WEBVTT - #149 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Arson Evidence

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>It's December twenty third. Last night, you decorated a Christmas

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.319
<v Speaker 1>tree with your family. You put your two year old

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on your shoulder so she could hang her favorite ornament

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>way up high on the tree. Your twin babies gazed

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 1>up at you from the living room floor, taking the

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>scene in with giggles and excited kicks of their little legs.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Later on, your wife put the kids to bed, and

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>then you both stayed up late, finishing the tree and

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>cleaning up. In the morning, your wife leaves the house

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>early for some last minute chopping for the girls. The

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>babies hear the door slam and start to cry, as

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they typically do. You take them out of their cribs,

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>give them eat a bottle, and put them on the

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>soft play mat on the floor so they can keep

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>each other company. You head back to your room and

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as you lay down, you hear them cooing from across

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the hall. You drift off to sleep. You are to

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.959
<v Speaker 1>sleep long. You wake up to your two year old

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>daughter screaming, Daddy, Daddy. You're groggy, startled, but the terror

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in her voice snaps you awake like a blaring alarm,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and then it hits you. The room is a dense

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>cloud of gray and black. You can barely see. You

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>smell charcoal, ash, smoke. Oh no, your girls. Get the

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>girls out of the house. It's loud. It sounds like

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>an angry windstorm. The entire house is crackling, popping. You

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>make your way to the baby's room and feel around

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>on the floor, groping in the darkness. You think you

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>grab one of the twins, but it's just a baby doll.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Your hair is on fire. You stand up and pat

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it out and frantically get on the ground again. Then

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a loud crash. Something is falling from somewhere in

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the house. It must be the caving in a part

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the room for a wall, but you can't see anything.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It's so hot you can't breathe. You need to catch

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>your breath before you pass out. You finally make your

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>way outside to get help. You'll come back for them.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>You see your neighbor on her front lawn and scream

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>for her to call the fire department. She sees a

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>hysterical man covered in soot, and she yells back, they're

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>on the way. You try to get back inside, breaking

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the window of the baby's room with the stick you

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>find in the yard, flames explode from the opening. Oh God,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't get in. You're crying out for your children. Someone, anyone,

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>please help. The fire department finally arrives and they have

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to hold you back. They find your two year old

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in the bedroom on the floor. You didn't realize she

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>had been right there, right there. Your babies are on

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the floor of their room where you had left them

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>with their bottle. You had been so close to finding them.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>They try to do CPR, but it's too late. You're

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.519
<v Speaker 1>escorted away from the house, and once the fires a

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>under control, investigators in protective gear head inside. There's no

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>sense of urgency anymore. They walk through the remains and

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>disappear into the black and living room where you had

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>spent your last night together as a family. You are

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>dumbfounded when they arrest you for arson murder. This was

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>your family. You would never lay a finger on your children.

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>At your trial, the prosecutors call expert witnesses who tell

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the jury that the proven science of fire tells the

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>story of how you committed this crime. You pour lighter fluid,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>which they referred to as an accelerant, under your baby's

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>beds in the hallway by the front door. The burn

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>marks seared into the floor indicate where that light or

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>fluid was puddled on the carpet. They say, there's no

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>way you tried to save your girls. If you had,

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>your feet would have been burned. Dripstains proved that you

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>poured accelerant up and down the hallway. The melted metal

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>door frame, the shattered glass, It all proves the fire

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>was so unnaturally hot that it produced temperatures that could

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>only have been created by chemicals that you intentionally poured

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>all over your home and your motive. Prosecutors argued this,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you love heavy metal music, and that indicates that you

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>have a dark side. You have posters on the walls

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>of your home, one of which depicts a grim reaper

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that proves you're obsessed with death. You have a tattoo

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of a skull and snake on your arm that indicates

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're a violent person. You have psychiatric problems, perhaps

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a demonic disposition. You couldn't afford to hire a lawyer,

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so the court appointed you an attorney. He too, suspects

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that you killed your children. He tells you to plead guilty.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>If you do, they'll give you life in prison instead

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of the death sentence. You can't do this. This was

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>an accident. There was no crime here. You're not going

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to confess to killing your three beautiful children. You didn't

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>do anything wrong here. You were convicted and sentenced to

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>death on death row. The events of that day haunt you.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You look at the photos of your children, your wife

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to remember the man you were, the life you once had.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Time seems to stand still on death row, and the

0:05:55.560 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>whole experience is nothing short of paralyzing. The date of

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>your execution eventually closes in. You write a letter to

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>your parents, telling them to never stop fighting to clear

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>your name, even if it's after they put you to death.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>The last wars of your fellow inmates, the ones who

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>were executed before you, one by one, were often apologies.

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they were confessions. But before you're strapped into the

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>gurney and given a lethal injection, you say, I am

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>an innocent person convicted of a crime I did not commit.

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I have been persecuted for twelve years for something I

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>did not do. From God's dust I came, and to

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>dust I will return, so the earth shall become my throne.

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Your parents scatter your ashes over the graves of your children.

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>The story you just heard is based on the wrongful

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>conviction of Cameron Todd Willingham, who was wrongfully convicted and

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>executed in two thousand and four. I'm Josh Dubin, civil

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>rights and criminal defense attorney and Innocent Ambassador to the

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Innocence Project in New York. Today on wrongful conviction junk science,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we examine arson evidence. In nineteen seventy three, the Nixon

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>administration published a report entitled America Burning. It was all

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>about damage the fires caused in America, both in terms

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of physical destruction and the billions of dollars spent to

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>repair and rebuild. But unfortunately, much of what was considered

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>fire signs in America Burning was merely a set of

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>core assumptions that were never subjected to the rigors of

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method, that is, develop a hypothesis, test it,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>confirm it, reconfirm it, and repeat until you know you

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have something sound and verifiable. As a result of this study,

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>fire investigators were given a handbook, a guide to reading

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>fire damage like a psychic reads tea leaves. An investigator,

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>having learned from this handbook, starts his investigation at the

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>exterior of a burnt down house. He sees a V

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>shaped burn on what's left of the walls of the

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>living room. He notes this is the room where the

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>fire started. He walks through the home, keeping an eye

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>out for the telltale signs of arson. First, crazed glass

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>windows shattered into irregular pieces with light smoke deposits that

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>indicate a rapid buildup of heat that can only be

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>caused by an accelerant. Second, alligatoring large shiny blisters on

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>burnt wood. Fast hot fires produced by accelerants create this pattern. Third,

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>puddle formations and burns that look like drip trails. These

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>are caused by the spreading of accelerant like gasoline or

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>paint thinner throughout a house before it is intentionally set

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on fire. The investigator checks all of these signs off

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the list. He knows this must be arson. It turns

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>out the investigator only had a fifty percent chance of

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>being right at best, because fire science was built on

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a foundation of conjecture and best guesses that were never

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>adequately tested and confirmed according to valid scientific principles. What

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>experts and prosecutors had been telling juries for decades about

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>how you can definitively determine that a fire was intentionally

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>set was completely wrong. In fact, signs that indicated to

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>investigators that they were dealing with arson, crazed glass, alligator patterns,

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>burn marks indicating drips or puddles of accelerant were actually

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the same things left in the wake of an accidental fire.

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So the evidence that was used to convict Cameron Todd

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Willingham and so many others was deeply, deeply flawed.

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 2>It turns out that there was no evidence whatsoever that

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 2>this had been a fire that was set by Todd

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Willingham running up and down his home, you know, just

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 2>before Christmas, spreading accelerant in all the different rooms and

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 2>down the hallway and killing his three children. It was

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 2>clear that this was junk science. And unfortunately, by this

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 2>point in my career I was familiar enough with the

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 2>phenomenon of junk science not to be surprised.

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Joining us today to tell us about arson evidence and

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>how it relates to cases like Cameron Todd Willingham's is

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Barry Sheck, co founder of the Innocence Project and famed

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>civil rights and criminal defense attorney. So Barry, first, thanks

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>for being here and for our listeners. Barry is one

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 1>of my personal heroes, and I'm just ecstatic that we're

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>able to get you to enlighten us about arson evidence. Now,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you worked to get Cameron Todd Willingham's case overturned after

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he was executed, And this might seem like somewhat of

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>a pointless fight to some people, since mister Willingham was

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>already put to death in two thousand and four. But

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you are fighting for mister Willingham's final wish for his

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>name to be cleared and him to be declared an

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>innocent man by a court. I think that it's well

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>accepted that he's an innocent man at this point. But

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you're also fighting so that the kind of evidence that

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was used against mister Willingham doesn't get used to convict

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>another innocent person. And so, to start off, Barry, if

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the clues used an arson investigation or indeed

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>junk science, how did Cameron Todd Willingham get convicted in

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the first place?

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 2>What the fire scientists, the arson investigators in Willingham, what

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 2>they did in that case. They would go to the

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 2>scene of a fire and they would look at all

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 2>these visual cues and if they saw what was called alligatoring,

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>which was like the scales of an alligator on wood.

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 2>If they saw what was known as craze glass that's

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>like a spider type cracking of the glass. If they

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 2>saw spawling of concrete that's like little chips coming off

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 2>the concrete at the scene of the fire. If they

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>saw scouring on the floor, poor patterns, they immediately assumed

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>that all of these visual cues meant that somebody had

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 2>spread accelerant around the house and lit it and that

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>was the cause of the fire. And they literally said

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>to the jury, we look at the fire, the fire

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 2>talks to us. The fire doesn't lie. That's very powerful

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>to a jury. So what happened, Josh, is that when

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 2>we at the Innocence Project saw what happened in the

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Willingham case, we had just been involved in setting up

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 2>what's known as the Texas Forensic Science Commission. They reviewed

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>all the crime scene evidence in the Willingham case and

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 2>they said what was clear, and that is this is

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 2>junk science. This had been discredited by Fire Protection nine

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, ten years ago. The science was completely flawed, unreliable, ridiculous.

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>So even after all of that, the state of Texas

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>still refused to free Cameron Todd Willingham. And to show

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>just how flawed this evidence was, there was a man

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>named Ernest Willis who was convicted of a similar crime

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>with similar evidence than was used in the Willingham case.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But while Cameron Todd Willingham was put to death in

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four, Willis was declared innocent that very

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>same year. So how is that possible, Barry, that one

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>man Willingham is executed based on this junk science, while

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>another man, Willis, whose case was very similar, gets to

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>go free.

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Ernest Willis went to trial, he had a completely incompetent

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>lawyer who was disbarred for all kinds of reasons. Willis

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 2>was so upset by the fire that you know he

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 2>killed family members, that he was literally on psychotropic medication

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 2>in the witness chair, right. He was lucky because his

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 2>lawyer was so incompetent, and on his death penalty appeal

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>he got a patent lawyer from Letha Ben Watkins in

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>New York who dove into the case and was able

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to get the federal courts to vacate that conviction. And

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 2>when the conviction was remanded on exactly the same evidence.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Just like the Willingham case, Willis was not only exonerated.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 2>There was a prosecutor in Pakos County, Texas took one

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 2>look at this and said, oh my god, this was

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 2>an accidental fire. This was not an arson murderer, and

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 2>he not only dismissed the case against Ernest Willis, Ernest

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Willis was compensated as actually innocent by the state of Texas,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>while within the same time period Cameron Todd Willingham was executed.

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just really hard to hear this stuff right because

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>right away this indicates some sort of double standard, or

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>at least some confusion within the justice system about what

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>arson evidence really means and how much it can be trusted.

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And to be clear, by two thousand and four, there

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have been any confusion about this type of evidence,

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>because in the early nineties there were two incidents that

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask you about that really proved that

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the kind of arson evidence used in the Cameron Todd

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Willingham case was bogus. The first was the Lime Street

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>case in nineteen ninety, which was the case of Gerald

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Lewis. Mister Lewis was accused of killing his pregnant wife,

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>his sister, and his sister's four children by arson. Now

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Gerald always maintained his innocence, but it was actually a

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>prosecution expert named John Lentini who was the moving force

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>improving Gerald's innocence.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>John Lentini was arson investigator, and he went along with

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 2>a colleague of his, John Dehan, to investigate an allegation

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 2>of arson at a home on Lime Street in Jacksonville, Florida.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 2>And they examined the crime scene and they were all ready,

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>by their own admission, to make a recommendation that it

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 2>was an intentional arson. But they realized that right next

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 2>to the house that burned down was another house that

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 2>was abandoned, but it was the same construction. So they

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 2>rebuilt the house right next door to be identical to

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the Lime Street house that burned down, and then they

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 2>basically put a cigarette on a couch. They began the

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>fire in a way that would be completely accidental. The

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 2>whole place burned down, and they saw all the clues,

0:17:55.320 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>all the visual clues from the craze glass alligator burning

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 2>under furniture, a completely compartmentalized fire. They saw all these

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 2>cues and they knew that it was an accidental fire,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 2>not a deliberate one, and so that began to change everything.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So again, this is very ironic and rare because Lentini's

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a fire investigator that's working for the prosecution and he's

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>actually trying to prove that this Lime Street case was

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact arson and that Gerald Wayne Lewis had actually

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>done it. But he realizes that there was some serious

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>issues with his assumptions because this accidental fire actually resembled

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>an arson, and it resembled it in very critical ways.

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And what was most shocking to me about this was

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that Lentini saw puddlestains and trail marks that looked identical

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to what he had been taught and so many other

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>investigators had been taught, or the telltale signs of someone

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>dripping gasoline or another accelerant throughout a house. But that

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely was not the case here. And they knew that

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>because they set the fire themselves with a cigarette exactly, and.

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>They'd say, well, that really can't happen unless it's an

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 2>intentionally set fire. But it turns out with this phenomenon

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>of flashover, which is you get this hot, combustible object

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 2>in a small space, ordinarily a room, right, and then

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 2>it begins to cause this huge burst of heat and

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 2>fire in that room, and the whole place becomes engulfed.

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 2>So that's what creates the intense heat that arson investigators

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 2>had hypothesized must come from the deliberate use of accelerants.

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>It turns out that it could all happen in a

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 2>completely accidental fire.

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So Lintini the investigator realizes that accidental fires can look

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.719
<v Speaker 1>just like arson, and he does something that is actually

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>quite remarkable. But it shouldn't be, because whether you're working

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>for the prosecution or the defense, when the science tells

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you something, you should not have a bias in its application. Right.

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't say, Oh, this is just some weird coincidence.

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to keep working for prosecutors to convict people

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in arson cases based on this evidence that I now

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>know is clearly faulty. It's wrong. Instead, he's pretty shocked,

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>appalled by what he sees, and he feels like he's

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>been misled by this evidence for years. Right, And he

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>gets an opportunity to examine a bunch more more accidental

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>fires and make sure that his findings in the Lime

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Street case were consistent with other accidental fires.

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if people remember, but these homes on

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the in the hills in Oakland, California, began to burn down,

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, in what was plainly a series of accidental fires.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 2>And after all these homes were burned down, the fire

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 2>scientists went at and examined each and every one of

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 2>them and they realized, once again, here were plainly accidental fires.

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 2>But all these visual cues that arson experts had been

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 2>relying on demonstrated that it was an accident. It was

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>not an intentionally set fire. So take just the craze glass.

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 2>That's a simple thing to understand. You know, you look

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>at the glass, it's sort of spider glass, and that

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 2>supposedly an indication of suddenly intense heat that comes from

0:21:55.320 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, an accelerant induced fire. In fact, you've had

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 2>craze glass all over in Oakland in the Lime Street fire.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Because craze glass happens when people come to put out

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the fire and they put cold water on it and

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the glass cracks. That's how you get crazed glass.

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So these arson investigators have been testifying for years and

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>years that the reason you see crazed glass, and it's

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>no pun intend that it's actually a crazy notion that

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they're testifying to one thing and it turns out to

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>be the exact opposite. All right, So crazed glass was

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>caused by the cooling of the glass when they're putting

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the fire out. What were some other things they were

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>wrong about?

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>They would say, oh, we're looking at mattress springs in

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 2>a bed or something and they're melted. That can only

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 2>happen if it's an intentionally set fire. But when they

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>went to the hills of Oakland and looked at these homes,

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 2>they saw the same thing, and the same thing at

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 2>the Lime Street fire.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you would think that would be the end

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of people trying to use this kind of junk science,

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>this kind of false evidence, but that isn't the case.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 2>What is really upsetting is that you see over the

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 2>next few decades, nonetheless, lots of people who were convicted

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>because they never did scientific validation in the first place.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>You actually have to conduct experiments, you have to have hypotheses,

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 2>and you have to prove that they're true, instead of

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 2>just having you know, really you know, sort of law

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>enforcement people in lab codes, so to speak, or people

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 2>that have expertise by way of quote unquote experience going

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 2>to crime scenes and looking at fire scenes and really

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 2>coming up with their own hypotheses that were never demonstrated

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 2>to be true by science. That's what's so shocking about

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>this whole area. In other words, if you believe all

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 2>these different visual cues demonstrate that an accelerant has been used,

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 2>you should do experiments to prove the point.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, Barry, this isn't the case where these investigators were

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>out to harm people. This is just how they were trained.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 2>I have some sympathy for a whole group of people

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>who had, many of them just high school graduates who

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 2>were trained in arson investigation to believe all these different

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 2>visual cues were a sign of the use of an

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 2>accelerant and intentionally set fire that was never empirically demonstrated,

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 2>and yet they were doing it, and that's how they

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 2>made a living. That's true, and they thought that they

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 2>had expertise. It's imagine how horrendous it is to believe,

0:24:56.080 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 2>as a prosecutor or as a so called know arson investigator,

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 2>that you were wrong and you destroyed people's lives. People

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 2>don't get up in the morning and say let's do that, right,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 2>But it happens and it's very hard to admit to it.

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, So why do you think it is that?

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, generations of experts have all been proven to

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be wrong. The assumptions they rely on turn out to

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>be incorrect, but there's this unwillingness to change.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Once you have invested yourself in this belief and all

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 2>these very weighty consequences follow, it's very hard to admit

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 2>that you were wrong, even when there's scientific proof that

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 2>you're wrong. John Linini and John de Haan and all

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 2>these various experts, you know, they started off as regular

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 2>ARSON investigators that we're taught to believe these things, but

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 2>engaging in real sessellience and doing these experiments, they realized

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 2>it was all wrong, and they had an enormous amount

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 2>of trouble persuading the forensic science community to stop, and

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>they're still fighting about it even to this day. I mean,

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I think that the Willingham case and all these other

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 2>exonerations have exposed the community to it, and you literally

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 2>can see fewer ARSON convictions since that happened. But Josh,

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 2>you're absolutely right, it's mystifying. It's so upsetting that it

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 2>is taking so long to change it.

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile these convictions based on this false arson science

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>or there's fire evidence, just keep on coming.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Hantak Lee, whose daughter, who suffered from mental illness, was

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 2>found literally burnt to death, incinerated, you know, in a

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 2>small community in Pennsylvania. He gets convicted of killing his

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 2>daughter intentionally in a fire which did not happen.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Right. The case of Hantok Lee is just it's really

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>really troubling. I mean, here's a guy that spent fifteen

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>years in prison for a murder he did not commit.

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And there's a quote that always stuck with me from

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>an opinion written by a judge during Hantok Lee's appeal,

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was this quote. Much of what was presented

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>to Lee's jury as science is now conceded to be

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>little more than superstition end quote. I mean, that's so remarkable,

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. And you know, again, the fact that this

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is still used in the face of quotes like that,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's hard to understand. You know. He was

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>granted a new trial and finally exonerated, thankfully, in twenty fifteen.

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Another was a Sonya Casey, who is convicted of burning

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Dana house and killing I guess it was her uncle

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Bill Richardson, and and of course it turned out that

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Bill Richardson was actually a heavy smoker and had probably

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 2>fallen asleep with a burning cigarette. But plainly she did

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 2>not start this fire. All the same kind of junk

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 2>science was used in that case. And that's the great tragedy.

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 2>When you look at the arson cases, so many people

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 2>like Ernest Willis or Cameron Todd Willingham or a Hantock League,

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're all convicted of killing with intentionally set fires.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>They're loved ones. That to me is, you know, the horrible,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>horrible irony of these junk science cases.

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, for our listeners, I know, Barry, you know twenty

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>years and I've seen you get emotional before and passionate

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of cases. But I want to go

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the Cameron Todd Willingham case for a moment

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>because it seems to me that this is one that

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>really stuck with you. And it seems to me like

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the two or three cases that has really

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>haunted you in all your innocence work.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 2>How can it not haunt you? It should haunt everyone

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 2>in this country. I mean, this is a case that

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>ought to change the way the people look at capital

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 2>punishment and forensic science. I think we look we've made

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of progress, but we still haven't corrected the

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 2>biggest injustice of all, and that is the wrongful execution

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 2>of Cameron Todd Willingham. You see the suffering up to

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the very very end, and the execution of an innocent man.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 2>How could it not haunt you? There's so much importance

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 2>attached with the state finally admitting that it was wrong

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 2>and that an innocent person is executed, and that will

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 2>happen in Texas. It will.

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Something we keep returning back to in this podcast is

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and nine National Academy of Sciences Report,

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a report published by rigorous scientists that is

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>very critical of forensic sciences like arson investigation. In fact,

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the only one that it's not really critical of is DNA.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And you've done a lot to try to push the

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>lessons of this report to overturn convictions based on junk science.

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Truth is The two thousand and nine and National Academy

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>of Science Report recommended that there be an independent entity

0:30:54.640 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 2>in the federal government that would be dedicated to providing

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 2>a scientific basis and oversight to all these forensic science

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 2>disciplines and independent entity. The National Commission on Forensic Science

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 2>was put into place, which had independent experts from lots

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 2>of different scientific communities. When Trump was elected, he abolished

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 2>the National Commission on Forensic Science.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Look, it's really inspiring to see that, despite all that's

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>gone wrong and all that hasn't worked, that you're still hopeful.

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Because something else that's so shocking is that this issue

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>about what kind of evidence should be considered scientific facts,

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>something that can literally determine whether or not some much

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>live or die based on a crime they may not

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>have committed. It's all still being treated like a political issue,

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and you have personal experience with these political barriers. Yet

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you're still hopeful despite all of the harm that's been

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>done and continues to be done by political officials, by presidents,

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>by judges who, unlike Lentini, refuse to see the light,

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>so to speak.

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, it becomes this big echo chamber. Junk science

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 2>is admitted by one court, right, and all the experts

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 2>can then testify again and again and again, even though

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 2>it was never properly validated in the first place. And

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>we've had a lot of that, and judges really have

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 2>to be rigorous on dealing with it. And the problem

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 2>with judges is that we all went to law school

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 2>and not medical school. The judges really do have to

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>be better in terms of getting into the nuts and

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 2>bolts of the science. It's intimidating to them, just as

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 2>it's intimidating to a lot of lawyers.

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>You might be listening to this wondering what you can

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>do to help. I want every listener to consider that

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>even those who are wrongly convicted and are lucky enough

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to be released from prison, their lives are just never

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the same. Let's take the example of Sonia Casey. She's

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the woman Barry shk mentioned who was accused of murdering

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>her uncle by arson. We know that miss Casey was

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>innocent because, amongst other evidence, it was later found during

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the autopsy of her uncle that he most likely died

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>from a heart attack. There was no soot in his lungs,

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>which would have been there if he had in fact

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.959
<v Speaker 1>died in the fire. Instead, there was fluid in his lungs,

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so the evidence supported the conclusion that he was dead

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>before the fire had even spread. Nevertheless, Casey was sentenced

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to ninety nine years in prison. Sonya Casey was eventually exonerated,

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>but the stain of her wrongful conviction meant that on

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>every job application or when she would try to rent

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>an apartment, she would either have to check a box

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>saying that she had been convicted of a crime, or

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be revealed on a background check that made

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it nearly impossible for her to find work or a

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>place to live. So, if you own a business, or

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you're a landlord, or you're just in a position to

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>either approve or reject someone for work or a place

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to live, and someone checks the box that they have

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>previously been convicted of a crime, please talk to them,

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>learn about the circumstances of their arrest, the accusations against them,

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>who they are now as a human being. Perhaps you'll

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>find that they were the victim, yes, the victim of

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>a wrongful conviction. Or maybe it's just that they've done

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>something in their past and are no longer that person.

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>The great civil rights attorney Brian Stevenson said it best.

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Each one of us is more than the worst thing

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we've ever done. The true measure of our character is

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 1>how we treat the poor, the disfavored, the accused, the incarcerated,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and the condemned. I think we can all learn something

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>from that. Next week will analyze hair microscopy, the profoundly

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>flawed junk science that attempts to use human hair to

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>accuse and convict people of crimes they did not commit.

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Wrongful Conviction Junk Science is a production of Lava for

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Good Podcasts and association with Signal Company Number One. Thanks

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>to our executive producer Jason Flam and the team at

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Signal Company Number one executive producer Kevin Wardis and senior

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>producers Karen Kornhaber and Britz Spangler. Our music was composed

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>by Jay Ralph. You can follow me on Instagram at

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>dubin Josh, follow the Wrongful Conviction podcast on Facebook and

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction and on Twitter at wrong

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Conviction