WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Has Dak Met Expectations?

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>The following. He's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, And so much for that.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It is Tuesday, October twenty second, twenty nineteen, Season fifteen,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>episode number sixty nine. Welcome to another edition of The Break.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>We're locking s WBC Mortgage Studios at the starts the

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>bye week, so we're gonna do some big picture stuff

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all week this week. Today, we're gonna focus

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in on the offense. Um, what I'm gonna do is

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go through every single player that has

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a role on this offense that plays decent time. We're

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about expectations. We're going to talk about

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>whether they are above expectations, below expectations, or right at

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>expectations of where you thought they were going into the

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>season compared to where they are seven games into the season.

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>How's everybody doing today? Great? Good? So good? See some

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>problems with this? Really great? Do you see some problems

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with what this the premise of your game because my

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 1>expectations and Dave's expectations and your expectations. Yeah, so that's

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the point that they can all chime in. Honestly, that's

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the point of the game is because I want to

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>know not only how they're playing, but how they're playing

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>relative to what you thought they would be when we

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>went into the season. And this comes It stems all

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the way back to the difference that Dave and I

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have with grading players with Avali grading on a curve

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's like whether or not you thought they would

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be great or not, as he's still good, yeah, you know,

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is like is a Mark Cooper like still having a

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>good year or you know. But here's why it's important.

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>The reason why it's important, in my opinion, is because

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>if the if the team went into the season and

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>they expected this player to be at the middle level

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and they expected this play player to be great, then

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they factor all that into how they build a team. Right, oh,

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the team. Now that now we're on the team's expectations,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, yes, yes, but I'm I'm talking about it.

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But you give my point though, and because of that

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>then If a player is meeting expectations, then that means

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for the overall team and how they composite, how they

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>built the team, they feel like, Okay, we're getting what

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we need out of the different players were getting. If

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got too many guys following below expectations, whether those

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>expectations were high or middle, middle, or low, then that's

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>when you run into problems. That's because what you built

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't performing as it should. Does that make sense? I

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm talking to a lawyer. But yeah, I

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>understand what I'm saying. It makes sense. Okay, good. I

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>just I'm sitting here, I'm doing the math in my

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>head already, like okay, above, above, maybe below, blah blah blah.

0:02:57.960 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, how does that jive with the fact

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that the team's four and three and lost to the Jets,

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>because that's not where I thought they'd be. Well, Thursday,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you up will get into the big overall

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>where they are as a team that is relative where

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they can't like this is this This is a multi

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>year trend where like I start asking the questions that

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Derek is trying to save that's just what I do.

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>He just kills shows. Yeah, I'm sorry. Well let's just

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>say this though, that was a really bad loss until

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>last night. Then it was just loss loss. They beat

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. It was great, and that's what I mean.

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it yesterday, is like, how good should

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you feel about that? And you're allowed to feel good

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.839
<v Speaker 1>about it. It's a division rival. They beat him really bad.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>They're above five hundred on top of the Vision, all

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that good stuff. But man, it was hard to turn

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that on and watch it and not I mean, it's stung.

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>You're sitting like this team is trash. They're they're awful,

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and even I mean, oh Sam Darnold's back, maybe they'll

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>be good. No turns out. All you gotta do is

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>blitz him even a little bit and he falls apart

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a terrible How did they lose that game? That's what

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the crazy part, because it did. It was a

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>buzz kill because you're riding high off Sunday and then

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you watch Dad and you'll like, I've never felt that victory.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Monday vibe just sucked away so quickly as I did

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>when I turned that game on. Literally, Sinica looks over

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>at me at one point it's like this is the

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>team we lost to last week. Yeah, that's the team

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we lost to last week. It's been an interesting first

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>seven weeks. Yeah, all right, So let's jump into this

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation on expectations we've got. I'm gonna run through this

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>list of the different players. We'll also get to some

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>some bigger picture stuff around that. I'll talk about the

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>running offense, passing offense, the red zone offense. But let's

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>start first with some of the players. Let's talk about

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott. Let's start with the big guy. Has he

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>performed above expectations, at expectations or below expectations? And again,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I want you to factor in all seven games, not

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just the last game, or not just the last the

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>three before that where they lost, factor in the entire

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>body of work he's been. He's at expectations. For me,

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I expected him to have his team above I mean

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you could almost you could almost say below, but his

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>stats have been pretty good, So I will say at expectations.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, and I'm I'm the guy that

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>grades on a curve. But he's not the fourth He's

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not a fourth round pick anymore. He's a guy that's

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to be a franchise quarterback and get the money

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that goes along with that. So it's hard for me

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to say above Yeah, they they're four and three. They're

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>four and three. At the very least they should have

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 1>beat the Jets, but they should have gone two and

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>one against those three teams and they went oh and

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>three instead. I agree. I think he's at expectations. I

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>think we've seen a massive jump and improvements between year

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>three and four, and a lot more confidence. He's playing well.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't have his stats in front of me, but

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the touchdown to jar Win the other net, so he's

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>at twelve touchdowns. I just I'm writing a story about

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cooper trade right now. Like he was averaging one

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty passing yards and less than a touchdown

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>per game at this point in the season last year. Obviously,

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>he's playing much better than that. He's made a couple

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the pick against the Eagles was ugly

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and the one against the Dolphins, but I'll take that

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>because he's playing more aggressive and I think he's playing

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>really well, but not above expect I say, and we're

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>not gonna do this with every player you could every

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>player you could say they're four and three, but quarterbacks

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>obviously get linked to two records, and so that being said,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it's, you know, right out of expectations. Yeah.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing to note though, he is right now

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent completion rate, he has two over two thousand yards,

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got twelve touchdowns. I mean, the seven interceptions is

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the part that that certainly would bother you. But when

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at that overall, I think then and again

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll point out one thing in particular. I think his

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>ability to throw the ball down field with more accuracy

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is much better this year than it was last year,

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's the part of their game I felt like

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they needed to improve the most, because if you're gonna

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have teams that are gonna suck down and they're gonna

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have eight guys in the box, you're gonna have to

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to kill him down field them to back up. Now,

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been able to do that consistently across all

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>seven games, but by and large, I think he's way

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>better there, and that's where I would give him. May

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I certainly think he's had expectations. Maybe you can get

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>him a little bump above, but I get what you guys. Well,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'll let me say this about Dak. Either they

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.559
<v Speaker 1>were three and four last year they traded for a Maori,

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the offense got better. I think

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you could put that on him. Look at this year

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>without any of their receivers, you know. I mean, when

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>he has Gallup and Cooper in the lineup, they're three

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and oh whether they or not in the lineup, they're

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they're one in one in three because they were able

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to win the Dolphins game without Gallup, But when he

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have those guys and definitely doesn't have both of them,

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like the Jets game, they don't win. So I don't

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not just comparing him to Aaron Rodgers. No one is

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.119
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, but you could see a guy that makes

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>these other guys around him better, and Dak's not at

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that point yet. So yeah, that's fair. Um, It's so

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>funny because what I was thinking is, like, if you

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>beat the Jets, obviously if they should they should have.

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>If they beat the Jets and he finds a way

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to win that New Orleans game, you I mean, he

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be like the leader in the clubhouse, but like

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>he would probably be on like the shortlist of like

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>MVP talk. Yes, you know, like with the way that

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>he's played, and I mean if ifs were fifth fifth,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we'd all be drunk. I get that. But I mean

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a fine line. He's played really well. As what

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to say, he really has um, but not

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>above expectation. Yeah, somebody just tweeted at me and said,

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you're down twelve to ten, why don't

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you just let Maha kick a seventy yard at field

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>goal instead of doing the hell marriage We kind of

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>talk talking about the Saints game, We kind of we

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of mold that over in the Superdome. We were

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>like what I was saying was it was especially with him,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>you know Russian like that. I would have tried the

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>hard count if anyone could hear, but I would try

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the hard count. See if you can get a five

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>yard pilming, if you get a five yard pilny in

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the sixty five yard or let's go get some adrenaline

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>going the one from Sunday Night would have gone in

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>from sixty five. So yeah, I mean that that's where

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he is as a weapon, right as you put him

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>back there, Like he may not make that thirty three yarder,

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>but he is a weapon you get beyond fifty and sixty, Like, seriously,

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>think about no, I get it. It's just he doesn't

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>make layoffs, but on half court shot people will kill him. Right,

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's the part where it does affect your ability

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to maybe win some games if you're willing to do that,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>win some games that maybe you wouldn't win otherwise, right,

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Yeah, all right, Let's me on to the

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>next player, Zeke Elliott. How's he performed above at or

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>below expectations? At again at I mean top five pick

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety million dollar contract. He's been. He's been really good.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But when you're talking about the amount of money involved,

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like I don't begrudge fans for wondering where the long

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>runs are and the you know, the jaw dropping stuff

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>that makes Red Zone channel cut in and like, oh

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>my god, you have to see what Zeke did. I mean,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>he's been really good, and there's no doubt that he

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>sets the tone for this team, But I can't say

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he's playing above expectations. The greatness from him in the consistency. Yeah,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's been he's borderline being below expectations, really really

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>he'd be he'd be closer to that than he would

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>be above. Yes, because because of fumble in New Orleans. Yeah,

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean he had and when he got here, you know,

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>now he he got here without a training camp and

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>he's been when you factor that part, and I know

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you always think that guys are going to have, you know,

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>have a huge drop off, so he hasn't really had that, right,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's just add expectations. You expected him

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to be one of, you know, probably be the best

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>running back in the league, and he's just he's right there.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I wish and not necessarily on him, like I wish

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>he was more involved in the passing game. I mean,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>how many times are we going to say that? But

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, other than like the no I actually I

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>thought quietly, six catches for thirty six yards against the Eagles,

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like I'd like to see that on a weekly basis even.

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it doesn't sound like a lot, but it

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>really does help. It moves the chains, you know, when

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he was just running into a brick wall time after

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>time against the Saints. There's other ways to use him

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that could maybe help you with that. And it's ridiculous

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that you go a year between seeing him run a

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wheel route. He did it against Detroit in eighteen in

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay in nineteen, Like, maybe he could do that

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>more often than once per season, just stuff like that.

