WEBVTT - Twitter's 'Impersonators' and Apple's Production Hit

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm Emily changing San Francisco and this is

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. Twitter starts

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to ban people who impersonate others, musque saying to vote Republican,

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and some of the employees laid off last week, while

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>some are being asked to come back to the office. Plus,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>China's COVID policies are undermining Apple's plans, are bloomberg scoop

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on the plan to cut iPhone production by millions of units?

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And SEC Commissioner Brendan Carr thinks the US government should

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>ban TikTok? Why and how far will he go to

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>make it happen. He'll join us to explain Twitter asking

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>some laid off employees to come back and beginning to

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>permanently banned users who impersonate real people. Meantime, as had said,

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Meta reportedly cutting thousands of jobs as soon as this week.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner joins us to talk about this more.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And Kurt, of course, you've been very busy covering both

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>Meta and Twitter let's start with Meta and get that

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the way. Is Meta planning to lay off

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people this week? What do we know? Yeah,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the company is obviously not confirming anything, but

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, pointing people to what Mark Zuckerberg has said

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>previously on earnience calls, which is that they are planning

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>for cuts, right, and that this is something that he's

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>also told employees that in all hands meeting just a

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>few months ago, is that the company is going to

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>look a lot smaller at the end of three than

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it is, you know right now in two right, So

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>all of those things seem to suggest that that something

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like this is coming. Obviously, I think they could probably

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>learn a thing or two from what happened at Twitter

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>over the past week in terms of how not to

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>handle a situation like this with employees and and and

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>all the information um that has shared. I imagine Metal

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>will probably be a little bit more structured in whatever

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they ultimately end up doing. But it does feel like

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>something like this is probably uh coming very soon. So

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what is actually happening. Then. At Twitter,

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you of course reported that more than thirty seven hundred

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>people would be lay up laid off. Has that happened?

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Have all of those people been told? And is Elon

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Musk really trying to get some of those people back?

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>And if so, how many? Yeah, So, the there were

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.399
<v Speaker 1>massive layoffs that started kind of Thursday night of last week.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Employees started losing access to their internal systems like email

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and Slack and things like that. And on Friday, we

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, saw the bulk of the layoffs happen. Um,

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe the internal kind of employee. They tracked the

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>number of employees at the company internally, and there's a

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>it's around thirty seven hundred, thirty eight hundred employees right now, um,

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>which was down from about seventy hundred at the beginning

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Right, So, so thousands of people have

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>been cut in just the last couple of days. And

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, Emily, yes, you know, when you do

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>something so drastic so quickly, Uh, there were mistakes that

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>were made. There were some employees who were laid off

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>who were done so accidentally. There were some who are

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>laid off that the company then realized, oh boy, we

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>actually need them, we need their expertise in the building.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And so we're told that you know, dozens of employees

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>were approached over the weekend and even heading into today

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>about returning. I don't know of anyone who's actually accepted

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that offer. I think it's going to be a tough sell,

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>um to convince someone who you know, was just fired

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to essentially go back to the company that just fired them,

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>even if it was a mistake. Meantime, Musk has said

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>there'll be an independent board focused on content moderation, but

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks like some users are already being banned um

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for impersonating real people. Party accounts, as you know, have

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>been quite popular on Twitter for many many years. Talk

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to us about what's happening here. Yeah, not just impersonating

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>real people, but impersonating Elon Musk, Right, That seems to

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be the line that a lot of people are crossing.

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting here is, you know, Ellen, when he

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>was talking about buying this company, he said he didn't

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>believe in lifetime bands, right, that was sort of part

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of his thing. He was like, when I get in,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna remove these things. He's taken a

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>softer stance stance since since then and said that he's

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>going to review these with sort of an outside council.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We don't know who's on that council. We don't know

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>if they've actually had any conversations yet, but it is

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting that, you know, he's sort of kind of crossing

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this line here and saying, hey, if you're impersonating someone,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna boot. You have to imagine, you know, this

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is coming from a lot of the pushpack he's getting

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>on this blue check verification process we've been talking about Emily,

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>which is where if you pay eight dollars a month,

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>you're soon going to be able to have kind of

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>that blue checkmark next to your name. Historically that's been

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>to verify that you are the actual person who you

