1
00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

2
00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:13,200
Speaker 1: with Jonathan Ferroll and Lisa Brownowitz. Daily we bring you

3
00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:18,600
Speaker 1: insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

4
00:00:18,960 --> 00:00:23,840
Speaker 1: Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot com,

5
00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:30,160
Speaker 1: and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. We continue and

6
00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:33,720
Speaker 1: focus on one fellow reserve. It is the Richmond Fed,

7
00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:37,599
Speaker 1: which has a fabulous history from Black to broad Us

8
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:40,959
Speaker 1: to Lacquer and now to Barkin. The Richmond Fed one

9
00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:44,000
Speaker 1: of my favorites with the wonderful Tom Humphreys on the

10
00:00:44,200 --> 00:00:49,040
Speaker 1: history of our economy. It's had a wonderful leadership, including

11
00:00:49,479 --> 00:00:53,520
Speaker 1: under Jeffrey Lacker, the former Richmond FED president joins us. Now, Michael,

12
00:00:53,560 --> 00:00:56,840
Speaker 1: it's a different fet, isn't it. Well, it's a different fat,

13
00:00:56,920 --> 00:00:58,960
Speaker 1: It's a different economy and we have learned a lot

14
00:00:59,320 --> 00:01:02,640
Speaker 1: and now we have an do reaction function for the FED,

15
00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:06,319
Speaker 1: which is where I'd like to start. Jeff, you have

16
00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:11,480
Speaker 1: expressed some reservations about this new policy of letting the

17
00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,319
Speaker 1: economy run a little hot till we can average inflation,

18
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:19,200
Speaker 1: because you've expressed concern that that could unmore inflation expectations.

19
00:01:19,880 --> 00:01:23,280
Speaker 1: Do you think that the Fed, in particular J Powell,

20
00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:25,440
Speaker 1: over the last couple of weeks and with his address

21
00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:29,240
Speaker 1: on Friday, maybe UH put a little bit of those

22
00:01:29,240 --> 00:01:32,520
Speaker 1: concerns to rest by emphasizing the fact that the Fed

23
00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:38,200
Speaker 1: is going to stay focused on inflation. UM somewhat, but

24
00:01:38,280 --> 00:01:41,160
Speaker 1: I think UM, I think the Fed's in a tough

25
00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:45,560
Speaker 1: spot the UH the danger that they face from this

26
00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:50,160
Speaker 1: inflation surge. UM, we have inflation on a six month

27
00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:54,520
Speaker 1: basis higher than it's been since nineteen three. The danger

28
00:01:54,560 --> 00:01:59,280
Speaker 1: is that that persists. Rob Kaplan was talking on Friday

29
00:01:59,320 --> 00:02:02,320
Speaker 1: about the then to which businesses were reporting that they

30
00:02:02,360 --> 00:02:05,760
Speaker 1: expect these supply constraints to continue, but then beyond that

31
00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:09,520
Speaker 1: getting embedded in inflation expectations. And I think that's the

32
00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:14,440
Speaker 1: real key risk that UM, the FED is running these days.

33
00:02:14,480 --> 00:02:17,520
Speaker 1: So I was glad to see that Powell addressed that

34
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:21,600
Speaker 1: in his remarks on Friday. He's and he's done that

35
00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:25,040
Speaker 1: elsewhere as well as trying to assure the public that yes,

36
00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:28,520
Speaker 1: if inflation persists at a high level, we have the

37
00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:31,520
Speaker 1: tools to deal with that. But it's it's somewhat like

38
00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:35,640
Speaker 1: I'm a friend of mine likinged it to um, you know,

39
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:39,120
Speaker 1: dr telling you you have gang green in your leg

40
00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:41,200
Speaker 1: and don't worry. We have the tools to deal with it.

41
00:02:41,240 --> 00:02:43,880
Speaker 1: But it's you know, the tools are the amputation kit

42
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:47,000
Speaker 1: and they include a big saw. So it's what we

43
00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:50,000
Speaker 1: went through in the early eighties to get inflation down

44
00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:53,760
Speaker 1: was exceptionally painful, and that's what motivated those of us

45
00:02:53,760 --> 00:02:57,680
Speaker 1: who over time have advocated a more preemptive policy. The

46
00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:01,720
Speaker 1: Fed's moved away from that and it's strategy statement last year.

47
00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:07,080
Speaker 1: The risk it runs is that that shift last year

48
00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:10,400
Speaker 1: UM is sort of a kin to going off Breton Woods,

49
00:03:10,480 --> 00:03:13,800
Speaker 1: and and that it it gives people the license to

50
00:03:13,919 --> 00:03:16,679
Speaker 1: believe that there's an entirely new regime in place now

51
00:03:16,680 --> 00:03:19,800
Speaker 1: with regard to inflation. In terms of tools, one of

52
00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:23,600
Speaker 1: the papers presented on Friday at Jackson Hall suggested that

53
00:03:23,639 --> 00:03:27,600
Speaker 1: our star, the level of interest rates that would be neutral,

54
00:03:28,480 --> 00:03:30,640
Speaker 1: is much lower than it had been. So does the

55
00:03:30,639 --> 00:03:34,160
Speaker 1: FED really have tools? Can they raise rates and cut

56
00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:39,680
Speaker 1: off inflation without sending the economy into recession? And I

57
00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:42,600
Speaker 1: think they very clearly can, and um, you know, more

58
00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:45,240
Speaker 1: to the point, I think they can nudge up the

59
00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:50,040
Speaker 1: polar expected policy path um, you know, over the coming year,

60
00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:51,800
Speaker 1: and I expect they're going to have to do that

61
00:03:52,520 --> 00:03:56,440
Speaker 1: to keep inflation expectations contained. Um So, I think they

62
00:03:56,480 --> 00:03:59,760
Speaker 1: have the tools to combat it. I mean, it's the

63
00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:02,920
Speaker 1: blunt we haven't used them in a long time, but

64
00:04:03,160 --> 00:04:05,520
Speaker 1: um yeah, I think the FED has the tools to

65
00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:09,280
Speaker 1: do that if they well, let me put it this way,

66
00:04:09,320 --> 00:04:13,760
Speaker 1: can they go back to jaw jaw to paraphrase Winston

67
00:04:13,880 --> 00:04:17,720
Speaker 1: Churchill and job owed uh the economy into place? Or

68
00:04:17,800 --> 00:04:22,080
Speaker 1: is it going to take action to get wall streets attention? Now?

69
00:04:22,120 --> 00:04:24,760
Speaker 1: I think I think actions have always spoken louder than

70
00:04:24,800 --> 00:04:29,000
Speaker 1: words in this Throughout the seventies, the Fed um loudly

71
00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:33,440
Speaker 1: proclaimed it's uh opposition to inflation and it's desire to

72
00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:36,839
Speaker 1: have inflation be lower. It just didn't take the actions

73
00:04:36,880 --> 00:04:41,599
Speaker 1: to back that up until Volker in one started letting

74
00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:46,040
Speaker 1: interest rates rise and engineered the recession that that brought

75
00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:51,320
Speaker 1: inflation expectations down. Jeff Lacker, Tom Can, good morning to you.

76
00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:54,359
Speaker 1: You mentioned the preemptive nature of a theory and that

77
00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:56,560
Speaker 1: Richmond has led on that. I think of the late

78
00:04:56,640 --> 00:04:59,880
Speaker 1: Marvin good Friend with a cause for concern over inflation,

79
00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:03,360
Speaker 1: the whole shadow Open Market Committee. What we saw out

80
00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:07,600
Speaker 1: of Carnegie Melon as well. Where did the inflation Eastas

81
00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:12,760
Speaker 1: get it wrong? On your watch? So, I think that

82
00:05:13,120 --> 00:05:16,960
Speaker 1: the stability of inflation expectations coming out of the recession

83
00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:21,200
Speaker 1: UM was a bit of surprise, I mean a bit. Um.

84
00:05:21,480 --> 00:05:25,160
Speaker 1: They were a bit more strongly anchored then I and

85
00:05:25,279 --> 00:05:30,920
Speaker 1: several others expected, So the upside risk to inflation didn't emerge. Um.

86
00:05:30,960 --> 00:05:34,880
Speaker 1: I'd point out um at the same time that UH

87
00:05:35,080 --> 00:05:39,400
Speaker 1: inflation doubs were also also missed it. They were afraid

88
00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:43,239
Speaker 1: of dramatic sag and inflation. Jeff, this came up, Jeff,

89
00:05:43,279 --> 00:05:44,880
Speaker 1: this came up over the weekend. And this is a

90
00:05:44,960 --> 00:05:49,400
Speaker 1: critical question in defense of the inflation Easta's the idea

91
00:05:49,480 --> 00:05:52,359
Speaker 1: that the reason we didn't see the inflation is we

92
00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:57,160
Speaker 1: just moved the inflationary impulse over to an increased asset

93
00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:02,479
Speaker 1: allocation and an asset battle of sheet inequities in real estate,

94
00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:08,000
Speaker 1: all the summer properties. Mike McKee can't afford. Sorry about that, Mike,

95
00:06:08,480 --> 00:06:12,160
Speaker 1: Good to be with you, Tom Um. So I think, um,

96
00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:15,039
Speaker 1: what people lost sight of with a huge increase in

97
00:06:15,080 --> 00:06:19,240
Speaker 1: the Fence balance sheet is that the monetary liabilities it

98
00:06:19,320 --> 00:06:22,240
Speaker 1: was pumping in the economy. We're being absorbed by a

99
00:06:22,279 --> 00:06:28,240
Speaker 1: tremendously a tremendously large demand for liquid assets by the

100
00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:32,520
Speaker 1: banking system, driven by the bank's natural reaction to what

101
00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:37,080
Speaker 1: happened in two thousand and eight, but also regulatory um

102
00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:41,520
Speaker 1: you know, impetus provided for them to hold larger liquid buffers,

103
00:06:41,560 --> 00:06:43,640
Speaker 1: and that means that, you know, the demand for money

104
00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:46,640
Speaker 1: is essentially flat at the interest rate on reserves, and yeah,

105
00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:49,200
Speaker 1: we could increase the money supply a lot until we

106
00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:52,640
Speaker 1: start forcing banks to hold more liquidity than they want.

