a must own stock. We just put

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 13>a buy on it with an eighty four dollars price target.

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 13>I know people are worried about the lockup ending on Friday.

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 13>It is a great opportunity. People are gonna regret not

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 13>buying it today.

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, partner Rich Greenfield, really great to have

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 3>you here. On Bluembog technology. Really appreciate it.

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 3>So coming up on the show, we keep the earnings

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 3>conversation going with David Risher, the CEO of Lyft, discuss

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 3>the company's earnings results, which reported before the opening bill

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 3>this morning. Timely this is Technology. Let's get back to

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 3>earnings and Lift the right check company reported before the

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 3>bell this morning. CEO David Risher joins us live from

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 3>New York City to discuss and the basics of it

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 3>are that bookings, the outlook, missed estimates or street expectations,

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 3>that the stock is down significantly. What is happening right

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 3>now with Lift? The environment that Lift finds itself in.

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so hey, it's good to see you again. I mean, look,

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 15>it's to me, it's a little curious, right, and this

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 15>is sort of the way the world works sometimes. So

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 15>we just had our first profitable quarter ever, which is

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 15>an enormous accomplishment thanks to a lot of work for

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 15>the team. Revenue group forty percent year on your bookings

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 15>and rides around midteen seventeen percent, two hundred and fifty

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 15>six million dollars of free cash, so just and service

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 15>levels that are fantastic, fastest pickups, we've had in a

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 15>long time, fastest or more drivers than we've ever had.

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 15>So all those things are incredibly strong, and they indicate

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 15>a strong marketplace. And and we reiterated our full year

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 15>guidance and our multi year guidance as well.

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Yes in team growth, So.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 15>All those things were good. I think what people are

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 15>looking at is they're seeing what I would consider to be,

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 15>you know, incredibly small, you know, sort of kind of

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 15>adjustment around what we've said about the future the next

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 15>next quarter, in the next couple of quarters. And this

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 15>to me sort of signifies, you know, sort of the

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 15>world we live in. Like the things that we think

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 15>about are one hundred and sixty billion rides in the

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 15>US in total private cars, and we are little by little,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 15>you know, in a very very disciplined and customer obsessed

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 15>way growing our business. You know, I think Wall Street

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 15>sometimes looks at short term things and gets a little

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 15>bit overly focused on that. I'm thinking about the long

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 15>term and super excited about.

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 4>The prospects David.

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 3>There's some David Risher's strategy and plans that I see

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 3>playing out, like price lock. Yeah, a paid feature that's

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 3>going to have an impact, maybe on the top and

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 3>bottom line. But why, why is that the plan for you?

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 15>Yeah? So, price lock is a way for riders to

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 15>lock in a price just like it sounds like, on

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 15>the same route and same time every day. It's really

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 15>in first met for commuters, and it's available today. By

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 15>the way, I encourage everyone to check it out. It's

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 15>kind of in soft launch, and the idea is it

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 15>takes away what I think is one of the most

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 15>hated features of all ride share, which is surge pricing, right,

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 15>and we're trying to get rid of it. Can never

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 15>get rid of it completely, but we can certainly give

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 15>riders a way to basically pay a small subscription fee

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 15>and lock themselves into a consistent price. I think it's

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 15>great and I think it's the sort of thing that's

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 15>going to grow the business in the long term. Of course,

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 15>it's an investment, right, and you always invest in new

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 15>features that you have a lot of conviction around. But this,

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 15>again is our customer obsession is what drives profitable growth. Again,

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 15>we're profitable now and we think there's going to be

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 15>a great growth driver for us.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Advertising is a battleground as well. You know, I am

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 3>so familiar with the lift at But why is advertising

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 3>the way to go? And what with who with?

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Right? You think about parallel industries?

