WEBVTT - Fritterin' Away Genius (Classic)

0:00:15.410 --> 0:00:24.650
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Hello everyone, Happy New Year. The Cautionary Tales team

0:00:24.730 --> 0:00:28.530
<v Speaker 1>is busy putting together a set of brand new cautionary

0:00:28.570 --> 0:00:32.450
<v Speaker 1>tales for the year ahead. Happiness Cults, a race around

0:00:32.450 --> 0:00:35.410
<v Speaker 1>the world, and some lessons from the front lines of

0:00:35.490 --> 0:00:39.770
<v Speaker 1>finding love and much more, all on its way. In

0:00:39.810 --> 0:00:43.050
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, don't forget We've got a Cautionary Club over

0:00:43.090 --> 0:00:46.370
<v Speaker 1>on Patreon, where you can find loads of bonus content,

0:00:46.570 --> 0:00:49.570
<v Speaker 1>extra cautionary tales, interviews with me and the team, and

0:00:49.770 --> 0:00:54.290
<v Speaker 1>an exclusive newsletter. Now, while you're setting your sights on

0:00:54.410 --> 0:00:58.330
<v Speaker 1>what twenty twenty six could look like, here's a cautionary

0:00:58.370 --> 0:01:06.810
<v Speaker 1>tale from the archives which might help enjoy. It would

0:01:06.850 --> 0:01:09.170
<v Speaker 1>be hard to think of a better example of a

0:01:09.290 --> 0:01:15.090
<v Speaker 1>game of chance than Roulette. Beneath the romantic French terminology

0:01:15.250 --> 0:01:18.130
<v Speaker 1>and the myriad rules of etiquette, each spin of the

0:01:18.170 --> 0:01:22.890
<v Speaker 1>roulette wheel is utterly random. The casino's advantage is small

0:01:23.530 --> 0:01:29.170
<v Speaker 1>that it cannot be overcome. The game is remorseless over

0:01:29.210 --> 0:01:32.530
<v Speaker 1>the long haul. The only way to win is not

0:01:32.650 --> 0:01:37.810
<v Speaker 1>to play, or is it. One day in August nineteen

0:01:37.890 --> 0:01:41.650
<v Speaker 1>sixty one, Claude and Betty Shannon stroll up to a

0:01:41.730 --> 0:01:45.330
<v Speaker 1>roulette table in Las Vegas, pretending not to know their companions,

0:01:45.890 --> 0:01:49.610
<v Speaker 1>Ed and Vivian Thorpe. Claude and the ladies are nervous,

0:01:50.010 --> 0:01:54.250
<v Speaker 1>but they don't show it. Ed Thorpe isn't nervous, he's excited.

0:01:54.930 --> 0:01:57.530
<v Speaker 1>He's still in his twenties, but he's an old hand

0:01:57.530 --> 0:02:01.930
<v Speaker 1>and the casinos Claude. Shannon stands right by the wheel.

0:02:02.530 --> 0:02:05.490
<v Speaker 1>He's forty five years old, slim and good looking, with

0:02:05.610 --> 0:02:10.490
<v Speaker 1>fine cheekbones and dark eyebrows. He's directing the attention of

0:02:10.530 --> 0:02:13.810
<v Speaker 1>the floor manager by scribbling down numbers. He looks like

0:02:13.850 --> 0:02:17.810
<v Speaker 1>he's got some crazy system that will inevitably bankrupt him.

0:02:18.210 --> 0:02:20.610
<v Speaker 1>Thorpe is at the other end of the table, far

0:02:20.650 --> 0:02:24.050
<v Speaker 1>from the wheel and far from Shannon. He has dark hair,

0:02:24.290 --> 0:02:28.570
<v Speaker 1>a round face, and a smile. He's having fun placing

0:02:28.570 --> 0:02:31.010
<v Speaker 1>his bets with the confidence of a man who knows

0:02:31.050 --> 0:02:35.970
<v Speaker 1>the unbeatable game is about to be beaten. This is

0:02:36.010 --> 0:02:39.170
<v Speaker 1>a defining moment in a project that has been quietly

0:02:39.250 --> 0:02:42.850
<v Speaker 1>ticking over for a year. When it began, Thorpe and

0:02:42.930 --> 0:02:46.770
<v Speaker 1>Shannon didn't know each other. Edward O. Thorpe was a

0:02:46.850 --> 0:02:52.330
<v Speaker 1>junior mathematics instructor at MIT. Claude, Shannon was the greatest

0:02:52.330 --> 0:02:56.410
<v Speaker 1>computer scientist in the world. Ed Thorpe had a plan

0:02:56.530 --> 0:03:01.330
<v Speaker 1>to beat Roulette, and he needed Shannon to help him.

0:03:01.570 --> 0:03:05.170
<v Speaker 1>Systems to beat Roulette are like blueprints for perpetual motion

0:03:05.330 --> 0:03:10.010
<v Speaker 1>machines or formulas to turn lead into gold. Third, the

0:03:10.010 --> 0:03:14.570
<v Speaker 1>pseudo scientific obsessions of Cranks and Claude. Shannon's secretary had

0:03:14.610 --> 0:03:18.690
<v Speaker 1>already warned Thorpe that Professor Shannon doesn't spend time on

0:03:18.770 --> 0:03:22.530
<v Speaker 1>topics or people that don't interest him. Shannon was a

0:03:22.650 --> 0:03:26.530
<v Speaker 1>legendary figure. People in his field talked about Shannon the

0:03:26.570 --> 0:03:30.930
<v Speaker 1>way physicists talk about Albert Einstein. What Ed Thorpe was

0:03:30.970 --> 0:03:35.170
<v Speaker 1>doing was much like buttonholing Einstein and saying, Hey, Albert,

0:03:35.330 --> 0:03:37.650
<v Speaker 1>I've got a surefire scheme for beating the bookies at

0:03:37.690 --> 0:03:43.290
<v Speaker 1>the racetrack. An unknown young mathematician a patently futile goal.

0:03:43.810 --> 0:03:50.050
<v Speaker 1>Claude Shannon, the computing legend, didn't hesitate. Take a seat.

0:03:50.490 --> 0:03:53.370
<v Speaker 1>He said to Ed Thorpe, we have a lot to

0:03:53.450 --> 0:04:24.450
<v Speaker 1>talk about. I'm Tim Harford, and you're listening to cautionary tales. Repeat.

0:04:24.490 --> 0:04:26.730
<v Speaker 2>Please please send floor for the present.

0:04:27.010 --> 0:04:29.890
<v Speaker 1>How do you receive send flower? Please see if you

0:04:29.930 --> 0:04:30.530
<v Speaker 1>can read this?

0:04:30.930 --> 0:04:34.010
<v Speaker 2>Can you read this, Yes, how are signals?

0:04:34.410 --> 0:04:38.210
<v Speaker 1>Do you receive? Please send something? Please send thees and bees?

0:04:38.530 --> 0:04:39.570
<v Speaker 3>How are signals?

0:04:40.690 --> 0:04:45.930
<v Speaker 1>Those messages from eighteen fifty eight represent a full day

0:04:46.290 --> 0:04:50.410
<v Speaker 1>of attempted conversation via Morse code. Who are cable? Lying

0:04:50.570 --> 0:04:54.370
<v Speaker 1>three miles under the surface of the Atlantic Ocean. The

0:04:54.450 --> 0:04:58.850
<v Speaker 1>cable had been enormously expensive, and as you might guess,

0:04:59.370 --> 0:05:04.050
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't really working. In an attempt to boost the signal,

0:05:04.290 --> 0:05:08.570
<v Speaker 1>the project's engineer, a man called Wildman white House, cranked

0:05:08.650 --> 0:05:14.370
<v Speaker 1>up the vault. The cable melted. It had survived only

0:05:14.490 --> 0:05:19.690
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight days. Over the years, telegraph engineers figured out

0:05:19.810 --> 0:05:22.410
<v Speaker 1>how to work around the problem of noise on the line.

0:05:22.570 --> 0:05:26.250
<v Speaker 1>They built stronger cables with better insulation and more sensitive

0:05:26.290 --> 0:05:30.250
<v Speaker 1>detectures at the far end. But nobody fully solved the

0:05:30.250 --> 0:05:34.850
<v Speaker 1>problem of noise. Nobody even fully understood it. Not until

0:05:35.290 --> 0:05:41.010
<v Speaker 1>nearly a century later, along came Clawed Shannon. Shannon's career

0:05:41.170 --> 0:05:44.930
<v Speaker 1>was defined by two thunderbolts of insight. When he was

0:05:44.970 --> 0:05:48.970
<v Speaker 1>twenty one in nineteen thirty eight, his master's thesis showed

0:05:49.010 --> 0:05:52.850
<v Speaker 1>that any logical statement could be evaluated by a machine,

0:05:53.290 --> 0:05:57.210
<v Speaker 1>with true or false being represented by switches being open

0:05:57.490 --> 0:06:01.490
<v Speaker 1>or closed those dots and dashes of Morse code, which

0:06:01.530 --> 0:06:04.770
<v Speaker 1>as to hint at the possibilities. Armed only with open

0:06:04.970 --> 0:06:08.810
<v Speaker 1>or closed on or off dot or dash zero or

0:06:08.850 --> 0:06:15.650
<v Speaker 1>war machines could perform any operation in mathematics or logic, and,

0:06:15.770 --> 0:06:19.610
<v Speaker 1>rather than merely proving the point in abstract, Shannon, who

0:06:19.690 --> 0:06:22.970
<v Speaker 1>was barely old enough to buy a beer, showed electrical

0:06:23.010 --> 0:06:28.290
<v Speaker 1>engineers how to efficiently build a logic machine. Claude Shannon

0:06:28.410 --> 0:06:33.010
<v Speaker 1>had bridged the vast gap between electrical wiring diagrams and

0:06:33.210 --> 0:06:41.650
<v Speaker 1>thought itself unlocking the age of the digital computer. Shannon's

0:06:41.690 --> 0:06:44.650
<v Speaker 1>second Thunderbolt was published in nineteen forty eight, when he

0:06:44.730 --> 0:06:49.810
<v Speaker 1>was working at Bell Labs alongside several future Nobel Prize winners,

0:06:49.890 --> 0:06:53.890
<v Speaker 1>including the team that invented the transistor. Shannon returned to

0:06:53.930 --> 0:06:59.890
<v Speaker 1>the deep problem underlying the Transatlantic cable fiasco. He created

0:06:59.970 --> 0:07:05.210
<v Speaker 1>a unified mathematical theory of transmitting information. Some of that

0:07:05.290 --> 0:07:08.890
<v Speaker 1>theory seems obvious from the viewpoint of the twenty first century.

0:07:09.290 --> 0:07:12.810
<v Speaker 1>We now take it for granted that information bits and

0:07:12.850 --> 0:07:17.330
<v Speaker 1>bytes and gigabytes might represent anything a computer game or

0:07:17.330 --> 0:07:22.770
<v Speaker 1>a spreadsheet, or music or pornography. But that idea started

0:07:23.090 --> 0:07:28.290
<v Speaker 1>with Shannon. Before him, researchers only dimly grasped the distinction

0:07:28.410 --> 0:07:31.290
<v Speaker 1>between the meaning of a message and the quantity of

0:07:31.330 --> 0:07:36.490
<v Speaker 1>information it contained. The idea of compressing a file so

0:07:36.530 --> 0:07:39.970
<v Speaker 1>that it took up less space was Shannon's, and so

0:07:40.130 --> 0:07:43.690
<v Speaker 1>too was the utterly radical idea that any amount of

0:07:43.730 --> 0:07:47.250
<v Speaker 1>noise on a line could be overcome. We didn't do

0:07:47.370 --> 0:07:50.690
<v Speaker 1>that by cranking up the voltage and melting the undersea cable,

0:07:51.050 --> 0:07:53.410
<v Speaker 1>nor did you need to build a better listening device

0:07:53.530 --> 0:07:57.570
<v Speaker 1>or a thicker cable. No matter how much distortion there was,

0:07:58.530 --> 0:08:02.330
<v Speaker 1>you could convey any message if you had enough patience.

0:08:03.050 --> 0:08:06.370
<v Speaker 1>All you had to do was add redundancy to the data.

0:08:06.610 --> 0:08:10.330
<v Speaker 1>It's the inverse of compressing a file. You add extra

0:08:10.410 --> 0:08:13.330
<v Speaker 1>data to make the message more likely to be recoverable.

0:08:13.770 --> 0:08:18.730
<v Speaker 1>Even in the presence of interference. That idea was unthinkable,

0:08:19.250 --> 0:08:22.130
<v Speaker 1>right up to the point that Claude Shannon proved how

0:08:22.130 --> 0:08:29.490
<v Speaker 1>to do it. This new theory of information was revolutionary

0:08:29.850 --> 0:08:32.610
<v Speaker 1>and so elegant and general that it could be applied

0:08:32.650 --> 0:08:36.250
<v Speaker 1>to anything from the Internet to genetic information in DNA,

0:08:36.850 --> 0:08:39.530
<v Speaker 1>even though the Internet did not then exist, and the

0:08:39.570 --> 0:08:42.970
<v Speaker 1>double helix structure of DNA had not yet been discovered.

0:08:43.770 --> 0:08:47.330
<v Speaker 1>Shannon wasn't merely ahead of his time. He was the

0:08:47.410 --> 0:08:50.410
<v Speaker 1>one who had wound the clock and set it running.

0:08:51.410 --> 0:08:56.410
<v Speaker 1>All this and he'd barely turned thirty. So what did

0:08:56.450 --> 0:09:00.650
<v Speaker 1>Shannon do for an encore? Is a description from his biographers,

0:09:01.010 --> 0:09:05.930
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Sony and Rob Goodman of Shannon's work ethic. Shannon

0:09:06.010 --> 0:09:09.250
<v Speaker 1>arrived late, if at all, and often spend the day

0:09:09.290 --> 0:09:12.370
<v Speaker 1>absorbed in games of chess and hex in the common areas.

0:09:12.970 --> 0:09:15.810
<v Speaker 1>When not besting his colleagues at board games, he would

0:09:15.810 --> 0:09:20.170
<v Speaker 1>be found piloting a unicycle through Bell Labs's narrow passageways,

0:09:20.530 --> 0:09:24.330
<v Speaker 1>occasionally while juggling. Sometimes he would pogo stick his way

0:09:24.330 --> 0:09:27.530
<v Speaker 1>around the Bell Labs campus, much to the consternation we

0:09:27.610 --> 0:09:32.530
<v Speaker 1>imagine of the people who signed his paychecks. Shannon wasn't

0:09:32.530 --> 0:09:36.770
<v Speaker 1>goofing off completely. He often worked hard, but the projects

0:09:36.770 --> 0:09:40.850
<v Speaker 1>he worked on seemed whimsical. For example, he spent many

0:09:40.890 --> 0:09:44.930
<v Speaker 1>hours at home playing with a colossal erector set. He

0:09:44.970 --> 0:09:48.090
<v Speaker 1>built a robot mouse that could explore a maze and,

0:09:48.290 --> 0:09:51.130
<v Speaker 1>by trial and error, on the first attempt, learn how

0:09:51.170 --> 0:09:54.770
<v Speaker 1>to reach its target flawlessly. On the second run, the

0:09:54.890 --> 0:09:58.050
<v Speaker 1>robot mouse was clever and thought provoking, and it might

0:09:58.090 --> 0:10:03.250
<v Speaker 1>have represented real progress towards artificial intelligence if Shannon had

0:10:03.290 --> 0:10:08.450
<v Speaker 1>persisted with it. But he didn't. Shannon built perhaps the

0:10:08.610 --> 0:10:13.170
<v Speaker 1>first chess playing computer, albeit one that could play only

0:10:13.210 --> 0:10:16.850
<v Speaker 1>a radically simplified setup the end game with six pieces.

0:10:17.610 --> 0:10:21.250
<v Speaker 1>He published a theoretical paper on computer chess. It could

0:10:21.250 --> 0:10:24.890
<v Speaker 1>have been the start of something, but again he lost interest.

0:10:26.210 --> 0:10:29.090
<v Speaker 1>It seemed a shame. If anyone could make progress with

0:10:29.130 --> 0:10:34.090
<v Speaker 1>computer chess, surely it was Shannon. He was good. Shannon

0:10:34.170 --> 0:10:37.210
<v Speaker 1>once traveled to Moscow and played chess with three time

0:10:37.290 --> 0:10:42.450
<v Speaker 1>world champion Mikhail Botvinick, and he made Botvinick sweat. When

0:10:42.450 --> 0:10:45.570
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't chess, it was juggling. Shannon tried to figure

0:10:45.570 --> 0:10:48.370
<v Speaker 1>out how to juggle upside down by hanging from the

0:10:48.410 --> 0:10:51.410
<v Speaker 1>ceiling and bouncing the balls off the floor. He built

0:10:51.490 --> 0:10:55.370
<v Speaker 1>juggling robots too, and a variety of machines designed to

0:10:55.410 --> 0:10:59.610
<v Speaker 1>play abstract games, such as Hex and a Rubik's Cube

0:10:59.610 --> 0:11:04.170
<v Speaker 1>solving robot, and the Juggleometer, and a flame throwing trumpet

0:11:04.770 --> 0:11:09.290
<v Speaker 1>and the Ultimate Machine. The Ultimate Machine is a box

0:11:09.330 --> 0:11:12.130
<v Speaker 1>with a switch and a trapdoor, and you flick the

0:11:12.170 --> 0:11:15.730
<v Speaker 1>switch to turn it on. A robot finger pops out

0:11:15.730 --> 0:11:18.610
<v Speaker 1>of the trapdoor and flips the switch back again to

0:11:18.690 --> 0:11:23.770
<v Speaker 1>turn itself off. Shannon made giant styrofoam shoes so he

0:11:23.770 --> 0:11:27.410
<v Speaker 1>could walk on water at a nearby lake. After Shannon

0:11:27.530 --> 0:11:30.810
<v Speaker 1>learned to juggle, ride a unicycle and walk a tightrope,

0:11:31.290 --> 0:11:34.770
<v Speaker 1>he formulated the aim of juggling on a unicycle on

0:11:34.890 --> 0:11:38.850
<v Speaker 1>a tightrope Alas he never got further than two out

0:11:38.850 --> 0:11:47.250
<v Speaker 1>of three, Claude Shannon's boss, Henry Pollock, said, Shannon has

0:11:47.370 --> 0:11:51.650
<v Speaker 1>earned the right to be non productive, and of course

0:11:51.690 --> 0:11:57.690
<v Speaker 1>he had. But come on, you're a genius, Claude. You're

0:11:57.770 --> 0:12:01.370
<v Speaker 1>thirty three years old, You're the Einstein of computer science,

0:12:01.810 --> 0:12:07.170
<v Speaker 1>and you're unicycling, poe going and playing board games. Shannon

0:12:07.610 --> 0:12:12.250
<v Speaker 1>never again published anything like his theory of information. He

0:12:12.370 --> 0:12:15.970
<v Speaker 1>never even came close. Once he promised the editor of

0:12:16.050 --> 0:12:20.650
<v Speaker 1>Scientific American an article on the physics of juggling. If

0:12:20.650 --> 0:12:24.130
<v Speaker 1>that didn't seem trivial enough, he followed it up with

0:12:24.210 --> 0:12:28.490
<v Speaker 1>an unapologetic letter. You probably think I've been frittering, I say,

0:12:28.530 --> 0:12:31.530
<v Speaker 1>frittering away my time while my juggling paper is languishing

0:12:31.530 --> 0:12:34.370
<v Speaker 1>on the shelf. This is only half true. I have

0:12:34.490 --> 0:12:37.770
<v Speaker 1>come to two conclusions recently. One, I am a better

0:12:37.810 --> 0:12:42.210
<v Speaker 1>poet than scientist. Two scientific American should have a poetry

0:12:42.290 --> 0:12:47.970
<v Speaker 1>column instead of his juggling research. Shannon enclosed a seventy

0:12:48.050 --> 0:12:52.690
<v Speaker 1>line poem about Rubik's Cubes, to be sung to the

0:12:52.770 --> 0:12:58.850
<v Speaker 1>tune of Tarara Bundier. He added, I'm still working on

0:12:58.890 --> 0:13:05.010
<v Speaker 1>the juggling paper. Shannon never finished it. Not only was

0:13:05.050 --> 0:13:09.450
<v Speaker 1>he not producing thunderbolts, he wasn't even producing a study ofuggling.

0:13:10.570 --> 0:13:14.210
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps we should not be surprised that Claude Shannon was

0:13:14.250 --> 0:13:18.290
<v Speaker 1>happy to put aside serious research when the young mathematician

0:13:18.530 --> 0:13:21.610
<v Speaker 1>Ed Thorpe approached him for help in hacking the roulette

0:13:21.690 --> 0:13:28.890
<v Speaker 1>table in Vegas. Cautionary tales will be back in a moment.

0:13:36.810 --> 0:13:39.570
<v Speaker 1>If we know anything, we know we're supposed to stick

0:13:39.650 --> 0:13:44.330
<v Speaker 1>to a task. Psychologists have developed some attractive ideas about

0:13:44.370 --> 0:13:49.970
<v Speaker 1>how success depends on practice and determination. There's Angela Duckworth

0:13:50.130 --> 0:13:54.690
<v Speaker 1>who's popularized the idea of grit, Carol Dwex's research on

0:13:54.930 --> 0:13:59.210
<v Speaker 1>the growth mindset and the late and as Ericsson, the

0:13:59.250 --> 0:14:02.530
<v Speaker 1>source of the ten thousand hour rule made famous by

0:14:02.570 --> 0:14:07.010
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Gladwell. There are subtleties to each of these research programs,

0:14:07.290 --> 0:14:10.170
<v Speaker 1>but the versions that have broken into pop culture are

0:14:10.210 --> 0:14:12.890
<v Speaker 1>simple enough, like some motivational poster.

0:14:14.050 --> 0:14:17.450
<v Speaker 3>Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence.

0:14:18.330 --> 0:14:22.410
<v Speaker 3>Talent will not. Nothing is more common than unsuccessful people

0:14:22.450 --> 0:14:28.010
<v Speaker 3>with talent. Genius will not unrewarded genius is almost a proverb,

0:14:28.930 --> 0:14:33.330
<v Speaker 3>the slogan press iron has solved and always will solve

0:14:33.410 --> 0:14:34.970
<v Speaker 3>the problems of the human race.

0:14:36.330 --> 0:14:41.090
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that great? It's often attributed to President Calvin Coolidge,

0:14:41.130 --> 0:14:45.450
<v Speaker 1>but it's older than that. Claude Shannon, however, seems not

0:14:45.530 --> 0:14:49.570
<v Speaker 1>to have gotten the message. He achieved so much, but

0:14:49.650 --> 0:14:52.330
<v Speaker 1>if it's stuck to a task, couldn't he have achieved

0:14:52.370 --> 0:14:57.050
<v Speaker 1>so much more? Instead, he was playing with flame throwing trumpets,

0:14:57.130 --> 0:15:01.530
<v Speaker 1>juggling robots, and silly poems, oh, and the impossible task

0:15:01.570 --> 0:15:08.130
<v Speaker 1>of beating the casino at roulette. For a junior academic

0:15:08.690 --> 0:15:12.330
<v Speaker 1>ed thought, Thorpe spent a surprising amount of time in casinos.

0:15:13.170 --> 0:15:16.810
<v Speaker 1>Using some ferocious mathematics and the best computers he could

0:15:16.850 --> 0:15:19.850
<v Speaker 1>access at MIT, Thorpe had figured out that it was

0:15:19.930 --> 0:15:24.050
<v Speaker 1>possible to beat the dealer at the casino staple blackjack

0:15:24.610 --> 0:15:26.970
<v Speaker 1>by keeping track of the cards that had been played

0:15:27.570 --> 0:15:31.130
<v Speaker 1>in placing bets when the deck was offering favorable odds.

0:15:31.890 --> 0:15:35.530
<v Speaker 1>Card counting is a familiar idea these days. It all

0:15:35.650 --> 0:15:41.050
<v Speaker 1>started with Ed Thorpe. Thorpe's ideas were sophisticated enough to

0:15:41.050 --> 0:15:44.250
<v Speaker 1>be worth publishing as an academic paper, which he did,

0:15:45.130 --> 0:15:48.650
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't content with that. He wanted to beat

0:15:48.730 --> 0:15:53.250
<v Speaker 1>the casino too. To do that, Thorpe had to learn

0:15:53.290 --> 0:15:58.170
<v Speaker 1>to spot crooked dealing, where a disguise count cards unobtrusively

0:15:58.250 --> 0:16:01.490
<v Speaker 1>late into the night, and above all, make sure he

0:16:01.530 --> 0:16:06.970
<v Speaker 1>didn't get killed. That was no idle worry. One day,

0:16:07.130 --> 0:16:10.490
<v Speaker 1>Thorpe made a little too much money and the casino

0:16:10.690 --> 0:16:14.890
<v Speaker 1>spiked his coffee with something mysterious that blurred his vision

0:16:14.930 --> 0:16:18.610
<v Speaker 1>for hours. He came back the next day and the

0:16:18.650 --> 0:16:23.850
<v Speaker 1>casino tried it again, but Thorpe wasn't scared. His idea

0:16:23.890 --> 0:16:27.410
<v Speaker 1>to beat roulette was the boldest of all. He didn't

0:16:27.450 --> 0:16:30.530
<v Speaker 1>have in mind a clever mathematical system. There are loads

0:16:30.570 --> 0:16:34.330
<v Speaker 1>of them, and he knew that none of them work. Instead,

0:16:34.810 --> 0:16:37.810
<v Speaker 1>he planned to build a computer that could predict where

0:16:37.850 --> 0:16:41.410
<v Speaker 1>the ball would land. That would be hard even today,

0:16:42.050 --> 0:16:45.130
<v Speaker 1>but at a time when computers were the size of pianos.

0:16:45.890 --> 0:16:49.090
<v Speaker 1>This computer needed to be one that you could conceal

0:16:49.290 --> 0:16:55.570
<v Speaker 1>inside your clothes, the world's first wearable computer, decades before

0:16:55.610 --> 0:17:01.170
<v Speaker 1>the fitbit, Google Glass or the Apple Watch. Thorpe had

0:17:01.210 --> 0:17:04.010
<v Speaker 1>done some experiments on the timing of a roulette wheel

0:17:04.050 --> 0:17:07.330
<v Speaker 1>with his wife, Vivian, a woman who was both intelligent

0:17:07.650 --> 0:17:10.730
<v Speaker 1>and indulgent, as you'd need to be if you were

0:17:10.770 --> 0:17:14.530
<v Speaker 1>marriage to Ed Thorpe. But to crack the problem he

0:17:14.610 --> 0:17:18.330
<v Speaker 1>needed to team up with perhaps the best gadgeteer in

0:17:18.410 --> 0:17:23.770
<v Speaker 1>the world, Claude Shannon. Thorpe spent twenty hours a week

0:17:23.810 --> 0:17:26.210
<v Speaker 1>at Shannon's house. He was in heaven.

0:17:26.890 --> 0:17:35.970
<v Speaker 2>The basement was a gadgeteer's paradise, molders, transistors, switches, pulleys, gears, condensers, transformers.

0:17:36.650 --> 0:17:40.210
<v Speaker 2>I was now happily working with the ultimate gadgeteer.

0:17:41.130 --> 0:17:43.650
<v Speaker 1>Shannon and Thorpe were able to time the spinning of

0:17:43.650 --> 0:17:46.330
<v Speaker 1>the ball around an upper loop and the contrary motion

0:17:46.370 --> 0:17:48.970
<v Speaker 1>of the wheel itself. With practice, they were able to

0:17:49.010 --> 0:17:52.050
<v Speaker 1>start a clock within one hundredth of a second and

0:17:52.090 --> 0:17:55.330
<v Speaker 1>then stop the clock after ten revolutions. That gave them

0:17:55.370 --> 0:17:57.890
<v Speaker 1>both the speed and the position of the ball. Relative

0:17:57.930 --> 0:18:00.650
<v Speaker 1>to the wheel, and Newtonian physics could do the rest.

0:18:02.450 --> 0:18:06.090
<v Speaker 1>The result of months of experimentation taught them that using

0:18:06.130 --> 0:18:08.650
<v Speaker 1>their computer to compute the path of the ball, they

0:18:08.650 --> 0:18:11.210
<v Speaker 1>could put that it would fall into one of five

0:18:11.290 --> 0:18:15.250
<v Speaker 1>numbers just over one eighth of the wheel and expect

0:18:15.330 --> 0:18:18.330
<v Speaker 1>to be right twenty percent of the time. It seems

0:18:18.370 --> 0:18:23.250
<v Speaker 1>a modest advantage, but the potential profits were enormous. All

0:18:23.290 --> 0:18:25.730
<v Speaker 1>they had to do was to figure out how to

0:18:25.810 --> 0:18:29.850
<v Speaker 1>miniaturize that computer, making it small enough to slip into

0:18:29.890 --> 0:18:33.890
<v Speaker 1>a pocket and carry into the casino undetected. It was

0:18:34.010 --> 0:18:38.850
<v Speaker 1>an astonishingly audacious project and a huge effort. For the

0:18:38.890 --> 0:18:42.650
<v Speaker 1>final three weeks, Thorpe was effectively living at Shannon's house,

0:18:43.290 --> 0:18:47.010
<v Speaker 1>but by August nineteen sixty one, the device was ready

0:18:47.850 --> 0:18:51.770
<v Speaker 1>with their accomplices, Vivian Thorpe and Claude's wife, the mathematician

0:18:51.810 --> 0:18:55.970
<v Speaker 1>Betty Shannon. The two gadgeteers then took it to the casinos.

0:18:56.330 --> 0:19:04.010
<v Speaker 1>The Einstein of computer science was going to Las Vegas.

0:19:05.250 --> 0:19:08.730
<v Speaker 1>Looking at Claude Shannon's career from age thirty three onwards,

0:19:09.170 --> 0:19:11.970
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to escape the conclusion that he might have

0:19:12.010 --> 0:19:15.490
<v Speaker 1>achieved more, much more, if not for his habit of

0:19:15.690 --> 0:19:19.530
<v Speaker 1>flitting between whimsical projects and typically setting them aside before

0:19:19.570 --> 0:19:23.610
<v Speaker 1>they were finished. But some very smart people would disagree.

0:19:24.050 --> 0:19:28.090
<v Speaker 1>Vanevar Bush arguably knew more than anyone about the way

0:19:28.210 --> 0:19:32.650
<v Speaker 1>scientific progress occurred. He guided science policy for the United

0:19:32.690 --> 0:19:36.490
<v Speaker 1>States during the Second World War, coordinating the efforts of

0:19:36.730 --> 0:19:41.650
<v Speaker 1>six thousand researchers. Bush said that great scientists should range

0:19:41.690 --> 0:19:45.250
<v Speaker 1>widely and keep changing things up. In a speech to

0:19:45.290 --> 0:19:50.930
<v Speaker 1>professors at MIT, Bush advocated breadth rather than depth. It

0:19:51.050 --> 0:19:55.330
<v Speaker 1>is unfortunate when a brilliant and creative mind insists upon

0:19:55.370 --> 0:19:59.690
<v Speaker 1>living in a modern monastic cell. Bush's idea was later

0:19:59.730 --> 0:20:06.450
<v Speaker 1>backed up by scientific investigation of scientists themselves. In nineteen

0:20:06.490 --> 0:20:10.050
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight, a remarkable study was launched by a young

0:20:10.130 --> 0:20:14.850
<v Speaker 1>psychologist named Bernice Agison. The study followed a group of

0:20:14.890 --> 0:20:19.850
<v Speaker 1>promising researchers as their careers unfolded, periodically interviewing them and

0:20:19.930 --> 0:20:23.610
<v Speaker 1>continuing even after Agison herself died in nineteen eighty five.

0:20:24.450 --> 0:20:29.010
<v Speaker 1>Four of the scientists eventually won Nobel Prizes. The findings

0:20:29.050 --> 0:20:32.810
<v Speaker 1>of the Agison study support Shannon's habit of flipping from

0:20:32.810 --> 0:20:36.850
<v Speaker 1>one project to another. The scientists who'd most flourished over

0:20:36.890 --> 0:20:40.730
<v Speaker 1>the decades, had switched back and forth dozens of times.

0:20:41.450 --> 0:20:44.650
<v Speaker 1>Once you start looking for this pattern, you see it everywhere.

0:20:45.250 --> 0:20:48.650
<v Speaker 1>Isaac Newton is most famous for formulating the law of gravity,

0:20:49.090 --> 0:20:53.050
<v Speaker 1>but made huge advances in mathematics and optics. He was

0:20:53.050 --> 0:20:56.690
<v Speaker 1>the master of the Royal Mint and was fascinated by economics,

0:20:57.130 --> 0:21:00.370
<v Speaker 1>and devoted as much attention to alchemy as to anything else.

0:21:01.090 --> 0:21:06.090
<v Speaker 1>Einstein published four astonishing scientific papers on four different topics,

0:21:06.290 --> 0:21:10.450
<v Speaker 1>all in the same year nineteen oh five. Charles Darwin

0:21:10.570 --> 0:21:14.810
<v Speaker 1>worked simultaneously on the theory of evolution. The definitive two

0:21:14.890 --> 0:21:18.890
<v Speaker 1>volume work on barnacles and a book about the human infant,

0:21:19.290 --> 0:21:23.130
<v Speaker 1>began while his son William was a baby, and published

0:21:23.290 --> 0:21:27.730
<v Speaker 1>just in time for William Darwin's thirty eighth birthday. Multiple

0:21:27.770 --> 0:21:31.890
<v Speaker 1>projects aren't unusual at the highest level of science. They're

0:21:31.890 --> 0:21:36.090
<v Speaker 1>the norm. Not only that, high achieving scientists often have

0:21:36.250 --> 0:21:41.050
<v Speaker 1>time consuming side interests, pursuing photography, fine art, or music

0:21:41.410 --> 0:21:46.490
<v Speaker 1>at or near a professional level. Nobel Prize winning scientists

0:21:46.610 --> 0:21:50.290
<v Speaker 1>are substantially more likely to have serious hobbies than other

0:21:50.410 --> 0:21:53.650
<v Speaker 1>leading scientists, who in turn are more likely to have

0:21:53.730 --> 0:21:57.410
<v Speaker 1>them than the rest of us. The later part of

0:21:57.490 --> 0:22:02.090
<v Speaker 1>Shannon's career fits right into this highly diverse pattern, but

0:22:02.130 --> 0:22:06.290
<v Speaker 1>then so does the early part. Back in nineteen thirty nine,

0:22:06.570 --> 0:22:10.930
<v Speaker 1>shortly after his first thunderbolt, he wrote a note to

0:22:11.010 --> 0:22:16.490
<v Speaker 1>an academic mentor, dear doctor Bush, Yes Vanovar Bush, the

0:22:16.530 --> 0:22:20.330
<v Speaker 1>man who knew everyone who mattered in mid century American science.

0:22:20.810 --> 0:22:23.970
<v Speaker 1>Of course, he was there to support the young Claude Shannon.

0:22:24.890 --> 0:22:29.370
<v Speaker 1>Dear doctor Bush, I've been working on three different ideas simultaneously,

0:22:29.410 --> 0:22:32.530
<v Speaker 1>and strangely enough, it seems a more productive method than

0:22:32.610 --> 0:22:36.570
<v Speaker 1>sticking to one problem. When Shannon wrote to Vanovar Bush,

0:22:36.970 --> 0:22:40.450
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't working on engineering or logic. He was working

0:22:40.530 --> 0:22:44.570
<v Speaker 1>on genetics. He knew nothing about the subject, but swiftly

0:22:44.610 --> 0:22:48.410
<v Speaker 1>produced a completely new kind of algebra to describe and

0:22:48.650 --> 0:22:53.490
<v Speaker 1>analyze genetic inheritance. The work was intriguing and wholly original,

0:22:53.770 --> 0:22:57.730
<v Speaker 1>but needed developing. Did Shannon develop it He did not.

0:22:58.690 --> 0:23:02.370
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he never even bothered publishing it. Neither did

0:23:02.370 --> 0:23:06.450
<v Speaker 1>he ever return to genetics. Later scholars lament the loss.

0:23:06.730 --> 0:23:09.810
<v Speaker 1>His new algebra might really have advance on the field,

0:23:10.410 --> 0:23:13.370
<v Speaker 1>but sticking with genetics might also have meant he never

0:23:13.450 --> 0:23:19.410
<v Speaker 1>had his second thunderbolt on information theory. Between those two thunderbolts,

0:23:19.610 --> 0:23:23.010
<v Speaker 1>Shannon didn't just switch fields. He lit a rich and

0:23:23.130 --> 0:23:27.010
<v Speaker 1>complicated life. He married and then divorced within a year.

0:23:27.410 --> 0:23:30.290
<v Speaker 1>He moved to Manhattan to spice things up. It played

0:23:30.370 --> 0:23:33.810
<v Speaker 1>chess in Washington Square Park. It played clarinet. He loved

0:23:33.850 --> 0:23:37.610
<v Speaker 1>the jazz scene in New York. He swam, played tennis,

0:23:37.930 --> 0:23:40.410
<v Speaker 1>stayed up too late, and played his music too loud.

0:23:41.170 --> 0:23:43.770
<v Speaker 1>All this was happening when Shannon was at the peak

0:23:43.930 --> 0:23:48.010
<v Speaker 1>of his intellectual powers. Shannon didn't just hit thirty five

0:23:48.330 --> 0:23:52.450
<v Speaker 1>then abandoned serious thinking in favor of playing around. Shannon

0:23:53.010 --> 0:23:57.370
<v Speaker 1>was playing around all along. Maybe Shannon's love of frittering,

0:23:57.490 --> 0:24:02.090
<v Speaker 1>I say, frittering away his time on juggling or unicycling,

0:24:02.330 --> 0:24:05.850
<v Speaker 1>or music or chess. Maybe that's not the reason he

0:24:05.930 --> 0:24:10.810
<v Speaker 1>produced only two truly brilliant ideas. Maybe it's the reason

0:24:11.010 --> 0:24:15.050
<v Speaker 1>he produced two truly brilliant ideas in the first place.

0:24:19.330 --> 0:24:28.610
<v Speaker 1>Cautionary tales will be back in a moment. I try

0:24:28.650 --> 0:24:31.050
<v Speaker 1>hard to answer all the people who write to me.

0:24:31.730 --> 0:24:35.610
<v Speaker 1>I get anxious knowing that the task is unfinished. Claude

0:24:35.610 --> 0:24:39.330
<v Speaker 1>Shannon didn't feel that same compulsion to clear his inbox

0:24:39.850 --> 0:24:44.290
<v Speaker 1>He often left correspondence unanswered, then eventually cleared the decks

0:24:44.330 --> 0:24:47.130
<v Speaker 1>to the use of a trash can marked letters I've

0:24:47.210 --> 0:24:51.570
<v Speaker 1>procrastinated on for too long. That might seem a trivial thing,

0:24:51.650 --> 0:24:55.130
<v Speaker 1>but I think it points to something deeper. Psychologists have

0:24:55.210 --> 0:25:00.490
<v Speaker 1>identified a tendency called completion bias. If you've ever assembled

0:25:00.490 --> 0:25:03.050
<v Speaker 1>a list of things to do, then ticked off all

0:25:03.090 --> 0:25:07.410
<v Speaker 1>the easy ones while ignoring the important stuff, you've demonstrated

0:25:07.450 --> 0:25:13.530
<v Speaker 1>completion bias. That apparently admirable tendency persistence the determination to

0:25:13.570 --> 0:25:17.730
<v Speaker 1>finish what we start well, it could be twisted and perverted.

0:25:18.210 --> 0:25:21.490
<v Speaker 1>If we feel compelled to reach the finish line, we

0:25:21.610 --> 0:25:25.450
<v Speaker 1>also feel tempted to choose a short racetrack. Is more

0:25:25.490 --> 0:25:28.770
<v Speaker 1>at stake here than making ourselves feel better by cheating

0:25:28.810 --> 0:25:33.170
<v Speaker 1>with our own to do lists. Psychologists recently studied completion

0:25:33.290 --> 0:25:37.170
<v Speaker 1>by us in a high stake setting, a hospital emergency department.

0:25:37.730 --> 0:25:40.970
<v Speaker 1>They found that the busier the emergency room becomes, the

0:25:41.010 --> 0:25:44.490
<v Speaker 1>more the doctors look for quick wins the patients who

0:25:44.570 --> 0:25:47.690
<v Speaker 1>aren't really very ill and can therefore be treated swiftly

0:25:48.050 --> 0:25:51.810
<v Speaker 1>and ticked off the list, and this behavior is counterproductive.

0:25:52.450 --> 0:25:56.170
<v Speaker 1>The more seriously ill patients wait longer, of course, and

0:25:56.290 --> 0:25:58.930
<v Speaker 1>the doctors start to slow down after working through a

0:25:58.970 --> 0:26:02.210
<v Speaker 1>lot of fairly trivial cases. I expect we all know

0:26:02.290 --> 0:26:05.930
<v Speaker 1>the feeling, but in their subconscious desire to see some

0:26:06.170 --> 0:26:10.690
<v Speaker 1>work through to completion, doctors were harming the patients who

0:26:10.690 --> 0:26:17.010
<v Speaker 1>were in greatest need. Claude Shannon's willingness to set aside

0:26:17.090 --> 0:26:21.210
<v Speaker 1>projects starts to look like a strength rather than a weakness.

0:26:21.770 --> 0:26:26.290
<v Speaker 1>Shannon certainly could focus, whether building information theory from scratch

0:26:26.810 --> 0:26:31.050
<v Speaker 1>or building a wearable computer to be Roulette. Yet Shannon

0:26:31.170 --> 0:26:34.210
<v Speaker 1>also seemed to have an inner confidence that allowed him

0:26:34.250 --> 0:26:37.410
<v Speaker 1>to declare victory at any point that suited him. If

0:26:37.450 --> 0:26:40.490
<v Speaker 1>a piece of work was not good enough to publish, fine,

0:26:40.770 --> 0:26:44.410
<v Speaker 1>he was happy to leave it unpublished. That juggling paper

0:26:44.450 --> 0:26:47.450
<v Speaker 1>is an example, but so too was his early work

0:26:47.490 --> 0:26:51.890
<v Speaker 1>on genetic algebra. One of Claude Shannon's colleagues at Bell

0:26:52.010 --> 0:26:56.690
<v Speaker 1>Labs praised him as a man of infinite courage. He

0:26:56.810 --> 0:27:01.810
<v Speaker 1>was talking about Shannon's intellectual daring, a willingness to march

0:27:01.970 --> 0:27:05.610
<v Speaker 1>into unknown territory to begin the search for solutions to

0:27:05.690 --> 0:27:10.490
<v Speaker 1>problems that seemed as unbeatable as Roulette. But perhaps Courage

0:27:10.530 --> 0:27:13.490
<v Speaker 1>is not quite the right word to describe Shannon's approach.

0:27:14.290 --> 0:27:20.050
<v Speaker 1>I prefer in soussiens Claude. Shannon just wasn't worried. He

0:27:20.090 --> 0:27:22.610
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel completion by us the way you and I

0:27:22.730 --> 0:27:25.810
<v Speaker 1>feel it. He would walk away from any project at

0:27:25.890 --> 0:27:29.730
<v Speaker 1>any time without regret. And if he was willing to

0:27:29.810 --> 0:27:34.050
<v Speaker 1>abandon a stalled project, where was the risk? And if

0:27:34.090 --> 0:27:38.490
<v Speaker 1>there was little risk, why talk about courage. Shannon didn't

0:27:38.530 --> 0:27:42.330
<v Speaker 1>need courage, He just needed the ability to move on.

0:27:45.090 --> 0:27:49.050
<v Speaker 1>In August nineteen sixty one, Claude and Betty Shannon met

0:27:49.250 --> 0:27:52.570
<v Speaker 1>Ed and Vivian Thorpe in a hotel room in Las Vegas.

0:27:53.330 --> 0:27:57.170
<v Speaker 1>Claude and Ed prepared the wearable computer system, which required

0:27:57.170 --> 0:28:01.370
<v Speaker 1>both of them to operate. Shannon controlled the computer itself,

0:28:01.810 --> 0:28:04.890
<v Speaker 1>the size of a cigarette packet, with twelve transistors in it.

0:28:05.730 --> 0:28:09.650
<v Speaker 1>He used his toes to trigger silent mercury switches hidden

0:28:09.690 --> 0:28:13.890
<v Speaker 1>in his shoes. Thorpe, whose research into blackjack had given

0:28:13.970 --> 0:28:17.290
<v Speaker 1>him plenty of experience hanging around in casinos, was the

0:28:17.330 --> 0:28:20.050
<v Speaker 1>one who would place the bets. He had a radio

0:28:20.090 --> 0:28:23.290
<v Speaker 1>receiver and an ear piece connected to a hair thin

0:28:23.410 --> 0:28:28.530
<v Speaker 1>steel wire. The ear piece played an ascending musical scale.

0:28:28.570 --> 0:28:31.770
<v Speaker 1>Shannon would use the toe switches to time a rotation

0:28:31.890 --> 0:28:34.530
<v Speaker 1>of the wheel, and then the counter rotation of the

0:28:34.570 --> 0:28:38.650
<v Speaker 1>ball from the moment it passed a reference mark. Thorpe

0:28:38.810 --> 0:28:42.410
<v Speaker 1>would hear the musical scale stop on a continuous note

0:28:42.850 --> 0:28:46.050
<v Speaker 1>at the moment that Shannon finished timing the rotation, and

0:28:46.090 --> 0:28:49.330
<v Speaker 1>the pitch of that continuous note would indicate in which

0:28:49.370 --> 0:28:51.930
<v Speaker 1>part of the wheel the ball was likely to drop.

0:28:52.930 --> 0:28:56.250
<v Speaker 1>Thorpe still had a few seconds to place bets and

0:28:56.330 --> 0:29:01.130
<v Speaker 1>collect the money. Thorpe knew from hard experience that they

0:29:01.170 --> 0:29:05.450
<v Speaker 1>had to be careful. Their device wasn't illegal, It was

0:29:05.770 --> 0:29:09.530
<v Speaker 1>far too inconceivable for that, but it wouldn't go down

0:29:09.570 --> 0:29:14.130
<v Speaker 1>well if discovered. Beating the casino required more than just

0:29:14.250 --> 0:29:17.970
<v Speaker 1>beating the game. That's why the Shannons and the Thorpes

0:29:18.210 --> 0:29:21.090
<v Speaker 1>stroll up to the table separately, pretending not to know

0:29:21.170 --> 0:29:25.450
<v Speaker 1>each other. It's why Claude Shannon's scribbling numbers down, distracting

0:29:25.450 --> 0:29:28.330
<v Speaker 1>the floor manager from what he's really doing. All the

0:29:28.410 --> 0:29:32.170
<v Speaker 1>while he's gazing intently at the wheel from under his

0:29:32.330 --> 0:29:38.130
<v Speaker 1>dark eyebrows and his toe silently pressing and releasing the

0:29:38.210 --> 0:29:42.930
<v Speaker 1>hidden control of the computer. And while Thorpe is standing

0:29:42.930 --> 0:29:46.130
<v Speaker 1>at the other end of the table, cheerfully placing his bets.

0:29:46.530 --> 0:29:50.330
<v Speaker 1>The earpiece is receiving the signals from Shannon's little computer

0:29:50.890 --> 0:29:54.490
<v Speaker 1>and giving Thorpe predictions in the form of musical tones,

0:29:55.210 --> 0:30:03.210
<v Speaker 1>and Thorpe is winning. Not everything goes smoothly. The fine

0:30:03.250 --> 0:30:07.010
<v Speaker 1>wires to Thorpe's ear piece break several times, requiring a

0:30:07.010 --> 0:30:10.170
<v Speaker 1>trip to the bathroom to fix them. At one moment,

0:30:10.490 --> 0:30:14.210
<v Speaker 1>a horrified observer sees the earpiece come loose and think

0:30:14.330 --> 0:30:18.090
<v Speaker 1>some strange insect is crawling out of Thorpe's ear. But

0:30:18.410 --> 0:30:24.850
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally the computer works perfectly. The chips are stacking up fast.

0:30:26.130 --> 0:30:28.610
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the visit to Vegas, the Shannons

0:30:28.650 --> 0:30:32.970
<v Speaker 1>and the Thorpes pondered their options ed. Thorpe was bullish.

0:30:33.250 --> 0:30:35.730
<v Speaker 1>He'd beaten the casinos before and was happy to do

0:30:35.810 --> 0:30:39.850
<v Speaker 1>it again, but Betty Claude and Vivian weren't so sure.

0:30:40.530 --> 0:30:44.770
<v Speaker 1>It had been an exhilarating day, but a nerve wracking one,

0:30:45.090 --> 0:30:47.970
<v Speaker 1>and casino's simply banned players who seemed to win too

0:30:48.010 --> 0:30:51.290
<v Speaker 1>much for any reason, so making the computer pay on

0:30:51.330 --> 0:30:56.850
<v Speaker 1>a regular basis would require constantly concealing their identities. Thorpe

0:30:57.130 --> 0:31:00.530
<v Speaker 1>was forced to admit they had a point. The computer

0:31:00.730 --> 0:31:04.290
<v Speaker 1>clearly worked, and in theory they could use it to

0:31:04.330 --> 0:31:08.130
<v Speaker 1>make millions, but was it worth the effort and the risk.

0:31:09.290 --> 0:31:12.250
<v Speaker 1>Shannon and Thorpe had had their fun, and they had

0:31:12.330 --> 0:31:16.450
<v Speaker 1>proved their point to their own satisfaction, and Claude Shannon

0:31:16.530 --> 0:31:20.770
<v Speaker 1>had other projects to play with. So after months of

0:31:20.850 --> 0:31:26.530
<v Speaker 1>hard work, the world's first wearable computer was retired undefeated,

0:31:27.410 --> 0:31:34.330
<v Speaker 1>after a single trip to Vegas. Decades later, Thorpe reflected,

0:31:35.530 --> 0:31:42.010
<v Speaker 1>I have always thought it was a good decision. When

0:31:42.010 --> 0:31:45.290
<v Speaker 1>I first thought about writing this cautionary tale, I thought

0:31:45.330 --> 0:31:47.850
<v Speaker 1>it would be a warning not to lose focus like

0:31:47.930 --> 0:31:52.770
<v Speaker 1>Shannon did. I've changed my mind now I think Shannon

0:31:52.850 --> 0:31:57.450
<v Speaker 1>and Thorpe are inspirational figures. The cautionary tale isn't a

0:31:57.490 --> 0:32:01.210
<v Speaker 1>warning to keep your focus. Instead, it's a warning not

0:32:01.490 --> 0:32:05.250
<v Speaker 1>to focus too much. Don't commit yourself so totally to

0:32:05.290 --> 0:32:08.370
<v Speaker 1>a project that you lose heart, or lose sight of

0:32:08.450 --> 0:32:13.890
<v Speaker 1>creative idea, or lose your freedom to change course. There's

0:32:13.890 --> 0:32:16.890
<v Speaker 1>one last lesson I think we can draw from Claude

0:32:16.930 --> 0:32:21.010
<v Speaker 1>Shannon's ability to move on in their Vegas hotel room

0:32:21.410 --> 0:32:24.490
<v Speaker 1>as Shannon equipped Thorpe with his earpiece and the fine

0:32:24.530 --> 0:32:28.410
<v Speaker 1>connecting wires. Shannon had cocked his head to one side

0:32:29.050 --> 0:32:33.210
<v Speaker 1>and smiled impishly. What makes you tick? It was a

0:32:33.290 --> 0:32:36.050
<v Speaker 1>joke about the fact that Thorpe was plugged into a machine,

0:32:36.530 --> 0:32:39.250
<v Speaker 1>but young Thorpe took it as a deep question from

0:32:39.290 --> 0:32:42.810
<v Speaker 1>an older and wiser man. What did make him tick?

0:32:43.770 --> 0:32:50.850
<v Speaker 1>Professional gambling, academic mathematics or something else? But then why choose?

0:32:51.690 --> 0:32:55.050
<v Speaker 1>Shannon seemed to do it all, from academia to juggling,

0:32:55.850 --> 0:32:59.090
<v Speaker 1>and so in the end would ed Thorpe. You can

0:32:59.130 --> 0:33:02.170
<v Speaker 1>find interviews with him well into his eighties, still as

0:33:02.210 --> 0:33:07.090
<v Speaker 1>sharp as anything, reminiscing about blackjack and academic mathematics and

0:33:07.210 --> 0:33:10.610
<v Speaker 1>the hundreds of millions of dollars he eventually made after

0:33:10.690 --> 0:33:14.170
<v Speaker 1>analyzing the patterns in financial markets as one of the

0:33:14.210 --> 0:33:19.290
<v Speaker 1>first quants. One of the intriguing ideas in Claude Shannon's

0:33:19.330 --> 0:33:23.210
<v Speaker 1>mathematical theory of communication is that a message can be

0:33:23.250 --> 0:33:28.090
<v Speaker 1>compressed to the precise extent that it is predictable. A

0:33:28.170 --> 0:33:31.130
<v Speaker 1>movie can be compressed because each frame tends to resemble

0:33:31.170 --> 0:33:36.650
<v Speaker 1>the previous one. A compression algorithm doesn't store the new frame. Instead,

0:33:37.090 --> 0:33:41.690
<v Speaker 1>it stores a series of difts changes from the previous frame.

0:33:42.250 --> 0:33:45.970
<v Speaker 1>Movies with lots of cuts or fast dramatic movements are

0:33:45.970 --> 0:33:49.530
<v Speaker 1>harder to compress. The same is true more or less

0:33:49.570 --> 0:33:52.610
<v Speaker 1>with the way we remember our lives. Although the brain

0:33:52.730 --> 0:33:56.490
<v Speaker 1>is not a video recorder and doesn't store difts, it

0:33:56.570 --> 0:34:00.050
<v Speaker 1>does compress memories by recalling the gist of an experience.

0:34:00.770 --> 0:34:02.930
<v Speaker 1>If I get up in the morning at the usual time,

0:34:03.290 --> 0:34:06.410
<v Speaker 1>eat my regular breakfast, walk the usual route to the station,

0:34:06.610 --> 0:34:09.730
<v Speaker 1>and catch the same trainers always to the office, my

0:34:09.810 --> 0:34:14.090
<v Speaker 1>brain doesn't trouble itself to remember much. The diffs aren't

0:34:14.130 --> 0:34:19.290
<v Speaker 1>worth bothering with. A life that's too predictable creates few memories.

0:34:19.850 --> 0:34:23.050
<v Speaker 1>That's what prisoners sometimes say about their years behind bars.

0:34:23.530 --> 0:34:26.930
<v Speaker 1>Don't remember much because it was all the same or

0:34:26.970 --> 0:34:30.970
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic lockdown For me and perhaps for you, involved

0:34:31.170 --> 0:34:34.050
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the same seat doing the same thing every day.

0:34:35.010 --> 0:34:41.250
<v Speaker 1>Life in lockdown was thin and forgettable. The opposite experience

0:34:41.370 --> 0:34:45.250
<v Speaker 1>is a vivid vacation somewhere, packed with new sights and smells,

0:34:45.330 --> 0:34:49.890
<v Speaker 1>the people, the language, the architecture, the food. These complex,

0:34:50.010 --> 0:34:55.250
<v Speaker 1>rich experiences defy compression. The diffs are too big, so

0:34:55.290 --> 0:34:58.090
<v Speaker 1>the memories are rich. Has it really only been ten

0:34:58.170 --> 0:35:01.530
<v Speaker 1>hours since I arrived you ask yourself? Feels like a week.

0:35:02.530 --> 0:35:05.410
<v Speaker 1>So if you want a full life rich with memories,

0:35:06.050 --> 0:35:10.930
<v Speaker 1>keep searching for new experiences like Shannon, don't be afraid

0:35:10.970 --> 0:35:16.050
<v Speaker 1>to declare victory and start afresh. Shannon did everything, the

0:35:16.130 --> 0:35:19.210
<v Speaker 1>jazz and the juggling and the chess, the intellectual journey

0:35:19.210 --> 0:35:22.730
<v Speaker 1>from genetics to the Rubik's cube, the joky robots and

0:35:22.770 --> 0:35:26.970
<v Speaker 1>the flame throwing trumpet, and he really did turn upside

0:35:26.970 --> 0:35:31.250
<v Speaker 1>down the way the world thought about digital information. Not once,

0:35:32.330 --> 0:35:46.970
<v Speaker 1>but twice. Isn't twice enough. The key sources for this

0:35:47.050 --> 0:35:51.570
<v Speaker 1>episode were Jimmy Sony and Rob Goodman's biography of Claude Shannon,

0:35:51.850 --> 0:35:56.490
<v Speaker 1>A Mind at Play and Edward Thorpe's autobiography A Man

0:35:56.570 --> 0:36:00.170
<v Speaker 1>for All Markets. For a full list of references, see

0:36:00.250 --> 0:36:07.410
<v Speaker 1>Timharford dot com. Cautionary Tales is written by me Tim

0:36:07.490 --> 0:36:11.570
<v Speaker 1>Harford with Andrew Wright. It's produced by Ryan Dilly and

0:36:11.690 --> 0:36:15.570
<v Speaker 1>Marilyn Rust. The sound design and original music are the

0:36:15.610 --> 0:36:20.850
<v Speaker 1>work of Pascal Wise. Julia Barton edited the scripts. Starring

0:36:20.890 --> 0:36:24.650
<v Speaker 1>in this series of Cautionary Tales are Helena Bonham Carter

0:36:25.130 --> 0:36:31.450
<v Speaker 1>and Jeffrey Wright, alongside Nazar Alderazzi, Ed Gohan, Melanie Gutteridge,

0:36:31.850 --> 0:36:37.850
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Hanshaw, Cobner, Holbrook Smith, Greg Lockett, Massa Munroe, and

0:36:37.970 --> 0:36:41.490
<v Speaker 1>Rufus Wright. The show would not have been possible without

0:36:41.490 --> 0:36:46.490
<v Speaker 1>the work of Mea LaBelle, Jacob Weisberg, Heather Fain, John Schnaz,

0:36:47.090 --> 0:36:53.250
<v Speaker 1>Carli mcgliori, Eric Sandler, Emily Rostick, Maggie Taylor, Daniella La Khan,

0:36:53.650 --> 0:36:58.770
<v Speaker 1>and Maya Kanning. Cautionary Tales is a production of Pushkin Industries.

0:36:59.130 --> 0:37:02.050
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please remember to share, rate,

0:37:02.530 --> 0:37:03.170
<v Speaker 1>and review

0:37:12.890 --> 0:37:20.570
<v Speaker 3>Pttlyttics