WEBVTT - NBA Futures Outlook (Ep. 157)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros and is v Joey Pa,

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe Pisapia with me today? Is the wonderful, the one,

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the only, Mike Randall, and it's all about the NBA.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>The All Star Break is officially over. And thank goodness too,

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that dunk contest finally ended. If I had to watch

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>one more dunk missed, I don't know what I would

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>do with myself. But it's time to look ahead to

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the future. That's right, a little NBA futures. We're gonna

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the Western and Eastern Conference potential winners, maybe

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a little stab at some finals futures.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>Also, I'll look.

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>At some awards, Who's most improved, who's the MVP. There's

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody better to talk about that within our own betting

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>pros analyst Mike Randall, who could follow on the Twitter

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>machine at Randall rant. Mike, it's good to talk to you,

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>my friend. It's good to see you. And look at

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>us doing a little NBA today.

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Joe, weren't we just at Flex drafts? Now we're doing NBA.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Time just goes on it's the greatest force in the world.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Time goes on. We're here with the NBA, and thank

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 2>goodness we had games on Thursday. But we got to

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 2>get over that dunk contest. I mean, I grew up

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>with Dominique Wilkins and Michael Jordan and then we went

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 2>to Spud Webb and Kobe What was that.

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>About, geez my Kingdom for Kenny sky Walker. Yes, I mean,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's where we're at right now. It was it

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>was the build up to the constantly missing dunks where

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of say, no, matter what they did

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>at the end of it, Mike, it was gonna be

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 1>anti climactic. And you know what, good on Dwayne Wade

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and I was a Kenny Smith who basically called it

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what it was. So I'm very proud of those guys

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>who kept it real.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>For sure.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>The three point competition was good. All Star Game is

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>always All Star Game. It's you know, all shooting, no defense.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what we expect of the All Star Game. That's fine,

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the NBA season right now, obviously, you

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>know we're starting to get to that stretch run. You know,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the time of year two where you've seen

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>g who're resting maybe rest a little less. And that

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is always the difficult thing with the NBA is.

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Can you stay healthy?

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you get these guys on the court that you want?

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>And I want to start here at the Eastern Conference.

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's start here with some of your best bets. And obviously,

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>as we're going through some of these, I want our

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>mind everybody. We have all the consensus lines over at

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>bettingpros dot com. So if you go to betting pros

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com, you can see the consensus for all the

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>things we're going to talk about and all the places

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>where you can find the best odds, whether it be

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM or another book, you can go and you

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>can go ahead and place your wagers wherever you want to.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And what's great too, is even if you're a daily

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>NBA better too, you can always check out the prop

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>bet cheat sheet that we have for NBA, just like

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we had for NFL, which gives you all of the

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>best consensus props, the variations to between our projections and

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the prop numbers, and where you can bet them. So

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it literally is the answers to the test. It's an

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>amazing thing that gets produced every single day here.

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 2>So you have no excuse to fail.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, you've got to go

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>check out the prop bet cheat sheet at Bettingpros dot

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>com for NBA. But going back to the Eastern right now,

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.399
<v Speaker 1>how do you see this board right now, Mike, kind

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>of unfolding itself, and where do you want to put

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>your money?

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I love the Eastern Conference, Joe, because there are so

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>many teams that are bunched together that could win this

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 2>There is really not one dominant team. Bucks has been great.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I love the Bucks near and dear to my heart.

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>But everyone else now has kind of caught up. And

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>what's interesting is, and I'll get to my long shot

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 2>in a minute, it's about styles. The best bet for

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>me at this point is Miami. They're around plus five

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 2>point fifty plus six hundred betting Pros consensus. They have

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 2>perfect balance. They are six overall in defensive rating this year,

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 2>eighth in offensive rating. And if you look at the

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>structure of the team, you have Lowry at point guard.

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 2>You have Jimmy Buckets who can get a big basket.

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Bam has come back now from the injury, so they've

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>had other players step up throughout the season. When Bam

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 2>was not there. Even Max Strus coming off the bench

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 2>can hit some threes. Tyler Hero, who is the leader

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>right now for six Man of the Year. I mean,

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about a player who two seasons ago in

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs was extremely, extremely hot. They have a style,

0:03:58.200 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>they are not afraid of anyone. They have a great

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 2>coach and Eric Spolstra. They would go there and battle.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 2>And what I like about them is if they get

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>that one seed. Getting the one seed in the Eastern

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Conference is going to be huge because that two to

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>three matchup is going to be massive. So what you

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>would like to do is see like a Chicago and

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 2>a Milwaukee battle it out and then just see them

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>in the finals. I'm not into the nets. I don't

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 2>like the Sixers trying to piece it together with the

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 2>process with Harden and beat although Mbats have a phenomenal year.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 2>My favorite bet in the East is Miami around plus

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 2>five to fifty plus six hundred. I think they have

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 2>the style, they have the team, they have the balance,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 2>and they have the bench to step up and win

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the Eastern Conference.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And the bench is such a huge component too at

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this time of the year two because we're getting up

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>there in games. So if guys, do you know, miss

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>some minutes or even miss some games, having that death

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>goes a long way right now to winning that Eastern Conference.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm with you about the nets to one hundred

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>percent agreement there. I do not like what's going on.

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk go with a long shot in the East.

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>So if that's your favorite bet, who is the team

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be a little bit further down the trophy

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>might have a shot.

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Shout out to Cleveland. And what's interesting here is no

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 2>one is going to buy Cleveland have plus twenty five

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred plus three thousand on betting pros consensus. Look at

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 2>what they did at the trading deadline. They bring in

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Karris Lavert to complement Darius Garland. They have Jared Down,

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 2>they have Kevin Love. What they have here is very

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 2>similar in college basketball. We all saw last year that

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the Houston Cougars made the Final Four with defense and rebounding,

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>something that's different than what everyone else has. That's what

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland has. They have a throwback team with the seven footers.

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 2>They have the probable rookie of the year and Evan Mobley. JB.

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Bickerstaff has done a tremendous job with this team. They

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 2>are young and they are naive coming into the All

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Star break four out of six all battling injuries here,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 2>they've won the last four to six throughout the season.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Garland was injured, Rubio Sexton is gone. Lowry market and

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 2>who should be back marketIn now makes Evan Mobley have

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 2>the ability to sort of freelance a little more on

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the inside market. And had the repation with the Bulls

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>as not being a defensive player. Now that he's with

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland and he's bumped down to the three, he's actually

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>been great at getting in the lanes, making steals and deflections.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Also keep in mind, Joe the Calves two and one

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>against Milwaukee this year, two and zero against Miami, one

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and one against Chicago. They aren't sexy. No one really

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 2>likes the Calves without Lebron on them. But they have

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>the style, they have a unique way, and it would

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>not surprise me if they had a magic ride here

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to the Eastern Conference. You're gonna give them to me

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>at plus twenty five hundred. I have no problem with that.

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I like the Calves as my long shot.

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Calves is an interesting long shot, and look, you're not

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 1>alone too. Have heard a lot of people over this

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>past weekend talking up the Calves who and liking the

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>moves that they've made here and the way that they're

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>playing potentially, So if you like the heat, you have

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>your long shot. We already said the Nets are a

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of a trap. Is there anybody else who's towards

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the top of this board? I see the Nets a

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>plus two seventy five on the betting pros consensus line.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I see the seventy six or two A plus three fifty.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Are they a trap? Yeah? I don't like the Nets

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>or the Sixers, this whole thing with Kyrie, with the

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 2>vat they had a fantastic matchup with Milwaukee. I remember

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>going to that game seven last year. They're playing the Bucks. Yes,

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 2>if Kevin durantz tow wasn't on the three point line,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>who knows. The Net's good to have won a title

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>last year, but it seems very flimsy. The Nets don't

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 2>play any defense. Now they're going to try to make

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 2>a move forward, but they need a healthy Kyrie. I

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 2>don't like them, and I don't like the Sixers, and

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 2>B could be your MVP, but I don't know if

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the matchup of Harden with MBID is going to win

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a title. Harden dominates the ball, He's almost gonna have

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>to subject himself to be a facilitator more. And I

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 2>just don't think in this situation with two alpha dogs,

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the way they're set up, that's gonna work for me.

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I understand people like it. They like the big names

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>stars winning the NBA more than any other league. I

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>get that. I do not like the sixers of plus

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 2>three fifty. I don't want to deal with that. I

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 2>don't see why you would not take the heat who've

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>actually had a championship pedigree falling short with a solid team,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>a much better all around team, a much deeper team

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>with a great coach. Why would you take six ers

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 2>over them? I don't see it.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's head over to the Western Conference, where

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>right now the consensus betting pros line has the Warriors

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>at plus one seventy five. Some other books are DraftKings

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>as at plus.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 2>One to eighty five.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got them a little variance there the Suns at

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>plus one eighty right behind them, kind of neck and neck,

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's a big drop off. Then it goes right

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Jazz at plus seven hundred. Now, the Jazz

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>were team last year, you know, played very good defense,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>really played well together. But you could see there's basically

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors and the Suns and then the drop off.

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So how do you see the Western Conference board shaking out?

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 2>Mike? What I actually love with the Western Conference. I

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>don't love what happened, but I like the betting advantage

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 2>is I'm going to see these Suns drop now that

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 2>Chris Paul is going to be out six to eight weeks,

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 2>which is Joe pretty much the rest of the regular

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 2>season because it's seven weeks until the end there, it's

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>not a totally balanced schedule. So I like the Sun's odds.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I think they're going to drop. I think they're going

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to come back to the pack. I think they're about

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>a five game lead over the Warriors right now, who

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 2>are gonna get hot. But when Chris Paul comes back,

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>and listen, he's thirty six years old, he's getting some

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 2>valuable rest. It is the thumb on his shooting hand.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>But I think you're going to see the Suns develop

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 2>here and their odds are going to drop. So I

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 2>have no problem waiting on them and then getting them

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 2>at that point. The team that I like the best

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 2>are the Grizzlies. John Moran has taken his game to

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 2>another level. I was saying on Twitter that you should

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>take him over Zion Williamson. I think Morent was just

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 2>a jump shot away from dominating this league, and that's

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 2>what he's getting. He is going to be your most

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Improved Player, and the odds say that it's at minus

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 2>five hundred right now. But he has a case for MVP.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>They are great inside with their bigs. They dominate on

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the boards. Desmond Bain also has a case to be

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 2>most improved Player. They are a very sneaky team. Last

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 2>year they're just squeaking in the playoffs. Now right now

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 2>they're sitting in a fantastic spot towards the top of

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 2>the Western Conference. So right now, betting pros consensus has

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the Grizzlies of plus twelve hundred. We've seen the Jazz before.

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I understand them. They're a great team. I don't see

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 2>them making the finals. So the teams I like, Warriors

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 2>are going to be the go ahead favorite. I don't

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>like betting the favorite in any situation of a long

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>sho got you go that, I'll take the Suns in

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>a few weeks when their odds dip down. And I

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>also like the Grizzlies with jam Morant because I believe

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 2>he is good enough to carry this team right to

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the precipice of that Western Conference Finals. And now I

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 2>just need one more series. I'll take my chances.

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I love it, you know, you and I see the

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>same as like, if you're not getting good money there

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on the favorites, then you either stay away or you

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>find something else you'd like to bet on. It's funny

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>because I'm looking ahead now at the Championship odds and

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies are a plus twenty five hundred on the

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Betting pro consensus.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:30.599
<v Speaker 2>So if you want to double.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Down your Jama Rant narrative ear for MVP and them

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 1>going to the Western Conference Finals, I mean, hey, that's

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>an interesting long shot right there. The rest of this

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>board looks like this. The Warriors are plus four twenty

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>five on betting pros dot Com. Then you have the

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>consensus line for the Suns at plus four fifty, and

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>then it goes to the Jazz at sixteen hundred. They

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>are Grizzlies Nuggets. So that's the way somebody's Western teams

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>shape up in order to win. So when you're looking

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>at finals odds right now, who kind of jumps out

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>to you at the different consensus potentially.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, that it's gonna follow a What it's gonna come

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 2>down to me, Joe, is the way they matched up.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Like I said in the Eastern Conference, the nets are

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be in an enviable situation where they're gonna

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 2>have to go through a ridiculous path to get to

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the finals. So I'm looking for teams that could match

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>up and have a run. What are the ones that

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to look at? And he's kind

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>of like my long shot for MVP. Also, let's not

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 2>count out the Mavericks with Luka Doncics. The Mavericks since

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>January first have had one of the best defenses in

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the NBA. They've been phenomenal and Doncic is making a

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 2>push for the MVP candidacy over the last couple of weeks.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 2>So if you're looking for a long shot to make

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the finals, besides the ones that I mentioned, what you're

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>looking for is a path. It is really similar to

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the NCAA tournament, where it's all about the matchups. Forget

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>what has happened before. If you have a situation where

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 2>things match up right and you see them going through,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 2>that's the team to grab. Doncic has everything you need

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>as a great player. The team is playing defense, they're

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 2>buying in and they have the ability even though they've

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 2>lost some players. Is poorzingis gone, they've had injuries. Now

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a hardaway. That's a team who's a real deep

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 2>long shot that I think you can look at. So

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>outside of the ones that I mentioned going to the finals,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely think if you want to throw a couple

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 2>dollars down, take a look at the Mavericks, who are

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>led by a star and have a style much like

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland that is against what is traditional now in the NBA.

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>All Right, would you hedge it all and take you know,

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>take it easy Golden State Warriors at the top of

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the board at plus four to ten or something like that,

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and then go ahead and take a little long shot

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>later on as well, or would you just continue to

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>stick with a long shot and play those odds.

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think Golden State is at the point where

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>you got to get him now or you're not gonna

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 2>get him at all.

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Clay Tom feels That's why I asked because they're in

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that four to one range basically right now. So that's

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>why I was curious, would you lock that in and

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>then start playing the board just to have a little

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of share, a little bit of comfort level, I guess,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Or do you just say no, you know, let the

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>let the favorite go and just keep playing a couple

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of the different long shots.

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 2>If you want to grab the Warriors, take them now.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Their focus for most of the year has been defense

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 2>in Curry. Now Thompson came back and they've struggled defensively.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 2>But I do Joe tend to go with the teams

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 2>that have styles and have players in certain positions. Come on,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Looney inside tremendous, does his role rebounds. They have to

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 2>get Wiggins going, but they're gonna get it right. That

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 2>defense now is going to start coming back as the

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>players get rested and get acclimated again with Thompson in

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the mix. So if you like the Warriors, I think

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>you grab them now because in a few weeks, like

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I said, I'm gonna be on the Suns because there's

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna be recency bias. People are gonna forget about them.

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 2>But what you're gonna watch is Devin Booker become more

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 2>of a facilitator, McCall bridges become more of a scorer,

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and you're gonna see this team get better and then

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna put a fresh, refreshed and replenished Chris Paul

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 2>back in there. So if you like the Warriors them,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 2>grab them now. I'd like to wait and grab the

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Suns in a little bit longer for a favorite. That

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 2>is all right.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>So we've spoken about some of the big names in

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. Let's see who the biggest name is going

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to be this year for MVP. Top of the board

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>right now is Joe Embiid and the consensus betting pros

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>line plus one thirty. Then Nikola Jokich at plus three hundred,

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Jannis at plus three fifty, so those usual suspects, and

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>then there's your boy John Morant right now plus one thousand,

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the consensus lying on him plus eighteen hundred. Over on

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Fandel too if you're really believe in if you want

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to get in there, also over on bet MGM two.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 2>We'll be waiting for those lines that come out.

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So tell me right now, how do you see the

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>MVP board? How would you sprinkle at chips as it were.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm a math guy. You know that. But there is

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a narrative there is in you it is there is

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 2>a narrativele educator, yep, but there's a narrative base Joe

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of these awards, and I think there's

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 2>a fatigue factor with a guy like you know, and

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I love Giannis. He's tremendous, but I think is he

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna get his third MVP in four years, he'd have

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>to be head and shoulders above everyone else, which I

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 2>don't see right now. Djokic has been tremendous. His statistics,

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>his value to his team are outstanding. But the problem

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 2>is the Nuggets right now are in six place. Last

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>year when he won it, they were in third. They're

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 2>missing a lot of guys, No Jamal Murray, They've had

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 2>injuries across the board. Michael Porter, I get that, but

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Djoki, as much as he's fantastic, is not

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to have his team high enough

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>in over to overcome that. Most people will go Embiid,

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and I have no trouble if it's Joel Embiid. He's

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 2>been fantastic for the Sixers this year. He's carrying them.

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 2>His player efficiency rating is over thirty one. It's off

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the charts. No problem with that. I just don't think

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 2>there's enough value right now with the consensus of plus

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 2>one thirty. So I really want odds of plus two

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred to better if I'm going to invest the two

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 2>favorite bets, I like you mentioned them first. John Morant

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 2>plus twelve hundred. I love the guy. He's a lot

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 2>for the most improved player. Do I think that they're

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 2>going to give it to Jaw in this situation so

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>young in his career. I don't, but he really should

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 2>get some votes. They lost to the Jazz last year.

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Four to one is the eighth seed. Right now, they're

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 2>third in the West at forty one and nineteen. If

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 2>you're going by who's deserving. To me, Jaw is absolutely

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 2>top three, and don't sleep on those highlights. They matter.

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 2>You've seen the dunks. You saw better dunks from ja

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Jo in the All Star Game than he actually started

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the dunk contest. So he's a guy who I love.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's gonna get it, but it's certainly

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>worth a run because if he gets hot and some

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 2>other players get injured, he could sneak in. My favorite

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>bet to me is dong It's a plus three hundred.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Here's my argument. If we ran the rest of the

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 2>regular season thirty times, would Dongits win MVP at least twice?

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 2>The answer is absolutely yes. Last ten games for Luca

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty five point four points, ten point three rebounds, nine

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 2>point eight assists while shooting forty nine percent from the

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>floor and over forty three percent from beyond the arc.

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 2>What does that even mean? Now there's only twenty regular

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 2>season games left. Here's my question. Philadelphia is thirty five

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 2>and twenty three, Dallas is thirty five and twenty four,

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 2>and Biid is twenty nine point six, eleven and four.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Luca twenty seven, nine to nine. If he keeps going

0:16:56.520 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and Biid gets hurt Dallas gets hot, why not at

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 2>plus three hundred. I'll take it, no problem, And you

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 2>can always put a small unit on that.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the same logic we're used here on the

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>show and then the baseball season when Bryce Harper was

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty to one. Yes, it was a narrative to be

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>had out there in the media. There was no clear winner. There,

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>there was some fatigue with some other guys, but also

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, it's you don't have to go crazy on this.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>You just have to put a small number on it

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>now and then as it drops down, this thirty to

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>one can become fifteen to one in just a week's time,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, then you can double down on that.

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And that, to me is always the way to approach

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some of these because you bring it up and it's

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent right. These awards are media awards, they're

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>narrative driven, and yeah, with Giannis there's definitely a little

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>bit of fatigue factor in there as well. All right,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>let's get to maybe most Improved Player. Let's take a

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the names on that board right now,

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>anybody stand out to you for this award?

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mentioned I love job, but I just want

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 2>to throw a couple names out here. If you want

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 2>to go against him, you know, never know injury he

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>had injury early year over.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Yea, he can't make money on him because he's minus

0:17:58.080 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>five hundred already in the consensus.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, So if you're looking to go for a long

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 2>shot couple here, Desmond Baan has been fantastic as teammates,

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>So if Jah goes out for an extended period of time, look, no,

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 2>further than Desmond Bain at plus six hundred has been

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 2>massively improved. And what I love about Desmond ban Joe

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 2>is he's got like a hit list of teams that

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 2>passed on him in the draft. And Desmond ban has

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 2>huge games. Remember that for NBA props against teams that

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 2>passed on him. It's almost personal. He's been fantastic. So

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Desmond being fantastic. Job there for Memphis. Dejonte Murray has

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 2>been a mini triple double for San Antonio this year

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 2>has really taken it to another level. He's at plus

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 2>twelve hundred, as is Darius Garland. So staying with the theme,

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 2>if you believe in Cleveland as much as I do,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Evan Mobley is going to be tough because he's there.

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 2>He's take some votes away from Garland. But Garland could

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 2>absolutely have a massive end of the year leading Cleveland

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 2>to oh, I don't know, second seed maybe in the East,

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and could pick up some awards as well. Miles Bridge

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 2>as I like, and he's had some massive, massive games,

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 2>including against the Knicks recently, but I put him a

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 2>step below even though he's the second favorite at plus

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 2>one thousand. So de Jontay Murray Desmond Bine absolutely guys that.

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 2>I like Darius Garland, some people like Anthony Simon's did

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a nice job with Portland. I just don't know if

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 2>he can have the end of season that he needs

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 2>to have for a team like Portland, which is really struggling.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Memphis will travel to Minnesota on the twenty fourth. I

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was just looking ahead at the prop at Chie sheet

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to just see what that Bane prop might be.

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, It's like, oh, is it out already? Let me

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 2>check that out. It's not yet.

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>My friends tell me it should be out very shortly,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>though my imagine would sometime maybe tomorrow. But that's one

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>to already start getting ahead. Listen to Mike Randall and

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>go use the tools, make yourself some cash. So there's

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>your Rookie of the Year conversation two we can have.

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>We can throw that in there. But before we get

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to the rookie stuff, actually, is there any other award

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>do you have a strong feeling about.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you look at Defensive Player of the Year,

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 2>it's wide open. I know Rudy Gobert wins it all

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 2>the time. I just have a feeling he missed about

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 2>nine games recently. I don't know if he's going to

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 2>get it again. Giannis at plus three hundred. I mean

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 2>he's been dominating doing so many different things, the blocks,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the steals, and then as Milwaukee gets into games that

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 2>are blowouts, you really see him his full game on display.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>He's not just scoring. So if you think there's Giannis

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>fatigue for the MVP of the Year, how about Giannis again?

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 2>For Defensive Player of the Year. Draymond has some issue

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 2>with Gobert. They compared him. He was doing the play

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 2>by play with the All Star Game and he said,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be compared to Gobert. We're totally

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 2>different guys. So Draymond has the motivation to sort of

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 2>take this award away from Gobert, but I just don't

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 2>know if he's going to be back healthy enough in

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 2>order to get it. So my dark horse for Defensive

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Player of the Year is McCall bridges at plus fourteen hundred. Joe,

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>He's been great on every wing. He's been scoring more

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 2>this year too, which is bringing more attention to him

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 2>as a legitimate defensive Player of the Year. Has been

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 2>locking down for the Suns, and now with Chris Paul out,

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 2>he may get a little bit more publicity for being

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 2>that player, the well rounded player that he is, because

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't always because it's usually Booker and Paul may

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>be an opportunity here, so a dark horse for me.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 2>McCall bridges love him here. Defensive Player of the Year

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 2>plus fourteen hundred. If you don't want to go with

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the favorites, and if you have to pick a favorite,

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I go with Giannis at plus three hundred over go

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Bart plus one twenty five. Now, betting pros consents, is

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of money there to be.

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Made, all right, last one here, let's go to Rookie

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Year. We mentioned the Cleveland Cavaliers in What

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>You Like Them. Evan Mobley's been a big part of

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that and he is minus eight thirty five right now,

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so not a whole lot of movement there. It seems

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like this award might have gotten away. Is there any

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>way anybody else could be considered for this besides Mobile

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point?

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not gonna be Kate Cunningham because Detroit is

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 2>not really winning a ton of games, and he's been

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>in and out of the lineup with injuries. So he's

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 2>at plus twelve hundred. He's the third on betting pros.

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't like him. You know, Josh Getty has been

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 2>outstanding here with an injury. Is Shae gilds Ers Alexander

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 2>he's been putting up. I think he put up three

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 2>consecutive triple doubles before the All Star break. So if

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 2>something were to happen to Mobiley and Guiney continues to

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 2>do this triple double machine is what he is, you

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>could definitely go there. Long shot for me is Scottie

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 2>Barnes at plus twelve hundred. They want Scotty Barnes to

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 2>take over the point guard role Toronto. And what I

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 2>like about the Raptors here with Nick Nurse is he

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 2>plays his starters a ton of minutes. He is one

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 2>of the few coaches in the NBA that will stay

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 2>with those starters. So Barnes is going to get opportunities

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 2>to make plays. Van Vlietz had a great first half,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 2>but he was banged up a little bit. So in

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>terms of a pathway, if something were to happen to Mobili,

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 2>if Barnes is really given the keys to the offense,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 2>you know he's going to see more minutes than anyone

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 2>on this list, and he absolutely would have a chance

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 2>to perform, but it's a long shot because Mobiley is

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 2>just so special. I don't know how he fell the

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 2>number three for Cleveland, but God bless him. They got

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 2>themselves a great player, a guy who can pass, a

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 2>big man who can defend, who's only going to get

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 2>better at age twenty one.

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it feels like Mobley's the guy, so but who knows.

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>You never know in the last twenty games. Obviously some

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>things can certainly change. But my goodness, it seems like

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that shit might have sailed potentially. But lucky for you,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we're here every single day given you a content. Make

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>sure if you haven't already, subscribed to the Daily Juice

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast with our own Matt Parolet, because Matt Parolt's given

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you NBA MLB eventually whenever it comes back. He's given

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you all kinds of stuff. I'm sure NFL draft stuff

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>right around the corner too, But basically, anything that's going

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>on in the world to wagering, Matt Pearl's gonna cover

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it for you right here.

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget too.

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Everything we do is also on our YouTube channel, so

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Betting Pros YouTube channel. I know our

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>own Mike Randold' is gonna be doing some live streaming

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>events there too. Matt Parrault's out there giving you content.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>All the podcasts we do are gonna be here. I know,

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Bogman and I have a ton of stuff going on

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for NFL Draft. We just did an NFL show kind

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>of looking ahead already to twenty twenty two and the

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three Super Bowl.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 2>If you can possibly believe it.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we're that kind of maniac lunatic kind of fringe over.

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Here at You Don't Sleep Show.

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it sleeps over rated at the end of the day,

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's fine. But again, Daily Juice is out there for you.

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>All the tools at bettingpros dot com, the prop bet

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>cheet sheet, all this is here to support you as

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you find your way in wagering. I know a lot

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>of people for them, it's new and you might be

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>just starting to dabble a little bit. This is the

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>place to be. We're gonna walk you through it. We're

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk you through it, and that's a very important

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>combination of things here and the tools are going to

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>show you why and the reasons behind it all. So

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure you check out Bettingpros dot com, check out

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Juice, check out the PROMP betche sheet, and

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>also subscribe to our YouTube channel at Betting Pros. That'll

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>do it for us, but the story of the game

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>goes on for Mike Randall, I'm Joey P. We'll see

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you next time, kids,