WEBVTT - No Complexity in Closing Eclectica Fund, Hendry Says

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Good morning everyone, Bloomberg Surveillance, David Gurratt

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and Tom Keene in New York. We're going to go

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>to a most important interview. Good morning to all of

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you of Global Wall Street and David, this really frames

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>out the struggle for all of investment, conservative, boring, mutual

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>fund managers, everyone in every flavor of hedge fund and

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you see it when I quote the VIX ten point

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>seven one. We look at foreign exchange vix, we look

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income volatility. The dampening and quiet of the market

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is challenging for everyone. In conversations at Cantor Fitzgerald on

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>September eleven and that charity event, you talked to the

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>people in the trenches, and I'll tell you, David, it's

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a trade to trade of quiet through two thousand seventeen.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Henry Georges now from our studios in London. He

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the manager of a collect gasset management, announced in a

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>letter yesterday that that fund closing after fifteen years. Great

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us here on bloom brigs Veils.

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate the time this morning. Let's just start with the

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>motivations for for doing this, the complexity, the global complexity

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that led you to make this decision and tell your

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>investors this yesterday. But there was absolutely no complexity. Um.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to think in my life I've done things differently,

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't want to sign like Frank Sinatra. Um,

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but in my messages, I died and in act of combat,

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>if you go, I died having a goal. Um. I

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>think what we've seen. Uh, A lot of my contemporaries

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like we're rich, we're tired, we're fed up, and just

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, slipped out of the back door.

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to go out with a buying if you will,

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>when I went together saying I see the word it's huge.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I have these trades. I'm here and let me. I

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think you're missing this. Let's have this dialogue. It just

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the economics and there's nothing complex. Yeah, you no inks,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but against me you Good morning wonderful to come on

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>with us at Global Wall Street. Listen. You know, across

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>all of our radio you said the Lionel Barber's rag

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. We're harshly disciplined by market trends. You

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>will never see us pursue a homegrown idea to the

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>detriment of the prevailing trend. The trend hasn't been there

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.119
<v Speaker 1>with a damp and vall across all asset classes. Are

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you a victim of the dampening of Janet Yellen, John Karney,

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Mr Corona and Mr drug Um. Far from me to

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to play my violin and claim to be a victim,

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but certainly I believe they're whier forces to play, because

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>this is not a story about individuals. This is a

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>genetic story about a great group of some of the

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>most provocative and fantastic brains in the world. Who has

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>a group since two thousand and twelve really have consistently

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>failed to produce Brits Well? But I made the key

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>distinction this morning, hum, and I think this is critically

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>important in the mathematics failure. You didn't blow up. I mean,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you're down nine percent this year. I get that, But

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you didn't blow up this is a sequence of frankly

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>good subpar returns. How do we end that and get

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>back to alpha generation or alpha lass? I mean, somebody loses,

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>but how do we get back to so called normal

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>where the game is fair when you wake up in

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the morning. Well, I'm not arguing that the game is unfair.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I would actually say that global macro enjoyed a moment

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in time which where the fortunes and the great performance

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the protagonists perhaps owed much to the context. I

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>believe that we had that inflation drama in the nineteen seventies,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and for three at least three decades, if not forty years,

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it remained long in the market memory, if you will,

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that we could return to such an environment. It was

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>also there with the Fed. I mean remember as early

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>as back in the taper transroom of two thousand and thirteen,

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the FED was proposing to tighten its policy. With the

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>national unemployment where it's seven and a half percent and

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>with no credible sign of inflation, we've just been on

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this high alert now. The The result of that has

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>been that for decades, the real recurn on US treasury

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>bonds were very, very high, and the macro model was

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>simple you come in, you leverage those returns, you get

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a a high risk adjusted return. It pays for the

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>commercial cost of running the business, and it pays for

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>taking like buying convective Veer puts on fixed income or

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>equity Marcus, and periodically they go in your favor and

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone thinks you're a rock star. Now quantitative easing. Now,

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I estimate the ten year real treasury bond yards are

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>zero point three pc. So even leveraging that which I advise,

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>because they see, you know, well that's where we are.

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>When do you envision the young kids see a phase?

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>When do they get to play again? Because we've seen

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>X number of years of this dampened idea. When does

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the game get fun again? Well, the game gets and

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know the game will get fun again. But I

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>think I always look at the irony and the paradox

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of of the path that the world chooses to take.

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It will become relevant again because there will be a

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>moment when people will call upon diversifying us as they

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>were discovered, to their great horror, their U S treasuries

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are not doing the job, and so they will be

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>calling upon global micro but they'll be looking at their

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>allocation they'll be saying, you'd be used to see where

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>all the customers. Yachts will be saying where all the

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>micro managers, and he might retore on the yachts, but

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you know where we are. We're de scaling portfolio, diversifying subsector.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>You don't be a stranger when you're in New York

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>when you take the conquered. He's the only one still

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>talk the concord when when you take the conquered over

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>your private golf stream. Please stop by in New York.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to talk to you for a longer conversation,

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>or when we're in London. Mr Henry shutting down his

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund yesterday really global, major global news for Global

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. David, I really can't convey enough. He didn't

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>blow up. That's the news here. He didn't blow up.

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It was just the dampening. I can honestly say, I've

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>never seen this, David. There you go invoking Frank Sinatra regrets.

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I've had a few. Hugh Henre great to speak with

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>him exclusively here on Bloomberg this morning, on the heels

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of that news. This is Bloomberg Surveillance. On Bloomberg Radio,

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>David Gura and Tom Keane in New York coast to

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>coast and worldwide. Ben Carton has been in the U. S.

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Senate since two thousand seven. Before that, he represented third

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>District in Maryland in the U. S. House of Representatives.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>He's now the ranking member of the Senate form Relations Committee.

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Joins us now on our phone lines on a day

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when we are keenly focused on what's happening in the Pacific.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course, another nuclear sorry, another missile test last last

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>night by a North Korea intermediate range ballistic missile shot

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a distance farther than the distance between North Korea and Guam,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a protectorate that country has threatened several times now, Senator Carten,

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>great to speak with you. I look at the President's

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>schedule today, your colleague on the Senate Formulations Committee, Senator

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Bob Corker of Tennessee, is going to be meeting with

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the President today. I wonder if you have any insight

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.119
<v Speaker 1>into what the two of them will be talking about,

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and if you could tell us a bit about the

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of interface you've had with this administration on issues

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like these thus far. Well, first of all, good morning,

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm certain that Senator Corker will be talking about

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>North Korea as one of the subjects on the agenda

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with the President. We've I've had discussions with the members

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump administration and North Korea and other issues.

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>But clearly, this most recent tests confirms the fact that

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>North Korea not only has the nuclear weapon, but they

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>are developing the means of which it could be delivered

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>um not just in the region, but beyond the region.

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's a matter of it's extremely dangerous and it's

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a it's an urgent issue for the United States to

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to change its game plan from the point of view

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of I believe starting a diplomatic surge working with China

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that changed the equation. As you watch all of these tests,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think there have been thirteen or fourteen of

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>them this year alone, do you regard them as tests,

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>as North Korea trying out to or showcasing technology they've developed,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>or these simply provocations to you? How do you view them?

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I believe that they want to have a functional UH

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>nuclear arsenal that is capable of reaching the US and

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>our allies. This they look at this as an ability

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to prevent the United States from UH affecting their regime.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But you never know how these weapons could be used.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's it's a regime that's unpredictable. It violates

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>international mall. So our objective is to prevent a North

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Korea from destabilizing the region in our our interest, and

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that means freezing and hopefully eliminating their nuclear weapon program.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>The Senor cardon Good Morning, I think Maryland is possibly

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>the most misunderstood state in the country. Cumberland, Maryland, hundred

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight miles away from your Baltimore went plus vote

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>for President Trump. When you travel out to west astern Maryland,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you see as the reaction to the follies

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of your Washington over the last two or three days.

