WEBVTT - And, This is How Democrats Win Back Men with Jackson Katz

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the issue of race and gender,

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the issue of masculinity, there are

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>few people that hold more credentials on this subject matter

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>than my next guest. This is Gavin Newsom, and this

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is Jackson Katz. You've got a new book coming out

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>at least overseas, and we'll see who comes out here.

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>It's called every Man. But I mean that's interesting. Obama

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Renegade's Springsteen. So tell me a little bit more about that.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, my book was just published in the UK

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>in February, but it's coming out in September in the

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 2>United States the American version. It's called every Man, Why

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 2>violence against women is a men's issue and how you

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>can make a difference.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.959
<v Speaker 1>And Jack, just so for people that don't know you,

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you've been at this issue, been talking about the issue

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of intersection between gender race violence for decades and decades.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean you've been in this space talking about the

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>issues of masculinity, what's happening to young men and the

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>relations between the sexes for twenty five plus years.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, Oh, yeah, since I was a college student really,

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>which is a long time ago.

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And what what what what originally inspired all of this

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately what inspired this book all these decades later,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>building on what the work you've been doing.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, as a young guy, and I was

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>a big, you know, athlete in high school. I was

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>an all star football player, and I was I came

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 2>from a blue collar family, you know. If my stepfather

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>was a truck driver and an army veteran of World

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>War Two. My father was a medic in Germany and

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 2>France in World War Two. I came from a family

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 2>where you know, well, you know, it was a blue

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>collar family, and and and and yet education was a

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>big emphasis. And and when I was in college, I

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>started taking courses in subjects that related to you know,

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>gender and race and other things. And I was learning.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I thought I was smart when I was a young guy,

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 2>but I realized how little I knew, especially about how

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 2>other people lived, because I, you know, I came from

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>a kind of a white suburban background just north of Boston.

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 2>And when I started taking classes on gender related topics

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 2>and started hearing about women's experiences of violence, and I

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>started seeing women organizing around the fear that they have

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>so often, especially at night, you know, because that was

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of the take back to Night movement where

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>women were marching to say, we have the right to

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 2>walk outside at night. And I remember thinking when I

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 2>saw these women, you know, sort of organizing for better

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 2>lighting on campus, I remember thinking not that these women

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 2>hated men, but that they felt like they had the

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 2>right to walk across campus. And I felt like that

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 2>was what leadership looked like. I was inspired by it.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I was a young student journalist at the time, and

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I was inspired by women standing up and speaking up

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>for themselves, just as I was inspired by African Americans

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 2>and what we used to call, you know, the in

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the gay what used to be called the gay rights movement,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:49.679
<v Speaker 2>which is now the LGBTK.

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And just put us in context of what year, roughly

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>would we be talking.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>About, Roughly around nineteen eighty, So it's like, you know,

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little long in the two, but I've been

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>doing this work so since I started speaking out then,

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>and because I had this background in traditional male culture

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 2>as a as an athlete and pretty successful, I knew

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>that I had a platform. I knew that people were

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 2>interested when I started saying, hey, you know, sexual assault

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and domestic violence, this is wrong, guys, this is like

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 2>wrong and women should be able to shouldn't have to

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 2>worry constantly about their personal safety and how would you

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 2>feel if you were a woman, and how to live

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>like that? I remember thinking, why aren't more men saying

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>these things? Why aren't more men speaking out? Why is

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 2>it always you know, women having to organize and speak

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 2>out and push for, you know, reforms of the laws.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Why aren't men doing this? And I know most men

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 2>are not abusive, but yet most men don't speak out.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 2>And so because I knew I had a platform, I

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>started speaking out. And honestly, I'm doing today, Governor, what

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I started doing as a you know, nineteen year old.

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I always say my hair is a lot shorter, not

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 2>by choice, right, And I have nicer clothes than I

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 2>did when I was a you know, a nineteen year

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 2>old guy. But it's the same message. And you know,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 2>my book every Man, you know why violence against women

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>as a men's issue is like what I've been saying

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>for forty years. It's just because of my work and

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 2>other people's work and the way the culture moves. There's

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's an energy now, there's a receptivity to

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>talking about this, thinking about this. With the exception of

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the backsliding that we're doing in our country right now,

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 2>which is a really dramatic series of steps backwards. And

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, we can talk about that as well.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>So what I mean when you look back forty years,

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, did you really feel like you were the

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>lone voice back then? I mean, were there was there

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>any organized movement or recognition or was there any political

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>leadership with men in this space to call out that

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>violence against women? Or is it primarily would you describe

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>as the feminist movement that was really organized behind the

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>women's rights in this space or.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 2>At least yeah, it was definitely a sort of multi racial,

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>multi ethnic feminist women led movement, and there was a

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 2>tiny number of men. I mean I was, you know,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I was kind of an early adapter as they would say,

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 2>or adopter, like when I was twenty. I mean, there

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 2>was not that many men doing this work, and now

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 2>there are. I mean, there's no question that my work

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:16.679
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of other people's work over the last

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 2>couple of generations has made a difference in terms of

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 2>normalizing this kind of conversation. But political leadership very limited.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying it didn't exist, but it was very

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 2>limited and in the public space, it was very unusual

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>to hear men talking about any of this subject matter.

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that you started to say this is

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>a man's issue, I mean, what do you mean by that?

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And how was that received by women that were expressing

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>themselves and leaders in the feminist movement? Was it well

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>received in that respect? Was it understood when you started

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>talking initially about this being a man's issue?

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Generally speaking? I would say yes, because what feminist leaders

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>were saying back then and they say this now, is

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 2>that the role for men who are really know, concerned

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 2>about these matters, which, by the way, all men should be.

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not something that should be a specific to me

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>or a small number of men yourself, but a lot

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>of the you know, a lot of the women leaders,

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 2>including Bell Hooks famously, the African American, the sadly late

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 2>African American feminist scholar and writer and activist, would say,

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>would she and others would say the proper role for

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 2>men in this work is to educate, organize, and politicize

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 2>other men. It's not to it's not to go in

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and save women or even to work with women. It's

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 2>to go into male culture in every racial and ethnic

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, community and every it's a global These are

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 2>global problems, not local problems. I mean they're manifest locally,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 2>but their global problems. The proper role for men is

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 2>to is to like, yeah, with their guys, you know

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, like their their friends, their colleagues, their peers,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 2>and adult men need to be providing much more over

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 2>it and explicit leadership to young men. And if you

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>stay in that lane. In other words, I think that's

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 2>what women are asking. It's, by the way, it's very

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>similar to what people of color have been saying for

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 2>white people who are whether you call them allies or collaborators.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 2>It's like, you don't need white people going to black communities.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 2>You need white people organizing white people and speaking out

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and using the platform of influence that they have within

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 2>their own sort of you know, culture or spheres of influence.

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a simple concept. It's not even that complicated.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So you say, I mean for forty years you've been

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at this and obviously there was you know, you've had

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly successful career, had a lot of influence in

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this space. But you referenced yourself that this is there

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.119
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a door that's opening now in this space.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But they're also a door closing, and we'll get to

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that in a minute in terms of some regression. But

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the door that's opening in terms of what consciousness in

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the space, a recognition of the crisis of young men.

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>The political side of this, how do you describe from

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it a policy framework that you see shifting or

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>political framework that's shifting.

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>It's both, I would say, I would say I would

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 2>say there's a shift in consciousness that's been happening over

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of generations. Really it's not a really,

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, brand new thing. I mean, whole generations of

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 2>men and young men have grown up with feminist mothers,

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 2>with women in the workplace as equals, with girls and

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>women sitting next to them in school, in the professional world.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, my parents' generation didn't have those experiences. It

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>was much more sex segregated, and women were excluded from

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 2>mainstream sort of competition with men in so many areas.

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 2>But there's a whole generations of men who have come

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 2>of age in a way that it's been normalized, you know,

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of men have much more likely to

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 2>have female friends and colleagues. And take that as just

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>obvious as opposed to something that some radical new, you know,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>development that they have to adjust to. But at the

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>same time, I think there's a whole lot of men

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 2>who have done very little speaking out about men's violence

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 2>against women, and a lot of men get really uncomfortable

0:08:58.040 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>about this subject. And I think a lot of men,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 2>including powerful men, who are really incredibly articulate about a

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>whole range of subjects, but when it comes to this subject,

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 2>they are like, oh my god, I don't I don't

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 2>want to go near this, or I don't know exactly

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>what to say, or they become inarticulate. And so what

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>ends up happening for a lot of men, including powerful men,

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm serious, Uh, what they'll do is they'll either remain

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>silent because they don't want to screw it up, or

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 2>they're or they're just so uncomfortable, or they'll defer to

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 2>women and women's leadership. And I think on one level, fine,

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>we need to, we need to, you know, uplift women's leadership.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 2>But in a sense that's that's not fair. It's not

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>what it's not why why is it women's responsibility? It

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 2>should be men's. That's that's that's a way of hoisting

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 2>off of you know, putting onto women what should be

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 2>what men should be carrying, especially those of us who

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 2>have you know, cultural, political, economic, you know, power and influence.

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 2>And so I think, I think one of the big

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 2>challenges of our time is getting more men who are

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 2>already there in the sense that we're uncomfortable with other

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 2>men's abusive behavior. We don't like it, we know it

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 2>when we see it, but we don't either know what

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 2>to say or we feel uncomfortable around it and don't

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 2>know what to do, and so we retreat. And I think,

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I think what we need to do is not that

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 2>we have to quote unquote convert the men who are

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the most deeply you know, misogynists and angry at women.

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>It's that we have to talk to men. I mean,

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 2>that would be a good thing, but I mean that's

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 2>not where I spend my time. I spend my time

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 2>with men who are already knows that, who already know

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 2>that gender justice, gender equality, reducing gender based violence are

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 2>important things, but they don't really know how or what

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 2>to do about it. My goal is to empower them

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 2>and to give them, both conceptually and practically the tools

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to be better leaders. And to be better partners, be

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>better you know, fathers, uncles, you know, teachers, coaches, youth workers,

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, religious leaders. There's so many men who are

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 2>good men in positions of influence, especially with young people,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 2>who could be doing so much more than they're doing

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Contextualize the issue for and just sort of, you know,

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>bring us in a little bit on you know, one

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of the trend lines we've seen in the last few decades.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you started this work, was sort of

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was that an apex of the anxiety in this space?

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Was it? Was there just little data, a little research

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in this space. Are we seeing a diminution and violence

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>perpetrated against or against women? Are we seeing a return

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to a little more misogyny? And has it been impacted

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>by culture? Social media, has been impacted even by our

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>politics today.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 2>All of that, I think, I think you've touched on

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 2>a whole bunch of really important developments. It's a complicated thing,

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 2>like social change itself is really complicated. So we're making

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of forward progress. There's reforms in the laws,

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a level of consciousness that seeps through, whether it's

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 2>through the education system, through media. There's so many powerful

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 2>and empowered women that are vocal and thoughtful around this

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 2>subject matter to a lesser extent men. But at the

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 2>same time, yes, we have had an enormous backlash against

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 2>some of this progress, and I think, honestly, I think

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>right wing populism in the United States and in Europe

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>and other parts of the world. But a big part

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 2>of it that doesn't get enough sort of discussion is

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 2>that it's not just resistance to racial integration and immigration

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and the increasing you know, sort of racial and ethnic

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 2>heterogeneity of some of these societies that had previously been

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty white. That's a part of it I'm saying. I mean,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 2>part of it, clearly is right wing populism feeds on

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that energy, that sort of racial grievance. But I think

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 2>it's also a lot of men who are really put

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>off by and decentered by feminism and by the LGBTQ revolution,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>which decenters sort of heteronormative heterosexual men in particular, And

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that has to be part of the conversation.

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean trump Ism, for example, me trump Ism is

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 2>so much of that is about not just white backlash,

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 2>but white male backlash against forward progress by by by women. Basically,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>and this is tricky stuff because you know, can I

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 2>also say I also, I think it's really important that

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I say. People like me who have been doing the

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 2>work that I and we have been doing, have long

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 2>made the connection between men's violence against women, men's violence

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 2>against other men, and men's violence against themselves, because you know,

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 2>suicide is violence turned inward. So the idea that sometimes

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 2>men will say, well, well you talk about violence against women, yo, okay,

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 2>what about violence against men? You know you'll hear this,

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 2>And I write about this in my book, of course,

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 2>because this is so predictable. It's like, well, I've thought

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>about that. Of course, we've all thought about we all

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 2>understand this. My friend Michael Kaufman, who's the co founder

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 2>of the White Ribbon Campaign, which is the largest global

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 2>movement of men working to end men's violence against women.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 2>It's in like sixty something countries and it's a great thing.

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 2>It started after the Montreal men massacre in nineteen eighty nine,

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 2>where a man, a twenty five year old man, lined

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>up fourteen women in the Institute of Technology and murdered

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>them in cold blood. This is in nineteen eighty nine,

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and he left a suicide note that said feminists, you know,

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>blaming feminists for having ruined his life, and he was

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>going to take revenge. Well, a group of men created

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the White Ribbon campaign, which is this big public display

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>two years later where a man, you know, at the

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>end of November every year, men wear white ribbons, Michael

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to say that they're not going to condone men's violence

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>against women, be silent in the face of it. Michael

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Kaufman wrote this essay in nineteen eighty seven where he

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 2>connected men's violence against women to men's violence against other men,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 2>to men's violence against themselves because they're all connected, and

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>so no thoughtful person in the twenty first centuries who's

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 2>looking at men's violence against women fails to see that

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of other things in men's lives are also connected.

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 2>In addition, by the way, look at all the men,

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, who have women in our lives who have

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 2>been assaulted by other men. Who look at all the

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 2>men adult men who have you know, partner partnered with

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 2>women who are sexual assault survivors or domestic mind and

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 2>full disclosure.

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, well, my wife who's been very vocal about that,

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and I am what occurred with Harvey Weinstein.

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 2>She has been, and she's been an incredible brave leader

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 2>on this subject. And I love her leadership on this

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 2>and her bravery, and I love working with her on

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 2>these matters absolutely. But I'm saying there's so much I

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know what your point. Yes, I don't know any

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 2>man who doesn't have women, So.

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I imagine you go to audiences all the time and

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just ask people to raise their hand.

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Or or or yes or just in terms of my

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 2>social networks and the people that I know, I mean,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm surprised if I meet a man who doesn't

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>have women in his life who have been assaulted by

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>other men. It's it's not some esoteric subject matter that

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 2>affects some small.

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it getting worse? Is it getting better?

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Again? It's a complicated question. I think we've made enormous

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 2>progress until the current regime, and the level we've made

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>enormous progress.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious. I mean, you just you just put out

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a report that can really quantify that in terms of

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>research dollars that are rolling back. Obviously, advocacy in the

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>DEI space, which is not I think so much of

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what people focus on DEI is around racial issues, but

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>A big part of the movement was a gender issues

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and obviously that's that's under assault. But what else I

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>mean is the actual statistics in terms of acts of

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>violence perpetuated against women. Is that increasing, decreasing or is

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>those research dollars drying up? And we're going to finally

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>not really have any understanding of that.

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>All of the above, I would I would say we

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 2>have been making progress. There have been some there has

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 2>been some data that showed that we have been making

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 2>progress over the past, you know, twenty five thirty years

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 2>in reducing the incidents of domestic and sexual violence. But

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the flip side is you don't know fully because of

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the vast majority has never reported. And then when you're

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 2>effective at raising consciousness, when you're effective at providing services

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 2>to victims and survivors, when you create an environment in

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 2>an institutional setting, whether it's in a corporation or obviously

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>in a school or some other in the military or

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 2>at some other setting, if you create an environment where

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 2>people feel comfortable coming forward to access services or to

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.239
<v Speaker 2>say that this has happened to them, then they're going

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to come forward. But if you create an environment where

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the institution is non responsive, then they're going to remain silent.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>And so when all these programs are being cut, one

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of the effects is people won't come forward because they'll

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 2>be scared that or they'll be doing a cost benefit

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 2>analysis they'll say, you know what, it's not worth it

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>because why why do I want to be re injured

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 2>by the system not being responsive to my needs and

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>put myself even more in more position of vulnerability. So

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 2>it's complicated in terms of the back and forth. But

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 2>also I do have to say the social media is

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of the digital revolution has created a whole new

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 2>set of challenges. It's also created new possibilities obviously for

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 2>connection and for solidarity and community and people connecting with

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>each other from their isolated, you know, silos. There's no

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 2>question that it's a mixed bag in terms of this

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 2>subject matter. But the porn culture, the pervasiveness of like

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.239
<v Speaker 2>deeply misogynous, the complication.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Of women, the objects ownership.

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and the complete sexual degradation of women in the

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 2>mainstream porn culture that a lot of young people growing

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 2>up with it are seeing that as normal. They're not

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>they're not seeing this as like some oh my god,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 2>some radical you know, uh, you know, new development. They're

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 2>more like, this is what sex is supposed to look like.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 2>It's it's some of it's just incredibly abusive and cruel.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 2>We're not talking about sexual expression here. We're talking about

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>cruelty and misogyny enshrined in the sexual act. And a

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 2>lot of young guys, I mean, who think that that's

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be that's normal. What ends up happening in

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 2>some of these relationships is guys are doing things to

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>women like in heterosexual relationships, non consensually. They're you know,

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 2>they're starting to strangle them during you know, consensual non

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>consensual strangulation during consensual sex and things, thinking that it's

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 2>normal and it's unbelievable. Have you seen adolescens?

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I didn't have the guts. I mean, I back

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to my wife Jen, she wanted me to see it,

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I did the opening scene, realizing the depths of it.

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>As a father, you know, I've.

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Got I mean at this age, right.

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've got We've got four young kids, two

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>boys and uh and social media is just encroaching upon

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>their lives and our lives.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>And it found way well I appreciate that, and I

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 2>and I'm going to say this is a spoiler alert.

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 2>But but I have to say that the main actor,

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>or one of the one of the main actors, Stephen Graham,

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 2>the British actor, who is also the uh one of

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 2>the creators and the co writer of the piece, brilliant.

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 2>This guy is brilliant, right, I mean he talks about

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>this publicly. He talks about it on Jimmy Fallon. So

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not giving away something that isn't like a mainstream

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of you know, uh sort of plot point, but

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 2>one of the I think one of the most powerful

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 2>things about the story and one of the reasons why

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 2>I caught on so much. I mean caught on like

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 2>in the way that I think it might be the

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 2>biggest Netflix uh my success ever and in the UK

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.959
<v Speaker 2>something like half the population I've seen the thing. Okay, Anyways,

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.479
<v Speaker 2>the point is the storyline about the father and his

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 2>feelings of failure for having failed to protect his son,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 2>and he thought he was doing a good job. In

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 2>other words, this was a you know, a heterosexual, heteronormai family,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 2>blue collar family. He's a plumber, thought that he was

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 2>doing what his father didn't do for.

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Him and and just just quickly it's a thirteen year

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>old kid.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Thirteen year old boy who is who murders his classmate?

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 2>And and what's in the background of the whole piece.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>They don't really foreground it, but it's certainly always there

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 2>is the manisphere, the misogynist manisphere. That's the Andrew Tait

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>world where this young boy had been in his room,

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 2>so his parents thought he was safe. He's in his room,

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.479
<v Speaker 2>he's you know, he's there. They're doing their job, and

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 2>meanwhile he was immersed in that whole world. The reason

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 2>why I think that so many people resonate with this film,

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 2>including man and myself. I'm a father of a son.

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I have a young son. You know, he's in his twenties,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 2>but he's, you know, young young guy. I think it

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 2>resonated with a lot of men because of the father's

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 2>pain and how badly he felt he had let down

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>his son, as well as of course the girl and

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 2>her family because she was the primary victim.

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean it's look, I mean it well, it

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>speaks with unpacking all of that, and I want to

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>get back to this mano sphere and I think, I mean,

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you alluded to it in the context of social media,

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but even unpacking that a little bit. You've made a

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>point and reinforced a point today in a report you

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>just put out that there is now a big setback.

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 2>In this space.

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a very intentional, organized effort now with

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the current administration, the Trump administration, to vandalize a lot

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of the progress in the space.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yes, and it's disgraceful. Let me just say, I'll

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 2>just use that word. It's disgraceful and it's harmful to women,

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 2>but it's also harmful to men. I'll give you an

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>example the military. I've been working with the military. I

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 2>created the first gender violence prevention program in the United

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 2>States Department of Defense nineteen ninety seven. We started out

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 2>in the Marine Corps. And I and my colleagues have

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 2>been working in that space for a long time, twenty

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 2>seven years or something. And there's all these great people,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 2>men and women, and you know, uniform military and DoD civilians.

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 2>And I was on the US Secretary Secretary of Defense

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Task Force on Domestic Violence in the Military. This is

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 2>back in two thousand. I mean, there have been so

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>many different talented people, including uniform military leaders, who are

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 2>on board with knowing how important it is to talk

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 2>about this stuff. To have programming to create it's for

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>morale purposes, for mission readiness purposes, for all these reasons.

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Having this kind of educational process within the military space

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>is really important, and it's being all just radically cut back,

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>and it's just it's absolutely disgraceful. And I'm saying this

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 2>as somebody who's been working in that space. And if

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.719
<v Speaker 2>anybody thinks that it's somehow anti mail, this is what

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 2>this is the subtext of all this, right, that somehow

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>it's anti mail to like talk about sexual assault or

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 2>domestic violence. This is BS. This is byes.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>They frame it in the wokesm just more woke.

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 2>BS right and there and there and that's and I'll

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 2>call BS on that because there's so many good people,

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 2>including really powerful men in that space. I mean, I've

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 2>worked with so many powerful military leaders from the from

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 2>the you know generals and colonels and admirals at the

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 2>highest level of you know authority. But also like when

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I started in the Marine, working in the in the

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Marine Corps, we were working with it was called a

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Sergeant's Major Initiative. It was an enlisted leadership initiative. We

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 2>were training sergeants. These are these are generally men. In

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Marine Corps about ninety four percent male,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 2>so there are women, but it's very much a male

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 2>dominated space. Let's be clear. Most of the you know

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>sergeants are in their twenties and they work directly with

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the young troops, these you know, the eighteen nineteen, twenty

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 2>year old troops, and so providing the leadership, providing the

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 2>leadership training for them for how they can leadership to

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 2>the younger troops. This is to me such a basic thing.

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 2>It should be. It should be not only should it

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 2>not be rolled back, it should be expanded and deepened.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 2>And it's what's happening is the exact opposite. Under the

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>name of supposedly caring about warrior culture, this is just

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 2>total bs. And I think under the name of anti wokeism,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>some of the most some of the most forward thinking

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and and sort of useful educational and other consciousness, you know,

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 2>shifting strategies over the last generation are being undermined.

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And you've seen this happening also in sports, because I

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>know you've been not just working a military but you've

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>represented a lot of good work in many different venues

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>as it related to athletics as well.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Well again, the program that I created, the Mentors and

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Violence Prevention Program MVP, was the first nineteen ninety three

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 2>at a place called the Center for the Study of

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Sport in Society. That's an institute that was created by

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Richard Lapchick, doctor Richard Lapschick, who's a pioneer of combining

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 2>sport and civil rights activism. Father. There was Joe Lapchick,

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the pioneering players and coaches in the NBA,

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 2>who was a white guy. Joe Lapchick, He's in the

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame. I mean, this is an NBA guy.

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 2>He ended up as the coach of the New York Knicks,

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and he was the coach of the Saint John's men's

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 2>basketball team. This is the father. He was also a

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 2>white guy who was for racial integration, way ahead of

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the curve. The son was an activist, like a sixties

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 2>era activist who wasn't an elite athlete, but he was

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 2>passionate about civil rights and sports. And he created this

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 2>institute in nineteen ninety In nineteen eighty four, and I,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 2>as a graduate student in Boston, came over to his

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 2>institute pitching the program to train college male student athletes

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>to speak out on these matters. This is in nineteen

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>ninety three, and my thinking was not that there was

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>a problem in athletics of male athletes assoulting women, although

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 2>there was such a problem and continues to be. My

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 2>thinking was, where are we going to find young men

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 2>who have the status, the self confidence, and the platform

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 2>of influence to break the silence among men and young men,

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Because I was thinking, lots of guys are uncomfortable with

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 2>abusive behavior and misogyny around them, but they don't speak up.

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>As I was saying earlier, so we need more men

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 2>who have already have some confidence because it takes guts.

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons why guys don't speak up on

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 2>these matters is it takes guts, it takes strength, it

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 2>takes self confidence. And not just twenty year olds, but

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 2>for fifty year olds. A lot of men get a

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 2>little they're anxious, and you know what they're anxious about.

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 2>They're anxious about other men, and they're anxious that other

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 2>men are going to think that somehow they're soft or weak.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 2>And it drives me. I have to say, it drives

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 2>me crazy because I watch on people on the right

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 2>mock and ridicule men who speak out about domestic violence

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 2>or sexual assault. Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson, These people mock

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 2>and ridicule. Andrew Tate is even more exaggerated in what

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>he in how he mocks, in ridicules men who stand

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 2>for gender equality and gender justice, as if we're somehow

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 2>soft and weak. And I often say, and I so

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>appreciate the opportunity to say this to you here in

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 2>this in this setting, if you're a guy, being one

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 2>of the guys takes nothing special whatsoever. Just going along

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 2>with you boys, It's like that takes nothing special. What

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 2>takes something special if you're a guy, is turning to

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 2>your friends and saying, hey, dude, that's not cool. The

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 2>way we don't do shit like you know, we don't

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 2>do stuff like that here, yeah, or we don't treat

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 2>women like that, or that's not you're my friend, But

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the way you're talking to your girlfriend, I'm concerned. That's

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 2>not cool, dude. That takes so much more strength and

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 2>guts and self confidence. And yet the guy who does

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 2>who says it is a is a beta, is a

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 2>woos is a soy boy, is a virtue signaler, and

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 2>so many young guys have grown up in a media environment,

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 2>a social media environment where like me, I know that's

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen is when people watch this, there's

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna be people that, who's that, who's that? Beta. It's

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 2>just so embarrassing to me because it's like literally the

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 2>opposite of the truth, right And so anyways, that's why

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 2>I started working with in the athletic subculture. And my

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 2>program was the first large scale program in college athletics,

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 2>and that was the first program in professional and I

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 2>have to say, you know who are first the first

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 2>team we work with in professional athletics, New England Patriots.

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 2>And then and then we work with the Red Sox

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 2>because you know, we're in Boston, right, So we had

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots in the Red Sox and at one point

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots had won like three out of the first

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 2>like five years we were working with them. The Patriots

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.479
<v Speaker 2>had won the Super Bowl and the Red Sox had

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>won the World Series for the first time in eighty

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 2>six years right after they started working with us. And

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 2>so I said, I would always say, as a laugh line,

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I would say, you know what about the Yankees, I'm sure,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 2>well that's true. Well, that's true but but it was

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 2>even more self serving, I said, I said, you know,

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to claim that the Red Sox and

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the patriots working with us was the reason why they

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 2>won incredible championships. But you can't prove disprove it either.

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Wi.

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Hi am Anthony Scaramucci, former White House Director of Communications

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 3>and Wall Street financier. You might have caught me on

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 3>a recent episode of This is Gavin Newsom. If you

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 3>like that, I think you'll enjoy my own podcast, The

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Rest Is Politics US. Alongside journalist Caddy k we go

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 3>behind the scenes of politics, from the chaos of the

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 3>West Wing to the forces shaping the world's most powerful economy.

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I was in the Trump White House for eleven wild

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 3>days and Caddy's been reporting on US politics for nearly

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 3>thirty years. We bring sharp insight, real stories, and maybe

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 3>a few secrets you haven't heard before. Search The Rest

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Is Politics US wherever you get your podcasts.

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Hope to see you over there.

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>So back to the manospeare because you mentioned Joe Rogan,

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Joe Peterson, obviously mentioned Andrew Tay, who you know,

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>respectfully need not be mentioned much. I mean he's I

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>mean even by extreme standards. He's a unique spectrum. That said,

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>he's also been embraced by members of the Trump administration

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and Trump himself, which full disclosure. But talk to me

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>about the manos speirre, I mean, what is it?

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 2>And who?

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>By the way, who are some of these fun I

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mean people I think I have heard of. Joe Rogan.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Average person may not have heard of Joe Rogan then

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously heard something about him when it came to Kamala

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Harris not deciding to go to Austin to go on

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>his podcast, though few people likely were first to learn

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>about him with that alone. But Joe Peterson's someone not

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows who else in this mano sphere? What is it?

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you define it? And when did you start

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to see the emergence of it? And how real inconsequential

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is it is? Is it in the context of this

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>gender conversation.

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was certainly a small sort of dark corner

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 2>of the Internet for a number of years where men

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 2>who were many of them really angry at women, at

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 2>feminism more generally, and at women. Many of them were

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 2>men who were divorced, who had custody battles, you know,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 2>who were really angry at both the courts in some

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 2>cases their you know, their wives or their ex wives

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 2>because they didn't have access to their kids. And some

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 2>of those men were abusive, some of them weren't abusive.

0:30:57.680 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a complicated picture. And when it comes to

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the messiness of relationships, I mean, i'm

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, who knows, you know. But so there was

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 2>there was a sort of men's rights movement which was

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 2>organizing itself. And then when the Internet came came into

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the picture, they were organizing through you know, through connecting

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 2>with each other through the digital universe. And it was

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 2>called the manosphere. And it was again a small sort

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 2>of corner of the Internet. It's become completely mainstream now.

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 2>So and and you know, Donald Trump's election in twenty

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 2>sixteen was a big accelerant to the to the mainstreaming

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of the Manisphere. And now a lot of young people,

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 2>young boys in particular, but not exclusively, but certainly young

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 2>boys and young men get drawn into the manisphere. And

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 2>by the way, not necessarily because they're you know, ideological.

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 2>It's not because they have like a critique of feminism

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 2>or something or anything, or masculinity. It's more like the

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 2>algorithms draw them in and maybe.

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe learning on a YouTube version of a video game

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>they like, and all of a sudden there's an ad

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that's right, it's you know, with a Bugatti or something,

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and they click onto that. All of a sudden they're

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>part of some university's right, and then all of a sudden,

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>two months later, they're in a conspiracy theory.

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right, and and and and part exactly

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 2>and part of the conspiracy is that is that men

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 2>are being taken advantage of, and that men are being disadvantaged,

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 2>and that you know, feminists are uh anti mail and

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 2>that and that you as a man need to stand

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.479
<v Speaker 2>up and speak up and fight back because you know,

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.719
<v Speaker 2>that's the whole red pill idea. Like somehow, somehow you're

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 2>now consciously seeing that the world is lined up for women,

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and which is, by the way, again talk about a

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 2>topsy turvy understanding of the way the world works. Right

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, a lot of these men, as

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of these men have never they've

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 2>never taken a course on you know, gender. You know,

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 2>they've never read a book about it. They've never attended seminars,

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 2>they haven't watched you know, long YouTube videos or even

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 2>even Ted talks like my Ted Talk or other people's

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Ted talks. They haven't had much exposure, but they have

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>heard that, you know, feminists hate men and especially white men.

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Let me just say this is one of the things

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 2>that I think is really great about you doing this

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 2>podcast and the kind of people that you've been interviewing.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 2>You're having a dialogue. I think I think a lot

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 2>of young guys don't hear any conversation like this whatsoever,

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and certainly if there if all they're listening to is

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the Jordan Peterson's of the world and the and Joe Rogan.

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, Joe Rogan has enormous, enormous influence,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and he's not particularly ideological, although he does platform people

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 2>right of center, and he's very conspiratorial in the way

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 2>he thinks.

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>So not long ago he was he was platforming in

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders, I mean, on the other side of the

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>political spectrum in that respect.

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, But he's also he's a smart guy, even

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 2>though he's you know, I think he's a little bit

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, he he goes in different directions and sometimes

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I think, oh my god, he's so insightful, and other

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 2>times he says things that I'm like, oh my god,

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 2>But he does you know, he interviews you know, theoretical physicists,

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 2>and he has thoughtful conversations and my son and others

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that I know, and I enjoy listening to him. So

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not this isn't just a complete, you know, sort

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 2>of dismissional of Joe. Yeah. I do think the Democratic

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Party has done a horrible job of outreach to men.

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's not just about Kamala Harris failing

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 2>to go on Joe Rogan. Although I think that was

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 2>a mistake. I don't think that that's unique to Kamala

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Harris and her campaign, right, I think the Democratic Party

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 2>as a party has done a really poor job for

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 2>fifty years at outreach to men.

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So I want to talk. I want to unpack that

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, because I mean, it connects to the

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>manto sphere, and it connects to what's happening with podcasts

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and how media is now consumed. And that's been again

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>an expertise of yours. It's sort of the it's the

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>intersection of race and violence and gender, but also the

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>intersection of gender and media. But there's this larger trend

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>line that also connects, and that is men are not

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>doing well right. I mean, suicide rates four x, the

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>addiction rates three x, twelve times more likely a man

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to be incarcerated. You look at obesity rates, dropout rates,

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at graduation rates, you look at discipline, you

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>look at all these larger issues you've been focused on

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of violence. I mean this, this is a crisis, arguably.

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is a serious, serious crisis the state

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>of men. And it's not just white men, it's young men.

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what is going on in this space? And

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what have you?

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean you've you've.

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>You've talked in terms of hyper masculinity. You and my

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>wife full disclosure, were part of a film you guys

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>worked on together around women and girls called Misrepresentation. But

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>then you followed up a decade ago in this space

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>with a film called The mascul Living about masculinity, hyper masculinity.

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Man up, be a man, you know, and you called

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>out in that film a lot of these stats a

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>decade plus ago, And so I think you're right to

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>call out the Democratic Party. Where the hell have we

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>been on this topic? We see where the Republicans have

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>gone with it and to exploit, I think a little

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of it, not necessarily to solve for some of it.

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But what are these trend lines? What do they mean

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to you? And what have you gleaned from? And what

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the hell is going on with young men in this

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>country and maybe around the world.

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Sure well, I mean, there's no doubt that there's all

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 2>kinds of indict you know, indications that a lot of

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 2>young men are not doing well. And then you just

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 2>name some of those statistics. And some of your other

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 2>guests have talked about this subject and and thoughtfully and

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 2>and you know, and it's all good. By the way,

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I do want to say one of the things that

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 2>that is frustrating to me is that feminism is not

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the enemy of men.

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 2>It's like, if you want to help men, if you

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 2>want if you want boys to thrive, if you want

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 2>boys to have better lives, better relationships, better self regard

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 2>and self care to take care of themselves, feminism is

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 2>not the uh antithesis of that. Feminism is giving giving

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.959
<v Speaker 2>a pathway. Can I also let me just a related point,

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the men's health movement, which is a small but growing

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 2>movement of of of people who are looking at ways

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 2>in which cultural ideal ideas about manhood. And this is

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 2>again around the world, it's not just in the United States,

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 2>but have contributed to men's health problems, both in terms

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 2>of risk taking behavior and certainly in terms of health

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 2>seeking behavior. In other words, men not going to the doctor,

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 2>men not going to the dentist, men not going to therapy,

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, dealing with self medication rather like through the

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 2>bottle or through drugs, rather than going to get you know,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 2>professional health like therapy, because that's unmanly to do. In

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 2>other words, in other words, the impediment to doing that

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 2>is a belief about manhood. Like a real man sucks

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 2>it up, a real man just deals with it. The

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 2>men's health movement, which is an important movement to say

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the least, is directly connected to the feminist led women's

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 2>health movement. In fact, one of the major events in

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the women's health movement was the publication in nineteen seventy

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 2>two of a book called Our Bodies, Ourselves, published by

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 2>the Boston Women's Health Book Collective, which was one of

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 2>the first interventions into the public conversation about how women's

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>health was affected by gender. You know ideas about femininity

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 2>and how the healthcare system was set up for men

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and for women. Anyhow, the men's health women Some of

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 2>the major figures in it, including my friend and colleague

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 2>Terry Reel, who wrote the first major book about men's

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.800
<v Speaker 2>depression called I Don't Want to Talk about It, Overcoming

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the Secret Legacy of Male Depression in nineteen ninety seven.

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 2>People like Terry Reel talk openly about how his ideas

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 2>were informed by feminist you know, intellectuals and activists and

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 2>practitioners in the women's health space, in the therapy space.

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 2>And yet the average guy who cares about women, you know,

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 2>men's health, and who or listen or listens to manisphere

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 2>figures talk about how feminists hate men. They have no

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 2>idea that some of the most thoughtful things, you know,

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 2>thoughtful people about men's health are direct products of feminist

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 2>ideas and feminist activism. And I think the reason why

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that's important is because we have we have

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 2>too much artificial division between men and women. And I

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 2>think the Right thrives on this division, and it's it's

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 2>it's dividing people from each other rather than bringing them

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 2>to And I think part of what I do in

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 2>my work, and I think you do it as well.

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 2>But I think certainly what I do in my work

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 2>is because I come from a fairly traditional background, and

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I have all this experience in sports culture, in the

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 2>military and working with traditional men. In fifty I've been

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 2>all fifty states, you know, I work in Red States.

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I work with really traditional men in every you know sector.

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 2>You can imagine men can have these conversations and with

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 2>each other. With women, it's not like it's not so polarized.

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 2>But I think if you go into these manisphere spaces

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 2>or the political spaces, or Fox, or you watch Fox,

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:37.399
<v Speaker 2>or you listen to talk radio, conservative talk radio, which

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I've been listening. I started listening in Rush Lombard like

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety. I know this stuff really really well.

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>We had on one of the OJEZU was the number

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>two on radio, Michael Savage, was that right where you're

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting just a few weeks ago on the podcast.

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right about that history as well, that's right they

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, these guys created a formula that

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 2>made a ton of money for them and a lot

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 2>of other people, and dividing people and and making caricatures

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 2>of people that they don't agree with Rush Limbaugh did

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it fabulously and ridiculed and mocked, you know, feminists and

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 2>women who are trying to be treated with respect.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're basically, I mean, so this goes I think

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this is This is the real dialectic right on this topic.

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a difficult one because the people to see it

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it's one or the other. It's a binary that somehow

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a zero sum game, that that you are somehow

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>diminishing the feminist movement if you're trying to elevate young men,

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 1>or if you're elevating or the opposite. I mean, what

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you start to there's more of an abundance mindset.

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>What's good for the feminist movement is good for young men.

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Is the point I guess you're making. Is that the

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>point you're making?

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, but it's all I have to say. It's

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 2>complicated because people can say, well, there's only so many jobs,

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 2>and if women are getting those jobs, then there's going

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 2>to be harder you know, competition for the men. But

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 2>you know what, if you believe in merit, if you

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 2>believe in democracy, if you believe in fairness, and you

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 2>believe in fairness. I think fairness is to me the

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 2>governing issue, right. I believe in fairness plat out women.

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 2>If women are smarter than men, if they work harder,

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 2>if they're more talented, then they deserve the job. It's

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 2>like you don't deserve the job.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Just because aristocracy in that respect is certainly showcasing itself

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>an education system, and certainly higher education, which women are

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on pace in half a decade to be two to

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>one of college graduates in that that's right.

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, anti intellectualism is deep in American culture,

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 2>especially among men. The idea that if you're somehow smart,

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 2>you're a wimp, or you're condescending because you're educated, you're

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 2>condescending to people who don't have an education. And I

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 2>appreciate that certain members of of you know, the educated

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 2>classes can be clunky, to say the least in terms

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 2>of the way they communicate with people like with with

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 2>with a less you know, less pedigree in terms of

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 2>their education. I don't think I'm like that, but I

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 2>do think that that's a real thing. But the idea

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 2>that being somehow intellectual, being you know, somebody who reads,

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 2>who engages with ideas is somehow makes you weak and

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 2>soft as a man, or less than a real man.

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the most self defeating idiocy that I could

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 2>ever imagine, and yet it's fed daily in the in

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 2>the popular discourse, especially in you know, right wing talk radio.

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So what the hell is going on with young men?

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Then?

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>What's going on?

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Well? I think it's a complicated world. I think I

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of women, for example, have been pioneering

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 2>new ways of being women in a in a in

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 2>a in a very diverse and changing you know, sort

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 2>of historical social you know context, And I think a

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:34.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of men are as well. We're just trying to

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 2>figure it out, Like what does it mean to be

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 2>a good father? What does it mean to be a

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:38.839
<v Speaker 2>good husband? What does it mean to be a strong man?

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 2>If the historically being a strong man meant you're a

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 2>protector of your family and a provider. But then you

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 2>know your wife, say you're a heterosexual man and you're married,

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 2>what if your wife is like making more money than you,

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 2>what does it mean to be a provider at that point?

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 2>You know what I'm saying, Like, I mean, what does

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 2>it mean to protect your kids? When people are dropping

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 2>off their kids at school and they're worried that their

0:42:57.719 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 2>kids are going to get shot in a school shooting.

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 2>So are we protecting our kids effectively or are we actually,

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 2>through bad policy, making our kids more vulnerable. So I

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 2>think I think guys want to do the right thing.

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 2>They want to be respected, they want to be strong,

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 2>but they don't really know exactly how to go about

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 2>doing it. And because because of the changes in women's lives,

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 2>And again I'm making a wildly general statement, and it's

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 2>complicated by class and race and ethnicity and all these

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 2>other categories. I appreciate that intersectional thinking is not just

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 2>a that's not just a slogan. It's real. It's like

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:34.280
<v Speaker 2>people have complex identities, right, and they occupy complex social positions.

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 2>But I think a lot of women have been doing

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 2>incredible things to sort of upend centuries, millennia of tradition,

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:45.280
<v Speaker 2>and as a result, a lot of men are completely

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 2>dissentered and are still trying to figure out what does

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 2>it mean? What do I mean? What does it mean

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 2>to be me? What does it mean to be strong?

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:54.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think some men are drawn to And again

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm not dismissing this. I think it's okay. You know,

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 2>some men are drawn to more traditional ideas about manhood

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 2>in part because they're they're they're simpler, and they're they're

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 2>they're they're they're they're they're they're less comp they're just

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:13.840
<v Speaker 2>less less complicated, like so, for example, celebrating physical strength,

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:16.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I mean, and by the way, Trump in

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 2>his you know, his way, he's no, you know, he's

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 2>no intellectual, right, but he's he has a visceral understanding

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 2>of some of this. And so and the Trump campaign

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 2>how how they go to UFC fights and then Trump

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 2>walks into a UFC fight and everybody's cheering. It's like yes,

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's like that re establishes that Trump is the

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 2>man's candidate. The Republican Party is the men's party. And

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 2>they just doubled down. The Republicans double down on this

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 2>in the twenty twenty for r NC. And it was like,

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to me, it was like a cartoonish, hyper masculine spectacle.

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 2>It was I was embarrassed by it. But it were

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 2>shirt yes, yes, and and and Dana White saying he's

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 2>the best, you know, he's the biggest badass. And one

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 2>person after another going up and saying Donald Trump is

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the strongest man I've ever met, and it's just I

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 2>was just embarrassed by this. But it worked, worked, It worked,

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 2>especially for young men.

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But you knew it was going to work because you

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote books on this. Yes, you wrote a book about

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Clinton and Hillary I mean about Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>You wrote a book about masculinity and leadership.

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 2>I did. Yes, I saw this coming decades ago. I

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 2>mean it wasn't. And by the way, Reagan, I mean,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 2>how do you think Reagan was marketed to the I

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 2>mean what your predecessor as governor of California. How Reagan

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 2>was marketed to the to the American population was he

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 2>was a cowboy riding in from the West to save

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 2>a degenerated, you know, liberal establishment that's soft and weak,

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:36.359
<v Speaker 2>and and you know the Iranian hostage crisis, and rom

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Reagan was going to come in. John Wayne wasn't available

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Ronald Reagan, and and it started. It didn't start there,

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 2>but it accelerated with the Reagan administration and then for

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the last forty plus years. One of the biggest challenges

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 2>that the Democrats haven't risen to is how do you,

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 2>on the one hand, represent the interests of the ascendant

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 2>classes of women and people of color and LGBTQ and

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 2>hang on to the one of the key parts of

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:04.839
<v Speaker 2>the New Deal coalition, which is, you know, blue collar

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 2>white men and how do you do that at the

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 2>same time. And it's really a complicated challenge.

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So what's the.

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Answer to that? Ha ha?

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because I mean it goes back to the

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party. It's interesting Democrat at the DNC, they didn't

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily platform. They platform pretty much every group, but they

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't platform a group that's struggling and struggling to be

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>heard and identified as struggling, right, that are looking for

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>meaning and purpose and mission that you, for a long

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>period of time have recognized are feeling these pressures. There

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:38.399
<v Speaker 1>are these macrol pressures. I mean, what is I mean,

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>why do you think the Democratic Party did not meet

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that moment? Do you think the Democratic Party is waking

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 1>up to that moment? Maybe it goes back to my

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>question a little while ago about what does this moment

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in this conversation mean? Why do you feel like is

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 1>there a political is it because the political opening in

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the space, more people are having this conversation about men

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>than they have in the past. That's actually illuminating even

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>more of your work as well.

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's so many pieces to that. I would say,

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 2>I would say the crisis of right wing populism and

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 2>trump Ism is focusing a lot of people's minds. I

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:20.320
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of people who were kind of asleep

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 2>at the switch a little bit, and they thought, you know,

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats could just keep going without really addressing this

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 2>complex set of identity issues, especially involving men, without being

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 2>seen to somehow be you know, selling out women, you know.

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 2>And I think the consultant class, I think I think

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of political consultants haven't been on this. They

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 2>haven't understood this dynamic, the dynamic of men and speaking

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 2>two men and how I mean Steve Bannon, one of

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 2>your formal guests, Steve Bennan says, everything is narrative. This

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 2>isn't about ideology. It's about narrative. And I mean, I'm

0:47:58.040 --> 0:47:59.800
<v Speaker 2>one of the co founders of an organization called the

0:47:59.800 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Young Men Research Project, right, and we've been doing we

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:05.320
<v Speaker 2>started in early twenty four and way before the election,

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to push the Democratic Party, but not just the

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.479
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party, journalists, people in the media to think about

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the young men's vote, to think about how to speak

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 2>to young men because we were worried about the slide

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 2>over to the to the right of young men. And

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 2>by the way, young women move into the left and

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, politically and young men moving to the right.

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 2>But it's not ideological. In other words, the same men

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 2>who voted for Trump, but young men, many of them,

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 2>they're pro choice on abortion rights, and you've been a

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:33.799
<v Speaker 2>strong leader on abortion rights and unapologetically, which is by

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the way, what we need. We need unapologetic leadership from

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:40.439
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic side on things like women's rights. But when

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 2>it comes to you know, strong labor unions, when it

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 2>comes to action on the climate crisis, when it comes

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 2>to increase of minimum wage and the issue after issues,

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 2>young men are progressive.

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Way though there's some interesting state wide elections overwhelming they

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>went for Trump but supported a portion of reproductive freedom

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and supported minimum wage increases. That's right, same exact voter.

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Because it was about identity, not ideology. In other words,

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 2>there the identity politics. This is what identity politics are

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.959
<v Speaker 2>always The Democrats are already are always accused of playing

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 2>identity politics when they talk about issues relating to you know,

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:17.439
<v Speaker 2>women or people of color or LGBTQ or something. But

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the Republicans have been playing identity politics with white male

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 2>voters for fifty years. Richard Nixon started playing identity politics

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 2>when he started talking about the forgotten man, and you

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:28.320
<v Speaker 2>know they and that silent majority queens.

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, they've only been playing those.

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Games exactly identity politics. But it worked again in the

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty floor election. And I think a lot of

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 2>young men and a lot of young men were basically

0:49:40.280 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 2>being told that the party that cares about you and

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 2>the party that is the men's party is the Republican Party,

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 2>and Trump is the man's candidate, and the Democrats are

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the party of women and non masculine men, right, And

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 2>that's that. That was the mainstream message to young men

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:00.879
<v Speaker 2>and young men who were low engagement voters. In other words,

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 2>what does that mean? Low engagement voters? It means they

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:06.359
<v Speaker 2>don't pay close attention to politics. They don't read, they

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:09.399
<v Speaker 2>don't engage in political discourse, they don't you know, read

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:11.279
<v Speaker 2>think pieces in the Atlantic. You know what I'm saying.

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>They're not where I am every night on MSNBC or

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Fox or you know, Newsmax or CNN.

