WEBVTT - Lyft's Record Earnings and Coinbase's BlackRock Pact (Podcast)

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power COLLI

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily changing San Francisco, and this is

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. Lift posts

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the highest earnings in the company history. As right hailing

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>companies near a full recovery from the pandemic, White supply

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to be finally meeting demand. Plus coin based pops

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>after its deal with black Rock, reinforcing crypto status as

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a serious player on Wall Street. Is the crypto winter

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to thaw? We will discuss and an estimated food

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>process in the U S goes uneaten. We will chat

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>with a startup using AI to help grocers to ave

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>up to thirty four million pounds of food from going

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to waste. I want to get back to with results

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with our own Jackie Davalos, who covers the company for

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>us along with Uber and door Dash. So look, good

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers from Lift, you know, is this the start of

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a broader trend? Have left and Uber fully recovered from

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. They're certainly edging a lot closer now. Those

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers for rides are still a little bit under pre

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>pandemic levels. But what we could see here is that

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they're not sacrificing their profits in order to really boost

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>those numbers. And you saw that come through just st

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>even in the language that the CEOs were imparting to

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>analysts that look, you know, we went through really rigorous

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>cost cutting measures in the second quarter, and it was

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>tough to bear with employees being laid off and hiding

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>off that car rental business. But what we're seeing is

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that airport travel is incredibly strong, a lot of that

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.639
<v Speaker 1>coming from air trouble rebounding um and you're also seeing

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, these markets a battles between Uper and Lift intensifying.

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think a lot of the concern around Lift

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>was that they were going to see some of that

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>market share and their attempts to stay profitable, but we

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>were not seeing that come through so far. Well. I

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>did speak to Uber CEO Dar Causershi earlier this week. Again,

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Uber's results strong as well and big positive investor reaction.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen to what causera he had to say.

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The marketplace is more balanced. The number of new drivers

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that we're adding in the US is up over se

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on a year. On your basis surges down e t

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>A s or down. Uh. So the business is really

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 1>hitting on all cylinders and it's reflected in the stock

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>prus which is great. So does a rising tide lift

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>all boats? You know, if it's it's certain seems to

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>be because if you think about this shared rebound, both

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Uber and Lift are benefiting from that. But where we

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>started to see some of the divergence was in the

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>adagies that they were taking to really get those drivers back.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>That's really what's also driving the strong ridership because the

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>more drivers you have to meet the demand, the lower

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>your fares are going to go. More people are going

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to get back to the platform instead of you know,

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>opting to take the taxi, a yellow cab or the subway.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, Lift acknowledged that, you know, a

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of that spend that really spooked investors last quarter

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>was really coming through in fairs to consumers. They were

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the ones bearing a lot of that cost burden. And

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>now that you're seeing way times coming down, you're seeing

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>fares come down. Uh, those ridership levels are recovering. Uh.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>In following suit. Meantime, if you did look for a

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>weakness in ubernvers and you pointed this out to me, Jackie,

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it was in food delivery. On the other hand, we're

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing strong numbers from DoorDash. What is DoorDash doing better

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>than Uber in this case? You know, I think with DoorDash,

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>they are just uh if. They started off as a

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>pure play core business that's focused on food delivery, and

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they've refined that to a t and you can really

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>see that come through their convenience business. They projected is

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be profitable by the end of the year,

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's fairly impressive considering that they just launched it

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>less than two years ago. And so with Uber, you know,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>it's taken time for them to really um tweak the

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>way they match, you know, certain orders with whoever is

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on the road, and now that they're really trying to

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>cross sell the rides and the delivery to both drivers

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and consumers, they've had a lot of work to do

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>on the algorithm side, but they're certainly catching up. All right,

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Davilos, thank you so much for Evanus dig In.

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be watching how these UH on demand companies fair

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>over the next quarter. Elon Muski is boysed to take

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>questions at TESSAs annual shareholder meeting dubbed the Cyber Around,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>taking place at his new plant in Austin, Texas. This

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>year's discussion is expected to focus on a potential stock

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>split and corporate transparency on everything from battery sourcing to

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>workplace diversity. Here to discuss saw that and more. Steve Wesley,

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>managing partner at The Wesley Group and a former TESTA

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>board member, Steve always going to have you back with us.

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So what are you expecting this year? Well, first, I

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>think you're to see some awfully happy shareholders. Look. Test

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the share price up just this year alone. Second record

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>revenues sixty three point six or fifties six point three

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars last year, growing to eighty seven billion dollars

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. That's sixty year of a year of growth.

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>No one in the auto industry is coming close to that.

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>Second profitability, No one expected Tesla's gross or net margins.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The other majors like Volkswagen, Triota, people who are making

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>cars for years down at six percent. This would be

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>their twelfth consecutive quarter of profitability. That's awfully good news

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for investors in five factories up running full bore so

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprise to me the Testless flirting at trillion

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar evaluation. We'll see if we can hold it. But

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the big question today is going to be about corporate

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>governance e s g. How does Testla deliver on those issues?

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>It should be fascinating. Meantime, we are entering a really

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>tough phase potentially in the economy. Even Elon Musk has

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>said he has a super bad feeling about it. How

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>does Tesla fair in a recession? Are people necessarily dropping

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>money on new electric cars? Well, the fact of the

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>matter is Testless posting record sales. So if you want

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>to buy a Testa today, you're looking at a year

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>long wait. There is huge demand. The interesting thing is

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>how many can you actually manufacture? And that's where it

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>gets interesting. I think Tesla is gonna go from five

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand vehicles sold in one to one point five million

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this year. Other firms GM Ford aren't selling a action

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of that. So the real question is who's figured out

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>supply chain? Who has factories up and running again? Teslate

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>five factories we know Fremont, California, Texas, Germany, China all

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>gearing up the full capacity, most of the others, and

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 1>yet to break ground, so there's a lot of ground

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to catch up. We'll see how the others do so.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>With production still the main challenge, you know, and and

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>how much does that have to do with continuing supply

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>chain issues. Well, they're all intertwined. And again I served

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on the board it testsed ten years ago. I think

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.119
<v Speaker 1>we made a lot of the mistakes in the book.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>But they've grown up and they're hitting the ground running now.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Plus they have long term supply chain relationships in place.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why they're able to grow literally sixty seventy percent

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a year. It's heartbreaking to watch firms like Lucid, and

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm really pulling for They make a beautiful car, but

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they said they would produce twenty tho units this year.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a pittance. Then they dropped it to twelve. Now

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they've dropped it to six, So tough news for Lucid.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Reminder fall of us, it's a little harder to make

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles than you might think. It took Tesla ten

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>years to get where they are today. It's gonna be

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>hard for others to catch up. We'll see how General Motors,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Ford and the others do. Well. Let's talk about the competition.

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Which competitor are you most optimistic about? And you know

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>which of these companies are really going to give Tesla

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>potentially run for its money. Well, let's start at the beginning.

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Mary Bar at General Motors said, we're going to catch

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>up with Tesla. By they're not. They've produced first half

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year eight thousand electric cars. Uh, they're way behind.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>They're struggling with supply chain, struggling with manufacturing. Ford appears

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to be rising for the ashes. They're going to sell

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and sold twenty five cars already this year with the

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>E four one, fifties a great car, and the Mustang,

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So they're rising for the from the ash is well,

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>General Motors is literally and figuratively trying to put out fires.

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>So as much as I'm pulling for GM and four,

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like they're going to be the real

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>challenger anytime soon. Volkswagen it's a whole head of steam up.

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna go over two evs first half of the

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>year more by year end. They're producing about half what

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is, but eight times more than Ford and GM combined.

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So VW is in a strong place global supply chain,

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing facilities on every continent deep pockets. If anybody has

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a shot to catch Tesla in the short term, it's Volkswagen.

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Longer term, don't count out the Chinese. The world's largest

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>producer of batteries, Chinese government subsidizing their batteries, currently producing

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>more than half the evs the world, and it's the

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest auto market. So Chinese are gonna come on quicker

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>than people think in the near term. I'm just hoping

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>as many American companies make the cut as possible. Don't

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>forget thirty new EV companies have coming to the market

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>in the last year, precisely the time the economy is

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>slowing down. Expect to shakeout in the marketplace. Be careful,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you're betting on winners, not the losers. Meantime, you've got

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter side show going on for Elon Musk and

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>even you. When we when we last spoke about this,

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not happy about his behavior. It's been a huge distraction.

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Many Testa shareholders and Tesla owners aren't happy about it.

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>How much do you think that has hurt the brand?

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Has that hurt the Tesla brand hasn't hurt the Elon

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>Musk brand. Well, look, it's a deal of two cities.

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>On the way hand, you've got a nearly trillion dollar company,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful brand in the auto world, with zero

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>marketing budget. If anybody had told you that would happen

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>five years ago, they would have said that's a dream

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>come true. But I think it could be too much

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of a good thing, and I think for many people,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.119
<v Speaker 1>including the SEC, it appears to be something of a distraction.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh and it's something that I think it needs to

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>be changed over time. People need to realize this is

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a multi trillion dollar SmackDown. Who's going to control the

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>global EV market, not just for cars but trucks as well,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and who's going to control the next big thing, which

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is the move to autonomous vehicles. This is going to

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>be cut throat competition. I think Tesla needs to throw

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>every ounce of focus they can and staying in the

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>driver's seat. Let me give you one example. Tesla's had

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the best, longest range, least expensive, most reliable batteries in

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the sector. They're now developing their new revolutionary eight battery composition.

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 1>It should be better at range, cheaper and greener than

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>anything ever made. But c A t L, the world's

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest battery manufacturer in China claims to have some leap

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>frog advantages. This is going to be a fascinating SmackDown.

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is going to need all the focus they can get.

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I'd keep the side shows to a minimum. Whoever win

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this next round is going to have done something special.

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>If Tesla wins the autonomous race, it could be a

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollar company. That would be quite a trick.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Uh, Steve Wesley, always good to have you here.

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.239
<v Speaker 1>What's the group managing partner? Thank you for stopping by. Okay,

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>coming up Meta's brand new reward on global threats and

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in particular, how the company is tackling a Russian troll farm.

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Have more on that from a top Meta executive. Next,

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Bloomberg. Meta says it just shut down a Russian

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 1>troll farm. The Facebook parent company releasing the quarterly report

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that outlines the actions it's taken against fake accounts and

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>hackers who tried to create the appearance of support for

0:12:55.600 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Russia's war on Ukraine. Vanemo, global threaten Intelligence strategy lead

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>out Meta joined us now from more on this, So

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.599
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about this particular operation. Just how widespread

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>and effective was it? Well in terms of being widespread,

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it was really trying to hit everywhere across the Internet

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all at the same time. What we had

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>was a troll farm, so an organization run from St.

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Petersburg and Russia that was hiring people off the street

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to run fake accounts kind of everywhere on the Internet.

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>They could think of those reports of fake accounts on YouTube, Telegram, TikTok, Twitter,

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>We found them on Instagram, UM, and what they were

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to do was make it look like there was

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>large scales support for the Russian innovasion of Ukraine. So

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the widespread effect. But in terms of effect, all

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw was that they weren't very good at what

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they did. UM. A lot of their fake accounts kept

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>on getting caught by the automated systems before we even

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>investigated them and took them down. Real people kept on

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>calling them out as trolls UM. And there were even

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>cases when they would try to steer people towards celebrities

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>or influences on social media and then they put their

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>own account. So, for example, at one point they tried

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to steer people towards the UK Foreign Secretary Liz Trust

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and instead of finding the Foreign secretaries favorite page on Facebook.

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>They found something that hadn't been used since twenty eighteen,

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so they were trying to spread themselves wide. But nothing

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we saw show that they were actually having much of

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.599
<v Speaker 1>an impact this time. So it sounds like this particular

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>operation wasn't very sophisticated. How unique was this operation? Is

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this something that you've seen before. We've seen attempts like

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>this before in lots of different parts of the world.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So so we've taken down troll farms in the past,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for example in Nicaragua, in Albania, we've taken down other

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>activity by Russian trolls as well. But there was an

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting twist to this case, and it's that the operation

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>was really working in two halves. It was running a

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>public channel on Telegram which was trying to, if you like,

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>crowdsource comments which were supporting Russia, and when it didn't

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>get real crowdsource comments, it would use the fake accounts

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to go in instead, And it's the same operation running

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>all these things. And then what the people behind the

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>operation would do would be they do in the interviews

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>on Russian state TV and supportive media and say, look,

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>what a great job we're doing. So It's like there

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>were multiple layers of deception nestled inside one another, almost

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>like a Russian doll. But ultimately they were trying to

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>make it look like they were effective, but they were

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>using fakes to do it, and then the fake has

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>gone caught. In general, how effective has Russian have Russian

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>disinformation campaigns actually been. Over the course of the last

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>several months of this war on Ukraine, we've taken down

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think about half a dozen different Russian operations that

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>have been targeting Ukraine recently, so since the war began.

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>In general, what we've seen is that they've been struggling

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to get any kind of real engagement, but we've also

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>seen that they keep on trying, and this is the

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>time to keep our foot on the gas. What we

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>really need to do is take these operations as a lesson.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>We need to learn from them, and we need to

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>keep looking because we know threat actors like this are

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to go away. We need to take them seriously,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and each time we find something like this, we need

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to explain to people. Here's what it was, Here's how

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it worked, Here's the kind of content that they were pushing,

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's the way they were operating because this time around

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they weren't very good at what they did. But we

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>need to prepare for the next time. And that's what

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>as threatning investigators we always have to be ready for.

