WEBVTT - Selects: How Tabloids Work

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody. Have you ever been followed around by a

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>person to the camera taking pictures of you and your

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>family and your children, and then publishing them in a

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>newspaper or a weekly rag. Well, that happens to people,

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen to me, Probably doesn't happen to you. But

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we're the lucky ones. But if you're celebrity, and I

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>know you kind of sign up for this. It's not

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>great to be followed around by tabloid photographers and be

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>splashed across those tabloid magazines. And this is all about

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>tabloid's from how tabloid's work. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant uh,

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is Stuff you should Know. It's a podcast.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It's audio only, um, but coming soon it will also

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>include smells. Oh yeah, smell a vision, not vision, smellow

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>sound smell. It will just called it Smellow rama be

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and grumpy people today. I'm not grumpy. You're grumpy. I'm grumpy. Jerry.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Jerry's grumpy. I'm fine. Y'all were grumping at each other

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>when I came in here. No, Jerry was mad at

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>me for being mad at her, which doesn't count. It's

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>just everyone's grumpy. It's such a grumpy day. I'm not grumpy.

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just head legitimate. Everyone's scripy. So chuck. Yes, I

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>want to tell you about a great American hero, William

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>kat No okay uh. Many years ago, in the wilds

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of I wish I could remember where he was found Mississippi,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a little guy known as bat Boy was captured. He

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>was caught on a rooftop during a flood in Mississippi,

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and the authorities seized him and UM took him into

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>their care. He became a ward of the state. That

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>makes sense because bat boys are known to go to

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>higher ground during flooding. Yeah, and he did, true to form.

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh so uh. Bat Boy at first he didn't like

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this captivity UM, but eventually he kind of became something

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>of a patriot by UM volunteering to go search for

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda operatives UM in

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the caves of Afghanistan. The reason bat Boy was so

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>good at it is because he was raising caves half

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>bat half boy names UM. He wasn't able to find

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Bin laden, but he still returned to the U S

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a hero after a long, long flight because he just

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>flew himself. Of course. And we know of bat boys

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>exploits thanks to a little newspaper known as The Weekly

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>World News. Have you heard of this? Two things? I

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>used to subscribe to The Weekly World. Yeah, for like

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a year in high school, me and my buddy rad

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>did because it was fun Radcliffe, Radford. And two. I

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize that bat Boy they continued his exploits. I

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>think bat Boy sold a lot of papers for well,

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I knew he did, but I didn't know. I didn't

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>know they kept it up. That's awesome. I'm glad to

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>know that he was fighting the terrorists. Yes he did,

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>he tried to. I don't know if he was successful.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>At least he went equipped more than with just a sword. Um.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so bat Boy was a prominent character, I guess.

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And The Week, which also bills itself as the world's

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>only reliable newspaper. Yeah, that little tagline or whatever. That's great. Yeah,

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not around anymore in print. Yeah, I think I

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>remember a bit shutting down and being sort of sad

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's online, I guess. Yeah. In two thousand and eight,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it moved too and moved online. Yeah, so really every

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>aspect of that story from this outrageous UM claim that

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the bat Boy was captured and sent to Afghanistan, to

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>UM calling itself tongue in cheek, the World's most reliable,

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the world's only reliable newspaper to it's shutting down and

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>going online because of massive profit losses after being purchased

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>by this huge conglomerate of tabloid papers. The Weekly World

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>News is a perfect analogy for the course of tabloids

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>over the last like twenty years as a whole. Yeah,

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna dig into that. Um. I think it's funny.

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I never because I didn't know the little tagline, but

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>I guess they figured if we're just going to be

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>making up stories, because the Weekly World News, for those

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of you who haven't read it, isn't just a tabloid,

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like it's it's fan fiction. I mean,

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it's completely ridiculous. They don't pretend. But that's why it's

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>funny that they said that the only reliable thing. They said, well,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>we might as well just say that in the thing,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>get it. Yes, And one of their apparently one of

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>their editors is quoted as saying, I could only find

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>one source for this quote, so I don't know how

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:09.679
<v Speaker 1>true it is. It could be made up, which would

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be kind of like this apropos meta parody of the

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. But um, he said, if our if our

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>readers are informed, it's usually by accident. Really, so they

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>were well aware. That's great and it is an extreme example.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>But there are there are some aspects of the weekly

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>World News that do fit the bill of the of

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a standard tabure. Um. So I mean, let's talk about it.

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>What is a tabloid? Well, Um, should we start at

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the beginning or should we just talk about a little

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>bit then do the history? Do you want to do

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the history first? Man, Yeah, let's do the history first,

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>because positive that we don't practice. So I did see, Um,

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>there was one slight error. This is an ed Grabanowski article,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>which are always great. But did you see this other

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>etymology for the word tabloid with the pill company No um.

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>In the late eighteen hundreds, apparently, um Burrows, Welcome and

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Company was a pharmaceutical company in England. They produced at

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the time like medicines were all like BC powder and

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>good he's powdered. They all powdered, and he I think

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was the first one to make into to a pill

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>by compressing the powder, and he called it a tabloid

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of cocaine. Yeah, it probably was. And um that that

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>word became to mean anything figuratively, that was a small

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>dose of anything. So the word tabloid actually became came

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>before I believe about ten years before the shrunken newspaper, uh,

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the physical newspaper shrinking. Well, it still works. It's like

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the origin of life on Earth comes from another planet,

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>but really, where did the origin of life begin? Right?

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't answer the question. It's the same thing like, okay,

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>so maybe that's the origin of the word tabloid. Then

0:06:55.800 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it was associated with newspapers that the tabloid paper um

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is printed on a smaller, more compact version of the

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>normal newspaper newsprint called a broadsheet. Right, so the tabloid

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is a smaller, more compact version the broadsheet is longer

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and wider um and then the tabloid were usually printed

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on the smaller paper, hence the word. Yeah. So at

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>first it was a pill, then it became the size

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of the paper, and then later on it just became

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>um the style of the paper and size, but really

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the style. But tabloids, as were explaining them, are basically

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>like um. They are also commonly referred to as rags

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>as UM gutter public. Yeah, they're gossip sheets, whatever it's

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it's basically it's a it's a uh, slightly shifty, underhanded

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>newspaper and um tabloids. One of the ways that they

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>exist and always have existed is in compare us into

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a quote, legitimate newspapers. So like originally newspapers that say,

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>like the beginning the early nineteenth century, they were extremely stuffy,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>they were extremely expensive. They were like six cents per

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>which was like half a day's pay for the average labor.

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Really dry. Man. If you ever read these old New

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>York Times articles, there's like they just really just you know,

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they lay out the facts and then say the end

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly like the AP used to do until a few

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>years ago. The AP always did that. It was sort

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of straight who, what, when, how, where and why the

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>old journalistic pyramid exactly and then like maybe a quote

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in there and that was it. UM. And so out

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of this I guess kind of boredom and a need

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for the working class to be able to, you know,

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>get their news too, because I couldn't afford it came.

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>The predecessors were tabloids called the penny press, so they

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>were cheaper, and they also did something different. They took

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>stories from just these boring facts, political stories, business stories,

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing, and started working on human interest stories.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And they changed the style of writing sentences for shorter paragraphs,

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>for shorter way more emotion. It was. It was designed

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for that, like listen to the triumph of this family

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>over their evil landlord or whatever kind of what we

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>see now in mainstream newspapers. Exactly. Yes, a lot, a

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of our mainstream UM media owes quite a bit

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to the evolution of tabloids. And there's actually a point

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>where it kind of spread. Finally it made a jump.

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>But you can see throughout the history of tabloids and

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>newspapers this interplay where tabloids almost kind of break ground,

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>take a bunch of heat and flak for it, and

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>then newspapers like latch onto what they're doing. After after

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it becomes co opted in normal behind the guys of

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're the upstanding publication exactly just the sky

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>right I'm discussed by it all. Um. Yellow journalism came

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>about in the era of William Randolph Hurst with his

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>New York Journal later called The New York Journal American,

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and he was the first person in the United States,

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>at least, because I think in England it even started

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>out before us. But I'm not mistaken. In England, I

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>think they were kind of like the birth of some

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>of the more tabloid style writing. But in America William

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Randolph Hurst did with all of a sudden he started

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>doing some celebrity stuff and some murderer and little sensational

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>gore here and there, and he found that it sold

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>really well up until the Depression, when nothing sold really well.

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Um pick up after the Depression when a very uh

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>monumental figure in tabloid history named Janetta Janetoso Pope or

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Gene Pope Gene Pope jr. Um, He bought a Hurst

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>paper called The New York and Choir for seventy five grand,

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>changed it to tabloid size, started uh printing you know,

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, stuff that he he figured people like to

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>stare at a car crash, So he was actually inspired

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>literally by seeing people like jockeying to see the blood

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and the gore in a car crash and thought, wow,

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>people really are disgusting and crazy, so I'm going to

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>give them what they want. And he did remember the

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>crime scene photography episode we talked about we gi um

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>he he and he sold a lot of stuff to

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Jeane Pope. Um, he printed a lot of his like

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 1>gory crimes photos. What's his name, right, Lewis Felig, I think,

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but he went by W E G EIGI Interesting. Yeah,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>so I said it again. Um yeah, I was cueing

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like the Executive Orders episode how many times, like I'll

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>bunch you know why because it was super interesting. Um.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So he starts selling a lot of papers um, based

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>on this new style. And then a guy named Rupert Murdoch,

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>who you may have heard of, who saw or prove

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that you could actually have pretty wide circulation um, and

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>began selling News of the World in England millions of

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>copies sex scandals. And then the Pope said, you know what,

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>if he can sell millions and millions of copies, so

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>can I let me changed the name to the National Enquirer. Boom, Right,

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the National Enquirer was born. But um, the Inquirer is

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.599
<v Speaker 1>we know it still wasn't born yet. It was the

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>thing they were crazy headlines about, like interracial sex and

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>lesbianism and like horrible acts of violence, posthumous violence. There

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is this one headline um about a team ripping the

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>head off of a corpse to get at its gold teeth,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and always with the gory crime scene photos like the

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>pulp comics we're doing too. Yeah, very much. It was

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just very tawdry. It's um, I mean if the stuff

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>uh and the inquiry today is tawdry, it's this was

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>just like it's not fathom model. But the reason it's

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not is again because of Gene Pope. So he had

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of competition U and not just he, but

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole industry was facing a big problem in that

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>news stands were starting to dry. So Jane Pope came

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>up with an idea. He's like supermarkets. Everybody goes to supermarkets.

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I need to get in there now. I stand in

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the line at the checkout stand, right. But he knew

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>like there was no way that any any respectable supermarket

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>was going to sell his tabloid, his rag that the required.

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So he cleaned the thing up right, he um added

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>way more. He took a queue from Rupert Rupert Murdoch

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and his News of the World, and um added way

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>more celebrity stuff sex scandals, but nothing tawdry like you know, um,

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this stuff he was talking about before that was just

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>really it was more like a like a the Senator

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>got caught with somebody or whatever. Um. And there's this

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>guy named James Walcutt. He wrote for the for Vanity Fair,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.599
<v Speaker 1>and he wrote this article called us Confidential. It was

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in the June two thousand two issue of Vanity Fair.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It was about this and about that transition going from

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the crime scene photography to um astrology overnight

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so he could get into supermarkets. Uh, he said. Um,

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the Inquirer's staff was aghast. It was like asking an

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>experienced team of grave robbers to take up gardening. So

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much how the Inquirer's staff took. We got

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to clean up our acts and start writing about astrology

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and celebrity sex scanals. And it wasn't even cleaning up

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>attacked that much. It's not like you said, we're going

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to become the you know, New York Times. No, but

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why they're there. Yeah, that's why when you stand

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in line at a supermarket checkout line. It's because in

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties Jeane Pope was like, we got to

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>get in the supermarkets. I think people either read these

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>or they don't. Like I don't think anyone dabbles in tabloids,

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying. It's kind of like soap operas,

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Like no one just says like, let me watch a

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of Days of Our Lives, Like you're either

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>hooked on this stuff or not. I agree with that,

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot of people are guilty of

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>picking up the tabloid and thumbing through it and then

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>not buying it in the supermarket checkout line. Well, now

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what they do now, and of course we're

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>going to get to this, might as well bring it up.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>They look at People magazine and US Weekly because they

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have nicked from tabloids as well and become a quote

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>unquote respectable thing to pick up and read. Even now,

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>come on, do you ever read a People magazine? I have.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of tabloid at times, it is, and um

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>actually you can thank the Star for that. Um Star

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>used to be a tabloid sheet tabloid, right, and it

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>went over to the glossy format at some point. I

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>think that may be the late nineties, and um it,

0:15:54.880 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it married those two things, glossyful magazine format with tabloid,

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was enough of his success that people was like, well,

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we've already got the glossy magazine part. Let's just start

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>doing the tabloid thing. Yeah, I mean what people have,

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean legitimate articles still, but and they're not like

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>making stuff up, but they've definitely gone way into the

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, look at the cellulite on the beach in

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Malibu and look at this person, and look at that person,

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and who wore it better? Plastics versus asters? Yeah, exactly,

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, who wore it better? I know somebody

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who's been reading people. Yeah, when they have the two

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>ladies with the same dress, so mean, especially when it's

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>like eight two to eight teens now, I know, especially

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>when it's like, you know, it's just means. Sometimes I'm

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna start wearing hockey jerseys and they'll be like, a

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>who were it better? Kevin Smith or podcaster Chuck Bryant.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>People go, I guess Kevin Smith, because I've never heard

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of this other guy. It's the same guy. It's the

0:16:53.320 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>same dude anyway. Alright, so, um, that's pretty much the

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>quick history of tabloids. Yeah here in the States, at

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>least England. We keep mentioning England because they're they're lousy

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>with it. Well, they're kind of on the leading edge

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of the decline of tabloids right now. Yeah, let get

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to that, all right. So before we go onto tabloid

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>stories and how they get these stories, we should point

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>out that the National Choir, the Star of the Globe,

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the National Examiner, and Weekly World News, we're all purchased

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>by American Media, Inc. Like all all of those just

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>snapped them all up, basically, just goout on the show. Now,

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>every big tabloid in the United States was purchased by

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this one company. And um, yeah, I think that's never

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. Or maybe that's just me being it,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>you know. Well that's the funny thing, like the title

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of this sidebars, they control everything you read unless you

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>don't read any of those things. So, um, the the

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>am I, actually they're the reason the Weekly World News

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>shut down. Um, they were like, okay, as things losing money.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Am I posted a hundred and sixty million dollar loss

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and six and was facing like a

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in debt to bad Boy had to go. Yeah,

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>bad Boy went to the internet. Yeah that makes sense.

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>That's where bad Boy belongs. So okay, let's talk about this.

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>What what makes a tabloid? It's not just subjective. I mean,

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's tabloids like pornographer, you know when you see it, right,

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to define. That's not um entirely the case.

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>There are some actual, um discernible distinctions among tabloids that

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>make a tabloid tabloid? Agreed, So what are there? Well

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Ed points out here something really important. The key to

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a tabloid story is not that it be true, just

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>that someone has said that it's true, and they latch

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>onto that person. And as long as they say, you know,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>attribute these quotes to this person, then they can't be

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>held accountable. And that person is frequently cited as an

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>expert and a close friend. Sure, I mean, if somebody

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it's all the way you present the story, if the

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're saying, if your whole story is all about

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>how this person said something, yeah, it's not really about

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the story. The story is still there, but you're focusing

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on this person. It's like the the rule of the

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of the tabloid industry. It's kind of a trick though,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>because very much you're tricking people into thinking you're reading

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>about a story about Brandjelina. In fact, you're reading a

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>story about a former made that worked for Branchlina and

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>what they think is true, right, Or some crazy person

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.239
<v Speaker 1>who has nothing to do with bran Angelina who like

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>just um, maybe saw one of them in a coffee

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>shop and like, notice they didn't tip or something like that. Bam,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>there's your story. Um. Also, like we said that, they

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>like to add experts, and but the experts are in

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>no way, shape or form qualified in a lot of ways.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>They have no credentials, they're not vetted. It's more say, like, um,

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the example Grabmanowski uses is like a bigfoot enthusiast, Right,

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>if somebody spends a lot of time, uh, searching for bigfoot,

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>researching bigfoot, there there's no institute out there to qualify them,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to give them credentials. But you could reasonably make a

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>case of this person's a big foot bigfoot expert. Right.

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>The thing is is like the Inquirer or the Star

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>or the weekly World News is not going to the

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>trouble of explaining that. They just say bigfoot expert so

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and so says that there's a bunch of these things

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>out and he's seen a bunch and he's an expert exactly.

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>My favorite is the leading quote, like, uh, they will

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>get the random person who saw Angelina Jolina coffee shop

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and they will say did she look that? They would

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 1>say maybe something like yeah, she looked like she looked jittery,

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and they would say did she look strung out and

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that she had possibly been up for days without eating. Yeah,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>she sort of looked like that, And then all of

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, that's the quote because witnesses say she looked

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>strung out and like she had not eaten for days,

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh, all they have to do is say yes,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly yes, or like would you say this? And if

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the prison says yes and you just said that. Another

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>hallmark of tabloids is making a huge deal out of

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>something I guess other newspapers would consider small stuff. Yeah,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and like actually looking through other newspapers to find some

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>quasi interesting story and then blowing it up into possibly

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a front page feature. Um, just by getting into this story,

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>really interviewing a lot of people involved um, and then

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe throwing an expert or something like that, and just

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>basically making a lot a lot of hay out of

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>something very um kind of negligible. UM. And this by

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 1>adding a bunch of quotes and stuff and what do

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you think about this? What do you think about that?

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>It takes it from being about the story, right, like

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>a UM man saved a goat from a burning building

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to what these people think about this man and his goat?

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>And you can do anything with that exactly the love affair,

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you mean, maybe who knows? As somebody said it, then

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they could conceivably report if anyone said, um. Celebrity Uh.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Celebrity news is obviously one of the biggest parts of

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tabloids these days at least, and they the writers have informants,

0:22:56.280 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of informants from um secure people who had

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.719
<v Speaker 1>worked for them, or who worked at venues where they

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>might have been hairstylists, nail salon people like anyone that

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>can dish up dirt, and they get in the rotation

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I remember we shot you ever heard of

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Janet Charlton, No, you might recognize her. She was a

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>gossip columnist and think did stuff for TV like entertainment tonight.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's how she made her living. And she was

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>like one of the more famous ones. And we shot

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a commercial at her house one time in l a

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and she was there hanging out and uh, I was like,

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you gotta tell me some stories. And of course she

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>just loved that kind of thing, and she would just

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>sit down and regale us with stories about Michael Douglas

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and his secret sex addiction and and she was she

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>always said like, well, you know, my sources tell me

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>she had a list a rollodex of people on the

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>bank roll that she would pay, you know, a few

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>bucks if it was not a big deal, to a

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, if it was a big celebrity with

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:01.719
<v Speaker 1>big news, and it's um, that's pretty much standard. Like

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you were saying. There, there's this guy named um Paul

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>McMullen who wrote for I think News of the World,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know Dentel Elliott. He was he was

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Indiana Jones's sidekick. I can't remember his name, but the

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>older British guy. Okay, here's this this huge star in

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Great Britain and he had a very very beloved too

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and he had a daughter who was addicted to heroin

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and after he died. Um, she took like a big

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>turn for the worst, and this cop tipped off I

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>think another person who in turn tipped off Paul McMullin.

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But the cop got a few hundred pounds for it.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Um that this girl was like, she's kind of a prostitute,

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>she's so much of a heroin addict, So whatever you

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>want to do with that. Paul McMullin goes and like

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>offers to pay this this lady like drug money for

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>sex or whatever, and she agrees, and like all of

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, he starts reporting on it. He's got photos

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and everything. Well, she ended up killing herself and he

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 1>now says, like, you know, I take responsibility for that,

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>which is meaningless, but um yeah he The all started

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>with a cop knowing about this and then tipping off

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the reporters. So sad cops are not immune to this

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing too, believe it or not, Josh. Another

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>way they'll get their information is from the celebrities themselves. Um,

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>from what I've gathered, did you're either you fall into

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>three categories. You either fight fight fight the tabloids. You

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>either are lucky enough and are smart enough to kind

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of be low profile and you're not really a subject

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of table tabloids. There's a lot of big stars you've

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>never seen the tabloids Harrison for yeah uh. Or number

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>three is you play ball a little bit, which means,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'll give you a little information here

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and there. I'll leak out some stuff here and there.

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>If you play nice with me, I'll play ball with you.

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll let you know, like what restaurant I'll be

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>coming out of one night you can photograph me. Give

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you your little time and um. Sometimes the movie studios

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a leak stuff to get get up a little press.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>They did that a lot a lot back in the day,

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>but it still goes on. Yeah, it's like a symbiotic

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>relationship between the person who needs their star to maintain this.

0:26:55.680 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's position through things like just basically you're a star

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>because the public is aware of you. Yeah, no such

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>thing as bad pressed. Like you might be in there

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>for your cellulite, But what if someone picks up the

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>magazine they're like, oh, I wonder whatever happened to her?

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought she was dead, And all of a sudden

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they're like, she's not dead, she just has cellulite. How sad,

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>how sad, but at the same time I feel better

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>about myself exactly. Um So, I guess one of the

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>ways that you stay in the tabloids is through having

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>your picture made. As we stay here in the South,

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a group of people known collectively as paparazzi, and they

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>actually I found out, are named after a paparazz so photographer.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>You didn't know that named Paparazzo with a capital P.

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>He was a character in Um Fellini Fellini's ladulce Vita

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that's right movie, and um apparently they were already extant,

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>but they got their name through this character. But even

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 1>in they weren't crazy. It wasn't until the seventies again

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Jane Pope um, that they really became the

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of reckless, relentless nuisances that we have today. And

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it was all because Jeane Pope was obsessed with Jackie

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh and Aristotle or and he would pay so much

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>money for anything on them that people that the photographers

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>were like just really really became aggressive and assertive because

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. And they're way worse in Europe because of

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Gene Pope and because they initially started doing this stuff

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in Greece and in in Europe. UM, and that that

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>still is connected to this day, to the death of

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Um Diana, Princess of Wales. They were supposedly the driver

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>had been drinking, but they were supposedly being chased by

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>paparazzi on motorcycles. Yeah, very sad, but that's all generoso

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Pope jr. Um. I'll bet that guy wore huge black

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>glass thick ones like Robert Jernier at the end of

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>See you know God, that's for great Um. Supposedly Felini too,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I dug this up. Took the word from an Italian

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>word that described the buzzing sound of a mosquito. That's unverified,

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but he said in an interview in Time magazine in

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the seventies that he's like, yeah, I always just associate

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it with something buzzing around you and in your way, Like, well,

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that's paparazzi. Um. And there's that movie too, Paparazzi. Is

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that what I was called from two thousan four? Yeah,

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>with the dude, uh what's his face goes back and

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>beats up Coalhauser. Yeah. Did you see it? No, No,

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I ran across it on IMDb today. It's not bad

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. Um. It's also it could very easily be

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>based on the life of Alec Baldwin. Uh yeah, sure, yeah, yeah,

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>because there's I think the categories you were describing, Um,

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the people who are just so big that they can't

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>keep a low profile, but they also don't want or

0:29:55.120 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>need that that the tabloids on them. But I also

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>very much gotten the impression it's like there's a lot

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of people out there who feed it to him, who wanted,

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>who craving, And I can't feel bad for those people

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>at all. Yeah, it's a it's a tough thing. And

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>because there are people plenty, like you're saying, like plenty

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of people out there who are big stars, but you

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>never see anything about him in the tabloids. Is because

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>they just stay out of it. They stay away from it,

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, I'm trying to think of one. I mean,

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>there's so many. That's probably why I can't think of it.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>But like Harrison Ford is a good example, I guess,

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>except when he started dating cliss to Flockhart, they were

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they were in the tabloids a lot. But I also

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>suspect like most of that stuff was all very pleasant,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like hand holding things so yeah, but she was in

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the tabloids a lot because of her weight, so that

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>fed into that, you know, like, maybe she'll be happy

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and eat again now that she has Harrison Ford, you know, yeah,

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he's just like eat this, eat that too. Here, eat

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this all right, let's talk about let's talk about the law. Yeah,

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>because this was really interesting, I thought, because the first

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thing you think with the rest of it was not

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting at all. No, I thought. I thought this was

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>super interesting though, because the first thing I think of

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is why aren't these people suing every day? Suing these tabloids.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Some try, some do, some have been successful for a while.

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>For the early tabloids, ones like um oh, what were

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>they called, like Confidential I think was one of the

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>early tabloids. Um, like the tatler Um, they're just whatever

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>stupid name about not about airing dirty laundry. That was

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the name of some pulp tabloid in the fifties and sixties.

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Dirty laundry was probably one of them, I'll bet um.

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And they got away with that stuff because well, for

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>two reasons. This guy wrote, um uh yeah, he wrote

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I watched a wild hoggy my baby, which is pretty

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>much this definitive history of the tabloids. And he's got

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>his bona fides because he was an edit her for

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the National Enquirer, right. Um. And he said, there's two

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>reasons in the fifties and sixties. One, if you were

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate star, these things were so in the gutter

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that the stoop to suing them was problematic. In one,

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it was the attention that lawsuit would attract because the

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>regular press was gonna start talking about it, would make

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you look as bad as well, it would draw a

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>lot more attention to the original story. And then the

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>second thing is that even if you want that publisher

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the money to pay you, good luck. Then

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Jeane Pope once again changes everything. Jeane Pope and Rupert

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch all of a sudden, these things have enormous circulations. Um.

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Jeane Pope took the Inquirer from like fifteen

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand or a hundred thousand to five million at its

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>peak in the eighties. Um. And so suddenly they did

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>have deep pockets and things changed. And um. Carol Burnett

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of still to this day stands as like a

0:32:55.680 --> 0:33:00.239
<v Speaker 1>bell weather for the celebrities versus the tabloids. As far

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>as the law goes, Yeah, she sued in uh after

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>nine article said, and I have to read this quote,

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty good. At a Washington restaurant, a boisterous Carol

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Burnett had a loud argument with another diner, Henry Kissinger.

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>She traped around the place, offering everyone a bite of

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>her dessert, and they didn't put her dessert in quotes

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have. Uh. Carol really raised eyebrows when she

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>accidentally knocked a glass of wine over one diner and

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>started giggling instead of apologizing. So they basically said she

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was blitzed at this restaurant and she yeah, he's a

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>big fan, probably, And she sued in one one point

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>six million dollars, which was and we'll find out here

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in a second. This is one of the hallmarks of

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>their litigation settled out of court for much much less, well,

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>very quietly. She got a big settlement because in one

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars one point six millions, like a hundred billion to day,

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, And then um, it was reduced by

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>an appeals court, which is usually step two in these

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of suits, and then it was settled out of court.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>So I would imagine for even less than that, UM,

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>but it was still was a big deal. It was

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the first time really that like a major star was

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>able to win a defamation lawsuit against the tabloid. But

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>it was one of the I don't want to say

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it was one of the only times. It was one

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of the very few times, especially if you are going

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on the premise of all the people who want to

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 1>sue the tabloids and don't actually bring a suit because

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 1>things have changed now now the tabloids have these reputations

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 1>for being extremely fearsome litigators, where like, if you want

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to sue them, you thought that story that ticked you

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>off was bad, They're going to get anything they can

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to do it through the courts. So

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>like when Aretha Franklin or no um oh Elsa Taylor, Yes,

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>when she tried to sue I think the Inquirer, or

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 1>when she did see the Inquirer, the Inquirer's lawyers tried

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to subpoena all of her medical records for the past

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. So they go after everything. They try to

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>drag your life into the spotlight to make it like

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>really not worth your while to sue them. Yet it's

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the celebrity attorney that was interviewed for this awesome New

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>York Times article. H Vincent Chifo, Everyone's Italian um. Everybody

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>has Italian said that it's basically he calls it the

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>scorpion defense, which is, uh, you don't attack a scorpion

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>because you will get stung. Um. Aside from not the

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 1>not the most complex analogy, I like it. No, it's

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward. I guess do they need to be complex?

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But you can call it. That's the snake analogy, that's

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the spider analogy, that's the two year old analogy. Oh, like,

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>don't mess with the two year old. You'll get thrown

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 1>up on or been pooped on. That's what they should use.

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Because the scorpion can only do one thing. To year

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>old can humiliate you in a number of ways. Have

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you ever heard So there's this whole thing that like

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>scorpions commit suicide if you set them on fire by

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>stinging themselves. Really and apparently there's a lot of like

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>YouTube videos out there people like doing this with scorpions,

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>like sting them on fire, and then the scorpion will

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>like jump about and like sting itself and eventually die. Well,

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll be trying to put the fire out. They found

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that this, They found that that scorpions are almost entirely

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>immune to their own venom, and that really all this

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is just a reaction of being burned alive. They're like

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to like they're flailing about, and one of the

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>flails is like they're they're stingers moving and sometimes it

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>stings itself. So it appears to dumb kids who set

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>scorpions on fire that scorpions committing suicide terrible. Isn't that awful?

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:47.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a great tangent though, thanks me, all right, don't

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:51.439
<v Speaker 1>burn animals or insects of any kind, kids, It's just mean.

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly means setting yourself up for being a sociopath

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>later in life. Also, legally, speaking with tabloids, Um, you

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>have to prove malice. Yeah, that's the big one. Not

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:05.879
<v Speaker 1>only that what they printed was false, but that they

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>knowingly printed information they knew was false. Because it's got

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to be libelous. It can't just be maliciously libelous. They

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>just printed a rumor about me that wasn't true. It's

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>got to have malice behind it. Libel is printed, slander

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is stated with your mouth. These are the two differences

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>or I guess you could blink it out with your eyes.

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Um, So, basically the scorpion defense and then

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the delays. The first thing they're gonna do is start

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>filing motions to delay, to delay, to spend a lot

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of money, a lot of money. So and if you

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>think about it, there's nothing to really gain here necessarily. Well, yeah,

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it's your reputation. So a star who has a bunch

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of money says, I have a bunch of money, and

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm really mad at these guys, and i want to

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>teach them a lesson, So I'm going to soothe them,

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and that they Basically the first tactic is the tabloids

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it not worth your all, that you'll

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>drop it because you don't really need this money. You're

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>looking for a judgment and hopefully you'll get bored. Well

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in the tabloids don't care. Even if they drag this

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>thing out in print a retraction six months later, no

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>one remembers. No one reads retractions or cares about retractions. Well,

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>six months later, that's a it's a well put because

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>apparently part of the judgment of some of these and

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in successful suits is that you can't write about um

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the star for a said amount of time. Yeah, they'll

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>like cut a deal sometimes and say, you know what,

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll drop the lawsuit, just give me a break for

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the next year. And then they put on their calendar

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise one year from now, set reminder to start

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>effing with him again and UM. Another way that tabloids

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:52.720
<v Speaker 1>stay out of court is most of their UM articles

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are read screened by an attorney or attorneys. They have

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.439
<v Speaker 1>a retainer, so each article it's printed and it comes

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to this this implicit um stamp of approval from a

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>legal expert. Yea, you you really don't have a case

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>if you want to sue against this. Yeah, they want to.

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>They want to walk right up to the line of

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.399
<v Speaker 1>libel and stop there. And they're pretty good, and you're

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in ate on it, and then you're in ate on it,

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine the writers are really good at it,

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and then as backup, they have their own attorneys that

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are even better at it, and so they're like, yeah,

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this is not libelous, prove it, spend spend half a

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>million dollars trying to prove this, and some people do,

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like Aretha Franklin. I think settled Tom Cruise Schwarzenegger and

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Katie Kate Cruise and one did she win because Katie

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Holmes just filed in March. She is she settled for

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a donation to her charity unless she has done it twice.

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>She did it just this past March. She filed suit

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:01.280
<v Speaker 1>against him for this one cover um like, yeah, bags

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>under her eyes and they're like Katie's drug problem why

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>she won't leave Tom? All this? And I also the

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>article kind of goes after Scientology and um, well, based

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.479
<v Speaker 1>on that list Nicole kid meant Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes.

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It makes you wonder, like, huh, I wonder how how

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>much Scientology encourages suing for defamation and articles that also include,

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, stuff against Scientology because Travolta just had the big,

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>little supposed tawdry affairs here in Georgia. And then I

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>guess another homework that's not really in um it's not

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>really in the article, but I think you can make

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong case is that sometimes a lot of

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>times the tabloid gets things right. Yeah, but the the

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>way that they do it often is very much unethical

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and immoral as far as um the standards of the

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>press is concerned and that's what Rupert what's been going

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on with Rupert Murdoch like UM Parliament, like a parliamentary

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>UM panel basically said you're not fit to run news

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>corps any longer because this scandal is so huge. With

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the phone hacking scandal UM where we I can't remember

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>what episode we talked about it in, but there was

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the girl who was kidnapped and like the News of

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the World writers were hacking into her UM voicemail and

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>then deleting them and so the police thought she was

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>still alive and it was possibly affecting the course of

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the investigation. They they identified four thousand celebrities, athletes, politicians,

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>people of note UM who were whose emails were hacked

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.760
<v Speaker 1>four thousands, and then another thousand that had likely been hacked.

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Some people have already sued in one like CNA Miller,

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve Coogan of UM for our Party people and Tristan

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Shandy UM. Some people have already won. But for the

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>most part it's UM. These people aren't gonna get any

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>any damage is awarded. It's basically just no. News of

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the World is shut down now. But it was out

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of hand and now they're they're showing that they were

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>also hacking email, which great Britain has this kind of

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>um this this computer theft law now which makes email

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>hacking way worse than phote and hacking. So if that

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>opens up to be a big thing, there's people are

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna start doing time for it. Yeah, that's what

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I say. But like I was saying, sometimes they get

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>things right. They do um. Over the years, we'll mention

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a few O. J. Simpson case the National Enquiry, and

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:49.879
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's generally the Inquirer that that sort

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 1>of scoops the legit ones. It's never like the Star. Yes,

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, so the National Enquirer scooped in the O J. Trial,

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the uh story about his shoes, the Bruno Molly's. Yeah,

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.839
<v Speaker 1>they scooped the story of the dealer that sold him

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 1>a knife similar to the murder weapon. I guess knife

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>dealers the way they scooped the shoe story. Remember there

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>were bloody footprints. I thought this was awesome. They really

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>went to town to because there was a Bruno Molly

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>bloody footprint at the scene. And O. J. Simpson said,

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't. I've never owned a pair of

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>shoes like that, and they went back and found footage

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of him from like wearing them on the field, like

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 1>reporting yeah, and proved that yes, indeed he did have

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:43.399
<v Speaker 1>those shoes. And he's like, oh those shoes right, yeah. Uh.

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill Cosby's kid Ennis. Remember when he was killed. The

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>inquiry offered a hundred thousand dollar reward for information, and

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that actually led to somebody coming forward and giving the

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>information that led to the capturing of the killer. That's right,

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Jackson's illegitimate child. Yeah. In two thousand one, he

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Um came out and was like, oh, yeah, I guess

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>he found out it's true. Yes, Gary Hart when he

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was running for president, I remember this well. He was

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on the monkey business down in Miami with what was

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 1>her name, Donna Rice. UM's a funny photo when you

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>look at it now. He I haven't seen it. I

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>don't think. She's just like sitting on his lap and

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>he's just got a big grin on his face and

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:30.840
<v Speaker 1>he's got a T shirt that says monkey shines grew

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And it was it was all over the place at

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the time, but he dropped out of the race. It

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>was because of this this Um picture in the inquiry,

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 1>they scooped everybody on it and Russia Limball, Yeah, my

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite drug addict that was exposed, Rush Limball. Yeah. I

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>remember he was buying oxy cotton from his maid. He

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was on like how many pills a day he bought, well,

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:55.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many a day, but he bought

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 1>apparently thirty thousand pills from her. I think he was

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>on like some ungodly amount like twenty or sixty or

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>eighty pills a day, just so I remember hearing it

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>was like, how is he alive or even not a

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>standing up? Yeah, but that was the inquirer that did that.

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But again, so there there could be it could have

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>come from a tip, right, Yeah, it could have come

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>from um yeah, they could have um, they could have

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten this information from wire tapping, from whatever. It doesn't

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>mean it's wrong, but just one of the hallmarks of

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the tabloid is that the they'll follow sometimes loose, looser

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>ethics than maybe again A New York Times reporter, Um,

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so tabloids today, Josh, like you mentioned um, at the peak,

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the National Choir was selling about five million copies in circulation.

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Now all of the leading ones in the United States

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>combined sell about five point four million, so they've really

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 1>gone down. In One of the reasons why is because

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they were so successful it mainstream media became much more

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>tabloid e and tabloids became much less, much less different.

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>The field of competition increased. Yeah, and basically everyone was

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of doing similar stuff now. And they point out

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the article during the Lewinsky trial, sales went down because

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff you were seen on CNN and was just as

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>salacious as anything you would read in the Star. And

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>again it's like the mainstream media kind of took a

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:33.919
<v Speaker 1>cue from tabloids, as they have so many other times.

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>They were so pissed off about that. With the Clinton thing,

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>they were probably just like, let's let's make up some stuff.

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's like what if he used a cigar? And they

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>were like, yeah, exactly, it was all true. Yeah with Clinton, man,

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>those nuts looking back. Yeah, so you got anything else? Um,

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I got nothing else? Well, then that's tabloid's chuck. Uh.

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>If you want to learn more about tabloids and see

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a picture of the beloved bat boy, you can type

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in tabloids T A B L O I D S

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>in the search bar at how stuff works dot com,

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 1>which means it's time for listener mail. All right, Josh,

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this. Uh, don't cry for me. It's

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Josh and Chuck. Hi, guys, I'm currently working in Argentina,

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 1>m conducting research and teaching English on a Fulbright scholarship.

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to let you know that your podcast serves

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a great resource for English learners in other countries. Um.

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I've been introducing your podcast to students and adults I

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>meet who are interested in furthering their English and learning

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>more about US culture. Yeah, little scary too, Um. The

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>idea of a podcast culture does not yet exist in Argentina.

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>When I introduce the idea in your program to people here,

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they're very curious and eager to listen. They make great

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>wine too, by the way, Argentina, Okay, that's good stuff.

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Your podcast is providing a fun and am in a

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>way for students here to practice listening to different English accents, um,

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to try and pick up on some colloquialisms and jokes,

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to learn new vocabulary. Why I feel a lot of

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 1>heat all of a sudden, um, And to become more

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>informed on the various issues you discuss. The idea of

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 1>people listening to podcasts purely to further their own knowledge.

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Is part is a part of us culture that I

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 1>am proud to share and thank you very much for

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that spreading your fan base in Argentina, Angela Hartley, it's

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>very nice, thank you very much for that. We're becoming

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>a cult like figures like Rodriguez. Who there's this like

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>singer songwriter from I think the late sixties, early seventies

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and he just went by the name Rodriguez and released

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of albums that is totally flopped here and um,

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 1>he just went the way of obscurity. Didn't realize that

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in South Africa, these two albums are achieved like just

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 1>incredible status overly and everyone wondered what happened to him,

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and finally years later he found out, like he's like

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a mythical figure in South Africa. You know, there's a

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 1>documentary that just came out about the whole time. It

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:10.400
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a movie or something. There's a documentary, but

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like a feature film, like something someone would

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>make up. I saw a movie like that, you mean,

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I went to Silver Docks and saw The Impostor and

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it was very much like that where the one of

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the producers afterwards of the Q and it was like

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it was he was asked if they were going to

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>turn it into like a feature film. Then he was like,

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we can't. Like there's just too many it's too outlandish

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that if you fictionalized it, people would be like, this

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is stupid. Why did you Why did you make these choices?

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to see it. Yeah you should. It's very good, awesome. UM, okay,

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>if you have a doc recommenentary a documentary recommendation, so

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess it'd be a documentary recommendation, a doc you wreck,

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>thank thank you. Um, we're always looking for that. Um

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is that correct, docu wreck? Because I think I've seen

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that written before. Really Yeah, I just made it up. Um.

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>You can tweet to us at s y ESK podcast.

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You can join us on Facebook dot com slash Stuff

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know, and you can email us your rex

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to stuff podcast at how Stuff Works dot com. Stuff

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know is a production of I Heart Radio.

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.399
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts my Heart Radio, visit the I Heart

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.