1 00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:07,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:09,960 --> 00:00:13,840 Speaker 2: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live 3 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:17,000 Speaker 2: weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo, cardplay and Android 4 00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:20,120 Speaker 2: Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever 5 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:24,400 Speaker 2: you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:28,120 Speaker 3: The real data was the June number for PCE. This 7 00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:30,600 Speaker 3: is what the FED looks at, personal income up two 8 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:33,400 Speaker 3: tenths of one percent, spending up three tenths of one percent, 9 00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:36,720 Speaker 3: holding up. You also had a core PCE on a 10 00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:38,959 Speaker 3: month on month coming in just two tenths of one 11 00:00:38,960 --> 00:00:42,000 Speaker 3: percent and two point six percent year on year. 12 00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:43,880 Speaker 4: So they say this is status quo. 13 00:00:44,200 --> 00:00:46,400 Speaker 1: John Tucker, how goldly lockxy? 14 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:47,639 Speaker 4: Is this I mean? 15 00:00:47,960 --> 00:00:49,800 Speaker 3: Or is it just a case of confirmation bias? Like 16 00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:53,000 Speaker 3: you see what you want to see? Yeah, let's have 17 00:00:53,080 --> 00:00:55,120 Speaker 3: someone who might have an opinion on that one. Lauren 18 00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:58,840 Speaker 3: Saylor Baker is economists and senior consulting speaker at ITR 19 00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:02,080 Speaker 3: Economics on the data. Is this data like a see 20 00:01:02,120 --> 00:01:04,119 Speaker 3: what you want to see? Or is this a goldilocks 21 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:04,680 Speaker 3: for real. 22 00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:08,120 Speaker 4: Result to be? 23 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:11,440 Speaker 5: This is not confirmation bias, as we got the GDP 24 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,720 Speaker 5: numbers yesterday. The economy is still holding up, very resilient, 25 00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:18,679 Speaker 5: inflation finally coming down. It was a little more persistent, 26 00:01:18,760 --> 00:01:20,560 Speaker 5: a little stickier than the FED wanted to see at 27 00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:22,800 Speaker 5: the start of the year. But all of the most 28 00:01:22,840 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 5: recent months of data giving them what they need to start. 29 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:25,959 Speaker 5: Cuts in September. 30 00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:30,039 Speaker 1: All right, cuts in September. What about July thirty? First 31 00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:34,679 Speaker 1: we heard from Bill Dudley, even Mohammad al Arian Bloomberg 32 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:37,960 Speaker 1: columnists saying that they should get it done with and 33 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:38,839 Speaker 1: get it done soon. 34 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:42,800 Speaker 5: I think that's the wishful thinking in the room. I 35 00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:45,160 Speaker 5: do not expect the FED to be moving in their 36 00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:47,480 Speaker 5: meeting next week. If we could accuse the FED of 37 00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 5: one thing, it would probably not be cutting rights too 38 00:01:50,280 --> 00:01:50,960 Speaker 5: soon in this cycle. 39 00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:54,520 Speaker 3: What do you think that the well, what are we 40 00:01:54,560 --> 00:01:56,360 Speaker 3: gonna learn? Though, Like, Okay, they don't want to cut 41 00:01:56,600 --> 00:01:58,560 Speaker 3: too soon. But to John Tucker's point, I get next 42 00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 3: week might be pushing a little bit. What else are 43 00:02:00,720 --> 00:02:04,080 Speaker 3: we going to learn from next week until September that 44 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:06,360 Speaker 3: will really cement anything. It's just going to be the 45 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:07,920 Speaker 3: same trajectory, right. 46 00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 4: Well, that's their hope. 47 00:02:09,960 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 5: So the FED really does want The word they're using 48 00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:15,000 Speaker 5: is confidence, and to them that just means more months 49 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:18,959 Speaker 5: of data, additional data points coming in, so they don't 50 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:21,280 Speaker 5: want to move too quickly. I mentioned very strong GDP 51 00:02:21,440 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 5: numbers that came out yesterday that will very likely be 52 00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:28,000 Speaker 5: revised in future releases. So they just want to see 53 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:31,720 Speaker 5: that the inflation, as I mentioned, has been more persistent, 54 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 5: has been stick here, that it isn't starting to creep 55 00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:37,880 Speaker 5: back up by the end of the summer. Again, I 56 00:02:37,880 --> 00:02:40,120 Speaker 5: think it's moving in the right direction finally, But because 57 00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:41,880 Speaker 5: it took so long for us to get here. We 58 00:02:41,960 --> 00:02:45,679 Speaker 5: had been on a nice smooth disinflationary track and then 59 00:02:45,760 --> 00:02:47,880 Speaker 5: we hit that three three and a half percent range 60 00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:50,120 Speaker 5: and things went much more sideways. So the Fed just 61 00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:51,800 Speaker 5: wants to be sure this isn't a blip. We've had 62 00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:53,880 Speaker 5: a couple of months of good data. They want to 63 00:02:53,880 --> 00:02:54,640 Speaker 5: see a couple more. 64 00:02:55,120 --> 00:02:58,120 Speaker 1: Well, there's another sign to their policy mandate. Isn't there 65 00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:01,320 Speaker 1: and what's happening on that it has been there? 66 00:03:01,320 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 6: There is? 67 00:03:02,240 --> 00:03:05,120 Speaker 5: Yeah, Yes, the labor market is actually something they had 68 00:03:05,160 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 5: wanted to see. Wage inflation cool. If we separate goods 69 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 5: inflation out from service inflation, that good side of things 70 00:03:11,240 --> 00:03:14,000 Speaker 5: is well under control. It has been for some time. 71 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:16,079 Speaker 5: Now it's the service side that's been held up by 72 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:19,600 Speaker 5: a very very tight labor market, so they're watching again. 73 00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:24,600 Speaker 5: Cooling labor has really been expected. Our labor market was 74 00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:27,320 Speaker 5: just on fire for the past couple of years. I 75 00:03:27,400 --> 00:03:30,600 Speaker 5: expect long term we have a floor under labor market activity. 76 00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:33,680 Speaker 5: We're starting to see the tide shift back in flavor of, 77 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:37,520 Speaker 5: you know, a slightly looser market at the moment. I 78 00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:39,400 Speaker 5: don't think we're going to go too far that way though. 79 00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:42,080 Speaker 5: It's just a demographic issue. We have baby boomers, that 80 00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:45,760 Speaker 5: huge generation finally retiring. We don't have a huge glot 81 00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:48,440 Speaker 5: of workers waiting on the sidelines or aging into the 82 00:03:48,480 --> 00:03:51,320 Speaker 5: workforce at this point, so the numbers aren't going to 83 00:03:51,600 --> 00:03:54,960 Speaker 5: materially rebalance this little bit of loosening in twenty twenty four. 84 00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:56,520 Speaker 5: But I think that's a temporary trend. 85 00:03:56,720 --> 00:04:00,520 Speaker 1: Well what happens, What's what happens more quickly, when labor 86 00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:03,400 Speaker 1: starts to cool. Does that really really start to cool? 87 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:08,440 Speaker 1: Because it also affects personal spending as well. 88 00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:12,120 Speaker 5: Sure, again, I don't think it really really starts to cool. 89 00:04:12,200 --> 00:04:15,800 Speaker 5: Labor has been supporting that personal spending component, which again 90 00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:18,680 Speaker 5: about two thirds of GDP driven by consumer spending, so 91 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:21,360 Speaker 5: that is the floor under economic activity this time around. 92 00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:24,520 Speaker 5: We do see some echo effects from the pandemic still 93 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:27,520 Speaker 5: playing out in the labor market. Because things got so 94 00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:30,080 Speaker 5: tight in that twenty one twenty two time frame, it 95 00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:32,279 Speaker 5: drew a lot of folks into the labor market. So 96 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:35,119 Speaker 5: as we look at things like labor force participation rates 97 00:04:35,200 --> 00:04:37,800 Speaker 5: for primeage workers, those are at twenty plus year highs 98 00:04:37,880 --> 00:04:41,000 Speaker 5: right now. Again, we've brought more of those workers back 99 00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:44,200 Speaker 5: to the workforce. The risk now is if we start 100 00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:46,200 Speaker 5: to see layoffs or even if we just see more 101 00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:49,279 Speaker 5: folks entering again. I don't think there are too many 102 00:04:49,279 --> 00:04:51,800 Speaker 5: of them left on the sidelines, but that could pull 103 00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 5: down some of that, say unemployment rate. I don't think 104 00:04:55,839 --> 00:04:58,080 Speaker 5: the fundamental drivers are there, and I think the ones 105 00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 5: that we're seeing are again a very temporary shoe focused 106 00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:04,359 Speaker 5: on twenty twenty four, twenty five and beyond. Looks like 107 00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:06,440 Speaker 5: that tightness will just be grinding tighter. 108 00:05:06,520 --> 00:05:09,400 Speaker 3: Still, going back to the inflation point for a moment, 109 00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:12,680 Speaker 3: we have seen freight rates kind of start to move 110 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:15,839 Speaker 3: a lot higher. We heard from Chipotle that their costs 111 00:05:15,839 --> 00:05:18,680 Speaker 3: are really starting to increase, Like they singled out the 112 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:20,960 Speaker 3: price of avocado. And I can appreciate that some of 113 00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:24,400 Speaker 3: these are idiosyncratic, but is there a danger that certain 114 00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:27,080 Speaker 3: type of inflation that we felt was done will start 115 00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:27,640 Speaker 3: coming back. 116 00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:32,600 Speaker 5: We will always see pockets of inflation, I mean avocado specifically. 117 00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:36,040 Speaker 5: If you look at those trade routes, we get these 118 00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:38,919 Speaker 5: odd kind of one off events. So weather events. There's 119 00:05:38,960 --> 00:05:41,119 Speaker 5: been a drought in the Panama Canal that is keeping 120 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:43,520 Speaker 5: ships from getting through. That's really increasing the time and 121 00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:47,520 Speaker 5: the cost of that journey. So I from an economic 122 00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:50,880 Speaker 5: fundamental point of view, I wouldn't say that's the trend, 123 00:05:50,960 --> 00:05:54,200 Speaker 5: but yes, weather events, these kind of black swan events. Obviously, 124 00:05:54,279 --> 00:05:57,480 Speaker 5: geopolitics that is the big one right now. I would 125 00:05:57,480 --> 00:05:59,520 Speaker 5: not want to make any predictions on that front. That's 126 00:05:59,560 --> 00:06:02,320 Speaker 5: not my ex for tease. But generally, if we look 127 00:06:02,360 --> 00:06:06,559 Speaker 5: at major industrial commodity prices right raw material cost most 128 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:08,720 Speaker 5: of those are still below the year ago level. They're 129 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:12,120 Speaker 5: trending much more sideways than outright rise or decline. So 130 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:14,600 Speaker 5: I hope that's a breath of relief after a few 131 00:06:14,680 --> 00:06:17,840 Speaker 5: years of very strong volatility. But we'll always be able 132 00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:19,160 Speaker 5: to cherry pick those examples. 133 00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:20,960 Speaker 1: You know what, I haven't looked at a long time 134 00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:24,640 Speaker 1: and just look at the yield curve, the inversion between 135 00:06:25,120 --> 00:06:31,159 Speaker 1: twos and tens. It's less invertity. What yeah, what does 136 00:06:31,160 --> 00:06:31,680 Speaker 1: that tell you? 137 00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:36,719 Speaker 5: So the yield curve, it's a great rule of thumb 138 00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:41,040 Speaker 5: that yield curb inversions tend to precede a recession. This 139 00:06:41,200 --> 00:06:44,520 Speaker 5: time around, clearly that has not been the case. We've 140 00:06:44,520 --> 00:06:47,240 Speaker 5: been inverted for what two years now, are going on 141 00:06:47,279 --> 00:06:48,919 Speaker 5: two years now, it's. 142 00:06:48,800 --> 00:06:51,960 Speaker 1: Just eighteen basis points separation. 143 00:06:53,120 --> 00:06:55,799 Speaker 5: Well, we like to see that come under control. Looks 144 00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:59,320 Speaker 5: like it might normalize sooner than later, but that was 145 00:06:59,400 --> 00:07:03,520 Speaker 5: never a guarantee. We've had several historical cases, so a 146 00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:05,880 Speaker 5: lot of precedent for an inverted yield curve with no 147 00:07:06,160 --> 00:07:07,159 Speaker 5: following recession. 148 00:07:07,279 --> 00:07:08,200 Speaker 2: So I think. 149 00:07:08,040 --> 00:07:10,320 Speaker 5: That's a funroll of thumb. It certainly gives us a 150 00:07:10,360 --> 00:07:14,520 Speaker 5: great look into, you know, where the market is expecting 151 00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:17,480 Speaker 5: things to trend, but not an iron cloud guarantee. And again, 152 00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:20,280 Speaker 5: I think the outlier this time around, what really kept 153 00:07:20,320 --> 00:07:23,120 Speaker 5: us out of that GDP recession was the labor side 154 00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:25,440 Speaker 5: of things. That tight labor market supporting the consumer. 155 00:07:25,600 --> 00:07:27,360 Speaker 4: All right, Lauren, thanks a lot, We really appreciate it. 156 00:07:27,440 --> 00:07:32,320 Speaker 3: Lauren Zadelbaker is economists and senior consulting speaker at ITR Economics. 157 00:07:32,360 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 4: Thank you very much. 158 00:07:34,960 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 2: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live 159 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:42,440 Speaker 2: weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android 160 00:07:42,480 --> 00:07:45,239 Speaker 2: Auto with the Bloomberg Business at You can also listen 161 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:48,440 Speaker 2: live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, 162 00:07:48,800 --> 00:07:51,600 Speaker 2: Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 163 00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:55,920 Speaker 3: There was another story that is starting that was reading 164 00:07:56,000 --> 00:07:59,040 Speaker 3: high that was a surprise to many, and that is 165 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:04,200 Speaker 3: the se SEE suing Andrew Left of committing fraud through 166 00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:08,040 Speaker 3: stock trades, social media posts, and research reports. This is 167 00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:11,680 Speaker 3: SEC's biggest move yet in a year's long crackdown against 168 00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:15,360 Speaker 3: traders who tout these bearish bets. Joining us now is 169 00:08:15,400 --> 00:08:17,880 Speaker 3: Tom Schoenberg, a Bloomberg senior reporter. 170 00:08:18,520 --> 00:08:21,040 Speaker 4: Tom. Can you walk us through what we know about 171 00:08:21,080 --> 00:08:21,440 Speaker 4: the suit? 172 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:24,680 Speaker 1: Well, first of who is mister Left? 173 00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:26,960 Speaker 4: Oh, sorry, who's mister Left? 174 00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:32,120 Speaker 6: Andrew Left is a famed short seller. He has a 175 00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:36,280 Speaker 6: you know, website, Citron Research, and he's been making sort 176 00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:40,280 Speaker 6: of bearish bets for years of kind of a real, real, 177 00:08:40,360 --> 00:08:44,679 Speaker 6: sort of well known voice in stock trade. 178 00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:48,360 Speaker 3: So what was the problem because I mean short sellers, 179 00:08:48,400 --> 00:08:49,840 Speaker 3: long long guys come on, they. 180 00:08:49,760 --> 00:08:50,800 Speaker 4: Talk about the stocks they like. 181 00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:52,880 Speaker 3: Short sellers come on, they talk about what they don't 182 00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 3: like about the stock, and they have positions on that 183 00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:57,959 Speaker 3: benefit if the stock goes down. But we know all 184 00:08:58,000 --> 00:08:59,920 Speaker 3: of this, So what was the specific problem with an 185 00:09:00,080 --> 00:09:00,559 Speaker 3: your Left? 186 00:09:01,679 --> 00:09:04,480 Speaker 6: So so what's happening here is both we've had both 187 00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:06,880 Speaker 6: the SEC and the d o J. Now the criminal 188 00:09:06,920 --> 00:09:15,000 Speaker 6: case alleging that Andrew Left was essentially not trading on 189 00:09:15,440 --> 00:09:17,720 Speaker 6: the way he was telling the public he was going 190 00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:22,160 Speaker 6: to be traded, he would essentially profit from going out 191 00:09:22,280 --> 00:09:25,720 Speaker 6: either releasing a report or tweets or other social media 192 00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:30,240 Speaker 6: interviews saying company stock, what should be valued at x 193 00:09:30,800 --> 00:09:33,920 Speaker 6: and as everyone as as the market moved to that, 194 00:09:34,480 --> 00:09:38,120 Speaker 6: he was immediately getting out and sort of making a 195 00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:41,520 Speaker 6: profit on those sort of you know, short term stock movements. 196 00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:46,240 Speaker 1: So saying one thing and doing another, basically. 197 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:47,840 Speaker 6: That's correct, that's according to the government. 198 00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:51,040 Speaker 1: Yet this is something that's been kind of plaguing this 199 00:09:51,400 --> 00:09:53,000 Speaker 1: industry for a while, isn't it. 200 00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:57,440 Speaker 6: Well, this is obviously you know, uh, you know, the 201 00:09:57,559 --> 00:10:02,160 Speaker 6: mean stock frenzy from the about three years ago, you know, 202 00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:06,040 Speaker 6: caused sort of a longer, deeper look into this, both 203 00:10:06,080 --> 00:10:09,719 Speaker 6: by you know, Congress and that as we're seeing here 204 00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:13,040 Speaker 6: the Justice Department in the SEC, and you know, it 205 00:10:13,080 --> 00:10:16,160 Speaker 6: looks like they're looking at conduct, you know, conduct in 206 00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:19,920 Speaker 6: both of these cases go as far back as twenty eighteen, 207 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:22,560 Speaker 6: and with the Justice Department saying as recent is October 208 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:23,400 Speaker 6: twenty twenty three. 209 00:10:24,640 --> 00:10:28,160 Speaker 4: So this, this conversation happens at home like every six months. 210 00:10:28,160 --> 00:10:30,520 Speaker 4: My husband says, I don't understand short selling. Why do 211 00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:31,199 Speaker 4: we allow it? 212 00:10:31,440 --> 00:10:33,679 Speaker 3: And my response is like, oh, because it helps keep 213 00:10:33,720 --> 00:10:36,920 Speaker 3: markets in our CEOs in check because they have someone 214 00:10:37,480 --> 00:10:41,560 Speaker 3: being more critical the short I'm just explaining. But you 215 00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:43,640 Speaker 3: know what if we look at it, like why do 216 00:10:43,679 --> 00:10:44,680 Speaker 3: we allow short selling? 217 00:10:46,040 --> 00:10:48,480 Speaker 6: Right? Well, what you see with you know, Andrew Left 218 00:10:48,600 --> 00:10:51,960 Speaker 6: essentially became sort of a well known short seller in 219 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:55,160 Speaker 6: part because of a number of the reports that he released, 220 00:10:55,920 --> 00:10:59,319 Speaker 6: you know, we wound up leading to actual charges against 221 00:10:59,360 --> 00:11:03,480 Speaker 6: the company or you know, SEC violations and so on. 222 00:11:03,600 --> 00:11:06,600 Speaker 6: So he established a you know, having a good reputation 223 00:11:06,679 --> 00:11:08,640 Speaker 6: in the space. And what the government is saying here 224 00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 6: is that you know, once he had that reputation, had 225 00:11:11,520 --> 00:11:15,040 Speaker 6: that audience, he sort of misused that to sort of 226 00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:19,240 Speaker 6: you know, essentially fool people into moving to a certain 227 00:11:19,280 --> 00:11:22,640 Speaker 6: position that he himself wasn't maintaining, even though he gave 228 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:25,800 Speaker 6: the illusion that that's where he was. 229 00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:27,840 Speaker 1: What what are the companies involved? 230 00:11:27,840 --> 00:11:27,880 Speaker 2: Do? 231 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:28,120 Speaker 7: What? 232 00:11:28,679 --> 00:11:29,680 Speaker 1: Do we know? The names? 233 00:11:30,400 --> 00:11:36,080 Speaker 6: Well, we got everything from Tesla, Roku, Navidia, there's you 234 00:11:36,120 --> 00:11:38,800 Speaker 6: know about you know, I think two dozen or more 235 00:11:39,480 --> 00:11:39,880 Speaker 6: in here. 236 00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:42,800 Speaker 1: And how much did he how much did he make 237 00:11:42,840 --> 00:11:45,280 Speaker 1: as a result of this? Do we know what? The SEC? 238 00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:49,480 Speaker 6: Yeah, SEC is saying that he profited as. 239 00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:52,840 Speaker 2: Just twenty million dollars. 240 00:11:52,120 --> 00:11:54,720 Speaker 6: Which also involved you know, one of the one of 241 00:11:54,720 --> 00:12:00,000 Speaker 6: the criminal charges against Andrew is for lying to federal 242 00:12:00,120 --> 00:12:04,880 Speaker 6: agents claiming that he also wasn't didn't receive a conversational 243 00:12:04,960 --> 00:12:07,959 Speaker 6: hedge funds. They're saying, you see more than a million 244 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:09,760 Speaker 6: dollars from two edge funds. 245 00:12:09,880 --> 00:12:12,000 Speaker 1: Real quick? Have we heard from mister Left. 246 00:12:13,520 --> 00:12:17,440 Speaker 6: At the moment, he has, he's not commenting. You know, 247 00:12:17,480 --> 00:12:20,800 Speaker 6: if that changes, obviously we will we will report that. 248 00:12:21,200 --> 00:12:22,719 Speaker 4: All right, We appreciate it, Thank you very much. 249 00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:26,600 Speaker 3: Tom. Tom Schomberg, Bloomberg senior reporter, joining us on that game. 250 00:12:27,760 --> 00:12:31,640 Speaker 2: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live 251 00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:34,360 Speaker 2: weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and 252 00:12:34,360 --> 00:12:37,440 Speaker 2: Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand 253 00:12:37,480 --> 00:12:41,800 Speaker 2: wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 254 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:44,080 Speaker 3: Let's get back to the market. Lisa was talking about 255 00:12:44,080 --> 00:12:45,920 Speaker 3: what's happening in the bond market. You're seen buying pretty 256 00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:48,040 Speaker 3: much all across the curve. It's been quite a week 257 00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 3: and we've seen a steepener of the last few days. 258 00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 4: That has been quite a week. 259 00:12:52,640 --> 00:12:54,440 Speaker 3: So we want to get some great insight here with 260 00:12:54,480 --> 00:12:56,960 Speaker 3: Steve Major. He's a global head of fixed income research 261 00:12:56,960 --> 00:12:59,280 Speaker 3: at HSBC. I keep saying he lives in Asia. It 262 00:12:59,400 --> 00:13:01,480 Speaker 3: was Hong Kong and now he's in Dubai. 263 00:13:01,559 --> 00:13:05,240 Speaker 1: But the point is Shanghai Bank of Commerce, right, so. 264 00:13:05,360 --> 00:13:08,680 Speaker 3: Banking corporation, Okay, But the point is he's never here, 265 00:13:09,080 --> 00:13:11,400 Speaker 3: so you have to be on the early, early, early show, 266 00:13:11,720 --> 00:13:13,280 Speaker 3: or he has to stay up late late late for 267 00:13:13,360 --> 00:13:15,880 Speaker 3: you in order to get him on TV and radio. 268 00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:17,920 Speaker 3: But he's here in studio and this is very exciting. 269 00:13:17,960 --> 00:13:20,640 Speaker 3: He's a prolific voice when it comes to the fixed 270 00:13:20,679 --> 00:13:21,520 Speaker 3: income market. 271 00:13:21,559 --> 00:13:23,920 Speaker 4: Steve, thanks for being here. It's great to see you. 272 00:13:24,080 --> 00:13:24,960 Speaker 8: Thank you for having me. 273 00:13:25,360 --> 00:13:27,520 Speaker 4: So just broad Stokes, What are your calls right now 274 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:29,400 Speaker 4: on the US bond market. 275 00:13:29,440 --> 00:13:33,439 Speaker 8: Well, it's lower yields. We've tended to have a lower 276 00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:36,040 Speaker 8: as you know. And it's not just for the sake 277 00:13:36,080 --> 00:13:38,120 Speaker 8: of it. We're not just doing it. We're not doing 278 00:13:38,160 --> 00:13:40,920 Speaker 8: it to attract attention. It's because we incorporate a more 279 00:13:40,960 --> 00:13:45,679 Speaker 8: structural and secular approach to the to the forecasting. If 280 00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:48,280 Speaker 8: you just do it based on the cyclicuse, you'd always 281 00:13:48,320 --> 00:13:51,160 Speaker 8: have a higher yield. And that might explain why other 282 00:13:51,160 --> 00:13:54,319 Speaker 8: people think yields should be five. And so to me, 283 00:13:54,920 --> 00:13:57,679 Speaker 8: if yields are bearing down on four for the ten 284 00:13:57,760 --> 00:13:59,959 Speaker 8: year right now, and you ask me where we're being 285 00:14:00,040 --> 00:14:02,280 Speaker 8: a year or so, it's time, I would say nearer 286 00:14:02,320 --> 00:14:03,240 Speaker 8: to three than five. 287 00:14:04,240 --> 00:14:07,400 Speaker 1: So you're looking at the stuff that's not necessarily short termy, 288 00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:08,880 Speaker 1: but the more long term. 289 00:14:08,760 --> 00:14:12,160 Speaker 8: Stand exactly structural and secular. Structural tends to be more 290 00:14:12,840 --> 00:14:17,560 Speaker 8: things like regulation. Perhaps secular would be more demographic, so 291 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:21,200 Speaker 8: the impact of aging populations, things. 292 00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:22,120 Speaker 1: That's really long term. 293 00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:25,120 Speaker 8: Yeah, well yes, but then you need to because you 294 00:14:25,240 --> 00:14:27,240 Speaker 8: have to have a view on the equilibrium to have 295 00:14:27,280 --> 00:14:29,240 Speaker 8: a view on the tenure. Now, this is where many 296 00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:32,920 Speaker 8: people switch off they'll say, well, I can't observe this 297 00:14:33,160 --> 00:14:36,440 Speaker 8: our star or this equilibrium rate, so I'm not going 298 00:14:36,520 --> 00:14:39,600 Speaker 8: to use it. Well, everyone who buys or sells a 299 00:14:39,640 --> 00:14:45,200 Speaker 8: ten year security is implicitly taking a view on that number, 300 00:14:45,520 --> 00:14:49,280 Speaker 8: because the tenure yield is not defined by today's policy rate, 301 00:14:49,400 --> 00:14:51,680 Speaker 8: is defined by the path of that policy rate and 302 00:14:51,720 --> 00:14:54,720 Speaker 8: where it ends up in the longer run. So if 303 00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:58,000 Speaker 8: you think that the longer un equilibrium policy rate is four, 304 00:14:58,480 --> 00:15:03,480 Speaker 8: for example, and then you think that the yield probably 305 00:15:03,480 --> 00:15:06,000 Speaker 8: won't go down much more from here, and you would 306 00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 8: also think that the FED isn't particularly restrictive. Okay, that's 307 00:15:10,680 --> 00:15:11,520 Speaker 8: an interesting point. 308 00:15:12,200 --> 00:15:14,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's the FED restrictive because I can't figure out 309 00:15:15,240 --> 00:15:18,120 Speaker 1: and then also when you answer that question for me, 310 00:15:18,520 --> 00:15:21,480 Speaker 1: what goes into making that determination whether or not they 311 00:15:21,640 --> 00:15:22,680 Speaker 1: are restrictive. 312 00:15:23,080 --> 00:15:25,960 Speaker 8: Yeah, so you know, our assumption is that the fed's 313 00:15:25,960 --> 00:15:29,640 Speaker 8: longer run equilibrium is about where the FED thinks it is, 314 00:15:29,640 --> 00:15:32,680 Speaker 8: which is two and a half percent, and it's two 315 00:15:32,680 --> 00:15:35,680 Speaker 8: point seven to be precise, and it's pretty much unchanged 316 00:15:35,720 --> 00:15:39,320 Speaker 8: from before the pandemic. Now, I would look at this 317 00:15:39,600 --> 00:15:43,240 Speaker 8: as scientifically as possible. It's difficult to be a scientist 318 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:46,400 Speaker 8: in bonds really, but the point is what has changed? 319 00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:50,000 Speaker 8: And it's very easy to say the market indicates something 320 00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:52,960 Speaker 8: has changed, therefore the world has changed. That's not good enough. 321 00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:57,080 Speaker 8: All there is is a risk premium around the possibility 322 00:15:57,120 --> 00:16:00,120 Speaker 8: that the world has changed. It is very different. So 323 00:16:00,640 --> 00:16:04,360 Speaker 8: I think that the policy is restrictive because today's rate 324 00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:07,680 Speaker 8: is more than double what the longer run equilibrium is. 325 00:16:07,960 --> 00:16:10,040 Speaker 3: How do you look at something like fiscal stimulus And 326 00:16:10,040 --> 00:16:11,960 Speaker 3: I appreciate that you're going to say that that's cyclical, 327 00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:15,480 Speaker 3: but when we're looking at something globally from the energy 328 00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:19,480 Speaker 3: transition where companies, private equity, and governments are going to 329 00:16:19,480 --> 00:16:23,480 Speaker 3: be spending boltloads of money in the next thirty years, Yeah, 330 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:24,880 Speaker 3: how does that fit into your model? 331 00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:28,320 Speaker 8: Yeah, so there's a debt, there's a debt and a deficit, 332 00:16:28,360 --> 00:16:32,200 Speaker 8: there's a stock and a flow effect. I think that 333 00:16:32,280 --> 00:16:35,920 Speaker 8: when you're talking about deficits that are going up and 334 00:16:36,120 --> 00:16:38,600 Speaker 8: therefore more bonds, you can see how that can feed 335 00:16:38,600 --> 00:16:41,640 Speaker 8: into the risk premium. But then the debt stock is 336 00:16:41,680 --> 00:16:44,600 Speaker 8: a drag on longer run growth because it has to 337 00:16:44,640 --> 00:16:46,880 Speaker 8: be rolled over and finance, and it takes cash flow 338 00:16:46,920 --> 00:16:51,120 Speaker 8: away from investment and consumption. My point is that it's 339 00:16:51,240 --> 00:16:54,640 Speaker 8: just it can be a little bit too easy and 340 00:16:55,240 --> 00:16:58,200 Speaker 8: somewhat lazy to say there's a lot of supply, therefore 341 00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:00,480 Speaker 8: the yield has to go up because you really do 342 00:17:00,600 --> 00:17:03,720 Speaker 8: need to know what's on the other side. Now, when 343 00:17:03,800 --> 00:17:06,720 Speaker 8: it comes to bonds, the substitution effect, if you like, 344 00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:09,600 Speaker 8: it depends on the value. What a bonds look like 345 00:17:09,720 --> 00:17:13,199 Speaker 8: compared to stocks, what a bonds look like compared to money, 346 00:17:13,480 --> 00:17:16,960 Speaker 8: what do government bonds look like compared to credit, etc. Etc. 347 00:17:17,640 --> 00:17:21,000 Speaker 8: It strikes me that the valuation argument for bonds is 348 00:17:21,000 --> 00:17:22,000 Speaker 8: looking pretty good. 349 00:17:22,640 --> 00:17:25,120 Speaker 1: All right, So what am I supposed to buy right now? 350 00:17:25,760 --> 00:17:30,600 Speaker 8: Well, most real money investors that's different to a hedge 351 00:17:30,600 --> 00:17:33,040 Speaker 8: fund or a trader, are sitting in what we call 352 00:17:33,080 --> 00:17:36,640 Speaker 8: the belly in the middle majorities in credit. That way, 353 00:17:36,680 --> 00:17:40,119 Speaker 8: they mitigate the negative carry because the market's implying the cuts. 354 00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:43,520 Speaker 8: So your good quality You can buy indices of good 355 00:17:43,640 --> 00:17:47,400 Speaker 8: quality credit and you're going to get a yield more 356 00:17:47,600 --> 00:17:50,600 Speaker 8: than on the S and P five hundred forward earnings. 357 00:17:50,840 --> 00:17:54,040 Speaker 8: And to me, you could have said that at any 358 00:17:54,080 --> 00:17:57,800 Speaker 8: point in the last year. But ultimately it's a safe 359 00:17:57,840 --> 00:18:01,439 Speaker 8: investment to be buying good quality US corporates. 360 00:18:02,119 --> 00:18:04,280 Speaker 3: What about in the treasury curve. Where do you think 361 00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:06,320 Speaker 3: we're going to see the most action, Alex. 362 00:18:06,160 --> 00:18:08,720 Speaker 8: You mentioned the steepener that's been playing out. Do you 363 00:18:08,760 --> 00:18:11,720 Speaker 8: know that the movement in let's look at twos tens right, 364 00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:15,439 Speaker 8: the two tens has moved about as much as it 365 00:18:15,480 --> 00:18:18,800 Speaker 8: did in the one month after the twenty sixteen election, 366 00:18:19,280 --> 00:18:21,760 Speaker 8: which says that if there is a trade around this, 367 00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:24,639 Speaker 8: it just played out. It just happened. Now it's all 368 00:18:24,680 --> 00:18:27,560 Speaker 8: about the probabilities around the election result, and we've just 369 00:18:27,600 --> 00:18:30,320 Speaker 8: seen a huge swing in that in the last few weeks. 370 00:18:30,400 --> 00:18:33,520 Speaker 8: So the idea that it was all one way traffic 371 00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:35,320 Speaker 8: and there was only gonna be one winner and one 372 00:18:35,359 --> 00:18:38,960 Speaker 8: outcome with one set of policies, that's no longer clear today. 373 00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:42,879 Speaker 8: So if the steepener was predicated on that, then I 374 00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:46,320 Speaker 8: think people will start to think again. So it's, you know, 375 00:18:46,359 --> 00:18:49,320 Speaker 8: to put a steepener on at this point today, given 376 00:18:49,359 --> 00:18:51,680 Speaker 8: how much it just moved, I think would be dangerous. 377 00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:53,560 Speaker 3: But what if it wasn't about the election? What if 378 00:18:53,600 --> 00:18:55,240 Speaker 3: it was about pricing in the cuts? 379 00:18:55,400 --> 00:18:58,480 Speaker 8: And that's I think you're spot on, because in fact 380 00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:02,560 Speaker 8: it's been the it's been the recent inflation prints and 381 00:19:02,600 --> 00:19:07,240 Speaker 8: the calling real economy that has dominated the scenario analysis 382 00:19:07,520 --> 00:19:12,040 Speaker 8: and the fiscal views and the election views, and so 383 00:19:12,720 --> 00:19:16,560 Speaker 8: that's explained the steepening. That's explained why two's are pushing 384 00:19:16,600 --> 00:19:19,399 Speaker 8: to the low yield for the last year. But the 385 00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:21,720 Speaker 8: problem is, if you enter today, you buy a two 386 00:19:21,760 --> 00:19:24,760 Speaker 8: year that is so far through the money market rate 387 00:19:25,080 --> 00:19:28,000 Speaker 8: that if the Fed isn't cutting and cutting by more 388 00:19:28,040 --> 00:19:31,080 Speaker 8: than is priced in on the WRP screen, you're not 389 00:19:31,119 --> 00:19:34,240 Speaker 8: going to make any money. And so that's why I 390 00:19:34,240 --> 00:19:37,760 Speaker 8: think that the steepener may have played out. 391 00:19:38,359 --> 00:19:42,000 Speaker 1: Okay, so the obligatory question we'll finish up with this September, 392 00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:45,639 Speaker 1: how and what's the path forward beyond September. 393 00:19:45,760 --> 00:19:48,520 Speaker 8: The baseline is they do twenty five. The interesting thing 394 00:19:48,600 --> 00:19:51,800 Speaker 8: is that the scenarios around that, whether it could be 395 00:19:51,840 --> 00:19:56,000 Speaker 8: more to me to value a bond today, you need 396 00:19:56,040 --> 00:19:58,440 Speaker 8: to think about not just the next couple of meetings, 397 00:19:58,440 --> 00:20:00,879 Speaker 8: it's the it's through next year as well. They're in 398 00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:04,119 Speaker 8: anmazing path and I think that they will deliver at 399 00:20:04,200 --> 00:20:08,639 Speaker 8: least what's in the in the forwards, which makes it 400 00:20:08,680 --> 00:20:11,280 Speaker 8: difficult to buy the front end, but makes you want 401 00:20:11,359 --> 00:20:13,080 Speaker 8: to be a bit higher up. 402 00:20:12,960 --> 00:20:13,480 Speaker 1: On the curve. 403 00:20:14,240 --> 00:20:15,239 Speaker 4: Steve, It's so good to see you. 404 00:20:15,320 --> 00:20:18,200 Speaker 3: Steven Major, Global head of Fixed Income Research at HSBC. 405 00:20:18,480 --> 00:20:20,920 Speaker 3: So helpful to understand all those different dynamics. I was 406 00:20:20,920 --> 00:20:21,440 Speaker 3: taking notes. 407 00:20:21,480 --> 00:20:24,040 Speaker 1: Did you see me here from his underground layer? 408 00:20:24,400 --> 00:20:26,680 Speaker 4: It doesn't look oh, he was just somewhere else. 409 00:20:26,760 --> 00:20:29,320 Speaker 3: It just means all right, come back next time. Okay, 410 00:20:29,320 --> 00:20:30,080 Speaker 3: Well we'll just go with it. 411 00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:32,800 Speaker 4: Steve Major, the man of mystery, Thank you very much 412 00:20:33,160 --> 00:20:33,920 Speaker 4: for joining us. 413 00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:39,280 Speaker 2: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live 414 00:20:39,359 --> 00:20:42,880 Speaker 2: weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android 415 00:20:42,920 --> 00:20:46,080 Speaker 2: Otto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live 416 00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:49,359 Speaker 2: on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just 417 00:20:49,400 --> 00:20:53,040 Speaker 2: say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 418 00:20:53,960 --> 00:20:55,720 Speaker 4: All right, two politics we go. 419 00:20:56,000 --> 00:20:58,440 Speaker 3: So the latest was that former President Barack Obama and 420 00:20:58,440 --> 00:21:02,400 Speaker 3: Michelle Obama has a have a officially endorsed vice president 421 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:03,640 Speaker 3: now presidential candidate. 422 00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:04,400 Speaker 4: Can I say that now? 423 00:21:04,480 --> 00:21:06,800 Speaker 1: Kamala Harrish presumptive. 424 00:21:06,359 --> 00:21:10,960 Speaker 3: Presumptive presumptive nominee Kamala Harris. Nathan Dean Bloomberg Intelligence and 425 00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:14,120 Speaker 3: your Policy analyst, joins us. Now, Nathan, the last sort 426 00:21:14,160 --> 00:21:18,520 Speaker 3: of you know, lever falls into place for Kamala Harris. 427 00:21:18,760 --> 00:21:20,240 Speaker 4: What can we expect over the weekend. 428 00:21:21,359 --> 00:21:23,880 Speaker 9: So I'm actually hoping that we don't expect all that much. 429 00:21:23,920 --> 00:21:26,920 Speaker 10: I mean, after two weekends you know of having really 430 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:28,959 Speaker 10: big news. But you know the next thing for us 431 00:21:29,040 --> 00:21:31,880 Speaker 10: really is to try and figure out who Kamala Harris 432 00:21:31,960 --> 00:21:34,280 Speaker 10: is going to pick as their vice presidential candidate. You know, 433 00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:36,639 Speaker 10: the the betting markets, which you can find in the 434 00:21:36,680 --> 00:21:39,560 Speaker 10: terminal at WSL election are really suggesting it's coming down 435 00:21:39,600 --> 00:21:42,480 Speaker 10: to Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and Senator Josh Shapiro 436 00:21:42,480 --> 00:21:46,480 Speaker 10: out of Pennsylvania, you know, Senator Cooper and Senator Bashara 437 00:21:46,480 --> 00:21:48,800 Speaker 10: out of North Carolina and Kentucky being the others. But 438 00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:50,920 Speaker 10: you know, just remember that Kamala Harris has a lot 439 00:21:50,920 --> 00:21:53,760 Speaker 10: of time. The Chicago election isn't until August twenty second, 440 00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:56,040 Speaker 10: and that's when she actually has to pick that vice 441 00:21:56,080 --> 00:21:57,240 Speaker 10: president nominee. 442 00:21:57,240 --> 00:22:00,000 Speaker 9: So you know, I'm thinking that they may take some time. 443 00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:00,359 Speaker 9: I'm on this. 444 00:22:00,440 --> 00:22:02,399 Speaker 10: The news cycle is worth them right now. You know, 445 00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:04,480 Speaker 10: maybe they're going to play that up again. So I'm 446 00:22:04,520 --> 00:22:06,360 Speaker 10: thinking for the next week or so, it could be 447 00:22:06,440 --> 00:22:09,320 Speaker 10: just more back to originally what we originally thought. 448 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:11,359 Speaker 9: Just a campaign for the presidency. 449 00:22:11,560 --> 00:22:15,600 Speaker 1: What it's a history teaches. I mean, Pennsylvania, Shapiro, what 450 00:22:15,760 --> 00:22:18,600 Speaker 1: is it nineteen delegates there? 451 00:22:19,520 --> 00:22:21,560 Speaker 10: Yeah, so I don't remember the number off the top 452 00:22:21,560 --> 00:22:23,600 Speaker 10: of my heads. But you know, for the Democrats, you know, 453 00:22:23,680 --> 00:22:27,040 Speaker 10: the really it's this idea of the Russbelt, Pennsylvania, Michigan, 454 00:22:27,040 --> 00:22:28,840 Speaker 10: in Wisconsin, you know, the other tuples. 455 00:22:29,480 --> 00:22:31,399 Speaker 1: Let me just I just want to might I should 456 00:22:31,400 --> 00:22:34,720 Speaker 1: have follow up with my actual question picking a vice 457 00:22:34,800 --> 00:22:38,399 Speaker 1: presidential candidate, does that really move the needle for the 458 00:22:38,440 --> 00:22:40,040 Speaker 1: person who's on the top of the ticket. 459 00:22:40,280 --> 00:22:40,840 Speaker 9: Does it matter? 460 00:22:40,880 --> 00:22:44,000 Speaker 10: You know, yeah, you know, I think it would matter 461 00:22:44,080 --> 00:22:46,320 Speaker 10: at a specific state level. So if you go with 462 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:48,919 Speaker 10: Josh Shapiro, you know, obviously I think you're gonna get 463 00:22:48,920 --> 00:22:51,400 Speaker 10: a boost because he's really popular in the state of Pennsylvania. 464 00:22:51,440 --> 00:22:53,960 Speaker 10: But just to remember that we're also talking about the 465 00:22:54,040 --> 00:22:56,840 Speaker 10: vice presidential picks here when it comes to policy and 466 00:22:56,880 --> 00:22:59,399 Speaker 10: the one debate that's between the vice president. You know, 467 00:22:59,560 --> 00:23:01,840 Speaker 10: historic it's usually people don't go to the polls to 468 00:23:01,920 --> 00:23:04,080 Speaker 10: vote for the vice president. They go to the polls 469 00:23:04,080 --> 00:23:06,320 Speaker 10: and they go to the ballots to vote for the president. 470 00:23:06,480 --> 00:23:08,399 Speaker 10: So you know, there's a lot of focus on the 471 00:23:08,520 --> 00:23:10,879 Speaker 10: VP candidates, and then certainly we cover at BI in 472 00:23:10,960 --> 00:23:14,119 Speaker 10: terms of how they can ultimately influence policy and so 473 00:23:14,200 --> 00:23:16,000 Speaker 10: forth like that. But you know, at the end of 474 00:23:16,040 --> 00:23:17,840 Speaker 10: the day, when people go to November, they're going to 475 00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:20,800 Speaker 10: be voting for either President Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris. 476 00:23:21,200 --> 00:23:21,960 Speaker 4: When do we think. 477 00:23:21,800 --> 00:23:24,960 Speaker 3: We're going to get real policy initiatives from Kamala Harris? 478 00:23:25,000 --> 00:23:27,760 Speaker 3: I appreciate that in her first sort of campaign speech, 479 00:23:27,760 --> 00:23:29,240 Speaker 3: she's not going to do that, Like her goal is 480 00:23:29,240 --> 00:23:31,440 Speaker 3: to get everyone jazzed up and excited. When do you 481 00:23:31,480 --> 00:23:33,800 Speaker 3: think we're going to start to hear more specifics? 482 00:23:34,680 --> 00:23:36,480 Speaker 9: I actually don't think it's going to come all that 483 00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:37,160 Speaker 9: too soon. 484 00:23:37,200 --> 00:23:38,919 Speaker 10: I mean, when we went back to look at some 485 00:23:39,040 --> 00:23:41,399 Speaker 10: of their policy statements, we had to go all the 486 00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:44,040 Speaker 10: way back to our time as attorney general as California, 487 00:23:44,080 --> 00:23:46,080 Speaker 10: and I think August they're just going to focus more 488 00:23:46,119 --> 00:23:49,360 Speaker 10: so on this idea of you know, the vice presidential pick, 489 00:23:49,400 --> 00:23:51,040 Speaker 10: and I think you'll see a little bit more on 490 00:23:51,119 --> 00:23:53,719 Speaker 10: border and a little bit more on immigration. But when 491 00:23:53,760 --> 00:23:56,080 Speaker 10: it comes to like her economic policy, you know, foreign 492 00:23:56,080 --> 00:23:58,480 Speaker 10: relations and so forth like that, I think we aren't 493 00:23:58,480 --> 00:24:00,960 Speaker 10: going to see the specifics until we get to September, 494 00:24:01,160 --> 00:24:04,000 Speaker 10: which is the debate season, and so after Labor Day, 495 00:24:04,040 --> 00:24:06,879 Speaker 10: after the August recess, I think Americans will really be 496 00:24:06,880 --> 00:24:09,160 Speaker 10: paying attention to the race then, and at that point, 497 00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:12,000 Speaker 10: Kamala Harris is going to have to explain those policy positions. 498 00:24:12,240 --> 00:24:13,919 Speaker 10: I think the next two weeks or so, they're just 499 00:24:13,960 --> 00:24:16,159 Speaker 10: going to try and figure it out, just because remember 500 00:24:16,160 --> 00:24:18,800 Speaker 10: that her campaign is only what four days old, five 501 00:24:18,880 --> 00:24:20,800 Speaker 10: days old at this point, so I think there's still 502 00:24:20,800 --> 00:24:22,639 Speaker 10: a lot of baby steps that campaign has to do, 503 00:24:23,040 --> 00:24:25,640 Speaker 10: and then we'll see more and more of the policy statements, 504 00:24:25,640 --> 00:24:28,160 Speaker 10: I think towards Labor Day and maybe even to September. 505 00:24:28,160 --> 00:24:29,679 Speaker 1: At that point, do you know how long we have 506 00:24:29,720 --> 00:24:32,800 Speaker 1: to wait before we get really good polling data? 507 00:24:34,640 --> 00:24:34,840 Speaker 9: You know? 508 00:24:35,119 --> 00:24:37,240 Speaker 10: I think it's the first We've already started to see 509 00:24:37,240 --> 00:24:39,960 Speaker 10: the first polls that have come out post the Biden decision, 510 00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:42,800 Speaker 10: but it's early, and it's at a national level. I 511 00:24:42,800 --> 00:24:44,960 Speaker 10: think some more of the state polling data that was 512 00:24:45,000 --> 00:24:47,720 Speaker 10: more important to us in terms of like Pennsylvania, Arizona 513 00:24:47,760 --> 00:24:50,280 Speaker 10: and so forth like that, that's being conducted this week, 514 00:24:50,320 --> 00:24:52,520 Speaker 10: and so I think, you know, and please don't hold 515 00:24:52,520 --> 00:24:54,320 Speaker 10: me to this, it'll probably be the tail end of 516 00:24:54,359 --> 00:24:56,440 Speaker 10: next week when we start to see that do. 517 00:24:56,720 --> 00:24:59,080 Speaker 4: We trust polls now, John Tucker? Is that something that 518 00:24:59,119 --> 00:24:59,640 Speaker 4: we do. 519 00:25:00,520 --> 00:25:02,399 Speaker 1: A Dewey defeated Truman, didn't he? 520 00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:07,040 Speaker 4: Oh, okay, it was a little bit ago though. So 521 00:25:07,160 --> 00:25:09,840 Speaker 4: when it comes to the campaign, is the campaign and 522 00:25:09,920 --> 00:25:14,560 Speaker 4: infrastructure for President Biden, is that infrastructure set up for 523 00:25:14,680 --> 00:25:16,800 Speaker 4: Kamala Harris right now to do what she needs to 524 00:25:16,800 --> 00:25:18,280 Speaker 4: do and travel a lot and do a lot of 525 00:25:18,359 --> 00:25:19,680 Speaker 4: rallies and get her name out there. 526 00:25:20,400 --> 00:25:22,800 Speaker 10: According to them, yes, but I would say just you know, 527 00:25:22,920 --> 00:25:25,399 Speaker 10: it's also you know, you have the ground staff, but 528 00:25:25,440 --> 00:25:27,480 Speaker 10: you also have the leadership staff, and I think the 529 00:25:27,560 --> 00:25:30,800 Speaker 10: lead leadership staff is going to obviously change, if not 530 00:25:30,920 --> 00:25:33,080 Speaker 10: in direct positions, but in terms of influence. 531 00:25:33,280 --> 00:25:34,159 Speaker 9: I mean, look, you know. 532 00:25:34,240 --> 00:25:36,760 Speaker 10: Vice President Harris had a campaign back in twenty twenty 533 00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:38,480 Speaker 10: didn't go so well for us. She was one of 534 00:25:38,520 --> 00:25:42,280 Speaker 10: the first people to drop out of the Democratic nomination process. However, 535 00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:45,119 Speaker 10: you know, the Democratic Party is fairly aligned at this point, 536 00:25:45,160 --> 00:25:46,800 Speaker 10: and so I think that there are other people out 537 00:25:46,840 --> 00:25:49,840 Speaker 10: there who are certainly interested, if not serving in the campaign, 538 00:25:49,960 --> 00:25:52,440 Speaker 10: but at least be able to whisper into that campaign. 539 00:25:52,480 --> 00:25:53,760 Speaker 9: So I think what's. 540 00:25:53,520 --> 00:25:56,120 Speaker 10: Happening right now is that you know, obviously they're going 541 00:25:56,160 --> 00:25:58,359 Speaker 10: through this growth. They didn't really have much of a 542 00:25:58,400 --> 00:26:01,080 Speaker 10: plan up until Sunday or maybe a few days beforehand. 543 00:26:01,280 --> 00:26:02,880 Speaker 9: So I think they'll have another week or two. 544 00:26:02,880 --> 00:26:06,240 Speaker 10: But then, you know, come August, early August, mid August, 545 00:26:06,320 --> 00:26:07,160 Speaker 10: I think they'll be fine. 546 00:26:07,160 --> 00:26:08,959 Speaker 9: In terms of moving forward. 547 00:26:09,119 --> 00:26:11,280 Speaker 1: Is there going to be a debate? Is that a 548 00:26:11,280 --> 00:26:11,720 Speaker 1: sure thing? 549 00:26:12,800 --> 00:26:14,399 Speaker 9: Well, you know, I certainly think so. 550 00:26:14,520 --> 00:26:17,159 Speaker 10: I mean, look, if President Trump, you know it would 551 00:26:17,280 --> 00:26:19,119 Speaker 10: were to back out with one of the dates, the 552 00:26:19,160 --> 00:26:22,600 Speaker 10: September tenth date, if I recall correctly, is still moving forward. 553 00:26:22,680 --> 00:26:25,640 Speaker 10: And I think they've invited both candidates for a September 554 00:26:25,720 --> 00:26:26,520 Speaker 10: seventeenth debate. 555 00:26:26,560 --> 00:26:28,440 Speaker 9: And look, if one of the one of the. 556 00:26:28,359 --> 00:26:30,560 Speaker 10: Candidates at this point decides to drop out, I think 557 00:26:30,560 --> 00:26:33,280 Speaker 10: that's a serious, uh mistake on their part. 558 00:26:33,320 --> 00:26:36,320 Speaker 9: But you know, it's Washington politics. Anything can happen. 559 00:26:36,359 --> 00:26:38,879 Speaker 10: But I think at this point, certainly they'll entertain and 560 00:26:38,960 --> 00:26:41,080 Speaker 10: I think ultimately they'll have one, if not two debates 561 00:26:41,119 --> 00:26:41,760 Speaker 10: going forward. 562 00:26:42,040 --> 00:26:44,080 Speaker 4: Oh boy, we're definitely watching that. 563 00:26:45,320 --> 00:26:45,520 Speaker 2: Well. 564 00:26:45,600 --> 00:26:48,120 Speaker 1: I'm worrieds just like the forum, that it's going to take. 565 00:26:48,320 --> 00:26:52,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, Nathan, we thank you. We really do 566 00:26:52,080 --> 00:26:53,960 Speaker 3: hope you have a weekend for the first time in 567 00:26:54,040 --> 00:26:58,360 Speaker 3: quite a while. Nathan Dean, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior policy analyst, 568 00:26:58,400 --> 00:27:00,800 Speaker 3: don't scare the guy. 569 00:27:01,080 --> 00:27:04,960 Speaker 2: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live 570 00:27:05,040 --> 00:27:08,120 Speaker 2: weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and 571 00:27:08,119 --> 00:27:11,040 Speaker 2: Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also 572 00:27:11,080 --> 00:27:14,280 Speaker 2: listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York 573 00:27:14,320 --> 00:27:18,000 Speaker 2: station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty. 574 00:27:19,160 --> 00:27:21,720 Speaker 3: Focus on Unis is brought to you by Build America 575 00:27:21,840 --> 00:27:25,800 Speaker 3: Mutual ensures of US municipal bond that finance essential American 576 00:27:25,840 --> 00:27:29,879 Speaker 3: infrastructure and provides guaranteed income to improve any portfolio. Be 577 00:27:29,960 --> 00:27:33,920 Speaker 3: part of Building America. Invest in BAM insured bonds. 578 00:27:33,960 --> 00:27:34,359 Speaker 4: How'd I do? 579 00:27:35,000 --> 00:27:38,960 Speaker 1: Amanda come out? You can chime in there, go bam bam. 580 00:27:39,560 --> 00:27:39,720 Speaker 2: Oh. 581 00:27:39,760 --> 00:27:41,760 Speaker 4: She sounded like me and I first started doing the show. 582 00:27:41,960 --> 00:27:44,359 Speaker 3: Yeah, sure, where we're going to get you just gotta 583 00:27:44,359 --> 00:27:46,520 Speaker 3: really own it and like jump in there. Amanda Albright 584 00:27:46,880 --> 00:27:49,800 Speaker 3: is a municipal finance reporter and she joins us from 585 00:27:49,840 --> 00:27:50,639 Speaker 3: Bloomberg News. 586 00:27:51,160 --> 00:27:51,960 Speaker 4: Okay, a man the. 587 00:27:51,960 --> 00:27:54,600 Speaker 1: Mantle, I should say from Joe Mysek, you have some 588 00:27:54,680 --> 00:27:57,400 Speaker 1: pretty big shoes to fill there, Amanda. 589 00:27:57,320 --> 00:28:00,320 Speaker 7: Yes, very big shoes to Bill Pressure. 590 00:28:00,320 --> 00:28:02,879 Speaker 4: We support you, We miss him, and we support you. 591 00:28:03,640 --> 00:28:05,400 Speaker 3: There are a couple of stories that caught my eye 592 00:28:05,400 --> 00:28:08,320 Speaker 3: this week because I'm I'm very I have lack of 593 00:28:08,320 --> 00:28:10,679 Speaker 3: confidence when it comes to my ability to discuss muni's, 594 00:28:10,720 --> 00:28:12,320 Speaker 3: so I want to make sure that I can handle 595 00:28:12,320 --> 00:28:12,840 Speaker 3: this segment. 596 00:28:13,680 --> 00:28:15,840 Speaker 4: Goldman Sachs makes a bet. 597 00:28:15,560 --> 00:28:18,760 Speaker 3: On a muni et F market one hundred and nine 598 00:28:18,800 --> 00:28:20,520 Speaker 3: billion dollar meuni ETF market. 599 00:28:20,880 --> 00:28:22,080 Speaker 4: What have they done this week? 600 00:28:23,480 --> 00:28:27,399 Speaker 7: Yeah, so Goldman has joined the rush of firms that 601 00:28:27,400 --> 00:28:32,399 Speaker 7: we've seen that have started offering muni bond ETF's. Goldman 602 00:28:32,440 --> 00:28:35,159 Speaker 7: sax Asset Management already had immuniti ETF, but they are 603 00:28:35,240 --> 00:28:38,680 Speaker 7: kind of getting deeper involved in the space with four 604 00:28:38,720 --> 00:28:41,520 Speaker 7: new funds. So one of the funds appeals to folks 605 00:28:41,560 --> 00:28:44,840 Speaker 7: in New York that are worried about their taxes that 606 00:28:44,880 --> 00:28:48,240 Speaker 7: it's been a common theme lately. There's another fund that 607 00:28:48,320 --> 00:28:52,200 Speaker 7: kind of mimics like a cash like fund, except it's 608 00:28:52,240 --> 00:28:55,440 Speaker 7: tax exempt. So I'm like money market funds that are 609 00:28:55,480 --> 00:28:58,560 Speaker 7: paying you know, upwards of five percent. You can kind 610 00:28:58,560 --> 00:29:02,000 Speaker 7: of shield your tax is if you invest in their 611 00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:05,520 Speaker 7: ultra short MUNI fund. So we've seen a bunch of 612 00:29:05,720 --> 00:29:09,320 Speaker 7: companies get further involved in the ETF space just because 613 00:29:09,320 --> 00:29:12,360 Speaker 7: it seems like that's kind of that and separately managed 614 00:29:12,360 --> 00:29:15,360 Speaker 7: accounts are becoming a little bit more popular compared to 615 00:29:15,480 --> 00:29:17,040 Speaker 7: traditional mutual funds. 616 00:29:17,080 --> 00:29:21,320 Speaker 1: And these are actively managed funds, right, and you said 617 00:29:21,400 --> 00:29:24,040 Speaker 1: ultra short, so that sort of sets them apart from others. 618 00:29:25,440 --> 00:29:29,960 Speaker 7: Yeah, And interestingly enough, it seems like actively managed is 619 00:29:30,040 --> 00:29:34,040 Speaker 7: where other companies kind of see more of an opportunity 620 00:29:34,040 --> 00:29:38,160 Speaker 7: to make an impact. The passive space within muny ETFs 621 00:29:38,240 --> 00:29:41,720 Speaker 7: is very dominated by Vanguard and black Rock. They have 622 00:29:41,840 --> 00:29:46,120 Speaker 7: two extremely large funds that are both passive passively managed, 623 00:29:46,880 --> 00:29:48,960 Speaker 7: and so I think it's a little bit harder for 624 00:29:49,080 --> 00:29:53,880 Speaker 7: other companies to kind of gain market share in that segment. 625 00:29:53,920 --> 00:29:58,400 Speaker 7: So we're seeing most of the launches within actively managed. 626 00:29:58,320 --> 00:29:59,560 Speaker 1: And are they popular. 627 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:01,760 Speaker 4: I was going to ask that, Oh he stole it. 628 00:30:01,800 --> 00:30:04,320 Speaker 1: See it's a mind she held between the two of us. 629 00:30:05,920 --> 00:30:06,720 Speaker 4: Actively managed. 630 00:30:06,720 --> 00:30:10,360 Speaker 7: It is definitely making it's growing, but I still think 631 00:30:10,480 --> 00:30:14,600 Speaker 7: it's really hard to compete with to passively managed funds 632 00:30:14,600 --> 00:30:16,680 Speaker 7: that are I think when I ran the numbers, it 633 00:30:16,720 --> 00:30:20,600 Speaker 7: was close to seventy billion between the two of them. 634 00:30:20,680 --> 00:30:24,160 Speaker 7: So I still think passively managed, being you know, so 635 00:30:24,320 --> 00:30:26,920 Speaker 7: cheap and so easy for investors to get involved in, 636 00:30:28,000 --> 00:30:30,880 Speaker 7: is still like we shouldn't we shouldn't write that off. 637 00:30:31,160 --> 00:30:33,160 Speaker 7: But I think a lot of the money managers are 638 00:30:33,160 --> 00:30:37,200 Speaker 7: betting that active will eventually gain more adoption. 639 00:30:37,360 --> 00:30:39,600 Speaker 1: And I'm guessing that these are for people who live 640 00:30:39,680 --> 00:30:41,400 Speaker 1: in high tech states. 641 00:30:41,080 --> 00:30:42,800 Speaker 4: Right exactly. 642 00:30:42,880 --> 00:30:46,800 Speaker 1: So it's just offered where like New York, California, New Jersey. 643 00:30:46,960 --> 00:30:49,720 Speaker 7: So there's a California fund and then a New York fund. 644 00:30:50,880 --> 00:30:54,120 Speaker 7: So when we spoke to the folks at Goldman, you know, 645 00:30:54,160 --> 00:30:58,680 Speaker 7: they just mentioned that they're still hearing concerns about perennially 646 00:30:59,240 --> 00:31:02,200 Speaker 7: perannial concern about high taxes in both of those states, 647 00:31:03,080 --> 00:31:06,240 Speaker 7: and that's you know, kind of been We're seeing a 648 00:31:06,240 --> 00:31:09,600 Speaker 7: lot of demand for unis generally this year, and definitely 649 00:31:10,240 --> 00:31:14,160 Speaker 7: taxes are part of that, especially given folks not knowing 650 00:31:14,160 --> 00:31:17,360 Speaker 7: what's going to happen next year with tax rates. Taxes 651 00:31:17,360 --> 00:31:18,400 Speaker 7: are front and center. 652 00:31:18,600 --> 00:31:20,160 Speaker 4: Let's move to another great story. 653 00:31:20,200 --> 00:31:22,720 Speaker 3: It was a big take this week you and a 654 00:31:22,720 --> 00:31:24,560 Speaker 3: couple of your colleagues wrote about it, and the title 655 00:31:24,640 --> 00:31:27,280 Speaker 3: is Harvard's four hundred and sixty five million dollars in 656 00:31:27,440 --> 00:31:30,760 Speaker 3: tax benefits draw some new scrutiny. Can you tell us 657 00:31:30,800 --> 00:31:33,680 Speaker 3: about this big take What was your takeaway and would 658 00:31:33,720 --> 00:31:34,040 Speaker 3: you learn? 659 00:31:35,360 --> 00:31:38,719 Speaker 7: Yeah, so we have a story just kind of examining 660 00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:43,040 Speaker 7: different tax benefits that Harvard has just given the very 661 00:31:43,080 --> 00:31:47,160 Speaker 7: intense focus on Harvard for the past I guess year 662 00:31:48,760 --> 00:31:52,240 Speaker 7: they we focused a lot on the property side because 663 00:31:52,280 --> 00:31:55,800 Speaker 7: there's a very rich and kind of long standing debate 664 00:31:55,880 --> 00:32:00,640 Speaker 7: over tax exempt property in college towns across the US, 665 00:32:00,680 --> 00:32:04,120 Speaker 7: not just in Boston and Cambridge, but we found that 666 00:32:04,760 --> 00:32:08,520 Speaker 7: within Boston and Cambridge there is kind of a growing 667 00:32:08,680 --> 00:32:12,360 Speaker 7: push to have Harvard pay more in what's known as 668 00:32:12,800 --> 00:32:16,080 Speaker 7: payments in lieu of taxes or pilots, and that's basically 669 00:32:16,080 --> 00:32:19,160 Speaker 7: an annual payment that Harvard makes every year to account 670 00:32:19,160 --> 00:32:21,600 Speaker 7: for the fact that it's property is tax exempt. Which 671 00:32:22,760 --> 00:32:25,120 Speaker 7: this is a debate that could be could be had 672 00:32:25,160 --> 00:32:28,880 Speaker 7: at any college town with any university pretty much because 673 00:32:29,960 --> 00:32:32,840 Speaker 7: city leaders are always going to want more from their universities. 674 00:32:33,440 --> 00:32:36,640 Speaker 7: But I think just the growing wealth at Harvard and 675 00:32:37,080 --> 00:32:40,240 Speaker 7: you know, sky high tuition has just kind of reinvigorated 676 00:32:41,080 --> 00:32:46,520 Speaker 7: this debate and it's a really interesting topic and also 677 00:32:46,640 --> 00:32:51,920 Speaker 7: very relevant to many elite institutions, the debate that's taking 678 00:32:51,960 --> 00:32:54,719 Speaker 7: place both in city halls but also in Congress because 679 00:32:55,520 --> 00:32:59,000 Speaker 7: the Ivy League has become a major target lately. 680 00:32:59,520 --> 00:33:03,840 Speaker 1: Okay, apolitic the intersection of politics and munichs Hey in 681 00:33:03,880 --> 00:33:06,520 Speaker 1: the MEUNI space, if we can back up for what 682 00:33:06,640 --> 00:33:09,760 Speaker 1: is issuance like and what are some of the more 683 00:33:09,880 --> 00:33:12,040 Speaker 1: interesting issues that you see out there. 684 00:33:13,400 --> 00:33:17,120 Speaker 7: Yeah, issuance has been pretty surprising this year. I think 685 00:33:17,160 --> 00:33:21,680 Speaker 7: it's up thirty eight percent, a record first half of 686 00:33:21,720 --> 00:33:25,840 Speaker 7: the year. That was something that Joe loved covering when 687 00:33:25,880 --> 00:33:27,040 Speaker 7: he was with US. 688 00:33:27,280 --> 00:33:31,400 Speaker 1: Oh, he retired. We sound like he's died. He's retired, retired, 689 00:33:31,480 --> 00:33:32,600 Speaker 1: he's on a beach somewhere. 690 00:33:33,400 --> 00:33:36,480 Speaker 7: He's Yes, he's still rooting us on and reading our coverage. 691 00:33:37,240 --> 00:33:40,400 Speaker 7: But there's just been so many for just kind of 692 00:33:40,400 --> 00:33:44,400 Speaker 7: a preview for terminal readers. In a little bit, we 693 00:33:44,400 --> 00:33:46,920 Speaker 7: should have a story about how a lot of these 694 00:33:46,960 --> 00:33:51,040 Speaker 7: deals are getting totally gobbled up. There's like kind of 695 00:33:51,080 --> 00:33:54,280 Speaker 7: you know, the food fight for for MUNI deals. Some 696 00:33:54,360 --> 00:33:57,920 Speaker 7: investors are kind of frustrated by this because they can't 697 00:33:57,960 --> 00:34:01,320 Speaker 7: get enough bonds that they put in order for and 698 00:34:01,360 --> 00:34:05,080 Speaker 7: we're really seeing this across the board for you know, 699 00:34:05,240 --> 00:34:07,440 Speaker 7: even very vanilla bond structures. 700 00:34:07,480 --> 00:34:11,080 Speaker 4: And then you know, it's actually surprised me. 701 00:34:11,120 --> 00:34:12,879 Speaker 7: There's not been a ton of deals that I've been 702 00:34:12,920 --> 00:34:15,400 Speaker 7: really like, oh, this is so interesting that they're doing this. 703 00:34:16,080 --> 00:34:18,960 Speaker 7: It's just kind of a typical infrastructure that we're seeing 704 00:34:19,360 --> 00:34:21,960 Speaker 7: getting funded, and not a ton of like you know, 705 00:34:22,440 --> 00:34:25,520 Speaker 7: high yield issuances, but just kind of across the board 706 00:34:26,239 --> 00:34:30,640 Speaker 7: general obligation bonds, triple A, double A, and but yet there's. 707 00:34:30,360 --> 00:34:31,440 Speaker 4: So much demand for them. 708 00:34:31,880 --> 00:34:34,000 Speaker 7: And I think part of that is people are worried 709 00:34:34,080 --> 00:34:37,239 Speaker 7: that this is a rush before the election, trying to 710 00:34:37,239 --> 00:34:39,360 Speaker 7: get ahead of any volatility, and people are worried that, 711 00:34:39,480 --> 00:34:43,040 Speaker 7: you know, after November, these sales are going to go away, 712 00:34:43,080 --> 00:34:44,960 Speaker 7: so you kind of have to get in the market 713 00:34:45,000 --> 00:34:46,200 Speaker 7: now while you while you can. 714 00:34:46,640 --> 00:34:49,640 Speaker 1: So this is exciting. Is anybody on shaky ground? 715 00:34:51,640 --> 00:34:56,200 Speaker 7: No, I'm so surprised that everything is just anytime. The 716 00:34:56,280 --> 00:35:00,640 Speaker 7: US economy is doing well, COMMUNI issuers are they do well? 717 00:35:00,760 --> 00:35:03,640 Speaker 7: States do well. I just saw Virginia. I think they 718 00:35:03,640 --> 00:35:06,799 Speaker 7: had a billion more in tax revenue than anticipated for 719 00:35:06,840 --> 00:35:10,600 Speaker 7: the most recent fiscal year. Like it's really surprising just 720 00:35:10,719 --> 00:35:15,680 Speaker 7: how well state and local finances have been holding up. 721 00:35:15,880 --> 00:35:19,400 Speaker 7: It's pretty remarkable, but that just speaks to the broader economy. 722 00:35:19,760 --> 00:35:22,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, I was going to say, like it is really surprising, 723 00:35:22,160 --> 00:35:24,399 Speaker 3: particularly as the whole narrative of the COVID funding it 724 00:35:24,440 --> 00:35:28,000 Speaker 3: is running out. They're going to have huge budgets shortfalls, 725 00:35:28,120 --> 00:35:30,319 Speaker 3: and I feel like I have yet to hear that. 726 00:35:31,960 --> 00:35:37,440 Speaker 7: Yeah, we definitely haven't. Where I see stress is more 727 00:35:39,560 --> 00:35:43,440 Speaker 7: higher ed private colleges. Those aren't kind of typical classic 728 00:35:43,840 --> 00:35:46,359 Speaker 7: munique credits or you know, they're not funded necessarily by 729 00:35:46,719 --> 00:35:49,680 Speaker 7: tax revenues. But where we're seeing stress is not necessarily 730 00:35:50,080 --> 00:35:53,319 Speaker 7: states and cities. It's more like a private college that's 731 00:35:53,320 --> 00:35:56,080 Speaker 7: sold muny bonds. And I was talking with a colleague 732 00:35:56,080 --> 00:35:59,920 Speaker 7: today about how schools that have been relying on pandemic 733 00:36:00,040 --> 00:36:02,800 Speaker 7: really funding. Those are the areas that, now that the 734 00:36:03,200 --> 00:36:06,400 Speaker 7: funding is running out, schools are kind of where the 735 00:36:06,440 --> 00:36:10,000 Speaker 7: stress is being seen rather than like the city, though 736 00:36:10,000 --> 00:36:12,319 Speaker 7: of course there's probably exceptions out there. 737 00:36:12,680 --> 00:36:14,120 Speaker 4: All right, Amanda, thank you so much. 738 00:36:14,160 --> 00:36:17,399 Speaker 3: We really appreciate Amanda Albright Municipal Bonds report. Does Joe 739 00:36:17,400 --> 00:36:20,680 Speaker 3: Myisick like really email you about your stories of course. 740 00:36:21,080 --> 00:36:21,799 Speaker 4: Oh my god. 741 00:36:21,840 --> 00:36:25,240 Speaker 3: I love that he's retired, but he's not he's reading, 742 00:36:25,440 --> 00:36:28,600 Speaker 3: he's listening. Yes, please tell him that we say hi, 743 00:36:29,120 --> 00:36:30,280 Speaker 3: I learned la a lot. 744 00:36:30,160 --> 00:36:33,040 Speaker 1: That was really interesting and you are so like. 745 00:36:33,160 --> 00:36:37,800 Speaker 4: Not so scared. Every Friday, nieds, I definitely get nervous. 746 00:36:38,080 --> 00:36:42,600 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify, 747 00:36:42,800 --> 00:36:45,720 Speaker 2: and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live 748 00:36:45,800 --> 00:36:49,400 Speaker 2: each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, 749 00:36:49,480 --> 00:36:52,920 Speaker 2: the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. 750 00:36:53,000 --> 00:36:56,160 Speaker 2: You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube 751 00:36:56,239 --> 00:36:58,120 Speaker 2: and always on the Bloomberg terminal