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the response you as a die Aard Baltimore Democrat,

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you see in Republican Maryland? Well, you know,

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Maryland is called American miniature. We have the mountains of

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Western Maryland, we have the beaches of eastern Shore. Uh. Clearly,

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the western part of our state is more politically conservative

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>than either the Baltimore or Warsington regions, which is much

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>more progressive. Uh. It's the western part is traditional conservative

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>areas of our state. Uh. They're good people. If they wavered,

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>they wavered on the president. If they wavered on the president,

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I think if you, if you, if you deal with

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the issues. They're certainly disagreeing with a lot of the

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>policies that have been proposed by the Trump administration, and

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they are certainly against a lot of the language the

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>president is used. Whether that would translate into votes that

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>would but against the president, I don't know, but I

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do believe there is disagreement with a manner in which

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the President is conducting his affairs. Sender Kardin, You're gonna

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>get through the weekend. On Tuesday. Next week there's a

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>nominations hearing before the Senate to Form Relations Committee. The

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Honorable John Huntsman is going to be sitting down taking

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>questions from you and your colleagues. He of course nominated

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the next ambassador to Russia. How much is

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is his nomination clouded by the the scandal involving Russian

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>interference in the US presidential election? And what questions do

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you have for him about how he's going to move

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>forward if in fact he's confirmed. Well, Mr Hudson is

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>well qualified to the ambassador to Russia. He is a

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 1>person who is well respected by both Democrats and Republicans.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm pleased that he's willing to allow his name to

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>come forward. My guess is that the confirmation hearing is

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>going to focus more about our challenges with Russia than

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the qualifications of Mr Huntsman. Uh. The the US Russia

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>relationship is extremely important and it is very challenged today.

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I bring up bring up that a nation that's a

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>high level one for a big ambassadorship, when when you

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the names the White House is putting forward,

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>how worried are you about how few of them you've

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>seen thus far? Are you getting any indication here that

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the White House is going to be moving faster to

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fill some of the vacant positions that still exist in

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Foggy Bottom. I am extremely concerned by the slow pace

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of filling critical positions at the State Department. I'm not alone.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Republicans have voiced our concern just talking about

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>North Korea, we don't have an Assistant secretary for that region,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>so we don't have the people in place that can

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>give a clear direction to U S policy in so

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>many parts of the world. So it's not just our

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>ambassadors in important countries, it's key positions within the State

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Department that are political appointments, such act confirmation about a

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Senate that hadn't been filled. It's Friday, so I'm allowed

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to do gossips. I'm absolutely fascinated by who's sitting on

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the couch in the Oval office. Do the Democrats have

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the back of Senator Schumer and Speaker Pelosi? Do they

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>have the support of not common sense Democrats like Cardon

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of Maryland but the other rabble? Are they in support

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of the two? Oh? Absolutely. We very much want our

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>political system to work, and the only way it's going

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>to work is with Democrats and Republicans all being involved.

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.599
<v Speaker 1>So we applaud our leaders willingness to sit down with

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and to work out solutions that the doctor children.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>We need to protect the Dreamers, and it's one of

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's one of our highest priorities among the Democratic caucus.

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>We were pleased to see that we didn't have a

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>default on our government debt. We would see a budgets

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>passant's keep government open. So look, we were disappointed by

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the election, but we wanted to make sure that our

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>system works and Democrats need to be part of the process.

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Senator I was medicated coming in this morning because I

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>had to watch Orioles baseball last night. Come on, guys,

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>doing like a public grant to help Mr Show Walter

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>out any Kenny hit the ball. It's a Nutcome on,

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>When does this turn around for the dreaded Baltimore Orioles. Well,

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.839
<v Speaker 1>you know that we've had ups and downs during the sea,

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>some stretches that we we thought we were going to

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>be the world champions, and we're not giving up hope

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>yet We're still in We're still in a pennant chase,

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and but it's it's been a very disappointing two weeks,

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>no question about it. And we love our Orioles. We

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>just wish they were flying along higher. They play in

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the most gorgeous modern ballpark. Senator Card, Thank you so much,

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Senator for the Baltimore word. Great to speak with him again,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Incredibly

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>timely interview. Grateful to have him taking the time on

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this busy Friday morning to talk to us about North

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Korean particularly David, did those states like I think in

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Georgia North South that span geography Maryland is remarkable over

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a short distance from the West on serious XM to Baltimore,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>M Baltimore, Washington. This is Bloomberg. We had one solitary

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>guest this hour, and he brought an entourage with him.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Why did you attempt an introduction, David, I'm gonna I'm

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna run down the list you get Mark last year

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>with us, Jeff down in West, Eden's as well here

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg eleven three oh studios in New York.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, I don't know who to begin with you.

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's start with West if we could talk it,

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you follow up from here. Let me just

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>get your your sense of sort of where things stand

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>from an investment perspective right now, where there's the greatest

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>opportunity as you see it, and and UH just too

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe outline if you could some of the challenges of

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of being invested right now. Well, good morning, thanks for

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>having us. You know, the UH, I think the environment

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>right now from an investment standpoint is pretty tough. You know,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you've had a long period of very low interest rates

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and you've got pretty good good growth in the US

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and nowithstanding kind of lots of challenges, but there's not

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot that is obviously cheap, you know, So it's

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a it's a time to pay attention to what you're doing.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a four hour interviews. If you have three

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>guys in the studio, go, can I get into here?

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>David Mark? Last year, I've been dying to talk to

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you about the follies of Washington. How did you enter America?

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Were you were like on? You didn't go through Ellis Island,

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>right comes through? Jfk JFK. I mean, what do you think?

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're Moroccan, you come into the country. You're

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the definition of success of immigrants. What do you think

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in Washington with Dacca and with

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the debate over rich or poor immigration and the rest. Look,

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I mean for me, it's probably a little

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more sensitive. But I think at the end of

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the day, you know, this country was made on immigrants

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and what's going on today is a bit ridiculous over

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, So you would hope that people would

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to solve this issue. On doc CO. You

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>came out of one of the coolest schools on the

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>East Coast, Clark University. Would you have to go back home? Now?

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean you, I mean, I guess you were in

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the US then, But think of the immigrants that are

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>going through top flight engineering schools and am I right?

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>They gotta go home? Now? Well they do. I mean,

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>good news is I got naturalized, So I guess for

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>me it's okay. But ultimately, at the end of the day,

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>for all these people who are at school, they'd have

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to return, should be done. Let me let me turn

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to you have a wide ranging conversation. You're obviously there. Yeah,

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>well let's let's go there if we could. And and

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is something of particular fascination we we've we've

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>seen the sale here the Houston Rockets recently for for

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary sum of money. Help us understand how you

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>value a basketball team. You hear the three of you investors,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>owners of a big NBA franchise, What does it? What

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>does a sale like that mean for how you you

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you assign a value to to an NBA franchise. Jamie, Sorry,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're blood as well. Yeah, we can't get flooded. Um, No,

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know it's you know what's at the at the

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, which really happening is really a

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>few things. One is the modern NBA game is probably

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>as exciting, if not the most exciting. I think sports

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>thing to watch and as a result, viewers are watching it,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>kids are watching, millennials are watching it, the world is

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>watching it. I think it's probably you know, the most

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>popular you know, big type you know sport I can

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>China for example, and after soccer, it's the number two

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>sports in the world. That's that's really number one. And

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>as you look at what's happening with money for sports, okay,

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>money for entertainment, it's really live sports that basically is

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the one thing you cannot watch the next day, don't

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>want to watch the next day, you don't you know,

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>want to basically deal with the so called court coloring risk.

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>You have to watch it, you know, live, So it's

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>real value that. And then lastly, quite frankly, is I

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think there's a live people who love the you know teams.

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You know. I would say, of all my investments I've

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>ever done, and I think Mark and West would agree,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.719
<v Speaker 1>this is by far the most fun investment. You had

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>more fun at d l J a few years ago, right,

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a long time ago, A long time Mark

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>last three and Jamie dining with us. You know, we're

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna mix it up. We could literally, folks, we could

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>go worldwide here for four hours. And these three guys,

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>they've got such great experience, an individual and distinct experience. Jamie,

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>let me start with you. You were in the d

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>LJ Orange book years ago, right, Elliott Platt would write

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the Maroon book for DLJM Fixed Income and you had

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing going. Can you tell a kid today

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>to go into global Wall Street given a method two,

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>giving the battle over research? Can you tell some kid

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Pennsylvania like you did? Can you tell

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>him to go into finance be like Mark last? Three? Absolutely,

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>if it is your passion. Okay. I remember when I

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>went into Wall Street and it was one My first

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 1>job paid me twenty two thousand dollars a year. It

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>was a decent salary, but it wasn't like you know

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the kind of numbers you're hearing about today. And I

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>went because I was passionate about I actually wanted to

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>do it. If this is the career that you're passionate about,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you really want to do, you should do it. I

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's still a good career. Okay. If if you're

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>going to get rich, I wouldn't do that. If you're

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.719
<v Speaker 1>going to because you want to make something that you're

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna enjoy doing and actually do well. Got absolutely,

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's see this. Let me ask you about infrastructure in particularly.

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>We came out of the election headed into inauguration with

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk about there being a big infrastructure

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>spending package, there being a renewed policy focus on infrastructure

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in this country. You know this is something you're keenly

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>interested in as an investor. Are you convinced we're gonna

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>see something? How essential is it in your estimation that

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we get Washington to play some sort of catalytic role

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>here to to to provide some sort of package that's

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna renew focus on infrastructure in this country. I think

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's critical, you know, I think that the returns on

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure are you know, multiplier effects. I think, who do

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you have great infrastructure and actually is the kind of

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>bedrock of a lot of economics activity. So it's really

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>important and there's lots and lots of need for in

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the country. Um. I think there will be something on Washington,

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>hopefully by the end of the year or the first

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>part of next year. And uh, I don't know what

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna what they're gonna say and how effective it's

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be, But I think it's desperately needed. What

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the I mean, what what could be most effective?

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've listened to the presidency talked about this

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and you see it sort of Eban flow what he

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>focuses on. And he's talked about infrastructure sum he was

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>out in Io talking about it and the merits of

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>more public private partnerships. Is there a policy tool or

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>something in particular that you think would be more effective

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>than others at at boosting investment infrastructure. Yeah, I think

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very very clear. I think that the

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>essential thing to to provide is uh a mechanism for

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>private capital to fund a lot of it and so

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and and really the missing link in the capital structure

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of this is debt. So I think

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the government can be a debt provider and not cost

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>the government a lot of money. And I think they

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>can then enable a lot of product and direct investment.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you could really see a tremendous moment.

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And so it's true, and jump in here if you

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>we just got it's a phone with Hugh Henry of

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Scotland over in England. He's shutting down his hedge fun today.

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And I made a key distinction here. He didn't blow up.

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people blow up. We all blow up.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I've by mistakes. Everybody else's may mistakes. At three of you,

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure have your war stories as well. He was

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>killed by just damp and volatility. You know, he's down

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. That's you're fine, But all the rest of

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the returns with just the single digitness mark last week

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to begin with you, is that where we are now

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as perpetual single digitness or can we actually get back

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to making elfit within the industry. Look, it's hard. I mean,

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the biggest issue that's out there today is pretty simple.

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The risk free rate is sort of zero, right, So

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know when if you just look at ten years ago,

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, the risk fy rate if you left

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>your money in the bank was four percent. So if

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you did four or five times the risk fy rate,

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you're fine. You're a twenty. Here today you do four

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>times or five times a risk free rate. Let's just

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>say it's ten bibs. You're making fifty bibs, so you're

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>taking a lot more risk. It's what West said, I

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>mean It's just you're in a much much harder environment

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and because of that, you're taking a lot more risk,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna end up having, in my opinion, fewer

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and fewer people who do what we do, because you know,

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>people aren't going to tolerate the lower returns west quickly.

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Is this dampening because of central bank policy? Is as

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>simple as that. I asked the same question, Hugh. I

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>think if you had to pick one thing, you say, yeah,

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that it really is keeping rates

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>low as they have been as long as they have been.

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>While it might have been a great idea, you know,

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the financial crisis, financial crisis has

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>been over for a long time, and I think that's

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a real challenge. It really is in this lower rate

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that Mark talks about, that actually is what drives than

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>all other related returns, and that's what makes the challenges everythink.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But we're surveillance on bloom Bgradio David Durrett and Tom

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Keene in New York. Here with a packed house, we

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>live in three smart you got your seat back, Tom,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.239
<v Speaker 1>you should take it away, go go forward here, uh

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>fact asked here with so many things to speak of,

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think it would be unfair to speak to

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Mr Dinning, Mr last Fore industry and not speak about

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>basketball and television in that we're all fixated by Cleveland

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and Boston and this and that and the stories on

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast. I guess as a team David on

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast it's pretty good. I can't remember. But

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but is the is the gravy train going to continue

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that thing? There's one of you three, the TV expert

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of the three at West is the is the party

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>going to continue for you? That is TV sports? Well,

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of sports. Is UM is very very valuable? Right,

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's what everyone wants to watch, And even the

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 1>cable cutting and whatnot, you still want to watch a

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of sports. Now. The old media companies, I think

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>are struggling and the new media companies are in the

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in the rise. So I think, UM, the answer is

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>that the content very valuable conn continue to be valuable

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>more valuable. Perhaps the nature of how it's distributed I

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>think could change a lot. Next week it will change

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in distribution, But will it poured over to the Facebook's,

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the Twitters, the Googles. I don't understand how I watched

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks on a little itty bid computer screen like

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you do on the Big four case Sony. I mean,

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I just I can't get there. Help me get there.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You might be a little too old. It's conceived about it.

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, I think that people can. So you think

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>that's funny, you're I think I think people can. I

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>think people consume the sports in a lot of different ways.

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think what's gonna happen though, is that unquestionably

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be distributed many different ways. You know the

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you saw the big announcement from uh, you know Disney

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on the streaming you know product, and we haven't really

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to monetize it properly as an industry,

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's coming. It's coming fast. We're classic. Let me

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>just ask you about your audience that the Bucks is

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>audience right now, obviously incredibly important to that city itself.

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>But but how connis that are you? How connies are

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>all three of you? About the national the international reputation

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of of the brand. What's the focus there? Well, I

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>actually think we're America's team. I mean, I think if

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you forget about everybody else, if you look at but

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not the Um, I know. I think because of

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Janice and number are the other players that we have. Um,

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it is an international team, right and because of that,

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you could be anywhere. My daughter was on her honeymoon

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in Greece and she was wearing a Milwaukee Bucks T

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>shirt and everybody just keeps running up to her. Why

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>are you a fan of your honest? And you know

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>she was like, yeah, I love your honest. I mean

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it's I think wherever you are, UM, especially for our

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>team and where you've got international players, I think it's huge.

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>How about the issue of of of legalized gambles. I

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know who would take a bite out of this,

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but Adam Silver talks about the need to have a

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>better mechanism in place for that. Uh, Marco, have you

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>take a bite of it if you want, and y'

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>all can jump in if you want. Do you think

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna happen? Is there is there a lot of

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>money to unlock there? Do you think we're gonna get

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>some sort of legal, legalized system within the context of

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the NBA for for legalized gambling. Look, my view is

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you should have it. I mean, it happens so UM,

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we can stop making believe it doesn't happen, And I

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think Adams right, I think sooner or later it will

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>end up becoming legal. And once it does, I don't

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>know what ultimately happens, but I'm sure um ask people

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>are betting um there will be ways for people to

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>figure out. Yeah, you know, I don't pretend to be

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>an expert, but you went inside? Is this right for

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the GM? The new GM? You had one guy go

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to Orlando, and you tell me about that decision. I

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 1>mean the pressure to to to spend huge money to

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>go outside. Why did the bucks stay internal to pick

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>up the guy that's got to keep the egos in check? Well,

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we ran a very robust process to look at a

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, and in the end we concluded even

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>did they call you they can It wasn't quite that,

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>but we ran a barrow must right. We talked a

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of people and concluded at the end that the

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>guy that worked for us is the best candidate. So

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it was that simple and we're very happy with them.

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But big decision. Mark, just certainly back something Tom asked

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you about a few moments ago, that being Hedge Funds.

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>We had this conversation with Henry just a little while

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>while ago and we didn't talk about was fees, and

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he said he's thrown in the towel, not not going

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>out with the disappointedly um is the conversation about fees

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and ancillary conversation. He said that we were seeing the

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>end of a global macro moment um. How much readjustment

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 1>has to happen with fees and hedge funds and is

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 1>that going to be something that saves hedge funds you're

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:21.439
<v Speaker 1>going forward. I don't think people mind paying fees, to

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>be perfectly blunt, if you're giving them the returns right

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day. What gets people upset

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>is if you're charging them two and twenty and you're flat,

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>or you're up one, you're up five, right, It's that's

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what gets people upset. It's not so fees become a

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>big part when you sort of look at it and say,

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, the tenure, which is a little bit of

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>what West said. If the safest investment is a treasury

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and a ten years two percent and you're charging somebody

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>two percent um, that's kind of tough, you know, It's

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just math. I mean, ultimately, at the end of

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the days, done to that yeah, that's all it is.

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>We just got forty seconds, Jamie donald Let's go back

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to the acclaimed Elliott plattet Donaldson generated a few years ago.

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>He never had a deal with negative. The three of

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you survive when you got a German two year done

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>negative seventy beeps in a Swiss twenty year it I

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>can't remember what it is, just quickly here. When do

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the negative rates bill a end without? We don't know,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>but my guess is ultimately it has to end. This

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>is not normal. But I think you know we've all

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>survived by finding idiots and crack opportunity. Just because markets

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and markets really globally, particularly risk acid markets are fully priced.

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>You can still find out he's a fully price Jamie Diamond.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>What's het in the smart Lazarie? Thank you so much.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg for continuing to follow the news out

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Korean Peninsula. The U N. Security Council scheduled

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.239
<v Speaker 1>to meet at three o'clock this afternoon here in New

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>York to discuss the situation there as Secretary State Rexi

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Solurial calls from more action against that rogue regime. Our

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>next guest, without question, the interview of the show. Ambassador

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Hill joins us now on our phone lines. Distinguished

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>career in public service in the government. He was most

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>recently US Ambassador to Iraq. Now he's the dean, as

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, of the Corbel Schooled International Studies at the

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>University of Denver. I should note he was an ambassador

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Pope of Korea as well, and a participant

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Six Party talks on the North Korean nuclear issue.

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Abastad Hill, great to have you with us today, and Uh,

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the word of the day is inured. We've seen so

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>many of these tests over the course of the year.

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh is each one different? What was different about the

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>one that happened last night? Well, at a certain point

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to ask, you know, why are they testing

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>as every week or so, because clearly it's it's more

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>than just you know, to check the flight path. And

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I think what they're really doing it's kind of an

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>any of the face move. They're trying to say. Christ

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, we're in full for auction with these things,

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>so clearly they don't have to hand make them every cast.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've got some production line. And secondly, I

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>think they're trying to make the point that we are

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a full switched uh uh nuclear power and you're just

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>going to have to deal with us as such. And

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the more we send up these missiles, the more of

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a reality and their view will sink. In my own

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>view is we cannot accept them as a nuclear are

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>when we certainly cannot accept a situation where country points

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>uh possibly nuclear tipped missiles at us and uh, We're

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to step up our game. You've lived this,

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>You've watched the deliberations of the U N. Security Council.

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>We certainly saw some heated ones. On Monday, the U.

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>S Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, wanted more severe

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sanctions yet placed on North Korea with regard to oil

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that didn't happen because of China in particular. What do

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you think is going to happen next? I'm going to

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>steal a question that Tom asked a little earlier on

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the show, that is, what more can the U N

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>do at this point? Well, I think clearly the Chinese

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to do more. I mean it's

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>not enough to say there against it and and sort

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of go along with these limited sanctions. They've really got

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to go the full go the full distance. North Korea

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>does not have refining capacity, and so I mean it's

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>amazing they have nuclear facilities, but not on oil refiery.

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think China really needs to look at this

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>critical issue of gasoline. But looking beyond that, I think

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the US and China really need to look at what's

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do about this. And it's more than sanctions,

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>because the sanctions train just moves too slowly compared to

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the legalization train. And so I think we do need

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to look at some options, and I do I think

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to make China understand that we're going to

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have their choice. But to go forward, to borrow a

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>line from from the musical Hamiltons, you've been in the

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>room where it happens. You you were part of the

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Six Party talks on North Korea. Very few few people

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have been engaged in direct diplomacy with with the North

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Korean regime. What's that like and is it likely to

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be different now? If if at some point in the

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>near future we see all these parties returning to talk

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to each other one again, What are the particular complexities

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of dealing diplomatically with North Korea? Well, first of all,

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>these people are aren't not stupid, they're not robots. They're

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not just reading from talking points. Uh, they're making their case.

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know you're up against people who know what

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about. But I think it's important to understand

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 1>that when you talk to these negotiators, you're basically talking

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to the note taker, because the note taker is going

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to take the message back to Piong Young, and we've

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not really had any kind of capacity to take a

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>message to put Pill and Young. Well. I emphasize, however,

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the North Korean's have shown no interests, zero interests in

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a in getting back to the original purpose of these talks,

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>which was demo verzations that they've talked about the need

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to have kind of some kind of limits. And I

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think we should go that way. I think we

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>should really press the Chinese and work together with China

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on this. If you're just joining us first, Christopher Hill,

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>where us is David and I both degree, this is

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>without question the interview of the day for Bloomberg Surveillance. Inbassador,

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to go through a little bit of the

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>path here from Moses Brown in Providence to Boden to

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>your continued public services ambassadors to different areas. You work

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 1>critically in Kosovo and then on the Eastern Europe in Poland,

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and then your expertise on Asia, You more than anyone

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we speak to, understands the trenches of the State Department.

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>How destroyed is the State Department from the actions of

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the president with Secretary Tillerson, Well, to put it gently,

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a problem. Uh. Diplomacy does, after all,

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>needs some diplomats, and it's worrisome to see many of

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the better ones, some of the best ones leaving. I

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>think Secretary Tillerson has really tried to address some of

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the main issues, but it's a bit of a team sports,

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think the Secretary of State can do

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it alone. And I think he needs to understand the

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>secretary of the role of the Secretary of State should

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>be someone who comes into the ninth inning and shuts

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>down a problem, rather than shows up in the third

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>inning and encourages parties to keep on talking or something.

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a kind of a failure to

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>understand the sort of u uh technology of it all

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of how why you have lower ranked people, I have

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>middle ranked people, And I think there's a failure to

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>understand that these are career people who have a heck

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of a lot to offer there. You know, when Secretary

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Killers have showed up at the State Department in February,

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't one person there at the C Street entrance

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>who wanted anything but full success for for him. And

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>instead he's gotten involved in this issue of reforming the

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>State Department. Look, that's a good idea. I think everything

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to be reformed. But my goodness, we have far

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>more uh you know, urgent matters out there in the

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>world and having some accounting firm. Look at how the

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>State Department is organized. We're we've got all sorts of

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>new investor. One more question, if I could, one of

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the few things you have and I have in common,

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>besides a view of the athletic fields of Moses Brown,

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is we really are concerned about Aaron Judge. The ball

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>he hit last night for the New York Yankees in

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Fenway Park, Chris, it would have gone over the turnpike,

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>probably would have landed across the Charles River. What are

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox going to do about the surging dreaded

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:33.879
<v Speaker 1>New York Yankees. I think they need to pitch him

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>high in a way and uh, make him bite on

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>sliders as well. I mean, I'm not really sure, but

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. We've got to deal with that problem.

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 1>It is this true national problem. Chris Hill, thank you,

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. We look forward to seeing you

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>in our Washington and New York studios. He's not, David Is.

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It's correct with the University of Denver at the University

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of Denver heading up the Corbel School of International Studies.

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>They're a fine and growing program there and always incredibly

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>great to talk to him about this issue in particular,

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and I've talked about the Middle East as well, legendary

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>stories of wearing Red Sox, carrying the Red Sox flag

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 1>across all of Asia, like he's been known to go

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:19.479
<v Speaker 1>into meetings with with swag Kiss reminds you of Megan

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Green with her Red Sox socks that she will tell

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>our audience, Dave, in the time we've got left, we're

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting for something to happen here. Our team is working

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>on it right now. David. Why when when we say

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that's the most important interview of the day. To me,

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the guy's experience. He's in the trenches. Yeah, absolutely,

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think what I want to highlight again and I

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>did in the question to him they're about about diplomacy,

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is that he lived this as the ambassador to to

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>South Korea and then as a part of those talks.

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, many years ago now we were engaging with

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>North Korea diplomatically, with a few other countries in the region.

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just extraordinary to think about how few

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>people have been in a wardroom, sent it around a table,

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>having occasion to exchange words with representatives of the North

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Korean government and Basterd Christopher Hill, as you said at

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the University of Denver, one of those few. Thanks for

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene. David Gura is at

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:37.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.