107
00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:55,440
Speaker 1: And we're we were ways away from that, so the

108
00:06:55,480 --> 00:06:57,960
Speaker 1: size of the balance sheet wasn't really doing much for

109
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:01,400
Speaker 1: the economy. On the flip side of the station debate, Jeff,

110
00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:03,440
Speaker 1: is the employment picture, and we're gonna get a better

111
00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:05,440
Speaker 1: read on that perhaps on Friday. If you were still

112
00:07:05,440 --> 00:07:07,479
Speaker 1: on the Fed, what would you be looking for to

113
00:07:07,520 --> 00:07:10,800
Speaker 1: determine just how much slack or how tight the labor

114
00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:14,760
Speaker 1: market really is. It's a really good question. You know,

115
00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:18,239
Speaker 1: we had all these debates about what maximum employment meant

116
00:07:18,320 --> 00:07:22,080
Speaker 1: or what that number was. It's really a long run,

117
00:07:22,240 --> 00:07:26,120
Speaker 1: long horizon kind of thing. It's like, after all the

118
00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:30,960
Speaker 1: sectoral reallocation has occurred. After all the matching that has

119
00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:33,520
Speaker 1: to go on between people looking for another job, what

120
00:07:33,640 --> 00:07:35,520
Speaker 1: kind of careers are going to be. I want a

121
00:07:35,560 --> 00:07:37,960
Speaker 1: different occupation. I want to be in a restaurant anymore,

122
00:07:38,480 --> 00:07:42,160
Speaker 1: and uh, firms looking for where they're going to find

123
00:07:42,200 --> 00:07:45,320
Speaker 1: someone with the skills that I need. After that process

124
00:07:45,400 --> 00:07:49,280
Speaker 1: plays out, Yeah, maximum employment might be a lower unemployment

125
00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:52,360
Speaker 1: rate we have now, but that takes time, and maximum

126
00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:57,680
Speaker 1: employment in September of it's really close to where we

127
00:07:57,720 --> 00:08:02,120
Speaker 1: are right now. We're really close to September maximum employment.

128
00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:06,360
Speaker 1: We can't we can't get maximum unemployment much above where

129
00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:09,440
Speaker 1: it's it's going to be in September. So um, I

130
00:08:09,480 --> 00:08:11,800
Speaker 1: think that you have to keep in mind the dynamic

131
00:08:11,880 --> 00:08:17,400
Speaker 1: process in which labor markets. Heal some recent research by

132
00:08:17,440 --> 00:08:22,080
Speaker 1: Bob Hall and Marianna kudlak Um in that regard is

133
00:08:22,600 --> 00:08:25,080
Speaker 1: painting a very different picture of labor markets. You think

134
00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:29,760
Speaker 1: of the unemployment ratist shooting up in a a recession

135
00:08:29,880 --> 00:08:33,920
Speaker 1: coming down, but you know, uh, it looks like it

136
00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:38,960
Speaker 1: just comes down at the same pace every every expansion. Jeff,

137
00:08:39,040 --> 00:08:41,800
Speaker 1: you were very much an inflation used to when you

138
00:08:41,840 --> 00:08:45,000
Speaker 1: were on the board, and I'm wondering if you've seen

139
00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:49,439
Speaker 1: what the current FED seems to be arguing that inflation

140
00:08:49,559 --> 00:08:53,720
Speaker 1: dynamics have changed, uh, and there is, as j Pal

141
00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:59,760
Speaker 1: said on Friday, a natural disinflation in the global economy.

142
00:09:02,240 --> 00:09:06,720
Speaker 1: I'm not sure i'd buy it. Um what people have

143
00:09:06,840 --> 00:09:12,440
Speaker 1: been uh increasing the weight they place on um inflation

144
00:09:12,480 --> 00:09:15,600
Speaker 1: expectations and inflation dynamics over the last couple of decades.

145
00:09:15,640 --> 00:09:18,360
Speaker 1: I know, you know, early two thousands people thought it

146
00:09:18,400 --> 00:09:22,240
Speaker 1: was all sort of a backward looking process. The important

147
00:09:22,280 --> 00:09:24,760
Speaker 1: thing to remember and think the thing people neglect about

148
00:09:24,760 --> 00:09:27,600
Speaker 1: inflation expectations. People talk about it as if it's some

149
00:09:28,679 --> 00:09:33,760
Speaker 1: exogenous external force of nature or else some collective psychological

150
00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:38,520
Speaker 1: whim or something. It's really expectations about what the FED

151
00:09:39,360 --> 00:09:42,920
Speaker 1: is going to do in the near future. And so

152
00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:46,600
Speaker 1: when you look at inflation expectations, that's really credibility of

153
00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:51,240
Speaker 1: the FED, and that can change. And the process by

154
00:09:51,280 --> 00:09:55,400
Speaker 1: which that shifts and changes over time is not one

155
00:09:55,440 --> 00:10:00,320
Speaker 1: that's deeply deeply understood in the economics profession. So Lecker,

156
00:10:00,440 --> 00:10:02,520
Speaker 1: thank you so much. With VCU and of course the

157
00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:05,640
Speaker 1: former president of the Richmond FED, thank you, thank you

158
00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:13,479
Speaker 1: so much. We've got the perfect guest for you. Kitchens

159
00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:16,800
Speaker 1: of Society General. We spoke to his people last night

160
00:10:17,080 --> 00:10:19,320
Speaker 1: and they said he would make an appearance with us,

161
00:10:19,360 --> 00:10:22,520
Speaker 1: even though his arsenal struggles there. Kid, let me start

162
00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:25,200
Speaker 1: with the first important question of the week. If Harry

163
00:10:25,280 --> 00:10:29,240
Speaker 1: Kane and Ronaldo joined Arsenal, would that help? No, we

164
00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:31,800
Speaker 1: can't defend the goal scoring is less of a problem

165
00:10:31,880 --> 00:10:34,920
Speaker 1: unless one of them places full back. It's been sport

166
00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:36,800
Speaker 1: to say the least. Kid, let's get started in a

167
00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:40,160
Speaker 1: serious matter here. It is the summer doldrums, but it's

168
00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:43,160
Speaker 1: not What are you looking for? How do you frame

169
00:10:43,160 --> 00:10:46,920
Speaker 1: a set up to maybe a more active September in October?

170
00:10:48,559 --> 00:10:51,200
Speaker 1: I think you know, we have to get away from

171
00:10:51,240 --> 00:10:55,120
Speaker 1: being driven just by the FED tape of story. Um,

172
00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:58,280
Speaker 1: so you know the the other currents will take over.

173
00:10:58,480 --> 00:11:02,280
Speaker 1: I'll be interested, Oh, what's happening outside the United States?

174
00:11:02,760 --> 00:11:05,480
Speaker 1: Only in the sense that things change if other parts

175
00:11:05,480 --> 00:11:08,280
Speaker 1: of the world start to see recovery. If you started

176
00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:11,160
Speaker 1: to get better data in Europe coming through relative to

177
00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:13,280
Speaker 1: the States, that could change things a little bit. But

178
00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:15,520
Speaker 1: but while we're bogged down with this idea of not

179
00:11:15,640 --> 00:11:17,959
Speaker 1: even when does the FED start to slow its asset

180
00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:20,520
Speaker 1: purchases down? But what does that mean about when they're done?

181
00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:22,120
Speaker 1: And what does that mean about when rate rice has

182
00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:24,880
Speaker 1: come and they're not going to come to three? So hey,

183
00:11:25,040 --> 00:11:27,160
Speaker 1: what are we going to do in two? You know,

184
00:11:27,160 --> 00:11:28,680
Speaker 1: we have to we have to get past that, that

185
00:11:28,679 --> 00:11:31,400
Speaker 1: whole story. But I think you know, there's there's geopolitics

186
00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:34,800
Speaker 1: coming up. The comment situation is is is either going

187
00:11:34,840 --> 00:11:36,800
Speaker 1: to improve or or it's going to become a real

188
00:11:36,960 --> 00:11:41,680
Speaker 1: economic factor again, so that that's not static. Um and um.

189
00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:44,520
Speaker 1: You know, the the range of forecasts for Friday's peril

190
00:11:44,600 --> 00:11:47,840
Speaker 1: numbers over on your side of the pond is huge,

191
00:11:48,320 --> 00:11:50,880
Speaker 1: So we will get surprised by this. We we don't

192
00:11:50,920 --> 00:11:52,800
Speaker 1: have a handle on the place of job creation really,

193
00:11:52,880 --> 00:11:55,520
Speaker 1: we just guess kit taking a step back, it seems

194
00:11:55,520 --> 00:11:57,720
Speaker 1: like the market is saying that the taper is a

195
00:11:57,800 --> 00:12:00,720
Speaker 1: non event. Is that what we're seeing that basically Fed

196
00:12:00,800 --> 00:12:04,800
Speaker 1: Chair J. Powell has successfully made tapering the one billion

197
00:12:04,840 --> 00:12:08,760
Speaker 1: dollars of monthly bomb purchases an entirely non event from markets.

198
00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:11,839
Speaker 1: It should be. I mean, in a sense, the whole

199
00:12:11,880 --> 00:12:14,200
Speaker 1: idea of the table was the you know, the FED

200
00:12:14,320 --> 00:12:16,880
Speaker 1: slows down its asset purchases at the same time as

201
00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:20,720
Speaker 1: the government spends less money and the needs to issue

202
00:12:21,080 --> 00:12:24,800
Speaker 1: fewer bombs. So who cares, right, Because what what we've

203
00:12:24,800 --> 00:12:27,480
Speaker 1: done is we is the United States finance the pandemic

204
00:12:27,559 --> 00:12:31,680
Speaker 1: with the government handing out checks paid for by issuing

205
00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:35,560
Speaker 1: debt that was brought by the Fed. Just unwind the process.

206
00:12:35,679 --> 00:12:38,760
Speaker 1: Just stop paying out checks and stop stop buying the bombs,

207
00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:41,040
Speaker 1: and then and then we can get back to discussing

208
00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:45,080
Speaker 1: important stuff, which is did all these checks create savings?

209
00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:47,240
Speaker 1: Did all these create checks create demand? Did all these

210
00:12:47,280 --> 00:12:50,920
Speaker 1: checks create inflation somewhere out there with all these bottlenecks

211
00:12:50,960 --> 00:12:52,760
Speaker 1: and things like that, And I think that's what we're

212
00:12:52,760 --> 00:12:55,600
Speaker 1: going to find out. But the focus is on can

213
00:12:56,000 --> 00:12:59,559
Speaker 1: can the US government have spent this much money getting

214
00:12:59,559 --> 00:13:03,240
Speaker 1: the on me to recover this fast from the pandemic

215
00:13:04,200 --> 00:13:08,920
Speaker 1: without without some inflation that's stickier than the legged than

216
00:13:08,960 --> 00:13:10,840
Speaker 1: the FED is going to feel comfortable with. And we're

217
00:13:10,840 --> 00:13:12,600
Speaker 1: going to find that out over the next six months

218
00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:14,560
Speaker 1: in a big way, I think, you know. Okay, speaking

219
00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:17,240
Speaker 1: of being this far from the pandemic, it is interesting

220
00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:19,080
Speaker 1: that people are saying that when we taper, we have

221
00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:22,199
Speaker 1: to go faster given how far into this we are

222
00:13:22,280 --> 00:13:25,080
Speaker 1: eighteen months or so. How are you thinking about a

223
00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:29,160
Speaker 1: pace of a taper um. Well, you know that the

224
00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:32,960
Speaker 1: consensus view on tapering is you reduce. You reduce the

225
00:13:33,160 --> 00:13:37,320
Speaker 1: pace by ten billion each FMC meeting instead of the

226
00:13:37,400 --> 00:13:41,439
Speaker 1: five billion for treasuries that they did in twenty fourteen,

227
00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:45,760
Speaker 1: and that takes a year. Now you could go every month,

228
00:13:46,440 --> 00:13:49,400
Speaker 1: you could try more. In a sense, it should be

229
00:13:49,400 --> 00:13:52,400
Speaker 1: possible to go fast because the Treasury is going to

230
00:13:52,679 --> 00:13:55,120
Speaker 1: be issuing less debt into it, so you're you know,

231
00:13:55,160 --> 00:13:57,040
Speaker 1: you've got you kind of got things lined up. The

232
00:13:57,080 --> 00:13:59,560
Speaker 1: only difficulty would be if we started to get seriously

233
00:13:59,559 --> 00:14:02,960
Speaker 1: worried out the inflation data and the strength of the

234
00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:04,960
Speaker 1: economy at the same time as they're tapering, and then

235
00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:06,800
Speaker 1: the bond market is going to struggle and that kind

236
00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:09,920
Speaker 1: of catches us where we are. It's really easy, it's

237
00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:13,400
Speaker 1: really easy to to taper without yields going up if

238
00:14:13,440 --> 00:14:16,000
Speaker 1: inflation is low and the economy is not growing too fast.

239
00:14:16,360 --> 00:14:18,720
Speaker 1: But if you if you lose control of the story

240
00:14:19,080 --> 00:14:21,880
Speaker 1: while you're doing it, it can get pretty messy. So

241
00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:24,640
Speaker 1: I think they'll I mean, I would go as fast

242
00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:27,720
Speaker 1: as the market let me go once I started, because

243
00:14:27,720 --> 00:14:30,280
Speaker 1: it buys me a degree of freedom. But you have

244
00:14:30,360 --> 00:14:32,880
Speaker 1: to be market lead. You know, if you if you

245
00:14:32,960 --> 00:14:36,040
Speaker 1: cut back your your purchases by ten billion one month

246
00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:39,200
Speaker 1: um and yields back up study basis points in the

247
00:14:39,240 --> 00:14:42,000
Speaker 1: first week, you know you kind of you go and

248
00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:44,680
Speaker 1: have a scratch of your head pretty quickly. Thank you

249
00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:47,480
Speaker 1: so much, greatly appreciated. A good conversation to start the

250
00:14:47,520 --> 00:14:50,840
Speaker 1: week for me, society General and the chief Foreign Exchange

251
00:14:50,880 --> 00:14:58,440
Speaker 1: Strategies right now is the most important conversation of the

252
00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:01,600
Speaker 1: day and even of the week. For those that are saying,

253
00:15:01,640 --> 00:15:05,120
Speaker 1: you know, lose the fancy talk, just give me some courage.

254
00:15:05,560 --> 00:15:09,040
Speaker 1: Robert Doll for decades has done just that, a storied

255
00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:13,200
Speaker 1: career in the equity markets with cross market global investments,

256
00:15:13,240 --> 00:15:17,160
Speaker 1: and Bob Doll I love within your research. Note you say, look,

257
00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:22,520
Speaker 1: we've got to invest in a quote a still good economy.

258
00:15:22,560 --> 00:15:27,880
Speaker 1: What does stocks do in a still good economy? They

259
00:15:27,960 --> 00:15:31,440
Speaker 1: generally go up. Tom uh. You know, a good economy

260
00:15:31,520 --> 00:15:34,720
Speaker 1: means good earnings and so the path of LEAs resistance

261
00:15:34,800 --> 00:15:37,880
Speaker 1: has been and likely will continue to be to the upside.

262
00:15:38,160 --> 00:15:40,600
Speaker 1: That does not mean there aren't flies in an ointment.

263
00:15:40,600 --> 00:15:42,880
Speaker 1: I can give you a list but the path of

264
00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:45,680
Speaker 1: least resistance is still higher. Tom. You know that, Bob,

265
00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:47,960
Speaker 1: the flies an ointment, Let's go right there, because that's

266
00:15:47,960 --> 00:15:50,720
Speaker 1: how I roll. I mean, honestly, what material fly in

267
00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:53,440
Speaker 1: the ointment are you looking at that potentially could disrupt

268
00:15:53,440 --> 00:15:56,200
Speaker 1: things in a way that people are not expecting. Well,

269
00:15:56,280 --> 00:15:58,440
Speaker 1: if they're all at the margin. You all just talked

270
00:15:58,480 --> 00:16:01,520
Speaker 1: about coronavirus and in the delta variant that that that

271
00:16:01,680 --> 00:16:05,480
Speaker 1: is one. But inside the market, earnings estimates for the

272
00:16:05,560 --> 00:16:09,000
Speaker 1: third quarter peaked in early August and they're off a

273
00:16:09,040 --> 00:16:11,920
Speaker 1: little bit. That's after four quarters were right. During the

274
00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:15,440
Speaker 1: quarter of the earnings estimates kept going up. Brett's the

275
00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:18,880
Speaker 1: average stock peaked in June. What's that telling us? Its

276
00:16:18,920 --> 00:16:21,360
Speaker 1: telling us the markets get a little tired. So I

277
00:16:21,400 --> 00:16:26,200
Speaker 1: can find flies and annointment are the material ones? Great question, Bob?

278
00:16:26,240 --> 00:16:28,760
Speaker 1: Can you answer the question for me? Can we get

279
00:16:28,760 --> 00:16:35,120
Speaker 1: a reflationary cyclical trade if bond yields don't rise? Uh?

280
00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:37,880
Speaker 1: That's the million dollar question. If you dropped me on

281
00:16:37,920 --> 00:16:40,800
Speaker 1: the planet and told me everything except where the tangy

282
00:16:40,840 --> 00:16:43,720
Speaker 1: year and asked me to guess, I guess a lot

283
00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:47,000
Speaker 1: higher than one thirty something going on the bond market

284
00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:51,960
Speaker 1: when the SUP has the same yield as a tenure treasury. Um. Uh,

285
00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:54,880
Speaker 1: we need to watch that carefully. That has that you

286
00:16:55,120 --> 00:16:57,880
Speaker 1: has to go up. Uh in my view to have

287
00:16:57,960 --> 00:17:01,080
Speaker 1: this cyclical trade. To come back on, Bob Dol, you

288
00:17:01,160 --> 00:17:04,880
Speaker 1: have fought against the pendulum of flies in the ointment

289
00:17:05,119 --> 00:17:08,320
Speaker 1: for decades. In decades you have said you have to

290
00:17:08,359 --> 00:17:12,240
Speaker 1: participate in the foundation of that, Bob Doll, is it

291
00:17:12,400 --> 00:17:17,320
Speaker 1: corporations will adjust? Do you observe and in what way

292
00:17:17,359 --> 00:17:23,920
Speaker 1: do you observe corporations adjusting into two thousand twenty two. Well,

293
00:17:23,480 --> 00:17:26,080
Speaker 1: I'll start look in the rear view mirror. First. If

294
00:17:26,119 --> 00:17:28,919
Speaker 1: you had told me they're more companies in the SMP

295
00:17:29,040 --> 00:17:32,720
Speaker 1: five dred that would benefit from COVID, then would be hurt.

296
00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:35,040
Speaker 1: I wouldn't have believe you wanted to get. But that's

297
00:17:35,040 --> 00:17:39,760
Speaker 1: exactly what's happened. Corporations are figuring out how to morph. Uh.

298
00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:43,480
Speaker 1: They're dealing with very low interest rates. Uh. They've learned

299
00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:47,399
Speaker 1: how to raise prices in environment where pricing power is

300
00:17:47,480 --> 00:17:51,400
Speaker 1: coming back. They've kept cost down. A labor I think

301
00:17:51,440 --> 00:17:54,560
Speaker 1: will be a flying ointment on that one. But corporations

302
00:17:54,560 --> 00:17:58,359
Speaker 1: have morphed in lots of ways that caused them to

303
00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:02,680
Speaker 1: print these slin earnings reports. I'll talk about another flying

304
00:18:02,680 --> 00:18:04,680
Speaker 1: the ointment, just to keep repeating the image on this

305
00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:08,920
Speaker 1: Monday morning for everybody eating breakfast. I do wonder going forward, Bob,

306
00:18:09,359 --> 00:18:12,760
Speaker 1: about the potential for higher taxes, and I look to Washington,

307
00:18:12,840 --> 00:18:15,760
Speaker 1: d C. Pulling together some sort of infrastructure plan. What

308
00:18:15,920 --> 00:18:19,160
Speaker 1: have you accounted for in your projections and what isn't

309
00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:23,000
Speaker 1: accounted for? Right now? Yeah, I still think the path

310
00:18:23,080 --> 00:18:26,520
Speaker 1: the least resistance for that legislation is that we do

311
00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:33,080
Speaker 1: have a Democrat reconciliation package following the bipartisan um infrastructure plan,

312
00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:37,320
Speaker 1: but a much watered down one. Uh. Let's call it

313
00:18:37,400 --> 00:18:40,720
Speaker 1: two trillion with up to a trillion dollar of tax increases,

314
00:18:41,200 --> 00:18:45,520
Speaker 1: kind of the plane Vanilla ones, higher for higher wage earners,

315
00:18:45,560 --> 00:18:48,680
Speaker 1: for corporations, and higher capital gains. But you know, the

316
00:18:48,720 --> 00:18:53,640
Speaker 1: Afghanistan thing, uh, does not raise President Biden's political capital

317
00:18:53,680 --> 00:18:56,520
Speaker 1: get that through. So whatever you thought the probability there,

318
00:18:56,600 --> 00:18:59,280
Speaker 1: it is lower. Now, Bob Don, what's your target on

319
00:18:59,440 --> 00:19:05,439
Speaker 1: SMPF hundred. I'm embarrassed to say fifty. Uh, as the

320
00:19:05,440 --> 00:19:08,280
Speaker 1: thing just keeps going up, I've not revised my target.

321
00:19:08,400 --> 00:19:10,520
Speaker 1: Let's revise it. Right now. It's a slow Monday. We

322
00:19:10,560 --> 00:19:13,280
Speaker 1: had to get Riggs on the show for Taylor. Riggs,

323
00:19:13,280 --> 00:19:17,800
Speaker 1: do your revision right now. Al there we go. We're

324
00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:21,080
Speaker 1: making news. Bob Doll, thank you so much. Dollar, I

325
00:19:21,160 --> 00:19:30,040
Speaker 1: love it, Taylor Dollar, cross Mark pretty cool joining us now.

326
00:19:30,560 --> 00:19:33,480
Speaker 1: Peter Truowittz from the London School of Economics with all

327
00:19:33,520 --> 00:19:36,880
Speaker 1: of his good work over the years at the University

328
00:19:36,920 --> 00:19:40,320
Speaker 1: of Texas at Austin, and Professor Trubowitz. We talked to

329
00:19:40,400 --> 00:19:44,000
Speaker 1: Afghan experts. I want to talk to you about United

330
00:19:44,040 --> 00:19:48,200
Speaker 1: States experts, and I go back to your landmark politics

331
00:19:48,200 --> 00:19:53,240
Speaker 1: and strategy. Do we have a strategy in foreign policy

332
00:19:53,680 --> 00:19:56,359
Speaker 1: that gets us out to say, two thousand twenty three

333
00:19:56,720 --> 00:20:01,480
Speaker 1: a year before our next election. Well, Tom, it's good

334
00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:03,720
Speaker 1: to be with you. I would say we have the

335
00:20:03,800 --> 00:20:07,760
Speaker 1: beginnings of a of a strategy. I mean, really, what's

336
00:20:07,760 --> 00:20:10,600
Speaker 1: been going on for well over ten years at the

337
00:20:10,680 --> 00:20:16,240
Speaker 1: United States is in the process of reassessing and adjusting

338
00:20:16,280 --> 00:20:22,040
Speaker 1: strategically and internationally. What that means is moving more of

339
00:20:22,119 --> 00:20:25,480
Speaker 1: its energy, it's time, it's energy, and its assets to

340
00:20:25,640 --> 00:20:30,199
Speaker 1: East Asia and domestically. I think the principal challenge that

341
00:20:30,280 --> 00:20:36,679
Speaker 1: has dogged three administrations. Is UM rebuilding or renewing the

342
00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:41,199
Speaker 1: social contract, which has really been badly damaged by the

343
00:20:41,280 --> 00:20:45,800
Speaker 1: country's failure to keep international openness and social protection and balance.

344
00:20:46,359 --> 00:20:51,520
Speaker 1: This is the challenge. Afghanistan doesn't really change that, but

345
00:20:51,640 --> 00:20:54,000
Speaker 1: I think it kind of draws our attention to it

346
00:20:54,040 --> 00:20:57,119
Speaker 1: in a kind of more focused way. UM. As we

347
00:20:57,160 --> 00:21:01,159
Speaker 1: wind down this chapter and UH and hopefully the United

348
00:21:01,160 --> 00:21:04,960
Speaker 1: States begins a new one, I look Peter at a

349
00:21:05,040 --> 00:21:08,840
Speaker 1: new strategy, and it just seems to be all of

350
00:21:09,000 --> 00:21:13,200
Speaker 1: the ghosts that the looking back. We look back one year,

351
00:21:13,520 --> 00:21:17,000
Speaker 1: we looked back, two decades, we look back three wars.

352
00:21:17,320 --> 00:21:23,800
Speaker 1: Which are you looking back to to find perspective? I'm

353
00:21:23,800 --> 00:21:27,359
Speaker 1: not actually looking back at wars. What I think about

354
00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:31,439
Speaker 1: is I think about I really do think we're in

355
00:21:31,480 --> 00:21:35,800
Speaker 1: a period where the national interest is being redefined, and

356
00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:39,200
Speaker 1: it's not being done in the news cycle. It's being

357
00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:41,640
Speaker 1: done over an extended period of time. So I look

358
00:21:41,720 --> 00:21:46,359
Speaker 1: back at periods for the historians out there, UH, like

359
00:21:46,400 --> 00:21:49,680
Speaker 1: the eighteen nineties and the nineteen twenties and the nineteen

360
00:21:49,760 --> 00:21:56,320
Speaker 1: forties and the nineteen seventies where the United States readjusted, recalibrated,

361
00:21:56,960 --> 00:22:01,960
Speaker 1: change the balance between international and domestic stick interest and

362
00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:04,240
Speaker 1: and that's what I think we're in the middle of.

363
00:22:04,280 --> 00:22:06,840
Speaker 1: And I think it's very hard to see. You have

364
00:22:06,920 --> 00:22:09,359
Speaker 1: to be able to kind of bracket it, step outside

365
00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:12,520
Speaker 1: of it, and get some distance looking at it from

366
00:22:12,560 --> 00:22:16,399
Speaker 1: ten thousand feet rather than from from a hundred feet,

367
00:22:16,480 --> 00:22:19,000
Speaker 1: And right when you're in the middle of something like

368
00:22:19,040 --> 00:22:22,480
Speaker 1: what's going on in Afghanistan right now, it's very hard

369
00:22:22,520 --> 00:22:26,920
Speaker 1: to see that. But I do think that's what Biden wants,

370
00:22:27,080 --> 00:22:30,440
Speaker 1: perhaps trying to get out he is having trouble. That's

371
00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:32,720
Speaker 1: where I wanted to go because right now we're looking

372
00:22:32,840 --> 00:22:35,439
Speaker 1: at an agenda in Washington, d C. That is almost

373
00:22:35,480 --> 00:22:37,880
Speaker 1: solidly Afghanistan. I mean, I was watching the Sunday talk

374
00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:41,000
Speaker 1: shows and the political shows are all Afghanistan at a time,

375
00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:43,200
Speaker 1: and we're heading up into the debt ceiling debate. We're

376
00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:46,440
Speaker 1: heading up until uh this question about infrastructure and getting

377
00:22:46,440 --> 00:22:51,160
Speaker 1: it past. I mean, did this just accomplish the opposite? Yes,

378
00:22:51,240 --> 00:22:53,639
Speaker 1: I think that's you know, they said, that's the great

379
00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:56,320
Speaker 1: irony and all of this. One of the reasons that

380
00:22:56,440 --> 00:22:59,879
Speaker 1: Biden was so keen to get out of Afghanistan was

381
00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:03,879
Speaker 1: to focus more attention on domestic problems and the messy,

382
00:23:04,280 --> 00:23:09,000
Speaker 1: costly withdrawal from Afghanistan has basically only increased the political

383
00:23:09,119 --> 00:23:12,600
Speaker 1: risks of failing to deliver on that front and the

384
00:23:12,680 --> 00:23:16,439
Speaker 1: difficulties of getting it done because he's now open and

385
00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:20,440
Speaker 1: vulnerable to attacks over Afghanistan. You heard it yesterday, people

386
00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:25,080
Speaker 1: calling for impeachment, Lindsey Graham calling for impeachment of Joe Biden,

387
00:23:25,680 --> 00:23:27,879
Speaker 1: you know, and and we'll hear more of that in

388
00:23:27,920 --> 00:23:33,080
Speaker 1: the coming days. I think, Professor, are our allies rethinking

389
00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:37,159
Speaker 1: our commitment to them, and I have Taiwan specifically in mind,

390
00:23:39,160 --> 00:23:42,760
Speaker 1: so you know, I think that is going on, although Frankly, Teller,

391
00:23:42,840 --> 00:23:45,880
Speaker 1: it's mostly on my side of the Atlantic over here,

392
00:23:45,920 --> 00:23:50,120
Speaker 1: and I don't mean the UK, but also in Europe

393
00:23:50,560 --> 00:23:52,600
Speaker 1: there's a lot of people who are very piste off

394
00:23:52,680 --> 00:23:57,280
Speaker 1: about not being sufficiently consulted about the operations with respect

395
00:23:57,280 --> 00:24:01,200
Speaker 1: to the withdrawal. I hear much less of actually from

396
00:24:01,200 --> 00:24:04,359
Speaker 1: our allies in East Asia. So why is that the case.

397
00:24:04,800 --> 00:24:08,320
Speaker 1: I think it's because they know that the goal behind this,

398
00:24:08,600 --> 00:24:12,320
Speaker 1: at least the international goal, is to shift the focus

399
00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:16,200
Speaker 1: to East Asia, to China and more broadly, and that's

400
00:24:16,200 --> 00:24:19,040
Speaker 1: a concern on this side of the Atlantic on on,

401
00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:22,280
Speaker 1: you know, in the European theater, Peter, Are we actually

402
00:24:22,440 --> 00:24:25,520
Speaker 1: going to see the US remove involvement from that region

403
00:24:25,640 --> 00:24:28,159
Speaker 1: or are these drone attacks that we're seeing going to

404
00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:30,960
Speaker 1: be ongoing and then the need to put more personnel

405
00:24:31,080 --> 00:24:33,159
Speaker 1: on the ground in order to get intelligence. Then all

406
00:24:33,200 --> 00:24:35,080
Speaker 1: of a sudden, did we really get out in the

407
00:24:35,080 --> 00:24:39,760
Speaker 1: first place? Well, I mean, you know, who knows. But

408
00:24:39,880 --> 00:24:45,160
Speaker 1: I think we're gonna see now because of the terrorist

409
00:24:45,240 --> 00:24:49,240
Speaker 1: strike again that killed you know, US service um men

410
00:24:49,240 --> 00:24:53,200
Speaker 1: and women, We're going to see the Biden administration invest

411
00:24:53,400 --> 00:24:55,880
Speaker 1: more time and energy in this. I think they really

412
00:24:55,920 --> 00:24:58,879
Speaker 1: cannot afford to see this kind of thing happen. It

413
00:24:58,920 --> 00:25:01,960
Speaker 1: really can't happen on their watch. Whether or not it

414
00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:04,760
Speaker 1: can be done over the horizon, that is, with drones

415
00:25:04,840 --> 00:25:07,840
Speaker 1: and some special courses, I think that's the goal. I

416
00:25:07,960 --> 00:25:11,720
Speaker 1: do not think there is a huge push anywhere for

417
00:25:11,960 --> 00:25:15,600
Speaker 1: more kind of boots on the ground, big time with

418
00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:19,000
Speaker 1: nation building the United States. American people, when you look

419
00:25:19,000 --> 00:25:22,639
Speaker 1: at the polls, they're piste off about how the withdrawal

420
00:25:22,760 --> 00:25:25,560
Speaker 1: was handled, but they are not upset about getting out

421
00:25:25,560 --> 00:25:29,240
Speaker 1: of Afghanistan. Peter, Thank you so much. Peter, Trubois with

422
00:25:29,320 --> 00:25:33,760
Speaker 1: us the London School of Economics Professor of International Relations

423
00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:38,080
Speaker 1: that this is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening.

424
00:25:38,440 --> 00:25:41,760
Speaker 1: Join us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern

425
00:25:42,000 --> 00:25:46,040
Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from

426
00:25:46,119 --> 00:25:51,320
Speaker 1: six to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

427
00:25:51,520 --> 00:25:56,560
Speaker 1: and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

428
00:25:56,640 --> 00:26:00,440
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

429
00:26:00,560 --> 00:26:04,600
Speaker 1: the terminal. I'm Tom keane in. This is Bloomer