WEBVTT - Week 11 NFL Best Bets (Ep. 65)

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everybody. Welcome into the Bedding Bros bet About podcast.

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host Dan Harris. With me, of course, is

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Pearl. You can find us on Twitter at Dan

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Harris Adi and at Sports Talk Matt Matt. How are

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you as we roll into week eleven?

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>How am I? I'm a little perturbed at what we

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 2>what for us, what we've been doing. Yeah, and it

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>just feels like we're constantly getting caught. Yeah, just every week.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>It's been a frustration where I feel, really, I thought

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>we were gonna be great last week and then we

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 2>just got a little bit of a you know, just

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>one of those weeks and just it's been a tough year.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's been you know, I look around and

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 2>I talk to a lot of my friends who are

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>in these contests as well, and it's been a tough year.

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So I'm okay, how about that?

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? How are you doing in your other two contests

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>before I get to the Draftking.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm three and two every week and all of them. Yeah,

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>like just consistently. And it's not like we're picking the

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 2>same games either, right, it's three and two, three and

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>two the Bears. We would have been four and one

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>last week with the Bears. I would have been four

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 2>and one last week in my Westgate Super Contest if

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 2>the Bears had covered the Bears with the right side.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 2>That third down play is giving me nightmares where they

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>ran a screen pass with they kick a field goal

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and it's a three point win and we're good. We

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>cover and they run a screen pass that made no sense.

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 2>They lost four yards and they had to punt. So yeah,

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>just betting on Nick Foles and betting on whether we

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Bill Laser or Matt Nagy. Just the Bears are now

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 2>on my off list.

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, you're not gonna get an argument for me.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Watching that game was very, very frustrating. I agree, But

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>let's recap our last week. But before we do, let's

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>do our usual reminders of a couple of things. Number

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>one discord. I don't know how many people are. I

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>try to give an update every week, but it's just

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>growing too fast. Bettingpros dot Com slash chatd is legitimately

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>just a place where you can talk about betting. You

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>can talk about it with us, you can talk about

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it with your fellow gamblers. You can talk about any

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>topic really you want. In the sports gambling landscape. You've

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>got different channels and you can win assigned aj Brown

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>helmet that is going on through the end of November.

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>If you just go into Betting Pros dot Com slash

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>chat and go into discord, there is a place where

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you can enter the contest. It's pretty awesome. The other

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>thing is our prop bet What did I said is

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>prop bet cheat sheet? Right, that's what, Yes, I've nailed

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the name. Finally, Betting pros dot Com slash props again.

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>That compares consensus projections to the prop bets that are

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>available in the market, and it ranks them based on

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>how different, essentially the projections are from the lines that

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the sports book sets. So it's really invaluable if you

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>like prop betting, as you should. All Right, so we're

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about this week. But as Matt said, we

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>went three and two last week, which is basically what

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>happens every week. We're essentially middle of the road in

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the contest. So unless we kind of really we go

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>crazy here at the end, it's going to be kind

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of hard to make up the ground, but it is

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>still possible. We're twenty six and twenty four fifty two percent.

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>We hit them. The only game that we both came

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>into the week really liking, which was the Bucks laying

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>four and a half to the Panthers. That was not

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a sweat. We also hit in the Giants getting three

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half from the Eagles and the Rams laying

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>one and a half to the Seahawks. We missed on

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the one that Matt liked, which was the Bengals getting

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>six and a half from the Steelers. And as Matt said,

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the one really that I liked and I pushed a

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit, which was the Bears, and they were actually

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>only getting two and a half from the Vikings in

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>our contest, so we would have lost even if they

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>made that fit go. But still, come on, do something.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>We got to get some wins. Also, as we'll talk about,

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to play two bye weeks here in the

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>next several weeks. I think, what we've got six weeks

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>left because it goes through Week sixteen, we've got to

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>play two bye weeks, meaning we can't make picks for

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>two of the weeks. That might be this week Matt

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and I sort of floated the fact that we didn't

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>love the slate this week. We will still go through

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>every game. We will give you whatever picks we are

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>leaning towards. We may not play them though this week

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>because we do have to take a bye week. And

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Matt, you still thinking that the slate

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is ugly or in the last few hours have you

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>come around and found some games that you really like?

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Still hate it ly? Still till absolutely entirely one hate it?

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 2>But I mean there are three games I like. You

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>can if you like them, maybe we play it if

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 2>you want to get into it. I actually like tonight

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday Night. We haven't played a Thursday Night before,

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>but I actually like the Seahawks tonight.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh I thought you didn't like it at Wait when

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>it is its.

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Three and a half. It's three and a half in

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>our contest. I bet it at three, but I think

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that you know the way, I think it's the seven

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 2>point win personally for the Seahawks tonight, but that's just

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 2>my personal opinion on it. I bet it at three.

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 2>It's down to two and a half. The pros and

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the Joe's are all over this back and forth. I mean,

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of a crazy game watching the money and

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 2>the line movement as to where it's gone. But I

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 2>like Seattle tonight to win. I think the primetime games

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>it's where all the action is. Sunday, Thursday, Monday or

0:04:57.920 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 2>all the are the best three games of the week.

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so this is the Seahawks are laying three and

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a half tonight. Man. Yeah, I liked it at three.

