Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunch. The results are in
Speaker 1: for the vice presidential debate and it didn't go well
Speaker 1: for the Democrats. Plus is there going to be another
Speaker 1: presidential debate? The Biden camp saying it has to be virtual?
Speaker 1: Trump saying not so fast. Plus where are we now
Speaker 1: in the third fourth whatever wave it is now of COVID.
Speaker 1: We'll get into that more coming up. Buck Sextons coding
Speaker 1: the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake,
Speaker 1: you're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Former CIA analysts. I can speak to three hours without
Speaker 1: a phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No welcome friends,
Speaker 1: Great to have you with me here on the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. And looks, let's all just take a little
Speaker 1: victory lap. Let's all just let it, let it sink
Speaker 1: in for a moment. Mike Pence gets an a great job,
Speaker 1: great job in the debate last night. Honestly, I thought
Speaker 1: substantially more effective than it even I had anticipated. And
Speaker 1: I thought he was going to be pretty good. But
Speaker 1: this was a reminder that Pence is an undervalued asset
Speaker 1: of the Trump administration, at least in many people's eyes.
Speaker 1: This guy has been a steady hand, competent, solid, but
Speaker 1: also gentlemanly, respectful. He's a great, a great yin Yang,
Speaker 1: a great contrast, you know, counterpart to Trump. Because of
Speaker 1: all this, and Kamala was, how do we put this
Speaker 1: gently a disaster a disaster. But that shouldn't surprise anyone.
Speaker 1: As I've been saying to you, she wasn't strong even
Speaker 1: in the Democrat primary at all. Nobody thought that she
Speaker 1: was doing a good job then. But so, how do
Speaker 1: you know that the Democrats are particularly worried about all us?
Speaker 1: How do you know that the Democrat Party doesn't feel
Speaker 1: like things went their way last night? Just by all
Speaker 1: the whining today, all the nonsense of the misdirection he
Speaker 1: was man explaining. They're saying that a lot vice presidential
Speaker 1: debates don't matter. Let's remember they're sexism in our politics.
Speaker 1: Voters aren't ready for an assertive woman, and time to
Speaker 1: change the debate format. These are talking points coming from
Speaker 1: Democrats in the media that roughly translate to our side
Speaker 1: got crushed last night. Let's just pretend that never happened. Now. Look,
Speaker 1: the polls are all still showing Biden ahead in a
Speaker 1: lot of swing states, and you know, the election were
Speaker 1: held today, the posters would have you believe it's likely
Speaker 1: Biden would win. I don't believe that personally. I think
Speaker 1: that they'll be wrong again, or they'll they'll all magically
Speaker 1: be within the margin of error, but always in the
Speaker 1: margin of error favoring Biden. That's what they like to do. Well,
Speaker 1: it's a you know, it's a it's a two point race,
Speaker 1: but everyone thinks Biden's up two points, and it's a
Speaker 1: two to three point margin of error. No, I don't
Speaker 1: see that the the vice presidential debate, as bad as
Speaker 1: it was for the Democrats, is not going to change
Speaker 1: the course of this election most likely. But this is
Speaker 1: that the on the other hand, also all about just
Speaker 1: those those small slices of the of the electorate, right,
Speaker 1: the voters out there who are thinking, Look, I just
Speaker 1: want and I don't say this with any with any
Speaker 1: disrespect or any judgment. I understand there are going to
Speaker 1: be people out there who are who are good folks,
Speaker 1: who are responsible and you know, worthwhile productive members of
Speaker 1: their community. Wherever we're talking about in Florida and Ohio
Speaker 1: and Michigan and New Hampshire and so on and so
Speaker 1: forth uh, and they're just saying, look, whoever's gonna bring
Speaker 1: back the economy the best. That's who I'm voting for.
Speaker 1: I don't care about anything else. I understand that I
Speaker 1: don't creating necessarily that's the way people should view politics,
Speaker 1: But I can understand how people would feel that way,
Speaker 1: and for that group, for those that are going into
Speaker 1: this looking for who would do a better job on
Speaker 1: issues of actual management of the United States government in
Speaker 1: the economy. I don't think you could have watched last
Speaker 1: night's debate and come away thinking anything other than so
Speaker 1: the Democrats are evasive, dishonest, and incompetent. That's really what
Speaker 1: you're getting. And there's been so much effort from the
Speaker 1: Democrat aligned media to try to convince people that that's
Speaker 1: not true, but you could see it last night. No,
Speaker 1: in fact, they want you to believe that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is terrible. He's basically hitler as vice president, is a stooge,
Speaker 1: and has no thoughts of his own, doesn't do any
Speaker 1: They say all these horrible things about him all the time.
Speaker 1: But when they can't be the ones who are just
Speaker 1: writing the narrative, when they can't be staring into the
Speaker 1: prompters on CNN and MSNBC doing the work of the
Speaker 1: DNC while pretending to be journalists. All the rest of
Speaker 1: us sit around and see what's really happening and realize
Speaker 1: that this is a weak Democrat ticket. Folks. It's weak,
Speaker 1: it is, and that has not always been the case.
Speaker 1: And I'm not judging that from what I think or like.
Speaker 1: It's what the American people want from an administration. These
Speaker 1: Democrats are not going to provide that. So they're trying
Speaker 1: to convince people there's something other than what they actually are.
Speaker 1: The biggest wins and we'll go through some of the
Speaker 1: specifics on the policies and the exchanges, and there were
Speaker 1: a lot of them, and they were worthwhile in this
Speaker 1: debate because there were fewer interruptions and the moderator wasn't
Speaker 1: trying to do an audition for NBC News because she
Speaker 1: was already at c SPAN. So what difference does it make.
Speaker 1: There were some good moments, but the best single thing,
Speaker 1: I mean, the one issue where you knew that they
Speaker 1: had to push and it didn't come from the moderator.
Speaker 1: It should be noted it came from Pence. He tied
Speaker 1: this up. He followed up. He made it very clear
Speaker 1: they will simply not tell you, Kamala Harris and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and the DNC will not allow you to know,
Speaker 1: will not make a claim on either side of whether
Speaker 1: they will pack the Supreme Court. And that's just really
Speaker 1: all you have to know. Here's Kamala trying to dance
Speaker 1: around it, trying to avoid addressing the issue. Play clip nine. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's talk about packing the court. Then let's talk about
Speaker 1: the pack. Yeah, I'm about to So the Trump Pence
Speaker 1: administration has been because I sit on the Senate Judiciary Committee,
Speaker 1: Sessan as you mentioned, and I've witnessed the appointments for
Speaker 1: lifetime appointments to the federal courts, district courts, Courts of Appeal,
Speaker 1: people who are surely ideological, people who have been reviewed
Speaker 1: by legal professional organizations and found who have been did
Speaker 1: not competent, are substandard. And do you know that if
Speaker 1: the fifty people who President Trump appointed to the Court
Speaker 1: of Appeals for lifetime appointments not one as black, this
Speaker 1: is what they've been doing. You want to talk about
Speaker 1: packing a court, Let's have that discussion. That's amazing. People
Speaker 1: should listen to that answer. On a vice presidential debate
Speaker 1: stage for years to come about what you don't want
Speaker 1: to do as a politician. Pretend that you're being earnest,
Speaker 1: pretend that you're being forthcoming, and then for everyone to see,
Speaker 1: show them that you're actually just completely full of it.
Speaker 1: Let's let's have that conversation. You were asked a question.
Speaker 1: You're not asked a question as to whether you would
Speaker 1: like to have the conversation. You were asked yes or no.
Speaker 1: Would your administration or the administration you'd be a part
Speaker 1: of as the vice president although really should probably be
Speaker 1: the guy I mean, sorry, the gal running things? What
Speaker 1: do you think would you do? This? Wouldn't give an answer,
Speaker 1: They will not answer. How can you trust a presidential
Speaker 1: ticket that are an issue as massive as packing the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court, which people brought up until now, even on
Speaker 1: the left, as you know, FDR was pregating to do this,
Speaker 1: and that would have been really norm busting and tyrannical
Speaker 1: and undoing our system and changing the balance of powers
Speaker 1: and everything else. How can you get away with not
Speaker 1: answering that question. There's there's no reason other than they
Speaker 1: don't want to tell their base they won't up end
Speaker 1: this system and remake it in the image of the
Speaker 1: radical left, and they definitely don't want to tell independent
Speaker 1: swing state voters, yeah, we're full of it. We actually
Speaker 1: will do whatever we have to do in the pursuit
Speaker 1: of power, or whatever we have to do, we will do.
Speaker 1: And that doesn't sit well with folks, especially when you've
Speaker 1: had years now of Democrats saying that Trump is undermining
Speaker 1: or sacred institutions they are trying to remake, to destroy
Speaker 1: and then remake our sacred institutions, by the way, not
Speaker 1: that they're really sacred either. I don't even like that term.
Speaker 1: But there was that evasion, and then there were other things,
Speaker 1: the lies that came out. Pence squarely for anyone who
Speaker 1: is not utterly delusional, last night, Vice President Pence destroyed
Speaker 1: the lie that Donald Trump said that there were good
Speaker 1: people on both sides and also pointed out that this
Speaker 1: is a man who who has Jewish grandchildren, but the
Speaker 1: left keeps calling him a neo Nazi. They think that
Speaker 1: that's in any way fair or sensible or are acceptable,
Speaker 1: and it's not. I mean, they're disgusting, they are disgusting,
Speaker 1: but that's what they're doing. And I thought Pence was
Speaker 1: excellent on that issue. I mean, he crushed the vile
Speaker 1: lie about Trump Charlottesville comment once and for all for
Speaker 1: anyone who's not suffering from stage five Trump derangement syndrome.
Speaker 1: And I wish the President had been able to lay
Speaker 1: into it when he was going up against Biden the
Speaker 1: last time around. But at least Pence got to it
Speaker 1: last night. We also saw what I've been saying all along,
Speaker 1: and it's just objective. It's just obvious at this point.
Speaker 1: It's something that you would pick up on very quickly.
Speaker 1: Commers is just not very likable. She is a product
Speaker 1: of California machine politics. She's never had to appeal to
Speaker 1: people who aren't solid left wing Democrats. She's never had
Speaker 1: to appeal to moderates or swing voters. She just figured
Speaker 1: out who the power players were in some ways that
Speaker 1: were also unethical that no one even brings up anymore.
Speaker 1: But she figures out who the power players were and
Speaker 1: ensconced herself in the Democrat apparatus of California and just
Speaker 1: sort of worked her worked her way up by befriending
Speaker 1: the right people, making the right allies, and running in
Speaker 1: the safest of safe places to be a left wing Democrat,
Speaker 1: particularly one who's a minority female. Because as we know diversity,
Speaker 1: they don't just say it's a strength on the left anymore.
Speaker 1: Diversity is a requirement for many things. California just made
Speaker 1: diversity meaning racial and ethnic diversity, a requirement for company
Speaker 1: boards that are set up in California. You have to
Speaker 1: have at least one minority board member in California. Now,
Speaker 1: so Kamala comes from that left wing machinery of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. She's never had to be in a really
Speaker 1: tough race. She's never had to convince people that don't
Speaker 1: agree with every poll tested political consultant created phrase that
Speaker 1: comes out of her mouth. And it was there for
Speaker 1: all to see last night, and no one could cover
Speaker 1: for her. There was no one to bail her out.
Speaker 1: And she wasn't very nice either. She's just not that likable. Now.
Speaker 1: Maybe as a person one on one, I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't know. I've never met the lady. Maybe she's fine.
Speaker 1: I have no idea. But we're talking about her political persona.
Speaker 1: We're talking about the way that she is perceived by
Speaker 1: those who were supposed to vote for her to put
Speaker 1: her in a position of power and leadership and truth
Speaker 1: is she kind of makes Hillary look likable hollow. It
Speaker 1: really thinks that people thought that Hillary was about as
Speaker 1: untakable unlikable as one could be. But no, I think
Speaker 1: Kamala actually was in some ways even more so, just
Speaker 1: because she hasn't even had to be through the battles,
Speaker 1: She hasn't even really had to be through the political fights.
Speaker 1: Feels like it was all kind of handed to this person.
Speaker 1: And now she's just been handed the vice presidency, so
Speaker 1: she could be handed the presidency. You're like, what what
Speaker 1: if she done to learn any of this? Why? It
Speaker 1: was a very kind of interchangeable prosecutor and then made
Speaker 1: the right friends and the Democrat power circles and became
Speaker 1: a state attorney general and ran for Senate and now
Speaker 1: she can be vice president based on what what's her
Speaker 1: big policy is? Now? Perhaps we're digging in too much
Speaker 1: on the holes in Kamala's record or just the lack
Speaker 1: of an impressive record, but also, she was a representative
Speaker 1: of the Biden ticket last night. And when you allow
Speaker 1: somebody to represent Joe Biden's political campaign and you actually
Speaker 1: forced them to answer some questions or at least pose
Speaker 1: real questions to them, it's all very flimsy. It all
Speaker 1: falls apart very rapidly, and that's what you saw on
Speaker 1: that stage. One of my favorites is the issue of fracking,
Speaker 1: because you know, we're fracking. Really, you don't want to
Speaker 1: talk about banning fracking in places like Pennsylvania. Not good,
Speaker 1: not a good, not a good move. So what do
Speaker 1: the Democrats do when they come up against a difficult
Speaker 1: position that they've taken in the past, now when they
Speaker 1: can present it to the full view of the American people. Oh,
Speaker 1: we'll get into that. You're in the Freedom Heart. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Joe Biden will
Speaker 1: not raise taxes on anyone who makes less than four
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars a year. He has been very clear
Speaker 1: about that. Joe Biden will not end fracking. He has
Speaker 1: been very clear about that. Joe Biden is the one who,
Speaker 1: during the Great Recession, was responsible for the Recovery Act. Okay,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden will not band fracking. And she was very
Speaker 1: upset with the even the suggestion that that was not
Speaker 1: the case, that the Harris Biden team would ever even
Speaker 1: even consider such a thing. Isn't that so interesting because
Speaker 1: here's m Kamala was saying during her run, which did
Speaker 1: not go very well for the Democrat nomination Play twelve practice,
Speaker 1: there's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking. So yeah,
Speaker 1: starting there's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking.
Speaker 1: So now I understand this is where people would jump in,
Speaker 1: who are the little the Kamala handlers and you know,
Speaker 1: spin room people and everything else, say well, she's now
Speaker 1: a part of a different ticket, but there's an even
Speaker 1: bigger problem, right, So she clearly when it was the
Speaker 1: Democrat primary, was gonna bean fracking. And for those that
Speaker 1: are who don't know this, I think it's worth everyone
Speaker 1: understanding that fracking is a huge, a huge component now
Speaker 1: of our energy situation. That fracking is something that's done
Speaker 1: routinely so that people have access, so that the companies
Speaker 1: that are taking the stuff up out of the ground
Speaker 1: are able to create this unbelievable American energy superpower that
Speaker 1: we've become in the last ten or fifteen years. So
Speaker 1: anyone who's saying band fracking after stand this is big.
Speaker 1: Hydraulic fracking is used. It's where you take a process
Speaker 1: of injecting liquid water and sand, tiny amount of lubricants
Speaker 1: into shale formations that creates small fractures allowing the extraction
Speaker 1: of oil and natural gas from sites where the oil
Speaker 1: derec and the well have been removed. More than ninety
Speaker 1: percent of American oil and gas wells are currently hydraulically fractured.
Speaker 1: Of oil and natural gas is involved fracking. You're gonna
Speaker 1: ban fracking. This is what it's It's actually a really
Speaker 1: big deal. You're gonna ban fracking. You're telling people to
Speaker 1: do this. Oh okay. Kamala Harris says, I wouldn't do that,
Speaker 1: and now she's on Biden's tickets, so maybe she What
Speaker 1: was Biden saying about this before? Too? Play one, No more,
Speaker 1: no new fracking. We are we argue to get rid
Speaker 1: of fossil fuels. What would there be any place for
Speaker 1: fossil fuels, including coal and tracking in a Biden administration. No,
Speaker 1: we would, we would work it out. We would make
Speaker 1: sure it's eliminated. I guarantee, I guarantee We're gonna fossil
Speaker 1: fuel and no ability for the oil industry to continue
Speaker 1: to drill period ends Number one. Three consecutive American presidents
Speaker 1: have enjoyed stints of explosive economic growth due to a
Speaker 1: boom in oil and natural gas production. As president, would
Speaker 1: you be willing to sacrifice some of that growth, even
Speaker 1: knowing potentially that it could displace thousands, maybe hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of blue collar workers, in the interest of transitioning
Speaker 1: to that greener economy. Answers Yes, Oh, but he wouldn't
Speaker 1: ban fracking. Kamala says, these people are lying to you,
Speaker 1: my friends, and you know it, and I hope all
Speaker 1: the American people know it. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Busson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. There's certainly
Speaker 1: more policy to discuss, and I want to do that
Speaker 1: with you today from the takeaways from this debate, But first,
Speaker 1: can we just have some fun with the O. Kamala
Speaker 1: is wonderful media, She's really Her core constituency is the
Speaker 1: editorial page of the New York Times. And if you're
Speaker 1: wondering who are the biggest all the supporters, it's people
Speaker 1: who work for establishment media, people who are big producers
Speaker 1: in Hollywood, left wing hedge fund managers. They love Kamala.
Speaker 1: She's great. She's great, but just normal Americans, and I'm
Speaker 1: talking about Democrats now they're like, nah, not so much, sorry,
Speaker 1: not into it. And the media now has to do
Speaker 1: this whole act where they come up with explanations for
Speaker 1: why it was such a tremendously lackluster performance last night.
Speaker 1: Here is fake Tapper explaining, you know, try try to
Speaker 1: come up with a ration now for why Kamala got crushed,
Speaker 1: I mean straight up trounced in that debate play too.
Speaker 1: I wonder if a woman candidate feels like she can't
Speaker 1: push as much or steamroll as much as say Mike
Speaker 1: Pence can, for fear of seeming and offending some segment
Speaker 1: of the electorate. I'm not saying that it should be
Speaker 1: that way, but I'm wondering if it is that way. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm just asking questions, like maybe it's sexism. I'm just
Speaker 1: asking questions though, you know, just just asking questions, just
Speaker 1: just floating an idea, just putting out some analysis. I'm
Speaker 1: a straight reporter, man, I'm I don't do opinion. You
Speaker 1: don't do clean up on Aisle seven for colmless disastrous performance,
Speaker 1: because that's what that sounds like. Oh, she can't be
Speaker 1: assortive enough. She was nasty to him to Pence at
Speaker 1: different parts during the debate, and I think she thought,
Speaker 1: because of what we had seen with President Trump, that
Speaker 1: maybe she'd be able to goad Pence into the same
Speaker 1: kind of look. I thought Trump was a little too
Speaker 1: aggressive in some parts of last debate. You know that
Speaker 1: I've said that where it was just counterproductive for him,
Speaker 1: and that's what I'm really focused on. But now you
Speaker 1: look at the way that the media is trying to
Speaker 1: convince people that there was sexism involved here or something
Speaker 1: like that. It's just it's completely The problem is when
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris is asked, are you're gonna ban fracking? She
Speaker 1: says absolutely not, when both her and Joe Biden been like, yeah,
Speaker 1: fracking is evil, get rid of it on the campaign
Speaker 1: trail in this election. That's the problem. The problem is
Speaker 1: she repeats the Charlottesville lie and is so sanctimonious and
Speaker 1: smug while she does it, and you look at her,
Speaker 1: you go, what is this. We all have access to
Speaker 1: the transcript, it's online, you can watch the video of
Speaker 1: that press conference, and you can also just think through
Speaker 1: because they didn't really believe the president of the United States,
Speaker 1: who wants to stay president get reelected as president, that
Speaker 1: he's gonna openly praise neo Nazi. Of course not. They
Speaker 1: don't really think he did that. They just think they
Speaker 1: can get away with saying he did that, which has
Speaker 1: been the game, the game all along. Here, MSNBC had
Speaker 1: a comment you know, there's more of this, of the
Speaker 1: sexism thing. MSNBC had a commentator who there's so many
Speaker 1: of them, but he's got to hear some of It's
Speaker 1: kind of fun to hear that. Just I don't know
Speaker 1: what to do because no, no serious person could watch
Speaker 1: that debate and they get any other than well, Kamala
Speaker 1: was outclassed on presentation and on policy. That's it. Everything
Speaker 1: else is kind of a waste. Everything else is make
Speaker 1: believe time. So let's get into some of that make
Speaker 1: believe time. Here's someone on MSNBC. You never heard of
Speaker 1: this person before played twenty nine. The things had jumped
Speaker 1: out for me were the way that he seemed extremely
Speaker 1: misogynistically dismissive of the other two women who were there
Speaker 1: in conversation with him. He talked all over the moderator
Speaker 1: like she didn't even matter, and then certainly had you know,
Speaker 1: a bit of disregard for Kamala Harris and just kept
Speaker 1: on going, even with a calm tone. And I think that,
Speaker 1: you know, he showed himself out to be in a
Speaker 1: very evangelical way. I'd say, someone who is dismissive in
Speaker 1: disregards women. I didn't like that tone and tenor. I
Speaker 1: also didn't like the fact that he just lies through
Speaker 1: his teeth. And the guy is responsible for two hundred
Speaker 1: and eleven thousand I think deaths due to COVID. He's
Speaker 1: in charge of the committee, he's responsible for. I mean,
Speaker 1: how much stupid can you fit into one SoundBite is
Speaker 1: a fair question you could ask me right now. First
Speaker 1: of all, the misogy that she claims was there. Vice
Speaker 1: President Pennce I thought was very gracious and quite respectful
Speaker 1: of Kamalaris. He started out the debate by saying, honored
Speaker 1: to be here on the stage with you. He very
Speaker 1: clearly established a level of respect that I don't think
Speaker 1: was always reciprocated from Kamala with all the faces and
Speaker 1: the you know, the person of the lips and the
Speaker 1: rolling of the eyes and all the things that she
Speaker 1: was doing when he's talking. I mean that may play
Speaker 1: well with the MSNBC audience. But for people who really
Speaker 1: want to know what these individuals who are who are
Speaker 1: vying for a very consequential role, very consequential job, they
Speaker 1: don't like those kinds of little games. And but then
Speaker 1: of course this commentator at the end says that he's
Speaker 1: responsible for two hundred thousand deaths. Does anyone think does
Speaker 1: anyone think that with a Bye administration? I just want
Speaker 1: to how many deaths would we have with a Biden administration?
Speaker 1: I would like to I'd like to know what the
Speaker 1: Biden supporters think. Ten thousand, twenty thousand, is that really
Speaker 1: what they're going to claim we're gonna have. If that
Speaker 1: were true, we would have by far, we'd have a
Speaker 1: lower death we'd have a lower death rate per capita
Speaker 1: population than than any any country in the world that
Speaker 1: has actually been hit by this thing that's over. You know,
Speaker 1: ten million people. We got three hundred and fifty million
Speaker 1: people in this country. They have twenty thousand dead in Argentina.
Speaker 1: So or three on thirty million people in this country,
Speaker 1: I should say, although how many legals there are is
Speaker 1: still an open question. Uh, they're they're living in a fantasyland.
Speaker 1: That's not surprising. I suppose Oh, speaking of fantasyland, that's
Speaker 1: a perfect that's a perfect transition point here to Meeka,
Speaker 1: who just hates our president, just hates them, who turns
Speaker 1: on the TV in the morning, goes you know, I
Speaker 1: really need to know what Mika Brzinsky thinks of something.
Speaker 1: From her deep expertise of having her hair and makeup
Speaker 1: done and reading off a prompter for many years, I
Speaker 1: really need to hear what she thinks. I just wonder
Speaker 1: about that same thing with Joe Scarborough, by the way,
Speaker 1: But I'm curious. I kind of want to meet the
Speaker 1: person who finds Mika insightful or Joe for that matter.
Speaker 1: But here she is living in a truly alternative universe.
Speaker 1: But what else you gonna do. You're a flack, You're
Speaker 1: a hack. You're there to do a job, which is
Speaker 1: to promote the Democrat candidate. Here is Mika. Oh. I
Speaker 1: thought Kamala Harris was fabulous, and she was disciplined, She
Speaker 1: was strong. She kept a fine balance in terms of tone,
Speaker 1: which you know, would be a challenge for any woman
Speaker 1: debuting on the national stage like that as a vice
Speaker 1: presidential candidate. She was reality versus of whatever was happening
Speaker 1: on the other side of the stage, and she really
Speaker 1: used every every skill in her toolbox to deliver a clear,
Speaker 1: almost you know, near perfect performance. She was right on
Speaker 1: spot on a near perfect performance. This is awesome. You
Speaker 1: know why I made you listen to this. I mean
Speaker 1: there's a reason for it, not not just because I
Speaker 1: find it amusing, although that's a big, a big part
Speaker 1: of it. That what she just gave you is what
Speaker 1: the lib hack media. That that's a perfect You could
Speaker 1: use that as an exemplar. That would be the the
Speaker 1: boiler plate, the template of what you say after debate
Speaker 1: with a Democrat involved, where you're just going to say
Speaker 1: the same thing about them no matter what, because you
Speaker 1: don't care, because you are a cheerleader for them. You
Speaker 1: are a booster. You are rooting for and actively trying
Speaker 1: to help them win. This is this is what you
Speaker 1: would have. This is what you would say if you
Speaker 1: had seen the debate and you walked on set in
Speaker 1: the morning. You didn't even watched a minute of it,
Speaker 1: but you know you're a Democrat, you know you're a
Speaker 1: phony in a fraud, and you got to support the
Speaker 1: democrat cannedy no matter what. So that's it. Oh, she
Speaker 1: was fabulous discipline, strong says. He says, there's not anybody
Speaker 1: in the day what about her not answering critical questions
Speaker 1: and really not answering them. I mean it was clear
Speaker 1: that she was like, nah, I'm just not going to answer. Sorry,
Speaker 1: oh okay. There was there was nothing about her performance
Speaker 1: that was fabulous, and there was certainly no reasonable human being,
Speaker 1: whoever reasonable is the caveat There no reasonable human being
Speaker 1: who saw that and thought, you know what, Kamala was perfect.
Speaker 1: Kamala is perfect. Yeah, so perfect that Democrat voters in
Speaker 1: the primary were like, we have no interest in this
Speaker 1: person whatsoever, but we appreciate that the New York Times,
Speaker 1: the Washington Post have tried to voice her upon us. Look,
Speaker 1: I do believe that for a out of the journos,
Speaker 1: they have a nostalgia, they have a PTSD from Trump.
Speaker 1: They have post traumatic actually it should be p tt
Speaker 1: D post traumatic Trump syndrome or disordered post traumatic Trump disorder.
Speaker 1: That's what they've got. They can't adjust to this new world,
Speaker 1: they can't deal with this new world. And they also
Speaker 1: have this crippling nostalgia for Obama. And I think our media,
Speaker 1: which is diversely obsessed and deeply superficial. I mean, our
Speaker 1: national news media is full of vein, really a bunch
Speaker 1: of vein self loving but secretly self loathing idiots. I
Speaker 1: think that they see some similarities in background, in presentation,
Speaker 1: in storyline between Obama and Kamala, and that for them
Speaker 1: is enough. That for them is all that is necessary. Right.
Speaker 1: They think that they can maybe get back to the
Speaker 1: great old days, the eight years of the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: and so they add her to Biden and what do
Speaker 1: you have? Obama two point zero, a third term of
Speaker 1: the glorious Obama administration. That's to me how we got
Speaker 1: to this point because on skill, on the electoral map,
Speaker 1: on any of these other political considerations, you can't look
Speaker 1: at Kamala and think that this is really the best
Speaker 1: they could come up with. Doesn't make any sense. You know,
Speaker 1: if she were from Ohio, if she were the senator
Speaker 1: from Michigan, you know, I would think that there's a
Speaker 1: distinct possibility. But nope, it's because they want Obama term two.
Speaker 1: That's what they're going for. You're in the Freedom hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. I thought
Speaker 1: that wasn't even a contest. Last night, she was terrible
Speaker 1: she was I don't think you could get worse and
Speaker 1: totally unlikable, and she is. She's a communist. She's left
Speaker 1: to Bernie. She's rated left to Bernie by everybody. She's
Speaker 1: a communist. We're gonna have a communist and she's going
Speaker 1: to be, in my opinion, within a month. Look, I
Speaker 1: stood next to Joe and I looked at Joe, and
Speaker 1: Joe's not lasting two months as president. Okay, that's my opinion.
Speaker 1: The president. Oh man, he's calling her a communist. He's like,
Speaker 1: Joe's not gonna last two months. This is what I
Speaker 1: love this guy. This is this is when he's really
Speaker 1: it's most entertaining when he just decided to let it rip.
Speaker 1: But understand who he's fighting against. Understand that the other
Speaker 1: side doesn't even do this stuff. In Jess. I mean,
Speaker 1: they'll say the most crazy, untrue, absurd stuff imaginable, and
Speaker 1: if it works, it works. They don't care at all.
Speaker 1: Here's Steve Schmidt, the dumbest political analyst on TV. Not
Speaker 1: surprising guy ran John McCain's campaign into the ground so
Speaker 1: that John McCain could get absolutely crushed crushed by Barack Obama,
Speaker 1: not even close. And it was part of the picking
Speaker 1: Sarah Palin genius decision. So here's Steve Schmidt. He's not
Speaker 1: trying to be funny, he's just crazy. The thing is,
Speaker 1: sometimes these lib commentators will say something that you go, well,
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe they're trying to get a rise out
Speaker 1: of us, or they're being hyperbolic on purpose. No, they're
Speaker 1: actually just nuts. They're they're not normal. There's something something
Speaker 1: deeply wrong with them. And here is a Threeve Schmidt
Speaker 1: played twenty eight and not for nothing. I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't think it's ever a good sign when a fly
Speaker 1: plans on your head for two minutes. You know, that's
Speaker 1: a that's a sign all through history of sin and
Speaker 1: historically biblically. Maybe you wouldn't normally say this after you
Speaker 1: wouldn't it's only safe to say this, sorry after midnight.
Speaker 1: But you know, a fly, he who commands the fly
Speaker 1: has always been seen historically the mark of the devil.
Speaker 1: Hugh commands a fly, mark of the devil. I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: I will, Okay, what's here talking about. If you didn't
Speaker 1: see the debate, there was about a ninety second or
Speaker 1: so period where a common house fly, I guess you'd
Speaker 1: say I think that's what it was landed and Vice
Speaker 1: President Pence's hair, and because his hair is silver, it
Speaker 1: was noticeable, but it flew away. It wasn't a big deal.
Speaker 1: It was a little distracting for a second. You got
Speaker 1: one of the chances of this. I was just glad
Speaker 1: that it didn't stay there the whole time. But you know,
Speaker 1: Steve Schmidt, I mean, this is what people. They're grasping, folks,
Speaker 1: and they're grasping at straws. They got nothing. There was
Speaker 1: nothing to take from last night's debate that was good
Speaker 1: for the Democrats. And as we're in the final few
Speaker 1: weeks here before well, I know, Americans are already voting
Speaker 1: in some places, but before all of us have to
Speaker 1: cast our votes, except for the Democrat election fraudsters who
Speaker 1: are gonna send in ballots late or figure out where
Speaker 1: they need a little more help. And all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: some of those you know, oh, because that would never happen. Sure, yeah, anyone,
Speaker 1: anyone really believe that. But they're they're only able to
Speaker 1: win by lying about what they want to do. You know,
Speaker 1: Democrats have really abused the word lie a lot. They'll
Speaker 1: say that Trump lies when he says that you know,
Speaker 1: he's the best president ever. That's not a lie. I mean,
Speaker 1: you might think that's not a true thing to say,
Speaker 1: but it's not a lie, or it's not an accurate
Speaker 1: thing to say. But they abuse words, and lying is
Speaker 1: one of them. They can't be honest with the American
Speaker 1: people about what they want to do. Right if Trump
Speaker 1: says that he's going to build a wall, and he
Speaker 1: comes into office as he has and it's trying to
Speaker 1: build a wall and keeps getting stopped and stopped, it
Speaker 1: wasn't a lie what he said, I'm going to build
Speaker 1: a wall. That was his plan. They just got in
Speaker 1: the way of the plan, but he did try to
Speaker 1: execute on it. Democrats are lying to you. They're lying
Speaker 1: to the American people because they don't even want to
Speaker 1: do the things that they say they want to and
Speaker 1: they won't do things that they say they will. So
Speaker 1: that's a pretty big difference. And the President points that
Speaker 1: out call play twenty three. He gets up and he says,
Speaker 1: we're not fraking, we're not fracking. He was fraking for
Speaker 1: six months. He was fraking. He was raising his very
Speaker 1: thin hand and he was fracking. And now all of
Speaker 1: a sudden he's not tracking. We'll tell the Pennsylvania people
Speaker 1: that you're going it's ridiculous. He said, he's not frakking,
Speaker 1: That's all he said. And then all of a sudden
Speaker 1: he goes to a franking motor. How about her? She
Speaker 1: committed her life to it, and all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: she's a fracker. She's a big fracker. They're going to
Speaker 1: stop fraking the minute they get into office. They're lying
Speaker 1: to everybody. They're lying about so many different things. It's true,
Speaker 1: but they can't win unless they lie. Trump I'm not
Speaker 1: talking about his record. When Trump says what he stands for,
Speaker 1: what he wants to do, we've seen for four years
Speaker 1: he does stand for those things, and does try to
Speaker 1: accomplish those things, and in some cases has delivered on
Speaker 1: some major areas. He also does not get enough credit
Speaker 1: for not getting us involved in a pointless war, because
Speaker 1: you know, for my young adult life, for my twenties
Speaker 1: and into my thirties, we just we couldn't stop getting
Speaker 1: drawn deeper into one war or into another war. So
Speaker 1: we're talking about foreign policy more in the next hour.
Speaker 1: But the president deserves a lot of credit for that.
Speaker 1: Doesn't get any of it from the media at all,
Speaker 1: Kamalin Biden, meanwhile, get away with lying constantly. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the Bust and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. What about the Green New Deal, folks,
Speaker 1: I don't have the big idea that the Democrats rolled
Speaker 1: out before COVID that we spend all this time talking
Speaker 1: about it and it became something that you could expect
Speaker 1: to be asked whether whether climate change was an existential threat.
Speaker 1: That's a fancy sounding way. I mean, that's a pseudoscientific
Speaker 1: way of asking if you don't do what we want
Speaker 1: you to do on climate change. You understand that everyone's
Speaker 1: gonna die, right, You understand we're all gonna die from
Speaker 1: climate change. We are all gonna die, as I like
Speaker 1: to remind everybody, it's important to know that. But we're
Speaker 1: all gonna die from climate change. This is insane. This
Speaker 1: is a belief for crazy people. But they really think it.
Speaker 1: They really think that unless you know, California reduces its
Speaker 1: carbon emissions by I don't know, twenty percent or something,
Speaker 1: or they change it all, it doesn't matter unless California
Speaker 1: and start living greener lives, and we give the federal
Speaker 1: government more control over industry. We're all gonna die from
Speaker 1: climate change. So I think it's it's important for us
Speaker 1: to understand just how they frame the issue normally, Like
Speaker 1: what they say when they talk about climate change, what
Speaker 1: are they claiming the downside is? And then beyond that,
Speaker 1: why would they walk away from it now? I mean,
Speaker 1: if they've established that it's an existential threat, if I
Speaker 1: told you that, I thought there was something that was
Speaker 1: truly capable of wiping out the human race, And I
Speaker 1: really believe that anytime that issue came up, I would say,
Speaker 1: whatever we have to do to address this, we have
Speaker 1: to do it without fail. Because what could be more
Speaker 1: important than the continuation of our species? I think it's
Speaker 1: very hard to find, right, So they they take it
Speaker 1: to that level with the rhetoric, they say it's an
Speaker 1: And they even asked Mike penns this last night the
Speaker 1: Journal or whatever name was, and I don't remember who cares,
Speaker 1: totally replaceable with a thousand other kind of boring journals,
Speaker 1: but they ask, as climate change an existential threat? And
Speaker 1: sure enough, Mike Pats just kind of said, look, you know,
Speaker 1: there's some things we need to do. The climate's always changing.
Speaker 1: I like that by all you have to do. This
Speaker 1: is the response when someone says, do you believe in
Speaker 1: climate change? You just found climate's always changing. It took
Speaker 1: us a while to get to something, but it's true.
Speaker 1: It does not concede what they're looking for you to
Speaker 1: really concede, which is you're going to do what we
Speaker 1: say about the climate right. No, just like, yeah, the
Speaker 1: climate change is sure, it does and it drives libs nuts,
Speaker 1: which is the best part, which is really one of
Speaker 1: the biggest reasons that I think it's so clear that
Speaker 1: everybody should support Donald Trump if nothing else, and there's
Speaker 1: a lot of other stuff, but just for the way
Speaker 1: that it would trigger libs alone, getting Donald Trump four
Speaker 1: more years, to me, feels like a great idea, just
Speaker 1: for the way that it would make them completely lose
Speaker 1: their minds, their heads would explode. It's worth it. It's
Speaker 1: worth it. So then there's all these other issues. But
Speaker 1: on the Green New Deal, Mike Pray Mike Pence pointed
Speaker 1: this out, they're playing another game here where they're saying
Speaker 1: that Biden's plan is not the Green New Deal. But
Speaker 1: he also said that it's greatly influenced by the Green
Speaker 1: New Deal. Well why not just have it be the
Speaker 1: Green New Deal talking about an existential threat? Right? The
Speaker 1: Journal last night even asked about the existential nature of
Speaker 1: climate change. Pence pointed this one out, and I have
Speaker 1: to say he was quite right in doing so. Play eight.
Speaker 1: And with regard to banning Franking, I just recommend that
Speaker 1: people look at the record. You yourself said repeatedly that
Speaker 1: you would bann franking. You were the first Senate co
Speaker 1: sponsor of the Green New Deal. And while Joe Biden
Speaker 1: denied the Green New Deal, Susan, thank you for pointing
Speaker 1: out the Green New Deal is on their campaign website.
Speaker 1: And as USA Today said, it's essentially the same plan
Speaker 1: as you co sponsored with AOC when she submitted it
Speaker 1: in the Senate. And you just heard the senators say
Speaker 1: that she's going to resubmit America to the Paris Climate Accord. Look,
Speaker 1: the American people have always cherished our environment, will continue
Speaker 1: to cherish, and we've made great progress reducing CO two
Speaker 1: emissions through American innovation and the development of natural guests
Speaker 1: through fracking. We don't need a massive two trillion dollar
Speaker 1: Green New Deal. That would impose all new mandates on
Speaker 1: American businesses and American families. Of course we don't need that.
Speaker 1: But the Democrat left is psychotic about climate change. It's
Speaker 1: their religion replacement. It's the religion for people who think
Speaker 1: they're too smart for religion. That's what climate change is.
Speaker 1: It's a it's a belief about existential nature, right, it's
Speaker 1: it's a belief about why we're here and the end
Speaker 1: of days, and it has and then you get more
Speaker 1: into it, you know, paying for indulgences with the carbon offsets.
Speaker 1: And it is completely set up in a way that
Speaker 1: it's an analog of actual belief in a creator and
Speaker 1: god of a religious belief, except the god is Earth
Speaker 1: right the planet. It's like as so in that sense,
Speaker 1: it's a more early stage or primitive religion where it's
Speaker 1: Earth worship. That's what you actually have with the climate
Speaker 1: change believe But they think it's all science. Isn't that fascinating?
Speaker 1: They believe it's a deeply a deeply scientific and sophisticated
Speaker 1: belief system. But really at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: it's because why are we all here? Oh? Oh, we
Speaker 1: exist to save the planet. And the way we're going
Speaker 1: to save the planet is by making sure that you
Speaker 1: can't have a plastic grocery bag. No, you have to
Speaker 1: have one of those dumbass paper bags that will have
Speaker 1: a hole in it when you're trying to actually carry
Speaker 1: some milk and eggs back to your home. That's how
Speaker 1: we're going to save the planet. These petty idiots think
Speaker 1: that that's really true. They think that, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: it's it was the landfills are filling up too fast,
Speaker 1: and it's we're choking all the sea life, and the
Speaker 1: CO two is all over all over the air. CO
Speaker 1: two is less than one percent of the atmosphere, and
Speaker 1: yet they believe that it's going to warm up the
Speaker 1: whole planet. They can't tell you what the warming will
Speaker 1: actually be, and they can't even measure it accurately ten
Speaker 1: years from now. But we're supposed to all change our
Speaker 1: lives because of what's going to happen on a hundred
Speaker 1: years round. I know, I don't want to get too
Speaker 1: deep into the how climate change is insane, but the
Speaker 1: more obvious thing, and I mean climate change catastrophist, this
Speaker 1: notion that if we don't do everything the left wants
Speaker 1: us to do, we're all going to die. And that's
Speaker 1: really it. We're all gonna die. I'm not I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to be funny. Well it is kind of funny,
Speaker 1: but I'm not exaggerating. That's what they say. Unless people
Speaker 1: believe in the scientific wisdom of AOC. I mean, I
Speaker 1: remember in college. I mean there were people I knew,
Speaker 1: guys and girls who were like AOC and that they
Speaker 1: were the dumb kid in the class who still a
Speaker 1: lot and thought everyone should listen to them. I've been
Speaker 1: around people like that who have a tremendous and unearned
Speaker 1: confidence in their intellectual abilities and have no self awareness
Speaker 1: that their way beyond their knowledge and their understanding. And
Speaker 1: that's what AOC is on climate That's why she had
Speaker 1: the staffers right. And this is where we got cow farts.
Speaker 1: Remember that we got to stop the cow farts? And
Speaker 1: oh no, that was a working paper that wasn't supposed
Speaker 1: to be released. Sure, sure it was. No. The truth is,
Speaker 1: if you believe in climate change catastrophe, then you have
Speaker 1: to also understand that you have to get rid of meat.
Speaker 1: And there have been Democrats who even say this, I believe.
Speaker 1: Was that one of the town halls, which were just
Speaker 1: kind of in kind donations to Democrats that CNN and
Speaker 1: these other channels do where I think I think it
Speaker 1: was Kamala Harris who's asked about whether we should consider
Speaker 1: banning meat because of the climate change, and she was like, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a really really interesting which again is what this
Speaker 1: is what a professor does when you're saying something that's dumb,
Speaker 1: but the pressor is not trying to be mean, so
Speaker 1: that's a really interesting perspective. They'll say, right, which is
Speaker 1: a kind way of saying, what kind of garbage are
Speaker 1: you saying? But I don't know, maybe Kamlo would want
Speaker 1: to ban meet if that would get her enough votes
Speaker 1: and enough donations because methane from cows. Look, I know
Speaker 1: it's so dumb that it's hard to even talk about
Speaker 1: this out loud, but it's true. Methane from cows creates
Speaker 1: much greater damage to the atmosphere in the environment and
Speaker 1: causes much more warming than what you get from a
Speaker 1: whole lot of other areas where they're focusing in on
Speaker 1: CEO two. So they've been wrong with this. They're gonna
Speaker 1: be talking about this for another fifty years. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is not going away, and in fifty years they're
Speaker 1: gonna keep saying. Every ten years will be told we
Speaker 1: have ten years before it's too late to fix this,
Speaker 1: and then in ten years they'll just you know, enough
Speaker 1: time will have elapse that people will forget that ten
Speaker 1: years ago they were saying, Look, it's this is maybe
Speaker 1: just the circuitry or the wiring of certain human brains,
Speaker 1: but this is the way it's going to be, this
Speaker 1: is how it will play out. Oh and another area
Speaker 1: where we were treated to a Democrat fantasyland version of
Speaker 1: what's really going on on what will happen? This was
Speaker 1: a question in the debate. Now we were so we
Speaker 1: were so burned. I know many of us were expecting it,
Speaker 1: but we were so burned by Chris Wallace being so
Speaker 1: far in the tank for Joe Biden that I think
Speaker 1: this debate moderator and Jesse Kelly and I talked about
Speaker 1: this last night on the first that this debate moderator
Speaker 1: was just not as horrible. So you want to think, Okay,
Speaker 1: I guess she's all right. But one of the questions
Speaker 1: that they asked was what do you do if Donald
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't accept the results of the election, What do
Speaker 1: you do if Donald Trump doesn't accept the results. Who
Speaker 1: thinks that's going to happen? Evidence is there for that
Speaker 1: actually being a serious concern? And Vice President Pants did
Speaker 1: a very good job dealing with this issue play eleven.
Speaker 1: When you talk about accepting the outcome of the election,
Speaker 1: I must tell you, the Senator, your party has spent
Speaker 1: the last three and a half years trying to overturn
Speaker 1: the results of the last election. It's amazing. When Joe
Speaker 1: Biden was Vice President of the United States, the FBI
Speaker 1: actually spied on President Trump in my campaign. I mean,
Speaker 1: there were documents released this week that the CIA actually
Speaker 1: made a referral to the FBI documenting that those allegations
Speaker 1: were coming from the Hillary Clinton campaign. And of course
Speaker 1: we've all seen the avalanche, what you put the country
Speaker 1: through for the better part of three years until it
Speaker 1: was found that there was no obstruction, no collusion case close.
Speaker 1: And then Senator Harris, you and your colleagues in the
Speaker 1: Congress trying to impeach the President of the United States
Speaker 1: over a phone call. And now Hillary Clinton has actually
Speaker 1: said to Joe Biden that under and her words, under
Speaker 1: no circumstances should he conceive the election. So So who
Speaker 1: are really worried about refusing election results? Who is really
Speaker 1: of concern here for rejecting the expressed will of the
Speaker 1: American people through a free and fair election as Democrats friends,
Speaker 1: there was no Republican movement in twenty twelve to pretend
Speaker 1: Obama didn't really win, or to unseat him or impeach him,
Speaker 1: or have a special counsel against him. Look at the
Speaker 1: record with Democrats. You have an impeachment against Donald Trump
Speaker 1: over the Ukraine phone call, which was just crazy town.
Speaker 1: The whole thing was crazy town, and we know it
Speaker 1: didn't go anywhere, was never going anywhere. But Nancy Pelosi's nuts.
Speaker 1: She's a rich, you know, nutty old lady. And you
Speaker 1: had the three year long special Counsel investigation based on
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton campaign dirt dossier, totally false, but that led
Speaker 1: to a special counsel and all the other stuff. And
Speaker 1: the whole point of a special council was to create
Speaker 1: the grounds for removing Trump from office through impeachment and
Speaker 1: removal in the Senate. So that was the point of it.
Speaker 1: So it's not like it didn't at least give them something,
Speaker 1: but it didn't give them enough. There were the marches
Speaker 1: of people saying not my president. After Trump won. I
Speaker 1: remember that that was happening here in New York and
Speaker 1: other places. So they just immediately rejected it. There was
Speaker 1: the Special Counsel during the Bush administration of Scooter Libby,
Speaker 1: so this is their favorite tactic. They get a special
Speaker 1: counsel to go after the top people in the administration
Speaker 1: as a weapon over the completely farcicle Oh Bellary play,
Speaker 1: she's in so much. It's crap. I was in the CIA.
Speaker 1: It's crap. The whole thing was nonsense. But you know,
Speaker 1: they were going after Bush people, and Bush got very
Speaker 1: unpopular at that point because of the Iraq warm was
Speaker 1: going on Afghanistan and the war on Terror, and nobody
Speaker 1: was willing to step up and say this is not
Speaker 1: meant for this, this is this is really unconstitutional actually
Speaker 1: to create this body of investigative partisan hacks who aren't
Speaker 1: really count anyway. And then you have the two thousand
Speaker 1: election who didn't accept the results, al Gore, who kept
Speaker 1: taking it to court al Gore. So you have this
Speaker 1: long line of actions taken by Democrats meant to ignore
Speaker 1: election results. But last night we're at Donald Trump, or
Speaker 1: rather Mike Pence has asked, what if Donald Trump doesn't
Speaker 1: accept the results of the election, where is there any
Speaker 1: evidence for that? Hillary Clinton has said Democrats shouldn't accept
Speaker 1: the results of the election. Democrats have been setting up
Speaker 1: mail in balloting intended, in my mind, not only to
Speaker 1: try to help them win through possibly fraudulent means, but
Speaker 1: also to create the grounds for rejecting the election results
Speaker 1: based upon you know, I've been predicting this too, that
Speaker 1: they would reject the ground ounce for the election results
Speaker 1: based upon the very changes to the election process that
Speaker 1: they insisted on. Oh okay, that's where we are, that's
Speaker 1: where we're heading. And yet Mike Pence had to feel
Speaker 1: that question last night. Isn't it so interesting? Friends, the
Speaker 1: way the journos play the game. You're in the freedom Hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh, let's
Speaker 1: not forget about Kamala's record. I'm sorry, es get past
Speaker 1: this one. Vice President penns dismantled her record last night.
Speaker 1: He wasn't only a very effective defender of the Trump
Speaker 1: administration record and really just a promoter of what has
Speaker 1: gone on here, someone who will smash the lunacy of
Speaker 1: the left, acting like Donald Trump has been some catastrophic failure.
Speaker 1: Who's killed two hundred thousand people as if he was
Speaker 1: going around, you know, smothering them all with a hello himself.
Speaker 1: These people are nuts, crazy, totally outrageous stuff that they say.
Speaker 1: But Pennce went after Kamala's record. Here's what he said,
Speaker 1: played ten. Did you talk about having personally prosecuted. I'm
Speaker 1: glad you brought up your record CENTA, thank you. I
Speaker 1: really need to make this point. When you were when
Speaker 1: you were DA in San Francisco, when you left office,
Speaker 1: African Americans were nineteen times more likely to be prosecuted
Speaker 1: for minor drug offenses than whites and Hispanics. When you
Speaker 1: were Attorney General of California, you increased the purport the
Speaker 1: disproportionate incarceration of banks in California. You did nothing on
Speaker 1: criminal justice reform in California. You didn't lift a finger
Speaker 1: to pass the first step back on Capitol Hill. I mean,
Speaker 1: the reality is your record speaks for itself. President Trump
Speaker 1: and I have fought for criminal justice, fought for educational
Speaker 1: choice and opportunities for African Americans all of our thank you, sir,
Speaker 1: and we'll do it for form. Thank you. So the
Speaker 1: moderator here. You'll notice is, you know, every like four seconds,
Speaker 1: thank you, thank you know, trying to talk over and
Speaker 1: we get him to stop. I just want you to
Speaker 1: note that there was a lot of complaining initially about
Speaker 1: how Penn's steamrolled Kamala and all this stuff. She spoke
Speaker 1: more than he did, Okay, she got more airtime. The
Speaker 1: good news about these things is that we actually can
Speaker 1: measure it, and it's there, and there's a record. I
Speaker 1: think she spoke for two or three minutes more in
Speaker 1: total than the vice president did, so it's almost exactly
Speaker 1: equal time. So I'll say that's pretty good. But if
Speaker 1: we're really going to talk about this, there's no steamrolling.
Speaker 1: She spoke more than he did. You can't say your
Speaker 1: steamroll when you get to talk more than someone else. Now,
Speaker 1: on the issue of Kamala's record, he got it. Something
Speaker 1: that's very important here, something that doesn't get nearly enough attention,
Speaker 1: and that is Democrats often talk about desparate impact in
Speaker 1: the criminal justice system, which is just a way of
Speaker 1: talking about how you in many jurisdictions, in many places
Speaker 1: have a larger number of certain groups incarcerated than they
Speaker 1: represent of the general population. New York City is a
Speaker 1: good example of this, where you have ninety percent of
Speaker 1: Rikers Island is either Black or Hispanic, Rikers Island being
Speaker 1: the main prison here. Well, we're told that that's all
Speaker 1: about systemic racism, and Pence is pointing out that you
Speaker 1: actually meeting Kamala Harris when she was the state Attorney general,
Speaker 1: that incarceration of African Americans went up substantially compared to
Speaker 1: her predecessor. So why is that was she a part
Speaker 1: of systemic racism? It's a brilliant point that I think
Speaker 1: should get more attention from the Vice President. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the show. Podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Let's talk more about the difference between the Democrats and
Speaker 1: Republicans on feminal justice for a minute. Showay, this came
Speaker 1: up in the debate. It comes up all the time
Speaker 1: because of the BLM protest. There's another one that happened.
Speaker 1: It's not getting much attention right now, but there's another
Speaker 1: setup protests, riots going on, I believe where someone was
Speaker 1: shooting at cops. It's it's honestly tough to keep it
Speaker 1: all straight and keep up with this. And Kamala did
Speaker 1: the usual last night where she was saying justice wasn't
Speaker 1: done in the Brianna Taylor case. That's a very you
Speaker 1: know that, that's a very kind of wishy washy. She
Speaker 1: don't really take a position because, as she's saying, the
Speaker 1: justice system did not do the law there, the justice
Speaker 1: system did not actually function it's supposed to, or just
Speaker 1: there's no such thing as justice for a woman who's
Speaker 1: killed accidentally by the cops, because obviously the latter is true,
Speaker 1: you're never going to achieve justice. But you could argue
Speaker 1: then that our entire justice system is misnamed because anybody
Speaker 1: who's a victim of a crime, sending away the person
Speaker 1: that did it too doesn't make it, doesn't really make
Speaker 1: it better. Maybe it protects the rest of society and
Speaker 1: we need to punish the guilty. And I understand that
Speaker 1: there are reasons for this, but I'm just saying, you
Speaker 1: never really get justice. Right if some guy robs your home,
Speaker 1: steals all your stuff, and an attacks you in the
Speaker 1: middle of the night, and then they catch him six
Speaker 1: months later and he goes to prison for ten years, Okay,
Speaker 1: that's the justice system working. It's not really justice for you.
Speaker 1: You just wish that thing had never happened. So I
Speaker 1: just I note that what she says, your justice wasn't done.
Speaker 1: I think that's a very interesting way to put it.
Speaker 1: She was clear and that she has to take the
Speaker 1: side of BLM, and that's that's not a surprise. She
Speaker 1: very clearly is a big BLM supporter and has been
Speaker 1: on the record saying all kinds of things about how
Speaker 1: it's a great movement for change and it's really in
Speaker 1: line with the civil rights heroes of the past that
Speaker 1: BLM is doing all this great stuff. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think she's completely insane for saying this stuff, but she
Speaker 1: believes it. She believes it. And Penn's pointed out that,
Speaker 1: you know, you really like to offer somebody who was
Speaker 1: a part of a justice system that sent a lot
Speaker 1: of people to prison, meaning Kamala Harris when she was
Speaker 1: stated turning general when she was a prosecutor before that
Speaker 1: really doesn't have much faith in the system at all
Speaker 1: when it suits her politically. Play thirteen, Well, our heart
Speaker 1: breaks the loss of innocent, any innocent American life, and
Speaker 1: the family of Brianna Taylor has our sympathies but I
Speaker 1: trust our justice system of grand jury that refuses the evidence.
Speaker 1: And it really is remarkable that as a former prosecutor,
Speaker 1: you would assume that anpaneled grand jury looking at all
Speaker 1: the evidence, got it wrong. But you're entitled to your
Speaker 1: opinion center, So yeah, they got it wrong. What I
Speaker 1: would have said, I'm just gonna point this one out.
Speaker 1: Someone should ask Kamala Harris, are the cops murderers? Your prosecutor?
Speaker 1: You know the law? Would you charge one of those
Speaker 1: officers with murder? Really that she should be pressed on
Speaker 1: that one. Let's hear it, because she could not say
Speaker 1: no and stay in the good graces of the Democrat
Speaker 1: left and the BLM rioters and all the rest of it.
Speaker 1: Couldn't couldn't do it. They want to hear that, yes,
Speaker 1: those cops are murderers, even though that would mean that
Speaker 1: we're creating a new standard for murder by which when
Speaker 1: you try to defend yourself you could be considered a murderer,
Speaker 1: even if your actions are entirely justifiable. But if something
Speaker 1: bad happens while you're defending yourself, that is an accident,
Speaker 1: which is what happened to those cops. One cop was
Speaker 1: hit in the femoral artery and could have bled out
Speaker 1: and died right there. It was. It was a near fatal,
Speaker 1: a near fatal shooting of that officer. He's not supposed
Speaker 1: to shoot back. Now you're gonna start firing a cops.
Speaker 1: The cops are gonna fire back. I don't know how
Speaker 1: anyone can expect anything else, but that is surely one
Speaker 1: of the areas of demagoguery where the Democrats can't give
Speaker 1: up any ground. They can't do it none Whatso there's
Speaker 1: no way they would get away with that for their base.
Speaker 1: And then you look at the other area where I
Speaker 1: think Pence could have hammered it home a little bit more. Look,
Speaker 1: he did a very good job and so now I look,
Speaker 1: I'm doing a little bit of Thursday morning quarterbacking here
Speaker 1: after the Wednesday night debate. But I wish he had
Speaker 1: gone after a little bit more on the rioting and
Speaker 1: BLM and all of this, all of this insanity. I mean,
Speaker 1: he made this clear. Here's what he said, play six.
Speaker 1: And with regard to George Floyd, there's no excuse for
Speaker 1: what happened to George Floyd, and justice will be served.
Speaker 1: But there's also no excuse for the rioting and looting
Speaker 1: that followed. I mean, it really is astonishing. Flora whist
Speaker 1: Brooke is with us here to nine a Lake City.
Speaker 1: This few weeks ago, I stood at what used to
Speaker 1: be her salon was burned to the ground by rioters
Speaker 1: and looters, and Flora is still trying to put her
Speaker 1: life back together. Yeah, how could anyone justify that? Oh?
Speaker 1: But BLM is really angry, So that's no. No, This
Speaker 1: is no different than if somebody doesn't like a jury
Speaker 1: verdict and goes out and just hit some random person
Speaker 1: on the street in the head with a brick because
Speaker 1: they're angry. If you can justify that, then you've destroyed
Speaker 1: You've destroyed our entire system of laws where you have
Speaker 1: individual culpability and responsibility and the right for people to
Speaker 1: be protected, and it's all gone. But it does seem
Speaker 1: that they're willing to at least kick at the load
Speaker 1: bearing walls of our justice system because it plaguecates this mentality,
Speaker 1: this anger that exists on the left toward this system,
Speaker 1: toward the cops. And these are Democrat base voters. These
Speaker 1: are people that are very very much, you know, in
Speaker 1: favor not only of the Biden Harris ticket. But these
Speaker 1: are the activists. These are the people that get the
Speaker 1: other voters out, you know, these the people that get
Speaker 1: the other voters going. So they're not going to speak
Speaker 1: the truth about it, which is that the cops are
Speaker 1: overwhelmingly doing the right thing. You know, here's here's a
Speaker 1: perfect way to encapsulate this whole BLM debate and the
Speaker 1: thing we've been talking about for months now. They will
Speaker 1: excuse the rioting and the looting. Michelle Obama did this
Speaker 1: herself in that video early. They'll excuse that by saying, well,
Speaker 1: it was ninety percent peaceful. But they will condemn law enforcement,
Speaker 1: our justice system, and our brave men and women who
Speaker 1: wear the uniform of the police on the streets of
Speaker 1: American cities, and our state troopers and highway patrol. They'll
Speaker 1: they'll they'll defame them by referring to our systemically racist
Speaker 1: law enforcement system based upon the shooting of unarmed black men.
Speaker 1: That is one. I mean, I can't even do the
Speaker 1: math off the top of my head, but it's a tiny,
Speaker 1: tiny fraction that is less than one percent of all
Speaker 1: police encounters using force of any kind. And it's something
Speaker 1: that in a country of three hundred and thirty million people.
Speaker 1: Happens less than fifty times a year, probably more like
Speaker 1: fifteen to twenty times a year, where someone who is
Speaker 1: unarmed and black is shot and killed by cops. And
Speaker 1: sometimes it's entirely justified, moral and legitimate. When that happens,
Speaker 1: that we need to say that that is true. Sometimes
Speaker 1: it is, sometimes it's not. When it's not, the law
Speaker 1: should be and I think generally is applied with its
Speaker 1: full force against that law enforcement officer who has transgressed,
Speaker 1: who has broken his or her oath, and who needs
Speaker 1: to be brought to justice, needs to be punished. So
Speaker 1: that's that's my view of where I think they need
Speaker 1: to go on that one. I wish I wish we
Speaker 1: could see a little bit more I don't a little
Speaker 1: bit more fire fire and Furia like that book, a
Speaker 1: little bit more fire in the belly on this issue
Speaker 1: of the rioting coming from the left and what's going
Speaker 1: on there. That's what I would like to see, because
Speaker 1: people really need to know exactly what has gone on
Speaker 1: here and who's responsible for it. You know, I almost
Speaker 1: forgot the I want to just throw this in there too.
Speaker 1: One of the best lines of the night that Pence
Speaker 1: had had to do with China. China and the trade
Speaker 1: war because Kamala Harris was claiming that Joe Biden that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump lost the trade war with China, which I don't,
Speaker 1: I mean, look to say that she's wrong and making
Speaker 1: stuff up. He's obviously nothing new on this show. But
Speaker 1: here's what Penn said about about Biden and his record
Speaker 1: in China. Effectively, Pennce dunked so hard on Biden in
Speaker 1: China that he shattered the backboard and then Kamala had
Speaker 1: to clean up the broken glass below it afterwards. I mean,
Speaker 1: this was a really good moment for him. Play three
Speaker 1: lost the trade war with China, Joe Biden never fought it.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has been a cheerleader for communist China through
Speaker 1: over the last several decades. And again, the Senator, you're
Speaker 1: entitled to your opinion, you're not entitled to your own facts.
Speaker 1: When Joe Biden was Vice president, we lost two hundred
Speaker 1: thousand manufacturing jobs and President Obama said they were never
Speaker 1: coming back. He said we needed a magic wand to
Speaker 1: bring him back. In our first three years, after we
Speaker 1: cut Texan fullback regulation, unleashed American energy. This administration saw
Speaker 1: five hundred thousand jobs created, and that's exactly the kind
Speaker 1: of growth we're going to continue to see as we
Speaker 1: bring our nation through this pandemic. Good stuff from the
Speaker 1: Vice President. You're in the Freedom Hud. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast. All right, team, very fortunate
Speaker 1: here to be joined by Mercedes Slap. She's a senior
Speaker 1: advisor Trump campaign. You see her on Fox and across
Speaker 1: all media outlets all the time. Mercedes, thanks for making
Speaker 1: the time. Well, thank you for having me. I'm actually
Speaker 1: live from the Women for Trump bus. It's a big
Speaker 1: pink bus going through Pennsylvania. We've had several stops here
Speaker 1: in h near Pittsburgh, and it's been a very enthusiastic crowd,
Speaker 1: ready to win and come November. Tell us about this
Speaker 1: this uh ready for women for Trump rather this this
Speaker 1: whole campaign. Who's a part of it, what's the what's
Speaker 1: the next itinerary? And what are you telling the ladies
Speaker 1: out there? Because we all know that particularly suburban women
Speaker 1: voters are a very coveted demographic in this upcoming battle. Well,
Speaker 1: I think one of the phenomenons that we have found
Speaker 1: when we've been on the road for so much and
Speaker 1: we've been on this bush, it's been going for over
Speaker 1: one hundred days. Has been the incredible response at phone women,
Speaker 1: women who are leading many of these field offices, women
Speaker 1: who are making phone calls, knocking outdoors, you know, basically
Speaker 1: saying we have to get President Trump reelected. Very concerned
Speaker 1: about the direction that the Democrats have taken, where they
Speaker 1: really have abandoned any sort of moderate policies, moved to
Speaker 1: the far left on so many of the issues. And
Speaker 1: uh and you know, we really spend a lot of
Speaker 1: time talking to these women and get out the vote effort.
Speaker 1: So today on the bus to Tuna person, another senior
Speaker 1: advisor in the campaign, one of the originals for twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: Laura Trump, is joining us as well. And you know,
Speaker 1: I just got to tell you we feel very strongly
Speaker 1: that it's important to be in contact with these voters,
Speaker 1: let them know that the President is incredibly grateful for
Speaker 1: the work that they're doing. And obviously during this time
Speaker 1: that we know that the President has been fighting for us,
Speaker 1: fighting for America, and it's our turn to fight for him,
Speaker 1: get him to the finish line, and continue to really
Speaker 1: expose the far left. Adjudda of Kamala and Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: which we know even yesterday and in the vice presidential
Speaker 1: camp debate, Kamala couldn't even answer basic questions like will
Speaker 1: they pack the court? You can see a little bubble
Speaker 1: over her head saying, well, of course we're going to
Speaker 1: pack the court, but they're not willing to be transparent
Speaker 1: and honest with the American people. Speaking to Mercedes Schlapp,
Speaker 1: senior advisor for the Trump campaign, he's out on the
Speaker 1: road trying to make things happen so that Trump gets
Speaker 1: four more years. Mercedes, specifically from the women voters that
Speaker 1: you're talking to out there and especially in these swing
Speaker 1: states Whereveren's gonna have such a focus for the next
Speaker 1: few weeks. Here as we get into the final stretch,
Speaker 1: what are the biggest things that they're wanting to ask
Speaker 1: about and what are there what are what's the top
Speaker 1: of their list of concerns right now? I mean, I
Speaker 1: know it's going to be one of the things we
Speaker 1: but I want to know from from what you're hearing,
Speaker 1: what are they putting at number one? Number two? I
Speaker 1: would say number one and number two are clearly the
Speaker 1: economy and ensuring that we're able to build a strong
Speaker 1: economy or robust economy, and they've seemed President Trump to
Speaker 1: do it once and they know he's going to do
Speaker 1: it again. And we've seen obviously a lot of concerts
Speaker 1: in that area. Uh, you know, in the recent jobs
Speaker 1: numbers where we've created over eleven million jobs in the
Speaker 1: last four months. And so the other piece of this,
Speaker 1: I would say is safe communities. It's this idea that
Speaker 1: we've seen a lot of chaos on the streets and
Speaker 1: the fact that he the President, has made it very
Speaker 1: clear that law and order is a priority, and that
Speaker 1: that we're that we don't report on defunding the police,
Speaker 1: that we hone in on community safe, community policing, community
Speaker 1: safe safe, and that's also another priority. And of course,
Speaker 1: you know, COVID is on the minds of so many
Speaker 1: of these women voters. You know, it has been exhausting
Speaker 1: to raise children during this time, to make ends met,
Speaker 1: during this time of dealing with the global pandemic. And
Speaker 1: this idea that Joe Biden really has no plan, as
Speaker 1: Vice President Mike Kent said yesterday. Yesterday, they're literally plagiarizing
Speaker 1: what President Trump and the Vice president have already offered
Speaker 1: and what the plans that we have put in place.
Speaker 1: And what's so shocking to me is the fact that
Speaker 1: you know, I know, the Democrats want to use coronavirus.
Speaker 1: As you know, Jane Fonda said that this is God's
Speaker 1: gift to the Democrats and politicize the sellers. Sue, that's disgraceful.
Speaker 1: We're in a global pandemic. The President is fighting her
Speaker 1: to make sure that we're able to develop the vaccines,
Speaker 1: to get the therapeutics to market so that the American
Speaker 1: people who are inflicted with coronavirus can get better and
Speaker 1: get healthy. And the other piece of this is that
Speaker 1: we can't be in lockdown indefinitely. It is really causing
Speaker 1: a lot of stress, a lot of anxiety for our youth,
Speaker 1: for our families. We need to be able to reopen
Speaker 1: our economies in our schools safely and responsibly. And that's
Speaker 1: what the President is focused on to ensuring that we
Speaker 1: can move in that direction, as opposed to Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: which wants to end some of the media that want
Speaker 1: to make sure that we all live in fear. Mercedes,
Speaker 1: what are we expecting now for the next presidential debate?
Speaker 1: As of today, we've heard the Biden campaign wanted to
Speaker 1: be a virtual debate, and the Trump campaign, as of
Speaker 1: the latest reporting i've seen, says, well, there's not going
Speaker 1: to be a virtual debate. What can you tell us? Well,
Speaker 1: what was shocking was that I call them the communist
Speaker 1: Commission of Presidential Debates. I mean, they've got like never
Speaker 1: Trumps on there. And one of the things that what
Speaker 1: I'm finding with them is that they literally made this
Speaker 1: unilateral decision on moving forward the virtual debate without even
Speaker 1: talking to the campaigns about it. Just think about that,
Speaker 1: and that's what's so disturbing is the fact that they're
Speaker 1: looking to protect Joe Biden. They know that the president
Speaker 1: had a very strong night, they know that My Pence
Speaker 1: won the debate yesterday, and so at this point, it
Speaker 1: just seems that they have no interests in ensuring that
Speaker 1: this conversation, and this important conversation happens between the two presidents,
Speaker 1: between the two candidates, I should say. And so I
Speaker 1: think it's important to really understand that this was a
Speaker 1: unilateral decision made by the Commission. They did not discuss
Speaker 1: it with the campaigns, and that is incredibly problematic. So
Speaker 1: we're hoping and what we're looking to do is to
Speaker 1: move the debate a week later, had the two debates
Speaker 1: October twenty second, the next October twenty nine, and let's
Speaker 1: have that discussion where the American people could see these
Speaker 1: two men in person being able to, you know, to
Speaker 1: subscribe what their visions are for America. And that is
Speaker 1: I think we're what the goal is at this time.
Speaker 1: Mercedes Schlap, senior advisor for the Trump campaign out there
Speaker 1: on the trail on the bus doing the work. Mercedes,
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for joining us. Good luck to you.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Thanks for listening to the Bus
Speaker 1: Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcast, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts Our buddy
Speaker 1: David Harsani of National Review back in the mix here
Speaker 1: to tell us what he's seeing in the realm of politics, culture, America.
Speaker 1: All that good stuff, David. Great to have you back.
Speaker 1: Always a pleasure. Thank you. So what do you think
Speaker 1: about last night? Man? I mean, I thought I thought
Speaker 1: penns one convincingly and almost every area you can win
Speaker 1: in debate. I mean I didn't think Trump had won,
Speaker 1: though I didn't think it was as bad a performance
Speaker 1: as many did. But I think that clearly Pence was
Speaker 1: the winner here on both specifics of policy and vote
Speaker 1: in general. Pushing back as someone online I so said
Speaker 1: that Pence is kind is better at defending Trump's record
Speaker 1: than Trump is. I think that that's a pretty fair assessment.
Speaker 1: Sometimes the way he kept as cool, and I think
Speaker 1: part of that also has to do with Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: not being perhaps as likable as perhaps some other candidates. Yeah,
Speaker 1: well that's not surprising to anybody. I mean, this was
Speaker 1: we ran this experiment already of do do even Democrats
Speaker 1: really like Kamala Harris? The answers no. I want to
Speaker 1: pose this question you because people have been asking me
Speaker 1: this and I gave my assessment at the beginning of
Speaker 1: the show. But I want to know what you think here.
Speaker 1: Why did they pick Kamala Harris? Like, what was the
Speaker 1: thinking behind this? It feels in retrospect now, especially after
Speaker 1: last night, like that wasn't a very strong move. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think obviously part of it is that, you know,
Speaker 1: it has lots to do with identity politics, and I
Speaker 1: think that not to say that there aren't good black
Speaker 1: women candidates out there, but to just say that a
Speaker 1: few months before you're making this decision without seeing who
Speaker 1: you mesh with best or how candidates are going to perform,
Speaker 1: is put you in a pretty tight spot. So obviously,
Speaker 1: like you mentioned or alluded to, she was not popular
Speaker 1: with Democrats, so she had a horrible primary. So I
Speaker 1: don't know why he picked her. I think it hasn't
Speaker 1: worked out. We don't see much of her. I kind
Speaker 1: of forgot she was even running until yesterday. Frankly, for weeks.
Speaker 1: Her positions are are at of sync with the sort
Speaker 1: of predict what way he's trying to project this idea
Speaker 1: that they're moderates. I mean, she's taken left wind positions
Speaker 1: on the environment, on guns, on a ton of other
Speaker 1: things that simply are I think, out of sink with
Speaker 1: most Americans. So I don't know, is that's a long answer,
Speaker 1: I don't know, or I don't know. It just feels
Speaker 1: like the to me, I mean, except for the identity
Speaker 1: politics piece. And I know when we talk about with
Speaker 1: Warren identity politics, you and I the jokes start writing themselves, right.
Speaker 1: But if you wanted a female vice president who was
Speaker 1: actually popular with Democrat voters, who did have substantial support,
Speaker 1: Kamala was never popular with the Democrats and the idea
Speaker 1: that she would now be useful. But no, I think
Speaker 1: we also need to remember that, I mean she's the
Speaker 1: governor of California. I mean she's a Senator of California.
Speaker 1: So it's not like she has no support. No know
Speaker 1: that Elizabeth Warren. Maybe Warren would maybe war would have
Speaker 1: been a bad pick, but I just mean the Democrat
Speaker 1: primary there was, I mean Warren was number three at
Speaker 1: you know, behind Bernie and Biden, but especially toward the end,
Speaker 1: and Comlin ever got that much help. And your point
Speaker 1: about California, I think it's interesting because yes, she can
Speaker 1: appeal to people in California. I think the same way
Speaker 1: that Joe. I think that everyone needs to remember there
Speaker 1: are some states where you have to appeal to beyond
Speaker 1: just your own party. California is obviously not one of them.
Speaker 1: But it's also going to be a more are left
Speaker 1: electorate than you'd see even in some of the other
Speaker 1: states that are at least closer to being purple. But
Speaker 1: that's a fair point. Kamala won the who do we
Speaker 1: even remember who she run against? You don't, right, right, Well,
Speaker 1: obviously I think she's probably a primary candidates they don't
Speaker 1: remember that's what I mean. Yeah, yeah, they don't run
Speaker 1: against a Republican, which is why these these people who
Speaker 1: are always talking about all the Democratic voters who come out,
Speaker 1: Yeah who can there have no reason to come out
Speaker 1: in California for statewide elections because there's no one to
Speaker 1: vote for. So, you know, it's a little different. But
Speaker 1: you make a good point and that you don't really
Speaker 1: need Harris because California is going to be yours anyway,
Speaker 1: So why not pick someone perhaps whole appeals to you know,
Speaker 1: Middle America or the South or something like that, trying
Speaker 1: to pick up state here or there with a candidate.
Speaker 1: But that hasn't really worked very well since you know,
Speaker 1: Gore lost Tennessee. Right, I don't know how much that
Speaker 1: actually matters. Yeah, well that's that's the other question, other
Speaker 1: than the fact that there's I think a realistic, a
Speaker 1: realistic thought that Kamala Harris might actually have to take
Speaker 1: over the presidency if Biden wins this election, and not
Speaker 1: that far off I think that that is. Look, the
Speaker 1: guy's gonna be almost eighty likes president United States. This
Speaker 1: is real, right, I Mean, when you get to this
Speaker 1: age and Democrats have kind of learned recently that you
Speaker 1: can't just keep wishing people to be in you know,
Speaker 1: infinite good health for as long as you want them
Speaker 1: to be for political reasons. The you know, never mind
Speaker 1: what's happened here with Trump. But they it seems to
Speaker 1: me maybe the Democrat it doesn't really I mean, the
Speaker 1: vice president. Maybe it doesn't really matter that much usually,
Speaker 1: And I don't think the debate will matter that much either,
Speaker 1: And now that I've spent a lot of time analyzing
Speaker 1: and pulling apart in terms of who people vote for.
Speaker 1: But do you think it does? I don't think it
Speaker 1: matters a ton. It might matter more because of what
Speaker 1: you just pointed out. You have two older people as president,
Speaker 1: and not just old, you know, very you know, considerably
Speaker 1: older people than you usually have running, you know, either
Speaker 1: running for president or even in the presidency, So it
Speaker 1: might matter to some extent. I think it's more like this.
Speaker 1: If you just perform admirably or don't embarrass herself, nothing happens.
Speaker 1: But you can hurt yourself by having a really bad performance.
Speaker 1: So I'm not sure that Harris had that terrible of
Speaker 1: a performance enough to change any of the dynamics, but
Speaker 1: it certainly seems to me like she's not going to
Speaker 1: ever win a presidential election. I mean, she might have
Speaker 1: become president one day, but I just I don't think
Speaker 1: she's ever gonna win with She's just not that good
Speaker 1: at debate or I noticed that, um, you know, doing
Speaker 1: the primaries as well. She's just not that good. Her
Speaker 1: can lines come off canned, and and and her her
Speaker 1: sort of like fake uh indignation and stuff. It's just
Speaker 1: it's just really obvious, at least to me. Look, it
Speaker 1: felt very staged. It felt very staged to me, and
Speaker 1: I mean I was willing to admit it. I mean
Speaker 1: Obama when he was in his zone, you know, when
Speaker 1: he was doing his thing. There are a lot, it
Speaker 1: feels a lot of Democrats, and there are a lot
Speaker 1: of other folks who they like the the Obama way
Speaker 1: of being on stage and the speeches and everything else.
Speaker 1: And even Joe Biden gets away. I think now that
Speaker 1: he's kind of older and a little more tired, it
Speaker 1: seems a bit more forced. But his whole rolled up
Speaker 1: sleeves Joe from Amtrack, I mean you I appreciate that
Speaker 1: you've put it up. The sela is like very you know,
Speaker 1: a very high end train, very high end trained life.
Speaker 1: This is not like the way Joe Biden, you know,
Speaker 1: makes it sound. It's like he's wearing overalls that he's
Speaker 1: there shoveling coal with the engineers or something that's not
Speaker 1: That's not Joe Biden, good old amtrack Joe. But you
Speaker 1: with with with Kamala, there was no go ahead. I
Speaker 1: just gonna say he pays twenty thousand. He pays twenty
Speaker 1: thousand a month for his mansion here in McClain or
Speaker 1: wherever in Virginia. But I just want to quickly say
Speaker 1: the difference between those two is this. It's the Castanza thing.
Speaker 1: If you don't if you believe your lie is true,
Speaker 1: it becomes true. And that's what I think Biden is.
Speaker 1: I think he believes the stories he tells. I think
Speaker 1: he believes that he's sort of working class Joe, so
Speaker 1: it always comes off as more authentic than Harris, who
Speaker 1: I don't think believes anything she's saying, right, I think
Speaker 1: that's an authenticity to Biden because he actually believes the
Speaker 1: fairy tale he has built around about himself, which has
Speaker 1: gone on now for thirty years. It's like the incredible
Speaker 1: notion that Harris repeated yesterday that Biden is running because
Speaker 1: of Charte what happened in Charlottesville. It's been running for
Speaker 1: president since nineteen eighty seven, he's probably even before that.
Speaker 1: It is it is just a lie, and everyone knows it,
Speaker 1: and she knows it what she says it well. I
Speaker 1: also think the whole Charlottesville thing is a lie, and
Speaker 1: Pence did a good job of finally really addressing it
Speaker 1: and saying the president has Jewish grandchildren, so calling him
Speaker 1: a neo Nazi is pretty gross. And beyond or the
Speaker 1: saying that he has sympathy for neo Nazi is pretty disgusting,
Speaker 1: and they also leave I mean, his daughter, one of
Speaker 1: his daughters is a convert to Judaism as well. But
Speaker 1: beyond that, he said in the speech, I totally condemned
Speaker 1: neo Nazis and the bad people. But I'm talking about
Speaker 1: the statue debate. He clarified in the statement. They always
Speaker 1: cite exactly what he was saying. It wasn't a later clarification,
Speaker 1: it was, as you know, the equivalent of a paragraph
Speaker 1: down to the transcript, just so everyone's very clear on
Speaker 1: what he's saying. And he's Trump, so he's imprecise with
Speaker 1: his words, and they've just I feel like that's been
Speaker 1: one of the fundamental dishonesties that the media and the
Speaker 1: Democrats have run with this whole time, and it's really
Speaker 1: a foundational lie of the resistance, you know. It's that
Speaker 1: and Russia collusion are the two things they dug in on,
Speaker 1: and they're both complete fabrications, and yet we're supposed to
Speaker 1: take them seriously when they, even at this stage, continue
Speaker 1: to cite Russian interference in the election and Trump's Charlottesville comments.
Speaker 1: It's even worse than that in a way, because she
Speaker 1: aframed the Charlottesville comment as if Trump said it while
Speaker 1: the neo Nazis were marching about them specifically, and then
Speaker 1: she tied it into this larger story of him saying
Speaker 1: things about soldiers and so on. But the way she
Speaker 1: framed it was even worse than the lie itself is
Speaker 1: usually told. And it is a lie. And you're right, though,
Speaker 1: I mean, it should have been a slam dunk for
Speaker 1: Trump at the time to be more clear and precise
Speaker 1: about what he meant. But still he didn't say what
Speaker 1: they claim he says, which has becomes so prevalent that
Speaker 1: it's everywhere all the time, and no one will fact
Speaker 1: check it, really, I mean on the you know, in
Speaker 1: the media, they'll just repeat it. And now she gets
Speaker 1: to say things like Trump walked up to you the
Speaker 1: graves of soldiers and spit on them, which is also
Speaker 1: probably not true either. We have no real corroboration of
Speaker 1: that story, but yet they can just say it. They
Speaker 1: work in sync with the Atlantic magazine whoever reported that,
Speaker 1: and they do this constantly, and it's very hard to
Speaker 1: fight back against. And I think you're right. Pence did
Speaker 1: a good job of pointing those things out as the
Speaker 1: debate went along, and he also did a good job
Speaker 1: of posing questions that Susan Page, who everyone says or
Speaker 1: most people say, did a good job. I don't think
Speaker 1: that that's true. Wouldn't ask, you know, yeah, well, she
Speaker 1: didn't ask about the Supreme Court, which was stunning. She
Speaker 1: didn't ask yeah, right, the court packing question was very
Speaker 1: a very good moment for pets where she wouldn't answer,
Speaker 1: and then she went off on some ridiculous you know,
Speaker 1: university rant, you know, yeah, diversity rant. It you should
Speaker 1: have done more of that. That I think is what
Speaker 1: Republicans shouldn't be doing. So like when they asked you
Speaker 1: would you would you ban vice president of pets? Would
Speaker 1: you ban abortion in Indiana? You should turn to Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris and say, give me the single restriction on abortion
Speaker 1: you support. Do you support states funded abortions until the
Speaker 1: ninth month? Because they're never going to ask that question
Speaker 1: of the other candidate never. Yeah, you're right, you know,
Speaker 1: and I think that's important. And I spoke with the
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly about this last night right afterwards, and you know,
Speaker 1: because he said she was horrible, and I said, well,
Speaker 1: the moderator was horrible. But it felt like in comparison
Speaker 1: to the I mean Chris Wallace white supremacist question, I
Speaker 1: mean that for me is just that's like, you know,
Speaker 1: hit hit the button, nuke at all. I can't handle
Speaker 1: this anymore. I mean, for me, that was a total
Speaker 1: total debacle. But you're right, I mean the MOTOO. We
Speaker 1: are so used to the bias and so used to
Speaker 1: the journos doing what they do that we don't even
Speaker 1: really ever step back and say, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: why can't they ask a question like that? They'd ask
Speaker 1: questions like that of Republicans. No, we have we have
Speaker 1: become so used to allowing them to frame the issues,
Speaker 1: talk about the issues that they find important, that we
Speaker 1: don't talk about the issues that we do. Now the
Speaker 1: whether whether he wants to ban abortion or not. Returning
Speaker 1: Row would only bring it back to the States. Now,
Speaker 1: let's have an argument about abortion. But when you really
Speaker 1: they always point out that Rows overturning it is so unpopular. Well,
Speaker 1: let's see how what polls say about people who want
Speaker 1: state funded abortions in the ninth month. You know, I
Speaker 1: assure you that that's going to be unpopular as well,
Speaker 1: But they never bring it up. And even though sort
Speaker 1: of words they use, like you know, pro choice or
Speaker 1: whatever it is, it's always skewing in one direction. I'm
Speaker 1: not sure how to fix that. I don't know what
Speaker 1: to do other than taking over a debate and asking
Speaker 1: your own questions, which is why I think these debates
Speaker 1: are ridiculous. Anyway, let them fight. It is ridiculous to
Speaker 1: have all these rules, like they're in the middle of
Speaker 1: a good conversation and somebody has to butt in and say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's the two minute deadline on this question, so we
Speaker 1: can talk about global warming or whatever. I mean. It's
Speaker 1: just insane. Yeah, they really should just have people. They
Speaker 1: should just have somebody who's sitting there to you know,
Speaker 1: I guess, try to keep some degree of equal time
Speaker 1: and let let them have at it. Because my least,
Speaker 1: for everything the debate was every time it felt like
Speaker 1: it was getting good, there was, but we got to
Speaker 1: get to this other thing. Why I don't give a
Speaker 1: crap about global warming. I want to hear about this nonsense.
Speaker 1: Let them actually have the debate they're having, or have
Speaker 1: a number of debates and have them talk about different
Speaker 1: issues per debate. You should like, for instance, why are
Speaker 1: you asking different questions? Both candidates throw up an issue
Speaker 1: and let's see what they have to say about it.
Speaker 1: I just don't understand why you have to lead the
Speaker 1: conversation in that way. You know has had better questions
Speaker 1: than the moderator. Yeah, from the Republican point of view,
Speaker 1: but still let let Kamala Harris ask her own questions
Speaker 1: if she wants. Maybe that's the best way to do it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I like it. David Arsan everybody national review dot com
Speaker 1: for his latest check out his very clear thinking and
Speaker 1: clear writing at National Review dot com. David, thanks so
Speaker 1: much for joining. Thank you, sir, you're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Got to
Speaker 1: throw a discussion at COVID into the mix here before
Speaker 1: we get to roll call. Kamala went after the administration
Speaker 1: and this is their single biggest area of attack, and
Speaker 1: it's really all about con COVID. It's terrible. We know
Speaker 1: that it's hurt the American people very badly. Two hundred
Speaker 1: thousand plus people have died. How many of them died
Speaker 1: from COVID directly versus with COVID. That's a discussion will
Speaker 1: continue to have going forward. But it's clearly a lot
Speaker 1: of people that have died from COVID nineteen and it's
Speaker 1: done terrible things to our economy. It's true a lot
Speaker 1: of countries around the world, but they want to blame
Speaker 1: Trump for all of it, and Kamala Harris is certainly
Speaker 1: part of that effort. Play sixteen. Trump administration's perspective and
Speaker 1: approach to China has resulted in the loss of American lives,
Speaker 1: American jobs, and America's standing. There is a weird obsession
Speaker 1: that President Trump has had with getting rid of whatever
Speaker 1: accomplishment was achieved by President Obama and Vice President Biden.
Speaker 1: For example, they created within the White House an office
Speaker 1: that basically was responsible for monitoring pandemics. They got away,
Speaker 1: they got rid of it. Not true. There was a
Speaker 1: team of disease experts that President Obama and Vice President
Speaker 1: Biden dispatched to China to monitor what is now predictable
Speaker 1: and what might happen. They pulled them out. We now
Speaker 1: are looking at two hundred and ten thousand Americans who
Speaker 1: have lost their lives all because of Trump. Is what
Speaker 1: you're supposed to take from this. That's insane. But they
Speaker 1: believe it, or at least they want enough people to
Speaker 1: believe it so that they can become the regime in
Speaker 1: charge here. First of all, what she's saying is not true.
Speaker 1: But as Vice President Pen's pointed out, they did not
Speaker 1: scrap all these disease experts. We have a CDC, we
Speaker 1: have an NIH, we have an intelligence community with you know,
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of people running around in it. Okay,
Speaker 1: what exactly, what exactly are we supposed to think was
Speaker 1: going to happen here? Oh, if only we had had
Speaker 1: a handful of people in the NSC who specialized in
Speaker 1: pandemic what they would have known more than Fauci. They
Speaker 1: would have known more than the other experts. I mean,
Speaker 1: you got experts all over the place, and honestly, most
Speaker 1: of them were kind of worthless. What have they been
Speaker 1: ambled to tell us? People forget that we didn't know
Speaker 1: how this was going to affect, particular the elderly and
Speaker 1: the more vulnerable until it really hit Italy very badly,
Speaker 1: and at that point it had already spread to American shores,
Speaker 1: and was anyway just lying about it. You know, it
Speaker 1: is to blame for it, though Pence is right about
Speaker 1: this China play eighteen. China is to blame for the coronavirus,
Speaker 1: and President Trump is not happy about him. He's made
Speaker 1: that very clear and made it clear again today. China
Speaker 1: and the World Health Organization did not play straight with
Speaker 1: the American people. They did not let our personnel into
Speaker 1: China to get information on the coronavirus until the middle
Speaker 1: of February. Finally, some honesty. I mean, the Vice President
Speaker 1: did a phenomenal job. I know we spent a lot
Speaker 1: of time talking about it today, but the guy deserves
Speaker 1: a big high five, and he really showed what the
Speaker 1: other the other side of this debate's all about, which
Speaker 1: is misdirection. Lies, obfuscating, stonewalling, and doesn't really have very
Speaker 1: much to offer the American people. The Trump record is
Speaker 1: something that they can be proud of. The Biden Harris
Speaker 1: record is well individually, and then what they would do
Speaker 1: going forward is something that they just can't be honest
Speaker 1: with the American people about. That's the biggest single takeaway
Speaker 1: from all of this. Thanks for listening to the past.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts at the iHeartRadio app
Speaker 1: for wherever you get your podcasts, like Soft Butter on
Speaker 1: Warm Toast. Time to spread some freedom coast to coast.
Speaker 1: It's time for Roll Call, Role Call everybody. I'm so
Speaker 1: glad we have roll Call so I can hear from
Speaker 1: all of you across the country about what you think
Speaker 1: about the show and just what's going on in your lives.
Speaker 1: But also, you know, it's nice to hear stories about
Speaker 1: what's going on in other places because we have so
Speaker 1: much less contact with each other. I go, I do
Speaker 1: so much less traveling now and don't get to get
Speaker 1: around and it's a shame. I like being able to
Speaker 1: bring you some stories and tell you about things. But
Speaker 1: we're all everyone's in kind of work from home lockdown,
Speaker 1: mode here in New York, New Jersey. I don't know
Speaker 1: what it's like in other places, so I'm glad to
Speaker 1: hear from all of you. I think it's a little
Speaker 1: bit better. But it looks like my brothers gonna be
Speaker 1: moving down to Texas the next couple of weeks, so
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have a There's gonna be a Sexton in
Speaker 1: Texas a couple of weeks from now, so I'll be
Speaker 1: visiting him. He's gonna be in Austin, So it's a KLBJ.
Speaker 1: I know I've been promising you folks for a long time,
Speaker 1: but I will be telling you at some point. I'm
Speaker 1: down for the weekend and I'm gonna be, you know,
Speaker 1: eating some barbecue and hanging out downtown. You can all come,
Speaker 1: and I'd say first rounds on me, but there could
Speaker 1: be a lot of them and that might get very expensive,
Speaker 1: and you know, gotta watch the expenses during the pandemic.
Speaker 1: But you know, we'll see, we'll make it happen. Facebook
Speaker 1: dot Com, slash Buck Sexton on the Facebook, Instagram Bucks Exton.
Speaker 1: Please send us your your messages there and let's get
Speaker 1: to it. Andrew right Hey, Buck Marine Corps lawyer here.
Speaker 1: I wonder if Republicans in Congress could propose a constitutional
Speaker 1: amendment to establish nine Supreme Court justices. I think it
Speaker 1: would have wide public support, and then maybe Joe Biden
Speaker 1: will answer whether he supports it. Love the show, keep
Speaker 1: up the good work, brother, Well Andrew, thank you so
Speaker 1: much for writing again. Thank you for your service. Sir. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that you know, it's a good idea what
Speaker 1: you raise, But I just know how the Democrats would
Speaker 1: probably dodge it very very early on, very very quickly.
Speaker 1: And that's just to say, well, of course it'll be
Speaker 1: not we don't even need we don't need it, Andrew.
Speaker 1: That's what they would say, we don't need it. We're nine,
Speaker 1: it's gonna be nine. Sure, sure, I need to say, well, buck,
Speaker 1: but they've said that maybe they packed the court. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but that's just that's just what they're saying to try
Speaker 1: to get their base happy. Right now. They can't tell
Speaker 1: people what they would really do right now, so I
Speaker 1: think they would they would avoid it, just like look
Speaker 1: what Kamala is doing. She is straight up saying no,
Speaker 1: not gonna answer. No, I'm not gonna give you an answer. Ah,
Speaker 1: how does that work? Well, that's where we are. But yeah, man,
Speaker 1: good thought, Andrew, thank you so much for listening to
Speaker 1: the show. Kevin Buck, I run off the road and
Speaker 1: die because my fogged up glasses when I exhaled while
Speaker 1: wearing my required mask while driving for Uber? Is that
Speaker 1: a COVID related death? Kevin? First of all, please safety first, Kevin,
Speaker 1: take care of yourself. We need everyone, We need every
Speaker 1: everyone on the team first and foremost to take good
Speaker 1: care of themselves and make sure they're healthy and safe.
Speaker 1: And as for yeah, COVID related debts there the media
Speaker 1: has no interest in finding out whether this is sure
Speaker 1: or not that the media has no interest in finding
Speaker 1: out whether there is in fact an inflated number of
Speaker 1: COVID debts because of the way that they're categorizing them.
Speaker 1: There have been doctors who have come forward and said, yes,
Speaker 1: sure enough, it is the case that we are counting
Speaker 1: things as COVID related debts that are not COVID related deaths.
Speaker 1: But I don't care a right the media doesn't. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. They're just going to keep pretending that this
Speaker 1: is not an issue because for right now, and this
Speaker 1: will switch so there'll be far fewer deaths attributable to
Speaker 1: a bid deministration under change rules of COVID, not actually
Speaker 1: any response because of the way they tabulate the numbers.
Speaker 1: The fix is in, folks, the fix is in. We
Speaker 1: all know it. Chris. How do you, mister sex and
Speaker 1: love the show? Anyway you can post your bit on
Speaker 1: Obama reading off the teleprompter? That is, no doubt in
Speaker 1: the top five funniest things I've heard in my life.
Speaker 1: Your discussion on that was awesome. It'll serve as a
Speaker 1: great pick me up with Nita. Keep doing what you're
Speaker 1: doing it. Thank you for it. Well, thank you so much, Chris.
Speaker 1: I'm really really pleased that that was so amusing. Mark.
Speaker 1: Which one did I do? What was that? What did
Speaker 1: I do? Mark? Has to remind me of what I
Speaker 1: say on the show the day of as soon as
Speaker 1: I'm done, I'm like Will Farrell and old School, where
Speaker 1: it's like he prepares for the debate gens at all
Speaker 1: in his head, and then afterwards she's like he doesn't
Speaker 1: remember anything. Um, I have a feeling this was before
Speaker 1: my time and this wasn't the end about Obama administration.
