WEBVTT - "Bad Astronomer" Phil Plait

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Cipher and I'm Jerry O'Shea. I was a

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>CIA officer stationed around the world in high threat posts

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, Russia, and in Asia.

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>And I served in Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and in war zones. We sometimes created conspiracies to deceive

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 2>our adversaries.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going to use our expertise to deconstruct conspiracy

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>theories large and small.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Could they be true or are we being manipulated?

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>This is mission implausible. Today we have the bad astronomer,

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Phil Plate. He's an award winning astronomer, educator, and science writer.

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>He's worked with NASA on the Hubble Space Telescope team,

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's written several well received books. So welcome, feel

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>glad to have you with us.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so nice to be here.

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So, Phil, you do a lot of work on debunking

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>common misunderstandings of science and astronomy and educating people on

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>why astronomy is so important. Can you give us just

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>some sense and background on your work and the kind

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of examples that you talk about.

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, these days, mostly I'm doing straight science, just talking

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>about all the wonderful things that are happening in the universe.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Basically in astronomy. I do still occasionally have to dip

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 3>my toe into the debunking pool, and this is something

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I used to do all the time. As a matter

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>of fact, I guess I could say I was a

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 3>professional skeptic, a critical thinker. And it all started in

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the nineties when I started seeing just silly ideas about

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 3>astronomy online. And this was when online was not what

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 3>it is today. But I started just debunking these ideas, saying, hey,

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>you know that's not how this really works. Why does

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 3>the moon look big on the horizon as opposed overhead?

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 3>And read up on how that works. And in two thousand,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Fox TV aired a moon landing denial show called Conspiracy Theory?

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Did we land on the Moon? And you know, if

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 3>they'd been honest and just said yes, it would have

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 3>been a very short show.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 4>It has been estimated that as many as twenty percent

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 4>of Americans believe we never went to the Moon. Is

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 4>it really possible that NASA to see the world. According

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>to a former astronaut, it's entirely possible.

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Regarding the Apollo mission, I can't say one ercent for

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 5>sure whether these men walked on the Moon.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 3>I wrote it up on my website and it became

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>really popular. That was my first big sort of viral moment,

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 3>and ever since a UFO's moon landing. When it comes

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 3>to science based conspiracy theories or urban legends and that

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing, that's when I would come storming in.

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start up a discript basy talking about

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 2>espionage astrology, not astronomy and effectiveness. So let's jump back

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 2>on our time machine. And Hitler was a great believer

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 2>in astronomy in the cult and especially Googles, And when

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 2>World War II was just starting, the Nazis, surprisingly enough

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 2>took astrology is a war effort and they banned private

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>use of astrology. All had to be done by the

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>state as part of the propaganda effort. I was actually

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>surprised to find that there's been a long history of

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 2>using astrology and other bogus science for propaganda efforts that

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>sometimes have been quite effective, is as real conspiracies and

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>real conspiracy theories to actually further a political agita. And

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I was wondering if your sense of like how astrology

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>is used to basically they drafting off of real astronomy

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 2>to make political purposes or to to you know, to

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>make money things.

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>If I knew that, I'd be a million well, I know. Yeah.

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 3>So astrology, I mean, just to be clear, is nonsense.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 3>There's no aspect of astrology that works. This has been

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 3>tested over and over again, including using tests that astrologers

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 3>themselves have come up with, and then double blind studies

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 3>where they say, here will agree to these rules, and

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 3>then they cast their horoscopes or whatever, and what they

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>do is no better than random chance, which is exactly

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 3>what astronomer has been saying. But Nancy Reagan used a

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 3>personal astrologer to schedule, yeah, quickly, that's right, to make

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 3>appointments for Ronald Reagan to meet with people or to

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 3>do things or not do things. And this is all

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 3>silly until it's not silly anymore, which is typical of

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy theories and scientific nonsense, pseudoscience or anti science, whatever

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 3>you want to call it. With astrology, you've got a

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 3>pretty good head start because, first of all, astrology has

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 3>been around for thousands and thousands of years. The constellations,

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 3>the zodiac, the zodiacal constellations, we base these on the

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Greek constellations. We're already talking about twenty five hundred years

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 3>or so, and most ancient civilizations had their own versions

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>of this, the Egyptians and the Babylonians, the Chinese. I

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>could just go on and on. So a lot of

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 3>people believe this stuff, and it all kind of boils

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 3>down to people want to remember the hits and forget

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the misses. So you know when they say, my astrologer

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>said I was going to to come into money, and

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 3>then I found a twenty dollars bill, and it's like, yeah,

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 3>how about all the other times they said you'd come

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 3>into money and nothing happened. You forget about those. Plus

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 3>there's a desire to believe, a desire to sort of

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 3>give up your responsibility about certain things and let whatever

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 3>is going on over your head take care of it.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 3>So you've got a big head start. There's leverage with people. Yeah,

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 3>you've got a pretty good place to put your crowbar

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 3>and pry things open. And we're seeing that now. People

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 3>are believing almost anything they're being told and it's all nonsense.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 3>But if it's coming from the people you believe and

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the people you have put your trust in, you believe it.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>So the British intelligence services knew that the Germans were

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 2>using astrology to their benefit. And so they hired a

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 2>guy called Lewis DeWitt and they actually established inside British intelligence,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 2>they established a small division form, but they sent him

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>to the US where he made all sorts of predictions

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>about the Nazis about to fall. And he met in

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland with a group of American astrologers and it's sort

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 2>of unclear what really happened, but he either bribed them

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 2>or persuaded them to begin casting rogue British astrological projections

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 2>to help get the US into the war, you know,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to push you the US to join World War two.

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 3>That is absolutely terrifying and it makes me super uncomfortable

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 3>to know. And we are talking World War two and

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Nazis and all of that. So yeah, sure that had

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 3>to be defeated. But that stuff tends to linger.

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So why do you think there is so much science

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>skepticism these days?

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 3>It Waxes and Waynes. In the seventies there was all

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 3>sorts of nonsense, you know, astral projection ESP and all

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 3>that kind of stuff, and that kind of went away,

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 3>and then the moon hoax thing was huge for I

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 3>don't know about a year in two thousand and now

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 3>that's basically gone away. It's still out there, but it's

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>not a big deal. But what we're seeing now in

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 3>the past few years is different. And if you want

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a conspiracy theory, I might posit that there has been

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 3>a concerted effort to destroy I can't say anything about

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 3>other countries, but in America, to destroy people's trust in science.

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 3>And this has all come not all, but the vast

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 3>majority is coming from the Republican Party, which is downplaying

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.119
<v Speaker 3>climate change, building up anti vaxxers. You know, anti vaxx

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 3>for a while was kind of a crunchy granola thing.

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 3>There's a whole history of that, and so it was

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>a left wing thing, but then it got co opted

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 3>by the right, especially when Gardasil came out, which was

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 3>a vaccine against a type of virus that can give

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 3>you cancer. But there are sexual overtones to that, and

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 3>the right wing took that up in their social case.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 3>And so now this has spread to everything. And there's

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 3>not any aspect of science, evolution and versus creationism, because

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these are religious based, and the right

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 3>wing Party of the United States has co opted religion,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 3>and now the GOP denies everything when it comes to science.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>It's horrifying. So it's anti science, but it's also anti expert,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>anti elite.

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that's what makes me think is a concerted

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 3>effort because it's coming at all levels. Right, they're attacking universities,

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 3>they're talking about scientists and the elite. That's the perfect

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>word of this anti elitism. It's like, oh, you just

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 3>think that because you're part of the elite, and it's like, no,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>I just got an education, and you know, I see

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>what's going on, and so I see this all the time.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>People argue with me. I go on. I used to

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 3>go on TikTok and leave comments. People would say I

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 3>saw this light in the sky and I think it's

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 3>UFO and I'd be like, it's Venus. You're looking right

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 3>at Venus and you're looking at the right direction, and

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 3>there it is in this guy. And they're like, no,

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 3>it was doing this and this, and what do you know?

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 3>And it's like, been an astronomer for forty years, I

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 3>think I know when I see Venus, but they don't

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 3>believe me. So it's mind boggling that people would rather

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>believe they're in group than think for themselves.

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Is this something innately human? Or is this something that

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 2>you see sort of different now being pushed by political

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 2>forces or certainly the Russians are doing it.

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.119
<v Speaker 3>What's your sort of sense of this As a scientist,

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 3>I'd say it's both. Sometimes there is an innate need

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 3>to find some sort of outside force that is affecting us,

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 3>and certainly human our brains have evolved to seek out patterns,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 3>and it happens in astronomy all the time. I mean,

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 3>you look at it at four stars in the sky

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 3>and say, yes, that's the Great Hunter or a microscope

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. And so we have the constellations,

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 3>and we see it when you see faces in clouds.

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 3>And this is another thing I've dealt with a lot

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 3>in astronomy, because we see rock formations on Mars gas

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 3>clouds in space and they look like things we're familiar with.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 3>They look like faces or whatever. And so that's a

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 3>fun aspect of this. It's when people start believing that

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 3>there's more to it. Coincidences happened. And on the flip side, yeah,

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>there are people out there who are absolutely trying to

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 3>manipulate others into believing stuff that is clearly wrong. It's

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighty four, you know when you deny the evidence

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>of your eyes, and that's what's happening now, and so

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 3>it's easy for evildoers to use that unbrelative to manipulate

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 3>people into denying the evidence that they think might be

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 3>real like science, and believe in something that's incredibly wrong,

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 3>like ivermectin, Cure's COVID or anything that comes up that

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 3>we've seen in the past few years. In the height

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 3>of COVID, I was living in Colorado and I had

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 3>a couple of horses and some goats, and I was

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>always worried that I was going to go to my

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 3>local feed store and they weren't going to have it

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>when I needed it, And I thought, this is it

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 3>seems that seems silly. But again there's an undercurrent of

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 3>serious trouble here when anti vaxxers are telling people not

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 3>to get the COVID shot, to not worry about polio

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 3>and whooping cough and measles and these horrific diseases, and

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 3>it's people say how common is this and they're like, gommin,

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 3>because we have vaccine for them. Why do you think

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 3>this is? Oh?

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So, I think bad actors, either for money or for

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>political purpose, often try to use fear. Fear works obviously,

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'm wondering what should we worry about. And I

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>know you've looked at asteroids and things like that. What

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>things in science are things that we actually should be

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>paying more attention to.

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, in the medical field, I think that's all pretty clear.

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 3>In astronomy about yeah, yeah, well, there's there's lots to

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>worry about. When it comes to astronomy. There are a

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 3>handful of things to be concerned about. I say, being

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>concerned means maybe we should pay attention to this versus

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 3>worrying like this is going to happen and an asteroid impact,

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 3>for example, we don't need a gigantic dinosaur killer asteroid

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 3>impact to wipe us out. There are and only be

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 3>worried about that. That is, that's a once in a

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 3>fifty million year event, so that's probably not going to happen.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 3>And plus those giant asteroids, we know where almost all

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 3>of them are, so I'm not too worried about that.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 3>The other side, on the other side of this, twenty thirteen,

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>over Russia, there was a nineteen meter asteroids something in

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 3>the size of a big house came screaming in and

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 3>exploded twenty thirty miles up in the atmosphere and caused

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of damage on the ground. And if that

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>thing had been moving faster, had been bigger, maybe made

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 3>of metal instead of crumbly rock, it would have done

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 3>a huge amount of damage. And those sorts of impacts

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 3>happen every couple of decades.

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Luckily, the Earth is very large, seventy something percent of

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 3>it is water. What's not water is typically uninhabited. Antarctica

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 3>is a big empty space, so there's a surface area

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 3>of the Earth where these things can come in and

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 3>not do any damage. On the other hand, chel Yabinsk

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 3>was a city of is a city of a million

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 3>people or more, and this thing shattered windows and caused

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 3>over a thousand injuries. So that happens, how often is

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 3>not too And the small ones we can't really do

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 3>anything about. But the bigger ones that are coming in

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 3>at the size of a football stadium, and those can

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 3>do much more damage over a region as opposed to

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 3>a locality, And those are the kind of things that

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 3>we're looking at more carefully and saying, what can we

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 3>do about that? Smash it with a rocket. We've done this.

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 3>The dart mission not too long ago, slammed a spacecraft

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 3>into an asteroid and moved it. It worked, worked really

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 3>well actually, so if there's something in one hundred meter

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 3>side scale, we can probably prevent that from hitting the Earth.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Which is when you say we give us a little more.

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I never I don't know about that. Who's we? Was

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it humans and humans?

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 3>The Dart mission, the Double Asteroid Redirect t Test so

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 3>many acronyms, was a NASA mission that basically approached an

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 3>asteroid and hit it really hard. It was actually the

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 3>moon of a small asteroid and changed its orbit, changed

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 3>the orbital period by quite a bit. And the European

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Space Agency is doing a follow up mission called Hero

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 3>which is launching soon, and we'll go there and make

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 3>close up measurements and really see what happened. There are

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of space agencies now India has one China,

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 3>and it's possible that we can get together and if

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 3>there's something big enough, we can all do something about it.

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Or one country just takes the reins and says we're

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 3>going to do this. That is fraught with international issues

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 3>because okay, here's an asteroid coming in. It's going to

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 3>hit the US. So NASA's going to launch a rocket,

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 3>we hit it, we change its trajectory, and we find out, oh,

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 3>now it's going to land in China. Oh that's a problem.

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 3>So given the time skills here, this is something I

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 3>think about. This is something I'm concerned about, but not

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 3>something I lie awake in the middle of the night

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 3>sweating about. This is something that we're getting better at

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 3>detecting them and better at figuring out what to do

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 3>about them.

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a break. We'll be right back.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 2>So Phil, let's talk maybe just a little bit about

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 2>satellite there. I'm assuming they have overt missions, but they

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 2>may have covert missions. And I've read about something called

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 2>the Kessler syndrome or the Kessler effect where killer satellite

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>which sort of I guess put badly hit shrapnel in it,

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 2>which destroys other satellites, that creates more shrampnel, that destroys

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 2>our ability to operate in low Earth orbit, which means

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 2>we go back to like manual tie writers and VCRs

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 2>and things like that. So what's your sense now, the

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>space race and an espionage and national rivalries with using

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>satellite technology or modern technology to impact how we all

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>live today.

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 3>The Kessler syndrome is a real thing, and the idea

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 3>being that, sure, you could have an anti satellite, which

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 3>is basically an explosive device in space, and you pull

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 3>up your satellite next to your enemy's military saturate or

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 3>something blow years up and the shrapnel will shred their satellite.

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 3>The problem is, satellites are orbiting the Earth at eight

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>kilometers a second five five miles per second, which is

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 3>very fast, twenty thousand miles an hour, and they're moving

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 3>in a certain direction, typically roughly west east, the same

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 3>direction to the Earth spins, but not always. There are

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 3>some in polar satellites that go north south. But now

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 3>you've got this expanding cloud of debris, thousands of small

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 3>parts and it doesn't matter how big they are iffle

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 3>like a paint moving at twenty thousand miles an hour,

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Slamming into your satellite could destroy it. Huge energy is

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 3>involved here. A bullet is small, but it's moving really fast.

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 3>That's why it's doing so much damage. If you have

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 3>a thousand pieces a cloud of this debris which is

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 3>now miles across and screaming around in lower th orbit

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 3>at that speed, the odds of one satellite hitting another

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 3>satellite are very low that it's only happened a few times.

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 3>The odds of this cloud of debrisating something are much

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 3>much larger, and when they do, they create another cloud

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 3>of debris, which then increases the odds and what you

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 3>get as a runaway effect a cascade. That's what the

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Kessler syndrome is. The movie Gravity with Sandra Bullock and

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 3>George Clooney, was based on this idea. The basic idea

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>of that movie was the premise was correct. But yeah,

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 3>this is a very big concern. If we had as

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 3>many satellites as we did twenty years ago in space,

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 3>that would be one thing, a few thousand or even

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 3>ten thousand. But right now SpaceX is launching thousands of

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Starlink satellites. Then their plan is to launch tens of thousands.

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 3>There are other what they call mega constellations of satellites

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 3>that are being planned, and these things they can fail

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 3>and they can hit other satellites. The more you have

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 3>up there, the more likely acclision is. Now there's plans

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 3>to diorbit these things. If they start to go wrong,

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 3>they just bring them down, let them burn up. Tens

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 3>of thousands of satellites it's just you have that many

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the chances of a collision go up and up, and so, yeah,

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 3>this is a concern.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't there reason reporting that the Russians were looking

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 1>at possibly nuclear explosions in space. You could conceivably use

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons in space. It doesn't necessarily kill people right away,

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but it creates these kind of problems.

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 3>We've done this. Starfish Prime was a hydrogen bomb that

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 3>was blown up over the Pacific Ocean in the nineteen fifties,

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 3>nineteen fifty four i think, and it was done to test, Hey,

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 3>what happens when you do this? And it turns out

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 3>that you get a tremendous blast of high energy particles

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 3>electrons and gamma rays and things like that that interact

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 3>with Earth's atmosphere and cause an electromagnetic pulse. And this

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 3>is the kind of thing where you hear about this

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 3>in science fiction all the time. Oh, it's an EMP

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and it blows out our computers. And it turns out, yeah,

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 3>that's what these things do. You have a tremendous pulse

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 3>of energy, it passes through your satellite and it creates

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 3>electric charges inside the satellite that can fry the circuits.

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 3>And this is a decent concern. A good solar storm

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 3>can do this, which is something a lot of solar

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 3>astronomers and engineers are concerned about. The sun blasts off

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 3>these big storms. It's a sensely like detonating a hydrogen

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 3>bomb in space, very similar. So yeah, you can do that.

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't recommend it. First of all, it's against international law.

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 3>We've signed the Outer Space Treaty so as Russia, I believe,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 3>and that makes it illegal to detonate those things in space.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, what are you going to do

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 3>about it? Somebody blows up a nuke. The repercussions are awful.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 3>You could blow out a lot of satellites. Military satellites

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 3>are hardened typically against such things. But what do you

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 3>do if Russia decides to do that or a rogue

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 3>president of the United States says I'm going to bomb Greenland?

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 3>How do you stop them?

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Phil, we have to talk about UFOs at least

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. What is your take on the recent

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 2>space of sightings of aerial phenomenon or perceived sightings going

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 2>on around in Jersey and let's pretend they're real. What

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 2>would we actually see? Scientists and how could we prove

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 2>it or verify that there's stuff up there that isn't

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 2>just drones through airpor.

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 3>My overwhelming take on this is frustration to see the

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 3>stuff that's been going on for decade and it's just

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 3>the same stuff over and over again, and you cannot

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 3>debunk it is whack a mole. All this new stuff

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 3>is not new. The only thing new about it is

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 3>that these are we're seeing lights in the sky and

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 3>it's probably drones. And I remember thinking when drones started

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 3>to become popular a few years ago, I thought I

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 3>would hate to be a UFO researcher now because this

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 3>is going to destroy anything you can do. It is

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 3>like trying to build an astronomical observatory in the middle

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 3>of a football stadium with all the lights around you.

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 3>There's just going to be so many things up in

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 3>the sky now. And watching these videos, you know, everybody's

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 3>taking their videos and posting them online. And I'm looking

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 3>at that and going, that's Venus, that's Jupiter, that's the moon,

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 3>that's an airplane, that's a drone. Those are spotlights. I

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 3>see a lot of circling circles of light, five or

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>six of them in a circle. Spinning around on a

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 3>cloud bank, on a low cloud bank. I'm thinking those

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 3>are spotlights. There's probably a movie theater or somebody trying

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 3>to get somebody's attention, and people are losing their minds

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 3>over the stuff. So this is all nonsense.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 2>But what do we as a scientist, what do we

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 2>have that like can actually see the Have we got

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>radars that are going up, We've got weather saurights, We've

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 2>got people on the you know, landing airplanes.

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if there's a concerted effort to observe

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 3>these things and to see what they are. If somebody's

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 3>got a radar installation that they're using to shoot radar

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 3>up into the atmosphere and see if and when there's

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 3>a UFO sighting, that would be really hard to do anyway,

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 3>because UFO sighting seemed to be sporadic. How would you

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 3>know where to put your radar assembly.

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 2>They're around an airport, right, I mean, yeah, sure, you.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Know, and it's like, yeah, an airport where there are

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 3>tons of airplanes flying around, and you see a light

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 3>moving in the sky and its first guess is probably

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 3>an airplane. And you have, for example, the Navy released

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of footage declassified this stuff, and these have

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 3>been these are known what they are. One of them

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 3>is an airplane in the distance. One of them looks

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.239
<v Speaker 3>like an object that is moving against the wind at

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a rapid speed with the sea in the background. The

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 3>plane was looking down on the saying and it turns

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 3>out that's likely a balloon, And it's just perspective making

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 3>it look like it's moving really rapidly, just like when

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 3>you're driving down the street and it looks like the

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 3>trees are whizzing past you and it's no, they're really not.

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 3>They're stationary. You're the one moving. So there are lots

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 3>of ways of looking at these things and everything comes

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 3>up negative. There are things you can't explain because we

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 3>just don't happen to know what they are. That maybe

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 3>it's a balloon, Maybe it's a flock of birds. Maybe

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 3>it's an alien spaceship coming down to slice up our

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 3>cows and probe people. But I would always put that

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 3>at the bottom of the list. You think mundane first,

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 3>eliminate the more obvious things. And again with these videos,

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm seeing people saying they're flying saucers or whatever, and

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking there's a hundred other things that you guys

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know. First, like they don't know how their cameras work.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 3>They zoom way in and they see this sparkling ball

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 3>and it's yeah, it's a star and it's out of focus.

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 3>That's what you're doing. So this kind of stuff is

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 3>what makes it so frustrating. And if aliens did come,

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I guess that was the second part of your question. Yeah,

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 3>how would you know? And that's a good question if

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 3>they didn't want to be seen. If you have the

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 3>technology to go from star to star, which is way

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 3>beyond what we think is even possible right now according

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 3>to physics, chances are you're going to have good science

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 3>to absorb radar. I mean we have that technology now.

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 3>The stealth bombers and fighters absorb radar. So if you

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 3>ping them with radar and nothing returns back to the

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 3>dish and you just don't see them, it might not

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>be that hard to avoid us, and you wouldn't need

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 3>to land necessarily, even you could do remote sensing. We

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 3>do that now. Then people always ask me if you

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 3>don't believe all of this footage, and I'm like, you

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 3>have terrible footage. But that's why I don't believe it.

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 3>But if you don't believe all this footage, what is

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 3>going to convince you landing on the White House line?

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, yes, that is the standard of proof

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 3>that I am looking for. If you're going to make

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 3>a claim that is so extraordinary, it goes against everything

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 3>that everybody's been claiming for fifty years. And you want

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 3>me to believe that they're aliens. I want them to

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 3>land on the White House lawn. I want them to

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 3>have biology that is very different than ours, and when

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 3>our scientists study it and they say, wow, they have

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 3>six DNA pairs or something like that, six base pairs,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 3>very different than any life on Earth, a metal alloy,

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 3>or they can tell us something like what's the next

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 3>star that's going to blow up? It's like that light

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 3>is on its way to Earth. There's no way we

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 3>can know what star is going to blow up next,

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.239
<v Speaker 3>and they can. They have faster than light travel. They

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 3>can say, oh, it's going to be this star, and

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 3>then two years later we see it something like that.

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 3>That's my standard of proof.

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if something really is really happening to the

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>United States or to the world are coming from people

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>will look at it and experts will look at it.

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It'll come out. It doesn't need me to try to say, hey,

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something going on there.

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty familiar with the sky and so if I

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 3>saw something like that, I'd be like, now, that's very interesting.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 3>That's not a satellite, it's not a meteor. Could it

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 3>be a drone? And think about how higher drones and

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 3>how fast is this moving. I can work that math out,

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 3>and if I can't, I can go online and ask

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 3>people about it. And that's kind of the difference between

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 3>scientist and a conspiracy theorist. If I don't understand something,

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 3>I seek more information. When a conspiracy theorist doesn't understand something,

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 3>they wedge it into their already preconceived framework and say,

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 3>the government's lying to you, and this is clearly this

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 3>this when it's it's not clearly that at all.

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Just hold on for a short break. We'll be right back.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 2>So, Philip, I was wondering, how do you feel about

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 2>astrology and how do you for someone who believes in astrology.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 2>What's your easiest way to say, Look, here's the difference

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 2>between astronomy and astrology. I think a lot of people

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 2>mix them up.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 3>Five thousand years ago, they were the same thing. It

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 3>was the study of the stars and how they affected us.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 3>And eventually astronomy became a science when we started understanding

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 3>the motions of the planets and gravity and how all

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 3>that stuff work. People want to believe in the sort

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of thing, and I get that. I get that desire

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 3>to believe in something greater than ourselves. But in the

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 3>case of astrology, it just falls short. And it's very

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 3>easy to read your horoscope and think, oh, this pertains

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 3>to me. But again, we have tested this over and

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 3>over again, including again using tests that astrologers have come

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 3>up with, and when these tests are done correctly, they fail.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 3>And when I was part of the skeptic community, part

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 3>of the critical thinking movement back in the two thousands,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 3>we did a lot of testing on this. And it's

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 3>funny how the skeptical movement had this bizarre almost group

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 3>of people including scientists and magicians and mind readers mentalists.

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 3>But the thing about magicians and mentalists is they know

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 3>how to fool people. They know what tricks make it

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 3>look like magic, make it look like something else is

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 3>going on, and what's really happening, And it's exactly the

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing that han men do. I'm not saying

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 3>astrology is necessarily a con saying it's wrong. And so

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 3>we tested this and I see mentalists do things that

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 3>I cannot figure out. How did that person know the

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 3>date on a coin in my pocket? And they're telling

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 3>you the whole time, this isn't real. And so even

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 3>when it seems like a horoscope accurately predicts you, there

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 3>are a thousand people out there whose horoscopes completely missed

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the mark, and you're the one that it worked with,

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 3>and so you're the one who's now a believer. That's

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 3>how these things work.

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 2>So certain zodiac signs are naturally inclined to excel in

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 2>espionage due to their unique traits and skills. Gorpio, Capricorn, Virgo, Gemini,

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 2>and Pisces are the zodiac signs possessing qualities ideal for

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 2>covert operations and intelligence gathering.

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 3>It's just funny that we rely on these super outdated

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 3>constellation ideas. I just wrote about this for Scientific American,

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 3>that these zodiac signs no longer correspond to where the

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 3>sun is in the sky. That's what the zodiac signs are.

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 3>When you say you're a Libra. Then when you were born,

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 3>the son was literally in that constellation. But over the

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 3>past twenty five hundred years, these constellations have shifted, and

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 3>so when you say you're a Libra, the son was

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 3>actually in Virgo more likely when you were born.

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this is for people of a different generation. But

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 2>there was someone called Gene Dixon, and there was something

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 2>known as the Gene Dixon effect, and she carently claims

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 2>to have and has some evidence that she predicted Kennedy's assassination,

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 2>although it was a vague prediction before JFK was assassinated

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 2>and Dallas. But I have looked into this, and there

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 2>is something in scientific literature called the Gene Dixon effect.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 2>It basically what she did is she just threw so

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 2>much shit out there that so she also predicted that

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 2>we would have World War three in nineteen fifty eight

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 2>with China. She threw out so many predictions that some

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 2>of them came true, and she would then advertise those

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and the ones that didn't come true. She just sort

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 2>of like God thought, right, And I think that for

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>pseudo science today. QAnon for example, right, I mean threw

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of predictions, almost none of them came true.

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a couple did. I mean, you know, it's you know,

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 2>monkeys and typewriters.

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 3>And this is what I was talking about earlier, that

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 3>people tend to remember the hits and forget the misses.

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 3>So if you make a ton of predictions, and the

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 3>beauty of this too is you can be super vague,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of astrology is vague.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 6>And a lot of.

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 3>These these psychics and the speakers to the dead, James

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 3>van Prague and a few others, John Edwards, that were

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 3>popular fifteen twenty years ago. Now, these guys would do

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that same thing. They would just throw things out on

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 3>you and the audience there, did you lose somebody recently? Yes,

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 3>this is why they're there.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 6>In the audience.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm sensing a ja or an m. Is there is that?

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Because John and Mary and James and Margaret these very

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 3>popular names, and they would just throw stuff out like

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 3>that and zero in on something until they started getting hits.

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 3>And even then the hits were like not great.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 7>And is somebody now pregnant?

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Who died?

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 7>Was so the person who passed was pregnant? Yes, okay,

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 7>there's a reference to two people. There's two people, So

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if we're talking about two people involved

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 7>in this case, but two people perpetrated it, or two

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 7>people are passed to be passed. You're telling me this

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 7>is a husband and wife that was pregnant that was killed. Yes,

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 7>did this make headlines?

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 8>Yes?

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 7>Okay, they're telling me to talk to you about Scott

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 7>or skip or something.

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>S K.

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:35.959
<v Speaker 7>I don't know who that is.

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 8>I don't know who that is.

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 7>So she's just a friend of yours, like a contemporary. Yes, yes,

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 7>and it's her dad passed, but her mom's life.

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 9>No, both of the parents are alive.

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 7>No, she's with an older male that's passed, like a father.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 3>But people, first of all, they wanted to believe in

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 3>this stuff. And second, yeah, it's like you called it,

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 3>the gene diiction effect, and we've seen it over and

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 3>over again. A mentalist friend of mine who is amazing.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 3>If you see one of his shows, you just cannot

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 3>believe this guy is not psychic, and he's not. He's

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 3>just really good at figuring out this sort of thing

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 3>and working people that way. He said, anybody in the

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 3>audience here, anybody been hit by lightning? And nobody said anything,

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 3>and he laughed, and this was a skeptic audience, and

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 3>he said, I always ask that. He said, nobody ever has,

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 3>but someday somebody will have been. And boy, oh boy,

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 3>am I going to be a miracle worker that night?

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 3>And I thought, yeah, can you imagine somebody pulling that

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 3>out and when you finally get that hit, that's going

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 3>to really seem like that person is psychic. And yeah,

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:36.479
<v Speaker 3>and we see this over and over again. Look at

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 3>how many times Donald Trump has lied when he was

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 3>president and people just forget and he's, oh, yeah, he

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 3>was wrong about this. It was always two weeks and

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 3>in two weeks, we'll have an infrastructure plane. In two weeks,

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 3>we'll do this knowing that in two weeks the news

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 3>that's five news cycles away, and people forget. So it's

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 3>very easy once you've honed your audience, once you prime

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 3>them this way, that you can make them believe than

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 3>almost anything, no matter how nonsensical.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 6>What you're saying is, guys, this is your producer, John Stern.

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 6>There's a conspiracy theory that I heard a couple of

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 6>years ago that Elon Musk's whole thing about going to

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.959
<v Speaker 6>Mars is a red herring. He's building up all of

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 6>his space force not to go to Mars, but to

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 6>go to an asteroid and drag that asteroid into the

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.719
<v Speaker 6>orbit of Earth, and that asteroid is mostly gold and

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 6>in doing so control the Earth's economy. So is that

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 6>feasible on any level?

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:35.719
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of asteroids out there. There are

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them made of metal. NASA has already

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 3>launched a mission called Psyche, which is on its way

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 3>to an asteroid called Psyche that we think is mostly metal,

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 3>and it's quite large, and there are smaller ones that

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 3>will have a lot of interesting metals in them, platinum

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 3>and rare earth metals. Finding one that has enough gold

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 3>in it to control the Earth's economy strikes me as

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 3>being unlikely. There's probably more gold in minds that you

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 3>could get for much less effort and expense. So yeah,

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 3>if you want to go to asteroids to mind the metal,

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 3>and this is something that has been tried already, there

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 3>have been a few startups that have tried to identify

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 3>asteroids and build ships that can go to them to

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 3>mind them. It turns out mining an asteroid is really tough.

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 3>It's not as simple as they make it seem in

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 3>science fiction shows. But it's possible, and this is something

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 3>we may be doing in one hundred years finding that

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 3>much gold. I don't think so. Using to control the economy.

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 3>The guy's got two hundred and fifty billion dollars. He

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 3>already controls the economy. Conspiracy theories are like a pyramid

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 3>built upside down, is how I always say it. You've

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 3>got this one sort of idea that everything rests on,

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 3>but that idea doesn't make sense. There's no balance there,

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 3>and you build all this stuff on top of it,

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna fall over. It's much better to flip that

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 3>pyramid over, get all your basic facts and build from there,

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to making up wild ideas and trying to

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 3>get everything to fit.

0:33:55.760 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 2>So there was this strange relationship between Harry Houdin me

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 2>and yes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, right, the friends, and

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 2>then they became bitter enemies. Oh yeah, and who Deny

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 2>whose job it was was to convince people that he

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 2>could break the laws of physics, that there was a

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 2>supernatural because it was like Penn and Teller, because he

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 2>knew there was no magic. He was he was against

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 2>this kind of thing. And in fact, I've got a

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 2>quote here when he's talking about astrologists, he says, these

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 2>call them human leeches, sucking every bit of reason and

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 2>common sense and money from their from their victims. And yet, Sir,

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 2>Sir Arthur Conan Doyle created a character who was the

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 2>absolute hitome of rationality. Right, everything is a rational explanation,

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is. But Who Deny could not make Sir

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Arthur Conan Doyle believe that he could not break.

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 6>The laws of physix.

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Good, right, he died thinking Who Deni was secretly supernatural

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and that there was a supernatural So.

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I almost mentioned Who Denie earlier when we were talking

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 3>about the skeptic movement, because Houdini was in many ways

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 3>one of the pioneers of magicians coming out and saying no,

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 3>this is all nonsense. And Penn and Teller are a

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 3>good example of people doing it now. James Randy, Back

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 3>when I was a kid, the Amazing Randy would go

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 3>on the Carson Show and would debunk a lot of

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 3>these things.

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 8>Would you welcome, please, the Amazing Randy. What do you

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 8>think of the phenomenon that's going on now that is

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.720
<v Speaker 8>getting a lot of the channeling or if somebody speaks

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 8>through or they'd become the entity or the body or

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.439
<v Speaker 8>the voice of somebody who's been dead twenty five they're

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 8>called channelers.

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 5>Let's face it, this is spiritualism warmed over. Spiritualist used

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 5>to be sitting in the dark with your hands overlapping,

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 5>play the Rock of Ages, and they could do anything

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 5>in the dark. Edgar Bergen used to do the same thing.

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 5>He changed his voice and he sounded like Charlie McCarthy.

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 5>No one ever said Charlie McCarthy was alive. And yet

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 5>these people are paying three hundred dollars a session to

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 5>go into these meetings. And these channelers themselves had got made.

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 5>One of them said on a TV interview not long ago, Look,

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 5>we can't prove that it's real, but you can't prove

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 5>that it isn't. It's a perfectly non falsifiable situation.

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Especially towards the end of his life, Randy was taking

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 3>on speakers to the dead, These people who would say,

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm sensing a presence at your father, blah blah blah.

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And we call them psychic vultures, these people who would

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 3>prey on the emotions of the bereaved. It's just awful

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 3>to watch that happen. And I've certainly met and dealt

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 3>with enough people who have come into conspiracy theories as

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 3>con artists. The Moon landing, remember Planet X, this giant

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:35.320
<v Speaker 3>planet in two thousand and three that was going to

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 3>come by the Earth and destroy humanity. Utter one hundred

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 3>percent nonsense, not a spec of truth to any of

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 3>the stuff. But there was this one guy who came in,

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 3>became part of this sort of cult following around this

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 3>one person, and then schismed off and started his own thing.

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 3>It seemed to me that it's possible that this guy

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 3>was a con man and not part of the believers,

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 3>but eventually grew to believe it. And there's a Moonhax

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 3>denier the same. It came in clearly using con artist

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 3>tricks to worm his way into this, but then later

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 3>on really seem to believe it. And of course it's

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 3>much easier to sell people on stuff if you believe

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 3>in what you're selling.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 2>So magic in espionage, especially in how we do things,

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 2>if you're unders fail. It's something that we have looked at.

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>There are stories, but it's true because I was involved

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.479
<v Speaker 1>in it in places like Russia where we're under full

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 1>time surveillance at all times, we have to continue to

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>meet people or achieve our goals or accomplish things even

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>while under surveillance. And so we actually brought in magicians

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk to us about are there ways of which

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>when someone is watching you can do things while they're

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>watching you to get away with things? Can you distract

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>them or like you create the slight of hand, all

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>these kind of things. You're looking for ways to get

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>people who are perceiving you to misperceive what they're saying.

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, in espionage, you never know when you need to

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>make a white tiger disappear.

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>So, Phil, thank you so much for spending time that

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting and keep up what you're doing,

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.439
<v Speaker 1>keep up educating the public. I think it's an important time.

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we as a people need to get back

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to focusing on rationality and sciences.

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for being up frontman for us for keeping people

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 2>from realizing that we do have space ariens trip at

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Area fifty one where we are first engineering their technology.

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not at liberty to talk about that.

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 9>Mission Implausible is produced by Adam Davidson, Jerry O'sha, John Seipher,

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 9>and Jonathan Stern. The associate producer is Rachel Harner mission implausible.

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:43.280
<v Speaker 9>It is a production of honorable mention and abominable pictures.

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 6>For iHeart Podcasts,