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>claim to be on the account. But now it seems

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like you're just going to be able to buy that

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>check for the eight dollars without any actual verification of

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>your identity. So that's probably why he's now trying to

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of people who are in person, both himself

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but presumably other you know, famous or well known users.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Last quick question, because I just have to ask, he

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is now encouraging voters to vote Republican and also went

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to great lengths to say he is a registered independent.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:20.239
<v Speaker 1>He's voted entirely Democrat until now. Why why is he

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>why is he going this far? Well, he he claims

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in his tweet that you know, the White House is

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, run by Democrat president, and so to counterbalance

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that power, we should have Republicans who are um, you know,

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>running or controlling Congress. But this is something that's been

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of a a change for him over the last

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. He told employees and in all hands

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in June that he voted Republican for the first time.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>It feels like he is sort of swinging that way.

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just very interesting, Emily that he would come out

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and say it so bluntly like this. Could you imagine,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, if Mark Zuckerberg came out and took a

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>very strong political stance like this, right, I feel like

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>people would be absolute up in arms, losing their mind

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>over that. But you know, the fact that it's Elon

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Musk and the fact that he's saying vote Republican, and

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>those are typically conservatives seem to be the ones who

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>typically have the biggest issue with you know, these social

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>networks and and the speech on them, I feel like

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe people are okay with that given the stance that

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>he's taken here, right, It's it's wild indeed when you

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>put it that way. Okay, Bloomberg's krt Wagner, thank you,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>will continue to follow you're reporting. I do want to

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.799
<v Speaker 1>dig into another bloomberg scoop from this weekend, Apple expecting

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>to make at least three million fewer iPhone fourteens that

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>originally planned for the year. Are Mark German broke that story,

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>joins me. Now, Mark, why is Apple making these production cuts?

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So two things going on here, right, you have the

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>iPhone fourteen and iPhone fourteen plus, which are the lower

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>end phones, and then you have the iPhone fourteen Pro

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and the iPhone fourteen Pro mats, which are the higher

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>end phones. Now, in terms of the three million units

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for that production cut that we wrote about, going from

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>ninety million through the year to eight seven million, that's

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>because of softer demand that has plagued those two or

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone fourteens really from the beginning of their release, right,

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone fourteen prone promax. That's a supply issue, and

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned at the top of the show, Apple

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.679
<v Speaker 1>put out a warning discussing how their outlook for iPhone

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>units sold is going to be lower than anticipated because

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the output at their fox Con facility for those two,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly particular models in China going mostly offline due to

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID protocols. So clearly there's both a supply and demand

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>issue depending on which models of the iPhone fourteen you're

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at. How this impact the company's outlook, you know,

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>how does this fit into Apple's bigger picture? Right now,

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems pretty clear that revenue for the holiday quarter,

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>which they'll announce at the end of January. This quarter

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>runs through December thirty one, it's gonna come in a

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit lower than expected. Right when Apple held their

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>earnings about a week ago, they didn't know this was

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the case. The COVID nineteen related lockdowns that was just

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>emerging in the days after that. That's why they had

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to put this statement out over the weekend to indicate

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that there is some sort of change here from what

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they spoke about previous sleep. Now, the good news for

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple from a financial regulation standpoint, they didn't give any

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>formal guidance. They didn't say our revenue is going to

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>come in between x amount and X amount. They said

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that growth is going to come in slower than the

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>eight percent we saw in the fourth quarter, right, and

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>then Luca my Street, the Apple CFO, was asked, does

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that mean you're going to see an annual decline from

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the holiday quarter. He said, it's just going to be

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>less than eight percent, So that could mean seven percent

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>or that could mean negative two. All right, We're gonna

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to follow your reporting on this, Mark, Thank you

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>so much for all of those updates. Bloomberg's Mark German

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>lots to digest. How to secure and protect online identity

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>has only become more important as more businesses go all

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>in on a digital world. This week, the cloud identity

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 1>software provider Octa is holding an investor day to talk

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>about the future of our digital and digital identities, along

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>with its biggest customer event of the year. Joining me

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>now oct to CEO and co founder Todd mckinn and Todd,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>great to have you back here as always. So, look,

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone is talking about the outlook right now. It seems

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.599
<v Speaker 1>like every company is laying off. Folks were expecting potentially

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>thousands of layoffs at Meta alone. What are we seeing

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in the sales environment in terms of the appetite to

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>buy your software and enterprise software right now? Well, the

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>first thing we're really excited about is the appetite for

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>folks to come to this conference. It's the first time

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we've had our Octane event in person in three years,

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and the whole thing is sold out. We're oversubscribed. That's

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>both from our customer event our investor event. So people

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>are incredibly interested in this topic and what do you know,

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they like to be together in in person, which is

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a powerful platform for us to start telling the story.

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And as you did, as you mentioned Emily, everyone this

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is a different world than we were in a year ago.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is worried about the economic uncertainty. Everyone is really

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>scrutinizing their investments to make sure that they spend their

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars on the things that are going to move their

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>businesses forward. And the good thing for us as they

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 1>make those decisions, identity is coming up as a very

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>strategic initiative they should invest in. What is your outlook

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>given the macro environment? Taught and how are you thinking

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>about jobs and spending? Are you planning any layoffs? Are

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you planning to cut back anywhere? We are not planning layoffs,

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>but like every other company, we're really scrutinizing where we're investing,

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and we think our team is a great investment. They're

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the best in the industry and they're going to help

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>our customers be successful. But across the board, everyone is

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to do more with less. Make sure that every

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>dollar we spend is in the highest r o I area,

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And what you see from our customers is that they're

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>getting a huge return on their investments and identity. It's

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>not just for security, and it's not just for I

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>T productivity. It's also for customers. They can build better

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>customer relationships, they can drive new revenue channels, and that's

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what you want to do. And there's a time of

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>economic uncertainty. You want to make sure you cut costs

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and have good investment in terms of what you're spending

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>your money on, but you also have to drive growth

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of times that's when you can get

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of your competitors when they're cutting back. You can

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>invest in the right areas and move forward time. Digital

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>authentication services are still a huge prize for hackers. Of course,

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the the the hack that Octa had

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>to deal with earlier this year. Twilio also dealing with

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one as well. How would you say, the threat level

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>has changed, and what are you doing to stay on

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>top of it. Well, one thing that doesn't change is

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that whether there's economic uncertainty and how people are thinking

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>about investments, the risk from security breaches and the regulatory

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>overview that comes when there's a security breach, and the

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>cost that puts on companies, that is consistent. That's always there.

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So companies have to invest in their cyber posture and

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they have to make sure they have a great foundation

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>foundation to keep everything secure. They of course have to

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure they're spending the right investments and getting the

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>best innovation for that money. But cybersecurity is something that's

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's recession resistant. I'm curious what you think of

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk's approach to verification, this idea of knowing your

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>customer proving identity when others are saying this is just

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a way to pay to play. Well, I think that

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is a is a great technology company. It's changed

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the world, and even a company like Twitter has to

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>do a better job connecting with their customers, whether that's

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>figuring out who gets the blue check mark, whether that's

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>figuring out what's about and what's not about these things

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in the in the takeover of Twitter and as as

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Ellen comes in to run the company, these things have

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>come up over and over again. So it just goes

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to show you if Twitter has these challenges and these

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>opportunities by they could brief the benefits of getting another

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>customers better. Think about every other company, every other organization

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in the world. If they can know their customers, if

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>they can build great products and service for them that

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>validate the right users, get them into the right capabilities,

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be really a groundswell for every organization in

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the world. And that's what everyone's trying to do. And

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why it all comes back to identity, because you

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have to know who that customer is. You have to

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>have high confidence in it so you can deliver that

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>customer a great personalized experience that changes their day, makes

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>them perceive a ton of value from your product or service,

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>moves your company forward. He's also telling users to vote

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>republic Republican and I know federal government sales are important

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to Octa. How do things change for you if you

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>know Congress Republicans win Congress. Does that make a difference

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for Octa? Well, one thing I want to say is

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I did. I voted today so you can see my

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>good for you very conference. We have this big conference,

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 1>so I had to do it early absentee. But all

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>I'll say on this is that everyone needs to vote.

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Democracy works when everyone has heard, So everyone should vote.

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an important part of what we do. It's an

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>important part of our country, it's important part of the world.

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So get out there and vote. All right. I can

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>can only support that. Look, you've got a huge customer

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>event coming up and invest your day. You've been talking

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>about this passwordless future for a really long time. What

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>are you telling them about how far away that really is?

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>When are we all going to be done with passwords?

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the most exciting things that's happening

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in the industry. We are on the cusps, especially at

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>work of being able to get rid of passwords. ACTA

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>has the technology today to remove the password from every

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>employee in the world. And that's because two things. One

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is that we can utilize the strong authentication from their

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>iPhone or their Android phone, or from their Mac or

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>their PC and integrate that. And this is an important point,

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has to be integrated to every application service you need

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to go in your entire work day, and that's what's challenging.

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not that we didn't have the right biometric sensors,

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is that it was hard to get these biometric sensors

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>connected to everything in your environment. And that's the problem

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we solve. And so this is an exciting development. I

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think we can make employees much more productive and more importantly,

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's a biometric sensor, it's much more secure, and

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why we're excited to tell our story to the

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>world this week. All right, well, good luck at Octane

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>This week, oct to CEO and co founder Todd McKinnon

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>joining us for an exclusive interview. Todd, thanks so much

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for stopping by. All Right, coming up, we're gonna hear

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>from Microsoft President Brad Smith from top in Egypt. We're

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about microsoft new climate initiatives and how the

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>company is also navigating the downturn. That's next. This is Bloomberg.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>The Summit is underway in Egypt, with this year's event

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.239
<v Speaker 1>providing a chance to reinject momentum into the energy transition.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Heads of states and governments all in attendance, as well

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>as major companies like Microsoft, which plans to be carbon negative.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I caught up with Microsoft President Brad Smith. Take a listen.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really important to think a little bit

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>about the problem that we and others are trying to

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>help solve. So much of the work that is needed,

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>especially to adapt the climate change, really involves better use

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of a more data, better predictive modeling. You look at

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>predicting wildfires, whether you're in the United States or India

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>or in Africa. If you look at things like responding

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to floods, you need to be able to predict these

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>things and then give people early warning systems. Yet, if

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at Africa today, for every four team data

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>scientists that there are in developed countries, there's only one

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in Africa. So we've opened up. We're announcing today two

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>new data labs, one in Egypt, one in Kenya. We're

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>parkering with Planet Planet Labs in San Francisco, which is

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>doing I just think this extraordinary work with new satellites

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to bring satellite based imagery and data, including for Africa.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>You put our AI capabilities are data scientists, planets imagery together,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>now we can be a bit of an equalizer. We

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>can help climate scientists on a continent like Africa. Now meantime,

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>bread the economy continues to go south. We're seeing layoffs

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in the tech industry across the board. We're expecting thousands

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of people to get laid off at Meta just this week.

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I know Microsoft has done some layoffs but hasn't had

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>a major round of cuts yet. Are you planning to

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>do more layoffs and how are you thinking about spending, etcetera.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the most important thing for a company like

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is first to recognize the role that we play.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>We're not in the advertising business to the degree that

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the other companies are, or more focused on

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>really providing the digital infrastructure that companies, businesses, nonprofits, governments need.

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So in a world with increasing economic headwinds and there

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>are many, you know, the kind of technology that we

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>create is one of the better tail winds on which

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>people can rely and we're seeing that. So to answer

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>your question, Emily, we will continue, I think, to manage

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>through this recession the same way we have managed through

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>every recession since Microsoft was founded. In We identify the

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>technologies that will not only be important to the quarter

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in the year, but fundamentally the decade ahead, and we'll

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we invest and we may even invest

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>more in the technologies of the future, say things like

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. Now, we may have to trim some other

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>cost areas because it is a recession. But I think

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>what you'll do is see us trim if we need to,

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and then use that to free up resources to invest

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 1>in what we regard as the long term creation of value,

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:38.479
<v Speaker 1>not only for ourselves but for our customers. Welcome back

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to bloom Er Technology, em Emily Chang in San Francisco.

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Twitter may now be a private company, but Elon Musk's

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>purchase of the social media platform is still being felt

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>by the public markets. Bloomberg's ad Ludlow here with a

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 1>look at Tesla and obviously you know I can't ignore

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this if you're a Tesla investor at yeah, you can.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the stalk is down on this on a

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve month basis, It's at the seventeenth month and new

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty two week low, down five percent during Monday's session,

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>worst performer on a points basis on the NASA one.

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And clearly there's a Twitter overhang, right. I think one

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of the numbers that jumps out at me is that

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Tesla shares are down more than twelve percent since October

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, when must close the deal to buy Twitter.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>In that time, the SMP five, the main gage of

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>US equities is basically flat, and there's a lot of

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>discussion in the market about what is going on here.

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>A big part of it, if you come to me,

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it's my Bloombow terminal m. It seems to be key

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>man risk that as we know from Twitter. For anyone

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that's paid any attention to the platform in the last

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours or the last few months. Elon Musk

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is tweeting very regularly. He's kind of very focused based

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on the reporting that Kurt Wagoner and I have done

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>on this platform and its future. And there's concern out

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>there from Tesla shareholders who have voiced this concern on

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the platform that he's distracted being away from Tesla. There's

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>less of a conversation now about the concern of him

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>selling down more of his own tests the shares in

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>order to finance the Twitter deal because of what we

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>know what he did both on the debt and on

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the equity co investors side. But clearly there's an overhang

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>here and it's just strange to see such poor performance

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in Tesla stock both in the short, medium, and long terms.

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>And this is sort of a perennial question, but I

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>wonder if the answer to it is changing. Is Tesla

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a tech stock or is it a car stock? And

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>how our investors thinking about it? And I will take

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a perennial question from you any day of the week.

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is the question. You know. The cell

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>side analysts that cover Tesla do so from a sort

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of classic automotive perspective. Many treat it as a higher

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.719
<v Speaker 1>multiple tech or software play, right, because much of its

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>valuation in recent years has been based on the future

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>promise of full self driving. Ultimately, I look at the fundamentals, right,

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a stock that trades at forty seven times

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>forward earnings. If you compare with General Motives for example,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a stock that aids below seven times forward earnings.

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>At forty seven times forward earnings, that is a stretched

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 1>multiple stock in anyone's book. You know, we've talked all

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>about in video for example, trading at thirty times forward earnings.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>There's nowhere near what test is at right now. So

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>that's not a definitive answer the question. I'm sorry to

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of bat you away, but it depends how you

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>look at it, if you look at the fundamentals, test

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that does not trade like a legacy automotive name. All right,

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's I'd love low. Thank you, as always, more perennial

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>questions to come. The US midterm elections are coming up. Man,

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>The crypto industry has its eyes on Congress. Question after

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the vote, will we finally get progress on crypto regulation?

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Kayley lines, reports are regulators, and frankly, our Congress

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is an hour late and a dollar short, and we

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>need to catch with where these cryptocurrencies are going. Congress

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>has been calling for greater regulation of crypto for years,

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's been a lot of talk and to this point,

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of walk. We have the intention, we're

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>just not quite getting it over the line. The crypto

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>industry has been asking Congress to help create the rules

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of the road, but optimism on progress has faded as

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms draw closer. There was some hope from

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>many an industry that this was actually going to happen

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>this year, that a bunch of bills that had been proposed,

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>we're promising that we could actually see some movement here

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill. But just like pretty much everything in

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Washington heading towards the end of it all seems kind

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuck right now. The bills that have gained the

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>most traction include legislation to regulate stable points and to

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>give the CFTC more power to oversee digital assents, but

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>success on those initiatives will have to wait until after

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms. I think both Kirsten and I believe

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that the bill in one piece, as a total bill

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is more likely to be deferred until next year. It's

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a big topic, it's comprehensive, and it's still new to

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 1>many U S. Senators. It's a lot for them to

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>digest with the few remaining weeks we have in this

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>came under a year. Big names in crypto like Sam

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>bankman Fried, the billionaire founder of FTX, are also trying

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to make change, with their dollars emerging as influential political donors.

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>While he says he's motivated primarily by pandemic prevention and

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to support candidates who will prioritize that, he also

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 1>has been pushing the regulatory agenda. I've a duty as

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a member of the industry to try and get us regulated,

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to try and move the industry in a more responsible direction,

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think that requires engagement. I think to be

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>irresponsible to me not to engage UM, you know, with

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Tackle Hill, with regulators and the things that I've been

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>arguing for, our more regulation for the industry. I think

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>that's what's right for the country. Bankman Freed is the

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>fourth largest individual donor this midterm cycle and has made

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>about forty million dollars in political contributions this year. He

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>has said he could give even more in I think

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to see more people pushing into politics

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>because now, uh, the interaction with DC is going to

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be one of the main drivers of whether enterprises are

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>able to grow and operate UM successfully. Yeah, clearly lines

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>with that report. Republican lawmakers have been working to revive

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>former President Trump's bid to band TikTok in recent months,

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so for fears the u S data is ending up

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in the hands of the Chinese government. Just last week,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>FEC Commissioner Brendan Car told Axios that TikTok should be

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>outright ban. He joins me now for more on this

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>UM Commissioner Car, thank you as always for taking the time.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>You said specifically, you don't believe there's a path forward

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for anything other than a ban, which is a step

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>up from what you said in the past. Why take

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it that far. Yeah, Look, it seems almost every week

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a new leaked material coming out of TikTok that

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>just really advisceerates the trust. And at the end of

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the day, the nation security agencies haven't working on what's

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>known as Project Texas, which is to move a lot

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok's operations to oracle servers here in the US,

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's the response to national security concerns. The problem

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>with that is there's a new report about ten days

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ago from Forbes that a TikTok official out of l

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>A having an unusual outside business hour meeting where they're

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>asking another TikTok employee detailed questions about the location and

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>other details of those oracle servers. We also have leaked

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>materials from a DC TikTok official that said once that

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Project Texas is put in place, it remains to be

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>seen if Beijing can still get access to US user

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>data because the end of the day, these are their

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>tools that they build in China. So if TikTok is

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>ensure that these new protections will safeguard US user data.

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Then I don't think we should be so sure either.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.239
<v Speaker 1>You don't have the authority to ban TikTok, So what

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>are you hoping to accomplish with this assertion? Yes? Right,

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>this isn't like Huawei or ZC or China Mobile, where

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>we at the SEC had um federal funding at issue

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>or sc licensed at issue. But what I gained from

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>all this case was some insight into dealing with companies

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that have ties back into communist China and sort of

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>malign data flows. And so I'm happy to sort of

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>bring that expertise to bear and talk about it. But

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the reality is this is broad and bipartisan. You've got

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Senator Mark Warner, Democrats, chairman of sent An Intel, who

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>looks at a lot of really interesting security briefrints every day,

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and he says that it is TikTok that scares the

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>dickens atum you have. Just last week, Democrat Chairwoman Shikowski

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in the House, she wrote a letter with Republican Bill

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Iraqis to Apple and Google saying we're concerned about your

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>continued inclusion of TikTok in the app store. So this

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't just about me. This is about broad, deep bipartisan

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>concern that's being expressed, and you're right this. Ultimately, I

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>think in the lead is gonna be tread Tree, which

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>has the Cippius process, and I think that should be

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the focus of federal action at the Treasury Scipious Process,

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>not the SEC, but it could potentionally the f PC

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>or the Commerce Department as well. So what do you

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>hope to come out of that national security agreement with

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>TikTok that we have at this moment? You know, I

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't open, at least theoretically for a while that there

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is some agreement that's put in place that addresses national

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>security concerns. But there is a New York Times piece

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago that said there's a tentative

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>deal that's been put in place or a draft deal

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>with TikTok, But then it had multiple high level um

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>sources in the Justice Department saying that the number two

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in the d o J is concerned that tenantive deal

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't tough enough. And so I think we have to

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be very careful here going forward that we're not allowing

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>data flows back into China, because it's not just about

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>espionage and foreign influence, but we're also feeding China's AI,

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and AI can use for good or can be use

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for bad, and the p l A and the CCP

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has had a goal of dominating AI. So I'm very

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned about US sending data back and the way it's

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna crew and make that AI effective for nefarious purposes.

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>So the question is how far do you take this?

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Should companies like Meta Alphabet, Apple have employees in China

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in your view at all? Well, Look, I do think

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this is an opportunity here where we need to revisit

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>UM these deep corporate ties into China, particularly as UM

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the saber rattles on Taiwan UH coming out of the

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party confab of last week. I was just in

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan for two days last week myself, and I think

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>it is time to start thinking about diversifying outside of China.

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Up to now, my concern has been focused on individual

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>companies and what I call plus factors, meaning it's not

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just that you have tied back into communist China, So

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there's something else there that's concerning. That was the case

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>with Halwei with DT, and that's the case with TikTok

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not ready to make a broader pronouncement more

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>generally about companies that are doing business there. Now, we've

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.719
<v Speaker 1>got a mid term election happening in a matter of hours,

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious what your hope is for, you know,

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and a new Congress, you know, along with FDC chair

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Lena Kahan, to take action or not on big tech

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of years. Well, actually election, you know, obviously,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I sort of leave it to the American people to

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>make their decisions there, particular by the Hatch act Um

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>not in a position to make sort of partisan comments there.

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>But what I'll say is generally, I do think it's

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>important we find some alignment Republicans and Democrats alike on

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>addressing you know, outsized abuse of corporate power. And I

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>do think we're starting to see more and more bipartisan

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>interest in that topic. And I would always look forward

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to find partners on you know, slides of the both

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>sides of the political aisle to drive towards that result.

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But again, when it comes to TikTok in particular, in

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>my sense is that the tide is is moving out

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.239
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok. And again you see almost every week new

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>letters from new bipartisan members of Congress that are focused

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on this issue. What's the latest on the plan to

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ban all Huawei and z t E telecom equipment from

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the US market. Is the SEC going to be voting

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>on that soon? You're making really good progress. A couple

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, we voted to withdraw all future funding

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>for wahweyans et equipment and or right now funding the

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>ripping and replacing axios. I believe I'll report a couple

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago that said that we're about to vote

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at the FEC on denying equipment authorization for those devices,

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>which would close what I've described as a wahweih loophole,

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>which means up to now, you can't use federal dollars

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>or purchase this year, but you can use private dollars

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>by the same gear put in the same point in

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>your network. And I have long call for us to

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>close that loophole. So the ect that activists reporting is

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>right that the SEC is moving forward with that boat

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to get into the details of

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it um, but suffice to say I'd be very happy

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with that outcome at the FCC and quickly at the FTC.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on the actions that Lena con

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>has taken so far. You know, look, I think our

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:53.959
<v Speaker 1>guiding prints will have to be to protect individual liberty.

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>We we can have threats to individual liberty from the

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>overreach of government, who can also threat to indi votual

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>liberty UH from the abuse of corporate power. And we've

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>got to find a way here to have it that

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>as our guiding star. And I know it's been a

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>partisan time at the FTC and they've had a hard

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>time agreeing. At the FCC, we've been working to the middle,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>compromising and finding common ground, and I hope that we

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to do that at the FCC at least all right,

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>FEC Commissioner Brendan Carr, thanks so much for stopping. I

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Meantime, millions of mothers have left their jobs

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the COVID nineteen pandemic. The cause

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>inadequate childcare. That is why Girls Who co found her

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Rest My show Johnny decided to come up with the

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Martial Plan for Moms, and nonprofit that has helped pass

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>landmark childcare legislation in New York and is working with

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>big companies on employer sponsored childcare, she joins me now

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>for more and obviously Rush might have to ask you

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>about the mid terms, which we are now hours away from.

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Which races are you paying the closest attention to and

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>why all of them? I mean, this election is the

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>most important election that women have seen, you know, following

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the Dollas decision, women have essentially become class citizens in America.

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we have a lot of extremists on

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the ballot, a lot of candidates you know, on the

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>right who want to restrict our rights even more. And

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so what happens in Tuesday is going to fundamentally change

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the lives of American women. How concerned are you about misinformation?

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Given I know that you have pointed out the voices

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of women especially have not been heard. I mean, I'm

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>very concerned about misinformation, um, and I think it's something

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's critical that a lot of my students, for example,

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>are are working on. And I think the comment that

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was just made, you know, by the Commissioner and seeing

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens you know with Twitter and with Elon must

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>taking over Twitter, to make sure that we continue to

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>root out disinformation and that everybody has access to fair

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and just and reliable information is critical. That was my

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>next question is I'm curious what your take is on

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the direction that Elon Musk has taken Twitter thus far

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and how uh free speech can be balanced with safety

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and security and healthy dialogue. I'm watching it, Emily. You know,

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we know that social media Twitter has been a toxic

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>place for women and girls and for people of color,

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and that there's got to be a way to kind

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of moderate content without making people feel like every day

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to face some amount of abuse or

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we called the name or be you know, showed content

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be really, you know, toxic for them.

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think that again, this is an opportunity to

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>do something right and to do something that you know,

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>again uplifts people of color and women will see if

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that actually happens. Now. Given your work with the Martial

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Plan for Moms, I'm curious what you're hearing from moms

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and parents right now about their concerns as they had

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>into the election. What matters to them right now and why. Look,

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think Republicans have made it seem that

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the biggest concern you should have is the cost of

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>gas or the cost of cereal. But if you talk

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to a mom, she'll tell you my biggest concern is

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the cost of childcare. Parents have gone into debt because

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of the cost of childcare the child The cost of

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>childcare is outpacing the cost of inflation. It is literally

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the most expensive line item for families and the only

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>party that's tried to do something about it is Democrats,

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, through the Bill Back Better Bill. So you know,

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>mom's got to be paying attention. Mom's got to be

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>voting on Tuesday, and you know, we've got to be

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>making sure that we're pushing an agenda that is going

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to put families first. And if we want to say

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that women in the workforce are not just a nice

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to have but a must have, then we have to

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we're providing affordable childcare. And that's what

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we're doing at the Marsha Lamber Moms with our National

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Business Colorship for Childcare. We can't wait for government to

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>do the right thing. We can push them to, but

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime we have to advocate for subsidizing childcare

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in the workforce. You recently went toe to toe with

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Parents Rights group that banned girls who code books

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious if you can share some context on

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that and what do you think it tells us about

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>the state of America. I think it tells us that

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 1>that they were coming for our bodies and now they're

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>coming for our minds. I mean, Emily, I woke up

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>to a headline that girls who code books have been

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>banned in Pennsylvania. And it wasn't just girls who code books,

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>it was books about Grace Hopper, you know, books that

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get girls an opportunity, girls of color, an

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to be everything in anything. You know, what is

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>happening in schools right and now what is happening in

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of the school board fights, of the culture wars

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>is critical and we have to start paying attention again.

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I cannot stress this enough. You know, we've entered this

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 1>period of force birth where our reproductive rights have been

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>taken away, and I am shocked to see what they

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>are trying to take away from our girls. And every

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 1>single parent who cares about their girls having a chance

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to be an engineer, to be a doctor, to be

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a president needs to be informed about what's happening in

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the schools because it is shocking. It's frightening and it's

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>scary how much progress is last quick question, is actually

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>happening in the schools? You know, you founded this company

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to get more girls to learn how to code. How

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>optimistic are you about that? You know, truly happening across

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the board? You listen, Emily Covid was devastating, you know,

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for kids, especially for kids from underserved communities. I saw

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>so many of my students who are on their way

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to learn in computer science had to drop out of

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>college or not go to college because their moms were

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>essential workers and they had to take care of their siblings.

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>That is why it's so critical that we fix the

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>broken structure of care. You know. The second thing is

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is that we're you know, we have got to continue

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to invest in public school education. I'm sure you saw

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times article about how you know the

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the again, you know, the the math and science. You know,

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>rates of what our kids are learning in schools have

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>diminished and decreased. I know that's happening. You know, we

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:49.919
<v Speaker 1>had ten thousand girls who code clubs at the start

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, and we are now inching back to

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>where we were before. And so when teachers are exhausted

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>and tired when they're not getting paid adequately, they're not

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>volunteering to teach a coding club, and and and again,

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>who can blame them? And so we got to have

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to continue to public school education and make sure that

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>our kids have access to opportunity in the jobs of

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the future, which include coding. Rest Michel Johnny, thank you

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>for your advocacy for girls, girls who co founder appreciate

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you stopping by. And that doesn't For this edition of

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology coming up on election Day here in the

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.439
<v Speaker 1>United States, We've got an all star lineup including LIFT

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>president John Zimmer will be talking about Prop thirty and

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the future of the gig economy and so many other

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>important guests. And don't forget it to check out our

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast wherever you get your podcasts. This is Bloomberg