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Right now, he is sixth in the league in yards

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>per attempt, which is not a bad thing to be obviously,

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>expectations might be higher than that, but he's also fifth

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>in the league and attempts per game, so he's getting

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the bass, it's in a significant amount of times, and

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>again maybe getting him more involved in the passing game

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>would help. Really. I think, as you guys said, the

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>big challenged there as he's not getting the big, big

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>chunk yard plays that you'd expect from him. But you know,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>still that's a pretty good number to be, what fifth

0:11:59.920 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>or six with the yards per attempt because he is

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 1>a short yardage back pack. He's gonna get third and one,

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get the one yard or two yards here,

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So that kills your average there. What helps is getting

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>those thirty and forty yard runs, which he doesn't have,

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>so that means he's getting a healthy amount of ten

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and eleven yard runs. Yeah, they're not going to cut

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>into the red zone channel with that, but if you

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>keep doing it. Obviously, I haven't checked on it since

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles game, but again, I mean, I think he

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>leads the league in terms of explosive runs if you

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>consider that an explosive run is only twelve yard and

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>changing the word on that explosive to me, I think

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it speaks to how hard it is to get

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>running room in the NFL. I think that's fine. Twelve

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>yards if you get a first down on one touch,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that's explosive to me. I agree, Yeah, I think that's

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>But he definitely doesn't lead the league in terms of

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty thirty forty plus, and you'd like to

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>see more of that. I'm not going to kill that's

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>an explosive pass play sixteen ye eighteen. The parameters are

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot lower than you would says Witten gets I mean,

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>how often does Jason get that? Say? He has maybe

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a few in the career. Yeah, like an eighteen yard fumble.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It's true, he doesn't do it often. All right, let's

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>take our first break when we come back. I'm gonna

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ask you about Tony Pollard. Then we'll move into this

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. We're gonna move move quickly, all right. Then

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll come back back. This is the Dallas Cowboys dot

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. Well, a player could look good on paper,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one he's out on the field that you really

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>find out what he's made of. That's why the Cowboys

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>rely on more than just stats and scouting reports when

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>building their team. When picking a tractor, it's why you

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>should rely on more than just specs and features. You've

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>got to take it out and put it to the test.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys did when they named John Dear their official

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>tractor experience one for yourself. If this at my John

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Dear Dealer dot com slash football. Do you want the

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>most interesting, up to the minute Dallas Cowboys news straight

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>from the star in Frisco. How about exclusive and on command.

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right, news and nuggets you can't find anywhere else.

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 1>With our exclusive Cowboys content on Alexa, you can have

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>all the answers, secrets, stories and more. What's Stephen Jones

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking during a game? What's Joe Looney's favorite pregame? Neal.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>We take your questions to Cowboys players and coaches and

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you can hear the answers directly back to you. Just

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa Open, Dallas Cowboys want to use what the

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>pros use. How about the official men's skincare brand of

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black. Right now you can get

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection of Cowboys locker

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>room favorites, for just ten bucks with free shipping. The

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>starter includes four Jack Black skincare favorites plus a full

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>sized and tense therapy lip bomb. Go to get Jack

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code word

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>team JB. That's get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>The Jack Black Starter ten bucks, free shipping. The excitement

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of Dallas Cowboys football. It's back at at and T Stadium.

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Plashas going crazy at our Leyton, Texas your chance to

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>see the Cowboys lot when they host their NFC East riot,

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles Giants in redskins plus the Green Bay Packers,

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and watch his way through a Watch the Door single

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>game tickets You're on sale down get there before they're

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>going first to go quarterbacks Prescott pushes up the middle touchdown.

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Visit Dallas Cowboys dot com to get your tickets today.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break Welcome back to the second segment

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Break. Lock Nest WVC Morgy Studios at the

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Star We're talking about expectations for this team. We talked

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>about the quarterback in the running back. Tell me about

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollits. He's been above expectations, below er at expectations,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>below expectations. That is that entirely his fault. None of

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it's his fault, but it's below expectations. I expected him

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the gadget player that would be, that would

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>be similar to Alvin Kamara. Okay, so let me ask

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you this. Does it change your answer? If I tell

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you a little later we're gonna actually talk about expectations

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for Kellen Moore and the offensive, it doesn't change my answer.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But because what I'm saying is that sept To me,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that separates out what For me, it separates out Tony

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Pollard from how he's being used for what I've seen

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in the plays that I've seen. That is a different

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like when you're talking about met expectations. To me, he's

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>been above expectations the plays I've seen him play. He's

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>actually played above what I thought he would play. He's okay,

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but he's not being utilized enough. That's on Kellen Moore.

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>If he can't what if he doesn't know where to

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>line up? What if he doesn't. What if he's not

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>get Well, that's an assumption. I'm not making an assumption.

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying based on what I've seen, I don't know

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if I buy that. Because he blocked the hell out

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of that guy on the first snap of the second night.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder why they're not using that. Okay, Well,

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we have a history with this team of seeing a

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of players alf talent that not that are underutilized,

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and I would say he's at the expectation of the

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>talent that I expect him to have and we're not

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing it. I don't put that on him. So fine, Okay, yeah,

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard's at expectation, But I say at not above

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>because spent the whole offseason telling me how awesome he

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is and like basically intimating that you might not need Zeke.

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they basically did that, and obviously it was posturing,

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>but you believed it enough to even say it to

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>begin with. So, but what we saw in training camp

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for him to come out and have you know, this

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of numbers, it is below the expectations that I

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>thought they'd have for him. Put it on him, Kellen Moore, whatever,

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sawing him a bad player. I'm just saying

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 1>I've expected more. I get lead back at camp. I

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>just look at it as some of the things I've

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>seen him do on the field are better than where

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I expected him to be at this point in his career.

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Now they're not utilizing him enough, and you're right, it

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>could be that there's something he's doing to make them

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>not when you I don't know that. What I know

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>is in the opportunities they've given him. That run he

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>made last week, that that level of balance I didn't

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>expect that he had, Like that is that is an

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary run that I didn't necessarily think this guy would

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily be able to provide. Me. I'm not gonna let

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna let them off the hook for that.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>And now I mean no, no, no, but it's it's no.

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go as far as to say, like none

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of it is Tony Pollard's fault, because at every step

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of the way, like all through training camp, like do

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you trust him to block? Do you try? Like really,

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>he's your number one guy. Where's Darius Jackson and Alfred

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Morris And they're like no, Like every step of the way,

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he just impresses us, like, every time we put more

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>on his plate, he can do this, he can do that.

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>We totally trust him way more than we thought we would. Like,

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>these are all things that they said, Could this also

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>be a situation where because I do think in this

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>last game we saw Tony Pollard out there with Zeke

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>more frequently. Could this be a situation where up until

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this point, the reason why he hasn't been utilized as

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>much as because they don't want to take Zeke off

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the field. And we know how important Zeke is, we

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>know how good Zeke is is. That could that be

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>part of it? And now they're starting to realize, hey,

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we could put them out there together more frequently. That's

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>how you get it more involved rather than necessarily having

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to take Zeke off the field. Yes, I'd be okay

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>with that. I don't like I mean, the guy played

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver in college. Like, there's so many different ways you

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>can do this, and that's I keep I like this

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>analogy is like that, it's so paint by numbers. They're like, well,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>we have Zeke. We can't take Zeke off field. Nobody

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>said you had to do something different. Fun you think

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that would have been different if during training camp you

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>had Zeke there, which meant you could have Zeke in

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the backfield and now you could actually practice him out

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of very fair assessment that he wasn't able to do

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>those kind of things because he was the number one

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>running back. Okay, I didn't even really think about that

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.959
<v Speaker 1>until you just said it. But yeah, that's probably one

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons. What that kind of hurt him with that,

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if that's a I wonder if that's

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>something he can pick up in season with a limited

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>amount of reps. Like you know how it goes during

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the season. Everything this week might be a week, but

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know how during the season it's it's very tough

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to get reps outside of just installing the offense. Right, Yeah,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much they can really build those skills

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and teach him. Okay, here's what you gotta do on

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this play as a wide receiver playing whichever one of

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the positions you want to play you want to play

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>him at. I wonder if that's something they can develop

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>now or if they have to wait all the way

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>till the next offseason. There's probably something in between that

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to where you can start working on parts of it

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and get him involved in certain parts of it without

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>giving him the whole thing. I would guess. I'm not

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a football coach, okay, but I know shocking. All I

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>want is for number twenty to line up in the

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>slot motion across the formation. It could be an orbital

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>thing like we saw from Tavon, it could be straight

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>across the formation. And I want him to be right

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>there at the mesh point when Dak snaps the ball,

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes I want it to go to Zeke and

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I want him to take it. And I don't

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>think that would be very hard to pull off. I

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>just don't because Tavan does it all good. Point, absolutely,

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to reinvent the wheel. Just get your

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>very fast, talented playmaker onto the field and put him

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in position to make place. All right, let's move on.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about this one from the standpoint

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>of the unit, the offensive line above at or below

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>expectations below below below expectations. It's amazing that we all

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>agree on that one. It's it's just a statement about

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>how high the expectations are. Yeah, and okay, they've been

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>banged up, so you know they that those injuries cost

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>him a game maybe two. You can go down the

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean Tyrone has been banged up. We know that.

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Zach Martin, I mean he he might be playing like

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the worst football of his career right now. And I

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>mean that sounds I don't like that the way that

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds coming out of my mouth, because I still think

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>he's a hell of a player. But he's been dealing

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with this back injury. We've talked about it. Nobody played

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>very well against the Saints. He didn't have a great

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>game against the Jets. I'm sure that's part of it,

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>but those are the expectations that come along with being

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>at all pro every year of your career. We talked

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the other week too about Frederick not have not playing

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>up to his standards and if we would have started

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Looney and I feel like we're talking about Connor Williams

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that if you want to put into a filo, I

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's just every player and earlier, I mean, even

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the guys filling in for injuries. I just they haven't

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>been performing to the standards that this offensive line has. Okay,

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so good day, um My guy Lyle has been killing

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it though I know, I mean he lost the game

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 1>to injury too. But he stepped right back in and

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>kicked Brandon Graham's But the other night, I guess you

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>would say ad expectation because they paid him very well.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>He got that extension, So still hard to say above,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>but he's playing very well. I'll say this, when you

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>look at how he played last year compared to this year,

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's above expectations. My expectations for him were

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>not that he would be the best right tackle in

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>football through what was that Week five? I think it

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>was before he went on the injury. Doesn't it kind

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of I mean, I'm going along with Nick here, like,

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it kind of reset your expectations when he gets

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a sixty nine million dollars extent or whatever it was? Yeah,

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a lot. No, No, we'll tell him. Let

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>me just say this, and I may be a little

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>different on this. I know fans are out there saying absolutely.

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I've just over the years, I've come to believe, Look,

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you pay the guy, you get him in the building.

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Because you don't pay, you're not paying necessarily for how

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the guy plays. I think a lot of times you're

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>paying for what it would cost to either replace him,

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>or you're trying to figure out what the market value

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is relative to that position, and if you think you

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have a good one, then you kind of have to

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>pay at the top part of that market, right, So

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of factors involved in that that

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't necessarily saying because I give him a top contract

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>means he's a top player, I think, especially at the

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position. I just think there's a lot of other factors.

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't not for me so much just answering

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>your question, that doesn't factor in so much for me.

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But that all being said, I still think where Lyle

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>was last year to where Lyle is this year, I

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>think he's performing significantly better than he was last year

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion. Okay, all right, let's do this. I'm

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna change that question a little bit, just on this

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>position alone. If you have to lean more toward good

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>or bad, and this is not about expectations, has offensive

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>linemen closer to good or closer to bad on a

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>seven game full body of work seven game games full

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>body of work, I'd say more good because you know,

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>there have been injuries, and they've they've played, they've played

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>their fourth you know, tackle, he had to start a game,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>he had to play you know, a game and a

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>half and again I win the lost to the worst

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>team in football. So I don't know if that's good.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Quarterback took a few hits, I will say, but I'll

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I will continue to insist this, like we've seen bad

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive line play completely sink this team's ability to win

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a game. I don't think that was the case against

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>either the Packers or the Jets. Like they did not

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>lose that game because either of those games because their

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>tackles couldn't protect. That's not why, UM, And so to

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>some degree, I think it's you know, it's impressive that

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Cam Fleming stepped up. He wasn't awesome by any stretch,

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not saying that, UM. And then Brandon Knight like they

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>were playing him at guard and training camp and they

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>got him ready to go in and handle himself at

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>right tackle and play fairly well. So you take all

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that stuff together, injuries to Zach and Travis coming back

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>from a year long absence, like there's way more to

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>feel good about than bad. And an interesting stat here,

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys right now ranked sixth in the league and sacks allout,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>They've only given up ten for the season, So when

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you compare them to the rest of the league. Although

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we watched these games, we think Dak's getting hit a lot,

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>and maybe he is getting hit more than he's being sacked.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Right now, they're only ranked six in the league in

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the season. Yeah, they've never allowed they haven't allowed more

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>than three in a game in this so far. Right,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the Packers got Dack three times. I think I don't

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>know about per game, but I think the Eagles and

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Packers got him three each. I think, yeah, they gave

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 1>up eight against Atlanta on their own that one time.

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying is, yeah, they're playing pretty well. Yeah,

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that one of those sacks was probably one of the

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>worst play of the season though. We're just getting getting

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Saints. The sack there and it also he

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>runs into tire and you know, they lost yards, they

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>lost ten seconds, they lost their left tackle, they lost

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the game. I mean, that was a very bad play

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on that And they didn't give up a sack in

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the two point conversion, but miscommunication right at the line

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of scrimmage mess that whole play up. So they've gotten

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>some pressure. Packers game forced a couple of interceptions. I

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think they've been great, but you know, pressure does matter.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not a sack, but horseshoes, hand grenades and pressure.

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I've always said that needs to be included because close matters.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Have you always said that always? Okay, I'm talking about

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about it with Anthony Spencer for you about Anthony. Yeah,

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I believe you. I just thought it was funny because

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it's always horses and hand grenades the only thing that

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>matters close. No, if you get after the quarterback and

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you hit him and you don't get the sack, but

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>he's still looking at his year whole when he gets

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>up that you did something there, which is a big

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>deal in today's NFL because it's not even often you

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>can hit a quarterback. You'd better be like a split

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>second after gres the ball. Right, all right, so let's

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>let's move on. Let's actually take our final break. We'll

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>come back. We'll get it to some of the skill

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>positions to tight end the wide receivers. Do that when

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio.

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Your new apartment's big, such a great deal. Yeah, it's okay,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>just okay, what's not right above the subway? Well, I

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>bet you don't even notice it. After that's my neighbor angus.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>A deal that's just okay is not okay. Get a

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>great deal with America's best network. Come into an AT

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and T store and learn how to buy one smartphone

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and get second one on US Based on GWS one score.

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>September twenty eighteen, it's time for tailgate with the Autobox boys.

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Auterbox the makers are those crazy protective phonecases so one

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and only. They're also wild about protecting parking lot parties

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>from sad drinks. It's why they made elevation tumblers room

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>around the crock pot as they're made from stainless steel

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>with a copper lining to keep temps hot or coal true.

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>They even come in seven different sizes up to sixty

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>four ounce the growler. I like how Auterbox drinks. I

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>mean thanks, and that's been tailgating with the Autobox boys.

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Check out all the colors and sizes of their elevation

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>tumblers at auterbox dot com. A man's steps and doesn't

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just protect him from life's elements. It projects an unstoppable

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and legendary spirit. Like them in wearing silver and navy

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on the field every Sunday sends eighteen sixty five. Stetson

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Hats are American made with pride right here in Texas.

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>They are still the official crown of all self prospecting Cowboys,

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and Stetson is proud to be on the field with

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>America's team. Find Stetson Hats in the pro Shop or

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at Stetson dot Com today. Star Sports Tours is the

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>only official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline access and photo

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though,

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You'll get to talk x's and os with Senior Director

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of Player Personnel Will McClay and of course with yours

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>truly me, Brian broad Us. You can trust the official

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll travel like a pro. Visit Cowboys Travel dot com

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to book your travel package today. Back to the break,

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, we are going to talk about November the ninth.

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to look ahead, but we will here

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>does it is? They salute to service party Plaza coffin

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>over there. You got to make sure Danny Serek is

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna make sure it and be healthy for this one

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>because she's the host of the Tostitos Championship Plaza, Salute

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to Service Plaza Party, man enjoy live entertainment, military ceremonies,

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys alumni autographs, Danny Sirek will be there and more.

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>After the event festivities, the Star will also be hosting

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>two Madden players as they face off in the EA

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Sports Madden NFL twenty Club Championship presented by Spire. That's

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>actually a really cool thing. What they're gonna do is

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna actually take the There are every team's having

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like a tournament and this is going to be to

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>determine who the Cowbotto's presentative from the Madden Tournament will

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>be that will be playing. Then go and play a

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>tournament against all the other teams. And if that happens,

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you have do you play with the Cowboys?

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Like when you go to that tournament? If you are

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, you're going to have on the Cowboys jersey?

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good? You have to play with the Cowboys, I

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>would assume the team I would assume. So I'm not.

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of the most tricked up teams where Aaron

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is playing for the Cowboys. I doubt that, actually

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Honestly, I don't know how that rule works.

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I would assume they're going to be playing with the Cowboys,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but maybe in this in this championship game, then are

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>they both playing with the Cowboys. I don't know. That's

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a good question. Can you show up and figure it out?

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that you're the host, She'll be there. She will

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>figure it out when she gets she will be there.

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Should be a lot of fun. November the ninth, it

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is the Salute service party. Plaza. Yeah, plaza party. It

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>will be fun. All right, let's jump back in. We

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>got a few more players we gotta hit. We're talking

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>about expectations above below or ad expectations. Jason Witten, he

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is literally like at the definition of ad expected. This

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is like, this is what we thought. He's exactly like

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the day he came out of retirement. You're like, he's

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna play most of the snaps. He's gonna run eight yards,

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>turn around and catch it a bunch of times, unless

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the last minute of the game. Three times

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>when it's an end of scenario, he's going to run

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a ten and out like he's Jason Witton and he'll

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>have a few penalties here and there, and some of

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>them will be costly. But I mean, he is what

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>he is, and this is exactly what we thought he'd be.

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Is he the same guy that he was when he

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>was here his final year before he went into retirement.

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think like he does. Look he still looks

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fresher like that was a storyline at camp, and I

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair. I'm a little better than I thought

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he would be. Yeah, that's where I was getting to

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like moves a little better. Probably he seems like he's

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and this is gonna be like this

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>is here a little bit better than he was before,

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that is taking a year away and letting

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>your body actually actually heal. Well, he's got better wide

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>receivers around him that are better at running routes, which

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>should open up the guys in the in the middle.

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So he's got three route runners that are way better

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>than the three that when he was here before, with

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Dez Beasley and Terrence Williams. It seems like forever ago.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>It was literally two years ago, not for long. Terence

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in the XFL. I believe he is he was his

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like I heard his name crop up, but he was

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.239
<v Speaker 1>not drafted into the exile. Okay, scooting, No, na, all right,

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go ahead and get with Blake Blake Jarwin

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Blake Jarwin above below or at expectations, much like Tony Pollard.

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>It's very similar to me. How much is just his usage? Verse?

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Like how good he actually is? I mean, I mean

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I played a decent amount of twelve personnel, So he's

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>getting on the field a decent amount of times at expectations. Yeah, yeah, probably,

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's so it's running into a problem though, because it's

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>four and three at expectations for this team or below. Well,

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you kill him on the Thrisday Show. No, I'm not,

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>We're not. But this this, this would happen with Wade

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Phillips on a Monday after the Cowboys would lose by

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty points and he would sell everybody played pretty well,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.959
<v Speaker 1>but you lost by twenty to the to the Rams.

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>So guess what a guess what tomorrow? That's so, but

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that's but tomorrow, I'm but here's no, here's the deal.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow We're going to talk about the defense, and I

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>want to see if we start to see more of

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>those below expectations when you talk about the defense. Now

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we've already talked about the offensive line. You guys say

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it was below expectations, right, true, And if if your

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is performing below expectations, that's a big reason

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>why you could be losing three games in a row,

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>right I. Honestly, the offense is not the reason why

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this team is where they are kind of, I know,

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm just saying. I mean, they are playing

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. Like the Green Bay game was a stinker

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that, like, you know, guys that don't

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>typically do this stuff for are making boneheaded players. A

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Mari's tip that was picked even with the potential penalty,

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the throw Dack's throw to Kevin King bad throw, bad

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>throw over the middle, Like that was like the outlier

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>because even even the Saints game, like we were so

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>troubled about how bad they looked. Well, what if the

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Saints done since completely annihilated the Bears. Uh, they you

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.239
<v Speaker 1>know the game before they played the Cowboys, they went

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>up to Seattle and like Russell Wilson scored a garbage

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>time touchdown in that game, but they shut them out. Uh,

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>there's another game. I'm forgetting in there. But like the Saints,

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>their defense is for mine. For my money, they're probably

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the best team in the league considering they're doing all

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of this without Drew Breests. Yes, I mean, you got

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to give people credit in the NFL regardless, But like,

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>go look at the supposed murderers Row that the Patriots

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>have beaten, because it's a bunch of crap. It's a

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of baden playing out there. Knowing that hit coach,

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bet they might be very point actually put

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it there. Okay, the Saints have the best resume of

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>any team in the league. They have beaten some good

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:48.240
<v Speaker 1>teams without the starting Tom Brady have the best resume

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in the I'm trying to have it both ways. Regardless,

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the points you're making. The Cowboys have

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>been great. The Cowboys offense played a very bad game

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in our arguably the toughest environment in the league. Against

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the defense that we are seeing is pretty legit. So

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>even if that's their one stinker, I'll give it to

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>him because it's you know, it's not an outlier in

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the way that the Jets are an outline. And so

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean not to throw out this as an excuse

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>but I would have liked to have seen Michael Gallop

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in that game because I think that that would have

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>opened up a little bit more from them trying to

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball around down the field. So I guess

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>my overarching point is I think more the offense has

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>been pretty good for the most part, like more often

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>than not. Like I don't think they're the reason why

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>this team is four and three, So I don't have

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a problem saying most of them are playing at or

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>above expectations. So let's move to the wide receivers of

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Mark Cooper above below or at expectations. I think it's

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of similar almost to think in a sense that

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>your expectations, yeah, are so high because of what he

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>can do. Not just to be clear, if you look

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>at if you look at as of this week, he's

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>now been with the Cowboys sixteen games, which would be

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a full season. That would be ninety one options, thirteen

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty six yards and eleven touchdowns. Yeah, I'm

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it has been bawling. It's at for me, Yeah, yeah,

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it talk for me to go below it. But he's playing.

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>He had a crucial part in all three losses because

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>he had He had two pass interference penalties against the

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Saints that were big. He had a big drop pass

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>against the Packers, even though he came back with so

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>many great plays, And then he got hurt against the Jets,

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know, I don't mean he didn't he

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't get back on the field. I don't know what

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the deal was there. I don't know how bad he

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was in pain. I don't know. But he did come

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>back the next week and help him. But his absence

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>hurt them in that game. I'm not gonna blame him

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>for that. Just he was a he was a part

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of all three losses. Yeah, well but but but but

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>he's balled out completely when he's out there, even in

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Packers. So I don't think they'd

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>win the four games they win without him. So if

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you want to say, well, those three he had a

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 1>hand in all three losses, well that tells me how

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>critical he is to his team, because go back to

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>even last year, what were they doing before he got here?

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>What do they do after? He may be one of

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>the most critical parts on this entire team because they

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>just need him in order to make this offense work.

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>For something, something about him elevates this entire offense. Right,

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that plenty of times last year, this year,

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 1>even all the points you were just listing off Nick,

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's something about him being on that field that makes

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:23.959
<v Speaker 1>his offense overall a whole different teams. Oh sorry, go ahead.

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I just wish I would have known what was going

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on with that injury there in the Jets game, because

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>just watching him, they just showed him on the bench,

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean just just his body language. I just didn't

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>understand any of that, and and I know he was

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in pain, but I was like, never thought he'd come

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>back and play the very next week. So I just

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>wondered why he didn't try more. There's a phrase, come back.

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a phrase that he keeps using. He said it

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. He said it after that game

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and after the Eagles game and leading up to it,

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>where he was like, I didn't think I could do

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>my job. And I think that's probably the crux of it,

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and not like in the sense of like, you know,

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I need to get my numbers or I'm gonna be unhappy,

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>because like he hasn't been that guy the whole time

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>he's been here, and he's had some not great games

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 1>in the Atlantic Game last year. Like, I don't think

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>he's thinking about it from a stat standpoint, but he

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was simply like me, being out here is going to

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 1>hurt the team more than than than it won't. And

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that's you watched the sluggo that he ran against the Jets,

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like he's basically hobbling at the end of his route.

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I can see. I can see where that comes from.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I mean, especially with all the stuff he's

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>fought through since the start of training camp. I'm not

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>about to question his toughness or his want to planned

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>or fasciitis. Yeah, I mean, that's the point. The fact

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that throughout his career, not just even with the Cowboys,

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>just throughout his career college in pro. He's a guy

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.359
<v Speaker 1>who's played through some pretty painful injuries. So for him

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:48.879
<v Speaker 1>to be like, I just can't do it during this

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>game because of the pain, that says to me the

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>pain must have been immense for him not to be

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>able to go. I wouldn't question personally, I wouldn't question

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>his toughness. I think that if he couldn't and he

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>was doing because he said, I just can't give what

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I need to give his toughness at all. I'm just

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>questioning the fact that if you watched it. When you

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>were you were watching, you had the binoculars on him

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Just the whole sequence seemed odd to then

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>come back and play the next week, That's that's all.

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>It was just odd that he wasn't even trying Byron

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Jones had a hamstring injury. He was running around and

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>hopping and trying to see it. Maybe I missed it.

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>It just seemed like he was tugging on the shoulder

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>pads the whole time, and like, but there is something

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, like if you know because you let's say

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he went into that game in those first three plays, Yeah,

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he kind of knew it and he was like, all right,

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>this ain't right. And then after that third play he's like, yeah,

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>this definitely ain't right. I ain't got it. Just can't

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 1>do it right. Then then he knows, like there's no

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>point in jumping around on it, Like he knows I

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have it right now. I've already done three plays

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not I don't have it. That have been

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest surprises that he was able to

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 1>come back, maybe because I thought if that's the case

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>where you absolutely know you're not gonna be back. And

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that's and that's also when I also questioned, like or

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 1>at least I say, maybe this guy's that tough where yeah,

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't there, he couldn't do it that day, but

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>then that next week he's like, he probably went into

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this game not one hundred percent, but he's like, I

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>feel better than I felt last week. I feel like

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I can give a little something and here we go,

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>right or knows he always balls out against Philly either way.

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>But the point is, I think there are a lot

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of guys played in this game because they feel like

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they needed it, and they were at a situation where

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they were like, literally, I'm gonna put my body on

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the line a little bit more this week because I

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>think we needed I don't think those guys were all healthy.

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't get myself to believe all five

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of them where all of a sudden healthy. No chance,

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>yeah they were. None of them were healthy. And they

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 1>always say we figured it out. Kudos to them, they say,

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 1>when we're not gonna determine whether or not someone's going

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>to play or wrestling before by a week, if we think,

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>but these players know, I've got to buy a week

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>if if I have to go through a little extra pain.

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.280
<v Speaker 1>This week, I had more recovery time. I think that played.

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>It was a critical game like being four and three

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>verses three and four and having that division win is

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a ton of difference. They didn't want to go went

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 1>to that bye week on a four game loser. The

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Giants and Eagles play, does anyone know? Not off the

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>top of my head, because that's big. I mean, you

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to beat the Giants coming up,

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>but you know you want the Giants to kind of

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>be competitive here and beat the Eagles. That would be huge.

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Eagles got somebody tough this week too, don't they. We'll

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>talk about that when we get thirty. But I think

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they got a tough game this week at all. Get

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 1>tough for them. They have a tough schedule coming up.

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I think the Bills are in there and the bill yeah,

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I knew it was gonna register as soon

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as you said it. All right, let's go to a

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>real quick Randall Cobb and Michael Gallup. How do you

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>think they've performed above or below expectations? Expectations for Gallup

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>for he's above. What I thought. I thought was, what

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>about the last two games, Um, you have some drops? Yeah? Yeah,

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean he but he have every drop the ball

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>against Philly, Yeah he did. I never expected him to

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>be the number one receiver. I just I was hoping

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 1>he would be a good, solid number two. And he's

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:57.800
<v Speaker 1>been even better than that. But in that game against

0:41:57.840 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, he showed that he wasn't ready to be

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in the number one. That's fine. I didn't expect that

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>get out of him. That's not what they drafted for.

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not what they're paying for. They expect him to

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 1>be a very good, complimentary receiver. He's been that and

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>more so. I say above, definitely above. I'm gonna go

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>under for cop I'm gonna say below for Cobb, And

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I hate I hate that because, like he's such a

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 1>victim of circumstance almost I mean, injuries is obviously part

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of it, but like he had a seventy four yard

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 1>touchdown negated by a penalty he got within just a

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>hair or the goal line the other night against Philly. Like,

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>if four, I'm serious, give him five, reminds me seven

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>more yards at the end of the game. I mean,

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>he get tripped up, but if he can get seven

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the hail Mary, Yeah, then then you're talking about a

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Brett Maher kick. If four or five different plays go

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the other way for Randall Cobb, we would be talking

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:51.399
<v Speaker 1>about him much differently. And I you know that's that's

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in small consolation. But Dak had a bad throw. He

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was wide open in the end zone against the Saints

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and Dak missed him, missed him in the missed him

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>on third well, I mean half and half. He should

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>have caught the third down ball in New Orleans, but

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it was not a great throw her. So again, so

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 1>he's been so close so many times. Like on Sunday night,

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, can we get this man a touchdown

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>because he's he's I know, he's a pro, but like

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he's got to be frustrated based on how close he

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is to having a better season and having that great

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>first game as a cowboy. Yeah, touchdown the staff arm. Yeah,

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been below. I'm not going to kill him

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for it because there's there's a few different circumstances that

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 1>contribute to that. But hasn't quite clicked for him yet.

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:35.959
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I think Galve's above too good. All right,

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a rap for today. We'll be back to Mark tomorrow.

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about the defense. We wanna talk about

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the guys that are above below and av expectations on

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the defense and the defensive unit as a whole. Do

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that when we come back tomorrow. Until then, for Nick Even,

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Dave Hellman, Danny Serek, I'm Derek Hilton. This has been

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:58.840
<v Speaker 1>has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas cowboy Is Football Club. How Go