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd certainly like it two and a half. Yes, But

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what, let's talk. We've got we've got We're

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>recording this at six pm on Eastern Standard time, so

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got two hours until the game goes. So we'll

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>talk it through. Let's get to some of the other games,

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and then let's see maybe I don't know whatever, I'd

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>be open to it. We could talk about I do

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>think that the Seahawks are gonna win this game, so

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd be open to doing it. But let's start with

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the games here on Sunday or Monday, whatever

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you want. Let's see if we can agree on any

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of them. I have to warn you, Matt, We've been

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.799
<v Speaker 1>doing this now for eleven weeks. I think I generally

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>know how you feel about certain picks. I will be

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>shocked if you and I are able to come to agreement,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>because the few that I like, I'm always just like,

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>oh God, Matt's gonna absolutely despise this pick, But go ahead,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 1>let's see what you've got. Start us off with your

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>favorite play the weekend.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 2>So there are games that the line movement like, for instance,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 2>the line movement right now for Casey and the Raiders

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 2>is eight eight and a half. That is sign it's

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 2>six and a half in this contest. Yep, that is

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 2>an insane number. So while I might be on the Chiefs,

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 2>sorry on the on the Raiders betting, I think the

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>six and a half off of a bye week under

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 2>a seven point I don't know how you don't bet

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City.

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Here, Yeah, that's that's on my list.

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just I don't know. I don't I

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>think the Raiders can keep this game within ten points,

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 2>so I'm gonna.

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Wait beat them. I beat him the first game.

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is off of a bye it's Andy Reid,

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a pissed off bunch of chief players coming in here,

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 2>and the Raiders got COVID problems like crazy.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Well I think that is that? Do you think that's

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>what's accounting for the move Matt, The fact that their

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>entire defense is basically COVID.

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a public move. But I think the

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 2>pro movie is the fact that Andy Reid destroys AFC

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 2>West opponents, and I think it's just been a ridiculous run.

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it's like twenty four and four or something

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>against the AFC West. So I think that's why it's

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>going in. The COVID problems come in and then but

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm just gonna wait till this thing gets to ten,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna bet the Raiders. But for this contest,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>my number one when I wrote down at six and

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a half, the best number play is the Chiefs minus

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>six and a half.

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm gonna for now pencil that one into the

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>extent we're going forward, because I definitely had that one

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>on my list. You know there is I don't think

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you tell me if it matters in any way to you.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>But Clyde Edwards Hilaire has missed practice so far this

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>week with a quote unquote illness and they have not

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>elaborated on it. We you know, you know where your

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>mind goes as soon as you hear illness, So he

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>may he couldn't miss this game, in which case you're

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at Le'Veon bell Now they don't run the ball anyway,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter. They're getting Sammy Watkins back here.

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But does that matter to you at all if Edward

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Hilaire were to miss this game?

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean it's the defense. The problem for the

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Raiders is they get no pressure on the quarterback, so

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>their secondary. I love Abram talking about a bunch of

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the podcast. I think, you know, getting Arnett back is big.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 2>His hand is now recovered, so we can play. I

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 2>think they're good at covering, they're not great at getting

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>after the quarterback. And I just think they don't have

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 2>a ton of team speed in the secondary. Their linebackers

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 2>are average at best. I think it's a monster Kelsey game,

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's an angry bunch of Chief players

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 2>coming in that want to prove a point. So it's

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 2>a bad spot for the Raiders to be in. I

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>don't think that victory lap bust controversy is actually a thing,

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 2>but I do think there is a level of like,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>this is our division. You guys are a year or

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>two early, and yeah, you caught us at home, we'll

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 2>come with our pants down, but where we're ready to

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 2>go here and we're coming after you. So again, I

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>think the Raiders have the weapons to keep it close

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 2>in a high scoring game. I love the over in

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 2>this game, but I think you're going to wind up

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>with a seven point victory for the Chiefs.

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, under a touchdown. It's really hard not to take

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this game. That's really what it is. As you said,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the line's been moving. The consensus line that I'm looking

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>at right now is eight.

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised if it goes higher. At seventy

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>one percent are still on the Chiefs in our bed analyzer.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So yeah. I mean, if there were a game that

0:08:58.520 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I was going to pick that was on my list

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that I think I thought you might like because of

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's under touchdown, it would be this one.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So again, if we do play this week, let's pencil

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that in. But if you somehow find it anywhere at

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>six and a half, we'll certainly take that. Now, Matt,

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>what is your dividing line between when you think it

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>goes to the point where you would feel comfortable to Raiders?

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it ten? Is that the line?

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? And other than that, if it's over a touchdown,

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>are you just staying away in between let's say seven?

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Because I think the difference between eight and ten.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>The books go very quickly, so you'll see line movements.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>The books have no problem going from seven and a

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 2>half to eight and then from eight and a half

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>to ten, so they'll move it fast, and so getting

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 2>off the key numbers of seven and eight are always

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the most difficult. Going below sevens even more difficult. So

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 2>and the most difficult is three to three and a half.

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>That's the most difficult line movement for the books. So

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I think if it gets to eight and a half,

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 2>it'll go ten. It'll just they'll just keep on moving

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 2>it up and they won't worry about it. Then look

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 2>at the ten and then they'll stop because then by

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>because it gets to ten and a half, the pros

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>will come in on the raiders and buy it back.

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 2>So ten's my number.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Got it okay? So this ends the portion of the

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>show where Dan and Matt agree on anything, is what I.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Think, because we'll see hold on all right.

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Because the games I'm taking, I just can hear you

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>doing the thing that you go. You have the whole

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>slate available to you.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Head one game in my head that I think that

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna do, and I want to my reaction will

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 2>only be off of one game, and I want to

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>see if you actually take it.

