WEBVTT - AI Jitters Cloud Market Optimism Over Shutdown Resolution

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Right now, we're gonna get right to it. We've got

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful conversation here. What Oliver Wyman has done as

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 2>part of marsh Broc Clennan and Mercer and all the

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 2>rest is it gone out to people that have shown

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>stunning expertise in different fields, pooled them in together and

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 2>it's like a legit global consultancy. So to explain, you know,

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 2>it's like Butch Cassidy, who are the nice Scott Dan

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 2>tannebon Is sanctions. He's the one that knows who's cheating

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 2>and why they're cheating and what's going to take the will,

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>if you will, for in the case of Russia, for

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Europe to get its act together. Hu Van Steinis was

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 2>iconic at Morgan Stanley, Ages, Ago and Finance in banking worldwide.

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Huvanstinius's partner vice chair at Oliver Wyman. Daniel Tannemum partner

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>global anti financial crime practice leader at Oliver Wyman. Here,

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>let me start with you the year end, and you

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 2>know it's not like thirty pages, the one hundred and

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty page Oliver Wyman, this is twenty twenty six. Do

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 2>you have a theme yet? It's a great question.

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 3>We'll look.

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 5>I was just chatting with one of my friends about

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 5>their their outlook yesterday and they said the biggest question

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 5>for them was has the flurry of defaults? Is that

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 5>going to be a snowstorm or is it going to

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 5>be That was just a little flurry which came past us.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 5>So this, I think the credit markets spreads are historically tight,

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 5>riskwards a little bit tighter than it was. Where does that?

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Where did credit markets go from here? And is much

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 5>of a slow down? I think that's one of the

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 5>big questions on our plant's mind. Obviously the whole AI

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 5>data center growth or that off with that impetus offset,

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 5>that's clearly a baked in and a big debate too.

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 3>But lots around credit markets.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 2>But when you're dark in the door at Oxford, did

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 2>you take cockroach four oh two?

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you know the cockroaches out there?

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we don't get so many cockroaches in the UK

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 5>Chilli there private credit.

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this isn't your main question for banking and

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 2>for everybody out there?

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 6>Are they going to do you sense us as cockroaches.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 5>Look the way I take it is this feels like

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 5>a bit late cycle behavior. So you know, you imagine

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 5>we're we're a long way through a cycle. Some of

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 5>the some of what we see and you've seen on

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg this morning is fraud, some is uh, difficulties around

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 5>a K shaped economy. What the real dissonance, Tom, is

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 5>that the banks CFOs we engage with are not sensing

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 5>a big pickup in credit. They're saying it's really benign.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 5>But obviously what the debate in the market is much

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 5>more concerned. So I think there's a real tension there

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 5>at the moment. I don't see. Look, this late cycle,

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 5>there will be more folks. The key question is are

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 5>they well spread and are they amplified? Dan, what's the

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 5>latest here on I don't know. I guess just our

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 5>tariff policy here in the US. The Supreme Court heard

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 5>some arguments last week. I guess we'll hear from them

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 5>later this year here. But what's the policy these days

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 5>on tariff's is there one?

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, the policy is the Trump administration is

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 4>treating that hearing like it's a speed bump, if at

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 4>all okay, and really trying to come out saying we

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 4>have other authorities we can use, whether it's Section two

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 4>thirty two or three ZHO one, which are much more

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 4>limited than what the president attempted under AEPA, which is

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 4>a reminder, AEPA was created to limit the president's authorities.

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 4>So all of the rhetoric that Trump had set around

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 4>tariffs and the run up to and aftermath of Liberation

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Day kind of shot the whole argument in the foot,

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 4>and it's why even the conservative justices were pretty skeptical

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 4>of the arguments made. So I think the administration is

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 4>trying to show confidence that their strategy will move forward.

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 6>Do you believe in that?

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, investment's over it with Morning Joe right now

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>talking it up. I mean, the basic gist Paul's talking

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>about is we've moved on from tariffs.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 6>So I don't buy it for a minute.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 4>We've definitely not moved on from tariffs, because if we do,

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 4>that's a key part of this administration strategy for hammering

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 4>out trade deals. So it literally kicks the stool out

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 4>from under a bunch of them. And you look at

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 4>what's happening between the US and China where there's this

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 4>detent for the moment, does that go away? Does China

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 4>begin to turn the screws again and turn off this

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 4>spigot for the five rare earths they began allowing movement of.

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 7>So part of the just the talk of this administration

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 7>has been really impacting your industry, the financial services industry

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 7>in terms of deregulation. Is that a thing or they've

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 7>been focusing so much on tariffs they haven't looked at

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 7>the banking system.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 6>Oh.

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 5>I think that the simplification of bank rules is one

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 5>of the four big priorities for the administration. I think that,

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 5>you know, funding the data center, build out, the energy security,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 5>the rare earth supply chains. Think about the JP Morgan

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 5>announcement about national security, huge numbers for the next decade.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 5>So now I think that financial deregulation, financial simplifications. I mean,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 5>as I think the industry is calling it is a

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 5>huge part of this, and I think what we're seeing it.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 5>Think about the data center, it's all hands on deck.

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 5>The banks alone and can't do it. A private markets

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 5>alone clearly can't do it, so you need both working together.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 5>I think that does mean that the banks are feeling,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, a bit of a spring and their step,

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 5>certainly the larger ones because of the And the key

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 5>question will be how much of it comes back in

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 5>buybacks and dividends versus actually really reinvested. And that's the

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 5>bet Here.

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Special momenting this morning, Daniel Tanna bound Hu Vanstein is

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 2>there with Oliver Wyman, together with us in the studio.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to go a holistic cany I mentioned yesterday

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Apple TV down Cemetery Road. It's like a travelogue for Oxford.

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Basically it's centered in Oxford, and they use the Bloomberg terminal.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Great within a nice I mean, I was looking for

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 2>your pod, didn't see yeah there, but you know, you

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 2>know down Cemetery Roads doing the Bloomberg thing. You saw

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Hugh von steinas and slow horses like season three they

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 2>made an appearance. I want you guys to talk about

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 2>great Britain and is a general sense Dan yours the

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>ugly American foreigner here you're living at your service to

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the to the to the public of the United Kingdom.

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>From where we sit. It's turned upside down. Kit Jukes

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>at Sacchen this morning with a blistering Noe Jordan Rochester

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 2>models one south of one thirty. Here Von steinas where

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 2>is your nation in twelve months?

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Look, it's a great question when we would have these debates,

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 5>Say fifteen years ago, the UK was mid atlantic. We did,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 5>We had the growth rate which was mid atlantic. We

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 5>had the deregulation which was edging between the two continents.

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 5>And I think post the financial crisis and particularly Brexit,

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 5>the moment we voted to leave, the more European became.

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's the challenge and that's the problem here,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 5>that the politics has become more unstable in Itali's the

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 5>finances have become a little bit more unstable. And I

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 5>think the debate here is like will we get a

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 5>little will the pressure from the bomb market's edges back

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 5>to that mid atlanticism or we just got stuck in

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a rut. And I think, look, politically

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 5>it's painful, but like everything in life, it's not all

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 5>about politics.

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 8>Stuff on the economy expert and Heathrow, in the tram

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 8>and in sanctions and all that you said on the

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 8>truck lines that the port of Dover is the relationship with.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 2>The United Kingdom and the continent of Europe. Is it

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>basically shattered because of Brexit?

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 6>I don't.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure I would agree with that. I mean,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 4>Hugh is certainly the expert on this, but is it

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 4>shattered because of Brexit? I mean, interestingly in my world

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 4>and I was I've been in Brussels and London in

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 4>the last few weeks.

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 6>If you take the issue.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Of Russia, I think there's general alignment between the European Commission,

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 4>the British, the US, which is nice to see for

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 4>a chain. So, I mean, I think it may be

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 4>on an episodic basis, but shattered seems like a stretch.

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 6>So they're getting they're getting on, they're getting a lot,

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 6>I think.

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 5>So we'll just get back to such to finance, it's interesting,

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 5>I think the it's interesting how two big private market

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 5>films of both both bought in the UK recently, so

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 5>there's actually there's there's there's money to be made in

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 5>terms of financing. The economy may not be leaping ahead,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 5>but there's business to be done.

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Can I poss got okay? Questions here? I Vantstein is

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 2>dantan about with us. All my radar is up and

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm biased saying go along United Kingdom. It's so gloomy, like,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 2>what's the royal family going to do? What in God's

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>name is tatany I'm gonna do? Time? May you late

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 2>in the game? I mean my gut feeling is this

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>is the time to go long breckxit long UK? Is

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>that in the Oliver Wyman zeitgeist.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Look, I know, I think it's an interesting call.

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the moment where you get this, the pessimism

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 5>about the UK, particularly my trip here to the US,

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 5>is profound. So I think you're right that I think

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 5>it is kind of darkest before dawn. I think the

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 5>pressure from the bomb market is going to challenge the

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 5>government to make better fiscal decisions. Look, there's a little

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 5>bit of caution, but I see a lot of interest around.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 5>You talked about Oxford, around the universities as a huge

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 5>science parks being built. You know, the Ellison Institute is

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 5>just poured in over one hundred million into Oxford. I

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 5>think there's a lot of excitement around US science and energy.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 5>But you know, I think it's most important to invest

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 5>through the politics, not because of.

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 7>So, Daniel tos As you mentioned some of the sanctions

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 7>on Russia and so on. We're talk to us about sanctions,

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 7>do they work at all here? Because it just seems

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 7>we have wave after wave after wave of sanctions and

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 7>these people I think they just it doesn't seem to

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 7>have an impact that well.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 4>No, so we there was a moment a few weeks

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 4>ago when the US decided to rejoin the Global Coalition

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 4>and sanction Luke Oil and Rasneft. Those were literally the

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 4>first sanctions that the Trump administration has put on Russia's

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 4>since they took office in January. They have made a

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 4>difference because they, in doing so, put India and China

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 4>on notice that if you continue to buy, you may

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 4>have issues. Now, follow through is not necessarily a strength

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 4>of this administration on this issue, but you have seen

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 4>a reduction in barrels per day being sold. It is

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 4>beginning to hit the Russian economy. But when you look

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 4>at things like you know, Orbon coming to the White

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 4>House asking for an exemption, depending on who you ask,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 4>indefinite or a year like that kind of doesn't help

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 4>the argument necessarily, But they are moving the needle. The

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 4>Biden administration was very reluctant to touch energy, probably too reluctant.

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 4>The Trump administration has waited way too long to re engage.

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 4>But now that they have, they have to follow through

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 4>and actually enforce the existing sanctions.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 2>I've got a project right now John McCrae, the iconic

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>British author. I'm reading each of his books, trying to

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 2>go back and get a first edition evident all of

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 2>a good time. I'm on the looking glass war right now,

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 2>right after Spio came in from the cold, what's the

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Russian relationship with the continent? Not so much in terms

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 2>of MI five and spying, but what's the Russian relationship

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 2>commercially with Europe right now that we don't see.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 4>There's still trade. There's trade for nuclear fuel things like uranium.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 4>There's still lng that they're weaning off. I think January one,

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven was the date they pushed forward in the

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 4>last round of sanctions that the European Commission passed. There

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 4>is still trade like it is not dead. And the

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 4>challenge is there's still a lot of goods that are

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 4>transshipped over land borders into Russia. We have an automotive

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 4>client that will go nameless that saw like a two

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent increase in cars being sold to a country

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 4>bordering Russia and said that without irony, it's like you

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 4>see what has happened here, Like the cars are being

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 4>shipped across the border. Countries like Lafia have actually stepped

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 4>up their efforts to literally block physical movement of goods

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 4>from Europe and too Russia. But there is still trade.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 4>It is not down to nothing like that. That much

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 4>is clear.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Two great skill sets at Oliver Wyman, Hugh von stein

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Is with his vice chair and Daniel Tannema'm partner here

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>that today on sanctions and here's just great financial expertise

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>as well, Passueny Worldwide with Hugh von Steiners and.

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 7>C with some hindsight here, how does the average Britain

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 7>view Brexit these days? And is it still a talking point?

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 7>Does it come up in a pub on a Friday evening?

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 5>So so okay, So there's two answers this. If you

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 5>look at the polls, there is some bars remorse, so

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 5>the majority of the population now have have regrets. But

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 5>I think this is more like thinking a head to

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 5>Thanksgiving about what are the topics which shouldn't come around.

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 3>The dining table.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 5>So still that's still one of these topics which wow,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 5>people put below the table iff until the fourth class

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 5>of wine.

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 2>You're usually qualified on this, Hugh von Steiners, should the

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Fed enjoy the descent of the Bank of England Bank

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 2>of England recently five to four unheard of at the Fed,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 2>we would never see that. And you know, I'm working

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 2>with Governor Kearney now running a small nation to the north.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 2>My draw Canadians in first place. I believe q von

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>stein is just as simple as I can. The descent

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 2>that we've learned at the Bank of England is at

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a constructive exercise.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 3>That's a really good question.

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 5>I think it speaks to just how difficult the setup

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 5>is because you've got sluggish growth, as you've just said, Thomas,

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 5>you want low rates, but inflation keeps picking up ahead

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 5>and that's partly actually a function of breaks it, but

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 5>it's a partly function of other import markets as well.

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 5>So I can see why the committee is really stuck

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 5>and challenged. I don't think you'll get quite the same

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 5>degree of dissent over here because you don't have the

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 5>same difference and fundamentals. But I think it's it's sort

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 5>of healthy, but you know it probably speaks to the

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 5>problem rather than the committee.

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 2>People are really begging for that to a great except

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 2>one final question, Dan Tannembaham Hardwire in to the bonus

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 2>joy of Autumnal twenty twenty five Global Wall Street.

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 6>It's nuts out there.

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a boom Wall Street economy. Exactly how

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 2>much is you know, the real estate of Greater New

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>York to explode a higher here with all that money

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 2>coming in to New York Wall Street.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 6>I don't know where you're going with this one.

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I do thought Hampton's gonna go up springing

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>into Samptons has seen record pricing.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 6>We want to hear it.

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know if that means people are migrating

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 4>east on a permanent basis or if people have just

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 4>rediscovered the beauty of the Hampton's and the off season.

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 2>With your experience, it's a boom Wall Street economy, right,

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 2>it does seem that, But I mean, what does it

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 2>take to flip it the other way?

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Like if the Supreme Court rules against the tariffs, for instance,

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 4>how does the market react to that. They've been pretty

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 4>muted to some of these broader events and what that.

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 6>Call and to Supreme Court's gonna do.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm not on Cawshier poly market, but I feel pretty reasonable,

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 4>reasonably comfortable that they're going to overturn the and uphold

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 4>the prior decisions that the IPA tariffs are shot.

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Last word is is the city enjoying the Wall Street

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>bomb that we see in New York.

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Nowhere near as much?

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 9>No?

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 5>And I think actually there's because there's We've alwaysly got

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 5>concerns about housing taxes about to come through in two

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 5>weeks time.

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 3>So I know the housing market, you get a bargain.

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 5>In fact, the number of Americans Tom when you're coming

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 5>over to buy your John McCarey's give a house at

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 5>the same time.

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 6>It's just, it's just, it's.

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Just I read the Telegraph, I read the Times. It's

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I read an article on the BBC yesterday and the

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Times of London. It was incomp I couldn't understand it.

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 2>I literally tried to understand what's going on there. It's

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 2>nuts over there is everybody gonna.

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 6>Leave if they put through this tax regime.

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 5>So we've already seen a significant wave of nondoms. In

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 5>other words, non Brea too had a special tax status

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 5>and you know, if I go to events in Milan

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 5>or Middle East, I mean, there's plenty of folk hoop

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 5>who've departed, and it looks it's a bit like the

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 5>debate you've had recently in New York. The tax base

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 5>is very geared towards the top one percent, so we've

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 5>already seen a stream of people leave. I don't I

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 5>think though now these taxes are more for middle classes

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 5>and that's going to be tougher. But you're you're also

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 5>seeing some of the young, the you know, the under

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 5>twenty five's move too, So I don't think this is

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 5>nineteen seventies. There's no any like that, you know, but

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, but that's the parable. But it's it's definitely

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 5>getting It's a This is the topic of the dinner tables.

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Dan.

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 6>One final question, Are you moving to Milan?

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 4>No, No, I'm staying. We just finished a long overdue renovation.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 4>I am long in New York regardless of what's happened

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 4>in the last week.

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 6>So anyway, Tannemum, thank you so much.

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 2>With Oliver Wyman von Steinas, thank you for visiting from

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 2>the United Kingdom. Venstinas and tann Obama of Oliver Wyman together.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 6>I love doing that here.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 2>The conversation is what we try to do with these

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 2>two gentlemen of great expertise and sanctions and of course

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 2>in European and global finance.

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 6>Govery shutdown.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's do economics, Blorena or Rich joins us on Chief

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you us economists the Tiro prices, we get the market

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 2>open today, Blurina, How blind are you at Tiro price

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 2>when you go to a meeting with Sebastian Page and

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the other beasts? Where are you getting your information from

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 2>your belief, your conviction?

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 9>Lucky for me, Bloomberg published this alternative data charts and

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 9>tables and so on, so I'm not flying so blind anymore. Also,

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 9>lucky for me, we are a big fundamentals house with

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 9>bottoms up analysis from our credit and equity analysts, so

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 9>we're getting a lot of live information. It's just the

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 9>job has become harder because we're not relying on the

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 9>same things that we used to feed the.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 10>Models in the past.

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 9>But what your question is, what are the private sector

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 9>data telling us. We had seen some encouraging news from

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 9>ADP that weakness in labor demand was stabilizing in October

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 9>and that we could hope for improvements going forward. The

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 9>ism employment in this is we're pointing in the same direction.

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.719
<v Speaker 9>So I think I'm still leaning on that as my thesis.

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 9>But today's weekly data on ADP, which showed a decline

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 9>for the week of October twenty five, was a bit

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 9>of a setback. Now when I'm talking to investors and

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 9>Sebastian Page, what I'm emphasizing is that October will be

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 9>really noisy. It will be actively vity spending. Employment numbers

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 9>will be affected by the government shutdown. We might not

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 9>even have its ability into price data because it's too

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 9>late to collect CPI data anymore. But we'll look at November,

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 9>we'll look at December to gauge the trend of the economy.

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 9>I remain still optimistic about the path going forward, and

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 9>we can discuss together why.

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 11>That is so.

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 7>Blarena, do you have a sense of if the government

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 7>that does open in the next few days, how it

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 7>will release the data to the marketplaces or do you

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 7>have any sense of when that will occur, how that

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 7>will occur right.

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 9>This is a very important question right now because essentially

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 9>what we want to know is how much information will

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 9>the FED have before it's December tenth meeting. So let's

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 9>see the government. If the government opens later this week.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 9>I expect that both BLSS, Census BA, they will all

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 9>release a new data schedule once they have gauged how

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 9>much time it will take them to play catch up.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 9>I think we should get pretty quickly the September Employment

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 9>report because that would have been already prepared before the

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 9>government shut down. It was a matter of formality to

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 9>approve it. Now the BLS could go down the root

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 9>of collecting October and November employment data and that could

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 9>delay the release of the next employment report, or if

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 9>they just focus on November. It's a collection data collection

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 9>week this week and next week, so we could see

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 9>that before the FOMC meeting, and I think that would

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 9>be quite important for the fact because they won't have

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 9>the CPI report, but at least they would look at

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 9>the full employment side of their mandate before the next meeting.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Unbelievable.

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea how we get to the December meeting.

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>We're going to continue with the Lorena her reach, she

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 2>f Us economist a Tiro price. Give us a moment

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 2>here to get the market open again. The bond market

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is close today. There's a little bit of you know,

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 2>spread information in that, but it's data and frozen here in.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 6>The bond market. The equity market not frozen.

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 2>With ready green on the screen to keep score at home,

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 2>going into the market, opening futures are negative fifteen to.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 6>See where we end up here, but with ready green

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 6>on a screen.

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 2>An interesting veterans day.

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 6>The dollar resilient. Here's Lisa MINTEO.

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 11>You got it.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 10>And let's start right now with the SMP five hundred.

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 10>Right now, I'm sitting some rud on the screen, down

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 10>about two tens of percent, fourteen points the level six thousand,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 10>eight hundred and seventeen. We go to the Dow, it's

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 10>up about a ten percent seventy points forty seven four

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 10>hundred and forty four, and the Nasdaq right now down

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 10>about half a percent one hundred eighteen points at twenty

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 10>three thousand, four hundred and seven. The yield space, well

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 10>we have at the bond market closed today, so we're

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 10>not going to get that well that it'll be back

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 10>open tomorrow. Over to commodities, we have COMX gold up

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 10>about three tens percent, four thousand, one hundred and thirty

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 10>seven dollars an ounce, Brent crude up more than one percent,

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 10>sixty four dollars a barrel, WTI crewed sixty dollars a barrow.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 10>All the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index down about a tenth

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 10>of a percent. Checking you with chairs of a video

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 10>at the open there down about two percent. That is

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 10>your Bloomberg opening Bellerpoort, Paul and Tom.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Lisa, thank you so much. First quote here on the

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>develop one hundred and eight points. But it's sort of

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 2>a mess out there. We'll see as we go forward

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 2>with us. Plerina, you're reaching chief youis economist a t

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 2>rowe price? Blerina, I mean it's what is It's November eleventh? Right, yeah,

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 2>we know that date. Okay, so one week got two

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 2>weeks out, three weeks out? How do you prosecute a

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 2>FED meeting? I mean, I just I get it. It's

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 2>original territory, but how original will it be in December.

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 9>I think it will be pretty tough this meeting. We

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 9>know the committee is already quite divided between cut in

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 9>December and staying put because they're worried about employment on

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 9>the one side and inflationary pressures on the other side.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 9>And I feel like because we don't have new data

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 9>and information, it will take that much more to shift

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 9>either hawks or doves from their position. So it could

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 9>be quite a hot and contested meeting. What do they

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 9>need to see? The thing is October, first month of

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 9>the quarter. We know that the spending data and activity

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 9>data will be affected by the government shut down. The

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 9>CBO estimates seven hundred and fifty thousand furloughed workers from

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 9>federal government. That's four tenths of a percentage point effect

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 9>on the unemployment rate. That could show up in the

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 9>unemployment numbers. Now the FMC needs to figure out wherether

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 9>that's noise or whether it's continued weakness from the summer months.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 9>So it's going to be pretty tough. And on top

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 9>of that, they won't have the information they need on

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 9>the price side to say, Okay, there is some softness

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 9>in the labor market, but we have some uptick in inflation,

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 9>So those two things might cancel themselves out. So it's

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 9>going to be a pretty difficult meeting. I think to navigate.

0:23:56.240 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>They're blind down price. All that got does the price

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 2>of the market, which yield?

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Ye?

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 6>Do they make a FED decision of the two year? Sweeny? You,

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 7>I don't know, so, Lourina, what do you think is

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 7>the focus of this FED here coming up on their

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 7>February sorry, December tenth meeting here?

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 11>Inflation? Employment? What's taking center stage? Do you believe?

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 9>I feel that we're still on the tail end of

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 9>the full employment concerns. It feels a bit like twenty

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 9>twenty four when they were worried about the labor market

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 9>rolling over quickly and they were worried about activity. I

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 9>get a taste of that situation right now too, So

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 9>we are at the tail end of them focusing on

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 9>full employment. I think next year, and perhaps even as

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 9>soon as after the December of MC meeting, the shift

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 9>will be towards inflation, because I do expect that we

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 9>see those effects of the tariffs picking up in Q four.

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 9>I also think the dollar weakness since the beginning of

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 9>the year will push import prices. Also in January, we're

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 9>going to get that price reset that we've seen since

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 9>the pandemic. A lot of companies will reset prices at

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 9>the beginning of the year, and so I do think

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 9>the focus will shift to inflation, but we're not there yet.

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Brilliana, Thank you so much. Great brief here at a

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 2>tough time for economists. Bleirino, Richie's with.

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 6>Tea row Price. Stay with us.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 2>John Stolphus gives us clinic here he's with Oppenheimer and

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 2>a company the chief investment officer. The greatest thing about

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 2>your notes, John, is you address the fear is this

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 2>a repeat of the late nineties the dot com bubble?

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 2>We do not believe, so discuss well. Tom, great to

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 2>be here with you today.

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 12>I've got to say that we do not think that

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 12>this is the tech bubble at all, and it's a

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 12>very different The structure is decidedly different in the I

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 12>remember exactly where I was during the tech bubble. I

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 12>was fortunate that that time I was a manager of

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 12>international equity marketing, so I was working with privatized telephonies,

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 12>all kinds of things around in Europe and Latin America,

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 12>and I was pretty clear of the tech bubble, but

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 12>I watched it happen because I was very much in

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 12>close proximity at that time. It was tech was rather

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 12>primitive if we look back on it. I mean we

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 12>had the modems that we'd pluck into the wall, yeah,

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 12>and the frozen screens that would occur even at the

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 12>well known firms around town. Your best friend was the

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 12>tech person all the time. Against we call it peace Sweeny.

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 12>And today what we have is file lunch in nine

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 12>never please kill Yeah, right.

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 6>The marvels.

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 12>When you'd hear the cart come down the hallway, I'd

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 12>start barking, you know, and to make sure I have

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 12>the cheesecake with the caramel frosting on it. But sec

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 12>where we are today I think is structurally you have

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 12>technology is deeply embedded in the lives of both the

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 12>consumer as well as business. We all rely, we're all

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 12>on the upgrade cycle, whether we like it or not.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 12>And these big companies are highly profitable, you know, the

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 12>world of positive cash flow and developments. If anything, probably

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 12>the biggest risk is that governments around the world might

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 12>want to break them up. And at this point even

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 12>that probably wouldn't be so bad because probably the individual

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 12>pieces are worth more than the sum of the parts.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 12>So I think it's a different world, John. We just

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 12>got pretty much through earning season. I seem to be

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 12>pretty solid earnings. Is it enough to support this marketplace?

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 6>Let me tell you that.

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 12>I've got to say, Paul, the earnings are just marvelous

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 12>this time around. When you consider that nine, let's say

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 12>nine sectors are positive. Of those five or double digit growth,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 12>and it's a mix of what you would.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 11>Call a value as well as growth.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 12>So you've got tech right in there, but you've also

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 12>got good representation. Even materials is doing fairly well right now.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 12>With the earnings growth, you've got positive there. So when

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 12>we look at it, if anything, we think the rally

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 12>has broadened, but it's still driven by technology because technology

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 12>drive technology like credit makes the world.

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 11>Go around when it comes to finance and the market.

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 12>I really believe no matter what the turbulence is in

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 12>Washington or Beijing or Moscow, the ultimately what they're really

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 12>carrying about is revenue growth and profit growth.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 11>We've got it.

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 6>We start strong.

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 2>This morning, Jen Sofis Oppenheimer in company with this Good

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Morning in New York down to Washington ninety nine and

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 2>one FM Good Morning, a serious extension of.

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 6>One twenty one. I have no idea how large that

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 6>audience is. Well, it's like old technology. Sure it's still rocketed. Yeah,

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 6>you know across Canada as well. Paul suite with John stolfhis.

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 7>Hey John, So you know, one of the concerns in

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 7>this marketplace is AI. It's been such a big, big

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 7>theme in this marketplace really for the last two plus years,

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 7>not just in the technology sect, but just kind of across.

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 11>The market in general.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 7>Are you concerned that, I don't know, we're in an

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 7>AI bubble.

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 12>Maybe for so many sectors, you know, Paul, I really

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 12>think where the bubbles may be found or probably in

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 12>the areas of meme stocks and cryptos. But when it

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 12>comes to AI, when we talk to people, whether it

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 12>is private investors, just general consumers looking for things. Civilians

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 12>are using AI more and more all the time.

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 11>And within business, you know.

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 12>I can remember a few months ago I attended the

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 12>Institutional Audience conference here at Bloomberg, and it was a.

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 11>Mix of people.

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 12>It wasn't just people from finance, but it was healthcare

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 12>and different different sectors and everybody people normally, and they

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 12>were I've met a person from healthcare who said, oh,

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 12>how she loves doing research with AI because it makes

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 12>her so much more efficient. And then at one point

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 12>she said, sometimes I think it's better than me, And

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 12>I said, don't say that, because I think the other

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 12>thing is I don't think AI is going to replace

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 12>humanity because it has no uh, it has no sympathy

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 12>or empathy, and it's apart from here.

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 6>Were you seven thousand, seventy one hundreds?

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 11>Just kill them?

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 6>Can we make some newsier? Lisa? Give them? Give them, Tito,

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 6>can you get the seventy two hundred?

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think that seventy one hundred could be surpassed,

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 12>but I'm sticking with the seventy one.

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 11>At this point is pretty late in the year. The

0:30:57.680 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 11>gloom Crew.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 2>The foundational discussion is the earnings juggernaut, the cash flow

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 2>juggernaut will end. Do you see it ending for the

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 2>chosen few? Or does it continue to disperse to a

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>better earning season for all the other stocks?

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 12>I think, you know, at this point, I think we

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 12>begin to see I mean, this earning season looks. What

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 12>We've got earnings growth up eleven point seven percent on

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 12>back of eight point one percent revenue growth. You've got

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 12>tech twenty four percent growth year over year financial Q

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 12>three or year over year twenty three point nine, so

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 12>that's another twenty four piece. You've got materials double digit growth,

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 12>industrials double digit growth. This is looking pretty good, and

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 12>the single digits aren't bad. And you've only got two

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 12>sectors with negative growth. That's energy negative two point two

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 12>six percent on the screen and communication services eight point

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 12>one nine percent, and that some of that may be

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 12>the result of just incredible investment, a watershed period related

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 12>to AI technology.

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 11>So where do we go from here?

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 7>John? I mean, we've had a crazy year, excellent return

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 7>so far after that volatility in the beginning of the year.

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 7>How are you positioning twenty twenty six?

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 12>Well, right now, you know, we won't make our official

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 12>calls until mid December when we usually do because we're

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 12>not we don't have X ray vision.

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 6>Yes, we'll go to seventy two hundred. I like that.

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 11>I'm trying to clouds the situation there.

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 12>But what we what we would say is we probably

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 12>where we're standing, not in terms of the index itself,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 12>but for years now we have been cyclicals over defensives.

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 12>So emphasis on cyclicals and primarily large caps, but with

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 12>a smattering of always hope for the mids and the smalls.

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 11>But I think until the FED really cuts rates, I

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 11>don't think they got to get much love point.

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the juggernaut and Dan I says Microsoft is

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:05.479
<v Speaker 2>a founder of this dialogue. Is Microsoft a cyclical in nature? Well,

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's a really philosophical question. We're in buffet,

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 2>he's ninety five, he's going quiet. Yes, sofas won't shut up.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 2>That's the opposite of buffet. I mean the bottom the

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 2>bottom line is some of these tech stacks have.

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 6>Almost cyclical characteristics.

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 11>Oh, we most certainly think so. And in fact, in

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 11>the old days, you.

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 12>Know, back when we used to call consumers staples a

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 12>defensive sector coke, smokes and soaps, technology was regarded as

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 12>a cyclical, and we regard it as a cyclical because

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 12>the while the investment appears to be a secular issue

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 12>and the developments are the actual investment is there's sentiment

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 12>behind that, even at.

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 11>The institutional level in terms of Palo Alto.

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 7>John, how much does this market need the FED to

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 7>continue to cut races here question?

0:33:55.160 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 12>You know, we we have been for the last few years,

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 12>you know, the last two years when a lot of

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 12>people were expecting a lot more cuts, expecting that Jerome

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 12>Powell would be very careful with cutting rates. We were

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 12>looking for this year maximum of three cuts, and then

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 12>it looked for a while it was only going to

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 12>be two cuts. But I think we're going to do

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 12>I think he will do it another cut of twenty five.

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 11>Bibs in December, okay.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 12>And the big thing is the FED is very very

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 12>sensitive as to how it practices. It's dual mandate, and

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 12>the dual mandate being supporting a Curlian question.

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Paul, you're too young to remember this, Sulphus

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and I remember Arthur Burns and you have a pipe

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 2>and you go, he's making circles with his pipe.

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 6>What's it mean? What's that?

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of the modern complete fixation on

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.919
<v Speaker 2>the FED. I mean we've gone from Marty's wide don't

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 2>fight the FED to a twenty four to seven fixation

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 2>on the FED.

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 6>And your glory.

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 2>You look at Ernie's cashlow, you look at revenue growth.

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 6>Do we do too much Fed?

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think it's important to look at the FED.

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 12>If anything in our research which is fundamentally driven, it's

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 12>revenue and earnings growth, but very much an eye to

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 12>FED policy. And we think we are living with the

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 12>benefit of what I called the ben Bernanke legacy because

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 12>Arthur Burns was a disaster. Then as a result of

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 12>that you had Paul Walker had to come in and

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 12>take draconian measures. Remember just about what I came in

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.479
<v Speaker 12>in eighty three, just about a year and a half,

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 12>two years before I got in, the yield on the

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 12>ten year almost reached sixteen percent. That was real wild

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 12>inflation with you know, the current generation thinks that nine

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 12>point seven was a lot in March of twenty two.

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 12>But that Ben Bernanke legacy, high transparency, communications, it carries

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 12>on through Jerome Powell and that balance where you want

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 12>to see the FED a nurture a sustainable growth in

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 12>economic growth, but at the same time not overthrow the

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 12>apple cart in terms of employment in jobs and avoid

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 12>a recession, which they have done notwithstanding all the predictions

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 12>of inflight of recession since twenty twenty two, so far

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 12>no recession, which I think is extraordinary.

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 7>John o'b we don't talk about these days is tariffs

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 7>and the impact on economy is that kind of in

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 7>our rearview?

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 6>Do you think you know?

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 12>I belonged to the camp the g I wish they

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 12>hadn't gone on that tariff route, though when I look

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 12>at it as a strategist, I think as a tactical maneuver,

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 12>it sure got the attention of all the countries around

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 12>the world because, in essence, over the course of the

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.240
<v Speaker 12>last eighty years since World War.

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 11>Two, the US had a policy.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 12>Where we exported our manufacturing just so fas, thank you

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 12>so much.

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Just a brilliant, brilliant dissertation there on SPX A path

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 2>to seventy one hundred.

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us.

0:36:55.320 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.959
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.399
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty time.

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 2>For the newspapers, here are we a guana free?

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:26.359
<v Speaker 6>In the news site?

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 10>We are a guana free?

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 10>I'm starting with the Wall Street Journal. I'm not sure

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 10>if you noticed, but luxury hotels they're charging this record

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 10>high premium, okay, more than usual, but it's not stopping

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 10>those affluent travelers from splurging. Okay. So they had some

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 10>data to show that the average daily room rate at

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 10>US luxury hotel a record high three hundred and ninety

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 10>four dollars this year. That's the average, okay, But when

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 10>you look at let's say Paris, where a luxury room

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 10>will run about one thousand dollars away, the average price

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 10>of most expensive ones about twenty six hundred a night.

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 10>New York have ultra luxury hotels at about fifteen hundred

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 10>some two thousand a night, but still bookings for those

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 10>properties were up two and a half percent this year

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 10>through September. A lot of those luxury hotels are expanding too,

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 10>So the prices are going up, but people are still splurging.

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Capiono Marriott I said this repeatedly.

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 11>Yes, they completely.

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Misunderestimated the luxury hotel drive. I mean there is I

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 2>know in Paris, We've got offspring over there. And basically

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I have a secret literally, I have a secret hotel

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 2>that's within this you know, the circle of tourism and

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 2>all that. But I have a secret hotel that I

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 2>tell no one about. I'm so afraid exactly people.

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 11>That's a shafey economy. Okay, shafed economy, yep.

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 10>Crazy, not good, not good, Okay, this one I want.

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 10>I want to stick with the ultra rich.

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 11>Okay, there you go.

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 10>There they go. They are scooping up penthouses in Dubai.

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 10>It's one of the world's hottest property markets right now.

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.479
<v Speaker 10>They're paying top dollars for places that are not even

0:38:58.560 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 10>built yet.

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 11>Okay, this is bidding.

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 10>Wars at Brookfield Properties. New luxury project in Dubai prices Okay,

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.479
<v Speaker 10>here it is for waterfront apartments pushing above twenty four

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 10>million dollars. They have water the waterfront, yes they do.

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 10>They do it so house hunters they have to prove

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 10>they have the cash, all right, I got it now. Yes,

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 10>in order to express interest, you have to hand over

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 10>a cash for check for two hundred and seventy two

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 10>thousand dollars just.

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 11>To say that you're interested.

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 10>Wow, because they have, you know, so many people lined up,

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 10>so they want to make sure that you have the

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 10>cash and you're not wasting their time by checking these out.

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 10>But more luxury hotels sold in Dubai and Race Quarters

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 10>than any other city that includes New York, and that

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 10>includes London too, So it is the.

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 11>Hot it is. I hear about this as much as

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:43.479
<v Speaker 11>I hear about Miami or even more.

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 7>Now it seems like Dubai is just kind of like

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 7>the hot Yeah, certainly the pictures are beautiful, but.

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 10>If you have twenty four million, then that's used to.

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 6>Go all the time.

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Major shout out to Peter Grower, our chairman, who really

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 2>forcefully led the build.

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 6>Out of Dubai.

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 2>And I was there right at the beginning of it,

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and you know, they had a slope period and look up,

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, look at all the cranes on the buildings,

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 2>And our economic leader in Dubai said time, the cranes

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 2>are there because it's so slow they have no place

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 2>to put the cranes.

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 6>So it's boom and bust. And right now it's a

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:22.720
<v Speaker 6>huge boom.

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's just huge, huge boom, say an Abu

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Dhabi is Well, let's go next podcast.

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:29.399
<v Speaker 11>Okay, this one.

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 10>If you're looking to live a bit longer, you might

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 10>want to extend your daily walk. Okay, this was in

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:35.760
<v Speaker 10>the Washington Post.

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 11>Okay, it's years long.

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 10>See see I knew it.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 11>I knew it.

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 10>So you have to walk for at least ten to

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 10>fifteen minutes straight. That's better for you than doing five

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 10>minutes here, five minutes there, walk to the you know,

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 10>the store across the street. That doesn't count. You got

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 10>to do ten to fifteen minutes one.

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 7>Time in office. This sounds like verbati. Walk to penn station.

0:40:58.520 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 7>That's that'll get it done.

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Time ten to fifteen minutes equivalent.

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, big time.

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 10>You can tell it. I'm not going to go into

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 10>the weight invest because we've been there.

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 6>Donait?

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Do you do? How many steps do you need to

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 2>do to be Lisa Matteo.

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 11>Us that's time?

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 6>How many do you need?

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't knows.

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 10>Everything about ten to fifteen thousand you know, I catch

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 10>it on the weekend. You know, that's how it works.

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 10>But yeah, they usually say ten.

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 11>This is a weight person.

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 7>She's like pumping irons.

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much, Lisa, go back to your breakfast.

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 6>Lisa Mateo, Thank you so much for the newspapers.

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:58.760
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal