WEBVTT - Fed Insider Reveals The Feds End Game | Danielle DiMartino Booth

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everyone, welcome to another episode of the Market Disruptors Show. Today,

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting down with Danielle di Martino Booth. She is

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the CEO and founder of quil Intelligence, former Federal Reserve insider,

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and the author of the book Fed Up Now. Of course,

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're watching this channel, you know I talked about

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the FED policy a lot and what it's doing. Of course,

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an insider. I make a lot of assumptions accusations.

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we try to look at the facts and data.

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But today we get to sit down with an insider.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm so excited for this interview. So Danielle, welcome

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for joining us. All Right, so I've

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>watched you and countless interviews and have a good idea

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of questions I want to ask, but just for the

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>people that are watching, just give us a quick background

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on on maybe kind of who you are and what

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. So I graduated from business school and being

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>finance bright Light Big Cities, started off on Wall Street

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Uh, never thought i'd leave. Nine eleven

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>came and went and the firm that I worked for

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>got about out by a Swiss investment bank which was

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>very quiet and boring. Uh So, after eleven I met

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the man of my dreams, moved down to Texas. I

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>had gotten my second masters in journalism at Columbia when

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I was working on Wall Street. I retired, sold my

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>book of business back to the firm, signed a noncompete

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and um, and just decided to write for a living

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>and thought that my career was going to be over

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at that point. And at some point Warren Buffett called,

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and off I went to Omaha, and you're writing really

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy things and controversial and blah blah blah. And Richard

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Fisher called from the Federal Reserve. I ended up working

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>for him for nine years of the Dallas Fed as

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>an advisor. And I'm anything but a FED bureaucrats. It

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting fit and I enjoyed myself so much.

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I came out of the Fed and wrote a book

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for two and a half years called fed Up, An

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Insider Stake on why the Federal Reserve is Act for America.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So I suppose you could call that my exit interview.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And since then I have started a research firm, Quill Intelligence.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>We published daily, we published weekly. We've got retail and

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>institutional subscribers. And I talk a lot. You do talk

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and we love hearing it. The public, the

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>market has decided they like, they like what you have

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to say. Now I'm curious, um, the dig into the FED. Now,

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw in another interview, I think it was with

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Patrick that David and you said that you're fiscally conservative, um,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and you believe in bringing down the debt in America. UM.

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And maybe I'm just curious, is that maybe what happened

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at the FED. Right you're fiscally conservative. You weren't a

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>green with their just inflate away till no infinity or

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>into infinity. I I was. I was never a fan

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Fed enabling Congress to borrow as much as

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it wants. I've yeah, I listened to the conventional wisdom

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>as always, well, you can afford it as long as

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you can service the debt. I don't. I don't buy

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that for a minute. But that is what's happened in

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the extreme with Uncle Sam. And that is, if the

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>FED brings interest rates down to the lowest level in

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>five thousand years, will low and behold, the government's going

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to start running up deficits and debts that it cannot

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in the end afford and look at where we are today. Yeah, exactly,

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>great point. And uh, for everybody that's listening right now,

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>make sure you stick around to the end because I

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.399
<v Speaker 1>am going to ask Daniel what that end game looks

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like and we're gonna try and just make some stabs

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in the dark edits. So make sure you stick around

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>for that. But back to that point, So, being physically

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.119
<v Speaker 1>conservative and seeing them spend to infinity, I could understand

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that stress. I'm curious just what's your viewpoint is, just

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe generally on the FED itself. I mean, from my viewpoint,

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems that, um, they're they're kind of responsible for

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the problems that we have. UM through

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this endless money, inflation, debasement, etcetera. Right, purchasing power has

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gone down, that levels of quality. The list goes on. Yeah,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so back so so specifically about income inequality. I believe

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that the FED policy has been a major factor in

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the income inequality. UM do you would you see that? Yeah?

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I do. And it's not, Um, it's not only about

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing and injecting liquidity into the system. It's also

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>about indexing and the whole idea of the FED putting

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>a floor under markets, which started with Alan Greenspan in seven.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>In the weeks and months that followed the Black Monday,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the Crash of seven, he went so far as to

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>allow the New York Fed Markets Desk to inform Wall

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Street bond traders ahead of FED moves to inject liquidating

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the system. So that was kind of when moral hazard

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>was born, when the FED put was born, and it's

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>just gotten to be bigger and bigger and bigger over

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the years. But what's come out of this is this

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of don't fight the FED. And what don't fin

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the FED has done is it's fed this huge indexing

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>industry because you don't need to pay for active managements.

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>When a monkey or port Dave Portnoy, take your choice,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>can simply the row darts at a wall and make

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>tons of money because they own anything and everything, and

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it all goes up. But what's actually happened in the background.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, the SMP five hundred recently hit an all

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>time high and we exited from the bear market, and

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>there were fireworks going off. If you took out the

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>SMP five then the stock market was down about three

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So but to the point of the Fed and income

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>inequality and don't fight the FED and indexing. If you

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>don't fight the FED and you put your money in

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the Vanguard SMP index fund, then you're just going to

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the biggest companies get bigger. And when

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>big companies get bigger, what they do in competition comes

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>along is they eat it. And anytime there's an innovator,

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you can to the people who sold um I think

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's Instagram. Uh, and they they they thought they were

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>really wealthy when they sold it to one of the

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>big five, but they realized a few years later that

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>instead of multi millionaires, they could have been millionaires. But

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. But but what's happened Because the FED makes

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest companies bigger, and because the FED foster's monopolization

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of the US economy, it ends up stifling innovation. It

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ends up killing the ability to be an entrepreneur. And

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you you take the wind out of the American dream

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of anybody being able to to start a business and

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>become successful because it's much harder to do if you

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>live in a monopolized economy, which is something that the

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>FED has fed. Yeah, that's such a great point. And

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, it's something that's it's a little bit

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>of a different twist than I've actually looked at. Obviously,

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I see government policy going into a lot of the monopolization,

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but I haven't really thought and of course the easy

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>flowing money go is into that as well. Letting these

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>big companies running running massive losses, right Like, Uh, that's

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>one reason why I think like Warren Buffetts maybe kind

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of lost it because he's still looking for that value investor.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>But today companies aren't about making money. They're just about

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>growing um. And that's the thing, you know, if the

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>FED and its current policies and people people people think

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that zombie corporations are something new. You know, prior to

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, four of companies in America were zombie corporations.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So the FED has been fostering keeping deadwood alive, keeping

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>non productive entities in the in the economy. The fetes

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>had a great track record of doing that for years.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Post COVID, it's popped up to of companies because the

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Fed's been so aggressive at keeping companies that should go

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>out of business alive by putting more debt on their

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. Yet, but there's something beyond the zombie uh,

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the danger of creating all these zombies and the fact

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to suck productivity out of future growth

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and hold back the ability to create jobs because you're

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>keeping companies in the industry when if they came out,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>innovators could enter. But there's there there's something that even

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>goes um beyond that when when it comes to zombie corporations,

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's that if you pile on so much more

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>debt onto these companies, pay attention when you read Chapter

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven headlines. Pay attention when you see bankruptcy filings. Today,

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>more often than not, you're seeing companies go straight from

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>filing to liquidation. And that's the difference that having way

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>too much debt sets that you need to file Chapter

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 1>eleven and having so much debt that there's no value

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can carve out in the end that saves jobs.

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And that is what this current generation, this last iteration

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Feds hurah is doing. Yeah, So just to

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>dig into that just for a second. So typically you

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>would file see a company file for Chapter eleven, which

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>would give them protection to reorganize. But you're saying they're

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not bothering, they're just going straight to liquidation because there's

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>just no hope. There's no hope, and because there's so

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>much more debt than there would have been otherwise had

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the junk bond market not been kept wide open by

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the FED to keep them alive when they otherwise would

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>have had to restructure. The more pot the more debt

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you pile on, the less value you can extract in

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the end. Yeah, and that's been my argument creditors. Yeah,

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that's been my argument, you know, with with this whole

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, just picking out Airlines for example, which I

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>know you have used on the airlines, but you know,

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone's like, oh, we can't let them go bankrupt. And

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, we you know, we need to protect

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the jobs and this and that, and it's like, well,

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just because they go bankrupt doesn't mean the jobs go away.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>They just get re orged, right, and they get rid

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of the debt and now they're a lean, mean company

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that can grow again. But instead you're saddling them with

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>more debt. That's not like a good thing. But like

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, American Airlines had in one press release that

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>they were going to be issuing one to trillion dollars

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of debt and oh, By the way, on September thirty,

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>when the bailout expiration ends, they're gonna be upping their

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>layoffs from twenty five thousand people. Who puts that in

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the same press release. Yeah, the nerve of these people

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>so um. It seems like, you know, I'm not the

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>brightest guy. I didn't. I don't have your pedigree, but

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like so obvious to me. And I

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>see comments. I mean I see five ten comments a

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>week on my videos, and it seems like people get this. Um.

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Would you say that the FED policy to do this

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is they're completely just missing the picture, or they know

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing, but they're doing it anyway. I think

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the ladder. I think that I think that that J.

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>Powell has seen the whites of the eyes of how

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 1>big of a monster this credit is, and he's scared. Um.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, I tell this story all the time. General

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Electric debt was downgraded Halloween two thousand and eighteen, fourteen

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>days later junk bond issue and shut down in the

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>United States for forty one days. The collateral backing exchange

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>traded bond funds was trading by appointment only, and there

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was a huge liquidity issue, and there was the risk

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that that systemic risk was going to be unleashed. And

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>that was what brought out the Powell pivot, when he

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.359
<v Speaker 1>realized that so much debt has been created that this

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this is possibly worse than the subprime crisis would be.

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Because in the aftermath of the subprime crisis, everybody decided

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that quantitative easing was the way to go. Everybody was

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lower for longer, whether it became a global phenomena, and

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>now you have pushing three trillion dollars of debt worldwide

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and a beast that central bankers simply don't feel like

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they contain. Yeah, I really want to dig into that

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>three hundred trillion dollar debt balloon that constantly has this

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>big hole in it. But before we do, I just

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>want to jump back into the FED policy a little bit.

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>So recently UM FED FED chair Jerome Powell came out

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and said that he he did not believe the FED

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>policy created inequality, and my right, I mean he said that,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And then and then we have Senator Elizabeth Warren introduced

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a bill with a few other people UM, a bill

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to specifically have the FED fight inequality. So currently, a

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.359
<v Speaker 1>FED policy should be to maintain stable inflation and maximize employment.

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>But apparently it's not good enough. Now. Now the Fed's

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.599
<v Speaker 1>going to fight the inequality that they create. Um, the

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>deference to Senator Warren, I couldn't think of a worst

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.359
<v Speaker 1>way of trying to approach the issue of incomm inequality.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.599
<v Speaker 1>If you want to stop the FED from from widening

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the income inequality divide, then just tell them to quit

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>supporting Wall Street in you know, with Main with Main

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Street as the loser curio. Yeah, okay, yeah, I just

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>hand again Like I said, it's like, it's just seems

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so obvious to me. And in the comments that I see,

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>UM to see Senators Maxine Waters and whatever going behind this.

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I I guess it goes back to that previous question

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>do they not know? And maybe Acine Waters and Elizabeth

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Warren don't. I would venture to say that Elizabeth Warren

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>completely understands what the FETE is doing, and that in

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a post COVID world, you know, because of the programs

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that that the FETE is laid out, that that and

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and this is her thing. She didn't like the big banks,

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and yet when the FED prize opened the credit markets

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and all these companies are rushing to do record levels

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of bond issuance. Sorry, but that is a great pop

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to the revenue line of these biggest banks. And that

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is what this policy, this post pandemic policy, has done,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>along with quantitative easing. I mean, somebody's got to sell

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the bond, sell the bonds to the fet somebody's gonna

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>make money on that. Somebody's gonna help these these companies

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>issue record levels of debt. They're gonna make big fat

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>investment banking fees on that. We wonder with all these

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>credit lost provisions, why the banks aren't doing worse. Well,

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it's because the ft is effectively subsidizing them with policy.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what Elizabeth Warren should be concerned with, right, Yeah,

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it just seems so obvious that they're missing it.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like they have to know and and

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>intentionally be doing that. I know you've talked to quite

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit of good, good politics, good optics, all that

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>good b s. Yeah. Um, yeah, I mean it's apparent, well,

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems apparent that they're really trying to help out

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the buddies, right and not not main street Joe. But um,

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I've seen you know, you've talked quite a bit about

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, and you just mentioned it as well. I

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to dig into, uh, the pandemic per se,

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but but the economy post pandemic or or during pandemic

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>or post pandemic, and um, what's your view. I know

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we seem to have a V shaped recovery in the markets,

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>but the economy ain't have a no vcaped recovery, right, Uh.

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I've seen you recently say maybe a W maybe it's

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>an L. I don't know. But what do you see

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>about the economy kind of moving forward in this post

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>pandemic world? Well, I think that uh, And and I

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>don't mind being a little bit controversial about this. I

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think had we had a uniform national mask policy, that

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>we the economy will be in a lot better place.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It was finally forced on the state of Texas where

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I live, and lo and behold, we've got the hospitalization

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>right down. Smaller businesses or reopening, people feel safe for

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>going out. It makes a huge difference. And the fact

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that we had a patchwork approach meant that the biggest

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>spenders in the economy were too frightened to come out

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of their house. And that's just flat out gallop polling,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>non biased polling. So well, they weren't just scared to

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>come out of their house. I live in California and

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we were mandated. I mean the businesses were forced to

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>shut down. It wasn't a matter of being scared business well, no,

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about states that reopened and when businesses were

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>wide open and come on in. There was there was

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>there was two little follow through economically speaking. Something was missing.

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And the something that was missing was that the people

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>who have the most money to spend still weren't coming

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>out of their houses because there was no policy mandating

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that that you wear a mask. I just the thing

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that gets me about masks the most is that it

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with science. It has to do

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with economics and the top of earners in America, the

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>top two quintiles of earners account for sixty one of consumption.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're not going to convince them to come out,

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you're dead in the water with trying to reopen an economy.

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just not gonna happen. And lo and behold, it

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen. And when you look at spending by zip codes,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the highest income zip codes have had the highest degree

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of small businesses closing, and that's a shame because again,

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>had they felt safe going out, maybe their dry cleaner

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be out of business, maybe the restaurant down at

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the corner wouldn't be out of business. But nobody had

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>any continuity. I mean, Angela Merkel don't. I don't agree

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with all of her policies, but she was like, fine, fine,

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>literally you you were fined and Germany opened back up.

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the to answer your question, the

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>long term damage to the economy because so many small

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>businesses have been sacrificed because we haven't had strong leadership.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>It's going to stay with us for a generation. You

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>can't bring back small businesses overnight. So this is actually

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>going to increase the divide between the oligopolies and the

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>monopolies and the biggest companies and the smallest companies. And

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it was a policy error that occurred in Washington, d C.

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's a shame. Yeah, you know, I know, as

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you said, it's controversial, and a lot of times talking

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>about politics is because there's opinion in there. But you

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>can't understand finance without talking about politics because they're so intertwined. Right,

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So I get that I'm curious though, because it seems like, um,

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the middle class be hollowed out in the

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>United States and and and through policy after policy after policy,

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever you wanna call it. That a combination of as

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we've as you've already said, right, indexing and giving free

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>money away and uh, you know, chrony capitalism, regulations, outsourcing,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>all those things. But it almost seems to me, again

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>if you would look at it from politically, like there

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is a reason why they want the middle class hollowed out,

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and this almost seemed like a continuation of that, because

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the mom and pops. I can't go to

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>my local store, but I can go to Walmart. I

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>can't go to my local hardware store, but I can

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>go to home depot. Like it's like purposely targeting the

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>middle class. Almost it is. And and again, had there

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>been a cohesive leadership structure that said we're going to

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>open up all businesses and we're gonna open up all

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>businesses safely, then you wouldn't have seen such destruction in

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the small business sector. Had the paycheck Protection program not

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>just been for W two employees, had there been ten

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that were able to be included. Had they accounted for

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that if you're a restaurant and you're being

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>told that you can only reopen with twenty five or

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent capacity, you might want to bend the rules

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>someway somehow to allow the small business to stay both

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in compliance with regulations in terms of social distancing and

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not have them lose the loan ability because they're not

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>covering seventy of the loan proceeds with employment when you're

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>not allowing them to employ their employees. So Washington, in

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, has completely failed the middle class yet again.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, they've you know, they've effectively

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>introduced socialism into the U. S. Economy with the stimulus Bill,

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and now that now that workers in the economy have

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>gotten a flavor for what twenty four extra hundred dollars

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a month, feels like they're like, I like this universal

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>basic income, Let's get some more of it. So it's

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous path we've gone down to have signed in

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>legislation without really thinking about it, legislation that helped people

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>not work, and legislation that put hard working small businesses

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>out of business. Yeah, So, um, I agree with what

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, I mean you're talking about multigenerations or a

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>decade to come back. I think maybe multigenerations because we've

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>seen like restaurant chains that have been passed down through

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>multigenerations are gone now. Um, and so a lot of

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's not coming back at all. And also like, uh,

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, I I grew up racing dirt bikes,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>super dangerous. I've metal in every limb of my body. Uh,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the three boys. I'm happy they didn't

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>take that up, even though one of them flies planes. Anyways, Yeah,

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's one That's one thing that's helped me

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>with investing because I'm not afraid of the risk. But

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's also I've made a lot of money, I've lost

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. But my point is is my

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>doctor would always tell me stay off of it. So

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I go there, I'm like, hey, doc, you know my

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>ankle gun herds all stay off of it. But like, hey,

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go to work. I can't just stay off

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. So I thank thank you for your opinion.

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>But I understand there's a bigger picture that I have

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to look at. I can't just look at the medical

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>and we it kind of look at the medical but

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we didn't take in all the other ramifications of that, right,

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>And so like you're talking about business shutdown, Well that

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>changes the trajectory of of of multigenerations. And even today,

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>right kids can't go back to school, parents are quitting

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>their job. You take two or three years off in

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the middle of your career, you're not getting back onto

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that same trajectory you're on, and then your kids aren't

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the same trajectory. Right right, It

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>trickles down and it's a real crying, dying shame. It truly,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>truly is. Again, I there was a way to safely

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>reopen the economy. If you look at certain countries in

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Asia that have been scarred by prior pandemics, they never

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>shut down the restaurants just said, oh god, look at

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>another pandemic. They got rid of half the restaurants. Excuse

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that they go at a half the tables inside the restaurant,

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they just put them in the back. They socially distanced,

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they put their masks on. They did not close their

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>economies down, and they haven't had this massive loss to

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>their small business economies that we have. But yet nobody

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in in a leadership position. And I'm not talking about

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about both sides of the aisle. Nobody was

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>strong enough to say, you know what, let's be humble

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>about this. We're not a country that's accustomed to pandemics.

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>But let's look at countries whose economies are not being

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>devastated by a pandemic and maybe emulate what they're doing.

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't there wasn't any logic to it. Sure, Yeah,

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>well no, no doubt, no doubt that it could have

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>been done better. And and the sad thing is is

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>continuing to be done bad. Um, So we'll see, we'll

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>see how that that goes on. But um, jumping back

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>into the FED stuff, because I got my FED insiders,

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you questions there. Um. So you know,

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they're constantly saying they have this target of two percent

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation and I and I and I heard you mentioned

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it was on David's podcast. You know the CPI,

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>which is the consumer price index what they measure, and

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that you know, over time they

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>continually change what they're looking at to get the c

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>p I. Um, and supposedly they can't get any inflation

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>but yet main street knows that. I mean, for sure,

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>healthcare education have gone up big time. For sure, we

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>know that home prices have gone up, and even my

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>milk and my steak have gone up and like big time.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So what the heck are they looking at for CPU?

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>They're they're not looking at. What part of the Fed's

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>problem is is very basic. They try and smooth everything out. Well,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't live in a smooth world. But they try

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and smooth inflation out by removing inflated by removing food

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and energy costs. Sorry, but those are pretty important to

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>most families. I mean, when I've got all four kids

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in the house, we drink a gallon of milk a day,

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you exactly fifty nine down at the

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>store for the gallon period, and it was three a

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>few months ago. So I mean, but the FED excludes

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>things so that they can keep things that they can

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>smooth out their models. In addition to that, the FED

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>does not use the CPI. The FED uses pc which

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is an alternative measure of inflation, which uses my biggest

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>pet PEEVE, which uses Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates for

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the input for health care inflation. I can tell you

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's not what I pay for healthcare at all,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that my premiums have gone up, that my codepas have

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>gone up, and that's the largest The second are just

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>input to inflation. The largest input to inflation is housing,

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and they impute inflation some way, somehow that has again

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>zipped to do with what you're actually spending in the

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>real market. So by understating inflation, which is infuriating, they

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>can hide behind that target and say, as long as

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it's below two percent, we can keep the printing press going.

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I've seen them say recently. Uh it was one of

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the smaller FED Bank chairs. I forget which one, but

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>he said they're gonna, quote let it run hot, right,

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>so like they're gonna go instead of like tapering down

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>as they're getting close to target. He says, they're gonna

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>run out hot to two percent, which means they're gonna

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>wagh overshoot their goal, which if they're looking at over

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>shooting two percent, what the heck does that mean for us? Right? Well, look,

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been able to hit their target in the

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>first place. They haven't been able to hit the two

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>percent target in the first place, because they know that

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they have a manipulated metrics. So for them to say

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna let inflation run hot is simply code

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>word for saying we're never going to stop printing money,

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that if it does creep above two percent by some

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>miracle with oh, I don't know, all these people losing

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>their jobs, companies losing pricing power, disinflationary pressures building up

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in the background, but somehow they're gonna let inflation run hot.

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's if these people live in a

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>different planet, right, But they need the inflation. They want

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the inflation, right, I mean, I mean they, I mean

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>they not not we, but they need the inflation, uh,

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in order to keep alive. It almost seems like the

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>minute they stop printing, the whole system collapses, right, And

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they have now so much debt they have to continue

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to inflate it away. Is that correct? They want inflation

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to inflate away the debt. But at the same time,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>if they truly had higher interest rates, this whole house

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of debt cards would come just it would implode under

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the weight of whether you're talking about households debt service

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>or corporation's debt services. Inability to refinanceer. For God's sake, uncle,

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>say what the interest expense of the country would be

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>if we truly had normalized interest rates? As you think

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>about it, inflations is actually the fed's worst damn nightmare.

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But again, when you purposely understate it, then you can

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>hide behind it and ignore asset price inflation and ignore

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>food price inflation and just keep the game going. Right.

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>But I saw you mentioned before to that you know

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>by doing this, the FED has basically destroyed price discovery.

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Now do you see that as only destroying price discovery

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in the financial sector or like money or price price

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>discovery across everything. No, I was really referring more to

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>stocks and bonds, and but but those are those are

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>critical cogs in the system. I mean there was before

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED stepped in and intervened in the investment grade

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>bond market and even in the junk bond market. As

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>as a trader, you know, you knew that you the

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>value that you were getting, you could assess what an

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>investment should be. Every time a price agnostic buyer enters

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a market, your price discovery shot to hell. Yeah, I mean,

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>if you want to extrapolate that to the real world,

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>private equity backed investors swarmed into certain inland Empire Phoenix

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that they went into certain markets in America and bought

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>up prices without even without even inspecting the homes and

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>lo and behold today we have home prices that are

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>too high. And they started this cult of investing in homes.

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And that is something that I also leave at the

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>foot of the Fed because if money is so cheap

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.479
<v Speaker 1>for so long, investors are going to find new and

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>exciting in different ways to come in and destroy price

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>discovery in real markets that affect households as well. Yeah,

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've definitely been influenced big time in the

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Austrian school of thought, right, a lot of the mesas

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff and whatnot, and a lot of f high I can.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>You know they talk about like money is communication and

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I kind of believe that, you know, central planning fails,

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and so how do you organize million people? And so

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>through money? Money is communication is price discovery. So how

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>do I know I need to order new supplies? How

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>do I know I need to raise the price of

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>my my thing? Right? Well, the market can organize all

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>those people when there's prices, when there's price in there.

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But when money is distorted, then nobody knows what the

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>heck to do? Do you see that? And and that

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is that that is also the case when it comes

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to uh companies, the ease with which companies can can

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>access borrowing as well, and so they end up taking

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on more death than they should because they think that

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>there and then all of a sudden, when you have

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a recession, come along, poof, they're gone. So uh No,

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the ability to run businesses at the most at the

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>most fundamental level, to your point, uh is, depends critically

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on true price discovery, which is why when when you

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>look at socialism UH and you look at the problems

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it has when they have everything controlled by the government,

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you lose all of that and then you end up

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with massive shortages. They don't have enough parts to fix

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>their car, they don't have enough food to eat, right,

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's all because it's been completely captured and controlled.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Ye I lived in Venezuela. I live in Venezuela before

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>socialism came about. So i'm i'm I'm a big study

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of that. And I nothing scares me anymore than the

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>armies of modern monetary theorists to think that that we

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>can just print away as much as we want to

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>give everybody everything they need in a pony and no,

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a very slippery slope. But again, I

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's enough of a recognition of the fact

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've taken a step in that direction with the

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of the stimulus bill. If you look at the

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>past um six recessions, Yes, if you look at the

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>past six recessions going back to disposable personal income adjusted

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for inflation and declined by o point five percent during

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>those recessions, real disposable income inflation adjusted disposable income in

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this country has risen by in the current procession on

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>an annualized rate because we've given away so much. But again,

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we've taken we've taken socialism for a test drive. And

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>my greatest concern is that they're going to be there's

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be enough critical mass to keep it going, because

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to remember this was signed into law with

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a Republican in office. See what they wanted? One tint

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:38.239
<v Speaker 1>inswer three. But yeah, um, but but I'm you know,

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that I kind of look at and

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, I mean I see the same thing and

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>like Bernie Sanders, the first guy running on an open

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>socialist platform. But I don't look at it as like

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a defining moment. We were capitalism and now we're socialist. Right,

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It's always like a blend and so it's like we're

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>part socialist, we're part capitalist. And and people point to

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, the you know, some of the Nordic

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>countries and say this is the same thing. But everyone's

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a blend um and it seems like maybe,

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can speak to this because you've been there,

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but maybe Venezuela was way more socialist. China had started

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to become a little more capitalist, right that we've seen that.

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But like you talk about like the money going out,

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus whatnot. But we already have welfare in California.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>If you were to before pre pandemic a year ago,

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>if you were to collect all the unemployed, all the

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>welfare benefits that are available to you, I think it's

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>like almost forty thousand a year. Why it was the

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>highest state in the nation. I think it was like

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty thousand a year, and that's no taxes. So like

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we're already kind of had a socialist nation. I would say, right,

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we uh, you know, I like to say that the

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>past ten fifteen years, because of FED policy, because of

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rates at or close to the zero bound, that

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we've had the stealthiest expansion of the social safety nets

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>since f DR was in office. People just haven't paid

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>attention to it. And again, borrowing costs at artificially low

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>levels bring about all manner of sins and we've seen them.

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We're more aware of them today. But this has been

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>going on for a very long time. Yeah, now, UM,

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I know we're I want to start wrapping it up here,

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but for everyone who's still listening, I am going to

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna dig into the inflation versus deflation debate or

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>not debate with the conversation, But before we get into

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that and where this endgame is. But before we get

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>into that, UM, talking about deflation, you had mentioned how, um,

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, how technology has improved things and now with

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic people working from home streamlining things like that, UM,

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>technology has it is and should be deflationary, right, Uh,

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we make things easier and it's deflationary. And for me

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it seems like deflation is a really good thing, Like

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>do I want my dollars to buy more things in

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the future? Or less. Right. Uh, the Kenzian system has

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>taught people that we need inflation. What do you where

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>do you sit on that? Do we need inflation or

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is deflation good? H Well, we don't need deflation in

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>our earnings, that's for sure and that. But but if

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>if they purchased more, it's always purchasing power, right, purchasing power. Yes.

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>But but but you're talking about utopia. You're talking about

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>people with no debt. So that's the always the argument, right, Well,

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we need inflation because of debt. Well what if we didn't,

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>What if we weren't a debt addicted world, if we

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>weren't a debt addicted world, then we wouldn't care about

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>deflation at all. I mean, that's that is utopia. I mean,

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I personally, I had a mortgage for a

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>while and I you know, I lost sleep every single

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>night until the mortgage finally went away. Uh. But not

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think like me. And we are

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a debt our nation and we have ingrained into society

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea of borrowing and living beyond your meat. This

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things that has to be expunged.

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Or are you our fate is a nation is is

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>at risk. Yeah. So having lived in Venezuela and and

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing that kind of firsthand, Um, where do you see

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>us on that scale? Do you think there's hope? Well, now,

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I was in Venezuela the summer before Chaves came on

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and really socialism started to get going. And I will

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>tell you that, Um, and again capitalist total conservative right

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>here completely, But I will tell you that the level

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of poverty that I witnessed and the level of homelessness,

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, but the time I I spent a

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>few months living there, I left. You know, this is

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>prior to all of the knowledge that I have today

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>about economics. But just as somebody observing what was going on,

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I knew that the environment was right for somebody to

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>come up and try and help the people. And if

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you if there's enough suppression that goes on, then you

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>end up with a big enough ground swell to bring

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about a change in an economy where it's not the

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>balance that you describe, but something that swings too far

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to left. You certainly don't want that. But and again

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that is why I think it's so critical that education

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>reform and reforming the FED be pursued, because ultimately the

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 1>country pays the price if you allow the income inequality

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>divide to get completely out of hand, and there is

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>concern for that right now. There is talk of mass

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>homelessness in our future. There already is mass homeless in California. Man,

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you live in California. Last time I was in Los Angeles,

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I was, I was. I mean, it's my children were,

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 1>They've never seen anything like that. But when when you're

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about a world a decade in which FED policy

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>made it for every real estate developer. The only way

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that they could make the math work in a zero

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>interest rate environment was to build luxury units. So now

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got a bunch of high rises and beautiful condos

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that nobody can afford. And the only the only thing

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that home builders built for a decade where luxury homes.

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's a there's an argument to be made

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>for the FED having made housing out of reach. You

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be working in a in a hospital

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 1>downtown or in a hotel downtown and have a two

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>hour commute and you know you can't find an apartment

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a reasonable rent. So again, this is not how

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>economies should work. But when you artificially repress interest rates.

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It's exactly what's happening. Yeah, And I've I've made the argument.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's maybe a pen tweet on my on

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter threat is uh, you know, real economies make

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>real things, and we've financialized the economy. So that's hard.

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 1>That's hard. Big thing is like finance, and everything's gotten

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>during the real estate boom, what were we doing? I mean,

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>what was productive about building all those homes and all

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>those mansions. I mean, we we we came out on

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the other end of it. There was those homes because

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>because the price signal was wrong the first the price

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>signal was wrong because because Alan Greenspan interest rates too

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>low for too long, and subprime mortgage went through the

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>roof right in your backyard, New Century country wide, and

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>all those names probably ring about oh yeah, oh yeah.

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I I got caught up in that, and unfortunately it

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:24.839
<v Speaker 1>didn't end good for me as well. And that's that's

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why I really dug into gold

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and learned about hard sound money and found Mike Maloney

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and Ron Paul and I started chanting in the Fed

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with him, and uh, here I am a dozen years later. Um.

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>But getting back into that, UM, I would just say

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>one comment. I didn't have this on my list of things,

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I'm I'm forty five, so I'm like

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>old enough to have kind of grown up to like

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>be fearful of the USSR. And I remember thinking like

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 1>communist Russia, like they tell you what you can do

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for work and what you can't do. And I remember

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as a kid, like people like coming from Cuba and

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>like risking their life, and I was thinking, like, oh,

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they're swimming in shark infested water to like escape, you know.

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>And I remember the Berlin Wall, and I remember these

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>thoughts as a kid, like what if I was like

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>at my friend's house and then I woke up in

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the morning and the fence was up and I couldn't

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 1>get back, And like, um, we have all these examples,

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and we have real life examples in Venezuela. Right, Um,

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>why do people still think it's a good idea? Uh? Well,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an easy way of thinking. It is. It's

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the easy way out. And on top of that,

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you've had a lot of corruption in public education in

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>America such that you have generations of people who feel

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>like they're stuck in this loop and they can't escape poverty,

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and in many cases you can't. I mean, I've I've

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>actually written uh some ideas down I've published some papers

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 1>about education reform. And you know, if you want to

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:07.240
<v Speaker 1>spend taxpayer dollars on something, then make sure a working

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 1>mom has has childcare coverage in the first few months

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>of a child's life so that she can rejoin the workforce.

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't make it so prohiberitly expensive that she has to

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>drop out and go on welfare, because then she's going

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to be stuck in a loop and her kid's going

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to be stuck in the same loop. And there there's

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>make it to where people can work, and that is

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>what you need to do, I think, to ensure that

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>because working parents teach their kids to get educated. Parents

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>who don't work don't and that is part of the problem.

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it comes down to the parents, and that is

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>part of where financial illiteracy is so rife in this

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>in this country. Yeah, that so that we can have

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>a whole show on that, and I don't I don't

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.359
<v Speaker 1>really want to jump into that, but but you're absolutely right.

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It's always about education. Our food that we eat, our

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 1>medicine that we take, everything always boils down to education.

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think the system has uh intentionally we know this, right,

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we know it's been taken over, and it's intentionally created

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of victims, like, Hey, you can't get ahead

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>because you're poor, you can't get head because you're black,

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't get ahold head because you're a woman. And

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>now when when you when you become a victim, then

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for a savior instead of empowering people. Right,

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I mean just that little minor shift, and

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I and I just had this thought that's like analogy,

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, uh, right, if the state is going

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep us safe from every virus and every sickness

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and every poorness and every all these things, were like, shoot,

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>just put me in a cage and give me a

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>steak once a day, and like I'm good, right, like

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a lion. I guess, like I won't roam the planes

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because that's a hard life on the planes. Sometimes I

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>don't eat. I have other animals and hunters that try

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to kill me. So put me in a cage and

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:42.439
<v Speaker 1>give me a steak every day and keep me safe.

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Like and that's kind of like where people are at right, Uh, Anyway,

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole another conversation. But let's jump back into this.

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So I know we're gonna wrap it up here. So UM,

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're really bullish on gold. You've talked

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 1>about that, UM and right now, right now, we've got

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>one too many speculators in the house in my opinion.

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, Yes, it is a long term hold, one term.

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean by that, Warren Buffett jumping in. No,

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's I don't think he's a speculator.

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Warren Bufett jumping in is a reflection on

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there's nothing of value to buy out

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>there right now because prices are so distorted. No, I

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 1>just mean that it feels like there's been a lot

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of hedge funds, a lot of fast money has moved

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>into precious metals of late UM. But you're always going

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to have that at certain times in UH in economic cycles. Sure,

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but I would say, you know, you said long it's

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a long term hold. Right, So we see, UH

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>FED can continue print money. Interest rates are probably going

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to be continue to be held low for a really

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>long time. Why hold UH bonds that are going negative

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>when I could just go to gold. Right. Um, so

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>there's like this, my my long maturity bonds have treated

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.919
<v Speaker 1>me very well. I still have those two, so you're lucky.

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about like treasuries, you know what I mean,

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Like treasuries only one percent or half a percent, but

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, justin for real inflation or whatever, it's like

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a negative. Um. What are your thoughts on bitcoin?

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I think bitcoin is is kind of the young hip

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>crowd hit hip crowd's gold. I think that it is

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a reflection of the disgust with fiat money and and

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the Fed monetizing the dead. I think bitcoin is I

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>literally think it's a modern day equivalent to gold or

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's how it's perceived. Um. You know,

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>from from what little I understand about it, the economics

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of mining for bitcoin or not ideal. And once quantum

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 1>comes about, I think that that could revolutionize how the

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>world views cryptos. But at the same time, we already

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>know that all major central banks in the world are

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at sovereign cryptocurrencies, such that you have to wonder

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 1>if there are crypto sovereign currencies, what the fate would

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>be then of something that was not sovereign well, um,

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, bitcoin is not cryptos. So bitcoin is a

0:42:57.440 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>decentralized system that's built on proof of work on a

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 1>minor system. Um, so all the other cryptos are centrally controlled,

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and sovereign cryptos will be the same thing, centrally controlled.

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>And we know where essentially controlled things go. They become

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>manipulated and distorted. A decentralized technology that is not able

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to be manipulated, inflated, distorted, whatever is different. And I

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>always think about fa hiak. He said that there will

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>never be a sound money again until we take the

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>thing out of the hands of the government, and it

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 1>can be done in a forceful way, has to be

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 1>done in a slide round about way. He said that

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 1>like in the eighties and so forth, telling because that's

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of where we're at. Um. So, as a bitcoin person,

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>we believe that, Um, we want to opt out. We're

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>opting out of the system, right, getting our money out

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of the financial system. All right, forget the Fed, forget this, uh,

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing. We're just gonna take our money. We're

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna vote with our money, right, Uh, and we're opting out.

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Gold is a way is opting out as well. Um,

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.879
<v Speaker 1>do you think if enough people opt out with their money,

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 1>it makes a big difference to the fed. Are we

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna win that war opting out? Oh? I think if you,

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have enough adoption of anything, then

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it will win. I mean, that's that's a rhetorical question.

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It works as long as everybody agrees to it working. Um. Yeah,

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a bigger battle to fight. Yeah. I don't see

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't see a government ever saying hey,

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just forget the dollar and move to bitcoin. Like.

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Of course not, they're gonna want to control it, manipulate it.

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's like the people's money, you know, and and

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>again in Venezuela, like and they say, well, you know,

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they have the army, they can force you to use

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:33.479
<v Speaker 1>their currency. Will know they can't. Like, if people don't

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 1>trust the money, they're not going to use it. I'd

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 1>rather just trade you water for bread. Right. Uh. So

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 1>it's like, hey, you can have the government money over here,

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have our our own money over here. Maybe,

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>but you're talking about kind of the ultimate endgame, right,

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>because people in Venezuela who had money, they got it

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>out of Venezuela and put it in dollars. Uh. And

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of what capital flight has always looked like.

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking about the end of the dollar, I

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:03.479
<v Speaker 1>mean these are it's a much bigger discussion. Yeah. Um,

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>so we'll we'll tease into that just a little bit.

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And I know we won't. We don't have time. We're

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna wrap it up here in a couple minutes. But

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>so talk about the endgame. So we're in a situation

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 1>now where we have this massive debt bubble. I don't know,

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:18.240
<v Speaker 1>three trillion whatever it is, one point to quadrillion derivatives.

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Who knows how big that is? Um, And it's constantly

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to deflate, and the FED keeps trying to inflate it. Right,

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like, uh, each each correction that we've

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 1>had is uh is the market trying to correct and

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the FED just keeps trying to pump it up. Um.

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:34.439
<v Speaker 1>We're at a point now where I think you said

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier like the Fed's kind of between a rock and

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a hard place. They have to continue to print. If

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 1>they quit, it's over. So what does the endgame looks like?

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking that they go until they blow, meaning uh,

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's having diminishing returns. Right, it's already having less and

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>less effect. But they have no choice, and they're gonna

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>just go and tell it doesn't work anymore. Is that

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>what you see? Or what do you think they're gonna

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:57.919
<v Speaker 1>wake up and be They're gonna wake up and pass

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>austerity tomorrow, Like, how does that work? Look? J Powell's

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>first eleven months in office, he tried desperately and he

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.919
<v Speaker 1>was serious about it, about shrinking the balance sheet, about

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 1>quantitative tightening, about normalizing interest rates, getting interest rates up

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to higher levels. I mean, he he was our last

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>great hope because he had the stones to actually try

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and do it. And he failed and so well he tried, right,

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:28.880
<v Speaker 1>he tried, but I don't know. He tried his again

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>before the credit market instructed him that if he kept

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>about the business of tightening it was going to blow

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>up to Kingdom come and that he better back off.

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.319
<v Speaker 1>He was really making an effort to take us to

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 1>a better place. And what he learned was that had

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we stopped after the housing crisis, had we not ventured

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>off into quantitative easy, had we not gone down that

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole, there might have been a way to normalize

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy but there's not there's not anymore. And in

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:08.799
<v Speaker 1>theory because again the three trillion dollar figure that we're

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>throwing about, that's a global number you have to have

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for the endgame to work, which is a debt jubilee

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.879
<v Speaker 1>theoretically of all sovereign debts. You have to have all

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the countries agreed, and at last check, not all countries

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world are our allies. And that is really

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the discussion. I think that brings us to what the

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:34.720
<v Speaker 1>endgame might or might not look like. And you recall

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>from history that every time a reserve currency status has

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>been lost, there's been a war involved. And that is

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:44.439
<v Speaker 1>that is really my greatest fear. It's that we keep

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.839
<v Speaker 1>the money printing going. The genesis of every world war

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and history has always been economical in nature and triggered

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>by something debt related. So again, if if the Kumbai

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Yah happy ending is a debt jubilee and all the

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.360
<v Speaker 1>countries in the world are going to agree to expunge

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>all of their sovereign debts, wipe the slates clean, forgive everything,

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 1>forget everything, in order for that to work, you have

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to have every single country agree with the United States,

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 1>which I would agree would be almost an impossible task. However,

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 1>after seeing what's happened with COVID, with every country in

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the world locking down all of a sudden, I think

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe it could happen. But um, I guess if we

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are the debt you beilie, that's that's a big thing.

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>But also like mom and Pop's own treasuries, do they

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>want that wiped out as well? No? No, look, there's

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:38.439
<v Speaker 1>there is nothing. Um it's a there's a good reason

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that debt jubilees are in the Bible. Uh, it's not

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:45.799
<v Speaker 1>really a feasible modern I mean, you would have to

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have a debt jubilee just for the sovereign, and that

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 1>would be tricky enough given the fact that mom and

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Pops do own treasuries. And again the reason I bring

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>up other countries, it's because other countries own a ton

0:48:56.960 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of treasuries. Again, everybody would have to agree, and you

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>still wouldn't be able to have a debt jubilee in

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the private debt markets that could. It's impossible. So I'm

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>only talking about one sliver of the pie and not

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about household debt and not talking about corporate debt,

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 1>not talking about financial debt. Yeah, yeah, so the sovereigns

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>all get off the hook, but we still have all

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the debt. Great, so we're saying there's no elegant out. No, no,

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>there's not. All right, So last question, um, and we'll

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>wrap it up. So, Um, the question is inflation or deflation.

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So we have this massive debt bubble and it's continually

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to deflate. Um, the Feds trying to reinflate. It

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.439
<v Speaker 1>seems like defaulting on a billion dollars is very easy

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and the and the money's gone to put a billion

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars back into a lot harder. However, we see you know,

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the Green New Deal, and they want to spend thirty

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to ninety trillion. Where is that going to come from? Whatever?

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So do you think the Fed is able to inflate

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 1>the balloon faster than it's deflating or do we are

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:58.239
<v Speaker 1>they gonna are they gonna be able to inflate it

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:00.400
<v Speaker 1>for a while and then lose, or we're gonna go

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>into a deflationary period, Like how do you see that

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>playing out? Maybe over the next couple of years or whatever.

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think right now that the FED is trying

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>really really hard to engineer inflation. In fact, the FET

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:14.239
<v Speaker 1>is trying so hard to engineer inflation that it's it's

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:17.320
<v Speaker 1>gotten into the business of buying treasury inflation protected securities

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>to push up inflation expectations like by force. So they're

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 1>they're trying as hard as they possibly can. However, a

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>million new filers of initial claims every week dictates that

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have deflation eventually take cold if there's

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>not some kind of a magnificent economic recovery in the offing,

0:50:38.719 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 1>which is going to be very difficult to do given

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that debt got us in this situation in

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the first place, and debt by definition is a drag

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on economic activity and a drag on the ability of

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy to achieve exit velocity. So I think that

0:50:56.880 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that deflation can, in the media term, rear its ugly head.

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I see the possibility of their being negative nominal rates

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>dictated by the market, as we've seen in France, Germany, Holland, Switzerland,

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the UK. So and that would be very daunting for

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the FED because it would it would obviously reveal that

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they had lost the battle, the inflation deflation battle. So

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but again, you can only take so many people out

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:32.919
<v Speaker 1>of the workforce which kills pricing power and hold off

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:37.839
<v Speaker 1>deflation for so long. So which one is it going

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to be? I think we have deflation first, and I

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:44.360
<v Speaker 1>think if we try and keep printing printing, printing. It

0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>depends on who's going to be in Washington. If they

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 1>ever change the FED mandate and allow the FED, instead

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of buying treasuries in the secondary market, to actually buy

0:51:55.560 --> 0:52:00.480
<v Speaker 1>treasuries at auctions such that the FED is basically um

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the feds liabilities are legal tender. Then you can flip

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the mother of all inflation switches. Okay, you're as goodbye.

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:14.279
<v Speaker 1>So you think deflation and then inflation. It depends on

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 1>what Washington does or doesn't do. If somebody draws the

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 1>line and prevents the FED. I mean, opening the Federal

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Reserve Act is a big deal, um so, and it's

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a can of worms. But if if the FED it,

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>but look at what they've done with treasury and special

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>purpose vehicles and off balance sheet and corporate bonds and

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 1>municipal bonds and junk bonds. So clearly they can expand

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's footprint if they want. The politicians in Washington,

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>let's see what they do next. Yeah, and that's a

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>great answer, and we'll wrap it up with that answer.

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And just for everybody listening, you know, nobody has a

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:47.600
<v Speaker 1>crystal ball. I always say it would be so much

0:52:47.600 --> 0:52:50.640
<v Speaker 1>easier if we did um, and so nobody myself. I

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:53.399
<v Speaker 1>never give predictions, and obviously Danielle is trying to stay

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:55.000
<v Speaker 1>away from it as well. And what we do is

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 1>we look at probabilities, right like, hey, this is probably

0:52:57.960 --> 0:53:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not a very high probability, but if these things happen,

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 1>then it could, right. And so for everybody listening, just

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:06.280
<v Speaker 1>try to always think about things in that in that framework,

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and and and pay attention watch for the signs. Uh,

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation and deflation are both probable, and then we'll watch

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the signs to know which ones are coming and we'll

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:17.399
<v Speaker 1>have to react accordingly. Right, you've got you've you've got

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>ten of the workforce, depending on what agent, what statistical

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 1>agencies is telling you what the date is out of

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the workforce. I'm sorry, but a monkey could tell you

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 1>that that's disinflationary. Yeah, exactly. Money printing eventually is inflationary.

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And and you're right, you just have to assign odds. Yeah, great, Okay,

0:53:34.200 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wrap it up with that, Daniel, I appreciate

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Now we went maybe a little bit over,

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 1>so I appreciate that. Um. Now, of course you're all

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 1>over all over the internet with all your interviews, but

0:53:44.560 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe do you want to direct people to where they

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>can go follow you for more? Sure of you can

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:50.760
<v Speaker 1>always follow me at de Martino Booth. I'm the most

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>active by far on Twitter. Um, come on over to

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>my YouTube channel as well, and if you really want

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.799
<v Speaker 1>a great education in good entertainment every day, then become

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a subscriber at Quill Intelligence. We're happy to have you

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>great and I'll link to all that in the show

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 1>description so everybody can go find that. And with that

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 1>we're going to wrap it up. Daniel, thanks so much

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:11.719
<v Speaker 1>for joining. Thank you. Take care,