1 00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:09,680 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:12,200 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:16,160 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud 5 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:19,680 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. The Senate has 6 00:00:19,680 --> 00:00:22,720 Speaker 1: confirmed the youngest person nominated by President Trump to be 7 00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:25,919 Speaker 1: a federal Appeals Court judge, the thirty seven year old 8 00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:30,040 Speaker 1: Alison Jones Rushing once worked for the Alliance Defending Freedom, 9 00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:33,720 Speaker 1: a conservative Christian organization that is designated as an anti 10 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:37,640 Speaker 1: lgbt Q hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. 11 00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:40,560 Speaker 1: Joining me is Carl Tobias, professor at the University of 12 00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:44,480 Speaker 1: Richmond Law School. Carl She's only practiced law for nine 13 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:48,280 Speaker 1: years and has been co counsel on only four cases 14 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:51,720 Speaker 1: that went to verdict or judgment. Is she qualified to 15 00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:54,360 Speaker 1: sit on a circuit court that is just below the 16 00:00:54,400 --> 00:00:58,520 Speaker 1: Supreme Court? Well, that's a good question. There have been 17 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:02,480 Speaker 1: some other people who similarly situated who have served on 18 00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 1: the appeals courts. She points to her clerking for Justice 19 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:13,080 Speaker 1: Thomas Justice Corsage on the Tenth Circuit and Judge Sentel 20 00:01:13,160 --> 00:01:17,120 Speaker 1: on the d c Circuit and says that, uh supplements 21 00:01:17,160 --> 00:01:20,840 Speaker 1: her experience. And I think she's filed some fifty briefs 22 00:01:20,840 --> 00:01:25,399 Speaker 1: and appellate courts. Uh, so she has some experience. The 23 00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:27,679 Speaker 1: A b A likes to see twelve years of practice 24 00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:32,280 Speaker 1: experience when it makes its ratings. So what drew her 25 00:01:32,600 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 1: to the attention of the Trump administration to make her, 26 00:01:37,120 --> 00:01:41,520 Speaker 1: you know, eligible for one of these key spots. Well, 27 00:01:41,560 --> 00:01:44,920 Speaker 1: I think the Federalist Society and Leonard Leo, the executive 28 00:01:45,000 --> 00:01:49,480 Speaker 1: Vice president, who's the pre eminent advisor to the president 29 00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:54,000 Speaker 1: on these nominations. And so I think that's what put 30 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:57,280 Speaker 1: her on the radar, and I think that's what um 31 00:01:57,400 --> 00:02:02,160 Speaker 1: allowed her to be confirmed so quickly. She was opposed 32 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:06,040 Speaker 1: by a coalition of more than two hundred civil rights organizations. 33 00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:11,840 Speaker 1: They called her an ideological extremist who opposed same sex 34 00:02:12,080 --> 00:02:16,720 Speaker 1: marriage and remedies for discriminatory lending practices, among other things. 35 00:02:17,400 --> 00:02:21,919 Speaker 1: Was that addressed in her hearings, Not really, because her 36 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:25,120 Speaker 1: hearings were held I think after the Senate had recessed 37 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:29,560 Speaker 1: to go campaign in October. Uh, And so she wasn't 38 00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:33,079 Speaker 1: really wasn't questioned very rigorously, and most of the questions 39 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 1: actually came from Republicans like Senator Kennedy from Louisiana, and 40 00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:40,760 Speaker 1: he was concerned about her lack of life experience and 41 00:02:40,840 --> 00:02:43,800 Speaker 1: lack of practice experience, and he raised those concerns, but 42 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:46,440 Speaker 1: he voted for her list at all the Republicans, right, 43 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:49,040 Speaker 1: so all fifty three Republicans voted for her, while the 44 00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:52,760 Speaker 1: rest of the Senate voted against her. Why are these 45 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:57,680 Speaker 1: nominations being rushed through when there are only eleven circuit 46 00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:01,240 Speaker 1: court positions out of one six seven that are vacant. 47 00:03:01,639 --> 00:03:07,240 Speaker 1: Why they need to rush Well, the President has campaigned 48 00:03:07,320 --> 00:03:11,800 Speaker 1: on and made good on his campaign promise to uh 49 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:15,200 Speaker 1: fill the vacancies at the appellate level. They're one level 50 00:03:15,200 --> 00:03:18,040 Speaker 1: blows Supreme court. They're really the supreme courts in the 51 00:03:18,080 --> 00:03:22,000 Speaker 1: regions around the country because the Supreme Court here so 52 00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:26,520 Speaker 1: a few minutes, so few cases, uh, And so they 53 00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:29,840 Speaker 1: have accentuated that to the exclusion of everything else, really 54 00:03:30,320 --> 00:03:34,520 Speaker 1: including legislation. And we do have a hundred twenty nine 55 00:03:34,560 --> 00:03:39,400 Speaker 1: federal district court vacancies is just nearly but that just 56 00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:44,160 Speaker 1: reflects the incredible emphasis on the appeals courts because more 57 00:03:44,200 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 1: policies made there. The hot button issues are finally resolved 58 00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:52,440 Speaker 1: there around the country, and so that's being emphasized by 59 00:03:52,480 --> 00:03:56,320 Speaker 1: the White House and the Senate. The Senate confirmation of 60 00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:59,440 Speaker 1: Trump's thirty appeals court judges is more than any other 61 00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:04,560 Speaker 1: president two years into a term, and Mitch McConnell wants 62 00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:10,040 Speaker 1: to continue this rapid pace exactly. And this week we'll 63 00:04:10,040 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 1: have three more. There are two more that are going 64 00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:16,320 Speaker 1: to be uh, probably confirmed today and tomorrow for the 65 00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:18,960 Speaker 1: sixth Circuit. That will bring his total to thirty four. 66 00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:23,720 Speaker 1: And they're more in the wings, so um, they are 67 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:26,400 Speaker 1: moving in. It's conceivable this year there could be no 68 00:04:26,520 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 1: vacancies on the appeals courts. When was the last time 69 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:34,240 Speaker 1: that's happened. I think you have to go back decades actually, 70 00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:38,240 Speaker 1: uh to have that few, which is great for the 71 00:04:38,360 --> 00:04:44,159 Speaker 1: courts in terms of resolving appeals. The questions are, you 72 00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:48,640 Speaker 1: know these people will have life tenure and serve years 73 00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 1: and decades after the president has long left the White House. 74 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:57,000 Speaker 1: Democrats are taking a particularly hardstance on one of the 75 00:04:57,040 --> 00:05:02,200 Speaker 1: nominee's Chad Readler, based on his recent advocating against the 76 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:07,120 Speaker 1: Affordable Care Act, and Eric Murphy has argued against marriage equality. 77 00:05:07,800 --> 00:05:12,920 Speaker 1: Is President Trump nominating moderate conservatives or are they more 78 00:05:13,040 --> 00:05:18,960 Speaker 1: radical conservatives? Are they ideologues? Well, I think Democrats, at 79 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:21,839 Speaker 1: least most of them believe that a number are, and 80 00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:24,400 Speaker 1: there's a fair amount of data to show that in 81 00:05:24,520 --> 00:05:27,680 Speaker 1: terms of their positions on a number of issues at 82 00:05:27,760 --> 00:05:32,360 Speaker 1: least that they've argued as lawyers Republican responses. Of course, 83 00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:36,200 Speaker 1: they're just representing their clients, um. But I think it's 84 00:05:36,240 --> 00:05:40,599 Speaker 1: fair to say that they're very conservative, probably more conservative 85 00:05:40,600 --> 00:05:46,239 Speaker 1: than President Bush's nominees for the appellate bench um. And 86 00:05:46,320 --> 00:05:49,440 Speaker 1: so I think that's what concerns a number of people. 87 00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:53,719 Speaker 1: So would you say that they're less like Chief Justice 88 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:56,839 Speaker 1: John Roberts, who is more of a moderate, and more 89 00:05:56,960 --> 00:06:02,120 Speaker 1: like Justice Neil Gorsch, Well, I would say they're closer 90 00:06:02,200 --> 00:06:06,839 Speaker 1: to Justice Thomas and a number of the appellate judges 91 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:12,960 Speaker 1: were his clerks, and probably closer to Justice scalia Um 92 00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:16,560 Speaker 1: in terms of their views. But again they're not completely 93 00:06:16,839 --> 00:06:21,719 Speaker 1: uniform there conservative number of issues, especially the culture war 94 00:06:21,839 --> 00:06:28,480 Speaker 1: issues like abortion, freedom of religion, um, those kinds of questions. 95 00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:31,760 Speaker 1: In any of these cases, have any of the Republicans 96 00:06:31,960 --> 00:06:36,280 Speaker 1: broken ranks and voted against the nominations because they seem 97 00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:39,800 Speaker 1: to be sailing through. They are pretty much. A number 98 00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:43,200 Speaker 1: of them are party line votes. Uh. There were a 99 00:06:43,240 --> 00:06:48,839 Speaker 1: few moderate nominees, such as the person for Hawaii, and 100 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:53,360 Speaker 1: a number of Republicans voted against him, but that's about 101 00:06:53,440 --> 00:06:57,960 Speaker 1: the only one I can think of. In Senator Kennedy 102 00:06:58,160 --> 00:07:01,720 Speaker 1: was the sole person to asked a single no vote 103 00:07:02,400 --> 00:07:07,000 Speaker 1: on any of President Trump's judicial nominees. So that gives 104 00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:09,720 Speaker 1: you a sense of how few no votes there have 105 00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:12,480 Speaker 1: been on the Republican side. Are we at the point 106 00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:16,920 Speaker 1: yet where there are enough Trump appointees on the federal 107 00:07:16,960 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 1: appellate courts to make a difference to tip the balance. 108 00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:24,040 Speaker 1: Well probably not in some yes, if you count Republican 109 00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:29,560 Speaker 1: and Democratic appointee presidents. But what's critical, I think is 110 00:07:29,640 --> 00:07:36,320 Speaker 1: most of them are replacing Republican appointed uh judges, and 111 00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:39,200 Speaker 1: so it's not as much of a difference. So of 112 00:07:39,240 --> 00:07:42,880 Speaker 1: course you're having someone who's in her thirties or forties 113 00:07:42,920 --> 00:07:45,760 Speaker 1: as opposed to someone who's in sixties or seventies, and 114 00:07:45,840 --> 00:07:47,920 Speaker 1: so it's beginning to make a difference and will in 115 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:51,080 Speaker 1: the long run. All Right, Thanks so much, Carl, As always, 116 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:53,280 Speaker 1: that's Carl Tobias is a professor at the University of 117 00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 1: Richmond Law School. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. 118 00:07:59,720 --> 00:08:03,800 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 119 00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 1: and on bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Grosso. 120 00:08:08,280 --> 00:08:09,560 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg