WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 1/2: 3 Up/Down vs. Chargers, Bills Preview, NFL Draft Talk

0:00:30.618 --> 0:00:34.657
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Unfiltered the world's original podcast. Patriots Unfiltered brings you

0:00:34.698 --> 0:00:38.818
<v Speaker 1>inside Jillette Stadium for rousing conversations on everything New England, Patriots,

0:00:38.857 --> 0:00:42.658
<v Speaker 1>and NFL. Join host Fred Kersh alongside Patriots dot COM's

0:00:42.658 --> 0:00:46.098
<v Speaker 1>Paul Parillo, Mike Desso, Evan Lazar, Tamara Brown, and Alex

0:00:46.138 --> 0:00:48.898
<v Speaker 1>Francisco as they bring you in depth coverage of the team.

0:00:48.977 --> 0:00:51.098
<v Speaker 2>He's a red shirt rookie at that point, so it's

0:00:51.138 --> 0:00:53.978
<v Speaker 2>really that's his rookie season essentially too. So now we're

0:00:53.978 --> 0:00:56.018
<v Speaker 2>really not talking about them, really knowing.

0:00:56.138 --> 0:01:05.257
<v Speaker 1>Search for Patriots Unfiltered anywhere you get your podcasts. This

0:01:05.378 --> 0:01:08.697
<v Speaker 1>is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan Lazar

0:01:08.777 --> 0:01:09.738
<v Speaker 1>and Alex bar.

0:01:09.777 --> 0:01:13.697
<v Speaker 2>I'm Lazar Blazar from Lazar. Hello, everybody nailed it, Joined

0:01:13.738 --> 0:01:17.938
<v Speaker 2>as always by our Bark.

0:01:19.138 --> 0:01:21.378
<v Speaker 3>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex Bars.

0:01:21.738 --> 0:01:23.618
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's fair. All right, Let's go to the downs.

0:01:23.818 --> 0:01:28.137
<v Speaker 2>You got seventeen of them, so hurry up. That is you.

0:01:28.298 --> 0:01:31.297
<v Speaker 2>Last week you told me you had like six down? Yeah,

0:01:31.378 --> 0:01:32.658
<v Speaker 2>how many do you have this week? I mean, this

0:01:32.738 --> 0:01:33.577
<v Speaker 2>game was even worse.

0:01:33.658 --> 0:01:36.057
<v Speaker 3>I just kind of bundle them all together.

0:01:36.777 --> 0:01:39.218
<v Speaker 2>I did kind of do that. Okay, you did you

0:01:39.258 --> 0:01:42.978
<v Speaker 2>do offense, defense, special teams. No, I should have done that.

0:01:43.018 --> 0:01:46.698
<v Speaker 2>This would have been a good week to do that. Okay, well,

0:01:48.458 --> 0:01:50.218
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know where to start right now. I

0:01:50.218 --> 0:01:53.098
<v Speaker 2>am gonna pay the bills real quick though, and say, hey,

0:01:53.098 --> 0:01:55.618
<v Speaker 2>Patriots fans, if you want to see Toyota right, am

0:01:55.618 --> 0:01:59.298
<v Speaker 2>I doing it right? Toyota, Toyota, Toyota, It's a tea,

0:01:59.298 --> 0:02:02.498
<v Speaker 2>It's right there. Toyota's best offers, including those not seen

0:02:02.538 --> 0:02:05.778
<v Speaker 2>on TV. Go to buy a Toyota dot com. It's

0:02:05.778 --> 0:02:08.737
<v Speaker 2>Toyota's official website for deals from the official vehicle of

0:02:08.778 --> 0:02:12.058
<v Speaker 2>the New England Patriots. Toyota Let's go places and easy

0:02:12.098 --> 0:02:14.338
<v Speaker 2>to drink, easy to enjoy, but like the official beer

0:02:14.418 --> 0:02:17.538
<v Speaker 2>sponsor of the New England Patriots. Hello everybody, Evan Lazar,

0:02:17.618 --> 0:02:20.738
<v Speaker 2>Alex Barth, Patriots Catch twenty two with you for the

0:02:20.738 --> 0:02:24.697
<v Speaker 2>next couple hours, and we're obviously gonna talk plenty off season.

0:02:24.778 --> 0:02:27.698
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk plenty of draft. That's gonna be the meat

0:02:27.738 --> 0:02:30.978
<v Speaker 2>of today's show, as it will be for the next

0:02:31.018 --> 0:02:34.258
<v Speaker 2>four or five months. Ready on Catch twenty ye Wait

0:02:34.338 --> 0:02:37.898
<v Speaker 2>for insincerity being sincere That kind of came off like

0:02:37.938 --> 0:02:39.418
<v Speaker 2>I was being sarcastic about that.

0:02:39.418 --> 0:02:40.377
<v Speaker 3>But I do love it.

0:02:41.858 --> 0:02:44.458
<v Speaker 2>I do wish that we were talking about playoffs and

0:02:44.498 --> 0:02:47.898
<v Speaker 2>competitive football absolutely, uh So. But this is where I

0:02:47.898 --> 0:02:49.698
<v Speaker 2>want to start today because I think it's important for

0:02:49.818 --> 0:02:52.338
<v Speaker 2>us to still talk about what's going on in the

0:02:52.377 --> 0:02:55.818
<v Speaker 2>present and and what's going to happen with the direction

0:02:55.898 --> 0:02:59.297
<v Speaker 2>of this football team. Alex and I just coming off

0:02:59.298 --> 0:03:02.738
<v Speaker 2>of Saturday's game. Uh The one feeling that I can't

0:03:02.858 --> 0:03:05.738
<v Speaker 2>escape that I keep feeling about the performance against the

0:03:05.818 --> 0:03:09.378
<v Speaker 2>Chargers was that was the one thing they could not

0:03:09.538 --> 0:03:12.458
<v Speaker 2>do like they could They could play a game like

0:03:12.498 --> 0:03:18.098
<v Speaker 2>they played in Arizona, which was lackluster, but okay, you

0:03:18.138 --> 0:03:20.218
<v Speaker 2>know you you're just not a very good team. You're

0:03:20.258 --> 0:03:22.618
<v Speaker 2>on the road, right, like all that kind of stuff.

0:03:22.818 --> 0:03:24.538
<v Speaker 2>They could have played a game like they did in

0:03:24.538 --> 0:03:27.858
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo and we'd be probably giving them flowers, like if

0:03:27.858 --> 0:03:30.938
<v Speaker 2>they had stacked two games like that back to back.

0:03:31.458 --> 0:03:34.858
<v Speaker 2>The one thing that this coaching staff could not afford

0:03:35.058 --> 0:03:37.378
<v Speaker 2>was to get blown out, and not even just get

0:03:37.378 --> 0:03:40.338
<v Speaker 2>blown out, but really just not be competitive in any

0:03:40.338 --> 0:03:44.098
<v Speaker 2>phase from start to finish. And I thought after the

0:03:44.138 --> 0:03:49.898
<v Speaker 2>Bills game that Drodmeo's job was safe coming off this

0:03:50.058 --> 0:03:53.778
<v Speaker 2>Chargers game. I'm not saying that he should or shouldn't,

0:03:53.778 --> 0:03:56.138
<v Speaker 2>but I think all options are currently on the table

0:03:56.338 --> 0:03:59.458
<v Speaker 2>because of how bad it looked against a Charger team

0:04:00.018 --> 0:04:03.698
<v Speaker 2>which seems to have its bleep together, and you can

0:04:03.778 --> 0:04:07.458
<v Speaker 2>kind of see the compare and contrast of a well coached,

0:04:07.578 --> 0:04:12.098
<v Speaker 2>well oiled machine with the Chargers, who aren't blowing doors

0:04:12.098 --> 0:04:14.298
<v Speaker 2>off of every team. Right, they had just played a

0:04:14.298 --> 0:04:15.578
<v Speaker 2>close game against the Broncos.

0:04:15.658 --> 0:04:17.578
<v Speaker 3>They think in the week before that they got was

0:04:17.618 --> 0:04:19.178
<v Speaker 3>it the week four, two weeks before they got wrecked

0:04:19.178 --> 0:04:21.138
<v Speaker 3>by Tampa? Yeah, that was in the last month, I know.

0:04:21.298 --> 0:04:23.858
<v Speaker 2>So they're not a wagon. We're not talking. If the

0:04:23.898 --> 0:04:26.178
<v Speaker 2>Bills had done what the Chargers did, I think I

0:04:26.217 --> 0:04:27.498
<v Speaker 2>would have felt differently.

0:04:27.138 --> 0:04:29.218
<v Speaker 3>If you flip the two games, like, it's more or

0:04:29.258 --> 0:04:32.058
<v Speaker 3>less what I was expecting from those two games, just backwards,

0:04:32.217 --> 0:04:35.017
<v Speaker 3>right right right. Play the Chargers close, tight, Maybe you lose,

0:04:35.058 --> 0:04:36.978
<v Speaker 3>but you put up a fight against a team that's

0:04:37.298 --> 0:04:39.058
<v Speaker 3>sort of right there in the playoff picture, and look,

0:04:39.097 --> 0:04:43.538
<v Speaker 3>Buffalo's Buffalo. What's gonna happen is gonna happen? Instead it flipped.

0:04:43.577 --> 0:04:44.258
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm with you.

0:04:44.337 --> 0:04:47.098
<v Speaker 3>If we're just playing the prediction game, regardless of what

0:04:47.097 --> 0:04:50.698
<v Speaker 3>we think shoul or shouldn't happen. We've both kind of said, like, yeah,

0:04:51.138 --> 0:04:53.058
<v Speaker 3>they're probably gonna run it back. That was the first

0:04:53.097 --> 0:04:55.337
<v Speaker 3>game it kind of came away from and said.

0:04:56.618 --> 0:04:59.578
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not. Yeah, it's a great point, and I just

0:04:59.938 --> 0:05:03.178
<v Speaker 2>what I keep coming back to as well, is okay,

0:05:03.298 --> 0:05:08.138
<v Speaker 2>So you decide that you've committed to girod Mayo and

0:05:08.618 --> 0:05:12.017
<v Speaker 2>you feel as though he is gonna grow on the

0:05:12.138 --> 0:05:14.458
<v Speaker 2>job and all that kind of stuff, and it's it

0:05:14.618 --> 0:05:16.497
<v Speaker 2>is a little I don't want to call it unfair

0:05:16.498 --> 0:05:19.738
<v Speaker 2>because it's professional sports, but you had to have known

0:05:19.778 --> 0:05:22.818
<v Speaker 2>that he was gonna have some growing pains as really

0:05:22.818 --> 0:05:26.098
<v Speaker 2>a guy coming into this very very green for the position, right,

0:05:26.337 --> 0:05:28.137
<v Speaker 2>So you had to have known that this was gonna

0:05:28.138 --> 0:05:33.018
<v Speaker 2>sort of be a multi year build for girod Mayo here.

0:05:33.857 --> 0:05:38.218
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, it just is hard to envision,

0:05:38.658 --> 0:05:42.418
<v Speaker 2>like how do you rearrange the deck chairs here underneath

0:05:42.457 --> 0:05:47.618
<v Speaker 2>girod Mayo to then make it better next year is

0:05:47.698 --> 0:05:49.698
<v Speaker 2>hard to envision. Like the way to do it, I

0:05:49.737 --> 0:05:53.657
<v Speaker 2>suppose would be to move on from one of the coordinators,

0:05:53.698 --> 0:05:58.018
<v Speaker 2>But now you're scapegoating a coordinator who probably doesn't deserve

0:05:58.058 --> 0:06:01.258
<v Speaker 2>it to be honest, especially on an offense in my opinion,

0:06:01.258 --> 0:06:04.218
<v Speaker 2>in Alex van Pel doesn't deserve to be scapegoated. But

0:06:04.498 --> 0:06:06.338
<v Speaker 2>with a head has to roll for going three and

0:06:06.378 --> 0:06:09.178
<v Speaker 2>fourteen or three four and thirteen, whatever it ends up being.

0:06:10.217 --> 0:06:13.498
<v Speaker 2>And I just I don't know how that changes anything

0:06:13.577 --> 0:06:16.298
<v Speaker 2>really at the core of it. If all you're doing

0:06:16.898 --> 0:06:20.258
<v Speaker 2>is we're gonna let go of DeMarcus Comington and we're

0:06:20.258 --> 0:06:23.777
<v Speaker 2>gonna bring in a more experienced, a more seasoned defensive

0:06:23.778 --> 0:06:26.098
<v Speaker 2>coordinator on that side of the ball, I'll give a name.

0:06:26.418 --> 0:06:28.418
<v Speaker 2>You know, Let's say the Giants, let's say they clean

0:06:28.457 --> 0:06:31.897
<v Speaker 2>house and Patrick Graham becomes available. You know, maybe you

0:06:31.977 --> 0:06:34.378
<v Speaker 2>bring in Patrick Graham, who's called a defense, who's run

0:06:34.378 --> 0:06:37.738
<v Speaker 2>a defense, who's been a successful coordinator in different areas.

0:06:38.938 --> 0:06:41.698
<v Speaker 2>But then at the same time, it's like, okay, but

0:06:41.818 --> 0:06:46.938
<v Speaker 2>you're still you still need the head coaching to significantly improve,

0:06:47.418 --> 0:06:50.138
<v Speaker 2>even if the coordinators are a little bit more stable

0:06:50.217 --> 0:06:53.017
<v Speaker 2>underneath him. And it just it feels like a lot

0:06:53.018 --> 0:06:56.898
<v Speaker 2>of gymnastics to try to avoid the dude state scenario.

0:06:57.178 --> 0:07:00.777
<v Speaker 3>The whole thing with that Bills game was you just

0:07:00.818 --> 0:07:03.138
<v Speaker 3>wanted to see some sort of progress from this coaching

0:07:03.178 --> 0:07:04.538
<v Speaker 3>staff this year. Like you said, it might be a

0:07:04.618 --> 0:07:07.618
<v Speaker 3>multi year thing, but you can't just have a bad

0:07:07.737 --> 0:07:09.937
<v Speaker 3>year one throughout and then expect to jump without any

0:07:09.977 --> 0:07:12.538
<v Speaker 3>evidence in year two. And the Bills game was is

0:07:12.538 --> 0:07:14.818
<v Speaker 3>this the start of that late season push? And instead

0:07:14.818 --> 0:07:16.938
<v Speaker 3>it looks like, more likely than not, it was a blip.

0:07:17.258 --> 0:07:19.778
<v Speaker 3>It was an anomaly. And that that's where you look

0:07:19.818 --> 0:07:22.377
<v Speaker 3>at Trod Mayo, because if he's gonna be this CEO

0:07:22.458 --> 0:07:24.938
<v Speaker 3>head coach, it is all about development, not just of

0:07:25.018 --> 0:07:27.138
<v Speaker 3>the players, but of the coaches, and this game was

0:07:27.138 --> 0:07:28.338
<v Speaker 3>a step back in that regard.

0:07:28.977 --> 0:07:31.178
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I want to talk a little bit about,

0:07:31.258 --> 0:07:33.658
<v Speaker 2>you know, what actually went wrong, and then we'll do

0:07:33.698 --> 0:07:35.378
<v Speaker 2>three up, three down, and then and then we'll get

0:07:35.378 --> 0:07:36.818
<v Speaker 2>to the draft. We'll try to keep this a little

0:07:36.818 --> 0:07:39.138
<v Speaker 2>bit shorter than our normal game precap because I know

0:07:39.178 --> 0:07:40.898
<v Speaker 2>that there's not a ton of there's only so much

0:07:40.938 --> 0:07:43.738
<v Speaker 2>to Yeah, but I think the biggest thing to look

0:07:43.737 --> 0:07:46.018
<v Speaker 2>on the offensive side of the ball when I watch

0:07:46.058 --> 0:07:50.258
<v Speaker 2>their film offensively and it's not it's not too that's

0:07:50.258 --> 0:07:52.578
<v Speaker 2>the word. It's not to make excuses for Alex van

0:07:52.618 --> 0:07:54.978
<v Speaker 2>Pelt and the coaching. Could the play calling, could the

0:07:54.977 --> 0:07:57.498
<v Speaker 2>play design. I've been critical of that all year long.

0:07:58.298 --> 0:08:01.818
<v Speaker 2>The play design in particular, I think is pretty vanilla.

0:08:01.898 --> 0:08:04.858
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time you watch them try to

0:08:04.938 --> 0:08:08.497
<v Speaker 2>execute the slot pass to Pop Douglas and it turns

0:08:08.498 --> 0:08:11.938
<v Speaker 2>into a horrible t which, like I love that. That

0:08:12.178 --> 0:08:13.858
<v Speaker 2>So what that play is supposed to be is.

0:08:13.778 --> 0:08:17.738
<v Speaker 3>Like you're he's supposed he's essentially tossing it to Pop

0:08:17.737 --> 0:08:20.618
<v Speaker 3>Douglas is coming in motion, but you have ramondre Stevenson

0:08:20.698 --> 0:08:22.698
<v Speaker 3>go out the other way as ee Candy. Yeah, I've

0:08:22.698 --> 0:08:24.378
<v Speaker 3>seen that play work a ton of times. It's a

0:08:24.458 --> 0:08:26.578
<v Speaker 3>very fun play. It's a good touch for Pop Douglas

0:08:26.618 --> 0:08:29.098
<v Speaker 3>all that, but if you can't execute it, you can't

0:08:29.098 --> 0:08:30.778
<v Speaker 3>execute it. And this is where you have to square

0:08:30.857 --> 0:08:32.898
<v Speaker 3>the two between Alex van Pelt.

0:08:33.018 --> 0:08:33.618
<v Speaker 2>Understand it.

0:08:33.658 --> 0:08:35.218
<v Speaker 3>You know you don't have the talent to run it,

0:08:35.498 --> 0:08:38.258
<v Speaker 3>so maybe don't run it, but like, could you just

0:08:38.338 --> 0:08:40.018
<v Speaker 3>you could do that with a handoff and it would

0:08:40.018 --> 0:08:42.458
<v Speaker 3>still work. The toss makes it a little bit better,

0:08:42.698 --> 0:08:44.778
<v Speaker 3>but you can still get to the point with a handoff,

0:08:44.778 --> 0:08:46.618
<v Speaker 3>And if you know you can't run it as a toss,

0:08:46.938 --> 0:08:48.578
<v Speaker 3>you got to recognize that if you're Van Pelt. But

0:08:48.618 --> 0:08:50.658
<v Speaker 3>also they probably don't have the talent there to run

0:08:50.698 --> 0:08:51.018
<v Speaker 3>it as.

0:08:50.898 --> 0:08:53.618
<v Speaker 2>A toss, right, So it's tough. That's I think a

0:08:53.658 --> 0:08:57.178
<v Speaker 2>great microcosm of everything on offense is that particular play

0:08:57.618 --> 0:09:00.058
<v Speaker 2>of all the issues with their offense right now. Because

0:09:00.098 --> 0:09:03.297
<v Speaker 2>they don't have the talent, they don't have the chemistry

0:09:03.377 --> 0:09:05.098
<v Speaker 2>whatever you want to call it, just sort of the

0:09:05.098 --> 0:09:08.058
<v Speaker 2>execution to be able to pull off a play like that.

0:09:08.538 --> 0:09:12.218
<v Speaker 2>But because they can't do anything that's sort of high level,

0:09:12.658 --> 0:09:16.018
<v Speaker 2>they're just so basic offensively that they're easy to defend. Right, So,

0:09:16.137 --> 0:09:19.297
<v Speaker 2>like it's sort of this you know, damned if you do,

0:09:19.377 --> 0:09:22.218
<v Speaker 2>damned if you don't, type of scenario. And like you said,

0:09:22.218 --> 0:09:24.138
<v Speaker 2>you know, you see teams like the Bills, teams like

0:09:24.178 --> 0:09:26.818
<v Speaker 2>the Lions, teams like the Packers like pull off plays

0:09:26.857 --> 0:09:29.538
<v Speaker 2>like this all the time. It's a wing tea play.

0:09:29.538 --> 0:09:31.657
<v Speaker 2>It's like it goes back like fifty years. Like they've

0:09:31.698 --> 0:09:34.578
<v Speaker 2>been running these types of like veer wingt type of

0:09:34.578 --> 0:09:39.338
<v Speaker 2>offense scheme since, you know, like Navy in the nineteen forties, right,

0:09:39.377 --> 0:09:41.578
<v Speaker 2>Like this is not new to football by any stretch

0:09:41.578 --> 0:09:44.458
<v Speaker 2>of the imagination. But the Patriots don't have the ability

0:09:44.538 --> 0:09:47.098
<v Speaker 2>to do it, And so I go with Van Pelt,

0:09:47.098 --> 0:09:49.977
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, okay, but you know that's hard, like that,

0:09:49.977 --> 0:09:53.498
<v Speaker 2>that's hard to coordinate an offense, and everybody is And

0:09:53.578 --> 0:09:56.418
<v Speaker 2>I get that there's been some criticism about him reacting

0:09:56.458 --> 0:09:59.018
<v Speaker 2>too much to the media and what we're saying about

0:09:59.017 --> 0:10:01.738
<v Speaker 2>the play calling, But everybody's on you to be more

0:10:01.778 --> 0:10:04.857
<v Speaker 2>creative and be more innovative, and be more tricky and

0:10:04.898 --> 0:10:07.218
<v Speaker 2>like all these types of things. And then you try

0:10:07.257 --> 0:10:10.058
<v Speaker 2>something that's a little bit creative and tricky and it

0:10:10.178 --> 0:10:13.218
<v Speaker 2>just completely backfires, like it completely blows up in your face.

0:10:13.658 --> 0:10:15.257
<v Speaker 2>And so like, what do you do if you're Van

0:10:15.338 --> 0:10:18.058
<v Speaker 2>Pelt is a really good question. So basically what I'm

0:10:18.098 --> 0:10:19.938
<v Speaker 2>getting out with the offense is every single week that

0:10:20.017 --> 0:10:23.338
<v Speaker 2>I watch their offensive film. It's not so much that

0:10:23.377 --> 0:10:25.498
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that they have a plan or like

0:10:25.617 --> 0:10:29.338
<v Speaker 2>that they don't go into games with like a script

0:10:29.458 --> 0:10:33.538
<v Speaker 2>and sort of a goal or a you know, landmarks

0:10:33.578 --> 0:10:35.418
<v Speaker 2>of like how we are going to move the ball

0:10:35.458 --> 0:10:36.977
<v Speaker 2>and how we're going to score points and how we're

0:10:36.977 --> 0:10:39.098
<v Speaker 2>gonna win this game. I just don't think they have

0:10:39.137 --> 0:10:41.978
<v Speaker 2>the talent, Like I just think they're very very talent

0:10:42.098 --> 0:10:45.857
<v Speaker 2>poor and all over the place. Besides basically quarterback and

0:10:45.898 --> 0:10:49.018
<v Speaker 2>tight end, So like, what are you supposed to really look?

0:10:49.338 --> 0:10:52.418
<v Speaker 3>There's certainly a case to talk about the coaching staff.

0:10:52.458 --> 0:10:53.858
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not saying the coaching is perfect.

0:10:53.938 --> 0:10:54.218
<v Speaker 2>It's not.

0:10:54.857 --> 0:10:56.738
<v Speaker 3>If we are to list the biggest issues facing the

0:10:56.737 --> 0:11:00.298
<v Speaker 3>New England Patriots this season, talent roster talent is at

0:11:00.298 --> 0:11:00.698
<v Speaker 3>the top.

0:11:00.578 --> 0:11:01.458
<v Speaker 2>Of the list number one.

0:11:01.497 --> 0:11:04.458
<v Speaker 3>There's plenty of teams in the league that have a

0:11:04.578 --> 0:11:07.618
<v Speaker 3>very talented roster and an okay coach or even a

0:11:07.658 --> 0:11:09.897
<v Speaker 3>bad coach that they may look good. You would probably

0:11:09.898 --> 0:11:11.898
<v Speaker 3>say the Detroit Lions. I would say the San Francisco

0:11:11.938 --> 0:11:12.578
<v Speaker 3>forty nine Ers.

0:11:12.658 --> 0:11:12.858
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:13.137 --> 0:11:15.858
<v Speaker 3>There's also some coaches that are considered great coaches that

0:11:16.017 --> 0:11:18.778
<v Speaker 3>have rosters to avoid of talent and it doesn't look

0:11:18.857 --> 0:11:22.297
<v Speaker 3>very good. Yeah, so does the Does there need to

0:11:22.298 --> 0:11:25.617
<v Speaker 3>be changes with the coaching staff? Absolutely? None of it matters.

0:11:25.658 --> 0:11:28.497
<v Speaker 3>If you don't improve the talent, that is issue number one,

0:11:28.538 --> 0:11:30.458
<v Speaker 3>first and foremost. And if you disagree, I'd ask you

0:11:30.497 --> 0:11:33.698
<v Speaker 3>to think about it this way. Would you rather run

0:11:33.737 --> 0:11:35.898
<v Speaker 3>it back with the same coaches but a better roster,

0:11:36.818 --> 0:11:38.538
<v Speaker 3>or the same roster but different coaches.

0:11:40.538 --> 0:11:43.857
<v Speaker 2>It's a good question. Obviously you don't have to, right

0:11:45.098 --> 0:11:47.898
<v Speaker 2>bull should right, bull should be improved, but give me

0:11:47.938 --> 0:11:49.218
<v Speaker 2>the better roster all day.

0:11:49.377 --> 0:11:52.178
<v Speaker 3>It's it's the players on the field that ultimately decide

0:11:52.178 --> 0:11:52.458
<v Speaker 3>the game.

0:11:52.658 --> 0:11:56.137
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a it's a great point. And again I'm

0:11:56.178 --> 0:11:59.698
<v Speaker 2>not trying to shield Alex van Pelt to blame or

0:11:59.698 --> 0:12:03.138
<v Speaker 2>make excuses for him, But when I watch their their

0:12:03.257 --> 0:12:07.858
<v Speaker 2>their tape offensively, I just don't I'm running out of

0:12:07.898 --> 0:12:10.698
<v Speaker 2>ideas of like, Okay, how what could they really do? Differently,

0:12:10.737 --> 0:12:13.378
<v Speaker 2>Like they can't run block, they can't pass protect for

0:12:13.538 --> 0:12:17.178
<v Speaker 2>very long, Like people are criticizing him of you know,

0:12:17.218 --> 0:12:20.578
<v Speaker 2>not giving the tackles a lot of help in past protection.

0:12:21.058 --> 0:12:25.617
<v Speaker 2>But they don't have the capability of running like two

0:12:25.698 --> 0:12:28.538
<v Speaker 2>man routes because they don't have guys that get open, right. So, like,

0:12:28.617 --> 0:12:31.818
<v Speaker 2>if you're running a two man route, then you're trying

0:12:31.818 --> 0:12:34.377
<v Speaker 2>to set up a one on one matchup for somebody

0:12:34.458 --> 0:12:37.138
<v Speaker 2>by doing that max protect two man route. You know,

0:12:37.137 --> 0:12:40.377
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking post safety, single high, so someone's gonna get

0:12:40.377 --> 0:12:42.578
<v Speaker 2>the safety and someone's gonna be one on one. But

0:12:42.658 --> 0:12:44.737
<v Speaker 2>you consistently need that player to be able to win

0:12:44.818 --> 0:12:47.617
<v Speaker 2>one on one. They don't have that, so they put

0:12:47.658 --> 0:12:50.258
<v Speaker 2>everybody in the pattern to try to stretch out the

0:12:50.257 --> 0:12:52.657
<v Speaker 2>field and try to make the defense at least cover

0:12:52.818 --> 0:12:57.458
<v Speaker 2>everything right, So like it just it continue to just

0:12:57.538 --> 0:13:02.137
<v Speaker 2>kind of see that. Offensively, Now defensively, I still think

0:13:02.137 --> 0:13:04.857
<v Speaker 2>they're not playing to their talent level on defense. I

0:13:04.898 --> 0:13:08.098
<v Speaker 2>still believe that there are better defense than what they've

0:13:08.098 --> 0:13:11.338
<v Speaker 2>shown talent wise, and the main reason to me is

0:13:12.178 --> 0:13:14.778
<v Speaker 2>a lack of fundamentals on the defensive side of the ball.

0:13:15.017 --> 0:13:18.058
<v Speaker 2>If you, I will continue to say this over and

0:13:18.098 --> 0:13:22.298
<v Speaker 2>over again, if you tackle well, if you play with

0:13:22.338 --> 0:13:26.777
<v Speaker 2>good angles, good leverage, if you play with good fundamentals

0:13:26.818 --> 0:13:29.658
<v Speaker 2>and technique on the line of scrimmage, you can just

0:13:29.737 --> 0:13:32.418
<v Speaker 2>be a good defen by trying hard, like not a

0:13:32.418 --> 0:13:34.818
<v Speaker 2>great defense. Like you're probably not going to be top

0:13:34.898 --> 0:13:38.578
<v Speaker 2>ten in the league by just being locked in and

0:13:38.617 --> 0:13:41.098
<v Speaker 2>having effort in all those kinds of things. But I

0:13:41.098 --> 0:13:44.258
<v Speaker 2>think it's true in almost any sport that if you play,

0:13:45.298 --> 0:13:51.777
<v Speaker 2>if you are a fast, pursuit, relentless, good like tough, physical,

0:13:52.137 --> 0:13:55.857
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally sound defense, I still think that you're better than

0:13:55.977 --> 0:13:58.698
<v Speaker 2>thirtieth in the league in DVOA on defense just with that,

0:13:59.538 --> 0:14:01.737
<v Speaker 2>just with that alone, Yeah, And they don't do that.

0:14:01.898 --> 0:14:05.778
<v Speaker 2>They don't play that way. They're constantly pulled out and

0:14:05.898 --> 0:14:09.218
<v Speaker 2>drawn out of coverage areas, They're constantly you know, not

0:14:09.458 --> 0:14:12.338
<v Speaker 2>their run fits, and they're tackling and all that kind

0:14:12.377 --> 0:14:15.498
<v Speaker 2>of stuff is just it's totally falling off and totally

0:14:15.538 --> 0:14:18.738
<v Speaker 2>falling apart. So you look at all these things and

0:14:18.818 --> 0:14:20.938
<v Speaker 2>I still think that they are playing below their talent

0:14:21.058 --> 0:14:24.498
<v Speaker 2>level on defense and schematically. Like Greg Roman's a good

0:14:24.498 --> 0:14:27.218
<v Speaker 2>offensive coordinator, I don't think that Greg Roman is a

0:14:27.258 --> 0:14:30.418
<v Speaker 2>great pass game coordinator. He's a very very good run

0:14:30.538 --> 0:14:34.218
<v Speaker 2>game quarter Day, this game, they made Greg Roman in

0:14:34.258 --> 0:14:36.458
<v Speaker 2>the past game look like he was like, you know,

0:14:37.098 --> 0:14:40.297
<v Speaker 2>just unstoppable, right, you know, so it wasn't the run game.

0:14:40.338 --> 0:14:43.537
<v Speaker 2>If they were getting torched by like you know, Roman's

0:14:43.618 --> 0:14:46.138
<v Speaker 2>like run designs like that we've seen in Baltimore and

0:14:46.298 --> 0:14:49.498
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco and now at the Chargers, I would say, Okay,

0:14:49.578 --> 0:14:52.298
<v Speaker 2>you know, Greg Roman did his thing this week. This

0:14:52.418 --> 0:14:54.778
<v Speaker 2>was past game stuff like this was we know, you

0:14:54.778 --> 0:14:57.018
<v Speaker 2>guys are gonna be in man to man and we're

0:14:57.058 --> 0:14:59.138
<v Speaker 2>just gonna have a bunch of man beaters. And then

0:14:59.178 --> 0:15:01.458
<v Speaker 2>those times that you do play zone, like you're not

0:15:01.498 --> 0:15:03.618
<v Speaker 2>gonna be good enough in zone to stop us, right,

0:15:03.698 --> 0:15:05.938
<v Speaker 2>and so the fact that they don't have any sort

0:15:05.978 --> 0:15:09.138
<v Speaker 2>of right hand or or left hand excuse me, they

0:15:09.138 --> 0:15:13.258
<v Speaker 2>don't have any sort of counter defensively, These teams just

0:15:13.298 --> 0:15:15.378
<v Speaker 2>know they're gonna play man on third down. They know

0:15:15.418 --> 0:15:18.178
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna get man. They know that if they run

0:15:18.418 --> 0:15:21.738
<v Speaker 2>you know, tight splits, if they run bunch concepts, if

0:15:21.738 --> 0:15:24.498
<v Speaker 2>they run pick plays, if they just do all these

0:15:24.498 --> 0:15:27.018
<v Speaker 2>different things to beat man to man coverage that you

0:15:27.138 --> 0:15:30.898
<v Speaker 2>see all around the league, they are going to find success.

0:15:30.898 --> 0:15:32.858
<v Speaker 2>And just talking to some of the players after the

0:15:32.858 --> 0:15:35.618
<v Speaker 2>game on Sunday, you know, they basically said, it's just

0:15:35.698 --> 0:15:37.898
<v Speaker 2>really hard, Like it's really hard to go out there

0:15:37.938 --> 0:15:40.018
<v Speaker 2>and play man to man for four quarters when the

0:15:40.058 --> 0:15:42.178
<v Speaker 2>other team knows you're going to be playing man to man.

0:15:42.378 --> 0:15:44.258
<v Speaker 2>They have all these tricks and all these game plan

0:15:44.378 --> 0:15:46.698
<v Speaker 2>wrinkles ready for you to play man to man. And

0:15:46.738 --> 0:15:49.778
<v Speaker 2>my thought was, you know that that's a coaching like

0:15:49.818 --> 0:15:53.058
<v Speaker 2>that's adjusting right, like that's finding other ways to to

0:15:53.338 --> 0:15:56.218
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and play pass defense. And I just thought

0:15:56.218 --> 0:15:58.738
<v Speaker 2>that they are have become very predictable. Now could you

0:15:58.818 --> 0:16:02.537
<v Speaker 2>sit there and say that's that's talent that they don't have.

0:16:02.578 --> 0:16:04.698
<v Speaker 2>The they don't have guys that can play mann zone

0:16:04.738 --> 0:16:07.258
<v Speaker 2>and things like I guess, but I still feel like

0:16:07.338 --> 0:16:09.498
<v Speaker 2>they have better talent than what they've shown.

0:16:09.618 --> 0:16:11.178
<v Speaker 3>Well, some of that, I think it's tie talent. Remember

0:16:11.178 --> 0:16:12.537
<v Speaker 3>we were doing shows at the beginning of the year

0:16:12.578 --> 0:16:14.938
<v Speaker 3>wondering why they weren't playing more man cover. Yeah, because

0:16:14.938 --> 0:16:15.578
<v Speaker 3>of the personnel.

0:16:15.618 --> 0:16:17.378
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's tied too. But at the end

0:16:17.378 --> 0:16:20.858
<v Speaker 2>of the day, talents talent, Yeah, I had last thing

0:16:20.858 --> 0:16:23.978
<v Speaker 2>on the defense. I would just say, supposed to be

0:16:24.058 --> 0:16:26.018
<v Speaker 2>up and downs. We're gonna do it night now, Okay,

0:16:26.018 --> 0:16:29.298
<v Speaker 2>But I just wanted to wrap this up, put a

0:16:29.298 --> 0:16:32.178
<v Speaker 2>bow on this, this takedown of this entire game on

0:16:32.258 --> 0:16:37.258
<v Speaker 2>Sunday or Saturday. Do you realize how much they've struggled

0:16:37.258 --> 0:16:39.058
<v Speaker 2>to press their quarterback.

0:16:38.698 --> 0:16:41.498
<v Speaker 3>Like it's I think this was another game where they

0:16:41.498 --> 0:16:43.578
<v Speaker 3>had no quarter They had one quarterback hit and it

0:16:43.618 --> 0:16:45.418
<v Speaker 3>was a penalty. It was a really bad penalty.

0:16:45.538 --> 0:16:49.458
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they they are now thirtieth in the league

0:16:49.818 --> 0:16:52.417
<v Speaker 2>in team pressure rate. I'm actually surprised it's not thirty second, Like,

0:16:52.538 --> 0:16:56.138
<v Speaker 2>why I don't watch every single defense, every single snap

0:16:56.178 --> 0:16:59.298
<v Speaker 2>of every single defense is surprising. I don't even know

0:16:59.338 --> 0:17:01.538
<v Speaker 2>what those other teams are doing. But one of the

0:17:01.578 --> 0:17:04.177
<v Speaker 2>things that has really stood out to me is their

0:17:04.178 --> 0:17:08.098
<v Speaker 2>inability to manufacture pressure. Remember when they traded Matthew Judon,

0:17:08.498 --> 0:17:10.898
<v Speaker 2>the big quote was, we've done this in the past,

0:17:10.938 --> 0:17:14.058
<v Speaker 2>where we've manufactured pressure without a Chandler Jones or a

0:17:14.098 --> 0:17:16.858
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Judon or a stud pass presher, and we've been

0:17:16.898 --> 0:17:21.018
<v Speaker 2>able to get away with it. So last season under

0:17:21.058 --> 0:17:25.298
<v Speaker 2>Bill and Steve Belichick, they were first in the league

0:17:25.938 --> 0:17:30.138
<v Speaker 2>in unblocked pressure rate creating free runners at the quarterback

0:17:30.218 --> 0:17:32.058
<v Speaker 2>number one in the league. Nine point eight percent of

0:17:32.058 --> 0:17:34.258
<v Speaker 2>the time they were able to generate a free runner.

0:17:34.498 --> 0:17:37.458
<v Speaker 2>That has basically been cut in half. This year They're

0:17:37.458 --> 0:17:39.938
<v Speaker 2>had five point one percent. They're twenty fourth in the

0:17:39.978 --> 0:17:43.858
<v Speaker 2>league this season. So that again, that's all scheme right.

0:17:43.938 --> 0:17:45.978
<v Speaker 2>And in the very first third down of the game,

0:17:46.418 --> 0:17:51.578
<v Speaker 2>they blitzed Gonzo on a boundary blitz and the Chargers

0:17:51.618 --> 0:17:54.298
<v Speaker 2>just blocked it like it was just like they just

0:17:54.338 --> 0:17:56.778
<v Speaker 2>picked it up, like it was just it was totally

0:17:57.138 --> 0:18:01.138
<v Speaker 2>and completely ineffective, like the back just picked up. Gonzo

0:18:01.618 --> 0:18:04.618
<v Speaker 2>stood him up. No pressure on Herbert. He had a

0:18:04.818 --> 0:18:07.338
<v Speaker 2>picnic back there and made a throw and converted and

0:18:07.338 --> 0:18:10.258
<v Speaker 2>moved the chains that has been Alarming to me too

0:18:10.378 --> 0:18:13.338
<v Speaker 2>is the fact that they have had no they have

0:18:13.458 --> 0:18:17.138
<v Speaker 2>no sort of schematic ability to get after the quarterback

0:18:17.418 --> 0:18:20.018
<v Speaker 2>and any sense of the word. And I get like,

0:18:20.098 --> 0:18:22.178
<v Speaker 2>you know, you you wish that you could just do

0:18:22.178 --> 0:18:24.498
<v Speaker 2>it with a four men rush. Their four man rush,

0:18:24.538 --> 0:18:27.538
<v Speaker 2>they have the fewest sacks allowed, a fewest sacks generated

0:18:27.578 --> 0:18:29.618
<v Speaker 2>in the league from a four man rush. They've only

0:18:29.778 --> 0:18:33.218
<v Speaker 2>sacked the quarter back fourteen times. I'm surprised all year

0:18:33.218 --> 0:18:35.458
<v Speaker 2>with the four men rush's last in the league. So

0:18:35.498 --> 0:18:38.658
<v Speaker 2>they can't really just rush four and get home, that's

0:18:38.698 --> 0:18:41.058
<v Speaker 2>for sure. But they also haven't done a really great

0:18:41.138 --> 0:18:44.338
<v Speaker 2>job of manufacturing pressure as well. So if it is

0:18:44.378 --> 0:18:48.658
<v Speaker 2>this coaching staff and they are back next year, that

0:18:48.738 --> 0:18:52.058
<v Speaker 2>has to be the number one question. Is Okay, we

0:18:52.138 --> 0:18:54.458
<v Speaker 2>could go out and draft Abdul Carter and throw a

0:18:54.498 --> 0:18:57.778
<v Speaker 2>bag at you know, pass rushers in free agency or

0:18:57.818 --> 0:19:00.698
<v Speaker 2>something like that, and maybe just upgrade the talent and

0:19:00.738 --> 0:19:04.218
<v Speaker 2>hope that that improves. But to me, it's more complicated

0:19:04.298 --> 0:19:06.858
<v Speaker 2>than that. They have to figure out why are our

0:19:07.218 --> 0:19:11.698
<v Speaker 2>disguised rushes, like our blitzes, our simulated pressures things like that,

0:19:11.978 --> 0:19:15.698
<v Speaker 2>like why did those not work? Like what we do

0:19:15.738 --> 0:19:16.978
<v Speaker 2>we have a tell? Do we?

0:19:17.218 --> 0:19:17.338
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:19:17.738 --> 0:19:20.218
<v Speaker 2>It almost feels like they have a tell. And I'm

0:19:20.218 --> 0:19:22.578
<v Speaker 2>not like advanced enough to figure out what the tell is,

0:19:23.018 --> 0:19:24.778
<v Speaker 2>but like, it almost feels like they have a tell

0:19:25.018 --> 0:19:27.138
<v Speaker 2>because every single time they run one of these like

0:19:27.218 --> 0:19:31.218
<v Speaker 2>simulated pressures or creepers or whatever, the disguised rush, it

0:19:31.338 --> 0:19:34.458
<v Speaker 2>just gets bocked. So like something is telling the offense

0:19:34.498 --> 0:19:36.618
<v Speaker 2>that this is coming. I don't know what, but I

0:19:36.658 --> 0:19:38.218
<v Speaker 2>have a big feeling that they have a tell.

0:19:38.898 --> 0:19:39.538
<v Speaker 3>I can see it.

0:19:39.938 --> 0:19:43.298
<v Speaker 2>Three up, three down? What's what are your Do you

0:19:43.338 --> 0:19:45.538
<v Speaker 2>have any ups? I do have two ups. I have

0:19:45.578 --> 0:19:46.218
<v Speaker 2>two ups as well.

0:19:46.218 --> 0:19:49.298
<v Speaker 3>Okay, uh, number one is cold strange. Now, he wasn't

0:19:49.338 --> 0:19:53.698
<v Speaker 3>perfect in this game. He certainly wasn't perfect, but he

0:19:53.778 --> 0:19:56.458
<v Speaker 3>never even started a game at center in college. Yeah,

0:19:56.498 --> 0:19:59.138
<v Speaker 3>so to come into the NFL against a good defensive

0:19:59.138 --> 0:20:01.498
<v Speaker 3>front that the Chargers have, he had.

0:20:01.858 --> 0:20:03.218
<v Speaker 2>He didn't have any bad snaps.

0:20:03.258 --> 0:20:05.378
<v Speaker 3>He did have the one that was early late in

0:20:05.418 --> 0:20:08.418
<v Speaker 3>the game, and he was called for an illegal man

0:20:08.458 --> 0:20:11.938
<v Speaker 3>downfield at one point, but again for guys starting his

0:20:11.978 --> 0:20:16.018
<v Speaker 3>first game ever at center at this level, it certainly

0:20:16.098 --> 0:20:18.058
<v Speaker 3>could have been a lot where and also a guy

0:20:18.138 --> 0:20:20.498
<v Speaker 3>coming back from it was a very serious knee injuries,

0:20:20.538 --> 0:20:22.698
<v Speaker 3>starting his first game at center, in his first game

0:20:22.738 --> 0:20:24.898
<v Speaker 3>back for me very significant nee injury, hadn't played an

0:20:24.898 --> 0:20:27.178
<v Speaker 3>over a year, didn't have that many practices to get

0:20:27.178 --> 0:20:30.338
<v Speaker 3>ready for this game. It certainly could have been maybe

0:20:30.458 --> 0:20:32.138
<v Speaker 3>should have been a lot worse. I was very impressed

0:20:32.138 --> 0:20:34.178
<v Speaker 3>with what Cole Strange did. Does that mean he's the

0:20:34.178 --> 0:20:35.898
<v Speaker 3>center of the future after David Andrews.

0:20:35.938 --> 0:20:36.298
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:20:36.338 --> 0:20:40.018
<v Speaker 3>I need to see a little more, but realistically, as

0:20:40.018 --> 0:20:41.858
<v Speaker 3>good of a start as you could ask for from

0:20:41.938 --> 0:20:43.298
<v Speaker 3>Cole Strange in that center role.

0:20:43.658 --> 0:20:46.418
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought he looked the part of the position.

0:20:46.498 --> 0:20:50.058
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think he was looked completely overwhelmed or out

0:20:50.098 --> 0:20:53.058
<v Speaker 2>of place or anything like that. Now, there were definitely

0:20:53.098 --> 0:20:58.458
<v Speaker 2>some issues with Blitz pickups and protections and things like that.

0:20:58.578 --> 0:21:00.858
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know how many times is Derwin James

0:21:00.898 --> 0:21:03.138
<v Speaker 2>just gonna come in unblocked, right? Like? There has to

0:21:03.178 --> 0:21:05.177
<v Speaker 2>be ways that they can be better in that regard

0:21:05.218 --> 0:21:08.338
<v Speaker 2>with Cole Strange making the calls and things like that.

0:21:08.538 --> 0:21:10.938
<v Speaker 2>I would get venture to say that there were probably

0:21:10.938 --> 0:21:16.138
<v Speaker 2>some errors there by the pre snap processing of BOTZ

0:21:16.178 --> 0:21:19.378
<v Speaker 2>pickup and protections and things like that. And you know,

0:21:19.378 --> 0:21:21.738
<v Speaker 2>in the run game. I still felt like there were

0:21:21.818 --> 0:21:26.138
<v Speaker 2>times where he was getting out muscled by the DT's

0:21:26.618 --> 0:21:30.058
<v Speaker 2>on the Chargers, but I agree those were like sort

0:21:30.098 --> 0:21:32.578
<v Speaker 2>of my nip picks I guess of this game for him.

0:21:32.578 --> 0:21:36.298
<v Speaker 2>But I overall, I thought that it was encouraging, like,

0:21:36.418 --> 0:21:39.018
<v Speaker 2>let's see what this looks like after a full offseason

0:21:39.018 --> 0:21:42.978
<v Speaker 2>in training camp and just looking at David Andrews's injury history.

0:21:43.178 --> 0:21:48.138
<v Speaker 2>Love David Andrews, but he's had a lot of injuries.

0:21:48.138 --> 0:21:52.218
<v Speaker 2>At this point. I don't know if David Andrews is

0:21:52.258 --> 0:21:54.938
<v Speaker 2>gonna come back next year and be the same guy.

0:21:55.298 --> 0:21:56.818
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know if we're going to be in

0:21:56.858 --> 0:21:59.938
<v Speaker 2>a situation where we're two weeks into training camp and

0:21:59.978 --> 0:22:02.538
<v Speaker 2>he kind of realizes that he doesn't have it anymore, Right, Like,

0:22:02.578 --> 0:22:05.138
<v Speaker 2>I hope that's not the case, but you have to

0:22:05.138 --> 0:22:08.138
<v Speaker 2>prepare for that outcome, and maybe cold Strange is the

0:22:08.178 --> 0:22:08.978
<v Speaker 2>backup plan there.

0:22:09.058 --> 0:22:10.657
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, at the very least, we'll see what

0:22:10.698 --> 0:22:12.578
<v Speaker 3>he does on Sunday, but at the very least you

0:22:12.618 --> 0:22:14.378
<v Speaker 3>have an option. I would still like to see them

0:22:14.378 --> 0:22:16.298
<v Speaker 3>take a center, maybe on day three, because even if

0:22:16.298 --> 0:22:19.178
<v Speaker 3>cold Strange is the guy, you now need his backup, right, But.

0:22:19.658 --> 0:22:23.738
<v Speaker 2>It was he looked good for what it was. I

0:22:23.778 --> 0:22:27.738
<v Speaker 2>was impressed for what that was. Yeah, Okay, My number

0:22:27.778 --> 0:22:30.177
<v Speaker 2>one up in this game was Anthony Jennings. I did

0:22:30.258 --> 0:22:32.378
<v Speaker 2>two up. I did won an offense, one in defense.

0:22:32.858 --> 0:22:35.298
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Jennings I thought was the one guy that kind

0:22:35.298 --> 0:22:37.378
<v Speaker 2>of came to play on the defense. Had those two

0:22:37.458 --> 0:22:39.458
<v Speaker 2>run stuffs early in the game, very first play of

0:22:39.458 --> 0:22:42.538
<v Speaker 2>the game, stuff to a run to try to set

0:22:42.578 --> 0:22:44.378
<v Speaker 2>the tone a little bit. I also had him with

0:22:44.418 --> 0:22:47.258
<v Speaker 2>four quarterback pressures in this game. I thought this was

0:22:47.298 --> 0:22:49.578
<v Speaker 2>a nice bounced back game for him after he struggled

0:22:49.578 --> 0:22:52.138
<v Speaker 2>a little bit in Buffalo. And you know, I think

0:22:52.138 --> 0:22:53.778
<v Speaker 2>he's a solid player for them. Do I think he's

0:22:53.778 --> 0:22:55.538
<v Speaker 2>a game changer. No, but I think that he has

0:22:55.578 --> 0:22:58.578
<v Speaker 2>a role in the defense in the NFL, setting the edge,

0:22:58.658 --> 0:23:02.018
<v Speaker 2>playing first and second down, and they have something in

0:23:02.058 --> 0:23:03.258
<v Speaker 2>that in that respect.

0:23:03.778 --> 0:23:04.578
<v Speaker 3>He's my other up.

0:23:04.738 --> 0:23:07.818
<v Speaker 2>Okay. My other up was just Tomario Douglas because the

0:23:07.898 --> 0:23:10.418
<v Speaker 2>touchdown was the only offensive play they made all day

0:23:10.658 --> 0:23:12.658
<v Speaker 2>and it was really him, Like, not to take anything

0:23:12.698 --> 0:23:15.578
<v Speaker 2>away from Drake May, but it was he made the

0:23:15.938 --> 0:23:16.458
<v Speaker 2>hell of the catch.

0:23:16.538 --> 0:23:18.858
<v Speaker 3>I'll get Drake May and Cole Strange gets some credit

0:23:18.858 --> 0:23:22.177
<v Speaker 3>to for like getting that free play, getting the snap off.

0:23:22.218 --> 0:23:24.338
<v Speaker 3>It's an unreal catch. I was attempted to put Douglas.

0:23:24.698 --> 0:23:27.298
<v Speaker 3>Who do you put the fault on on the blown

0:23:27.338 --> 0:23:29.658
<v Speaker 3>pitch plays it Douglas for not getting the spot in time,

0:23:29.938 --> 0:23:31.898
<v Speaker 3>or May for the toss to out in front of.

0:23:31.858 --> 0:23:34.538
<v Speaker 2>Him, I put I would put it mostly on May.

0:23:34.578 --> 0:23:38.018
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it was a great toss, And I

0:23:38.058 --> 0:23:39.978
<v Speaker 2>also I am with you that in terms of the

0:23:40.018 --> 0:23:41.658
<v Speaker 2>design of the play, I didn't love that it was

0:23:41.698 --> 0:23:43.978
<v Speaker 2>a toss to begin with. Yeah, so the Bills ran

0:23:44.058 --> 0:23:46.578
<v Speaker 2>it as a toss on the goal line to Khalil Shakir,

0:23:46.978 --> 0:23:48.538
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know if it was supposed to be

0:23:48.578 --> 0:23:50.378
<v Speaker 2>a toss, it might have just ended up being a

0:23:50.378 --> 0:23:53.058
<v Speaker 2>toss because it just didn't hit exactly how they wanted

0:23:53.098 --> 0:23:55.178
<v Speaker 2>it to hit. Kind of similarly to this one. The

0:23:55.258 --> 0:23:59.218
<v Speaker 2>Lions always run this play as a handoff. It's a

0:23:59.258 --> 0:24:00.538
<v Speaker 2>straight handof.

0:24:00.098 --> 0:24:02.898
<v Speaker 3>So most of the time when I see that play

0:24:02.938 --> 0:24:05.178
<v Speaker 3>as a toss, it's at the college level. Yeah, and

0:24:05.218 --> 0:24:07.138
<v Speaker 3>it's a little easier to do because you run it,

0:24:07.738 --> 0:24:09.778
<v Speaker 3>you motion the guy from the short side, so he's

0:24:09.818 --> 0:24:11.818
<v Speaker 3>not coming as far from the from the sideline with

0:24:11.818 --> 0:24:14.258
<v Speaker 3>the hashes being further out. I'm trying to remember if

0:24:14.258 --> 0:24:15.818
<v Speaker 3>I've seen as a toss in the NFL. I was

0:24:15.818 --> 0:24:18.818
<v Speaker 3>trying to find it. Sure I have, but in the

0:24:18.938 --> 0:24:20.378
<v Speaker 3>NFL that's usually a handoff play.

0:24:20.458 --> 0:24:23.858
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought that it should have been a handoff play,

0:24:23.938 --> 0:24:26.178
<v Speaker 2>and it didn't sound like it was ever supposed to

0:24:26.178 --> 0:24:27.698
<v Speaker 2>be a handoff play, Like I think that was a

0:24:27.978 --> 0:24:30.818
<v Speaker 2>toss all the way. Yeah, So yeah, I I didn't

0:24:30.858 --> 0:24:33.258
<v Speaker 2>put it on Douglas, and I thought again that his

0:24:33.378 --> 0:24:35.978
<v Speaker 2>touchdown catch and the adjustment that he made and the

0:24:36.018 --> 0:24:38.378
<v Speaker 2>catch that he made was in an incredible catch and

0:24:38.418 --> 0:24:40.338
<v Speaker 2>it was really the only offensive highlight of the game.

0:24:40.458 --> 0:24:42.418
<v Speaker 2>So yep, there you go, all right to the downs.

0:24:43.138 --> 0:24:48.218
<v Speaker 3>So my biggest issue in this game was the situational defense. Yeah,

0:24:48.658 --> 0:24:51.058
<v Speaker 3>ten of seventeen on third down, the charges, ten of

0:24:51.098 --> 0:24:53.378
<v Speaker 3>seventeen on third down. They were good in the red zone,

0:24:53.458 --> 0:24:56.138
<v Speaker 3>they were good in the two minutes. The defense wasn't

0:24:56.138 --> 0:24:59.978
<v Speaker 3>good overall in this game, but it felt like every

0:25:00.058 --> 0:25:04.258
<v Speaker 3>single potential pivot moment you saw some of the worst

0:25:04.338 --> 0:25:07.778
<v Speaker 3>performances they had throughout the afternoon. Yeah, and that goes

0:25:07.818 --> 0:25:10.698
<v Speaker 3>to coaching, That goes to coaching, so that that was

0:25:10.738 --> 0:25:13.578
<v Speaker 3>the biggest thing that stood out to me. There's been

0:25:13.578 --> 0:25:16.018
<v Speaker 3>a lot made about the time of possession. Patriots had

0:25:16.018 --> 0:25:18.018
<v Speaker 3>the ball for under twenty minutes, by the way, s

0:25:18.058 --> 0:25:20.058
<v Speaker 3>their second such game this year. It's the first time

0:25:20.258 --> 0:25:22.818
<v Speaker 3>since at least the eighties that that's happened. Yeah, but

0:25:23.538 --> 0:25:24.978
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of people looked at that as the

0:25:25.018 --> 0:25:27.338
<v Speaker 3>offense and look, the offense couldn't stay on the field, certainly,

0:25:27.938 --> 0:25:30.738
<v Speaker 3>but some of that was the defense couldn't get off either.

0:25:30.778 --> 0:25:33.138
<v Speaker 3>They were some long drives in that game. Yeah, from

0:25:33.178 --> 0:25:35.498
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers. The situational defense was just not there.

0:25:35.618 --> 0:25:37.378
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I looked some of this up. I'm not a

0:25:37.378 --> 0:25:40.258
<v Speaker 2>big time of possession guy, as you could probably imagine.

0:25:40.258 --> 0:25:44.338
<v Speaker 3>Well, have the Chargers ran seventy seven plays? Yeah, that's

0:25:44.378 --> 0:25:46.818
<v Speaker 3>an absurd now, as I'm saying, and I want to

0:25:46.818 --> 0:25:47.418
<v Speaker 3>double check.

0:25:47.338 --> 0:25:52.578
<v Speaker 2>To defensive film, was thirty minutes seventy that's insane offense.

0:25:53.138 --> 0:25:55.258
<v Speaker 3>You don't have teams that run seventy seven plays in

0:25:55.298 --> 0:25:56.098
<v Speaker 3>an overtime game.

0:25:56.178 --> 0:25:59.258
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's insane when you look at time of possession.

0:25:59.298 --> 0:26:01.738
<v Speaker 2>I think you know the reason why. You know, I'm

0:26:01.738 --> 0:26:03.898
<v Speaker 2>not big on time of possession Sometimes just because of

0:26:03.898 --> 0:26:05.938
<v Speaker 2>the context right of why you're on the field and

0:26:05.978 --> 0:26:06.458
<v Speaker 2>why you're not.

0:26:07.178 --> 0:26:09.538
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's why I think play disparity fits at So yeah,

0:26:09.818 --> 0:26:12.978
<v Speaker 3>for the disparities point Chargers ran seventy seven plays, it's

0:26:12.978 --> 0:26:14.018
<v Speaker 3>not like it was a quick game.

0:26:14.178 --> 0:26:18.578
<v Speaker 2>Patriots ran forty eight. Yeah. Yeah, So last year it

0:26:18.618 --> 0:26:20.818
<v Speaker 2>felt like the Patriots defense was on the field a

0:26:20.818 --> 0:26:23.138
<v Speaker 2>lot because of the offense, because they were good on

0:26:23.218 --> 0:26:26.098
<v Speaker 2>third down last year there I think they were ninth

0:26:26.138 --> 0:26:27.698
<v Speaker 2>in the league. I want to say on third down

0:26:27.738 --> 0:26:30.538
<v Speaker 2>and twenty three like they were. It wasn't because they

0:26:30.578 --> 0:26:33.098
<v Speaker 2>were letting teams extend drives all the time. Right this

0:26:33.218 --> 0:26:35.658
<v Speaker 2>year both have been a problem they have the offense

0:26:35.658 --> 0:26:37.698
<v Speaker 2>can't stay on the field and the defense can't get

0:26:37.738 --> 0:26:39.978
<v Speaker 2>off of it. The defense right now is bottom third

0:26:40.018 --> 0:26:41.378
<v Speaker 2>of the league. And third down I want to say

0:26:41.378 --> 0:26:44.058
<v Speaker 2>they're twenty fourth or one of them's twenty fourth and

0:26:44.058 --> 0:26:45.418
<v Speaker 2>one of them is twenty seventh. I don't know which

0:26:45.458 --> 0:26:47.698
<v Speaker 2>one's red zone and which one's third down off the

0:26:47.698 --> 0:26:50.378
<v Speaker 2>top of my head. So basically they're they're not good

0:26:50.418 --> 0:26:53.978
<v Speaker 2>on third down on defense. So now the problem is

0:26:53.978 --> 0:26:55.978
<v Speaker 2>is that the offense can't sustained drives but also the

0:26:55.978 --> 0:26:58.018
<v Speaker 2>defense can't get off the field, so some of this

0:26:58.458 --> 0:27:01.458
<v Speaker 2>time of possession stuff is self inflicted for the defense

0:27:01.498 --> 0:27:03.818
<v Speaker 2>this year. Maybe you couldn't say that in twenty two

0:27:03.818 --> 0:27:06.058
<v Speaker 2>and twenty three, but this year this is definitely some

0:27:06.058 --> 0:27:09.338
<v Speaker 2>self inflicted stuff on the defensive side. I went with

0:27:09.378 --> 0:27:11.498
<v Speaker 2>the player a couple of players, and then I had

0:27:11.538 --> 0:27:15.018
<v Speaker 2>one like sort of like what you just did. But

0:27:15.138 --> 0:27:17.338
<v Speaker 2>Number one down for me in this game is Jonathan Jones.

0:27:17.538 --> 0:27:19.858
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I hate to pick on Jonathan Jones because

0:27:19.858 --> 0:27:23.218
<v Speaker 2>I love Jonathan Jones, but eight catches, ninety one yards,

0:27:23.978 --> 0:27:26.738
<v Speaker 2>gave up a touchdown. You know, mcconkee just was too

0:27:26.778 --> 0:27:29.018
<v Speaker 2>good for him, Like he was just outclassed by Malconukee

0:27:29.138 --> 0:27:31.658
<v Speaker 2>in this game. That does not bode well to me

0:27:32.378 --> 0:27:35.538
<v Speaker 2>for John Jones long term. I know he's really good

0:27:35.538 --> 0:27:38.498
<v Speaker 2>against Shakir. He deserves his flowers for that. I gave

0:27:38.538 --> 0:27:40.978
<v Speaker 2>him to him last week. But it seems like this

0:27:41.058 --> 0:27:43.698
<v Speaker 2>has been more of what we've gotten from John Jones

0:27:43.738 --> 0:27:46.018
<v Speaker 2>this year than the Shakiir game. Kind of felt like

0:27:46.058 --> 0:27:49.618
<v Speaker 2>an outlier a little bit for him. And as we

0:27:49.658 --> 0:27:52.858
<v Speaker 2>start to talk about the draft and the offseason, I

0:27:52.898 --> 0:27:55.378
<v Speaker 2>don't know how you go into next year with Jonathan

0:27:55.458 --> 0:27:58.138
<v Speaker 2>Jones and Marcus Jones. Is your your number two and

0:27:58.218 --> 0:28:00.818
<v Speaker 2>number three corners? I think you need to upgrade the

0:28:00.898 --> 0:28:03.938
<v Speaker 2>number two cornerback spot and put the Joneses back in

0:28:03.978 --> 0:28:06.098
<v Speaker 2>the slot, like if the you know that. To me,

0:28:06.618 --> 0:28:09.458
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Jones at this point is probably more of like

0:28:09.498 --> 0:28:12.338
<v Speaker 2>a safety corner. Like he's probably like a nickel or

0:28:12.378 --> 0:28:15.338
<v Speaker 2>a dime safety corner and you know, maybe plays a

0:28:15.378 --> 0:28:16.858
<v Speaker 2>little bit in the deep part of the field a

0:28:16.898 --> 0:28:19.738
<v Speaker 2>little more next year if he's back, I don't know

0:28:19.738 --> 0:28:22.458
<v Speaker 2>if his days of I'm gonna take this guy in

0:28:22.538 --> 0:28:24.858
<v Speaker 2>man to man coverage for four quarters, I don't know

0:28:24.898 --> 0:28:27.978
<v Speaker 2>if that is in him anymore. I think we might

0:28:28.058 --> 0:28:31.298
<v Speaker 2>have moved past that stage of his career. So just

0:28:31.338 --> 0:28:34.218
<v Speaker 2>from a bigger picture standpoint, not depict so much on

0:28:34.338 --> 0:28:38.538
<v Speaker 2>John Jones. I I feel like cornerback two is now

0:28:38.778 --> 0:28:40.458
<v Speaker 2>right on the list, you know, put it right in

0:28:40.498 --> 0:28:42.938
<v Speaker 2>the top five. Yeah, it's a it's a major need.

0:28:42.978 --> 0:28:44.978
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you. Yeah, all right, number two.

0:28:45.818 --> 0:28:47.778
<v Speaker 3>Uh, Kyle Dugar And I feel like I have him

0:28:47.778 --> 0:28:50.578
<v Speaker 3>on it every week at this point, and is what

0:28:50.658 --> 0:28:53.138
<v Speaker 3>I get, He's battling through something, but he just can

0:28:53.218 --> 0:28:57.258
<v Speaker 3>there continues to be mistackles, miscoverage assignments, like a couple

0:28:57.298 --> 0:28:59.578
<v Speaker 3>of times a game where he is like it kind

0:28:59.618 --> 0:29:01.778
<v Speaker 3>of seems like teams are targeting him now, yeah, to

0:29:01.818 --> 0:29:04.298
<v Speaker 3>try to take advantage of him, and it's you hope

0:29:04.298 --> 0:29:06.178
<v Speaker 3>it's just the ankle and he comes back next year

0:29:06.258 --> 0:29:08.378
<v Speaker 3>looking more like the guy he was in twenty twenty three.

0:29:08.458 --> 0:29:12.778
<v Speaker 3>But this version of him is they he can't play

0:29:12.818 --> 0:29:13.858
<v Speaker 3>the role they needed to play.

0:29:14.698 --> 0:29:18.418
<v Speaker 2>So his eyes are the problem to me right now.

0:29:18.738 --> 0:29:21.338
<v Speaker 2>And that's why I'm sure that some of the recovery

0:29:21.578 --> 0:29:23.738
<v Speaker 2>is being affected by the ankle. I mean, like, you know,

0:29:23.778 --> 0:29:26.138
<v Speaker 2>recovering when you're your fall step or you're you're a

0:29:26.178 --> 0:29:28.938
<v Speaker 2>little bit out of position. Some of that is probably

0:29:28.978 --> 0:29:31.778
<v Speaker 2>due to physical issues, but right now, his eyes just

0:29:31.778 --> 0:29:34.058
<v Speaker 2>seemed to constantly be in the wrong places in the

0:29:34.098 --> 0:29:36.298
<v Speaker 2>passing game. And yeah, he was a part of two

0:29:36.298 --> 0:29:38.498
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns in this game where I just felt like his

0:29:38.578 --> 0:29:40.258
<v Speaker 2>eyes are just not in the right places. You know,

0:29:40.378 --> 0:29:43.658
<v Speaker 2>mcconkee runs a really nifty route on the short touchdown

0:29:43.658 --> 0:29:46.058
<v Speaker 2>that he scored down in the red zone. I don't

0:29:46.098 --> 0:29:48.938
<v Speaker 2>know if I've necessarily seen that route before out of

0:29:48.978 --> 0:29:52.058
<v Speaker 2>that sort of look, so they kind of mimicked crossers,

0:29:52.098 --> 0:29:54.018
<v Speaker 2>you know, down in the red zone, and then he

0:29:54.178 --> 0:29:56.698
<v Speaker 2>like pivoted out of his crosser. It was pretty cool.

0:29:56.738 --> 0:29:58.978
<v Speaker 2>It was a great route. So that one I don't

0:29:59.018 --> 0:30:02.018
<v Speaker 2>necessarily kill Dugger for because that's just a fantastic route

0:30:02.058 --> 0:30:05.618
<v Speaker 2>and a really nice play design by the Chargers. That

0:30:05.698 --> 0:30:09.018
<v Speaker 2>to me goes back to the Chargers saw in film. Okay,

0:30:09.098 --> 0:30:10.938
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots in the red zone are going to switch

0:30:10.978 --> 0:30:13.498
<v Speaker 2>off these crossers, right, They're gonna be in man to

0:30:13.618 --> 0:30:16.578
<v Speaker 2>man and when the crosser runs across the field, he's

0:30:16.618 --> 0:30:18.818
<v Speaker 2>gonna pass it off to this free safety and then

0:30:18.858 --> 0:30:22.458
<v Speaker 2>replace the free safety. So they showed like McConkey was running,

0:30:22.658 --> 0:30:25.698
<v Speaker 2>the defender dropped off McConkie, and then mcconkee went back

0:30:25.698 --> 0:30:28.298
<v Speaker 2>out the other way. So that to me is coaching

0:30:28.418 --> 0:30:32.058
<v Speaker 2>like that was a game plan to wrinkle or play

0:30:32.458 --> 0:30:35.618
<v Speaker 2>that the Chargers had ready for how the Patriots handle

0:30:36.138 --> 0:30:39.178
<v Speaker 2>crossers in the low red zone. So I don't necessarily

0:30:39.178 --> 0:30:41.058
<v Speaker 2>put that as much on Dougger as I put it

0:30:41.098 --> 0:30:45.458
<v Speaker 2>on Mayo and Covington. But the McConkie forty yard touchdown,

0:30:46.018 --> 0:30:48.898
<v Speaker 2>I'm not one hundred percent sold that what coverage they

0:30:48.898 --> 0:30:51.218
<v Speaker 2>were in because Douggers eyes are in the backfield the

0:30:51.378 --> 0:30:53.818
<v Speaker 2>entire time, and he's like reading it almost like he's

0:30:53.858 --> 0:30:55.738
<v Speaker 2>in zone, like a hook or something like that over

0:30:55.778 --> 0:30:58.498
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the field. And then John Jones opens

0:30:58.938 --> 0:31:01.418
<v Speaker 2>like he has inside help and then mccauky just runs

0:31:01.458 --> 0:31:03.698
<v Speaker 2>right by him. And I don't know if Dougger was

0:31:03.698 --> 0:31:05.778
<v Speaker 2>supposed to help. I don't know if John Jones just

0:31:05.818 --> 0:31:08.698
<v Speaker 2>got beat. I kind of settled more towards John Jones

0:31:08.778 --> 0:31:11.378
<v Speaker 2>just got beat. But like again, it's just Dougger's eyes

0:31:11.418 --> 0:31:14.018
<v Speaker 2>are just locked into the backfield on the quarterback and

0:31:14.058 --> 0:31:17.338
<v Speaker 2>he has no spatial awareness of like that there's a

0:31:17.378 --> 0:31:19.778
<v Speaker 2>receiver running right by him right And the same thing

0:31:19.818 --> 0:31:22.338
<v Speaker 2>happened on the crossing route early in the game by

0:31:22.418 --> 0:31:26.218
<v Speaker 2>Davis where Austin thought he was passing and Dugger just

0:31:26.458 --> 0:31:29.418
<v Speaker 2>was not ready to pick it up. So right now,

0:31:29.538 --> 0:31:31.858
<v Speaker 2>to me, it's this is like he's in a mental

0:31:31.858 --> 0:31:36.058
<v Speaker 2>pretzel back there. And I think that for the Patriots

0:31:36.058 --> 0:31:39.938
<v Speaker 2>moving forward, I hate to keep adding needs to the list,

0:31:40.018 --> 0:31:43.618
<v Speaker 2>but like free safety, it just he's not a free stating.

0:31:43.498 --> 0:31:45.458
<v Speaker 3>You know where I've been on this, Like they they

0:31:46.498 --> 0:31:49.618
<v Speaker 3>moved on from Devin mccordy with zero plan. Well, then

0:31:49.658 --> 0:31:50.818
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna play guys out of position.

0:31:50.898 --> 0:31:52.538
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're gonna play like Peppers and Dugger.

0:31:52.738 --> 0:31:55.058
<v Speaker 3>That was their planet left tackle, That's been their planing

0:31:55.058 --> 0:31:57.058
<v Speaker 3>at so many positions. We're just gonna play players we

0:31:57.098 --> 0:31:58.858
<v Speaker 3>trust out of position. But just because you trust a

0:31:58.898 --> 0:32:00.938
<v Speaker 3>guy doesn't mean he can play her position on the field.

0:32:01.018 --> 0:32:03.018
<v Speaker 3>So they need they need to find Like I was

0:32:03.018 --> 0:32:04.418
<v Speaker 3>texting about this guy the other night. You know how

0:32:04.458 --> 0:32:06.298
<v Speaker 3>high I am on this guy. Happened since his draft.

0:32:06.738 --> 0:32:08.178
<v Speaker 3>They need to find their Kirby Joseph.

0:32:08.298 --> 0:32:09.058
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's a good play.

0:32:09.218 --> 0:32:10.298
<v Speaker 3>That guy's a difference maker.

0:32:10.418 --> 0:32:13.618
<v Speaker 2>It just feels like they were they were banking on

0:32:13.818 --> 0:32:17.178
<v Speaker 2>being interchangeable, like they were gonna be. They're probably thinking,

0:32:17.618 --> 0:32:20.738
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna go into more too high, you know, post

0:32:20.778 --> 0:32:23.778
<v Speaker 2>snap rotation. We're gonna start in too high. We're gonna rotate.

0:32:24.338 --> 0:32:28.018
<v Speaker 2>And they thought we could rotate either Dugger or Peppers

0:32:28.058 --> 0:32:31.178
<v Speaker 2>into the box. So because of we were going to

0:32:31.258 --> 0:32:33.298
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit more disguise heavy, we're gonna be

0:32:33.338 --> 0:32:36.738
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more deceptive of Okay, we could rotate

0:32:36.818 --> 0:32:38.618
<v Speaker 2>either way. So now you have to account for the

0:32:38.658 --> 0:32:40.898
<v Speaker 2>fact that you don't really know which way they're going.

0:32:41.418 --> 0:32:43.538
<v Speaker 2>But at the end of the day, somebody's got to

0:32:43.538 --> 0:32:45.738
<v Speaker 2>play off top, and somebody's got to be up top

0:32:45.778 --> 0:32:48.658
<v Speaker 2>on third down, and someone's gonna end up up top,

0:32:49.098 --> 0:32:52.738
<v Speaker 2>and if can that player play back there consistently well,

0:32:53.098 --> 0:32:54.898
<v Speaker 2>and I just don't think Kyle Duggar has been able

0:32:54.938 --> 0:32:56.978
<v Speaker 2>to do that, and teams know it. Teams are now

0:32:57.018 --> 0:32:59.018
<v Speaker 2>just hunting him, all right. Number three?

0:33:01.178 --> 0:33:02.218
<v Speaker 3>Where'd I go here?

0:33:03.418 --> 0:33:03.578
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:33:03.778 --> 0:33:04.978
<v Speaker 3>I went in the wrong word. I thought we're doing

0:33:05.018 --> 0:33:08.618
<v Speaker 3>players offensive situationally again, same thing two for ten on

0:33:08.698 --> 0:33:11.498
<v Speaker 3>third downs. The few times they got in the red zone,

0:33:11.498 --> 0:33:14.138
<v Speaker 3>they couldn't get it going. Just the situational football in

0:33:14.178 --> 0:33:15.498
<v Speaker 3>this one was not there.

0:33:15.538 --> 0:33:18.578
<v Speaker 2>It was not good. Yeah, fair enough. Number three for me,

0:33:18.618 --> 0:33:20.578
<v Speaker 2>I kind of went over it already with the pass

0:33:20.618 --> 0:33:23.058
<v Speaker 2>Russ stuff, A nineteen percent pressure eight. I think they

0:33:23.098 --> 0:33:26.298
<v Speaker 2>had nine pressure dropbacks on forty one attempts or forty

0:33:26.338 --> 0:33:29.938
<v Speaker 2>one drop backs by Justin Herbert just nowhere near him.

0:33:29.978 --> 0:33:33.538
<v Speaker 2>And this was in a mush rush. Compact the quarterback,

0:33:33.778 --> 0:33:36.138
<v Speaker 2>you know, compact the pocket, keep the quarterback in the pocket.

0:33:36.338 --> 0:33:38.578
<v Speaker 2>They came after him. They blitz them thirteen times, and

0:33:38.618 --> 0:33:41.538
<v Speaker 2>they did not get home. They got on thirteen blitzes.

0:33:41.778 --> 0:33:45.538
<v Speaker 2>They had one pressure on thirteen blitzes. Think about that.

0:33:45.538 --> 0:33:46.258
<v Speaker 3>That's ridiculous.

0:33:46.378 --> 0:33:49.738
<v Speaker 2>They pressured him one time, they blited them thirteen times.

0:33:49.778 --> 0:33:52.098
<v Speaker 2>That was way more than they blitzed Josh Allen, way

0:33:52.098 --> 0:33:54.418
<v Speaker 2>more than they blitzed Kyler Murray. Like, this was not

0:33:54.698 --> 0:33:57.418
<v Speaker 2>a we're going to keep the quarterback in the pocket game.

0:33:57.778 --> 0:34:00.698
<v Speaker 2>They wanted to rush Justin Herbert. They couldn't get to him,

0:34:00.818 --> 0:34:04.698
<v Speaker 2>that doubt. That's the bottom line. And their pass rush

0:34:04.738 --> 0:34:06.658
<v Speaker 2>just continues to create. All right, do you have any more?

0:34:06.698 --> 0:34:08.857
<v Speaker 2>I have one more go ahead, So I did put

0:34:08.898 --> 0:34:11.777
<v Speaker 2>Drake May on here. This was my worst graded game

0:34:11.777 --> 0:34:15.377
<v Speaker 2>for Drake May now, out of everybody involved in this

0:34:15.578 --> 0:34:18.778
<v Speaker 2>entire organization. Yeah, the one guy I'm going to absolve

0:34:18.858 --> 0:34:22.377
<v Speaker 2>sometimes right now is the rookie quarterback Like this is

0:34:22.498 --> 0:34:25.618
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot wrong with the situation around Drake May.

0:34:26.098 --> 0:34:28.618
<v Speaker 2>But I had him with the minus ten negative plays.

0:34:28.938 --> 0:34:31.618
<v Speaker 2>I had him with e turn over play obviously on

0:34:31.698 --> 0:34:33.738
<v Speaker 2>the toss you know, whatever the heck that was supposed

0:34:33.777 --> 0:34:36.258
<v Speaker 2>to be on the play to pop Douglas. I just

0:34:36.297 --> 0:34:39.058
<v Speaker 2>thought in this game, though, what bothered me a little

0:34:39.098 --> 0:34:41.458
<v Speaker 2>bit about the way he played, I thought he was

0:34:41.498 --> 0:34:44.857
<v Speaker 2>a little bit premature, Like leaving the pocket. I thought

0:34:44.858 --> 0:34:47.498
<v Speaker 2>he left the pocket early a handful of times, he said,

0:34:47.698 --> 0:34:49.698
<v Speaker 2>only once on the play he got his belt wrung on.

0:34:50.138 --> 0:34:53.458
<v Speaker 2>That was part of it. But even like the Derwin

0:34:53.538 --> 0:34:56.978
<v Speaker 2>James fifteen yard sack on fourth and two, him rolling

0:34:57.018 --> 0:34:59.098
<v Speaker 2>to his right and trying to run away from the

0:34:59.098 --> 0:35:02.418
<v Speaker 2>pressure felt very Caleb Williams to me, right, it just

0:35:02.738 --> 0:35:05.098
<v Speaker 2>didn't really see it. Pre Snap was caught a little

0:35:05.098 --> 0:35:07.378
<v Speaker 2>bit off guard by it. All he had to do.

0:35:07.458 --> 0:35:10.178
<v Speaker 2>He had Antonio Gibson in the flat like right behind

0:35:10.218 --> 0:35:12.138
<v Speaker 2>the blitz, Like all you had to do was hit

0:35:12.218 --> 0:35:15.858
<v Speaker 2>the back hot out of the blitz, right. And I

0:35:15.898 --> 0:35:19.578
<v Speaker 2>don't want to see him develop bad habits. That's the

0:35:19.658 --> 0:35:21.857
<v Speaker 2>last thing I want to see him do. And some

0:35:21.938 --> 0:35:24.658
<v Speaker 2>of these, you know, the teams now are just kind

0:35:24.658 --> 0:35:26.738
<v Speaker 2>of recognizing that he's going to leave the pocket if

0:35:26.738 --> 0:35:29.618
<v Speaker 2>you invite him to leave the pocket, and so they

0:35:29.938 --> 0:35:32.338
<v Speaker 2>kind of are to him about it. And this is

0:35:32.418 --> 0:35:34.818
<v Speaker 2>one thing that I'm going to nitpick him on, Like

0:35:34.858 --> 0:35:37.138
<v Speaker 2>he's got to play quarterback in these situations from the

0:35:37.178 --> 0:35:39.218
<v Speaker 2>pocket if they're gonna blitz him and they're gonna make

0:35:39.258 --> 0:35:41.297
<v Speaker 2>them hot and they're gonna charge him up, like he's

0:35:41.338 --> 0:35:44.018
<v Speaker 2>got to beat them with throwing the football, like make

0:35:44.058 --> 0:35:46.538
<v Speaker 2>a quick decisive decision and get the football out. I

0:35:46.538 --> 0:35:48.698
<v Speaker 2>thought there was three or four times in this game

0:35:49.218 --> 0:35:52.618
<v Speaker 2>where he had options against the Blitz and just kind

0:35:52.658 --> 0:35:55.857
<v Speaker 2>of froze on the last derwin James sack, and then

0:35:55.898 --> 0:35:58.098
<v Speaker 2>the other ones. Was just kind of running around and

0:35:58.258 --> 0:36:00.298
<v Speaker 2>don't I don't want to see him doing that that often.

0:36:00.898 --> 0:36:01.538
<v Speaker 2>So that was that.

0:36:01.898 --> 0:36:04.018
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not one of his better games. I just felt

0:36:04.018 --> 0:36:05.538
<v Speaker 3>like there was too much going on around him to

0:36:05.538 --> 0:36:06.378
<v Speaker 3>put him on the downs.

0:36:06.378 --> 0:36:09.018
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, totally fair. All right, do you have any more? No,

0:36:09.058 --> 0:36:12.337
<v Speaker 2>it's it, okay, So let's let's do offseason. Let's talk

0:36:12.378 --> 0:36:15.258
<v Speaker 2>about this game on Sunday a little bit too. Not

0:36:15.378 --> 0:36:18.658
<v Speaker 2>about the strategy of you know x's and o's of

0:36:18.658 --> 0:36:21.738
<v Speaker 2>how they're gonna take down the Bill's backups, but where

0:36:21.738 --> 0:36:22.898
<v Speaker 2>do you stand.

0:36:22.658 --> 0:36:25.338
<v Speaker 3>On Well, I have one thought on that, okay, And

0:36:25.378 --> 0:36:27.417
<v Speaker 3>I've been excited to give this take this week because

0:36:27.418 --> 0:36:31.698
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a fun take. Okay, everybody's talked about

0:36:32.058 --> 0:36:34.218
<v Speaker 3>and Alex Van Pelt said today Drake May is going

0:36:34.298 --> 0:36:36.178
<v Speaker 3>to start, which by the way he should. I think

0:36:36.218 --> 0:36:37.938
<v Speaker 3>I'm in the minority on this. I'm curious to hear

0:36:37.978 --> 0:36:40.377
<v Speaker 3>what you think of this. Okay, I'm okay that Drake

0:36:40.418 --> 0:36:42.178
<v Speaker 3>May is starting this game. Frankly, I think he should

0:36:42.218 --> 0:36:44.658
<v Speaker 3>start this game. I think it's important to the Patriots

0:36:44.738 --> 0:36:48.498
<v Speaker 3>organization that he starts this game. Now, I would do

0:36:48.778 --> 0:36:51.138
<v Speaker 3>exactly what the Bills are doing. Yeah, play him for

0:36:51.138 --> 0:36:53.938
<v Speaker 3>a series maybe two, mostly handoffs, take him out, But

0:36:53.978 --> 0:36:55.458
<v Speaker 3>I would do it for the same reason the Bills

0:36:55.458 --> 0:36:57.218
<v Speaker 3>are doing it. And I'm giving the Bills credit. Evans,

0:36:57.218 --> 0:37:00.658
<v Speaker 3>So you know, I feel strongly about ows Drake May.

0:37:00.698 --> 0:37:03.938
<v Speaker 3>We want Drake May to be face to the franchise,

0:37:04.618 --> 0:37:08.458
<v Speaker 3>one of the faces of the league, elite starting quarterback.

0:37:08.538 --> 0:37:08.777
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:37:08.858 --> 0:37:11.817
<v Speaker 3>Ye, what do elite starting quarterbacks do more than anything else?

0:37:12.218 --> 0:37:15.298
<v Speaker 3>They start games? Play football, They play football, They start games.

0:37:15.298 --> 0:37:18.377
<v Speaker 3>They have Brady starting streak, Peyton Manning had that long

0:37:18.458 --> 0:37:22.138
<v Speaker 3>starting streak. That's why Alan's doing it. Let's say Drake

0:37:22.138 --> 0:37:24.937
<v Speaker 3>May becomes like awesome in five years, right, Yeah, don't

0:37:24.938 --> 0:37:26.297
<v Speaker 3>we want to kind of be hyping up how many

0:37:26.338 --> 0:37:27.658
<v Speaker 3>games in a row he own. He has to do

0:37:27.658 --> 0:37:29.218
<v Speaker 3>a better drum of protecting himself as a part is,

0:37:29.338 --> 0:37:30.778
<v Speaker 3>but like, yeah, it's gonna be weird. We have to

0:37:30.818 --> 0:37:32.538
<v Speaker 3>be like he started almost every game, but oh yeah,

0:37:32.538 --> 0:37:33.538
<v Speaker 3>there was that one at the end of the year

0:37:33.538 --> 0:37:35.817
<v Speaker 3>in Buffalo. And I think that matters to Drake May

0:37:35.938 --> 0:37:38.058
<v Speaker 3>because I think Drake May wants to be viewed like

0:37:38.098 --> 0:37:41.258
<v Speaker 3>a guy like Josh Allen. So if Josh Allen's going

0:37:41.338 --> 0:37:43.498
<v Speaker 3>to start this game, if the Bills can risk Josh

0:37:43.498 --> 0:37:47.418
<v Speaker 3>Allen for one series in order to extend his streak,

0:37:47.778 --> 0:37:49.938
<v Speaker 3>if we want Drake May to have that same standing,

0:37:51.218 --> 0:37:52.018
<v Speaker 3>start Drake May.

0:37:52.658 --> 0:37:55.498
<v Speaker 2>I feel sly about this. I like it. I have

0:37:55.538 --> 0:37:57.698
<v Speaker 2>no problem with them starting. I have no problem with it.

0:37:58.658 --> 0:37:59.498
<v Speaker 2>Part two of the take.

0:38:00.538 --> 0:38:03.938
<v Speaker 3>Everybody is acting like if Joe Milton plays the Patriots

0:38:04.058 --> 0:38:05.338
<v Speaker 3>automatically lose the game.

0:38:05.258 --> 0:38:08.058
<v Speaker 2>Are you offended because he's your guy? Well you are,

0:38:08.058 --> 0:38:08.857
<v Speaker 2>you are a little bit.

0:38:09.018 --> 0:38:11.938
<v Speaker 3>First of all, for that to happen, you also have to.

0:38:11.858 --> 0:38:13.817
<v Speaker 2>Be became famous because you're Joe Milton line.

0:38:13.858 --> 0:38:15.738
<v Speaker 3>I know. First of all, you also have to have

0:38:15.818 --> 0:38:18.178
<v Speaker 3>people like the defense has to do their part, right.

0:38:18.338 --> 0:38:18.938
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:38:19.018 --> 0:38:20.938
<v Speaker 3>So I go back to and I've had fun bringing

0:38:20.938 --> 0:38:24.178
<v Speaker 3>this name up all week. Yeah, Matt Flynn, Yeah, Matt

0:38:24.178 --> 0:38:26.818
<v Speaker 3>Flynn in twenty eleven. Now it was the opposite situation.

0:38:26.938 --> 0:38:29.378
<v Speaker 3>The Packers were in the playoffs. They were where the

0:38:29.418 --> 0:38:31.898
<v Speaker 3>Bills are. They don't want to risk Aaron Rodgers. They

0:38:31.938 --> 0:38:34.418
<v Speaker 3>put in Matt Flynn to make his second career starts.

0:38:34.418 --> 0:38:36.777
<v Speaker 3>You know what his first career start was, You know

0:38:36.818 --> 0:38:40.738
<v Speaker 3>what game, d Condy. He was fine in that game,

0:38:40.818 --> 0:38:43.098
<v Speaker 3>he was fine. That was his third year in the league,

0:38:43.098 --> 0:38:44.777
<v Speaker 3>fourth year in the league. He makes his second start

0:38:44.778 --> 0:38:47.818
<v Speaker 3>Week seventeen against the Detroit Lions. Think about some of

0:38:47.818 --> 0:38:51.578
<v Speaker 3>the quarterbacks the Packers have had. Matt Flynn set every

0:38:51.618 --> 0:38:54.938
<v Speaker 3>single like all of the major single game passing records

0:38:54.978 --> 0:38:57.337
<v Speaker 3>for the Green Bay Packers four hundred and eighty year

0:38:57.578 --> 0:39:00.938
<v Speaker 3>contract he got from this six touchdowns against the Lions.

0:39:01.258 --> 0:39:03.538
<v Speaker 3>Now he was a free agent. Joe Milton's not. He

0:39:03.578 --> 0:39:05.738
<v Speaker 3>got what at the time was a significant contract. The

0:39:05.778 --> 0:39:08.018
<v Speaker 3>Seahawks are ready to name him the starter. Now he

0:39:08.098 --> 0:39:10.338
<v Speaker 3>lost out to a third round pick named Russell Wilson

0:39:10.378 --> 0:39:12.738
<v Speaker 3>in training camp, then bounced around. He was even here

0:39:12.778 --> 0:39:17.018
<v Speaker 3>at one point, But like, who's to say this isn't

0:39:17.018 --> 0:39:19.978
<v Speaker 3>a showcase game for Joe Milton. This is the packerway,

0:39:20.058 --> 0:39:21.218
<v Speaker 3>this is the thing.

0:39:21.378 --> 0:39:22.258
<v Speaker 2>It's a fourth preseason.

0:39:22.418 --> 0:39:25.538
<v Speaker 3>Right, You draft all these quarterbacks with the idea that

0:39:25.618 --> 0:39:27.098
<v Speaker 3>you can't have too many. If you end up with

0:39:27.138 --> 0:39:28.897
<v Speaker 3>a good one, they're worth something you can trade them.

0:39:29.258 --> 0:39:31.178
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know why we're all just assuming Joe

0:39:31.178 --> 0:39:33.498
<v Speaker 3>Milton's gonna go out there and be terrible. Yeah, And

0:39:33.538 --> 0:39:35.498
<v Speaker 3>that way he can be good and the Patriots can

0:39:35.498 --> 0:39:37.458
<v Speaker 3>still lose the game. We talked about the issues with

0:39:37.498 --> 0:39:40.258
<v Speaker 3>the defense. Mitchell Trubisky's a backup, but I was a

0:39:40.338 --> 0:39:42.738
<v Speaker 3>Paul or Fred who said earlier, like, he's not exactly

0:39:42.738 --> 0:39:46.538
<v Speaker 3>a low level backup. He's kind of bad you compare

0:39:46.538 --> 0:39:48.738
<v Speaker 3>to some of the other backups in the league. Fair enough, right,

0:39:49.018 --> 0:39:52.058
<v Speaker 3>he's Is he a top forty quarterback in the league. No,

0:39:52.458 --> 0:39:55.458
<v Speaker 3>you don't think so. I'd put him top forties or

0:39:55.778 --> 0:39:57.258
<v Speaker 3>forty two. I think he's one of the ten best

0:39:57.258 --> 0:39:58.058
<v Speaker 3>backups in the league.

0:39:58.098 --> 0:39:59.578
<v Speaker 2>Okay, right, fair enough.

0:39:59.938 --> 0:40:03.698
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just saying, don't run off Joe Milton.

0:40:04.178 --> 0:40:06.658
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough. I'm not writing off Joe Milton. I also

0:40:06.738 --> 0:40:09.817
<v Speaker 2>think that there's absolutely zero tape on Joe Milton, and

0:40:09.818 --> 0:40:11.938
<v Speaker 2>the Bills will have no idea what the Patriots might

0:40:11.978 --> 0:40:13.098
<v Speaker 2>actually do with Joe Milton.

0:40:13.138 --> 0:40:15.058
<v Speaker 3>So even when you have tape on Joe Milton, he

0:40:15.098 --> 0:40:16.378
<v Speaker 3>can still be kind of un predictable.

0:40:16.458 --> 0:40:18.538
<v Speaker 2>I know, but I'm just saying, like, you know, it

0:40:19.818 --> 0:40:22.058
<v Speaker 2>could be a little unpredictable, yeah, right, when you have

0:40:22.178 --> 0:40:24.338
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback like that that's not played a single snap

0:40:24.378 --> 0:40:26.777
<v Speaker 2>all year. But I would start Drake May in this

0:40:26.858 --> 0:40:29.738
<v Speaker 2>game or don't have a problem. It's I probably I

0:40:29.738 --> 0:40:31.498
<v Speaker 2>don't know where I this, but this is where I

0:40:31.578 --> 0:40:34.498
<v Speaker 2>kind of wanted to go. Anyways, Like, you know, how

0:40:34.538 --> 0:40:36.738
<v Speaker 2>should they approach this game? Is really the only story

0:40:36.818 --> 0:40:41.578
<v Speaker 2>with this game, and I am I'll can't stress this enough.

0:40:42.258 --> 0:40:45.337
<v Speaker 2>They're not They're not gonna tank guys. They're not gonna

0:40:45.378 --> 0:40:48.698
<v Speaker 2>sign some quarterback off the street right and and play

0:40:48.738 --> 0:40:50.378
<v Speaker 2>him on Sunday to purposely lose them.

0:40:50.418 --> 0:40:52.538
<v Speaker 3>They're not gonna be all right, you know, we're down

0:40:52.658 --> 0:40:55.058
<v Speaker 3>four with ten seconds to go, let's kick a field goal.

0:40:55.178 --> 0:40:55.417
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:40:55.498 --> 0:40:58.377
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're not gonna purposely lose the game. Okay, could

0:40:58.418 --> 0:41:01.098
<v Speaker 2>they just lose it out right? We've seen them lose thirteen.

0:41:01.418 --> 0:41:03.498
<v Speaker 2>Very possible. It's very possible.

0:41:03.578 --> 0:41:05.898
<v Speaker 3>But no, you're not, especially because you've got to remember,

0:41:06.338 --> 0:41:11.178
<v Speaker 3>for all these players, they're either trying to when teams

0:41:11.178 --> 0:41:14.458
<v Speaker 3>evaluate players. They significantly wait games at the end of

0:41:14.458 --> 0:41:16.378
<v Speaker 3>the year more than they wait the games at the beginning.

0:41:17.178 --> 0:41:19.498
<v Speaker 3>They're not going to care about the circumstances in this

0:41:19.538 --> 0:41:21.858
<v Speaker 3>game when they do that, especially for guys who are

0:41:21.858 --> 0:41:24.698
<v Speaker 3>pending free agents or maybe aren't a lock to be

0:41:24.738 --> 0:41:26.498
<v Speaker 3>back here next year. They want to put on a

0:41:26.618 --> 0:41:28.618
<v Speaker 3>good tape because they want to keep their jobs in

0:41:28.618 --> 0:41:31.858
<v Speaker 3>the NFL. The same for the coaches. Jarrodmeo coaching for

0:41:31.898 --> 0:41:33.658
<v Speaker 3>his job, is Alex sant Pelt coaching for his job.

0:41:33.698 --> 0:41:37.218
<v Speaker 3>They're not Why would they help an organization get the

0:41:37.258 --> 0:41:38.938
<v Speaker 3>first overall pick when they don't know if they'll be

0:41:39.018 --> 0:41:41.498
<v Speaker 3>part of that organization when they make that pick. There's

0:41:41.618 --> 0:41:44.498
<v Speaker 3>no incentive there. The only one who has any incentive,

0:41:44.578 --> 0:41:47.058
<v Speaker 3>it's it's the general manager on up now. If Drod

0:41:47.098 --> 0:41:50.378
<v Speaker 3>Mayo has been told his job is safe, that could

0:41:50.618 --> 0:41:53.857
<v Speaker 3>factor in a little bit. If he knows, no matter

0:41:53.898 --> 0:41:57.378
<v Speaker 3>what happens, you're good. We want to pick. That's another conversation.

0:41:57.458 --> 0:42:00.817
<v Speaker 3>But it doesn't happen. Tanking does not happen on a

0:42:00.898 --> 0:42:02.218
<v Speaker 3>game day level.

0:42:02.418 --> 0:42:04.618
<v Speaker 2>I just think that that is such a terrible look.

0:42:04.658 --> 0:42:06.897
<v Speaker 2>Like to your point, let's say they get the ball

0:42:06.938 --> 0:42:08.738
<v Speaker 2>back with like a minute and a half to go

0:42:09.218 --> 0:42:12.337
<v Speaker 2>within one score and they just kneel it out. Not happen, right,

0:42:12.378 --> 0:42:14.178
<v Speaker 2>it's not happy. You can't do that, And you know what,

0:42:14.218 --> 0:42:14.658
<v Speaker 2>it shouldn't.

0:42:14.698 --> 0:42:16.578
<v Speaker 3>I don't you know, do you want people in your

0:42:16.658 --> 0:42:19.978
<v Speaker 3>organization that are not invested solely in winning games?

0:42:20.018 --> 0:42:21.498
<v Speaker 2>You want apex competitors.

0:42:21.538 --> 0:42:23.817
<v Speaker 3>I go back to the scene in the Last Dance

0:42:23.858 --> 0:42:25.618
<v Speaker 3>of Michael Jordan at the end of that last game

0:42:25.618 --> 0:42:27.378
<v Speaker 3>of his rookie year where they try to take them

0:42:27.378 --> 0:42:28.857
<v Speaker 3>off the floor because they're trying to get a better

0:42:28.938 --> 0:42:31.138
<v Speaker 3>draft pick, and he's losing his mind because he's like,

0:42:31.138 --> 0:42:32.618
<v Speaker 3>we have a game to win today. What are you

0:42:32.658 --> 0:42:33.178
<v Speaker 3>talking about?

0:42:33.178 --> 0:42:33.698
<v Speaker 2>The draft?

0:42:34.098 --> 0:42:36.258
<v Speaker 3>So you know, those are the kind of competitors you want.

0:42:36.378 --> 0:42:38.738
<v Speaker 3>I think Drake may may kind of be wired that way,

0:42:38.778 --> 0:42:40.458
<v Speaker 3>which is part of the reason I would let him

0:42:40.458 --> 0:42:44.298
<v Speaker 3>get the start, even if it's ceremonial. But yeah, that's

0:42:44.418 --> 0:42:46.858
<v Speaker 3>not gonna happen. Now that being said, the stakes themselves.

0:42:47.058 --> 0:42:49.897
<v Speaker 3>I heard you talking about this earlier when it comes

0:42:49.938 --> 0:42:50.938
<v Speaker 3>to the first overall pick.

0:42:50.978 --> 0:42:52.538
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's get to that in a stade. Okay, all right,

0:42:53.498 --> 0:42:56.938
<v Speaker 2>last thing on this point of it. I've gone back

0:42:56.978 --> 0:42:59.298
<v Speaker 2>and forth on how much Drake may should play in

0:42:59.338 --> 0:43:02.777
<v Speaker 2>this game, because my biggest fear in the way that

0:43:02.818 --> 0:43:04.858
<v Speaker 2>things have gone in the last couple of years for

0:43:04.898 --> 0:43:08.858
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots, always thinking worst case scenario. Frankly, my biggest

0:43:08.858 --> 0:43:12.058
<v Speaker 2>fear is that there's you know, I heard you know

0:43:12.098 --> 0:43:14.978
<v Speaker 2>on your station a lot about like, well, he has

0:43:15.018 --> 0:43:18.738
<v Speaker 2>all off season to get to like recover from an injury. Yeah, Okay,

0:43:18.778 --> 0:43:20.777
<v Speaker 2>if he gets nicked up in the game and he

0:43:20.858 --> 0:43:24.178
<v Speaker 2>has a hand, you know, his hand, he stubs a finger,

0:43:24.618 --> 0:43:26.658
<v Speaker 2>sure he has plenty of time to get over that.

0:43:27.138 --> 0:43:29.618
<v Speaker 2>What happens if he blows out his knee, What happens

0:43:29.618 --> 0:43:31.337
<v Speaker 2>if he tears in a kill that's the kind of injury.

0:43:31.738 --> 0:43:33.978
<v Speaker 2>What happens if he separates his shoulder and now he

0:43:34.018 --> 0:43:35.498
<v Speaker 2>can't throw for four months?

0:43:35.578 --> 0:43:35.698
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:43:35.778 --> 0:43:40.378
<v Speaker 2>Like what those types of things are derailing to an

0:43:40.538 --> 0:43:44.058
<v Speaker 2>entire off season that I fear. I worry about because

0:43:44.378 --> 0:43:47.258
<v Speaker 2>this is a huge off season for his development. This

0:43:47.338 --> 0:43:49.298
<v Speaker 2>is the year two leap right right that he should

0:43:49.338 --> 0:43:52.338
<v Speaker 2>be in the lab working with his whoever it is,

0:43:52.378 --> 0:43:54.738
<v Speaker 2>you know, Clyde Christensen or whoever he decides to work

0:43:54.778 --> 0:43:56.858
<v Speaker 2>with in the off season. That's who he worked with

0:43:57.018 --> 0:43:59.578
<v Speaker 2>pre draft and down at North Carolina, so I assume

0:43:59.618 --> 0:44:02.938
<v Speaker 2>it would be the same. He is supposed to be

0:44:02.978 --> 0:44:06.058
<v Speaker 2>in the gym working out, he's supposed to be throwing,

0:44:06.098 --> 0:44:08.218
<v Speaker 2>he's supposed to be working on his craft. He's supposed

0:44:08.258 --> 0:44:11.498
<v Speaker 2>to be working with receivers and having passing camps and

0:44:11.538 --> 0:44:14.018
<v Speaker 2>things like that with the receivers away from the facility.

0:44:14.898 --> 0:44:17.978
<v Speaker 2>If he isn't able to do all those things, and

0:44:18.018 --> 0:44:21.178
<v Speaker 2>god forbid, if he's at all limited in training camp

0:44:21.258 --> 0:44:24.618
<v Speaker 2>next year, yeah, that is very detrimental to your twenty

0:44:24.658 --> 0:44:27.658
<v Speaker 2>twenty five season. It could be detrimental to his whole career.

0:44:27.658 --> 0:44:29.938
<v Speaker 2>I don't need to be hyperbolic about it, but it could.

0:44:30.138 --> 0:44:33.418
<v Speaker 2>It could literally derail a lot of his development. So

0:44:33.458 --> 0:44:37.378
<v Speaker 2>that I have big, big fears about. But to segue,

0:44:37.738 --> 0:44:40.418
<v Speaker 2>what I don't have necessarily is big of a fear about.

0:44:40.458 --> 0:44:42.538
<v Speaker 2>And I think we might disagree a little bit on this.

0:44:43.338 --> 0:44:48.218
<v Speaker 2>I am not as gung ho or like married or

0:44:49.458 --> 0:44:53.778
<v Speaker 2>you know, inclined to need the number one overall pick.

0:44:53.898 --> 0:44:57.378
<v Speaker 2>I don't in this particular year. So if there was

0:44:57.418 --> 0:45:02.777
<v Speaker 2>a Trevor Lawrence, Caleb Williams, you know, level quarterback prospect, well,

0:45:02.938 --> 0:45:05.018
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of years, if there was that level

0:45:05.018 --> 0:45:09.178
<v Speaker 2>of quarterback prospect where you knew definitively that you were

0:45:09.178 --> 0:45:11.978
<v Speaker 2>going to get an absolute you know, Andrew Luck, that

0:45:12.058 --> 0:45:14.458
<v Speaker 2>you were going to get an absolute haul for the

0:45:14.538 --> 0:45:17.978
<v Speaker 2>number one overall pick. I'd feel very, very differently. But

0:45:18.138 --> 0:45:20.458
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel as though this is this draft. I

0:45:20.738 --> 0:45:23.018
<v Speaker 2>even if you do get the number one overall pick

0:45:23.458 --> 0:45:25.498
<v Speaker 2>and you do get a partner to trade down with,

0:45:25.698 --> 0:45:27.538
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's gonna be at the same level.

0:45:27.538 --> 0:45:30.018
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna be a discounted sale. Now we'll

0:45:30.018 --> 0:45:31.897
<v Speaker 2>get to that the second because I'd still do it. Yeah,

0:45:31.938 --> 0:45:34.258
<v Speaker 2>I'd still do it, But I don't think that you're

0:45:34.338 --> 0:45:36.978
<v Speaker 2>going to get I don't even think you're gonna get

0:45:37.058 --> 0:45:39.658
<v Speaker 2>what the Bears got from Carolina a couple of years ago.

0:45:39.738 --> 0:45:42.058
<v Speaker 2>I know I think you will. I I we're close

0:45:42.138 --> 0:45:42.498
<v Speaker 2>to it.

0:45:42.738 --> 0:45:44.897
<v Speaker 3>Just because it is the first overall pick, it does

0:45:44.938 --> 0:45:46.777
<v Speaker 3>have inherent value. And at the end of the day,

0:45:47.098 --> 0:45:49.938
<v Speaker 3>you don't need every team to love the top quarterback,

0:45:50.138 --> 0:45:51.698
<v Speaker 3>but you need to get No.

0:45:51.738 --> 0:45:52.978
<v Speaker 2>You don't know, you don't do no.

0:45:53.338 --> 0:45:55.858
<v Speaker 3>You just need one team and a really good negotiating.

0:45:55.418 --> 0:45:57.817
<v Speaker 2>No, you absolutely need multiple teams. You need one team

0:45:57.898 --> 0:46:00.458
<v Speaker 2>a really good negotiating at least need the how many

0:46:00.498 --> 0:46:02.538
<v Speaker 2>facade of multiple how many teams were do you remember

0:46:02.618 --> 0:46:05.058
<v Speaker 2>how many teams were clamoring to get up for Bryce Young?

0:46:05.178 --> 0:46:06.098
<v Speaker 3>It was like three?

0:46:06.378 --> 0:46:09.337
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but that creates a market, like if you if

0:46:09.378 --> 0:46:12.817
<v Speaker 2>there's only one team, Let's say the only team that

0:46:13.018 --> 0:46:15.698
<v Speaker 2>has any interest in drafting Shador Sanders in the top

0:46:15.698 --> 0:46:18.418
<v Speaker 2>ten is the Vegas Raiders for obvious reasons. Yep, it's

0:46:18.458 --> 0:46:20.297
<v Speaker 2>been all over it right like that. He wants to say.

0:46:20.338 --> 0:46:22.098
<v Speaker 3>If you look at it and you say that because

0:46:22.098 --> 0:46:24.138
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders are at eight right now, this is what

0:46:24.218 --> 0:46:26.618
<v Speaker 3>it costs for nine a couple of years ago, pay up.

0:46:26.898 --> 0:46:29.058
<v Speaker 3>And if the Raiders say, we won't, say fine, you're

0:46:29.058 --> 0:46:30.018
<v Speaker 3>not gonna have a quarterback.

0:46:30.498 --> 0:46:32.418
<v Speaker 2>How do you know that they're not gonna have a quarterback? Though?

0:46:32.658 --> 0:46:35.218
<v Speaker 3>Like Shure's not falling to nine if they don't find

0:46:35.258 --> 0:46:38.618
<v Speaker 3>not because should you think is gonna fall the nine?

0:46:39.098 --> 0:46:40.658
<v Speaker 3>You think we're gonna go eight picks without the court?

0:46:40.698 --> 0:46:42.698
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, this is not This has bugging the crap

0:46:42.738 --> 0:46:44.538
<v Speaker 3>out of me. It's not twenty twenty two. I think

0:46:44.658 --> 0:46:47.777
<v Speaker 3>these guys are not Kenny Pickett. Shad Sanders is such

0:46:47.818 --> 0:46:49.898
<v Speaker 3>a better prospect I think than Kenny Pickett was. I

0:46:49.938 --> 0:46:52.538
<v Speaker 3>think he's he's a significantly he's a lot closer.

0:46:52.538 --> 0:46:54.978
<v Speaker 2>I'm not young than he is. To Kenny Pickett. I'm

0:46:55.018 --> 0:46:57.898
<v Speaker 2>not giving up anything for Sanders, He's a lot. If

0:46:57.938 --> 0:46:59.458
<v Speaker 2>I'm the Vegas Raiders.

0:46:59.218 --> 0:47:01.777
<v Speaker 3>These teams are so dumb about quarterbacks.

0:47:01.258 --> 0:47:03.218
<v Speaker 2>I hear you. But if I'm the Vegas Raiders, and

0:47:03.258 --> 0:47:06.698
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that I wouldn't put a package together.

0:47:07.458 --> 0:47:09.578
<v Speaker 2>But if I'm the Vegas Raiders, I'm putting together a

0:47:10.178 --> 0:47:15.258
<v Speaker 2>realistic package. Not what people want from a Patriots angle,

0:47:15.298 --> 0:47:18.658
<v Speaker 2>not multiple first round picks into the future. I'm putting

0:47:18.738 --> 0:47:21.458
<v Speaker 2>it together, a realistic package. And I'm saying to the Patriots,

0:47:21.618 --> 0:47:23.658
<v Speaker 2>if you don't want to take the deal, We're gonna

0:47:23.698 --> 0:47:26.458
<v Speaker 2>roll the dice, make the Giants take them second over.

0:47:26.738 --> 0:47:28.498
<v Speaker 2>And so all right, you want to talk about the Giants,

0:47:28.538 --> 0:47:30.218
<v Speaker 2>because I think the Giants are gonna do something different

0:47:30.258 --> 0:47:31.058
<v Speaker 2>if they keep table.

0:47:31.218 --> 0:47:37.978
<v Speaker 3>I that clip of It's Shane, right, Joe Shane. Yeah,

0:47:38.098 --> 0:47:41.338
<v Speaker 3>that clip of Joe Shane essentially hanging up on Elliott

0:47:41.338 --> 0:47:44.618
<v Speaker 3>Wolf last year with the or Elliewolf hanging up on

0:47:44.658 --> 0:47:46.658
<v Speaker 3>Joe Shane with the offer for Drake May and Elliot

0:47:46.698 --> 0:47:49.578
<v Speaker 3>Wolf was a million percent right to do that. Yeah,

0:47:50.138 --> 0:47:55.338
<v Speaker 3>in New York Giants land, that clip is like Buckner

0:47:55.418 --> 0:47:57.178
<v Speaker 3>the ball going through Buckner's legs in eighty six to

0:47:57.218 --> 0:48:00.297
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox fans. Joe Shane has had to eat that

0:48:00.378 --> 0:48:03.618
<v Speaker 3>clip from fans from the media all year. If I'm

0:48:03.618 --> 0:48:05.538
<v Speaker 3>the page, because he didn't offer enough to make Because

0:48:05.538 --> 0:48:06.978
<v Speaker 3>he didn't offer enough to make the trade.

0:48:06.818 --> 0:48:08.378
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anything was going to make him make

0:48:08.378 --> 0:48:10.058
<v Speaker 2>the trade. And I don't think so either. Like, obviously

0:48:10.098 --> 0:48:12.138
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so either. If he said if it

0:48:12.178 --> 0:48:15.297
<v Speaker 2>was you know, two three threes three two three three, right,

0:48:15.498 --> 0:48:18.218
<v Speaker 2>it would have to have been something crazy.

0:48:18.258 --> 0:48:22.338
<v Speaker 3>But there's still a frustration that that wasn't made. And

0:48:22.378 --> 0:48:26.178
<v Speaker 3>we know NFL teams are reactive to public perception that

0:48:26.298 --> 0:48:29.538
<v Speaker 3>clip no team should ever do in season off season

0:48:29.538 --> 0:48:33.377
<v Speaker 3>hard knocks. Ever, again, that clip is going to sort

0:48:33.378 --> 0:48:35.658
<v Speaker 3>of be the obituary when the Giants move on from him.

0:48:35.858 --> 0:48:37.018
<v Speaker 3>That's gonna be a big part of it.

0:48:39.858 --> 0:48:42.178
<v Speaker 2>Saying that he's never gonna sleep again if Saquon goes

0:48:42.218 --> 0:48:43.818
<v Speaker 2>to the Eagles, and then he goes to the Eagles,

0:48:43.818 --> 0:48:47.338
<v Speaker 2>and the point being like if I'm the Patriots.

0:48:47.338 --> 0:48:50.337
<v Speaker 3>I'm reminding everybody, you want to risk passing on him,

0:48:50.418 --> 0:48:52.178
<v Speaker 3>you want to risk your job passing on the guy.

0:48:52.418 --> 0:48:56.378
<v Speaker 2>I'm not telling the Patriots. I try. I just think

0:48:56.418 --> 0:48:57.338
<v Speaker 2>it's nuts.

0:48:58.018 --> 0:49:00.378
<v Speaker 3>I don't know my theory, and I don't need to

0:49:00.458 --> 0:49:02.458
<v Speaker 3>kind of be in a hole about it. I think

0:49:02.458 --> 0:49:04.618
<v Speaker 3>there's a certain group of Patriots fans that want Travis

0:49:04.698 --> 0:49:07.218
<v Speaker 3>Hunter so bad but know it's kind of an irresponsible

0:49:07.258 --> 0:49:10.658
<v Speaker 3>pick that their argument is to prove that no pick

0:49:10.738 --> 0:49:13.418
<v Speaker 3>is good and there's nothing else the Patriots can do,

0:49:13.538 --> 0:49:15.658
<v Speaker 3>so they have to take Hunter. And I think that's

0:49:15.698 --> 0:49:18.138
<v Speaker 3>kind of where this quarterback stuff is coming from. Shadur

0:49:18.258 --> 0:49:22.938
<v Speaker 3>Sanders is a legitimate top five quarterback prospect. I think

0:49:23.018 --> 0:49:26.578
<v Speaker 3>cam Ward is a legitimate top five quarterback.

0:49:27.378 --> 0:49:30.698
<v Speaker 2>A single person that that like a single draft you know,

0:49:30.818 --> 0:49:33.378
<v Speaker 2>analysts that does it year round, like Dame Brugler is

0:49:33.378 --> 0:49:35.458
<v Speaker 2>saying that he'd have been quarterback seven for him in

0:49:35.538 --> 0:49:39.098
<v Speaker 2>last year's draft, where Dane Bugler, JJ McCarthy, I don't remember,

0:49:39.178 --> 0:49:41.458
<v Speaker 2>but Hi high okay, but they all had him high,

0:49:41.858 --> 0:49:44.538
<v Speaker 2>like and where'd he go? Okay? Matt Miller just released

0:49:44.578 --> 0:49:47.138
<v Speaker 2>his like first round grades. He has twelve of them

0:49:47.138 --> 0:49:48.698
<v Speaker 2>this year, he said, you know, he doesn't have a lot.

0:49:49.058 --> 0:49:52.818
<v Speaker 2>Neither quarterback is on there. That's crazy. Should here Sanders before?

0:49:52.978 --> 0:49:56.857
<v Speaker 2>So last year, before uh deon kind of started talking

0:49:56.858 --> 0:49:58.658
<v Speaker 2>about who's going back to school when we were really

0:49:58.698 --> 0:50:02.538
<v Speaker 2>talking about Shoulder Sanders in that class, he was QB

0:50:02.658 --> 0:50:05.538
<v Speaker 2>four if not QB three. Okay, so you're gonna take

0:50:05.578 --> 0:50:08.378
<v Speaker 2>a guy that You're gonna take that guy number one overall,

0:50:08.458 --> 0:50:10.538
<v Speaker 2>not not just number one overall. You're gonna trade up

0:50:10.578 --> 0:50:11.298
<v Speaker 2>and you're gonna.

0:50:11.098 --> 0:50:14.818
<v Speaker 3>Get yes, because teams are nuts about the quarterback position.

0:50:15.018 --> 0:50:18.538
<v Speaker 3>But that's so what happened, what happened between last year

0:50:18.538 --> 0:50:20.898
<v Speaker 3>and this year that should Her Sanders suddenly worse because

0:50:20.898 --> 0:50:21.618
<v Speaker 3>he got better.

0:50:22.138 --> 0:50:23.818
<v Speaker 2>He got better between I.

0:50:23.858 --> 0:50:26.618
<v Speaker 3>Don't know why everybody who he is, but no, but

0:50:26.698 --> 0:50:28.817
<v Speaker 3>he But so then what was he last year?

0:50:28.978 --> 0:50:30.178
<v Speaker 2>Because it's night and day.

0:50:30.618 --> 0:50:32.377
<v Speaker 3>He was talked about last year and he's being talked

0:50:32.378 --> 0:50:34.538
<v Speaker 3>about now and it doesn't line up with the product

0:50:34.538 --> 0:50:36.337
<v Speaker 3>on the field. I think everybody just wants to take

0:50:36.378 --> 0:50:39.138
<v Speaker 3>their weird victory lap that this draft class sucks. Is

0:50:39.178 --> 0:50:40.018
<v Speaker 3>it a great class?

0:50:40.098 --> 0:50:40.658
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not.

0:50:40.978 --> 0:50:43.298
<v Speaker 3>But that doesn't mean there's zero good players in it.

0:50:43.338 --> 0:50:45.618
<v Speaker 3>And that seems to be everybody's argument that you'd be

0:50:45.618 --> 0:50:48.018
<v Speaker 3>better off just not picking a player this year, And

0:50:48.058 --> 0:50:49.298
<v Speaker 3>it's mind blowing to me.

0:50:49.418 --> 0:50:51.018
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say that. I didn't say you're better off

0:50:51.098 --> 0:50:53.098
<v Speaker 2>not picking a player. I do think you have to

0:50:53.138 --> 0:50:55.818
<v Speaker 2>be selective in a draft like this because there's a

0:50:55.818 --> 0:51:00.938
<v Speaker 2>lot of guys that, in my opinion, are low ceiling

0:51:01.178 --> 0:51:05.018
<v Speaker 2>maybe high floor, but low ceiling players, and you don't

0:51:05.018 --> 0:51:07.978
<v Speaker 2>want to pick a guy one to one overall who's like,

0:51:08.098 --> 0:51:10.898
<v Speaker 2>at best, is going to be like a functional NFL starter.

0:51:11.058 --> 0:51:14.618
<v Speaker 3>Look right, I'm glad the Patriots didn't punt on quarterback

0:51:14.698 --> 0:51:16.178
<v Speaker 3>last year. I would not want to deal with this

0:51:16.258 --> 0:51:18.698
<v Speaker 3>quarterback class if I was a team. But there are

0:51:18.738 --> 0:51:22.178
<v Speaker 3>general managers, there are coaches out there that need a

0:51:22.298 --> 0:51:25.098
<v Speaker 3>quarterback to save their jobs. That is the nature of

0:51:25.098 --> 0:51:26.297
<v Speaker 3>the position in this league.

0:51:26.338 --> 0:51:29.418
<v Speaker 2>But it's not just saving your job because you're willing,

0:51:30.778 --> 0:51:33.738
<v Speaker 2>is not just taking the quarterback. I believe that Shador

0:51:33.858 --> 0:51:37.058
<v Speaker 2>Sanders will go in the top ten. But if I,

0:51:37.218 --> 0:51:39.578
<v Speaker 2>first of all, if I'm the Giants at you, I'm

0:51:39.618 --> 0:51:43.738
<v Speaker 2>probably strongly considering like a Baker Mayfield Gino Smith type

0:51:43.738 --> 0:51:46.378
<v Speaker 2>of approach where I'm I might look in the veteran

0:51:46.458 --> 0:51:50.738
<v Speaker 2>market at a Sam Darnold. Yeah, or I might call

0:51:50.898 --> 0:51:53.978
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota and ask if JJ McCarthy is available. So all right,

0:51:54.058 --> 0:51:56.698
<v Speaker 2>let me ask you about this chapter said yesterday on ESPN,

0:51:56.778 --> 0:52:00.817
<v Speaker 2>J McCarthy is worth a first plus? What's worth more

0:52:01.258 --> 0:52:06.458
<v Speaker 2>JJ McCarthy or the first pick in the draft in

0:52:06.498 --> 0:52:08.458
<v Speaker 2>this year? It might be JJ McCarthy.

0:52:08.538 --> 0:52:12.018
<v Speaker 3>How is a guy who was ranked behind Sanders last

0:52:12.058 --> 0:52:13.298
<v Speaker 3>year and has since I.

0:52:13.618 --> 0:52:16.498
<v Speaker 2>Tore his acl who was ranking him behind Sanders?

0:52:16.778 --> 0:52:19.138
<v Speaker 3>That was the I remember what the consensus was last

0:52:19.218 --> 0:52:22.018
<v Speaker 3>year when Sanders dropped out. We were talking about Sanders

0:52:22.018 --> 0:52:25.898
<v Speaker 3>in the same breath as May and Daniels and yes.

0:52:25.778 --> 0:52:29.098
<v Speaker 2>We yes, we were, Yes we were. We were people

0:52:29.138 --> 0:52:31.578
<v Speaker 2>talked about. The table was talking about him in the

0:52:31.578 --> 0:52:34.698
<v Speaker 2>same breath as May and Daniel. I remember though, it

0:52:34.818 --> 0:52:38.698
<v Speaker 2>was certainly in the McCarthy knicks. Like you want to

0:52:38.738 --> 0:52:41.297
<v Speaker 2>make the argument that he was quarterback for next year

0:52:41.418 --> 0:52:43.498
<v Speaker 2>or last year, if you put him in last year's class,

0:52:43.578 --> 0:52:46.378
<v Speaker 2>I'm willing to let you make that argument, like you

0:52:46.378 --> 0:52:47.978
<v Speaker 2>would you would put him ahead of Penix.

0:52:49.458 --> 0:52:51.578
<v Speaker 3>Everybody at Penis is a second round pick. Do you

0:52:51.618 --> 0:52:52.218
<v Speaker 3>not remember this?

0:52:52.538 --> 0:52:54.098
<v Speaker 2>You were the one that didn't. So I'm trying to

0:52:54.098 --> 0:52:54.778
<v Speaker 2>give you credit.

0:52:55.138 --> 0:52:58.458
<v Speaker 3>I know, and this is me telling you I have generally,

0:52:58.658 --> 0:53:00.898
<v Speaker 3>have I or have I not been generally? Will Levis

0:53:00.978 --> 0:53:03.298
<v Speaker 3>was another one. I was the one on here. Okay,

0:53:03.338 --> 0:53:07.458
<v Speaker 3>so furious that people are talking about but these guys

0:53:07.738 --> 0:53:10.297
<v Speaker 3>you that you were right on. You're telling me now

0:53:10.338 --> 0:53:12.458
<v Speaker 3>that Shador Sanders is worth the number one overall.

0:53:12.498 --> 0:53:12.698
<v Speaker 2>Pick.

0:53:13.138 --> 0:53:15.538
<v Speaker 3>I feel like he's not telling you. I'm not telling you.

0:53:15.858 --> 0:53:17.818
<v Speaker 3>I'm not telling you he's worth the number one overall.

0:53:17.858 --> 0:53:18.018
<v Speaker 6>Pick.

0:53:18.218 --> 0:53:20.538
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling you that generally have a pretty good understanding

0:53:20.538 --> 0:53:22.418
<v Speaker 3>of how the quarterback market is going to shake out.

0:53:22.698 --> 0:53:24.857
<v Speaker 2>And I'm giving you your flowers for that. But I'm

0:53:24.898 --> 0:53:27.298
<v Speaker 2>also letting you know that the film is the film

0:53:27.498 --> 0:53:30.458
<v Speaker 2>and he is not the film was you cannot if

0:53:30.538 --> 0:53:32.898
<v Speaker 2>you're a general manager. And again I said, if I

0:53:33.018 --> 0:53:35.738
<v Speaker 2>was the Raiders and I really fell in love with Shador, okay,

0:53:36.138 --> 0:53:39.818
<v Speaker 2>I would offer a package to move up to number one.

0:53:39.978 --> 0:53:42.258
<v Speaker 2>I just wouldn't make the offer as good as it was.

0:53:42.498 --> 0:53:45.298
<v Speaker 2>Would have been a couple of years ago for better prospects,

0:53:45.338 --> 0:53:47.338
<v Speaker 2>right like I wouldn't have made the same offer that

0:53:47.418 --> 0:53:50.218
<v Speaker 2>the Bears made for the I keep doing that the

0:53:50.218 --> 0:53:53.858
<v Speaker 2>Panther's made for Bryce Young. If it was like Trevor

0:53:53.938 --> 0:53:58.058
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence's draft or Joe Burrow's draft or one of those situations,

0:53:58.098 --> 0:54:01.738
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't go there. Like Joe Burrow, if like that

0:54:01.818 --> 0:54:04.858
<v Speaker 2>pick was for sale for the Bengals, like, that's like

0:54:04.938 --> 0:54:07.418
<v Speaker 2>an RG three type trade, right, Like that's like.

0:54:08.218 --> 0:54:10.897
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So I'm not necessarily saying they'll get the same,

0:54:10.938 --> 0:54:14.498
<v Speaker 3>but I think they'll get something significant because again.

0:54:14.418 --> 0:54:18.218
<v Speaker 2>The league is weird about quarterbacks. They don't really look

0:54:18.258 --> 0:54:21.458
<v Speaker 2>at the value of the player specifically himself.

0:54:21.738 --> 0:54:24.817
<v Speaker 3>It's I need a quarterback to save my job. Who

0:54:24.858 --> 0:54:27.498
<v Speaker 3>is the best player available? That is often how the

0:54:27.578 --> 0:54:28.578
<v Speaker 3>league looks at it.

0:54:28.618 --> 0:54:31.337
<v Speaker 2>Sanders is gonna Jam's going to kill you because you're

0:54:31.338 --> 0:54:33.777
<v Speaker 2>gonna go and you're gonna take Shador Sanders. He's not

0:54:33.818 --> 0:54:36.378
<v Speaker 2>gonna be good enough to change the course of your franchise.

0:54:36.578 --> 0:54:38.218
<v Speaker 2>And then the next year that takes over, he's gonna

0:54:38.218 --> 0:54:40.298
<v Speaker 2>have no future first round picks because you trained.

0:54:40.138 --> 0:54:42.858
<v Speaker 3>And how many quarterbacks have been drafted in the exact

0:54:42.938 --> 0:54:44.098
<v Speaker 3>scenario you just laid out.

0:54:44.378 --> 0:54:48.458
<v Speaker 2>So let me ask you this, because we're arguing. Okay, wait,

0:54:48.538 --> 0:54:49.337
<v Speaker 2>let me make one more point.

0:54:49.338 --> 0:54:50.857
<v Speaker 3>Then I'll get to point of ultimately trying to get

0:54:50.858 --> 0:54:54.218
<v Speaker 3>to Okay, if the Patriots trade the first overall pick

0:54:54.258 --> 0:54:56.538
<v Speaker 3>for less than what JJ McCarthy goes for their nuts,

0:54:56.658 --> 0:54:59.418
<v Speaker 3>there's no reason a guy who has won last year

0:54:59.458 --> 0:55:02.618
<v Speaker 3>on his contract and just blew out his knee should

0:55:02.618 --> 0:55:04.538
<v Speaker 3>be worth more than the first overall pick in the

0:55:04.618 --> 0:55:07.018
<v Speaker 3>draft when the quarterback that's most likely to go there

0:55:07.218 --> 0:55:08.738
<v Speaker 3>was ranked ahead of him last year and we were

0:55:08.738 --> 0:55:10.418
<v Speaker 3>doing headdame, true, We're false.

0:55:10.698 --> 0:55:12.738
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he was ranked ahead. I think

0:55:12.738 --> 0:55:15.578
<v Speaker 2>that everybody's gonna say that JJ McCarthy was a better prospect.

0:55:15.658 --> 0:55:16.578
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at it right now.

0:55:16.578 --> 0:55:19.138
<v Speaker 3>The last big book, the last consensus big board from

0:55:19.218 --> 0:55:22.138
<v Speaker 3>last year that j Sanders was on, had him seventeenth.

0:55:22.218 --> 0:55:23.898
<v Speaker 3>I don't know where McCarthy was at that point, but

0:55:24.058 --> 0:55:25.298
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he was seventeenth.

0:55:25.338 --> 0:55:28.578
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let me ask you this, because we're gonna

0:55:28.658 --> 0:55:31.458
<v Speaker 2>argue on yeah, for the next six months about this subject.

0:55:31.898 --> 0:55:35.018
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you this, what is a realistic trade

0:55:35.378 --> 0:55:38.258
<v Speaker 2>that you would accept as the Patriots, Because to me,

0:55:38.698 --> 0:55:42.178
<v Speaker 2>the realistic trade that I would look at is probably

0:55:43.018 --> 0:55:45.458
<v Speaker 2>obviously your swapping picks this year in the first round

0:55:45.938 --> 0:55:49.298
<v Speaker 2>I would get a twenty twenty five Day two pick,

0:55:49.338 --> 0:55:51.538
<v Speaker 2>like a second or third round pick this year, on

0:55:51.618 --> 0:55:54.898
<v Speaker 2>top of that a first round pick next year twenty

0:55:54.938 --> 0:55:57.978
<v Speaker 2>twenty six first, and maybe if you could pry it

0:55:57.978 --> 0:56:00.618
<v Speaker 2>out of them like a twenty twenty six third. So okay,

0:56:00.778 --> 0:56:04.538
<v Speaker 2>that well, So it's basically the Panthers Bears trade without

0:56:04.618 --> 0:56:05.258
<v Speaker 2>DJ Moore.

0:56:05.378 --> 0:56:09.938
<v Speaker 3>So this goes to my take about Sunday's game. Yeah,

0:56:10.738 --> 0:56:15.938
<v Speaker 3>I the first getting the first overall pick this year

0:56:16.658 --> 0:56:18.578
<v Speaker 3>is not about this offseason.

0:56:19.498 --> 0:56:22.297
<v Speaker 2>It's really about such a U take. Just listen. I'm

0:56:22.338 --> 0:56:24.298
<v Speaker 2>not saying you're wrong, but it's just it's.

0:56:24.178 --> 0:56:26.777
<v Speaker 3>Really about because I this is what I this is

0:56:26.778 --> 0:56:29.178
<v Speaker 3>what you got to do all your film stuff all

0:56:29.298 --> 0:56:29.738
<v Speaker 3>year and.

0:56:29.698 --> 0:56:33.658
<v Speaker 2>Talk about DV and whatever. Okay, and I mostly let.

0:56:33.658 --> 0:56:34.098
<v Speaker 4>You do it.

0:56:34.298 --> 0:56:35.898
<v Speaker 2>I like Sean McDonough by the way.

0:56:36.178 --> 0:56:38.378
<v Speaker 3>I think he's good. Test the tour was awesome yesterday. Okay,

0:56:38.378 --> 0:56:39.138
<v Speaker 3>I know people don't like it.

0:56:39.258 --> 0:56:40.417
<v Speaker 2>No one knows what we're talking about.

0:56:40.698 --> 0:56:45.018
<v Speaker 3>Sunday is about the off season in twenty twenty six. Agreed,

0:56:45.538 --> 0:56:49.138
<v Speaker 3>it's they can do what they need to do this

0:56:49.258 --> 0:56:52.858
<v Speaker 3>off season without the first overall pick. Agree or disagree,

0:56:52.858 --> 0:56:54.658
<v Speaker 3>they can have the off season they need to have. Okay,

0:56:54.858 --> 0:56:58.297
<v Speaker 3>so when you talk about a trade, obviously you're you're

0:56:58.338 --> 0:57:00.698
<v Speaker 3>swapping picks, right, I'm getting whatever I get back. And

0:57:00.778 --> 0:57:02.138
<v Speaker 3>some of this is how far are you moving down?

0:57:02.178 --> 0:57:03.897
<v Speaker 3>You're moving to four, you move in to eight. Right.

0:57:05.258 --> 0:57:08.897
<v Speaker 3>The next ask for me is a future first. Yep,

0:57:08.978 --> 0:57:11.738
<v Speaker 3>that is the most important asset the Patriots can get.

0:57:11.898 --> 0:57:15.178
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely after that, and this is where I people think

0:57:15.218 --> 0:57:17.098
<v Speaker 3>maybe I'm trying to pump up the draft class more

0:57:17.138 --> 0:57:19.818
<v Speaker 3>than more than I should. My next ask after the

0:57:19.858 --> 0:57:23.938
<v Speaker 3>future first is a future second. Okay, that's I would

0:57:24.058 --> 0:57:28.578
<v Speaker 3>rather have a second, right, But I think I agree

0:57:28.578 --> 0:57:31.378
<v Speaker 3>with you. But isn't every isn't every GM gonna know

0:57:31.858 --> 0:57:35.018
<v Speaker 3>that the picks in twenty twenty six are more valuable. Well,

0:57:35.138 --> 0:57:40.778
<v Speaker 3>the idea would be, if you're drafting a quarterback, and

0:57:40.858 --> 0:57:42.858
<v Speaker 3>also one other take, you might get a haul for

0:57:42.858 --> 0:57:45.698
<v Speaker 3>Travis Hunter two. But if you're drafting a quarterback.

0:57:46.058 --> 0:57:46.338
<v Speaker 2>Crazy.

0:57:46.538 --> 0:57:48.418
<v Speaker 3>If you're drafting quarterback, the idea is you're going to

0:57:48.458 --> 0:57:50.338
<v Speaker 3>be better. You want to be the commanders, right, Yeah,

0:57:51.138 --> 0:57:54.698
<v Speaker 3>would you rather give up the thirty fifth pick in

0:57:54.698 --> 0:57:58.098
<v Speaker 3>this draft or the fifty fifth pick in next year's draft?

0:57:58.218 --> 0:58:01.018
<v Speaker 2>Well? And we know that this is how it works.

0:58:01.978 --> 0:58:04.138
<v Speaker 2>You might think that the player at fifty five next

0:58:04.178 --> 0:58:05.058
<v Speaker 2>year is going to be better.

0:58:04.898 --> 0:58:06.818
<v Speaker 3>Than Okay, so that it comes down to that, So

0:58:07.338 --> 0:58:08.818
<v Speaker 3>run me through your trade again.

0:58:08.858 --> 0:58:11.538
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's just again, it's just Yeah. Basically, the Bears

0:58:11.578 --> 0:58:13.818
<v Speaker 2>Panthers trade from a couple of years ago for Bryce

0:58:13.898 --> 0:58:16.858
<v Speaker 2>Young without Dj Moore. So it's swap your first ye

0:58:17.218 --> 0:58:19.858
<v Speaker 2>give a future first round pick, a second round pick

0:58:19.898 --> 0:58:21.258
<v Speaker 2>this year, and a third next year.

0:58:22.018 --> 0:58:26.178
<v Speaker 3>So at that point what I would rather do, keep

0:58:27.378 --> 0:58:30.178
<v Speaker 3>the third and get a player I would rather get.

0:58:30.458 --> 0:58:34.778
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather get a player too, Yeah, but not living

0:58:34.778 --> 0:58:37.098
<v Speaker 2>in La La Land. Yeah, I don't think the value

0:58:37.178 --> 0:58:40.818
<v Speaker 2>is necessarily there. Now, if you're telling me that the

0:58:41.218 --> 0:58:46.658
<v Speaker 2>player you're getting back is Jakobe Myers, like a good player,

0:58:46.698 --> 0:58:48.178
<v Speaker 2>but not a not Max Crosby.

0:58:48.858 --> 0:58:50.778
<v Speaker 3>Well, so when we do the Raiders and am I've

0:58:50.778 --> 0:58:51.898
<v Speaker 3>looked at? Is Colton Miller?

0:58:52.418 --> 0:58:54.698
<v Speaker 2>Sure? But I don't that one. I find really hard

0:58:54.698 --> 0:58:56.658
<v Speaker 2>to believe that they would do. He's a twenty nine

0:58:56.698 --> 0:59:00.098
<v Speaker 2>year old tackle, he's very good, and you're drafting a

0:59:00.178 --> 0:59:02.258
<v Speaker 2>rookie quarterback and now you're not gonna have a blindside

0:59:02.258 --> 0:59:04.338
<v Speaker 2>protector and you're not gonna have any assets to get one,

0:59:04.378 --> 0:59:08.738
<v Speaker 2>And I think, yeah, he's entering a contract here. Okay,

0:59:08.778 --> 0:59:11.018
<v Speaker 2>but again, like, where's your left tackle coming from?

0:59:11.058 --> 0:59:13.338
<v Speaker 3>But are you gonna pay a thirty year old tack?

0:59:13.418 --> 0:59:15.378
<v Speaker 3>He's a pre agent, right, are you gonna pay a

0:59:15.378 --> 0:59:16.138
<v Speaker 3>thirty year old tackle?

0:59:16.498 --> 0:59:18.218
<v Speaker 2>Just did it with Garret Bowles? All right, fair enough,

0:59:18.258 --> 0:59:22.578
<v Speaker 2>same scenario. So I think you're right. It's it's first, second,

0:59:22.618 --> 0:59:23.258
<v Speaker 2>first third.

0:59:23.418 --> 0:59:27.538
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Honestly, to me, even if you're like, let's say

0:59:27.538 --> 0:59:31.338
<v Speaker 3>it's the Giants, right, let's say you're moving down one spot, swap,

0:59:31.338 --> 0:59:32.978
<v Speaker 3>give me next year's first, I'm done. I don't need

0:59:32.978 --> 0:59:35.618
<v Speaker 3>any more picks in that I would.

0:59:35.818 --> 0:59:38.178
<v Speaker 2>I would like a Day two pick. It doesn't I'd

0:59:38.218 --> 0:59:40.218
<v Speaker 2>like it. It doesn't have to be my full trade.

0:59:40.218 --> 0:59:42.098
<v Speaker 2>Like if you only get one more Day two back,

0:59:42.498 --> 0:59:46.658
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay. I am with you, though in general that

0:59:48.178 --> 0:59:51.178
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that you roll over in negotiations. But

0:59:51.458 --> 0:59:55.658
<v Speaker 2>I'm not necessarily gonna be too upset. You know, if

0:59:55.698 --> 0:59:57.978
<v Speaker 2>they take a little bit of a discount because of

0:59:57.978 --> 1:00:00.818
<v Speaker 2>the year, because of the draft class, I still would

1:00:00.858 --> 1:00:02.818
<v Speaker 2>do it. I still think it's more important to get

1:00:02.818 --> 1:00:04.978
<v Speaker 2>the package of picks to not do it at all.

1:00:05.018 --> 1:00:08.858
<v Speaker 3>I think the prize here is twenty twenty twenty six.

1:00:08.938 --> 1:00:11.698
<v Speaker 3>If they get that and obviously swap, you can't move

1:00:11.698 --> 1:00:12.538
<v Speaker 3>out of the first round.

1:00:12.578 --> 1:00:15.498
<v Speaker 2>The sea and I so the Fred and I got

1:00:15.538 --> 1:00:17.578
<v Speaker 2>in and I don't know how far.

1:00:17.698 --> 1:00:20.538
<v Speaker 3>So there's two trades in the last twenty five years

1:00:20.578 --> 1:00:23.738
<v Speaker 3>of the first overall pick. One was the Bears Panthers

1:00:23.738 --> 1:00:27.418
<v Speaker 3>back time. Yeah, the Titans moved back to fifteen, right,

1:00:27.858 --> 1:00:30.538
<v Speaker 3>I think the furthest I go back is mate. So

1:00:30.458 --> 1:00:35.138
<v Speaker 3>so let's say the Raiders fall to nine, which is realistic. Yeah, first, second,

1:00:35.258 --> 1:00:38.818
<v Speaker 3>future first, and then one of Max Crosby or Colton Miller.

1:00:39.618 --> 1:00:40.698
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot. That's a lot.

1:00:40.698 --> 1:00:42.178
<v Speaker 3>But you're moving all the way back to nine. So

1:00:42.258 --> 1:00:44.938
<v Speaker 3>now you probably don't have a shot at Banks, Carter

1:00:45.338 --> 1:00:49.538
<v Speaker 3>or Campbell. If I'm going to pass on Banks, Carter

1:00:49.578 --> 1:00:51.378
<v Speaker 3>and Campbell, I need a ship player.

1:00:51.578 --> 1:00:54.018
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'm not totally sold. You're so you're saying

1:00:54.178 --> 1:00:55.818
<v Speaker 2>goodbye to the to the two linemen.

1:00:55.938 --> 1:00:59.898
<v Speaker 3>But at nine, yeah, okay, because I I think so, well,

1:00:59.978 --> 1:01:02.298
<v Speaker 3>let me put it this way, probably if if at

1:01:02.378 --> 1:01:04.618
<v Speaker 3>least one of them, but but if they fall that

1:01:04.698 --> 1:01:07.098
<v Speaker 3>far they're probably guards, at which point the Patriots probably

1:01:07.098 --> 1:01:07.938
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't be interested.

1:01:08.778 --> 1:01:11.658
<v Speaker 2>Maybe. I mean, like Olufushanu went around there last year,

1:01:11.778 --> 1:01:16.018
<v Speaker 2>you know, like Telesia, but he was the third tackle. Yeah,

1:01:16.098 --> 1:01:19.138
<v Speaker 2>that's that's That's the rub about this class is that

1:01:19.218 --> 1:01:21.578
<v Speaker 2>there's not that talent. So that's so that's why I

1:01:21.578 --> 1:01:22.578
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't move that far.

1:01:22.698 --> 1:01:25.458
<v Speaker 3>So that's why move wouldn't move that far down unless

1:01:26.018 --> 1:01:28.458
<v Speaker 3>I get like a player, right, because if you get

1:01:28.698 --> 1:01:31.338
<v Speaker 3>Colton Miller, I don't mind that I passed on Will

1:01:31.378 --> 1:01:34.658
<v Speaker 3>Campbell and Calvin Brice, right, so I know, but that's

1:01:34.698 --> 1:01:36.658
<v Speaker 3>just the point. Yeah, I would try to stay in

1:01:36.658 --> 1:01:39.298
<v Speaker 3>that four to five range. And if it's just swap

1:01:39.458 --> 1:01:43.018
<v Speaker 3>next year's first and and then maybe it's give me

1:01:43.058 --> 1:01:45.298
<v Speaker 3>a Day two pick this year next year second, third,

1:01:45.378 --> 1:01:47.778
<v Speaker 3>like whatever you throw that in, I'd probably be good

1:01:47.778 --> 1:01:50.738
<v Speaker 3>with that. The real prize is that twenty twenty five first,

1:01:51.578 --> 1:01:54.018
<v Speaker 3>twenty six first, and then if you really want to

1:01:54.018 --> 1:01:55.898
<v Speaker 3>get nuts and you really want to stretch this out, Evan,

1:01:56.538 --> 1:01:58.978
<v Speaker 3>you have two first next year you trade down from

1:01:58.978 --> 1:01:59.458
<v Speaker 3>one of those.

1:01:59.538 --> 1:02:00.938
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we can get to that next you.

1:02:00.898 --> 1:02:06.058
<v Speaker 3>Now, wait, Jeremiah Smith, Yeah, it is Jeremiah Smith like

1:02:06.098 --> 1:02:07.658
<v Speaker 3>everything you've ever wanted what we have.

1:02:08.698 --> 1:02:09.218
<v Speaker 2>Is he your fair?

1:02:09.218 --> 1:02:09.538
<v Speaker 3>All right?

1:02:09.938 --> 1:02:10.298
<v Speaker 4>He is?

1:02:10.338 --> 1:02:11.018
<v Speaker 2>He is?

1:02:11.018 --> 1:02:12.138
<v Speaker 3>He already your favorite.

1:02:11.898 --> 1:02:14.098
<v Speaker 2>Draft hospital We'll get it. We'll get to it.

1:02:14.138 --> 1:02:16.858
<v Speaker 3>I want your Jeremiah say something nice about Jeremiah smith Man.

1:02:16.858 --> 1:02:19.138
<v Speaker 2>There's too many things to say nice about Jeremiah Smith.

1:02:19.298 --> 1:02:21.978
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna make you choose between Jeremiah Smith and Ryan Williams.

1:02:22.018 --> 1:02:23.098
<v Speaker 2>I think I already have a choice.

1:02:23.258 --> 1:02:23.378
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

1:02:23.738 --> 1:02:27.338
<v Speaker 2>Anyways, I I'm with you. I still do the trade

1:02:27.378 --> 1:02:31.578
<v Speaker 2>even if it is perceived, you know, perceived from relatively

1:02:31.578 --> 1:02:33.738
<v Speaker 2>speaking to other drafts as a little bit of a

1:02:34.018 --> 1:02:35.938
<v Speaker 2>of a discount, a little bit of pennies on the dollar.

1:02:36.178 --> 1:02:38.658
<v Speaker 2>I still think it's worth their while to do the

1:02:38.698 --> 1:02:42.298
<v Speaker 2>trade down because I don't. I hate, hate, hate the

1:02:42.418 --> 1:02:46.698
<v Speaker 2>idea of taking being forced into taking somebody one one

1:02:47.098 --> 1:02:48.778
<v Speaker 2>this year for the Patriots. I don't want to take

1:02:48.818 --> 1:02:52.258
<v Speaker 2>anybody at one one. I don't. I just don't. Travis

1:02:52.338 --> 1:02:56.818
<v Speaker 2>Hunter awesome talent, scares the crap out of me. Like,

1:02:56.898 --> 1:03:00.178
<v Speaker 2>what is he? Where does he play? What coaching staff

1:03:00.218 --> 1:03:01.058
<v Speaker 2>are you giving him to?

1:03:01.258 --> 1:03:01.458
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1:03:01.898 --> 1:03:04.218
<v Speaker 2>It just bad you've come around on that team. That

1:03:04.338 --> 1:03:06.578
<v Speaker 2>terrifies me. I still think he could play a receiver

1:03:06.658 --> 1:03:09.178
<v Speaker 2>in the league. I still lean towards him being a

1:03:09.178 --> 1:03:11.258
<v Speaker 2>better corner, but I think he's gonna want to play receive.

1:03:11.338 --> 1:03:14.338
<v Speaker 3>Everything I've heard is the league is drafting him as

1:03:14.338 --> 1:03:14.658
<v Speaker 3>a corner.

1:03:14.778 --> 1:03:16.738
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but he wants to play receiver. I know he does,

1:03:16.818 --> 1:03:21.698
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, he wants to play both ways. Right, I'm

1:03:21.738 --> 1:03:24.658
<v Speaker 2>coming around if I had, like you know that that

1:03:24.738 --> 1:03:27.138
<v Speaker 2>guns your head, you have to take somebody one one.

1:03:27.298 --> 1:03:29.498
<v Speaker 2>I am coming around a little bit to Abdul Carter

1:03:29.898 --> 1:03:33.698
<v Speaker 2>because the biggest reason won Walker take it is a

1:03:33.698 --> 1:03:35.898
<v Speaker 2>little bit, but I think Abdul Carter has more college

1:03:35.898 --> 1:03:39.298
<v Speaker 2>production than Trayvon Walker did. I think the biggest reason why, though,

1:03:39.378 --> 1:03:42.618
<v Speaker 2>is because I I want a super athlete. If I'm

1:03:42.618 --> 1:03:44.538
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to draft somebody there, I want him to

1:03:44.538 --> 1:03:47.378
<v Speaker 2>at least be a unicorn athletically. And I do think

1:03:47.538 --> 1:03:50.498
<v Speaker 2>that Hunter and Abdul Carter both checked that box. So

1:03:50.538 --> 1:03:54.018
<v Speaker 2>at least there's that, But their projection is murky in

1:03:54.138 --> 1:03:57.218
<v Speaker 2>terms of Hunter especially, but even Carter. You know he's

1:03:57.218 --> 1:03:59.458
<v Speaker 2>gonna be like a six ' to two, two hundred

1:03:59.498 --> 1:04:02.778
<v Speaker 2>and forty five pound edge rusher, you know in this system,

1:04:02.858 --> 1:04:04.938
<v Speaker 2>like what He's not gonna set the edge right, Like,

1:04:05.018 --> 1:04:06.778
<v Speaker 2>it's not that he's not gonna be that kind of guy.

1:04:07.258 --> 1:04:08.898
<v Speaker 2>So how do they use him? You know, how do

1:04:08.978 --> 1:04:11.418
<v Speaker 2>they develop his pass rush toolbox? I think is really

1:04:11.418 --> 1:04:13.698
<v Speaker 2>big too, because he's still a little bit raw after

1:04:13.738 --> 1:04:16.858
<v Speaker 2>playing inside most of his career at Penn State and

1:04:16.858 --> 1:04:19.218
<v Speaker 2>then playing on the line of scrimmage mostly this year. Like,

1:04:19.258 --> 1:04:22.178
<v Speaker 2>he's still developing as a pass rusher. But the tools

1:04:22.218 --> 1:04:24.098
<v Speaker 2>are the tools. I mean, he's a shot out of

1:04:24.098 --> 1:04:28.378
<v Speaker 2>the cannon freak. But I still would just do the

1:04:28.378 --> 1:04:31.578
<v Speaker 2>trade down to your point of how far down would

1:04:31.578 --> 1:04:35.858
<v Speaker 2>you go? Yeah, I am trading down I and my

1:04:35.938 --> 1:04:39.138
<v Speaker 2>two targets. When in a trade down, yep, I would

1:04:39.258 --> 1:04:41.858
<v Speaker 2>love to say that Carter would still be on the

1:04:41.858 --> 1:04:44.538
<v Speaker 2>board for you. Like, let's say it goes you know,

1:04:44.898 --> 1:04:49.178
<v Speaker 2>quarterback hunter. You know, Mason Graham and Will Johnson are

1:04:49.178 --> 1:04:49.938
<v Speaker 2>still sitting there.

1:04:50.178 --> 1:04:52.738
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Mason Graham's going before Abdell Carter.

1:04:53.098 --> 1:04:56.298
<v Speaker 2>Probably not. So maybe if you're at like three or four,

1:04:56.538 --> 1:04:58.778
<v Speaker 2>you could maybe still talk about Abdol Carter being.

1:04:58.738 --> 1:05:03.178
<v Speaker 3>Okay, if you're at four, you're gonna get one of.

1:05:03.178 --> 1:05:05.578
<v Speaker 2>Carter Hunter, right, I truly believe that, So I like

1:05:05.658 --> 1:05:07.258
<v Speaker 2>that that's where I sort of.

1:05:07.178 --> 1:05:09.058
<v Speaker 3>Like, I think three or four is the sweet spot.

1:05:09.138 --> 1:05:11.658
<v Speaker 3>I will remind people to the Browns do have all

1:05:11.698 --> 1:05:14.978
<v Speaker 3>their picks back? Yeah, after the now there may be

1:05:14.978 --> 1:05:17.298
<v Speaker 3>more of a day two quarterback team because they restructured

1:05:17.338 --> 1:05:19.658
<v Speaker 3>Rogers contract. We were talking so you I was talking

1:05:19.658 --> 1:05:21.858
<v Speaker 3>earlier about Drew Aller like that may be a landing

1:05:21.898 --> 1:05:25.218
<v Speaker 3>spot for Drew Aller. The other question in this because

1:05:25.218 --> 1:05:26.818
<v Speaker 3>I've been getting this a lot, and I asked you

1:05:26.858 --> 1:05:28.258
<v Speaker 3>off the air where you stand, but just for you

1:05:28.298 --> 1:05:29.498
<v Speaker 3>to give your take on the air.

1:05:29.378 --> 1:05:32.058
<v Speaker 2>Can I give one more We're on that real quick. Yeah.

1:05:32.538 --> 1:05:34.338
<v Speaker 2>The two guys that I'm looking at right now for

1:05:34.378 --> 1:05:36.938
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots and Hunters his own thing, Like I think

1:05:37.018 --> 1:05:40.698
<v Speaker 2>Hunter is you need to be organizationally aligned to draft

1:05:40.698 --> 1:05:42.858
<v Speaker 2>a guy like Travis Hunter, that this is what he is,

1:05:42.978 --> 1:05:44.778
<v Speaker 2>this is how we're going to play him, this is

1:05:44.778 --> 1:05:47.938
<v Speaker 2>how we're going to manage it whatever. And frankly, with

1:05:48.018 --> 1:05:50.018
<v Speaker 2>the state of the Patriots, I'm not sure that that

1:05:50.258 --> 1:05:53.498
<v Speaker 2>organization that take a couple of weeks ago. So the

1:05:53.498 --> 1:05:57.778
<v Speaker 2>two guys on the it's a take, welcome to it.

1:05:58.298 --> 1:06:02.098
<v Speaker 2>What I'm looking at right now. Kelvin Banks, Abdul Carter,

1:06:02.338 --> 1:06:06.898
<v Speaker 2>right like, whichever one doesn't, whichever doesn't go your way

1:06:06.898 --> 1:06:09.218
<v Speaker 2>in free agency, right right, Like if you don't get

1:06:09.218 --> 1:06:10.938
<v Speaker 2>the pass rusher in free agency or you don't get

1:06:10.938 --> 1:06:13.658
<v Speaker 2>the tackle, whichever way it goes in free agency, I

1:06:13.658 --> 1:06:16.058
<v Speaker 2>think you have a plug and play starter on the

1:06:16.098 --> 1:06:18.058
<v Speaker 2>line or an impact past I'm with.

1:06:18.258 --> 1:06:20.298
<v Speaker 3>I want a line of scrimmage player, one side the

1:06:20.338 --> 1:06:22.698
<v Speaker 3>ball or the other trenches out. Remind me where you're

1:06:22.738 --> 1:06:23.458
<v Speaker 3>at on Campbell.

1:06:24.898 --> 1:06:26.858
<v Speaker 2>If his arms are checked off, then I'm in.

1:06:27.258 --> 1:06:29.458
<v Speaker 3>But so would you put him in that group?

1:06:29.858 --> 1:06:32.818
<v Speaker 2>If if he's even if it's like thirty two and

1:06:32.898 --> 1:06:35.138
<v Speaker 2>seven eight, just get me as close to thirty three

1:06:35.178 --> 1:06:37.498
<v Speaker 2>as you possibly can. I mean the clip that's going

1:06:37.498 --> 1:06:39.778
<v Speaker 2>around of his answer at the press, like, that guy's

1:06:39.818 --> 1:06:41.898
<v Speaker 2>just gonna be. He's gonna be an NFL football player

1:06:41.938 --> 1:06:43.378
<v Speaker 2>for a decade. I don't know if it's gonna be

1:06:43.378 --> 1:06:46.218
<v Speaker 2>inside or outside, but he's gonna make an offensive line better.

1:06:46.258 --> 1:06:48.578
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna be a captain. Like he's gonna be sounds

1:06:48.618 --> 1:06:51.778
<v Speaker 2>like Matthew McConaughey too. He's okay, he doesn't ad a

1:06:51.818 --> 1:06:56.578
<v Speaker 2>little bit. He's gonna be an absolute stud in your

1:06:56.658 --> 1:07:00.298
<v Speaker 2>locker room. In your on your football field everywhere. I

1:07:00.418 --> 1:07:02.578
<v Speaker 2>just don't know where on the football field he's gonna be.

1:07:02.658 --> 1:07:05.138
<v Speaker 3>So I'm with you, and like, if they walk away

1:07:05.298 --> 1:07:08.178
<v Speaker 3>with Carter Banks and then Campbell with the astrisk with

1:07:08.218 --> 1:07:10.698
<v Speaker 3>the arms right, Yeah, if they walk away with Carter

1:07:10.818 --> 1:07:15.378
<v Speaker 3>Banks or tackle Will Campbell, Yeah that good.

1:07:15.538 --> 1:07:16.658
<v Speaker 2>They did the job. Yeah.

1:07:16.658 --> 1:07:18.458
<v Speaker 3>And then just if they get the first over but

1:07:18.658 --> 1:07:20.858
<v Speaker 3>they can do that without the first overall pick, which

1:07:20.898 --> 1:07:23.178
<v Speaker 3>goes back to my take of the first overall picks

1:07:23.178 --> 1:07:25.658
<v Speaker 3>really about the twenty twenty six offseason, not twenty twenty five.

1:07:26.098 --> 1:07:29.018
<v Speaker 3>So we're talking about spots to trade down, right, Tennessee

1:07:29.058 --> 1:07:31.418
<v Speaker 3>at two seems like a spot. Cleveland at three seems

1:07:31.418 --> 1:07:33.538
<v Speaker 3>like a spot. Giants at Fords it stands right now,

1:07:34.258 --> 1:07:37.098
<v Speaker 3>Vegas at eight, I wouldn't go down to ten. Maybe

1:07:37.098 --> 1:07:39.098
<v Speaker 3>New Orleans somehow slips a couple spots that I could

1:07:39.098 --> 1:07:39.898
<v Speaker 3>be quarterback team.

1:07:40.898 --> 1:07:41.298
<v Speaker 2>Would you?

1:07:41.498 --> 1:07:43.458
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not talking about Fred's trade, I'm talking about

1:07:43.498 --> 1:07:46.458
<v Speaker 3>swat picks, the trade we've been talking about. Would you

1:07:46.458 --> 1:07:48.178
<v Speaker 3>trade the first overall pick in the division to the

1:07:48.218 --> 1:07:49.818
<v Speaker 3>New York Jets.

1:07:50.858 --> 1:07:54.058
<v Speaker 2>I lean towards yes, because I don't.

1:07:53.898 --> 1:07:55.098
<v Speaker 3>Know you've changed your mind.

1:07:55.218 --> 1:07:56.698
<v Speaker 2>Did I change them? Yeah, I text you about this

1:07:56.698 --> 1:07:59.738
<v Speaker 2>the other day. I always, I always, like, am inclined

1:07:59.778 --> 1:08:03.218
<v Speaker 2>to say no. But I don't really think very highly

1:08:03.258 --> 1:08:06.098
<v Speaker 2>of Shador and I kind of feel like giving him

1:08:06.098 --> 1:08:10.178
<v Speaker 2>to the Jets might actually be like kind of sabotaging

1:08:10.218 --> 1:08:12.018
<v Speaker 2>the Jets in a way. I would not do it.

1:08:12.338 --> 1:08:16.218
<v Speaker 3>So maybe if the Jets were at like three, I would, Yeah,

1:08:16.938 --> 1:08:20.577
<v Speaker 3>on the off chance, or is a guy you put

1:08:20.617 --> 1:08:22.898
<v Speaker 3>an elite quarterback on your schedule twice a year for

1:08:22.978 --> 1:08:24.577
<v Speaker 3>ten years, there's no coming back.

1:08:24.738 --> 1:08:27.858
<v Speaker 2>Now there's no coming back. I probably still say no,

1:08:28.098 --> 1:08:29.817
<v Speaker 2>but I do find it funny now that they could

1:08:29.818 --> 1:08:31.777
<v Speaker 2>hand him a overdrafted quarterback.

1:08:31.858 --> 1:08:33.857
<v Speaker 3>Now, well, if I so, I made this joke yesterday

1:08:33.898 --> 1:08:35.737
<v Speaker 3>because you know my take on Will Howard, Right, that's

1:08:35.738 --> 1:08:37.978
<v Speaker 3>some NFLT. If you find out the Jets want Will

1:08:38.018 --> 1:08:41.697
<v Speaker 3>Howard find have the pick. But if that being said,

1:08:41.697 --> 1:08:44.697
<v Speaker 3>if I'm Elliott Wolf or whoever's in charge, right, I

1:08:44.778 --> 1:08:48.338
<v Speaker 3>am leaking to everybody everybody under the sun that I'm

1:08:48.338 --> 1:08:51.538
<v Speaker 3>taking the Jets call, and I'm taking the Jets call. Yeah,

1:08:51.577 --> 1:08:54.017
<v Speaker 3>and I'm using that to leverage these other teams. I'm

1:08:54.058 --> 1:08:55.577
<v Speaker 3>not trading it to the Jets, but I'm not letting

1:08:55.577 --> 1:08:57.298
<v Speaker 3>the Jets know that I'm not trading it to the Jets.

1:08:57.378 --> 1:08:59.138
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's open it up because I know these

1:08:59.138 --> 1:09:01.657
<v Speaker 2>people have been waiting and we're getting inundated with emails.

1:09:01.697 --> 1:09:04.017
<v Speaker 2>That's the right word, right, We got lots of emails, Yes,

1:09:04.058 --> 1:09:06.618
<v Speaker 2>we got calls. We got lots of emails. So Bridgestone

1:09:06.817 --> 1:09:09.258
<v Speaker 2>is the official tire of the New England Patriots and

1:09:09.378 --> 1:09:12.657
<v Speaker 2>his proud sponsor with Sullivan Tire, New England's headquarters for

1:09:12.737 --> 1:09:16.657
<v Speaker 2>quality Bridgestone Tires. Visit Sullivantire dot com to find a

1:09:16.697 --> 1:09:20.497
<v Speaker 2>location near you and do your New Year's resolutions include

1:09:20.617 --> 1:09:23.817
<v Speaker 2>upgrading your mattress. Bob's Discount Furniture can help. Whether you're

1:09:23.817 --> 1:09:26.777
<v Speaker 2>looking for a plush pillow, top cloud or near a

1:09:27.058 --> 1:09:30.378
<v Speaker 2>need a firmer memory foam feel there's a budget friendly

1:09:30.537 --> 1:09:33.977
<v Speaker 2>Bob Opedick mattress for you. Plus, Bob's mattresses come with

1:09:34.058 --> 1:09:36.657
<v Speaker 2>the best in the biz warranties and costs hundreds even

1:09:36.737 --> 1:09:39.857
<v Speaker 2>thousands less than the competition, So stop in and get

1:09:39.897 --> 1:09:43.657
<v Speaker 2>your best rest yet thanks to Bob's Discount Furniture. The

1:09:43.697 --> 1:09:45.657
<v Speaker 2>official for interest or of the New Old Patriots, I

1:09:45.737 --> 1:09:49.137
<v Speaker 2>will tell you marine that Bob's read is the cleanest

1:09:49.218 --> 1:09:51.937
<v Speaker 2>read we've ever had from Bob's That's how you write

1:09:51.978 --> 1:09:54.338
<v Speaker 2>out or read. That's how you know that somebody actually

1:09:54.418 --> 1:09:56.058
<v Speaker 2>read it out loud and said, is this going to

1:09:56.138 --> 1:09:59.338
<v Speaker 2>be a tongue pretzel or is this actually going to

1:09:59.418 --> 1:10:01.777
<v Speaker 2>come out clean? So good job, Bob's all right, let's

1:10:01.777 --> 1:10:04.857
<v Speaker 2>get to these phones because people have been waiting. Patty

1:10:04.978 --> 1:10:07.298
<v Speaker 2>is an aguam. What's up, Patty?

1:10:07.978 --> 1:10:09.498
<v Speaker 7>What is up this afternoon?

1:10:09.537 --> 1:10:09.857
<v Speaker 6>Gentlemen?

1:10:10.537 --> 1:10:11.657
<v Speaker 2>How are we doing? All right?

1:10:11.737 --> 1:10:16.338
<v Speaker 7>So Elevan your favorite time favorite discussion draft talk o kah.

1:10:16.378 --> 1:10:19.737
<v Speaker 7>First off, Alex, I gotta tell you you can't compare

1:10:19.777 --> 1:10:22.218
<v Speaker 7>that Packer's team to this Patriots team. That Packer's team

1:10:22.258 --> 1:10:25.058
<v Speaker 7>went fifteen to one and we are abysmal.

1:10:25.418 --> 1:10:26.777
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but when else am I gonna get to talk

1:10:26.777 --> 1:10:27.537
<v Speaker 3>about Matt Flynn?

1:10:29.497 --> 1:10:29.977
<v Speaker 8>Good point?

1:10:30.058 --> 1:10:33.258
<v Speaker 7>Good point? But you know that hey, that game made

1:10:33.298 --> 1:10:35.418
<v Speaker 7>that dude a lot of money, so it props to him.

1:10:36.737 --> 1:10:40.017
<v Speaker 7>So I just want to say one thing to you, Evan,

1:10:40.338 --> 1:10:43.338
<v Speaker 7>and then give you my the combos that I want.

1:10:44.058 --> 1:10:46.977
<v Speaker 7>Never underestimate how stupid the Raiders are. Evan. I don't

1:10:46.978 --> 1:10:50.537
<v Speaker 7>care that Tom Brady's in that organization. If Mark Davis

1:10:50.537 --> 1:10:54.298
<v Speaker 7>wants Shador Sanders and we're sitting there at one, I

1:10:54.298 --> 1:10:56.537
<v Speaker 7>would give it to him, you know, because I think

1:10:56.537 --> 1:10:58.977
<v Speaker 7>we can get a first round pick, like you were saying,

1:10:59.178 --> 1:11:01.577
<v Speaker 7>a future first round pick, swat picks, and a second

1:11:01.657 --> 1:11:04.937
<v Speaker 7>round pick this year, and that'd be good enough for me.

1:11:04.978 --> 1:11:07.058
<v Speaker 7>And I would take Banks if he's there. But I

1:11:07.098 --> 1:11:10.258
<v Speaker 7>want to come away with a combination of one of

1:11:10.258 --> 1:11:14.378
<v Speaker 7>these two players, either Banks and Jack Sawyer. I don't

1:11:14.378 --> 1:11:15.697
<v Speaker 7>care if you've got to trade up to the first

1:11:15.737 --> 1:11:18.418
<v Speaker 7>round to get him. But the guy I'm really I

1:11:18.497 --> 1:11:23.418
<v Speaker 7>really want now is Abdul Carter because our defense sucks.

1:11:23.458 --> 1:11:25.657
<v Speaker 7>And part of the reason why our defense sucks is

1:11:25.978 --> 1:11:28.737
<v Speaker 7>we cannot generate a pass rush and we need a

1:11:28.777 --> 1:11:32.418
<v Speaker 7>friggin dude, and that guy is a dude. Get him

1:11:32.577 --> 1:11:36.338
<v Speaker 7>and trade up and try and get Connolly. So if

1:11:36.338 --> 1:11:38.298
<v Speaker 7>we can get a combination of one of those two things,

1:11:38.338 --> 1:11:41.017
<v Speaker 7>I'll wike away from this draft happy. That's all I got.

1:11:41.258 --> 1:11:43.617
<v Speaker 2>Thanks it takes I feel like this is starting to

1:11:43.617 --> 1:11:45.138
<v Speaker 2>become a little bit of group think, which is not

1:11:45.298 --> 1:11:50.657
<v Speaker 2>an insult, you know, Abdul Carter or Banks, and then

1:11:50.897 --> 1:11:53.178
<v Speaker 2>trading back up into the end of the first round

1:11:53.258 --> 1:11:55.258
<v Speaker 2>to get whatever you don't get right and I I

1:11:55.617 --> 1:11:57.777
<v Speaker 2>love to take And that's kind of where I am

1:11:57.777 --> 1:12:00.937
<v Speaker 2>settled at this point. I sent you my little offseason plan.

1:12:01.018 --> 1:12:03.937
<v Speaker 2>I think i'll tell you the next week. Jack was

1:12:05.138 --> 1:12:08.697
<v Speaker 2>in that role. He was really freaking. I thought he's

1:12:08.697 --> 1:12:11.378
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a second round pick after that game. Maybe not. Yeah,

1:12:11.418 --> 1:12:14.378
<v Speaker 2>he's ranked pretty low on our consensus website. I saw.

1:12:14.418 --> 1:12:17.057
<v Speaker 3>I think they have an updated yet for yesterday's game.

1:12:17.178 --> 1:12:18.458
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna I threw that out.

1:12:18.537 --> 1:12:20.378
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking of throwing that out there too, because

1:12:20.378 --> 1:12:22.537
<v Speaker 2>I like a couple of those guys. You know, I

1:12:22.577 --> 1:12:24.418
<v Speaker 2>don't feel like you could ever go wrong with drafting

1:12:24.497 --> 1:12:26.777
<v Speaker 2>talent from Ohio State, Like, do you know it's crazy?

1:12:27.378 --> 1:12:29.258
<v Speaker 3>The two guys on Ohio State who are probably the

1:12:29.258 --> 1:12:31.857
<v Speaker 3>best NFL prospects, neither one of them is draft out.

1:12:32.138 --> 1:12:33.537
<v Speaker 2>I will get to it in a second.

1:12:33.657 --> 1:12:36.497
<v Speaker 3>Well, I want to know if you watch Caleb Downs too,

1:12:37.458 --> 1:12:40.017
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. So if we're allow me for

1:12:40.058 --> 1:12:42.737
<v Speaker 3>a second, Okay, twenty twenty five draft, we're done.

1:12:42.857 --> 1:12:43.097
<v Speaker 2>No.

1:12:43.218 --> 1:12:45.097
<v Speaker 3>Number one for the Patriots on the twenty twenty six

1:12:45.178 --> 1:12:47.298
<v Speaker 3>draft board right now, and hopefully they're not picking this high.

1:12:47.338 --> 1:12:50.897
<v Speaker 3>But Caleb Downs what position is safety? He was like

1:12:51.338 --> 1:12:55.137
<v Speaker 3>Nick Saban's favorite, one of Nick Saban's favorite recruits ever.

1:12:55.537 --> 1:12:57.857
<v Speaker 3>And then when Sabin retired, he transferred to Ohio State

1:12:57.897 --> 1:13:00.298
<v Speaker 3>this year. Yeah, and he's like the guy. He does

1:13:00.378 --> 1:13:04.017
<v Speaker 3>everything on that Ohio State defense. He's the only he

1:13:04.098 --> 1:13:06.617
<v Speaker 3>was the only unanimous All American playing in the Rose

1:13:06.657 --> 1:13:08.737
<v Speaker 3>Bowl yesterday. But he's a true sophomore. If he was

1:13:08.737 --> 1:13:10.897
<v Speaker 3>in this draft, he's easily a top ten, probably a

1:13:10.897 --> 1:13:11.537
<v Speaker 3>top five pick.

1:13:11.737 --> 1:13:15.258
<v Speaker 2>So I always, I'm always with the Buckeyes, right. I

1:13:15.258 --> 1:13:18.657
<v Speaker 2>feel like that's been almost neglected by the Patriots for

1:13:18.697 --> 1:13:23.057
<v Speaker 2>some probably weird like Ohio State bias Nate Abner. Yeah,

1:13:23.098 --> 1:13:25.418
<v Speaker 2>besides Nate Ebner, like we need some more Buckeyes here,

1:13:25.537 --> 1:13:26.657
<v Speaker 2>that's where the talent is.

1:13:26.937 --> 1:13:28.418
<v Speaker 3>Well maybe if a Buckeyes head coach.

1:13:28.697 --> 1:13:33.418
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's true. Jack Sawyer a maan, But yeah,

1:13:33.458 --> 1:13:36.098
<v Speaker 2>I really liked this idea in my opinion, and I

1:13:36.098 --> 1:13:37.977
<v Speaker 2>think they tried to pull it off last year and

1:13:38.018 --> 1:13:41.418
<v Speaker 2>they just couldn't do it. Of trading, you know, you're

1:13:41.458 --> 1:13:44.458
<v Speaker 2>gonna be at probably what thirty three, thirty four, thirty

1:13:44.497 --> 1:13:47.298
<v Speaker 2>five something like that at the top of the second round.

1:13:47.537 --> 1:13:49.777
<v Speaker 2>I would love to make two first round picks, especially

1:13:49.817 --> 1:13:51.737
<v Speaker 2>in a year like this where it's a really thin

1:13:51.897 --> 1:13:54.097
<v Speaker 2>draft at the top, like you might as well get

1:13:54.138 --> 1:13:57.897
<v Speaker 2>two guys that are you know, consensus, you know, first

1:13:57.978 --> 1:14:00.977
<v Speaker 2>rounders in this class. So there's a couple of guys

1:14:01.018 --> 1:14:03.697
<v Speaker 2>that fit that bill to me, you know, Connorly certainly

1:14:03.737 --> 1:14:05.418
<v Speaker 2>one of them if you don't get the tackle early,

1:14:06.258 --> 1:14:07.777
<v Speaker 2>and I have a couple of others, but I want

1:14:07.777 --> 1:14:10.017
<v Speaker 2>to save that for for recency bias here at the end.

1:14:10.018 --> 1:14:13.497
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I'm with Patty about that trade up. I

1:14:13.497 --> 1:14:16.258
<v Speaker 2>feel like if you trade down, yeah, and then you

1:14:16.298 --> 1:14:18.817
<v Speaker 2>accumulate the assets, and then you use one of those

1:14:18.857 --> 1:14:20.377
<v Speaker 2>assets to then trade.

1:14:20.138 --> 1:14:23.178
<v Speaker 3>Back up and they still right from the judn't trade,

1:14:23.218 --> 1:14:23.617
<v Speaker 3>so then you.

1:14:23.577 --> 1:14:26.337
<v Speaker 2>Make two first round picks. All right, Sean is in Florida.

1:14:26.338 --> 1:14:31.137
<v Speaker 2>What's up Sean? Sean? Guys, Hey, how you doing.

1:14:31.018 --> 1:14:34.737
<v Speaker 9>A great a happy New Year? I hope you both

1:14:34.737 --> 1:14:36.577
<v Speaker 9>had a happy hanakah.

1:14:36.657 --> 1:14:40.298
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to Joan, you know, welcome well.

1:14:40.338 --> 1:14:42.697
<v Speaker 9>I hear a lot of talk about Joe Milton playing

1:14:43.657 --> 1:14:46.697
<v Speaker 9>on Sunday, and it makes sense. One argument I haven't

1:14:46.737 --> 1:14:50.378
<v Speaker 9>heard yet is something I wanted to bring up that

1:14:50.657 --> 1:14:52.897
<v Speaker 9>we don't know if we're said it's going to be

1:14:52.937 --> 1:14:57.017
<v Speaker 9>back next year. So, like Alex, you mentioned the Bills

1:14:57.018 --> 1:14:59.178
<v Speaker 9>don't know much about Joe Milton to the Patriots. I

1:14:59.178 --> 1:15:01.337
<v Speaker 9>want to see if this guy can run our offense.

1:15:01.617 --> 1:15:05.338
<v Speaker 9>Can he be a backup next year? And Alex also,

1:15:05.857 --> 1:15:08.857
<v Speaker 9>I like you're trying to get to the twenty twenty

1:15:08.897 --> 1:15:11.897
<v Speaker 9>seven draft. I think that's going to be a good

1:15:11.897 --> 1:15:14.178
<v Speaker 9>one because the Patriots, let's face if they're not a

1:15:14.178 --> 1:15:16.177
<v Speaker 9>good team, they're not gonna be in playoffs in twenty

1:15:16.218 --> 1:15:19.058
<v Speaker 9>twenty five or twenty twenty six. So looking at not

1:15:19.298 --> 1:15:23.897
<v Speaker 9>just Jeremiah Smith, but also someone who'll probably see today

1:15:24.577 --> 1:15:28.258
<v Speaker 9>in Emitt Mosley, there's some gonna be some good receivers

1:15:28.298 --> 1:15:32.577
<v Speaker 9>and be nice to have awesome uh immunion to get

1:15:32.577 --> 1:15:34.577
<v Speaker 9>that pick again for the top one. So I'll let

1:15:34.617 --> 1:15:36.577
<v Speaker 9>you go and that thanks guys.

1:15:37.298 --> 1:15:39.418
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Sean. So we've got a bunch of emails about

1:15:39.418 --> 1:15:42.418
<v Speaker 2>this because everybody is watching I'm sure the college football

1:15:42.418 --> 1:15:45.217
<v Speaker 2>playoff games yesterday. David and Madrid, who is a regular listener,

1:15:45.817 --> 1:15:47.178
<v Speaker 2>asked about this as well.

1:15:47.258 --> 1:15:49.298
<v Speaker 3>When if I just say to his first point real quick, YEP,

1:15:49.617 --> 1:15:51.857
<v Speaker 3>that is another value of Joe Milton playing, you find

1:15:51.857 --> 1:15:54.377
<v Speaker 3>out if you need a backup quarterback this offseason. Yeah,

1:15:54.418 --> 1:15:57.177
<v Speaker 3>like with Cole strains, check another box before the offseason starts.

1:15:57.258 --> 1:16:02.698
<v Speaker 2>Agreed, I'm for Joe Milton getting some time in this game. Uh,

1:16:02.937 --> 1:16:05.378
<v Speaker 2>David here says, you know, so we do have a

1:16:05.418 --> 1:16:06.338
<v Speaker 2>little bit of draft news.

1:16:06.497 --> 1:16:09.418
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Jalen Milroe has officially declared. Oh geez, so there's

1:16:09.458 --> 1:16:11.897
<v Speaker 3>another quarterback on the board. I might have gone back

1:16:11.937 --> 1:16:14.697
<v Speaker 3>if I were him after that game this week. But

1:16:14.897 --> 1:16:18.177
<v Speaker 3>Evan wanted Alabama in the playoffs, so maybe he feels differently, but.

1:16:18.378 --> 1:16:19.937
<v Speaker 2>I still feel the same way. I still would have

1:16:19.937 --> 1:16:23.177
<v Speaker 2>taken Alabama. They got a house by Michigan. Michigan.

1:16:23.298 --> 1:16:25.817
<v Speaker 3>They didn't call home up Vanderbilt. They didn't care about

1:16:25.857 --> 1:16:27.577
<v Speaker 3>the game, cared enough to play everybody.

1:16:27.577 --> 1:16:30.017
<v Speaker 2>Michigan didn't. Michigan played their backups. They weren't trying.

1:16:31.657 --> 1:16:34.218
<v Speaker 3>Jayle should have been trying to be going to the draft.

1:16:34.178 --> 1:16:36.817
<v Speaker 2>Just to just just to poke them, just to poke them.

1:16:37.018 --> 1:16:39.697
<v Speaker 2>So David and Madrid at calling in about the twenty

1:16:39.737 --> 1:16:42.777
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven draft as well, which is just I love

1:16:42.817 --> 1:16:45.617
<v Speaker 2>that our listeners are play ball with us on these

1:16:45.657 --> 1:16:49.097
<v Speaker 2>things and we actually talk about three drafts, from which

1:16:49.138 --> 1:16:49.697
<v Speaker 2>is is great.

1:16:49.897 --> 1:16:54.537
<v Speaker 3>You know as much as anybody, how giddy Patriots fans

1:16:54.577 --> 1:16:57.177
<v Speaker 3>get about elite wide receiver prospects. There was a need

1:16:57.218 --> 1:17:00.418
<v Speaker 3>for a quarterback last year. There were three franchise quarterbacks

1:17:00.418 --> 1:17:02.777
<v Speaker 3>on the board, and you still had a large segment

1:17:02.777 --> 1:17:05.897
<v Speaker 3>of the fan base. They just want that receiver already

1:17:05.937 --> 1:17:08.458
<v Speaker 3>because it's been twenty or however long. Ranny Rady Moss

1:17:08.458 --> 1:17:12.577
<v Speaker 3>was right by the way twenty years. Marvin Harrison Bill

1:17:12.697 --> 1:17:16.418
<v Speaker 3>this generational. I'm not saying that was incorrect. Jeremiah Smith's

1:17:16.418 --> 1:17:17.138
<v Speaker 3>already better than you.

1:17:17.258 --> 1:17:20.657
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So if for those that don't know, because some

1:17:20.697 --> 1:17:23.657
<v Speaker 2>people aren't paying a twenty to the twenty twenty seven draft,

1:17:23.657 --> 1:17:26.018
<v Speaker 2>I don't think those people are watching the show. Jeremiah

1:17:26.058 --> 1:17:28.937
<v Speaker 2>Smith on Ohio State, who's a true freshman nineteen year

1:17:28.978 --> 1:17:32.577
<v Speaker 2>old from Miami area somehow got out of the state

1:17:32.617 --> 1:17:35.338
<v Speaker 2>of Florida and went up to Ohio State. It's Ohio State,

1:17:36.058 --> 1:17:40.737
<v Speaker 2>Bryan Hartline and Jeremiah Smith. I was trying to I

1:17:40.777 --> 1:17:44.977
<v Speaker 2>looked this up actually last night, trying to rack my brain.

1:17:46.138 --> 1:17:48.537
<v Speaker 2>Jeremiah Smith, I don't think it's hyperbole to say is

1:17:48.577 --> 1:17:50.497
<v Speaker 2>the best true freshman receiver that's ever lived.

1:17:50.937 --> 1:17:52.697
<v Speaker 3>He is the I'm trying to find who the first

1:17:52.697 --> 1:17:56.618
<v Speaker 3>too were. Jeremiah Smith is the third highest ranked recruit

1:17:57.098 --> 1:17:59.338
<v Speaker 3>in the history of twenty four to seven. And I

1:17:59.378 --> 1:18:01.218
<v Speaker 3>can't remember who the other two players are. I know

1:18:01.298 --> 1:18:02.817
<v Speaker 3>one of them is like on track to be an

1:18:02.897 --> 1:18:05.058
<v Speaker 3>NFL All of Famer and the other barely made it

1:18:05.058 --> 1:18:05.657
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL.

1:18:05.697 --> 1:18:09.017
<v Speaker 2>But he is rare, rare.

1:18:10.058 --> 1:18:12.058
<v Speaker 3>Remember last year he was saying Harrison was rare and

1:18:12.098 --> 1:18:14.177
<v Speaker 3>I was knocking it down. Everybody's saying these other guys.

1:18:14.817 --> 1:18:18.097
<v Speaker 3>I don't like to use generational Jeremiah Smith is why

1:18:18.138 --> 1:18:20.577
<v Speaker 3>because I need a proper way to talk about Jeremiah Smith.

1:18:20.817 --> 1:18:23.857
<v Speaker 3>Jeremiah Smith is different. If Jeremiah Smith was in the

1:18:23.937 --> 1:18:27.737
<v Speaker 3>NFL two day Evan at eighteen years old, he'd be

1:18:27.737 --> 1:18:28.537
<v Speaker 3>a top ten receiver.

1:18:29.058 --> 1:18:31.098
<v Speaker 2>He would already be the best receiver on Patriots by

1:18:31.098 --> 1:18:31.737
<v Speaker 2>a country mile.

1:18:31.897 --> 1:18:34.617
<v Speaker 3>In the NFL today, how many receivers are there better

1:18:34.657 --> 1:18:36.777
<v Speaker 3>than eighteen year old version Jeremiah Smith.

1:18:38.497 --> 1:18:40.577
<v Speaker 2>I think he's probably a top fifteen receiver.

1:18:40.978 --> 1:18:43.418
<v Speaker 3>So the way he was described to me by somebody

1:18:43.458 --> 1:18:47.577
<v Speaker 3>before the season started, because I'm looking at these things, Wow,

1:18:47.577 --> 1:18:50.657
<v Speaker 3>who's this recruit? Ohio State cut. The way he was

1:18:50.697 --> 1:18:53.338
<v Speaker 3>described to me was, you know how everybody drooled about

1:18:53.338 --> 1:18:56.937
<v Speaker 3>Marvin Harrison Junior. Imagine if Harrison Junior was a slightly

1:18:56.978 --> 1:18:59.057
<v Speaker 3>better route runner and ran a four four forty.

1:18:59.458 --> 1:19:03.057
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so there's been a lot of a lot of

1:19:03.338 --> 1:19:07.617
<v Speaker 2>Julio comparisons because they have similar measurables like six three

1:19:07.697 --> 1:19:10.258
<v Speaker 2>two fifteen. Also, let's just throw it out there, it's

1:19:10.298 --> 1:19:12.617
<v Speaker 2>insane that Jeremiah Smith at nineteen years old is six

1:19:12.737 --> 1:19:16.178
<v Speaker 2>three two fifteen. Like, that's absolutely stupid and absurd. I

1:19:16.218 --> 1:19:19.058
<v Speaker 2>don't know what he was fed as a child, but

1:19:19.178 --> 1:19:21.737
<v Speaker 2>it certainly wasn't the same food I was eating. I

1:19:21.737 --> 1:19:24.338
<v Speaker 2>would also just say that I don't I correct me.

1:19:24.537 --> 1:19:28.737
<v Speaker 3>He is the highest rated recruit since twenty for twenty

1:19:28.777 --> 1:19:30.897
<v Speaker 3>four to seven, So he wasn't the second and highest

1:19:30.897 --> 1:19:32.138
<v Speaker 3>overall was a couple guys ahead of them.

1:19:32.178 --> 1:19:35.378
<v Speaker 2>But I looked at some of the other really great

1:19:35.697 --> 1:19:39.537
<v Speaker 2>true freshman seasons of yesteryear. The thing is is that

1:19:39.657 --> 1:19:43.298
<v Speaker 2>as you would, you know, could attest to, yeah, true

1:19:43.298 --> 1:19:46.697
<v Speaker 2>freshmen didn't play like they do now, right, Like you know,

1:19:46.697 --> 1:19:49.497
<v Speaker 2>they weren't giving the opportunities. So like even like true

1:19:49.497 --> 1:19:52.657
<v Speaker 2>freshman Julio Jones didn't play a ton right out of

1:19:52.697 --> 1:19:55.737
<v Speaker 2>the gate at Alabama. Right, so those stats like Chris

1:19:55.737 --> 1:19:58.458
<v Speaker 2>Carter had like the freshman record for like the longest time,

1:19:58.497 --> 1:20:00.497
<v Speaker 2>it was like five hundred yards. Yeah, right, So this

1:20:01.018 --> 1:20:04.017
<v Speaker 2>it's changed, The landscape has changed about playing these guys

1:20:04.058 --> 1:20:07.017
<v Speaker 2>as early as they are. You know, Saban historically never

1:20:07.018 --> 1:20:10.097
<v Speaker 2>played freshman. Even Julio Jones had to earn playing time

1:20:10.098 --> 1:20:13.138
<v Speaker 2>and Saban's system, So it's not apples to apples, is

1:20:13.138 --> 1:20:15.497
<v Speaker 2>my point, comparing him to guys like that. Jamar Chase's

1:20:15.537 --> 1:20:19.098
<v Speaker 2>breakout season was his sophomore season, so he wasn't a

1:20:19.098 --> 1:20:23.857
<v Speaker 2>breakout freshman. It's pretty hard to find a breakout true

1:20:23.857 --> 1:20:27.617
<v Speaker 2>freshman on the level of Jeremiah Smith. You were teasing

1:20:27.657 --> 1:20:32.857
<v Speaker 2>me earlier. He's perfect. He's he's literally perfect. He's six

1:20:32.897 --> 1:20:36.218
<v Speaker 2>foot three something, two hundred and fifteen pounds, four to

1:20:36.258 --> 1:20:38.298
<v Speaker 2>four or below. I think he might be in the

1:20:38.298 --> 1:20:40.977
<v Speaker 2>fourth sie so well. He was running. He ran a

1:20:41.018 --> 1:20:46.258
<v Speaker 2>four to four in high school last year. Fantastic fastle

1:20:46.338 --> 1:20:49.537
<v Speaker 2>he wins at the catch point, his release, he can stack,

1:20:49.617 --> 1:20:51.617
<v Speaker 2>he can release off the line of scrimmage against press

1:20:51.657 --> 1:20:56.497
<v Speaker 2>man coverage. He's fantastic. He's unbelievable. Like I now do

1:20:56.617 --> 1:20:59.177
<v Speaker 2>I think you can plan ahead to the twenty twenty

1:20:59.218 --> 1:21:01.138
<v Speaker 2>seven draft to put yourself in a position to the

1:21:01.178 --> 1:21:03.537
<v Speaker 2>draft if you start trading down first round picks. Maybe,

1:21:03.617 --> 1:21:06.017
<v Speaker 2>I guess and theory, I don't know, that's some that's

1:21:06.018 --> 1:21:08.098
<v Speaker 2>some balls to like look that far ahead with your

1:21:08.178 --> 1:21:10.857
<v Speaker 2>job security where it's at right now for the people

1:21:10.897 --> 1:21:13.697
<v Speaker 2>in this building, but like in general, yeah, I mean, look,

1:21:13.737 --> 1:21:16.777
<v Speaker 2>he's he's the person that he reminds me of. He's

1:21:16.777 --> 1:21:19.817
<v Speaker 2>a little bigger than Jamar, but he moves a lot

1:21:19.857 --> 1:21:24.017
<v Speaker 2>to me like Jamar Chase, but is definitely more in

1:21:24.218 --> 1:21:27.458
<v Speaker 2>like the longer build. I like Jamar Chase. I want

1:21:27.458 --> 1:21:30.257
<v Speaker 2>to day is like six one six two. So Jeremiah

1:21:30.258 --> 1:21:32.897
<v Speaker 2>Smith a little bit bigger, but when I watch him

1:21:32.897 --> 1:21:35.258
<v Speaker 2>on film, he moves in and wins a lot.

1:21:35.817 --> 1:21:37.737
<v Speaker 3>I'm on the Julio tray, I really am.

1:21:37.777 --> 1:21:40.777
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can see that. I'm yeah. The other thing

1:21:40.897 --> 1:21:42.697
<v Speaker 2>is he's he is. I just have a tough time,

1:21:42.897 --> 1:21:45.017
<v Speaker 2>and I mean his great as tomorrow is I have

1:21:45.058 --> 1:21:46.857
<v Speaker 2>such a tough time comparing guys to Julio.

1:21:46.978 --> 1:21:49.218
<v Speaker 3>On top of everything you just said, the one thing

1:21:49.218 --> 1:21:51.458
<v Speaker 3>that stands out to me watching him. His hands are

1:21:51.537 --> 1:21:54.338
<v Speaker 3>so big and so strong, it allows him to make

1:21:54.338 --> 1:21:56.258
<v Speaker 3>some absurd catches. You want the list of guys who

1:21:56.258 --> 1:22:00.057
<v Speaker 3>are higher rated recruits than Jeremiah Smith ever since two thousand,

1:22:00.817 --> 1:22:02.937
<v Speaker 3>So the highest rated high school recruit of all time

1:22:03.258 --> 1:22:07.857
<v Speaker 3>is Davian Clowney. Yeah, he freak Cyrus Kwan Joe. He

1:22:07.897 --> 1:22:09.617
<v Speaker 3>was a bust at Alabama. He got hurt a bunch,

1:22:10.138 --> 1:22:14.097
<v Speaker 3>Trevor Lawrence, Justin Fields, Brian Berzy, Bryce Young, Walker Little,

1:22:14.577 --> 1:22:14.897
<v Speaker 3>that's it.

1:22:14.937 --> 1:22:16.057
<v Speaker 2>Those are some interesting ones.

1:22:16.218 --> 1:22:18.058
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's tied with Fournette.

1:22:18.138 --> 1:22:22.857
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's he's incredible. I said the thing about to Florida.

1:22:23.178 --> 1:22:27.218
<v Speaker 2>How that guy he grew up in Miami. Yeah, get

1:22:27.218 --> 1:22:29.537
<v Speaker 2>out of the state of Florida. One nil two.

1:22:29.657 --> 1:22:32.257
<v Speaker 3>Ohio State has this poll where if you're an elite

1:22:32.298 --> 1:22:34.977
<v Speaker 3>receiver and you want to maximize we do you go play.

1:22:34.817 --> 1:22:37.338
<v Speaker 2>For Brian Highy. He's the only recruit so high.

1:22:37.378 --> 1:22:40.338
<v Speaker 3>He's the only recruit twenty four to seven, only wide

1:22:40.378 --> 1:22:44.737
<v Speaker 3>receiver recruit that's ever gotten six stars. So Doriel Beckham,

1:22:44.897 --> 1:22:49.138
<v Speaker 3>Doyl Green. Beckham was just below, Julio Jones was just below.

1:22:49.737 --> 1:22:54.378
<v Speaker 2>But he's he's fantastic. I mean, I he's fantastic. I

1:22:54.378 --> 1:22:55.897
<v Speaker 2>have one more thought on it, but I want to

1:22:55.897 --> 1:22:57.418
<v Speaker 2>say it. No, what is it? No? No, no, I

1:22:57.458 --> 1:22:57.897
<v Speaker 2>want to say it.

1:22:57.937 --> 1:22:59.378
<v Speaker 3>Are we gonna get like in this show or for

1:22:59.418 --> 1:22:59.897
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty?

1:23:00.138 --> 1:23:02.458
<v Speaker 2>No, No, in this show. It's just relevant to something else,

1:23:02.697 --> 1:23:05.378
<v Speaker 2>all right, Jesse? Is he in the car? Or is

1:23:05.418 --> 1:23:08.817
<v Speaker 2>he in Carolina? He's in the car. Jesse's in the car.

1:23:08.897 --> 1:23:11.537
<v Speaker 2>What's up? Jesse was in the car.

1:23:12.378 --> 1:23:15.057
<v Speaker 5>I've been listening for a while, so now here awesome,

1:23:15.098 --> 1:23:19.218
<v Speaker 5>Thank you. One thing that I wanted to point out, Evan,

1:23:19.258 --> 1:23:21.857
<v Speaker 5>that I don't know that you're fully taking into account.

1:23:21.937 --> 1:23:24.097
<v Speaker 5>So it's gonna kind of support Alex's point of view.

1:23:24.617 --> 1:23:28.258
<v Speaker 5>But on these NFL execs, we're looking at the QB

1:23:28.418 --> 1:23:29.097
<v Speaker 5>class in.

1:23:29.058 --> 1:23:32.577
<v Speaker 8>Two year increments, two cycles increments. So what is ahead

1:23:33.138 --> 1:23:36.538
<v Speaker 8>if you're one of these QB and needy teams Garrett Nussmeyer,

1:23:37.138 --> 1:23:41.537
<v Speaker 8>Drew Aller and John Matteir Right, I think some of

1:23:41.537 --> 1:23:43.617
<v Speaker 8>those teams are gonna get jumpy looking ahead, like you

1:23:43.617 --> 1:23:45.657
<v Speaker 8>can't go to twenty twenty seven as we're talking about

1:23:45.657 --> 1:23:48.418
<v Speaker 8>it for arch Manning, So I think there will be

1:23:48.497 --> 1:23:52.897
<v Speaker 8>a desire to get their most highly ranked, whether it's

1:23:52.937 --> 1:23:56.137
<v Speaker 8>ward for shador standers to move up for those picks,

1:23:56.178 --> 1:23:58.937
<v Speaker 8>because looking ahead, there's not like it's the class of

1:23:58.978 --> 1:24:01.458
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty four where you see guys who are talented

1:24:01.537 --> 1:24:04.057
<v Speaker 8>and you could possibly wait. If you need your quarterback now,

1:24:04.178 --> 1:24:05.577
<v Speaker 8>you better get him now because he might not be

1:24:05.657 --> 1:24:09.057
<v Speaker 8>there next year. Question for you guys talking about trading

1:24:09.098 --> 1:24:12.017
<v Speaker 8>back into the first round if you trade down, thoughts

1:24:12.178 --> 1:24:16.737
<v Speaker 8>on Tyler Warren as a rock solid difference maker as.

1:24:16.577 --> 1:24:17.378
<v Speaker 10>A pass catcher.

1:24:17.497 --> 1:24:19.537
<v Speaker 2>Good cause we real quick on the quarterback line.

1:24:19.537 --> 1:24:23.097
<v Speaker 3>So arch Manning is eligible next year, Yeah, assuming yours

1:24:23.138 --> 1:24:26.897
<v Speaker 3>goes to school, he'll start. But he's right after arch

1:24:26.978 --> 1:24:30.057
<v Speaker 3>Manning the projection right now, And Drew Aller's a wild

1:24:30.058 --> 1:24:31.617
<v Speaker 3>card here. I think Dre Allen might come out this

1:24:31.737 --> 1:24:36.378
<v Speaker 3>year after arch Manning next year's quarterback class. So I

1:24:36.378 --> 1:24:38.737
<v Speaker 3>said before like everybody's treating this year like it's twenty

1:24:38.777 --> 1:24:41.537
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, when it's not. If arch Manning doesn't come

1:24:41.537 --> 1:24:45.017
<v Speaker 3>out as junior, next year's class looks like twenty twenty two.

1:24:45.298 --> 1:24:47.617
<v Speaker 3>If you want a quarterback, get him now because you're

1:24:47.657 --> 1:24:50.137
<v Speaker 3>probably not gonna have a job then that twenty twenty

1:24:50.178 --> 1:24:52.218
<v Speaker 3>seven class rules. That's like, you know how much I

1:24:52.218 --> 1:24:55.258
<v Speaker 3>love DJ Loway and those guys, are you still gonna

1:24:55.298 --> 1:24:56.537
<v Speaker 3>have a job if you wait that long?

1:24:56.657 --> 1:24:58.617
<v Speaker 2>Okay? So here's my take on the quarterbacks. And this

1:24:58.697 --> 1:25:01.258
<v Speaker 2>is just like a big picture take that I have. Yeah,

1:25:02.258 --> 1:25:07.857
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if there's gonna be more teams that are

1:25:07.897 --> 1:25:11.177
<v Speaker 2>going to look at the Seattle Seahawks with Gino Smith,

1:25:11.737 --> 1:25:15.257
<v Speaker 2>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers with Baker Mayfield, the Minnesota Vikings

1:25:15.298 --> 1:25:18.458
<v Speaker 2>with Sam Darnold, and they're going to say even like

1:25:18.497 --> 1:25:21.137
<v Speaker 2>to a lesser extent, but I still think it applies

1:25:21.298 --> 1:25:24.497
<v Speaker 2>the Detroit Lions with Jared Goff and are there gonna

1:25:24.497 --> 1:25:28.617
<v Speaker 2>look at it and say we could do something like

1:25:28.697 --> 1:25:33.057
<v Speaker 2>that instead of over rafting or trading a haul and

1:25:33.178 --> 1:25:36.697
<v Speaker 2>over drafting YadA, YadA, YadA. I just wonder if those

1:25:36.697 --> 1:25:41.657
<v Speaker 2>success stories change it all how the landscape is viewed

1:25:41.777 --> 1:25:47.218
<v Speaker 2>for like quote unquote bus in the first round, and

1:25:47.378 --> 1:25:50.177
<v Speaker 2>how does that impact this whole market? Like let's say,

1:25:50.978 --> 1:25:53.697
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't have a great example I guess

1:25:53.737 --> 1:25:55.137
<v Speaker 2>off the top of my head of like who would

1:25:55.178 --> 1:25:58.218
<v Speaker 2>move in this in that type of scenario, But I

1:25:58.298 --> 1:26:01.258
<v Speaker 2>just would I would look at Donald in particular as

1:26:01.298 --> 1:26:04.258
<v Speaker 2>like a free agent, they obviously drafted JJ in the

1:26:04.298 --> 1:26:07.097
<v Speaker 2>first round. Like it's probably gonna be JJ McCarthy's team

1:26:07.138 --> 1:26:09.338
<v Speaker 2>at some point unless Donald like wins an MVP next

1:26:09.418 --> 1:26:12.218
<v Speaker 2>year or something like that. So what you know, what

1:26:12.378 --> 1:26:15.258
<v Speaker 2>team are the Giants for example, with Brian Dable, who

1:26:15.298 --> 1:26:17.737
<v Speaker 2>they know it does well with quarterbacks? Like would they

1:26:17.897 --> 1:26:22.777
<v Speaker 2>just pay Donald like a bridgy franchise quarterback deal instead

1:26:23.138 --> 1:26:25.378
<v Speaker 2>and then buy themselves some time to draft.

1:26:25.298 --> 1:26:27.378
<v Speaker 3>Donald's an interesting one. I think one of these quarterback

1:26:27.378 --> 1:26:29.298
<v Speaker 3>teams will end up with Donald McCarthy. By the way,

1:26:29.298 --> 1:26:31.897
<v Speaker 3>if Viking should trade JJ McCarthy, that's how I feel,

1:26:32.218 --> 1:26:38.697
<v Speaker 3>maybe a surprise. But for every Geno Smith, how many

1:26:38.737 --> 1:26:42.977
<v Speaker 3>times are you gonna get Kirk Cousins or Aaron Rodgers.

1:26:42.978 --> 1:26:47.017
<v Speaker 3>But the difference be Derek Carr Russell Wilson.

1:26:47.138 --> 1:26:50.737
<v Speaker 2>The difference between all those examples, though, is their age obviously, right,

1:26:50.817 --> 1:26:54.418
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm talking about Derek Carr. Derek Carr is still

1:26:54.577 --> 1:26:57.338
<v Speaker 2>older than like Baker was. Like Gino is a good

1:26:57.338 --> 1:26:59.897
<v Speaker 2>comp for those guys, I suppose, but like the Donald

1:26:59.978 --> 1:27:04.057
<v Speaker 2>Baker comp is darnold contract, So Donald is legit. Donald.

1:27:04.058 --> 1:27:05.298
<v Speaker 2>The Jets quit on too, early.

1:27:05.338 --> 1:27:07.857
<v Speaker 3>I think although that that situation in Minnesota is fantastic.

1:27:08.058 --> 1:27:10.938
<v Speaker 3>Who's okay, so that's one team, Who's next.

1:27:12.378 --> 1:27:14.617
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna I'm looking at it because I'm trying to

1:27:14.617 --> 1:27:17.058
<v Speaker 2>figure out like to make my take hold, I have

1:27:17.098 --> 1:27:18.577
<v Speaker 2>to find right have my point.

1:27:18.617 --> 1:27:21.298
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that that maybe works for one team.

1:27:21.458 --> 1:27:24.857
<v Speaker 3>There's five or six quarterback needy teams and that's just

1:27:24.897 --> 1:27:26.258
<v Speaker 3>at the top of the draft. You also have to

1:27:26.258 --> 1:27:29.298
<v Speaker 3>consider the Seahawks may want a quarterback, the Steelers may

1:27:29.338 --> 1:27:32.058
<v Speaker 3>want a quarterback. Teams like die. So now, if you

1:27:32.098 --> 1:27:33.777
<v Speaker 3>want to go there enough, if you want to like

1:27:33.817 --> 1:27:36.697
<v Speaker 3>the group of guys you're talking about here, Evan, are

1:27:37.058 --> 1:27:39.697
<v Speaker 3>the twenty twenty one class. You're talking about Mac Jones,

1:27:39.777 --> 1:27:42.137
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about Justin Fields, you're talking about Zach Wilson.

1:27:42.418 --> 1:27:46.378
<v Speaker 3>That's what you're talking about. Are you really gonna risk put?

1:27:47.018 --> 1:27:49.418
<v Speaker 3>Would you rather go that route, especially some of these

1:27:49.458 --> 1:27:51.657
<v Speaker 3>teams that don't have the talent that the Detroit Lions do.

1:27:52.378 --> 1:27:55.218
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing is, and we know this all

1:27:55.218 --> 1:27:57.298
<v Speaker 3>too well because of what just happened here in New England.

1:27:57.657 --> 1:28:01.537
<v Speaker 3>You signed Sam Darnold. That changes the football team you

1:28:01.657 --> 1:28:04.977
<v Speaker 3>draft sder Sanders in the top five. You draft cam

1:28:05.058 --> 1:28:08.657
<v Speaker 3>Ward in the top five, that changes the organization, That

1:28:08.777 --> 1:28:13.217
<v Speaker 3>changes the franchise. You're not gonna get the buzz. Maybe

1:28:13.298 --> 1:28:16.298
<v Speaker 3>Donald again, but who's that next guy? Who really is

1:28:16.338 --> 1:28:19.497
<v Speaker 3>the next veteran name. I just you're not gonna get

1:28:19.497 --> 1:28:23.937
<v Speaker 3>the organizational pop signing a veteran that you do. And

1:28:24.218 --> 1:28:26.497
<v Speaker 3>the if you have a high pick, if you're scheduled

1:28:26.497 --> 1:28:28.418
<v Speaker 3>to pick in the top five to sixty seven, as

1:28:28.418 --> 1:28:30.777
<v Speaker 3>we talked about last year, the owner is an involved

1:28:30.817 --> 1:28:32.937
<v Speaker 3>to an extent at that point, and you now have

1:28:33.018 --> 1:28:35.378
<v Speaker 3>to sell the owner on well, look at what all

1:28:35.418 --> 1:28:38.657
<v Speaker 3>these teams last year with their rookie quarterbacks did.

1:28:38.737 --> 1:28:40.777
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but you could also say look at look at

1:28:40.777 --> 1:28:43.258
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings, like the Vikings are going to potentially be

1:28:43.298 --> 1:28:44.577
<v Speaker 2>the number one seed in the playoff.

1:28:45.178 --> 1:28:48.258
<v Speaker 3>But that was a slow burn, that was not I just.

1:28:48.218 --> 1:28:50.338
<v Speaker 2>Look at it, and I think you didn't have people.

1:28:50.138 --> 1:28:52.177
<v Speaker 3>Line to buy Sam Donald Jerseys.

1:28:52.218 --> 1:28:53.857
<v Speaker 2>I know, but we have a fifty to fifty hit

1:28:53.978 --> 1:28:56.537
<v Speaker 2>rate with these quarterbacks in the first round. For every

1:28:56.697 --> 1:28:59.737
<v Speaker 2>for every Jaden Daniels and Drake May and Bo Nicks,

1:28:59.857 --> 1:29:02.617
<v Speaker 2>there is a you know we know all of them

1:29:02.697 --> 1:29:04.458
<v Speaker 2>right then, you know that there's there's a bust, right,

1:29:04.497 --> 1:29:07.137
<v Speaker 2>there's a Zach Wilson, there's you know, there's a Mac Jones.

1:29:07.178 --> 1:29:09.097
<v Speaker 2>Like this could go either way in the draft.

1:29:09.338 --> 1:29:12.418
<v Speaker 3>I know your plan is to sign Zach Wilson or

1:29:12.418 --> 1:29:13.378
<v Speaker 3>mac Jones instead.

1:29:13.697 --> 1:29:17.577
<v Speaker 2>No, yeah, I hear you do different. That's one team one.

1:29:17.857 --> 1:29:19.697
<v Speaker 2>I get it. There's a difference between. There's not like

1:29:19.737 --> 1:29:24.177
<v Speaker 2>a great pivot. I would say Donald to the Giants though,

1:29:24.497 --> 1:29:28.378
<v Speaker 2>to me just feels really uh doable, Like I feel

1:29:28.418 --> 1:29:31.497
<v Speaker 2>like if if Dable stays, so you feel good about

1:29:31.497 --> 1:29:33.937
<v Speaker 2>the development and the play calling and all that, and

1:29:33.978 --> 1:29:36.177
<v Speaker 2>the offensive side of the ball. You have the league

1:29:36.178 --> 1:29:39.458
<v Speaker 2>neighbors for him, like you obviously use the number two

1:29:39.497 --> 1:29:41.977
<v Speaker 2>overall pick or whatever pick they end up with, four two,

1:29:42.018 --> 1:29:46.218
<v Speaker 2>whatever you draft, you know, help to help him out

1:29:46.258 --> 1:29:48.577
<v Speaker 2>even more. You know, maybe that's a tech McMillan team,

1:29:48.617 --> 1:29:50.257
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's a tackle team. Whatever.

1:29:50.418 --> 1:29:52.937
<v Speaker 3>So now the Patriots called Tennessee Titans, or the Cleveland

1:29:52.937 --> 1:29:56.097
<v Speaker 3>Browns or the Las Vegas Raiders. Sure you didn't get

1:29:56.138 --> 1:29:57.977
<v Speaker 3>who did not get Sam Donald?

1:29:58.098 --> 1:30:00.537
<v Speaker 2>Right? But Sam Donald's and now those teams are more

1:30:00.577 --> 1:30:03.378
<v Speaker 2>desperate because there's one guy off the Okay, let me

1:30:03.418 --> 1:30:05.657
<v Speaker 2>give you another name, Okay, because I just to have fun.

1:30:06.458 --> 1:30:11.178
<v Speaker 2>Rock Purty well does his elbow work? Assume it works.

1:30:13.138 --> 1:30:16.058
<v Speaker 3>All right? Would you rarely rather have Brock Purty than

1:30:16.058 --> 1:30:17.298
<v Speaker 3>Shur Sanders.

1:30:17.418 --> 1:30:20.378
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you of all people would yes, because at least

1:30:20.617 --> 1:30:23.058
<v Speaker 2>at least I have that Brock Party can play in

1:30:23.058 --> 1:30:23.338
<v Speaker 2>the line.

1:30:23.497 --> 1:30:25.777
<v Speaker 3>I saw enough of what Brock Party looks like this

1:30:25.857 --> 1:30:27.418
<v Speaker 3>year without the monstars around him.

1:30:27.458 --> 1:30:29.178
<v Speaker 2>On offense, he actually I thought he played better this

1:30:29.258 --> 1:30:30.977
<v Speaker 2>year than he did last year. I don't think so.

1:30:31.098 --> 1:30:32.418
<v Speaker 2>I think you did. I think last year he was

1:30:32.458 --> 1:30:35.458
<v Speaker 2>just surrounded by freaking monstars. Like you just said, this

1:30:35.577 --> 1:30:37.458
<v Speaker 2>year he actually had to elevate a little bit and

1:30:37.458 --> 1:30:40.218
<v Speaker 2>actually think he played better. How many games they went? Yeah,

1:30:40.258 --> 1:30:42.057
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying they won a ton, but I actually

1:30:42.098 --> 1:30:43.977
<v Speaker 2>thought that his film and his play was better.

1:30:44.058 --> 1:30:45.937
<v Speaker 3>So and again, now you have to sell the owner on.

1:30:46.338 --> 1:30:48.338
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna get people line up around the block for

1:30:48.418 --> 1:30:51.217
<v Speaker 3>Brock Purty jerseys in Las Vegas.

1:30:52.178 --> 1:30:56.497
<v Speaker 2>The Raiders may be able to sell those better off

1:30:56.537 --> 1:30:58.737
<v Speaker 2>with that. Like I just again, I'm just not high

1:30:58.777 --> 1:31:01.497
<v Speaker 2>on the quarterback class. You're building a brand new stadium

1:31:01.497 --> 1:31:03.937
<v Speaker 2>in Tennessee. Oh my god, you're building that to put

1:31:04.058 --> 1:31:06.737
<v Speaker 2>put Brock Party in the middle of it. Yeah, you

1:31:06.777 --> 1:31:10.178
<v Speaker 2>can as opposed to went to a super Bowl and

1:31:10.897 --> 1:31:13.057
<v Speaker 2>has been pretty good. Oh so now we're giving brock

1:31:13.058 --> 1:31:16.937
<v Speaker 2>Purty credit for that super Bowl because not given Brock

1:31:16.978 --> 1:31:18.697
<v Speaker 2>Party the reason why I brought out up. All right,

1:31:18.777 --> 1:31:21.018
<v Speaker 2>So then you know who's a free agent, Jimmy Garoppolo. No,

1:31:21.138 --> 1:31:23.257
<v Speaker 2>come on. The reason why I brought up brock Party

1:31:23.657 --> 1:31:25.777
<v Speaker 2>is because one, I just wanted to bring up Brock

1:31:25.777 --> 1:31:28.217
<v Speaker 2>Party because I knew it would be funny. But two,

1:31:29.098 --> 1:31:32.017
<v Speaker 2>you and I both know that there's a chance that

1:31:32.098 --> 1:31:34.737
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Shanahan looks at brock Purty and says, you want

1:31:34.777 --> 1:31:35.617
<v Speaker 2>me to pay you how much?

1:31:35.897 --> 1:31:38.378
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Brock Party might be gone. That's very real,

1:31:38.458 --> 1:31:40.937
<v Speaker 3>all right. I still he's not gonna move on from

1:31:40.937 --> 1:31:42.418
<v Speaker 3>Brock Party this year, still has one more year in

1:31:42.458 --> 1:31:42.937
<v Speaker 3>his contract.

1:31:43.098 --> 1:31:45.977
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but he wants he needs that extension, and the Niners,

1:31:46.018 --> 1:31:47.617
<v Speaker 2>I am not sold, are going to give him that.

1:31:47.777 --> 1:31:49.378
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a real chance he ends up being

1:31:49.418 --> 1:31:50.897
<v Speaker 3>a lame duck starting quarterback for them.

1:31:51.138 --> 1:31:53.217
<v Speaker 2>It could happened, and he could get like a Daniel

1:31:53.298 --> 1:31:56.137
<v Speaker 2>Jones type extension where it's like really a two year deal.

1:31:56.338 --> 1:31:59.138
<v Speaker 2>But it's disguised as like a four year you know, uh,

1:31:59.497 --> 1:32:04.218
<v Speaker 2>mega quarterback. You're if that's what NFL teams want to do,

1:32:04.258 --> 1:32:06.657
<v Speaker 2>that's what they want to do. But I'm just telling

1:32:06.697 --> 1:32:09.258
<v Speaker 2>you that I feel like the reclamation project thing is

1:32:09.258 --> 1:32:09.937
<v Speaker 2>in right now.

1:32:10.058 --> 1:32:16.818
<v Speaker 3>It is, but there are not five serious reclamation quarterbacks Tennessee, Cleveland,

1:32:16.978 --> 1:32:19.537
<v Speaker 3>the Giants, the Jets aren't gonna do a reclamation They

1:32:19.617 --> 1:32:23.378
<v Speaker 3>just did that, the Raiders in the Saints. If you

1:32:23.418 --> 1:32:26.657
<v Speaker 3>can give me five quarterbacks more that are a better

1:32:26.697 --> 1:32:29.937
<v Speaker 3>option than Shouldur Sanders, I'll agree with your take.

1:32:29.978 --> 1:32:32.058
<v Speaker 2>But should Sanders can only go to one team to

1:32:32.617 --> 1:32:33.658
<v Speaker 2>do the Sam Donald.

1:32:33.497 --> 1:32:35.098
<v Speaker 3>They trade, So the Patriots only need one team that

1:32:35.138 --> 1:32:36.817
<v Speaker 3>they're not trading the pick to three different teams.

1:32:36.897 --> 1:32:39.418
<v Speaker 2>No, but they need at least two teams to be

1:32:39.458 --> 1:32:41.817
<v Speaker 2>interested in the pick. They only need one. They don't

1:32:42.018 --> 1:32:45.218
<v Speaker 2>they need at least two as that's not how markets work.

1:32:45.258 --> 1:32:50.138
<v Speaker 3>But tea, but you're not gonna if somebody wants if

1:32:50.138 --> 1:32:52.697
<v Speaker 3>somebody views Sanders a franchise quarterback, they are going to

1:32:52.737 --> 1:32:54.178
<v Speaker 3>trade up, right.

1:32:54.378 --> 1:32:57.017
<v Speaker 2>You think that a team that no, like let's say

1:32:57.098 --> 1:32:59.418
<v Speaker 2>it's a team that's at four or three or four

1:32:59.497 --> 1:33:02.857
<v Speaker 2>or five and they know that. Yeah, they want Shador Sanders,

1:33:02.897 --> 1:33:05.737
<v Speaker 2>but nobody else freaking does you think that they're gonna

1:33:05.737 --> 1:33:08.058
<v Speaker 2>just trade a package to the Patriots.

1:33:07.617 --> 1:33:09.817
<v Speaker 3>Just because because maybe some of these teams don't want

1:33:09.817 --> 1:33:12.057
<v Speaker 3>Sanders at one, but they take them at three or four.

1:33:13.218 --> 1:33:15.737
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but what if that team's already had, like well.

1:33:16.098 --> 1:33:18.258
<v Speaker 3>The Cleveland Browns are a fascinating wild card.

1:33:18.338 --> 1:33:21.897
<v Speaker 2>Somebody needs to say, Okay, this team is picking two.

1:33:22.098 --> 1:33:25.737
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee is picking second overall and as a quarterback team,

1:33:25.978 --> 1:33:29.178
<v Speaker 2>and will take Shador Sanders if if the Patriots don't

1:33:29.178 --> 1:33:31.338
<v Speaker 2>trade out of that pick, and that's how you create

1:33:31.378 --> 1:33:34.257
<v Speaker 2>the market, right you need but you need that to exist.

1:33:34.338 --> 1:33:36.777
<v Speaker 2>Like if the Titans so again, Sam Darnold, then it

1:33:36.777 --> 1:33:37.258
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work.

1:33:37.258 --> 1:33:39.178
<v Speaker 3>So you only need one team plus the Titans. I

1:33:39.178 --> 1:33:41.178
<v Speaker 3>don't think the Titans are going the veteran route. They

1:33:41.298 --> 1:33:44.017
<v Speaker 3>they have not invested in that position seriously in a

1:33:44.018 --> 1:33:44.497
<v Speaker 3>long time.

1:33:44.577 --> 1:33:46.497
<v Speaker 2>Except the real guys. It didn't work.

1:33:46.537 --> 1:33:48.298
<v Speaker 3>It clearly didn't work, and deep weren't happy with that

1:33:48.338 --> 1:33:49.817
<v Speaker 3>pick at the time that they half measured it.

1:33:50.458 --> 1:33:52.298
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's well, no, you had a chance.

1:33:52.298 --> 1:33:54.458
<v Speaker 3>Talk about you, guy, Tyler Warren there, Oh yeah, I

1:33:54.777 --> 1:33:56.217
<v Speaker 3>do like Tyler Warren a lot.

1:33:56.497 --> 1:34:00.577
<v Speaker 2>Here's my reservation with Tyler Tyler Warren, and I hate

1:34:00.617 --> 1:34:02.058
<v Speaker 2>to hold this against him, but it's kind of like

1:34:02.098 --> 1:34:05.497
<v Speaker 2>the tight end thing in general. To me, building an

1:34:05.577 --> 1:34:09.097
<v Speaker 2>offense around a tight end is just different than building

1:34:09.098 --> 1:34:12.017
<v Speaker 2>it around receivers, and you need that tight end to

1:34:12.058 --> 1:34:15.098
<v Speaker 2>be Gronk Kelsey level. Good. Well, what if to make

1:34:15.138 --> 1:34:18.017
<v Speaker 2>it T Higgins DK Metcalf kind of guy. Sure, if

1:34:18.058 --> 1:34:20.258
<v Speaker 2>there's multiple pieces to this. So I know you were

1:34:20.298 --> 1:34:20.817
<v Speaker 2>you were big.

1:34:20.857 --> 1:34:24.977
<v Speaker 3>You were talking earlier about get TK metcalfevery you know,

1:34:25.058 --> 1:34:27.617
<v Speaker 3>trade for DK Metcalf and then move up into the

1:34:27.617 --> 1:34:29.697
<v Speaker 3>first or hope in the second that like in Mecha

1:34:29.777 --> 1:34:32.378
<v Speaker 3>Buca falls you right, Yeah, could you do that playing

1:34:32.378 --> 1:34:33.017
<v Speaker 3>with Tyler Warren?

1:34:35.178 --> 1:34:37.017
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, you can trade back up for Tyler Warren.

1:34:37.058 --> 1:34:39.258
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you my issue with Tyler Warren. Okay, I

1:34:39.298 --> 1:34:41.218
<v Speaker 3>think he's gonna go too early to real estately trade

1:34:41.218 --> 1:34:42.177
<v Speaker 3>back up in the first round.

1:34:42.378 --> 1:34:44.337
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially well.

1:34:44.178 --> 1:34:46.737
<v Speaker 3>He's listed at six six, two sixty, which is part

1:34:46.737 --> 1:34:49.298
<v Speaker 3>of what makes him so impressive. Yeah, he might get

1:34:49.338 --> 1:34:51.418
<v Speaker 3>to the combine and be like two forty five, So

1:34:51.458 --> 1:34:54.537
<v Speaker 3>we'll see there, but he he I don't think he's

1:34:54.537 --> 1:34:56.298
<v Speaker 3>go'n be a top fifteen pick. I think he's gonna

1:34:56.298 --> 1:34:56.897
<v Speaker 3>be top twenty.

1:34:57.458 --> 1:34:59.577
<v Speaker 2>He moves like a smaller guy, but he has the

1:34:59.577 --> 1:35:02.577
<v Speaker 2>physicality of the bigger guy. Still. This isn't Travis Kelsey,

1:35:02.617 --> 1:35:06.218
<v Speaker 2>who plays like a right So that's the thing.

1:35:06.298 --> 1:35:08.617
<v Speaker 3>One like he can walk in for I was gonna

1:35:09.098 --> 1:35:11.497
<v Speaker 3>he'll block, he'll play, he'll do the dirty work. The

1:35:11.577 --> 1:35:13.697
<v Speaker 3>Travis ke This is not always a wide receiver, but

1:35:13.737 --> 1:35:15.617
<v Speaker 3>he's big, so call the tight end. This is a

1:35:15.657 --> 1:35:18.497
<v Speaker 3>true three down, well rounded tight end. Yeah. The other

1:35:18.537 --> 1:35:21.378
<v Speaker 3>thing he is going for him copycat league. How many

1:35:21.378 --> 1:35:23.537
<v Speaker 3>teams around the league you think are locking their chops

1:35:23.817 --> 1:35:25.897
<v Speaker 3>looking at it and going, I'd love to get myself

1:35:25.897 --> 1:35:27.418
<v Speaker 3>a brock Bowers. This is the guy.

1:35:27.657 --> 1:35:30.097
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not it's not fair to brock Bowers because

1:35:30.098 --> 1:35:33.017
<v Speaker 2>he's been awesome. Yeah, but it sort of speaks to

1:35:33.058 --> 1:35:37.298
<v Speaker 2>my point. He just hasn't impacted that offense at all.

1:35:37.497 --> 1:35:40.257
<v Speaker 2>Like he's He's put up great numbers, but the offense

1:35:40.298 --> 1:35:43.017
<v Speaker 2>isn't any better. And that and that's mostly because they

1:35:43.018 --> 1:35:45.578
<v Speaker 2>don't have a quarterback. Like I'm not. It's not necessarily

1:35:45.737 --> 1:35:48.378
<v Speaker 2>solely a brock Bauers problem because like you could say,

1:35:48.458 --> 1:35:50.298
<v Speaker 2>although to be fair, like couldn't I say the same

1:35:50.298 --> 1:35:51.857
<v Speaker 2>thing about Malik. I was just about to say that

1:35:51.897 --> 1:35:53.817
<v Speaker 2>you could say, they probably say something similar to Melik

1:35:53.857 --> 1:35:57.218
<v Speaker 2>neighbors as well. But I just think from a coaching standpoint,

1:35:57.737 --> 1:36:00.418
<v Speaker 2>if you're trying a game plan team that has a

1:36:00.458 --> 1:36:04.897
<v Speaker 2>really really good tight end, I unless again, unless he's

1:36:05.178 --> 1:36:09.418
<v Speaker 2>Gronk Kelsey that kind of level, I do think that

1:36:09.537 --> 1:36:13.338
<v Speaker 2>it is. It's just harder to build it out from there,

1:36:13.897 --> 1:36:18.378
<v Speaker 2>right most of the time, Like tight ends are eight

1:36:18.458 --> 1:36:20.977
<v Speaker 2>hundred yards a year, you know. And and the thing

1:36:21.018 --> 1:36:23.657
<v Speaker 2>that I worry about with Tyler Warren is like, you know,

1:36:24.018 --> 1:36:25.537
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's gonna be as bad, but like

1:36:25.617 --> 1:36:28.458
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Pitt's right was supposed to like change the revolution

1:36:28.577 --> 1:36:32.258
<v Speaker 2>of tight ends and everything, you know, TJ. Hockinson, who

1:36:32.338 --> 1:36:34.737
<v Speaker 2>I thought was a great prospect coming out like that,

1:36:34.817 --> 1:36:38.617
<v Speaker 2>this happens with tight ends. OJ Howard, Like these guys

1:36:38.657 --> 1:36:41.497
<v Speaker 2>get overdrafted a little bit. But I do like the player.

1:36:41.657 --> 1:36:43.897
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to kill the player. I just I

1:36:44.258 --> 1:36:47.057
<v Speaker 2>always am weary of Okay, we're going to build around

1:36:47.058 --> 1:36:49.258
<v Speaker 2>a tight end, like you better hope that that's a

1:36:49.338 --> 1:36:51.737
<v Speaker 2>generational tight end. You better hope that guy's really good.

1:36:52.018 --> 1:36:54.617
<v Speaker 2>All right, Tie in North Carolina is on the line.

1:36:54.617 --> 1:36:55.138
<v Speaker 2>What's up? Tie?

1:36:57.218 --> 1:36:57.418
<v Speaker 10>Hey?

1:36:57.418 --> 1:36:57.777
<v Speaker 6>What's up?

1:36:57.817 --> 1:36:58.097
<v Speaker 4>Guys?

1:36:58.338 --> 1:37:01.218
<v Speaker 11>Wanted the change tracks real quick from draft talking talk

1:37:01.298 --> 1:37:04.177
<v Speaker 11>a little bit about coach Mayo. One thing I haven't

1:37:04.178 --> 1:37:07.338
<v Speaker 11>really heard too much talked about is just the fact

1:37:07.378 --> 1:37:09.138
<v Speaker 11>that he knew that he was going to be the

1:37:09.138 --> 1:37:11.258
<v Speaker 11>Patriots ed coach. I know he took over a year

1:37:12.378 --> 1:37:15.378
<v Speaker 11>before he was expected to, but he knew that he

1:37:15.458 --> 1:37:17.537
<v Speaker 11>was going to be taken over for Bill and for

1:37:17.617 --> 1:37:19.937
<v Speaker 11>this year to look the way that it has has

1:37:20.018 --> 1:37:23.178
<v Speaker 11>just been really disappointing. And I think that there's just

1:37:23.218 --> 1:37:26.937
<v Speaker 11>way too momentum involved with hiring a coach variable in

1:37:26.978 --> 1:37:30.817
<v Speaker 11>the offseason and using that to bring in free against

1:37:30.857 --> 1:37:35.458
<v Speaker 11>and then also work the draft, trade back, get as

1:37:35.537 --> 1:37:38.458
<v Speaker 11>many assets and and build forward. I just want to

1:37:38.458 --> 1:37:39.458
<v Speaker 11>get your guys thoughts on that.

1:37:39.937 --> 1:37:41.977
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, TDD, thanks for the call. I would say the

1:37:42.378 --> 1:37:46.777
<v Speaker 2>biggest criticism beyond the micro level stuff that we can pick,

1:37:46.817 --> 1:37:49.378
<v Speaker 2>you know, the scheme and all that messaging and uh,

1:37:49.537 --> 1:37:53.138
<v Speaker 2>the biggest criticism that I have with Gerrodmeo uh so

1:37:53.338 --> 1:37:56.418
<v Speaker 2>far has been that I don't think that he was

1:37:56.617 --> 1:38:00.017
<v Speaker 2>at all prepared to build a staff when he got hired.

1:38:00.577 --> 1:38:02.657
<v Speaker 2>And when you look at a lot of these other

1:38:02.697 --> 1:38:07.258
<v Speaker 2>coaches around the league, when they get the job, they

1:38:07.298 --> 1:38:09.058
<v Speaker 2>know who their OC is going to be, they know

1:38:09.098 --> 1:38:11.537
<v Speaker 2>who their DC is going to be, and it almost

1:38:11.657 --> 1:38:14.018
<v Speaker 2>is coming as a package. Like part of the interview

1:38:14.697 --> 1:38:17.817
<v Speaker 2>is who are going to be your high level assistant?

1:38:17.897 --> 1:38:19.737
<v Speaker 3>You'd lay out, this is who I'm bringing with.

1:38:19.897 --> 1:38:24.257
<v Speaker 2>Right, and so you know a couple of examples, Raheem

1:38:24.258 --> 1:38:28.497
<v Speaker 2>Morris in Atlanta. Raheem Morris knew that Zach Robinson was

1:38:28.497 --> 1:38:31.377
<v Speaker 2>coming with him from LA Right, he knew Zach Robinson

1:38:31.777 --> 1:38:35.057
<v Speaker 2>is my OC pick, He's my guy. Jim Harbaugh came

1:38:35.058 --> 1:38:37.458
<v Speaker 2>with two coordinators that have all sorts of ties to

1:38:37.458 --> 1:38:40.298
<v Speaker 2>the Harbas right, Greg Roman and Jesse Minter who was

1:38:40.298 --> 1:38:43.697
<v Speaker 2>at Michigan with him. He had his coordinators locked and

1:38:43.777 --> 1:38:47.097
<v Speaker 2>ready to go. Part of that is because Girod's only

1:38:47.138 --> 1:38:49.857
<v Speaker 2>worked for one organization and there wasn't an obvious OC

1:38:50.098 --> 1:38:52.737
<v Speaker 2>unless they kept O'Brien like, there wasn't an obvious OC

1:38:52.978 --> 1:38:56.298
<v Speaker 2>for him to go after within the walls. But it

1:38:56.458 --> 1:38:59.178
<v Speaker 2>just that would be my one criticism. I think the

1:38:59.218 --> 1:39:03.458
<v Speaker 2>one really strong pitch other than the obvious of the

1:39:03.537 --> 1:39:08.178
<v Speaker 2>experience that he has. The strong pitch for Rabel and

1:39:08.258 --> 1:39:12.057
<v Speaker 2>going that direction is that my guess is that Rabel

1:39:12.098 --> 1:39:15.378
<v Speaker 2>has spent the last year poking around to see who

1:39:15.418 --> 1:39:17.817
<v Speaker 2>he would come with him to his next stop. So

1:39:17.978 --> 1:39:22.258
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna come probably turnkey, like he's going to have. Yeah,

1:39:22.577 --> 1:39:24.817
<v Speaker 2>head coach is going to be him. I would actually

1:39:24.857 --> 1:39:26.497
<v Speaker 2>even say that there's a chance that he already has

1:39:26.497 --> 1:39:30.897
<v Speaker 2>a personnel guy that he would favor offensive coordinator, defensive coordinator,

1:39:30.937 --> 1:39:34.298
<v Speaker 2>special teams coordinator, probably some high level assistants that are

1:39:34.298 --> 1:39:38.137
<v Speaker 2>already on his radar as well. That's very appealing. It's

1:39:38.218 --> 1:39:42.338
<v Speaker 2>very appealing to have that turnkey situation. And this never

1:39:42.378 --> 1:39:45.978
<v Speaker 2>felt like this. They interviewed like fifteen offensive coordinator candidates

1:39:46.178 --> 1:39:49.178
<v Speaker 2>and settled on Alex van Pelt. DeMarcus Comington was an

1:39:49.218 --> 1:39:53.017
<v Speaker 2>internal promotion, obviously, but that one even felt like he

1:39:53.138 --> 1:39:55.378
<v Speaker 2>was maybe a year or two early to get that

1:39:55.458 --> 1:39:59.537
<v Speaker 2>kind of job. It just didn't feel like the staff

1:39:59.697 --> 1:40:03.258
<v Speaker 2>was in great shape from the jump. So, yeah, it

1:40:03.418 --> 1:40:06.577
<v Speaker 2>is appealing. You can't deny that it's appealing to just

1:40:07.178 --> 1:40:09.298
<v Speaker 2>go out there and get a guy like Rabel who

1:40:09.298 --> 1:40:11.617
<v Speaker 2>you know is going to be a turnkey staff and

1:40:11.817 --> 1:40:13.298
<v Speaker 2>that's a decision they are gonna have to make.

1:40:13.378 --> 1:40:14.977
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's why I've had this take, like, if they

1:40:14.978 --> 1:40:17.577
<v Speaker 3>are going to move on from Drod Mayo, right, I've

1:40:17.577 --> 1:40:19.577
<v Speaker 3>seen people say you need an offensive coach or Drake

1:40:19.617 --> 1:40:21.737
<v Speaker 3>may more than offensive versus defensive. I just want a

1:40:21.777 --> 1:40:23.098
<v Speaker 3>guy with previous experience.

1:40:23.298 --> 1:40:23.458
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

1:40:23.497 --> 1:40:26.017
<v Speaker 3>I don't think replacing a rookie head coach with another

1:40:26.058 --> 1:40:28.737
<v Speaker 3>rookie head coach solves the problems you're trying to solve it. Like,

1:40:28.737 --> 1:40:31.617
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of out on Ben Johnson because we know

1:40:31.697 --> 1:40:33.298
<v Speaker 3>he can design an offense and we know he can

1:40:33.338 --> 1:40:35.458
<v Speaker 3>be great in that regard and all that, But can

1:40:35.458 --> 1:40:37.378
<v Speaker 3>he command a locker room? Can he do the game

1:40:37.418 --> 1:40:39.617
<v Speaker 3>planning element of it? Can he handle the pressers and

1:40:39.657 --> 1:40:43.937
<v Speaker 3>things like that? I think experience If they are moving

1:40:43.937 --> 1:40:47.577
<v Speaker 3>on from Ao, what should the next guy have? Issue

1:40:47.657 --> 1:40:49.577
<v Speaker 3>Number one? From his experience, you figure it out on

1:40:49.617 --> 1:40:51.777
<v Speaker 3>either side of the ball. After that, with coordinators and

1:40:51.857 --> 1:40:54.138
<v Speaker 3>the fact Vrabel might come with Josh McDaniels, who's not

1:40:54.138 --> 1:40:57.617
<v Speaker 3>a flight risk, is certainly in a unique intriguing trait.

1:40:57.697 --> 1:41:01.658
<v Speaker 3>We talked about this last year, But yeah, I experience

1:41:01.817 --> 1:41:04.138
<v Speaker 3>should be the number one concern if they are going

1:41:04.178 --> 1:41:07.497
<v Speaker 3>to add a new head coach above all else experience.

1:41:07.577 --> 1:41:09.937
<v Speaker 2>And I've come I think this is, you know, doing

1:41:10.018 --> 1:41:11.897
<v Speaker 2>side of the street. I've come around to the whole

1:41:11.937 --> 1:41:16.777
<v Speaker 2>idea of like, you know, culture building and building a

1:41:17.458 --> 1:41:21.258
<v Speaker 2>football program. Like I feel and maybe it's just because

1:41:21.298 --> 1:41:24.177
<v Speaker 2>Jim Harbaugh was just here, Yeah, but it feels as though,

1:41:24.298 --> 1:41:28.098
<v Speaker 2>you know that has become even more important in a

1:41:28.098 --> 1:41:31.057
<v Speaker 2>lot of cases than he calls offensive place.

1:41:31.098 --> 1:41:33.657
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, your point about that is, well, you want

1:41:33.697 --> 1:41:35.777
<v Speaker 3>an offensive coach because him and the quarterback can grow

1:41:35.817 --> 1:41:38.617
<v Speaker 3>together and all that. But if you have a head coach,

1:41:38.657 --> 1:41:40.058
<v Speaker 3>and this is where Dan Campbell comes in, This is

1:41:40.058 --> 1:41:42.057
<v Speaker 3>where Dan Campbell's really gonna get put to Dan Campbell's

1:41:42.058 --> 1:41:43.857
<v Speaker 3>are well, this is where he'll get put to the

1:41:43.857 --> 1:41:45.777
<v Speaker 3>test this offseason. A big part of the reason Dan

1:41:45.817 --> 1:41:48.537
<v Speaker 3>Campbell is good is Ben Johnson and Aaron Glenn are

1:41:48.577 --> 1:41:50.857
<v Speaker 3>amazing at what they do. Doesn't mean they'll be good

1:41:50.897 --> 1:41:53.137
<v Speaker 3>head coaches, but what they do they're amazing at. They're

1:41:53.178 --> 1:41:57.418
<v Speaker 3>both probably gonna leave this offseason. Does Dan Campbell have

1:41:57.458 --> 1:41:59.817
<v Speaker 3>a pipeline in place? For get developing players, can you

1:41:59.857 --> 1:42:02.097
<v Speaker 3>develop coaches? That's part of the reason it worked here

1:42:02.138 --> 1:42:04.458
<v Speaker 3>for so long there was always the next guy up.

1:42:04.657 --> 1:42:07.497
<v Speaker 3>And realistically, if your offensive coordinator moves on right and

1:42:07.537 --> 1:42:09.977
<v Speaker 3>you replace with the quarterbacks coach, are you replacing with

1:42:10.018 --> 1:42:12.337
<v Speaker 3>the tight ends coach, you replacement with the passing and coordinator.

1:42:12.777 --> 1:42:14.617
<v Speaker 3>The guys in your pipeline are not going to run

1:42:14.657 --> 1:42:17.977
<v Speaker 3>a wildly different offense. So as long as you can

1:42:18.098 --> 1:42:21.817
<v Speaker 3>keep a pipeline and continue hiring from within, the concept

1:42:21.817 --> 1:42:23.977
<v Speaker 3>of your offensive coordinator moving on every two or three

1:42:24.018 --> 1:42:28.017
<v Speaker 3>years really isn't as scary as it otherwise would be.

1:42:28.138 --> 1:42:31.417
<v Speaker 2>So especially if your quarterback gets to the point where he's.

1:42:31.378 --> 1:42:33.578
<v Speaker 3>Right and four or five years in if becomes irrelevant.

1:42:33.777 --> 1:42:35.857
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, Josh Allen, like they they kind of

1:42:35.897 --> 1:42:39.098
<v Speaker 2>screwed up with Mercy, but he's so good that he

1:42:39.258 --> 1:42:41.577
<v Speaker 2>just kind of persevered through it, and they got it

1:42:41.657 --> 1:42:43.657
<v Speaker 2>right with Joe Brady, so it ended up not mattering.

1:42:43.978 --> 1:42:46.977
<v Speaker 3>So for me, it's it's like, if your coach can

1:42:47.018 --> 1:42:49.697
<v Speaker 3>develop coaches, yeah, it doesn't really matter what side of

1:42:49.737 --> 1:42:51.617
<v Speaker 3>the ball he's on, and I trust for able to

1:42:51.617 --> 1:42:52.298
<v Speaker 3>be able to do that.

1:42:52.418 --> 1:42:54.857
<v Speaker 2>There's a couple of guys in the UH in the

1:42:54.937 --> 1:42:58.697
<v Speaker 2>Lions staff who was the tight Ends coach that interviewed

1:42:58.737 --> 1:43:01.897
<v Speaker 2>around last year for OC jobs, if interviewed here, right, Yeah,

1:43:01.897 --> 1:43:04.458
<v Speaker 2>it'd be interesting to see, uh if if those guys

1:43:04.537 --> 1:43:06.577
<v Speaker 2>can can coach, like and it's that thing you have

1:43:06.657 --> 1:43:07.217
<v Speaker 2>an agreement.

1:43:07.218 --> 1:43:09.378
<v Speaker 3>It's like I you know, I developed you, I worked

1:43:09.378 --> 1:43:11.057
<v Speaker 3>with you, so you just have to leave me one

1:43:11.138 --> 1:43:13.458
<v Speaker 3>or two guys when you take your new job. So

1:43:13.497 --> 1:43:17.657
<v Speaker 3>that uh Steve Hyden, No, yeah, that's their tight Ends.

1:43:17.777 --> 1:43:18.617
<v Speaker 3>It was Steve Hyden.

1:43:18.657 --> 1:43:20.097
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, I think it was somebody else. I'm thinking

1:43:20.098 --> 1:43:20.258
<v Speaker 2>of it.

1:43:20.298 --> 1:43:23.378
<v Speaker 3>You were thinking of em Tanner Engstrid, Yeah, that he

1:43:23.537 --> 1:43:25.497
<v Speaker 3>is their pass games.

1:43:26.697 --> 1:43:28.258
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was the tight Ends coach a couple of

1:43:28.298 --> 1:43:30.458
<v Speaker 2>years ago. But he's the guy that that seems to be.

1:43:30.777 --> 1:43:33.298
<v Speaker 3>You just you just keep that pipeline stocked and it's

1:43:33.338 --> 1:43:34.777
<v Speaker 3>gonna matter a lot less than you thought.

1:43:34.937 --> 1:43:37.897
<v Speaker 2>Yep, all right, Mark is in Connecticut. What's that Mark?

1:43:39.497 --> 1:43:42.418
<v Speaker 6>Hey, guys, just said two quick things for you. First

1:43:42.418 --> 1:43:50.697
<v Speaker 6>of all, happy New year, guys, And first questions for Alex, So, Alex,

1:43:50.697 --> 1:43:55.057
<v Speaker 6>I'm not understanding what Gaine now. NBC Sports Squasson talked

1:43:55.098 --> 1:43:57.298
<v Speaker 6>about it a lot. What gain do you have by

1:43:57.298 --> 1:44:00.138
<v Speaker 6>putting Drake mate out there? Other than getting him a

1:44:00.138 --> 1:44:03.338
<v Speaker 6>little more experienced. I mean, he's already hurt. You know,

1:44:03.378 --> 1:44:06.538
<v Speaker 6>you're really just you're throwing him out there to accomplish

1:44:06.657 --> 1:44:08.857
<v Speaker 6>what I mean. The Buffalo Bills are going to have

1:44:08.978 --> 1:44:11.617
<v Speaker 6>their backups out there, most of them. I mean, Josh

1:44:11.657 --> 1:44:13.697
<v Speaker 6>Allen's gonna come out for a series maybe and then

1:44:13.737 --> 1:44:14.697
<v Speaker 6>that's right.

1:44:14.737 --> 1:44:16.737
<v Speaker 3>So why can't he do the same thing as Josh Allen?

1:44:16.777 --> 1:44:18.418
<v Speaker 3>That's my whole point. Come out, hand it off a

1:44:18.458 --> 1:44:21.657
<v Speaker 3>couple times. He's your franchise quarterback. Franchise quarterback, start games.

1:44:21.697 --> 1:44:23.817
<v Speaker 6>If he gets hurt and then he can't start the

1:44:23.897 --> 1:44:25.418
<v Speaker 6>next season, that's that's more.

1:44:25.298 --> 1:44:25.657
<v Speaker 7>Of the thing.

1:44:25.777 --> 1:44:29.338
<v Speaker 3>What if Josh Allen gets hurt, do you disagree with

1:44:29.378 --> 1:44:30.458
<v Speaker 3>the Bills starting Josh Allen?

1:44:30.497 --> 1:44:31.897
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen's going to turn around and hand the ball.

1:44:31.978 --> 1:44:33.378
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying. Why can't Drake May do that?

1:44:33.937 --> 1:44:34.097
<v Speaker 11>Well?

1:44:34.178 --> 1:44:36.218
<v Speaker 6>Then yeah, yeah, ok, I guess you can.

1:44:36.897 --> 1:44:39.657
<v Speaker 3>Right. That's that's all I'm not saying, Start Drake May

1:44:39.657 --> 1:44:42.537
<v Speaker 3>and have him dropped back fifty times. I'm saying, franchise,

1:44:42.577 --> 1:44:45.138
<v Speaker 3>this is what franchise quarterbacks do. He wants to be

1:44:45.218 --> 1:44:47.657
<v Speaker 3>viewed on that same level you as an organization want

1:44:47.697 --> 1:44:49.937
<v Speaker 3>and viewed on that same level. Let him go out there,

1:44:50.018 --> 1:44:52.097
<v Speaker 3>hand off a couple of times and take him out

1:44:52.338 --> 1:44:54.657
<v Speaker 3>because that's what star quarterbacks do in this league, and

1:44:54.697 --> 1:44:55.777
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to turn him into a star.

1:44:57.098 --> 1:45:02.057
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, And then the second thing was for Evan. I'm

1:45:02.138 --> 1:45:07.657
<v Speaker 6>just very disappointed in Gerard Mayo, his communication all year

1:45:07.697 --> 1:45:11.177
<v Speaker 6>with the media. I mean just his just in game

1:45:11.218 --> 1:45:14.977
<v Speaker 6>decisions have just it hasn't gotten better at all throughout

1:45:14.978 --> 1:45:19.418
<v Speaker 6>the year, and you should see progress and you haven't. Now.

1:45:19.697 --> 1:45:22.937
<v Speaker 6>I think Mike Rabel is the answer in everybody else

1:45:22.978 --> 1:45:25.178
<v Speaker 6>has been calling up talking about it as well. When

1:45:25.218 --> 1:45:27.497
<v Speaker 6>he can bring a staff in and we can get

1:45:27.497 --> 1:45:30.378
<v Speaker 6>this rebuild rocking and rolling. I think a lot fast

1:45:30.577 --> 1:45:33.178
<v Speaker 6>or sticking with you, Mayo, but I don't think that

1:45:33.458 --> 1:45:36.577
<v Speaker 6>the Crafts have the you know, the balls to do it,

1:45:36.857 --> 1:45:39.178
<v Speaker 6>because I think it'll look bad on them after one

1:45:39.258 --> 1:45:40.657
<v Speaker 6>year firing to Rod.

1:45:40.577 --> 1:45:44.537
<v Speaker 2>Mayo, Yeah, Mark, thanks for the call. I go back

1:45:44.577 --> 1:45:46.737
<v Speaker 2>and forth on that about whether it would look bad.

1:45:47.897 --> 1:45:50.137
<v Speaker 2>I think in a lot of ways it could look bad,

1:45:50.338 --> 1:45:52.458
<v Speaker 2>and you could certainly spin it that way if you

1:45:52.497 --> 1:45:55.817
<v Speaker 2>wanted to. I also think a lot of people will

1:45:55.817 --> 1:46:00.017
<v Speaker 2>spin it sunk cost fallacy right, like you, you made a.

1:46:00.018 --> 1:46:02.497
<v Speaker 3>Mistake, admitted they made a mistake, they moved on, right,

1:46:02.577 --> 1:46:04.697
<v Speaker 3>and then I mean it becomes about who they hire next.

1:46:04.777 --> 1:46:07.617
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like it's almost to me and this

1:46:07.697 --> 1:46:10.657
<v Speaker 2>is like just to be company man. But like I

1:46:11.098 --> 1:46:13.218
<v Speaker 2>honestly think that that would be commendable. Like I think

1:46:13.218 --> 1:46:15.537
<v Speaker 2>that that would be good, Like if they really truly

1:46:15.577 --> 1:46:17.737
<v Speaker 2>felt and they have all the information and we don't.

1:46:17.737 --> 1:46:20.697
<v Speaker 2>So if they truly really felt that this was a

1:46:20.737 --> 1:46:23.298
<v Speaker 2>mistake and he wasn't ready for it and it was

1:46:23.338 --> 1:46:26.617
<v Speaker 2>a mistake, then admitting the mistake and not wasting another

1:46:26.697 --> 1:46:30.218
<v Speaker 2>year of Drake May's clock, of the whole organization's time,

1:46:30.737 --> 1:46:33.577
<v Speaker 2>you know, all of our times, not wasting another year.

1:46:34.138 --> 1:46:36.937
<v Speaker 2>I honestly think that that would be spun as a

1:46:36.978 --> 1:46:39.697
<v Speaker 2>positive in a lot of ways. Okay, you made a mistake.

1:46:39.817 --> 1:46:42.058
<v Speaker 2>Now the difference is, and I know a lot of

1:46:42.058 --> 1:46:45.057
<v Speaker 2>people have said the thing about Rabel. I'm on board

1:46:45.058 --> 1:46:47.177
<v Speaker 2>with Rabel. I think we all are to an extent

1:46:47.418 --> 1:46:50.298
<v Speaker 2>if that's the way that this goes. But the other

1:46:50.378 --> 1:46:53.057
<v Speaker 2>side of this is part of this will be league

1:46:53.058 --> 1:46:56.258
<v Speaker 2>manadated with a Rooney rule. But you absolutely have to

1:46:56.258 --> 1:46:58.418
<v Speaker 2>have a legitimate hiring process. You got to go through

1:46:58.418 --> 1:47:01.098
<v Speaker 2>the process. You can't this time around. You can't just

1:47:01.138 --> 1:47:03.098
<v Speaker 2>hand the job to Rabel, as good as he is

1:47:03.218 --> 1:47:04.657
<v Speaker 2>and as much as I think he would be the

1:47:04.737 --> 1:47:07.937
<v Speaker 2>right hire. Now, is it ceremonial? Is it just going

1:47:07.978 --> 1:47:10.737
<v Speaker 2>through the motions? Maybe? But you look at the team

1:47:10.857 --> 1:47:13.617
<v Speaker 2>like the Chargers. The Chargers interviewed like ten or fifteen

1:47:13.657 --> 1:47:16.218
<v Speaker 2>guys for their head coaching job. You have to go

1:47:16.258 --> 1:47:20.097
<v Speaker 2>through a legitimate interview process. And if you end up

1:47:20.178 --> 1:47:22.857
<v Speaker 2>on Mike Vrabel at the end of that process, then great.

1:47:23.378 --> 1:47:26.817
<v Speaker 2>But you can't just do another situation where this is

1:47:26.857 --> 1:47:28.777
<v Speaker 2>like a handshake deal under the table and we're just

1:47:28.777 --> 1:47:31.138
<v Speaker 2>handing you the job. It's gonna have to be a

1:47:31.218 --> 1:47:35.057
<v Speaker 2>legitimate interview process. All right, DeShawn is in West Virginia.

1:47:35.138 --> 1:47:35.817
<v Speaker 2>What's up to Seawan?

1:47:37.857 --> 1:47:40.058
<v Speaker 10>As few as actually Virginia?

1:47:40.258 --> 1:47:42.577
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, regular Virginia.

1:47:44.777 --> 1:47:47.657
<v Speaker 10>Yes, two things. You know, for instance, like with the draft,

1:47:47.697 --> 1:47:50.058
<v Speaker 10>you know what I call it? That called about quarterbacks

1:47:50.378 --> 1:47:53.937
<v Speaker 10>since not being available. He basically deliverify my point and

1:47:54.817 --> 1:47:57.338
<v Speaker 10>I mentioned I believe I mentioned before on Pature's Unfiltered

1:47:57.378 --> 1:48:01.178
<v Speaker 10>about other guys jobs being like on the hot seat

1:48:01.178 --> 1:48:03.537
<v Speaker 10>as much as y'all you guys talk about the jobs,

1:48:03.697 --> 1:48:05.338
<v Speaker 10>a few jobs here in New England being on the

1:48:05.378 --> 1:48:07.298
<v Speaker 10>hot seat, you don't think that's the same thing, the

1:48:07.338 --> 1:48:08.897
<v Speaker 10>same woe be the same problem in the other place

1:48:09.018 --> 1:48:10.657
<v Speaker 10>or whatever. That's why I believe that they will be

1:48:10.737 --> 1:48:12.138
<v Speaker 10>anty go ahead and try to call up for the

1:48:12.218 --> 1:48:14.937
<v Speaker 10>number one pick, you know, to try to get that quarterback,

1:48:15.018 --> 1:48:17.697
<v Speaker 10>knowing the fact that the fativable feature may not hold,

1:48:18.138 --> 1:48:20.057
<v Speaker 10>you know, to be true as much as they wanted

1:48:20.098 --> 1:48:22.297
<v Speaker 10>to be. Now, when it comes to Mike Bravery the situation,

1:48:22.577 --> 1:48:25.257
<v Speaker 10>I believe he get him. He brings stability to the situation.

1:48:25.737 --> 1:48:28.537
<v Speaker 10>He can coach. And also if people talk blame him

1:48:28.737 --> 1:48:31.737
<v Speaker 10>for the destruction of Tennessee or whatever, people seven forget

1:48:31.777 --> 1:48:35.378
<v Speaker 10>that it was that GM. I believe he comes here,

1:48:35.418 --> 1:48:37.577
<v Speaker 10>he had more power and he'd be able to get

1:48:37.617 --> 1:48:39.537
<v Speaker 10>the gods that he want to get. What the gods

1:48:39.577 --> 1:48:41.857
<v Speaker 10>you want to keep. That's all I have to say.

1:48:42.218 --> 1:48:44.218
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Sean, thanks for the call. Yeah, look, I

1:48:44.537 --> 1:48:46.778
<v Speaker 2>get it. I get why everybody wants changes.

1:48:47.418 --> 1:48:51.178
<v Speaker 3>And I would not bring John Robinson with Mike Frabel that.

1:48:51.617 --> 1:48:55.057
<v Speaker 2>I sent you, Yeah, I sent you a text about this.

1:48:55.178 --> 1:48:59.378
<v Speaker 2>But Ryan Cowden in the New York Giants organization. Now,

1:48:59.737 --> 1:49:02.298
<v Speaker 2>who was the number two to John Robinson for a

1:49:02.298 --> 1:49:05.098
<v Speaker 2>long time in Tennessee. It sounds like there is a

1:49:05.138 --> 1:49:08.657
<v Speaker 2>connection there between Rabel. Now, the last thing I want

1:49:08.657 --> 1:49:12.378
<v Speaker 2>to say about this, and you know it's a touchy subject.

1:49:12.418 --> 1:49:13.857
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna lie to you, But the last thing

1:49:13.857 --> 1:49:16.777
<v Speaker 2>I want to say to you about about this is

1:49:16.817 --> 1:49:18.937
<v Speaker 2>there a world because I'm starting to think there might be.

1:49:19.617 --> 1:49:24.418
<v Speaker 2>Is there a world where it's just a rodd and

1:49:24.777 --> 1:49:30.298
<v Speaker 2>maybe Covington also, But Rabel comes with Elliott Wolf and

1:49:30.617 --> 1:49:33.937
<v Speaker 2>keeps Alex van Pelt and they go that direction because

1:49:34.857 --> 1:49:37.937
<v Speaker 2>I look at it, and raybol just came from Cleveland. Yeah,

1:49:38.058 --> 1:49:40.737
<v Speaker 2>just spent the year with Kevin Stefanski and Cleveland. And

1:49:40.777 --> 1:49:43.137
<v Speaker 2>some of the reporting out of Cleveland at the time

1:49:43.338 --> 1:49:45.497
<v Speaker 2>was that firing Van Pelt was a little bit of

1:49:45.497 --> 1:49:50.098
<v Speaker 2>a head scratcher for everybody there. Yeah, he just came

1:49:50.138 --> 1:49:54.857
<v Speaker 2>from Cleveland. His two coordinators in Tennessee were Lafleur and

1:49:54.978 --> 1:49:59.898
<v Speaker 2>Arthur Smith, who are both West Coast offense Shanahan decightful

1:49:59.978 --> 1:50:04.497
<v Speaker 2>type coaches and I wonder, you know, I know Josh

1:50:04.657 --> 1:50:08.137
<v Speaker 2>is popular. Tommy Reese is another name that's been floated around,

1:50:08.178 --> 1:50:10.338
<v Speaker 2>and I know you hate, but I just wonder, like,

1:50:10.418 --> 1:50:12.897
<v Speaker 2>if he's gonna run a West Coast offense anyways, right,

1:50:12.978 --> 1:50:15.498
<v Speaker 2>and it's gonna be that sort of flavor anyways.

1:50:16.897 --> 1:50:20.577
<v Speaker 3>Well, and then on top of that, you think Stefanski's.

1:50:20.018 --> 1:50:24.657
<v Speaker 2>Job is safe. He's a really good coach. I don't know.

1:50:24.817 --> 1:50:29.058
<v Speaker 3>Does Stefanski come in as essentially what my blanking on

1:50:29.098 --> 1:50:29.418
<v Speaker 3>his name?

1:50:30.897 --> 1:50:31.097
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1:50:31.138 --> 1:50:34.258
<v Speaker 3>Does Defanski come in as along with Ben McAdoo to

1:50:34.298 --> 1:50:37.658
<v Speaker 3>replace Ben McAdoo as kind of that offensive consultant.

1:50:37.817 --> 1:50:42.337
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's possible. It's possible. I just wonder. I'm beginning

1:50:42.338 --> 1:50:46.097
<v Speaker 2>to know the situation is. I look, the McDaniels thing

1:50:46.138 --> 1:50:48.497
<v Speaker 2>is always there. Yeah, I'm not saying it's not, and

1:50:48.777 --> 1:50:50.857
<v Speaker 2>it has its advantages. I don't know that.

1:50:52.098 --> 1:50:55.737
<v Speaker 3>I honestly don't know that between McDaniels in between Van Pelt,

1:50:55.937 --> 1:50:58.057
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that one's definitively better than the other.

1:50:58.098 --> 1:51:00.737
<v Speaker 3>They're very different. They both have pros and cons. But

1:51:01.617 --> 1:51:05.617
<v Speaker 3>there is certainly a through line with Elliott Wolf Mike

1:51:05.737 --> 1:51:09.418
<v Speaker 3>Rabel to Alex van Pelt. And then if I can

1:51:09.458 --> 1:51:12.178
<v Speaker 3>add one more to you there, Wes Welker.

1:51:12.857 --> 1:51:15.458
<v Speaker 2>So, Wes Welker is the name that I've thought of,

1:51:15.737 --> 1:51:19.018
<v Speaker 2>maybe Rabel being able to bring in the coach receivers.

1:51:19.418 --> 1:51:24.817
<v Speaker 2>There's also the current offensive coordinator for the Green Bay

1:51:24.857 --> 1:51:29.897
<v Speaker 2>Packers is on the coaching track to be promoted somewhere.

1:51:30.617 --> 1:51:35.497
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know pell Well right, but I'm talking

1:51:35.537 --> 1:51:37.497
<v Speaker 2>about if they're not, Oh, just another name to know.

1:51:37.657 --> 1:51:41.977
<v Speaker 2>I don't know Rabel is necessarily part of that. But

1:51:42.058 --> 1:51:44.497
<v Speaker 2>if the Patriots decide even to keep Gerrod and move

1:51:44.497 --> 1:51:50.537
<v Speaker 2>on from Adam Stenovich, yes, Adam Stenovich basically runs Green

1:51:50.577 --> 1:51:51.378
<v Speaker 2>Bay's run game.

1:51:51.897 --> 1:51:53.977
<v Speaker 3>He is the run game coordinator before he was the.

1:51:54.218 --> 1:51:56.737
<v Speaker 2>So he is Alex van Pelt in Cleveland. He is

1:51:56.777 --> 1:52:00.458
<v Speaker 2>not calling plays for the Green Bay Packers, but he

1:52:00.777 --> 1:52:03.537
<v Speaker 2>is a little bit more. Now.

1:52:03.897 --> 1:52:05.418
<v Speaker 3>If you're gonna do that, though, you got to get

1:52:05.418 --> 1:52:08.737
<v Speaker 3>a you got to get somebody with experience in that role.

1:52:09.378 --> 1:52:12.257
<v Speaker 2>I don't necessarily disagree with you, but at least according

1:52:12.298 --> 1:52:14.258
<v Speaker 2>to Lafloor and I think that you know, part of

1:52:14.298 --> 1:52:15.937
<v Speaker 2>it is lafor Is trying to gasp up his guy

1:52:15.978 --> 1:52:18.537
<v Speaker 2>to get him interviews and stuff like that. But Lafora

1:52:18.537 --> 1:52:21.617
<v Speaker 2>has said that this guy deserves to be a at

1:52:21.697 --> 1:52:24.737
<v Speaker 2>least a play caller somewhere, and he also has said

1:52:24.737 --> 1:52:27.298
<v Speaker 2>that he basically calls the run game, so they when

1:52:27.298 --> 1:52:29.298
<v Speaker 2>they know he's gonna they're gonna run the ball. He's

1:52:29.298 --> 1:52:31.737
<v Speaker 2>the one that's calling the play. So I think he

1:52:31.817 --> 1:52:36.057
<v Speaker 2>has done some a little bit of play calling. And

1:52:37.178 --> 1:52:41.258
<v Speaker 2>he apparently is like the next thing, the next Mike McDaniel,

1:52:41.338 --> 1:52:44.817
<v Speaker 2>the next Kyle Shanahan, the next Matt Before you know,

1:52:44.857 --> 1:52:48.577
<v Speaker 2>he's kind of the next guy. So whether it's Elliott

1:52:48.577 --> 1:52:52.497
<v Speaker 2>Wolfe's connection to Green Bay bringing him here, whether it's

1:52:52.657 --> 1:52:55.217
<v Speaker 2>you know, Mike Rabel and Elliott wolf bringing him whatever,

1:52:55.378 --> 1:52:56.777
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. But it's just a name to throw

1:52:56.817 --> 1:52:59.617
<v Speaker 2>out there that's in this system, in this tree, in

1:52:59.657 --> 1:53:02.258
<v Speaker 2>this world, last thing that I want to do before

1:53:02.258 --> 1:53:04.017
<v Speaker 2>we wrap here. I do have some reason to get.

1:53:05.777 --> 1:53:08.137
<v Speaker 2>I've been like a lot of what we're I want

1:53:08.138 --> 1:53:11.697
<v Speaker 2>that other Jeremiah Smith take. Oh yeah, we're gonna do

1:53:11.697 --> 1:53:15.258
<v Speaker 2>it right now. So I don't actually remember what I

1:53:15.258 --> 1:53:17.857
<v Speaker 2>said I was gonna say. But anyways, you said you

1:53:17.857 --> 1:53:21.577
<v Speaker 2>had another take on Jeremiah Smith. Okay, maybe I'll get

1:53:21.657 --> 1:53:24.497
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'll remember, so I have some recency biased guys

1:53:24.537 --> 1:53:29.218
<v Speaker 2>for you. Okay, not necessarily like pounding the table for

1:53:29.298 --> 1:53:32.577
<v Speaker 2>either guy. There's two guys I've watched recently. One of

1:53:32.577 --> 1:53:34.298
<v Speaker 2>them you're gonna hate. One of them, I'm not sure about.

1:53:34.897 --> 1:53:37.897
<v Speaker 2>They both go to Ohio State. So the guy that

1:53:37.978 --> 1:53:43.178
<v Speaker 2>I am swimming over a little bit now is a Meccava.

1:53:42.657 --> 1:53:44.577
<v Speaker 3>That I know which one gonna hate.

1:53:45.138 --> 1:53:50.657
<v Speaker 2>Meccauka from Ohio State, who to me plays a lot

1:53:50.737 --> 1:53:53.097
<v Speaker 2>like Jackson Smith and jigl like they played the same

1:53:53.178 --> 1:53:56.218
<v Speaker 2>role in the Ohio States offense, that z slot role. Uh,

1:53:56.258 --> 1:53:59.338
<v Speaker 2>and he just is more of like a glider smooth mover,

1:53:59.978 --> 1:54:02.697
<v Speaker 2>you know, bursty off the line of scrimmage, but not

1:54:02.737 --> 1:54:05.577
<v Speaker 2>gonna blow you away with speed over the top. He's

1:54:05.577 --> 1:54:08.258
<v Speaker 2>gonna be an inside receiver in the NFL. I just

1:54:08.497 --> 1:54:11.738
<v Speaker 2>like JSN has developed a Year two for the Seahawks.

1:54:12.058 --> 1:54:14.657
<v Speaker 2>I see like Buka as as your chain mover, right,

1:54:14.697 --> 1:54:17.017
<v Speaker 2>Like that guy's gonna catch a hundred passes in the NFL,

1:54:17.098 --> 1:54:19.418
<v Speaker 2>basically what Jalen Polk was supposed to be. Yeah, and

1:54:19.817 --> 1:54:23.057
<v Speaker 2>I really, I really thought his film was was really

1:54:23.058 --> 1:54:28.338
<v Speaker 2>really good. Just really smooth, doesn't fight it catches the

1:54:28.378 --> 1:54:32.138
<v Speaker 2>ball really smooth. You really, he's gonna be great in

1:54:32.138 --> 1:54:34.458
<v Speaker 2>the Gauntlet drill like one of those types of guys

1:54:34.658 --> 1:54:38.418
<v Speaker 2>that's got great body control, great hands, catcher, transitions really

1:54:38.458 --> 1:54:41.378
<v Speaker 2>quickly into yards after the catch, has quickness at the

1:54:41.378 --> 1:54:43.418
<v Speaker 2>top of the route to get open and create separation.

1:54:43.858 --> 1:54:46.137
<v Speaker 2>He's just not a blazer. He's just not a third

1:54:46.258 --> 1:54:49.897
<v Speaker 2>level deept type of receiver. Now. He can stretch the

1:54:49.897 --> 1:54:51.698
<v Speaker 2>field from the inside though. You put him, you know,

1:54:51.738 --> 1:54:54.338
<v Speaker 2>as the slot guy, number two, number three in trips like.

1:54:54.418 --> 1:54:57.338
<v Speaker 2>He can run the seam, he can run a deep over.

1:54:57.578 --> 1:55:00.818
<v Speaker 2>He caught a touchdown pass yesterday running you know, across

1:55:00.818 --> 1:55:04.498
<v Speaker 2>the field on a deep over. That those elements are there.

1:55:04.538 --> 1:55:06.418
<v Speaker 2>He's just not going to win on the outside on

1:55:06.458 --> 1:55:08.977
<v Speaker 2>the perimeter. But if you're building out, like kind of

1:55:09.018 --> 1:55:11.418
<v Speaker 2>an offense and you're building out, you know, a receiver room.

1:55:11.658 --> 1:55:13.658
<v Speaker 2>You know, if you get the outside guy in a

1:55:13.738 --> 1:55:15.778
<v Speaker 2>in free agency or in the veteran market, if it's

1:55:15.818 --> 1:55:19.178
<v Speaker 2>t Higgins, if it's DK Metcalf, it's whoever, if you

1:55:19.218 --> 1:55:21.618
<v Speaker 2>get that guy on the outside, you know, that's what

1:55:21.658 --> 1:55:23.858
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks have going on right now. Right they have

1:55:23.937 --> 1:55:25.977
<v Speaker 2>DK on the outside, they have Jason in the middle

1:55:25.978 --> 1:55:29.458
<v Speaker 2>of the field. Jayson's putting up great numbers. I'm starting

1:55:29.498 --> 1:55:33.137
<v Speaker 2>to really love the the idea of trading up into

1:55:33.178 --> 1:55:35.378
<v Speaker 2>the back end of the first round for Buka, who

1:55:35.378 --> 1:55:36.977
<v Speaker 2>I think is going to go somewhere in the twenties.

1:55:37.138 --> 1:55:39.858
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think he's he's gonna move that high up.

1:55:39.897 --> 1:55:39.977
<v Speaker 9>Now.

1:55:40.058 --> 1:55:43.538
<v Speaker 3>I like, he can't be their only wide receiver edition, correct,

1:55:43.738 --> 1:55:46.498
<v Speaker 3>but if you get a DK metcaffer T Higgins, he

1:55:46.538 --> 1:55:49.578
<v Speaker 3>would be a really nice complimentary piece.

1:55:49.698 --> 1:55:53.138
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I feel really strongly about the fact that I

1:55:53.138 --> 1:55:55.618
<v Speaker 2>don't think anybody in the Patriots receiver room is good

1:55:55.738 --> 1:56:00.017
<v Speaker 2>enough that I care about positional overlap. Yeah. Like so, yes,

1:56:00.258 --> 1:56:03.778
<v Speaker 2>technically he plays the same role as Jalen Polk. Jalen

1:56:03.818 --> 1:56:05.578
<v Speaker 2>Polk didn't prove enough to me that I can.

1:56:05.698 --> 1:56:07.578
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm with you one hundred percent. Yeah, I'm with

1:56:07.618 --> 1:56:08.418
<v Speaker 3>you hundred percent on that.

1:56:08.738 --> 1:56:12.057
<v Speaker 2>Uh, the next one you're really gonna hate. Yeah, I

1:56:12.058 --> 1:56:14.858
<v Speaker 2>did watch Josh Simmons. Ye, so there's a lot of

1:56:15.698 --> 1:56:17.778
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of caveats with Josh Simmons, And this

1:56:17.818 --> 1:56:20.298
<v Speaker 2>is a take that probably we're going to unpack a

1:56:20.338 --> 1:56:23.698
<v Speaker 2>lot more moving forward, but just my quick thirty second

1:56:23.778 --> 1:56:27.258
<v Speaker 2>take on him his film in the first five games

1:56:27.258 --> 1:56:30.178
<v Speaker 2>of the season, No I'll get to it, Okay, that

1:56:30.218 --> 1:56:35.218
<v Speaker 2>he played against Ohio State is was absolutely otherworldly, like

1:56:36.138 --> 1:56:38.178
<v Speaker 2>left tackle number one in the draft, Like he would

1:56:38.218 --> 1:56:41.137
<v Speaker 2>be the top tackle in the in the draft bar none.

1:56:41.338 --> 1:56:44.218
<v Speaker 2>If he played like that the entire campbell. Yeah, if

1:56:44.218 --> 1:56:46.937
<v Speaker 2>he was playing like that like yesterday in the bowl game,

1:56:47.058 --> 1:56:49.138
<v Speaker 2>we wouldn't be even having a discussion. He would be

1:56:49.937 --> 1:56:54.658
<v Speaker 2>number one. Crisp, explosive mover, really quick out of his stance.

1:56:54.818 --> 1:56:57.858
<v Speaker 2>Mirror's guys. Plays a great balance, great leverage, arm length,

1:56:57.937 --> 1:56:59.897
<v Speaker 2>checks that box more. I think he's gonna have like

1:56:59.937 --> 1:57:02.698
<v Speaker 2>thirty five inch arms. Like he's a long dude. He's

1:57:03.098 --> 1:57:07.818
<v Speaker 2>a freak athlete. Now the caveats he played nobody. Yep.

1:57:08.218 --> 1:57:10.578
<v Speaker 2>He transferred in for one season at Ohio State from

1:57:10.618 --> 1:57:14.578
<v Speaker 2>San Diego State, right, Sandy or Sandieo State, and so

1:57:14.618 --> 1:57:17.818
<v Speaker 2>he played nobody there, right. And he also appeared to

1:57:17.858 --> 1:57:21.218
<v Speaker 2>take a really big leap from where he was at

1:57:21.218 --> 1:57:23.937
<v Speaker 2>San Diego State to where he was in the first

1:57:23.937 --> 1:57:28.057
<v Speaker 2>five games again at Ohio State. So you're you're really

1:57:28.498 --> 1:57:30.937
<v Speaker 2>you're drafting a guy based off of five game against

1:57:30.978 --> 1:57:34.218
<v Speaker 2>like Michigan State. I think he played Iowa.

1:57:34.058 --> 1:57:35.698
<v Speaker 3>Well, he started the full I think he started the

1:57:35.698 --> 1:57:39.138
<v Speaker 3>full season last year at San Diego State. At Ohio State, No,

1:57:39.178 --> 1:57:40.858
<v Speaker 3>I think this is his first year at Ohios was

1:57:40.858 --> 1:57:43.017
<v Speaker 3>a second. Oh, then I gotta go back and watch,

1:57:43.138 --> 1:57:43.778
<v Speaker 3>got to watch more.

1:57:44.098 --> 1:57:47.378
<v Speaker 2>So he improved a lot. Is the point from this

1:57:47.418 --> 1:57:52.298
<v Speaker 2>year to last year? So was that competition? Was he

1:57:52.298 --> 1:57:55.538
<v Speaker 2>gonna keep it up? And he played a half against Oregon.

1:57:55.738 --> 1:57:57.977
<v Speaker 2>He did give up a pressure and half against Oregon,

1:57:58.498 --> 1:57:59.977
<v Speaker 2>but then he got hurt and then he's been out

1:58:00.018 --> 1:58:03.698
<v Speaker 2>for ever since. So it's a risk. It's you're you're

1:58:03.738 --> 1:58:05.177
<v Speaker 2>banking on five game sampled.

1:58:05.258 --> 1:58:08.177
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what have we said about the tackle position going

1:58:08.218 --> 1:58:09.578
<v Speaker 3>back to like last offseason.

1:58:11.098 --> 1:58:13.578
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's no half measures, it's a it's a

1:58:13.578 --> 1:58:15.977
<v Speaker 2>half measure, it's a risk, whatever you want to call it, right,

1:58:16.378 --> 1:58:20.097
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a risk. Now would you feel better because

1:58:20.658 --> 1:58:21.538
<v Speaker 2>the tape.

1:58:21.578 --> 1:58:23.578
<v Speaker 3>And yeah he was he's a full time start Ohio States.

1:58:23.658 --> 1:58:25.498
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you need to go I gotta watch that

1:58:25.578 --> 1:58:27.298
<v Speaker 2>because I from what I've heard, and I'm going off

1:58:27.338 --> 1:58:30.458
<v Speaker 2>of what uh what Brennan Thorne right in his right

1:58:30.578 --> 1:58:32.858
<v Speaker 2>up about him? He was nowhere. He was not this

1:58:32.937 --> 1:58:33.618
<v Speaker 2>level of player.

1:58:34.178 --> 1:58:35.858
<v Speaker 3>I can just give you his numbers I can't tell

1:58:35.858 --> 1:58:38.217
<v Speaker 3>you off the top of my head. He allowed fifteen

1:58:38.258 --> 1:58:40.097
<v Speaker 3>pressures with eight penalties last year.

1:58:40.178 --> 1:58:42.498
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so he got a lot better, a lot better

1:58:42.978 --> 1:58:45.458
<v Speaker 2>and has made a real big leap and then didn't

1:58:45.498 --> 1:58:48.338
<v Speaker 2>play the tough part of their schedule. So you're really

1:58:48.378 --> 1:58:51.858
<v Speaker 2>banging on. You're getting the player that dominated against like.

1:58:51.937 --> 1:58:55.018
<v Speaker 3>Jack Green, Western Michigan, Marshall, Michigan State, and Iowa.

1:58:55.058 --> 1:58:57.738
<v Speaker 2>So Iowa usually has some pretty good defensive linemen.

1:58:57.818 --> 1:58:59.858
<v Speaker 3>Though they allowed like free points a game this year.

1:58:59.937 --> 1:59:02.538
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but they usually have pretty good defensive lines. I

1:59:02.578 --> 1:59:04.258
<v Speaker 2>maybe they don't this year, but.

1:59:04.418 --> 1:59:06.818
<v Speaker 3>So you're you're drafting him off twenty seven pass block

1:59:06.858 --> 1:59:09.138
<v Speaker 3>snaps against Iowa.

1:59:09.258 --> 1:59:12.098
<v Speaker 2>I don't disagree. It's it's a it's not it's a

1:59:12.178 --> 1:59:14.298
<v Speaker 2>risky thing, but we have to talk about it. We

1:59:14.378 --> 1:59:16.338
<v Speaker 2>have to talk about it. Yeah, you're right, we have

1:59:16.338 --> 1:59:16.897
<v Speaker 2>to talk about it.

1:59:16.937 --> 1:59:19.097
<v Speaker 3>I would say, this is you telling me I talk

1:59:19.138 --> 1:59:22.257
<v Speaker 3>about it, wouldn't And it's a little bit different.

1:59:22.937 --> 1:59:24.738
<v Speaker 2>Another damn is gonna get rolled? Yeah they are.

1:59:25.058 --> 1:59:27.178
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to draft Dominique Easley to beat to

1:59:27.218 --> 1:59:27.977
<v Speaker 3>protect Drake May?

1:59:28.258 --> 1:59:31.618
<v Speaker 2>It's way different than that. So I domin easily was like.

1:59:32.058 --> 1:59:33.897
<v Speaker 3>I need to see how bad the knee injury is.

1:59:33.937 --> 1:59:38.018
<v Speaker 3>It hasn't been reported exactly what it was, but there

1:59:38.218 --> 1:59:40.618
<v Speaker 3>because they don't have to put out injury boards. Yeah,

1:59:40.698 --> 1:59:43.937
<v Speaker 3>there's some chatter that it might have been really bad.

1:59:44.498 --> 1:59:50.098
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but if you have between one really catastrophic injury.

1:59:49.658 --> 1:59:51.578
<v Speaker 3>And then like if you have a guy with the

1:59:51.738 --> 1:59:55.498
<v Speaker 3>completely reconstructed knee, that is a ticking time bomb.

1:59:55.618 --> 1:59:56.738
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no doubt.

1:59:56.897 --> 2:00:00.297
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying I for other teams make sense. Certainly

2:00:00.698 --> 2:00:03.858
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots couldnot afford. Let's put this way, is it

2:00:03.897 --> 2:00:05.897
<v Speaker 3>worth the wrist that his knee blows up again and

2:00:05.937 --> 2:00:09.538
<v Speaker 3>now you burned that pick? When there are other tackles

2:00:09.578 --> 2:00:12.618
<v Speaker 3>who have similar ceilings, maybe not the same floor, but

2:00:12.658 --> 2:00:14.338
<v Speaker 3>similar ceilings on the table.

2:00:14.338 --> 2:00:16.338
<v Speaker 2>Are there similar ceilings? He's really good.

2:00:16.698 --> 2:00:19.378
<v Speaker 3>You don't think Banks is a similar ceiling. You don't

2:00:19.418 --> 2:00:22.338
<v Speaker 3>think Campbell if a similar I think Banks is definitely

2:00:22.418 --> 2:00:24.898
<v Speaker 3>a safer pick. I don't think he has a similar.

2:00:24.618 --> 2:00:28.618
<v Speaker 2>I want a safe picksh Simmons has like real like

2:00:28.738 --> 2:00:30.017
<v Speaker 2>all pro caliber ceilings.

2:00:30.018 --> 2:00:33.258
<v Speaker 3>I want to say, what about Connory? No, I want

2:00:33.258 --> 2:00:35.658
<v Speaker 3>a safe pick. I don't want to do this whole

2:00:35.658 --> 2:00:36.137
<v Speaker 3>thing again.

2:00:36.258 --> 2:00:38.138
<v Speaker 2>Okay, where we don't know who the left tackle is

2:00:38.138 --> 2:00:40.778
<v Speaker 2>week to week for three years. Let me ask you this,

2:00:41.218 --> 2:00:44.578
<v Speaker 2>it's valid. Let me ask you this. Yeah, if they

2:00:44.578 --> 2:00:46.818
<v Speaker 2>go out in free agency and they signed Cam Robinson

2:00:46.897 --> 2:00:48.498
<v Speaker 2>or they signed Ronnie Stance.

2:00:48.378 --> 2:00:51.258
<v Speaker 3>Then just make Cam Robinson your tackle and draft your

2:00:51.298 --> 2:00:52.618
<v Speaker 3>future left tackle next year.

2:00:53.458 --> 2:00:56.177
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but you wouldn't take Josh Simmons on Day two

2:00:56.618 --> 2:01:00.338
<v Speaker 2>as like this project. You know, you know what I'm saying, Like.

2:01:00.498 --> 2:01:02.498
<v Speaker 3>They can't they can't really afford to be using top

2:01:02.538 --> 2:01:05.178
<v Speaker 3>one hundred picks on guys that aren't gonna play, all right,

2:01:05.258 --> 2:01:08.257
<v Speaker 3>fair enough, it's just hard to not go get Caden

2:01:08.258 --> 2:01:11.017
<v Speaker 3>Proctor next year. At that point, it's just hard to deny. No,

2:01:11.098 --> 2:01:13.738
<v Speaker 3>he's the tape was incredible. He makes sense for he

2:01:13.818 --> 2:01:17.218
<v Speaker 3>makes sense for some teams I make. This is crazy.

2:01:17.258 --> 2:01:19.418
<v Speaker 3>This was if this was like five years ago, when

2:01:19.458 --> 2:01:21.418
<v Speaker 3>you knew Nate Soldier was towards the end and you

2:01:21.538 --> 2:01:24.178
<v Speaker 3>had talent elsewhere on the offensive line, sign me the

2:01:24.218 --> 2:01:26.937
<v Speaker 3>hell up for where this team's at right now. They

2:01:26.978 --> 2:01:29.698
<v Speaker 3>cannot use top one hundred picks on guys with medical

2:01:29.738 --> 2:01:33.137
<v Speaker 3>flags and guys that win or guys that won't play

2:01:33.218 --> 2:01:36.378
<v Speaker 3>or aren't designed to play in the upcoming season. Can't

2:01:36.378 --> 2:01:38.778
<v Speaker 3>do it, can't afford to do it, Okay, I I had.

2:01:38.778 --> 2:01:40.178
<v Speaker 2>That's how I feel. I bring it up.

2:01:40.178 --> 2:01:41.418
<v Speaker 3>We have to know, we have to talk about it.

2:01:41.538 --> 2:01:43.017
<v Speaker 3>We have to give our takes. We gave our takes

2:01:43.018 --> 2:01:45.298
<v Speaker 3>on him. Although you're you're suddenly so in on a

2:01:45.298 --> 2:01:47.178
<v Speaker 3>guy that played nobody, but you still won't give ash

2:01:47.218 --> 2:01:49.937
<v Speaker 3>and genty the Oregon game. I find that interesting. Oregon's

2:01:49.978 --> 2:01:51.738
<v Speaker 3>defense a lot better than I was defense.

2:01:52.018 --> 2:01:55.338
<v Speaker 2>He's so he was. He was very impressive. I hate

2:01:55.378 --> 2:01:57.738
<v Speaker 2>throwing out comps. You know that. I hate throwing up

2:01:57.937 --> 2:02:03.338
<v Speaker 2>like crazy, crazy comps. But like one name that just

2:02:03.458 --> 2:02:05.658
<v Speaker 2>kind of came to mind is watching him with Tyron Smith,

2:02:06.058 --> 2:02:09.818
<v Speaker 2>like he's his film. He was that dominant all right

2:02:09.937 --> 2:02:11.498
<v Speaker 2>against nobody, but he was that It.

2:02:11.418 --> 2:02:13.458
<v Speaker 3>Would be great if they had the flexibility to take

2:02:13.498 --> 2:02:16.178
<v Speaker 3>that risk. I don't think they do, especially if it's

2:02:16.178 --> 2:02:17.097
<v Speaker 3>still Elliott Wolf.

2:02:17.378 --> 2:02:17.818
<v Speaker 2>I hear you.

2:02:17.897 --> 2:02:19.618
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they do. I have one recency bias.

2:02:21.338 --> 2:02:23.578
<v Speaker 3>Matthew Golden, So I know you like guys a bond.

2:02:23.778 --> 2:02:26.858
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, he's he was impressive. I might like Golden.

2:02:26.858 --> 2:02:29.217
<v Speaker 2>I thought you, I thought you were gonna say Cam's Kataboo. Well,

2:02:29.258 --> 2:02:33.937
<v Speaker 2>obviously should be a patriot, but no, I liked what

2:02:33.978 --> 2:02:36.658
<v Speaker 2>I saw. So Matthew Golden, maybe this is where we

2:02:36.698 --> 2:02:38.897
<v Speaker 2>meet in the middle. Because last week I asked you,

2:02:38.937 --> 2:02:41.137
<v Speaker 2>what does Isaiah Bond do well besides be fast?

2:02:41.178 --> 2:02:42.778
<v Speaker 3>And you couldn't give me any I don't have an answer.

2:02:42.778 --> 2:02:44.937
<v Speaker 3>You don't have an answer. What is Matthew Golden do well? One,

2:02:44.937 --> 2:02:47.658
<v Speaker 3>He's bigger, he's built for the NFL. I think he

2:02:47.658 --> 2:02:50.418
<v Speaker 3>has more positional versatility, and I think he's a better

2:02:50.458 --> 2:02:52.778
<v Speaker 3>route runner. I don't know that he's a great runner,

2:02:52.818 --> 2:02:53.858
<v Speaker 3>but I think he's better.

2:02:53.658 --> 2:02:56.458
<v Speaker 2>His body control and uh and obviously his ability to

2:02:56.498 --> 2:02:59.297
<v Speaker 2>have when above the room with his lanth, yeah, is impressive.

2:02:59.378 --> 2:03:01.698
<v Speaker 3>And he's I think he can play the Z or

2:03:01.738 --> 2:03:04.858
<v Speaker 3>the slot. He gives you some flexibility. He's still explosive.

2:03:04.897 --> 2:03:06.378
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that his forty is going to be

2:03:06.378 --> 2:03:08.498
<v Speaker 3>as good as Isaiah Bond's, but yeah, I would put

2:03:08.578 --> 2:03:11.858
<v Speaker 3>him in the explosive we're talking about Marvin Mims earlier. Yeah,

2:03:11.897 --> 2:03:13.378
<v Speaker 3>he was a little I have to watch him a

2:03:13.378 --> 2:03:13.858
<v Speaker 3>little closer.

2:03:13.858 --> 2:03:15.538
<v Speaker 2>I don't know he's quite as fast as Marvin No,

2:03:15.618 --> 2:03:16.498
<v Speaker 2>but he's fast.

2:03:16.538 --> 2:03:18.538
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't say he's he's like, remember we said Ted

2:03:18.618 --> 2:03:21.937
<v Speaker 3>McMillan isn't slow, but he's not fast. I'll call Matthew

2:03:21.937 --> 2:03:25.258
<v Speaker 3>Golden fast. Okay, Right now, he's projected to be a

2:03:25.298 --> 2:03:27.818
<v Speaker 3>Day three pick. I don't think that stands. He's going

2:03:27.897 --> 2:03:30.218
<v Speaker 3>to be a Day two guy. Maybe more like late

2:03:30.258 --> 2:03:33.178
<v Speaker 3>set and early third. But again, shouldn't be the only

2:03:33.218 --> 2:03:35.458
<v Speaker 3>pick at wide receiver. Definitely shouldn't be the only pick.

2:03:36.178 --> 2:03:37.698
<v Speaker 3>But if you go out and you get a DK

2:03:37.778 --> 2:03:40.618
<v Speaker 3>Metcalf to here, so let's say they can't trade up

2:03:41.218 --> 2:03:43.977
<v Speaker 3>for a booka right, ye Matthew Golden, I think would

2:03:43.978 --> 2:03:46.177
<v Speaker 3>be another really good answer. Yeah, you know, Matthew Golden

2:03:46.258 --> 2:03:47.937
<v Speaker 3>is if he comes out, he is a true junior.

2:03:48.298 --> 2:03:51.378
<v Speaker 3>I could see him waiting, so that caveato.

2:03:51.578 --> 2:03:54.057
<v Speaker 2>So he's gonna be in that same category and then

2:03:54.058 --> 2:03:56.017
<v Speaker 2>we gotta go. But yeah, he's gonna be in the

2:03:56.018 --> 2:03:59.097
<v Speaker 2>same category. To me, Matthew Golden as like the Trey

2:03:59.138 --> 2:04:04.258
<v Speaker 2>Harris is. I can't pronounce the kid from Stanford's name. Uh, shoot,

2:04:04.258 --> 2:04:07.458
<v Speaker 2>I can't do. I am minor Io manner. Yeah, yeah,

2:04:07.458 --> 2:04:09.578
<v Speaker 2>I am manor Uh the Miami kid.

2:04:10.178 --> 2:04:13.818
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I really like Ristreppo Yeastreo I might put Rastrepo

2:04:13.897 --> 2:04:14.738
<v Speaker 3>in Golden.

2:04:14.418 --> 2:04:16.778
<v Speaker 2>Savion Williams, like they're all gonna be in like this

2:04:16.937 --> 2:04:21.578
<v Speaker 2>day two bucket, like it's gonna be McConkie poll Ke again,

2:04:21.858 --> 2:04:22.578
<v Speaker 2>I might put.

2:04:22.818 --> 2:04:25.177
<v Speaker 3>I might put Rostrepo and Golden like a step ahead

2:04:25.178 --> 2:04:27.538
<v Speaker 3>of guys like Ao Manor and and Trey Harris.

2:04:27.698 --> 2:04:29.698
<v Speaker 2>Rostreppa reminds me a lot of Khalil Share, which is

2:04:29.698 --> 2:04:30.418
<v Speaker 2>a compliment by the.

2:04:30.937 --> 2:04:34.578
<v Speaker 3>I am a super lazy comp, but I have a

2:04:34.618 --> 2:04:39.458
<v Speaker 3>super lazy comp. It's Ricky Piersoll. Okay, remember my whole

2:04:39.458 --> 2:04:42.218
<v Speaker 3>thing last year is Ricky Piersoll plays the position angry. Yeah,

2:04:42.658 --> 2:04:43.738
<v Speaker 3>Xavier strep I mean it.

2:04:43.818 --> 2:04:45.698
<v Speaker 2>Kind of close your care. It's a little I guess

2:04:45.738 --> 2:04:48.818
<v Speaker 2>I see a little with him. Anyways, our Streppo is

2:04:48.818 --> 2:04:51.378
<v Speaker 2>also bigger. Yeah, he's a good player. He's gonna be

2:04:51.418 --> 2:04:53.818
<v Speaker 2>a good player in the league. Uh. Okay, so that

2:04:54.138 --> 2:04:57.017
<v Speaker 2>does it for us. Here. We're gonna go watch Georgia

2:04:57.058 --> 2:05:00.017
<v Speaker 2>Notre damn here, I'm sure in a second, and uh

2:05:00.058 --> 2:05:01.977
<v Speaker 2>and we're gonna have plenty of this draft talk. We

2:05:02.098 --> 2:05:04.698
<v Speaker 2>got a ton of emails anymore, Thank you so much

2:05:04.698 --> 2:05:06.658
<v Speaker 2>for all the emails. We didn't get to quite all

2:05:06.698 --> 2:05:08.738
<v Speaker 2>of them, but I tried to bake them all into

2:05:08.738 --> 2:05:11.418
<v Speaker 2>the show more months. And look, there's a lot of

2:05:11.498 --> 2:05:14.698
<v Speaker 2>you guys that are emailing in that have these elaborate,

2:05:14.978 --> 2:05:18.418
<v Speaker 2>like bullet point off season plans Like I would love

2:05:18.458 --> 2:05:20.498
<v Speaker 2>to read those emails on the air. It's just not

2:05:20.538 --> 2:05:24.138
<v Speaker 2>gonna be great radio, folks, So I apologize, but your

2:05:24.138 --> 2:05:26.897
<v Speaker 2>plans are all great. Come with one tape. Yeah yeah,

2:05:27.258 --> 2:05:29.418
<v Speaker 2>give us an email, give us a shout. We love

2:05:29.698 --> 2:05:31.578
<v Speaker 2>hearing from you guys, but I've just got to get

2:05:31.578 --> 2:05:34.177
<v Speaker 2>that there. And one last time, Easy to Do a drink,

2:05:34.218 --> 2:05:36.818
<v Speaker 2>Easy to Enjoy bud By, the official beer sponsor of

2:05:36.858 --> 2:05:39.097
<v Speaker 2>the New England Patriots. We will see you guys next week.

2:05:39.138 --> 2:05:41.178
<v Speaker 2>Really quick note about next week, I think we're going

2:05:41.258 --> 2:05:44.177
<v Speaker 2>to be moving to Wednesdays next week for the rest

2:05:44.178 --> 2:05:45.858
<v Speaker 2>of the off season. So we're going to take the

2:05:46.018 --> 2:05:49.097
<v Speaker 2>noon to two PU time slot on Wednesday that Patriots

2:05:49.178 --> 2:05:52.338
<v Speaker 2>Unfiltered usually occupies and that's gonna be your catch twenty

2:05:52.378 --> 2:05:56.338
<v Speaker 2>two time slot. So noon to two moving forward on Wednesdays.

2:05:56.338 --> 2:05:58.698
<v Speaker 2>We'll make sure to tease that and plug it plenty

2:05:58.738 --> 2:06:00.298
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter, so you guys know where to find us.

2:06:00.298 --> 2:06:01.418
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you guys, then bye.

2:06:02.218 --> 2:06:06.097
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for downloading this podcast. Subscribe on Apple, Google Play,

2:06:06.138 --> 2:06:09.178
<v Speaker 4>and everywhere else you listen. Like the show, please rate

2:06:09.218 --> 2:06:12.378
<v Speaker 4>and review us. Listener comments and ratings help keep us

2:06:12.418 --> 2:06:15.578
<v Speaker 4>high on the podcast rankings so new listeners can find us.

2:06:15.738 --> 2:06:18.818
<v Speaker 4>Be sure to check Patriots dot com for more news

2:06:18.858 --> 2:06:20.178
<v Speaker 4>and more podcasts.

2:06:24.418 --> 2:06:29.538
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Postgame Show join Maatsmith along with Patriots dot Com

2:06:29.658 --> 2:06:32.978
<v Speaker 1>Paul Perillo Mike to Sow as they offer instant analysis

2:06:33.018 --> 2:06:34.378
<v Speaker 1>after every Patriots game.

2:06:34.658 --> 2:06:37.137
<v Speaker 3>We bring you the good, the bad, and the injury

2:06:37.178 --> 2:06:37.778
<v Speaker 3>from each game.

2:06:38.098 --> 2:06:41.778
<v Speaker 1>Plus you'll hear press conferences, exclusive player interviews, and more

2:06:41.818 --> 2:06:45.418
<v Speaker 1>on the Patriots Postgame Show. Search for Patriots Postgame anywhere

2:06:45.458 --> 2:06:47.217
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts