WEBVTT - I Like My Lambs Noisy

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Ketty arm Strong

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jettie and he Armstrong and Yetty.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Listen is that President Trump is going to become the

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>first sitting president to attend the Super Bowl.

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Every time the cuts to tell us swich he's gonna

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>lean in? Like, also, I'm here too, Hi, Mama Kelsey, Hi,

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I just saw Travis Kelsey asked, doing those media appearances

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>all week long would be hard to do while you're

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>preparing for the biggest moment of your life all week long.

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>But Travis Kelcey was just asked, do you know what

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Taylor's gonna wear to the game? Yeah? Did he punch them?

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't he punch them? He laughed, and he laughed,

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and he said, I'm sure she's gonna wear red. There

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you go, that's a charmac. Yeah. Man.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 3>So who could forget this charming young woman? Catherine Mayer,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 3>she was the This was just before she became the

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 3>CEO of NPR for.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Our most tricky disagreements. Seeking the truth and seeking to

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 4>convince others of the truth might not be the right

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 4>place to start in fact, our reverence for the truth

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 4>might be a distraction that's getting in the way of

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 4>fine and common ground and getting things done.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>That is so insane as somebody who is allegedly a journalist.

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 3>She is not a journalist. She is an activist and

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 3>a propagandist. And she is with her blonde hair and

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 3>her straight white teeth and her lovely shape and her

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 3>soothing voice, trying to explain this hole seeking the truth thing.

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>That's an interference with our goal, even outside of journalism.

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And tell me a realm of life where you like that,

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>any any any anything where you like the the truth

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is getting in the way. When when is that ever

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a thing? Oh?

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, when does that ever not turn rancid and and

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>and and infected in a relationship. I'll just keep these secrets.

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 3>He's better off not knowing. Yeah, nice attitude. Play that

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 3>one more time, Michael. It's so incredible.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 4>For our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth and seeking

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 4>to convince others of the truth might not be the

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 4>right place to start. In fact, our reverence for the

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 4>truth might be a distraction that's getting in the way

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 4>of finding common ground and getting things done.

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>That's like, Wow, dangerous lenin Stalin sort of crap right there.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean just gonna say Hermann Gerring is in hell saying, Wow,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 3>she's got it down?

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Is she still in charge NPR? I believe she is? Wow? Yeah.

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, do you remember their name? Uri Berliner?

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 3>He was the guy who it was like ten months

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 3>ago he wrote an essay for The Free Press in

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>which he explained why he was resigning from NPR, where

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>he'd worked for twenty five years, and he said much

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 3>more in sorrow than anger, having they lost the trust

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 3>of a large segment of the country. Once curious, open minded, rigorous,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>if liberal leaning, public radio news had evolved into a

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>doctrinaire source of what I called one story after another

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>about instances of supposed racism, transphobia, signs of the climate apocalypse,

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Israel doing something bad, in the dire threat of Republican policies.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 3>In twenty twenty alone, we dismissed the very possibility of

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>a COVID lab league in China, and our then managing

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 3>editor refused even to cover Hunter Biden's laptop, call it

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 3>not really a story, and he reminds us of some

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 3>of the things he said. But now the crisis is

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 3>in at hand. Republicans control Congress in the White House,

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 3>and they seem serious about what had previously been ritualistic

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 3>GOP threats to cut public media. And indeed, Catherine Mayer,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 3>the delightful woman we just heard from who called Berliners

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 3>free press essay disrespectful, hurtful and demeaning, Oh my god,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>has been called before the House Subcommittee on Delivery on

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Government Efficiency, that's the doge fellas as soon as early March.

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So do you have the numbers? I saw some numbers

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>footing around the other day. That's about a half a

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars five hundred million dollars. It gets spread around

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>NPR and PBS outlets around the country. So it's not

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>going to happen to have that, and it's not a

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>ton of money, but you know, it's a half billion

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>dollars more that's being spread around to stations were on

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of taxpayer money to not to have as many commercials

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or higher better reporters or whatever you want to do

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>with it.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 3>And if you have state sponsored propaganda media for the

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 3>domestic audience, the sides of the budget isn't the issue.

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's very existence that is going to be

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 3>absolutely terrible.

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I personally, I know though a number of very smart

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>people who you cannot convince them that NPR is not

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't know they're straight down the middle, didn't They have

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>no reason to be biased because they don't have to

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>take advertisers. I know, and I've actually said to people

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>before seriously, and because I don't want to get into

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a fight with people that I'm friends with, but sit

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>down anytime for a half an hour, let's listen together.

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll point out all the places where it's just insanely biased. Yeah.

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, as I've said a million times, I'm

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 3>thinking of getting it tattooed on my forehead. Intelligence and

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 3>wisdom are two completely different things and practically unrelated.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you just.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Never get a perspective, you might be both intelligent and wise,

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>but not realize because you hadn't seen the other side

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 3>of it. And I think a lot of people haven't.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, Uri Berliner, the point of his piece today

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 3>is he suggests a series of questions to ask the

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 3>head of NPR, both Ms Mayer, who would have been

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 3>an absolutely outstanding Nazi propagandas gandist, and Paul Berger, CEO

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 3>of PBS. Can you provide examples of NPR coverage that

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 3>criticized or questioned progressive narratives on crime, immigration, youth, gender, medicine,

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 3>or climate change. Ms Mayor you said, regarding your previous

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 3>role as the CEO of the Wikipedia Foundation Wikimedia Foundation,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 3>that our reverence for the truth might be a distraction

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 3>that quote we just heard. What exactly did you mean?

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you still believe it? And if so, how is

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 3>such a view compatible with leadership of a news organization.

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Another question, The immediate past CEO of NPR, the late

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>John Lansing, declared that diversity, equity, and inclusion is the

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 3>north star of our organization?

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it still?

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 3>If not, why and if so, please explain how DEI

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 3>influences NPR's hiring, training, and coverage. Love this, especially because

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 3>all that's illegal. In twenty twenty one, his next question goes,

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 3>I found eighty seven registered Democrats among NPR editorial staff

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 3>residing in DC, where the network is headquartered.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Eighty seven.

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>There were zero Republicans, along with forty four registered with

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 3>no party. Is NPR doing anything to address this seeming

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 3>lack of diversity of viewpoints, such as hiring journalists from

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 3>conservative media recruiting military veterans or seeking candidates who attended

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>religious colleges and state universities.

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's a question I'd go with, do you realize that

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>latenax is stupid and that Hispanic people don't like it?

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's only over educated white women that ever even

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>came up with this stupid term and keep using it,

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But you use it all the time on PBS and NPR.

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 3>In fact, are you aware that LATINX people hate LATINX

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 3>more than anybody else?

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>It's stupid? Are you aware of that? That'd be my

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>question be a good question.

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Do you have regrets about how NPR dealt with the

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Biden laptop story, the Lablaku theory, or more recently,

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 3>President Joe Biden's apparent cognitive decline while in the White House.

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Love these questions.

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>NPR says it gets one percent of its annual operating

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>budget directly from federal funding. A larger portion, though reportedly

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 3>around ten percent, flows indirectly to NPR through member stations

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>that acquire NPR programming with support from the Corporation for

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 3>Public Broadcasting. Would you be open to a new financing

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>structure that lets local member stations keep more money.

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>In which case you would what probably end up with

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>super left leaning NPR versions in San Francisco, which you

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>already have, but maybe more moderate or right leaning NPR

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>stations in you know, Oklahoma City, May I don't know.

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, his next question is kind of hint at that

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 3>very thing. It could happen, I.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Mean, because well, how would we feel about that. I'd

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>never thought about this before, but I think that'd be

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>fine for public radio if it more or less reflected

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that city area's beliefs and things. If you're gonna have

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>bias at all, as opposed to the way it currently is,

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like insanely biased every every example in the country.

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, and this is the problem with right yeah, obviously. Uh,

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 3>this is the problem with government media in general. Is

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 3>once you step onto that that twisty, slippery road, you're

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna find yourself in really uncomfortable places without good answers.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, for instance, I could absolutely make the case

0:09:51.000 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 3>that NPR ought to be studiously carefully run by an

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 3>ideologically diverse, you know, board that makes sure every issue

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 3>looks at both sides in a fair way, steel mans

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 3>each other's arguments, as the saying goes, But then you

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 3>run into the problem. And actually lefties bring this up.

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 3>They bring it up in ridiculous ways. But all right,

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 3>what if the question is should child molesters be allowed

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 3>to get child porn?

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Or you know something truly horrific, that's a good one,

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a great ethical dilemma.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Or or you know, like confused adolescent girls ought to

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 3>be fed sterilizing hormones and have their healthy breasts cut

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 3>off if they decide one day, under pressure from an

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 3>activist teacher, that they admire that.

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>They're a boy.

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't particularly relish the idea of having somebody make

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 3>that case because I find it repugnant.

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So you just you find yourself in a place you

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be, right, hmm, Well, what we got

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>currently is ridiculous and it's laugh out loud funny regularly.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, their attempt to be the news.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, and they're how every story or eight out of

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>nine is who is the victim of something somewhere on earth?

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if there is a painter in Afghanistan who

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 3>no longer can get the blue paint because the US

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 3>is embargoed something or other, they will spend ten minutes

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 3>on the bitter sadness of this poor Afghan artist who

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 3>can't get blue paint.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>There was a horrifying school shooting somewhere in the world

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the other day. Where was that Sweden someplace? And I

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was listening to the NPR version where they went at

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>length about how we've exported this culture to the country.

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're to blame. Gun owners are in the United

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>States are to blame for school shootings in other countries.

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's make that clear. Because nobody has any agency. They're

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>all just victims of what ugly conservatives do. That's it whole.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>In the Palestinians who have no agency, that's victims. That's

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that weird mindset that you're always talking about the oppressor

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>oppressed if you buy into that mindset. So whoever's got

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>power is the reason for all bad things happening. So

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>United States says power the biggest economy and biggest culture

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and everything like that. So any shootings around the world,

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's our fault.

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 3>And anybody who's a victim or has less power is

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 3>automatically good and virtuous and right, no matter what their

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 3>opinion is. And a lot of people listening are like, dude,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 3>you can't oversimplify it like that.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>No, that's actually the philosophy. I've said more than once.

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 3>If my dog has spoused that philosophy, I would kick

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 3>him for being that dumb.

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And I am not a dog kicker. Oh my god,

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>But you got people.

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Graduating from quote unquote, I might vomit elite universities who

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 3>spout this nonsense all day long and think they're wise

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 3>and educated.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Man, if they're going to finally look into the funding

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of NPR radio and like get to the brass tacks

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>on it, I would love that. I'll watch that on

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>c SPAN. More on the way.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 2>Diplomatic shock waves are reverberating across the Middle East after

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>President Trump unexpectedly announced plans for a US takeover of

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Gaza that would include forcing Palestinians out. The idea was

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>quickly rejected by Jordan and Egypt, countries the President says

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 2>would take in displaced refugees. Saudi Arabia also denounce the proposal.

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 5>The Ministry of Foreign Affairs affirmed that the Kingdom's position

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 5>on the establishment of the Palestinian state is firm, steadfast

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 5>and unwavering, and that this firm position is not subject

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 5>to negotiation or outbidding.

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Hmm, do they feel that way behind the scenes. I

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Time will tell.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 3>I speak fluent Arabic, I can translate that we have

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 3>been getting by by paying lip service to the Palestinian

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>people while doing nothing and letting them continue to die.

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>We would like to continue that plan. So it's Oscar season.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking about that trans movie that got so

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>many nominations. But some movies are in the news. There

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is a new list out of best movies of all time.

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It's compiled from like a whole bunch of interesting sources

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>IMBD and Rotten Tomatoes and all these different things that

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>people vote on. There's like ten different examples. They compiled

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>them and gave them a score and came up with

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the fifty best. That's as good as any way to

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>do it off the top of your head. What's your

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite movie of all time?

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>For years I've said Unforgiven Clinic Western. Would that be

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>different than if I ask you what's the best movie

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of all time? Or would it be the same question.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's sure similar. And I was looking at this

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>list and wondering, has anybody watched Paths of Glory or

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Seven Samurai who didn't take a film class in college.

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do people watch that? I don't even know

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Paths of Glory. I think it's a young Kirk Douglas,

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's a World War One trenches movie. Truly good? Huh.

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But I mean it's black and white and dark, and

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, those kind of movies hard to follow.

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>But I just wonder does anybody ever watch those movies?

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>They often make your list. One thing I like about

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this list is Citizen Kane is not I don't even

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>know where Citizen Kane shows up on? Here is it on?

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Does it make the top fifty? It's not, certainly not

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten. My favorite movie of all time,

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think is Apocalypse Now is at thirty four. I

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>almost went with Saving Private Ryan. But here's your top ten.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>It's lost to Shakespeare in Love for the Oscars. By

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the way, never forget, here's your top ten. And this

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>has got a lot more to do with people watching

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>them and liking them more than critics. I guess number

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>ten pulp fiction, And whenever you do a list like that,

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know it's going to tend toward recent. Nobody's taken there,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody's on the gay Hey, kids, I rented Pads of Glory.

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Then we're gonna watch seven Samurai tomorrow night. Now they're

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>black and white, silent film. That's right, nobody watches that stuff,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>so there's a presentism bias. Number ten pulp fiction. Damn

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>good movie. I'll watch it just recently with my high

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>school kid. It's a heck of a movie. We did

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>skip a scene or two so much buggery. Yeah, exactly,

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really need that. Uh number nine, you know what,

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>We're down to one minute, and I don't want to

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>rush through this because I think I can't wait. But seriously,

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>who watches those art films? Does anybody? Unless you've heard

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>about it so much you're curious enough go out and

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>watch Citizen Kane? Are you having date night anything? Unless

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you got a really weird boyfriend or girlfriend, do you

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>do that? I just don't think they do. And this

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is true of music to some extent. Too innovative isn't

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>always enjoyable. Right, broke new ground paved the way for

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>this style. Doesn't mean I need to see it now

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or hear it now.

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it turned into something that's a lot more enjoyable,

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 3>comfortable for most people to watch. But the early innovative stuff.

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes it's it's just just tough.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you, Katie and Michael, also, what's your

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what's your favorite movie all time? When we come back,

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>among other things, and we'll get to this list, and

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we got some other stuff. I have plenty of good stuff.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be all It's gonna be a bang up

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>half hour. I'll tell you that if you missed a

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>second to get the podcast. Armstrong and Getty on demand

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>are Strong and Getty. We are gonna fight this fight.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 3>I am gonna stand with you in this fight, and

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 3>we will win.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>We win. We will win. We will win. We will win.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>We will win. We will win. We won't rest. We

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>won't rest. We won't rest. We won't rest.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 4>They are those that have said that we made face

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 4>a constitutional crisis.

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 7>I want you to.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Know that the crisis is here.

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 8>We will not take this from Donald Trump and Elon.

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Mus We have got to tell Elon must nobody elected judge.

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, a lot of we are a war hit

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the streets. Sounds like you're inspiring and inspiring an insurrection

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to me, But I'm guessing on this one. This is

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>completely guessing. But I think they're on the wrong side

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of this by a lot. I think the majority of

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Americans are loving this digging into these various programs and

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>finding stuff that's a waste of money. It's just in

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the lunch room and a guy getting coffee in there,

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the top salespeople around here saying how many

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars for Politico subscriptions? That story you brought

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>us earlier where taxpayers were buying Politico subscriptions for some

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>agency in DC, And I brought up the yeah, well,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that's about the same as the eight million dollars for

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the trans play in Ireland or whatever. I've had a

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>number of people bring this up to me in real life.

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>This cutting this just insane stuff that condoms for the

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Tally banner whatever the hell?

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, right, Yeah, I just I think it's desperate flailing.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>They don't know what to say. Oh yeah, the idea

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk is evil for trying to get rid

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff. All right, we'll see how this plays out.

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So I brought up the it's Oscar season. Been talking

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>about movies. There's this new list of the fifty greatest

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>movies of all time where they compiled a bunch of

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>online thingies and took their average scores, and this is

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>what they came up with. So I did. I just

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>noticed in Uh, I'll go with the top sixteen because

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at number sixteen is the highest ranking Star Wars movie

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of any kind. Well, first of this, Michael, what's your

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite movie of all time or what do you think

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is the best movie of all time?

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, for me, I mean it's Araplane, the comedy movie

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 9>way back when. So I have a fond memories of

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 9>watching it with my dad. And also it taught me

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 9>you know what comedy was, I mean, you know what

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 9>crazy comedy was, and that's I was.

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Then you spent some time in a Turkish prison. No,

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that was handy. That is a great movie if you're

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about like influence or people know it or

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>references or whatever. Yeah, rank way up there. Anyway, Katie, It's.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 10>A toss up between two from Sawshank Redemption to Life

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 10>Is Beautiful.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Those are two of my all time beautiful too fine

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 1>choices both. Yeah, Shawshank Redemption ranks very high in this

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>list of what I could about to get to it

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>quick reveal, I've never seen that movie really, Yeah.

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 3>Right up the Gladiator. It's it's it's every bit as

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 3>good as you've gotten the impression.

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe it. I just I've never been in the

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>mood for it. Every time I think of it, I

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>think I should have seen it at the time when

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it was hot. Yeah, it's it's not a light comedy.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not a Star Wars guy. So the highest

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>ranking Star Wars movie is Star Wars Episode five, The

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Umpire Strikes Back from nineteen eighty Did you say Empire Umpire?

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Just because if you said Umpire, I think you're confused

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 3>about the plot.

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Empire. Ah, So the only Star Wars movie they

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 1>got in the top sixteen is that one? Why are

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you shaking your head like that? Katie? Know that I

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>your friend and colleague, huge Star Wars fan, But would

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>you have but would you choose a different one? If

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have one of the Star Wars movies from

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole franchise break into the top fifteen, would it

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>be that one?

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 9>Fine?

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's as good as they get, but a whole

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Lord of the Rings. We just don't like wookies,

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>do you, Katie? And nailed that three three Lord of

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>the Rings movies make it in the top fifteen like

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the greatest filmmaking ever made. They are extraordinary. I don't

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>dig that sort of thing at all. I just I'm

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 1>not into fantasy that sort of stuff. But the movie

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>making part of it is just freaking amazing. That's Peter

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Jackson stuff. Is that right?

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 10>I have such a hard problem escaping from reality with

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 10>those kind of movies. I just picture that director call

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 10>cut and the Hobbits going off and having a cigarette

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 10>or something.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>I can't at their hairy feet. Interesting problem that is anyway.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 9>Soon as are Hanson's movies are Smoking in the Bandit

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.959
<v Speaker 9>Blazing Saddles and Doctor Schafhoga, Oh Blazing Saddle.

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>It's quite the spanning the globe of kind of movies.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Hell of a film Festival eleven. I do like Smoking

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the bat Okay, I don't even know Grave of the

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Fireflies from nineteen eighty eight at thirteen. The Dark Knight

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is a joker vehicle? Is that correct? Batman? Batman is twelve?

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Number eleven the highest ranking Lord of the Rings movie. Okay,

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>now at top ten I mentioned pulp Fiction number nine. Well,

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>what's the highest ranking fellowship The Lord of the Ring

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is the Fellowship of the Ring from all one Yeah,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>first one, Yeah, okay. Number ten Pulp Fiction. As a mention,

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that is an amazing movie. Number nine The Good, the Bad,

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Ugly. Happy to see that on the list

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>as a guy who's a big fan of that kind

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of movie. I tried to watch that not terribly long ago,

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>did not enjoy it. Really. I love that movie, but

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're used to the modern pace of movies, right,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>it is so slow compared to the modern world. I

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>tried to watch it with my kids and it was

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>just killing them. It's like a punishment for them. And

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that's from nineteen sixty six. Number eight Spirited Away from one.

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that movie. Spirited Away, No, okay. Number

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>seven The seven Samurai, which you have to watch if

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you take a film class from nineteen fifty four. Fine,

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>good for you. Congratulations to Samurai. Too long. Five would

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have been playing five samurais plenty of Samurai. How many

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Samurai do we need? Uh? Number six Good Fellas Give

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>me a break, right. You can't hardly get better than

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that movie. The Godfather Part Two at number five. Schindler's

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>List at number four, do you feel like you're being

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>mean if you don't put Schindler's List at the top.

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I like Schindler's List. I just don't get bad being

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>an anti semi from the Seinfeld episode, you fell asleep

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>during Schindler's List number three, Shawshank Redemption number two. Twelve

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Angry Men Again, I think ten Angry Men would have

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>been plenty. You get two of the angry Men with

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>a couple of samurais, go have their own movie, and uh,

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it might have been a good, good film. Twelve Angry Men.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I've ever seen that. Oh goodness, second

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>best movie of all time. I've seen one of the

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a very very famous play for a long time.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure I've seen some version of it. It's a jury movie, right, Yeah.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 3>Essentially eleven to one bigoted jury is going to convict

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 3>a black man of murder, I think it is, and

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 3>one loan hold out. It's very uh to kill a

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 3>mockingbirtish in its.

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Themes and what they have is the greatest movie of

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>all time The Godfather from nineteen seventy two, which is

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>an amazing movie and I think ranks up there with

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lord of the Ring stuff in terms of like

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>movie making. I mean that whole backyard wedding scene and

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. It's just incredible, just incredible. But I

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>just thought it was interesting that this list. I don't

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>see Citizen Kane anywhere, which used to be Like if

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you ask critics, they always put it number one or two. Whatever.

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Good for you, congratulations, you're smarter than me. You like

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Citizen Kane. Give me a real movie. Let me look

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>through the top fifty three of anything jumps out Amadeus.

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh loved it. Alien number forty oh, one of the

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>great suspense movies ever made. Yeah, Lawrence Arabia is cool

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>movie making, but again very slow, very slow. Can they

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.959
<v Speaker 1>speed up old timey movies? Just like the way we

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>were talking earlier about listening to podcasts at one and

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>a half time speed or if that would work. You

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>take Lawrence of Arabian, you put it on one and

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a half time speed. Maybe my kids could enjoy it

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in some fashion whatsoever?

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, instead of having Lawrence gaze out on the desert

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 3>sands for thirty seconds, just have a quick one second

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 3>that he looked at the sand for a bit and

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 3>then it comes.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>To the next scene exactly. My favorite movie of all time.

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is Apocalypse Now and that's number thirty four.

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man Spider Verse at thirty two. That is a

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>great movie. MM Silence of the Lambs. I like my Lambs.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Noisy Casa Blanket twenty six, Cuckoo's Nests.

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Back when you could present a serial killing madman as

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:25.719
<v Speaker 3>a transgender person.

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Is the shining on there? Oh yes, please it is.

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw it in here somewhere.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 10>I just saw a movie with Jack Nicholson's son, and oh,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 10>my gosh, it is Jack Nicholson Part two, really really

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 10>facial expressions, his mannerisms, the way he laughs.

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's so great. Huh yeah. I think the only

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Jack Nicholson thing on here is uh Cuckoo's Nest, which

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I do really really like that movie. Psycho. I've always

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>felt that's overrated. It's fine.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 3>That's again of its time, influential and important and enjoyable

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 3>or different questions.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Saving Private Ryan is number twenty two. That's a pretty

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>damn good movie. Got a bunch of art films all right.

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they throw those into the list just

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to make them to give their list some credibility, Like

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have Semon Samurai and Harry Carey from

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty two, which I've never seen, and Pads of Glory,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>which nobody wants to watch. If you don't have those

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Modern Times from nineteen thirty six with Charlie Chaplin, I

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like you we're gonna make a list. We gotta

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>put these five on there. Let's spread them out and

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>then get the real movies on their people care about.

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll watch Modern Times by Charlie Chaplin if you change

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 3>the title to old boring Times, gotta be accurate.

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I demand that when people had nothing else to do Times,

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it should be the main of the movie.

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's pop that list up on Armstrong and Geddy dot com.

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Animal House is not on the list. Noo also a

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>very very good movie. The like we've mentioned before, the

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter follow of seventy Sports guy or what is that called.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a super seventy sports super seventy Sports and he

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>has a tweet that he regularly puts out that mentions

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Judden Nelson from Breakfast Club and he says Bender's character

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is more memorable and more amazing than tons of Oscar winners,

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and that that's true. It's kind of like you mentioned

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of the movie Airplane. If you rank it on a

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>like influence in your life, you remember it, it had

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>an impact on you. The list is completely different than

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>if you get into some of the fancy stuff.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Right right now, Katie, you're not like a super girly girl.

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 3>And I mean that is neither a compliment nor an insult.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 3>It just would you say that's more or less accurate?

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Okay, So is it like it is with guys?

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 3>To the extent that you've observed it that there are

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 3>a hand a pretty good handful of touchstone movies that

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:09.959
<v Speaker 3>everybody knows the catchphrases from for their generation. Does that

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 3>happen with women the way it does with guys?

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 10>Somewhat like the more recent comedy stuff like step Brothers,

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 10>I know, you know, like the do we just become

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 10>best friends? Like throwing those type of lines around that

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 10>it's not like a real big point of our conversation.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, Yeah, I've been a golf freak freaks since has

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 3>a little kids, So it's prejudice. But to me, Caddyshack

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 3>has launched more catchphrases than any film in the history

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 3>of mankind. Such a great movie, and for that reason alone,

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 3>it must be on all best of lists right exactly.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of what I'm saying that if it has

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that sort of cultural impact, that there ought to be

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>some list for that, or it should carry some Nobody's

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>going around in the office today quoting from Pads of Glory,

0:29:57.960 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>which might be a silent film now that I remember,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it makes it difficult to have quotes. But you see

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>my point, I do. We will finish strong next.

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 11>Gambling is illegal at Bushwhit, sir, and I never slide.

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 7>Do you know who won Best Country Album of the

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 7>Year for the twenty and twenty got Grammy's Last?

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 6>Not Prdy, no mar No hell Agree, no, uh Riley Green, no,

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 6>Luke Holmes, no, Allie zimmern uh Ty Whims. Now, what's

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 6>your name? Megan Morny?

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>No, Jimmy tell you sure? Beyonce?

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 8>Oh my god, he's nine in Huntry.

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's funny. That kid could name a lot of

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>country artists. My kids could have too when they were younger,

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Mouths of Day because it is the only

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>miss music we could listen to. Even though it's probably

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be lifetime alcoholics, they've they've they were

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>drenched as children in NonStop whiskey drinking is the answer

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to everything. But didn't have any bad words, so let's

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have some good news. Come on, good news to end

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the show. Michael twenty five, Roll It, Baby, Roll It.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 7>A Trump commitment on the campaign trail became the latest

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 7>executive order today.

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 11>The war on women's sports is over.

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Effective immediately.

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 7>The new order prohibits biological males from competing against biological

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:33.239
<v Speaker 7>females for sports teams at schools at any level that

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 7>receive federal taxpayer dollars.

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 11>Have you let men take over women's sports teams or

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 11>invade your locker rooms, you will be investigated for violations

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 11>of Title nine and risk your federal funding.

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>There will be no federal farm Huh any school at

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>any level that receives federal funding. Would that be practically

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>every school that's not private in America and many that are.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, one hundred percent, Yeah, and the fabulous under the

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong You Getty show.

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Riley Gaines, commenting in twenty eight, m.

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 8>Dog to see President Trump's decisive action. There was a

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 8>campaign promise of his issue number seventeen on his platform,

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 8>no men and women's sports. So to see him deliver

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 8>in the way that he did that visual that you

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 8>saw him signing this executive order with I mean dozens

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 8>of young girls surrounding him. I mean, I can't even

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 8>tell you what that visual means to me. Man, I

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 8>just feel vindicated and I feel this, this overwhelming feeling

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 8>of gratitude.

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 3>That was Riley Gaines who was forced to her metaphorical.

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Needs nees for a way.

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 3>That sentence was just a train wreck, forced to her

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 3>knees metaphorically speaking to dress and undress in front of

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 3>a fully intact six foot four inch mail and say

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 3>that's a woman. Can you imagine the humiliation and the

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 3>soul deadening nature?

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Then? How is it an applause level event to do

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>something this obviously needed to happen a long time ago?

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>How did we even get this far down the road?

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, Palm strong, and good to you. You have

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>disappointed me for the last time. These are your final thoughts.

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a final thought about that. Here's your host

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for final thoughts, Joe Getty. Let's get a final thought

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>from everybody on the crew.

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 3>It's an ensemble cast, Michael Angelow, what's your final thought?

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 9>We've had some people on Facebook asking about this. Yeah,

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 9>the cheese dip. Recipe for your football party is on

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 9>Armstrong Getty Radio or Armstrong Getty dot com.

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>How long will it take me to make this? Thirty minutes? Cool? Yeah?

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Katie Greener esteemed to Newswoman as a final thought.

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 10>Katie, I just realized today February sixth is my second

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 10>Armstrong and Getty birthday.

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, now show for two years? Really kidding, congrats, I

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like you just started ten years. I'm aging like

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a president. Oh my god. Jack. A final thought for us,

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>how many schools across the country, at all levels are

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>happy that Trump that so that they've got an excuse

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for no longer allowing this. And I'll bet a bunch

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of schools where they were letting dudes, you know, win

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the track competition or whatever. They're gonna pretend they don't

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like it, but they're gonna love the fact that we

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 1>can't do that anymore. We'd lose our fund. I'm so sorry.

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of good teachers, a lot of good coaches. Yeah,

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true. My final thought, I always feel like trapped.

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 3>And cheated when when forced to name one of the

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 3>best of something on my favorite of something.

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's silly. I take everything too seriously.

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 3>But I should throw in a clockwork Orange, which I've

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 3>watched so many times in my life.

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Good one me Drew Kis taxi driver wasn't on that list.

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>It's one of my all time favorites. It's a good one.

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty wrapping up another grueling four hour workday,

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 1>so many people, thank etc.

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I hope you can go to armstrong a getdy dot

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 3>com to grab some hot links or drop us a

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 3>not if there's something we ought to be talking about.

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling you the hoodie pick it up.

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>See tomorrow. God bless America. I'm Strong and Getty. This

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is a message for the people of America. Creak was

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>over fifteen minutes ago. Match wow wow. I got nothing

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>for you on that. So let's go with the bangs.

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>What's the John Denver song? I don't know what is

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the John Denver song? You know? With the thank God?

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a country boy. OH got me and my pipe?

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I got me Old Phil. When the sun's coming up?

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I got cakes on the griddle. How can you not

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>fall asleep with the lifestyle. I want to thank.

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 10>You all very much.

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye, Armstrong and Getty.