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you speaking directly with other big tech companies Apple, Google, TikTok,

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter about coordinating efforts on this front. Whenever we do

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a threat report like this, we share with industry partners,

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we share with researchers, we share with we share with

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the public. Right we report these things and that's because

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>we found that that influence operations. They're a bit like

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>mold growing in your house. They grow best in dark places,

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and so when you find them, there's two things you

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>really need to do. You need to clean them up,

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but the on you need to shine a light on

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>them as well. You need to move them into a

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>bright place. And we've always found that the more we

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>can share information about these operations, the more we can

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>make people aware of how they behave it's harder for

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>them to come back. What keeps you up at night?

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're heading into the U S mid terms

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States? Have you seen activity rising

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on that front. I'm a threat investigator, so investigations keep

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>me up at night. It's it's what we all do

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>on the team. UM. In terms of the mid terms, sorry,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen any upticking activity so far. For example,

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this Russian operation that we've taken down was really focused

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on the war in Ukraine and it was all about

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>pushing the Russian point of view. But again, operations like

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this are a lesson and one of the big things

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>from the Russian operation was that what they were trying

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to do was use a fake operation to make a

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>more public operation look like it was working. And this

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is something we call perception hacking. It's trying to fool

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>people that there's something big going on, if you like.

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like dropping an ice cube into the water and saying,

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>look as an iceberg underneath. And that's the kind of

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>tactic which could be very easily transferred to other areas.

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So we have to take threat actors like this serious.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Just because they were ham fisted this time around doesn't

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.239
<v Speaker 1>mean that they will be the next time. And so

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking out for as investigators, and the thing

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that's keeping us up at night is making sure we

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>keep ahead of whatever trends are out there. Meantime, we've

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>been following this story about TikTok and the Chinese government

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.719
<v Speaker 1>or an entity supported by the Chinese government trying to

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>set up a stealth account on TikTok to target Western

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 1>audiences with propaganda. You know, is this something that concerns you?

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>If you look at our FRET reporting over the last

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>few years, we've taken down operations from around the world.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>We have seen operations from China, Iran, India, um. I

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's more than fifty different countries that we've We've

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>seen operations coming in from more than two dozen different languages,

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like the idea is out there that

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>influence operations are a thing. There's something that many different

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>countries come run. And our job is threatned investigators, is

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to go and find them, and particularly really to shine

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>a light on them and to share information about them

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>as widely as we can, because the more different lies

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we can get on this, the more we can try

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and catch them. With the Russian troll Farm, it was

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>really interesting the way it was exposed was the troll

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>farm was trying to hire people off the street and

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>telling them, Hey, come and work for us. One of

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the first people they hired turned out to be an

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>undercover journalists to expose the whole operation. Fascinating Meta executive

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Bennimo Global Threat Intelligencely, thank you Ben for sharing all

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that with us. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm emily

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>changing San Francisco legacy names and streaming and media out

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with more earnings results are and Ludlow back with the

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>latest and Warner Brothers Discovery. Yeah interesting, I mean doesn't

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>look great right down in after hours. They had a

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>net loss in the quarter, which they attribute the costs

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>relating to the merger between Warner Media and Discovery. Of

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>course that closed in April, and this was the first

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>time investors really got a look under the hood of

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this combined entity. And I'm zeroing in on subscribers across

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>HBO Max other properties like Discovery Plus. They added one

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>point seven million subscribers net new subscribers in the quarter.

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's compare and contrast, because they weren't the only

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>streaming name to report earnings this Thursday. Paramount up one

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>percent in regular trading. Actually, Warner Brothers are almost five

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>percent before its earnings. But Paramount across Paramount Plus added

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>three point seven million subscribers in the quarter, so actually,

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a relative minnow in what we call

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the streaming wars, it's seeming to get some traction in

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>its user based and adding new users. What they both

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>had in common was the ad business is really underperformed,

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting given what we've heard in the mixed

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>picture of the global advertising market in recent weeks. Where

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>do we stand here today, m with all these different

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>names with zeroed in on who's doing well who's doing not?

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the share prices, actually Paramount is

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>the relative outperformer, down just sixteen percent year today. But

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Netflix still really ug down sixty two percent year today.

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they had a shock in the first half

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of this year with the shock loss of its subscribe

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>It based a more positive outlook for the second half

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>this year. But there's still a big questions right in

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the face of great inflation, what's the consumer of doing?

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of option. Personally, I got a lot

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of choices. I subscribed to all these. I don't know

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>if you saw a top gun great movie that boosted Paramount,

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Can we have them all forever? I haven't seen it

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>yet and I don't have time to go to the

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>movie theater, But I will try to make it. Thank you. Okay,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>let's continue this conversation with Julia Alexander, director of Strategy

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>at Parrot Analytics. Juliet, look, you know there's a lot

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about here. Let's start with Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>You know clearly they're they're making changes, planning to make

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot more changes, and there's you know, some uncertainty

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>about where this is all going. What's your take, right,

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the first thing we have to do is,

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think almost stepped back from the amount of subscribers gained.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So we look at the subs gained, right, they gained

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>one point seven million. It's not much. They actually, according

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to their new way that they report, they lost about

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>three hundred thousand in the domestic market. But I think

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>we have to look at and what David Zaslab CEO

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>David zas Laws real game is is what is the

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>actual value of this content? How do we go through

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>HBO Max and call some of it and Discovery Plus

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and call some of it in order to really ensure

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're hitting profitability on the fastest path that we

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>can for our shareholders. When we talk about David Zaslav

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>and his team's approach to streaming. It's different from what

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Netflix is doing and what Disney is doing, where they're

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>increasing their content spend constantly and constantly, and David zas

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Lab does not want to be in the content spanned

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>wars as he likes to say it. Instead, he wants

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, we want to get to profitability. We want

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to get the most value for our dollar. And so

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what we're really going to see play out is how

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>well that um ibada and how well that obada really

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>comes into the case for Discovery going for Warner Brothers

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Discovery going forward. What are you expecting Zaslav to do

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>as they work to merge these two platforms. You know,

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>there's talk about a big calling potentially of HBO Max.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>They're taking movies out of the rotation that are already

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>filmed because they don't want to spend money on marketing.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of the new Backgirl movie, which as I

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>understand it has already been shot. Right. I mean, the

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>key horde right now is amortization. Amortization. Amortization. When you're

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at the amount of debt that David Zazo and

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>his team brought in, you're looking at what you can

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>do um specifically with HBO Max. I think what we're

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>going to see happen is less of culling than press

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>made it, you know, to be that rumors made out

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to be. Over the last two days, it's been a

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>lot on Twitter as analysts and industry in centers and

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>reporters try to guess at what's going to happen with

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>HBO Max. This report, the earnings report to it was

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>actually a little bit beneficial in that way. What we're

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing is that HBO Max use mail. We're seeing that

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Discovery Plus use female. And before Discovery Plus came in,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the HBO Max idea was to invest in more female

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>oriented contests. We have like the Cooking Show with Lena Gomez,

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and you have um the New Gossip Girl, and you

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have all these such of shows that appeal to a

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>different audience to really, why do that? Why didn't that

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>total addressable market? But as Discovery Plus comes in, they're saying, well,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we're already making this content. It's doing well on cable.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>It is a brand and of itself, so we're gonna

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>bring some of that to HBO Max and Casey Boys,

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the visionary leader who oversees content for HBO, HBO Max

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>can focus on scripted content and scripted fair that works.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>So I actually think we're not going to see as

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>much of a call as reports made it out to be.

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, I mean, I think when we

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about streaming services there is far too much confident content.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>We're in an oversaturated market and it's never been easier

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for a subscriber to say this is mediocre and this

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is great. So if content isn't performing, why keep it

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>on the platform? Is kind of the thought strategy that

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Warner brother Discovery executive seem to be having. Okay, so

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Paramount Plus. As Ed said this, you

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>know service has has been a minnows thus far, but

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it is racking up subscribers. The bottom line doesn't necessarily

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>look great so far. You know, Top Gun, Yellowstone, which

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is one of my favorite shows. Are people going to

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>pay for four streaming services? Though before inflation, before interest

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>rates started hiking, I would say yes in the United States. Globally,

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. I think now we're looking at closer

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to two to three over the next little bit, as

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>people choose where they want to put their credit card dollars.

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Every single month, But that being said, I would say

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that Paramount. Everyone has kind of looked at Paramount and said,

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't really know. We're really m bearish

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>on Paramount and what they want to do with their streaming.

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>When I think Paramount really has going for them is

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that not only are they a great streaming service and

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they're building a great streaming services and their numbers are

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 1>increasing every single quarter, but they're also a great seller.

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>There's someone who can license really in demand content to

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Netflix and to other players and charge a hefty feet

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for that because their content is so in demand, which

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>means that people will pay to have access to it.

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So when I think we look at Paramount, you know,

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the question three or four years ago, not even you know,

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. So question was which are the three

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>services that people sign up for? And it used to

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>be Disney plus Netflix and HBO Max. And I think

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>as the stream wars, which is really just a colloquial

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 1>term for proper uh competition in the marketplace, that as

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>opposed to Netflix having a almost monopolization on the on

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the entire industry, I think what you'll start to see

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is a company like Paramount that can offer really great

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>pricing on the ad front and also on the subfront,

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that has shows that people really want, that has the

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>film franchises that people really want. I think you'll start

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to see them emerge as a really strong contender in

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the same way that I really have faith at HBO

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Max unders As Lab and even HBO Max under Jason Clark,

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the former CEO. I think that's a great product in

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>combining Discovery and HBO Max offerings in a really smart,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>strategic way that feels curated and human but also scalable

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and accessible. Um. I think that's really going to help

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>them even not maybe not surpass Netflix in terms of

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribers in the next two years, but definitely be worthwhile contenders.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So are you saying, if you're a betting person, you

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>should be spreading your bets right now. I would spread

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>my bets a little bit. Yeah, I think it's too early.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny. I think we're trying to declare

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>a winner in the streaming wars again that term that

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>really just means competition is happening. It's far too early.

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>We really need to see what a lot of these

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.959
<v Speaker 1>companies that have the theatrical studio components that have linear networks.

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>We need to see what their strategy is for handling

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>all that type of content across a bunch of different

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 1>revenue streams. And I think the key takeaway from what

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing as a subscriber growth in the the United States

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of slows down a little bit, um kind of hits.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit of a peak for certain streaming services.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think the takeaway is that streaming is not

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the end game for a lot of these companies,

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>but it is a very important support system for a

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of its other different investment areas. And I think

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>that's really key because it used to be that streaming

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was the only option. You know, two three years ago,

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>everything was streaming, and now it's well, everything is also

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>includes streaming. What about Disney coming up next week? What

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>are you expecting there? It's been it's been a tough

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>ride for Bob j Peck. It's been a ride a

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>ride for Bob Jeck. My major concern with Disney is

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the promise or the projection. I should say that Bob

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>j Peck and his team gave to the street of

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>two to two and sixty million subscribers globally by a

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>fiscal year. It's ambitious. That's an average with about ten

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>million subscribers per quarter being added, and eventually you run

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>out of countries to launching, right, that's kind of a

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>guarantee subscriber based when you launch a new country, customers

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>will sign up. So my biggest concern is what Disney

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>will have to do on the Disney Plus front to

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>really hit those projections, unless they come in, you know,

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>next week and say we're changing our projections. But I

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>really don't think that's going to be the case. You know,

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>as long as Disney has families and Marvel fans and

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars fans are going to continue to be a

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>well supported streaming service. But I think the bigger question

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>now is to hit those numbers, you have to increase

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>your total addressable market, which means bringing more UM Hamilton's right,

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>bringing more of that, bringing more the West Side story

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>into into the Disney Plus sphere so that people can

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>watch it. And I think in the United States, when

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you have Hulu, that becomes a really interesting conversation with

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what goes to Hulu, what goes to Disney Plus UM

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and both are designed to support the bundle, and so globally,

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is where we're going to see what the

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>future of Disney Plus really looks like under the Star

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and Star Plus banner, where we can see how Disney,

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a much more four quadrant designed Disney Plus can operate

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in both acquiring subscribers and then retaining them. Okay, Julia Alexander,

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks for breaking up all that down for us. Appreciated.

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Director of Strategy at Parrot Analytics, appreciate it. Another story

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we are following American basketball star Britney Griner is nine

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half year prison sentence in Russia. President Biden

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is calling her sentence quote unacceptable and says the White

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>House will worked tirelessly for her release. Grinder was sound

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>guilty of drug possession and smuggling after she was arrested

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at a Moscow airport with vape cartridges containing cannabis oil.

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>The United States has been trying to broke her a

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>prisoner swap for her return, no deal so far. One

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street's biggest traditional finance players is making a

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>big bet on crypto, black Rock teaming up with coin

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>based to make it easier for institutional investors to trade bitcoin.

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Black Rock chose to partner with coin base because of

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>its scale in the market. You're gonna break it all down.

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Our crypto CONTRIBUTORTIONALI Bostic Shine. Coin based investors loved this

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>new It's so interesting, Emily because if you look at

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>coin based shares, they really took a leg higher today

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's up about ten percent on the day. Pre market

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that jump was much bigger, so appaired some of those

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>games for the day. But it's so interesting, especially because

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>coin Basis shares have gained almost forty more than over

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>three days, so you're really seeing some of the gains

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>come back to coin Basis stock that's down still more

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>than sixty this year. I want to flip up the

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>board a little bit and talk about what Wall Street

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>really feels about coin base, because you're seeing some one

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest players come into it. The twelve month

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>price target for coin base has also come down meaningfully

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>among some of these larger challenges, even with uh some

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>love from people like black Rock, you have coin Basis

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve month price target was so really flying at around

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars a hundred and one dollars her share.

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>If you look at it today, it's just below ninety.

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>If you flip up the board again, you still see

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>again with all the challenges, still love from Wall Street.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>About fifty percent of folks say by stay hold, which

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is basically, you know, we don't really know how to

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>feel about things given all the volatility, six said sell.

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So there's been a lot of questions around whether the

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>momentum would move to the downside for coin base. Emily,

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, what it's also interesting is the

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunity provided here from black Rock because this partnership not

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>just with black Rock, but with a part of black

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Rock that's called Aladdin. It gives you exposure not just

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to big institutional investors. Aladdin works with a lot of

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>wealth management platforms across Wall Street and around the globe.

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And the reason that's interesting is it potentially exposes you

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>not just institutional clients, which is a growth area for

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>coin base, but more people that can really fly into

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the more traditional retail business at a time when rivals

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>like robin Hood are under a lot more pressure. What

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for coin based longer term? Obviously, the

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the winter is not over, you know, maybe maybe this

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is the beginning of something, But how much further, how

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>how much colder, how cold is the road going to get?

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's a question because it's all correlated to bitcoin prices,

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and you saw something similar when it came to Blocks

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>earnings that reported after the market closed today. This idea

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that transactions have really slowed. Remember a lot of the

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>retail investors that got into cryptocurrencies at the end of

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>last year are very much in the red, and so

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>how much powder is there left on the sidelines for

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>investors to get back into it in volumes to come

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>back again. The good news for coin base is and

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you saw it here with Robin Hood just this week

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>when you see some of the rivals under pressure here,

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it is good news for coin base, and you saw

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it reflected in coin bases stock. But just for a

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of how far we fall in for coin based,

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is still a company that's under twenty

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in market cap. This was once seventy five

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in market cap, and that was at the

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>end of last year. So how quickly you can bitcoin

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>recover get back to sixty seventy thousand. I think it

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to do with whether coin base can

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>regain its former glory, and whether that even matters if

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>people see enough crypto adoption moving forward among the big institutions,

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like you said today with a black rock. So, you know,

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking for next year? Obviously we've seen

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a wave of you know, difficulties for you know, there's

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>been bankruptcies, there's been increasing regulatory scrutiny. There has been

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this big letter from you know, hundreds of skeptics to Congress.

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's going to be the next inflection point

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in the story of crypto. You know, we've been talking

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>about it a lot. You and I this idea of

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>coin base versus the SEC. Why does that matter so much?

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Because exchanges coin based f t X, the more that they,

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't heart with the SEC. You wonder if

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they look more like traditional exchanges like the New York

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange, like the Chicago CEBO, the Board Options Exchange.

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>F t X has been highly regulated, working with a

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more traditional players here, and you wonder if there's

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a future where people list to token, they go public,

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily choose between the two, or do both.

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>The world's are merging. So the question to me is

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>how much does coin based embrace that again like you

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>see today with a big institutional partnership, or how much

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>do they stick to kind of the heart of crypto,

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>which was very focused on a decentralized finance and things

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that were so far away from Wall Street as we

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>know it. Alright, thank you. As always. As much as

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>food produced in the United States is never eaten, that

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is according to the National Resources Defense Counsel, enter a

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Fresh Technology is a startup that is hoping it's AI

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>software will help grocery stores massively reduce food waste. They

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>just raised fift million dollars in new funding and they're

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>on track to save thirty four million pounds of food

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>waste by the end of match. Schwartz is a co

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO of A Fresh Technologies and it's here

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>with us in the studio. Thank you for having me.

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>So how does this say I technology work? So? Out

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of fresh We believe that food, more so than anything else,

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>shapes the health of people and our planet, and specifically

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>within that, we think that fresh food is really driving

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the future of the grocery business and what people want

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to eat. At the same time, though, in building the company,

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we observed that most, if not all, of the technology

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was built for non fresh stuff. It was built for

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 1>things that come in a box. And have a bar

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>code and last a long time. And the result of

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that intern is that there was all these processes that

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>were not built for fresh and that in turn would

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>cause hundreds of billions of dollars of food waste across

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the world and a bunch of other problems. How can

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>AI help in the produce categories. So what we're doing

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is building technology specifically for fresh food, and what that

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>enables us to do is optimize the quantity of food

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>that goes into differ in parts of the supply chain

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to be as fresh as possible, order just the right

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>amount and not too little, and that causes us to

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to prevent food waste while keeping grocers in stock.

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that? I mean, even me, as

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a mom, I it's either too much or not enough

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever I buy at the store. It's a classic balancing

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>act and it's really, really, really tough. The way that

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we do it is we empower store employees at grocery

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>stores with an app that's served on a tablet and

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that's powered in the background by artificial intelligence that's trying

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to predict the future, how much is going to be sold,

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>understand how much is in the store, right now, and

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 1>then use all that information to create a profit, maximizing waste,

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>minimizing order, keeping the shelves full, while minimizing the inventory

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that's in the back room. So you're basically trying to

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to get groceries not to overorder. That's right.

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't want them to overorder. At the same time,

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't want them to under order because the other

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>problem we're seeing with the supply chain is those empty shelves.

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>So what we really want to do is find that

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sweet spot where you go to the store and the

0:36:57.000 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>shelf is full, but the food is they didn't or

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>too much that they are going to cause waste. Why

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>is getting fresh food so difficult? I mean even when

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>picking produce out at the store, sometimes it's it's already

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>going bad by the time I pick it up. Yeah, well,

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this is going back to the original

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>thesis of the company. We think fresh is the future,

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but fresh is just so tricky. When you pick a berry,

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a race against the clock until it's moldy.

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It's got to stay refrigerated, it's got to move quickly

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>through it. It's could be sold by weight, and so

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the data structures aren't there. There's no best by date

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>on a strawberry, so everything in fresh is far more complicated,

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we believe you have to build fresh

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>first technology to be able to handle it. You've got

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>nine grocery chains on board in the US, SAT do

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you plan to get more? So we're demonstrating results. So

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.439
<v Speaker 1>we've shown to date that we prevent waste by about

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>fift while also increasing sales by over three percent. And

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>so success like that is generating word of mouth and

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>happy reference customers for us that are really enabling us

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>to grow super rapidly. How do you plan to use

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the new capital really scale? So at the end of

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.399
<v Speaker 1>last year, we were live in two hundred stores and

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we've signed now as of right now, over three thousands,

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>so we're growing by over fifteen x. So we're going

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to use the capital to help us scale, and then

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go from our starting point in fruits and

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>vegetables to meet and seafood, Delhi Bakery, all the fresh

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff around the grocery store, and then we plan to

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>make our initial forays internationally and up higher in the

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. What was it like raising money in this environment.

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a tough environment. Did that impact your valuation?

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>What is your valuation? We're in a we're in a

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of a unique place at of Fresh where we're

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of service to this mission critical industry of grocery. I

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>think during the pandemic everyone came to appreciate them. When

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>times are tough, grocers are what really feed us and

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>shareff stomach goes more towards eating in, and so we're

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of service to that industry that kind of is a

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>cyclical or can even benefit from tough times. And then

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we're tackling problems of inflation and supply chain and so

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I think investors really saw all of that, and they

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>saw the traction that we had and they were willing

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to be big on us, which I'm proud of. I

0:38:57.719 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>can't share that right now. Well, what are your longer

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>term play ends? I mean, are you looking to stay independent,

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>go public, get bought by a larger food distributor? What's

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the goal. Our mission is to eliminate food waste and

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>make fresh food accessible to all. There's trillions of dollars

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of fresh food sold around the world. Our mission, what

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe we want to do is build a very

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>big company that eliminates that waste and proliferates across the

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>supply chaine. So whether that be a standalone company or

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>eventually I p owing, my plan really is just to

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>try to fulfill that mission. And how does this impact

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the suppliers on the back end quickly? So is it

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>worse for them because you know, grocers are ordering less.

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>The dynamic we live in is that population is growing

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>from something like seven billion people to nine and ten

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>billion people. So we've got I mean, no comment, but

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>what I will say is that population is growing and

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we're out of land. Uh we're burning down the rainforest

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and create enough land to grow cowse and yields are

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be impacted by climate change. So we have

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 1>to find ways to do more with less to be sustainable.

0:39:57.600 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And so at the end of the day, when we

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>drive the ficiencies at the store, growers upstream are really

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciative that as well. All right, Matchwarts, CEO and co

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>founder of a Fresh Technology. Thank you, really interesting, Thank

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you keep your eyeing you all right? That does it

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. I'm Emily Chang in

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Great show coming up tomorrow. Lift co founder

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>John Zimmer will be here. Glenn Kelman of Redfinn and

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Reed Hoffman always loved talking to him. That's tomorrow, right

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 1>here on Bloomberg Technology. This is Bloomberg