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I bet you I'll take it. It's probably not going

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to be this game because this game is backing an

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>ugly team, but it's kind of the classic by Low

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where this team usually comes up big

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>no matter how bad they look. It's the Eagles getting

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>three and a half from the Browns. Now they're in Cleveland.

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Look the Eagles, I think the match.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Up the number two is on the other side.

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you like the Browns. All right, well, let's talk

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>this through. And I will say immediately what I do

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>when we make a pick is I go to the

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>bed analyzer and I look at which side people are.

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Now that the consensus spread is three and Wold fel

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a litle diferently about this game of three, but it's

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>legitimately fifty percent. Fifty percent on the Eagles, fifty percent

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>are on the Browns. So here's here's my line of thinking.

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Number one. Historically speaking, I just think this is when

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you back the Eagles when they look absolutely like maybe

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst team in football, and then you know they

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 1>like that game against the forty nine ers Matt where

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we talked ourselves into them getting seven and a half,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and I realized that maybe that game was a little

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more on the forty nine ers than it was

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily on the Eagles. But you look at a game

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>where they look just dead in the water, which they did,

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and you just say, Okay, this is probably a spot

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>where they're gonna bounce back. Miles centers looked very good

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in the game against the Giants. I think he's going

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to look very good here. They get a lot of pressure.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the one thing that the Eagles defense really does.

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>They get pressure, they're able to stop the run. I

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>guess the two things that they do. They're able to

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>stop the run. That's what Cleveland absolutely needs. And they

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of pressure. And you know that's where

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Baker kind of struggles. He doesn't like to get pressure,

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and that I think the Browns defense is overrated. I

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>think they've got you know, they've had the two games

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>in the wind, They've had a pretty easy schedule. So

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this is really more of a I bet on the

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Eagles just when you think they're done. Now, I've caught

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>this already at three and a half. At three, maybe not.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they could win it out right, But I

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>do like it when I'm getting a hook, So go

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>ahead and give your side because you like the Browns obviously.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, the weather forecast is gonna be not as windy

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>as the previous two, but it's not gonna be nice.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>It looks like rain, right, it's.

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Gonna be cold. It's gonna be rainy. Ye, it's gonna

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 2>be breezy. Not not an hour maybe as a time

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 2>of tape it's Thursday, I thinks can switch in, but yes,

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the forecast is not the thirty five mile par our

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 2>sustained wins that we saw last week for them, but

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>it's still weather. Eagles are awful, Wentz is awful.

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 2>This is who the Browns beat. The Browns beat bad teams.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>They can't beat anybody good. But if you look at

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.599
<v Speaker 2>PFF Pro Football Focus, they have the I think of

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the third ranked offense in the NFL right now. So

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean they could score and they could put the

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 2>points up on anybody. And that's even with Odell or

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 2>without Odell, they can put points up on the board.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Hooper with the tight end. I just think this is

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>a bad team that you know, the Browns beat bad teams,

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 2>and the Eagles are a really really bad team. Yeah,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm at home laying. I think they win the game

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 2>by seven.

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, so we're gonna stay off it because

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I mean, sometimes there are times where I

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>come in on one side and you talk me into

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it and I do get your points completely about this

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to me, again, this is a spot where you're like,

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles might be the worst team in football, and

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>then they come up and they come up big, and

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I really think that this is a game again. I

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>think the Browns are really I mean, they're just I

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>think they're overrated. Man. Without Odell Beckham, I think that

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chubb is great, Kareem Hunt is great. But

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Eagles are gonna understand, Okay, let's

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>make Odell Beckham Junior beat us if they can. And

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty decent against the run, and I'm just not

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>confident without Odell Beckham Junior that he's gonna be able

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to do that throwing to Jarvis Landry and Roshard Higgins

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and Austin Hooper without those guys. So for me, I

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>think this is sort of the classic. All Right, the

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are left for dead. Wait a minute, Why did

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they just win the game by ten points? I don't understand.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So all right, let's go to your next That was

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>your number two.

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.599
<v Speaker 2>Under too, Let's get your one and told you I

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 2>had three.

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm ready.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Casey won Cleveland two, and I think the Ravens are

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a mess. I got the Titans here. I think the

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Titans win this game outright. I think they're the better offense.

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I think they're the better defense. I think there's some

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 2>real problems right now with Lamar Jackson trying to move

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the football. And you can make the excuse about the

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 2>rain and the wind and whatever you want to say

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 2>about why the Patriots beat the Ravens, but they got

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 2>problems in Baltimore. People had them. Colin Cowhard had them

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>going sixteen and oh, okay sixteen and oh this year,

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 2>there's some real problems in Baltimore. I like the Titans.

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Whatever point tumber what is it? Six and a half?

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Six in six and a half?

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Six and a half? Love it? Titans plus six and

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>a half?

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Yep, this I'm on this as well. And what's funny

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is that this wasn't my number one, but I thought

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>about leading with it because I was like, this could

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this seems like a game that Matt might like. Yeah,

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And I loved the Ravens. I was willing to back

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>them all the time. And again I kind of talked

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this into and you heard from some other people into

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>backing them against the Colts. But they didn't look good

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Really, you know, they wound up winning it,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and they really really did not look good. And kudos

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to you, by the way, that was my bad. The

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Patriots were your last one, but one of the picks

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that you said you were willing to go with last

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>week against the Ravens, and I thought you were nuts,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and that was absolutely the right side. So kudos to you.

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not only Matt, are they a mess? But

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the big thing right like, they're good against the run,

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, well, the Titans really need to establish

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Eric Henry. No Brandon Williams, and he's not gonna play

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game. He's mispracticed. He is the guy who

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>stops the run. He was the guy last year when

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>he was out. You saw how they were against the run.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be the same thing this year. Probably. No

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kalay Is cambell here, no Stanley on the line, Nick Boyle,

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is kind of actually a sneaky big loss that they've

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>got here going on. So I'm in total agree with

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you on this one. Actually, this is week two of

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>your picks right now are two games that were not

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>just I'm okay with it actually on my list. So

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>if we go, we'll go with the Titans plus six

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half against the Ravens. Very good. All right,

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>so you're done now right. You don't have any I.

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Have two leans. Those are my yeses. I've got two

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 2>others that are on my list, and if you say

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 2>you want it, I'm comfortable with it.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, they I'm not going to list those, I can

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>almost promise you because these are ugly. So just get

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>ready for how ugly this is about to get. How

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>ugly do you think it is to take the Jaguars

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>getting ten and a half from the Steelers?

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I like it? What? Yeah? I like it?

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I love it? Okay, yeah, I mean.

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 2>This is not on my list, but I like it

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>because this is my thinking.

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh go ahead, no, no, no, you go ahead out then

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll just go ahead.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Historically speaking, over the last four years, YEP teams with

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>one loss taking on a team that's undefeated. They are

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>three and one against the spread. I just think that

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 2>this is a classic. Pittsburgh needs to lose a game,

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 2>okay before the playoffs. If you're a Steeler fan, this

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 2>is the game you can lose. You can lose this

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>game out of nowhere. You get beat, it means nothing.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 2>You have a three game lead in the division. You

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>just come off of a big win over the Ravens

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 2>a couple weeks ago. This game, this is trap city

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 2>for Pittsburgh. Here that this is a one win team,

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 2>wounded animal. If you will back into a corner at home.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm totally comfortable with It's not one of my picks,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>but I'm comfortable with Jacksimo.

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>This is hilarious for it because I thought you were

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, no way, yeah, ten and a half

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point. By the way, I did forget on

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the Titans and the Ravens. The spread is moving. By

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's not only minus five and seventy percent

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>are on the Titans. So just to be clear on

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that one. Yeah, with this one, I mean, this is

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like a mike and I wanted to fade. I forget

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>what it was, but I maybe it was against the Ravens.

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>But it was something where I wanted to fade Tomlin

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the Steelers come in and that Cowboys game.

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>That Cowboys game is what Mike Tomlin and the Steelers

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>really are. Mike Tomlin's a very very good coach. I'm

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not saying anything away from him, but he does not

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>get the team up to play in these games where

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they are massive favorite. It's especially when they're not in division, right,

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>like this is just and you look at that Cowboys game.

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>They were like inches away from suddenly being like, oh

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>my god, you just lost to the Cowboys. And don't

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>forget next week is Thanksgiving. They play the Ravens on Thanksgiving, right,

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so they've got to be looking ahead right in this game.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>This game cannot mean anything to them. No, I'm not wrong, right,

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they play the Ravens on thanks Game, Yes, so they've

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>got to be looking ahead at that point to what

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this are. I'm not saying the Jaguars are gonna win.

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying ten and a half. You're getting more

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>than the ten. Yeah, I'll take that. Actually, I want

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to look at where the bed analyzer has that one,

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's now this is actually it leans towards Jacksonville,

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>but not overwhelmingly, so just fifty three percent. But yeah,

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a game I feel I don't know, man,

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty comfortable with this one. So Okay, we've

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>got we've got three that we're talking about. Let's go

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to your next one. That you don't absolutely your lean

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that you don't despise Colts.

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I've been so wrong on the Colts this year. You've

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 2>liked the Colts a lot this year? Yeah, what about

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 2>what about Indie this week?

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So the spread is two and a half, laying two

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half to the Packers.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate it. I don't hate it. I don't

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>know that I don't have a good lean on it.

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I will say that Devontae Adams has missed practice so

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>far this week with an angle injury. Now they're getting

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>bizarred back, but their their whole persona is different if

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>they don't have DeVante Adams.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And the Colts are off a mini bi I'm a

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>little worried that they might be flying high after that.

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 2>But so here's so, here's here's what I've been talking

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.239
<v Speaker 2>to some people about. And I don't know how you

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 2>biden into conspiracy theories, But have you seen the latest

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>one with what's going on here? Why the Colts supposedly

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>knew what the Titans were going to be and defensively.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Like crazy, I actually have not.

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 2>There's there's a conspiracy theory out there that the Colts

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 2>have been listening to the calls of the defenses that

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>they're playing and they're going back into the game film

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 2>because there's no crowd, so the radio, the radio call

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 2>and the TV call, you can hear the audibles being

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>yelled out by the defenses. Supposedly, Supposedly, there's been some

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 2>interesting work going on with the Colts and they know

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 2>what the defensive audibles are and you're hearing Philip rivers

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 2>switch into different plays. They're gonna put them in the

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 2>better play based upon what the defense has switched into.

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But you feel like that that's not like I mean,

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I get.

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 2>It, No, no, no, it's a trick of a veteran who

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 2>knows what to get. That's why they've been moving the

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>ball so well on some of these good defenses.

