WEBVTT - How do Michelin Stars Work?

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.519
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Part Time Genius, the production of Kaleidoscope

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Guess what mango was that?

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, I know you're a huge Katy Perry fan.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Right, Well not really.

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're at least familiar with the twenty seventeen songs

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>she did with Migos called Bone Appetite, right like big One. No, real,

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 2>this is it. We may need to do a different episode.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>That's fine. I know it's no firework. But the whole

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 2>song is basically this extended metaphor. You didn't know she

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>was into this, right, extended metaphors where Katy Perry is

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 2>describing herself as a delicious meal in lots of creative ways,

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>and at one point in the song, she says, I'm

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 2>a five star Michelin, a five star Micheline Mengo.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Five stars is really confident.

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not confident. It's ridiculous because the Micheline star

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 2>rating only goes up to three stars. And poor Katy

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Perry actually didn't realize that sousicians don't fact check their songs.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I know, it's very very disappointing.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So wait, well, why does Michelin only use three stars

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and not like five or ten.

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Michelin Star system is full of all kinds

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 2>of arbitrary, opaque, and frankly mystifying rules, and it's kind

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 2>of its whole thing. That's why they do this, and

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>that's what we're getting into in this episode.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Or in the words of Katy Perry Bone Petite.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I knew you were a big fan.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Part Time Genius. I'm will and as always,

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm here with my good friend Mango, and somewhere behind

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 2>that big booth is our pal Dylan, who I think

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 2>is trolling us because he's decorated that booth with all

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>these posters of the see I think I see the

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Pillsbury dough Boy, the Staypuff marshmallow Man, even that character

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>from what was it, Big Hero six, Big Hero six?

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Pretty It is definitely trolling us because he's got every

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>other white puffy character from pop culture except the Michelin Man. Also,

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>where did he get so many Pilsburg Dobles.

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 2>He's impressive. He's very into like the you know, finding

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>the sales.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's probably where he really goes all out.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm really excited to be doing this show together,

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 2>but I'm curious what made you think to do this

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 2>episode on Michelin Stars.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So I watched this Bradley Cooper movie on a flight.

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 3>It's called Burnt.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>You've seen it, And there's this whole thing where they're

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about how to spot these like elite reviewers from

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Michelin whatever, and they come in pairs and order in

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>specific ways, and I kind of want to see how

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>much of.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 2>That was true. So that was part of it.

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Plus, I know your parents are foodies and they used

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to have all those menus on their porch from restaurants.

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I willed it.

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I just thought it to be a fun topic.

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm excited to dive in. So why don't we

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 2>go back to the beginning just to think about where

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>the name comes from. So basically, we're going way back

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to eighteen eighty nine and Michelin started out as a

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>tire manufacturing company, which I think a lot of people know,

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 2>but it was the brothers Andre and Eduard Michelin, and

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>they took over their grandfather's struggling manufacturing business and they

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 2>started producing tires and they were really clever, so they

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 2>pat into this removable pneumatic bike tire. They invented the

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 2>first automobile tire, and they even made rubber train.

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Tires, tires for trains.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 2>That's supposedly why the Paris Metro used to be so quiet.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I'd never heard of this before, but just then, looking

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>to this, it's pretty neat and it doesn't screech like

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>New York's. But anyway, in eighteen eighty nine, Michelin debuts

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 2>their puffy mascot, the Michelin Man. Way back in eighteen

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 2>eighty nine.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as Dylan pointed out, looks a whole lot like

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the stay Puffed guy from Ghostbusters.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Yep, except he's not made of marshmallows. He's actually made

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>of tires. And apparently Michelin tires used to be white.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 2>And one day Eduard looked at this pile of tires

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 2>and he was like, hey, Andre, if that pile of

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 2>tires had arms, it will look like a man. So yeah,

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 2>that's that's how this stuff comes to life.

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I guess anything's a mascot if you

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>put arms on it.

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>And they had this kind of funny concept for it.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>They named their tire man Bibindam because that comes from

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the Latin phrase nunc s bibindum which means now is

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the time to drink. Because in these earliest ads, if

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>you look at them, he's actually holding up this goblet

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 2>of nails and broken glass, because the whole concept was

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to show that michelin tires were unfazed by

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>obstacles on the road.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So in this super weird scenario, he's drinking nails and

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 1>broken glass.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the tire man, that's what it is.

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So Michelin man is like this well fed, indestructible

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>bon Vivonne, the kind of guy who can eatn drink

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>all day and night and just keep going.

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 2>It's such as it's impressive. Yeah, it's a very French

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 2>illustration of longevity. So anyway, in nineteen hundred, Michelin begins

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 2>publishing these free travel guides to France and eventually they

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 2>make guides for other parts of Europe. And it's a

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 2>pretty smart play because Michelin's basically acting like tourism pioneers,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 2>so they're encouraging ordinary people to take longer and longer

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 2>road trips. As you know, of course, helps boost hire sales,

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 2>and from the beginning of these tourism road trip guys

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 2>included restaurant recommendations.

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So I guess these early French travelers weren't like eating

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>handfuls of Twizzlers or beef jerky on they.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Really missing out, really really missing out. And Michelin was

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 2>smart about their review system too. The reviews were always

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 2>conducted anonymously, and so this gave Micheline this extra layer

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 2>of credibility with customers. They weren't just handing out good

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 2>reviews to friends. Then you fast forward to nineteen twenty

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 2>six when the stars first began appearing. So this is

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a quarter of a century later, but at that time

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>they're all awarded to restaurants in France, and so initially

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 2>they were just starred and non starred restaurants. But then

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen thirties, Michelin created the three star system

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 2>that remains in place today.

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's no real reason that's three stars.

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>They just kind of decided that. I mean, they're French,

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>so they have to do something. It's a little different.

0:05:58.080 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you've ever been to a Michelin

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 2>star restaurant, Mango a one or two or I got

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>a three Mango.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Listen, Milo's a three star restaurant.

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 2>The fast food burger joint. I think it was two stars,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 2>and still they started putting that extra nub of meat

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 2>on the paddy. It's just a little bonus nub, and

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>then that got them to three. No, actually I don't

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 2>think they have any stars mego.

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>So I think what's funny about the whole Michelin Star

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>thing is how vague the distinctions are between sort of

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the one, two and three star establishments.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean by that?

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So apparently one Michelin Star is award to restaurants using

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>top quality ingredients, where dishes with these distinct flavors are

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>prepared to a consistently high standard.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that sounds good.

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it totally sounds good. And then two Michelin Stars

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>are awarded when the personality and talent of the chef

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>are evident in these expertly crafted dishes and their food

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is refined and inspired.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 2>M hm also sounds good, m H.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And three Michelin Stars, the highest award, is given for

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the superlative cooking of chefs at the peak of their profession.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>The cooking is to an art form, and some of

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>their dishes are destined to become classics.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.559
<v Speaker 2>That also sounds good. Mengo like system that's the things.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>They all sound good, I mean, and they also kind

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of sound the same, right, like like one star is good,

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>two stars is more good, and three stars is just

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>like more and more good.

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Seriously, it's good.

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So how do you eat a meal and decide

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that the food is refined and inspired versus you know,

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a meal that's an art form, right? How do they

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>even make these judgments?

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm glad you asked that, mango.

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's almost like I set you off.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 2>So the judging is done by anonymous Michelin inspectors, all

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 2>of whom work full time and have prior restaurant and

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 2>hospitality experience. Multiple inspectors dine at a restaurant under consideration

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 2>and then they talk about these ratings together, so it's

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 2>not just one person that's passing judgment on a place

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>after a single meal. Inspectors visit multiple times for different

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>meals with the goal of experiencing the full range of

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the menu. So it's a really thorough process. And Michigan

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>claims there is quote no seqk mathematical formula and that

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 2>decor degree of formality, type of cuisine, like all of

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>that that they really don't matter, of course, there are

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>five specific criteria the judges used to award stars. So

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>here they are. The first is quality of the ingredients,

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 2>The second is the harmony of flavors. Then you have

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the mastery of culinary techniques. Fourth is the personality of

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the chef is expressed through their cuisine. And then the

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 2>fifth is consistency of the above but across the entire

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>menu and over time. And it's worth mentioning there's also

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 2>this thing called the bib Gourmand designation and it's given

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to the most affordable restaurants that offer high value for

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the money. And I have wondered this before, because you'll

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 2>notice this in cities. Sometimes it'll be like a diner

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>or something like that that'll end up with a Michelin Star.

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I do think that's pretty cool to think they think

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 2>about it this way. But all of this judging has

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 2>done completely anonymously, and that just actually seems crazy to me, Like,

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand how these inspectors could keep their identity

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>a secret if they're hopping around to all the world's

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>best restaurants multiple times a year.

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's exactly the part I wanted to dig into.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So why don't we tackle that after a break sounds good.

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to part time Genius, where we're talking about

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 2>Michelin stars and why chefs are so darn thirsty for them. So, Magel,

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 2>I think you were just about to tell us how

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 2>the food criticism at Michelin works.

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So in two thousand and nine, The New

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Yorker published this profile of a New York inspector and

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it's super fun and cloak and dagger. The inspector's pseudonym

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>was Maxine, and the first really interesting thing is that

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>she said, most Michelin executives don't even know who the

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>inspectors are.

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow.

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, inspectors are told to keep their work secret

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>from their friends and even from their parents.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 2>I have to be honest, I don't think I could

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 2>keep that secret from my parents.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know. I feel like Bill and Paulette would

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely be dining with you and bringing everyone boxes of

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>fancy leftovers. But Maxine revealed that she ate restaurant meals

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred days per year, dinner and lunch, and

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>almost always alone, because inspectors really can't risk being identified

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>through conversations at the table.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I love eating out, and I love eating out at

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 2>good restaurants, but two hundred days a year I have to,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and especially like by yourself most of the time. That

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of seems like torture.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I know. It's almost like work travel, Like as a kid,

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you think it's going to be so exciting, like on

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the road in hotels and stuff, and then you do

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it for a few months and it kind of loses

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the charm. But at Michelin, the system is almost set

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>up like this secret service. So Maxine said when she

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was being considered for the job, she had to eat

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>several meals under supervision of inspectors who operated like spies.

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And this is her quote. You never know the name

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of the person you're meeting, You never know where their

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>meeting until right before, so they call you up and

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>say meet me at the corner of XYZ and xyz.

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 2>So dramatic, like you kind of forget for a second

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about food, like it seems like a national

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 2>security thing, but it's really like who has the best

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 2>pork belly.

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And aspiring inspectors also have to attend a secret

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Michelin training course in France and then they have to

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 1>complete all this additional still anonymous training in another country,

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and then they do a three to six month still

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>very anonymous apprenticeship with a more senior inspector. So another

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>anonymous inspector from a twenty seventeen Food and Wine article

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>did shed a little bit of light on what happens here.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>He said, we always order three courses, an appetizer and

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>entree and dessert, and we try to pick items that

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>are the best representation of the menu concept or chef's talents.

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But of course, despite Michelin's best efforts, in December two

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three, there was this big tell all.

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 2>I was hoping you would get to a tell all.

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you kind of have to hope for it. So

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this book comes out from this inspector in Pascal Remy,

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>who was fired after revealing that he'd kept a diary

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of his career, and he planned to publish this book.

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And so the book is called The Inspector Sits Down

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Table, and it was published in France in

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>April two thousand and four, and it caused a huge stir.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>One journalist from France called it a storm and a

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>saucepan A storm.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I kind of love that.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's great, right, it's also a good description of Ruby.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>But Remy alleged some pretty wild stuff in this book,

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>all of which Michelin disputes. He said that despite publishing

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>new guides with updated ratings every year, Michelin didn't actually

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>visit or revisit every restaurant annually, which is a huge

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>scandal right in part because there aren't enough inspectors. Remy

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote that there were only five inspectors in all of

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>France as of two thousand and three when he was writing,

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>which is not nearly enough to cover the country's ten

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand restaurants. He also said there's some three star restaurants

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>which were secretly deemed untouchable, so like, under no circumstance

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>could they lose their talpeting. Even though Remi claimed more

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>than a third of the guide's three star rated establishments

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually meet the three star criteria.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's a really bad look for a

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>rating system that's supposed to be, you know, super objective

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and impartial for this whole history of its existence. But

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>when you have something like a Michelin star that sought

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>after and means so much to these restaurants, there's definitely

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be some fallout from this.

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So what are you thinking about right now?

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, for example, obviously, getting a Michelin star can catapult

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 2>a restaurant into fame in many cases bring these huge profits.

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>But losing a star, and I had not really thought

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 2>about this before, but it can bring just the opposite

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 2>of that effect. So Thornton's at the Fitzwilliam Hotel, a

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 2>high end Dublin restaurant, lost its Michelin star back in

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen, and it maintained this star for two decades,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and when it did, profits dropped by seventy six percent

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 2>by the end of twenty sixteen. Yeah, and actually the

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>place ended up having to close after that. And as

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the chef, Kevin Thornton told The Irish Independent, losing the

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 2>star felt like quote getting stabbed in the heart. I mean,

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>it means so much to these people. In fact, one chef,

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Bernard Lazeau, was so terrified of losing his three Micheline

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 2>stars that it may have actually contributed to his two

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 2>thousand and three suicide.

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>That's really terrible.

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it really is. I mean he'd been running this

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Burgundy restaurant called Lecouteur, where he had actually gotten a

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 2>third Michelin Star in nineteen ninety one, but in two

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>thousand and three, this French newspaper Le Figaro published this

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>rumor and claimed that he was slated to lose his

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 2>third star, and his widow told The Observer that the

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 2>rumor had a real impact on her husband because he

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:46.359
<v Speaker 2>feared that losing a star would have these devastating financial consequences.

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 2>But one of the saddest parts of the story is

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 2>after his death, the two thousand and three Michelin Guide

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 2>gave the restaurant its usual three stars. That is so sad,

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 2>it really is. But it's not just losing a star

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 2>that can have negative consequences for a restaurant. Even getting

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 2>a star can throw a place into turmoil. So it's

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 2>an example of that. After being listed in the twenty

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 2>sixteen Hong Kong Guide, there was this dessert shop called

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Kai Kai Dessert that was forced to move because its

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 2>landlord got greedy and thinking that it would bring this

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 2>new spike in business, he raised the rent by one

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty percent, which is awful. Yeah, and the

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 2>owners did get lucky though there was this loyal customer

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 2>that offered them rent in a nearby space at a

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 2>rent that he could afford. But the Michelin Star branding

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 2>can be especially tough on small establishments that don't have

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the capital or the capacity to meet this sudden demand

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 2>that comes with a rating. Like seventy two year old Jafi,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 2>who earned a Michelin Star in twenty seventeen for her

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>cooking at an open air street food restaurant in Bangkok.

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>So the award made her this overnight celebrity, which is great,

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>but she was one of only seventeen chefs in Thailand

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>with a star, and a few months later she actually

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>told a reporter she wanted to give the star back.

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you actually give a starback?

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Not really? But if I explain that her restaurant's vibes

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 2>had been super relaxed before and the star had basically

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 2>turned it into chaos, I actually feel like I've experienced

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 2>this before at restaurants when they seem so good and

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 2>suddenly they gained this notoriety and that experience has just

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.359
<v Speaker 2>changed totally. So the award made her this overnight celebrity.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>She was the only person cooking, so suddenly there was

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>this increase in traffic, and it meant she no longer

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 2>had time to take breaks or chat with her diners

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that were there, and her servers were overwhelmed from the

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>stress and just worry that neighbors on their street were

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 2>going to get angry because of the crowds and the noise.

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 2>But the worst part was that Jay Fi had all

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>these tax inspectors that started showing up seemingly because they

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>thought she must be making more money than she had reported,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and they kept trying to look through her books.

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So it is Jay the only chef who's tried to

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>give these starsback.

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Have you heard more? Not even close. So there's this

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 2>South Korean chef oh Ya Kwan got an Italian eatery

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 2>called Restaurante O, and it received a Michelin star in

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen. It was a guide to soul dining there

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and O claims that as soon as he learned this,

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 2>he contacted Michelin and asked to be removed, but it

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately didn't work for him, and his restaurant appeared again

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen with a star.

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, I guess there's another way, right, he

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>could just try to lower the quality of the food

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>theirs out, But I mean, I guess that's not anything

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>any self respecting chef wants to do well.

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 2>In the twenty nineteen edition, oh actually did lose the star,

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 2>but he still appeared in the guide, at which point

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 2>he actually sued Michelin, not for the demotion, but for

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 2>including his restaurant at all. There was this CNN interview

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 2>that he did and he explained that the guide's methodology

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 2>was part of the problem. It's the cruelest test in

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 2>the world, he says. It forces the chefs to work

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 2>around a year waiting for a test, and they don't

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 2>know when and it's coming. I mean, I do love

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 2>that there's this rating system to help guide me as

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 2>this outsider, especially in cities that I don't know.

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>But you can see how it's hard on chefs. And

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>also there have been strange stories that make you question

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the objectivity and fairness of the organization, like apparently Michelin

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>inspectors are supposed to visit a restaurant several times before

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they raid it, but in two thousand and five, for

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the first time in history, Michelin was actually forced to

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>recall one of its guides. The two thousand and five

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>guide covering Belgium, the Netherlands in Luxembourg, was pulled after

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand copies had already been published, and the reason

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was that this Belgian restaurant, the Austin Queen, had been

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>given that bib Gorman designation, you know, the one for

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>like great cheap food, but the restaurant hadn't actually opened

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>yet loops. So you know, there's also this issue of

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>investors in the Michelin Guide. The whole thing is a

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>really expensive enterprise, and so like you're talking about these

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>big tabs from fine dining restaurants plus printing up the

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>actual guide. So some Michelin guides are the result of

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>investments from the countries themselves. Michelin guides to Thailand and

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Singapore and Hong Kong are actually backed in part by

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>payments from the local tourism boards, which totally makes sense,

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but the sums are pretty impressive. Like Thailand paid supposedly

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>four point four million dollars to be paid out over

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the course of five years to fund like multiple editions

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Michelin Thailand Guide.

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 2>That is a lot of money.

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and corporate sponsors can get involved too, like to

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>launch the Hong Kong Guide in two thousand and eight,

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Michelin got funding from several brands, including Evian Espresso, Robert

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Parker Wine Advocate, which Michelin owns a stake in, And

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>while the details are kind of scarce, it kind of

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>makes it hard to verify if government or corporate money

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>is influencing Michelin Stars and if they are, what extent

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>are they actually having their influence met?

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I have to guess this is not zero.

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the website Eater connected some of the

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>dots for Michelin Singapore g and so there's this Resorts

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>World Sentosa and they acted as a title sponsor the

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>guide and hosted this invitation only gala for the launch

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty sixteen Singapore Stars Guide and after that

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for the resort's restaurants also happened to snag seven of

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>those coveted Stars.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean, it could be a coincidence. Probably not.

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>There's also been an issue with Michelin and greenwashing. So

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, Michelin added a new designation to the

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Stars and the bib Gourmond and they call it the

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Green Star. Supposedly it honors quote restaurants that are role

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>models when it comes to sustainable astronomy.

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 2>So what exactly does that mean.

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it sounds great, but it's pretty unclear

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>what it actually indicates. So there's this chef Chris Polisi

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>who wrote in this deleted blog now that the Green

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Star review process consisted of one brief call to his restaurant.

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't an in person audit or a detailed questionnaire,

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and as he put it, there wasn't even quote a

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>critical question of any type. And then there's this other chef,

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Orlando, who agreed, and he told Wired there was

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no fact checking during his Green Star review. I

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>could have said anything and it would have qualified me

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>for the ward.

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm just shocked by this.

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So Michelin says, our teams rely both on their field work,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>i e. On the experience of eating in that restaurant,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as in depth research and conversations with restaurant

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>tours regarding their eco responsible practices. So that's their defense.

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I actually didn't think we could get more vague than

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 2>refined and inspired versus elevated to an art form, But

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 2>here we are. Mago.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a pattern, but the near total secrecy around

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this review process, especially the process by which stars are

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>given and taken away means it's kind of impossible to

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>know if Michelin is being fair or what other factors,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>whether that's money or connections or sponsorship, is actually playing

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a role. And for diners and chefs, you really don't

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>know if the reviews are done by people familiar with

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:00.120
<v Speaker 1>local cuisines.

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Right right, actually on that local cuisine tip. It's worth

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 2>noting that even though in recent years Michelin has expanded

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 2>coverage beyond Europe and European cooking, some have definitely criticized

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>it for retaining an overly European lens that South Korea

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 2>and chef oh Ya Kwan, the guy who wanted to

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 2>give his starback you remember him, said that the entire

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Soul Guide was suspect and quote a sad joke since

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 2>it only included one hundred and seventy of the city's restaurants.

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 2>So writing in Vogue Korea, one food writer explained, the

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 2>only people who really care about having the Michelin Guide

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 2>in Seoul are those who are obsessed with Soul's international status.

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Like they're obsessed with impressing Western elites. They aren't confident

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that Soul can stand on its own as a restaurant capital.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So is there Michelin on other continents?

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Well? So far, Michelin's presence in South and Latin America

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 2>is pretty new and rather limited. And it doesn't seem

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 2>aware that Africa exists just yet. Somebody should tell them

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 2>about Africa.

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I also noticed that you didn't mention Antarctica.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a real snub, to be honest with you. But

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 2>the research station near this one ice dome supposedly has

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>just the most amazing papoosas.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So they're missing out. Well before we sign off, maybe.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>We do a quick backup.

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, how about we start with the world's most remote

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Michelin star restaurant. This two star restaurant called Cox in Elimanok,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a tiny settlement on Disco Bay in Greenland. The town

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.959
<v Speaker 1>has a population of fifty six, but the restaurant's staff

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>has brought that up to eighty eight now and today.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It's accessible by boat in the fall and summer, but

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in the winter and spring, when icebergs clogged the bay,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you can only get there by helicopter.

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Wow, And so what can you get there?

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>There's a tasting menu that includes more than twenty courses

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and it costs about four hundred and seventy dollars or

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty two hundred Danish kroner, which I.

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Know you didn't have to do that conversion. Yeah, I knew.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The food is all locally sourced, and you get dishes

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like raw whale skin marinated in currant leaf oil, musk

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>ox broth, reindeer tartar with moss and fermented mushroom comfort food,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and tarmiguan with black currant salsa.

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, well, speaking of one of Michelin's cheapest restaurants.

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 2>Back in two thousand and nine, the dim sum restaurant

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Tim ho Wan opened in Hong Kong and set the

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 2>world on fire, and within just a year it received

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 2>a Michelin Star, becoming the world's most inexpensive Michelin starred restaurant.

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 2>But almost as quickly it expanded beyond its humble roots,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>and today Tim Howan is a multi national chain with

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 2>locations in twelve countries, including two where you live in

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 2>New York City, which is maybe the best way of

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 2>dealing with the headache of getting a star anyway. Tim

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Howan Hong Kong no longer has a Michelin Star, but

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 2>it does have the BIB gourmand as a nation.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was actually reading about another one of these

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>cheap eats. The Michelin twenty sixteen guide for Singapore, which

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>was their inaugural guide there, gave this star to a

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>street food hawker for the first time. The person's name

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was Leo Fan and the restaurant is Hong Kong Seya

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Sauce Chicken, Rice and Noodle, and it also claimed to

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be the most inexpensive Michelin Star restaurant for a while.

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>It's famous sey sauce chicken dish cost about two dollars.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But just like your chef, Tim Howan quickly used that

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>star to open up a slew of franchises.

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not surprising. So I know we talked about all

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 2>these chefs trying to give back their stars, but there

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 2>are plenty who lose stars and desperately want them back,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 2>including the French chef Mark Verrat. So in twenty nineteen,

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Verat lost this lawsuit he brought against Michelin after the

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>guide demoted his restaurant from three stars down to two.

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 2>And the thing is he wasn't actually asking for the

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>star to be reinstated, but he was trying to get

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Michelin to provide the names and resumes of the inspectors

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 2>who graded him, as well as proof that they had

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 2>in fact eaten at his restaurant. And for their part,

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Michelin refused, saying they had to protect their inspector's and anonymity,

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 2>but that the demotion was based on one detail. Verat

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 2>used English Cheddar in his soioux flet, I mean just

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 2>a big mistake, choose mistake. So for his part, Verrot

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 2>insisted that he had never done any such thing, and

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.959
<v Speaker 2>in fact, he showed the court a video of the

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 2>soufflet's preparation. It used two French cheeses, Beaufort and Roblachan,

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 2>and Verat told CNN, I'm ready to accept losing a star,

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>but they have to tell me why. In my opinion,

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 2>they are incompetent. Do you realize they mixed up Roblachan

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 2>and Cheddar. I mean, my god, can you imagine this?

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 2>So the court ruled against Verat, saying there was no

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 2>proof that he and his business had suffered any damage

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 2>from the demotion, and to be fair, it does feel

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 2>like if you've got the sophisticated palette of a Michelin chef,

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 2>it is hard to mix up cheddar and robleish on

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 2>which is this soft, squishy cheese that kind of looks

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 2>like brie or Beaufort, which is basically a type of griere.

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like this is probably a conspiracy that

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 2>we can investigate in a different episode cheese controversies.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I really like that last fact, and I think

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you today's trophy.

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's so kind of you. All right, I'm going

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to place this on Dylan's desk for all of those

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 2>pills very dope boys to admire. That's it for today's

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Part Time Genius. If you like the show, make sure

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 2>to tell every single person you know, seriously, every single person,

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 2>but thank you for listening.

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Part Time Genius is a production of Kaleidoscope and iHeartRadio.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>This show is hosted by Will Pearson and Ni mongaish

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>heatique and research by our goodpal Mary Philip Sandy. Today's

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>episode was engineered and produced by the wonderful Dylan Fagan

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with support from Tyler Klang. The show is executive produced

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for iHeart by Katrina Norvell and Ali Perry, with social

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 1>media support from Sasha Gay trustee Dara Potts and Viny Shorey.

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from Kaleidoscope and iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.