Speaker 1: Probably an OSS member here, Uh so it wasn't recent then, Yeah,
Speaker 1: because I don't I don't know. I don't know when
Speaker 1: I did this. I mean, I don't know done a
Speaker 1: lot of funny things, folks. I don't want to tell
Speaker 1: you. You You know, it's hard to keep up. What can
Speaker 1: I say? Sorry, um, yeah, I don't Well, Chris, We'll
Speaker 1: try to find out what this was what I did.
Speaker 1: And I'm okay, Tim, I'm gonna tell you this too,
Speaker 1: and Mark is gonna groan, but I I give you
Speaker 1: my word. We are days away from the next shield
Speaker 1: Tie podcast. Days away, not weeks. Days from a shield
Speaker 1: Tie podcast right at the height of the election. I know,
Speaker 1: but I feel like we could all use something that's
Speaker 1: not election related to listen to. It's already the first episode.
Speaker 1: The first new episode is seventy five percent recorded. So
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not Mark. Mark don't. We don't want
Speaker 1: to hear it from Mark about how I've been promising
Speaker 1: for months of months. I'm just telling you, folks, right
Speaker 1: now it is recorded and it will be out relatively.
Speaker 1: See now that you've said it, you're gonna procrastinate even more.
Speaker 1: Let's hope now. I would have preferred you just didn't
Speaker 1: say anything, and I should have just told me when
Speaker 1: I was done. I should have just surprised everybody with it.
Speaker 1: But now now this is like I've I've made a
Speaker 1: deadline for myself that there's even I can't escape this.
Speaker 1: I mean, you made a deadline six months ago, just
Speaker 1: for the record. No, but this is like a real deadline. Oh,
Speaker 1: this is this is a deadline that you know. It's
Speaker 1: like it's a deadline, not a you know. Come on.
Speaker 1: Maybe I'm just saying we're gonna get it done and
Speaker 1: people can listen to the history, and I think they'll
Speaker 1: like it. And I've got a whole bunch of others
Speaker 1: in my mind, and once I get moving with it,
Speaker 1: then I think it'll Once you get those juices flowing,
Speaker 1: then it's easy to keep keep the history train rolling. Dan,
Speaker 1: here we go, Buck. I'm a professional software engineer with
Speaker 1: my own business. I manage enterprise scale clients, including a
Speaker 1: very well known media company, a distinguished university, and a
Speaker 1: handful of Silicon Valley startups. If I was as wrong
Speaker 1: as Anthony Fauci any point with my clients, I would
Speaker 1: be laughed out of the industry. We are led by,
Speaker 1: as you would say, unimpressive people. I have never heard
Speaker 1: of doctor Fauci before COVID, and the doctors I am
Speaker 1: familiar with, such as doctor Salk, Pasteur, and Freud, all
Speaker 1: have considerable accomplishments in their field. Even doctor Drew or
Speaker 1: ken Jong are more reputable at this point. And most importantly,
Speaker 1: please ask producer Mark about doctor Fauchi's not calling him
Speaker 1: doctor anymore? Throwing motion. How can we entrust the safety
Speaker 1: of our nation to a man who throws like that,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, We defer to your expertise. Does a man
Speaker 1: throw in a way that is not to be trusted? Well? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean you remember the opening day first pitch for
Speaker 1: the Nationals. He threw it to first base when he's
Speaker 1: trying to throw it a home plate. Basically, it's terrible,
Speaker 1: isn't he Like it is mid late seventies though. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but you, I mean, if you're in somewhat good health,
Speaker 1: you should be able to throw a ball straight. I
Speaker 1: think that's fair. He also was the captain of High
Speaker 1: High school's basketball team in different times. Maybe you give
Speaker 1: him a basketball instead of a baseball next time. He
Speaker 1: was the captain of the High of the of the
Speaker 1: basketball team, he was five to seven um, which is
Speaker 1: which is now? I think I think he played center
Speaker 1: as well, which was interesting. He's the center, he's captain.
Speaker 1: He's five seven, so huh, I don't know. Yeah, kissing
Speaker 1: that league, they don't grow him tall. Yeah, yeah, because
Speaker 1: five to seven for a basketball center is not not
Speaker 1: particularly large, Deborah. Since all the Democrats are so worried
Speaker 1: about having a hearing for Judge Barrett, is there some
Speaker 1: reason why they can't just take a vote if Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell has the votes. Thank you, um, Deborah, I've been
Speaker 1: saying all along. I think that's what they should do.
Speaker 1: The hearing is coming up on Monday, so there certainly
Speaker 1: will be some fireworks there. The hearing is coming up,
Speaker 1: and yeah, we'll have to see, we'll have to see.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Um, that's where we're Bob. I look
Speaker 1: back to your your thing, Deborah. I want to believe that.
Speaker 1: I think I just kind of did a kamala too there.
Speaker 1: I was like, you know, they hearing, it's coming up.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, it's been a long show. What could
Speaker 1: I tell you? The hearing coming up, and it's gonna
Speaker 1: be a hearing and we're gonna hear things at it.
Speaker 1: Sort of like I was comma on the debate stage,
Speaker 1: just spewing nonsense. I think they should go right to
Speaker 1: a vote. I don't I wish that they weren't going
Speaker 1: to open the door for the assaults on ACB. I
Speaker 1: just I don't see how they're gonna be able to
Speaker 1: stop ACB even even with what they're gonna try to do.
Speaker 1: It just won't work, even with a Democrat, a Democrat
Speaker 1: opposition that would break any rule of decorum, decency, morality,
Speaker 1: or ethics to stop her. I don't see the pathway one.
Speaker 1: I gotta say that she was a high school rapist too.
Speaker 1: I mean, they could try. I don't think that will work.
Speaker 1: So what are they gonna go with. They gonna call
Speaker 1: her a racist? Yes, the woman who adopted two children
Speaker 1: from Haiti and loved them as her own and raised them,
Speaker 1: you know, within her own family is a racist. Sure
Speaker 1: that's going to work really well, you know it? So
Speaker 1: they those are the usual. And look, Kamala last night,
Speaker 1: I will say this didn't really get to play much
Speaker 1: of either the racist card against Pence or the and
Speaker 1: she the sexist card the media tried to play for her.
Speaker 1: But and she was being a little bit a little
Speaker 1: bit snippy with Pence. But it was not it wasn't
Speaker 1: It wasn't that much of it. So maybe ACB just
Speaker 1: gets through. But I'll just tell you this right now,
Speaker 1: and I will not forget it. Kavanaugh was just sailing through.
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh was totally qualified. Sterling resume. Everything about this guy
Speaker 1: should have been just easy as easy can be to
Speaker 1: get him through. And then the coordinated assault with the
Speaker 1: three fake accusers of cavanall all coming forward to lie
Speaker 1: about him and call him a rapist and try to
Speaker 1: ruin his reputation, and you know, think about what they
Speaker 1: were really doing. They wanted that man's They wanted Brett
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh's wife to think differently about him. You know, every
Speaker 1: night when they would go to sleep, they will want
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh's wife to think that she had married a rapist.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the most disgusting. Look the Kavanaugh
Speaker 1: hearings they create, They created so many wartime conservatives and
Speaker 1: change the perspective that many of us have about the
Speaker 1: other side, where we just realize they're they're totally ruthless.
Speaker 1: They'll do whatever, they don't care, and you can either
Speaker 1: fight back or just let them have their way. Those
Speaker 1: are your options. The third option about triangulation or conciliation.
Speaker 1: You know, the the Mit Romney, John McCain, and yes,
Speaker 1: even George W. Bush approach at some level. Not good,
Speaker 1: not good. You're in the freedom Hud. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast. All right, more roll call?
Speaker 1: We got bomb up here, Hey, bucking Mark. I think
Speaker 1: Trump's message after leaving Walter read yesterday that we should
Speaker 1: not allow fear of COVID, we should not let fear
Speaker 1: of COVID control US is very powerful and will resonate
Speaker 1: with a huge number of Americans. I think the Democrats
Speaker 1: also realize that, and I believe the media will freak
Speaker 1: out about it as an attempt to make the statement radioactive,
Speaker 1: to try to scare Trump into toning down or abandoning
Speaker 1: the message. I am concerned they might succeed. I believe
Speaker 1: it is a winning message and he needs to keep
Speaker 1: it front and center. It speaks to the American spirit
Speaker 1: and American history. Who are we to borrow the DEM's
Speaker 1: favorite phrase? And I think it ties directly with economic recovery.
Speaker 1: Knowing Trump as you do, do you think he and
Speaker 1: his team will resist the message and keep pounding. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: resist the pressure and keep pounding this message home. Yes,
Speaker 1: I think Trump will keep hammering this message, Bob. I'm
Speaker 1: very confident of that, and I've spoken to some of
Speaker 1: his top people and they're also very confident about that.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I would say the answers. Yes, I would
Speaker 1: say it's very likely that the president will stay right
Speaker 1: where he needs to be with this Kevin Buck, when
Speaker 1: I run off the road and die because my glasses,
Speaker 1: Oh I'm sorry, we already did that one. Where we
Speaker 1: go here, Kyle Buck. On Tuesday's show, you talked about
Speaker 1: the anti cop hate movement in the Democrat Party while
Speaker 1: politicians talk out of both sides of the mouths, like Biden,
Speaker 1: of their mass mouths in order to not totally seem
Speaker 1: insane and moderate voters. It reminds me of the anti
Speaker 1: military protest during the Iraq War. I remember being subject
Speaker 1: to some very nasty comments and gestures when in uniform
Speaker 1: from what we're obvious lives. While Democrat politicians back then
Speaker 1: we're doing the same rhetorical two step you see now
Speaker 1: about supporting the troops while opposing the war. It was
Speaker 1: bull like more recent or like resent the war fighter
Speaker 1: because the war is a useful political cudgel against Republicans.
Speaker 1: Our unit was a was near a college campus and
Speaker 1: one night at brick was thrown through a large window
Speaker 1: with the words don't forget, will always hate you spray
Speaker 1: painted on the remaining window. I haven't forgotten. These are
Speaker 1: the types of people who protest cops. Now. It's disgusting. Kyle.
Speaker 1: Thank you for your service. And I think you're I
Speaker 1: think you're correct. I think that a lot of Democrat oh,
Speaker 1: we support the troops but hate the war. No, a
Speaker 1: lot of them actually hate. There are a lot of them. Actually,
Speaker 1: I disdained for the troops too. If you look in
Speaker 1: this country, and this is why their attacks on Trump
Speaker 1: and saying that he doesn't like the military, it's just
Speaker 1: so obvious and so fake. In this country, if you
Speaker 1: don't respect the military, there's about a ninety nine percent
Speaker 1: chance that you are a Democrat, a leftist maybe ninety
Speaker 1: nine point nine. That's where that's where cop hatred lives,
Speaker 1: and that's where military hatred lives on the left of
Speaker 1: our political spectrum. It's just the truth, just the way
Speaker 1: that it is. So I think you see that, Kyle.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry that some people show disrespect to you, but
Speaker 1: the decent patriotic Americans who listen to the show cannot
Speaker 1: thank you enough for doing what you did, serving in
Speaker 1: uniform and being the best of the American family. We
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Matt. I don't hear much about taking back
Speaker 1: the House this election. Is this a foregone conclusion that
Speaker 1: Republicans won't take control? Matt. I've heard about it, but
Speaker 1: you're right, it hasn't gotten a lot of attention, and
Speaker 1: I think it's because they don't want to raise expectations
Speaker 1: of it, maybe a unified Republican government and then have
Speaker 1: to obviously scale that back a whole lot if it
Speaker 1: doesn't end up coming to fruition. So I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's really looking that good for
Speaker 1: us right now. I haven't seen the polls recently, and
Speaker 1: I haven't seen a macro analysis of the House. My
Speaker 1: understanding is that it's probably going to be a tough
Speaker 1: one for us to take back the House. That's where
Speaker 1: that's what i've as I understand it's probably gonna be
Speaker 1: tough for that to happen. So we shall see. But
Speaker 1: I will look more into that one, Matt, because you're right,
Speaker 1: that's not really a lot of focus on obviously the
Speaker 1: presidential race, and on the Senate a bit too, not
Speaker 1: so much on the House race, and that's going to
Speaker 1: be up for grabs as well. John Buck, First off,
Speaker 1: Pens killed it in the debate. Second, I used to
Speaker 1: subscribe to the prediction that the election will be closed.
Speaker 1: But recently, after seeing a group of these Trump parades,
Speaker 1: yard signs, record new gun owners, record new black gun owners,
Speaker 1: and like in twenty sixteen, the Trump crowd versus the
Speaker 1: opposition crowd, I believe Trump will sweep on election day
Speaker 1: as long as he stays strong. All of these new
Speaker 1: gun owners are taking their safety into their own hands.
Speaker 1: They're not going to vote for the party that wants
Speaker 1: to ban them. Let's see, John, I'd like to think that,
Speaker 1: you know your observations here will turn into a huge
Speaker 1: ump wave. Let's just say that. I like where your
Speaker 1: heads at. But I think it's going to be a
Speaker 1: very tight election. But I hope you're right and I'm wrong.
Speaker 1: I hope you're right and I'm wrong. Remember how I
Speaker 1: told you there probably wasn't going to be a second
Speaker 1: debates Looking like that might be the case, though, So
Speaker 1: I do tend to get this stuff right. Just gonna
Speaker 1: say that. Remember people ask me back in August, I
Speaker 1: said there'll be one, So that may be it, and
Speaker 1: that may be it. We'll see all right, team, Thanks
Speaker 1: so much, Please pass the buck. Tell someone this week
Speaker 1: to download The Buck Sexton Show wherever they listen to podcasts.
Speaker 1: Until next time, Shield Tie