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so you know, think about you know, of course,

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 15>let's let's zoom way out for a second. Since the

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 15>history of advertising, you know, brands have tried to come

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.719
<v Speaker 15>up with new ways to talk to their consumers, right,

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 15>and one hundred years ago, maybe it was billboards, then

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 15>maybe it was radio ads, then maybe TV ads. Obviously

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 15>more recently internet advertising, we see this kind of mobile

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 15>advertising literally advertising that comes to you in the car

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 15>where you're going, as an incredibly important effectually a sector

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 15>that we're really going to help build out. And because

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 15>if you think about it and reflecting on some of

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 15>the earlier conversations you were having around Reddit, for example,

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.719
<v Speaker 15>we have an enormous amount of first party data, right,

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 15>two million rides a day, every one of them going

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 15>to a seven to eleven or a Starbucks or you know,

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 15>whatever it might be, and that's first party data that's

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 15>very indicative of what it is that riders want to do.

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 15>And so our media business has grown significantly. We're up

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 15>significantly year on year, and we're really optimistic that it's

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 15>going to be a whole new form of advertising and

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 15>media that go super great.

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 4>David.

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 3>When I reported that Tesla was delaying its Robotaxi event

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 3>to October, the shares of your company jumped in that session.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 3>The vision is a proprietary app from Tesla for ride hailing,

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 3>but a fleet of cars that drive themselves.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Tesla's Your stock.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Went up on the basis that everyone was like, Okay,

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the competition from Tesla's not yet coming. Just your latest

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 3>thinking on that, please, Yeah.

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 15>Look, I think avs are going to be great for

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 15>a lift, I really do. And I think it's because

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 15>we're going to be the best way to commercialize what

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 15>is a very very expensive asset. Different companies will try

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.959
<v Speaker 15>different things, but I think largely you'll have a lot

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 15>of oms doing a lot in the av space and

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 15>wanting them on our platform because of you know, millions

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 15>of rides, all the technology we have to incorporate cars

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 15>in our platforms and so forth. I don't want to

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 15>comment on Tesla. I don't know, you know, we'll see

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 15>kind of how that goes. But I do think that

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 15>creating your own thing a kind of closed network is

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 15>it's a front strategy and maybe a different strategy would

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 15>be to figure out a way to get your cars

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 15>that you've built in your technology, you know, as broadly

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 15>available to as many as possible.

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 3>David Richard, the CEO of Lyft, thank you so much

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 3>for joining us in the studio in New York. Thank

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 3>you now shares lower of Rivian. After the ev makers

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 3>second quarter revenue miss analyst estimates, just cash firm for

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 3>the quarter came in bigger than expected. Earlier, I sat

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 3>down with the CEO RJ Scaringe, listen to this.

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 16>We see that both through the excitement of our customers directly,

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 16>but there's lots of ways to measure this. And we

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 16>just had a JD Power as an annual appel study.

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 16>We came out as a number one brand this year.

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 16>We had a number one ranking on a JD Power

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 16>study last year. So the reaction of the product has

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 16>been great. We've in the second quarter we went through

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 16>a big refreshed to the product where we've now launched

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 16>what we call generation two of that vehicle of the

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 16>RWE tRNS, where it made significant improvements in the product

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 16>but also took us tremendous amount of costs out of

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 16>the vehicle.

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Jay, the kind of summary of the earnings print

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 3>was that all of the guidance previously issued was reiterated,

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of positivity around that. Very simply

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 3>loads of people asked me to ask you, can you

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 3>define what modest gross profit means or what you're defining

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 3>it by in order to achieve it?

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean, ultimately, this has been the central focus

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 16>for us as as a company that's a business, is

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 16>driving cost efficiencies into everything that we do, into our

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 16>bill of materials, into how we operate, run our plant,

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 16>and ultimately driving towards getting our production of our r

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 16>and t on RNs to positive growth, smart and ultimately

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.439
<v Speaker 16>to have the business gets a positive for cash flow

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 16>and nonprofitability.

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 14>So there's a whole series.

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 16>Of steps we're making along the way in terms of

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 16>improving costs, but the biggest singular step that we've made

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 16>is what we did in the second quarter. We took

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 16>the plant down for about a month or it, made

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 16>meaningful changes to the operations and importantly changed a significant

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 16>portion of our supply base, outs and new suppliers, in

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 16>conjunction with a number of design improvements, and all that

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 16>comes together to take us to a place where you know,

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 16>the incremental countribution to every vehicle we sell is positive,

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 16>and that's you know, that's what we're driving towards us

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 16>where we continue to guide towards for the fourth quarter

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 16>of this year.

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 3>In the first instance, sorry, Matt, I was just going

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 3>to hold DoD Jay to account on that one and say,

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 3>in the first instance, is it just like more than

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 3>zero or single digits gross profit? Just I think that's

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:36.399
<v Speaker 3>the answer we're looking for.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 16>You know, we haven't provided a specific number, but certainly

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 16>by saying it's positive gross margin, it's more than zero.

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 16>Our objective what we've guided to for a long time.

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 16>We continue to maintain this guidance is the long term

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 16>margin profile on our one should be around twenty five percent.

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 16>And so that's what we you know, beyond just this

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 16>this fourth quarter performance that we're we're tracking towards, seeing

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 16>how we continued to improve in twenty twenty five and beyond,

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 16>we still maintain confidence in the twenty five percent coross margin.

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 4>My interview with RJ.

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Scaringe, the Rivian CEO.

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 8>I was shocked by the evidence uncovered by the House

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 8>Judiciary Committee that a group of companies organized a systematic,

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 8>illegal boycott against X. It is just wrong and that

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 8>is why we are taking action.

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 3>That was Linda Yakarino, the CEO of X, after the

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 3>company filed a lawsuit accusing an industry group of violating

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 3>antitrust laws for an advertising boycott that costs the social

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 3>media company billions of dollars in alleges in the filing.

0:38:55.480 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in Bloombos, Kurt Wagner. An advertising boycott sounds

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 3>severe federal filing in a court in Texas. Just explain

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the very basic accusation that X is making.

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean, the claim is that this group, this

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 17>industry trade group for advertisers essentially you know, did anti

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 17>competitive behavior.

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 17>They came out and they advised all the members of

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 17>the group not to spend on X. Kind of created it,

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 17>as you know, Yakarino said, a boycott of the business.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 14>And they're claiming this is illegal.

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.240
<v Speaker 17>I don't know exactly what an illegal boycott is versus

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 17>a legal one, but ed you and I have seen

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 17>boycotts of not only advertising but products all the time.

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:40.399
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 17>This is usually the way that consumers or businesses sort

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 17>of voice their displeasure with someone, which is what happened

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 17>in this case, shortly after Elon took over.

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 14>I don't really know whether this lawsuit will.

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 17>Succeed for them, but I think what they're doing here

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 17>is sending a huge signal that, you know, one, the

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 17>business is struggling, they need to do something out of

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 17>a two picking a fight with the broader ad industry.

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Right now, we're showing some more of the comments that

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Linda Yakarino made. It was interesting, you know the video

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 3>posted to X Elon musk amplified it. I guess the

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 3>context is that X has been suffering in terms of

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 3>revenue or financially in the period since Must took over

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 3>and Lindy Yakarino was appointed CEO because of this, Like,

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to understand why they would take action.

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 14>Well, that's exactly right. They're saying that.

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 17>Look, this group is, you know, collectively getting everyone riled

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 17>up to intentionally hurt Ex's business. Now, I think what's

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 17>sort of interesting here is what does this ignore. Well,

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.800
<v Speaker 17>this ignores Elon's own behavior, right, which we have talked

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.879
<v Speaker 17>about on the show several times over the last couple

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 17>of years. Right, you may recall ed late last year

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 17>went on stage at a conference and told advertisers to

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 17>go f themselves.

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 17>He has been very proactively aggressive to certain advertisers over

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 17>the years, and so they are saying, well, hey, look,

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 17>this group is illegally creating this boycott. It doesn't take

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 17>into account the fact that some of this decision making

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 17>may simply be because people don't want to work with

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.919
<v Speaker 17>Elon given the things that he's done and said to them.

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner, thank you. I mean a complicated story.

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 3>There will be a legal process will follow it here

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Technology. That does it for this edition of

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology. Another busy day of earnings, fantastic interviews with

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 3>executives from across the world of technology recap on the

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 3>podcast You know exactly where to find it on the

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 3>terminal as well as on Apple, Spotify and IHEARTQ the

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Beautiful Pictures.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.