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 2>No, but they're but then, but they're hearing on and

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:20.279
<v Speaker 2>by the way. One of the things that we do

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 2>in the Young Men's Research Project is that you we're

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:25.320
<v Speaker 2>looking at all these different ways that the media ecosphere

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 2>that young men are inhabiting are not necessarily overtly ideological.

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 2>In theres a lot of them. They're just talking about comedy,

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:33.239
<v Speaker 2>they're talking about working out, they're talking about you know,

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 2>eating healthy and good, you know, relationship sports. But then

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 2>they throw in some politics, like like they're throw in

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:41.280
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of politics, and like, yeah, Trump, Trump's

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a guy, He's a guy's guy, you know, and then

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 2>this fight fight fight, which is you know, by the way,

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:46.760
<v Speaker 2>let me just say I was impressed.

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean it was shot that was extraordinary

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in the moment, yeah.

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Knowledge, yeah, and so good good for him. It's like,

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 2>but but then Charlie Kirk comes out and says, if

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 2>you're a man, after this, after the after the assassination

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 2>attempt and Trump's response to it, if you're a man

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:00.799
<v Speaker 2>and you don't vote for Trump, you're not a man.

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:04.479
<v Speaker 2>That to me is that's embarrassing to me, Charlie Kirk,

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm sorry, that's embarrassing.

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, we had him on the show as well

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:09.719
<v Speaker 1>as you know, yes.

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:11.839
<v Speaker 2>No, no, And again let me say also, I think

0:51:11.840 --> 0:51:14.839
<v Speaker 2>it's great talking to people, having dialogue with people I

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:17.399
<v Speaker 2>have arguments with and discussions with people that I don't

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 2>agree with all the time, including men, you know, around

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 2>some of this fraught subject matter. It's fine, good, let's go,

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 2>let's go, let's have a discussion.

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you about just the me too movement.

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, this sort of sendency of consciousness in this space,

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and then there were action to it. Do you think

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 1>there was there's been an overreaction to it. Do you

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:48.799
<v Speaker 1>think there's been appropriate reaction to it? Do you think

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 1>people have understated the power of the me too movement?

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Where are you, I mean, just on that spectrum of observation, acuity, interest,

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>your own activity in that space. Where do you come

0:52:02.120 --> 0:52:05.240
<v Speaker 1>out in terms of just your experience with that movement

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and with where we are today?

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I think I think we need to, like one

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 2>way to think about this is kind of widen the

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 2>aperture a little bit and think about this in the

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 2>longer terms. For thousands of years, men assaulted women in families,

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 2>in relationships, in marriages. Marriage was leg you know, rape

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 2>was legal within marriage, including in the West until very recently.

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean in the UK it was only allowed in

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety one rape within marriage, And in the United

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 2>States as late as the nineteen eighties, there were six

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:35.800
<v Speaker 2>states where it was still legal for a man to

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.840
<v Speaker 2>rape his his wife. I mean seriously, I mean, we

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 2>weren't so long ago cleaning up some statute language on that,

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:45.799
<v Speaker 2>even in California. So I completely understand what you're saying, right,

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 2>So there's still some language in that space exactly, and

0:52:49.080 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 2>to this day. And there's hundreds of millions of people

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 2>who live in countries where it's still legal for men

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to rape his own wife. So there's been thousands of

0:52:57.080 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 2>years of men brutalizing women and getting away with it

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:05.000
<v Speaker 2>within absolute impunity. And finally, you have in the in

0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the twentieth century, you have a movement, you know, whether

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:10.799
<v Speaker 2>it's the women's movement more broadly and then more specifically

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:14.359
<v Speaker 2>the anti sexual assault movement that started really taking off

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen seventies and eighties, as well as the

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 2>anti domestic violence movement. So these are very recent movements.

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, for somebody who's twenty years old, the eighties

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 2>might sound like a long time ago, but let me

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:26.400
<v Speaker 2>just say, it's not that long ago. You know. I

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 2>was just listening to us like a mixed list from

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:30.799
<v Speaker 2>the eighties, and I was like, that was my I

0:53:30.840 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 2>was in my twenties during the eighties, and I was like,

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I can I can say I could I know every

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:38.399
<v Speaker 2>word to these songs anyhow. Anyhow, the point is, it's

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:39.720
<v Speaker 2>not that long lack of seagulls.

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Just Duran, Duran, I won't die anyway. That's another conversation.

0:53:43.719 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, but the point exactly. But the point is

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 2>you have these movements organized against something that's been going

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.759
<v Speaker 2>on for thousands of years, and finally, you know, giving

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 2>a voice to women, reforming the laws. And then because

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:00.240
<v Speaker 2>of the Internet, because the you know, the incredible digital

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 2>technology that allowed the voices of women to be heard

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 2>in a way that they had never ever had the

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to be heard. One of like the Me Too

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 2>movement happened in part not just on the ground because

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 2>of women coming forward, but it became possible because of

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the technology of communication and the digital revolution. So many

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:20.279
<v Speaker 2>of the women who came forward to say, this is

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 2>what happened to me, this is my truth, this is

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 2>my experience. Yes, those women were speaking not just for

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:29.720
<v Speaker 2>themselves but for literally literally billions of women and girls

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 2>who had never ever had a voice for thousands of years.

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:37.120
<v Speaker 2>And so was there were there examples where it went

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 2>over the top and there and where where you know,

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 2>due process for men who were accused of crimes, you know,

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 2>was was not taken seriously. Yeah, I'm sure there was,

0:54:45.239 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 2>and I and I'm empathetic, and but I always say

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 2>this because I do gender violence prevention education. I've been

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 2>doing this for a long time. If you're a man

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 2>who has been, you know, falsely accused of some crime

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 2>that you didn't commit, it's a horrible thing. And there

0:54:57.640 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 2>but for the grace of God, go I and other men.

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not saying it's okay, it's horrible and it's unacceptable.

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the vast majority of sexual assault is

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:08.719
<v Speaker 2>never even reported, much less falsely reported. So I think

0:55:08.760 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of men have this falsely inflated sense of

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 2>their vulnerability to false accusations. And what ends up happening

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:17.719
<v Speaker 2>is that this narrative develops that all these women are

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 2>coming forward, all they can ruin a guy's life easily.

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:24.319
<v Speaker 2>And meanwhile, we know how how much, how difficult it

0:55:24.360 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 2>is for a woman to come forward, and how unlikely

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 2>it is that she's going to call that upon herself

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:33.560
<v Speaker 2>unless it really something really happened. Now, having said that,

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 2>I do think there were some excesses, and there were

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 2>some statements, certainly by women and others, that were dismissive

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:44.360
<v Speaker 2>of men's concerns about being unfairly targeted or falsely accused

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:46.239
<v Speaker 2>or what have you. But I think that I think

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:50.919
<v Speaker 2>overall it was a step forward. But it's messy. Life

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 2>is messy, and social change is messy, and I think

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 2>we have to give these and I'm just going to

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 2>say this. I mean, I'm not, you know, bizarre who

0:55:57.520 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 2>can make these, you know, issue these kind of edicts.

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 2>But I would say we have to give each other

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:03.640
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a break. I mean, we're all

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 2>struggling to try to be treated with respect and dignity,

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 2>try to live you know, lives of you know, you know,

0:56:10.160 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 2>of dignity and in relationships, and with all these complexities

0:56:14.000 --> 0:56:18.720
<v Speaker 2>of race and gender and and and and sexuality swirling about,

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:21.880
<v Speaker 2>it's not easy and navigating that space. And so I

0:56:21.880 --> 0:56:23.400
<v Speaker 2>think what's happening with a lot of young men is

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 2>that is that they're really confused, They're really be fuddled.

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think of a lot of adult men are too.

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 2>So it's not just the young guys are befuddled. And

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:33.439
<v Speaker 2>so part of the reason why so many young guys

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:36.080
<v Speaker 2>are befuddled is because the men, the adult men that

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 2>they look to for guidance, are themselves often bill bewildered.

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:42.240
<v Speaker 2>What am I supposed to say? How am I supposed

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:44.359
<v Speaker 2>to My wife wants me to be strong, she wants

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:47.200
<v Speaker 2>me to be powerful, but but but I'm also vulnerable.

0:56:47.239 --> 0:56:50.719
<v Speaker 2>And when I express vulnerability then she's uneasy about that

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 2>because she wants me to be strong, and I'm not

0:56:52.760 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 2>sure what to do. And what you know this is,

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 2>this is you know therapists. You know, for example, couples

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:01.680
<v Speaker 2>therapists deal with I'm not a therapist, right, but I

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:05.359
<v Speaker 2>know that couple therapists deal with this every day. And

0:57:05.360 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 2>and and Terry Reel, who's this brilliant you know couple therapists. He's,

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 2>by the way, Bruce Springsteen and Patty his wife, Patty's

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:13.719
<v Speaker 2>couple therapists. And I'm saying that because Bruce Springsteen wrote

0:57:13.760 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the literally wrote the forward to Terry Reel's latest book,

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:20.960
<v Speaker 2>which is called we it's about relationships. And Bruce Springsteen

0:57:21.160 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 2>is is like he's like a guy's guy, Like he's

0:57:24.200 --> 0:57:29.400
<v Speaker 2>like the prototypical American guy, right, he is, but he's

0:57:29.440 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 2>also extremely self reflexive and vulnerable, and he's it doesn't

0:57:33.600 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 2>make him any less of a of a of a

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of alpha rock star to be able to say,

0:57:38.680 --> 0:57:41.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, he needed therapy, and he needed therapy for

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 2>his own stuff with his own father and his relationship

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:45.960
<v Speaker 2>with his wife, and you know, and it was really

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 2>important to have support in this in the sort of environment.

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:52.760
<v Speaker 2>And this this notion that vulnerability is somehow weakness, This

0:57:52.840 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 2>is one of the biggest lies that young men get sold.

0:57:55.680 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 2>But there's the pressure on young men to be sort

0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 2>of sucking it up and pretending that they've got it

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 2>all going on because of because of the narrative that

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:06.320
<v Speaker 2>they're hearing. Is that a real man does that. And again,

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:08.520
<v Speaker 2>some of those manisphere of figures that we've been talking about,

0:58:08.560 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 2>including by the way, Donald Trump, who says it all

0:58:11.000 --> 0:58:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the time, you know, you don't admit weakness, you don't

0:58:12.880 --> 0:58:16.960
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge mistakes. To me, that's that's a sign of total

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:21.160
<v Speaker 2>insecurity rather than strength. But I think we need adult

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 2>men to model strong adult men to model vulnerability, not

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 2>as weakness, but as I'm confident enough to say that

0:58:28.920 --> 0:58:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't have it all figured out. I'm confident enough

0:58:31.040 --> 0:58:34.400
<v Speaker 2>to say that, you know what, I make mistakes too,

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 2>but I'm going to I'm just still going to get

0:58:36.120 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 2>back up on the on the horse. I'm still gonna

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 2>do my thing, and and and hearing professional athletes say it,

0:58:41.320 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's one of the reasons why it's so

0:58:42.560 --> 0:58:45.400
<v Speaker 2>powerful to hear like professional male athletes in this case

0:58:45.680 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 2>who have mental health challenges, who will say, you know what,

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I have panic attacks. I'm a I'm a I'm a

0:58:49.760 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 2>great professional athlete, and you know, look at me. I'm

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm I've succeeded at the highest level in

0:58:55.120 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 2>my sport, but I have issues and and I and

0:58:59.120 --> 0:59:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I and and that's so okay. Michael Phelps, the greatest

0:59:01.960 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 2>swimmer men's swimmer of all time. This is really a

0:59:05.520 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 2>powerful part of this. And last thing I want to

0:59:07.480 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 2>say about all this, I appreciate again, I appreciate all

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the opportunities you're giving me to say these things. Sometimes

0:59:14.080 --> 0:59:16.680
<v Speaker 2>people will say to me or to other men who

0:59:16.760 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 2>talk about the issues in this way, they'll say, you're

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:22.880
<v Speaker 2>trying to make men soft and weak. And if you

0:59:22.920 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 2>listen to Fox's News, they say it all the time,

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the worsification of America. These the liberals are trying to

0:59:28.640 --> 0:59:31.080
<v Speaker 2>worsify America. They're trying to make men soft and weak.

0:59:31.480 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's to me, it's a cartoon. It's like watching

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 2>a satire. But I reject the idea that I and

0:59:40.440 --> 0:59:43.840
<v Speaker 2>others are trying to make men soft and weak. I

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:45.400
<v Speaker 2>think I want to be strong. I think I'm a

0:59:45.400 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 2>strong man. I think that I want my son to

0:59:47.600 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 2>be a strong man, and he is a strong young man.

0:59:50.360 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 2>The question is not whether we want men to be strong.

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 2>The question is how do you define strength? And how

0:59:54.560 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 2>do you define strength? Is it this cartoonish ability to

0:59:57.480 --> 1:00:02.200
<v Speaker 2>impose your will on another person and dominate? Is that strength? Really?

1:00:02.240 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 2>In the twenty first century, are we supposed to take

1:00:04.120 --> 1:00:07.600
<v Speaker 2>that seriously as the definition of strength? What about moral courage?

1:00:07.920 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 2>What about courage to do something even though there's going

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to be a consequence for you that's negative because it's

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the right thing to do. What about social courage, which

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:17.920
<v Speaker 2>is to say, speaking up in the face of you know, abuse.

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's whether it's you know, your friends of

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:23.640
<v Speaker 2>yours making derogatory comments, or online spaces where guys are

1:00:23.640 --> 1:00:26.640
<v Speaker 2>being really disrespectful to girls or women and calling them

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>out and saying, hey, that's not cool. What about you know,

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>resilience in the face of adversity. These are all these

1:00:32.240 --> 1:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>are evidence of strength and courage and positive, you know,

1:00:37.680 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>positive positive qualities. I think we need to say to

1:00:40.600 --> 1:00:43.520
<v Speaker 2>young men and older men, we want you to be strong,

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>but we want you to expand your definition of strength.

1:00:45.800 --> 1:00:47.920
<v Speaker 2>And the reason why that's so I think so helpful

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>is because it's positive and aspirational. It's calling men into

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>good behavior rather than calling them out for bad behavior.

1:00:55.520 --> 1:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think if you call them into good behavior

1:00:57.280 --> 1:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and say, we need more men with the guts to

1:00:58.840 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>speak up, we need more young men who the courage

1:01:01.720 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>to say misogyny is not cool. Treating women with disrespect

1:01:06.320 --> 1:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>is not going to get you my respect. It's not

1:01:08.240 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>going to get you my admiration because you know what,

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>you've got some issues. If we had more men who

1:01:13.840 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 2>are willing to say that, and young men willing to

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 2>say that, then we would we would begin to counteract

1:01:18.280 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>some of these harmful things that are happening in men's lives.

1:01:21.240 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think a lot of young men seek connection,

1:01:23.280 --> 1:01:26.440
<v Speaker 2>they want relationships, they want intimacy in their lives. But

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:29.760
<v Speaker 2>if they're going down the route of hardening up, getting tough,

1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:33.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, being sort of you know, hiding in their shell,

1:01:33.920 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>if you will, and inhabiting this angry world of the

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 2>manisphere and the sort of the right wing populist movement,

1:01:43.680 --> 1:01:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that's not going to get them what they want. That's

1:01:45.600 --> 1:01:47.160
<v Speaker 2>not going to get them the love and the connection

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>and the intimacy that they crave. So I think we

1:01:50.040 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>have to say it in terms of men's self interest

1:01:52.160 --> 1:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and boys self interest. It's in women's self interest. Gender

1:01:55.200 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>equality and gender justice is obviously in women's self interest,

1:01:58.200 --> 1:02:00.480
<v Speaker 2>but it's also in men's self interest. And I think

1:02:00.560 --> 1:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>if people can hear that, I think we have you know,

1:02:03.240 --> 1:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>we've made a lot of progress.

1:02:04.960 --> 1:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Katz, thanks for joining us in this podcast A

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>hell of a way and close out this podcast. Thank

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you for your work, thank you for your advocacy, thank

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you for your clarity, your conviction, and thank you for

1:02:16.920 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>being at this for decades and decades.

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Governor, and thanks thanks so much for giving me

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:25.320
<v Speaker 2>this opportunity and for having these conversations right on. I

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:29.240
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate that, that leadership and that thought leadership and

1:02:29.320 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>your commitment. Thank you, I appreciate it. Thank you,