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But I would think that, like, I mean, that's you

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>know that. When you first said I was like wow,

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, well, wait, like that seems pretty

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>like why wouldn't every team do that like that? That's

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody know. You can hear everything now, yep in these games,

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>like why would that be something that It's sort of like, Wow,

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Colts stumbled upon this amazing way, Like I would

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>think the teams are changing their audibles every week. I

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>don't hate it. I just think the Colts are are

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a good I mean, River did look done for a while.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>He looks a little better now. I mean I think

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're you know, I think Michael Pittman Junior being

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>back is definitely helpful, getting him like a real playmarker

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in that offense. So especially with Adams being questionable, I'm

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna put that one in the in the maybe. I

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>mean I lean that side, so I'll definitely put that

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>one in the maybe. Okay, this is going better than

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>I thought here that I thought we would get all

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>right this one. I'd actually really like to know your

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on because you know, the Vikings looked really good.

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>They've played better, but I kind of like the Cowboys

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>getting more than the touchdown at seven and a half

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings, and I'll lay my case on and

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>then you could say I hate it or I lean

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that way. That's fine, Dalton should start here. I don't

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>really know if that matters whether or not. As long

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>as it's not Ben Denucci, it's fine. It doesn't really

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>matter which one it is. Their line is getting healthier

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>at this point. The Vikings cornerbacks, as we know, are abysmal,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and just the fact that you had Nick Foles who

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do anything, that's really why you weren't able to

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>necessarily exploit them. The defense played pretty well against the Steelers,

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as much as the Steelers kind of like meled it

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit like the Cowboys defense played a

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>little better.

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>They do have some injuries back there, but they're coming

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>off a bye. If Zeke's gonna be a little healthier.

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings are on a short week. This seems like

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of a little bit of a trap game here

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>for the Vikings, as they're flying high getting more than

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. I kind of like the Cowboys to keep

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this game close.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because then the other contest it's seven, So we

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 2>got a little better number there at seven and a half,

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 2>which I like on the hook perspective, And frankly, look,

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think the Vikings played that well and they

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 2>won the game. So like, okay, they won, Kirk Cousins

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>gets to run around to be like I won a

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 2>game on Monday Night football. Now look at me. I'm

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 2>no longer oh to nine. I can't stand Kirk Cousins.

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 2>So I know I remember, I have no problem fading

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 2>him here. I have no issue if you want to

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 2>stand on a table and you feel strongly, I don't

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 2>have a strong lean one way or the other.

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>But if I'm gonna fade Kirk Cousins and I get

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>more than a touchdown, okay.

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I I kind of like this one,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll you know. And again it's at seven right now,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven percent of experts in our bed analyzer are

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas. I think, coming off a bye, I think

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a game where they're going to come out

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and play well.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 2>And again, well, the number is Mike McCarthy is ten

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and two against the spread up of a bye in

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 2>his career.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was gonna get to McCarthy in the second.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely right. The other thing is, remember Dalvin Cook,

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>as amazing as he is. I was talking about it

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>on our DFS show today. What do you have thirty

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>two to thirty four touches in this game on a

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>short week, Like there's just so much the guy can do.

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And their receivers are very I mean, Jefferson is great,

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feelin is very very good. And again the Cowboys

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are a little injured in their secondary, but I just

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're going to be able to move.

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Dalton was nearly as bad as he

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>looked in that first game. We've seen Dalton be a

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>competent NFL quarterback. And again, the Vikings defense is really

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing to write home about it. If you give me

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>arrested zeke, you give me the good line, you give

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>me competent quarterback play, at least with the receivers, I

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>think they'll keep it within a touchdo so. I do

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like this game. This one would be one

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>that I would kind of push to get in if

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we were sort of like, well we need one more.

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this one, you know, comes in at fourth

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>on my list, behind the one that we're not going

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to go with with the Eagles. But I like the

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Titans as well as the Chiefs. All right, so do

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you have another lean here that you were looking at?

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 2>The only other game I was looking at, or the

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Patriots laying two and a half or two.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>I think it's two and a half in the contest.

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>It's two and a half in the contest. The consensus

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:27.239
<v Speaker 1>line right now is two though.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Patriots on the road against the Texans laying too,

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's the only other one that I would lean

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>to because I do think that this is the game

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 2>where if the year is going to turn around for

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots, this is it. Yeah, So if they're going

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 2>to be a contender, if they're going to be in

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the conversation point, Look, Shaun Watson's very dangerous. I'm not

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 2>going to debate that. But Damien Harris is going to

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 2>have a monster u DFS in prop players, My favorite

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 2>prop bit of the week is Damien Harris to run

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 2>crazy on this Texans defense.

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that an actual prop bet that they that they list.

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Will Damien Harris run crazy?

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, over over over over, touches, over carries, over yardage,

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>touchdown props. I will be on the daily juice. Damien

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Harris is going to be where I'm gonna ride this

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 2>guy like crazy. So I think he has a monster game.

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I think they play keep away they don't let Watson

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.239
<v Speaker 2>go deep and beat them. Although they will have their

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 2>secondary back, which is good. Gilmore should play and I

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 2>just think the Patriots.

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Is Gilmore gonna play in this game, by the way

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's.

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Going to do. I think that's why I think they

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't play him last week, because I think that they

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 2>knew they didn't need him because of the fact that

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Ravens can't pass. They need him in this game. To

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 2>shop is to stop Watson. Yeah, so put him on

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 2>fuller and see what happens. But I am I think

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots won the game by three.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm inclined to agree with this one. Matt. I'm

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>on that side. I mean, I lean that way. It

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't one of my picks, but I did. I always

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>have like, okay, if Matt comes in, which side of

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>my own if I say something. I was on that side,

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And I've kind of been more and more talking myself

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>into this game as we got there. I was, you know,

0:25:58.040 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that it matters, you know, because I

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>know was two and a half, and it was two

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half when I earlier locked in my pick,

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>which was the Patriots already and now it's moved to

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Sixty two percent of experts in our

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>bed analyzer are on the Patriots. So yeah, I'm thinking.

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 2>There's one game. I can't believe you hadn't brought up yet.

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 2>I thought for sure you.

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Were done, that we've done it. Wait, I don't have

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>which did you think I was giving?

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought you'd be on the Falcons.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, so that that is fair. The Falcons were

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>like my runner up pick of the ones that I

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>actually felt I would be totally fine if you were like,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to take the Falcons against the Saints with

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Jameis Winston. I just feel like, you know, first of all,

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Winston just historically he's not great as a favorite, great

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>as underdog because he's crazy and he just is going

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball until they would catch up. The Falcons,

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>off of by their defense, has been playing better. I

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>don't hate the Falcons getting four and a half, but

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not one of my you know, I wouldn't push

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for it over any of.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>The Pro Football Focus Play the week is the first

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 2>it's plus five.

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's four and a half for us.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't really I keep on, but my argument to

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 2>them was is it Winston you're fading or Taysom Hill? Yeah,

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 2>because who's playing quarterback? But way do we know who's

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 2>playing quarterback for them?

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Do we?

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Are we positive it's Jamis? Because if here Jamis fine,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 2>but they've got another option at quarterback.

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you know, if they were gonna do this,

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>if they were gonna go to Taysom Hill, then they

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>just why would they bring in Winston? Like the same

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>thing with Bridgewater. You have Taysom Hill on your roster,

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're willing to turn it over to him, why

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>are you bringing in an actual NFL.

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 2>And why are they paying him what they're paying.

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Him because they think he's the future.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess, well, now is your future because your quarterback's

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>got a punctured lung.

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I get it. But that's why that the same thing

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>last year with Bridgewater. I mean, what you know, I

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>get it? Well, I think for me and again, this

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>consensus spread is four and sixty three percent are still

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on Atlanta. That definitely was a game that I was like, Okay,

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe i'll talk about this. Frankly, I kind of thought

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>there's no way you would go for it, so I.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Want to go for it. I mean, I just figured you.

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess that was gonna be young because I don't.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 2>I have no real harsh feeling on your way. I

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 2>just don't. I just think that it's a dangerous pick

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 2>because of the Tasom Hill angle. I just I don't

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>know who the quarterback is. If you told me that

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Tasom Hill was hurt and it was all Jamos, then

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd probably subscribe to it and go fine, ride the Falcons. Yeah,

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 2>but it's not. I mean, they have a plan B

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that if Winston comes out and search Thorn picks, they

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 2>got a guy who can play the quarterback spot at

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 2>least competently. It scares me to go ahead. And it's

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 2>a big rivalry game. I mean, these two teams hate

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 2>each other.

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, I just I don't know, man, I like

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. I hate betting against them.

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I get it's not Drew Brees, but yeah, I don't.

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have a great feeling. I definitely lean

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons. And if I'm gonna go one way, it

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is with the Falcons. If you came in here and

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>said I want the Saints, I'd say, no, I'm off

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that game. But you know, I do think it's gonna

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>be Jamis, so to be fair, though, I think they're

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna mix in Hill a lot more than they would

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with Breeze. But I think the primary quarterback is gonna

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be Winston. But we'll put that one to the side.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll recap it at the end when we are finalizing

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>our five picks if we don't decide to use the

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>bye week. Although tagging it through, I don't hate this

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>week quite as much as I did before we got

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>into it. But we can get through it. Let's go

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>through the remaining games that we've gotten again. I have

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>just written them down randomly. Don't read anything into if

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I say the favorite or whatever. First, the Bucks laying

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>three and a half to the Rams in Tampa. This

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is Monday Night football, I believe, right.

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Yep, correct?

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel so at first?

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Guess it's gonna be a tough game for Tom Brady. Okay,

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 2>so this is the Rams. Do what you have to

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 2>do to beat Tampa. They're gonna rush and blitz the

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 2>holy heck out of Brady and make him very uncomfortable.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna make him move off of his spot. So

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 2>on the other side, I don't think Tampa moves the

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 2>ball much and scores much. So my question is what

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>does Jared Goff do on the road against that Tampa defense.

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't like this Tampa defense at all. I gotta

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 2>ride the Tampa defense. I would ride. I would take

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the three and a half points here and take the Rams.

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. If I'm forced to choose a side, it would

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>be with the Rams. I mean, whitworth being down scares

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>me because you know what GoF does under pressure. We

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have seen it a million times. I I feel like

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I could talk myself into either side of this game

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>if I really had to, Like, I don't.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Have it's a great game. It's a big game.

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Both it's a great game. Yes, that's true. It's a

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.479
<v Speaker 1>great game. I don't have a great lean on it,

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So it would be one that you know, you could

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>talk me into it if you were like Dan, I

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>feel great about the Rams, but I don't like it

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>more than our picks. But yeah, I mean I guess

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that I would probably lean towards the Rams. But it's

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>just kind of an ugly game. I don't really want it.

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>How about the Bengals getting one and a half from

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington in Washington?

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if I had to go with it. I

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 2>would take the Bengals. Yeah, but I mean, this is

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 2>just this game and the Lions and the Panthers game.

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even gonna watch these games. They're so bad.

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 2>It's just a horrific football games.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I don't want any part of this. And

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, this is another illness to Higgins miss

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>practice with an illness. I have no idea if it's

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>just an illness. A lot of times they like to specify,

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like Duke Johnson this week, this is a non COVID

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>related illness. They have not specified that with Higgins. They

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have not specified that with Clyde Edwards Dulaire. So I'm

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>not I don't know what's gonna happen. But yeah, this

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is a game where like I mean, I'll watch because

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I have to watch every game because I have to

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>do a recap show for fantasy purposes. But I would

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>not watch this game or lay any money on this game.

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I would just stay away from it. And again, same

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>thing with the lines. Now I will say that the

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Lion's getting one and a half from the Panthers. There

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>are so many variables in this stupid game. You've got

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Deonder Swift, who essentially has been declared out. Now, I mean,

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's he's unlikely to play with

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the concussion, that just game to light. Matthew Stafford is

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>questionable with the thumb. Kenny Galladay was at practice yesterday,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>then there was a report he was at practice, and

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't that practice today, so nobody really knows. Meanwhile,

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater is likely to sit just I I mean,

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>can we just skip this game because nobody should be

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>betting on this game?

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Right yep?

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very good. How about the Dolphins length three and

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Broncos in Denver?

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>This is hard. I mean, this is I hate Drew Locke.

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Their offense looked so bad on the road against the Patriot,

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 2>mean against the Raiders last week with four interceptions he

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 2>threw or three interceptions.

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It was playing this game by the right.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 2>And so that's why I was like, well, ripping my play,

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 2>look out for ripping. Okay, I mean is there that

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 2>big of a difference between the ripping and Locke? I

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know. The quarterback play has been so bad. John

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Elway needs to stop drafting quarterbacks and let somebody else

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 2>do it, because they can't pick quarterbacks saved life. It's embarrassing.

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 2>It's the Broncos at home at altitude. I don't like Tua.

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Like you guys know. Their numbers are still bad offensively,

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 2>but their defense is scoring.

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Especially offensively with Tua like, they have not played as

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>well offensively, and.

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 2>That was predictable. We knew. I said it they at

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>the switch. I said, this is stupid. This is a

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 2>bad move for their offense. But they're not doing it

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 2>for their offense. They're doing it because I want to

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 2>sell jerseys and may people think that they're going to

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 2>be there. If I had to bet, I would take

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the home dog at three and a half. But is

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 2>that what it is? It is three and a half, right,

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 2>three and a half correct. I would take the three

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 2>and a half for the hook, But I don't have

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 2>a great feel because the Dolphins are the better team.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I lean towards the Dolphins if I had to

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>go somewhere, just because I you know, the Broncos are awful, man,

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and that The one thing I will say is the

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins defense is legitimate like that. I mean, Brian Floores fantastic,

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>like maybe Coach of the Year considering what he has

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>done with that team right now. And the Broncos are

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just a mess. Man Like, they're a mess, and I

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really care if it's ripping or lock. By the way,

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't consider that a huge downgrade at this point

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in their careers. But this is what's funny to me, Matt.

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>That is the most one sided game in our bet analyzer,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's on the Dolphins at thine and a half

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty three percent, and that that is the side that

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm on. But I don't feel good. I as a

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>general rule, I don't love betting against the Broncos.

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 2>It's out in two. It's a warm weather team in

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 2>cold weather conditions, yep. And all they do is run

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the football. So it's like if Lindsey can get free,

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 2>it's I mean, the Dolphins have been living off of

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 2>their special teams in defensive points. At some point that

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 2>runs out, yep. So I don't like the Broncos defense.

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 2>The Broncos give up what forty five points to the Raiders,

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 2>whatever it was. I mean, it's a bad football team.

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 2>But there's a lot of exterior conditions there outside of

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos players with altitude and weather and you know,

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 2>cold and the Dolphins don't like playing. Look at their

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 2>record in New England in December. Okay, it's not great,

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 2>So it's tough to back the Dolphins there.

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think every point that you've made about why

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it is tough to back the Dolphins is legitimate. And

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I just can't back the Broncos under any circumstances, Like

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I just couldn't final game unless I missed one. The

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Charge laying eight and a half to the Jets in

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles.

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, if it wasn't for that stupid haircut, I would

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 2>say I'd go with the Chargers. But anybody that's gonna

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 2>let the strength and conditioning coach cut their hair, I'm

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 2>questioning the logic of where they are here with Justin Herbert.

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>So this is the second podcast that I've done that

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>has referenced feeling worse about Justin Herbert and the Chargers

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>because of the haircut. So I really like that we're at.

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Not the haircut itself, it's who he had do the haircut.

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 2>He asked his strength coach to cut his hair. I mean,

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 2>his hair is his thing. Okay, that's the thing for

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the big guy with the flock with the locks and whatever,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 2>and that that's the surfer boy or Oregon like, that's him.

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 2>To go ahead and cut the serial killer, you know,

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 2>fade whatever you want to call that haircut and to

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 2>have it be like, oh, I didn't care. I want

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:49.720
<v Speaker 2>to do something to I need to make a change.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 2>So it gave the Clippers to the strength coach justin dude,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 2>what's up? Man? Wow? So based on that Jets plus

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half, well, that.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Is a scientific analysis. I think I'm more than willing

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to pass on this game at eight and a half.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I would still take Chargers regardless of the

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>hair guy. But it isn't something that I feel comfortable

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>playing just because I mean maybe that was Joe Flacco's

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>game of his life against the Patriots. But you know,

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>if you do have if Paraman is going to play

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 1>in this game, you do have Denzel Nims who is

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>stepping up looking a little better. You've got Jamison Crowder's

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna play a full compliment of snaps, unlike what he

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>did against the Patriots. I think they can at least

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 1>score some points. Now, again, the Jets secondary, I mean,

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>their cornerback group is a joke right now. Brian Poole

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is just placed on my or you know, they cut

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Pierre to Seer, you know. Plus Austin is out, so

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand how you're ever gonna stop the Chargers.

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't really matter. I don't really want to

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>go near it. Okay, So let's recap Matt. This is interesting,

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and again I'm going to I'll tweet it out and

0:36:57.719 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt will tweet it out whether or not we decide

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to use one of our weeks because we have to

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 1>use two over the next six weeks. Now, I think, Matt,

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we have said that we're thinking of using one over Thanksgiving. Correct,

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>that's just kind of what you want to do, So

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we will have that one built in, so we might

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>use this one. I will let you know. But these

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are a leans, certainly the Chiefs for the contest, at

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>least the Chiefs getting minus six and a half to

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. That one is a lock in. It's much

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>higher now, so it's gonna go high. And you've heard

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 1>our thoughts on that one. The Titans plus six and

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a half against the Ravens. Again, that is moving in

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the other direction right now. So we like the Titans there,

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>We like the Jaguars gross getting ten and a half

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>from the Steelers. That's still where the line is last

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>time I checked everywhere. So if you can get that,

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I really do feel like this is just a letdown

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>spot for the Steelers. So then we've got a few

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>other games, Matt, that we've talked about, really three unless

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about the Falcons getting four and

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a half from the Saints, which I don't think you do.

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you like the Colts lank two and a half

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Packers, and the Patriots lank two and a

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>half to the Texans? And I kind of liked the

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys getting seven and a half from from the Vikings.

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So of those, do you have a favorite one that

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you like? I mean to assume it's one of the

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 1>two that you put out there.

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Boy, is there I would prefer I would, oh gosh.

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the Patriots saying too and a half to

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the Texans.

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 2>I want to the Patriots, but I'm gonna get called

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 2>a homer for it.

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that's my FA I think I like

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that one too, Matt. I think if if if you

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>were like Dan, what game do you like of those?

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Once we start talking about a little bit more, I

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man, like just the Patriots now that they're

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of back into it a little bit. And I

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>will say that I do think that a couple of

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>things for the Patriots. Number one, I think it's very possible.

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think you mentioned this that it's possible that

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Cam as bad as he looked when he returned from COVID,

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like he could have still been as much as he

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>said it was asymptomatic. Like you know from personal experience, Matt,

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that it messes with you.

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 2>The brain fog is real. The brain fog is is

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 2>a thing nobody wants to acknowledge because you can't measure it.

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 2>It's not a fever, it's not a know, a cough,

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 2>it's just you don't feel right. And I agree, I agree.

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And he has played better. I mean, he still

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is not a great passer. But again I do think

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that the you know, emergence of Jacoby Myers is a

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>big deal. He is playing great. I think Damien Harris

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>looks great. I like how they involved Rex Burkhead. I mean,

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm gaining a little confidence in this team. And conversely,

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I have very little comments in the Texans. So if

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you're giving it underfield, no Matt. I kind of like

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that game more and more so I do wanting to

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>go with that one. If you ate not a Homer,

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll make that pick, yeah.

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Because look it's the Look at the Texans against the run.

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Look at the numbers they give up. They just give

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:44.439
<v Speaker 2>up huge gash chunk plays yep in the run game.

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So all right, So, I mean, I won't quote unquote

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>stand on a table, but I will say that I

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>do like, particularly the Cowboys getting seven and a half,

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>okay from the Vikings, because I do think that they're

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>going to come out of the buy. I think this

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a letdown game for the Vikings

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>coming off that big divisional win. I'm not saying that

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are gonna win, but I do like them

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep this close enough too.

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:09.919
<v Speaker 2>It's fading the Vikings. You know, I'm gonna run it.

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So you're good, okay. So if we do go with it,

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>we like the Chiefs mind of six and a half

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 1>to the Raiders, the Titans getting six and a half

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>from the Ravens, the Jaguars getting ten and a half

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:21.399
<v Speaker 1>from the Steelers, the Patriots laying two and a half

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Texans, and the Cowboys getting seven and a

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>half to the Vikings. I don't know, Matt. I do

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>not hate this, Okay. I mean that probably means we'd

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>go on five. But I don't necessarily hate this. So

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>let's let it marinate for a little bit and then

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>let's see. I will say, if Devanta Adams turns out

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to be out, I would definitely consider swapping the Colts

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.399
<v Speaker 1>in for the Cowboys in that sense. We can talk

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>about that because I really think that that is a huge,

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>huge letdown for their offense, even if when Allen's started returned.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So all right, you feel, you know, maybe we'll think

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>about it. We'll talk about it then a little more.

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's do it, right, I'm good, good enough for me.

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>All right. That is it for today's show. Thanks everybody

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.879
<v Speaker 1>for stopping by. Reminder listen to The Daily Juice, Matt's

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>daily podcast, which is great. Tune into the YouTube channel

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:08.320
<v Speaker 1>YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros for Matt's live stream

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:12.399
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday mornings eleven a m. To noon Eastern time.

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I will give Matt my props. I remembered last week

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>both of them hit right, Yes, excellent. I will give

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:20.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure I will give Matt my props on Saturday

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>night so I don't leaven hanging again. It's a great time.

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.359
<v Speaker 1>So thanks everybody for listening for this podcast. We will

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to you next week.