WEBVTT - Bandon Deep Dives: Old Macdonald

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Ball in a brid egg Friday egg, the dreaded Frida

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 2>egg Frida egg, Frida egg Brian egg Frida egg.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Bride egg Lie, I'm about ready to run off of

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the hump.

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Hello and welcome to the Friday Podcast. My

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 2>name is Garrett Morrison, and I'm here today with Andy Johnson.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 2>How you doing, Andy, I'm doing great.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Just uh, you know, it's pretty cold here.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 2>In Chicago, so you're all bundled up.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I had to walk across the street to the office,

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>so it was, uh, you know, one of those it's

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>one of those mornings where you gotta kind of be

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be Bundy. It's like one of those mornings your your

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>house is letting in coal there you're just ever warm

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole day, no matter what.

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're we're getting some of the same in Oregon

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 2>right now, but it's nowhere near the level of what

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure it is in Chicago. So I don't I

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 2>don't really have a place to complain about it at

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the moment, but it is.

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 3>It's chili yeah, plain a fake winter.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that there's some there's a check the temperatures,

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 2>there's there's a hint of real winter in the air.

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I did my I did my years in Chicago. It

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 2>has felt similar these past couple of mornings. But I'm

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:31.199
<v Speaker 2>sure it's not as bad.

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 3>Oh whatever.

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we don't we don't need to.

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 3>We choose, We choose where we live. So you know,

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 3>that's the that's the reality.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 2>So we're talking today about Old McDonald. This is the

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>second of our Bandon Dune's Deep Dive podcasts, and so

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>we're going to go into detail about Old McDonald, which

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>opened in twenty ten, was built in two thousand and

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>eight and nine. As you may have noticed, we're doing

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>these backwards. We started with the most recent course at

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the Bandon Dunes Resort, which is Sheep Ranch, and now

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 2>we're too Old McDonald, which is the second most recent

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>eighteen hole course that was built at the resort. And

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>the architects were Tom Doak and Jim Urbina co credited.

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>They built this in the midst of a recession. Kind

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 2>of incredible that the project happened at all, but a

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>fascinating course and looking forward to digging into it, all right,

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 2>So why don't we start by talking a little bit

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>about the origin story of old McDonald. So a lot

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 2>of this information that I'm about to give I got

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>from the book Dream Golf by Stephen Goodwin, which is

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 2>a good read. So originally Kaiser, Mike Kaiser, wanted to

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 2>build a replica of the Lido, which is this great

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>lost course designed by C. B. McDonald and SETH. Rayner

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>on Long Island. It was lost during the Depression. A

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 2>lot of people at the time thought it was one

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 2>of the great golf courses in the world. Mike Kaiser

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>had gotten obsessed with it and just wanted to resurrect

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>it on this piece of land that he had just

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>north of Pacific Dunes at the Bandon Dunees Resort. So, yeah,

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 2>his idea was to build a replica of the Lido,

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>and he started kind of circulating this idea amongst his friends,

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and he didn't get the reaction that he was expecting.

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people thought that it would be kind

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>of lame. They were like, a replica course, you know,

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't really sound that exciting. We've seen replica courses before.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>They're usually kind of cheesy and so Kaiser ended up

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 2>shifting gears and pursuing other ideas for this property. And

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>around the same time, this must have been in the

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>mid two thousands or so, Tom Doak talked him into

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>doing a course with basically fresh renditions of Cebe McDonald's

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>ideal holes or templates as they're often called. And so

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>before people can really understand what's going on at Old McDonald,

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 2>they need to know a little bit about the templates.

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 2>I think Andy, you've written about the templates pretty extensively.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Could you give just a basic introduction to what the

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>ideal holes are?

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure.

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So Ceeb McDonald obviously people have probably heard of Ceb McDonald.

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>He's considered by many the kind of like the godfather

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of golf in America. He was instrumental in building, you know,

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>getting golf started in America. He had studied abroad in

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Saint Andrews and that's where he picked up the game.

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And he came back to America and kind of, you know,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.799
<v Speaker 1>after years of not playing, started picking up the game

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 1>in the Chicago area. So he built Chicago Golf Club,

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>which you know, there's seventy five courses that claim to

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>be the first golf course in America. It's one of

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the ones that claims that, you know, I'm not going

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to get into the semantics of all of them. But anyways,

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, golf architecture at that point was was pretty medial,

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, people were building courses. And before he

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>built National Golf Links of America, which is widely considered

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>his greatest course, what he did is he went back

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.119
<v Speaker 1>over to the British Isles and studied all the great

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>golf courses of the British Isles and some in Europe

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and formulated these ideal holes. Basically, he just picked out

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>his favorite holes that all had strategies and different features

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>about them, and that became these what now are called

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>temple holes. Now these are inspirations off of these ideal

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>holes from Great Britain, Ireland, maybe France, that's a debatable

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>subject about the Burritz. And basically he came back and

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>started building golf courses around these principles.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>So you see these golf holes.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>All over the place, whether it's the Radan, you know,

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the Buritz, the alps Hoole which is from Prestwick, or

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the you know, he got the Bottle Hole, and you

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have all these different hole a road hole from Saint

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Andrew's seventeenth which everybody would know. And and what he

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>did was then he took you know, these holes and

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.679
<v Speaker 1>he and he built golf courses using these holes, which

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially was a fail safe way to you know, inject

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>good strategic golf. Right, these are sound holes from principles

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and adopted them over a wide range of golf courses

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in different settings. And Seth Rayner was really somebody that

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, did this at a large scale.

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 3>See B. M.

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>MacDonald only built a handful of golf courses for his

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>rich friends that he wanted to appease, and he never

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>took a fee. So Seth Rayner then and Charles Banks

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>later kind of replicated this model, and you still see

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it today. You see a lot of temples used by

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>modern architects. So it's you know, it's not necessarily like

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a replica hole, if that makes sense. It's more of

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like principles and they're adapted to their landscape. And I

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good way to describe old mac because

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>these are these do not look like Seth Rainer and

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:15.119
<v Speaker 1>CB McDonald's templates per se. The shaping is much more

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, modern, but much more natural. They aren't

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>as manufactured an engineer, which makes sense, you know, today's

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>machinery allows you to build things a little bit more

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>subtly and fit them into the ground more than more

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>so than when Seth Rainer and Charles Banks were building

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>these with steam shovels. So I think the old Mac

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.119
<v Speaker 1>is a modern rendition of what CEB McDonald would build.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Is kind of the premise behind the golf course.

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Tom Doak essentially did to Cbe McDonald's templates as Ceb

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>McDonald did to the original versions of his templates, right.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 2>He took this inspiration and remixed it and made it

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 2>his own, And that really is what McDonald and Rayner

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 2>were doing. Rayner, by the way, I don't think we

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>introduced as McDonald's protege. He was an engineer and he

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 2>ended up building a great number of courses after his partnership,

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 2>his initial partnership with Cbe.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>What happened is people would inquire to Stebe McDonald and

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Rayner would go build the course, you know, like if

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't one of Cebe McDonald's rich friends or somewhere

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to have a house, he didn't build Rayner, right.

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think that often people misunderstand McDonald and Rayner's

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>templates in that they think that they're copies of these

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 2>holes and that they're just sort of replicating them at

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 2>every course they build, and that's not quite accurate. These

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 2>templates are always being adapted to individual landscapes, and then

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the ideas for the templates themselves. What the template holes

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 2>were is often very different from what the inspiration was

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>in at whatever course it was in Great Britain and Ireland.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, they were really C. B. MacDonald, Seth Rayner

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>designs these template holes. They were fundamentally their ideas just

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 2>based on these original examples. And so I think that

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>a good way to understand the template holes or the

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 2>ideal holes is that they were really a powerful marketing

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 2>device and an educational device for the American golfing public.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>They're saying, you know, this is what golf architecture is.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of incorporating some of these strategies into different holes,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's a very easy way to understand what makes

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>a well designed golf hole for a public at the

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 2>time that just really wasn't very knowledgeable in general about

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 2>golf architecture.

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a great way to explain it. Because

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>National Golf Links changed the landscape of golf architecture America.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It was really like what many considered the first great

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>golf course in America and it led to so many

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>courses that existed being redesigned. This is kind of right

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>when Donald Ross was starting to you know, build his

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>design career in America, and you know, he brought a

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of ideas from being you know, living in Scotland,

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the this took golf out of the

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Victorian kind of era of golf course design. This this

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>idea and you hit it on the nail on the head.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>It's about the principles and if you study the templates,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you you start to understand, you know, what strategy is

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and the ideas of variety.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that the templates do, you know,

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>with the par three's, and I think those are the

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>holes that become most famous and synonymous a because they're

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>easy to remember. They're one shot holes. You know, they

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>have you know, very defined characteristics. But like one of

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the brilliant things about the templates and the par threes

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is you get one hundred and thirty yard Part three,

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventy yard part three, hundred yard par

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>three and like a two thirty part three, you got variety.

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just like a simple thing like that. But

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean you're not going to have four two

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred yard part threes unless the templates are playing nothing

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like the principles of them, you know.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was just a way of sneaking solid architectural

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 2>principles into courses and being able to communicate what they

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 2>were doing.

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Now, some would say, you know, there are opinions that

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Rayner wasn't that talented and this was a way for

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>him to be a good architect, was just simply following

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>these rules. But like that's the point of the templates,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is like if you build these golf holes in different

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>landscapes and you don't you know, and you just like

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of fit them to the landscape these these strategies, you're.

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Not going to build a bad golf course.

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think there's definitely an opinion out there that

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Rayner is overrated or that Rayner wasn't a very talented architect.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 2>There are definitely people who hold that opinion. I think

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe the more nuanced version of that opinion is that

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 2>McDonald and Rayner represented a transitional stage and golf course

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 2>architecture and the ensuing generation of golf architects in America,

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the golden age of golf architecture as we call it,

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 2>moved beyond that, kind of took that initial breakthrough that

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>McDonald and Rayner made in strategic golf architecture, ran with

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 2>it and made something original out of it. And so

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 2>there are some people who say that, yeah, McDonald and

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 2>rain are important, but we've moved beyond that. Now we've

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>moved past that, let's leave that behind. Let's come up

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 2>with truly original whole ideas.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think, you know, that's that's a good

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 3>way to put it.

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things with like Rainer and McDonald

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>golf courses, every single golf course has holes that aren't

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>tepplate holes that are you know, you know a lot

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of them occupy some of the best ground, you know,

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I think of like Saint Louis Country Club, they have

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a part they have five par threes and one of

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>which is called the Crater Hole. It's the only only

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>one of it and it's it's set into this hillside.

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a really dramatic. You play from one one ledge

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to the other ledge. You go to Shore Acres and

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you've got the eleventh hole and the fifteenth hole, two

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest you know holes in America that are

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>not template holes. You know there they are you know,

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>original designs, so you know there the templates were a guide,

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I think at Old mac you see

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, like, there are you know, template holes,

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>but there also are a few that are not template holes.

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we could keep going down this rabbit hole

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 2>for a while discussing MacDonald and Rainer.

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that's important.

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>While we're here, we can call this out. Is our website,

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the fridagg dot com has extensive materials on each, not each,

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not every template, but maybe one day we'll get to that,

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>get back to that, but a lot of the templates,

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and we have profiles on McDonald and Rayner if you

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>want to read more.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think, by the way, one of the reasons

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that you wrote this template series is that it was

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 2>a relatively easy and accessible way to introduce the basic

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 2>principles golf course architecture. The template series is often where

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 2>people start on our website, and I think that's that's

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 2>really representative of how the templates functioned for McDonald and

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Rayner in the first place. They were using these as

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>educational devices, and it's pretty amazing that they still function

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the same way today. And one more thing that I

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 2>should add before we move into old McDonald is that,

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, in this debate about whether Rayner particularly was

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 2>a talented architect, I think that when you go actually

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>play a Rainer golf course, you see why he was

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>so well respected and why he remains so well respected.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, the courses don't feel like a bunch of

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 2>replica holes at all. They feel like these holes kind

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>of belong in the landscape, and there are little subtle

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>adjustments here and there that Rayner makes with every hole

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 2>to adapt them to the land that he was working with.

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 2>And so I think the idea of rain as a

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>guy who just kind of pasted certain template holes on

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 2>top of a landscape and didn't give much thought about

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 2>how to weave them into that landscape is pretty unfair

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>to what he actually did at these courses. This episode

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 2>of the Frida Egg Podcast is brought to you by

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Zero Restriction. So on our trip to Bandon Dune's last

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 2>November we encountered all kinds of weather. We played bandoned

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>trails and torrential rains and gale force winds, and we

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 2>played Old Mac on a beautiful, clear, but somewhat chilly day.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 2>So we needed performance apparel that was really versatile, that

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 2>could handle anything that the Oregon Coast threw at us. Thankfully,

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 2>we were outfitted on this trip by Zero Restriction. Zero

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Restriction makes excellent cutting edge outerwear, and we actually got

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 2>to try a couple of new items from the ZR

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>collection on this trip, including the Mayweather Pullover and the

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Wave Hybrid. Both of these pieces have high ten fabrics

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that are water repellent, moisture wicking and all that good stuff,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and they're nice and stretchy and comfortable, and finally, both

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 2>items can function really well as either a top layer

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 2>for a mild day or as a middle layer for

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 2>those colder and wetter days. You can find the Mayweather Pullover,

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the Wave Hybrid, and all sorts of other apparel right

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 2>now at zero Restriction dot com. And if you use

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the code old Mac at checkout that's one word, all caps,

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 2>old Mac, Old Mac at checkout, you'll get twenty percent

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 2>off at Zero Restriction dot com. All right, so into

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 2>old MacDonald. One note about the design team. Kind of

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 2>a unique arrangement that they had here. First of all,

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Mike Kaiser requested that Tom Doak and Jim Orbida share

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the design credit. Jim Orbino was a longtime associate of

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Tom Doaks at Renaissance Golf Design, and this time through

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Kaiser said, why don't you guys design course together and

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 2>you'll get a co credit on it. Essentially what happened

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>is that Urbina supervised construction and Doak made regular visits,

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>so it was similar to an arrangement that they might

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 2>have had in the past when kind of.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 3>How he's got it set up with all of his associate.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's absolutely the usual arrangement. Just in this case

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Kaiser was saying, this is a co credit, so sort

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of interesting. I think one of the reasons was that

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Kaiser at the time didn't want the same architect to

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>design two courses at Bandon Dune's and Tom Doak had

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 2>already designed Pacific Dunes, and so Kaiser was like, let's

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 2>do something new. Let's have this be a dok Urbina project. Now,

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 2>in addition to that, there was an old McDonald advisory

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 2>panel consisting of Bradley Klein, who is a golf course writer,

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 2>George Botto who was a historical researcher who wrote The

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Evangelist of Golf, which is a biography of C. B. MacDonald.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 2>It's really a landmark work and I think golf course writing.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 2>So he was on the advisory panel, and then Carl Olson,

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 2>who was the superintendent at National Golf Links. And Olsen

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>is one of the kind of early restorers of a

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 2>classic golf course. He was doing work at National Golf

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Links to bring it back to the original design in

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 2>the early eighties. I believe Carl Olsen was just in

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>his capacity as a superintendent. So that was the old

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 2>mac advisory panel and they were involved in this process

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>as well. It was a very kind of collaborative design process.

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 2>I think at times it was combative. You know. There

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>are some stories in Dream Golf about debates that this

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 2>team had about various features on the golf course. They

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 2>all kind of had input and obviously there would be disagreements.

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 2>One disagreement was about this burn or this little waterway

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 2>that Jim Orbino wanted to put in on the seventeenth hole,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 2>and Urbina was really pushing hard for this. He was

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 2>bringing his case directly to Mike Kaiser and saying, I

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 2>really want this burns. It's daring, it it's audacious, it's

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 2>a memorable feature. And then Tom Doak was on the

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 2>other side of it, saying, I don't think this really

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 2>belongs in this landscape. There's nothing else on the course

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>that really tells you that this might be here. And

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 2>so there was some real disagreement about this particular feature,

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and eventually Tom Doak's side of the argument won out,

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 2>and they did not build the burn on the seventeenth hole.

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 2>But if you read Dream Golf, there's a whole, really

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of in depth narrative of this disagreement that they had,

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think it gives you an idea of what

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 2>this design process was like. So maybe we should get

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>to the course itself. Now, just talking about Old Mac

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>in general, what do you think makes it distinct from

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the other bandoned courses. I think, well, aside from the templates,

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean that the ideal whole, that whole concept that

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 2>makes it unique. Just like if you didn't know about

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 2>that walked out onto the golf course, what would be

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 2>different about it?

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the biggest golf course there in the sense of

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's got the biggest fairways, it's got the biggest scale.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to you know, I think scale gets thrown

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>around a lot. It's kind of a buzzword. But it's

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>got the biggest scale, it's got the biggest greens. It

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>navigates over this huge ridge that is a it's a

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>dune that runs all the way from you know, Old

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>mac through Pacific Dunes, through band and dunes and through

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>bandon trails. It plays over this ridge and it's just

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a it's a large scale golf course where all the

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>features are are pretty much big. You know, you have

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>big greens, you have big wide fairways, and you have

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>some big hills that you kind of play over, dunes

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that you play over and onto.

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 2>And this is what you mean, by the way, when

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 2>you mean when you say this course has big scale,

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you mean the combination of big golf course features like

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 2>greens and fairways and bunkers and big landforms. You don't

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 2>just mean there's big landforms, because there's big landforms on

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 2>every band in Dune's course. But Old McDonald is different

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 2>in the sense that the scale of the fairways and

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 2>greens competes with the scale of the.

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Landforms exactly, so it's a big ballpark. And then you know,

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>with that, it's the only course that doesn't like just

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>have you on the ocean outside of trails. You know,

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>trails kind of plays you go up into the forest,

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's the only coastal course that's not really you're

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not staring at.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 3>The ocean most of the day.

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's the least if you go to the resort,

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the least popular at golf course. It gets the

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>least amount of rounds. That is very true. Should it

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't think it should. In my book,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have it be there. I think the conversation

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>about Old mac always kind of tends to revolve around

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what it doesn't have, which is ocean views, rather than

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>what it does have. And I think this is like

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>an important thing with with Old McDonald and understanding it.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It's arguably got the best starting holes in the best

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>finishing holes. It also has the best playing conditions at

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the resort in my opinion, where it's it's fescue, it's

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>firm and fast almost all the time. And then you

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>know it also has the most day to day variety

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>because of the large scale that it has, the wide

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>fairways in these greens, they're huge. That really can set

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the golf course up wildly different day to day. Now,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>at a resort, you know, day to day variety isn't

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>really a big deal. But if you're thinking about like

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 1>as a golf course, you know, in evalue evaluating it

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as a golf course, like day to day variety is

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>really important. And and like you could go out you

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>can see yourself out at Old McDonald playing one day

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>to the next and playing a few days in a

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>row and really getting it wildly different experience every day.

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the middle of the golf course I think

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is where it loses some people. It gets very hard.

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd say that, you know, it's it's probably the hardest

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>stretch of golf outside of maybe Pacific dunes in spaces

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>on the golf at the golf resort, and you know,

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>it traverses some of the you know, less interesting land

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't look at the ocean while it while

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>it goes across this uninteresting, relatively uninteresting land like anywhere else.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>This land would be very good. But you know, in

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the grand scheme of abandon. You know, it's less interesting,

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, meaning that it doesn't have as many you know,

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.239
<v Speaker 1>humps and bumps and and and stuff, and you're not

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at the ocean. So I think that's where it

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of it rubs people the wrong ways.

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 3>The difficulty of it.

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>People probably shoot a lot of their higher numbers at

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this golf course on their trips, and you know, I

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's how I would, you know, describe Old

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>mac just in general.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, so just to clarify the reason that you're not

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 2>staring at the ocean the whole time at Old MacDonald

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>is that, unlike Pacific Dunes and Bandon Dunes and Sheep Ranch,

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 2>there's a big ridge next to the ocean, and the

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 2>golf course sits on the inside portion of that ridge,

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 2>and most of the time you can't see over it

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 2>to the ocean. There are a couple of holes that

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 2>kind of climb up that ocean side ridge and you

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 2>can see to the other side. But the great majority

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 2>of the golf course, especially that middle portion that you're

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>talking about, feels like it's inland. It doesn't feel like

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 2>you're necessarily at a seaside course, except for you know,

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 2>the wind and the smells and all that kind of stuff,

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 2>and so that's why you don't have those ocean views.

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me the property a little bit. I said

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this one when we were out there. I called Seminole

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a salad bowl, you know, And Seminole's got two famous

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>ridges that I say are like the forks the tongs,

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but like it's it's just like that in essence, like Seminole,

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like you're right on the ocean, but you don't see

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the ocean that much unless you're up on one of

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the ridges. And it's very similar here where you know,

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got the big ridge that you play over on

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the third hole and then you're down into the bowl

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and then you come up onto the edge of the

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>ridge at seven and eight T and then also sixteen

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>T but like in fifteen Green, but that that's very

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very parsed out. You're you're on the ocean, you're

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>playing coastal golf, but you just can't see it because

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of these ridges.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Something that you mentioned earlier also is the conditioning of

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Old McDonald, which is really delightful. It is truly firm

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 2>and fast. It drains incredibly well, and it was the

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 2>first course at Bandon Dunes to be seeded with one

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent fescue. Now, one advantage that Old McDonald has

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 2>in this regard is that it's a newer course than

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Bandon Dunes, Bandon Trails and Pacific Dunes, and at those

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 2>courses at some point in the past they were a

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 2>little bit firmer because they didn't have as much poa

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 2>coming in and kind of pushing out the fescue. But

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Old MacDonald still has as really great linksy playing conditions.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 2>And part of the consequence of that approach, of the

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.959
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent fescue approach, is that there is what

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Jim Orbina calls in dream Golf a seamless look to

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the course. And what he means by that is, at

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 2>most golf courses, you see the green is distinct from

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the fringe, is distinct from the rough, and the fairways

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 2>are distinct from the rough, and there are these kind

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 2>of different colors and different textures, and it directs your

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.479
<v Speaker 2>eye to the places where you're supposed to play. You know,

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>you had for the lighter green fairway, you had for

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 2>the lightest green of the putting surface, right, and and

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the whole the seams of the core show you where

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 2>to play, and that's a consequence of the way that

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the grass is kept right at Old MacDonald, there aren't

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 2>really those cues. In fact, a lot of the time

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 2>you can't tell the green apart from the surroundings. You

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 2>can't see that the green is necessarily different from the fairway,

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 2>and so there is a kind of seamlessness to the

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>entire look of the course, which is different even from

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Pacific Dunes or the other courses at the resort. There

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 2>is a real sense of like there's a lot of

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 2>openness here and I don't necessarily know where to play, right.

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I kind of have to go out there and figure

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 2>it out.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a really cool adventure aspect of

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it is where when you're just trying to figure it out,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of bewilderment the first time you go

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.719
<v Speaker 1>around a place, I think is a pretty neat feeling,

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's also it kind of gives you an uncertain feeling,

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and I can see how a lot of golfers might

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like they're a little lost, and that's and that's

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a you know, can be a bad feeling. And I

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>think like those defined lines what you're talking about is

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what kind of creates those pictures in people's minds, and

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>it adds to memorability, especially when you throw ocean into it,

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.360
<v Speaker 1>or or towering trees like in the back part of trails,

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, like where you have these towering trees and

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.959
<v Speaker 1>it's just like, you know, it's gorgeous, like Pacific Northwest forests,

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like you know that that's memorable. And it's why so

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>many courses in the Midwest add this, you know, add

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the fescue strands to their you know, in between holes.

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Is to create those defined lines and those pictures in

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>people's minds. And I think that's where you know, you know,

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>what I think about Old Back is I just think

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of like what I hear people talk

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>about it, I think it's a lot it's really misunderstood.

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's you know, one of the things

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that gives it a knock is is just like all

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>these things combined together are what what lead people to,

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, look a little bit past the substance of

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the golf course and lead to you know, it's my

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>least favorite because and not well, like the thing that's

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy is like is the course maybe you know, I think,

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, seeing Pacific Dudes again is really worth it.

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But like outside like Pacific Dudes to this, I think

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>are the courses that you most need to play a

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>second time.

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that Old MacDonald would be more highly

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>regarded if it weren't a resort course, because the whole

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 2>idea of one of these destination resort courses is that

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>you play it once, and that's something that David McLay

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 2>kidd as an architect, has really figured out later in

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 2>his career. People are going to generally play this course

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 2>one time. I'm going to let them have as good

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 2>of a time as possible shoot their lowest score, and

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 2>that's that's kind of where Mammoth Dunes comes from, the

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.479
<v Speaker 2>idea that you're going to play this course once and

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 2>have a blast. I'm not sure that Mammoth Dunes would

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 2>be as fun on replays as Old Mac is. Old

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Mac really does reward those repeat visits. The problem is

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 2>people aren't doing many repeat visits at Bandon Dunes and

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 2>so they don't get that experience.

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a couple of courses I think that fit

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this bill that are resort courses where I think there's

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff that that once you scratch and

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>get below the initial surface, there's a lot of really

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>neat things going on. The loop is one that comes

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to mind where the first play, first time around, it

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>could really rub you the wrong way. But the more

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and more you go around, the more you realize stuff.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Kingsley Club's one that does this too, where

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it can kind of punch you in the face and

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you get some bad breaks and you but then you realize,

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like if I was over here, it would be a

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>lot better spot and things. And I think Old Max

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that way, where like the severity of some of the

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>contours could and the way the ball can just roll

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and trundle away seemingly to nowhere good all the time

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is it can really frustrate people. And but like the

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>more you play it, the more you see where the

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>spots are that that would funnel it right to the hole.

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And in order to understand where those spots are, no

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>matter how good your caddy is, you know your caddy's

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell you, hey, you should hit it here, but

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>like you're not gonna believe them all the time, or

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>believe her all the time. Like it you know, once

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you see it happen. That's when and that's where the

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>repeat plays happen all the time. And I completely agree

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>with your with your commentary about David McClay kidd, Like,

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Mammoth Dunes is so popular, but I think personally, and

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this is just my personal opinion, that it gets less

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and less interesting every time I go around it because

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really just fourteen punch bowl greens and of eighteen holes.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, punch bowls are great. I love punch bulls.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Did I've done videos on punch bowls, But you know,

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the variety of different green complexes and restraining yourself to

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe one or two punch bowls is fun. But if

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to build a golf course that everybody shoots

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>their lowest score ever, you build wide fairways and punch bowls,

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and then it doesn't matter where you are to hit

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>into the green.

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Most people are not going to play Mammoth Dunes as

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 2>many times as you've played it.

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean, so it serves its purpose exactly

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the point, like as a resort course. You know that

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. You know what is it supposed

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to be? You know what makes it great is should

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we look at resort courses and judge them differently than

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we judge you know, a municipal course or a member's course,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like you know it. And I think that's like something

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like everybody always says like, oh, that's a great tournament

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>golf course. And then this is the same discussion that

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you get into with like say Wingfoot and Quaker Ridge.

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Right wing Foot West is just a ballbuster. It's gonna

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>punch you in the face all day and that's not

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>something I don't I would necessarily want to.

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Do every day, but yeah as a member.

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>But then you go across the street and it's like

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Quake Ridge is like it's a joy, It's got a

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more interesting ground, which which leads a little

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>bit more day to day variety, And it's like which

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>one's a better course? Well, they're different types of courses,

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Are we judging them on the same scale?

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 3>You know? Are we?

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a really interesting debate because the theory

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is like it shouldn't matter what type of course they are,

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>but it does matter, you know, because businesses are tied

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to these things, and the realistic thing is like, you know,

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Mammoth Dunes for Mike Kaiser, the Kaiser family. Mammoth Dudes

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is a more successful resort course. Probably, I'm not fully

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>pertinent on the details a more successful resort course than

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Old McDonald, But in my opinion, as as somebody who

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>looks at a lot of golf courses and talks about

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>golf courses, in my opinion, Old McDonald does is leafs

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and bounds a better golf course than Mammoth Dudes.

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 2>And but part of the reason for that is that

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 2>it's better on repeat plays, right, Yeah, because this is

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 2>an entrenched criterion for evaluating a golf course that golf

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 2>course architecture afficionados have, how well does it do on

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>repeat plays? And I think that that comes from a legitimate,

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, philosophical basis that you know, a really good

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 2>golf course can reveal itself over time through many different rounds,

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and and there's a genius to designing a course that

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 2>can do that for a player. But at the same time,

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 2>the whole resort model is is kind of based on

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the idea that you're you're really just going to do

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 2>this once or maybe a couple of times in your life.

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 2>This is a dream golf trip. You don't do a

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 2>dream golf trip a couple of times a year, you know,

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 2>it's it's far more rare than that, and that's what

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 2>makes it special. And so it kind of that that

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 2>whole model, that business model challenges the philosophical conviction that

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 2>we have that a course should get better on repeat

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 2>plays as opposed to just ingratiating itself to you on

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the first play.

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, like I think a good a good thing,

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>A good way to think about it. Just for everybody

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that's gone through you know, life, dating life and finding

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.800
<v Speaker 1>your partner is like there's a reason usually you don't

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>propose after one date.

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, you you.

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Marry someone after years of experience life experiences with them,

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>is that you you really know this is the right

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>person for you, you know.

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.439
<v Speaker 3>And I think I think that's like something to like.

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>That's the way I think about golf courses personally, and

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I and everybody should think about it differently. But if

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at purely a business standpoint, and I think

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that's like a big topic of golf architecture that I

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>talked with Tim Jackson and David con about it. You know,

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing about golf architecture is like it's different

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>than every other art form, right, if you're if you're

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going to become a big musician or a big artist. Like,

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the reality is so many musician origin stories start with

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>them just making music for themselves in their garage, you know,

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and those are the big hits and everything.

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 3>But they do it.

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a self fulfilling process and their biggest hits. Like

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the hardest thing with musicians is they get famous, and

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like, how do we come up with new material?

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 3>That's real?

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, selling out? Selling out is a big deal in music, right,

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the idea of an indie band selling out by signing

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 2>on to a major label. Golf architecture from the beginning

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 2>has already sold.

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Now sold out unless you get that just great client

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>that just lets you do what you want to do.

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>We very almost never and and the Kaisers have done

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.240
<v Speaker 1>wonderful things, but I would say that they are they're

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>very heavy handed in the design process, which isn't a

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>bad thing. It's not a know, I'm not saying that

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad They have good taste and everything, but

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>hardly is the architect provided a canvas to just do

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do. In these situations, they you know,

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the Dream Golf Book and it goes into great detail

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>about tweaks and revisions and all this stuff, like very

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>rarely is a golf architect actually allowed to do what

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they artistically and create, like fully unleashed their creativity on

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>site because you know, the owner, whatever it may be,

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the club committee has their own thoughts that get injected

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and almost you know, I don't want to say poison,

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but they they some much alter it. Like if I

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>had somebody that was like over my shoulder while I

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>was trying to write something telling me what they think,

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Like the piece isn't going to turn out the same

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>as if I just write it myself.

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you send it to me and I edit

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 2>it right, well, I edited with the audience in mind,

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 2>like is this is this idea coming across clearly to

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the audience.

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>A writer I used to work with at a previous

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>job once told me, Andy, everybody's writing stucks until it

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 1>guests edited. So and I think that's or revised at least.

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the thing I was impressed most about about,

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, not to diverge into Scottsdale National was the

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Bob person has just left him alone and then came

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>back and edited at the end.

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's like he named the holes and he

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 2>did his well.

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 3>He did.

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>He did say like I don't like this, Like you know,

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I like this, you know, but it was after they

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>had done the majority of the creative process.

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, And to bring it back to Mike Kaiser,

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 2>he does oversee the design process, or he did when

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 2>the Band in Dunes courses were being built, But I'm

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 2>not sure it was necessarily from a place of ego.

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, Ego is always a factor with these tremendously

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 2>rich people. It's inevitable. But what I think he was

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to do in the design process was represent the

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 2>perspective of the quote unquote retail golfer, and whether or

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 2>not you think he had a truly clear idea of

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 2>what the retail golfer wanted, Mike Kaiser was devoted to

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 2>having that perspective be heard while these artists were designing

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 2>their courses, because I think probably Kaiser's belief is that

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Bill Kohrr and Tom Doak are artists and that's their

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 2>job to be artists and to try to make great

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 2>works of art. But that's not all that these courses

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 2>are they are part of my business and they're meant

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to serve the retail golfer, and so that point of

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 2>view needs to be present in the design process. I

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 2>think that's what Mike Kaiser sees himself as doing.

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I don't think he's necessarily wrong.

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, like what you're talking about this that makes me

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think that, like, you know, the full blown version of

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>selling out is just designing what you think people think

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is fun, Well you think people think they want.

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess, and sort of being condescending and your idea

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 2>of what you think people want, so believing that people

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 2>are stupider than they actually are and designing to that.

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So I don't know. It's a uh old mac is.

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's got an opinion on it, and I think that

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that should I think it falls into that bucket like

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>other courses I think about that fit this kind of mold,

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>like one that jumps to minus tobacco Road, where it's

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>got like a really wide range of opinions on it.

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody is necessarily wrong. It just it

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of is a barometer for the type of golf

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>courses that somebody likes. And again, like I reiterate this

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>all the time, like golf course tastes. There's nothing wrong

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>with disliking Old Mac or like like, or liking loving

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Old Mac like, there's nothing wrong like this all personal taste, right,

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what's the makes golf courses and talking about

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it so fun is that there's such a wide range

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>of taste. And I think that's the thing about Old

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Mac is it's super divisive. But like you know, because

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's so polarizing, that's why I think of almost all

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of them out there, it deserves some of the most

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>study because there's a lot going on that evokes reaction,

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and any sort of art that really evokes a wide

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>range of emotions and reaction is onto something.

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:29.879
<v Speaker 2>It's worthy of being preserved at the very least as

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:33.759
<v Speaker 2>part of the collection of courses at Bandon Dunes. It's

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 2>really cool that, you know, whether you like it or not,

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 2>it's really cool that Old McDonald is there. Maybe we

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 2>should get into the specifics of the course. So what

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 2>are some holes that you think really do their job

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 2>well at Old McDonald? If you are to point to

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 2>a couple of holes to say this is an example

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 2>of Old McDonald at its best, which holes would you

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 2>point to.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, oh man, there's so many.

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 2>A lot of them are really solid. We discovered this

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 2>when we went through the Dream eighteen exercise that we

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 2>did in December. You know, you could make an argument

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of different holes that old McDonald as

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 2>being among the best of their number at the resort.

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 1>The first seven are probably the best first seven holes

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>at any golf course. It starts off with a bag

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's over dead like. One of the things I

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think that it does really well that's emblematic of Rader

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and McDonald is the least interesting ground is on the

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>starting and ending holes, So seventeen eighteen one to two,

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it's on the backside of this of the big.

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Dune that you go over and into the bowl.

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So those holes have very bold templates, and that's something

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that Raider and McDonald did a lot of is like

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>where the ground was less interesting, they put really big

0:42:56.400 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>features and templeates that like work no matter what the

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>ground is. So you start with the double plateau. It's

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>really fun. As a short part four, what it's maybe

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:09.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the best green concepts in golf and why

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of the best green concepts of

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>golf is that no matter what type of approach you're

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>hitting into it is really fun shot. And in this case,

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you're hitting like a short, little wedge shot into it

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and with the firm conditions, like that's the thing. You

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>come there and it's a little bit like one of

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that does right off the bat is pops

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you in the face a little bit because it's firmer

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>than everywhere else and you're hitting this little wedge like

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times a half ledge in there, and

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that first bounce you're like, WHOA, this place is a

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>little different, like it's a tone setter, and I think

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, it gets people on their heels a

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit right off the bat because of the firmness

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the turf. You're hitting a wedge off that firm

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>rescue is not like a shot a lot of people

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>are comfortable with, and it kind of you know, the

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>eating hole, the second hole.

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Eden holes one of the best edens.

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Like I think where the templates of Rayner and McDonald

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>fall short, like the Eden's holes are across the board.

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.399
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them in America aren't that good, and

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>this is probably one of the best Eden templates.

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you think the typical McDonald and rainer Eden

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 2>is particularly good? Is there not much going on at

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the Green typically?

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think part of it's just modern technology has rendered

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>them a little bit. And I think, like the thing

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you know from pictures of Saint Andrews, like, I don't

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>think they captured the severity of the of the eleventh

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 1>at Saint Andrews, which is what it is modeled off

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of very well in a lot of cases. And I think,

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that could be just something the way they

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have aged, you know, and maybe tinkering. But this, this one,

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this one is one of the most memorable holes out there.

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, if I fast forward a little bit,

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, like the sixteenth the Alpshole is pretty unforgettable

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and embodies the golf cours because it's a spectacular version

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Alpshole, which originally is the seventeenth at pressed Wick.

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>It is a hole that it's just got these gargantuan landforms.

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got a dune cutting in from the left that

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>provides the blindness. If you play over to the right,

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the hole gets longer, but you can see into the

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of the bowl, the hollow that the Green sits in.

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not a bowl because it rejects a lot of

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:28.839
<v Speaker 1>different ways, but the hollow where you can actually get

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a look at the pin. But then if you play left,

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it shortens it dramatically and you get but you're just

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 1>so blind. It's the blindness of blind shots where you

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>literally like are the caddy's telling you where to go

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're just hitting it on that prague He's right,

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, Like it's where you have to put full

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>trust in it. And I think that hole does such

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>a good job of encapsulated like the gargantuan nature of

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the property.

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 2>That the dune is huge that you play over to

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 2>get to the green. It is true a blind shot

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 2>if you're not way out to the right. If you

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:06.439
<v Speaker 2>are way out to the right, then you can kind

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:09.320
<v Speaker 2>of see around, as you were saying, into that hollow.

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 2>But I think what you discover is that the blindness

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 2>is not really a big deal on that hole because

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 2>if you play out to the left and you just

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of hit a decent shot over the dune, if

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 2>you get the ball over the dune, it's going to

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 2>run down and be on the green. Yeah, everything kind

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 2>of feeds onto the green from that dune, and so

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 2>if you just get in the vicinity, you're going to

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 2>end up in a pretty good spot. And so the

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 2>blindness really isn't that big of a deal, but the

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 2>first time you play it, it's really intimidating and you

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 2>don't know where the hell to go. And so that's

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 2>where I've played Old Mac. I've been lucky enough to

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 2>play Old Mac three times now. It was only on

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the third time, this most recent time that we played

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 2>it that I realized this about the hole, that yeah,

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 2>just hit your drive out to the left, it's not

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 2>a big deal and loftier approach over the dune. It's

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 2>going to filter down there and be in a pretty

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 2>good spot. That was a late discovery. I did not

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 2>know that the first time I played the hole.

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and another great hole for repeat plays, the leave

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and hole the thirteenth where you know you've got to

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the green really dictates everything back. It's just in this

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>beautiful little pocket and it's got wild contours. It's kind

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>of got a high, high left side and a lower

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 1>right side that's bowly, and you know you can you

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>can shorten your route by playing up the left always,

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but it leads to a little bit more tricky of

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a golf shot into that green. But if you play right,

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>which is over by these bunkers, you you know, you

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>get a real big bowl and you get a little

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:47.880
<v Speaker 1>bit easier of a shot into that left side of

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the green.

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the leave and hole is delightful, and it's in

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 2>an area of the property that's sort of like that

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 2>other side of the dune ridge that you were talking about,

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:00.880
<v Speaker 2>where the land is a little bit less interest and

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 2>so a lot of the most recognizable and extreme templates

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 2>are in that area where the thirteenth hole the levin is.

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:12.360
<v Speaker 2>So the eleventh hole is sort of in that section

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of the property. It's a road hole. The twelfth hole

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 2>is in the same section, it's a redan, and so

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 2>those templates were saved for that piece of land. Now,

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 2>two holes that I keep thinking about are the fifth hole,

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 2>the short hole, and the sixth.

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Hole the long hole.

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 2>And these are part of that opening stretch that you

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:38.359
<v Speaker 2>were talking about, and they're so wonderful. You often ask

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 2>people if you were to pick a green to put

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 2>in your backyard, what green would it be? And I

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 2>would have a hard time choosing between the fifth and

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 2>the sixth At old McDonald, But I think it would

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 2>be one of those two. Probably the sixth green. There's

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 2>just like so much variety, so many little nooks and

0:48:55.920 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 2>crannies to the green that Doakes team designed there. It

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 2>would just be endlessly fun to kind of hit shots

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:05.319
<v Speaker 2>around there.

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think the fifth is such a

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:11.720
<v Speaker 1>smart hole too, is like in terms of a modern

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 1>adaptation on short holes. Like one of the things that

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>happens with short holes is especially at resorts, they just

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>get beat to shit because of you know, so many

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 1>people playing them and hitting the green. It's a green

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that everybody hits, so you get you know, ball marks

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. This green is just massive, and

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it's got all these different pockets, Like you could play

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:33.839
<v Speaker 1>it ten days in a row and it wouldn't you know.

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:37.879
<v Speaker 1>You could find ten pins easy out there that are

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>wildly different in different sections of the greens, and it

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 1>really all of them pretty much really reward great shots,

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>which I think is the you know, when you think

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about the short hole template and the short whole concept,

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>what great short par threes, what encapsulates them is all

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of them the great ones is if you hit a

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:03.279
<v Speaker 1>really great shot, you can make it two. But if

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you hit an average shot, you're gonna have to work

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>your ass off for four. And if you hit a

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 1>bad shot, you know, the range of outcomes can get.

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Very high, very quick.

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, like you could be staring like how

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>do I get out of here with a double? You know,

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 1>if you get into the wrong spot like where like

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've all been there, and you know, depending

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on what you know, all levels of play where you

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 1>you all of a sudden start to think about like

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>how do I get out of here in acts?

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 3>And that's the thing that that hole can do.

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And and with regards to the six, I think one

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of the cool things about the six is like the

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:42.360
<v Speaker 1>shot types that come into it. You know what we

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about. One, whether you're hitting a

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>three wood in there trying to get home in two,

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:48.800
<v Speaker 1>or if you lay up and you're hitting like a

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 1>little wedge. That green is so fun to hit hit

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>shots in two.

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can do it in a bunch of different ways.

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 2>You can run it on, you can try to hold

0:50:56.960 --> 0:51:00.920
<v Speaker 2>a particular section of the green. Yeah, it's great that

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the short hole, the fifth hole. You're so right that

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the great short par threes are do

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 2>or die propositions. But the way that most of them

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:13.520
<v Speaker 2>do that is by having a really small green with

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of trouble around it. Right, That's just what

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the most famous short par threes are.

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:24.759
<v Speaker 2>And the short hole has an absolutely massive green that

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 2>it shares with the tenth hole, So it is the

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 2>opposite in some ways, but it's still do or die

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 2>because there are these small sections of the green that

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 2>you need to hit if you want to have a

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 2>really good chance at a par right, and if you

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:41.319
<v Speaker 2>hit it, then then you have a good chance at

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 2>a birdie. If you don't hit that small section of

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 2>the green, you're going to have such a crazy putt

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to be looking at a three put

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:53.400
<v Speaker 2>more than likely. And so that's how it introduces that danger,

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 2>that that sense of peril that a lot of the

0:51:56.200 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 2>great short par threes have.

0:51:58.000 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is also another point of where I think

0:52:01.040 --> 0:52:04.240
<v Speaker 1>golfers get rubbed the rogways they feel I hit the green,

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>How did I make a four or five? Like they

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>get frustrated, this is a stupid green. But like when

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you think about the hole, you didn't hit the good shot,

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you didn't hit a good shot. You got a wedge

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in your hand, you didn't hit a good shot like

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that's like you should make a four. You know, the

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:23.799
<v Speaker 1>person that hits it fifteen feet away and is in

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a good spot and walks away with three. You should

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>have to really hit a great shot to match their three.

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:32.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's the irony of it that if there were

0:52:33.000 --> 0:52:35.959
<v Speaker 2>rough around a much smaller green and it was still

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:38.759
<v Speaker 2>do or die, people might not have as much of

0:52:38.760 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 2>a problem with it. But because it's all green, they

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 2>just have the expectation that if I get on the green,

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 2>then I should have a really good chance at two putting.

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:49.239
<v Speaker 2>But that's just not an expectation that's going to be

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 2>fulfilled at Old McDonald in general. And I think that

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:56.360
<v Speaker 2>is a big reason why some people react poorly to

0:52:56.360 --> 0:52:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Old McDonald, because you're just going to three put a lot.

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So I one thing I wanted to talk about is

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the stretch of nine through twelve is where

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Old Mack loses people. I know, it's one of your

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>least favorite stretches of golf at the resort. I personally

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I like some of the holes. I think one of

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the reasons I think is like I'm a little bit

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>longer player than you, And you know, I think I

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:27.759
<v Speaker 1>like having to hit long irons and degrees occasionally. But

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the tenth they're very, very hard

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:35.480
<v Speaker 1>golf holes if you play them to their assigned par

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is where I kind of fall

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on them. But I would love to hear, you know,

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of your critiques on holes nine through twelve.

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:47.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't have a big problem with really hard,

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 2>long golf holes. You know, I think that four at

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:55.959
<v Speaker 2>Old McDonald definitely fits that description. It's it's basically, I think,

0:53:56.000 --> 0:53:58.480
<v Speaker 2>on many days a par five, but it's a par

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 2>four on the scorecard. But I love that hole, and

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:04.680
<v Speaker 2>so I don't really have a problem with a hole

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:08.919
<v Speaker 2>being long and difficult, and I don't hate holes nine

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 2>through twelve. I think actually ten, the bottle hole is

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 2>has a terrific green, the road hole, the eleventh is

0:54:16.680 --> 0:54:20.480
<v Speaker 2>a really well functioning road hole. I think the redan

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 2>falls short of whatever it's trying to do. But at

0:54:24.880 --> 0:54:29.359
<v Speaker 2>the same time, we hit drivers into that radan. On

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 2>the day that we played, all of us were hitting

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 2>driver into it, and a couple of us hit the green,

0:54:34.360 --> 0:54:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and so the problem with that a lot of people

0:54:36.800 --> 0:54:40.360
<v Speaker 2>have with that Redan hole is that it's incredibly, incredibly

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.319
<v Speaker 2>difficult to hit the green. On the day we were there,

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:45.280
<v Speaker 2>the wind was pretty still, and so that was probably

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 2>a factor, but we were able to hold that green.

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:51.120
<v Speaker 2>The ninth hole is not one of my favorite holes

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:54.439
<v Speaker 2>that at Old Mac. I think that it's a cape hole,

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 2>and the general idea on the approach is that you know,

0:54:59.239 --> 0:55:01.279
<v Speaker 2>you can really sling it in there if you hit

0:55:01.320 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 2>it left to right, and you can run the ball

0:55:04.200 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 2>from well before the green to the very back of

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the green. But I think the way that the contours

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:14.400
<v Speaker 2>are right now that it's just a little too unlikely

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:16.800
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to hold that back section of the green.

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:20.879
<v Speaker 2>Even if you hit a great shot in there, it's

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:23.839
<v Speaker 2>just really frequently going to filter off the back of

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 2>that green and into the little chipping hollow beyond. I

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 2>think that outcome is just maybe a bit too common

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 2>for my taste. But at the same time, it's a

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:35.200
<v Speaker 2>fun shot. It's a fun shot to try. I'm sure

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that it's accomplishable. I think in general that those holes

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:42.799
<v Speaker 2>are a little bit harder to love because of the

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 2>relatively featureless land that they're on and I say relatively

0:55:48.680 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 2>because on many other golf courses that might be the

0:55:52.120 --> 0:55:55.320
<v Speaker 2>best stretch of land on the course, but at Bandon

0:55:55.440 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Dune's it doesn't really grab you as being a great

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 2>piece of golfing terrain. And that's why some of the

0:56:04.120 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 2>boldest templates are there. But I think the holes that

0:56:07.719 --> 0:56:10.320
<v Speaker 2>are around it just work better.

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:56:11.680 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing too, is that those are

0:56:14.239 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the places where you lose the massiveness of the ridge.

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Those are the holes that are disconnected from the ridge.

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 2>From both of the ridges. They're in the middle, and

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:27.320
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, the ocean side ridge and the inland ridge,

0:56:27.360 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 2>you're right in the middle. You're really distant from them,

0:56:29.719 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:33.400
<v Speaker 1>They're really the only holes on the whole course that

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:37.440
<v Speaker 1>are are that disconnected because you know, maybe eighteen falls

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:39.399
<v Speaker 1>into this bucket, but then you have that punch bowl

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 1>green that and you have the property line on the left.

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's one of the things too, is

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that like without really like noticing knowing it, you know, subliminally,

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you pick up on like you're you're not you don't

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have this bordering massiveness, you know on those holes.

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I think this again, this is all relative.

0:57:03.760 --> 0:57:07.359
<v Speaker 2>They're really good golf holes, but they're just not up

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 2>to the standard of the rest of the course. That

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 2>four hole stretch in the middle just gets lost a

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit for me. And I'd also put the eighth

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 2>hole the Beeritz and the fifteenth hole that goes from

0:57:19.800 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 2>one ridge to another as holes that in the scheme

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:26.360
<v Speaker 2>of things, are relatively mediocre.

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the fifteenth like you stand out of that

0:57:29.600 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 1>tee and it's one of the few times in the

0:57:31.960 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 1>round where you can really lose all sense of train

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of thought and just swing away it just you know,

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the t shot feels, you know, like a little bit

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of those moments where you just you

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:47.760
<v Speaker 1>don't really have to think and you just bash it away.

0:57:48.840 --> 0:57:51.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I could be completely wrong, but like that's

0:57:51.640 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 1>just the way I feel about it, is like that's

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the like I typically like when when you're

0:57:57.680 --> 0:58:01.560
<v Speaker 1>really stimulated and you're especially the first time around, having

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to really think about, you know, is this the right

0:58:04.680 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 1>spot do I want to in there? It just seemed like, okay,

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 1>just just launch it, just hit it as hard as

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you can and you'll be fine. Because I had I

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:17.360
<v Speaker 1>had one off the planet right that bounced back into

0:58:17.360 --> 0:58:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a fine.

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Spot, you know.

0:58:19.240 --> 0:58:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I think like we we also be rebiss

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to just mention really the fourteenth I think is one

0:58:25.640 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of the better holes at the whole resort, the maiden hole,

0:58:29.240 --> 0:58:33.400
<v Speaker 1>which plays up like just a huge, rich, unbelievable natural

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 1>blowout bunker on the right and uh and and that's

0:58:36.840 --> 0:58:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a really dynamic hole that could play so differently based

0:58:40.120 --> 0:58:42.040
<v Speaker 1>off the wind. And I think that's the other thing

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:46.280
<v Speaker 1>with with Old Mac is like the different winds with

0:58:46.280 --> 0:58:48.680
<v Speaker 1>with the size of the golf course and the way

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the pins can change from day to day with different winds,

0:58:53.000 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it really is a golf course that could play so

0:58:56.000 --> 0:58:59.280
<v Speaker 1>so different And like I think, you know, that would

0:58:59.320 --> 0:59:01.800
<v Speaker 1>be a fun golf course, a really fun golf course

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to go play from the forward tis on every hole.

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know, a fun golf course. This is

0:59:07.480 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 2>cliche to say now, but a fun golf course to

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 2>play a half set on and to just sort of

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:16.200
<v Speaker 2>liberate yourself from the usual expectations of playing a modern

0:59:16.280 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 2>round of golf where you can kind of be creative

0:59:19.240 --> 0:59:23.040
<v Speaker 2>about your drives and approaches, you know, especially your approaches

0:59:23.080 --> 0:59:25.320
<v Speaker 2>if you're just if you're one hundred and fifty yards

0:59:25.320 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 2>from a green at Old MacDonald and you're just choosing

0:59:28.120 --> 0:59:30.760
<v Speaker 2>your one hundred and fifty yard club, you might be

0:59:30.880 --> 0:59:33.400
<v Speaker 2>missing a little bit of what makes the course unique

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:36.160
<v Speaker 2>because one hundred and fifty yard shot usually at that

0:59:36.280 --> 0:59:39.440
<v Speaker 2>course you could play with any number of different clubs

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:42.920
<v Speaker 2>in different ways, and you know, taking a few clips

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 2>out of your set might might liberate you to do that.

0:59:45.600 --> 0:59:47.720
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, that's not really an experiment

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:49.640
<v Speaker 2>that you're doing if you're playing the course once in.

0:59:49.600 --> 0:59:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Your life, I would I would say that, like, that's

0:59:52.200 --> 0:59:54.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the magic. That's some of the magic of

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 1>All Back is that it provides you with the most

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>shot options of any out there. Every shot, Like you

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have the most avenues to get to the hole than

1:00:06.840 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>any other golf course. Like you can hit so many

1:00:09.720 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>different shots and they're so off. There's some you know,

1:00:12.920 --> 1:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff in front of greens that you have to think about,

1:00:15.320 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of times there's lots of contours there

1:00:17.680 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can move the ball off of in Like

1:00:20.600 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times you're just enticed to you know,

1:00:23.080 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're seventy yards out, like you're enticed to pull

1:00:26.040 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>out your five iron hit a little bump or run.

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:31.160
<v Speaker 2>And often you should, you know, often that's gonna work

1:00:31.160 --> 1:00:31.959
<v Speaker 2>out a little bit better.

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:34.560
<v Speaker 3>All personal, but you know, don't be afraid of it.

1:00:35.160 --> 1:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. So ultimately, where does where does Old Mac say?

1:00:39.120 --> 1:00:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I think you disagree with me about the middle section

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>of the course. I feel like you were more enthusiastic

1:00:44.120 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>about that part of the course than I am, and

1:00:48.040 --> 1:00:50.640
<v Speaker 2>so that might lead you to rate Old Mac a

1:00:50.640 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 2>bit more highly than I do. If you're looking at

1:00:53.520 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 2>the eighteen whole courses at Bandon Dunes, where would you

1:00:56.680 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>put Old Mac in a list?

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So? I think I I think if I was gonna

1:01:01.720 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>split ten rounds, it'd be near the top, you know.

1:01:05.040 --> 1:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Banded Trails is a better course.

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's you know, but I think it.

1:01:12.720 --> 1:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd have it pretty firmly in there. I

1:01:16.000 --> 1:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>think it and Sheep Ranch to me are kind of

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in the same I think i'd probably like Old Back

1:01:22.360 --> 1:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than Sheep Ranch, But like Sheep Branches,

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they're so different it's hard like it's a it's again,

1:01:28.120 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd put them in that same tier behind Bandoned Trails

1:01:32.160 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and Pacific Dunes. You know, so I I think like

1:01:36.400 --> 1:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of places though, that the course I most

1:01:39.560 --> 1:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>want to play. That's the see, that's the thing that's

1:01:42.040 --> 1:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>where like I think i'd play it a lot. Like

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>if if I just had those courses in my backyard

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't work and all I did was play golf,

1:01:51.000 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is I think like, And it's impossible to know this

1:01:54.440 --> 1:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>because I don't you know, this isn't a thing, but

1:01:56.800 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the that might be the

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>course that I end up playing the most, just because

1:02:01.160 --> 1:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>like how different it could play.

1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's why the exercise of splitting ten rounds that

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 2>courses is interesting because it's a different question than what

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:12.840
<v Speaker 2>do you think is the best course or what do

1:02:12.840 --> 1:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>you think is the best design course. Yeah, it's really

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:20.320
<v Speaker 2>appealing the idea of playing Old Mac many times and

1:02:20.400 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>having different experiences and different wins, with different pen positions

1:02:25.080 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 2>and having the freedom to try some freaky shots. You know.

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 2>One of the things people do at Old McDonald that

1:02:30.520 --> 1:02:34.640
<v Speaker 2>they don't do as much at other courses is after

1:02:34.680 --> 1:02:37.240
<v Speaker 2>they hole out, they'll just kind of put around the

1:02:37.280 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>greens and try different things and see how different putts go.

1:02:42.240 --> 1:02:44.320
<v Speaker 2>That's something that's so fun about that place, and it's

1:02:44.360 --> 1:02:47.920
<v Speaker 2>one reason why it's appealing to the idea of playing

1:02:47.920 --> 1:02:48.560
<v Speaker 2>it over and over.

1:02:49.360 --> 1:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there could be some really fun cross country holes

1:02:52.280 --> 1:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>out there too. Yeah, just like if you're thinking about

1:02:55.280 --> 1:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>like the course of like you know it as a

1:02:57.840 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>member's course, like you know, like there there are some

1:03:01.760 --> 1:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>really really fun holes that you could make from you know,

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>certainties to other te's and or other greens. And and

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's another aspect of it. Like I

1:03:13.080 --> 1:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's a it's a course that it's a grower, right,

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a course that like the more you more time

1:03:19.560 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you spend out there are the more it's going to

1:03:21.560 --> 1:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>grow on you. And and I I always think that

1:03:24.600 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like in a way like that's you know, all of

1:03:27.400 --> 1:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>our rating systems in America, all of the course rankings

1:03:30.920 --> 1:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>are predominantly based off people that have seen a course

1:03:34.000 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>one time. And and I think that's like one of

1:03:36.960 --> 1:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the great flaws of the rating system.

1:03:39.680 --> 1:03:39.880
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:03:40.040 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that there's a real easy fix because

1:03:42.560 --> 1:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>nobody's gonna spend you know, it's hard enough to see

1:03:45.320 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of courses, let alone see a lot of

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>courses twice. But you know, to me a lot of

1:03:50.400 --> 1:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the best courses are the ones that you you you

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>might not like fully grasp the first time around.

1:03:57.080 --> 1:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely all right. I think that pretty much covers it.

1:04:01.000 --> 1:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Andy,