WEBVTT - NFL Divisional Round Weekend Preview (Ep. 151)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in everybody to betting pros.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>It's v Joey p Joe Pizzapia and today it's about

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the divisional round of the NFL playoffs.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>So Wildcard weekend was fun.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Lots of exciting performances, some one sided games and some

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>closer ones, that's for sure, just as the Raiders and Bengals.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But those are all in the dust. Those are all history.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And Scott Bogman is going to help me break all

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the games for this weekend down. We've got four games,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.639
<v Speaker 1>two on Saturday, two on Sunday.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Scott Bogman, did you learn.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Anything from these teams that have advanced and survived after

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the first round?

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>I think we learned that the Chiefs and Bills game

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 3>might be the highest scoring game in the history of football.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean that the Bills literally scored a touchdown every

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>single time they touched the ball, so I think it

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 3>was seven for seven in touchdown drives. And then the

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>last drive they had was the victory formation. So they

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>were outstanding. And the Steelers woke the Chiefs up in

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 3>the second quarter, and you know you wake up Patrick

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes and you're gonna get a lot of points. Even

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, Tyreek Kills a little gimpy going in again game,

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 3>he looked fine. Travis Kelce was throwing touchdowns. They throw

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns to offensive linemen. I mean, it was an embarrassment

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>for my Steelers, but the Chiefs look like they're peaking

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 3>at the absolute right time right now.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, my Patriots were equally embarrassed.

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's okay.

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>We can go lick our wounds for the rest of

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the offseason. But yeah, high total on this Bill's Chiefs game,

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna break them all down. But we got

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to start here with Saturday at four thirty Eastern, and

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the Cincinnati Bengals taking on the Tennessee Titans. The

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Bengals are three and a half point underdogs in this

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>one heading to Tennessee, which feels about right to me.

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.639
<v Speaker 1>On the money line, if you like the Cincinnati Bengals,

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you're getting plus one fifty too. The total for this

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>game is forty seven. So Boggs, when you're looking at

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this one, what's your first instinct, because I know what

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mine is, but I want to get your take on

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this first.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 4>The Bengals are peaking right now.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>And I hate to say it because I despise them,

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 3>but they've been playing great football man, and Joe Burrow

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 3>looks unflappable right now. Jamar Chase is outstanding, Joe Mixon

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 3>is healthy.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 3>In the defense, I mean, they crushed Derek Carr. This

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 3>pass rush is incredible. I mean, you just go back

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 3>to the offseason and you think of this Trey Hendrickson

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 3>signing and it was just outstanding for this team. They

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>still need a little help in the secondary and linebackers.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 3>You can check out my mock draft to see where

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 3>I went there. But you know, I think that they're peaking.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 3>And this is the first week back for Derrick Henry

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>and we're not as we're recording this, we're pretty sure

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Derek Henry is going to be back, but he could

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.839
<v Speaker 3>still be inactive right and AJ Brown is just back,

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 3>So we don't know what.

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 4>Tennessee team we're gonna get.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Are we gonna get the good you know, run it

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 3>down your throat forty times with Dereck Henry is going

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 3>to be used sparingly. AJ Brown's had a couple of

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 3>good games, but Ryan Tannehill's kind of been hit or

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 3>miss this year. So for me, I'm going to take

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals on the money line straight up to win

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 3>this game on the road and go to the AFC Championship.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>As much as it discussed me over under, I'm a

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 3>little wishy washy. I'm gonna take the under just because

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Tennessee is going to win time of possession

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 3>in this game because Derek Henry is back. I'll give

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 3>them that at least so, But I just think the

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Bengals are too good to be beaten by Tennessee right now.

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You know we did not rehearse this ahead of time.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel the exact same way.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>The reason why is not because of last week's game.

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Actually, in some ways, it's in spite of it, because

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I did not like the fact that they let the

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Raiders hang around, and I did not like the fact

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that it got it took their foot off the gas

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>They took their foot off the gas.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>But on top of that, Bogs, when you watch that game,

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they also had a couple of injuries too.

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>They they they allow the Raiders.

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>To hang around, and you don't want to do that

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Titans. I just want to put that out,

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>especially you don't want to do it on the road.

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm going back to the game a couple weeks

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>ago against the Kansas City Chiefs where I made a

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>big statement I remember on the TV show about it,

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>which is, this is the game where you find out

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>who the Bengals are. And the Bengals showed you, and

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they showed you in a big way who they were

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas City Chiefs, and that, to me is

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>who the Bengals are. And I feel like they take

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it personally that you know, they won the division, they

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>won a playoff game, and they're still underdogs. I think

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they take it personally. I think Joe Burrow does too,

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think he is a leader in the real deal.

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think my favorite wager is, just like you,

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the Bengals on the money line, and we all

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>know one of these games is going to go sideways, right,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the fielders is not going to win at

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>least one, And looking at it, it's a hard sell

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for me on the other three home teams. It just

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is this is the one to me that's wide open.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>If we thought Tennessee was a paper tiger going into

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs anyway, even getting Derrick Henry back, There's been

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>games where they had Dereck Henry and they lost, and

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you look around each other like, how did the Titans

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>lose this game? I worry about Tannehill turn the ball

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>over at a crucial time, and I just feel like

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this is the sneaky one where you're looking at it

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's only three and a half. Right, So it's

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.799
<v Speaker 1>not like Vegas is confident at all, Right, Tennessee Titans

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>going into this game where it's like, oh, it's a

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>five and a half point spread or something like that. No, no, no,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it's basically like, eh, as little as you could possibly

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>favor them, we will. So I'm with you on this.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe we're agreeing on the Cincinnati Bengals. My goodness,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>that's exciting.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 4>But imo, they are changed.

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>The forty seven is a number that I don't care

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for either. I think the best wager is the money line.

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to put this in a parlay

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and do all four games, which by the way, we

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>were one game shy. We were five or six in

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the super parlay. Broke my heart.

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, boys, well in parlay, but he was six and

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 4>h against the spread this week.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>That's very good, very good. But yeah, Cincinnati Bengals, if

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to put him in this week, I would

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>put him with the three and a half. But if

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 1>you want to go crazy and put them on the

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>money line, you can, but I'm with you. That's the

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>wager I like in this game. Let's let's look at

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>some individual props potentially in this game too. Let's talk

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>about past numbers here, Joe Burrow two seventy eight and

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a half, Ryan Tannehill two thirty eight and a half.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>If we like the Cincinnati Bengals, do we like the

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>over here and the Joe Burrow number?

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean I do like the over, but I'm not

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>betting that number with confidence. That's a lot of yards,

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 3>so pretty had two seventy five is a lot. I

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 3>think he's going to be right somewhere between two seventy

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 3>five and three hundred, so there's just no way I'd

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 3>touch it.

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>The Chase number, to me is actually one that I

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>would go over on. It's seventy seven and a half.

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on that.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 3>One that's receiving mm hmm, Yeah, I mean I think

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 3>I think I would rather go over than under that number,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 3>But I think I would rather do total yards because

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 3>we saw Chase Gate used like Deebo Samuel last week,

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 3>he had four rushes, So I think I would go

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 3>with a total yards number over a receiving yards only

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 3>four Chase.

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, fair enough, And right now as recording this,

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we still don't have a number on Derrick Henry. So

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>if that comes through, you always see this up on

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and we'll answer that. What about on the passing

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>side for Ryan Tannehill, two thirty eight and a half

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is the number? Your thoughts on that, especially getting Derek

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Henry back theoretically what impact that has potentially on that number?

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to go over that number, especially

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 3>if you're picking Cincinnati to win this game. Straight up, mean,

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, it should mean that Tennessee is playing catch

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 3>up at some point in this game, even if it's

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 3>only the fourth quarter. You know, you have put a

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 3>seventy yard drive together with mainly passes. You have aj

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Brown back, you have Julio healthy finally, you know, so

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 3>all your pieces are there for Tennessee. There's no excuses

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>for them in this game. So I think I would

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 3>go over that number. If I had to pick it.

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what.

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.559
<v Speaker 1>If you don't like the passing number for Joe Burrow,

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>how about the passing tds at one and a half.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 4>That feels like an I take the over on that

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 4>I crush.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>That seems like an easy over to me too, So

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're having any sort of pause, that's the way

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I would approach it. In Bogs and I agree yet again.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>There all right, let's move on to the night game

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday night. The San Francisco forty nine Ers, who

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we told you were going to upset the Dallas Cowboys,

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and sure enough they did. The forty nine Ers, who

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna go into Green Bay. Now green Bay rested

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>off the by Aaron Rodgers' tow has been on ice

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>or heat or whatever the hell he's doing to his

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>toe Co Packers. The Packers are five and a half

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>point favorites in this one. No surprise there. If that

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>number feels respectable, we're respecting the Packers, but we're also

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>respecting the strong close to the season for the forty

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>nine ers. You have forty seven, just like the other game.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Interesting that both games on Saturday are forty seven, So

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine Ers defense, you know, has played relatively

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>well here. Deebo Samuel has been fantastic. The question is, Bogs,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>can they do enough here to cover this five and

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a half or do you think a rested Packers team

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay rolls them.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna take the Packers and look this game, I'm

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 3>gonna take the over too. I think I like the

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 3>over more in this game, just because the Packers have

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 3>not looked good on defense, particularly against the rush, and

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 3>that's exactly what the Niners do. They run the ball

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 3>down people's throats. Eli Mitchell twenty seven carries last week,

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Deebo had ten. They look outstanding in this run game

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 3>and the Packer has been bad against it. But that

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Niners defense, you know, Bosa is gonna play, but he's questionable.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Fred Warrener's little banged up now, and the secondary has

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 3>been the issue for that team the entire year. Aaron

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Rodgers isn't going to be stopped in this game. So

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I think there's gonna be a lot of points here,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>and I just am. The thing that I'm most confident

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 3>in is Jimmy g making that big boneheaded mistake third

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 3>or fourth quarter and the Packers taking advantage of it.

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 3>He did it in Dallas, and Dallas just couldn't score.

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, they had too min eight penalties on offense

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 3>thirteen penalties. Obviously a lot of controversy to the end

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 3>of that game and stuff. But for me, I think

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I have to go with the Packers at home and

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 3>lay the five and a half. And I really like

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>that it moved to five and a half instead of six,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 3>because I think six kind of makes me queezy. But

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 3>five and a half I like a lot. So give

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 3>me the Packers and the over in this game, all right.

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>The consensus continues with Bogging and myself, I like the over,

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and I also like the five and a half on

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Packers side as well. All the public money is

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>coming in, the vast majority of it on the Packers,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and typically that's something whenever I see it, I get

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a little antsy about myself. But I just I can't

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>do it. I'm not gonna go against Aaron Rodgers, at

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>least not this week. But believe me, if they end

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>up losing to the forty nine Ers, I'm not gonna

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>be sad about.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It at the end.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess here's the question.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 4>You and Welsh will be so happy.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, here, here's a question for you. When you're looking

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>at the two coaches in this game, and you know

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>these teams have met up before, and if you were

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>a call a few years ago on their path to

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, the forty nine Ers absolutely just ran

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>rough shot over the Packers.

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Now very it feels like a different pack.

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 4>I think Aaron Rodgers owing three in the playoffs against

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 4>the Niners.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, that was my last question. Is you know all

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 1>that public money going there. It's plus two hundred on

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the money line for San Francisco. I don't think it's

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a crazy wager if you know it's not to go

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>ahead with the forty nine Ers. It's one of those

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 1>things where we look at and go, oh, all the

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>public money, it feels like a all done deal.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 2>It's not.

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>I think this game has some tightness potentially in it,

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>and I would not be surprised that if Garoppolo does

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>avoid catastrophic mistakes, that the forty nine Ers can pull

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>out a victory here, even though it's in Green Bay

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and all of the other factors here. But I don't

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's investable for me personally, and I just won't

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>bring that to light.

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 3>We're down to the best eight teams in the NFL,

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 3>so all these games are going to be close. And

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 3>would I be shocked if the Niners beat the Packers

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 3>on the road. Absolutely not. I just think that you

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 3>get a flawless Jimmy G game if he does that,

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 3>and those are rare for Jimmy G.

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 4>And I think he's you can win the Super Bowl

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 4>with him.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a good enough quarterback, but he is

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 3>that Andy Dalton, Joe Flacco, Brad Johnson, you know line

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 3>of good enough quarterback, but he is not going to

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 3>will you to win many games.

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 4>So, you know, I think.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 3>That's where the big disconnect is. And you know, I

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 3>enjoy trends. I think they're good and they're fun to

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 3>look at, but I will never invest in a trend.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, sometimes they pay out like that, you know,

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 3>weird Jacksonville beating the Colts at home in Jacksonville since

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty fourteen. Sometimes they pay out like that. But how

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 3>different is the twenty fourteen Jaguars to the twenty twenty

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 3>one Wars Right, so unbelievable that I think that stuff

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 3>is vastly overrated. W Right, you have to live in

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the now exactly, especially because rosters turnover so frequently.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Passing props here, Jimmy Garoppolo to forty three and a half,

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers to sixty five and a half, Any interest

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in either of.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Those two numbers, Rogers over Jimmy under You're gonna win

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 3>on the strength of the run game, if you The Niners.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Agreed with that.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of which, passing touchdowns Garoppolo one and a half,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Rogers two and a half. That's pretty big number there.

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 4>For Rogers two and a half, I'm gonna stay away from.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think the numbers right, and he probably

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 3>throws three touchdowns, but I'm not going to bet on

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 3>it because you know, I mean, he just DeVante Adams

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 3>steps out at the one, and here's Aaron Rodgers, Here's

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 3>aj Dillon, here's Aaron Jones. You know, they have plenty

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 3>of other ways to go, you know, bootleg to the

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 3>tight end, you know, so many different ways to go

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 3>and scenario. So that's not what I'm gonna take. Although

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I did hit my I had the dak plus four

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred any time touchdown last week and I got there

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 3>you go.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Also, there you go.

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the receiving props here, speaking of DeVante

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Adams his numbers ninety one and a half, Deebo Samuel's

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty four and a half, and George Kittle, who's been

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>relatively quiet these last few weeks. On this forty nine

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>run just forty eight and a half. So anything tempting

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on the over under forty eight Hittle for Kittle, Yeah,

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what I was looking at.

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Kittle's the one, you know, and I know I said

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I'd take the under on Jimmy G's passing yards, but

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 3>he passes to different guys in different games, in different scenarios,

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 3>And last week Kittle was used mainly as a blocker.

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 3>He's probably gonna be mainly a blocker in this game too.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 3>But if he catches three passes, he's getting over that

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 3>forty eight and a half because I think at least

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 3>two of them are going to go for twenty because

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 3>he gets the ball and then runs some mffors over.

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's what Kittle does, right, So I think

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 3>that is the most intriguing one to me of all

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 3>of them.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's your combo number for Deebo Samuel, ninety three and

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.079
<v Speaker 1>a half over under.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 3>One of the best offensive players in the league. I

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 3>think you gotta take over. If it's less than one hundred,

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 3>you got to take over on deepo every single week.

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>The other one I think is sneaky is that one

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Lazard thirty eight and a half. I would go over

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on that too. It's a good trend with La Sam

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>vs is going to be out. That's one that I

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>would lock in now. I think that's a very good

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>That would be the biggest gimme, Like, if you're going

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to try to like run up the Deebo DeVante Adams

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and you need a third one, Lazard would be the

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>other one for me. I think that's the way I

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>would go. All right, let's move on from Saturday to

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Sunday's games. NFC matchup at three o'clock Eastern. The Los

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Rams taking on the Tampa Bay Bucks and defending

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>rating undisputed champions of the World. Are three point favorites

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in this one. Forty eight and a half is the number.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So the Rams finally showed up. So that's great. Dominated, Yeah,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they dominated, But do it does it travel? That's the

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>question here, Bogs, that's a huge question up and can

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they go to Tampa and win on the road. I say, no,

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>what say you?

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 3>There's no way I'm betting against Tom Brady. But I'll

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 3>tell you what, I don't like betting this game. And

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 3>because right now we don't know if Tristan Wirfs or

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Jensen are gonna end up playing for Tampa Bay.

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Losing two offensive linemen is enormous. Leonard Fournette also not

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 3>trending in the right direction, it seems like right now,

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 3>so he is a maybe in this game, it looks like. So,

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, those are big pieces to lose for Tampa Bay.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 3>And look, the Rams won and they were at home.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 3>You didn't have to have Matt Stafford do a bunch

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>for them to win that game. Kyler Murray more lost

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 3>that than Matt Stafford would not won it. You know,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 3>he didn't make the big mistakes that he had been making,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 3>been handed out turnovers like their Christmas gifts, you know,

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 3>previous three weeks before that game, and it was kind

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 3>of weird to watch this offense kind of crumble in

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>on itself. So I'm I think you can do that

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 3>to beat the Cardinals when they're shooting themselves in the foot.

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 4>You're not gonna get that from Tom Brady.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, so I think that Safford makes a mistake

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>or two in this game that cost the Rams the game,

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and I you know, it's just impossible to bet against

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Brady in the playoffs. So give me Tampa Bay and

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 3>give me the under in this game, just because that

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Rams defense did look good. And we have question Offen

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 3>some line of stuff going on with Tampa Bay right now,

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>and Matt Stafford hasn't is not playing at his peak.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>So all that adds up to me taking Tampa Bay

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 3>in the under in this game.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the under I think is the most appealing wager

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in this game to the under forty eight and a half.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm in locks up with you again here, and this

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is very rare that we're, you know, both kind of

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing everything.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Only one more.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Game to go. We'll differ on this one. I feel like,

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll see, we'll see.

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think we're gonna differ as much as I

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna be in locks up so much. Excuse

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>me on the Cincinnati game, But I also you know,

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it took a big game for Odell Beckham stepping up,

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and again I don't think that's something you can look

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>every single week to and rely on if you're the Rams.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like the Rams felt like they accomplished

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>something last week, and I don't think they have yet.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the other big takeaway from watching that

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>game on Monday is.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 2>They look at us, we're dominating. Look, Hey, we're the

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 2>best team.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 3>No, well there's been you know, mcveigh's taking this team

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 3>to the super Bowl. Obviously a pretty different roster at

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Patriot then. I mean, but but I mean it doesn't matter.

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Tom Brady's just in this. By the way, our boy

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Bubba uh broke me off this stat which I didn't

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 3>realize that Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers have the same

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 3>amount of victories against the NFC in the playoffs. So

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 3>uh isn't that crazy that I knew that one would

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 3>bring a big old smile.

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 4>To year face. So yeah, one year in the NFC,

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 4>by the way for Brady, So all right, I guess

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 4>one and a half.

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 2>And a half. Right, yeah, all right, God, that's that's wow.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Isn't that great?

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>That's amazing? Alright?

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Passing props here, Tom Brady to eighty six and a

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>half Stafford two seventy nine and a half.

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I would go the under on both of.

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 4>These, Yeah, pass on both them. I I don't gun.

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 3>In my head, I'd probably take the over on Stafford

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 3>under on Brady, just because I expect the Rams to

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 3>be losing this game and playing catch up late. So

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 3>that's where you get those big chunk yards and things

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 3>from Matt Stafford.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 4>But I would want to mess with you to one

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 4>of them.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup one two and a half for the passing

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>prop your thoughts.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you just take Cooper Cup and go over

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 3>just you know, that's the one weakness Tampa Bay has,

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 3>and maybe the offensive lineman too, but the secondary has

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 3>not been the best this year, so that's the one weakness.

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Jamel Dean lined up on Cooper Cup, He's gonna torch him.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So well, that's my figure too, is if you get

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>if you can at least contain Cooper Cup, then you

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>force them to beachy with Odell and other guys like that.

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm I'm still not sold that they can. I'm

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>just not not And last week didn't sell me enough

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on that. I guess that's the point. There not a

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of rushing pops available for this game too, because

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>the Backfield's kind of in motion, so to speak, so

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>none of them have really been released. The only one

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I can find right now is actually Tom Brady, so

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not one that we want to get too much into,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, last, but certainly not least if you like points,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this should be at least theoretically the game for you now.

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I say should be, and oftentimes these games

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>can be very disappointing. What looks like a shootout on

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>paper between two big time offenses oftentimes disappoints. I don't

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>think this one's going to six thirty pm Eastern, the

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs are going to host the Buffalo Bills.

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs are just one and a half point favorites,

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>which I think they should take a little personally because

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they are the team that's gone to the Super Bowl

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and won a Super Bowl recently. I think they deserve

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more respect than they're getting. The number

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is fifty three and a half. I think this is

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>an over but Bogs, I've thought real long and hard

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>on this one, and to me, I'm siding with the

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>side of the Chiefs here. I think there's a lot

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of emotion came out of last week I think it's

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a little bit of a letdown yet again

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Buffalo Bills, where I think all the years

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and years of getting beat up by the Patriots all

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>just kind of came out and it just kind of overflowed,

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and I just wonder if you can inflate the bubble

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>again and do it on the road against Patrick Mahomes.

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think at the end of the day they're

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>going to I really don't. I would love if the

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Bills made it to the Super Bowl because they were

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>my pick, but I feel like this is possibly the

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>end here for them. What are your thoughts on Bills Chiefs?

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 4>We're four for four, Joe, I can't believe it.

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I thought, for sure, after watching your team get dominated

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 3>by the Bills, you're gonna pick the Bills. But I

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 3>watched my team get dominated by the Chiefs, and I'm

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 3>going to pick the Chiefs too. What I think happened

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 3>in the second half the second quarter, excuse me of

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers Chiefs game, is that the Chiefs woke up.

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 3>We haven't seen Patrick Mahomes look this good in a

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 3>couple months, and he just looked out. Stanny couldn't miss

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 3>in the second half. You know, the Steelers couldn't do anything.

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>They couldn't stop an offensive lineman. You know, the Bills

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 3>obviously are a better team than Pittsburgh, and it's gonna

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 3>make it a much closer game, which is why this

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 3>is only a point and a half. And the Bills, look,

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 3>they were literally flawless against New England. You know everything

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 3>that seven for seven touchdown, drives.

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>To throw a ball out of the end zone and

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Dawson Knox just catches it for a touchdown.

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean literally everything.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And you knew that game was over from the moment

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Hide made that interception, that peg, that was it.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>That was it.

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>That was the moment where you go, okay.

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 4>It's such a great play.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was a good throw by Macrow, but

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 3>they were already such a great play.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>By anticipated it. He was the right place at the

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>right time POGs and I just feel like that's a

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>very crucial emotional moment at home for that fan base,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for Josh Allen specifically too. And now you've got to

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>pump up the balloon again and go on the road.

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 2>That's tough. If this was in Buffalo, I might feel differently.

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I think I would feel differently if it was in Buffalo.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 3>But it's going to be a Kansas City. You know,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City has great home field advantage, and you know,

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean the weather's not going to affect Buffalo at all.

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 3>Obviously coldest sitting in the NFL Buffalo. But you know,

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that I think what you're really going to

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 3>see here is a mismatch of you know, losing Trey

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 3>White was such a big thing for Buffalo earlier this year,

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 3>and you know they've been able to withstand that. I

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to be exposed here. Plus, you know,

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Travis Kelce versus Tremaine Edmonds or whoever. You're gonna have

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 3>to pick your poison. And that's what makes the Chiefs

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 3>so dynamic. And uh Stopper is.

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Going to be back for this game, it looks like too.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>So they're getting him back in help right full practice

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday.

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 3>When Patrick Mahomes gets going like that, they're damn near unsoppable.

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 3>The only team that could stop him last year was

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay in the in the Super Bowl and they

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 3>were still like, there's still video of the Bucks going,

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 3>how the hell did he do that?

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 4>You know, and they can stop the Chiefs.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs defense, That to me is always the undoing

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially of the Chiefs. The Chiefs defense can stop the Chiefs.

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>That is the biggest I think negative side of this.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think they're gonna do that in this game.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I just don't. I feel like you're right.

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I think they woke the You're gonna have to have

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 3>a you know, Stefan Diggs is gonna have to do

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 3>what Jamar Chase did to the Chiefs, which is in

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the realm of possibility. You know, Dawson Knox also becoming

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 3>a superstar like Travis Kelsey is, so they have It's

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:09.959
<v Speaker 3>very similar these two teams.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 4>But this is why they're in this spot.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 3>I think this is definitely an over just because both

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 3>these offenses have been so they're they're both clicking on

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 3>all cylinders right now. But I just I'm not going

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 3>to bet against Mahomes, I'm not gonna bet against Brady.

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 3>I think those are pretty safe assumptions in the playoffs.

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. Let's dig a little deeper here

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>into some of these numbers. Player passing at yards the

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>props here, we got Mahomes to eighty one and a

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>half Josh Allen to eighty and a half. That's a

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>big number there for Allen. I think I would go

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>under on the two eighty. What are your thoughts there?

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 4>This perfect number. I wouldn't bet them, but I would

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 4>go over on both.

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I just I think that both these offenses are going

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 3>to click here, So I go over on both.

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes at two and a half for the passing touchdowns,

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>but Josh Allen just at one and a half. That

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>one I like. And I understand this variables with Singletary

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and him bringing the ball, and I kind of I mean,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that's basically asking for trouble. I would take that trouble

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one and a half on the Allen side. I like

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that more than either of the receiving numbers that we

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>just talked the same excuse to be the passing numbers

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about.

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 4>I agree with you on that. What is what's Josh

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Allen's rushing number?

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Rushing props for this game? Josh Allen numbers fifty and

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, two and a half, Okay, on a

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 3>fifty and a half is probably what he'll get. So

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 3>there's no way I bet it. If it was thirty

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 3>thirty five somewhere in that range. I was going to

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 3>say hammer that, but no, I can't fifty and a

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 3>half nine and a half. So I would rather take

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Singletary by a wide margin in that one. And what

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 3>do you say, Mahomes was twenty four and a half.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm not doing that twenty five? Yeah, nah, no thanks?

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, I remember he got he got nicked up.

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I think in the Division round last year, hurt his

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 3>knee and it wasn't as mobile, you know, going into

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the ACU Championship and the Super Bowl. So I don't

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 3>think I think you're trying not to run Mahomes if

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 3>you avoid it.

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill seventy and a half or the receiving prop

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey seventy and a half, Stefan Diggs seventy two and

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a half. Which of these three do you like the most?

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 4>If any Hill?

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 3>I like Tyreek Hill, And you know because he'll gets

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 3>that on three catches, you know, because he's the deep

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 3>the deep threat. So if he catches four or five balls,

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's almost assured to pass this. And I

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 3>just don't think really anybody in the league, maybe Jalen

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 3>one on one can stop Tyreek, but not many guys

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 3>gonna stop him.

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, there you have it.

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you check out bettingpros dot com for all

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of our latest information on all the wagering and all

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the lines at all the different houses there. Anywhere you

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>want to place your bet, you could do it at

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>bettingpros dot com. So go ahead and check it out today.

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And Bogman, I'll be next week here yet again to

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Championship games. I can't believe it. It

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 1>flies so quickly. I feels it really does fly by.

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>But this should be a very entertaining four games, and

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>I think the peak game there is going to be

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that Sunday night one for sure, So look for something

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>strange there. But Bogmin and I are going to be

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>riding or dying together here.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know, my goodness, Just stand back. Well, I hope,

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I hope we're right, Boggs. Yea, I hope we're right.

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>We picked that one where we feel like I think

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go sideways. Maybe Saturday gets interesting at the

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, the Packers win, and then we

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>like the two home.

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you hope you're wrong about the Packers. I hope

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm wrong about the Bangles, so we're going there.

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>We go all right, that'll do it for us, But

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the story of the game goes on for Scott Bogman.

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids,