WEBVTT - It Could Happen Here Weekly 257

0:00:01.870 --> 0:00:04.010
<v Speaker 1>Call zone media. Hey, everybody.

0:00:04.230 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Robert Evans here, and I wanted to let you know

0:00:06.380 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 2>this is a compilation episode. So every episode of the

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.700
<v Speaker 2>week that just happened is here in one convenient and

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.020
<v Speaker 2>with somewhat less ads package for you to listen to

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.340
<v Speaker 2>in a long stretch if you want. If you've been

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.390
<v Speaker 2>listening to the episodes every day this week, there's going

0:00:21.410 --> 0:00:23.430
<v Speaker 2>to be nothing new here for you, but you can

0:00:23.470 --> 0:00:30.620
<v Speaker 2>make your own decisions. Hey everybody, Robert here, and this

0:00:30.700 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>is It Could Happen Here, a podcast about things falling apart.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.230
<v Speaker 2>And it sure looked like things in Brazil were about

0:00:38.270 --> 0:00:40.690
<v Speaker 2>to fall apart a week or two ago, but then

0:00:40.740 --> 0:00:43.390
<v Speaker 2>Lula won the second round of the presidential election in

0:00:43.510 --> 0:00:45.890
<v Speaker 2>a real shocker of a vote. Now, we've talked about

0:00:45.950 --> 0:00:49.229
<v Speaker 2>this on this week's ED, but immediately after the vote,

0:00:49.290 --> 0:00:52.110
<v Speaker 2>I started chatting with some Brazilian folks that I had

0:00:52.170 --> 0:00:54.779
<v Speaker 2>knew and had met online, people who had been Both

0:00:54.820 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>just kind of grassroots activists, you know, part of the

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.980
<v Speaker 2>effort to get Lula reelected in the second round of

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>voting and folks who had had, you know, positions of somewhat,

0:01:03.700 --> 0:01:05.500
<v Speaker 2>you know, a little more influence in the media and whatnot,

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.650
<v Speaker 2>all to talk about like what had happened and how

0:01:07.709 --> 0:01:10.510
<v Speaker 2>it had worked. And obviously, I didn't feel like I

0:01:10.569 --> 0:01:13.130
<v Speaker 2>was the best person to put together a comprehensive article

0:01:13.190 --> 0:01:15.490
<v Speaker 2>about that. And so that's why I was really grateful

0:01:15.550 --> 0:01:18.730
<v Speaker 2>to run into Caio Almendra. Caio is a former opinion

0:01:18.830 --> 0:01:21.770
<v Speaker 2>editor for The Intercept Brazil. He's a writer at Superstructure

0:01:21.810 --> 0:01:24.449
<v Speaker 2>with Julian Field. He's one of the hosts of the

0:01:24.490 --> 0:01:28.910
<v Speaker 2>Vera Casacas podcast and an Alameda Institute researcher. He's a

0:01:28.910 --> 0:01:31.260
<v Speaker 2>really cool guy, and he wrote this article, which I

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.340
<v Speaker 2>am going to read to you. This is Caio's article

0:01:33.459 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 2>about what happened in Brazil and about his own experiences.

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm reading it because English is his second language, and

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 2>we figured this would be a better way to reach

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.050
<v Speaker 2>more Americans with what had happened. Because The strategies with

0:01:44.069 --> 0:01:47.069
<v Speaker 2>which Lula won the second round of voting are really

0:01:47.170 --> 0:01:50.590
<v Speaker 2>important for people to understand in like 21st century politics.

0:01:50.630 --> 0:01:53.670
<v Speaker 2>This is not going to be just relevant to Brazil

0:01:53.750 --> 0:01:59.550
<v Speaker 2>and Brazilians. Anyway, here's Caio Almendra. On the night of

0:01:59.630 --> 0:02:04.750
<v Speaker 2>October 5th, 2026, the Brazilian left received horrendous news. Bolsonarismo

0:02:04.870 --> 0:02:07.710
<v Speaker 2>had won the elections, increasing its bench in the Chamber

0:02:07.730 --> 0:02:11.220
<v Speaker 2>of Deputies by 23 and in the Senate by 14.

0:02:11.220 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>There's a real risk that they might get the majority

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.580
<v Speaker 2>needed to amend the Constitution or even to impeach Supreme

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Court justices. With so much power in Congress and the

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.060
<v Speaker 2>prospect of controlling a 9 out of 11 supermajority on

0:02:23.100 --> 0:02:26.900
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court, nothing seemed capable of stopping the implementation

0:02:26.940 --> 0:02:31.190
<v Speaker 2>of the most radical parts of Flavio's authoritarian agenda. Because

0:02:31.230 --> 0:02:34.910
<v Speaker 2>Flavio Bolsonaro's platform called for billions of dollars in budget cuts,

0:02:35.070 --> 0:02:38.410
<v Speaker 2>which would inevitably gut public education, pensions, and public health care,

0:02:38.780 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 2>because his father had attempted a coup and his platform

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.740
<v Speaker 2>included granting amnesty to him and all the insurrectionists, as

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 2>well as impeaching all the Supreme Court justices who voted

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.419
<v Speaker 2>for his arrest and firing the federal police officers involved,

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.540
<v Speaker 2>because he spouted the worst rhetoric of penal populism, advocating

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.380
<v Speaker 2>for chemical castration, lowering the age of criminal responsibility, and

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.150
<v Speaker 2>legalizing the death penalty. And because of Flavio's countless ties

0:03:02.190 --> 0:03:05.590
<v Speaker 2>to organized crime, specifically the militia's, a type of mafia

0:03:05.610 --> 0:03:08.630
<v Speaker 2>that keeps favelas in a permanent dystopia and their residents

0:03:08.690 --> 0:03:11.930
<v Speaker 2>under the thumb of local petty dictators. The future felt

0:03:12.130 --> 0:03:16.870
<v Speaker 2>terrifyingly bleak. Lula, despite leading in the polls, had performed poorly.

0:03:16.889 --> 0:03:20.470
<v Speaker 2>Flavio Bolsonaro, the PL candidate, looked as though he had

0:03:20.590 --> 0:03:23.410
<v Speaker 2>almost won in the first round. The votes were still

0:03:23.450 --> 0:03:26.470
<v Speaker 2>being counted, and Lula was recovering part of the vote share.

0:03:27.250 --> 0:03:29.850
<v Speaker 2>In every bar and venue where the left, myself included,

0:03:29.870 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 2>had gathered, people watched the election results. In Prasa, El Salvador,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.660
<v Speaker 2>dubbed Rio's Little Havana because of the left's overwhelming influence

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>in the neighborhood, not unlike New York City's commie corridor,

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.060
<v Speaker 2>the atmosphere felt like a funeral. Hundreds of people had

0:03:44.100 --> 0:03:47.020
<v Speaker 2>gathered to watch the results, but with every vote tally update,

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the mood grew heavier. To make matters worse, so many

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>people had gathered there that the street beer vendors ran

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:54.470
<v Speaker 2>out of ice. It was going to be a night

0:03:54.490 --> 0:03:58.210
<v Speaker 2>of terrible news, solaced only by warm beer. Many were

0:03:58.250 --> 0:04:01.650
<v Speaker 2>tracking the count on the electoral court's mobile app. Whispers like,

0:04:01.870 --> 0:04:03.290
<v Speaker 2>did you see what's happening in Minas?

0:04:03.570 --> 0:04:04.250
<v Speaker 1>Were constant.

0:04:04.830 --> 0:04:08.410
<v Speaker 2>Nicolas Feria, a far-right influencer, something like a less overtly

0:04:08.470 --> 0:04:12.570
<v Speaker 2>white supremacist, more transphobic Nick Fuentes, had swept 3 million votes,

0:04:12.770 --> 0:04:15.990
<v Speaker 2>dragging 20 deputies into Congress along with him. The left

0:04:16.029 --> 0:04:18.750
<v Speaker 2>hadn't won a single Senate race in the Southeast, and

0:04:18.790 --> 0:04:21.750
<v Speaker 2>Rio de Janeiro would once again be governed by an unknown,

0:04:21.850 --> 0:04:25.150
<v Speaker 2>backed by the militias. Not far away, a lone, drunk

0:04:25.270 --> 0:04:26.470
<v Speaker 2>Bolsonarista was shouting.

0:04:26.910 --> 0:04:28.070
<v Speaker 1>It's Lula! It's Lula!

0:04:28.210 --> 0:04:31.550
<v Speaker 2>It's Lula back in prison! My friends living abroad kept

0:04:31.650 --> 0:04:34.810
<v Speaker 2>asking me through WhatsApp, What now? Hunger all over again?

0:04:35.150 --> 0:04:38.349
<v Speaker 2>Videos of people eating cow carcasses? Those videos showing the

0:04:38.410 --> 0:04:41.910
<v Speaker 2>misery and starvation under Jair Bolsonaro's government hit the Brazilian

0:04:41.950 --> 0:04:46.050
<v Speaker 2>diaspora in Europe, the US, and Australia particularly hard. My

0:04:46.089 --> 0:04:48.610
<v Speaker 2>uncle in Texas texted me, and I tried to comfort him.

0:04:49.070 --> 0:04:52.150
<v Speaker 2>As a progressive living in Texas, he's usually the pessimistic one.

0:04:52.510 --> 0:04:55.210
<v Speaker 2>But that day, the pessimism was palpable, almost like a

0:04:55.270 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>haze that smelled of warm beer. The left had grown

0:04:58.500 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 2>slightly in size, but the far-right's crushing victory over the

0:05:01.380 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 2>center-right meant that no one could help thinking the worst.

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.659
<v Speaker 2>People spoke of a defeat that would affect 220 million

0:05:07.700 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Brazilian citizens for at least a decade. A group of

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.660
<v Speaker 2>law students from the Universidade Federal Fluminense, a public university

0:05:14.700 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 2>in the small city of Niterói, sort of a New

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.979
<v Speaker 2>Jersey to Rio de Janeiro, grabbed all the banners and

0:05:20.020 --> 0:05:23.299
<v Speaker 2>stickers they had and started a march against Flavio's fascism

0:05:23.380 --> 0:05:26.370
<v Speaker 2>and in defense of Lula's government. They probably had no

0:05:26.470 --> 0:05:28.589
<v Speaker 2>idea what this would lead to, or how that small

0:05:28.670 --> 0:05:31.330
<v Speaker 2>gesture was the rolling of a snowball down a massive mountain.

0:05:31.830 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 2>The first-round campaign was remarkably listless in Brazil, a rarity,

0:05:35.540 --> 0:05:38.340
<v Speaker 2>especially in a presidential election year with Lula on the ballot.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Lula's third term was similarly lackluster. The main hallmarks of

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.370
<v Speaker 2>his third administration were reviving programs abolished by Jair Bolsonaro

0:05:46.450 --> 0:05:50.110
<v Speaker 2>and prosecuting the January 8th insurrectionists who refused to accept

0:05:50.170 --> 0:05:52.950
<v Speaker 2>Jair's defeat. On the eve of the first round, the

0:05:52.970 --> 0:05:56.770
<v Speaker 2>campaign team, sensing trouble ahead, took bold and hugely popular measures.

0:05:57.290 --> 0:06:00.549
<v Speaker 2>The first was banning sports betting platforms, bets, in Brazil.

0:06:00.950 --> 0:06:03.670
<v Speaker 2>Brazil is the world's largest market for online betting, despite

0:06:03.690 --> 0:06:07.529
<v Speaker 2>being the 10th largest economy globally. Gambling addiction affects 11

0:06:07.529 --> 0:06:11.910
<v Speaker 2>million Brazilians. These betting apps were originally legalized under Michel Timmer,

0:06:12.230 --> 0:06:15.910
<v Speaker 2>who took office after an unsubstantiated impeachment against Dilma Rousseff,

0:06:16.089 --> 0:06:19.750
<v Speaker 2>Lula's successor. The ban had 3-to-1 approval in Brazil. Had

0:06:19.790 --> 0:06:22.109
<v Speaker 2>it gone into effect, it would have meant that, on average,

0:06:22.470 --> 0:06:25.370
<v Speaker 2>every Brazilian would now have 40 reals more in their pocket,

0:06:25.690 --> 0:06:28.510
<v Speaker 2>the equivalent of a meal at a good restaurant. However,

0:06:28.690 --> 0:06:32.370
<v Speaker 2>it came too late, just days before the first round. Still,

0:06:32.490 --> 0:06:35.510
<v Speaker 2>it was enough to spark enthusiasm among the activist base,

0:06:35.830 --> 0:06:37.990
<v Speaker 2>focused on the lives of the poorest, as he was

0:06:38.029 --> 0:06:41.810
<v Speaker 2>during his first and second terms. The main issue was pessimism.

0:06:42.250 --> 0:06:44.690
<v Speaker 2>The vast majority of the Brazilian left went to sleep

0:06:44.770 --> 0:06:49.100
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday, October 5th, believing Lula's victory was now mathematically impossible.

0:06:49.690 --> 0:06:53.099
<v Speaker 2>All other candidates besides Lula and Flavio were right-wing, with

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>one even to the right of Flavio. The radical socialist

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.460
<v Speaker 2>left received 200,000 votes, a tiny fraction of the 2

0:06:59.460 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>million votes Lula needed to turn around. Robert again here,

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 2>and we'll continue with the story, but first we've got

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:19.670
<v Speaker 2>a break for some ads. And we're back, and I'm

0:07:19.690 --> 0:07:23.890
<v Speaker 2>going to continue with Kayo's article. Early in the week, however,

0:07:24.010 --> 0:07:27.810
<v Speaker 2>things began to shift. Every optimistic content creator, including the

0:07:27.850 --> 0:07:30.710
<v Speaker 2>writer of this episode, started going viral on social media.

0:07:31.150 --> 0:07:34.090
<v Speaker 2>On the Monday after the election, Philippe Abbal, Gabriel Devan,

0:07:34.490 --> 0:07:36.890
<v Speaker 2>and the author of this article recorded an episode of

0:07:36.930 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the Virakasas, the Turncoats podcast titled Bora, or Let's Go.

0:07:41.790 --> 0:07:45.250
<v Speaker 2>The tone was straightforward. We are three white, sechette, left-wing guys,

0:07:45.290 --> 0:07:48.430
<v Speaker 2>the stereotypical Brooklyn podcast, and we simply do not have

0:07:48.470 --> 0:07:50.970
<v Speaker 2>the right to give anything less than everything we've got

0:07:51.030 --> 0:07:54.130
<v Speaker 2>to win this second round. Nobody gets to stop. We'll

0:07:54.170 --> 0:07:56.410
<v Speaker 2>do whatever it takes, and this talk about it being

0:07:56.490 --> 0:08:00.070
<v Speaker 2>mathematically impossible to win is pure nonsense. I went as

0:08:00.110 --> 0:08:03.150
<v Speaker 2>far as making a bold prediction. History is in our hands,

0:08:03.310 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and Brazil's second round could be the first domino to

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.820
<v Speaker 2>fall in a wave of far-right defeats across the Americas.

0:08:09.300 --> 0:08:09.660
<v Speaker 1>The U.S.

0:08:09.700 --> 0:08:12.460
<v Speaker 2>Midterms would be the second. Two days later, I would

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.460
<v Speaker 2>repeat that exact phrase on Fear and Loathing in Brasilia,

0:08:15.690 --> 0:08:19.650
<v Speaker 2>Brazil's biggest left-wing podcast, only for the host to reply, despondently,

0:08:20.310 --> 0:08:23.750
<v Speaker 2>I hope so, Caio, but it looks tough. The same day,

0:08:24.050 --> 0:08:26.110
<v Speaker 2>I repeated the line as a guest on an episode

0:08:26.130 --> 0:08:28.100
<v Speaker 2>of Chapo Trap House and was met with a swarm

0:08:28.140 --> 0:08:31.140
<v Speaker 2>of foreign doomers on social media. As if local pessimism

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 2>wasn't enough, the second round was now importing doom and

0:08:33.740 --> 0:08:36.609
<v Speaker 2>gloom straight from the U.S. into my life. We didn't

0:08:36.650 --> 0:08:40.050
<v Speaker 2>expect the positive response that the episode of Virakashikas would bring.

0:08:40.429 --> 0:08:42.410
<v Speaker 2>On top of becoming one of the most viewed episodes

0:08:42.450 --> 0:08:44.430
<v Speaker 2>of the podcast, it was one of the most commented on.

0:08:44.590 --> 0:08:46.550
<v Speaker 2>Dozens of people wrote to us saying they had regained

0:08:46.570 --> 0:08:48.620
<v Speaker 2>their hope and proudly sharing the votes that they had

0:08:48.650 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>managed to flip. It was a tiny fraction, of course.

0:08:51.500 --> 0:08:53.980
<v Speaker 2>Lula needed two million votes, but it was a great

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.140
<v Speaker 2>indicator of what was to come. Record high abstention rates

0:08:57.179 --> 0:08:59.599
<v Speaker 2>were good news. Another reason for hope was the public's

0:08:59.700 --> 0:09:02.820
<v Speaker 2>low awareness of who Flavio really was, compounded by the

0:09:02.860 --> 0:09:06.230
<v Speaker 2>complete absence of debates in the first round. Flavio hadn't

0:09:06.290 --> 0:09:08.950
<v Speaker 2>attended a single one, and the only collective memory people

0:09:09.030 --> 0:09:12.110
<v Speaker 2>had of him debating was his infamous 2016 collapse on

0:09:12.190 --> 0:09:15.610
<v Speaker 2>live TV. This created a strong expectation that in the

0:09:15.650 --> 0:09:19.569
<v Speaker 2>second round, Lula, a seasoned debater since 1989, would easily

0:09:19.610 --> 0:09:22.209
<v Speaker 2>dominate the debates and swing a massive number of votes.

0:09:22.890 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Despite his strong showing in the first round of voting,

0:09:25.170 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Flavio was an exceptionally weak candidate. In the 2016 mayoral election,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.500
<v Speaker 2>Flavio finished in fourth place, after he fainted and soiled

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:36.189
<v Speaker 2>himself during a live debate. Within the Bolsonaro family, he

0:09:36.230 --> 0:09:39.150
<v Speaker 2>was the closest to organized crime and major corruption scandals.

0:09:39.530 --> 0:09:41.980
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to a miracle of media spin, the largest recent

0:09:42.010 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 2>corruption case in Brazil's history, the Banco Master Ponzi scheme,

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.099
<v Speaker 2>had been framed as ambidextrous, meaning it supposedly involved both

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.420
<v Speaker 2>the left and the right. It was a blatant lie.

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.210
<v Speaker 2>Leaked audio recordings proved an intimate friendship between Flavio and

0:09:55.270 --> 0:09:59.930
<v Speaker 2>banker Daniel Vorcaro. Vorcaro had donated money to Jair Bolsonaro's biopics,

0:10:00.030 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 2>starring Jim Caviezel, a project developed by Flavio. Vorcaro was

0:10:04.140 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 2>affiliated with the Lagoina Church, a recent megachurch that experienced

0:10:07.820 --> 0:10:11.340
<v Speaker 2>meteoric growth and was deeply tied to the PL right-wing party.

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.780
<v Speaker 2>Flavio was a silent partner in a betting platform linked

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>to Vorcaro. They even shared a business partner, Willard Tomas.

0:10:19.230 --> 0:10:21.010
<v Speaker 2>By the way, if you found it strange that the

0:10:21.050 --> 0:10:23.510
<v Speaker 2>same group owned a church, a betting company, and a bank,

0:10:23.790 --> 0:10:27.209
<v Speaker 2>all classic vehicles for money laundering, well, your suspicions might

0:10:27.250 --> 0:10:31.100
<v Speaker 2>be spot on. Allegations that this whole rapidly growing complex

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.219
<v Speaker 2>was a money laundering scheme for organized crime are well-founded.

0:10:34.900 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Willer Tomas, for instance, was the largest bettor on the

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.850
<v Speaker 2>Blaze platform, accounting for 50% of the company's profits by

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.250
<v Speaker 2>spending 6.6 billion rials, roughly $ 1.

0:10:42.090 --> 0:10:42.510
<v Speaker 1>2 billion.

0:10:45.580 --> 0:10:48.069
<v Speaker 2>There's no way he is not a hidden partner of Blaise,

0:10:48.250 --> 0:10:51.430
<v Speaker 2>and that's a money laundering scheme. Even so, the mainstream

0:10:51.450 --> 0:10:54.809
<v Speaker 2>media blackout on the topic shielded Flavio. Only the small

0:10:54.870 --> 0:10:58.790
<v Speaker 2>alternative media ecosystem was talking about it. To make matters worse,

0:10:58.929 --> 0:11:01.980
<v Speaker 2>Flavio's presumed future economy minister was appearing in the media

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 2>to lay out her platform. She proposed ending Bolsa Familia,

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.420
<v Speaker 2>the income transfer program that lifted millions out of poverty

0:11:08.460 --> 0:11:11.530
<v Speaker 2>during Lula's first terms in office. She backed blocking the

0:11:11.580 --> 0:11:14.099
<v Speaker 2>reduction of the workweek from 44 to 40 hours, a

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.179
<v Speaker 2>campaign that had originally gone viral on TikTok, led by

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>a black gay TikToker who had just been elected federal deputy,

0:11:20.700 --> 0:11:23.380
<v Speaker 2>in a campaign which Lula had embraced earlier this year.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.699
<v Speaker 2>Added to that were wage freezes and billions of rials

0:11:26.820 --> 0:11:29.819
<v Speaker 2>in budget cuts, echoing Millet and Doge, which the left

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>quickly realized would come straight out of healthcare and education.

0:11:33.340 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 2>And she was not the only person in Flavio's circle

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>damaging his image. Flavio himself was not a particularly religious

0:11:39.300 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 2>person until he needed to consolidate support among evangelicals to

0:11:42.970 --> 0:11:46.690
<v Speaker 2>gain leverage within the Bolsonarista coalition and secure his nomination

0:11:46.730 --> 0:11:49.990
<v Speaker 2>as the candidate. To that end, the pastor Flavio allied

0:11:50.010 --> 0:11:53.110
<v Speaker 2>with was especially radical. As a result, the pastor had

0:11:53.150 --> 0:11:56.689
<v Speaker 2>taken deeply anti-Catholic stances, such as demanding that Brazil strip

0:11:56.809 --> 0:11:59.449
<v Speaker 2>Our Lady of Aparecida, one of the few black saints,

0:11:59.690 --> 0:12:01.850
<v Speaker 2>of her status as the patron saint of the nation.

0:12:02.510 --> 0:12:05.449
<v Speaker 2>Despite evangelical influence on the right, the majority of Brazil

0:12:05.490 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 2>remains Catholic. Furthermore, the Afro-religious minority also reveres Our Lady

0:12:09.970 --> 0:12:15.329
<v Speaker 2>of Aparecida, syncretized with the Orisha Oshun. Still, fear only

0:12:15.370 --> 0:12:18.189
<v Speaker 2>gets you so far. The Democrats spent all of 2024

0:12:18.190 --> 0:12:21.790
<v Speaker 2>trying to fearmonger liberals into organizing, and it fell flat.

0:12:22.150 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Fear simply isn't enough. The 17th century Dutch philosopher Benedict

0:12:26.380 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Spinoza pointed out that if fear is anxiety about a

0:12:29.300 --> 0:12:32.479
<v Speaker 2>future bad outcome, and hope is that exact same anxiety

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.540
<v Speaker 2>about a good outcome, and given that all anxiety hinges

0:12:35.620 --> 0:12:38.420
<v Speaker 2>on uncertainty, Fear and hope are just two sides of

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 2>the very same coin. On Wednesday, October 7th, barely two

0:12:42.500 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 2>days after those UFF students spontaneously marched in a super

0:12:45.740 --> 0:12:49.070
<v Speaker 2>rare first round demonstration, students from all over the state

0:12:49.090 --> 0:12:51.370
<v Speaker 2>of Rio took over the streets at a massive rally.

0:12:51.890 --> 0:12:55.030
<v Speaker 2>The shift from sheer dread into rising hope was officially underway.

0:12:55.450 --> 0:12:58.290
<v Speaker 2>By Thursday, everyone was talking about how huge the student

0:12:58.330 --> 0:13:01.810
<v Speaker 2>march had been. That same day, Lula gathered influencers and

0:13:01.870 --> 0:13:05.619
<v Speaker 2>newly elected young leaders to recalibrate the online campaign. Despite

0:13:05.630 --> 0:13:09.150
<v Speaker 2>a few bumps along the way, like tanky YouTuber-turned-Congressman Yones

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Manuel calling out Lula's campaign for being totally lost, the

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 2>digital side started getting its act together. Lula switched to

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.340
<v Speaker 2>posting raw selfie videos, hitting Flavio much harder. The campaign

0:13:19.380 --> 0:13:22.140
<v Speaker 2>launched an intense calendar of street actions, maybe the most

0:13:22.179 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 2>relentless schedule Brazil has ever seen. Which brings us to

0:13:25.380 --> 0:13:29.300
<v Speaker 2>the bizarre story of André Yanones. Inones came from a

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>poor background, working as a bus conductor to put himself

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>through law school. While in college, he joined Lula's Workers' Party, PT.

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.580
<v Speaker 2>Working as a lawyer in a tiny town, he took

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 2>on healthcare access cases, suing the state and health insurance

0:13:41.580 --> 0:13:45.350
<v Speaker 2>companies to secure surgeries, medical tests, and other procedures. By

0:13:45.410 --> 0:13:48.650
<v Speaker 2>constantly pushing the state for improvements to the public healthcare system,

0:13:49.070 --> 0:13:52.330
<v Speaker 2>he earned the nickname the People's Inspector. In 2012, he

0:13:52.390 --> 0:13:55.530
<v Speaker 2>left the PT to join the far-right PSC, which at

0:13:55.570 --> 0:13:58.700
<v Speaker 2>the time was the political home of Carlos Bolsonaro. He

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.370
<v Speaker 2>chalked it up to ideological differences, which might just be

0:14:01.429 --> 0:14:03.929
<v Speaker 2>code for, I'm an evangelical, I can't sit in a

0:14:03.970 --> 0:14:07.309
<v Speaker 2>party rooted in Catholic left and Marxism. That said, a

0:14:07.350 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>good amount of opportunism goes a long way in explaining

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.570
<v Speaker 2>this change too. In 2018, he supported the truck driver strikes.

0:14:14.090 --> 0:14:16.910
<v Speaker 2>This was an ambiguous event in Brazil. Formerly, it was

0:14:16.950 --> 0:14:20.190
<v Speaker 2>a mobilization against President Michel Timmer, who had taken office

0:14:20.250 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 2>following the impeachment of Dilma Rousseff, Lula's successor. However, midway

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 2>through to the end of the strike, individual truck drivers

0:14:26.660 --> 0:14:29.500
<v Speaker 2>started returning to work, making its nature as a lockout

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>look glaringly obvious. Employer strikes organized by a trucking company

0:14:34.140 --> 0:14:36.740
<v Speaker 2>owners are not only illegal under Brazilian law, but they

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.610
<v Speaker 2>also carry a tragic history in Latin America. They were

0:14:39.650 --> 0:14:43.690
<v Speaker 2>weaponized to overthrow Salvador Allende in Chile and Joao Gaulert

0:14:43.790 --> 0:14:48.030
<v Speaker 2>in Brazil. In 2018, Yanones was elected federal deputy under

0:14:48.050 --> 0:14:52.020
<v Speaker 2>the Avante, a party so centrist that its name literally means, forward.

0:14:52.750 --> 0:14:55.290
<v Speaker 2>In 2022, he announced his presidential run, but on the

0:14:55.390 --> 0:14:57.950
<v Speaker 2>eve of the campaign, he declared his endorsement of Lula

0:14:57.970 --> 0:15:00.530
<v Speaker 2>during a livestream. From that moment on, he would become

0:15:00.590 --> 0:15:03.890
<v Speaker 2>one of Lula's most loyal fedain. Throughout this whole chaotic

0:15:03.930 --> 0:15:07.460
<v Speaker 2>political process, Inonis' charisma and his knack for understanding the

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.860
<v Speaker 2>Brazilian internet were his greatest asset. Today, he is a

0:15:10.900 --> 0:15:13.740
<v Speaker 2>member of Brazil's True Green Party, allied with the socialist

0:15:13.780 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 2>left of PSOL, and home to Marina Silva, Lula's Minister

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>of the Environment, who brought Amazon deforestation down to near zero.

0:15:21.290 --> 0:15:24.850
<v Speaker 2>Back in 2022, Llanones' influence was real, but it got

0:15:24.930 --> 0:15:27.610
<v Speaker 2>somewhat exaggerated thanks to the viral spread of the cultural

0:15:27.630 --> 0:15:32.030
<v Speaker 2>Llanonism meme, originally coined on Twitter by environmentalist Mauricio Angelo.

0:15:32.690 --> 0:15:36.109
<v Speaker 2>Cultural Llanonism was essentially dirty political warfare, the kind of

0:15:36.190 --> 0:15:39.370
<v Speaker 2>mudslinging the left usually had moral scruples about engaging in.

0:15:39.390 --> 0:15:43.370
<v Speaker 2>Llanones was the only one who exposed Bolsonaro's ties to Freemasonry,

0:15:43.470 --> 0:15:47.430
<v Speaker 2>and therefore Satanism, setting off alarms across his evangelical base.

0:15:47.900 --> 0:15:50.180
<v Speaker 2>He was the only one driving the narrative that Bolsonaro

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 2>was a cannibal, and he was the only one who

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.100
<v Speaker 2>turned a video viral in which Bolsonaro, right in the

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>middle of a xenophobic rant, claimed a 14-year-old Venezuelan girl

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:03.450
<v Speaker 2>had flirted with him, fueling accusations of pedophilia against the president. Basically,

0:16:03.690 --> 0:16:05.270
<v Speaker 2>Yanonism vented dark woke.

0:16:05.670 --> 0:16:06.750
<v Speaker 1>The U.S. copied him.

0:16:07.490 --> 0:16:10.850
<v Speaker 2>Lula's margin of victory in 2022 was so razor-thin that

0:16:10.890 --> 0:16:13.730
<v Speaker 2>many ended up hailing Yanonism as the desperate playbook the

0:16:13.770 --> 0:16:16.620
<v Speaker 2>left required to pull off a win. With Lula's base

0:16:16.660 --> 0:16:19.430
<v Speaker 2>feeling lost, terrified, and clinging to tiny glimmers of hope,

0:16:19.690 --> 0:16:23.130
<v Speaker 2>Yononas became an undisputed leader. The sentiment was, we may

0:16:23.150 --> 0:16:25.650
<v Speaker 2>not understand what he's doing, and we might even disagree,

0:16:25.810 --> 0:16:28.050
<v Speaker 2>we might not even like him, but we trust that

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>he wants Lula elected and that he understands online political

0:16:31.020 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 2>warfare better than any of us, so I'm going to

0:16:33.260 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 2>obey whatever Yononas asks. Yononas set up a broadcast group

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.250
<v Speaker 2>on WhatsApp, a channel where only he had posting rights,

0:16:40.470 --> 0:16:44.100
<v Speaker 2>dubbed Lula's Army. Through written posts and quick videos, he

0:16:44.140 --> 0:16:46.620
<v Speaker 2>handed out daily marching orders to everyone in the channel.

0:16:46.820 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Almost every single day, part of the job was scaling

0:16:48.990 --> 0:16:52.570
<v Speaker 2>up the group's footprint, pushing for non-stop member milestones. In

0:16:52.650 --> 0:16:54.330
<v Speaker 2>one clip, he claimed that if they hit 10 million

0:16:54.370 --> 0:16:57.550
<v Speaker 2>members before election day, Lula was guaranteed to win. It

0:16:57.570 --> 0:16:59.810
<v Speaker 2>was like handing out water in a desert. The channel

0:16:59.870 --> 0:17:02.930
<v Speaker 2>exploded in size, entering the second round runoff with 11

0:17:02.930 --> 0:17:06.130
<v Speaker 2>million subscribers. And we'll talk about what came after that,

0:17:06.330 --> 0:17:08.450
<v Speaker 2>but first, I've got to run to ads one last time.

0:17:19.980 --> 0:17:22.740
<v Speaker 2>And we're back, and I'm going to continue with Caio's piece.

0:17:24.980 --> 0:17:27.750
<v Speaker 2>The tasks assigned in the channel, the Lula's Army channel,

0:17:27.850 --> 0:17:30.270
<v Speaker 2>were not focused on gaming the algorithm like a digital

0:17:30.310 --> 0:17:33.909
<v Speaker 2>marketing agency would, but on torpedoing all of Flavio Bolsonaro's

0:17:34.010 --> 0:17:37.490
<v Speaker 2>efforts on the internet. The primary rule was, do not engage,

0:17:37.690 --> 0:17:41.250
<v Speaker 2>block on site, for every politician, influencer, viral content, or

0:17:41.290 --> 0:17:44.649
<v Speaker 2>hashtag coming from the far right. While Bolsonaroismo relied on

0:17:44.690 --> 0:17:48.090
<v Speaker 2>the highly effective tactic of message redundancy, where multiple different

0:17:48.170 --> 0:17:50.889
<v Speaker 2>figures post content in various formats to push the exact

0:17:50.950 --> 0:17:55.210
<v Speaker 2>same political agenda, Unanism's tactic was the exact opposite, everyone

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.550
<v Speaker 2>sharing the exact same piece of content. This flooded the zone.

0:17:58.910 --> 0:18:01.210
<v Speaker 2>More than a strategy to convince people on social media,

0:18:01.270 --> 0:18:03.649
<v Speaker 2>it was a strategy to disrupt the normal functioning of

0:18:03.690 --> 0:18:07.330
<v Speaker 2>social platforms, which, as reported, heavily favored the far right.

0:18:07.869 --> 0:18:10.630
<v Speaker 2>News that Meta directly interfered in the election, boosting views

0:18:10.690 --> 0:18:14.260
<v Speaker 2>on Flavio's content while suppressing Lula's, remains an international scandal.

0:18:14.990 --> 0:18:18.650
<v Speaker 2>In addition to gamification, Yaronis heavily relied on strategies driven

0:18:18.690 --> 0:18:22.590
<v Speaker 2>by curiosity and psychological teasers. At times, the tactic was

0:18:22.650 --> 0:18:25.830
<v Speaker 2>simply to spread the phrase, Who is Marina Flavio Bolsonaro?

0:18:26.130 --> 0:18:28.730
<v Speaker 2>without even explaining to his own followers what the message

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.340
<v Speaker 2>was actually about. The result was intense public curiosity about

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.740
<v Speaker 2>a story that was yet to break. In this specific case,

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Mariana was the pseudonym of a Ukrainian refugee who was

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>sexually trafficked by Daniel Varkaro. All this made it completely

0:18:41.780 --> 0:18:44.990
<v Speaker 2>impossible for Flavio Bolsonaro to land a single viral narrative

0:18:45.010 --> 0:18:48.270
<v Speaker 2>during the entire second round campaign. If the internet serves

0:18:48.330 --> 0:18:51.190
<v Speaker 2>as infrastructure for the far right, Unones used his army

0:18:51.230 --> 0:18:55.070
<v Speaker 2>to blow up that bridge. His persona, naturally, spawned endless memes,

0:18:55.250 --> 0:18:59.419
<v Speaker 2>his trademark habit starting every video screaming, folks, urgent, and

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.619
<v Speaker 2>closing out calls for mass sharing with, blast this out,

0:19:02.900 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>became running gags across every bar, embraced by people who,

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 2>even as they poked fun at him, executed his orders religiously.

0:19:09.430 --> 0:19:13.230
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, the channel drove grassroots ground-game persuasion tactics.

0:19:13.730 --> 0:19:16.209
<v Speaker 2>Reach out to three Bolsonaro voters today and send them

0:19:16.230 --> 0:19:19.710
<v Speaker 2>this breaking story on Flavio's latest corruption scandal, or find

0:19:19.730 --> 0:19:21.889
<v Speaker 2>an older Lula supporter who skipped the first round and

0:19:21.930 --> 0:19:23.780
<v Speaker 2>talk to them about what this election means for the

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:28.580
<v Speaker 2>next generation. Exotic vote-flipping tactics also turned into memes. Gay

0:19:28.619 --> 0:19:32.340
<v Speaker 2>men exposing the marriages of closeted Bolsonaristas. People taking their

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.659
<v Speaker 2>Bolsonarista families on weekend trips during the election, saying, I

0:19:35.700 --> 0:19:37.980
<v Speaker 2>might not vote, but I'm taking away 10 of their votes.

0:19:38.430 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 2>and people hiding the photo IDs required to vote all

0:19:41.180 --> 0:19:44.619
<v Speaker 2>racked up quick likes. Throughout this entire process, fear was

0:19:44.660 --> 0:19:48.850
<v Speaker 2>slowly flipped to its other side, hope. Knowing it became overconfident,

0:19:48.990 --> 0:19:51.190
<v Speaker 2>the first-round defeat had been far too brutal for that.

0:19:51.550 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Yet the rallies grew progressively larger and more joyful, eventually

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.389
<v Speaker 2>becoming the largest wave of demonstrations in the country's history,

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.980
<v Speaker 2>surpassing the far-right mobilizations for Dilma's impeachment in 2016, the

0:20:02.020 --> 0:20:04.979
<v Speaker 2>free bus fare protests in 2013, and the marches for

0:20:05.020 --> 0:20:10.070
<v Speaker 2>redemocratization in the 1980s. The direct coordination between Yanonis and Lula,

0:20:10.130 --> 0:20:13.409
<v Speaker 2>who were hosting livestreams together constantly, helped the calls for

0:20:13.450 --> 0:20:19.129
<v Speaker 2>demonstrations go viral. So, did Yanonis single-handedly save the campaign? Again,

0:20:19.210 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 2>he might be riding on more credit than he actually deserves,

0:20:21.950 --> 0:20:25.190
<v Speaker 2>simply because he was such prime meme material. Erica Hilton,

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 2>a socialist trans woman representative who racked up 1.6 million votes,

0:20:29.020 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 2>dwarfing Yanonis' 78,000, built a similar network that grew to

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.750
<v Speaker 2>2 million strong. If Eunonis hadn't been in the picture,

0:20:35.830 --> 0:20:38.390
<v Speaker 2>hers might easily have scaled to 11 million, or maybe

0:20:38.450 --> 0:20:41.550
<v Speaker 2>even higher. What Eunonis did can't be reduced to some

0:20:41.609 --> 0:20:44.730
<v Speaker 2>master strategy hatched by a solitary genius, who is an

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.180
<v Speaker 2>unlikely figure who stepped into the void left by a

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 2>crumbling campaign, channeling the raw fear and hope energy of

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.020
<v Speaker 2>millions of people. This isn't a great man theory of history,

0:20:54.100 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a story of how intense popular energy takes wild,

0:20:57.140 --> 0:21:00.619
<v Speaker 2>unpredictable turns when there's no traditional structure around to channel it.

0:21:01.220 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 2>A sense of moral duty to prevent Bolsonaro's victory, coupled

0:21:04.100 --> 0:21:06.940
<v Speaker 2>with the collective gratification of building a win through popular

0:21:06.990 --> 0:21:11.330
<v Speaker 2>mobilization against the Bolsonarismo that has plagued the country since 2016,

0:21:11.330 --> 0:21:15.170
<v Speaker 2>completely exploded. For a decade, the Brazilian left watched, stunned

0:21:15.210 --> 0:21:18.869
<v Speaker 2>and helpless, the effects of thousands of underground Bolsonarista WhatsApp groups.

0:21:19.510 --> 0:21:21.430
<v Speaker 2>One day, your neighbor would tell you that a satanic

0:21:21.490 --> 0:21:24.650
<v Speaker 2>ritual had been performed at the presidential palace. Suddenly, your

0:21:24.730 --> 0:21:26.810
<v Speaker 2>aunt would start talking about the government wanting to rewrite

0:21:26.830 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the Bible to remove homophobic passages. Another day, your grandfather

0:21:30.390 --> 0:21:32.940
<v Speaker 2>would swear that the government had handed out dick-shaped baby

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.899
<v Speaker 2>models at public nurseries. Stratospheric corruption figures were thrown around

0:21:36.940 --> 0:21:39.900
<v Speaker 2>out of nowhere. Being in a space free from all that,

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 2>free from fear, standing together and fighting for a social

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:47.100
<v Speaker 2>transformation everyone believed in became addictive and contagious. Images of

0:21:47.220 --> 0:21:50.580
<v Speaker 2>massive marches comforted tired hearts. None of this was a

0:21:50.660 --> 0:21:54.570
<v Speaker 2>cure for fear. Throughout this whole process, Inside every single

0:21:54.690 --> 0:21:56.989
<v Speaker 2>one of us, there was a lingering dread that Flavia

0:21:57.020 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 2>would be elected, slash billions in social spending, persecute political opponents,

0:22:01.420 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 2>and execute the Doge Melee agenda. The left knew that

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump's second administration was stronger, more absurd, and far more

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.869
<v Speaker 2>terrible than the first. We saw the cuts in pediatric

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.290
<v Speaker 2>cancer research and the money flowing to ICE raids. However,

0:22:14.670 --> 0:22:17.210
<v Speaker 2>if fear and hope are strictly speaking the same thing,

0:22:17.550 --> 0:22:20.570
<v Speaker 2>we must understand that both can be paralyzing, freezing us

0:22:20.630 --> 0:22:23.820
<v Speaker 2>in place. Yet, There is a virtuous cycle that turns

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.959
<v Speaker 2>action in the present, rather than anxieties about the future,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.460
<v Speaker 2>into a collective effort, transforming the fear-hope coin into a

0:22:30.500 --> 0:22:34.780
<v Speaker 2>potent force for mobilization. Sometimes, you just need a peculiar

0:22:34.820 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 2>guy to step up and fill the political vacuum of

0:22:37.260 --> 0:22:38.900
<v Speaker 2>a lost, headless campaign by.

0:22:38.900 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Shouting, Urgent!

0:22:40.260 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Blast this out!

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.659
<v Speaker 1>Now! All right.

0:22:44.260 --> 0:22:46.870
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what we've got for you today. If you're

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.389
<v Speaker 2>wanting to look into the author of this episode, Kayo Almendra,

0:22:49.930 --> 0:22:56.020
<v Speaker 2>You can find him on BlueSky at Kayo Almendra, C-A-I-O-A-L-M-E-N-D-R-A

0:22:56.390 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>dot BlueSky dot social.

0:22:58.460 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Thanks again. And we'll be back tomorrow.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to It Could Happen Here. I'm Kevin Foster, and

0:23:13.540 --> 0:23:16.610
<v Speaker 3>today is Election Day in the United States, provided you're

0:23:16.619 --> 0:23:20.550
<v Speaker 3>listening when this comes out. Rather than talking about candidates, races,

0:23:20.630 --> 0:23:23.010
<v Speaker 3>ballot measures, all the things there will be plenty of

0:23:23.070 --> 0:23:25.709
<v Speaker 3>chatter about, I want to have a discussion about the

0:23:25.890 --> 0:23:30.909
<v Speaker 3>ongoing problem of election rumors and misinformation. The 2026 general

0:23:30.950 --> 0:23:34.250
<v Speaker 3>election will have no shortage of rigged election rumors and

0:23:34.310 --> 0:23:37.790
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy theories. The lead-up to the election has been full

0:23:37.830 --> 0:23:42.310
<v Speaker 3>of erroneous claims of non-citizen voting and mail-in voting conspiracism,

0:23:42.750 --> 0:23:46.700
<v Speaker 3>frequently from the president himself. About a week before the election,

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Trump announced on Truth Social a $ 1 million bounty for

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.659
<v Speaker 3>reports of voter fraud in the current or previous elections

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.980
<v Speaker 3>that lead to a conviction. I don't expect any of

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.380
<v Speaker 3>this to slow down. In fact, it may well get

0:23:59.460 --> 0:24:03.020
<v Speaker 3>worse in the coming weeks. From coordinated efforts to undermine

0:24:03.060 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 3>faith in elections to unofficial alt-government agency accounts conspiracy posting,

0:24:08.420 --> 0:24:10.950
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a mess. which is exactly why

0:24:10.970 --> 0:24:13.369
<v Speaker 3>I brought on a few experts to help parse through

0:24:13.430 --> 0:24:16.690
<v Speaker 3>the flaming garbage pile that is the election rumor mill.

0:24:17.310 --> 0:24:20.820
<v Speaker 3>I interviewed Stephen Prohaska and Danielle Lee Thompson of the

0:24:20.890 --> 0:24:24.860
<v Speaker 3>University of Washington's Center for an Informed Public, or CIP.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:30.740
<v Speaker 3>Prohaska is a sixth-year PhD candidate studying disinformation, and Thompson

0:24:30.820 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>is the research manager for CIP, leading a team studying

0:24:34.700 --> 0:24:37.609
<v Speaker 3>institutional communication and rumors around U.S.

0:24:37.690 --> 0:24:38.170
<v Speaker 1>Elections.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.500
<v Speaker 3>Their research is a bit different from many academic institutions

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.459
<v Speaker 3>and involves a lot of rapid response work. It has

0:24:45.500 --> 0:24:47.659
<v Speaker 3>also gotten them in hot water with a cast of

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 3>election deniers, including Project Veritas, who unsuccessfully sued some members

0:24:52.900 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 3>of CIP for their reporting on allegations of voter fraud

0:24:56.340 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 3>in 2020. For those who don't know, Project Veritas is

0:24:59.740 --> 0:25:04.190
<v Speaker 3>a far-right organization that promotes disinformation and election conspiracism. It

0:25:04.790 --> 0:25:08.670
<v Speaker 3>was founded by James O'Keefe, who, according to Reuters, recently

0:25:08.710 --> 0:25:12.450
<v Speaker 3>filmed a stunt in Minnesota with right-wing influencer Cam Higbee,

0:25:12.890 --> 0:25:16.950
<v Speaker 3>landing them both with felony unlawful voting and identity theft charges,

0:25:17.290 --> 0:25:22.170
<v Speaker 3>proposing as registered voters at polling places during Minnesota's August primary.

0:25:22.190 --> 0:25:25.590
<v Speaker 3>That's not really relevant to the episode, I just think

0:25:25.630 --> 0:25:28.669
<v Speaker 3>it's really funny and ironic. But anyway, I want to

0:25:28.690 --> 0:25:31.570
<v Speaker 3>be clear, I'm not saying in this episode that we

0:25:31.609 --> 0:25:34.900
<v Speaker 3>have completely free and fair elections. We don't know what's

0:25:34.940 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 3>going to happen today or in the upcoming weeks, whether

0:25:38.060 --> 0:25:42.020
<v Speaker 3>ICE will intimidate people at the polls, what Trump will post, etc.

0:25:42.580 --> 0:25:45.540
<v Speaker 3>This episode is about trying to understand what's happening and

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.550
<v Speaker 3>how not to pour gasoline on the fire. So without

0:25:49.590 --> 0:25:54.430
<v Speaker 3>further ado, here's the interview. I want to talk a

0:25:54.470 --> 0:25:59.090
<v Speaker 3>little bit about your typology around elections. Why do you

0:25:59.250 --> 0:26:03.450
<v Speaker 3>use the word rumors to describe elections? All these things

0:26:03.470 --> 0:26:05.909
<v Speaker 3>that are popping up around the election. What's the difference

0:26:05.950 --> 0:26:10.669
<v Speaker 3>between that and misinformation or conspiracy? And I think this

0:26:10.690 --> 0:26:13.670
<v Speaker 3>would also be a good spot to talk about some

0:26:13.690 --> 0:26:16.820
<v Speaker 3>of the spot the lie kind of methodology that you have.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 3>And Danielle, you can kick us off.

0:26:20.180 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.260
<v Speaker 4>I think if you look back 10 years ago, there

0:26:23.300 --> 0:26:26.220
<v Speaker 4>was a really interesting moment where we had a lot

0:26:26.260 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 4>of new things happening in American society. A new president

0:26:30.859 --> 0:26:35.570
<v Speaker 4>who was super populist, aka Donald Trump. We had these

0:26:35.790 --> 0:26:40.070
<v Speaker 4>online platforms that brought quick information into the palms of

0:26:40.150 --> 0:26:43.629
<v Speaker 4>our hands in this very intimate way. And folks were

0:26:43.770 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 4>really wondering why. Like, why did this election happen? What's

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 4>going on? There's hate speech on the internet that's super visible.

0:26:51.060 --> 0:26:54.460
<v Speaker 4>There's false information on the internet that's super visible. And

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:58.550
<v Speaker 4>I think that there was a real interest across society,

0:26:59.010 --> 0:27:04.530
<v Speaker 4>whether it was civil society, academia, journalism, and other kinds of,

0:27:04.550 --> 0:27:06.970
<v Speaker 4>you could think of it as like, ivory tower truce

0:27:07.130 --> 0:27:12.590
<v Speaker 4>organizations interested in confronting this informational challenge. And so I

0:27:12.609 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 4>think at the moment, folks oftentimes fixated on how like

0:27:16.950 --> 0:27:19.620
<v Speaker 4>information was true or false. Like, oh my gosh, Trump

0:27:19.660 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 4>is saying all these false things. Oh my goodness. Someone

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.580
<v Speaker 4>said this like terrible thing that we need to moderate

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.939
<v Speaker 4>and we need to like figure out this problem. So

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:28.860
<v Speaker 4>there was a lot of, I think at the time

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.609
<v Speaker 4>to folks who jumped on this bandwagon of talking about

0:27:31.730 --> 0:27:36.180
<v Speaker 4>information as like a disinformation problem or a narrative disorder,

0:27:36.540 --> 0:27:38.860
<v Speaker 4>or like all of these ways in which we could

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 4>solve across just elections, but also public health or, uh,

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.290
<v Speaker 4>climate or other things like this challenge of the public

0:27:47.410 --> 0:27:52.590
<v Speaker 4>getting false information from smaller outlets or individuals because broadcast

0:27:52.650 --> 0:27:57.020
<v Speaker 4>media and journalism had just become, uh, I mean, quite frankly,

0:27:57.380 --> 0:28:00.570
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more under attack or consolidated or going

0:28:00.590 --> 0:28:02.530
<v Speaker 4>out of business. It's like the nature of how we

0:28:02.550 --> 0:28:06.450
<v Speaker 4>get information was changing so rapidly. Now, I think like

0:28:06.890 --> 0:28:10.460
<v Speaker 4>our team, the founders of our center, Kate Starburn and

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:14.290
<v Speaker 4>Emma Spiro had gotten their career starts studying data. crisis

0:28:14.330 --> 0:28:17.790
<v Speaker 4>informatics so this is how information flows on the internet

0:28:17.810 --> 0:28:21.270
<v Speaker 4>during crisis moments and they framed it very early on

0:28:21.470 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 4>as the study of rumor during crisis events a rumor

0:28:25.650 --> 0:28:30.300
<v Speaker 4>is an unfounded claim or speculation that doesn't necessarily have

0:28:30.500 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 4>evidence or maybe it does have some evidence that isn't

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 4>verified yet but rumors are really normal things during a

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 4>crisis event like yeah Everyone wants to know who did it,

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.300
<v Speaker 4>what did it, what happened, what's going on. And everyone

0:28:42.340 --> 0:28:44.260
<v Speaker 4>has a take. It's like playing a game of telephone.

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 4>And there have been studies for basically the past hundred

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.210
<v Speaker 4>years of how rumoring dynamics work in American society. Now,

0:28:51.330 --> 0:28:54.730
<v Speaker 4>sometimes those rumors can be true. They can be false

0:28:54.870 --> 0:28:56.630
<v Speaker 4>or they can be somewhere. And most of the time,

0:28:56.670 --> 0:29:01.990
<v Speaker 4>somewhere in between, right? Disinformation is the intentional spread of

0:29:02.380 --> 0:29:06.990
<v Speaker 4>of false or falsified information in order to mislead the

0:29:07.030 --> 0:29:09.709
<v Speaker 4>public or to gain or something for gain, some sort

0:29:09.750 --> 0:29:13.940
<v Speaker 4>of coordination, right? So there's like an intentional element. Misinformation

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.190
<v Speaker 4>is the spread of false or misleading information but not

0:29:18.260 --> 0:29:22.380
<v Speaker 4>necessarily with that intent. So sometimes we've all been guilty

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:24.980
<v Speaker 4>of sharing some sort of post online that might be

0:29:25.100 --> 0:29:27.340
<v Speaker 4>AI generated. Then we find out later that it was

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 4>AI generated.

0:29:28.180 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Oh my goodness.

0:29:29.620 --> 0:29:33.890
<v Speaker 4>I accidentally spread some misinformation online. That's very different than

0:29:33.990 --> 0:29:38.709
<v Speaker 4>intentionally spreading that piece of information in order to mislead

0:29:38.730 --> 0:29:39.170
<v Speaker 4>the public.

0:29:39.410 --> 0:29:42.850
<v Speaker 3>It's the pink Panther at the Paris protests and stuff.

0:29:42.910 --> 0:29:44.090
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:29:44.110 --> 0:29:47.330
<v Speaker 4>And so but a rumor actually is maybe a little

0:29:47.590 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 4>bit more honest to describe what we're studying in the moment,

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.670
<v Speaker 4>because we don't know the intent oftentimes of people spreading

0:29:54.990 --> 0:29:58.270
<v Speaker 4>certain kinds of information. So it's it's sort of a

0:29:58.270 --> 0:30:02.650
<v Speaker 4>little more honest in these rapidly unfolding moments of high

0:30:02.690 --> 0:30:06.510
<v Speaker 4>levels of uncertainty, like elections to call something a rumor,

0:30:06.850 --> 0:30:08.820
<v Speaker 4>because we're not the ones to like make that call

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:14.180
<v Speaker 4>about the intentionality of that information. Although there's definitely a

0:30:14.940 --> 0:30:17.540
<v Speaker 4>lot of signs sometimes to what might be a coordinated

0:30:17.580 --> 0:30:19.300
<v Speaker 4>disinformation campaign versus not.

0:30:19.980 --> 0:30:20.260
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:30:20.540 --> 0:30:23.070
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, so we've basically been doing this work so

0:30:23.110 --> 0:30:27.330
<v Speaker 4>long that we have identified six ways that rumors can

0:30:27.390 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 4>be potentially misleading. So I'm happy to sort of pass

0:30:32.300 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 4>that off to Stephen if you want to talk about it. Yeah.

0:30:36.180 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 6>Before I jump in that, I'm just going to emphasize

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.750
<v Speaker 6>the point Danielle made there that because we're doing rapid

0:30:40.810 --> 0:30:43.460
<v Speaker 6>response work, We are looking at rumors in real time.

0:30:43.500 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 5>We don't know facticity. We don't know intentionality.

0:30:45.700 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 6>So as far as like the primary construct for the

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.700
<v Speaker 6>work that we do in the rapid response setting, rumor

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:52.700
<v Speaker 6>is what we are looking at because there is so

0:30:52.740 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 6>much information that is uncertain at the time of spread.

0:30:55.020 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 6>So just to emphasize that it's really a very useful

0:30:57.340 --> 0:31:00.300
<v Speaker 6>tool for us. Yeah, that has roots in crisis informatics.

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 6>As Danielle mentioned, we've spent a lot of time looking

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.530
<v Speaker 6>at election rumors in particular. When we first started in 2020,

0:31:07.530 --> 0:31:10.390
<v Speaker 6>we didn't actually know everything that we were getting into.

0:31:10.850 --> 0:31:12.330
<v Speaker 6>There was a lot of stuff that was novel to us.

0:31:12.390 --> 0:31:15.170
<v Speaker 6>We were researchers. We had some familiarity with rumors in general,

0:31:15.610 --> 0:31:18.130
<v Speaker 6>online spaces, but we didn't know as much about elections.

0:31:18.610 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 6>And so we started seeing very similar rumors online. And

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.900
<v Speaker 6>even when rumors weren't using the exact same claims, they

0:31:24.980 --> 0:31:29.750
<v Speaker 6>often seemed to mislead in fairly predictable ways. And so

0:31:29.890 --> 0:31:32.330
<v Speaker 6>we've actually just published this in our sub stack, what

0:31:32.370 --> 0:31:35.430
<v Speaker 6>we call the six ways that rigged election rumors mislead.

0:31:35.450 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 6>So just like start at the outset. There are cases

0:31:38.980 --> 0:31:43.260
<v Speaker 6>where there is no evidence to support a particular claim. However,

0:31:43.820 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 6>most of the time in the work that we do

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.900
<v Speaker 6>and the rumors that we look at, it's pretty rare

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.930
<v Speaker 6>to have these things that is either fabricated or no evidence.

0:31:52.250 --> 0:31:55.090
<v Speaker 6>There's usually some sort of like photo or video or

0:31:55.130 --> 0:31:58.469
<v Speaker 6>the picture of a ballot or a lawsuit that is

0:31:58.700 --> 0:32:03.220
<v Speaker 6>catalyzing rumoring. It often involves these misinterpretations of the evidence

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.580
<v Speaker 6>that is available. I think one of the things that

0:32:05.620 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 6>we saw last election cycle and we're seeing again this

0:32:08.940 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 6>election cycle are rumors about Starlink, for example. We're saying

0:32:12.660 --> 0:32:15.070
<v Speaker 6>I think some folks, especially I think there's like an

0:32:15.130 --> 0:32:19.610
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk documentary coming out, claims about somewhat incriminating looking

0:32:19.670 --> 0:32:22.830
<v Speaker 6>texts about lasers in space, which. It gets into the

0:32:22.870 --> 0:32:25.990
<v Speaker 6>realm of conspiracy theories. But in the work that we do,

0:32:26.010 --> 0:32:29.209
<v Speaker 6>when we see rumors, people will see that, you know,

0:32:29.230 --> 0:32:31.110
<v Speaker 6>Musk seems to have some sort of conflict of interest.

0:32:31.130 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 6>They connect it to voting machines or statistics. And then

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 6>they start coming up with these theories about, you know,

0:32:36.460 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 6>that there's no like solid evidence, but they're coming with

0:32:38.420 --> 0:32:42.209
<v Speaker 6>these theories about how, yeah, maybe there's Starlink lasers that

0:32:42.230 --> 0:32:43.390
<v Speaker 6>are manipulating voting machines.

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.380
<v Speaker 6>The next category here would be like fake or falsified evidence.

0:32:47.500 --> 0:32:50.740
<v Speaker 6>So this is the truly oftentimes I think when talking

0:32:50.770 --> 0:32:52.590
<v Speaker 6>about AI, this is what people are really worried about.

0:32:52.750 --> 0:32:55.989
<v Speaker 6>So deep fakes, which is like synthetically generated videos or

0:32:56.110 --> 0:32:59.870
<v Speaker 6>photos that look real, but are AI generated. And again,

0:32:59.890 --> 0:33:01.710
<v Speaker 6>this is one that is like it's we've seen it

0:33:01.910 --> 0:33:05.490
<v Speaker 6>and they are increasingly prevalent, certainly compared to 2020. But

0:33:05.850 --> 0:33:08.510
<v Speaker 6>it's not the primary driver of the rumoring that we

0:33:08.590 --> 0:33:11.310
<v Speaker 6>see in the work that we do. We're often sometimes

0:33:11.350 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 6>seeing kind of low quality photos or videos. that are

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:18.100
<v Speaker 6>catalyzing rumoring or in this current environment, oftentimes official statements

0:33:18.660 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 6>or actions from the administration and that lead audiences to

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.220
<v Speaker 6>become either supportive or skeptical of the things that are

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:28.330
<v Speaker 6>being said. I think the misinterpreted evidence is the next

0:33:28.350 --> 0:33:31.870
<v Speaker 6>category for us. And misinterpreted evidence, I think, is one

0:33:31.910 --> 0:33:34.710
<v Speaker 6>of the more common ones that we see where we see,

0:33:34.750 --> 0:33:38.100
<v Speaker 6>I think, for example, someone might be ballot harvesting is

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.620
<v Speaker 6>one of the tropes or the most common claims here.

0:33:40.660 --> 0:33:43.620
<v Speaker 6>Ballot harvesting actually is an interesting example because there are

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:47.180
<v Speaker 6>states that that allow what is legally called ballot harvesting,

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.340
<v Speaker 6>which is the ability to drop off multiple ballots, usually

0:33:49.380 --> 0:33:51.890
<v Speaker 6>for a family member. But that is decided on a

0:33:51.940 --> 0:33:54.690
<v Speaker 6>per state basis. However, it's been kind of wrapped up

0:33:54.730 --> 0:33:58.550
<v Speaker 6>into a larger narrative that ballot harvesting is illegally and

0:33:58.570 --> 0:34:04.390
<v Speaker 6>intentionally perpetrated primarily by Democrat organized groups to collect ballots

0:34:04.650 --> 0:34:10.590
<v Speaker 6>from different individuals, oftentimes homeless folks, people in retirement homes,

0:34:11.150 --> 0:34:14.810
<v Speaker 6>certainly commonly non-citizen voters. And that people are illegally dropping

0:34:14.870 --> 0:34:19.210
<v Speaker 6>off these allegedly false ballots through ballot harvesting. So that's

0:34:19.330 --> 0:34:21.009
<v Speaker 6>a little bit on the term there.

0:34:21.370 --> 0:34:21.609
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:21.830 --> 0:34:24.070
<v Speaker 6>But oftentimes the evidence for that is like the picture

0:34:24.670 --> 0:34:28.170
<v Speaker 6>of someone dropping off multiple envelopes that is inherently ambiguous.

0:34:28.390 --> 0:34:30.670
<v Speaker 6>So it's not really, it doesn't support the claims that

0:34:30.690 --> 0:34:33.310
<v Speaker 6>people are making based off of evidence that spreads.

0:34:33.410 --> 0:34:33.549
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:34.450 --> 0:34:34.779
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:34:35.430 --> 0:34:38.589
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot about the camera versus 2020 or

0:34:38.670 --> 0:34:40.609
<v Speaker 3>one of the later elections. But I think a lot

0:34:40.650 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 3>about the election worker moving the bin full of votes

0:34:45.820 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 3>or ballots under a table and then everybody freaking out

0:34:49.260 --> 0:34:53.860
<v Speaker 3>online about that. That strikes me as misinterpreted evidence or

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 3>like you see something that, you know, could suggest, but

0:34:56.700 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 3>it just ends up spinning up based on narratives that

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:01.660
<v Speaker 3>people sort of propagate.

0:35:02.670 --> 0:35:06.410
<v Speaker 4>We say at the CIP, everything is a conspiracy when

0:35:06.430 --> 0:35:10.710
<v Speaker 4>you don't know how anything works. So elections are confusing.

0:35:10.790 --> 0:35:14.589
<v Speaker 4>Trust me, even on this team rules, there are rule changes.

0:35:14.830 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 4>And because in the United States, election rules and laws

0:35:18.100 --> 0:35:22.420
<v Speaker 4>are adjudicated at the jurisdictional level. Like we've literally thousands

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:27.020
<v Speaker 4>of different cases and rule systems and machines in this

0:35:27.060 --> 0:35:29.980
<v Speaker 4>country about like how people vote. So it's different state

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 4>by state. And there's a lot of weird objects or

0:35:34.780 --> 0:35:37.969
<v Speaker 4>protocol or procedures that people don't know what's going on.

0:35:38.070 --> 0:35:41.910
<v Speaker 4>So things can change. look very suspicious especially when there's

0:35:41.930 --> 0:35:45.750
<v Speaker 4>like a mundane object like a backpack or a box

0:35:46.250 --> 0:35:48.270
<v Speaker 4>and someone takes a picture of that oh my gosh

0:35:48.290 --> 0:35:50.550
<v Speaker 4>they put the ballot in the backpack or the bag

0:35:50.570 --> 0:35:52.569
<v Speaker 4>or the box and then they moved it when that's

0:35:52.590 --> 0:35:54.590
<v Speaker 4>actually just like a really mundane thing that's part of

0:35:54.630 --> 0:35:58.989
<v Speaker 4>somebody's procedure but you can wrap that up in intentionally

0:35:59.030 --> 0:36:02.529
<v Speaker 4>mischaracterized way to create this impression that something nefarious is

0:36:02.570 --> 0:36:05.940
<v Speaker 4>going on when it's just business as usual actually.

0:36:16.130 --> 0:36:18.129
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, I want to talk at some

0:36:18.150 --> 0:36:21.730
<v Speaker 3>point about malevolent actors and all of this and where

0:36:21.770 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 3>this starts to drift into broader conspiracism. But I think

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 3>it would be valuable to just take a second and

0:36:29.670 --> 0:36:32.910
<v Speaker 3>Talk about this election. You know, what is new in

0:36:33.310 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 3>the election rumor mill? I am curious about the something

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.820
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned with Trump saying he's going to offer a

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:43.469
<v Speaker 3>million dollars for people for reporting fraud or something like that.

0:36:43.489 --> 0:36:46.790
<v Speaker 3>This fraud.gov. Can we talk a little bit about what's

0:36:46.810 --> 0:36:49.649
<v Speaker 3>happening right now? Stephen and I were just talking about

0:36:49.690 --> 0:36:52.469
<v Speaker 3>this beforehand and there are a couple of things. So

0:36:52.489 --> 0:36:53.950
<v Speaker 3>I'll sort of list them out and then we can

0:36:53.989 --> 0:36:57.870
<v Speaker 3>go deeper. One is the power dynamics are different. Trump

0:36:57.930 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 3>is president this time. He has control over the executive

0:37:01.420 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 3>branch and DOJ and has access to like powerful lawyers

0:37:06.660 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 3>who can sue states.

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.060
<v Speaker 4>That's different, right? The power dynamics have changed. That has

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:16.610
<v Speaker 4>meant that secondly, we see a lot more rumoring on

0:37:16.650 --> 0:37:21.410
<v Speaker 4>the left about And in left-leaning or pro-democracy communities who

0:37:21.450 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 4>are really anxious around how our elections are going down

0:37:25.460 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 4>and if the federal government will interfere. So there's a

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:33.180
<v Speaker 4>heightened sense of anxiety so that a lot of the

0:37:33.260 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 4>rumoring that we used to see on the right around...

0:37:35.890 --> 0:37:39.930
<v Speaker 4>ballot machines and like screens switching votes or which we

0:37:39.950 --> 0:37:42.810
<v Speaker 4>saw last week in Tennessee with Dolly Parton's sister saying

0:37:42.850 --> 0:37:45.710
<v Speaker 4>that voting machine screen was switching her vote like when

0:37:45.730 --> 0:37:47.649
<v Speaker 4>there was a revenue and she voted how she wanted

0:37:47.690 --> 0:37:50.739
<v Speaker 4>in the end like there's like hyper anxiety on the

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 4>left so that's like the second thing and then the

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.810
<v Speaker 4>third thing I would say is also we have the

0:37:57.969 --> 0:38:02.410
<v Speaker 4>addition of prediction markets and profiting that are playing. So

0:38:03.090 --> 0:38:09.390
<v Speaker 4>that also has added another layer of visualizations and speculation

0:38:09.410 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 4>that can be used as evidence of like, oh my gosh, well,

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.980
<v Speaker 4>the odds were that we see this in the Brazilian election.

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Bolsonaro was going to win. And then all of a

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 4>sudden the odds.

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:20.780
<v Speaker 1>Flipped and Lula's winning.

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.940
<v Speaker 4>And the odds are for Lula. It must not, someone

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.460
<v Speaker 4>must have interfered with this when Lula, Prediction markets are

0:38:26.500 --> 0:38:29.500
<v Speaker 4>just betting markets. They're not official polling.

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:30.100
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 4>So I think like there are these three things. And

0:38:32.540 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 4>I know Stephen has done some work on like the

0:38:35.180 --> 0:38:39.850
<v Speaker 4>power dynamics of election conspiracies as well. I didn't know

0:38:39.890 --> 0:38:41.870
<v Speaker 4>if you wanted like we can like go into in

0:38:41.910 --> 0:38:43.589
<v Speaker 4>depth on these three things if you would like.

0:38:44.260 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it could be worth diving into. And

0:38:47.489 --> 0:38:49.969
<v Speaker 3>I just, you have me thinking about like Kalshi and

0:38:50.010 --> 0:38:54.029
<v Speaker 3>Polymarket and all this, and it's just how unbelievably frustrating

0:38:54.070 --> 0:38:57.450
<v Speaker 3>it is to me, this narrative that these are accurate

0:38:57.489 --> 0:39:00.629
<v Speaker 3>sources of information or because collectively people have put their

0:39:00.670 --> 0:39:03.570
<v Speaker 3>money on something for some reason that is now considered

0:39:03.590 --> 0:39:08.270
<v Speaker 3>a good actual odds maker. We're talking about, you know,

0:39:08.390 --> 0:39:12.859
<v Speaker 3>random political gamblers on the internet. I just, it makes

0:39:12.900 --> 0:39:15.820
<v Speaker 3>me go crazy, but You did also bring up the,

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Dolly Parton sister case where she was

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 3>there was speculation around if this machine in Tennessee was

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:23.950
<v Speaker 3>switching a vote. But it seemed like this was boiled

0:39:23.989 --> 0:39:29.230
<v Speaker 3>down largely to touchscreen glitches and errors, which obviously this

0:39:29.290 --> 0:39:29.930
<v Speaker 3>is a serious problem.

0:39:30.070 --> 0:39:30.630
<v Speaker 1>Problem.

0:39:31.190 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 3>But I do notice it seems like there is this

0:39:34.090 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 3>trend of the misattribution of intent around these different errors

0:39:38.900 --> 0:39:42.760
<v Speaker 3>in our election system. And I'm curious about how social

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:47.020
<v Speaker 3>media makes that worse. But also, yeah, we can dive

0:39:47.140 --> 0:39:49.219
<v Speaker 3>into some of the things you mentioned as well too, but.

0:39:50.180 --> 0:39:52.340
<v Speaker 4>I'll say like, you know, we were talking about the

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:55.399
<v Speaker 4>six ways rigged election rumors mislead. And there are those

0:39:55.460 --> 0:39:57.299
<v Speaker 4>three other ways that we didn't finish, which is like,

0:39:57.540 --> 0:40:01.430
<v Speaker 4>there's real evidence with real voting issues, right? So the

0:40:01.469 --> 0:40:03.930
<v Speaker 4>problem is, as in the case with Dolly Parton's sister

0:40:04.090 --> 0:40:07.509
<v Speaker 4>and her touchscreen not working, some folks would exaggerate the

0:40:07.550 --> 0:40:10.390
<v Speaker 4>impact and say, oh my gosh, this must only be

0:40:10.450 --> 0:40:12.690
<v Speaker 4>happening to Democrats or, oh my gosh, this is only

0:40:12.710 --> 0:40:14.430
<v Speaker 4>going to happen to Republicans. And then it's going to

0:40:14.469 --> 0:40:17.450
<v Speaker 4>change election results. When in the end, Dolly Parton's sister

0:40:17.489 --> 0:40:19.710
<v Speaker 4>cast her ballot the way she wanted to pass. So

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:24.509
<v Speaker 4>There's not like a huge impact on election results necessarily.

0:40:24.850 --> 0:40:27.310
<v Speaker 4>The second one is ignoring the remedies. Like there are

0:40:27.430 --> 0:40:30.170
<v Speaker 4>backup paper ballots in those cases. There are things that

0:40:30.190 --> 0:40:32.690
<v Speaker 4>are going to solve those problems. Oftentimes, by the time

0:40:32.710 --> 0:40:34.989
<v Speaker 4>you even hear about the rumor, it might have already

0:40:35.010 --> 0:40:38.740
<v Speaker 4>been solved for. And then third is misattributing the intent,

0:40:38.860 --> 0:40:40.299
<v Speaker 4>like saying that this is part of some sort of

0:40:40.380 --> 0:40:44.300
<v Speaker 4>nefarious conspiracy scheme. When it's not like, oh, for instance,

0:40:44.380 --> 0:40:47.339
<v Speaker 4>ballots being dumped in a dumpster. You know, we see

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 4>this in Washington state this week.

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:40:49.620 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Someone's like this must be an intentional part of election

0:40:53.140 --> 0:40:56.530
<v Speaker 4>suppression by Republicans putting these ballots in a dumpster somewhere.

0:40:57.130 --> 0:40:59.730
<v Speaker 4>And that's usually just not the case. Like that intention

0:40:59.810 --> 0:41:02.690
<v Speaker 4>isn't necessarily there. So I would say like those are

0:41:02.710 --> 0:41:05.020
<v Speaker 4>some things to really keep an eye out for. There

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:08.420
<v Speaker 4>are always anomalies or challenges or things that break or

0:41:08.460 --> 0:41:11.339
<v Speaker 4>things that happen during elections, but the ways in which

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:16.690
<v Speaker 4>they actually impact elections. Votes and outcomes ignore remedies or

0:41:17.150 --> 0:41:20.149
<v Speaker 4>misintribute the intent or make it seem like this big

0:41:20.190 --> 0:41:24.340
<v Speaker 4>conspiracy thing. It's just not necessarily. That's how it misleads

0:41:24.380 --> 0:41:26.580
<v Speaker 4>the public. And that's where you can kind of get

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:29.700
<v Speaker 4>wrapped up also in fretting about things if you don't

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:33.310
<v Speaker 4>slow down and really think, OK, what's really happening here?

0:41:33.830 --> 0:41:33.989
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:41:34.340 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think to add on to that, there's kind

0:41:37.420 --> 0:41:39.540
<v Speaker 6>of two distinctions to make here as well.

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Right now, we're talking about rumors.

0:41:41.020 --> 0:41:42.980
<v Speaker 6>I think one thing to call out is oftentimes these

0:41:43.180 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 6>ways that mislead, they co-occur within a single rumor. So,

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:49.939
<v Speaker 6>you know, the machines flipping votes, for example, we see

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:52.500
<v Speaker 6>rumors like that, and they'll be like, okay, this is suspicious.

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 6>And they start exaggerating impact, which usually ties into this intent.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.459
<v Speaker 6>So it's saying, oh, this is primarily impacting conservative voters

0:41:59.500 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 6>or Democratic voters, and therefore mislead. It must be the

0:42:03.180 --> 0:42:05.859
<v Speaker 6>goal of the Trump administration or the Democratic Party that's

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.980
<v Speaker 6>leading to this targeting. So these ways are ways that

0:42:09.020 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 6>we have articulated how we see how rumors mislead, but

0:42:11.860 --> 0:42:14.739
<v Speaker 6>they often are misleading in multiple ways at the same time.

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 6>They resonate with these larger narratives. So there's no single

0:42:18.860 --> 0:42:20.940
<v Speaker 6>rumor that just exists in a vacuum. When we see

0:42:20.980 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 6>these rumors spreading, they're resonating with political rhetoric. And so

0:42:25.410 --> 0:42:29.460
<v Speaker 6>to have the machine slipping vote in a larger political

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:34.060
<v Speaker 6>conversation about election integrity, about claims and like all across

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.479
<v Speaker 6>the political spectrum, we're seeing claims of fraud or people

0:42:36.500 --> 0:42:39.489
<v Speaker 6>being afraid that different parts of the election administration are

0:42:39.530 --> 0:42:42.070
<v Speaker 6>being manipulated. And so these rumors, then they exist as

0:42:42.090 --> 0:42:46.430
<v Speaker 6>these plausible explanations to explain things that we don't fully understand.

0:42:46.969 --> 0:42:48.500
<v Speaker 6>And I think maybe one of the things to emphasize

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.980
<v Speaker 6>and separate then is the rumoring from election administration itself,

0:42:52.260 --> 0:42:55.460
<v Speaker 6>where oftentimes just because someone doesn't know what that remedy is,

0:42:55.900 --> 0:42:57.620
<v Speaker 6>that doesn't mean there isn't a remedy, but that doesn't

0:42:57.660 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 6>mean that there isn't a security or a safeguard in

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:02.049
<v Speaker 6>place to make sure that votes are counted, to make

0:43:02.070 --> 0:43:06.570
<v Speaker 6>sure that that malfunctioning screen doesn't disenfranchise someone, doesn't prevent

0:43:06.610 --> 0:43:09.250
<v Speaker 6>them being able to vote. And as Danielle said, in

0:43:09.270 --> 0:43:11.649
<v Speaker 6>those cases, people were still able to vote. It's just,

0:43:11.670 --> 0:43:13.650
<v Speaker 6>it didn't work as perfectly as we would want it

0:43:13.670 --> 0:43:15.410
<v Speaker 6>to work. And I think it's important to remember that

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.430
<v Speaker 6>Elections are really complicated. When we look at elections in

0:43:18.450 --> 0:43:21.230
<v Speaker 6>the United States, they are not centrally run. Every state

0:43:21.330 --> 0:43:23.630
<v Speaker 6>has districts that are running it based off of their

0:43:24.070 --> 0:43:27.410
<v Speaker 6>local laws and regulations. And so this is a very

0:43:27.489 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 6>complicated process that involves both electronic systems, human organizations, and

0:43:32.890 --> 0:43:34.770
<v Speaker 6>a lot of things that have gone through a lot

0:43:34.790 --> 0:43:36.650
<v Speaker 6>of vetting to get into place. And election administrators, it's

0:43:36.670 --> 0:43:38.969
<v Speaker 6>their full-time job to make sure that those safeguards are

0:43:38.989 --> 0:43:40.870
<v Speaker 6>in place. And even with that, things do go wrong.

0:43:41.110 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 6>It's just part of every system is imperfect. Things will

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:45.660
<v Speaker 6>naturally go wrong. And the goal is to make sure

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:49.540
<v Speaker 6>that there are safeguards in place, backups for remedies when

0:43:49.580 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 6>things don't work out the way we want them to.

0:44:03.380 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 3>I imagine this has, like you mentioned, power dynamics. This

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:11.240
<v Speaker 3>interfaces a lot with that as well. I am still

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:13.930
<v Speaker 3>sort of stuck on this idea of Trump paying. What

0:44:13.950 --> 0:44:16.210
<v Speaker 3>did you say? He offered to pay people a million

0:44:16.250 --> 0:44:18.390
<v Speaker 3>dollars to report fraud?

0:44:19.150 --> 0:44:19.770
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:44:20.030 --> 0:44:22.390
<v Speaker 3>Could you elaborate on that? What is that exactly?

0:44:22.410 --> 0:44:24.109
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:44:25.430 --> 0:44:29.430
<v Speaker 4>Like right before we stepped into this interview, Trump posted

0:44:29.530 --> 0:44:33.210
<v Speaker 4>on Truth Social that, There would be a million dollar

0:44:33.250 --> 0:44:40.180
<v Speaker 4>reward for anyone who reported fraud in this or previous elections.

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 4>And he instructed folks to go to fraud.gov to do so. Now,

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 4>fraud.gov has existed for a while now. It's like a

0:44:47.620 --> 0:44:52.720
<v Speaker 4>way to report like welfare fraud, Medicare fraud, contracting fraud,

0:44:52.780 --> 0:44:55.450
<v Speaker 4>like all sorts of types of fraud. And it's sort

0:44:55.469 --> 0:44:58.540
<v Speaker 4>of like part of this participatory effort to like get

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:03.620
<v Speaker 4>the public involved in engaging in essentially like a hunt

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:10.100
<v Speaker 4>for fraud. But what's, what's ironic is we could not,

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:13.180
<v Speaker 4>so we can, this is serious, but Tina Peters, who

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:17.950
<v Speaker 4>was a quote unquote election integrity activist in Colorado and

0:45:18.410 --> 0:45:23.530
<v Speaker 4>previous election who had like intentionally tried, essentially committed voter

0:45:23.570 --> 0:45:29.250
<v Speaker 4>fraud and was indicted and charged and imprisoned as with

0:45:29.370 --> 0:45:31.980
<v Speaker 4>felony offense for election fraud, essentially.

0:45:32.100 --> 0:45:32.660
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my God.

0:45:33.060 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 4>And then was had her sentence commuted by the Democratic

0:45:36.620 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 4>governor of Colorado recently.

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 5>So she was let out of prison.

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Like, would someone who reported that get a million dollar reward?

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:44.820
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's important to note that there's a

0:45:48.140 --> 0:45:53.310
<v Speaker 4>lot of showmanship here. There's the bark and then there's

0:45:53.350 --> 0:45:58.450
<v Speaker 4>the bite of the powers that be. The bark is saying,

0:45:58.930 --> 0:46:01.930
<v Speaker 4>oh my gosh, there's so much election fraud. Look at,

0:46:02.030 --> 0:46:03.770
<v Speaker 4>you know, we saw last week in California, look at

0:46:03.830 --> 0:46:09.509
<v Speaker 4>the 20,000 person list of alleged non-citizen voters. Oh my gosh, look,

0:46:09.670 --> 0:46:12.470
<v Speaker 4>every day we have a new DOJ, DHS and White

0:46:12.510 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 4>House press release saying that we have arrested or charged

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:20.020
<v Speaker 4>more alleged non-citizen voters. But in fact, our analysis has

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 4>shown that Sometimes they're repeating the same names that they

0:46:22.820 --> 0:46:26.730
<v Speaker 4>were repeated the day before. But it creates this what's

0:46:26.770 --> 0:46:29.129
<v Speaker 4>called immediate theory, like a pseudo event, like you're drawing

0:46:29.250 --> 0:46:32.290
<v Speaker 4>all this attention to this perceived problem when it's a

0:46:32.330 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 4>drop in the bucket compared to actual impact on elections

0:46:37.180 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 4>or these are allegations. They're not proven. There's something about

0:46:41.219 --> 0:46:46.810
<v Speaker 4>that's different this time when the president and. his administration

0:46:46.830 --> 0:46:52.390
<v Speaker 4>are using their power and their legitimacy as heads of

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:56.939
<v Speaker 4>entire departments of justice to make these allegations that seem

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot bigger than they in fact are, or just

0:46:59.860 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 4>misleading entirely. And that is incredibly challenging and problematic. And

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:09.900
<v Speaker 4>that's why it creates that anxiety amongst left and liberal

0:47:09.980 --> 0:47:16.140
<v Speaker 4>folks that president might interfere or intervene because with bounties

0:47:16.180 --> 0:47:20.029
<v Speaker 4>essentially being posted for election fraud, who isn't to be

0:47:20.070 --> 0:47:22.190
<v Speaker 4>afraid of that? But I think the important thing to

0:47:22.230 --> 0:47:25.770
<v Speaker 4>remember is the numbers game here. Like at the end

0:47:25.790 --> 0:47:27.410
<v Speaker 4>of the day, and this is a massive country with

0:47:27.469 --> 0:47:32.210
<v Speaker 4>election administration carried out on a hyper-local level. And as

0:47:32.250 --> 0:47:35.280
<v Speaker 4>we've noted, like you can make these allegations that you're

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:40.549
<v Speaker 4>going to essentially sue Alaska to stop certifying its election

0:47:40.590 --> 0:47:42.779
<v Speaker 4>because there are two guys with a similar sounding name

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 4>on the ballot and maybe people will be confused. Like

0:47:46.060 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 4>we saw that last week, right? That's like a kind

0:47:47.820 --> 0:47:51.299
<v Speaker 4>of spurious lawsuit right there that doesn't seem to have

0:47:51.340 --> 0:47:55.780
<v Speaker 4>much precedent. But the fact that there's this constant like bark, bark, bark, bark,

0:47:55.820 --> 0:47:59.219
<v Speaker 4>like more problem, more problem, more problem when it's like

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of maybe the same problems that keep being repeated.

0:48:02.450 --> 0:48:04.890
<v Speaker 4>it makes your eardrums bleed. So like the bark is

0:48:04.930 --> 0:48:08.100
<v Speaker 4>just sort of hurting, even if it's not a direct bite,

0:48:08.340 --> 0:48:12.380
<v Speaker 4>like direct federal interference by sending say ice to the polls.

0:48:12.940 --> 0:48:14.660
<v Speaker 4>So these are like different things. And we have to

0:48:14.700 --> 0:48:17.690
<v Speaker 4>remember to like turn the volume down and focus on

0:48:17.730 --> 0:48:19.710
<v Speaker 4>what we can do. And that's like what we say

0:48:19.730 --> 0:48:23.750
<v Speaker 4>in our suggestions to election officials, to journalists, to creators,

0:48:24.010 --> 0:48:26.410
<v Speaker 4>to always go back to what you can do to

0:48:26.450 --> 0:48:29.700
<v Speaker 4>protect your vote, to vote early, to make sure to

0:48:29.940 --> 0:48:32.900
<v Speaker 4>track your ballot. Each state has different tracking mechanisms to

0:48:32.940 --> 0:48:35.259
<v Speaker 4>make sure that your ballot got counted, to drop it

0:48:35.340 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 4>off in secure locations, right? Like all of these different

0:48:37.700 --> 0:48:40.460
<v Speaker 4>things that you can do to make sure that your

0:48:40.500 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 4>ballot is safe and counted instead of getting caught up

0:48:44.780 --> 0:48:48.240
<v Speaker 4>in these larger narratives, which we don't want to deny

0:48:48.260 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 4>are very frustrating and create this sense of insecurity and

0:48:52.739 --> 0:48:56.069
<v Speaker 4>mistrust in our elections. But to just remember the numbers

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 4>game here, And a number of people who are going

0:48:58.820 --> 0:49:01.340
<v Speaker 4>to cast their ballots versus the small number that are

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:04.100
<v Speaker 4>being accused of this fraud is very, very different.

0:49:04.820 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:49:05.260 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 6>To add on a little bit of detail to what

0:49:07.500 --> 0:49:11.110
<v Speaker 6>Danielle has already mentioned here, particularly around this, like motivating

0:49:11.130 --> 0:49:13.430
<v Speaker 6>people to look for evidence in the power dynamics here.

0:49:13.730 --> 0:49:16.890
<v Speaker 6>We have seen that kind of call to activate these

0:49:16.969 --> 0:49:18.830
<v Speaker 6>audiences to go out and look for evidence.

0:49:19.230 --> 0:49:19.850
<v Speaker 3>That is not new.

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:23.580
<v Speaker 6>What's new right now is the power that the folks

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:26.840
<v Speaker 6>who are making those calls have. There's a group called

0:49:26.940 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 6>the Election Integrity Network, which is run by an election

0:49:29.500 --> 0:49:33.060
<v Speaker 6>denier named Clayton Mitchell, who has had this like national

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 6>kind of activist organization that has been doing very similar work.

0:49:36.570 --> 0:49:39.330
<v Speaker 6>So they've been recruiting volunteers to look for evidence in

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 6>of perceived fraud, they amplify that evidence. And oftentimes it's

0:49:44.540 --> 0:49:46.060
<v Speaker 6>the type of thing that we see in our work

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:48.980
<v Speaker 6>where they look at an ambiguous picture and it shows

0:49:49.020 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 6>something completely different from what they think it shows. When

0:49:52.260 --> 0:49:54.360
<v Speaker 6>you have enough people who are engaging in this, it

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 6>can create the illusion that something real is occurring. So

0:49:57.900 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 6>a lot of this is like retroactively trying to find

0:50:00.060 --> 0:50:02.359
<v Speaker 6>evidence that supports the claims that have been made that

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 6>are genuinely unfounded. So for example, when we look at

0:50:05.460 --> 0:50:08.100
<v Speaker 6>claims of non-citizen voters, which is one of the largest

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:09.940
<v Speaker 6>narratives that we see in the work that we do,

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:12.140
<v Speaker 6>Brennan Center did a study to try to look at

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 6>the number of non-citizen voters that actually vote in elections.

0:50:15.580 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 6>And there's like point zero zero zero zero one percent

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:22.170
<v Speaker 6>of voters are non-citizen. So it's like, yeah, OK, occasionally

0:50:22.190 --> 0:50:24.270
<v Speaker 6>there's a case that I think Danielle mentioned that the

0:50:24.290 --> 0:50:26.730
<v Speaker 6>Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security have

0:50:26.750 --> 0:50:28.850
<v Speaker 6>had these press releases where they're arresting in a very

0:50:28.910 --> 0:50:31.730
<v Speaker 6>public way. Yeah, these these folks who are they're alleging

0:50:31.750 --> 0:50:34.150
<v Speaker 6>and have not proven, but they're alleging that they have

0:50:34.350 --> 0:50:37.270
<v Speaker 6>voted illegally in elections. So they're using that to create

0:50:37.290 --> 0:50:40.110
<v Speaker 6>the illusion that something exists when the reality is the

0:50:40.250 --> 0:50:42.750
<v Speaker 6>evidence is just really sparse. It's just not the issue

0:50:42.770 --> 0:50:44.489
<v Speaker 6>that they're saying it is. And so it comes down

0:50:44.510 --> 0:50:46.810
<v Speaker 6>to this numbers game. But there's a difference when we

0:50:46.850 --> 0:50:49.710
<v Speaker 6>look at social media, when we look at media dynamics

0:50:49.770 --> 0:50:52.740
<v Speaker 6>in general, very often people aren't looking at the statistics directly.

0:50:52.780 --> 0:50:54.300
<v Speaker 6>They're taking people's word for it that this is an

0:50:54.340 --> 0:50:56.460
<v Speaker 6>issue and the stories, they can be very salient and

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:59.020
<v Speaker 6>they spread. And those are what drive rumors are these

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 6>like very sensational stories, things that that feel that maybe

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:05.800
<v Speaker 6>make us feel outraged or or sad or angry or

0:51:05.860 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 6>some sort of emotional response to it. We wrote a

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:11.020
<v Speaker 6>piece in 2024 where we outlined some of what we

0:51:11.060 --> 0:51:14.790
<v Speaker 6>call the evidence generation infrastructure. And this was under something

0:51:14.810 --> 0:51:17.230
<v Speaker 6>that we call the three Cs of election contestation. So

0:51:17.250 --> 0:51:20.330
<v Speaker 6>the first one was convince, which is convincing people that

0:51:20.350 --> 0:51:23.549
<v Speaker 6>election fraud was happening. The second one is collect, where

0:51:23.570 --> 0:51:26.230
<v Speaker 6>they go out and collect evidence of this perceived fraud,

0:51:26.250 --> 0:51:27.969
<v Speaker 6>which is kind of what we're talking about now. And

0:51:27.989 --> 0:51:31.020
<v Speaker 6>the second part is contest. So funneling that evidence into lawsuits,

0:51:31.500 --> 0:51:35.219
<v Speaker 6>into these political narratives that then mobilize audiences and find

0:51:35.260 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 6>ways to both contest elections legally and rhetorically on the

0:51:38.640 --> 0:51:39.300
<v Speaker 6>political stage.

0:51:39.620 --> 0:51:39.870
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:51:40.190 --> 0:51:43.549
<v Speaker 6>And so we see this intersection of governance, of now

0:51:43.610 --> 0:51:47.630
<v Speaker 6>law enforcement, of court filings, as well as the political

0:51:47.650 --> 0:51:51.290
<v Speaker 6>sphere where we see that what has... historically remained constrained

0:51:51.310 --> 0:51:54.030
<v Speaker 6>to the political sphere of contesting elections rhetorically, but now

0:51:54.210 --> 0:51:56.729
<v Speaker 6>it's seeping into many of these other spaces as well.

0:51:57.190 --> 0:51:59.870
<v Speaker 6>But it all creates the illusion that something exists that

0:51:59.969 --> 0:52:01.070
<v Speaker 6>doesn't actually exist.

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:05.340
<v Speaker 3>That's the end of what I've included from the interview,

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:07.420
<v Speaker 3>and I hope it was helpful for some of you.

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:11.239
<v Speaker 3>I find personally as a journalist who mingles with the

0:52:11.340 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 3>content creation and social media spaces, it's very frustrating to

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 3>me how fast these rumors can propagate on social media,

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 3>and I feel it's best if we can avoid becoming

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:25.730
<v Speaker 3>unwitting agents of misinformation. I'm stealing some language from the

0:52:25.790 --> 0:52:28.870
<v Speaker 3>CIP team, but some questions they said that are worth

0:52:28.989 --> 0:52:31.830
<v Speaker 3>asking are, why am I hearing this? What are the

0:52:31.890 --> 0:52:35.850
<v Speaker 3>incentives behind it? Does this contribute to someone's clicks, clout,

0:52:35.969 --> 0:52:39.500
<v Speaker 3>or cash? Again, rumors can be true and But I

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:41.820
<v Speaker 3>guess it would be nice if we didn't all accidentally

0:52:41.880 --> 0:52:44.460
<v Speaker 3>drive each other fucking crazy in the next few weeks,

0:52:44.540 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 3>because I'm certain there will be people trying to do

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:50.740
<v Speaker 3>so intentionally. We have to assess the validity of rigged

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:54.800
<v Speaker 3>election claims and slow things down, especially amid a discourse

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:58.140
<v Speaker 3>that feels as if it's growing more and more conspiratorial.

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:01.750
<v Speaker 3>It's bound to be an exhausting process, and I wish

0:53:01.790 --> 0:53:12.430
<v Speaker 3>you all luck. Hi everyone and welcome to the show.

0:53:12.710 --> 0:53:15.260
<v Speaker 7>I'm very lucky to be joined again today by Vladimir

0:53:15.300 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 7>Van Vilgenberg, who's a repeat guest, long-time journalist and reporter

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:23.020
<v Speaker 7>on Kurdistan and a very excellent source for this stuff.

0:53:23.040 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing today, Vladimir?

0:53:24.550 --> 0:53:27.010
<v Speaker 5>I'm doing well, thank you. Thank you for this opportunity

0:53:27.030 --> 0:53:28.089
<v Speaker 5>to be interviewed again by you.

0:53:28.510 --> 0:53:28.989
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of course.

0:53:29.030 --> 0:53:30.569
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for your time and thanks for staying up

0:53:30.590 --> 0:53:30.870
<v Speaker 3>so late.

0:53:31.590 --> 0:53:36.150
<v Speaker 7>I guess, like, to begin with, We should recap the

0:53:36.190 --> 0:53:42.430
<v Speaker 7>situation of Rojelati Kurdish groups, armed groups specifically, right?

0:53:43.010 --> 0:53:43.690
<v Speaker 1>Who they are.

0:53:43.770 --> 0:53:45.310
<v Speaker 3>And I realize we could take an hour to just

0:53:45.350 --> 0:53:46.110
<v Speaker 3>explain who they are.

0:53:46.469 --> 0:53:46.689
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:53:46.730 --> 0:53:49.450
<v Speaker 7>But like, can we briefly explain to people who they

0:53:49.650 --> 0:53:52.390
<v Speaker 7>are and for the most part, where they are right now?

0:53:53.110 --> 0:53:57.109
<v Speaker 5>So basically this Iranian Kurdish opposition parties, they have been

0:53:57.330 --> 0:53:59.230
<v Speaker 5>active for a very long time. I mean, they have

0:53:59.250 --> 0:54:00.030
<v Speaker 5>a long history.

0:54:00.050 --> 0:54:00.130
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:54:01.060 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 5>In fighting with the Islamic Republic, and most of them,

0:54:05.100 --> 0:54:08.270
<v Speaker 5>they were exiled a few years after they were military

0:54:08.350 --> 0:54:13.350
<v Speaker 5>defeated by the Islamic Republic after the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

0:54:13.350 --> 0:54:17.250
<v Speaker 5>And since then, they have been exiled in bases and

0:54:17.330 --> 0:54:21.110
<v Speaker 5>camps in Iraqi Kurdistan. It's a large number of Iranian

0:54:21.130 --> 0:54:23.810
<v Speaker 5>Kurdish parties. So if I would mention all the acronyms,

0:54:23.850 --> 0:54:27.850
<v Speaker 5>you'll be very confused. But there's a number of them

0:54:27.910 --> 0:54:31.830
<v Speaker 5>and they have camps around the province of Erbil and Slemani.

0:54:31.850 --> 0:54:36.010
<v Speaker 5>And they have been targeted several times, hundreds of times

0:54:36.090 --> 0:54:40.509
<v Speaker 5>during this February war. And there were around 19 people,

0:54:41.070 --> 0:54:43.649
<v Speaker 5>members of the Iranian Kurdish parties. They were killed by

0:54:43.710 --> 0:54:48.580
<v Speaker 5>Iranian drone strikes and missile strikes during this war. And

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:52.860
<v Speaker 5>currently they are sort of stuck in between because Iran

0:54:52.900 --> 0:54:56.290
<v Speaker 5>is demanding that they are removed from Iraqi territory. And

0:54:56.910 --> 0:54:59.110
<v Speaker 5>then you have the Iraqi Kurds that don't want to

0:54:59.150 --> 0:55:03.380
<v Speaker 5>be seen selling out Iranian Kurdish fellow Iranian Kurds by force.

0:55:03.780 --> 0:55:07.670
<v Speaker 5>kicking them out or giving them to Iran. So the

0:55:07.710 --> 0:55:09.670
<v Speaker 5>Kurds are a bit stuck in the middle. And then

0:55:09.730 --> 0:55:14.290
<v Speaker 5>you also have the withdrawal from the US-led coalition. Although

0:55:14.310 --> 0:55:17.610
<v Speaker 5>the US-led coalition was mostly defending the US bases, they

0:55:17.630 --> 0:55:20.180
<v Speaker 5>were not defending Iranian Kurdish parties, but sometimes they were

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:24.020
<v Speaker 5>taking out some drones or missiles that were going into

0:55:24.360 --> 0:55:27.340
<v Speaker 5>the direction of Iranian Kurds, but that could have also

0:55:27.400 --> 0:55:31.040
<v Speaker 5>gone into direction of, for instance, the consulate or the

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:34.100
<v Speaker 5>coalition base that is not there anymore. So that's sort

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:35.800
<v Speaker 5>of an overview.

0:55:36.420 --> 0:55:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's a good overview.

0:55:38.140 --> 0:55:40.919
<v Speaker 7>And so we're now in this position where these groups

0:55:40.940 --> 0:55:45.100
<v Speaker 7>have bases close to the border, but in the Iraqi

0:55:45.140 --> 0:55:47.340
<v Speaker 7>part of Kurdistan and the Iranian part of Kurdistan for

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 7>the most part. But in recent days, people maybe will

0:55:50.620 --> 0:55:54.620
<v Speaker 7>have seen that there has also been some conflict with

0:55:54.739 --> 0:55:58.830
<v Speaker 7>one of these groups inside of what is now Iran.

0:55:59.250 --> 0:56:00.910
<v Speaker 7>Can you explain a little bit of what's going on

0:56:00.930 --> 0:56:03.760
<v Speaker 7>there and who... who the actors are in that case.

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:56:05.180 --> 0:56:08.190
<v Speaker 5>So I was telling you about the acronym soup of

0:56:08.330 --> 0:56:11.570
<v Speaker 5>Iranian Kurdish factions. Um, but, but one of the factions

0:56:11.750 --> 0:56:15.549
<v Speaker 5>that have been active is, which actually is an affiliate

0:56:15.790 --> 0:56:20.610
<v Speaker 5>of the Kurdistan workers party from Turkey, which is engaged

0:56:20.670 --> 0:56:23.529
<v Speaker 5>in a peace process with Ankara. So there have been

0:56:23.590 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 5>some clashes. With Peshawar using drones in response to Iranian

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:32.259
<v Speaker 5>operations in the border areas of Iran, which is actually

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:36.440
<v Speaker 5>very close to the area where they have bases inside

0:56:36.500 --> 0:56:40.410
<v Speaker 5>Iraqi Kurdistan near Panjshir in Halabja province on the border

0:56:40.450 --> 0:56:43.790
<v Speaker 5>of Iran. So they have underground caves there and tunnels

0:56:44.190 --> 0:56:48.580
<v Speaker 5>and they have people there. And since also the February war,

0:56:48.620 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 5>there have been some occasional clashes between both sides. There

0:56:53.180 --> 0:56:56.930
<v Speaker 5>was also a ceasefire actually between Peshawar and Iran in

0:56:56.950 --> 0:57:00.970
<v Speaker 5>the past, which was brokered by Iraqi Kurds. But despite

0:57:01.010 --> 0:57:04.489
<v Speaker 5>of the ceasefire always, even before the current war between

0:57:04.510 --> 0:57:07.550
<v Speaker 5>the US and Iran, there was always tensions between Peshawar

0:57:07.610 --> 0:57:11.280
<v Speaker 5>and Iran. And recently also there was a death sentence

0:57:11.340 --> 0:57:14.900
<v Speaker 5>for one Iranian Kurdish activist close to the Peshawar and

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:20.500
<v Speaker 5>Iran recently. reaffirmed the death sentence for that female activist.

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:23.700
<v Speaker 5>So there are still sort of these tensions on the border.

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:26.040
<v Speaker 5>And Peshawar is also one of the few Iranian Kurdish

0:57:26.060 --> 0:57:28.860
<v Speaker 5>factions that has a lot of experience with drones. And

0:57:28.900 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 5>that's also due to their links to the PKK and

0:57:31.660 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 5>also to the SDF. So the PKK and the SDF

0:57:35.400 --> 0:57:38.740
<v Speaker 5>are basically the brother and sister parties of the PKK.

0:57:38.780 --> 0:57:41.860
<v Speaker 5>They have this experience of fighting with drones. For instance,

0:57:41.900 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 5>in Syria, the SDF fought with drones against the Syrian government.

0:57:46.040 --> 0:57:49.400
<v Speaker 5>And other factions and also the PKK, they have been

0:57:50.300 --> 0:57:53.820
<v Speaker 5>using drones and they have been experimenting with drones in

0:57:53.860 --> 0:57:56.530
<v Speaker 5>the last few years. But there's now a peace process

0:57:56.590 --> 0:58:01.290
<v Speaker 5>between Turkey and Ankara since 2024. And the PKK has said,

0:58:01.330 --> 0:58:03.210
<v Speaker 5>we're going to disband. So they are in this process.

0:58:03.250 --> 0:58:05.350
<v Speaker 5>But at the same time, that leaves out what is

0:58:05.370 --> 0:58:07.530
<v Speaker 5>going to happen with the Iranian Kurdish brands, which is

0:58:07.630 --> 0:58:08.190
<v Speaker 5>the Peshawar.

0:58:08.430 --> 0:58:08.590
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:58:09.230 --> 0:58:12.970
<v Speaker 5>And now the situation is unclear what is exactly what's

0:58:12.990 --> 0:58:15.370
<v Speaker 5>going to happen. Of course, we don't know if there's

0:58:15.390 --> 0:58:18.660
<v Speaker 5>going to be new clashes between US and Iran. But

0:58:18.900 --> 0:58:21.120
<v Speaker 5>at the same time, there have been some clashes between

0:58:21.460 --> 0:58:25.420
<v Speaker 5>this group, Peshawar and Iran. And there also have been

0:58:27.500 --> 0:58:32.330
<v Speaker 5>assassinations carried out by Iranian Kurdish political parties against Kurds

0:58:32.510 --> 0:58:36.370
<v Speaker 5>working with the Iranian government and also others. So that's

0:58:36.410 --> 0:58:41.190
<v Speaker 5>also have been like sort of a silent. small insurgency

0:58:41.290 --> 0:58:44.630
<v Speaker 5>brewing in the Kurdish majority areas of Iran. But we

0:58:44.650 --> 0:58:48.070
<v Speaker 5>should also not forget that this has always been brewing.

0:58:48.110 --> 0:58:53.450
<v Speaker 5>There have been always movements and attacks and assassinations and

0:58:53.670 --> 0:58:58.050
<v Speaker 5>protest movements. For instance, the Jina Amini protest movement that

0:58:58.370 --> 0:59:00.850
<v Speaker 5>erupted over the death of an Iranian Kurdish lady in

0:59:01.130 --> 0:59:05.690
<v Speaker 5>Iran by the morality police also sparked this huge widespread protest,

0:59:05.710 --> 0:59:08.650
<v Speaker 5>which also spread through the Kurdish areas and where Iran

0:59:08.670 --> 0:59:11.620
<v Speaker 5>actually accused the Iranian Kurdish opposition parties of being involved

0:59:11.660 --> 0:59:16.480
<v Speaker 5>in that. So yeah, there have been always protest movements

0:59:16.640 --> 0:59:21.010
<v Speaker 5>and unrest in Kurdish areas that were often ended with

0:59:21.050 --> 0:59:22.650
<v Speaker 5>a crackdown by the Iranian state.

0:59:23.130 --> 0:59:23.550
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:59:23.750 --> 0:59:26.780
<v Speaker 7>Like even in January... when we saw the biggest protests

0:59:27.460 --> 0:59:30.440
<v Speaker 7>over the last couple of years, there were some, like

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:33.260
<v Speaker 7>I remember the PAK were posting videos of them, which

0:59:33.320 --> 0:59:36.940
<v Speaker 7>is another of the acronym soup parties, were posting some

0:59:36.960 --> 0:59:40.180
<v Speaker 7>videos of them like shooting at police stations and it's

0:59:40.200 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 7>like a rising, falling tide.

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:46.930
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah. Like in January, there were this anti-government protest

0:59:46.970 --> 0:59:51.270
<v Speaker 5>that started in the bazaar of Tehran and Kurds mostly

0:59:51.310 --> 0:59:54.490
<v Speaker 5>stayed out of these protests in January because also there

0:59:54.510 --> 0:59:58.930
<v Speaker 5>was this idea that it was more monarchists that were

0:59:58.970 --> 1:00:01.390
<v Speaker 5>involved in these protests and you know the monarchists are

1:00:01.430 --> 1:00:05.380
<v Speaker 5>also very strongly against any form of Kurdish autonomy so

1:00:05.400 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 5>the Kurds mostly yes stayed out there was like I

1:00:08.180 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 5>think one strike and you also had the PAK Kurdistan

1:00:11.820 --> 1:00:14.280
<v Speaker 5>Freedom Party that was saying that they were carrying out

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:19.670
<v Speaker 5>some actions in some areas like around Kermanshah and some

1:00:19.730 --> 1:00:23.770
<v Speaker 5>other areas in that area around Kermanshah and Melekshah and

1:00:23.810 --> 1:00:26.979
<v Speaker 5>some other areas so It was a bit confusing, like

1:00:27.020 --> 1:00:29.460
<v Speaker 5>if some of these reports were true, but the Kurds

1:00:29.880 --> 1:00:32.160
<v Speaker 5>in general were not very much involved in those protests

1:00:32.220 --> 1:00:34.760
<v Speaker 5>as they were, for instance, in the past in the

1:00:34.800 --> 1:00:39.810
<v Speaker 5>Jini Amina protest movement, where they were much more involved in,

1:00:39.930 --> 1:00:43.530
<v Speaker 5>and in which also in response, Iran started to carry

1:00:43.570 --> 1:00:46.450
<v Speaker 5>out drone strikes against Iranian Kurdish parties in Iraqi Kurdistan

1:00:46.490 --> 1:00:46.930
<v Speaker 5>at the time.

1:00:47.710 --> 1:00:48.050
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:00:48.930 --> 1:00:49.410
<v Speaker 5>So, yeah.

1:00:50.190 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 7>And they continue to, like on the anniversary of Jini

1:00:52.780 --> 1:00:55.870
<v Speaker 7>Amina's murder, I can't remember if it was the anniversary

1:00:55.890 --> 1:00:58.750
<v Speaker 7>of her murder or her arrest, but they called a

1:00:58.790 --> 1:01:01.890
<v Speaker 7>general strike this year, right? And then the IRGC sent

1:01:02.340 --> 1:01:05.880
<v Speaker 7>significant numbers of troops, even to block the route to

1:01:05.920 --> 1:01:09.180
<v Speaker 7>her grave, if I understand correctly, so people couldn't gather there.

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:12.900
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and there was also a dispute again, which shows

1:01:12.940 --> 1:01:15.540
<v Speaker 5>the disunity of the Iranian opposition about the father of

1:01:15.580 --> 1:01:18.760
<v Speaker 5>Jina Amini using a Kurdish flag in a social media post.

1:01:19.140 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yeah.

1:01:20.000 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 5>So it's also... The Iranian opposition is very much disunited,

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:29.970
<v Speaker 5>what we saw, despite the opportunities they had, which is

1:01:30.010 --> 1:01:33.450
<v Speaker 5>very different, for instance, from the Iraqi opposition when the

1:01:33.490 --> 1:01:37.330
<v Speaker 5>Americans moved to remove the Saddam Hussein regime. Despite all

1:01:37.350 --> 1:01:40.330
<v Speaker 5>of the differences they had, the Shia, the Kurds, and

1:01:40.770 --> 1:01:43.010
<v Speaker 5>some other Iraqi opposition parties, they sort of united at

1:01:43.070 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 5>the time. But in Iran, we haven't seen. There were

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 5>some attempts like that in the past, but they basically

1:01:48.240 --> 1:01:52.830
<v Speaker 5>fell apart. Yeah, it also shows the disunity and the disorganization.

1:01:52.870 --> 1:01:55.910
<v Speaker 5>But it's also very difficult, of course, to organize an

1:01:55.950 --> 1:01:58.430
<v Speaker 5>opposition in exile when you're not on the ground and

1:01:58.490 --> 1:02:02.090
<v Speaker 5>also when the neighboring countries do not accept the presence

1:02:02.160 --> 1:02:05.220
<v Speaker 5>of such groups on their territory, for instance, which is

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:07.840
<v Speaker 5>very different, for instance, if you compare Iran to Syria,

1:02:07.880 --> 1:02:10.900
<v Speaker 5>where in Syria the Assad regime pissed off so many

1:02:10.980 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 5>of its neighbors, so many of its neighbors, even if

1:02:13.760 --> 1:02:17.730
<v Speaker 5>they were not completely 100%, actively supporting insurgent groups against

1:02:17.750 --> 1:02:20.230
<v Speaker 5>Assad regime, most of them were sort of tolerating it

1:02:20.450 --> 1:02:22.890
<v Speaker 5>or allowing it to happen. So there was a lot

1:02:22.910 --> 1:02:27.390
<v Speaker 5>of Gulf states and Turkey and other countries that supported

1:02:27.410 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 5>basically the Syrian opposition against Assad regime. But for instance,

1:02:30.860 --> 1:02:34.260
<v Speaker 5>in Iran, we never had such a situation, even Turkey,

1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:39.360
<v Speaker 5>despite that there's a large Turkish speaking ethnic group. In Iran,

1:02:39.380 --> 1:02:43.410
<v Speaker 5>you have the series and Turkmen. that Turkey was not

1:02:43.450 --> 1:02:46.990
<v Speaker 5>supporting the overthrow of the Iranian government, for instance, or

1:02:47.010 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 5>the other countries neighboring Iran were not so much happy.

1:02:50.580 --> 1:02:53.900
<v Speaker 5>And even, for instance, the Iraqi Kurds were also not

1:02:53.940 --> 1:02:58.080
<v Speaker 5>very much happy to become a target by Iran for

1:02:58.200 --> 1:03:01.600
<v Speaker 5>having such a campaign, for instance, against that you had

1:03:01.660 --> 1:03:04.900
<v Speaker 5>all these reports that the US and Israel were actively

1:03:05.040 --> 1:03:08.170
<v Speaker 5>arming Iranian Kurds across the border. And then we saw

1:03:08.450 --> 1:03:11.270
<v Speaker 5>statements recently, there was a forum, an annual forum in

1:03:11.330 --> 1:03:14.150
<v Speaker 5>Arabia called the Miri Forum, where Iraqi Kurdish leaders were

1:03:14.190 --> 1:03:17.570
<v Speaker 5>saying that this was very bad idea and that they

1:03:17.610 --> 1:03:20.720
<v Speaker 5>were against it. And that actually that the rival ruling

1:03:20.740 --> 1:03:23.540
<v Speaker 5>Iraqi Kurdish parties, the PUK and KDP, they both agreed

1:03:23.980 --> 1:03:27.680
<v Speaker 5>to basically close the border and to prevent any attack

1:03:27.780 --> 1:03:31.260
<v Speaker 5>from Iranian Kurdish parties towards Iran. And also that they

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:33.720
<v Speaker 5>coordinated on that fact, although they didn't even form a

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:38.260
<v Speaker 5>government yet to get the spice of elections taking place

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:41.660
<v Speaker 5>in 2024. They both sort of saw the threat of

1:03:42.340 --> 1:03:45.770
<v Speaker 5>such a plan from Iranian Kurds to move towards intervening

1:03:45.810 --> 1:03:48.310
<v Speaker 5>basically in Iran. And they really opposed that plan. And

1:03:48.330 --> 1:03:51.310
<v Speaker 5>they also were allying that in Turkey, Turkey was also

1:03:51.350 --> 1:03:54.689
<v Speaker 5>opposed in it because they were afraid of a second Rojava,

1:03:54.710 --> 1:03:57.669
<v Speaker 5>you know, a second Kurdish autonomy on their border, like

1:03:57.710 --> 1:04:00.530
<v Speaker 5>what happened in Syria. Yeah. I mean, even in Iraq

1:04:00.570 --> 1:04:03.190
<v Speaker 5>in the beginning, when the U.S. overthrew the Saddam regime,

1:04:03.370 --> 1:04:06.010
<v Speaker 5>Turkey was also opposed against the U.S. intervention because they

1:04:06.030 --> 1:04:08.550
<v Speaker 5>were afraid of that. But now they sort of de

1:04:08.590 --> 1:04:12.600
<v Speaker 5>facto accepted this Kurdistan region in Iraq. But in Syria,

1:04:12.640 --> 1:04:14.260
<v Speaker 5>it was much different. They never accepted it.

1:04:14.260 --> 1:04:14.860
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:04:15.600 --> 1:04:18.320
<v Speaker 5>So that's why it's all interconnected to each other. And

1:04:18.460 --> 1:04:19.980
<v Speaker 5>it's very complicated. Yeah.

1:04:20.480 --> 1:04:20.740
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

1:04:20.800 --> 1:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:04:21.440 --> 1:04:24.700
<v Speaker 7>And like Turkey, it's still making military incursions into the

1:04:24.720 --> 1:04:28.640
<v Speaker 7>Kurdistan region of Iraq to defend or defend its borders,

1:04:29.400 --> 1:04:32.440
<v Speaker 7>even though it like, yeah, it's de facto accepted the KRG.

1:04:44.100 --> 1:04:46.100
<v Speaker 7>We should talk a little bit about how the impact

1:04:46.140 --> 1:04:49.620
<v Speaker 7>of like specifically, actually, the impact of American journalism.

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:52.140
<v Speaker 1>Has been in this situation, right?

1:04:52.180 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 7>Because we had early on in the conflict, we had

1:04:54.320 --> 1:04:56.640
<v Speaker 7>this report, I think there was a Barak Ravid thing,

1:04:56.660 --> 1:04:58.939
<v Speaker 7>and then there was a Fox News thing, Barak Ravid

1:04:58.960 --> 1:05:02.140
<v Speaker 7>works for Axios, about like, oh, the Kurds are amassing

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:04.630
<v Speaker 7>at the border and they're ready to invade Iran, right?

1:05:04.770 --> 1:05:09.670
<v Speaker 7>Or even people from Iraqi southern Kurdistan are preparing to

1:05:09.930 --> 1:05:14.770
<v Speaker 7>liberate their Kurds in eastern Kurdistan and Iran. And that

1:05:14.830 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 7>reporting had very real consequences for Kurdistan, right?

1:05:18.340 --> 1:05:19.420
<v Speaker 1>For Iraqi Kurdistan.

1:05:20.210 --> 1:05:23.010
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, obviously it made Iraq and Kurdistan more a target

1:05:23.070 --> 1:05:27.580
<v Speaker 5>for Iran. And there were like 1,000 drone and missile

1:05:27.600 --> 1:05:32.760
<v Speaker 5>attacks on the Kurdistan region since 28 February. And you saw,

1:05:32.820 --> 1:05:35.800
<v Speaker 5>for instance, that report of, I think it was Fox

1:05:35.840 --> 1:05:38.360
<v Speaker 5>News reporter that was like posting on the next that

1:05:38.400 --> 1:05:40.820
<v Speaker 5>saying that all the Iraqi Kurds are now like going

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:43.120
<v Speaker 5>towards the border and attack. I'm not sure whether the

1:05:43.140 --> 1:05:45.070
<v Speaker 5>information was coming from, but I think it was actually

1:05:45.090 --> 1:05:47.230
<v Speaker 5>the opposite. This was probably the Iraqi Kurds going to

1:05:47.250 --> 1:05:49.240
<v Speaker 5>the border and To stop such an attack.

1:05:49.380 --> 1:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>To seal the borders.

1:05:51.260 --> 1:05:54.150
<v Speaker 5>And that was actually revealed during this last forum, the

1:05:54.170 --> 1:05:57.330
<v Speaker 5>midi forum in Erbil, where they were actually talking, the

1:05:57.630 --> 1:06:01.980
<v Speaker 5>Iraqi Kurds were actually talking quite transparent about all what happened, basically.

1:06:02.570 --> 1:06:04.350
<v Speaker 5>And they were saying, actually, we sent people to the

1:06:04.390 --> 1:06:07.850
<v Speaker 5>border basically to stop such a basically threat and to

1:06:07.910 --> 1:06:10.140
<v Speaker 5>tell Iran, like, we are not a threat to our

1:06:10.160 --> 1:06:14.200
<v Speaker 5>neighboring country. So I think, yeah, there was like actually

1:06:14.260 --> 1:06:18.140
<v Speaker 5>some of the reporting made the situation worse. But also,

1:06:18.200 --> 1:06:20.500
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure if there were people in the Trump

1:06:20.560 --> 1:06:24.850
<v Speaker 5>administration leaking that on purpose to undermine such plans to,

1:06:24.910 --> 1:06:30.390
<v Speaker 5>for because it was a fact that Iranian Kurds, they

1:06:30.430 --> 1:06:33.720
<v Speaker 5>did get some support and there were some data that

1:06:33.760 --> 1:06:36.740
<v Speaker 5>they received any weapons, but the Iranian Kurds were sort

1:06:36.760 --> 1:06:40.940
<v Speaker 5>of preparing for the potential scenario of getting like air

1:06:40.980 --> 1:06:44.360
<v Speaker 5>support and moving into Iran and attacking the Iranian government.

1:06:45.020 --> 1:06:47.160
<v Speaker 5>But then I think Trump, he changed his mind at

1:06:47.360 --> 1:06:49.450
<v Speaker 5>the last moment. So in the beginning, Trump was saying like,

1:06:49.510 --> 1:06:51.390
<v Speaker 5>it's a good idea. I think he told Reuters at

1:06:51.410 --> 1:06:53.370
<v Speaker 5>the time, it's a good idea that the Iranian Kurds

1:06:53.590 --> 1:06:56.710
<v Speaker 5>do that. And then later he said, Well, it's not

1:06:56.750 --> 1:06:58.650
<v Speaker 5>a good idea. I think they should not go into

1:06:58.870 --> 1:07:01.300
<v Speaker 5>Iran and attack Iran. It's not a good idea. They're

1:07:01.340 --> 1:07:03.720
<v Speaker 5>good fighters, but they should not do that. So I

1:07:03.760 --> 1:07:06.740
<v Speaker 5>think it was also like a lobbying effort by, for instance,

1:07:06.760 --> 1:07:08.880
<v Speaker 5>the Turkish government. There was like a lot of reporting

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:12.110
<v Speaker 5>that the Turkish president, Turkish President Erdogan at the time,

1:07:12.150 --> 1:07:14.350
<v Speaker 5>just directly called Trump and told him this is not

1:07:14.370 --> 1:07:17.630
<v Speaker 5>a good idea. Don't do that. And one time also Trump,

1:07:17.690 --> 1:07:19.850
<v Speaker 5>he said something weird, I think in a press conference,

1:07:19.870 --> 1:07:21.950
<v Speaker 5>he was saying that if Turkey would have a choice

1:07:21.990 --> 1:07:24.060
<v Speaker 5>to choose which side of the war they will be,

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:27.460
<v Speaker 5>they would rather be on the other side of the conflict.

1:07:28.060 --> 1:07:30.260
<v Speaker 5>So I think with that, he indirectly sort of suggested

1:07:30.300 --> 1:07:33.280
<v Speaker 5>that Turkey would be willing to intervene if, for instance,

1:07:33.420 --> 1:07:36.030
<v Speaker 5>Israel and the U.S. would support Kurds against the Iranian state.

1:07:36.050 --> 1:07:38.030
<v Speaker 5>He didn't say that directly, but sort of I think

1:07:38.070 --> 1:07:40.510
<v Speaker 5>it was more about that. I don't think that Turkey

1:07:40.550 --> 1:07:43.350
<v Speaker 5>would intervene on behalf of Iran against Israel and the U.S.,

1:07:44.060 --> 1:07:46.540
<v Speaker 5>if there's not like a sort of thing that they fear,

1:07:46.600 --> 1:07:51.220
<v Speaker 5>which is a Kurdish autonomy in Iran on its border,

1:07:51.800 --> 1:07:55.050
<v Speaker 5>supported by the US and Israel. So I think it

1:07:55.070 --> 1:07:58.050
<v Speaker 5>was like a reference basically to that, that they were,

1:07:58.870 --> 1:08:01.570
<v Speaker 5>Turkey could have basically, that they were not really serious

1:08:01.610 --> 1:08:03.830
<v Speaker 5>about it, but they were basically saying just what, for instance,

1:08:03.890 --> 1:08:06.090
<v Speaker 5>in Syria in the past, when the US was supporting

1:08:06.110 --> 1:08:09.550
<v Speaker 5>the SDF, at that time, Turkey said, well, US, if

1:08:09.590 --> 1:08:12.090
<v Speaker 5>you continue to do that, we may be one day

1:08:12.110 --> 1:08:16.050
<v Speaker 5>going to, jump in and cross the border and attack

1:08:16.090 --> 1:08:18.790
<v Speaker 5>the Syrian Kurds. And you better find a way to

1:08:18.830 --> 1:08:20.990
<v Speaker 5>get out at that moment, like, because we're going to

1:08:21.010 --> 1:08:23.830
<v Speaker 5>go one night, we're going to go and come into Syria.

1:08:23.850 --> 1:08:26.150
<v Speaker 5>And that's actually what they did in the end. After

1:08:26.189 --> 1:08:29.100
<v Speaker 5>a peace process broke down between Turkish Kurds and the

1:08:29.140 --> 1:08:32.320
<v Speaker 5>Turkish state after 2015, they launched like three or four

1:08:32.939 --> 1:08:37.600
<v Speaker 5>big Turkish cross-border military offensives. And they're still there in

1:08:37.640 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 5>Syria at the moment.

1:08:39.320 --> 1:08:39.540
<v Speaker 3>Mm-hmm.

1:08:40.070 --> 1:08:42.050
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, and they did the same in Iraqi Kurdistan. Well,

1:08:42.070 --> 1:08:45.500
<v Speaker 5>there was no US support for the PKK in Iraqi Kurdistan,

1:08:46.400 --> 1:08:50.080
<v Speaker 5>but Turkey also did like several military incursions for longer

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:53.900
<v Speaker 5>periods of time. And they actually increased their number of

1:08:53.939 --> 1:08:57.670
<v Speaker 5>bases in the border areas in Iraqi Kurdistan and actually

1:08:57.689 --> 1:08:59.610
<v Speaker 5>were able to remove some PKK positions from the border.

1:09:00.080 --> 1:09:03.760
<v Speaker 5>the area because of their superiority in drones that they

1:09:03.800 --> 1:09:06.580
<v Speaker 5>have developed over the recent years which is much more

1:09:06.620 --> 1:09:10.660
<v Speaker 5>difficult for insurgents to fight against drones than against like.

1:09:10.550 --> 1:09:15.750
<v Speaker 7>Regular airstrikes yeah yeah definitely and and yeah we saw

1:09:15.790 --> 1:09:19.180
<v Speaker 7>that in Syria right like and very directly like I mean,

1:09:19.200 --> 1:09:22.020
<v Speaker 7>we can look at the first Trump administration and see

1:09:22.040 --> 1:09:25.679
<v Speaker 7>like a phone call between Trump and Erdogan that leads

1:09:25.780 --> 1:09:30.389
<v Speaker 7>to US withdrawal, that leads to Turkish attacks on Syrian Kurds.

1:09:30.510 --> 1:09:33.370
<v Speaker 7>Like Trump has previously expressed a lot of admiration for Erdogan,

1:09:33.390 --> 1:09:35.510
<v Speaker 7>but like everything else, he kind of goes back and forth.

1:09:35.630 --> 1:09:39.229
<v Speaker 7>He also kind of, at one point he was speaking

1:09:39.290 --> 1:09:43.349
<v Speaker 7>very negatively about Iranian Kurds, like making this statement that

1:09:43.410 --> 1:09:47.200
<v Speaker 7>they had been supplied with weapons in January and that

1:09:47.240 --> 1:09:50.360
<v Speaker 7>they had been stolen or sold. I forget exactly what

1:09:50.400 --> 1:09:53.089
<v Speaker 7>he was saying. It was a very strange press conference.

1:09:53.450 --> 1:09:56.030
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he was saying that they stole the weapons and

1:09:56.050 --> 1:09:58.900
<v Speaker 5>he was basically saying like, Kurds are good fighters, but

1:09:58.939 --> 1:10:00.979
<v Speaker 5>they fight only when they get paid and this kind

1:10:01.000 --> 1:10:01.960
<v Speaker 5>of things, you know, so.

1:10:02.530 --> 1:10:03.590
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

1:10:03.850 --> 1:10:07.330
<v Speaker 5>Which was very confusing because as I mentioned at that time,

1:10:07.350 --> 1:10:09.490
<v Speaker 5>there was not like a very big protest movement in

1:10:09.510 --> 1:10:11.809
<v Speaker 5>the Kurdish areas. And also it would be difficult to

1:10:12.050 --> 1:10:14.650
<v Speaker 5>get weapons to protesters in other areas because you have

1:10:14.689 --> 1:10:16.260
<v Speaker 5>to cross this large territory.

1:10:16.270 --> 1:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:10:17.060 --> 1:10:19.720
<v Speaker 5>Inside Iranian territory. Not that the Kurds don't have smugglers

1:10:19.860 --> 1:10:23.000
<v Speaker 5>or something like that. There's a lot of cross-border smuggling

1:10:23.040 --> 1:10:25.220
<v Speaker 5>of a lot of goods and stuff, you know, alcohol,

1:10:25.439 --> 1:10:28.420
<v Speaker 5>which is banned in Iran and other stuff. I mean,

1:10:28.460 --> 1:10:29.939
<v Speaker 5>it gets crossed over the border.

1:10:29.960 --> 1:10:30.060
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:10:30.790 --> 1:10:33.070
<v Speaker 5>It would have been difficult just to bring in large

1:10:33.590 --> 1:10:36.769
<v Speaker 5>amounts of weapons into Iran and then give it to protesters.

1:10:37.390 --> 1:10:40.490
<v Speaker 5>It looks nice on paper, but it's difficult if you

1:10:40.530 --> 1:10:44.670
<v Speaker 5>don't have people on the ground. The US, they have

1:10:44.790 --> 1:10:49.680
<v Speaker 5>also supported insurgencies in the past or other movements. For instance,

1:10:49.689 --> 1:10:52.940
<v Speaker 5>the SDF, when the Syrian Kurds, for instance, were fighting ISIS,

1:10:53.580 --> 1:10:58.830
<v Speaker 5>the US were dropping weapons by planes in crates. Some

1:10:58.870 --> 1:11:01.170
<v Speaker 5>of the crates also ended up in ISIS hands because

1:11:01.189 --> 1:11:03.350
<v Speaker 5>it's difficult to control the weather, you know, that they

1:11:03.370 --> 1:11:07.809
<v Speaker 5>can blow up and saw somewhere else. But with Iran,

1:11:07.850 --> 1:11:10.719
<v Speaker 5>of course, it's a very different picture, a very large country,

1:11:11.580 --> 1:11:15.759
<v Speaker 5>hundreds of kilometers of border areas, mountainous areas, much bigger

1:11:15.800 --> 1:11:19.179
<v Speaker 5>than Iraq, for instance. So if you don't have people

1:11:19.200 --> 1:11:21.520
<v Speaker 5>on the ground, it's difficult to, if there's not like

1:11:21.560 --> 1:11:24.220
<v Speaker 5>a safe zone or something, or like an area where

1:11:24.890 --> 1:11:27.639
<v Speaker 5>The Iranian military doesn't have control to give support to

1:11:27.680 --> 1:11:31.620
<v Speaker 5>those groups. But Iran at the time controlled still all

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:35.280
<v Speaker 5>the territory of Iran. So if there's no area that

1:11:35.360 --> 1:11:37.960
<v Speaker 5>some group controls, it's difficult. Yeah.

1:11:38.160 --> 1:11:41.540
<v Speaker 7>And of course, the US still lists the PKK in

1:11:41.560 --> 1:11:45.830
<v Speaker 7>so much as PKK is still a thing. And the PJ,

1:11:45.910 --> 1:11:48.120
<v Speaker 7>I'll try and not use the Kurdish way of pronouncing it,

1:11:48.130 --> 1:11:51.750
<v Speaker 7>the PJAK as terrorist groups, as foreign terrorist organizations.

1:11:51.770 --> 1:11:51.910
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:11:52.500 --> 1:11:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, actually, Obama put Peshak on the list also. Like,

1:11:55.380 --> 1:11:57.920
<v Speaker 5>PKK was already listed, but Obama at the time, I

1:11:58.560 --> 1:12:00.679
<v Speaker 5>think because of the talks with Iran at the time

1:12:00.720 --> 1:12:04.349
<v Speaker 5>that he gave them sort of a... Maybe because there

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:06.229
<v Speaker 5>were some reports at the time also that Peshak was

1:12:06.270 --> 1:12:08.290
<v Speaker 5>meeting with Americans, so maybe it was sort of a

1:12:08.330 --> 1:12:09.930
<v Speaker 5>reassurance to Iran.

1:12:10.550 --> 1:12:14.030
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and they haven't really changed their stance on that.

1:12:14.050 --> 1:12:18.610
<v Speaker 7>But this leaves these Kurdish-Iranian opposition parties in a very

1:12:18.650 --> 1:12:23.120
<v Speaker 7>difficult position, especially... You sent me this thing today where

1:12:23.240 --> 1:12:26.100
<v Speaker 7>an Iranian diplomat had said that they were being kicked

1:12:26.240 --> 1:12:27.640
<v Speaker 7>out of southern Kurdistan.

1:12:27.780 --> 1:12:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Or handed over to Iran? I can't

1:12:29.540 --> 1:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>quite remember exactly what they said.

1:12:31.500 --> 1:12:36.139
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so there was this agreement between Iraq and Iran

1:12:36.300 --> 1:12:40.709
<v Speaker 5>in 2023 after this Jinnah Amini protest that Iran was

1:12:41.370 --> 1:12:44.490
<v Speaker 5>convinced that the Iranian Kurds were involved in that. So

1:12:44.870 --> 1:12:47.670
<v Speaker 5>after 2026, we saw that there was all these reports

1:12:47.710 --> 1:12:50.770
<v Speaker 5>that Iranian Kurds were receiving arms. And even the Iranian

1:12:50.790 --> 1:12:54.990
<v Speaker 5>foreign minister, he talked about that in an interview, that

1:12:55.010 --> 1:12:58.190
<v Speaker 5>he basically contacted the Turks and Iraqi Kurds to prevent

1:12:58.350 --> 1:13:02.760
<v Speaker 5>that from happening. So what Iran prefers is that those

1:13:02.820 --> 1:13:05.500
<v Speaker 5>Iranian Kurdish opposition parties that have been in exile and

1:13:05.620 --> 1:13:10.160
<v Speaker 5>in camps in Iraqi Kurdistan to basically be removed. Like,

1:13:10.180 --> 1:13:12.260
<v Speaker 5>for instance, what happened with the Mujahideen Halk, which was

1:13:12.300 --> 1:13:16.250
<v Speaker 5>removed in 2016. because of Iranian pressure, but also because

1:13:16.310 --> 1:13:19.130
<v Speaker 5>of the US that wanted them gone because they were

1:13:19.729 --> 1:13:24.110
<v Speaker 5>creating issues. So Mujahideen Khalkh is also an Iranian opposition group,

1:13:24.189 --> 1:13:27.710
<v Speaker 5>and they have armed members, and they were moved to Albania.

1:13:28.870 --> 1:13:31.229
<v Speaker 5>So Iran prefers something like that, that they are moved

1:13:31.430 --> 1:13:34.889
<v Speaker 5>out to Europe or that they are surrendered to Iran.

1:13:35.650 --> 1:13:37.810
<v Speaker 5>And that's also now actually a process now between the

1:13:37.840 --> 1:13:41.920
<v Speaker 5>PKK and Turkey, because Turkey is now discussing an amnesty

1:13:41.960 --> 1:13:44.500
<v Speaker 5>for PKK, and they said, We're not going to accept

1:13:44.520 --> 1:13:47.260
<v Speaker 5>the PKK leadership to come back to Turkey. So where

1:13:47.300 --> 1:13:49.120
<v Speaker 5>are they going to send them? So now they're talking

1:13:49.180 --> 1:13:52.220
<v Speaker 5>about sending the PKK leadership, for instance, to Europe as

1:13:52.260 --> 1:13:54.560
<v Speaker 5>part of this peace talks between the PKK and the

1:13:54.600 --> 1:13:57.740
<v Speaker 5>Turkish state. So what we saw during this recent forum

1:13:57.770 --> 1:14:00.430
<v Speaker 5>in the MIRI forum that the PKK leader, Bafo Talabani,

1:14:00.510 --> 1:14:02.890
<v Speaker 5>he was an Iraqi Kurdish leader. He was saying, like,

1:14:02.950 --> 1:14:05.150
<v Speaker 5>we can't do something like that with the Iranian Kurds also.

1:14:05.890 --> 1:14:07.929
<v Speaker 5>what is happening with the PKK, that we do something

1:14:07.970 --> 1:14:11.260
<v Speaker 5>like that. And Iranian Kurd Salwood said, well, we don't

1:14:11.300 --> 1:14:14.540
<v Speaker 5>have any talks with Iran or we have no idea what,

1:14:14.960 --> 1:14:17.439
<v Speaker 5>there's no process at the moment going on. I mean,

1:14:17.460 --> 1:14:20.340
<v Speaker 5>there were peace talks in the past between Iran and

1:14:20.400 --> 1:14:23.870
<v Speaker 5>Iranian Kurdish parties, but in the beginning, actually Iran assassinated

1:14:24.850 --> 1:14:27.990
<v Speaker 5>some of their leaders during these talks in Europe. Later,

1:14:28.030 --> 1:14:31.850
<v Speaker 5>they tried again in 2019. There also have been talks

1:14:31.890 --> 1:14:34.790
<v Speaker 5>between Peshawar and Iran, but some people say that it

1:14:34.870 --> 1:14:37.060
<v Speaker 5>was mediated also by the Iraqi Kurds at the time.

1:14:37.070 --> 1:14:41.240
<v Speaker 5>This was around, I think, 2011. They have all this history,

1:14:41.340 --> 1:14:43.340
<v Speaker 5>but the fact is that the Iranian Kurds said, well,

1:14:43.580 --> 1:14:46.300
<v Speaker 5>we are not aware of any talks. It seems that

1:14:47.000 --> 1:14:50.090
<v Speaker 5>the PKK leaders may be thinking that this PKK process

1:14:50.100 --> 1:14:53.990
<v Speaker 5>with Turkey could be replicated with Iran, and that then

1:14:54.130 --> 1:14:57.830
<v Speaker 5>Iran stops its drone attacks. For instance, Turkey In the past,

1:14:58.010 --> 1:14:59.910
<v Speaker 5>Turkey was carrying out a lot of drone attacks in

1:14:59.970 --> 1:15:03.860
<v Speaker 5>Iraqi Kurdistan, also on Sinjar, on the PKK and PKK affiliates.

1:15:04.660 --> 1:15:07.880
<v Speaker 5>And there were almost weekly drone attacks by Turkey. But

1:15:08.040 --> 1:15:12.080
<v Speaker 5>once the peace process started after 2024, we saw around,

1:15:12.700 --> 1:15:16.260
<v Speaker 5>I think it was around 2025 or before that, that

1:15:16.340 --> 1:15:19.220
<v Speaker 5>almost all the drone attacks, they stopped basically. So there

1:15:19.240 --> 1:15:21.510
<v Speaker 5>was no more artillery. There was no more drone attacks

1:15:21.550 --> 1:15:24.710
<v Speaker 5>by Turkey. And I think that sort of the Iraqi

1:15:24.729 --> 1:15:28.930
<v Speaker 5>Kurdish leadership sort of like thinking of, replicating that with Iran.

1:15:29.570 --> 1:15:31.759
<v Speaker 5>But also today I saw an interview with an Iranian

1:15:31.770 --> 1:15:34.260
<v Speaker 5>Kurdish leader who was saying that you should not like

1:15:34.320 --> 1:15:38.460
<v Speaker 5>compare us to other Kurdish areas. We cannot be compared,

1:15:38.500 --> 1:15:40.460
<v Speaker 5>the Iranian Kurds cannot be compared, for instance, with the

1:15:40.500 --> 1:15:44.360
<v Speaker 5>Kurds in Turkey because that's a very different political issue.

1:15:45.380 --> 1:15:48.229
<v Speaker 5>Also with this attacks, you know, like they're thinking of

1:15:48.290 --> 1:15:50.729
<v Speaker 5>like replicating that, but the issue is that in Turkey

1:15:50.770 --> 1:15:53.750
<v Speaker 5>you have PKK, you have the Turkish state, but in

1:15:53.790 --> 1:15:57.259
<v Speaker 5>Iran you have like Kurdish political alliance of six parties.

1:15:57.580 --> 1:15:59.980
<v Speaker 5>And then you still have some other Iranian Kurdish parties

1:16:00.020 --> 1:16:01.240
<v Speaker 5>that are not part of the alliance.

1:16:01.500 --> 1:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:16:01.860 --> 1:16:04.719
<v Speaker 5>So you have like this large number of Iranian Kurdish parties,

1:16:04.780 --> 1:16:08.780
<v Speaker 5>which have maybe around 10,000 or more fighters. Some people

1:16:08.820 --> 1:16:12.240
<v Speaker 5>say even more. So I think that's why it's a

1:16:12.260 --> 1:16:15.180
<v Speaker 5>bit more complicated than in Turkey, because in Turkey, they

1:16:15.200 --> 1:16:17.729
<v Speaker 5>can talk with Ocalan who's in jail, the leader of

1:16:17.770 --> 1:16:18.320
<v Speaker 5>the PKK.

1:16:18.479 --> 1:16:18.669
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:16:18.870 --> 1:16:20.590
<v Speaker 5>But if it's with Iranian Kurds, who they talk to.

1:16:21.229 --> 1:16:24.080
<v Speaker 5>And the Iraqi Kurds are basically offering themselves as a,

1:16:24.660 --> 1:16:27.160
<v Speaker 5>as a mediator, but the issue is then what you're

1:16:27.180 --> 1:16:29.820
<v Speaker 5>going to do with all these different political parties. And

1:16:29.840 --> 1:16:31.760
<v Speaker 5>then of course, they want to have something in return.

1:16:32.240 --> 1:16:35.260
<v Speaker 5>So it's complicated. And at the same time, you have

1:16:35.280 --> 1:16:37.920
<v Speaker 5>the Iranian ambassador in Baghdad saying, well, we already made

1:16:37.939 --> 1:16:40.020
<v Speaker 5>a deal with Baghdad. They're going to be removed or

1:16:40.500 --> 1:16:44.259
<v Speaker 5>given to Iran. And today there was also a KRG official,

1:16:44.280 --> 1:16:46.320
<v Speaker 5>an Iraqi Kurdish official who said that he was not

1:16:46.350 --> 1:16:48.809
<v Speaker 5>a part of the meeting in Baghdad. So he had

1:16:49.189 --> 1:16:50.810
<v Speaker 5>no comment on that specific issue.

1:16:51.110 --> 1:16:51.269
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:16:51.570 --> 1:16:56.809
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, it's, it's like very, um, very complicated, the situation. Yeah.

1:16:56.930 --> 1:17:00.660
<v Speaker 7>It's been such a fractured year, I guess, for Kurdistan,

1:17:00.680 --> 1:17:03.519
<v Speaker 7>like starting with all the developments in Syria at the

1:17:03.540 --> 1:17:06.760
<v Speaker 7>very start of the year. And then like, I feel

1:17:06.780 --> 1:17:10.020
<v Speaker 7>like immediately following that we saw a lot more unity,

1:17:10.280 --> 1:17:12.269
<v Speaker 7>like even to the point where there were like some

1:17:12.330 --> 1:17:17.229
<v Speaker 7>peak UK anti-terrorism forces who went to Hesika, I think like,

1:17:17.430 --> 1:17:20.650
<v Speaker 7>like during that, that time when, uh, the STG was

1:17:20.689 --> 1:17:23.349
<v Speaker 7>advancing towards the majority Kurdish cities in Syria.

1:17:23.890 --> 1:17:26.450
<v Speaker 5>I think there was a misunderstanding about that thing. Okay.

1:17:26.970 --> 1:17:29.769
<v Speaker 5>The PUK already had like this counterterrorism forces for a

1:17:29.790 --> 1:17:32.700
<v Speaker 5>long time in Syria and they were basically already there.

1:17:33.180 --> 1:17:35.420
<v Speaker 5>But then there was some social media, they were suggesting

1:17:35.439 --> 1:17:38.280
<v Speaker 5>that they were basically being sent to support the STF

1:17:38.320 --> 1:17:41.780
<v Speaker 5>against the muskists. But I talked to people from the

1:17:41.820 --> 1:17:43.939
<v Speaker 5>PUK side and they said, no, no, it was not,

1:17:44.300 --> 1:17:45.939
<v Speaker 5>it was not like sort of, I mean, there was

1:17:45.970 --> 1:17:48.730
<v Speaker 5>a lot of cross border solidarity, you know, Iraqi Kurds.

1:17:48.790 --> 1:17:49.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:17:49.580 --> 1:17:54.500
<v Speaker 5>Supporting also dialogue between Syrian Kurds and Damascus, both from

1:17:54.580 --> 1:18:00.450
<v Speaker 5>Erbil and Soleimani, but actively involved in supporting SDF military.

1:18:00.510 --> 1:18:03.070
<v Speaker 5>I think that was only mostly against ISIS and not

1:18:03.130 --> 1:18:04.570
<v Speaker 5>against Damascus.

1:18:05.070 --> 1:18:05.330
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

1:18:06.090 --> 1:18:09.300
<v Speaker 7>So they were still there on that anti-ISIS mission, which

1:18:09.340 --> 1:18:11.900
<v Speaker 7>was ongoing for them. Yeah, that makes sense, I guess.

1:18:12.140 --> 1:18:12.260
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:18:12.300 --> 1:18:12.420
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:18:13.080 --> 1:18:15.060
<v Speaker 7>It was interesting just to see like the move to

1:18:15.360 --> 1:18:18.920
<v Speaker 7>using not the SDF flag or the PYD flag, but

1:18:19.000 --> 1:18:22.040
<v Speaker 7>like the green, yellow and red Kurdistan flag.

1:18:22.120 --> 1:18:22.320
<v Speaker 8>Right.

1:18:22.939 --> 1:18:27.960
<v Speaker 7>And like a sort of more unified moment for Kurdistan.

1:18:27.979 --> 1:18:30.320
<v Speaker 7>And now we're, we're sort of back in this place

1:18:30.439 --> 1:18:35.010
<v Speaker 7>where the various states that divide Kurdistan have been able

1:18:35.050 --> 1:18:38.590
<v Speaker 7>to like fairly effectively play the interest and safety of

1:18:38.670 --> 1:18:41.610
<v Speaker 7>one group against the interest and safety of another group.

1:18:41.710 --> 1:18:41.910
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1:18:42.090 --> 1:18:42.750
<v Speaker 3>Is that fair to say?

1:18:43.400 --> 1:18:46.690
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, there was a lot of cross-border solidarity

1:18:46.729 --> 1:18:48.990
<v Speaker 5>at the time. Even yeah the reigning kurdish party saying

1:18:49.020 --> 1:18:52.900
<v Speaker 5>that they were willing to send their forces into syria

1:18:52.939 --> 1:18:56.340
<v Speaker 5>if they would receive a request so yeah and there

1:18:56.380 --> 1:18:59.060
<v Speaker 5>were also a lot of volunteers coming like iraqi kurdish

1:18:59.180 --> 1:19:02.300
<v Speaker 5>volunteers they were crossing the border and they were there

1:19:02.780 --> 1:19:05.930
<v Speaker 5>But then, of course, the agreement was made and then

1:19:05.950 --> 1:19:09.750
<v Speaker 5>the fighting stopped. So they mostly returned to Kurdistan. It's

1:19:10.010 --> 1:19:11.210
<v Speaker 5>not that anyone stayed there.

1:19:11.490 --> 1:19:12.229
<v Speaker 1>No, yeah.

1:19:12.330 --> 1:19:14.930
<v Speaker 3>I think most of them definitely came home pretty quickly.

1:19:26.150 --> 1:19:31.849
<v Speaker 7>So going along now, this still happens every... Every month

1:19:31.970 --> 1:19:34.210
<v Speaker 7>or so, someone on Twitter will be like, oh, the

1:19:34.310 --> 1:19:39.059
<v Speaker 7>Iranian Kurds are going to rise up against the Iranian regime.

1:19:39.120 --> 1:19:41.060
<v Speaker 7>I guess it's an easy way to generate revenue if

1:19:41.080 --> 1:19:43.919
<v Speaker 7>you're one of those people who has the blue tick

1:19:44.040 --> 1:19:46.700
<v Speaker 7>on Twitter now. And mostly it's people who have never

1:19:46.760 --> 1:19:49.420
<v Speaker 7>paid attention to Kurdistan before and won't again.

1:19:49.680 --> 1:19:52.430
<v Speaker 3>It's just a lie for attention.

1:19:53.090 --> 1:19:56.930
<v Speaker 7>But it seems almost less likely than it was a

1:19:57.210 --> 1:20:00.140
<v Speaker 7>year ago, right? The US has not really done much

1:20:00.200 --> 1:20:02.780
<v Speaker 7>to assist them. The bombing that the US has done

1:20:02.840 --> 1:20:11.160
<v Speaker 7>has not degraded Iran's capacity to suppress revolution internally. It

1:20:11.200 --> 1:20:14.950
<v Speaker 7>seems like we're not moving any closer to a situation

1:20:14.990 --> 1:20:18.170
<v Speaker 7>where we're likely to see any kind of open conflict

1:20:18.290 --> 1:20:18.790
<v Speaker 7>in Iran.

1:20:19.390 --> 1:20:21.670
<v Speaker 3>Is that a reasonable conclusion?

1:20:22.610 --> 1:20:26.890
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think like in February, when they started bombing

1:20:26.950 --> 1:20:30.689
<v Speaker 5>in February, March, that the Iranian government was quite weak,

1:20:31.729 --> 1:20:34.370
<v Speaker 5>especially the Kurdish areas. I mean, they were like basically...

1:20:34.820 --> 1:20:38.990
<v Speaker 5>Iranian soldiers and IRGC, they were basically hiding in mosques

1:20:39.030 --> 1:20:41.790
<v Speaker 5>and stuff. They were trying to avoid airstrikes. So at

1:20:41.850 --> 1:20:43.690
<v Speaker 5>that point, they were very weak. So I think at

1:20:43.729 --> 1:20:47.730
<v Speaker 5>that point, the ability of Iran to suppress any Iranian

1:20:47.750 --> 1:20:50.690
<v Speaker 5>Kurdish insurgency would be very difficult. But the Iranian Kurds

1:20:50.729 --> 1:20:53.370
<v Speaker 5>were basically waiting to see what the US and Israel

1:20:53.390 --> 1:20:56.309
<v Speaker 5>will do and if they were serious and nothing happened.

1:20:56.330 --> 1:20:59.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there were some airstrikes in Piran Shah near

1:20:59.810 --> 1:21:04.099
<v Speaker 5>the border, but that didn't really materialize in anything. And then...

1:21:04.460 --> 1:21:07.400
<v Speaker 5>I think now that the question is like, doesn't Trump

1:21:07.439 --> 1:21:11.260
<v Speaker 5>really want to have like a full regime change or

1:21:11.439 --> 1:21:15.180
<v Speaker 5>is the fact that he rather is looking for that

1:21:15.240 --> 1:21:17.900
<v Speaker 5>Iran just say like official, I mean, Iran already says

1:21:17.920 --> 1:21:20.040
<v Speaker 5>we don't have a nuclear, we don't have ambitions for

1:21:20.060 --> 1:21:22.740
<v Speaker 5>a nuclear weapon, but that's not enough for the U

1:21:22.860 --> 1:21:26.760
<v Speaker 5>S U S they want Iran to stop all this like, uh,

1:21:26.800 --> 1:21:29.060
<v Speaker 5>nuclear enrichment and this kind of things and all these

1:21:29.080 --> 1:21:31.769
<v Speaker 5>sites and stuff they want to be, be destroyed or

1:21:31.810 --> 1:21:34.710
<v Speaker 5>removed or whatever. So I think that's like the main

1:21:34.729 --> 1:21:37.910
<v Speaker 5>goal of the US and Israel rather has the regime

1:21:37.950 --> 1:21:41.479
<v Speaker 5>completely gone, but they cannot do it by themselves only. Yeah.

1:21:41.840 --> 1:21:44.300
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the Israeli prime minister is talking about that

1:21:44.340 --> 1:21:46.259
<v Speaker 5>a lot, but they cannot do it by themselves.

1:21:46.460 --> 1:21:46.620
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:21:47.080 --> 1:21:49.160
<v Speaker 5>The question is like, if there's going to be a

1:21:49.180 --> 1:21:53.599
<v Speaker 5>new round of strikes, conflict after or before the midterm

1:21:53.650 --> 1:21:55.570
<v Speaker 5>elections in the US, how are they going to look?

1:21:55.930 --> 1:21:56.090
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:21:56.270 --> 1:21:58.510
<v Speaker 5>But I think personally that Trump is not so much

1:21:58.570 --> 1:22:02.570
<v Speaker 5>interested in, he was hoping that Iran would have sort

1:22:02.590 --> 1:22:03.830
<v Speaker 5>of a Venezuela effect.

1:22:04.229 --> 1:22:05.930
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree.

1:22:05.950 --> 1:22:09.849
<v Speaker 5>They killed several Iranian top leaders. They killed the Supreme Leader.

1:22:10.510 --> 1:22:13.349
<v Speaker 5>And they were thinking that the Iranian government would quickly

1:22:13.390 --> 1:22:16.979
<v Speaker 5>collapse and that they could do something with Kurds and

1:22:17.020 --> 1:22:22.080
<v Speaker 5>maybe install either monarchists or someone friendly, like someone in

1:22:22.120 --> 1:22:26.120
<v Speaker 5>the Iranian government would basically surrender completely to US demands

1:22:26.200 --> 1:22:29.400
<v Speaker 5>and that basically... They would have like a new Venezuela

1:22:29.479 --> 1:22:33.000
<v Speaker 5>and all business would start and they could continue. But

1:22:33.040 --> 1:22:37.120
<v Speaker 5>they didn't realize that Iran is like a very ideological government.

1:22:37.380 --> 1:22:41.940
<v Speaker 5>And it's not like Venezuela, which is a very different situation.

1:22:42.740 --> 1:22:45.350
<v Speaker 5>And basically that idea was sold to Trump that it

1:22:45.390 --> 1:22:48.030
<v Speaker 5>would be quickly over, but it was not over very quickly.

1:22:48.050 --> 1:22:52.070
<v Speaker 5>And now they're sort of stuck in this conflict that's

1:22:52.110 --> 1:22:56.729
<v Speaker 5>not ending. And could continue until even a new government

1:22:56.770 --> 1:23:00.520
<v Speaker 5>comes and after new elections, you know, after, not even

1:23:00.610 --> 1:23:02.880
<v Speaker 5>after the midterm elections, a very big chance that this

1:23:02.900 --> 1:23:05.460
<v Speaker 5>will just continue, even not like a full scale conflict.

1:23:05.560 --> 1:23:07.800
<v Speaker 5>And still there will be tensions unless there's like an

1:23:07.840 --> 1:23:09.360
<v Speaker 5>agreement between the US and Iran.

1:23:09.800 --> 1:23:09.980
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:23:10.340 --> 1:23:12.760
<v Speaker 5>So it really depends on what will happen. So I

1:23:12.780 --> 1:23:15.880
<v Speaker 5>think personally that if the US will do something, probably

1:23:15.939 --> 1:23:18.200
<v Speaker 5>it will be like, again, like a very big strike

1:23:18.260 --> 1:23:22.770
<v Speaker 5>or something on energy or nuclear sites and stuff. But

1:23:22.830 --> 1:23:24.510
<v Speaker 5>will it be like a ground invasion?

1:23:24.590 --> 1:23:24.830
<v Speaker 9>No.

1:23:25.490 --> 1:23:28.450
<v Speaker 5>I mean, he's not going to send ground troops. I mean,

1:23:28.470 --> 1:23:30.590
<v Speaker 5>they could also do something, what they did with the

1:23:30.610 --> 1:23:34.379
<v Speaker 5>Syrian Kurds, that you have this small special forces supported

1:23:34.439 --> 1:23:39.540
<v Speaker 5>by airstrikes hitting the Iranian government and then pushing them

1:23:39.620 --> 1:23:42.179
<v Speaker 5>out from certain areas like what happened in Syria with ISIS.

1:23:42.260 --> 1:23:45.260
<v Speaker 5>But so far, I mean, there's no indication of that.

1:23:45.320 --> 1:23:47.280
<v Speaker 5>So probably it will just be like a very big

1:23:47.340 --> 1:23:51.190
<v Speaker 5>strike again all over Iran. And then again, you're going

1:23:51.330 --> 1:23:55.250
<v Speaker 5>to have talks. But I mean, just airstrikes are not

1:23:55.290 --> 1:23:58.070
<v Speaker 5>going to remove the Iranian government if that is the strategy.

1:23:59.110 --> 1:24:01.610
<v Speaker 5>And also, it's very unlikely that Iran will make any

1:24:01.650 --> 1:24:05.970
<v Speaker 5>concessions unless there's a very big threat to the future

1:24:06.030 --> 1:24:10.030
<v Speaker 5>of the Iranian Islamic Republic. If there's a very big

1:24:10.150 --> 1:24:15.620
<v Speaker 5>uprising or there's literally... Kurds marching on taking Kurdish territory

1:24:15.680 --> 1:24:18.939
<v Speaker 5>or something like that, something like insurgents taking areas like

1:24:19.000 --> 1:24:20.280
<v Speaker 5>Baluch and Kurds and others.

1:24:20.479 --> 1:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:24:21.240 --> 1:24:24.380
<v Speaker 5>There's really something that they think, oh, we're losing territory.

1:24:24.439 --> 1:24:27.280
<v Speaker 5>For instance, what happened when you had, for instance, the

1:24:27.300 --> 1:24:29.740
<v Speaker 5>British and the Soviets in a long time ago that

1:24:29.780 --> 1:24:33.620
<v Speaker 5>they basically controlled certain areas of Iran and created an

1:24:33.720 --> 1:24:35.979
<v Speaker 5>Azeri and a Kurdish republic. So at that time, Iran

1:24:36.040 --> 1:24:39.560
<v Speaker 5>was basically partially occupied by the Brits and the Soviets

1:24:39.620 --> 1:24:43.580
<v Speaker 5>at the time. So that's something they would, maybe then

1:24:43.760 --> 1:24:47.340
<v Speaker 5>they would make concessions, but currently it's unlikely. So they'll

1:24:47.360 --> 1:24:50.059
<v Speaker 5>probably be stalemate. There are probably going to be more strikes.

1:24:50.860 --> 1:24:53.639
<v Speaker 5>But the Iranian Kurds, if for instance, if the US

1:24:53.680 --> 1:24:56.679
<v Speaker 5>and Iran reach a deal, then Iranian Kurds, they will

1:24:57.380 --> 1:25:00.920
<v Speaker 5>probably be under more pressure from Baghdad, from Iran and

1:25:01.189 --> 1:25:06.050
<v Speaker 5>Baghdad to basically be removed from Iraqi Kurdistan. Although it's

1:25:06.090 --> 1:25:08.550
<v Speaker 5>unlikely that the Iraqi Kurds will just easily accept such

1:25:08.590 --> 1:25:12.510
<v Speaker 5>a thing because There's also this pun, Kurdish national sentiment

1:25:12.979 --> 1:25:17.350
<v Speaker 5>that if you remove those Iranian Kurds without their approval

1:25:17.510 --> 1:25:22.330
<v Speaker 5>or their acceptance, that could also create Kurds being unhappy

1:25:22.350 --> 1:25:24.830
<v Speaker 5>to say, oh, why are you betraying the Iranian Kurds?

1:25:25.290 --> 1:25:27.230
<v Speaker 5>But if it's like a peace process, which is happening

1:25:27.270 --> 1:25:30.240
<v Speaker 5>now between PKK and Ankara, where the PKK itself is saying, oh,

1:25:30.400 --> 1:25:33.610
<v Speaker 5>we're going to disband. and we have these negotiations with

1:25:33.630 --> 1:25:35.290
<v Speaker 5>the Turkish government, then it's going to be different.

1:25:35.530 --> 1:25:35.790
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:25:36.229 --> 1:25:39.510
<v Speaker 5>Uh, so it can like move into many, many directions,

1:25:39.710 --> 1:25:42.590
<v Speaker 5>but of course everybody doesn't know what is exactly going

1:25:42.610 --> 1:25:43.050
<v Speaker 5>to happen.

1:25:43.070 --> 1:25:45.950
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, I think it's important to keep an eye

1:25:45.970 --> 1:25:46.509
<v Speaker 3>on this stuff.

1:25:46.550 --> 1:25:48.390
<v Speaker 7>And I think it's good that we've given people a

1:25:48.880 --> 1:25:50.940
<v Speaker 7>better basis to understand it because the reporting in the

1:25:51.030 --> 1:25:54.320
<v Speaker 7>U S media on it has not been great. And

1:25:54.340 --> 1:25:56.780
<v Speaker 7>I think, yeah, as, as you said earlier, right? Like

1:25:57.260 --> 1:25:59.940
<v Speaker 7>sometimes the U S will just refer to the Iranian opposition.

1:26:00.570 --> 1:26:03.890
<v Speaker 7>But there really is no unity there. Even after the

1:26:03.930 --> 1:26:07.090
<v Speaker 7>killing of Jinnah Amini, we had these big protests about

1:26:07.110 --> 1:26:10.360
<v Speaker 7>the death of a Kurdish woman and the opposition cannot

1:26:10.420 --> 1:26:13.479
<v Speaker 7>even agree on what her name is. They want to

1:26:13.560 --> 1:26:17.580
<v Speaker 7>use her Persian name. And I think that's a pretty

1:26:17.600 --> 1:26:21.400
<v Speaker 7>good indicator of where they are. And the Iranian monarchists

1:26:21.479 --> 1:26:25.410
<v Speaker 7>cannot help themselves but go on Twitter and make... just

1:26:25.830 --> 1:26:28.850
<v Speaker 7>extremely big, bigoted is the wrong word, but it's very

1:26:28.890 --> 1:26:30.410
<v Speaker 7>clear that they and the Kurds are not in the

1:26:30.430 --> 1:26:35.070
<v Speaker 7>same place at all and that they don't consider any

1:26:35.130 --> 1:26:39.040
<v Speaker 7>sort of Kurdish autonomy to be compatible with their goals.

1:26:39.880 --> 1:26:42.580
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, actually, even Bahlavi, he was calling on the

1:26:42.600 --> 1:26:46.700
<v Speaker 5>Iranian army to fight the separatists or something like that,

1:26:47.460 --> 1:26:50.330
<v Speaker 5>and he didn't even control any territory on the ground. So,

1:26:51.170 --> 1:26:53.430
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's different from Syria where you have this

1:26:53.510 --> 1:26:58.179
<v Speaker 5>large Sunni... uh, Arab insurgent movements, uh, that were fighting

1:26:58.200 --> 1:27:02.230
<v Speaker 5>against Assad regime, they actually had manpower to fight against

1:27:02.250 --> 1:27:05.170
<v Speaker 5>the Kurds. And they did several times, uh, even before

1:27:05.350 --> 1:27:06.210
<v Speaker 5>the fall of Assad.

1:27:06.330 --> 1:27:06.470
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:27:06.910 --> 1:27:08.610
<v Speaker 5>And then when they took over the Syrian state, then

1:27:08.650 --> 1:27:11.550
<v Speaker 5>basically they put demands to the Kurds that you either

1:27:11.570 --> 1:27:13.840
<v Speaker 5>integrate into the Syrian state or it's going to be war.

1:27:14.140 --> 1:27:14.310
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:27:14.479 --> 1:27:16.420
<v Speaker 5>And that's actually what happened. It ended up in a

1:27:16.439 --> 1:27:19.060
<v Speaker 5>war in January and in the end Damascus won with

1:27:19.100 --> 1:27:22.740
<v Speaker 5>support of Turkey. And also because the West abandoned, um,

1:27:23.560 --> 1:27:26.690
<v Speaker 5>their alliance with the STF and they choose Damascus because,

1:27:26.710 --> 1:27:30.530
<v Speaker 5>you know, they want to send back Syrians from Europe

1:27:30.570 --> 1:27:33.509
<v Speaker 5>to Syria and the US wants to do business deals.

1:27:34.990 --> 1:27:38.410
<v Speaker 5>So I don't know, like maybe Pahlavi had something similar

1:27:38.450 --> 1:27:41.380
<v Speaker 5>in mind, you know, although it was actually interesting that

1:27:41.410 --> 1:27:44.960
<v Speaker 5>the Iranian foreign minister claimed that Pahlavi sort of have

1:27:45.040 --> 1:27:47.900
<v Speaker 5>accepted to lose control over Kurdish areas in exchange for

1:27:47.979 --> 1:27:52.420
<v Speaker 5>getting control over Iran central state. Interesting, I hear that.

1:27:52.810 --> 1:27:55.059
<v Speaker 5>He was saying that in an interview. But that was

1:27:55.100 --> 1:28:00.700
<v Speaker 5>never confirmed or denied by Pahlavi. And also seeing his

1:28:00.740 --> 1:28:03.900
<v Speaker 5>hostility towards Iranian Kurdish political parties and their alliances, you know,

1:28:04.439 --> 1:28:06.620
<v Speaker 5>doesn't really look like that, that he sort of accepted

1:28:06.660 --> 1:28:07.139
<v Speaker 5>such a thing.

1:28:07.320 --> 1:28:07.559
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:28:08.120 --> 1:28:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Because if it was like that, they could have formed

1:28:10.140 --> 1:28:14.140
<v Speaker 5>a sort of Iranian opposition alliance, you know, between monarchists,

1:28:14.220 --> 1:28:20.220
<v Speaker 5>Iranian Kurds, Mujahideen, this other group or other groups. But

1:28:20.240 --> 1:28:23.170
<v Speaker 5>they never did. You know, there was never really... A

1:28:23.189 --> 1:28:26.010
<v Speaker 5>big alliance. But Iranian Kurds themselves, they formed an alliance

1:28:26.090 --> 1:28:28.849
<v Speaker 5>and they also have some contacts with some other Iranian

1:28:28.890 --> 1:28:32.990
<v Speaker 5>opposition factions. But it's still very much disunited.

1:28:33.510 --> 1:28:34.130
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah.

1:28:34.670 --> 1:28:36.229
<v Speaker 7>But I think that's helped everyone get a better sense

1:28:36.270 --> 1:28:39.070
<v Speaker 7>of where things are at. If people would like to

1:28:39.090 --> 1:28:41.190
<v Speaker 7>follow more of your work... you do a really good

1:28:41.220 --> 1:28:43.960
<v Speaker 7>job of keeping people updated on Kurdistan all over.

1:28:44.460 --> 1:28:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Where can they find you online if they want to

1:28:46.460 --> 1:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>do that?

1:28:47.320 --> 1:28:50.679
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm mostly active on X, basically, and I write

1:28:50.720 --> 1:28:55.219
<v Speaker 5>for different outlets. I write for Kurdistan Chronicle, New Region,

1:28:55.240 --> 1:28:58.280
<v Speaker 5>Middle East, some other outlets. There's a large number of them.

1:28:58.930 --> 1:29:01.850
<v Speaker 5>But most of the stuff I always post on my X.

1:29:02.330 --> 1:29:05.370
<v Speaker 5>So that's where I'm mostly active. Also trying to follow

1:29:05.410 --> 1:29:08.910
<v Speaker 5>the whole regional conflict, which is ongoing, you know, and

1:29:09.490 --> 1:29:11.429
<v Speaker 5>spreading to Yemen and other areas.

1:29:12.410 --> 1:29:12.570
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:29:12.970 --> 1:29:14.490
<v Speaker 3>What's your handle there if people want to find you?

1:29:14.510 --> 1:29:17.510
<v Speaker 5>It's basically my name, but with a V. So it's

1:29:17.670 --> 1:29:21.130
<v Speaker 5>at the X, it's like V-V-A-N-W-I-L-G-A-N-B-U-R-G.

1:29:21.150 --> 1:29:21.269
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:29:26.600 --> 1:29:28.740
<v Speaker 5>It's easier to write it on the screen then.

1:29:28.770 --> 1:29:31.550
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we'll put a link for people. There's a lot

1:29:31.610 --> 1:29:34.210
<v Speaker 7>of consonants coming out of people. Thank you very much

1:29:34.290 --> 1:29:36.290
<v Speaker 7>for your time this evening. I think that really helped

1:29:36.310 --> 1:29:39.360
<v Speaker 7>people get a better grasp of how things are in Kurdistan.

1:29:39.580 --> 1:29:39.900
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

1:29:40.100 --> 1:29:41.320
<v Speaker 5>You're welcome. Have a good day.

1:29:53.580 --> 1:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>It could happen here! That's not how we open the show.

1:29:59.260 --> 1:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Executive Disorder, our special midterm election 2026 edition,

1:30:05.979 --> 1:30:07.940
<v Speaker 1>where we're going to talk about everything that we can

1:30:08.050 --> 1:30:11.450
<v Speaker 1>in the next hour and change. I'm Garrison Davis. I'm

1:30:11.510 --> 1:30:16.170
<v Speaker 1>joined by Robert Evans, James Stout, Kevin Foster, and special

1:30:16.229 --> 1:30:20.629
<v Speaker 1>Texas correspondent Stephen Monticelli. Welcome, everyone.

1:30:21.290 --> 1:30:21.550
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

1:30:21.830 --> 1:30:25.220
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the show, everybody. Stephen, I'm so glad

1:30:25.260 --> 1:30:27.720
<v Speaker 2>we made the decision several decades ago to embed you

1:30:27.780 --> 1:30:30.580
<v Speaker 2>in Texas, knowing that years later we would start a

1:30:30.600 --> 1:30:33.720
<v Speaker 2>media network and need a correspondent in Texas for the

1:30:33.720 --> 1:30:35.160
<v Speaker 2>2026 midterm elections.

1:30:35.800 --> 1:30:37.929
<v Speaker 10>The long-term planning really paid off.

1:30:38.470 --> 1:30:38.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah.

1:30:38.990 --> 1:30:40.950
<v Speaker 2>We actually went and scouted you like they do with

1:30:41.070 --> 1:30:43.769
<v Speaker 2>NBA players when you were a little kid. Like, yeah,

1:30:43.790 --> 1:30:44.610
<v Speaker 2>this one, this one.

1:30:44.970 --> 1:30:46.630
<v Speaker 1>Someone's going to take that seriously.

1:30:46.810 --> 1:30:48.710
<v Speaker 10>Someone's going to take that seriously.

1:30:48.729 --> 1:30:49.730
<v Speaker 5>Oh, God.

1:30:49.750 --> 1:30:49.830
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:30:51.630 --> 1:30:54.710
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we're looking for the LeBron James of podcasting about

1:30:54.750 --> 1:30:55.099
<v Speaker 2>the news.

1:30:57.120 --> 1:31:00.719
<v Speaker 1>We will get to Texas shortly. But, you know, similar

1:31:00.780 --> 1:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to LeBron James, the elections this year saw a super

1:31:06.020 --> 1:31:11.689
<v Speaker 1>tall blue wave, something that they are calling a blue tsunami.

1:31:12.050 --> 1:31:13.130
<v Speaker 3>Blue nami, come on.

1:31:13.430 --> 1:31:14.030
<v Speaker 1>A blue nami.

1:31:14.050 --> 1:31:14.750
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:31:15.310 --> 1:31:22.150
<v Speaker 1>All right, guys. All right. So Democrats have completely dominated

1:31:22.330 --> 1:31:23.670
<v Speaker 1>in the midterm elections.

1:31:23.950 --> 1:31:24.510
<v Speaker 2>They sure did.

1:31:24.890 --> 1:31:30.750
<v Speaker 1>Outpacing the polling in many cases, outpacing most expectations. They

1:31:30.790 --> 1:31:34.929
<v Speaker 1>are projected to win 258 seats in the House, at least,

1:31:35.510 --> 1:31:39.759
<v Speaker 1>possibly a few more. Jesus. At the very least, an

1:31:39.770 --> 1:31:43.519
<v Speaker 1>81-seat majority, the largest majority either party has had since 1992.

1:31:43.520 --> 1:31:43.780
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

1:31:44.500 --> 1:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

1:31:44.920 --> 1:31:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Fuck me.

1:31:45.960 --> 1:31:49.710
<v Speaker 1>It's an incredible victory. Yeah. Unfortunately, we'll have to kind

1:31:49.750 --> 1:31:51.670
<v Speaker 1>of blaze through some of the House results because the

1:31:51.710 --> 1:31:56.330
<v Speaker 1>Senate results are super, super important as well. But obviously

1:31:56.350 --> 1:31:57.830
<v Speaker 1>the House race was kind of in the shadow of

1:31:57.870 --> 1:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this redistricting effort done by Republicans and some Democrats. The

1:32:02.860 --> 1:32:05.700
<v Speaker 1>GOP wanted to flip about 15 House seats through redistricting.

1:32:06.040 --> 1:32:12.990
<v Speaker 1>And how many did they flip? Zero. Zero seats. It's stunning. Now, Garrison,

1:32:13.110 --> 1:32:16.510
<v Speaker 1>is zero a large number? No, no, it's actually one

1:32:16.550 --> 1:32:19.470
<v Speaker 1>of the smaller numbers. Really? Oh, this is interesting.

1:32:19.530 --> 1:32:21.250
<v Speaker 2>Okay, thank you. Thank you for that context.

1:32:21.590 --> 1:32:24.570
<v Speaker 1>In fact, one could argue we've gotten into negative number

1:32:24.630 --> 1:32:27.849
<v Speaker 1>territory because Democrats did not just hold on to those

1:32:27.910 --> 1:32:32.189
<v Speaker 1>gerrymandered seats. They went on to flip at least 35 more.

1:32:32.210 --> 1:32:33.229
<v Speaker 3>Oh, my God.

1:32:33.510 --> 1:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Good God. Winning all 28 battleground districts identified by NBC.

1:32:37.660 --> 1:32:37.729
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

1:32:38.610 --> 1:32:40.990
<v Speaker 1>At least 11 flips in the New York Times most

1:32:41.030 --> 1:32:43.550
<v Speaker 1>competitive districts. And that's an undercount because the New York

1:32:43.570 --> 1:32:48.730
<v Speaker 1>Times isn't counting any redistricted district. And then another 10

1:32:48.729 --> 1:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>flips in districts that Republicans expected to win. And then

1:32:53.020 --> 1:32:56.700
<v Speaker 1>another nine flips in districts Republicans expected to win easily.

1:32:56.720 --> 1:33:02.030
<v Speaker 1>A lot of those in North Carolina, which Democrats just obliterated.

1:33:02.050 --> 1:33:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Oof.

1:33:02.650 --> 1:33:05.450
<v Speaker 1>The Republican Party in North Carolina. It's a bloodbath.

1:33:05.550 --> 1:33:07.790
<v Speaker 3>North Blair-alina, as they call it now.

1:33:07.810 --> 1:33:10.870
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. Actually, it was just announced a few

1:33:10.910 --> 1:33:13.250
<v Speaker 1>hours ago. That's what they're changing the state's name to.

1:33:17.420 --> 1:33:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Carolinas haven't gotten hit this hard since the

1:33:20.840 --> 1:33:26.860
<v Speaker 2>Civil War. It's crazy stuff. Like there's so many house

1:33:26.880 --> 1:33:30.360
<v Speaker 2>races we could like focus, focus on. I do want

1:33:30.380 --> 1:33:34.740
<v Speaker 2>to highlight it is expected that Lauren Bobbert will no

1:33:34.810 --> 1:33:38.090
<v Speaker 2>longer be a congressperson from January.

1:33:38.570 --> 1:33:43.550
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is. Fuck yeah. God, that's that's just she

1:33:43.610 --> 1:33:47.660
<v Speaker 1>is currently trailing by 6000 votes. They're still counting.

1:33:47.860 --> 1:33:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Hearing you say that is like the auditory equivalent of

1:33:51.400 --> 1:33:56.850
<v Speaker 2>biting into a perfectly cooked piece of steak. It's just glorious. Oh, God,

1:33:56.860 --> 1:33:57.509
<v Speaker 2>that feels good.

1:33:58.280 --> 1:34:00.890
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I want to mention, because we've reported

1:34:01.229 --> 1:34:03.870
<v Speaker 1>on this on Executive Disorder this past year, Max Miller,

1:34:04.030 --> 1:34:09.050
<v Speaker 1>the Republican congressman accused of some very horrific familial abuse.

1:34:09.070 --> 1:34:09.189
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:34:10.200 --> 1:34:13.320
<v Speaker 1>That was covered up by the Republican Party in general.

1:34:13.540 --> 1:34:14.540
<v Speaker 2>Real monster shit.

1:34:14.720 --> 1:34:18.730
<v Speaker 1>He has lost by almost 10 points. He is out.

1:34:18.740 --> 1:34:22.790
<v Speaker 1>Brian Poindexter is in. That's in Ohio. This was a

1:34:22.850 --> 1:34:26.590
<v Speaker 1>race that Miller was expected to win, and he did not.

1:34:28.110 --> 1:34:33.590
<v Speaker 1>Other big Trump House districts, we have Indiana 5, Kentucky 6,

1:34:33.590 --> 1:34:38.290
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina 6, and Ohio 10. which Democrats won. These

1:34:38.390 --> 1:34:42.350
<v Speaker 1>are like 20, 30 point shifts away from Trump's performance

1:34:42.370 --> 1:34:45.220
<v Speaker 1>in 2024. Christ almighty. It's pretty incredible.

1:34:45.350 --> 1:34:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:34:46.200 --> 1:34:50.580
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in general, I expected the House to flip.

1:34:50.660 --> 1:34:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

1:34:51.120 --> 1:34:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And I think most people did and have like somewhere

1:34:54.340 --> 1:34:57.259
<v Speaker 2>between a slim and like a solid lead for the Dems.

1:34:57.580 --> 1:34:59.780
<v Speaker 2>And the Senate was kind of like, there's a decent

1:34:59.820 --> 1:35:01.500
<v Speaker 2>chance it would flip, but it was going to I

1:35:01.540 --> 1:35:05.530
<v Speaker 2>don't think anyone really thought this would happen. Even when

1:35:05.570 --> 1:35:08.170
<v Speaker 2>the polls were showing it, I couldn't, it's been so

1:35:08.210 --> 1:35:10.710
<v Speaker 2>hard to trust them, right? Like the fact that they

1:35:10.830 --> 1:35:15.059
<v Speaker 2>undercounted the dims is certainly not, like I'm incredibly happy.

1:35:15.180 --> 1:35:18.059
<v Speaker 2>I just, I couldn't let myself believe it was going

1:35:18.140 --> 1:35:21.040
<v Speaker 2>to go this well. And I'm still kind of in

1:35:21.120 --> 1:35:23.939
<v Speaker 2>shock that it did. Like this is nuts.

1:35:24.620 --> 1:35:25.900
<v Speaker 3>I felt like I didn't know what to do with

1:35:25.939 --> 1:35:28.670
<v Speaker 3>myself last night. I'm so used to everything just being bad.

1:35:29.170 --> 1:35:29.470
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:35:29.630 --> 1:35:29.870
<v Speaker 9>Right.

1:35:29.910 --> 1:35:32.089
<v Speaker 3>It's like I was remembering last election.

1:35:32.130 --> 1:35:32.470
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:35:32.490 --> 1:35:33.930
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how to feel.

1:35:34.689 --> 1:35:34.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:35:35.050 --> 1:35:35.710
<v Speaker 3>Good, I guess.

1:35:35.750 --> 1:35:38.830
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, there's obviously there's bad news, as

1:35:38.870 --> 1:35:41.430
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about, too. But just I don't know.

1:35:41.530 --> 1:35:43.259
<v Speaker 2>I felt like the need to take a second on

1:35:43.340 --> 1:35:45.320
<v Speaker 2>air to go like, yeah, holy shit.

1:35:45.680 --> 1:35:49.410
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. That went pretty well. We can talk about this

1:35:49.510 --> 1:35:53.510
<v Speaker 1>more in the voter trends section, like specifically. But I mean, yeah,

1:35:53.550 --> 1:35:57.550
<v Speaker 1>this is like a total reversal of the 2024 election.

1:35:57.650 --> 1:35:57.889
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:35:58.130 --> 1:36:02.250
<v Speaker 1>On almost every metric. Now, as Robert mentioned, Democrats were

1:36:02.270 --> 1:36:06.050
<v Speaker 1>expected to win the House, not by this much. And again,

1:36:06.090 --> 1:36:09.240
<v Speaker 1>not like this. The tally is still being counted. But

1:36:09.320 --> 1:36:13.460
<v Speaker 1>so when I say they're expected to get around 258, 260,

1:36:13.460 --> 1:36:15.660
<v Speaker 1>not all those have been confirmed yet. But that is

1:36:15.680 --> 1:36:19.700
<v Speaker 1>the NBC projection. Which they're projecting more confidently than the

1:36:19.729 --> 1:36:21.229
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, which is a bit more conservative in

1:36:21.270 --> 1:36:22.090
<v Speaker 1>their projections. Yeah.

1:36:23.229 --> 1:36:25.490
<v Speaker 2>They've done well enough that like the outstanding, obviously the

1:36:25.550 --> 1:36:27.930
<v Speaker 2>races that aren't called yet matter, but none of them

1:36:28.010 --> 1:36:30.769
<v Speaker 2>matter in the sense of determining what the dims will

1:36:30.790 --> 1:36:33.689
<v Speaker 2>be able to do or not probably. Like the margins

1:36:33.770 --> 1:36:36.120
<v Speaker 2>are so big that these like last couple of seats

1:36:36.720 --> 1:36:39.380
<v Speaker 2>won't shift the, obviously it matters, but won't shift the

1:36:39.479 --> 1:36:40.500
<v Speaker 2>overall battle.

1:36:41.060 --> 1:36:45.130
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Which is crazy. The big question was what was

1:36:45.150 --> 1:36:47.950
<v Speaker 1>going to happen with the Senate. Dems needed to net

1:36:48.130 --> 1:36:52.430
<v Speaker 1>four to five seats, getting to like 51, 52, considering,

1:36:52.450 --> 1:36:55.210
<v Speaker 1>you know, J.D. Vance and John Fetterman, you know, to

1:36:55.250 --> 1:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>counteract their votes.

1:36:56.680 --> 1:36:57.269
<v Speaker 2>Fetter Vance.

1:36:58.310 --> 1:36:59.910
<v Speaker 1>They would have to claw back a fair number of seats.

1:37:00.900 --> 1:37:03.860
<v Speaker 1>As of Wednesday afternoon, Democrats have secured 54 seats. Wow.

1:37:03.860 --> 1:37:09.860
<v Speaker 3>53, right, with Fetterman being not a Democrat.

1:37:10.640 --> 1:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

1:37:11.160 --> 1:37:14.179
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Fetterman's ex-account has gone suspiciously quiet this morning.

1:37:15.100 --> 1:37:16.620
<v Speaker 1>Tragic, tragic. He's in mourning.

1:37:16.660 --> 1:37:17.680
<v Speaker 2>A lot of his friends lost.

1:37:18.180 --> 1:37:22.940
<v Speaker 1>And Democrats could win upwards of 56 seats. Jesus Christ.

1:37:22.970 --> 1:37:26.610
<v Speaker 1>Between Alaska and the surprise possible flip of the night, Mississippi,

1:37:26.630 --> 1:37:29.330
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get to in a sec. Yeah, yeah. Between

1:37:29.350 --> 1:37:34.270
<v Speaker 1>like seven, eight or nine flips. It's incredible. Yeah, it's bonkers. Like,

1:37:34.310 --> 1:37:37.220
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen a Senate race like this ever.

1:37:37.240 --> 1:37:38.479
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no.

1:37:39.340 --> 1:37:42.080
<v Speaker 7>It's more like, I remember, I'm sure like some of

1:37:42.140 --> 1:37:44.420
<v Speaker 7>us who are older remember like 2008, right?

1:37:44.580 --> 1:37:46.510
<v Speaker 3>And like the Obama election.

1:37:46.510 --> 1:37:50.970
<v Speaker 2>2008 and 98 too, I think, was another shellacking for

1:37:51.010 --> 1:37:51.330
<v Speaker 2>the right.

1:37:51.350 --> 1:37:54.070
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, evidently nothing to this extent. No.

1:37:54.170 --> 1:37:55.970
<v Speaker 1>Like, this is remarkable.

1:37:56.070 --> 1:37:58.860
<v Speaker 3>And the incumbent party tends to do worse in midterms, yeah,

1:37:58.900 --> 1:38:00.180
<v Speaker 3>but not to this extent.

1:38:00.200 --> 1:38:04.620
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, getting possibly 56 Senate seats.

1:38:05.000 --> 1:38:08.010
<v Speaker 2>This isn't doing worse. This is like end of days.

1:38:08.650 --> 1:38:12.130
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, extinction level event, to quote Ron DeSantis.

1:38:12.290 --> 1:38:16.010
<v Speaker 1>As Ron DeSantis says, an extinction level event for the

1:38:16.070 --> 1:38:16.969
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party.

1:38:17.410 --> 1:38:18.910
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank God.

1:38:20.850 --> 1:38:24.179
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Michigan, one of the big races of

1:38:24.220 --> 1:38:26.900
<v Speaker 1>the night, Abdul El-Sayed versus Mike Rogers. This was an

1:38:27.040 --> 1:38:31.760
<v Speaker 1>open seat previously held by a Democrat, and El-Sayed held

1:38:31.800 --> 1:38:36.300
<v Speaker 1>this seat for the Democrats. He won 53 to Rogers 45,

1:38:36.280 --> 1:38:41.140
<v Speaker 1>a seven-point win. Nice. The entire GOP apparatus, and frankly,

1:38:41.720 --> 1:38:45.790
<v Speaker 1>a big portion of the Democratic establishment mobilized against El-Sayed hard.

1:38:46.260 --> 1:38:48.980
<v Speaker 1>on like a national level, right? He became this sort

1:38:49.010 --> 1:38:51.850
<v Speaker 1>of like poster child of this whole election cycle with

1:38:51.890 --> 1:38:54.990
<v Speaker 1>Republicans hoping that painting him as an extremist, by doing that,

1:38:55.030 --> 1:38:58.269
<v Speaker 1>his candidacy could like negatively affect Democrats and races all

1:38:58.290 --> 1:39:01.870
<v Speaker 1>across the country. And that did not happen at all.

1:39:03.030 --> 1:39:03.290
<v Speaker 5>Nope.

1:39:04.229 --> 1:39:05.950
<v Speaker 2>It's the same kind of deal with like, if we

1:39:05.970 --> 1:39:09.390
<v Speaker 2>really focus on Hassan Piker, that'll scare everybody away from

1:39:09.410 --> 1:39:10.530
<v Speaker 2>voting for the Democrats.

1:39:10.570 --> 1:39:12.850
<v Speaker 1>Didn't work. That didn't seem to work. And if you

1:39:12.890 --> 1:39:15.660
<v Speaker 1>get a look at the voter demographic numbers- Seemed like

1:39:15.680 --> 1:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the opposite may have happened.

1:39:17.260 --> 1:39:17.540
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1:39:18.120 --> 1:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss to mention that Haley Stevens decided

1:39:22.020 --> 1:39:26.110
<v Speaker 1>to endorse the quote unquote nightmare, her words, Mike Rogers,

1:39:26.689 --> 1:39:30.170
<v Speaker 1>like two or three days before the election because of

1:39:30.610 --> 1:39:34.810
<v Speaker 1>El-Sayed's anti-Israel stances. and essentially threw her career away for,

1:39:34.830 --> 1:39:37.689
<v Speaker 1>I guess, probably some AIPAC money. I was going to

1:39:37.710 --> 1:39:38.689
<v Speaker 1>say nothing, but.

1:39:38.790 --> 1:39:39.620
<v Speaker 3>What's she going to do with it?

1:39:39.890 --> 1:39:40.349
<v Speaker 1>But, yeah.

1:39:41.350 --> 1:39:44.620
<v Speaker 3>She, like, self-immolated as a career politician. Buy the flight

1:39:44.640 --> 1:39:45.300
<v Speaker 3>to Israel.

1:39:45.860 --> 1:39:49.099
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right. That does seem like kind of her only option.

1:39:49.420 --> 1:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Join Netanyahu. She's been kicked out of the Democratic Party.

1:39:52.160 --> 1:39:55.050
<v Speaker 2>Well, Netanyahu might not be in power all that much longer,

1:39:55.090 --> 1:39:56.550
<v Speaker 2>depending on how things go over there.

1:39:56.590 --> 1:39:58.809
<v Speaker 3>She doesn't have to join him in Parliament. Join him

1:39:58.830 --> 1:40:00.910
<v Speaker 3>in the International Criminal Court if she wants to. Sure.

1:40:01.090 --> 1:40:04.679
<v Speaker 1>She might build a win. Yeah. Moving on to Maine,

1:40:04.780 --> 1:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>another race with a lot of focus, Troy Jackson versus

1:40:09.000 --> 1:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Susan Collins, who's held this seat for 200 years. That

1:40:14.700 --> 1:40:16.020
<v Speaker 1>can't be right.

1:40:16.100 --> 1:40:18.330
<v Speaker 3>Since 1776. Yeah, actually.

1:40:18.370 --> 1:40:22.090
<v Speaker 2>I mean, she very famously stood with Washington at Yorktown.

1:40:23.330 --> 1:40:25.890
<v Speaker 3>So have a little bit of respect. She's a veteran

1:40:25.910 --> 1:40:28.220
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about. Signed the Declaration of Independence, Garrison.

1:40:28.800 --> 1:40:31.589
<v Speaker 1>And come election night, union logger and former Maine Senate

1:40:31.600 --> 1:40:36.189
<v Speaker 1>President Troy Jackson unseated longtime Republican Senator Susan Collins, who

1:40:36.250 --> 1:40:38.530
<v Speaker 1>defied the polls in 2020 when she held onto her

1:40:38.630 --> 1:40:42.729
<v Speaker 1>seat that year. Jackson has won by about eight points,

1:40:43.189 --> 1:40:46.750
<v Speaker 1>close to Kamala's margins against Trump. This is a huge

1:40:46.790 --> 1:40:51.070
<v Speaker 1>win for labor and like the Bernie wing of the Democrats. And,

1:40:51.110 --> 1:40:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, just getting Collins out of there is just

1:40:53.380 --> 1:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>feels good.

1:40:54.300 --> 1:40:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Feels good, man.

1:40:55.760 --> 1:40:56.020
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:40:56.060 --> 1:40:56.180
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:40:58.070 --> 1:41:00.780
<v Speaker 1>One of the seats that Democrats expected to flip was

1:41:00.820 --> 1:41:03.860
<v Speaker 1>in North Carolina with Roy Cooper, the man who has

1:41:03.900 --> 1:41:07.420
<v Speaker 1>never lost an election, going up against Mike Watley for

1:41:07.960 --> 1:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a previously Republican-held seat. And former Governor Cooper did flip this,

1:41:14.050 --> 1:41:18.590
<v Speaker 1>winning 60-40. Like I said, just North Carolina, total bloodbath.

1:41:19.150 --> 1:41:24.230
<v Speaker 1>Trump won this by three. And down-ballot races, the House races,

1:41:24.270 --> 1:41:28.060
<v Speaker 1>state legislature, just Really, in North Carolina, it's the bluest

1:41:28.080 --> 1:41:32.820
<v Speaker 1>you've ever seen. What's much more surprising is the neighbor

1:41:32.880 --> 1:41:37.519
<v Speaker 1>down south, South Carolina, with Annie Andrews against Darlene Graham,

1:41:38.060 --> 1:41:42.470
<v Speaker 1>the Republican incumbent. Yes. Democrat Annie Andrews lost a U.S.

1:41:42.510 --> 1:41:47.590
<v Speaker 1>House race to Nancy Mace in 2022. But last night,

1:41:47.729 --> 1:41:51.650
<v Speaker 1>she beat short-term Republican Senator Darlene Graham, flipping the seat

1:41:51.689 --> 1:41:55.210
<v Speaker 1>formerly held by late queer icon Lindsey Graham. who served

1:41:55.250 --> 1:41:59.750
<v Speaker 1>as a senator since 2003. In 2020, he won by

1:41:59.750 --> 1:42:05.050
<v Speaker 1>10 points. Trump won the state by 18 points in 2024.

1:42:05.050 --> 1:42:09.030
<v Speaker 1>Andrews won by four. So that's what, like a 22-point

1:42:09.229 --> 1:42:14.150
<v Speaker 1>swing from 24 to 26? Yeah. Annie Andrews is like

1:42:14.810 --> 1:42:18.479
<v Speaker 1>in between moderate and progressive. She ran on like a

1:42:18.580 --> 1:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>public healthcare option, right? Not Medicare for all, but a

1:42:21.620 --> 1:42:25.890
<v Speaker 1>public option. abortion rights, education funding, banning corporate PAC money,

1:42:26.630 --> 1:42:29.910
<v Speaker 1>cracking down on congressional stock trading, term limits, AI regulation,

1:42:30.030 --> 1:42:33.150
<v Speaker 1>border security, and path to citizenship while keeping families together.

1:42:33.170 --> 1:42:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Is she one of the Dignidad Act people?

1:42:37.229 --> 1:42:38.330
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that is.

1:42:39.210 --> 1:42:39.450
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

1:42:40.050 --> 1:42:41.639
<v Speaker 7>I don't want to divert the episode too much. It

1:42:41.689 --> 1:42:44.880
<v Speaker 7>is a thing that like Blue Dog Dems and some Republicans,

1:42:45.040 --> 1:42:47.519
<v Speaker 7>including Florida Republicans, have been trying to introduce for a

1:42:47.540 --> 1:42:50.960
<v Speaker 7>long time that would effectively create an underclass of people

1:42:51.060 --> 1:42:53.560
<v Speaker 7>who had no pathway to citizenship and had a right

1:42:53.580 --> 1:42:54.040
<v Speaker 7>to remain.

1:42:55.040 --> 1:42:56.220
<v Speaker 1>And they tend to couple.

1:42:55.979 --> 1:42:57.680
<v Speaker 7>This with border security and be.

1:42:58.320 --> 1:43:00.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like a faux amnesty, almost.

1:43:00.390 --> 1:43:00.860
<v Speaker 3>Okay, okay.

1:43:01.689 --> 1:43:05.430
<v Speaker 1>Her exact platform does not go into that level of specificity.

1:43:06.610 --> 1:43:10.110
<v Speaker 1>I will say coupling path to citizenship with border security

1:43:10.130 --> 1:43:12.850
<v Speaker 1>has been one of the most common talking points across

1:43:12.870 --> 1:43:17.860
<v Speaker 1>these swing states. What exactly that means once they're in

1:43:17.960 --> 1:43:20.180
<v Speaker 1>office is kind of a black box.

1:43:20.520 --> 1:43:23.620
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we have failed to reform our immigration policy for

1:43:23.660 --> 1:43:25.820
<v Speaker 7>decades and decades and decades, which is how we got

1:43:25.860 --> 1:43:29.280
<v Speaker 7>to this fucked up situation that we're in. We're going

1:43:29.300 --> 1:43:30.840
<v Speaker 7>to cross that bridge when we come to it, obviously.

1:43:31.240 --> 1:43:32.549
<v Speaker 7>I will report on it when it happens.

1:43:33.270 --> 1:43:37.270
<v Speaker 1>Another thing to cross, hopefully sooner than later, is the

1:43:37.350 --> 1:43:40.030
<v Speaker 1>trans issue and the way that's been weaponized in these

1:43:40.070 --> 1:43:42.990
<v Speaker 1>past few elections. And last month, Annie Andrews did release

1:43:43.030 --> 1:43:47.230
<v Speaker 1>an ad directly opposing, quote, biological men in women's sports and, quote,

1:43:47.310 --> 1:43:50.790
<v Speaker 1>gender surgery for minors in response to a swath of

1:43:50.830 --> 1:43:54.950
<v Speaker 1>attack ads against her. This ad is not good. This

1:43:54.990 --> 1:43:57.330
<v Speaker 1>is bad. This is bad. And this is handled much

1:43:57.410 --> 1:44:02.390
<v Speaker 1>worse than other candidates handled this, like Sherrod Brown. who

1:44:02.490 --> 1:44:06.570
<v Speaker 1>also faced a wave of ads attacking him and the

1:44:06.600 --> 1:44:09.460
<v Speaker 1>Democrats for the support of trans people. And he released

1:44:09.500 --> 1:44:13.240
<v Speaker 1>an ad calling the Republicans pedophiles. That was his response.

1:44:13.720 --> 1:44:14.040
<v Speaker 5>Oh, yeah.

1:44:14.820 --> 1:44:17.900
<v Speaker 1>Instead of throwing trans people under the bus. And Sherrod

1:44:17.920 --> 1:44:22.700
<v Speaker 1>Brown won. He beat incumbent Republican Senator John Husted, who

1:44:22.900 --> 1:44:27.190
<v Speaker 1>was occupying Vance's seat in Ohio. Sherrod Brown's a former senator,

1:44:27.370 --> 1:44:31.570
<v Speaker 1>a progressive populist. Brown won by about five points, over

1:44:31.570 --> 1:44:36.179
<v Speaker 1>200,000 votes. In 2022, Vance won by six points. Trump

1:44:36.189 --> 1:44:39.700
<v Speaker 1>won Ohio by 11. Sharon Brown, I think, handled this

1:44:40.400 --> 1:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as any, better than any other kind of

1:44:43.180 --> 1:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>swing state Democrat. Much better than Josh Turek, who handled

1:44:46.900 --> 1:44:49.929
<v Speaker 1>this the worst, the most kind of anti-trans one of

1:44:49.970 --> 1:44:54.610
<v Speaker 1>these swing state Democrats. In Iowa, Josh Turek beat Ashley

1:44:54.630 --> 1:44:59.210
<v Speaker 1>Hinson in an open seat held by Republicans. Turk won

1:44:59.250 --> 1:45:03.550
<v Speaker 1>by five points. Trump won the state by three points. Remember,

1:45:03.570 --> 1:45:08.550
<v Speaker 1>there was that late polling with the infamous Seltzer poll

1:45:08.610 --> 1:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that put Kamala ahead in the 2024 election. Seltzer wasn't wrong.

1:45:14.240 --> 1:45:17.300
<v Speaker 1>She was early. She was two years early. That's the

1:45:17.320 --> 1:45:21.860
<v Speaker 1>election Twitter joke. Because Iowa, not as much as North Carolina,

1:45:21.960 --> 1:45:25.220
<v Speaker 1>but did shift blue and shifted blue in house races

1:45:25.260 --> 1:45:28.540
<v Speaker 1>and special elections these past two years. But Josh Turek,

1:45:28.840 --> 1:45:32.820
<v Speaker 1>the new senator, is definitely more of a moderate. He's

1:45:32.880 --> 1:45:37.900
<v Speaker 1>a self-proclaimed, quote, prairie populist. Whatever, man. While campaigning, he

1:45:37.920 --> 1:45:40.939
<v Speaker 1>moved the farthest to the right on trans issues. He

1:45:41.080 --> 1:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely bought the hardest into this kind of gender war stuff.

1:45:45.240 --> 1:45:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Prairie populist? What the hell?

1:45:48.460 --> 1:45:55.290
<v Speaker 1>Populism for agricultural... Like workers, small businesses, small farms. I

1:45:55.350 --> 1:45:59.510
<v Speaker 1>hate prairie populists because he is a moderate. But I mean,

1:45:59.530 --> 1:46:02.070
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these guys are running on like affordability

1:46:02.170 --> 1:46:06.099
<v Speaker 1>populist-esque kind of messaging because that's really what has shown

1:46:06.120 --> 1:46:06.660
<v Speaker 1>to be successful.

1:46:07.080 --> 1:46:11.360
<v Speaker 7>Mary Peltola had a pretty anti-trans ad towards the end

1:46:11.380 --> 1:46:12.180
<v Speaker 7>of her campaign.

1:46:13.020 --> 1:46:15.500
<v Speaker 1>She is also one of the more moderate ones. Yes.

1:46:15.720 --> 1:46:19.099
<v Speaker 1>This is in Alaska. This is Alaska. Yeah. Who definitely

1:46:19.260 --> 1:46:21.670
<v Speaker 1>ran as a kind of I would say probably the

1:46:21.710 --> 1:46:26.150
<v Speaker 1>most conservative out of all of the swing state Democratic

1:46:26.189 --> 1:46:30.179
<v Speaker 1>senators in Alaska. Just like in general, like in general,

1:46:30.220 --> 1:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the most conservative out of all of these Democratic candidates.

1:46:33.080 --> 1:46:34.580
<v Speaker 3>Like Alaska will always be different, right?

1:46:34.620 --> 1:46:38.680
<v Speaker 7>Like she's one of the few indigenous women who was

1:46:38.700 --> 1:46:41.080
<v Speaker 7>like running for Senate and she ran some stuff on

1:46:41.100 --> 1:46:44.750
<v Speaker 7>like fishing and stuff like that, which would be more

1:46:44.830 --> 1:46:45.530
<v Speaker 7>radical than.

1:46:45.810 --> 1:46:50.389
<v Speaker 1>Fish, family, and faith, I think, work like her main

1:46:51.410 --> 1:46:55.110
<v Speaker 1>campaign slogan. Man, drop the last two, and I agree.

1:46:55.130 --> 1:46:56.509
<v Speaker 2>I'm on board.

1:46:57.890 --> 1:46:59.300
<v Speaker 1>Fish, just fish, just fish.

1:47:00.280 --> 1:47:02.820
<v Speaker 7>We've spoken about this on this podcast before, but there's

1:47:02.900 --> 1:47:06.080
<v Speaker 7>always one behind the bastard. Someone holding a fish, you've

1:47:06.100 --> 1:47:09.700
<v Speaker 7>got to support them. But yeah, it'll be a long time.

1:47:09.960 --> 1:47:11.180
<v Speaker 7>It takes a long time for us to get the

1:47:11.220 --> 1:47:13.300
<v Speaker 7>votes in Alaska, so it'll be a while before we

1:47:13.320 --> 1:47:13.960
<v Speaker 7>know about that one.

1:47:14.770 --> 1:47:18.650
<v Speaker 1>Correct. So we know South Carolina, Iowa, Ohio. These are

1:47:18.680 --> 1:47:22.599
<v Speaker 1>all flips. Yeah. Alaska could be a flip in the

1:47:22.640 --> 1:47:24.780
<v Speaker 1>next day, few days.

1:47:25.080 --> 1:47:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:47:26.340 --> 1:47:30.950
<v Speaker 1>Peltola is right now about like 60 votes ahead. with 77%

1:47:30.950 --> 1:47:35.430
<v Speaker 1>of the vote in. Jesus Christ. She's expected to gain

1:47:36.270 --> 1:47:40.850
<v Speaker 1>in her lead, but she's sitting at 48.2. So depending

1:47:40.880 --> 1:47:44.179
<v Speaker 1>on how that goes, this might result in a ranked

1:47:44.260 --> 1:47:47.720
<v Speaker 1>choice instant runoff. Yeah, yeah. And I've not looked into

1:47:48.100 --> 1:47:51.300
<v Speaker 1>this race specifically, and the opinions that I've seen from

1:47:51.340 --> 1:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>my election people have kind of gone either way of

1:47:55.360 --> 1:47:59.309
<v Speaker 1>whether that runoff would benefit her or hurt her. This

1:47:59.350 --> 1:48:02.470
<v Speaker 1>is the race with the two Dan Sullivans, the Republican

1:48:02.510 --> 1:48:10.220
<v Speaker 1>incumbent senator, Dan Sullivan, Daniel Sullivan Jr., the non-senator, who

1:48:10.260 --> 1:48:14.809
<v Speaker 1>did receive not totally insignificant part of the vote. This

1:48:14.820 --> 1:48:16.729
<v Speaker 1>is how close this race is. Like I said, like

1:48:16.729 --> 1:48:17.410
<v Speaker 1>70 vote difference.

1:48:17.689 --> 1:48:18.549
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:48:18.630 --> 1:48:20.280
<v Speaker 7>I feel like if I had been in Alaska, I

1:48:20.300 --> 1:48:22.719
<v Speaker 7>might've just like, I have no idea about Dan Sullivan Jr.

1:48:22.720 --> 1:48:25.259
<v Speaker 7>'s policies to be clear, but like when you're presented

1:48:25.280 --> 1:48:28.340
<v Speaker 7>with someone like either the Republican candidate or the Democrat

1:48:28.380 --> 1:48:31.950
<v Speaker 7>candidate doing transphobic bullshit, like maybe you're just having a

1:48:31.990 --> 1:48:33.439
<v Speaker 7>laugh of voting for Dan Sullivan Jr.

1:48:34.070 --> 1:48:36.450
<v Speaker 1>Like an active abstention. I think that's more likely than

1:48:36.490 --> 1:48:41.269
<v Speaker 1>people who mistook him for being the Republican. The idea

1:48:41.290 --> 1:48:42.790
<v Speaker 1>of people voting for him as a sort of joke

1:48:42.890 --> 1:48:46.190
<v Speaker 1>or protest candidate is certainly possible. So that's part of

1:48:46.220 --> 1:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>these ranked choice calculations. If Paltola is ranked second on

1:48:50.420 --> 1:48:54.139
<v Speaker 1>some of those Sullivan Jr. ballots, that'll change the game

1:48:54.380 --> 1:48:57.580
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to assuming that all the Sullivan Jr.

1:48:57.600 --> 1:48:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Votes.

1:48:58.270 --> 1:49:01.729
<v Speaker 1>in ranked choice will go towards senator sullivan right yeah

1:49:01.760 --> 1:49:03.500
<v Speaker 1>yeah and that's why it's hard to predict exactly what

1:49:03.520 --> 1:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>will happen with this race.

1:49:05.460 --> 1:49:08.580
<v Speaker 7>Yeah ranked choices is well it offers some benefits but

1:49:08.600 --> 1:49:10.460
<v Speaker 7>just like it can sometimes take a little bit longer

1:49:10.479 --> 1:49:15.230
<v Speaker 7>i will say i think is extraordinarily condescending to suggest

1:49:15.290 --> 1:49:18.870
<v Speaker 7>that people in alaska don't understand what incumbent means yes

1:49:18.910 --> 1:49:22.510
<v Speaker 7>like it's it's just a fucking nothing burger like like

1:49:22.810 --> 1:49:26.090
<v Speaker 7>it just i know i find it incredibly like Yeah,

1:49:26.130 --> 1:49:28.630
<v Speaker 7>snooty and condescending to suggest that people are that fucking dumb.

1:49:29.570 --> 1:49:32.090
<v Speaker 1>The one other race that we don't quite know the

1:49:32.110 --> 1:49:35.420
<v Speaker 1>result yet and is possibly the most shocking result of

1:49:35.450 --> 1:49:38.380
<v Speaker 1>the entire night is in Mississippi, which might somehow become

1:49:38.400 --> 1:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi with Scott Column against Sidney Hyde-Smith, the Republican incumbent.

1:49:45.280 --> 1:49:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Right now, this race is tied at 48.9 with Democratic

1:49:49.780 --> 1:49:54.479
<v Speaker 1>candidate Scott Column up less than 100 votes. with about

1:49:54.479 --> 1:49:59.939
<v Speaker 1>44,000 votes to be expected still to come in. And

1:50:00.060 --> 1:50:02.099
<v Speaker 1>these are going to be mostly coming in from areas

1:50:02.220 --> 1:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>where the Democrat column has performed well. But a lot

1:50:06.660 --> 1:50:08.500
<v Speaker 1>of these are going to be mail-in and provisional ballots,

1:50:08.740 --> 1:50:11.059
<v Speaker 1>which can be counted up to five days after the election.

1:50:11.120 --> 1:50:12.889
<v Speaker 1>So we probably won't know the results of this till

1:50:12.900 --> 1:50:16.710
<v Speaker 1>like Saturday. This is super shocking. This deserves its own

1:50:16.729 --> 1:50:20.470
<v Speaker 1>kind of deep dive. I did see one of Colum's

1:50:20.670 --> 1:50:25.100
<v Speaker 1>ads circulating, which targets cost of living and affordability. The

1:50:25.180 --> 1:50:28.939
<v Speaker 1>ad is this clip of Sidney Hyde-Smith being asked on

1:50:28.979 --> 1:50:32.610
<v Speaker 1>a news show what people should do about the price

1:50:32.810 --> 1:50:36.430
<v Speaker 1>of beef getting so expensive. And she said that people should, quote,

1:50:36.570 --> 1:50:43.070
<v Speaker 1>pick another protein. And this ad just totally skewered, skewered

1:50:43.090 --> 1:50:47.630
<v Speaker 1>her over this insane, like elitist response.

1:50:47.970 --> 1:50:48.190
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:50:48.210 --> 1:50:51.490
<v Speaker 1>That's a let them eat cake for half of America.

1:50:51.930 --> 1:50:54.130
<v Speaker 1>And the, the, the crux of the ad was all

1:50:54.150 --> 1:50:58.860
<v Speaker 1>these like, you know, actors playing constituents saying, pick another protein. No,

1:50:59.280 --> 1:51:03.700
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather pick another Senator. And that's the, that's the ad. Amazing.

1:51:04.200 --> 1:51:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's Mississippi. We will learn if both Alaska and

1:51:08.340 --> 1:51:12.550
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi flip in these next few days. One state that

1:51:12.570 --> 1:51:15.050
<v Speaker 1>did not flip that I will mention, Florida, with Angie

1:51:15.090 --> 1:51:17.950
<v Speaker 1>Nixon going up against Ashley Moody, the Republican incumbent in

1:51:18.210 --> 1:51:23.470
<v Speaker 1>Rubio's former seat. This race was way closer than Democrats expected.

1:51:23.590 --> 1:51:26.559
<v Speaker 1>This is like a two to three point margin, just

1:51:26.580 --> 1:51:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like over 200,000 votes. if Dems did more spending in

1:51:30.740 --> 1:51:33.660
<v Speaker 1>this race, it could have been even more competitive. Like

1:51:33.680 --> 1:51:36.580
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Nixon did so good in Florida is

1:51:36.620 --> 1:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a testament to her as a candidate and her like

1:51:39.200 --> 1:51:40.009
<v Speaker 1>direct ground game.

1:51:40.470 --> 1:51:40.660
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:51:41.270 --> 1:51:44.809
<v Speaker 1>But she got just completely outspent, like just, just, just

1:51:44.870 --> 1:51:47.930
<v Speaker 1>demolished in, in terms, in terms of ad spending. But

1:51:48.010 --> 1:51:50.710
<v Speaker 1>a really, I think a good show for her. I'm

1:51:50.750 --> 1:51:53.490
<v Speaker 1>excited to see what she does in the future. She's

1:51:53.710 --> 1:51:57.710
<v Speaker 1>a strong, a strong labor candidate. Unfortunately, a few days

1:51:57.750 --> 1:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>before the election, the head of the Teamster, Sean O'Brien,

1:52:01.479 --> 1:52:06.540
<v Speaker 1>endorsed Ashley Moody, the anti-labor candidate. Get O'Brien out of there!

1:52:07.140 --> 1:52:12.719
<v Speaker 1>He sucks! Get him out! Sean O'Brien, fuck off. Anyway,

1:52:13.220 --> 1:52:17.360
<v Speaker 1>there's two other flips that we should talk about. And

1:52:17.550 --> 1:52:20.470
<v Speaker 1>it's time to put on my little cross necklace, time

1:52:20.510 --> 1:52:25.410
<v Speaker 1>to revert back to my childhood Protestantism, because Methodist minister

1:52:26.050 --> 1:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Adam Hamilton flipped the Kansas beating Republican incumbent Senator Roger

1:52:32.140 --> 1:52:35.900
<v Speaker 1>Marshall by five points. Just two years ago, Trump won

1:52:35.920 --> 1:52:40.090
<v Speaker 1>Kansas by 16. Marshall won the Senate race by almost

1:52:40.090 --> 1:52:44.550
<v Speaker 1>12 points in 2020. Adam Hamilton ran on cost of living,

1:52:44.750 --> 1:52:47.890
<v Speaker 1>strengthening the right to organize, regulating data centers, abortion rights,

1:52:47.930 --> 1:52:52.790
<v Speaker 1>spanning algorithmic price fixing, combating fraud and scams, targeting seniors,

1:52:53.030 --> 1:52:56.120
<v Speaker 1>protecting their health care, term limits for Congress and the

1:52:56.140 --> 1:53:00.670
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court, and banning congressional stock trading, and also banning

1:53:01.680 --> 1:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>politicians from using prediction markets, which is like a new

1:53:05.160 --> 1:53:08.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of addendum to all these congressional stock trading measures.

1:53:08.900 --> 1:53:09.599
<v Speaker 3>Sure, yeah.

1:53:10.460 --> 1:53:12.839
<v Speaker 1>The Kansas flip is, I know, something that the Republicans

1:53:12.880 --> 1:53:16.610
<v Speaker 1>were increasingly worried about these past few months, moving ad

1:53:16.630 --> 1:53:19.110
<v Speaker 1>spending over from North Carolina, which they kind of gave

1:53:19.189 --> 1:53:24.410
<v Speaker 1>up on, into Kansas. But it wasn't enough. Now, there

1:53:24.470 --> 1:53:30.500
<v Speaker 1>is one other big win for christian democrats and we

1:53:30.520 --> 1:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>will talk about that after this ad break.

1:53:45.229 --> 1:53:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And we're back and the stars at night are big

1:53:49.820 --> 1:53:53.380
<v Speaker 2>and bright Deep in the heart of Texas. I was

1:53:53.400 --> 1:53:55.160
<v Speaker 2>waiting to see if you were going to do the clap, Stephen,

1:53:55.280 --> 1:53:55.780
<v Speaker 2>and you didn't.

1:53:56.200 --> 1:53:56.860
<v Speaker 1>You let me down.

1:53:56.920 --> 1:53:57.639
<v Speaker 2>You let me down.

1:53:57.760 --> 1:53:58.219
<v Speaker 1>Oh, sorry.

1:53:58.460 --> 1:53:58.820
<v Speaker 4>No, no.

1:53:59.780 --> 1:54:00.439
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry.

1:54:00.460 --> 1:54:04.000
<v Speaker 10>I just, you know, it's with the Zoom, the timing,

1:54:04.040 --> 1:54:05.519
<v Speaker 10>it's always off with the claps.

1:54:05.700 --> 1:54:09.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the first time I have been really shocked

1:54:09.930 --> 1:54:12.900
<v Speaker 2>by an election in Texas. I had come around to

1:54:12.930 --> 1:54:15.429
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Tallarico had a really good chance of winning,

1:54:15.510 --> 1:54:17.770
<v Speaker 2>in fact, was probably going to win, and he did.

1:54:18.560 --> 1:54:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Everything else that happened surprised the shit out of me. Yeah,

1:54:22.960 --> 1:54:24.500
<v Speaker 2>we should probably start by talking about Tallarico.

1:54:24.520 --> 1:54:29.440
<v Speaker 10>I mean, what an absolute bloodbath of an election this was.

1:54:29.820 --> 1:54:30.729
<v Speaker 2>Just a disaster.

1:54:30.770 --> 1:54:35.710
<v Speaker 10>I mean, so Tallarico uniquely performed among Texan candidates, I think,

1:54:36.070 --> 1:54:41.570
<v Speaker 10>in competitive races. He crushed Ken Paxton by 12 points. And,

1:54:41.710 --> 1:54:44.670
<v Speaker 10>you know, that could be attributed to Tallarico being a

1:54:44.670 --> 1:54:49.160
<v Speaker 10>good candidate. Could also be attributed to Ken Paxton being

1:54:49.320 --> 1:54:53.590
<v Speaker 10>widely regarded as the most corrupt guy in politics in

1:54:53.650 --> 1:54:54.870
<v Speaker 10>recent history.

1:54:54.890 --> 1:54:55.230
<v Speaker 5>Oh, yeah.

1:54:55.810 --> 1:54:56.709
<v Speaker 1>The devil incarnate.

1:54:57.950 --> 1:55:01.270
<v Speaker 2>Aidan McLaughlin with Vanity Fair went to a Republican Party

1:55:01.470 --> 1:55:04.950
<v Speaker 2>event at like a fancy steakhouse Butterworth's in D.C. It

1:55:05.290 --> 1:55:08.140
<v Speaker 2>was like an election night party. And obviously the Republicans

1:55:08.160 --> 1:55:11.500
<v Speaker 2>were expecting it to go bad, but it went so

1:55:11.580 --> 1:55:14.720
<v Speaker 2>much worse than they thought. And like the schadenfreude in

1:55:14.760 --> 1:55:18.560
<v Speaker 2>this article is outrageous, but especially like the point in

1:55:18.600 --> 1:55:21.390
<v Speaker 2>the article when it becomes clear that Tallarico is going

1:55:21.430 --> 1:55:23.930
<v Speaker 2>to beat Paxton by like a sizable amount.

1:55:23.970 --> 1:55:25.410
<v Speaker 1>And here's a paragraph from that article.

1:55:26.290 --> 1:55:29.030
<v Speaker 2>As Ella Langley's Choose in Texas blared through the speakers,

1:55:29.110 --> 1:55:31.060
<v Speaker 2>two men at the bar lamented the cruel irony of

1:55:31.070 --> 1:55:34.260
<v Speaker 2>the song playing as Tallarico's comfortable lead expanded over Ken Paxton,

1:55:34.320 --> 1:55:37.320
<v Speaker 2>his Republican challenger. I'm not trying to crash out, said

1:55:37.380 --> 1:55:39.300
<v Speaker 2>one of the men, a Republican organizer of the party.

1:55:39.600 --> 1:55:41.839
<v Speaker 2>But we nominated Hitler with Down syndrome.

1:55:41.940 --> 1:55:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And guess what? He lost.

1:55:43.200 --> 1:55:45.520
<v Speaker 2>He lost. And now we lose a Supreme Court justice.

1:55:45.600 --> 1:55:49.500
<v Speaker 2>It's a fucking disaster. This is at an official Republican

1:55:49.560 --> 1:55:54.470
<v Speaker 2>Party event. This Republican student just called Ken Paxton. Hitler was–

1:55:54.480 --> 1:55:57.500
<v Speaker 2>which like– there's a lot of things wrong with that.

1:55:57.760 --> 1:56:04.970
<v Speaker 1>But wow. Yeah. Like the candidness. Yeah.

1:56:05.120 --> 1:56:08.190
<v Speaker 10>I mean it was an issue early on. People were

1:56:08.230 --> 1:56:11.730
<v Speaker 10>worried that Paxton was a uniquely deficient candidate.

1:56:11.750 --> 1:56:12.190
<v Speaker 1>And he was.

1:56:12.370 --> 1:56:15.840
<v Speaker 10>Relative– to his alternative, John Cornyn, who he beat in

1:56:15.880 --> 1:56:18.900
<v Speaker 10>the primary. But the margins in this race- Cornyn would

1:56:18.920 --> 1:56:22.520
<v Speaker 10>have lost. It's just so large, even Cornyn would have lost.

1:56:22.620 --> 1:56:25.980
<v Speaker 10>It would not have mattered if it had been Cornyn

1:56:26.400 --> 1:56:30.000
<v Speaker 10>or Paxton. But for it to have been Paxton, it

1:56:30.060 --> 1:56:33.850
<v Speaker 10>really added a lot of sugar to that Schengen-Freud sauce

1:56:33.860 --> 1:56:35.810
<v Speaker 10>that you were tasting in that article.

1:56:36.050 --> 1:56:38.190
<v Speaker 1>And the way that they.

1:56:38.110 --> 1:56:41.790
<v Speaker 10>Campaigned towards the end was pretty despicable. I mean, they

1:56:41.930 --> 1:56:45.210
<v Speaker 10>unleashed a whole set of Dirty tricks. You mentioned the

1:56:45.250 --> 1:56:48.570
<v Speaker 10>trans issue earlier, Garrison. That was the last streak of

1:56:48.590 --> 1:56:52.490
<v Speaker 10>the campaign all throughout October. It was either bogus allegations

1:56:52.550 --> 1:56:56.490
<v Speaker 10>that Tallarico is in a mental hospital in Ohio, which

1:56:56.560 --> 1:57:00.260
<v Speaker 10>had been ginned up by an account that is run

1:57:00.300 --> 1:57:05.240
<v Speaker 10>by a criminal old woman, but it's using an AI-generated

1:57:05.460 --> 1:57:06.740
<v Speaker 10>young woman's face.

1:57:07.440 --> 1:57:08.460
<v Speaker 1>It's classic stuff.

1:57:09.130 --> 1:57:15.030
<v Speaker 10>And that got amplified by official campaign operatives incredibly. And

1:57:15.070 --> 1:57:18.450
<v Speaker 10>when that was quickly batted down, it just became all

1:57:18.490 --> 1:57:22.920
<v Speaker 10>about trans issues. And Paxton had interviewed on TV saying

1:57:22.940 --> 1:57:25.160
<v Speaker 10>that's what they think their best line of attack is

1:57:25.220 --> 1:57:29.680
<v Speaker 10>against Tallarico. And consequently, they leaned into that.

1:57:29.800 --> 1:57:30.680
<v Speaker 2>And now we're.

1:57:31.960 --> 1:57:34.910
<v Speaker 10>Trying to figure out still who sent 3 million fraudulent

1:57:34.950 --> 1:57:39.960
<v Speaker 10>mailers to Texans purporting to provide support to trans kids,

1:57:40.000 --> 1:57:43.000
<v Speaker 10>but it was really actually just Republican operatives. So it

1:57:43.040 --> 1:57:46.740
<v Speaker 10>was like a desperate election for these folks. And the

1:57:46.800 --> 1:57:51.280
<v Speaker 10>issue is no longer resonating with Americans, at least in Texas,

1:57:51.780 --> 1:57:54.770
<v Speaker 10>in the way that it maybe was four years ago.

1:57:54.780 --> 1:57:58.930
<v Speaker 10>And I mean, Alarica was expected to be the one

1:57:58.990 --> 1:58:01.290
<v Speaker 10>out of the pack probably to win, but I don't

1:58:01.310 --> 1:58:06.610
<v Speaker 10>think anyone called it with this level of just obliteration

1:58:06.670 --> 1:58:07.650
<v Speaker 10>on the Republican side.

1:58:08.200 --> 1:58:08.460
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:58:09.530 --> 1:58:09.670
<v Speaker 8>No.

1:58:09.940 --> 1:58:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And, you know, it's important.

1:58:11.320 --> 1:58:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, like gas prices are a big part of this,

1:58:13.600 --> 1:58:15.980
<v Speaker 2>especially for Texans. Like when you tell them you can

1:58:16.020 --> 1:58:18.500
<v Speaker 2>no longer afford to drive for gigantic diesel trucks, that

1:58:18.540 --> 1:58:22.480
<v Speaker 2>pisses them off. It's bad for agriculture. It's bad for

1:58:22.540 --> 1:58:24.430
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like cost of living is a part of this.

1:58:24.520 --> 1:58:26.590
<v Speaker 2>Another part of this that I think has not gotten

1:58:26.630 --> 1:58:30.450
<v Speaker 2>enough attention nationally is is what Dan Patrick and Greg Abbott,

1:58:30.490 --> 1:58:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the governor and lieutenant governor, did to the school voucher

1:58:33.120 --> 1:58:37.180
<v Speaker 2>program in 2025. Like they worked very hard to ram

1:58:37.320 --> 1:58:42.040
<v Speaker 2>through a school voucher program that was not super popular

1:58:42.120 --> 1:58:44.550
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of like rural school districts, like because

1:58:44.590 --> 1:58:47.350
<v Speaker 2>I think people just saw the danger it was going

1:58:47.390 --> 1:58:48.990
<v Speaker 2>to do to their local schools. And he had to

1:58:49.010 --> 1:58:52.610
<v Speaker 2>like really, Patrick especially had to like basically threaten a

1:58:52.670 --> 1:58:55.690
<v Speaker 2>lot of like local legislators in order to like make

1:58:55.730 --> 1:58:58.180
<v Speaker 2>this happen the way they wanted to. And I think

1:58:58.200 --> 1:59:01.620
<v Speaker 2>that cost them a lot of political capital, too, going

1:59:01.660 --> 1:59:04.780
<v Speaker 2>into this. And it really was like this churn of

1:59:06.000 --> 1:59:09.920
<v Speaker 2>both Patrick and Abbott's decisions over the last... They've been

1:59:09.970 --> 1:59:13.870
<v Speaker 2>in power for so long, and so much has gotten worse.

1:59:13.930 --> 1:59:16.130
<v Speaker 2>So you can't campaign, and I'm going to fix everything

1:59:16.150 --> 1:59:18.690
<v Speaker 2>when I've been in power for a decade. And then

1:59:18.790 --> 1:59:21.950
<v Speaker 2>Trump making the situation just all that more calamitous. And

1:59:22.610 --> 1:59:25.650
<v Speaker 2>I do agree, Stephen, that I think that Cornyn would

1:59:25.670 --> 1:59:26.290
<v Speaker 2>have lost, too.

1:59:26.350 --> 1:59:27.270
<v Speaker 1>But part of me wonders.

1:59:28.080 --> 1:59:33.630
<v Speaker 2>Did Paxton being such an obvious criminal, so obviously corrupt,

1:59:34.110 --> 1:59:36.630
<v Speaker 2>and that being front and center in like the part,

1:59:36.710 --> 1:59:40.030
<v Speaker 2>you know, the most funded election in the state, which

1:59:40.070 --> 1:59:42.790
<v Speaker 2>was the election between Tallarico and Paxton, like by far

1:59:42.810 --> 1:59:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the most money was spent on that. And it got

1:59:45.260 --> 1:59:47.720
<v Speaker 2>the most attention. Did the fact that Paxton was in

1:59:47.740 --> 1:59:50.940
<v Speaker 2>the limelight as such a scumbag also maybe drag down

1:59:51.620 --> 1:59:55.640
<v Speaker 2>enthusiasm for the Republican Party in a broader way of like,

1:59:56.120 --> 1:59:59.180
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering where their people are? you know, just kind

1:59:59.200 --> 2:00:01.850
<v Speaker 2>of habitual Republican voters, like a lot of my family,

2:00:02.310 --> 2:00:05.250
<v Speaker 2>who were just looking at Paxton and the way he was,

2:00:05.890 --> 2:00:07.270
<v Speaker 2>you know, his past and the way he was performing

2:00:07.290 --> 2:00:08.710
<v Speaker 2>this election and going like, I don't want to do

2:00:08.750 --> 2:00:12.070
<v Speaker 2>this anymore. You know, as that compounding with the cost

2:00:12.110 --> 2:00:15.250
<v Speaker 2>of living, compounding with the war, like I really do

2:00:15.330 --> 2:00:19.910
<v Speaker 2>think there was a stew of sickness that got boiled

2:00:19.950 --> 2:00:23.310
<v Speaker 2>up by the Republican Party, both in Texas and nationwide.

2:00:23.970 --> 2:00:26.770
<v Speaker 2>And I think Texas got the biggest dose of it

2:00:26.910 --> 2:00:30.460
<v Speaker 2>in some ways, right? Because there's so much Republican control,

2:00:30.580 --> 2:00:34.060
<v Speaker 2>because the Democratic Party has been useless for so long

2:00:34.100 --> 2:00:34.580
<v Speaker 2>in Texas.

2:00:35.080 --> 2:00:36.880
<v Speaker 10>Zooming out, I mean, it's not just been a decade.

2:00:36.920 --> 2:00:41.460
<v Speaker 10>It's been over three decades since Democrats have won a

2:00:41.500 --> 2:00:46.290
<v Speaker 10>statewide seat. So Republicans have had dominance for as long

2:00:46.350 --> 2:00:47.750
<v Speaker 10>as I've been able to speak.

2:00:48.340 --> 2:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>In this state.

2:00:49.800 --> 2:00:53.160
<v Speaker 10>And so the idea that they aren't responsible for where

2:00:53.230 --> 2:00:55.790
<v Speaker 10>we are now is incredibly ridiculous.

2:00:55.810 --> 2:00:57.850
<v Speaker 2>It's been a long ass time since Ann Richards.

2:00:58.170 --> 2:01:00.670
<v Speaker 10>And to your point, Paxton was uniquely bad, but it

2:01:00.730 --> 2:01:05.230
<v Speaker 10>wasn't just Paxton. I mean, low energy Paxton, criminal Paxton.

2:01:05.740 --> 2:01:07.700
<v Speaker 1>We had this guy, Beau.

2:01:07.500 --> 2:01:08.260
<v Speaker 5>French, who.

2:01:09.040 --> 2:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Beau French.

2:01:10.180 --> 2:01:13.540
<v Speaker 10>He's running for basically a seat that regulates oil and

2:01:13.580 --> 2:01:15.339
<v Speaker 10>gas on a three-seat commission.

2:01:15.420 --> 2:01:17.260
<v Speaker 1>It's the Texas Railroad Commission.

2:01:17.280 --> 2:01:18.200
<v Speaker 10>Stupid name.

2:01:18.260 --> 2:01:22.170
<v Speaker 1>It does not sound important, but is. Yeah.

2:01:22.190 --> 2:01:22.450
<v Speaker 4>Sorry.

2:01:23.070 --> 2:01:28.370
<v Speaker 10>Anyway, he's running, and that was an unnecessary seat because

2:01:28.690 --> 2:01:30.870
<v Speaker 10>they didn't even need to win it to still have

2:01:30.890 --> 2:01:34.700
<v Speaker 10>a majority on the railroad commission. And yet, you know,

2:01:34.860 --> 2:01:37.600
<v Speaker 10>a lot of people went in basically making it seem

2:01:37.620 --> 2:01:40.660
<v Speaker 10>like he must win. And I'm going to be a

2:01:40.660 --> 2:01:43.980
<v Speaker 10>little colorful in my language here, but he basically ran

2:01:44.040 --> 2:01:47.600
<v Speaker 10>on a platform of I am a Hitler youth troop leader.

2:01:48.340 --> 2:01:50.320
<v Speaker 5>Like that's kind of how it came across.

2:01:51.100 --> 2:01:55.100
<v Speaker 10>And so consequently, he was dragging everybody else around with

2:01:55.140 --> 2:01:58.750
<v Speaker 10>him down. We had another person running for Congress, Brandon Herrera,

2:01:58.810 --> 2:02:04.180
<v Speaker 10>who's a ridiculous gun tuber, did not. successfully moderate his

2:02:04.380 --> 2:02:07.780
<v Speaker 10>online edginess, said a bunch of ridiculous stuff, wouldn't even

2:02:07.820 --> 2:02:10.480
<v Speaker 10>walk back some of the stuff that he had said

2:02:10.540 --> 2:02:12.960
<v Speaker 10>in the past. And I mean, I think he suffered

2:02:13.020 --> 2:02:15.520
<v Speaker 10>for it. And also he was running to represent a

2:02:15.560 --> 2:02:18.930
<v Speaker 10>district that had one of the most horrific mass shootings

2:02:19.030 --> 2:02:24.110
<v Speaker 10>at a school in recent history. And he was this

2:02:24.150 --> 2:02:28.250
<v Speaker 10>guy who's out there downplaying or making light of political

2:02:28.290 --> 2:02:31.170
<v Speaker 10>violence when it happens to people who he doesn't like.

2:02:31.810 --> 2:02:34.230
<v Speaker 7>And talking of like Hitler youth, he literally dressed up

2:02:34.290 --> 2:02:35.410
<v Speaker 7>as a Nazi, right?

2:02:35.640 --> 2:02:37.020
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah. I profiled him.

2:02:37.060 --> 2:02:41.360
<v Speaker 10>I mean, yeah, his YouTube stuff was incredibly over the top, really,

2:02:41.440 --> 2:02:47.760
<v Speaker 10>really signaling language to extremists, whether it was nods to Rhodesia,

2:02:47.900 --> 2:02:52.410
<v Speaker 10>to the Nazis, to the Boogaloos, you know, you name it.

2:02:52.530 --> 2:02:56.830
<v Speaker 10>He really was in that online stew that was happening

2:02:57.470 --> 2:03:00.960
<v Speaker 10>in the early 2020s. And that's how he rose to

2:03:00.980 --> 2:03:06.070
<v Speaker 10>fame for being this edgy guy. And now that has

2:03:06.150 --> 2:03:09.390
<v Speaker 10>not landed. I mean, I think both him and Beau

2:03:09.430 --> 2:03:13.560
<v Speaker 10>French mistook Twitter for the campaign.

2:03:13.860 --> 2:03:14.080
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

2:03:14.560 --> 2:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people did.

2:03:16.240 --> 2:03:18.260
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. Yeah, I think that's what I wanted to get to.

2:03:18.640 --> 2:03:21.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think we'll talk more about that, I mean,

2:03:21.820 --> 2:03:24.560
<v Speaker 2>today and tomorrow, I'm sure. Speaking more on Texas, one

2:03:24.580 --> 2:03:26.800
<v Speaker 2>thing I want to emphasize to people that surprised me,

2:03:26.820 --> 2:03:29.010
<v Speaker 2>because again, I was open to the Tallarico winning, and

2:03:29.030 --> 2:03:32.030
<v Speaker 2>I thought Gina Hinojosa had a chance. She was polling

2:03:32.090 --> 2:03:33.570
<v Speaker 2>close enough that I was like, she might.

2:03:34.150 --> 2:03:34.910
<v Speaker 5>It's possible.

2:03:35.750 --> 2:03:37.310
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of thought it was going to be.

2:03:37.310 --> 2:03:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Limited to those two big and highly publicized seats. I

2:03:42.420 --> 2:03:44.720
<v Speaker 2>assume maybe the Democrats will do better than usual at

2:03:44.760 --> 2:03:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the state level. this is not what we're seeing is

2:03:47.820 --> 2:03:51.640
<v Speaker 2>not like a few big seats flip in a year

2:03:51.720 --> 2:03:53.940
<v Speaker 2>in which like there's just a lot of things going

2:03:53.980 --> 2:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>against the Republicans in terms of inertia wise. Texas flipped

2:03:58.700 --> 2:04:01.740
<v Speaker 2>like this was comprehensive across the board, rural districts, a

2:04:01.810 --> 2:04:04.590
<v Speaker 2>lot of rural districts elected Democrats in a variety of

2:04:04.630 --> 2:04:08.330
<v Speaker 2>state positions, too. Like I cannot overemphasize how comprehensive this

2:04:08.450 --> 2:04:11.380
<v Speaker 2>is like. the fact that Greg Abbott is out and

2:04:11.420 --> 2:04:14.380
<v Speaker 2>lost to Hinojosa is, is huge. But one thing that

2:04:14.440 --> 2:04:16.620
<v Speaker 2>is not getting as much attention outside of Texas and should,

2:04:16.660 --> 2:04:19.100
<v Speaker 2>is that Dan Patrick, the Lieutenant governor got his ass

2:04:19.120 --> 2:04:23.200
<v Speaker 2>kicked too. And Dan Patrick is the fucking, like I've

2:04:23.220 --> 2:04:25.180
<v Speaker 2>talked about Paxton is like the most corrupt guy in

2:04:25.220 --> 2:04:28.620
<v Speaker 2>Texas politics. Patrick might be the smartest in terms of

2:04:28.660 --> 2:04:31.480
<v Speaker 2>like right-wing politics. Like he is, he's a bad person,

2:04:31.520 --> 2:04:34.480
<v Speaker 2>but he was a really good politician in terms of

2:04:34.520 --> 2:04:38.060
<v Speaker 2>his ability to marshal power and like votes and get

2:04:38.120 --> 2:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>things done. He got in, he started in the Senate

2:04:41.080 --> 2:04:45.510
<v Speaker 2>in 2006 and was reelected in 2010. And immediately after

2:04:45.530 --> 2:04:48.550
<v Speaker 2>winning reelection, he created the Texas Tea Party Caucus in

2:04:48.590 --> 2:04:51.410
<v Speaker 2>the Texas state legislature. Like that was kind of like

2:04:51.470 --> 2:04:53.370
<v Speaker 2>one of his first big political moves.

2:04:53.430 --> 2:04:54.390
<v Speaker 1>He got elected.

2:04:54.410 --> 2:04:57.190
<v Speaker 2>He ran in 2014 against David Dewhurst and became the

2:04:57.230 --> 2:05:00.820
<v Speaker 2>lieutenant governor and immediately started pushing like some of the

2:05:00.880 --> 2:05:05.480
<v Speaker 2>most like regressive, like especially on abortion bills. He was

2:05:05.500 --> 2:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the guy who authored Texas's mandatory, and this is when

2:05:08.100 --> 2:05:11.060
<v Speaker 2>he was in the Senate, mandatory ultrasound bill, which got

2:05:11.120 --> 2:05:14.150
<v Speaker 2>signed into law in 2011 by Governor Perry, which forced

2:05:14.200 --> 2:05:16.950
<v Speaker 2>women seeking an abortion to have an sonogram of the

2:05:16.990 --> 2:05:19.530
<v Speaker 2>fetus taken before the abortion was performed.

2:05:19.630 --> 2:05:20.250
<v Speaker 1>Holy shit.

2:05:20.600 --> 2:05:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Like that's just one of the fucking hideous things he's

2:05:23.300 --> 2:05:25.410
<v Speaker 2>responsible to. He's a big charter school guy. And I

2:05:25.450 --> 2:05:28.230
<v Speaker 2>talked about how he rammed that stuff through. And he's

2:05:28.330 --> 2:05:30.130
<v Speaker 2>also one of the things that's really important about him.

2:05:30.230 --> 2:05:33.770
<v Speaker 2>He's been really good up until now. A big thing

2:05:33.790 --> 2:05:35.410
<v Speaker 2>he would always do is he would endorse a bunch

2:05:35.450 --> 2:05:39.470
<v Speaker 2>of like local candidates for like state positions. And he

2:05:39.690 --> 2:05:42.770
<v Speaker 2>usually won like his picked candidates usually won state. So

2:05:42.810 --> 2:05:46.510
<v Speaker 2>Patrick had like a massive influence on how the Republican

2:05:46.570 --> 2:05:50.900
<v Speaker 2>Party's like human infrastructure got constructed in the state government.

2:05:51.490 --> 2:05:54.120
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that his ass is out too is

2:05:54.180 --> 2:05:58.120
<v Speaker 2>a huge fucking deal. Like I did not expect him

2:05:58.220 --> 2:06:01.910
<v Speaker 2>to misjudge the moment and lose this election so badly,

2:06:01.950 --> 2:06:02.750
<v Speaker 2>but he fucking did.

2:06:03.150 --> 2:06:06.870
<v Speaker 10>They definitely walked right into some landmines. I mean, flock

2:06:06.950 --> 2:06:11.310
<v Speaker 10>had been a huge issue nationally, but also in Texas.

2:06:12.050 --> 2:06:15.640
<v Speaker 10>Abbott was left holding the bag there. Dan Patrick went

2:06:15.720 --> 2:06:21.080
<v Speaker 10>after pot during the most liberalized form of pot laws

2:06:21.220 --> 2:06:23.530
<v Speaker 10>in Texas, where it was actually pretty easy to get it.

2:06:24.140 --> 2:06:26.220
<v Speaker 10>And you could get edibles, you could get whatever at

2:06:26.260 --> 2:06:28.340
<v Speaker 10>these stores locally. And it was kind of a gray

2:06:28.380 --> 2:06:29.940
<v Speaker 10>market area, thanks to the hemp bill.

2:06:30.420 --> 2:06:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, the hemp stuff, yeah.

2:06:32.420 --> 2:06:35.430
<v Speaker 10>He went hard against that, and he pissed off a

2:06:35.510 --> 2:06:36.970
<v Speaker 10>whole swath of people.

2:06:36.990 --> 2:06:40.270
<v Speaker 1>It's like the vast majority of Texans, even rural Texans, love.

2:06:40.390 --> 2:06:44.490
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and that crosses political lines. And so this is

2:06:44.550 --> 2:06:47.110
<v Speaker 10>kind of the chickens coming home to roost. I mean,

2:06:47.450 --> 2:06:51.880
<v Speaker 10>this part of the Republican Party that had taken power

2:06:51.940 --> 2:06:56.000
<v Speaker 10>up until now in Texas was the furthest right version

2:06:56.100 --> 2:06:59.180
<v Speaker 10>of the Republican Party. They've been having this civil war.

2:06:59.670 --> 2:07:04.070
<v Speaker 10>that's been playing out. These huge donors have been backing

2:07:04.100 --> 2:07:08.600
<v Speaker 10>these primary challengers and consolidating power within the Republican Party.

2:07:09.200 --> 2:07:13.380
<v Speaker 10>And there's this one influencer who posted this insane video recently.

2:07:13.920 --> 2:07:17.290
<v Speaker 10>The caption was like total chud victory. And in fact,

2:07:17.470 --> 2:07:20.170
<v Speaker 10>that is what they have. They had a total chud

2:07:20.410 --> 2:07:23.130
<v Speaker 10>victory within the Republican Party of Texas.

2:07:23.290 --> 2:07:23.530
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:07:23.970 --> 2:07:29.360
<v Speaker 10>And they confused that victory with the actual general victory

2:07:29.440 --> 2:07:33.970
<v Speaker 10>because they assumed that they had this inertia effect. and

2:07:34.010 --> 2:07:36.850
<v Speaker 10>they could not be displaced in this way. Maybe they

2:07:36.870 --> 2:07:39.350
<v Speaker 10>could get a couple seats picked off. Maybe they would

2:07:39.390 --> 2:07:41.370
<v Speaker 10>have to try to get a Senate seat back.

2:07:41.430 --> 2:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>But Texas will never flip.

2:07:43.120 --> 2:07:46.160
<v Speaker 10>So I do want to caveat one thing, Robert. You're

2:07:46.180 --> 2:07:49.000
<v Speaker 10>right to say that this has been a total shift, right?

2:07:49.060 --> 2:07:53.560
<v Speaker 10>I mean, really major regime change. But the Senate in Texas,

2:07:53.590 --> 2:07:56.650
<v Speaker 10>the state Senate, is still Republican majority. Yes, they still

2:07:56.690 --> 2:07:59.450
<v Speaker 10>have one majority on the Supreme Court. So yes, you know,

2:07:59.490 --> 2:08:01.070
<v Speaker 10>there's there's going to be some interesting stuff in the

2:08:01.120 --> 2:08:03.980
<v Speaker 10>next two years. It's impossible to even really say what

2:08:04.160 --> 2:08:05.620
<v Speaker 10>is possible at this point.

2:08:05.980 --> 2:08:06.760
<v Speaker 6>Yes, yes.

2:08:07.180 --> 2:08:08.560
<v Speaker 2>And I don't mean to say flipped in the terms

2:08:08.580 --> 2:08:10.760
<v Speaker 2>that and now Texas is blue forever. It could it

2:08:10.800 --> 2:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>could there's a very good chance and probably likeliest that

2:08:13.240 --> 2:08:16.580
<v Speaker 2>it'll vote for Republican in 2028. Like I'm not saying that.

2:08:16.640 --> 2:08:20.310
<v Speaker 2>But like, This is more than just, oh, Trump's doing

2:08:20.350 --> 2:08:22.790
<v Speaker 2>bad this year, so a couple of Democrats slipped in, right?

2:08:22.850 --> 2:08:27.610
<v Speaker 2>This is evidence of a deep structural rot in the

2:08:27.650 --> 2:08:30.140
<v Speaker 2>Texas Republican Party, right? And I think it is what

2:08:30.160 --> 2:08:33.650
<v Speaker 2>you were saying, Stephen. These guys convinced themselves— because the

2:08:33.730 --> 2:08:36.380
<v Speaker 2>chuds were able to take over and dominate the state

2:08:36.440 --> 2:08:40.780
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party, and because Texas just kind of habitually elected Republicans,

2:08:40.820 --> 2:08:43.560
<v Speaker 2>they convinced themselves, well, what we're doing is popular and

2:08:43.600 --> 2:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>we can never lose, right? And it's not popular. Just

2:08:48.560 --> 2:08:50.200
<v Speaker 2>as one last bit before we move on of Texas

2:08:50.240 --> 2:08:52.940
<v Speaker 2>of schadenfreude, you can really be satisfied with the fact

2:08:52.960 --> 2:08:55.690
<v Speaker 2>that Dan Patrick is out of his job, among many

2:08:55.730 --> 2:08:59.550
<v Speaker 2>other shitty things. In 2016, Dan Patrick, after the Pulse

2:08:59.590 --> 2:09:02.270
<v Speaker 2>nightclub shooting in Orlando, is the guy who tweeted, do

2:09:02.330 --> 2:09:05.370
<v Speaker 2>not be deceived. God cannot be mocked. A man reaps

2:09:05.430 --> 2:09:09.210
<v Speaker 2>what he sows. Galatians 6-7. That's fucking Dan Patrick, and

2:09:09.230 --> 2:09:10.110
<v Speaker 2>he's out on his ass.

2:09:10.530 --> 2:09:13.700
<v Speaker 1>Fuck him. Any other things you wanted to add in, Stephen,

2:09:13.760 --> 2:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>from your write-up?

2:09:15.270 --> 2:09:17.910
<v Speaker 10>No, I mean, I just encourage people to maybe temper

2:09:17.970 --> 2:09:22.100
<v Speaker 10>their expectations, right? Because just because it's a misresult, it

2:09:22.110 --> 2:09:26.400
<v Speaker 10>doesn't mean that anything of major significance will even happen

2:09:26.560 --> 2:09:28.420
<v Speaker 10>in the next two years. They have a bunch of

2:09:28.460 --> 2:09:33.220
<v Speaker 10>roadblocks that will prevent some major changes. But I think

2:09:33.280 --> 2:09:37.740
<v Speaker 10>we could see reasonably some moderate Republicans crossing the aisle

2:09:37.860 --> 2:09:41.740
<v Speaker 10>on some specific issues, maybe pot, for example, because those

2:09:41.800 --> 2:09:44.560
<v Speaker 10>are easy and popular issues. you know, it's going to

2:09:44.600 --> 2:09:48.560
<v Speaker 10>take at least another election or two in this same

2:09:48.620 --> 2:09:53.750
<v Speaker 10>trajectory for Texas to really have like a reconstruction type

2:09:53.830 --> 2:09:58.270
<v Speaker 10>situation at hand. But I do think, you know, these

2:09:58.330 --> 2:10:01.820
<v Speaker 10>results make me believe that the election two years from

2:10:01.860 --> 2:10:06.560
<v Speaker 10>now it'll be competitive. It depends on who's running, but Texas,

2:10:06.660 --> 2:10:08.900
<v Speaker 10>it's incredible, but Texas is very likely to be a

2:10:08.940 --> 2:10:09.800
<v Speaker 10>battleground state.

2:10:10.040 --> 2:10:10.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2:10:10.560 --> 2:10:12.430
<v Speaker 2>I feel the same way right now about Texas, honestly,

2:10:12.450 --> 2:10:14.410
<v Speaker 2>that I do about Brazil in the wake of Lula's

2:10:14.450 --> 2:10:16.730
<v Speaker 2>victory and that there's a lot of problems. This does

2:10:16.810 --> 2:10:20.270
<v Speaker 2>not mean it's going to be an easy road. There's

2:10:20.290 --> 2:10:23.850
<v Speaker 2>still a shitload of right-wing power in Texas, but it's

2:10:23.910 --> 2:10:26.270
<v Speaker 2>a fight now. They're not just going to be curb

2:10:26.330 --> 2:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>stomping the left, the Democrats, whatever you want to call

2:10:28.900 --> 2:10:31.900
<v Speaker 2>them for the next however many years. There's actually going

2:10:31.940 --> 2:10:34.500
<v Speaker 2>to be a struggle over what's going to happen in

2:10:34.520 --> 2:10:36.770
<v Speaker 2>state politics. And that has not been the case since

2:10:36.820 --> 2:10:40.690
<v Speaker 2>I've been alive. Anyway, I'm feeling good.

2:10:41.990 --> 2:10:43.730
<v Speaker 1>Let's go one more ad break and then we will

2:10:44.050 --> 2:10:47.850
<v Speaker 1>return to talk about, I don't know, voter trends, miscellaneous

2:10:47.890 --> 2:10:50.130
<v Speaker 1>other election news. There's a lot of news. It's a

2:10:50.170 --> 2:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>big election. Welcome back. We just discussed Greg Abbott, who

2:11:07.020 --> 2:11:09.340
<v Speaker 1>is now out of a job. I'll grab it.

2:11:10.020 --> 2:11:10.220
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

2:11:10.240 --> 2:11:10.660
<v Speaker 1>You know what?

2:11:10.700 --> 2:11:10.940
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

2:11:11.040 --> 2:11:13.540
<v Speaker 1>I'll give it to you. This is your day, Robert.

2:11:13.600 --> 2:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You get it.

2:11:14.260 --> 2:11:15.300
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Thank you.

2:11:15.640 --> 2:11:19.210
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Gare. But there's actually four other Republican governors

2:11:19.250 --> 2:11:22.830
<v Speaker 1>who are also out of a job, or at least

2:11:22.970 --> 2:11:27.110
<v Speaker 1>candidates who will not be taking a job, like Vivek Ramaswamy,

2:11:27.250 --> 2:11:31.810
<v Speaker 1>who will not be the governor of Ohio. Amy Acton

2:11:32.130 --> 2:11:38.970
<v Speaker 1>will be governor of Ohio. Fuck Ramaswamy. Oh, my God. Yeah,

2:11:39.090 --> 2:11:43.670
<v Speaker 1>what a disgusting campaign. Fuck me. Vivek, it rhymes with loser.

2:11:47.790 --> 2:11:51.340
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing to see even a line for, like, some

2:11:51.410 --> 2:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>people in the modern Republican Party. Like, clearly not Trump

2:11:55.420 --> 2:11:57.640
<v Speaker 2>because he endorsed that ad, but, like, the degree to

2:11:57.660 --> 2:11:59.540
<v Speaker 2>which people are like, what the fuck, man, on his

2:11:59.660 --> 2:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>own side was nuts.

2:12:01.740 --> 2:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Acton has a lot of problems, a lot of the

2:12:03.920 --> 2:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>same kind of trans issues that a lot of these

2:12:06.760 --> 2:12:10.530
<v Speaker 1>swing state candidates on the statewide races have. But what

2:12:10.790 --> 2:12:13.890
<v Speaker 1>the Ramaswamy campaign did these past few weeks is so,

2:12:14.290 --> 2:12:18.010
<v Speaker 1>so despicable that I want whatever is worse for him

2:12:18.470 --> 2:12:21.820
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of his life. It's so gross. He

2:12:21.860 --> 2:12:24.610
<v Speaker 1>ended up losing by eight points. I hope to never

2:12:24.650 --> 2:12:26.870
<v Speaker 1>see him again. I'm sure I will. I'm sure I'll

2:12:26.890 --> 2:12:30.730
<v Speaker 1>be sitting here two years from now talking about Ramaswamy. Yeah,

2:12:30.810 --> 2:12:32.230
<v Speaker 1>he's going to try something.

2:12:32.260 --> 2:12:34.940
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be hard to come back from rapping

2:12:35.200 --> 2:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Lose Yourself at a rally event and knowing seemingly all

2:12:39.380 --> 2:12:42.700
<v Speaker 3>the lyrics. He sure did lose himself, though. Yeah, and

2:12:42.720 --> 2:12:46.750
<v Speaker 3>then losing really bad. And then losing. Unfortunately, he did

2:12:46.810 --> 2:12:49.690
<v Speaker 3>not have one shot. He's had two already. He's fucked

2:12:49.710 --> 2:12:51.270
<v Speaker 3>them both up, but he keeps coming back.

2:12:51.930 --> 2:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wish him only the worst. Georgia. Georgia. Former

2:12:56.700 --> 2:13:01.660
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms won the race for Georgia governor,

2:13:02.160 --> 2:13:08.150
<v Speaker 1>beating Rick Jackson, who was running for a previously Republican-held position.

2:13:08.990 --> 2:13:13.830
<v Speaker 1>Also won by around eight to nine points. Rob Sand

2:13:14.070 --> 2:13:17.290
<v Speaker 1>beat Zach Lind in Iowa to also claim the governorship

2:13:17.350 --> 2:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats. The one that I really did not

2:13:21.200 --> 2:13:23.380
<v Speaker 1>see coming, or at least didn't have on my radar...

2:13:23.690 --> 2:13:29.750
<v Speaker 1>is Nevada, where Democrat Aaron Ford beat incumbent Republican Joe

2:13:29.870 --> 2:13:34.860
<v Speaker 1>Lombardo by about seven points. These flips kind of go

2:13:34.960 --> 2:13:40.860
<v Speaker 1>alongside of various state legislatures also flipping or at least

2:13:40.940 --> 2:13:44.100
<v Speaker 1>moving towards the Democrats, which is the big trend of

2:13:44.150 --> 2:13:48.330
<v Speaker 1>the night, around 15 to 30 point shifts towards the

2:13:48.350 --> 2:13:53.010
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in both top of ballot races and down ballot races.

2:13:53.910 --> 2:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Dems ended up gaining five new state trifectas after flipping

2:13:58.760 --> 2:14:03.780
<v Speaker 1>Nevada's governor, the Minnesota and Michigan state houses, the Pennsylvania Senate,

2:14:04.340 --> 2:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and flipping the Wisconsin Senate and House while holding onto

2:14:08.780 --> 2:14:12.420
<v Speaker 1>control of the governor's office. And on top of that,

2:14:13.080 --> 2:14:17.870
<v Speaker 1>balance was shifted to Democrats by winning the Arizona State Senate,

2:14:17.950 --> 2:14:21.070
<v Speaker 1>the Georgia House, the New Hampshire House and Senate, North

2:14:21.110 --> 2:14:25.650
<v Speaker 1>Carolina's House, and the Texas House, though Democrats fell short

2:14:25.710 --> 2:14:29.470
<v Speaker 1>of a trifecta in those states. Kevin, do we want

2:14:29.550 --> 2:14:32.370
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the West Coast?

2:14:32.770 --> 2:14:36.390
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can start with the West Coast. So, you know,

2:14:36.510 --> 2:14:41.050
<v Speaker 3>in Oregon, things are generally a little bit boring. Not

2:14:41.090 --> 2:14:44.910
<v Speaker 3>a whole lot really happened. It's possible that the Democrats

2:14:45.010 --> 2:14:47.810
<v Speaker 3>might expand a little bit in the state legislature with

2:14:47.840 --> 2:14:52.100
<v Speaker 3>their supermajority, but that hasn't necessarily gotten us a whole

2:14:52.140 --> 2:14:54.040
<v Speaker 3>lot in the past few.

2:14:53.740 --> 2:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Years, unfortunately. Yeah.

2:14:55.800 --> 2:14:58.020
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what you should expect from a slightly

2:14:58.080 --> 2:15:01.450
<v Speaker 2>bigger Democratic lead in Oregon that's different from what we've got,

2:15:02.150 --> 2:15:03.670
<v Speaker 2>which people are not happy with, by the way.

2:15:03.690 --> 2:15:06.490
<v Speaker 3>It's been a disappointing time, but I think one of

2:15:06.510 --> 2:15:11.550
<v Speaker 3>the interesting things is like, despite Our Oregon governor, Tina Kotek,

2:15:11.610 --> 2:15:13.790
<v Speaker 3>is like one of the least popular governors in the

2:15:13.830 --> 2:15:18.470
<v Speaker 3>entire country. And even still, she's very bad at it. Yeah,

2:15:18.490 --> 2:15:21.270
<v Speaker 3>she's really bad at it. And she gained it looks

2:15:21.350 --> 2:15:23.890
<v Speaker 3>at least preliminary results are showing that she actually has

2:15:23.930 --> 2:15:27.810
<v Speaker 3>an even wider margin on Christine Drazen. So it's it's

2:15:27.870 --> 2:15:30.090
<v Speaker 3>just it just didn't matter. Everybody just hates it.

2:15:30.850 --> 2:15:36.050
<v Speaker 2>Mostly Republican poll sponsored polls that showed Drazen ahead during

2:15:36.070 --> 2:15:38.190
<v Speaker 2>that period of time when she was polling ahead. And

2:15:38.230 --> 2:15:40.370
<v Speaker 2>I kept I always felt like that can't be right. Like,

2:15:40.470 --> 2:15:43.340
<v Speaker 2>I know we all hate Tina Kotek, but that can't

2:15:43.350 --> 2:15:45.540
<v Speaker 2>be right. They don't no one likes Drazen.

2:15:45.700 --> 2:15:48.240
<v Speaker 3>No, she's I mean, it's like I've been to events

2:15:48.280 --> 2:15:50.320
<v Speaker 3>where they're talking. It's just like she's trying to sell

2:15:50.380 --> 2:15:52.840
<v Speaker 3>like I am not a crazy Trumper. And it's like, well,

2:15:52.860 --> 2:15:54.000
<v Speaker 3>we all know who you are.

2:15:54.220 --> 2:15:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Like she was her big ad that people were really

2:15:57.190 --> 2:15:59.370
<v Speaker 2>worried about and the democratic party, cause they thought it

2:15:59.390 --> 2:16:01.890
<v Speaker 2>was going to work. Some of them did was, Hey,

2:16:01.950 --> 2:16:04.230
<v Speaker 2>don't worry. I won't ban abortion. Like she literally ran

2:16:04.270 --> 2:16:06.070
<v Speaker 2>an ad to be like, I'm not going to ban abortion.

2:16:06.270 --> 2:16:07.870
<v Speaker 2>If I, if I'm the governor, trust me.

2:16:08.350 --> 2:16:12.700
<v Speaker 1>Like that's not a good sign. No, God, no. Yeah.

2:16:12.780 --> 2:16:17.020
<v Speaker 3>Other than that, like the DSA candidates held on Portland

2:16:17.040 --> 2:16:19.540
<v Speaker 3>city council. And that's, so that's a pretty big win

2:16:19.580 --> 2:16:21.820
<v Speaker 3>for them. And then I think there's one of the,

2:16:22.260 --> 2:16:25.580
<v Speaker 3>you know, kind of more concerning DSA state house races

2:16:25.640 --> 2:16:27.760
<v Speaker 3>that I think went to a ballot chase last time

2:16:27.820 --> 2:16:30.940
<v Speaker 3>with Leslie Munoz. It looks like she is going to win.

2:16:30.970 --> 2:16:34.130
<v Speaker 3>So they're going to expand a little bit in the

2:16:34.150 --> 2:16:37.890
<v Speaker 3>state legislature. And, but that's like kind of all that

2:16:37.950 --> 2:16:40.170
<v Speaker 3>really happened in Oregon, as far as I can tell

2:16:40.209 --> 2:16:44.520
<v Speaker 3>right now. And then in Washington, well, I think we'll

2:16:44.540 --> 2:16:48.530
<v Speaker 3>probably talk a little bit about the unfortunate, prop results

2:16:48.750 --> 2:16:51.610
<v Speaker 3>in California around the billionaire's tax, but we did get

2:16:51.629 --> 2:16:55.590
<v Speaker 3>a win, it looks like, in Washington with the, they

2:16:55.640 --> 2:16:58.820
<v Speaker 3>voted not to repeal the millionaire's tax. So that's a

2:16:58.980 --> 2:17:00.619
<v Speaker 3>nice little bit of a counter there.

2:17:00.640 --> 2:17:00.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:17:02.220 --> 2:17:08.330
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately, the other measure was the school sports by biological

2:17:08.390 --> 2:17:12.750
<v Speaker 3>sex one, which is really disappointing looking right now. It

2:17:12.990 --> 2:17:15.950
<v Speaker 3>seems very unlikely that it would flip back, but basically-

2:17:16.709 --> 2:17:22.650
<v Speaker 3>anti-trans legislation. According to Como News, they said that it's

2:17:22.690 --> 2:17:25.980
<v Speaker 3>a measure that would require students to undergo a physical

2:17:26.080 --> 2:17:31.480
<v Speaker 3>exam documenting sex assigned at birth before participating in interscholastic sports,

2:17:32.360 --> 2:17:36.900
<v Speaker 3>which Jesus fucking Christ. I, yeah, I don't know how

2:17:37.000 --> 2:17:39.920
<v Speaker 3>people justify voting on these things. I don't know.

2:17:39.940 --> 2:17:43.390
<v Speaker 2>This, this needs to get fucking sued. There needs to be,

2:17:43.410 --> 2:17:45.310
<v Speaker 2>this needs, this needs to be a Supreme state Supreme

2:17:45.330 --> 2:17:45.830
<v Speaker 2>court case.

2:17:46.129 --> 2:17:46.390
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:17:46.490 --> 2:17:46.789
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:17:46.810 --> 2:17:46.949
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:17:47.150 --> 2:17:51.279
<v Speaker 3>This is massive. Like another article from KNKX is saying

2:17:51.440 --> 2:17:54.740
<v Speaker 3>the ACLU plans to fight it with discrimination lawsuits. And

2:17:55.120 --> 2:18:00.540
<v Speaker 3>there's also questions remaining about implementation. But yeah, it's even

2:18:00.620 --> 2:18:04.199
<v Speaker 3>stupider because there was another thing where like the Washington

2:18:04.260 --> 2:18:08.350
<v Speaker 3>Interscholastic Activities Association, they don't even have a count anymore.

2:18:08.770 --> 2:18:11.750
<v Speaker 3>of how many like trans students are. There's no, they

2:18:11.770 --> 2:18:15.590
<v Speaker 3>don't track this. There's like, this could be like literally,

2:18:16.050 --> 2:18:16.810
<v Speaker 3>it's just insane.

2:18:17.010 --> 2:18:17.670
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous.

2:18:17.770 --> 2:18:18.050
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

2:18:18.430 --> 2:18:18.670
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:18:19.250 --> 2:18:20.070
<v Speaker 3>Really disappointing.

2:18:20.610 --> 2:18:24.170
<v Speaker 1>Not enough people pay attention to ballot measures. And the

2:18:24.209 --> 2:18:26.550
<v Speaker 1>fact that this thing won by a few hundred thousand votes,

2:18:26.570 --> 2:18:29.770
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is awful. Yeah. Then there needed to

2:18:29.810 --> 2:18:32.550
<v Speaker 1>be more organized against this. And people in general, they

2:18:32.570 --> 2:18:36.250
<v Speaker 1>need to get, the whole ballot measure process needs to

2:18:36.290 --> 2:18:42.190
<v Speaker 1>be reformed. Like it's so, and it allows people to

2:18:42.250 --> 2:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>shoehorn all these things in that don't get the same

2:18:44.680 --> 2:18:48.340
<v Speaker 1>attention as some of the other candidate races do.

2:18:49.000 --> 2:18:53.750
<v Speaker 2>No, and they're often like mis- represented badly by the

2:18:53.790 --> 2:18:56.330
<v Speaker 2>people who are getting signatures to get them on the ballot.

2:18:56.470 --> 2:18:58.010
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of like how they're framed.

2:18:58.190 --> 2:18:58.450
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:18:58.490 --> 2:18:59.370
<v Speaker 1>Even the phrasing.

2:18:59.550 --> 2:18:59.830
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:19:00.150 --> 2:19:00.970
<v Speaker 1>It's, it's issues.

2:19:00.990 --> 2:19:02.189
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of issues with that in the

2:19:02.230 --> 2:19:03.270
<v Speaker 2>Northwest in particular.

2:19:03.310 --> 2:19:03.470
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:19:03.510 --> 2:19:07.430
<v Speaker 1>It's been bad in California too. God. Yeah. And this Washington,

2:19:07.670 --> 2:19:10.660
<v Speaker 1>like trans sports restrictions, not the only one of its

2:19:10.740 --> 2:19:12.740
<v Speaker 1>kind that passed this election.

2:19:13.080 --> 2:19:13.260
<v Speaker 9>No.

2:19:13.660 --> 2:19:16.179
<v Speaker 1>One in Arizona, one in Colorado, and then another proposition

2:19:16.200 --> 2:19:21.580
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado prohibiting quote surgeries to alter a minor's sex characteristics.

2:19:22.670 --> 2:19:26.110
<v Speaker 1>which similarly passed by just like less than 100,000 votes

2:19:26.290 --> 2:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>as of time of recording. These are very small margins,

2:19:30.780 --> 2:19:32.740
<v Speaker 1>but they did pass. And that is bad.

2:19:32.940 --> 2:19:34.539
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what matters.

2:19:34.940 --> 2:19:37.220
<v Speaker 1>Which is very interesting is there was something similar in Missouri,

2:19:37.720 --> 2:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>which did not pass. There was a constitutional amendment to

2:19:40.560 --> 2:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>repeal the right to abortion and prohibit gender transition care

2:19:43.620 --> 2:19:47.490
<v Speaker 1>for minors, which did not pass. And this is a

2:19:47.510 --> 2:19:52.030
<v Speaker 1>really interesting example of something not passing in Missouri. But

2:19:52.110 --> 2:19:53.629
<v Speaker 1>passing in Washington state.

2:19:54.129 --> 2:19:56.060
<v Speaker 2>You said it was an abortion. Was it an abortion

2:19:56.090 --> 2:19:58.520
<v Speaker 2>ban and an anti? Were those two bills or one?

2:19:58.600 --> 2:19:59.539
<v Speaker 1>They crammed them together.

2:19:59.560 --> 2:19:59.939
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:20:00.140 --> 2:20:00.619
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

2:20:00.660 --> 2:20:00.980
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:20:01.220 --> 2:20:02.340
<v Speaker 2>That helps probably explain it.

2:20:02.459 --> 2:20:02.740
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:20:03.400 --> 2:20:05.830
<v Speaker 3>Another small thing in the Northwest, I did see that

2:20:06.080 --> 2:20:09.490
<v Speaker 3>Idaho did not- I was about to mention that. Yeah.

2:20:09.550 --> 2:20:12.650
<v Speaker 3>They also did not, or they blocked abortion access. I

2:20:12.670 --> 2:20:15.350
<v Speaker 3>forget exactly. James, you might know a little better than me, but- Yeah.

2:20:15.370 --> 2:20:15.450
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:20:15.879 --> 2:20:19.330
<v Speaker 3>It was Prop 1, which Idaho voters would amend state

2:20:19.370 --> 2:20:23.010
<v Speaker 3>law to establish a right to abortion up to the

2:20:23.070 --> 2:20:24.789
<v Speaker 3>point where the fetus is viable.

2:20:25.350 --> 2:20:25.630
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:20:25.970 --> 2:20:29.330
<v Speaker 7>Idaho, of course, also voted for its state gun yesterday.

2:20:29.450 --> 2:20:30.630
<v Speaker 7>Not sure how that went down for them.

2:20:30.730 --> 2:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you serious? Oh, yeah, absolutely. Yes, they did. But

2:20:34.620 --> 2:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>they were all bad.

2:20:35.540 --> 2:20:36.860
<v Speaker 2>None of them are, for one thing, none of them

2:20:36.920 --> 2:20:38.760
<v Speaker 2>are Idaho guns, although a couple of them were made

2:20:38.800 --> 2:20:41.080
<v Speaker 2>by a Mormon, and Idaho has a large Mormon population.

2:20:41.100 --> 2:20:41.340
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:20:41.740 --> 2:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

2:20:42.340 --> 2:20:44.459
<v Speaker 2>None of them are appropriate because the state gun for

2:20:44.600 --> 2:20:46.939
<v Speaker 2>Idaho should be the same state gun that I approve

2:20:47.000 --> 2:20:49.519
<v Speaker 2>of for Oregon, the life card, which is a, it

2:20:49.570 --> 2:20:52.830
<v Speaker 2>looks like a little, like a card you'd fit in

2:20:52.850 --> 2:20:56.580
<v Speaker 2>your wallet, but it unfolds into a. 380 or a.

2:20:56.510 --> 2:20:57.010
<v Speaker 1>22 or a.

2:20:56.950 --> 2:20:57.070
<v Speaker 3>32.

2:20:57.070 --> 2:20:57.810
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a.

2:20:57.790 --> 2:20:57.850
<v Speaker 11>22.

2:20:57.830 --> 2:20:59.330
<v Speaker 1>No, they have three calibers now, James. Oh, they have

2:20:59.350 --> 2:20:59.890
<v Speaker 1>the three calibers.

2:20:59.910 --> 2:21:02.730
<v Speaker 2>But there's no trigger guard, which means there's nothing between

2:21:02.790 --> 2:21:05.920
<v Speaker 2>your gun firing and the world but air. And I

2:21:05.950 --> 2:21:09.580
<v Speaker 2>think that perfectly embodies the frontier spirit of the Northwest,

2:21:09.760 --> 2:21:09.980
<v Speaker 2>you know?

2:21:11.570 --> 2:21:13.609
<v Speaker 7>People seem really shocked by the state gun thing. Tons

2:21:13.650 --> 2:21:15.350
<v Speaker 7>of states already have state guns.

2:21:15.490 --> 2:21:15.750
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:21:15.830 --> 2:21:18.470
<v Speaker 7>Tennessee's is the stupidest. I think it's like the Barrett

2:21:18.530 --> 2:21:20.529
<v Speaker 7>Light 50 Cal. That's just dumb.

2:21:20.590 --> 2:21:23.660
<v Speaker 1>That's just like Reddit shit. Fuck off.

2:21:25.020 --> 2:21:27.140
<v Speaker 2>One last piece of Northwest election news I wanted to cover.

2:21:27.300 --> 2:21:30.779
<v Speaker 2>So in the Portland City Council races, because we had

2:21:30.940 --> 2:21:33.689
<v Speaker 2>several people up for election there, Mitch Green is an

2:21:33.750 --> 2:21:38.600
<v Speaker 2>economist who represents District 4. And he got, earlier this year,

2:21:39.150 --> 2:21:43.250
<v Speaker 2>a right-wing reporter dug up some old tweets from his

2:21:43.330 --> 2:21:44.790
<v Speaker 2>Twitter in 2022.

2:21:44.790 --> 2:21:46.410
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't call him a reporter, but.

2:21:47.090 --> 2:21:51.010
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, a reporter, quote-unquote, right? A blogger, Max Steele.

2:21:51.030 --> 2:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Found some posts that he.

2:21:52.400 --> 2:21:55.140
<v Speaker 2>Mitch had deleted in 2022, I guess, in preparation for

2:21:55.160 --> 2:21:58.540
<v Speaker 2>his political career, but he posted in 2020 and 2021

2:21:58.540 --> 2:22:01.340
<v Speaker 2>during the protests, and he had expressed his pure hatred

2:22:01.410 --> 2:22:04.140
<v Speaker 2>for the Portland police. And so that got brought up

2:22:04.160 --> 2:22:06.340
<v Speaker 2>and there was a, there were like billboards outside of

2:22:06.379 --> 2:22:08.660
<v Speaker 2>like my place and like a bunch of places in

2:22:08.720 --> 2:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Portland that have like Mitch's hatred of police or also

2:22:12.120 --> 2:22:14.790
<v Speaker 2>he was laid on taxes once. He had a fire

2:22:14.930 --> 2:22:16.650
<v Speaker 2>in his yard when he shouldn't have had a fire

2:22:16.709 --> 2:22:18.230
<v Speaker 2>in his yard. Like crazy shit.

2:22:18.250 --> 2:22:19.830
<v Speaker 1>Like a normal Portlander.

2:22:20.070 --> 2:22:20.289
<v Speaker 5>Right.

2:22:20.670 --> 2:22:20.870
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:22:20.890 --> 2:22:24.529
<v Speaker 3>What a fucking nextdoor.com coded fucking campaign. It's all massive

2:22:24.650 --> 2:22:27.510
<v Speaker 3>like business lobby pack spending and stuff that's all like

2:22:27.640 --> 2:22:29.260
<v Speaker 3>sheltered and different. Yeah.

2:22:29.440 --> 2:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. And it didn't work.

2:22:31.670 --> 2:22:34.970
<v Speaker 2>Mitch won re-election along with the other people that he

2:22:34.990 --> 2:22:36.730
<v Speaker 2>was running alongside the other progressives.

2:22:36.870 --> 2:22:39.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he was one of like the six Oregon statewide

2:22:39.090 --> 2:22:41.750
<v Speaker 1>DSA candidates. Partly, I think generally it was a good

2:22:41.810 --> 2:22:44.410
<v Speaker 1>response when he was asked like, do you still stand

2:22:44.450 --> 2:22:47.210
<v Speaker 1>by your hatred for the Portland police? He said, I

2:22:47.250 --> 2:22:49.310
<v Speaker 1>would not characterize the police today that way. I know

2:22:49.330 --> 2:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>some police officers now because I'm a city counselor. I've

2:22:51.510 --> 2:22:53.740
<v Speaker 1>met some police officers who I think genuinely care about

2:22:53.770 --> 2:22:54.140
<v Speaker 1>our city.

2:22:54.430 --> 2:22:56.220
<v Speaker 2>I do want a world where we abolish the police.

2:22:56.280 --> 2:22:59.350
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm trying to build. So he kind of

2:22:59.390 --> 2:23:01.640
<v Speaker 2>hemmed by saying there's some good ones, but also I

2:23:01.660 --> 2:23:05.480
<v Speaker 2>want to abolish them. So I don't know. More or

2:23:05.520 --> 2:23:07.620
<v Speaker 2>less on balance, good. And I'm glad he won real.

2:23:07.660 --> 2:23:10.750
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad the fucking massive ad campaign against him didn't

2:23:10.780 --> 2:23:13.530
<v Speaker 2>work because it was really gross. Anyway, that's all I got.

2:23:13.870 --> 2:23:15.830
<v Speaker 3>Funny note on that. I actually wrote a story on

2:23:15.870 --> 2:23:18.410
<v Speaker 3>my sub stack not too long ago about how his

2:23:18.490 --> 2:23:21.939
<v Speaker 3>donations massively went up after that story ran.

2:23:21.959 --> 2:23:22.039
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

2:23:24.410 --> 2:23:26.110
<v Speaker 1>It made me want to. That's awesome.

2:23:26.350 --> 2:23:29.970
<v Speaker 3>Should I take us to something positive on data centers?

2:23:30.330 --> 2:23:33.990
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Let's talk about some good proposition or ballot measures.

2:23:34.010 --> 2:23:34.270
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:23:34.410 --> 2:23:35.050
<v Speaker 1>Oh, are we building?

2:23:35.150 --> 2:23:36.879
<v Speaker 2>I love data centers. Are we building a new one?

2:23:37.190 --> 2:23:39.640
<v Speaker 3>The short of it is that data center just got

2:23:39.760 --> 2:23:44.879
<v Speaker 3>absolutely clobbered in this election. According to CNBC, there were

2:23:44.879 --> 2:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>41 data center related ballot measures on the docket across

2:23:48.080 --> 2:23:50.959
<v Speaker 3>10 different states, 21 of which were in Ohio. And

2:23:52.240 --> 2:23:55.340
<v Speaker 3>All but one of those failed, or at least in

2:23:55.379 --> 2:23:58.830
<v Speaker 3>the direction. So everybody voted against data centers. The one

2:23:58.860 --> 2:24:02.709
<v Speaker 3>that did pass was in Harwood, North Dakota, where voters

2:24:02.930 --> 2:24:06.830
<v Speaker 3>went against the charter amendment, which required additional review before

2:24:06.890 --> 2:24:10.470
<v Speaker 3>city approval of industrial projects, which includes data centers. A

2:24:10.970 --> 2:24:14.130
<v Speaker 3>lot of these are like local jurisdictional things. But I

2:24:14.170 --> 2:24:16.170
<v Speaker 3>think something that was interesting is while a lot of

2:24:16.190 --> 2:24:19.290
<v Speaker 3>the vote counts are quite small, in nearly all of

2:24:19.370 --> 2:24:22.830
<v Speaker 3>the cases, the margins were Very wide. I think I

2:24:22.930 --> 2:24:26.800
<v Speaker 3>was looking at Ballotpedia and only one of them, I think,

2:24:26.860 --> 2:24:30.360
<v Speaker 3>was within 10 points. They were all like huge.

2:24:30.400 --> 2:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense. Yeah. Among the people who care about

2:24:33.500 --> 2:24:35.609
<v Speaker 1>this issue, they really care about this issue.

2:24:35.629 --> 2:24:35.709
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:24:36.030 --> 2:24:36.210
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:24:38.030 --> 2:24:39.390
<v Speaker 1>I personally am shocked.

2:24:39.450 --> 2:24:42.450
<v Speaker 2>And I really, I feel like the only explanation for

2:24:42.470 --> 2:24:45.670
<v Speaker 2>this is that people haven't read quite enough articles by

2:24:45.690 --> 2:24:48.369
<v Speaker 2>AI company CEOs talking about how their product is going

2:24:48.390 --> 2:24:50.490
<v Speaker 2>to kill everybody. You know, one more of those will

2:24:50.510 --> 2:24:53.160
<v Speaker 2>convince people that data centers, more data centers are good.

2:24:53.450 --> 2:24:53.670
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:24:55.320 --> 2:24:58.400
<v Speaker 3>It went so poorly for them that even Elon Musk

2:24:58.520 --> 2:25:01.620
<v Speaker 3>posted last night, the data centers in space looking pretty

2:25:01.700 --> 2:25:04.859
<v Speaker 3>appealing right now, which hopefully.

2:25:04.940 --> 2:25:07.360
<v Speaker 2>That's as real as everything else you advocate, Elon.

2:25:07.379 --> 2:25:07.459
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

2:25:09.970 --> 2:25:12.789
<v Speaker 3>I think this is just kind of an interesting position

2:25:12.890 --> 2:25:16.850
<v Speaker 3>for these companies. With Ohio, with 21 of these failing,

2:25:16.910 --> 2:25:19.060
<v Speaker 3>and they were, I guess, according to CNBC, the most

2:25:19.500 --> 2:25:23.480
<v Speaker 3>business-friendly state in the nation last year. OpenAI has a

2:25:23.520 --> 2:25:26.380
<v Speaker 3>giant project coming in there, but this is just a

2:25:26.560 --> 2:25:31.769
<v Speaker 3>massive setback. And there was the crypto AI and gambling industry.

2:25:32.870 --> 2:25:37.010
<v Speaker 3>lobby spent hundreds of millions of dollars this year. And

2:25:37.070 --> 2:25:39.429
<v Speaker 3>so having, and I think a lot of that might,

2:25:39.610 --> 2:25:42.289
<v Speaker 3>might have gone more into like candidate races. I don't

2:25:42.330 --> 2:25:44.810
<v Speaker 3>know exactly how this would have worked with measures, but

2:25:45.590 --> 2:25:49.070
<v Speaker 3>basically this, you know, follows the polling on data centers.

2:25:49.209 --> 2:25:51.270
<v Speaker 3>And I just think it'll be interesting to see how

2:25:51.310 --> 2:25:54.289
<v Speaker 3>this plays out with how shaky things are in the

2:25:57.610 --> 2:26:02.330
<v Speaker 3>Do not need more barriers to building compute capacity right now.

2:26:02.600 --> 2:26:04.980
<v Speaker 3>That is really bad for them.

2:26:05.080 --> 2:26:07.940
<v Speaker 2>And this is, to caveat off of your point, this

2:26:08.000 --> 2:26:12.500
<v Speaker 2>is something that the AI and crypto industries spent a

2:26:12.740 --> 2:26:16.670
<v Speaker 2>shitload on this on the midterms, and it nearly all failed.

2:26:17.030 --> 2:26:18.029
<v Speaker 1>Massive disaster.

2:26:18.050 --> 2:26:20.730
<v Speaker 2>There's a really good Gizmodo article on this by Bruce Gill,

2:26:20.810 --> 2:26:22.550
<v Speaker 2>and I'm going to read just a brief quote from that.

2:26:23.379 --> 2:26:27.660
<v Speaker 2>Crypto and AI-focused SuperPAC spent $ 112 million supporting and opposing

2:26:27.720 --> 2:26:30.840
<v Speaker 2>candidates in the general election alone, according to Tech Influence Watch.

2:26:31.020 --> 2:26:33.980
<v Speaker 2>As of Wednesday morning, $ 74. 7 million of that spending had

2:26:34.020 --> 2:26:37.250
<v Speaker 2>gone toward losing candidates or efforts to defeat winning candidates.

2:26:37.770 --> 2:26:39.970
<v Speaker 2>The losses came despite an influx of money from Silicon

2:26:39.990 --> 2:26:42.510
<v Speaker 2>Valley into this year's elections. Overall, crypto and AI companies

2:26:42.530 --> 2:26:46.410
<v Speaker 2>and employees contributed more than $ 506 million to political committees

2:26:46.430 --> 2:26:50.099
<v Speaker 2>this election cycle. according to Tech Influence Watch's estimates. Meanwhile,

2:26:50.160 --> 2:26:53.140
<v Speaker 2>industry-focused PAC spent nearly $ 250 million on the federal elections,

2:26:53.180 --> 2:26:57.840
<v Speaker 2>including primaries. And just the vast majority of that has

2:26:57.879 --> 2:27:02.869
<v Speaker 2>been completely disastrous. In Ohio, Sherrod Brown won his Senate

2:27:02.890 --> 2:27:06.030
<v Speaker 2>seat against John Husted, even though the crypto industry put

2:27:06.150 --> 2:27:10.209
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of money, like $ 64 million into supporting Husted.

2:27:10.209 --> 2:27:15.690
<v Speaker 2>$ 64 million into one campaign by the crypto industry.

2:27:15.720 --> 2:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>All my apes gone. Yeah. Oh, and that's not all.

2:27:19.220 --> 2:27:23.620
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk's backed Senate leadership fund spent another $ 95. 6 million

2:27:23.740 --> 2:27:25.600
<v Speaker 2>on the race trying to beat Brown.

2:27:25.840 --> 2:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's good. Oh, that's good.

2:27:27.500 --> 2:27:27.740
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:27:28.240 --> 2:27:31.080
<v Speaker 2>And then Musk's America pack spent almost 10 million. Like

2:27:31.120 --> 2:27:35.050
<v Speaker 2>they lot through so much money into beating Sherrod Brown.

2:27:35.110 --> 2:27:38.630
<v Speaker 1>It just did fucking nothing. It's so funny.

2:27:39.550 --> 2:27:39.890
<v Speaker 5>They also.

2:27:39.970 --> 2:27:43.029
<v Speaker 2>Put there was like the the AI focused building the

2:27:43.070 --> 2:27:46.770
<v Speaker 2>future in America mission pack put almost five million dollars

2:27:46.820 --> 2:27:49.290
<v Speaker 2>into supporting Darlene Graham's campaign.

2:27:51.820 --> 2:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Good good bet guys good bet guys that makes sense

2:27:54.580 --> 2:27:57.060
<v Speaker 1>because out of out of all these races that I

2:27:57.100 --> 2:27:59.990
<v Speaker 1>get I was going through last night both Sherrod Brown

2:28:00.090 --> 2:28:03.150
<v Speaker 1>and Annie Andrews had the strongest anti-AI stuff, with the

2:28:03.170 --> 2:28:08.500
<v Speaker 1>exception of Al Sayed, who's had very strong AI policies. Yeah.

2:28:08.640 --> 2:28:10.430
<v Speaker 2>And they did have some successes, but it was mostly

2:28:10.640 --> 2:28:14.200
<v Speaker 2>in not really competitive races. The one that's kind of

2:28:14.260 --> 2:28:18.540
<v Speaker 2>meaningful is they did the Defend American Jobs PAC, which

2:28:18.660 --> 2:28:23.780
<v Speaker 2>was an AI industry-backed one, put like $ 14 million almost

2:28:23.860 --> 2:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>into Senator Pete Ricketts' campaign in Nebraska, and he did win.

2:28:27.930 --> 2:28:31.590
<v Speaker 1>That is something I did want to mention. Yes, in Nebraska,

2:28:31.670 --> 2:28:34.330
<v Speaker 1>Dan Osborne was running as an independent on like a

2:28:34.370 --> 2:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>working class labor platform. And this was very competitive in

2:28:38.500 --> 2:28:42.900
<v Speaker 1>the polls. But Ricketts ended up really, really pulling ahead

2:28:42.940 --> 2:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end. And so this Senate seat stayed Republican.

2:28:48.220 --> 2:28:49.910
<v Speaker 1>Besides Angie Nixon, this is kind of one of the

2:28:49.930 --> 2:28:53.150
<v Speaker 1>big kind of losses for the night, you could say.

2:28:53.709 --> 2:28:55.970
<v Speaker 1>Or at least one of the examples of Republicans being

2:28:55.990 --> 2:28:56.770
<v Speaker 1>able to hold on to power.

2:28:57.209 --> 2:28:57.369
<v Speaker 7>Yes.

2:28:58.540 --> 2:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk about California briefly, right?

2:29:00.400 --> 2:29:03.689
<v Speaker 7>So I guess the big news out of California is

2:29:03.750 --> 2:29:05.970
<v Speaker 7>it's not looking good for Prop 40.

2:29:05.970 --> 2:29:07.690
<v Speaker 1>California overall, disappointing.

2:29:08.110 --> 2:29:10.510
<v Speaker 7>And we'll get into this later, but California is what

2:29:10.550 --> 2:29:13.670
<v Speaker 7>happens when the Democrats feel safe. And what we saw

2:29:13.740 --> 2:29:16.120
<v Speaker 7>here is there are a lot of votes still to

2:29:16.160 --> 2:29:18.440
<v Speaker 7>be counted in California. I should probably lead with that, right?

2:29:18.879 --> 2:29:23.970
<v Speaker 7>Right now, Prop 40 was a one-time 5% tax on

2:29:24.070 --> 2:29:29.480
<v Speaker 7>individuals or trusts that had assets over $ 1 billion. There

2:29:29.700 --> 2:29:36.360
<v Speaker 7>are less than 300 billionaires in California. Currently, no, it's

2:29:36.440 --> 2:29:37.620
<v Speaker 7>leading with 55.6% of the vote.

2:29:37.680 --> 2:29:38.320
<v Speaker 3>According to the AP, 44.4%.

2:29:38.320 --> 2:29:38.500
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

2:29:38.540 --> 2:29:38.820
<v Speaker 1>Bummer.

2:29:43.940 --> 2:29:47.920
<v Speaker 7>California's ballot had a number of props that sought to

2:29:47.980 --> 2:29:52.570
<v Speaker 7>directly cancel or invalidate Prop 40, like suggesting that the

2:29:52.610 --> 2:29:57.430
<v Speaker 7>wealthy were afraid, right? Looking by county, I was looking

2:29:57.470 --> 2:30:00.990
<v Speaker 7>at a county breakdown of Prop 40. It succeeded in

2:30:01.150 --> 2:30:05.860
<v Speaker 7>LA County. Otherwise, there are very few, it succeeded in

2:30:05.900 --> 2:30:11.940
<v Speaker 7>like Alameda County and like Mendocino County, Yolo County, Monterey,

2:30:11.980 --> 2:30:14.660
<v Speaker 7>like less big urban counties. For instance, it did not

2:30:14.720 --> 2:30:18.080
<v Speaker 7>succeed at this point in San Diego County. There was

2:30:18.120 --> 2:30:21.750
<v Speaker 7>obviously a lot of spending against Prop 40. Gavin Newsom

2:30:21.810 --> 2:30:27.380
<v Speaker 7>has also been opposed to it. California continues to be

2:30:27.420 --> 2:30:30.220
<v Speaker 7>a disappointment in every aspect.

2:30:30.540 --> 2:30:32.140
<v Speaker 3>It's very corporate Dems here.

2:30:32.180 --> 2:30:36.390
<v Speaker 7>We didn't really see at a statewide level, that swing

2:30:36.450 --> 2:30:40.379
<v Speaker 7>towards more progressive Democrats that we have seen in other places.

2:30:41.000 --> 2:30:46.220
<v Speaker 7>In terms of local races, Marnie Van Wilpert beat Jim Desmond,

2:30:46.860 --> 2:30:50.340
<v Speaker 7>which Desmond was taking over Daryl Issa's seat. Issa has

2:30:50.390 --> 2:30:54.350
<v Speaker 7>been a pretty hard caller. He's not a California Republican. Well,

2:30:54.370 --> 2:30:57.670
<v Speaker 7>he is obviously a Republican for California, but he's a Trumper.

2:30:58.280 --> 2:31:00.629
<v Speaker 7>For the most part, Duncan Hunter had previously held a

2:31:00.670 --> 2:31:04.090
<v Speaker 7>version of that. It's been redrawn, right? California redrew a

2:31:04.129 --> 2:31:07.720
<v Speaker 7>number of districts. But, like, Duncan Hunter, people will remember, A,

2:31:08.430 --> 2:31:11.920
<v Speaker 7>for being one of the more far-right members of Congress, B,

2:31:11.950 --> 2:31:14.379
<v Speaker 7>for buying flights for his bunny rabbit and spending campaign

2:31:14.420 --> 2:31:17.580
<v Speaker 7>funds on Steam games, among other things.

2:31:18.340 --> 2:31:18.820
<v Speaker 4>Respect.

2:31:19.200 --> 2:31:25.779
<v Speaker 1>Most useful Republican campaign expenditure. Sorry. I had to say.

2:31:25.820 --> 2:31:26.459
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, right.

2:31:26.620 --> 2:31:27.060
<v Speaker 1>You know what?

2:31:27.640 --> 2:31:29.900
<v Speaker 7>If they took that money and they spent it all

2:31:30.000 --> 2:31:33.980
<v Speaker 7>on Steam games, I wouldn't complain. You know, they're a

2:31:34.000 --> 2:31:36.830
<v Speaker 7>worse thing for them to spend their money on. Generally,

2:31:37.310 --> 2:31:42.570
<v Speaker 7>California has seen its characteristic like highly democratic, right? I

2:31:42.610 --> 2:31:46.689
<v Speaker 7>think there were, I'm seeing four house districts that returned Republicans,

2:31:47.370 --> 2:31:51.830
<v Speaker 7>the rest Democrats, right? California lines were redrawn. And so

2:31:51.879 --> 2:31:56.080
<v Speaker 7>some of these Republicans have pretty strong... It's not like

2:31:56.120 --> 2:31:59.240
<v Speaker 7>a one-for-one comparison, right? But we can look at how

2:31:59.280 --> 2:32:03.860
<v Speaker 7>that area would have voted before, but we see strong... Germany,

2:32:03.879 --> 2:32:06.720
<v Speaker 7>strong results for Republicans where they've won, but everywhere else,

2:32:07.160 --> 2:32:09.459
<v Speaker 7>big wins for Democrats. I did want to mention in

2:32:09.520 --> 2:32:13.420
<v Speaker 7>San Diego news that yesterday, a little election day treat

2:32:13.780 --> 2:32:17.670
<v Speaker 7>for us San Diegans. The first process of recalling a

2:32:17.709 --> 2:32:21.050
<v Speaker 7>mayor in California is to publish your intent to serve

2:32:21.070 --> 2:32:24.459
<v Speaker 7>a recall notice and a group published intent to serve

2:32:24.480 --> 2:32:28.000
<v Speaker 7>a recall notice for Todd Gloria. Of course, Todd supporters

2:32:28.100 --> 2:32:31.039
<v Speaker 7>in the Republican Party have immediately closed ranks behind that guy.

2:32:31.640 --> 2:32:34.990
<v Speaker 7>But for those who are not familiar, Todd Gloria, San

2:32:35.000 --> 2:32:38.449
<v Speaker 7>Diego's mayor, Another example of what happens in California, where

2:32:38.470 --> 2:32:41.330
<v Speaker 7>you get people running on supposedly progressive values and then

2:32:41.350 --> 2:32:45.210
<v Speaker 7>turning out to be massive grifters, liars and chuds. So

2:32:45.270 --> 2:32:51.020
<v Speaker 7>the group cited Gloria's failure to address our increasing crisis

2:32:51.600 --> 2:32:53.619
<v Speaker 7>of people living on the street and not having access

2:32:53.640 --> 2:32:59.140
<v Speaker 7>to services and his like persistent real estate grift. It'll

2:32:59.160 --> 2:33:01.840
<v Speaker 7>be really interesting. I think Gloria, I know this can

2:33:01.860 --> 2:33:03.570
<v Speaker 7>seem like a small local thing at a time when

2:33:03.590 --> 2:33:07.449
<v Speaker 7>it's been a massive swing in national politics. Gloria, at

2:33:07.470 --> 2:33:13.320
<v Speaker 7>least for me, really represents the pro-genocide corporate Democrats who

2:33:14.000 --> 2:33:20.400
<v Speaker 7>have failed in 2024 specifically to inspire people to turn

2:33:20.459 --> 2:33:22.780
<v Speaker 7>out to vote for them because they seem so out

2:33:22.800 --> 2:33:25.200
<v Speaker 7>of touch, because they didn't offer solutions to problems that

2:33:25.230 --> 2:33:27.630
<v Speaker 7>people had. We spoke about this on EDA a couple

2:33:27.650 --> 2:33:30.789
<v Speaker 7>of weeks ago, but Gloria is probably Flock Camera's strongest

2:33:30.830 --> 2:33:34.610
<v Speaker 7>defender of He has absolutely refused to concede on that.

2:33:35.010 --> 2:33:38.450
<v Speaker 7>When it comes to carceral, out-of-touch liberalism, I see him

2:33:38.530 --> 2:33:42.510
<v Speaker 7>as a totem of that. Although he will term out

2:33:42.550 --> 2:33:45.270
<v Speaker 7>at the end of this term, although this recall will

2:33:45.290 --> 2:33:48.270
<v Speaker 7>be expensive, I think it sends a really important notice

2:33:48.290 --> 2:33:51.790
<v Speaker 7>to the Democratic Party that this kind of aloof, out-of-touch,

2:33:52.410 --> 2:33:54.900
<v Speaker 7>giving all our money to the cops liberalism is not

2:33:54.980 --> 2:33:57.520
<v Speaker 7>what people want in 2028. I do think there's a

2:33:57.580 --> 2:34:01.480
<v Speaker 7>real risk of Democrats like falling back into well-worn patterns

2:34:01.520 --> 2:34:04.380
<v Speaker 7>of doing that shit. So he has to be served

2:34:04.420 --> 2:34:06.120
<v Speaker 7>the recall notice by the 8th, then he has a

2:34:06.150 --> 2:34:09.350
<v Speaker 7>chance to respond. It won't be until like the third

2:34:09.370 --> 2:34:12.130
<v Speaker 7>or fourth week of this month that people will actually

2:34:12.170 --> 2:34:16.150
<v Speaker 7>begin gathering signatures. And it would have to be 15%

2:34:16.150 --> 2:34:18.650
<v Speaker 7>of the electorate from the last election. I'm not sure

2:34:18.670 --> 2:34:20.789
<v Speaker 7>if that's the last election when they served the notice

2:34:20.870 --> 2:34:23.550
<v Speaker 7>or the last election, like at the time that they

2:34:23.590 --> 2:34:25.629
<v Speaker 7>published it. I'm wondering if that's why they published it

2:34:25.650 --> 2:34:28.430
<v Speaker 7>on election day, because the turnout was relatively high for

2:34:28.450 --> 2:34:30.880
<v Speaker 7>a midterm election, right? to get a lower number, but

2:34:30.920 --> 2:34:36.189
<v Speaker 7>it will be around 120,000, 130,000 voters that they would

2:34:36.230 --> 2:34:38.869
<v Speaker 7>need to sign that signature to trigger a recall. I

2:34:38.890 --> 2:34:40.890
<v Speaker 7>believe we're still working out if it will be recall

2:34:40.950 --> 2:34:44.150
<v Speaker 7>then election or if it would be recall and election.

2:34:44.170 --> 2:34:48.090
<v Speaker 7>You see what I mean? I'll keep updated on that. Otherwise,

2:34:48.110 --> 2:34:52.330
<v Speaker 7>a fairly predictable and disappointing result in California. We're still

2:34:52.450 --> 2:34:56.840
<v Speaker 7>waiting on On LA mare, it's very close right now.

2:34:57.520 --> 2:34:59.570
<v Speaker 7>The last I saw it was like 51 to 49.

2:34:59.570 --> 2:35:02.150
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if anyone's been looking at it like

2:35:02.209 --> 2:35:03.310
<v Speaker 7>while we've been recording.

2:35:04.010 --> 2:35:08.990
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the same. There's about like a 17,000 vote

2:35:09.110 --> 2:35:13.220
<v Speaker 1>difference with still almost half a million votes to come in.

2:35:13.580 --> 2:35:13.840
<v Speaker 4>Right.

2:35:14.280 --> 2:35:18.199
<v Speaker 7>That's ramen leading bass, which would be a major upset

2:35:18.300 --> 2:35:20.199
<v Speaker 7>for the corporate dem contingent.

2:35:20.220 --> 2:35:21.180
<v Speaker 3>Wait, did you say ramen is leading?

2:35:21.200 --> 2:35:21.340
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:35:22.170 --> 2:35:23.570
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Rahman is leading. Correct.

2:35:23.590 --> 2:35:24.170
<v Speaker 3>Oh, wow.

2:35:24.510 --> 2:35:25.609
<v Speaker 1>By 17,000 votes.

2:35:26.590 --> 2:35:26.890
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:35:27.430 --> 2:35:29.230
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, yeah. It looked a lot better for Bass

2:35:29.250 --> 2:35:32.610
<v Speaker 3>when we went to bed last night. Yeah, I didn't check. Okay,

2:35:32.709 --> 2:35:36.490
<v Speaker 3>that's good. So, yeah, that will be a big win

2:35:36.690 --> 2:35:37.910
<v Speaker 3>for the LA DSA.

2:35:38.170 --> 2:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully we'll know by Thanksgiving, California.

2:35:44.440 --> 2:35:46.099
<v Speaker 3>We'll see.

2:35:47.660 --> 2:35:52.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, but it will be Rahman winning LA... would be

2:35:52.280 --> 2:35:56.300
<v Speaker 7>a really interesting, like we've got Mandami in New York, right?

2:35:56.360 --> 2:35:59.470
<v Speaker 7>Like seeing the two, I think the two most popular

2:35:59.490 --> 2:36:03.050
<v Speaker 7>cities in the US, I would imagine, going both to

2:36:03.070 --> 2:36:05.869
<v Speaker 7>DSA mares, I think would set a really interesting trajectory

2:36:05.890 --> 2:36:06.710
<v Speaker 7>going into 2028.

2:36:06.709 --> 2:36:06.910
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:36:07.470 --> 2:36:10.650
<v Speaker 3>I can bring some on the ground reporting too. I

2:36:10.690 --> 2:36:13.959
<v Speaker 3>stopped by the DSA thing in Portland last night and

2:36:15.120 --> 2:36:19.150
<v Speaker 3>there's some speculation about them trying to run Mitch for mayor,

2:36:19.470 --> 2:36:22.610
<v Speaker 3>Mitch Green for mayor, which is, who knows if that's

2:36:22.670 --> 2:36:23.800
<v Speaker 3>even a good idea at all.

2:36:24.780 --> 2:36:28.160
<v Speaker 7>No, I think similarly in San Diego, who will we

2:36:28.180 --> 2:36:33.920
<v Speaker 7>get if they recall Todd Gloria? This DSA local politics

2:36:34.400 --> 2:36:36.820
<v Speaker 7>running on economic issues and local issues has been a

2:36:37.379 --> 2:36:38.380
<v Speaker 7>positive pathway for them.

2:36:38.920 --> 2:36:41.240
<v Speaker 1>This is something we'll talk a lot about probably these

2:36:41.280 --> 2:36:45.060
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks, is what the left should do or

2:36:45.100 --> 2:36:48.879
<v Speaker 1>what the left is doing. Now that Democrats have this majority,

2:36:49.400 --> 2:36:53.540
<v Speaker 1>how can people ensure that Democrats will actually do things

2:36:53.560 --> 2:36:56.340
<v Speaker 1>that are useful once they have this majority? This will

2:36:56.360 --> 2:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>be kind of an ongoing discussion these next few months

2:36:59.800 --> 2:37:01.039
<v Speaker 1>and years, frankly.

2:37:01.879 --> 2:37:04.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the immediate thing that needs to happen, and

2:37:04.480 --> 2:37:07.480
<v Speaker 2>we've already had a couple of newly elected House members

2:37:08.200 --> 2:37:11.090
<v Speaker 2>make comments along the lines of like, lawyer up to

2:37:11.190 --> 2:37:14.570
<v Speaker 2>members of the Trump administration. And that's what I want

2:37:14.590 --> 2:37:18.160
<v Speaker 2>to see immediately is investigations, right? I want to see investigations.

2:37:18.260 --> 2:37:21.380
<v Speaker 2>I want to see attempts at impeaching like figures, even

2:37:21.420 --> 2:37:23.860
<v Speaker 2>if they don't go after Trump himself. I want to

2:37:23.900 --> 2:37:29.949
<v Speaker 2>see like a dogged and vicious attempt to enact consequences.

2:37:30.430 --> 2:37:34.830
<v Speaker 2>for like Doge, for Pete Hegseth, for people in the DOJ,

2:37:34.890 --> 2:37:38.640
<v Speaker 2>for ICE, like whatever they can do. And they'll be limited, obviously,

2:37:38.670 --> 2:37:40.240
<v Speaker 2>while Trump is president. But I want to see that

2:37:40.280 --> 2:37:43.160
<v Speaker 2>shit starting now. Like they need to be striking back.

2:37:43.640 --> 2:37:43.900
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:37:44.340 --> 2:37:46.660
<v Speaker 7>One more on California before I forget. Prop 3 is

2:37:46.680 --> 2:37:50.690
<v Speaker 7>looking good. Prop 3 would extend a tax. The tax

2:37:50.709 --> 2:37:53.410
<v Speaker 7>was enacted in 2012, but it was set to expire

2:37:53.570 --> 2:37:56.629
<v Speaker 7>in 2031. And that is, it has a higher income

2:37:56.690 --> 2:38:03.269
<v Speaker 7>tax for top earners. So it's 10.3% over 360 grand, 12.3%

2:38:03.270 --> 2:38:05.800
<v Speaker 7>over 721 grand individual income.

2:38:06.400 --> 2:38:07.340
<v Speaker 1>So at least we kept that.

2:38:07.680 --> 2:38:11.439
<v Speaker 7>A lot of that is ring fence for public schools

2:38:11.480 --> 2:38:13.339
<v Speaker 7>with a little bit of it going to community colleges.

2:38:13.360 --> 2:38:13.860
<v Speaker 4>Nice.

2:38:14.560 --> 2:38:17.930
<v Speaker 1>So that's a good one. We'll probably discuss like voter

2:38:17.990 --> 2:38:22.010
<v Speaker 1>trends more also in these next few weeks. But I mean, TLDR,

2:38:22.690 --> 2:38:26.230
<v Speaker 1>the whole country shifted towards the Democrats by like 15

2:38:26.230 --> 2:38:28.390
<v Speaker 1>to 30 points, depending on the district.

2:38:28.770 --> 2:38:29.090
<v Speaker 9>Yes.

2:38:29.709 --> 2:38:31.490
<v Speaker 2>And again, I'm sure we'll talk more, but like young

2:38:31.590 --> 2:38:33.949
<v Speaker 2>people seem to, or young men seem to have shifted

2:38:33.950 --> 2:38:37.050
<v Speaker 2>28 points away from Republicans towards Democrats.

2:38:37.370 --> 2:38:40.300
<v Speaker 1>Which is crazy, right? Men 18 to 29 shift 38 points. Jesus. Jesus.

2:38:40.320 --> 2:38:40.420
<v Speaker 5>God.

2:38:40.430 --> 2:38:40.770
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

2:38:46.550 --> 2:38:49.820
<v Speaker 2>And the numbers weren't even that insane last night, but

2:38:49.840 --> 2:38:53.140
<v Speaker 2>that came up on Steve Bannon's radio show or podcast

2:38:53.160 --> 2:38:55.840
<v Speaker 2>when he was doing his election night coverage. And someone

2:38:55.860 --> 2:38:59.400
<v Speaker 2>pointed out to him, actually, a majority of young men

2:38:59.780 --> 2:39:03.369
<v Speaker 2>are voting for the Democrats right now. We've lost them.

2:39:03.490 --> 2:39:06.129
<v Speaker 2>And Bannon said, that can't be right. Those numbers have

2:39:06.150 --> 2:39:08.810
<v Speaker 2>to be wrong. Because he was so convinced that that

2:39:08.890 --> 2:39:12.429
<v Speaker 2>was a permanent majority that they'd gained in 2024, that

2:39:12.470 --> 2:39:13.930
<v Speaker 2>they had captured young men.

2:39:13.950 --> 2:39:14.390
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:39:15.080 --> 2:39:17.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's what all their messaging has been. That's all

2:39:17.140 --> 2:39:20.980
<v Speaker 1>of their fucking based Chungus memes on Twitter. Their whole

2:39:21.040 --> 2:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>comms strategy is like... Yeah, yeah.

2:39:24.760 --> 2:39:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I can't overemphasize a huge number of the most influential

2:39:28.660 --> 2:39:32.709
<v Speaker 2>thought leaders on the conservative right on Twitter convinced themselves

2:39:32.730 --> 2:39:35.670
<v Speaker 2>that a mix of memes about a gender-bent Draco Malfoy

2:39:36.410 --> 2:39:41.360
<v Speaker 2>and fucking Anakin Skywalker had handed them the election. they

2:39:41.400 --> 2:39:43.670
<v Speaker 2>walk themselves into that just in the same way that

2:39:43.690 --> 2:39:46.629
<v Speaker 2>they convince themselves that like the trans stuff Or like

2:39:46.670 --> 2:39:49.870
<v Speaker 2>Harambe was how they won in 2016. And like the

2:39:49.910 --> 2:39:52.250
<v Speaker 2>degree to which they keep convincing. And in 2024, they

2:39:52.290 --> 2:39:54.590
<v Speaker 2>were like, oh, it was the anti-trans messaging that like

2:39:54.690 --> 2:39:56.490
<v Speaker 2>won it for us. The degree to which they convinced

2:39:56.530 --> 2:39:59.900
<v Speaker 2>themselves that whatever this little bubble in Twitter is talking

2:39:59.930 --> 2:40:01.770
<v Speaker 2>about is what the nation gives a shit about.

2:40:01.830 --> 2:40:02.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:40:02.250 --> 2:40:04.660
<v Speaker 2>Has really bit them in the ass this time.

2:40:05.000 --> 2:40:05.240
<v Speaker 8>Right.

2:40:05.320 --> 2:40:08.379
<v Speaker 2>Like they were able to kind of ignore reality because

2:40:08.420 --> 2:40:12.310
<v Speaker 2>in general, things were so bad for any incumbent in 2024.

2:40:12.300 --> 2:40:12.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:40:13.650 --> 2:40:15.670
<v Speaker 2>But there's none of that shielding left.

2:40:15.810 --> 2:40:16.029
<v Speaker 4>Right.

2:40:16.070 --> 2:40:18.830
<v Speaker 2>They're left purely with the consequences of their actions and

2:40:18.850 --> 2:40:22.010
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they have convinced themselves of a fantasy

2:40:22.310 --> 2:40:25.280
<v Speaker 2>that like weirdos on Twitter who spend all of their

2:40:25.320 --> 2:40:31.040
<v Speaker 2>time like AI generating fucking images of characters from 25

2:40:31.040 --> 2:40:34.060
<v Speaker 2>year old movies is like the normal American voter. Like

2:40:34.500 --> 2:40:37.610
<v Speaker 2>that's that's what they did. That's part of why they lost.

2:40:37.629 --> 2:40:42.370
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's pretty bleak. Two years of prefrontal cortex development

2:40:42.390 --> 2:40:45.370
<v Speaker 3>will go a long way for my fellow young white lads,

2:40:45.450 --> 2:40:45.830
<v Speaker 3>I guess.

2:40:46.190 --> 2:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully. Jesus.

2:40:51.379 --> 2:40:55.039
<v Speaker 10>I do want to point out that the NBC exit

2:40:55.060 --> 2:40:57.260
<v Speaker 10>polls are pretty fascinating.

2:40:57.280 --> 2:40:57.350
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

2:40:58.970 --> 2:41:04.090
<v Speaker 10>And if you look at young voters, 18 to 29...

2:41:05.070 --> 2:41:08.790
<v Speaker 10>One third of them said, yes, they consider themselves a

2:41:08.830 --> 2:41:14.550
<v Speaker 10>democratic socialist. And 99% of those people said they were Democrats.

2:41:14.629 --> 2:41:19.529
<v Speaker 10>And only 9% said they were MAGA. So who would

2:41:19.550 --> 2:41:25.300
<v Speaker 10>have predicted that Anakin posting and Malfoy posting would be

2:41:25.700 --> 2:41:27.060
<v Speaker 10>in parallel.

2:41:26.580 --> 2:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>With this massive campaign?

2:41:28.580 --> 2:41:31.459
<v Speaker 10>Socialist swing. I mean, you know, not to be too

2:41:31.520 --> 2:41:35.060
<v Speaker 10>vulgar about it, but basically every older person that gets

2:41:35.220 --> 2:41:40.090
<v Speaker 10>out of the voting base is losing. It's like two

2:41:40.150 --> 2:41:43.650
<v Speaker 10>thirds less of a vote for a socialist. And then

2:41:43.670 --> 2:41:46.900
<v Speaker 10>there's like, you know, many more people who are aging

2:41:47.060 --> 2:41:51.120
<v Speaker 10>in who are leaning socialist. So it is dramatically backfired.

2:41:51.160 --> 2:41:53.960
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it is the entire opposite of what these

2:41:53.980 --> 2:41:57.369
<v Speaker 10>people wanted is truly their, their worst fears coming to pass,

2:41:57.770 --> 2:41:59.570
<v Speaker 10>which is just delightful to watch.

2:42:00.250 --> 2:42:05.090
<v Speaker 1>No, it's 17% of the electorate identified as socialists. Yeah.

2:42:05.290 --> 2:42:09.050
<v Speaker 1>It's wild. It's, it's, it's pretty shocking. And I mean,

2:42:09.090 --> 2:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we would be remiss to mention like the massive swings

2:42:11.580 --> 2:42:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in Hispanic voters, votes towards the Democrats that played a

2:42:14.900 --> 2:42:19.279
<v Speaker 1>big part in Florida, getting Angie Nixon closer and pushing

2:42:19.340 --> 2:42:23.260
<v Speaker 1>Tallarico way over the edge in Texas. Based on everything

2:42:23.320 --> 2:42:25.180
<v Speaker 1>ICE has been doing the past few years, this was

2:42:25.360 --> 2:42:29.650
<v Speaker 1>to be expected, but the extent to which a 28-point swing, really,

2:42:30.190 --> 2:42:33.750
<v Speaker 1>really large. Similarly, I mentioned at the top of the

2:42:33.770 --> 2:42:36.930
<v Speaker 1>episode how Republicans were not able to gain any seats

2:42:37.050 --> 2:42:40.990
<v Speaker 1>from their redistricting measures. And if anything, all the redistricting

2:42:41.030 --> 2:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>did was... enrage people. It really pissed people off. And

2:42:45.520 --> 2:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>generate massive, massive black voter turnout. Yeah. Because Republicans were

2:42:50.700 --> 2:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to take away their ability to vote, to have

2:42:53.940 --> 2:42:57.260
<v Speaker 1>their votes matter. Yeah. And that caused a huge black

2:42:57.300 --> 2:43:00.720
<v Speaker 1>turnout and a big swing also towards Democrats. The other

2:43:00.740 --> 2:43:02.820
<v Speaker 1>thing it did, and this is something that's really funny,

2:43:02.840 --> 2:43:08.419
<v Speaker 1>is because Republicans were trying to make more Trump districts

2:43:08.940 --> 2:43:13.750
<v Speaker 1>what they ended up doing is diluting their own mega

2:43:13.850 --> 2:43:18.609
<v Speaker 1>Trump voters across multiple districts, which then in North Carolina,

2:43:18.910 --> 2:43:22.230
<v Speaker 1>because of the big turnout for, for, for Democrats, me,

2:43:22.270 --> 2:43:25.830
<v Speaker 1>Democrats take districts that were previously like Republican strongholds. So

2:43:25.850 --> 2:43:28.940
<v Speaker 1>it was a complete backfiring of redistricting. They, they diluted

2:43:28.959 --> 2:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>their own support by trying to dilute black people's ability

2:43:33.520 --> 2:43:35.119
<v Speaker 1>to have their votes matter.

2:43:35.940 --> 2:43:39.040
<v Speaker 2>No, the, the, The tighter they clenched their grip, the

2:43:39.060 --> 2:43:42.050
<v Speaker 2>more systems slipped through their fingers, right?

2:43:42.150 --> 2:43:45.290
<v Speaker 1>It's all Star Wars, man. The whole election's Star Wars.

2:43:45.730 --> 2:43:46.490
<v Speaker 3>Yep, yep.

2:43:46.670 --> 2:43:50.449
<v Speaker 2>They convinced themselves, not just that, yeah, this has been

2:43:50.470 --> 2:43:54.800
<v Speaker 2>a permanent realignment, and now we can do anything. And

2:43:54.840 --> 2:43:56.800
<v Speaker 2>we can laugh about it. We can laugh about how

2:43:56.879 --> 2:43:59.410
<v Speaker 2>cruel we're being. We can laugh about the people we're killing.

2:43:59.430 --> 2:44:01.610
<v Speaker 2>We can laugh about the programs we're cutting, the lives

2:44:01.629 --> 2:44:05.670
<v Speaker 2>we're destroying. And no one will ever make us stand

2:44:05.750 --> 2:44:07.570
<v Speaker 2>for it, like accountable for it. They thought they could

2:44:07.590 --> 2:44:09.390
<v Speaker 2>do all this bullshit the past two years and just

2:44:09.410 --> 2:44:11.550
<v Speaker 2>get away with it. That they would not face consequences

2:44:11.610 --> 2:44:11.949
<v Speaker 2>for it.

2:44:12.420 --> 2:44:14.340
<v Speaker 1>Because they thought people loved it. Yeah, they thought they

2:44:14.360 --> 2:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>were locked in forever.

2:44:15.480 --> 2:44:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Because they thought their entire electorate was like 15% of

2:44:18.700 --> 2:44:21.330
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Party who were the craziest people in the world, right?

2:44:22.129 --> 2:44:24.730
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and to an extent they're still fucking doing it.

2:44:24.750 --> 2:44:27.970
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if you saw that Mark Wayne Mullen

2:44:28.910 --> 2:44:31.609
<v Speaker 3>went on Twitter today to post deportations will continue.

2:44:31.709 --> 2:44:33.140
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm sure they will.

2:44:33.160 --> 2:44:38.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they will, right? They will go wild with the

2:44:38.100 --> 2:44:40.560
<v Speaker 3>executive branch shit that they think they can get away with.

2:44:40.879 --> 2:44:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Because why not?

2:44:42.200 --> 2:44:42.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2:44:42.420 --> 2:44:44.500
<v Speaker 2>They're going to go as hard as they think they

2:44:44.540 --> 2:44:47.150
<v Speaker 2>can get away with. The only way it might stop

2:44:47.200 --> 2:44:50.670
<v Speaker 2>and mitigate that is depending on like how afraid they

2:44:50.730 --> 2:44:53.050
<v Speaker 2>are of being prosecuted after this, which I am seeing

2:44:53.070 --> 2:44:54.370
<v Speaker 2>a lot of talk about, quite frankly.

2:44:54.390 --> 2:44:54.470
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:44:55.170 --> 2:44:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And that might do some that might actually mitigate how

2:44:59.170 --> 2:45:00.400
<v Speaker 2>what they're willing to do.

2:45:00.740 --> 2:45:00.980
<v Speaker 9>Right.

2:45:01.080 --> 2:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Like, I don't know.

2:45:02.120 --> 2:45:03.420
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that's been interesting to me is

2:45:03.440 --> 2:45:05.580
<v Speaker 2>that despite all of the talk ahead of this is like, oh,

2:45:05.620 --> 2:45:07.180
<v Speaker 2>is Trump going to are they going to recognize the

2:45:07.220 --> 2:45:09.140
<v Speaker 2>results of the election? You know, are they going to

2:45:09.160 --> 2:45:11.660
<v Speaker 2>be sending troops out to stop this if it goes

2:45:11.700 --> 2:45:14.760
<v Speaker 2>against them? That talk dropped on the right when it

2:45:14.800 --> 2:45:17.260
<v Speaker 2>became clear how big a loss this was.

2:45:17.300 --> 2:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Within hours.

2:45:18.340 --> 2:45:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I feel like a bit of a dumbass with

2:45:21.120 --> 2:45:25.150
<v Speaker 3>my episode yesterday because it was.

2:45:25.070 --> 2:45:25.890
<v Speaker 1>Like, oh, there's going to be.

2:45:26.310 --> 2:45:29.630
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure they'll still come after various things, but it's like, oh, wow.

2:45:29.670 --> 2:45:32.629
<v Speaker 3>It really was just like an absolute blue nami.

2:45:32.670 --> 2:45:33.490
<v Speaker 1>Too big to rip.

2:45:33.530 --> 2:45:33.910
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

2:45:33.970 --> 2:45:34.250
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:45:34.450 --> 2:45:34.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:45:35.030 --> 2:45:37.070
<v Speaker 10>I mean, just to end on that note, we were

2:45:37.110 --> 2:45:39.570
<v Speaker 10>thinking here in Texas that one of the better outcomes

2:45:39.610 --> 2:45:44.090
<v Speaker 10>might actually be Greg Abbott winning and, you know, Tallarico winning,

2:45:44.129 --> 2:45:47.430
<v Speaker 10>because if it's a split vote, they can't cry wolf

2:45:48.410 --> 2:45:50.769
<v Speaker 10>with the same effect. But I mean, we ended up

2:45:50.870 --> 2:45:54.310
<v Speaker 10>getting the same effect, but just through a different mechanism,

2:45:54.330 --> 2:45:55.920
<v Speaker 10>which is amazing.

2:45:56.030 --> 2:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And they all lost.

2:45:57.930 --> 2:46:01.340
<v Speaker 10>If if all politics works. has to be Star Wars.

2:46:01.800 --> 2:46:03.800
<v Speaker 10>I want to see a lot more Glup Shiddos. I

2:46:03.820 --> 2:46:06.160
<v Speaker 10>don't want to see fascist Anakin. I want to know

2:46:06.300 --> 2:46:09.640
<v Speaker 10>who is the Glup Shiddo, the new Glup Shiddo of this.

2:46:09.800 --> 2:46:11.779
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot, you know, a lot of Glup Shiddos

2:46:11.840 --> 2:46:14.420
<v Speaker 2>came out of the woodwork to win it for, for

2:46:14.440 --> 2:46:15.720
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats last night.

2:46:16.830 --> 2:46:20.270
<v Speaker 7>Oops, all Glup Shiddos. Before we go, I do want

2:46:20.290 --> 2:46:26.129
<v Speaker 7>to mention, they're like, just we Glup Shiddos, sorry. You

2:46:26.170 --> 2:46:27.130
<v Speaker 7>some too Glup Shiddo.

2:46:27.530 --> 2:46:27.710
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:46:27.910 --> 2:46:30.650
<v Speaker 3>Um, really good night for indigenous candidates, right?

2:46:30.870 --> 2:46:31.110
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:46:31.420 --> 2:46:35.780
<v Speaker 7>Deb Harland, governor in New Mexico. Nez is looking pretty good.

2:46:35.800 --> 2:46:38.760
<v Speaker 7>Like former chairman of the Navajo nation. It remains to

2:46:38.800 --> 2:46:43.700
<v Speaker 7>be seen in Arizona, right? Peggy, uh, Flanagan in Minnesota.

2:46:43.840 --> 2:46:46.760
<v Speaker 7>Like I was talking to some friends, uh, some, some

2:46:46.810 --> 2:46:52.050
<v Speaker 7>Yaki friends yesterday about like incredible turnout in indigenous communities,

2:46:52.209 --> 2:46:54.490
<v Speaker 7>like at least where they were. Uh, and from what

2:46:54.530 --> 2:46:58.590
<v Speaker 7>I've heard, it was, it was pretty high everywhere. And, uh, Yeah,

2:46:58.640 --> 2:47:02.279
<v Speaker 7>that's good to see. Like Trump has been fucking extensively

2:47:02.459 --> 2:47:04.140
<v Speaker 7>with indigenous people, their.

2:47:04.040 --> 2:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Rights and their land.

2:47:06.180 --> 2:47:09.060
<v Speaker 7>And it's good to see them showing up and it's

2:47:09.080 --> 2:47:11.240
<v Speaker 7>good to see indigenous candidates being returned like at a

2:47:11.260 --> 2:47:11.750
<v Speaker 7>state level.

2:47:12.230 --> 2:47:14.050
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about some of this sort of stuff

2:47:14.070 --> 2:47:16.510
<v Speaker 1>where the Democrats will do next, that kind of thing

2:47:16.810 --> 2:47:19.970
<v Speaker 1>in tomorrow's edition of Executive Disorder, as well as something.

2:47:20.360 --> 2:47:24.369
<v Speaker 1>non-election-related stories to help get a general sense of what's

2:47:24.390 --> 2:47:27.800
<v Speaker 1>going on in the world. But before we close... Steven,

2:47:27.879 --> 2:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>where can people find your work, especially to keep up

2:47:30.320 --> 2:47:34.010
<v Speaker 1>on the politics of Texas? And who sent those fucking mailers?

2:47:34.550 --> 2:47:36.270
<v Speaker 10>God, we are going to get to the bottom of

2:47:36.310 --> 2:47:39.150
<v Speaker 10>those mailers, even if it may not be as consequential.

2:47:39.310 --> 2:47:44.640
<v Speaker 10>To Robert's point, the accountability must continue. We must get

2:47:44.670 --> 2:47:47.260
<v Speaker 10>to the bottom of who is behind that so their

2:47:47.340 --> 2:47:50.060
<v Speaker 10>feet can be held to the fire. You can find

2:47:50.200 --> 2:47:53.480
<v Speaker 10>my reporting often at the Texas Observer. But if you

2:47:53.540 --> 2:47:56.910
<v Speaker 10>just Google my Italian ass name, you can find my website.

2:47:57.530 --> 2:48:00.830
<v Speaker 10>And all of my articles get consolidated there because I

2:48:00.850 --> 2:48:04.610
<v Speaker 10>do write for a few different outlets. And, you know,

2:48:04.629 --> 2:48:07.090
<v Speaker 10>I'm always excited to be on the show with you all.

2:48:07.110 --> 2:48:07.910
<v Speaker 10>So thanks for having me.

2:48:08.790 --> 2:48:09.050
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:48:09.990 --> 2:48:11.590
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for holding Texas down.

2:48:11.610 --> 2:48:15.690
<v Speaker 3>How about you, Kevin? Where can people find your coverage

2:48:15.750 --> 2:48:19.670
<v Speaker 3>of the places with pine trees and rain? Yeah, I'm

2:48:19.930 --> 2:48:22.900
<v Speaker 3>on like all the social media channels at Kevin H.

2:48:22.950 --> 2:48:23.530
<v Speaker 1>Foster.

2:48:23.670 --> 2:48:26.109
<v Speaker 3>And then my sub stack is last week in hell.

2:48:27.020 --> 2:48:30.720
<v Speaker 3>And this week, it's not the most fitting name because

2:48:30.780 --> 2:48:32.830
<v Speaker 3>it seems like things have generally gone okay.

2:48:33.270 --> 2:48:37.429
<v Speaker 1>This week in purgatory. Yeah, this week in purgatory. One

2:48:37.450 --> 2:48:39.709
<v Speaker 1>level up, baby. One level up at a time.

2:48:39.730 --> 2:48:41.430
<v Speaker 3>We're clawing our way out.

2:48:42.790 --> 2:48:45.180
<v Speaker 1>That does it for us here at It Could Happen Here.

2:48:45.820 --> 2:48:48.100
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you tomorrow for another episode of Executive Disorder.

2:48:49.080 --> 2:48:50.039
<v Speaker 1>We reported the news.

2:48:52.160 --> 2:48:52.959
<v Speaker 5>We reported the news.

2:49:04.890 --> 2:49:08.939
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to It Could Happen Here, Executive Disorder, our weekly

2:49:08.980 --> 2:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>newscast covering what's happening in the White House, the crumbling world,

2:49:12.140 --> 2:49:15.270
<v Speaker 1>and what this means for you. I'm Garrison Davis. Today

2:49:15.370 --> 2:49:20.230
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by Robert Evans and number one electoralist Mia Wong,

2:49:20.830 --> 2:49:24.320
<v Speaker 1>who was so excited about the results that she couldn't

2:49:24.350 --> 2:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>even make it to our episode yesterday. She was too pumped.

2:49:27.640 --> 2:49:32.870
<v Speaker 1>We couldn't contain her. up all night. Not even a joke.

2:49:32.910 --> 2:49:33.750
<v Speaker 8>I actually was.

2:49:33.770 --> 2:49:36.330
<v Speaker 2>Well, she was also she votes in 11 or 12

2:49:36.330 --> 2:49:38.970
<v Speaker 2>states every election. You just can't stop her from voting.

2:49:39.290 --> 2:49:42.570
<v Speaker 1>I'm from Illinois. I was raised on vote early, vote often.

2:49:47.410 --> 2:49:47.930
<v Speaker 3>Good stuff.

2:49:48.750 --> 2:49:50.560
<v Speaker 1>We do need to acknowledge that I think out of

2:49:50.600 --> 2:49:53.980
<v Speaker 1>everyone's midterm predictions, Mia's was the most correct.

2:49:54.520 --> 2:49:57.910
<v Speaker 8>Oh, I want to grandstand for five seconds, which is

2:49:57.970 --> 2:50:01.330
<v Speaker 8>very funny that I am the least electoral person. And

2:50:01.790 --> 2:50:08.080
<v Speaker 8>you can pull the tape in early 2025, like March 2025.

2:50:08.080 --> 2:50:12.620
<v Speaker 8>I am pulling the election results from like rural Iowa

2:50:12.959 --> 2:50:16.160
<v Speaker 8>and going the Democrats are going to win by 20.

2:50:16.160 --> 2:50:17.410
<v Speaker 8>You can pull the tape on it.

2:50:17.990 --> 2:50:18.510
<v Speaker 1>I was there.

2:50:18.610 --> 2:50:19.140
<v Speaker 3>Please sit on me.

2:50:20.980 --> 2:50:22.250
<v Speaker 1>See, I respect that.

2:50:22.330 --> 2:50:24.590
<v Speaker 2>I didn't even have the courage to really make any predictions.

2:50:24.650 --> 2:50:26.870
<v Speaker 2>After the last, like, three elections, I was like, I

2:50:26.910 --> 2:50:28.890
<v Speaker 2>don't know, man. Maybe the polls are right. Who the

2:50:28.930 --> 2:50:30.810
<v Speaker 2>fuck knows?

2:50:30.970 --> 2:50:34.580
<v Speaker 8>My thing on that genuinely was that, like, I was

2:50:34.620 --> 2:50:37.580
<v Speaker 8>doing the polls were cucked angle, which is that the polls,

2:50:37.620 --> 2:50:39.580
<v Speaker 8>because the thing with the polls is the polls were

2:50:39.620 --> 2:50:43.280
<v Speaker 8>all using the 2024 demographic stuff for, like, ages.

2:50:43.410 --> 2:50:44.990
<v Speaker 1>And then they tried to modify it afterwards.

2:50:45.010 --> 2:50:49.240
<v Speaker 8>But it's like, If you go outside, you can tell that,

2:50:49.540 --> 2:50:52.300
<v Speaker 8>talk to any person in any state, you can be like,

2:50:52.340 --> 2:50:55.730
<v Speaker 8>this is not 2024. Even by the time you're hitting

2:50:55.830 --> 2:50:59.170
<v Speaker 8>early 2025, everything is just different.

2:50:59.570 --> 2:51:01.190
<v Speaker 2>Oh, no. I mean, even out in the country, I

2:51:01.209 --> 2:51:03.470
<v Speaker 2>spent a lot of time in rural Oregon, and the

2:51:03.510 --> 2:51:05.310
<v Speaker 2>Trump signs have largely disappeared.

2:51:05.390 --> 2:51:07.590
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. You've been seeing that a lot. A lot of

2:51:07.629 --> 2:51:10.210
<v Speaker 1>reports from people who live out in the country noting

2:51:10.270 --> 2:51:13.490
<v Speaker 1>that The Trump banners are no longer on the hay bales.

2:51:13.810 --> 2:51:14.109
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:51:14.750 --> 2:51:16.410
<v Speaker 8>And I think we're going to be doing a full

2:51:16.450 --> 2:51:20.890
<v Speaker 8>episode in like a couple of weeks on... how Trump

2:51:20.930 --> 2:51:23.830
<v Speaker 8>sort of systemically went through and pissed off all of

2:51:23.890 --> 2:51:30.310
<v Speaker 8>those people individually, because it's a truly like a masterwork

2:51:30.720 --> 2:51:33.039
<v Speaker 8>in electioneering. The only person I've ever seen do it

2:51:33.060 --> 2:51:36.260
<v Speaker 8>like this was former Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot, who just

2:51:36.660 --> 2:51:39.660
<v Speaker 8>went like row by row down every single one of

2:51:39.700 --> 2:51:44.590
<v Speaker 8>her constituencies and pissed them all off individually. Oh, it's

2:51:44.650 --> 2:51:45.350
<v Speaker 8>incredible stuff.

2:51:46.100 --> 2:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>This episode, we are covering the week of October 28th

2:51:49.200 --> 2:51:54.570
<v Speaker 1>to November 5th. Yesterday, we covered the election results in

2:51:54.600 --> 2:51:58.330
<v Speaker 1>a special edition of Executive Disorder. Today, we will be

2:51:58.390 --> 2:52:02.610
<v Speaker 1>covering reactions to those results from the Democrats and the Republicans,

2:52:02.730 --> 2:52:06.250
<v Speaker 1>as well as some other news stories. We'll start with

2:52:06.330 --> 2:52:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a few small things at the top. Yeah.

2:52:09.890 --> 2:52:12.970
<v Speaker 8>And I promise this is not entirely an election episode.

2:52:13.010 --> 2:52:15.459
<v Speaker 8>If you stick around long enough, you will get a

2:52:15.680 --> 2:52:19.480
<v Speaker 8>one million person wildcat general strike. So hang in there,

2:52:19.520 --> 2:52:23.020
<v Speaker 8>people who are sick of elections. Help is coming.

2:52:24.860 --> 2:52:29.420
<v Speaker 1>Last week, Mayor Mamdani quietly canceled New York City's own

2:52:29.560 --> 2:52:34.650
<v Speaker 1>Cop City, a $ 225 million, quote, public safety academy that

2:52:34.690 --> 2:52:37.580
<v Speaker 1>was slated to be built in Queens. It's something that

2:52:37.620 --> 2:52:40.570
<v Speaker 1>Zoran talked about a few times during the mayoral primary,

2:52:40.650 --> 2:52:43.150
<v Speaker 1>but has since then kind of receded into the background.

2:52:43.170 --> 2:52:46.410
<v Speaker 1>In an interview before the launch of his campaign, Zoran

2:52:46.470 --> 2:52:49.349
<v Speaker 1>told the outlet City &amp; State, quote, we do not

2:52:49.450 --> 2:52:52.949
<v Speaker 1>need to spend more than $ 200 million on a cop

2:52:52.990 --> 2:52:56.550
<v Speaker 1>city training facility in Queens. Good for him. And last week,

2:52:56.850 --> 2:52:59.970
<v Speaker 1>the mayor's office confirmed this plan is no longer going through.

2:52:59.990 --> 2:53:02.379
<v Speaker 2>Look, I've watched the NYPD at work.

2:53:02.730 --> 2:53:03.330
<v Speaker 1>A few times.

2:53:03.450 --> 2:53:05.470
<v Speaker 2>And how much training do you need to teach guys

2:53:05.510 --> 2:53:07.650
<v Speaker 2>to sit in a van playing Candy Crush on their

2:53:07.690 --> 2:53:11.050
<v Speaker 2>phone until it's time to maybe go out and hit people? Like,

2:53:11.110 --> 2:53:12.530
<v Speaker 2>how much training does that really take?

2:53:12.570 --> 2:53:14.670
<v Speaker 8>It requires a lot of training to kettle people on

2:53:14.709 --> 2:53:16.410
<v Speaker 8>the same bridge every single year.

2:53:16.890 --> 2:53:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, you're right.

2:53:18.350 --> 2:53:21.939
<v Speaker 1>Of course, of course. Do you need $ 200 million for that?

2:53:22.780 --> 2:53:26.720
<v Speaker 1>If Mamdani's promises a few weeks ago would come to fruition...

2:53:26.879 --> 2:53:29.140
<v Speaker 1>We should also be getting an update on the timeline

2:53:29.160 --> 2:53:32.769
<v Speaker 1>of the SRG dismantling in the next few days to

2:53:32.790 --> 2:53:35.870
<v Speaker 1>weeks as well. It has been a good week for

2:53:35.910 --> 2:53:39.310
<v Speaker 1>Mamdani overall. On Wednesday, an appeals court ruled that Mamdani

2:53:39.330 --> 2:53:41.870
<v Speaker 1>can go ahead with the pita tear tax on second

2:53:41.890 --> 2:53:45.810
<v Speaker 1>homes worth millions of dollars after a Staten Island judge

2:53:46.890 --> 2:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>tried to halt the rollout a few months ago. So

2:53:50.180 --> 2:53:52.940
<v Speaker 1>that will be going ahead. And in fact, when Mamdani

2:53:53.080 --> 2:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>was on CNN talking about the election results, Jake Tapper

2:53:56.420 --> 2:53:59.750
<v Speaker 1>was made a snide remark about the New York Knicks,

2:54:00.430 --> 2:54:04.380
<v Speaker 1>and Mamdani's rebuttal was bragging about him paying the PETA

2:54:04.400 --> 2:54:08.500
<v Speaker 1>tier tax. So, fuck you, Jake Tapper. Good bit, good bit.

2:54:10.940 --> 2:54:14.580
<v Speaker 1>Last Friday, dock workers held a one-day strike action across

2:54:14.580 --> 2:54:18.779
<v Speaker 1>22 countries and more than 100 ports in protest against

2:54:18.959 --> 2:54:22.850
<v Speaker 1>war and arms shipments. A coalition of unions released a

2:54:22.850 --> 2:54:26.269
<v Speaker 1>statement beforehand, quote, Ports must not be used for the

2:54:26.330 --> 2:54:31.090
<v Speaker 1>transport of weapons, ammunition, military equipment, and troops. Dock workers

2:54:31.150 --> 2:54:34.450
<v Speaker 1>do not work for war. This action was originally called

2:54:34.470 --> 2:54:39.890
<v Speaker 1>by the European Dock Workers Council, with unions in France, Italy, Greece, Spain, Turkey,

2:54:39.990 --> 2:54:40.650
<v Speaker 1>and Morocco.

2:54:40.670 --> 2:54:43.400
<v Speaker 8>This has been something that's been a very big issue

2:54:43.430 --> 2:54:46.320
<v Speaker 8>for European dock workers for a long time. I mean,

2:54:46.360 --> 2:54:50.360
<v Speaker 8>you can go back and look at like 2010, you

2:54:50.780 --> 2:54:53.040
<v Speaker 8>can find dock workers doing strikes about this. This is

2:54:53.080 --> 2:54:56.320
<v Speaker 8>something that Yeah, so this is a long-running concern of

2:54:56.379 --> 2:55:00.260
<v Speaker 8>European dock workers, particularly in Italy, Greece as well, and

2:55:00.340 --> 2:55:03.400
<v Speaker 8>obviously France. And it's good to see more of it.

2:55:04.280 --> 2:55:06.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a nice little kind of warm-up action. This

2:55:06.470 --> 2:55:09.590
<v Speaker 1>is just a one-day action. If this gets extended to

2:55:09.610 --> 2:55:14.270
<v Speaker 1>a few days, it could really clog the gears. And

2:55:14.310 --> 2:55:17.660
<v Speaker 1>so it's nice to see this happen, and hopefully more

2:55:17.690 --> 2:55:20.420
<v Speaker 1>things like it will happen in the future with some

2:55:20.440 --> 2:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>more organizing. We will now turn to a special segment

2:55:24.600 --> 2:55:30.609
<v Speaker 1>by James Stout. Take a listen. Hey, everyone. It's James.

2:55:31.070 --> 2:55:35.490
<v Speaker 7>Tragically, I lost a tooth to some Skittles about a

2:55:35.510 --> 2:55:38.050
<v Speaker 7>year ago. And the thing that was on top of

2:55:38.070 --> 2:55:40.050
<v Speaker 7>my tooth has fallen out again. So while my friends

2:55:40.170 --> 2:55:42.900
<v Speaker 7>are recording, I am having someone drill into my face.

2:55:42.920 --> 2:55:46.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm paying half a month's wages for the privilege. So

2:55:46.400 --> 2:55:48.439
<v Speaker 7>I can't join them. But I did want to update

2:55:48.459 --> 2:55:50.360
<v Speaker 7>you on a couple of non-election things as well as

2:55:50.440 --> 2:55:52.220
<v Speaker 7>one election thing. So let's start with the election thing.

2:55:52.879 --> 2:55:55.840
<v Speaker 7>Last week, I said there were 53 counties in California.

2:55:55.860 --> 2:55:58.190
<v Speaker 7>I just read the number that I had typed wrong.

2:55:58.230 --> 2:56:00.550
<v Speaker 7>There were 58. Also, I wanted to talk a little

2:56:00.590 --> 2:56:03.690
<v Speaker 7>bit more about California and specifically those.

2:56:03.350 --> 2:56:04.230
<v Speaker 3>20,000 votes, right?

2:56:04.690 --> 2:56:09.420
<v Speaker 7>The DOJ attempted to take their request to sequester ballots

2:56:09.459 --> 2:56:12.720
<v Speaker 7>to the Supreme Court of the United States, which just

2:56:12.740 --> 2:56:15.420
<v Speaker 7>like other courts did not cooperate, right? John Sauer, the

2:56:15.440 --> 2:56:19.279
<v Speaker 7>Solicitor General, wrote, quote, Once California commingles the challenge ballots

2:56:19.320 --> 2:56:21.230
<v Speaker 7>with lawful ones, there is no way to get the

2:56:21.260 --> 2:56:24.170
<v Speaker 7>challenge ballots back. The only way to preserve the District

2:56:24.209 --> 2:56:26.450
<v Speaker 7>Court's ability to grant relief to the United States to

2:56:26.530 --> 2:56:29.450
<v Speaker 7>offer a full merit to proceeding, therefore, is to segregate

2:56:29.490 --> 2:56:33.029
<v Speaker 7>the challenge ballots. That remedy would not cause undue hardship

2:56:33.050 --> 2:56:36.250
<v Speaker 7>to California. The Supreme Court disagreed. They turned down the

2:56:36.290 --> 2:56:41.150
<v Speaker 7>government's request with a very brief unsigned 9-0 order. I

2:56:41.170 --> 2:56:43.839
<v Speaker 7>think this is just illustration, right, that the government threw

2:56:44.000 --> 2:56:46.879
<v Speaker 7>everything it had at suppressing the vote in this election

2:56:46.920 --> 2:56:51.470
<v Speaker 7>and did not succeed. Even on election day, ICE posted

2:56:51.570 --> 2:56:54.090
<v Speaker 7>that HSI had arrested a Canadian man who they claimed

2:56:54.129 --> 2:56:57.690
<v Speaker 7>had registered to vote. Again, this is an attempt at

2:56:57.750 --> 2:57:01.890
<v Speaker 7>making people afraid or intimidated to vote that very obviously

2:57:01.930 --> 2:57:05.929
<v Speaker 7>did not succeed anywhere in the United States in numbers

2:57:05.970 --> 2:57:10.840
<v Speaker 7>large enough to influence the outcome of the election. moving

2:57:11.180 --> 2:57:13.820
<v Speaker 7>on from the united states i wanted to talk briefly

2:57:13.840 --> 2:57:16.400
<v Speaker 7>about iran the united states right before the election made

2:57:16.440 --> 2:57:19.270
<v Speaker 7>what it called a defensive strike which trump then went

2:57:19.350 --> 2:57:25.150
<v Speaker 7>on to say was against iranian air defenses evidently it's

2:57:25.190 --> 2:57:27.850
<v Speaker 7>very hard to make a defensive strike against someone else's

2:57:28.209 --> 2:57:31.260
<v Speaker 7>air defenses right Unclear if that was a different strike

2:57:31.300 --> 2:57:34.400
<v Speaker 7>or not, but Trump said they watched Iran rebuild their

2:57:34.440 --> 2:57:36.900
<v Speaker 7>air defences and then destroyed them, which is not a

2:57:37.200 --> 2:57:41.980
<v Speaker 7>defensive action. Talking of Iranian air defences, Iran took down

2:57:42.500 --> 2:57:50.070
<v Speaker 7>another MQ-9 Reaper drone. with what's called a 358. 358,

2:57:50.070 --> 2:57:53.570
<v Speaker 7>I think we've talked about them on Executive Disorder before.

2:57:53.870 --> 2:57:56.650
<v Speaker 7>They released a video in this case, but a 358

2:57:56.650 --> 2:58:03.160
<v Speaker 7>is a loitering munition. It's like an anti-drone drone. It's

2:58:03.240 --> 2:58:07.960
<v Speaker 7>not capable of taking down jets. I mean, it's capable

2:58:07.980 --> 2:58:09.440
<v Speaker 7>of doing it, it's just very unlikely it will be

2:58:09.560 --> 2:58:12.359
<v Speaker 7>able to, right? But it works very well for these drones.

2:58:12.810 --> 2:58:15.150
<v Speaker 7>Iran has taken down a number of drones with these.

2:58:15.690 --> 2:58:19.269
<v Speaker 7>They work in a similar way to the drones that

2:58:19.310 --> 2:58:23.369
<v Speaker 7>the Kurdish freedom movement was using to shoot down Turkish

2:58:23.830 --> 2:58:27.390
<v Speaker 7>Bayraktar and Akinchi drones. In fact, the SDF took out

2:58:27.650 --> 2:58:31.750
<v Speaker 7>a US drone, presumably by accident, in Syria after the

2:58:31.790 --> 2:58:35.510
<v Speaker 7>Assad regime collapsed. So not the first time these US

2:58:35.530 --> 2:58:39.269
<v Speaker 7>drones have run into these kinds of loitering munitions. But

2:58:39.390 --> 2:58:43.310
<v Speaker 7>it's indicative that the 358s are pretty cheap compared to

2:58:43.390 --> 2:58:45.810
<v Speaker 7>more advanced air defense systems. And as I said, they're

2:58:45.830 --> 2:58:48.390
<v Speaker 7>not the best solution for fast attack jets.

2:58:48.470 --> 2:58:50.010
<v Speaker 1>But it is one of.

2:58:50.010 --> 2:58:55.110
<v Speaker 7>These things that the Iranians have developed that have been

2:58:55.209 --> 2:58:56.879
<v Speaker 7>very effective for the money.

2:58:57.110 --> 2:58:59.099
<v Speaker 3>The other one being their Shaheed drones.

2:58:59.680 --> 2:59:01.779
<v Speaker 7>And they have been able to take out a number

2:59:01.840 --> 2:59:05.320
<v Speaker 7>of United States attack drones with these, in this case,

2:59:05.440 --> 2:59:08.480
<v Speaker 7>the MQ-9 Reaper drone. that they say they shot down

2:59:08.540 --> 2:59:09.680
<v Speaker 7>over the Strait of Hormuz.

2:59:10.400 --> 2:59:11.179
<v Speaker 3>It's a little unclear.

2:59:11.200 --> 2:59:14.040
<v Speaker 7>You can't see in the footage where they shot it down,

2:59:14.080 --> 2:59:17.120
<v Speaker 7>but nonetheless, I think it's reportable. Staying on the topic

2:59:17.360 --> 2:59:24.350
<v Speaker 7>of drones, the publication Intelligence Online is reporting that they

2:59:24.370 --> 2:59:27.810
<v Speaker 7>have seen intelligence from a Myanmar armed resistance group that

2:59:27.850 --> 2:59:31.310
<v Speaker 7>has identified four Russian drone operators deployed on a long-term

2:59:31.330 --> 2:59:34.629
<v Speaker 7>basis with garrisons of the Myanmar armed forces in southern

2:59:34.730 --> 2:59:38.959
<v Speaker 7>Shan state. This has been a thing for a while, right?

2:59:39.360 --> 2:59:45.050
<v Speaker 7>There have been Russian drone ops, Russian trainers deployed with

2:59:45.070 --> 2:59:48.590
<v Speaker 7>the Tatmadaw, along with the Tatmadaw using Russian technology for

2:59:48.629 --> 2:59:51.250
<v Speaker 7>quite some time, right? But it's interesting that these guys

2:59:51.310 --> 2:59:54.119
<v Speaker 7>are deployed long term and they seem to be rather

2:59:54.140 --> 2:59:58.010
<v Speaker 7>than training, actually operating drones. If you remember the fall

2:59:58.030 --> 3:00:00.030
<v Speaker 7>of the Assad regime, there were Russian drone ops there

3:00:00.070 --> 3:00:02.990
<v Speaker 7>as well. Some of those guys had paid a bribe

3:00:03.310 --> 3:00:05.550
<v Speaker 7>or had got this kind of posting that took them

3:00:05.590 --> 3:00:08.020
<v Speaker 7>out of the meat grinder in Ukraine and they were

3:00:08.040 --> 3:00:12.340
<v Speaker 7>doing these colonial wars for Russia, right? That's what this is.

3:00:12.360 --> 3:00:17.020
<v Speaker 7>This is imperialism by another name. The Tatmadaw has benefited

3:00:17.230 --> 3:00:22.449
<v Speaker 7>heavily from Chinese and Russian drone technology and drone tactics, right?

3:00:22.490 --> 3:00:26.020
<v Speaker 7>They've been using drones much more effectively in the last,

3:00:26.040 --> 3:00:29.280
<v Speaker 7>I guess, year or so than they previously had. And

3:00:29.379 --> 3:00:31.740
<v Speaker 7>so it's not surprising to see. We also saw, like,

3:00:32.060 --> 3:00:36.560
<v Speaker 7>sometimes you'll see guys with Wagner patches, like the, what

3:00:36.600 --> 3:00:39.800
<v Speaker 7>is now Africa Corps, right? The Russian private military contractor thing.

3:00:40.459 --> 3:00:44.490
<v Speaker 7>In that case, I'm pretty sure that at least in

3:00:44.620 --> 3:00:49.050
<v Speaker 7>my experience, that's just them thinking that they're cool and

3:00:49.670 --> 3:00:52.170
<v Speaker 7>In the same way that you will see PDF guys

3:00:52.209 --> 3:00:56.030
<v Speaker 7>sometimes with like a United States flags on their plate carriers,

3:00:56.110 --> 3:00:58.070
<v Speaker 7>because that is an aesthetic and a thing they look

3:00:58.150 --> 3:01:00.890
<v Speaker 7>up to, right? The US special forces guys, or you'll

3:01:00.910 --> 3:01:04.369
<v Speaker 7>see like special forces tabs used. You'll see guys with

3:01:04.430 --> 3:01:06.310
<v Speaker 7>things that look like Ranger tabs, but 99% of the

3:01:06.350 --> 3:01:07.770
<v Speaker 7>time that's from the Free Burma Rangers.

3:01:07.830 --> 3:01:08.500
<v Speaker 3>That's a different thing.

3:01:09.190 --> 3:01:13.300
<v Speaker 7>So it's nonetheless interesting to document the growing links between

3:01:13.360 --> 3:01:16.660
<v Speaker 7>Russia and the Tatmadaw. I would really love if some

3:01:16.720 --> 3:01:19.120
<v Speaker 7>of the solidarity that we've seen with the people of

3:01:19.240 --> 3:01:21.900
<v Speaker 7>Ukraine could be also directed to the people of Myanmar.

3:01:22.500 --> 3:01:24.280
<v Speaker 7>I can't help but think if they were white and

3:01:24.340 --> 3:01:26.280
<v Speaker 7>European and they were fighting for their freedom, they might

3:01:26.320 --> 3:01:27.959
<v Speaker 7>get a little more support from the rest of the world.

3:01:28.660 --> 3:01:29.580
<v Speaker 3>That's what I got for you this week.

3:01:31.620 --> 3:01:34.439
<v Speaker 1>We are back. Now, I said this wouldn't be an

3:01:34.480 --> 3:01:37.980
<v Speaker 1>election result episode, and that is mostly true. But I

3:01:38.020 --> 3:01:42.020
<v Speaker 1>will update a few races because there are still two

3:01:42.100 --> 3:01:47.250
<v Speaker 1>races yet to be called Alaska and Mississippi. An Alaska Democrat,

3:01:47.290 --> 3:01:48.090
<v Speaker 1>Mary Peltola.

3:01:48.129 --> 3:01:51.689
<v Speaker 2>Yes, let's engage in some racism here. I forgot to

3:01:51.709 --> 3:01:52.850
<v Speaker 2>do that joke yesterday.

3:01:53.090 --> 3:01:56.949
<v Speaker 1>Senator Dan Sullivan, the Republican incumbent, not going to acknowledge

3:01:56.970 --> 3:02:01.850
<v Speaker 1>that at all. Adam, leave it in. Right now, Peltola

3:02:01.980 --> 3:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is up 600 votes with 25% of the vote left.

3:02:07.240 --> 3:02:10.340
<v Speaker 1>So this still might go to ranked choice instant runoff

3:02:10.459 --> 3:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if she doesn't reach 50% of the vote or more

3:02:12.540 --> 3:02:16.140
<v Speaker 1>than 50% of the vote. Still a lot of votes

3:02:16.160 --> 3:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to be counted. We'll probably know more in a few days.

3:02:18.879 --> 3:02:21.030
<v Speaker 1>It's possible she does just pull ahead and this doesn't

3:02:21.270 --> 3:02:25.450
<v Speaker 1>go to instant runoff. We will see. The biggest, biggest surprise,

3:02:25.490 --> 3:02:30.130
<v Speaker 1>as I said yesterday, Mississippi with Scott Colum against Sidney Hyde-Smith,

3:02:30.170 --> 3:02:34.820
<v Speaker 1>the Republican incumbent. Colum is a little less than 2,000

3:02:34.820 --> 3:02:38.439
<v Speaker 1>votes ahead. So he has gained in the past 24

3:02:38.440 --> 3:02:43.119
<v Speaker 1>hours with over 40,000 estimated votes yet to be counted.

3:02:43.840 --> 3:02:47.779
<v Speaker 1>These are largely provisional or mail-in ballots, which, according to

3:02:47.800 --> 3:02:51.980
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi law, can be counted till Saturday. These are expected

3:02:52.020 --> 3:02:55.019
<v Speaker 1>to go mostly in Colm's favor, but this is still

3:02:55.100 --> 3:02:59.940
<v Speaker 1>a super close, super close race, right? This is like 49%

3:02:59.940 --> 3:03:03.190
<v Speaker 1>to 48.9%. Very close, but he is expected to pull ahead.

3:03:04.150 --> 3:03:05.709
<v Speaker 8>I wanted to talk a little bit about this as

3:03:05.750 --> 3:03:11.090
<v Speaker 8>like a very funny sort of revenge grudge match, which

3:03:11.310 --> 3:03:14.500
<v Speaker 8>is that Scott Column was nominated to be a federal

3:03:14.550 --> 3:03:20.250
<v Speaker 8>judge by Joe Biden in 2023. But there's a weird

3:03:20.330 --> 3:03:25.510
<v Speaker 8>convoluted system where the senator from a state can block

3:03:25.550 --> 3:03:29.930
<v Speaker 8>a nomination for federal judge appointments in their state. And

3:03:30.550 --> 3:03:35.390
<v Speaker 8>the person who blocked that was Senator Hyde-Smith.

3:03:35.870 --> 3:03:36.290
<v Speaker 1>Uh-huh.

3:03:37.220 --> 3:03:40.970
<v Speaker 8>And this apparently was because Colum was like too pro-trans

3:03:41.010 --> 3:03:43.150
<v Speaker 8>and also an unhinged thing about him getting money from

3:03:43.190 --> 3:03:49.830
<v Speaker 8>George Soros. So this has been a years in the

3:03:49.910 --> 3:03:54.220
<v Speaker 8>making revenge plot to some extent by Colum, who is

3:03:54.250 --> 3:03:59.300
<v Speaker 8>now about to beat in Mississippi, the senator who blocked

3:03:59.320 --> 3:04:03.500
<v Speaker 8>his appointment for being too pro-trans in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.

3:04:03.600 --> 3:04:07.650
<v Speaker 1>That is pretty wild. That's great. It's amazing. I have

3:04:07.730 --> 3:04:10.629
<v Speaker 1>seen some sort of liberal pundits trying to paint this

3:04:10.690 --> 3:04:14.129
<v Speaker 1>as an example of why it's better to nominate centrists

3:04:14.190 --> 3:04:16.170
<v Speaker 1>or moderates, because otherwise there'd be no way for a

3:04:16.170 --> 3:04:20.820
<v Speaker 1>Democrat to win Mississippi. People calling him a centrist just

3:04:20.879 --> 3:04:24.439
<v Speaker 1>are not familiar with him or his platform. This is

3:04:24.840 --> 3:04:28.970
<v Speaker 1>a firm anti-APAC Democrat running a lot of the same

3:04:29.020 --> 3:04:33.689
<v Speaker 1>economic populism that we've seen across many candidates, including raising

3:04:33.709 --> 3:04:37.550
<v Speaker 1>the federal minimum wage. anti-big tech stuff, like a lot

3:04:37.570 --> 3:04:39.350
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff that I think we're kind of largely

3:04:39.550 --> 3:04:44.379
<v Speaker 1>familiar with, beyond just saying the word affordability, like actual

3:04:45.020 --> 3:04:49.199
<v Speaker 1>policy proposals, not a centrist by any means. And if

3:04:49.220 --> 3:04:52.260
<v Speaker 1>he's prevented from being a judge in part by being

3:04:52.620 --> 3:04:56.849
<v Speaker 1>too pro-trans, then I think that kind of bolsters my argument.

3:04:57.830 --> 3:04:58.430
<v Speaker 1>Very funny.

3:04:58.830 --> 3:05:02.570
<v Speaker 8>Maybe stop from being from being a judge. Apparently not

3:05:02.610 --> 3:05:04.789
<v Speaker 8>stop from being a senator. So that's right.

3:05:04.990 --> 3:05:08.490
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I do also want to mention a few

3:05:08.510 --> 3:05:12.570
<v Speaker 1>of the DSA races a bit more in depth because

3:05:12.590 --> 3:05:15.750
<v Speaker 1>the DSA now has an expanded block of eight representatives

3:05:15.850 --> 3:05:19.910
<v Speaker 1>in the federal office. Rashida Tlaib was reelected in Michigan

3:05:20.070 --> 3:05:22.629
<v Speaker 1>and she'll be joined by a new block of DSA

3:05:22.670 --> 3:05:26.990
<v Speaker 1>House reps, including Donovan McKinney from Michigan, Chris Rabb of Pennsylvania,

3:05:27.330 --> 3:05:32.050
<v Speaker 1>Milat Kiros of Colorado, Angela Gonzalez-Torres from California, which is

3:05:32.110 --> 3:05:34.390
<v Speaker 1>a really solid win here. That one was kind of

3:05:34.410 --> 3:05:37.510
<v Speaker 1>more of a battle district. And of course, Daria Elisa

3:05:37.560 --> 3:05:42.099
<v Speaker 1>Villachavier and Claire Valdez, who joined AOC in representing New York.

3:05:43.360 --> 3:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And so far, there's at least 93 DSA candidates who've

3:05:46.060 --> 3:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>won at the federal, state, and municipal level. And the

3:05:49.200 --> 3:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>vote still is being counted in few of those places

3:05:51.420 --> 3:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>like in California, or at least the vote was still

3:05:53.500 --> 3:05:55.780
<v Speaker 1>being counted by the time I wrote this last night.

3:05:56.780 --> 3:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the big races that has not been getting

3:05:59.670 --> 3:06:02.990
<v Speaker 1>actually a lot of attention is the LA mayoral race,

3:06:03.090 --> 3:06:07.490
<v Speaker 1>which since yesterday has been called for DSA endorsed candidate

3:06:07.530 --> 3:06:10.209
<v Speaker 1>Nithya Raman. This is another thing that we should probably

3:06:10.250 --> 3:06:13.660
<v Speaker 1>do a deep dive in the future. It was a

3:06:13.690 --> 3:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>close race with Raman pulling ahead by three points in

3:06:17.020 --> 3:06:21.330
<v Speaker 1>the past day and a half. There's some interesting kind

3:06:21.350 --> 3:06:26.129
<v Speaker 1>of background lore regarding Rahman's DSA endorsement that I do

3:06:26.150 --> 3:06:28.990
<v Speaker 1>want to mention here. A few days before the election,

3:06:29.430 --> 3:06:32.820
<v Speaker 1>DSA's National Political Committee, kind of like their board of directors,

3:06:33.220 --> 3:06:35.959
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, voted on whether to force the local

3:06:36.040 --> 3:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>DSA LA chapter to rescind their endorsement of Rahman based

3:06:39.879 --> 3:06:43.470
<v Speaker 1>on perceptions from some out-of-state DSA members that Rahman did

3:06:43.490 --> 3:06:48.770
<v Speaker 1>not support the BDS movement enough, boycott, divestment, and sanctions

3:06:48.990 --> 3:06:52.340
<v Speaker 1>against Israel. During the election, Rahman stated multiple times that

3:06:52.379 --> 3:06:57.070
<v Speaker 1>she supports BDS as a protest tactic, but there's disagreement

3:06:57.530 --> 3:07:02.109
<v Speaker 1>in DSA National on the correct interpretation of a 2025

3:07:02.110 --> 3:07:08.369
<v Speaker 1>DSA Convention resolution against candidates opposing BDS and whether that

3:07:08.470 --> 3:07:13.610
<v Speaker 1>means holding candidates to implementing BDS once in office. So

3:07:13.770 --> 3:07:18.780
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday or Monday, just days before the election, DSA's

3:07:19.020 --> 3:07:23.940
<v Speaker 1>National Political Committee voted 14 to 13, very close, to

3:07:24.140 --> 3:07:27.650
<v Speaker 1>not force the local chapter to pull their endorsement before

3:07:27.709 --> 3:07:32.670
<v Speaker 1>the election. This is like a razor edge vote here.

3:07:32.970 --> 3:07:36.129
<v Speaker 1>And I think this general situation underlines some internal tensions

3:07:36.150 --> 3:07:39.850
<v Speaker 1>within the DSA, especially DSA as a national body, not

3:07:39.910 --> 3:07:43.580
<v Speaker 1>just like big chapters like New York or LA. Absolutely.

3:07:44.220 --> 3:07:46.519
<v Speaker 1>But there are these big tensions between the so-called mass

3:07:46.580 --> 3:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>politics wing and what I would kind of call like

3:07:48.860 --> 3:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the Zoranist wing of DSA, the Socialist Majority Caucus, Groundwork Caucus,

3:07:54.080 --> 3:07:57.820
<v Speaker 1>versus the more kind of agitational activist side of DSA,

3:07:58.340 --> 3:08:01.570
<v Speaker 1>characterized internally as like the quote unquote left wing of DSA,

3:08:02.120 --> 3:08:06.270
<v Speaker 1>which focuses more on like abolitionism, anti-imperialism, and also has

3:08:06.290 --> 3:08:09.990
<v Speaker 1>some more kind of like campist tendencies. I think that

3:08:10.030 --> 3:08:12.709
<v Speaker 1>sort of agitational side has more representation on like the

3:08:12.770 --> 3:08:16.270
<v Speaker 1>national body chapter than what they have in local chapters

3:08:16.400 --> 3:08:19.180
<v Speaker 1>like LA and New York, where a bunch of members

3:08:19.220 --> 3:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>are concentrated. And because of that split, we're seeing this

3:08:22.720 --> 3:08:24.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of drama play out between some of these bigger

3:08:24.640 --> 3:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>chapters and the national organization.

3:08:26.560 --> 3:08:30.220
<v Speaker 8>Which I will say, SOC Soak Dems, all power to

3:08:30.260 --> 3:08:32.750
<v Speaker 8>the locals looking a lot better now, huh?

3:08:33.670 --> 3:08:34.709
<v Speaker 1>Ah, okay.

3:08:34.750 --> 3:08:37.050
<v Speaker 8>Decade, decade, decade old DSA drama aside.

3:08:40.700 --> 3:08:45.289
<v Speaker 1>Two other, not technically, I guess, DSA races, but DSA-like

3:08:45.410 --> 3:08:47.910
<v Speaker 1>or like Bernie-crat kind of like races I want to mention.

3:08:48.450 --> 3:08:53.790
<v Speaker 1>Justin Pearson, a Democrat in Tennessee, unfortunately lost by less

3:08:53.830 --> 3:08:57.220
<v Speaker 1>than 3,000 votes to Republican Brett Taylor in a newly

3:08:57.300 --> 3:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>redrawn House district. This was redistricted into a Trump 22 district,

3:09:04.180 --> 3:09:07.820
<v Speaker 1>and Pearson ended up trailing by just a few thousand votes,

3:09:07.920 --> 3:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like a very small margin. This one was quite sad

3:09:11.600 --> 3:09:16.709
<v Speaker 1>to see. Pearson's great. Though in Michigan, in Michigan's 7th district,

3:09:16.750 --> 3:09:21.110
<v Speaker 1>William Lawrence went up against Republican incumbent Tom Barrett. Lawrence

3:09:21.170 --> 3:09:25.070
<v Speaker 1>is of the Sunrise Movement organization. This is a big

3:09:25.090 --> 3:09:28.330
<v Speaker 1>swing district. Centrists, moderates were concerned that Lawrence was going

3:09:28.350 --> 3:09:30.870
<v Speaker 1>to be too far left and would keep this district red.

3:09:31.270 --> 3:09:34.330
<v Speaker 1>Did not happen. Lawrence was able to pull this off

3:09:35.100 --> 3:09:40.279
<v Speaker 1>despite over $ 20 million in GOP spending against Lawrence. So

3:09:41.500 --> 3:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the more interesting results of the night.

3:09:45.000 --> 3:09:49.420
<v Speaker 1>Let's go on an ad break and then talk about copium.

3:09:49.480 --> 3:10:05.150
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the copium. Okay, we are back. Do

3:10:06.310 --> 3:10:08.709
<v Speaker 1>you know who's not back? The Republican Party. They are

3:10:09.200 --> 3:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Not feeling so hot. And it was it was really funny.

3:10:13.350 --> 3:10:17.570
<v Speaker 1>A few days before the election on Halloween, Mike Johnson

3:10:17.910 --> 3:10:19.550
<v Speaker 1>made this proclamation.

3:10:20.050 --> 3:10:22.190
<v Speaker 2>I have been all over the country, my friends, and

3:10:22.209 --> 3:10:23.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling really good right now.

3:10:23.920 --> 3:10:26.020
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, the polls are wrong, OK?

3:10:26.840 --> 3:10:28.820
<v Speaker 2>We're going to defy history and we are going to

3:10:28.840 --> 3:10:31.039
<v Speaker 2>be celebrating big victories.

3:10:30.720 --> 3:10:32.260
<v Speaker 1>On Tuesday night. That's my prediction, OK?

3:10:35.450 --> 3:10:35.930
<v Speaker 5>Amen.

3:10:36.050 --> 3:10:36.990
<v Speaker 1>It's a spiritual battle.

3:10:37.030 --> 3:10:37.510
<v Speaker 5>Yes, ma'am.

3:10:37.890 --> 3:10:38.550
<v Speaker 1>Great prediction.

3:10:38.610 --> 3:10:42.369
<v Speaker 8>Hey, I mean, look, the first two predictions were true.

3:10:42.670 --> 3:10:47.840
<v Speaker 8>The polls were wrong. They did make history. There were great.

3:10:47.700 --> 3:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Victories, too, just not the ones he was anticipating.

3:10:51.260 --> 3:10:53.400
<v Speaker 8>Unfortunately, the way you did it was by getting a

3:10:53.440 --> 3:10:54.800
<v Speaker 8>historic ass kicking.

3:10:55.480 --> 3:10:57.820
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, beautiful. And losing your job.

3:10:57.840 --> 3:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>But hey, that'll mean he has more time to monitor

3:11:00.560 --> 3:11:02.520
<v Speaker 2>his son's erections, which we know is his passion.

3:11:03.490 --> 3:11:06.709
<v Speaker 1>Mike Johnson has indicated he will not be staying on

3:11:06.850 --> 3:11:10.369
<v Speaker 1>as the– does not intend to stay on as minority

3:11:10.970 --> 3:11:13.529
<v Speaker 1>leader for the Republicans. So, yeah, he will have more

3:11:13.570 --> 3:11:16.170
<v Speaker 1>time to monitor his son's erections.

3:11:16.890 --> 3:11:18.970
<v Speaker 8>Which I also want to mention here that this sets

3:11:19.030 --> 3:11:23.619
<v Speaker 8>up a sort of fascinating– race for who who who

3:11:23.640 --> 3:11:25.400
<v Speaker 8>the minority leader is going to be to replace him

3:11:25.420 --> 3:11:28.380
<v Speaker 8>because i think people have forgotten this the reason mike

3:11:28.420 --> 3:11:31.800
<v Speaker 8>johnson was elected in the first place was that the

3:11:31.820 --> 3:11:35.440
<v Speaker 8>previous majority leader like couldn't survive a no confidence vote

3:11:35.600 --> 3:11:38.120
<v Speaker 8>it was really hard to find one yeah yeah and

3:11:38.140 --> 3:11:40.120
<v Speaker 8>they picked mike johnson because nobody had any idea who

3:11:40.160 --> 3:11:42.090
<v Speaker 8>he was and they didn't realize how weird he was.

3:11:42.690 --> 3:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Which, by the way, is the same reason Dennis Hastert

3:11:46.140 --> 3:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>got Speaker of the House, right? Was that like, he

3:11:49.180 --> 3:11:52.020
<v Speaker 2>was considered safe, he wasn't seen as ambitious, and no

3:11:52.080 --> 3:11:53.960
<v Speaker 2>one knew anything about him. So he didn't seem to

3:11:54.000 --> 3:11:54.800
<v Speaker 2>have any scandals.

3:11:56.080 --> 3:12:00.340
<v Speaker 1>So Mike Johnson's optimism in that clip there, delusional or not,

3:12:01.420 --> 3:12:05.310
<v Speaker 1>was also promoted by Fox News' Jesse Waters before the election,

3:12:05.610 --> 3:12:09.150
<v Speaker 1>by casting serious doubt on the blue wave and predicting

3:12:09.170 --> 3:12:11.890
<v Speaker 1>that the youth and Hispanic turnout would be low.

3:12:12.310 --> 3:12:17.789
<v Speaker 11>Here is the headline, Jessica. There is no blue tsunami. Yes,

3:12:18.090 --> 3:12:20.280
<v Speaker 11>there is a maybe a three foot wave that's going

3:12:20.320 --> 3:12:24.200
<v Speaker 11>to knock out a few sandcastles. But the Democrat narrative

3:12:24.260 --> 3:12:26.599
<v Speaker 11>that this thing is going to sweep the nation.

3:12:26.720 --> 3:12:31.060
<v Speaker 1>Does not exist. The red wall is forming.

3:12:31.920 --> 3:12:36.180
<v Speaker 11>Older voters are showing up to vote against socialism, and

3:12:36.230 --> 3:12:38.950
<v Speaker 11>the youth and the Hispanics are not showing up.

3:12:39.170 --> 3:12:40.350
<v Speaker 1>Sure. Yeah, they didn't.

3:12:40.790 --> 3:12:43.530
<v Speaker 8>I just want to put on the record that the

3:12:43.590 --> 3:12:46.400
<v Speaker 8>way that he said the Hispanics is a.

3:12:46.390 --> 3:12:49.980
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that is... That is something he intentionally... That's something

3:12:50.010 --> 3:12:54.940
<v Speaker 1>he intentionally does consistently also by saying the blacks, also

3:12:55.020 --> 3:12:58.060
<v Speaker 1>the whites. This is like one of his reoccurring bits almost.

3:12:58.280 --> 3:12:59.300
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ.

3:13:00.140 --> 3:13:00.359
<v Speaker 4>But.

3:13:00.860 --> 3:13:04.550
<v Speaker 1>Basically, everything he said in that sentence was completely wrong.

3:13:06.030 --> 3:13:08.730
<v Speaker 1>And after the election, Waters sang a bit of a

3:13:08.830 --> 3:13:16.359
<v Speaker 1>different tune, dooming how Republicans lost whites, men, Hispanics and farmers.

3:13:16.600 --> 3:13:18.520
<v Speaker 11>The coalition's totally collapsed.

3:13:18.560 --> 3:13:20.140
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we lost whites?

3:13:20.520 --> 3:13:20.920
<v Speaker 5>Whites!

3:13:22.330 --> 3:13:26.410
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that if you're a Republican. Men, Hispanics,

3:13:26.490 --> 3:13:27.050
<v Speaker 1>big time.

3:13:27.709 --> 3:13:29.330
<v Speaker 11>And so it's going to take a while to put

3:13:29.370 --> 3:13:32.490
<v Speaker 11>the coalition back together because it was in the heartland.

3:13:33.430 --> 3:13:35.670
<v Speaker 1>So what happened was, so China, in.

3:13:35.650 --> 3:13:38.289
<v Speaker 11>Order to pressure Trump in the trade war, stopped buying

3:13:38.350 --> 3:13:42.800
<v Speaker 11>crops from the farmers. And then you do the Hormuz

3:13:42.920 --> 3:13:45.760
<v Speaker 11>Strait squeeze and fertilizer and diesel go up.

3:13:45.820 --> 3:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So, whoa, they move blue. Which.

3:13:50.660 --> 3:13:53.560
<v Speaker 8>He's not wrong there, but, like, that was you guys. Like,

3:13:53.600 --> 3:13:55.100
<v Speaker 8>you didn't have to do any of this.

3:13:55.680 --> 3:13:58.580
<v Speaker 2>No, none of this was necessary. I mean, and that's, like,

3:13:58.780 --> 3:14:01.320
<v Speaker 2>they've been having to, like, J.D. Vance is kind of

3:14:01.360 --> 3:14:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the closest people in high power to coming out and saying, like,

3:14:04.420 --> 3:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>this is just a horrible fuck-up. But Trump has even admitted, like, yeah,

3:14:07.879 --> 3:14:09.930
<v Speaker 2>Iran is what screwed us, but we had to do it.

3:14:10.140 --> 3:14:16.619
<v Speaker 1>It was the only option. They had to keep... So

3:14:16.780 --> 3:14:19.780
<v Speaker 1>since the results on Tuesday night, there's been a lot

3:14:19.800 --> 3:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of kind of attempted explanations from the Republicans to figure

3:14:23.330 --> 3:14:27.050
<v Speaker 1>out what the fuck just happened. One of them coming

3:14:27.129 --> 3:14:31.510
<v Speaker 1>from some Republican operatives is that Trump got too friendly

3:14:31.550 --> 3:14:35.930
<v Speaker 1>with Mamdani and that kind of sabotaged the Republicans campaign strategy.

3:14:36.470 --> 3:14:39.900
<v Speaker 1>To quote from the Wall Street Journal, quote, Republicans plans

3:14:39.930 --> 3:14:43.060
<v Speaker 1>to make Zoran Mamdani, the 35-year-old socialist who became New

3:14:43.100 --> 3:14:45.970
<v Speaker 1>York City's mayor last year, the face of a party

3:14:46.010 --> 3:14:48.950
<v Speaker 1>that they would paint as out of touch with most Americans.

3:14:49.629 --> 3:14:51.490
<v Speaker 1>In September, when Trump was in New York ahead of

3:14:51.530 --> 3:14:55.090
<v Speaker 1>the UN General Assembly, Mamdani had a surprise announcement. He

3:14:55.250 --> 3:14:58.930
<v Speaker 1>had invited Trump to meet. Republicans in the House were apoplectic.

3:14:59.640 --> 3:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>House Speaker Mike Johnson told White House officials, an image

3:15:03.000 --> 3:15:05.820
<v Speaker 1>of Trump being friendly with Mamdani would hurt Republican House

3:15:05.840 --> 3:15:09.459
<v Speaker 1>candidates in New York who are running on an anti-Mamdani message.

3:15:10.060 --> 3:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump aides didn't like the idea either, according to people

3:15:12.879 --> 3:15:15.950
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the matter. Trump and Mamdani met at Gracie Mansion,

3:15:16.010 --> 3:15:19.830
<v Speaker 1>the mayor's residence, just as the president wanted. Johnson later

3:15:19.890 --> 3:15:22.610
<v Speaker 1>told others that it was an unforced error in a

3:15:22.670 --> 3:15:28.170
<v Speaker 1>difficult election year, unquote. Very funny, but definitely, definitely true.

3:15:28.270 --> 3:15:29.890
<v Speaker 1>If you remember when Mamdani was elected, there was a

3:15:29.910 --> 3:15:32.290
<v Speaker 1>lot of dooming on how this is now going to

3:15:32.310 --> 3:15:35.390
<v Speaker 1>give Republicans this perfect talking point going into the midterms

3:15:35.410 --> 3:15:38.270
<v Speaker 1>about how crazy the Democrats are. And because of how

3:15:38.330 --> 3:15:41.420
<v Speaker 1>good Mamdani's poll numbers have been, how well he's just

3:15:41.520 --> 3:15:44.670
<v Speaker 1>governed in general, which is kind of acknowledged in big

3:15:44.709 --> 3:15:48.690
<v Speaker 1>parts by like even Fox and Trump to some degree,

3:15:49.050 --> 3:15:51.349
<v Speaker 1>that kind of threw a wrench in their plans to

3:15:51.580 --> 3:15:56.060
<v Speaker 1>paint Mamdani as like emblematic of the craziness of the Democrats. Instead,

3:15:56.100 --> 3:15:58.540
<v Speaker 1>they kind of tried to do that with Al-Sayed, which

3:15:58.560 --> 3:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>also just didn't pan out for them at all either.

3:16:01.900 --> 3:16:05.340
<v Speaker 1>There was some kind of early explanations from the, you know,

3:16:05.900 --> 3:16:10.740
<v Speaker 1>Fox brain trust as they saw results coming in. One

3:16:10.800 --> 3:16:15.599
<v Speaker 1>being that youth just want instant gratification and can't commit

3:16:15.620 --> 3:16:21.250
<v Speaker 1>to anything. They can't stick with anything like voting GOP. Forever. Yeah. Forever.

3:16:21.850 --> 3:16:23.750
<v Speaker 13>This idea that I've been thinking about a lot, which

3:16:23.830 --> 3:16:27.730
<v Speaker 13>is just this shortened attention span, that everybody wants everything,

3:16:27.750 --> 3:16:31.600
<v Speaker 13>you And, you know, I gave you my vote for

3:16:31.660 --> 3:16:33.720
<v Speaker 13>two years and now I want to switch to somebody else.

3:16:33.840 --> 3:16:35.740
<v Speaker 13>And a lot of these voters don't seem to be

3:16:35.800 --> 3:16:39.650
<v Speaker 13>expressing what it is they think they're getting by switching over.

3:16:39.670 --> 3:16:41.789
<v Speaker 13>And we'll see how it pans out tonight. But I

3:16:41.830 --> 3:16:44.490
<v Speaker 13>think that's a change dynamic in America. Well, I also

3:16:44.550 --> 3:16:47.790
<v Speaker 13>believe that when you're scrolling, if it says Medicare for all,

3:16:47.810 --> 3:16:48.650
<v Speaker 13>you're like, yeah, I'm for that.

3:16:48.790 --> 3:16:49.650
<v Speaker 4>OK, now you're moving on.

3:16:49.650 --> 3:16:49.970
<v Speaker 8>You're watching.

3:16:50.110 --> 3:16:51.510
<v Speaker 4>The football game and you're learning how to put a

3:16:51.530 --> 3:16:53.950
<v Speaker 4>French hairpin in your in your hair. Like it's just

3:16:53.980 --> 3:16:55.170
<v Speaker 4>like there's so much going on.

3:16:55.820 --> 3:16:58.260
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's it. No. Yeah, that's it. I think they

3:16:58.280 --> 3:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>got it. I think they cracked the case.

3:17:00.320 --> 3:17:00.619
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

3:17:00.820 --> 3:17:05.330
<v Speaker 1>Oh, God. They're on their damn phones too much, and

3:17:05.350 --> 3:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the serotonin receptors are screwed. They just want everything super fast.

3:17:09.180 --> 3:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>They can't stick with a hard two more years, as

3:17:13.060 --> 3:17:18.050
<v Speaker 1>Vance requested, of war with Iran. Skyrocketing prices.

3:17:18.070 --> 3:17:22.090
<v Speaker 2>Skyrocketing prices, yeah. And ICE raids, yes. The youth should

3:17:22.110 --> 3:17:24.080
<v Speaker 2>have just had the chutzpah to stick it out a

3:17:24.100 --> 3:17:26.160
<v Speaker 2>little bit longer. See where that was going to lead.

3:17:26.360 --> 3:17:30.379
<v Speaker 1>Party discipline is the one thing that's lacking among youth.

3:17:30.400 --> 3:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>You have to give people a reason to be loyal

3:17:32.860 --> 3:17:36.950
<v Speaker 2>to a party. And that's like the antithesis of conservatism.

3:17:37.990 --> 3:17:40.289
<v Speaker 1>This really does highlight their sort of biggest frustration and

3:17:40.310 --> 3:17:43.490
<v Speaker 1>their biggest miscalculation is that they thought the 2024 electorate

3:17:45.100 --> 3:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is the new electorate. That's where the new lines are.

3:17:48.080 --> 3:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>The youth are going to stay with them. They did

3:17:50.780 --> 3:17:53.459
<v Speaker 1>not realize that the people who ended up voting for

3:17:53.500 --> 3:17:55.900
<v Speaker 1>Trump in really big numbers in 2024 were not doing

3:17:55.920 --> 3:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it out of loyalty to Trump, but out of this

3:17:58.220 --> 3:18:02.470
<v Speaker 1>huge anti-incumbent sentiments and major frustrations at the Biden administration.

3:18:03.310 --> 3:18:07.010
<v Speaker 1>And they thought that that then created loyal Trump voters.

3:18:07.600 --> 3:18:10.369
<v Speaker 1>And no, those same frustrations then just got moved over

3:18:10.390 --> 3:18:13.170
<v Speaker 1>to Trump because he continued all the same bad stuff

3:18:13.690 --> 3:18:17.090
<v Speaker 1>and then added a whole bunch of new bad stuff. Yeah.

3:18:17.150 --> 3:18:19.830
<v Speaker 8>Everyone suddenly remembered. Well, it's probably a combination of people

3:18:19.870 --> 3:18:23.520
<v Speaker 8>remembering that living under Trump sucks and then people learning

3:18:23.540 --> 3:18:24.400
<v Speaker 8>for the first time.

3:18:24.440 --> 3:18:28.619
<v Speaker 1>Like, this is awful. It's even worse than the last time.

3:18:30.000 --> 3:18:33.310
<v Speaker 1>On Wednesday, Vice President J.D. Vance posted what I'll call

3:18:33.330 --> 3:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a screed on X The Everything app.

3:18:36.330 --> 3:18:36.430
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:18:37.260 --> 3:18:40.490
<v Speaker 1>That's about right. Going over kind of his analysis of

3:18:40.590 --> 3:18:45.010
<v Speaker 1>what happened and how much maybe where Republicans kind of

3:18:45.030 --> 3:18:47.170
<v Speaker 1>dropped the ball and how they were thinking about kind

3:18:47.190 --> 3:18:49.129
<v Speaker 1>of what the voter composition would be.

3:18:49.230 --> 3:18:49.410
<v Speaker 9>Right.

3:18:49.790 --> 3:18:52.539
<v Speaker 1>If is this electorate going to be the 2024 electorate again?

3:18:52.560 --> 3:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And he he talked about in this screed as the

3:18:56.540 --> 3:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>election date, as the midterms got closer, he started developing

3:18:59.260 --> 3:19:02.140
<v Speaker 1>suspicions that, no, that's not going to be the electorate.

3:19:02.160 --> 3:19:05.530
<v Speaker 1>And he started asking his like polling guys what what

3:19:05.610 --> 3:19:08.810
<v Speaker 1>they think is going to happen. I will quote from

3:19:08.890 --> 3:19:13.650
<v Speaker 1>his screed. Despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the

3:19:13.670 --> 3:19:16.430
<v Speaker 1>data kept telling us the same story. In some states,

3:19:16.530 --> 3:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>turnout was merely okay. In other states, it was downright amazing.

3:19:20.080 --> 3:19:22.460
<v Speaker 1>And in no state was it catastrophic. There was a

3:19:22.500 --> 3:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>genuine sense of optimism on our team. Our people, our voters,

3:19:26.580 --> 3:19:29.859
<v Speaker 1>are showing up. So I asked the smartest data guy

3:19:29.900 --> 3:19:33.220
<v Speaker 1>I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? No,

3:19:33.360 --> 3:19:35.959
<v Speaker 1>he told me. We might do better than the polls suggest.

3:19:36.300 --> 3:19:36.679
<v Speaker 3>They didn't.

3:19:37.310 --> 3:19:38.949
<v Speaker 1>But the data is telling us that a lot of

3:19:38.990 --> 3:19:42.090
<v Speaker 1>Trump-Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for

3:19:42.110 --> 3:19:45.949
<v Speaker 1>the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they

3:19:45.990 --> 3:19:50.500
<v Speaker 1>may not vote for us. Vance continues, Undoubtedly, there were

3:19:50.600 --> 3:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>places we could have done better on turnout, but the

3:19:53.920 --> 3:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that

3:19:56.540 --> 3:20:00.619
<v Speaker 1>many people who voted for Trump-Vance 2024 voted for Democrats

3:20:00.680 --> 3:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in 2026. Then Vance listed the top four reasons causing

3:20:04.660 --> 3:20:09.060
<v Speaker 1>this switch, quote, end the war, focus on cost of

3:20:09.100 --> 3:20:13.830
<v Speaker 1>living and inflation, put America first and change our relationship

3:20:13.930 --> 3:20:14.770
<v Speaker 1>to Israel.

3:20:15.790 --> 3:20:19.310
<v Speaker 8>Which is very funny because like three of those like

3:20:19.590 --> 3:20:22.890
<v Speaker 8>end the war, cost of living, inflation and change relationship

3:20:22.910 --> 3:20:24.070
<v Speaker 8>to Israel. It's like, oh, so.

3:20:24.050 --> 3:20:25.730
<v Speaker 1>You're the Mamdani campaign.

3:20:26.760 --> 3:20:29.120
<v Speaker 8>Like the Republicans are like, what if we did the

3:20:29.140 --> 3:20:32.240
<v Speaker 8>Mondani campaign, but like actually anti-Semitic?

3:20:33.020 --> 3:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. It's like they might start kind of converging

3:20:35.920 --> 3:20:43.410
<v Speaker 1>on a more kind of nationalistic form of socialism. Yeah. Yeah.

3:20:43.550 --> 3:20:46.690
<v Speaker 1>A kind of national socialism has never gone wrong before.

3:20:47.070 --> 3:20:53.810
<v Speaker 1>There's no precedent for this. But Vance ended his screen, quote,

3:20:54.290 --> 3:20:57.250
<v Speaker 1>our voters showed up and the above four reasons are

3:20:57.290 --> 3:20:59.830
<v Speaker 1>why many of them voted for Democrats. I am open

3:20:59.870 --> 3:21:03.470
<v Speaker 1>to the idea that we should change enforcement, immigration enforcement,

3:21:03.930 --> 3:21:07.670
<v Speaker 1>by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance.

3:21:08.209 --> 3:21:11.810
<v Speaker 1>But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason

3:21:11.850 --> 3:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we lost is the war. The president himself said so

3:21:15.820 --> 3:21:19.220
<v Speaker 1>last night, unquote. I like that he has to add

3:21:19.280 --> 3:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in his little kind of ice quote. soft defense there

3:21:23.060 --> 3:21:26.949
<v Speaker 1>in his final point about the war costing them the election, which, yeah,

3:21:27.140 --> 3:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it does. The war was a huge part of that.

3:21:29.959 --> 3:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>The Trump administration saw some of this coming in the

3:21:32.200 --> 3:21:34.620
<v Speaker 1>days before the election, because on the morning of Election Day,

3:21:34.730 --> 3:21:37.209
<v Speaker 1>Trump told Fox News that the U.S. will stop sending

3:21:37.209 --> 3:21:39.690
<v Speaker 1>$ 4 billion in aid to Israel by the end of

3:21:39.750 --> 3:21:42.670
<v Speaker 1>this year. Did not matter. You can't just drop that

3:21:42.970 --> 3:21:46.170
<v Speaker 1>on Election Day and think that's going to change the results. Also,

3:21:46.270 --> 3:21:49.289
<v Speaker 1>no one believes you. But he did. He did say

3:21:49.330 --> 3:21:53.050
<v Speaker 1>that in part to kind of defang the potency of

3:21:53.129 --> 3:21:57.529
<v Speaker 1>candidates like El-Sayed, who campaigned in large part against sending

3:21:57.590 --> 3:22:00.410
<v Speaker 1>money to Israel. Trump also said election morning in a

3:22:00.810 --> 3:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bizarre kind of final message before the midterms, quote, if

3:22:05.430 --> 3:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>people ever got tired of me in the US, I'll

3:22:07.840 --> 3:22:09.959
<v Speaker 1>move to Israel and become prime minister.

3:22:10.660 --> 3:22:11.280
<v Speaker 8>Sure, man.

3:22:11.459 --> 3:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We're moving from the settler colony to

3:22:15.180 --> 3:22:20.550
<v Speaker 1>like a shittier, smaller settler colony. I do want to

3:22:20.570 --> 3:22:25.470
<v Speaker 1>mention one other Republican's reaction to the results. That's Ron DeSantis.

3:22:26.030 --> 3:22:28.750
<v Speaker 1>Both we and others have talked about DeSantis calling Tuesday's

3:22:28.790 --> 3:22:32.689
<v Speaker 1>election an extinction level event for Republicans. But I also

3:22:32.709 --> 3:22:36.129
<v Speaker 1>want to highlight a later part of his speech where

3:22:36.150 --> 3:22:40.449
<v Speaker 1>DeSantis identifies where he thinks Republicans got off track. Quote,

3:22:41.129 --> 3:22:43.510
<v Speaker 1>I knew Republicans were in trouble when I was reading

3:22:43.530 --> 3:22:47.150
<v Speaker 1>an overview of what they were running ads on. And

3:22:47.370 --> 3:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they are spending hundreds of millions on transgender ads. That

3:22:52.110 --> 3:22:55.300
<v Speaker 1>was not the issue motivating voters. And it was kind

3:22:55.320 --> 3:22:59.019
<v Speaker 1>of an attempt to just scare Republicans to vote. Now,

3:22:59.280 --> 3:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the issues are different. And Republicans, it seemed like in

3:23:02.420 --> 3:23:04.019
<v Speaker 1>some of the ads I was seeing, with how much

3:23:04.180 --> 3:23:08.810
<v Speaker 1>money they were spending, they were really fighting yesterday's battle. Unquote.

3:23:09.170 --> 3:23:15.210
<v Speaker 1>We're all looking for the guy who did this. Uh-huh. Yeah.

3:23:15.370 --> 3:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>You're telling me, huh? Maybe it's not the issue motivating voters. Yeah,

3:23:21.820 --> 3:23:23.060
<v Speaker 1>you sure about that? You sure about that?

3:23:25.980 --> 3:23:31.039
<v Speaker 8>Which, look, at least the transgender community is getting a

3:23:31.260 --> 3:23:34.600
<v Speaker 8>tiny form of revenge for all of the shit that

3:23:34.620 --> 3:23:36.560
<v Speaker 8>we've had to go through and will continue to go through.

3:23:36.580 --> 3:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>A revenge amuse-bouche.

3:23:38.970 --> 3:23:42.930
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, this is the reefing the whirlwind appetizer. We

3:23:42.950 --> 3:23:44.750
<v Speaker 8>will get the main course in time.

3:23:44.770 --> 3:23:47.590
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the whirlwind takes another 70 minutes to cook. It's

3:23:47.610 --> 3:23:48.570
<v Speaker 2>like ordering the souffle.

3:23:48.590 --> 3:23:53.290
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think one of the most sort of shocking

3:23:53.310 --> 3:23:58.900
<v Speaker 8>things Results of this election cycle was a quite progressive

3:23:59.580 --> 3:24:03.880
<v Speaker 8>trans woman winning a Alabama state house seat in Montgomery.

3:24:03.900 --> 3:24:07.780
<v Speaker 8>She pulled a 22 point swing to win it, to

3:24:07.840 --> 3:24:10.810
<v Speaker 8>win a district that was like Trump plus 16.

3:24:10.810 --> 3:24:13.410
<v Speaker 1>Also, her name is Montgomery. It's the same thing with

3:24:13.430 --> 3:24:18.369
<v Speaker 1>the fucking Hungary guy. Her name, her name is Alison Montgomery.

3:24:18.390 --> 3:24:24.349
<v Speaker 1>I should have put that together. That's hilarious. Yeah.

3:24:24.470 --> 3:24:26.690
<v Speaker 8>And, you know, her opponents ran a whole bunch of

3:24:26.750 --> 3:24:30.370
<v Speaker 8>anti-trans attack ads and she, you know, called them pedophiles

3:24:30.750 --> 3:24:35.110
<v Speaker 8>and did a bunch of anti-data center stuff and stuff

3:24:35.129 --> 3:24:38.530
<v Speaker 8>like that. And one in a place that is, you know,

3:24:38.550 --> 3:24:40.890
<v Speaker 8>like there are obviously there's a lot of trans organizing

3:24:40.910 --> 3:24:43.170
<v Speaker 8>in the Deep South. To the best of my knowledge,

3:24:43.510 --> 3:24:47.320
<v Speaker 8>like Montgomery, Alabama is like not like this part of Alabama,

3:24:47.340 --> 3:24:48.840
<v Speaker 8>this part of the city of Alabama is like not

3:24:49.860 --> 3:24:54.590
<v Speaker 8>a trans hub. This isn't a district in Atlanta or something.

3:24:54.610 --> 3:25:02.150
<v Speaker 8>Or New Orleans. This is not that. This was deep Trump. Again,

3:25:02.290 --> 3:25:04.170
<v Speaker 8>Trump plus 16.

3:25:04.170 --> 3:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>She ran on an economic populist platform that most people

3:25:07.610 --> 3:25:12.820
<v Speaker 1>can agree on. That it's a common sense anti-corporate platform.

3:25:13.379 --> 3:25:13.699
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:25:14.560 --> 3:25:16.080
<v Speaker 8>And I think this is a thing that you know,

3:25:18.230 --> 3:25:19.490
<v Speaker 8>It's something I think Gary's going to talk about a

3:25:19.510 --> 3:25:21.380
<v Speaker 8>little bit, but a lot of the narrative about sort

3:25:21.400 --> 3:25:24.680
<v Speaker 8>of Like, ah, progressive candidates did worse than non-progressive candidates.

3:25:25.060 --> 3:25:28.360
<v Speaker 8>It's like, trans women running on, like, the Bomdani platform

3:25:28.400 --> 3:25:30.560
<v Speaker 8>are winning in Alabama. Like, eat shit.

3:25:30.720 --> 3:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it's super absurd. Like, there's just no... Get

3:25:34.640 --> 3:25:37.519
<v Speaker 1>out of here. This is my frustration, because the word

3:25:37.580 --> 3:25:42.980
<v Speaker 1>progressive just doesn't mean anything. Like, does progressive mean that

3:25:43.040 --> 3:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a corporatist Democrat with good social policies? Does it

3:25:47.020 --> 3:25:49.650
<v Speaker 1>mean you're an economic populist who doesn't really talk about

3:25:49.670 --> 3:25:53.130
<v Speaker 1>culture or issues? Like, what does progressive mean?

3:25:53.150 --> 3:25:53.449
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

3:25:53.830 --> 3:25:57.150
<v Speaker 8>Does it mean you're Gamal Abdul Nasser, who was originally

3:25:57.209 --> 3:26:01.110
<v Speaker 8>a progressive? Like, who knows? No meaning.

3:26:01.890 --> 3:26:04.850
<v Speaker 1>It is really frustrating. This whole narrative, I just don't

3:26:04.910 --> 3:26:08.180
<v Speaker 1>find compelling at all because the vast majority of these

3:26:08.440 --> 3:26:13.990
<v Speaker 1>swing state candidates won on economic populism. anti-corruption, stopping foreign wars.

3:26:14.650 --> 3:26:19.180
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to characterize most of these candidates as centrists. Now,

3:26:19.220 --> 3:26:23.199
<v Speaker 1>there are some moderates and more center-left Democrats mixed in there,

3:26:23.240 --> 3:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like in Alaska. And there's a lot of issues with

3:26:27.120 --> 3:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>many of these candidates. They are not perfect by any means.

3:26:31.580 --> 3:26:34.070
<v Speaker 1>But when you're seeing liberal pundits really push this narrative

3:26:34.090 --> 3:26:38.830
<v Speaker 1>that moderates are winning way better than progressives or winning

3:26:38.870 --> 3:26:42.170
<v Speaker 1>way better than socialists, it's very clear that they're just

3:26:42.310 --> 3:26:48.180
<v Speaker 1>setting up a narrative to crush any potential progressive, left-wing,

3:26:48.680 --> 3:26:52.420
<v Speaker 1>or like a real populist from taking the lead in

3:26:52.480 --> 3:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the primary to become president in 2028. They're running the

3:26:56.580 --> 3:27:01.270
<v Speaker 1>same electability playbook, trying to convince people that candidates on

3:27:01.310 --> 3:27:04.550
<v Speaker 1>the left don't stand as good of a chance as winning.

3:27:05.250 --> 3:27:07.590
<v Speaker 1>And this is all very silly to me because El

3:27:07.610 --> 3:27:11.510
<v Speaker 1>Sayed did win. He won. He is going to be

3:27:11.550 --> 3:27:15.699
<v Speaker 1>the senator. Troy Jackson did win. But the only thing

3:27:15.760 --> 3:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these liberal pundits can talk about is

3:27:17.600 --> 3:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>how El Sayed did not do maybe as well as

3:27:21.600 --> 3:27:26.670
<v Speaker 1>some other candidates, especially compared to like Tallarico. And again,

3:27:26.690 --> 3:27:29.230
<v Speaker 1>I think this is all very silly because Tallarico and

3:27:29.270 --> 3:27:34.180
<v Speaker 1>El Sayed actually had very similar platforms. And these races

3:27:34.360 --> 3:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of different parts. Ken Paxton is much

3:27:38.600 --> 3:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>more hated than Mike Rogers, who is generally one of

3:27:42.080 --> 3:27:48.089
<v Speaker 1>the more liked Republicans in this midterm election. And prominent

3:27:48.150 --> 3:27:53.250
<v Speaker 1>Democrats tried to sabotage El Sayed for months from Neera

3:27:53.330 --> 3:27:57.380
<v Speaker 1>Tanden and to comments made by Nancy Pelosi, and of course,

3:27:57.840 --> 3:28:02.510
<v Speaker 1>Haley Stevens endorsing the Republican days before the election. Also,

3:28:02.970 --> 3:28:06.609
<v Speaker 1>just tons and tons of money was mobilized in Michigan.

3:28:06.629 --> 3:28:09.430
<v Speaker 1>It was also mobilized in Texas, but way more was

3:28:09.450 --> 3:28:13.410
<v Speaker 1>spent in Michigan than almost any other Senate race. And

3:28:13.530 --> 3:28:18.590
<v Speaker 1>in the end, El-Sayed performed pretty similarly to other statewide

3:28:18.750 --> 3:28:23.170
<v Speaker 1>Democratic candidates. He did perform slightly under the gubernatorial candidate,

3:28:23.250 --> 3:28:26.250
<v Speaker 1>but performed better than the attorney general candidate. And there's

3:28:26.270 --> 3:28:28.529
<v Speaker 1>a lot of just little differences in how states elect

3:28:28.610 --> 3:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>people sometimes. Like Maine historically selected a much more democratic

3:28:33.240 --> 3:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>governor than the representatives they've sent to D.C. And speaking

3:28:39.060 --> 3:28:43.679
<v Speaker 1>of Maine, I do not think centrist moderates can really

3:28:43.820 --> 3:28:47.420
<v Speaker 1>accurately say that a more moderate candidate would have won

3:28:47.470 --> 3:28:51.550
<v Speaker 1>by more against Susan Collins. Collins has shown herself to

3:28:51.570 --> 3:28:55.830
<v Speaker 1>be incredibly resilient. Anyone running against Collins would have had

3:28:55.870 --> 3:29:00.330
<v Speaker 1>a hard time. And it turned out a union populist

3:29:00.350 --> 3:29:04.390
<v Speaker 1>candidate eventually was the guy to beat Collins. I think

3:29:04.410 --> 3:29:07.430
<v Speaker 1>it's also very disingenuous to point to Florida when the

3:29:07.480 --> 3:29:10.940
<v Speaker 1>Democrats just totally abandoned the race in Florida, leaving Angie

3:29:10.959 --> 3:29:13.220
<v Speaker 1>Nixon to fend for herself. And all things considered, I

3:29:13.240 --> 3:29:15.980
<v Speaker 1>think Nixon actually did quite well having to run that

3:29:16.040 --> 3:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>entire campaign herself. And her opponent, Ashley Moody, had the

3:29:19.910 --> 3:29:23.990
<v Speaker 1>highest independent favorability rating. So if you're going to evaluate,

3:29:24.010 --> 3:29:28.170
<v Speaker 1>you know, the minute differences between progressives and moderates in

3:29:28.190 --> 3:29:29.910
<v Speaker 1>these races, I think you actually have to look at

3:29:30.510 --> 3:29:34.610
<v Speaker 1>the minute details of each individual race and not flatten

3:29:34.629 --> 3:29:38.350
<v Speaker 1>things out into these generalizations that probably don't hold water

3:29:38.390 --> 3:29:41.230
<v Speaker 1>when you consider things more closely. And keep in mind,

3:29:41.250 --> 3:29:44.750
<v Speaker 1>this whole rhetorical game played by liberal pundits is in

3:29:44.790 --> 3:29:48.379
<v Speaker 1>preparation of trying to crush any left-wing candidate for president

3:29:48.680 --> 3:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in 2028. Anyway, let's get into some of the Democratic

3:29:53.920 --> 3:29:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Party reactions to their own victory. And it's interesting because

3:29:58.150 --> 3:30:00.010
<v Speaker 1>this is all kind of in the shadow of Trump

3:30:00.030 --> 3:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>announcing election night on a phone call with Politico. that

3:30:03.830 --> 3:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>he is interested in working with Democrats to pass bills

3:30:06.440 --> 3:30:08.620
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't just want to sit in the office for

3:30:08.660 --> 3:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>two years and veto everything. That was the way he

3:30:11.320 --> 3:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>put it. Weak, scared. He said it very scared in

3:30:14.900 --> 3:30:17.380
<v Speaker 1>this clip. I may as well actually just play. It's

3:30:17.520 --> 3:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>only 15 seconds. He does sound very scared in this.

3:30:20.780 --> 3:30:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're going to work with.

3:30:21.620 --> 3:30:25.120
<v Speaker 8>The Democrats to make sure things go well for our country.

3:30:25.170 --> 3:30:25.910
<v Speaker 1>Very important.

3:30:25.930 --> 3:30:27.930
<v Speaker 10>They've already called and they want to work with me.

3:30:27.930 --> 3:30:29.370
<v Speaker 5>I have the right to veto everything.

3:30:30.230 --> 3:30:30.850
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to.

3:30:30.790 --> 3:30:33.070
<v Speaker 4>Be just sitting there for two years vetoing everything.

3:30:33.810 --> 3:30:35.369
<v Speaker 5>They want to see things happen.

3:30:35.030 --> 3:30:42.129
<v Speaker 1>Too does not sound does not sound happy yeah.

3:30:40.230 --> 3:30:42.110
<v Speaker 8>That that is that is the sound of a man

3:30:42.170 --> 3:30:44.490
<v Speaker 8>who was like oh fuck if i don't keep schumer

3:30:44.530 --> 3:30:47.330
<v Speaker 8>in power i could go to prison yeah oh speaking

3:30:47.370 --> 3:30:52.050
<v Speaker 8>of schumer horrible speech election night brick wall.

3:30:53.770 --> 3:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>In more than one way uh do you want to

3:30:55.840 --> 3:30:58.860
<v Speaker 1>play this this this clip of schumer talking about his

3:30:59.060 --> 3:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>aspirations of becoming the speaker again How do you deal

3:31:02.020 --> 3:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with those candidates who won, who said they're not going

3:31:04.220 --> 3:31:06.980
<v Speaker 1>to vote for you? Adam Hamilton, Troy Jackson.

3:31:07.340 --> 3:31:10.800
<v Speaker 9>Again, to repeat the answer, the issue is not me.

3:31:11.340 --> 3:31:15.510
<v Speaker 9>I'll be reelected as majority leader. But the issue is

3:31:15.650 --> 3:31:20.170
<v Speaker 9>focusing on the American people and what they want.

3:31:22.970 --> 3:31:25.010
<v Speaker 1>I like that he slipped into saying minority leader because

3:31:25.030 --> 3:31:26.589
<v Speaker 1>he's so used to being a loser.

3:31:27.590 --> 3:31:27.910
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

3:31:29.950 --> 3:31:32.180
<v Speaker 1>No, Schumer should not be. Obviously not.

3:31:32.740 --> 3:31:33.940
<v Speaker 8>No, no, no.

3:31:34.060 --> 3:31:34.640
<v Speaker 5>He is.

3:31:34.780 --> 3:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>He has.

3:31:35.020 --> 3:31:37.640
<v Speaker 8>He has been one of the key levers of power

3:31:37.740 --> 3:31:41.460
<v Speaker 8>for the Republican Party in rallying the Democrats to vote

3:31:41.720 --> 3:31:44.920
<v Speaker 8>for a bunch of the horrific shit that amazingly like

3:31:45.310 --> 3:31:47.590
<v Speaker 8>the some of the stuff that lost Trump the election

3:31:47.650 --> 3:31:50.349
<v Speaker 8>that was in the big, beautiful bill like passed because

3:31:50.410 --> 3:31:53.140
<v Speaker 8>of Schumer, like whipping people in order to vote for it.

3:31:53.350 --> 3:31:53.530
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

3:31:54.250 --> 3:31:55.750
<v Speaker 8>And Schumer himself also voted for that, too.

3:31:56.560 --> 3:31:59.260
<v Speaker 1>Since Tuesday, Bernie has started a push to get more

3:31:59.300 --> 3:32:02.019
<v Speaker 1>Dems to sign on to Medicare for All, and he

3:32:02.080 --> 3:32:04.820
<v Speaker 1>will likely become the new chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor,

3:32:04.879 --> 3:32:09.780
<v Speaker 1>and Pensions Committee. Minnesota Senator-elect Peggy Flanagan has loudly proclaimed,

3:32:09.959 --> 3:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we will rip ICE apart. And incoming House Oversight and

3:32:15.040 --> 3:32:18.620
<v Speaker 1>Government Reform Committee Chair Robert Garcia posted a two-word statement,

3:32:18.920 --> 3:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>lawyer up. And Oregon Senator Ron Wyden posted subpoenas.

3:32:24.020 --> 3:32:24.300
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

3:32:24.360 --> 3:32:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

3:32:24.940 --> 3:32:26.860
<v Speaker 1>In a strong one word statement.

3:32:27.800 --> 3:32:28.439
<v Speaker 5>Thanks, Ron.

3:32:29.640 --> 3:32:34.260
<v Speaker 8>So in terms of where where this is going, I

3:32:34.300 --> 3:32:38.310
<v Speaker 8>think there was a very interesting report that was released,

3:32:38.510 --> 3:32:41.070
<v Speaker 8>I guess, two weeks ago, Monday now, right about a

3:32:41.129 --> 3:32:46.029
<v Speaker 8>week before the election where. The House Judiciary Committee released

3:32:46.290 --> 3:32:51.640
<v Speaker 8>a genuinely astonishing document in which they accused Donald Trump of,

3:32:51.810 --> 3:32:54.010
<v Speaker 8>and I am just going to quote from this document here,

3:32:54.050 --> 3:32:56.709
<v Speaker 8>which again was released by the Democrats on the House

3:32:56.730 --> 3:33:03.410
<v Speaker 8>Judiciary Committee, like with their House Judiciary Committee official stuff

3:33:03.590 --> 3:33:03.890
<v Speaker 8>on it.

3:33:04.190 --> 3:33:05.710
<v Speaker 1>Seal. Yeah.

3:33:06.510 --> 3:33:06.830
<v Speaker 5>Quote.

3:33:08.360 --> 3:33:11.209
<v Speaker 8>Above all, the evidence we have seen, as shared in

3:33:11.230 --> 3:33:14.769
<v Speaker 8>the accounts of 11 women, each described below, indicates that

3:33:14.850 --> 3:33:18.730
<v Speaker 8>Trump abused, assaulted, and even raped numerous women alongside and

3:33:19.290 --> 3:33:23.190
<v Speaker 8>in coordination with the most infamous sex trafficker in history.

3:33:23.209 --> 3:33:27.099
<v Speaker 8>End quote. That most infamous sex trafficker in history would,

3:33:27.120 --> 3:33:31.980
<v Speaker 8>of course, be Jeffrey Epstein, who they accused Trump of being, quote,

3:33:32.100 --> 3:33:36.520
<v Speaker 8>a close friend and confidant of. alongside the sort of

3:33:36.680 --> 3:33:44.340
<v Speaker 8>aforementioned allegations, they furthermore accused the administration of, I think,

3:33:44.470 --> 3:33:47.449
<v Speaker 8>doing a thing we've all known they were very obviously doing,

3:33:47.610 --> 3:33:51.550
<v Speaker 8>which is stonewalling the investigation into the release of the

3:33:51.629 --> 3:33:56.370
<v Speaker 8>Epstein files to conceal alleged crimes. So this report itself,

3:33:56.770 --> 3:33:59.720
<v Speaker 8>I think, was sort of planned as the, I guess,

3:33:59.740 --> 3:34:02.300
<v Speaker 8>like October surprise that they ended up not really needing

3:34:02.340 --> 3:34:07.220
<v Speaker 8>and was really not covered by the media at all.

3:34:08.740 --> 3:34:11.600
<v Speaker 8>But the report itself is interesting because it's a combination

3:34:11.860 --> 3:34:15.920
<v Speaker 8>of information that had already been publicly available, but also

3:34:16.780 --> 3:34:20.960
<v Speaker 8>stuff that had not really been made public before. No, yeah,

3:34:20.980 --> 3:34:23.680
<v Speaker 8>there's brand new revelations in this.

3:34:24.060 --> 3:34:25.990
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this is.

3:34:26.000 --> 3:34:30.010
<v Speaker 8>And I say this quite genuinely, this is one of

3:34:30.050 --> 3:34:32.709
<v Speaker 8>the most astonishing documents ever. in the history of the

3:34:32.770 --> 3:34:36.879
<v Speaker 8>United States. I cannot think of another time anything like

3:34:36.900 --> 3:34:39.820
<v Speaker 8>this has ever happened. This is the members of the

3:34:39.940 --> 3:34:43.920
<v Speaker 8>opposition party on the House Judiciary Committee accusing the president

3:34:43.959 --> 3:34:46.919
<v Speaker 8>of the United States of participating in a sex trafficking

3:34:46.980 --> 3:34:50.260
<v Speaker 8>ring and accusing the administration and the broader, the president

3:34:50.280 --> 3:34:54.350
<v Speaker 8>and the broader administration of actively covering up those crimes.

3:34:54.890 --> 3:34:58.810
<v Speaker 8>The allegations in here range from like bizarre redactions of

3:34:59.090 --> 3:35:00.629
<v Speaker 8>the versions of the Epstein files that were released to

3:35:00.650 --> 3:35:03.640
<v Speaker 8>the public, that would, you know, that sort of withheld

3:35:03.680 --> 3:35:10.340
<v Speaker 8>information that would implicate close Trump associates. Most notably, Powell Zampolli,

3:35:10.760 --> 3:35:14.660
<v Speaker 8>who was the global envoy for strategic partnership until October

3:35:14.959 --> 3:35:20.050
<v Speaker 8>15th of this year. The documents accuse Zampolli of, you know,

3:35:20.090 --> 3:35:24.810
<v Speaker 8>facilitating and participating in sex trafficking. And the Democrats accused

3:35:24.850 --> 3:35:27.950
<v Speaker 8>Trump of concealing this and also of in their questioning

3:35:28.150 --> 3:35:30.270
<v Speaker 8>of Ghislaine Maxwell, who they also mentioned in this was

3:35:30.290 --> 3:35:34.270
<v Speaker 8>like sent to a like really cozy club fed prison

3:35:34.290 --> 3:35:37.950
<v Speaker 8>by the administration. They accused the administration of deliberately steering

3:35:38.000 --> 3:35:42.460
<v Speaker 8>interrogations of Ghislaine Maxwell away from discussing some very specific

3:35:42.520 --> 3:35:46.939
<v Speaker 8>allegations that like Ghislaine brought up by herself. And then

3:35:46.959 --> 3:35:49.480
<v Speaker 8>the interviewers like immediately were like, no, no, no, don't

3:35:49.520 --> 3:35:51.410
<v Speaker 8>talk about that and move to run to a different thing.

3:35:52.150 --> 3:35:54.369
<v Speaker 8>So the document itself, there's this sort of broad outline

3:35:54.430 --> 3:35:56.670
<v Speaker 8>of the alleged sort of Trump Epstein operation and how

3:35:56.709 --> 3:36:00.020
<v Speaker 8>they allegedly use modeling techniques. agencies to work a sex

3:36:00.040 --> 3:36:03.240
<v Speaker 8>trafficking ring. There are sections about the alleged cover-up by

3:36:03.260 --> 3:36:06.390
<v Speaker 8>the Trump administration, the DOJ, and the FBI. There's a

3:36:06.620 --> 3:36:12.330
<v Speaker 8>lot of going through very harrowing accounts of specific allegations

3:36:12.470 --> 3:36:17.350
<v Speaker 8>from different women. I'm going to quote from this at

3:36:17.370 --> 3:36:20.220
<v Speaker 8>the very end of the document. Quote, The stakes of

3:36:20.240 --> 3:36:24.920
<v Speaker 8>the Epstein-Maxwell conspiracy are monumental. Human trafficking, child abuse, and

3:36:25.000 --> 3:36:27.860
<v Speaker 8>rape are among the most serious offenses our law recognizes.

3:36:28.800 --> 3:36:32.100
<v Speaker 8>Government complicity and a cover-up to protect traffickers and rapists

3:36:32.160 --> 3:36:35.420
<v Speaker 8>is criminal obstruction of justice and an intolerable offense against

3:36:35.480 --> 3:36:40.020
<v Speaker 8>free society. Moreover, a president implicated in a sex trafficking

3:36:40.100 --> 3:36:44.050
<v Speaker 8>operation is a president exposed, constantly vulnerable to blackmail by

3:36:44.150 --> 3:36:47.390
<v Speaker 8>foreign governments and domestic criminals. The full extent of the

3:36:47.430 --> 3:36:50.310
<v Speaker 8>President of the United States' involvement in criminal sex trafficking

3:36:51.170 --> 3:36:55.580
<v Speaker 8>ring is inescapably to the utmost concern to Congress and

3:36:55.610 --> 3:36:59.000
<v Speaker 8>the American people. And the document ends with calling for

3:36:59.020 --> 3:37:02.000
<v Speaker 8>an investigation of Trump and other Trump allies and appointing

3:37:02.160 --> 3:37:06.260
<v Speaker 8>a specific independent counsel to carry out the investigation. It

3:37:06.320 --> 3:37:09.199
<v Speaker 8>is astonishing how little media coverage there was of this.

3:37:09.700 --> 3:37:11.050
<v Speaker 1>A few sites... Yeah.

3:37:11.330 --> 3:37:12.850
<v Speaker 8>You know, I mean, a few outlets like New York

3:37:12.900 --> 3:37:16.010
<v Speaker 8>Times was like on blue sky defending their coverage of

3:37:16.090 --> 3:37:19.019
<v Speaker 8>it in which they said that, you know, oh, yeah,

3:37:19.060 --> 3:37:23.780
<v Speaker 8>there's a document released by the Democrats calling for an investigation.

3:37:24.459 --> 3:37:26.580
<v Speaker 8>There are like rape allegations in this that like have

3:37:26.620 --> 3:37:28.539
<v Speaker 8>not really been made public before.

3:37:29.240 --> 3:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>New. Yeah.

3:37:30.900 --> 3:37:34.900
<v Speaker 8>And there was more coverage of Obama's joke about the

3:37:34.940 --> 3:37:39.420
<v Speaker 8>cheesecake factory. than there was 100%. Yeah, about the Democrats

3:37:39.470 --> 3:37:42.289
<v Speaker 8>of the House Judiciary Committee accusing the sitting president of

3:37:42.310 --> 3:37:44.550
<v Speaker 8>the United States of being in league with Jeffrey Epstein.

3:37:45.990 --> 3:37:49.070
<v Speaker 8>Which I think one of the things that it's kind

3:37:49.090 --> 3:37:51.789
<v Speaker 8>of helpful to do is like, I don't know, we're

3:37:51.810 --> 3:37:54.030
<v Speaker 8>in this era where everything is so insane that it's

3:37:54.590 --> 3:38:00.420
<v Speaker 8>very difficult to step back and think about what that

3:38:00.440 --> 3:38:03.459
<v Speaker 8>would mean in literally any other period of American history.

3:38:04.560 --> 3:38:05.439
<v Speaker 5>And I think.

3:38:06.209 --> 3:38:09.250
<v Speaker 8>One of the things that's become clear in the aftermath

3:38:09.690 --> 3:38:13.290
<v Speaker 8>of this election is that this does look like the

3:38:13.430 --> 3:38:15.770
<v Speaker 8>angle at which they're going to go after Trump, right?

3:38:16.030 --> 3:38:18.410
<v Speaker 8>Insofar as we're doing a sort of bringing Trump to

3:38:18.450 --> 3:38:21.170
<v Speaker 8>justice thing. It looks like this is going to be,

3:38:21.190 --> 3:38:23.330
<v Speaker 8>this is like at least how the House Judiciary Committee

3:38:24.260 --> 3:38:26.119
<v Speaker 8>is going to go after him. And I think this

3:38:26.620 --> 3:38:31.320
<v Speaker 8>changes to some extent the dynamics of previous Democratic attempts

3:38:31.340 --> 3:38:33.119
<v Speaker 8>to go after Trump, because it's a lot harder to

3:38:33.140 --> 3:38:34.959
<v Speaker 8>sort of brush this stuff off in the way that

3:38:35.000 --> 3:38:39.429
<v Speaker 8>you could do with something like Russiagate, where regular people

3:38:40.350 --> 3:38:41.930
<v Speaker 8>are pissed off about Epstein.

3:38:42.190 --> 3:38:42.430
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

3:38:42.790 --> 3:38:45.429
<v Speaker 8>And like even Trump's base is pissed off about Epstein

3:38:45.450 --> 3:38:46.850
<v Speaker 8>in a way that they didn't, you know, they could

3:38:46.870 --> 3:38:50.100
<v Speaker 8>just not give a shit about Russiagate. And I think

3:38:50.540 --> 3:38:55.980
<v Speaker 8>this being the angle of attack changes to some extent

3:38:56.040 --> 3:38:59.960
<v Speaker 8>some of the dynamics around what the political contours of,

3:39:00.480 --> 3:39:03.350
<v Speaker 8>of a like actual prosecution of the Trump administration is.

3:39:03.530 --> 3:39:06.670
<v Speaker 8>And also now that these people are in control of

3:39:06.709 --> 3:39:10.730
<v Speaker 8>the judiciary committee, there's going to be a lot more

3:39:10.770 --> 3:39:13.330
<v Speaker 8>stuff being revealed. They are going to have control to

3:39:13.370 --> 3:39:15.890
<v Speaker 8>a much larger extent of the investigation. If they can

3:39:15.970 --> 3:39:19.830
<v Speaker 8>get their independent console, like the stuff that has come

3:39:19.930 --> 3:39:22.900
<v Speaker 8>out from the Epstein files about Trump already has been

3:39:23.400 --> 3:39:26.430
<v Speaker 8>unbelievably damaging to him. And again, The stuff that we're

3:39:26.470 --> 3:39:29.949
<v Speaker 8>getting is the like redacted versions of it that that's

3:39:30.080 --> 3:39:31.920
<v Speaker 8>the result of their sort of half ass cover up.

3:39:32.980 --> 3:39:34.760
<v Speaker 8>The stuff that's going to be coming out of this,

3:39:35.140 --> 3:39:39.920
<v Speaker 8>I genuinely can't even imagine. And so I think this

3:39:40.379 --> 3:39:43.529
<v Speaker 8>is going to be in so far as the Democrats

3:39:43.570 --> 3:39:45.810
<v Speaker 8>are like going after him. I think this is going

3:39:45.850 --> 3:39:47.750
<v Speaker 8>to be the angle that they come at him for.

3:39:48.910 --> 3:39:51.970
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk a little bit more about that and then

3:39:52.110 --> 3:40:08.330
<v Speaker 1>one other non-election story. after this ad break. And we're back.

3:40:09.550 --> 3:40:13.090
<v Speaker 2>So I wanted to talk a little bit about what

3:40:13.270 --> 3:40:17.150
<v Speaker 2>I think needs to happen in order for this massive

3:40:17.190 --> 3:40:20.689
<v Speaker 2>upset midterm victory to matter in the long term, right?

3:40:20.790 --> 3:40:22.930
<v Speaker 2>Because this is good, and we've all spent our day

3:40:22.970 --> 3:40:26.779
<v Speaker 2>or two celebrating what's happened. And I'm very happy that

3:40:26.840 --> 3:40:29.910
<v Speaker 2>the Republicans got their asses kicked so badly. But we've

3:40:29.920 --> 3:40:33.050
<v Speaker 2>also seen over and over again that like just beating

3:40:33.090 --> 3:40:35.150
<v Speaker 2>them in an election, even like one that makes them

3:40:35.170 --> 3:40:39.330
<v Speaker 2>very sad, does not bring long lasting victory, right? We

3:40:39.370 --> 3:40:42.200
<v Speaker 2>remember 2020, you know, that seemed like a good election.

3:40:42.260 --> 3:40:44.629
<v Speaker 2>It seemed like things were going to at least move

3:40:44.670 --> 3:40:46.980
<v Speaker 2>away from the Trumpy stuff. And then it absolutely didn't.

3:40:47.020 --> 3:40:49.140
<v Speaker 2>It got much worse in 2024. And part of why

3:40:49.160 --> 3:40:50.380
<v Speaker 2>it got much more, big part of why it got

3:40:50.420 --> 3:40:53.680
<v Speaker 2>much worse is the Biden administration did fucking nothing to

3:40:53.760 --> 3:40:56.400
<v Speaker 2>punish Trump or any of his people for the crimes

3:40:56.420 --> 3:40:58.920
<v Speaker 2>that they committed in office for January 6th, for any

3:40:58.940 --> 3:41:01.810
<v Speaker 2>of that. Merrick Garland completely shat the bed and he

3:41:01.860 --> 3:41:04.250
<v Speaker 2>was allowed to shit the bed because that was what

3:41:04.590 --> 3:41:07.210
<v Speaker 2>Biden and the people in charge of the Democratic Party wanted.

3:41:07.270 --> 3:41:10.700
<v Speaker 2>They did not want to risk going after Trump in

3:41:10.740 --> 3:41:14.280
<v Speaker 2>a serious way and, you know, being seen as penalizing

3:41:14.320 --> 3:41:18.600
<v Speaker 2>their political enemies. And that's become such a bugbear in

3:41:18.660 --> 3:41:21.080
<v Speaker 2>liberal politics that like, well, that's just not what we

3:41:21.100 --> 3:41:23.420
<v Speaker 2>do here in America. We don't punish, you know, we

3:41:23.440 --> 3:41:25.950
<v Speaker 2>beat them in elections, but we don't go after. I

3:41:25.970 --> 3:41:28.269
<v Speaker 2>think Hakeem Jeffries had a quote that was along the

3:41:28.310 --> 3:41:30.150
<v Speaker 2>lines of like, the American people don't want.

3:41:30.670 --> 3:41:32.730
<v Speaker 1>Us to get even. Yeah, they don't want.

3:41:32.670 --> 3:41:35.629
<v Speaker 2>Us to get even. They want us to govern properly.

3:41:35.670 --> 3:41:38.910
<v Speaker 2>And governing properly means- It's not even about getting even.

3:41:38.930 --> 3:41:43.170
<v Speaker 2>It means punishing people for committing crimes against your society, right?

3:41:43.629 --> 3:41:46.119
<v Speaker 2>The Trump administration, this is not just a case of, oh, well,

3:41:46.160 --> 3:41:49.320
<v Speaker 2>these guys were bad at governing. They broke the law.

3:41:49.740 --> 3:41:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump is repeatedly, like massively engaged in fraud to the

3:41:54.760 --> 3:41:57.550
<v Speaker 2>tune of billions of dollars that he has stolen from

3:41:57.590 --> 3:41:59.850
<v Speaker 2>taxpayers and taken in foreign bribes.

3:42:00.230 --> 3:42:00.949
<v Speaker 1>We know this.

3:42:01.090 --> 3:42:05.890
<v Speaker 2>It's well-documented. We know that under his leadership, the Department

3:42:05.910 --> 3:42:07.690
<v Speaker 2>of Defense, the Department of War, whatever you want to

3:42:07.750 --> 3:42:10.840
<v Speaker 2>fucking call them right now, have committed crimes overseas. The

3:42:10.879 --> 3:42:14.760
<v Speaker 2>war against Iran is definitely illegal. There's a number of

3:42:14.840 --> 3:42:18.000
<v Speaker 2>policies that fucking Hegseth has been responsible for that also

3:42:18.640 --> 3:42:22.130
<v Speaker 2>should be seen as potentially criminal. In addition to this,

3:42:22.170 --> 3:42:24.830
<v Speaker 2>you've just got the fact that there is a broader

3:42:24.890 --> 3:42:29.010
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy among the tech elite. to get rid of democracy.

3:42:29.530 --> 3:42:31.350
<v Speaker 2>And they've been pretty open about what they wanted to do,

3:42:31.370 --> 3:42:34.050
<v Speaker 2>about the fact that they are looking to create a

3:42:34.170 --> 3:42:38.129
<v Speaker 2>new governing structure that does not give regular people any

3:42:38.190 --> 3:42:40.650
<v Speaker 2>sort of say, right? Peter Thiel is open about the

3:42:40.690 --> 3:42:43.510
<v Speaker 2>fact that he wants dictatorships, a bunch of them, balkanizing

3:42:43.530 --> 3:42:47.100
<v Speaker 2>the United States. All of these things shouldn't be allowed

3:42:47.240 --> 3:42:49.580
<v Speaker 2>to just sort of sit there. One of the things

3:42:49.600 --> 3:42:51.539
<v Speaker 2>that does really worry me is that there's been some

3:42:51.640 --> 3:42:53.480
<v Speaker 2>evidence that I've come across in the last couple of

3:42:53.840 --> 3:42:56.240
<v Speaker 2>days that prior to the midterms, some people in Silicon

3:42:56.260 --> 3:42:59.630
<v Speaker 2>Valley were have been reaching out to Democrats, right? Because

3:42:59.650 --> 3:43:01.670
<v Speaker 2>they can see which side their bread is buttered on.

3:43:01.690 --> 3:43:03.220
<v Speaker 2>They know that things are like, that this was a

3:43:03.300 --> 3:43:06.200
<v Speaker 2>bad bet and that's proven to be a bad bet

3:43:06.260 --> 3:43:09.820
<v Speaker 2>by 2026. And they need some Democrats on their side

3:43:09.879 --> 3:43:12.640
<v Speaker 2>because they want the government on their side. And like,

3:43:12.900 --> 3:43:14.480
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of things we can't allow. We can't

3:43:14.520 --> 3:43:17.600
<v Speaker 2>allow Trump to get away without accountability. We can't allow

3:43:17.650 --> 3:43:20.090
<v Speaker 2>his kids to get away without accountability. We can't allow

3:43:20.129 --> 3:43:23.370
<v Speaker 2>people like Pete Hegseth to get away without accountability. And

3:43:23.390 --> 3:43:26.670
<v Speaker 2>we can't allow Silicon Valley to get away without accountability, right?

3:43:26.720 --> 3:43:29.560
<v Speaker 2>There need to be people in fucking cages, right?

3:43:29.680 --> 3:43:31.220
<v Speaker 1>At the very least, as the.

3:43:31.180 --> 3:43:33.800
<v Speaker 2>End result of this. And that's not something I think

3:43:33.820 --> 3:43:35.680
<v Speaker 2>is going to happen in the next year or two.

3:43:35.820 --> 3:43:37.940
<v Speaker 2>But what they can do, what Congress can do right now,

3:43:37.959 --> 3:43:41.039
<v Speaker 2>the House has the ability to subpoena and investigate. Democrats

3:43:41.060 --> 3:43:43.740
<v Speaker 2>have certainly enough of a lead in Congress that they

3:43:43.780 --> 3:43:46.119
<v Speaker 2>can start, if they don't want to go for, and

3:43:46.170 --> 3:43:48.170
<v Speaker 2>I can actually understand an argument for not trying to

3:43:48.230 --> 3:43:50.090
<v Speaker 2>impeach Trump right now, given the fact that they tried

3:43:50.129 --> 3:43:52.070
<v Speaker 2>a couple of times, although I kind of think they

3:43:52.090 --> 3:43:54.750
<v Speaker 2>should try. But there are people they can't impeach, right?

3:43:54.770 --> 3:43:57.090
<v Speaker 2>They can go after Hegseth, right? They can go after

3:43:57.110 --> 3:44:01.030
<v Speaker 2>RFK Jr., right? And these are people that they should

3:44:01.110 --> 3:44:04.350
<v Speaker 2>go after. And if I see the Democrats making Elon

3:44:04.400 --> 3:44:06.949
<v Speaker 2>Musk's life a living hell, right? If I see the

3:44:07.000 --> 3:44:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Democrats investigating Meta, investigating SpaceX, investigating fucking Anderson Horowitz, if

3:44:16.080 --> 3:44:18.820
<v Speaker 2>I see stuff like that happening, if I see them

3:44:18.879 --> 3:44:22.109
<v Speaker 2>at least trying to to force RFK Jr. and Hegseth

3:44:22.190 --> 3:44:24.269
<v Speaker 2>out of office, if I see them trying to prosecute

3:44:24.629 --> 3:44:27.670
<v Speaker 2>Hegseth once he gets forced out, I will at least

3:44:27.750 --> 3:44:31.910
<v Speaker 2>feel like, okay, maybe they're showing the kind of guts

3:44:32.030 --> 3:44:38.250
<v Speaker 2>they need for 2028 to actually lead to a conclusive victory, right?

3:44:38.610 --> 3:44:40.849
<v Speaker 2>Because again, I don't think there's much of a possibility

3:44:41.470 --> 3:44:45.000
<v Speaker 2>of punishing everyone who has broken the fucking law properly

3:44:45.379 --> 3:44:47.119
<v Speaker 2>right now, but I do believe there is the potential

3:44:47.140 --> 3:44:49.660
<v Speaker 2>that if they start right now, and that if they

3:44:49.700 --> 3:44:52.480
<v Speaker 2>begin that process, the Republicans have a lot more of

3:44:52.540 --> 3:44:56.920
<v Speaker 2>an ability to obfuscate and interfere with that right now

3:44:57.020 --> 3:44:59.090
<v Speaker 2>while they still have the presidency, while they still have

3:44:59.110 --> 3:45:01.910
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court. But if the Democrats start fighting now

3:45:02.090 --> 3:45:05.030
<v Speaker 2>and build that habit of fighting, then I will have

3:45:05.050 --> 3:45:08.650
<v Speaker 2>a lot more faith that should they gain the executive branch,

3:45:08.930 --> 3:45:12.390
<v Speaker 2>that they will start taking efforts to extend that and

3:45:12.850 --> 3:45:14.930
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that we're actually properly punishing these people.

3:45:14.950 --> 3:45:17.540
<v Speaker 2>Because again, it's not about even vengeance, not that vengeance

3:45:17.580 --> 3:45:21.580
<v Speaker 2>doesn't feel good, It's about self-defense. And the only real

3:45:21.640 --> 3:45:23.420
<v Speaker 2>self-defense at this point is making sure that none of

3:45:23.459 --> 3:45:25.800
<v Speaker 2>these people can ever get close to power again. And

3:45:25.840 --> 3:45:28.379
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't just mean kicking them out of office. It

3:45:28.420 --> 3:45:32.050
<v Speaker 2>means locking them up. It means doing worse in some

3:45:32.090 --> 3:45:35.690
<v Speaker 2>cases because treason exists and there's a prescribed punishment for that.

3:45:36.190 --> 3:45:39.070
<v Speaker 2>And it means taking away their fucking money, right? Especially

3:45:39.090 --> 3:45:40.510
<v Speaker 2>when we come to the Silicon Valley people, it means

3:45:40.550 --> 3:45:44.160
<v Speaker 2>taking away every fucking ill-gotten dime they've gotten. And I

3:45:44.220 --> 3:45:46.500
<v Speaker 2>think this is something that you can frame this in

3:45:46.540 --> 3:45:49.310
<v Speaker 2>a way that that does not sound like politics of

3:45:49.410 --> 3:45:52.750
<v Speaker 2>vengeance to the average American conservative, right? Because that's not

3:45:52.930 --> 3:45:54.570
<v Speaker 2>the message you want. There's too fucking many of them

3:45:54.590 --> 3:45:56.270
<v Speaker 2>for one thing. That's not the message that's going to

3:45:56.310 --> 3:45:58.550
<v Speaker 2>win anything. I think the message that will win anything

3:45:58.610 --> 3:46:00.490
<v Speaker 2>is if you talk to both, you know, your liberal

3:46:00.530 --> 3:46:04.660
<v Speaker 2>democratic progressive constituency and the chunk of, you know, conservatives

3:46:04.770 --> 3:46:07.520
<v Speaker 2>and centrists who have voted off and on for Trump,

3:46:07.560 --> 3:46:09.640
<v Speaker 2>but are not super committed far right and say, look,

3:46:10.290 --> 3:46:13.580
<v Speaker 2>You are being hurt by these people. They have injured you.

3:46:13.640 --> 3:46:16.670
<v Speaker 2>They have stolen from you. They have destroyed your livelihood.

3:46:17.190 --> 3:46:19.410
<v Speaker 2>And we're going to not just hurt them for the

3:46:19.430 --> 3:46:21.129
<v Speaker 2>sake of vengeance. We're going to hurt them to take

3:46:21.190 --> 3:46:24.210
<v Speaker 2>their money and redistribute it to things that can help

3:46:24.250 --> 3:46:26.470
<v Speaker 2>you and that can fix and repair the systems that

3:46:26.490 --> 3:46:29.570
<v Speaker 2>have been hurting you. That's not just, again, how you

3:46:29.629 --> 3:46:33.010
<v Speaker 2>punish your enemy. That's how you build a long lasting

3:46:33.110 --> 3:46:36.340
<v Speaker 2>coalition by showing that like, no, no, no. Number one,

3:46:36.480 --> 3:46:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not just going after people who piss me off politically.

3:46:38.720 --> 3:46:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm going after enemies of the Republic. I'm going after

3:46:41.040 --> 3:46:42.820
<v Speaker 2>people who have hurt you and who have hurt.

3:46:42.840 --> 3:46:43.260
<v Speaker 1>All of us.

3:46:43.740 --> 3:46:46.480
<v Speaker 2>And I am going to stop them from being able

3:46:46.540 --> 3:46:48.780
<v Speaker 2>to do that again. I'm going to punish them. I'm

3:46:48.820 --> 3:46:50.680
<v Speaker 2>going to take what they've taken from you. And I'm

3:46:50.720 --> 3:46:53.100
<v Speaker 2>going to give it back to the people. I think that's,

3:46:53.660 --> 3:46:55.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a line that you can actually build a durable

3:46:56.080 --> 3:46:57.500
<v Speaker 2>and loyal electorate over.

3:46:57.879 --> 3:46:58.099
<v Speaker 5>Right.

3:46:58.540 --> 3:47:01.340
<v Speaker 2>One thing the Trump he airs should have taught Democrats

3:47:01.560 --> 3:47:05.750
<v Speaker 2>is that vengeance is really good politics. People like being

3:47:05.850 --> 3:47:08.430
<v Speaker 2>promised that you're going to fuck up someone who's hurting them.

3:47:08.490 --> 3:47:10.390
<v Speaker 2>The big thing that the Trump administration does, they just

3:47:10.490 --> 3:47:14.050
<v Speaker 2>lied about who's causing the damage, about who's hurting Americans,

3:47:14.070 --> 3:47:16.709
<v Speaker 2>about who's responsible for the problems in our society. They've

3:47:16.730 --> 3:47:20.370
<v Speaker 2>blamed it on trans people, on migrants, on fucking Hollywood

3:47:20.430 --> 3:47:23.000
<v Speaker 2>wokes or whatever. And that's all fucking nonsense. But there

3:47:23.120 --> 3:47:26.660
<v Speaker 2>are people who are continuing to cause tremendous damage to

3:47:26.700 --> 3:47:28.939
<v Speaker 2>the average person in this country and to people all

3:47:29.000 --> 3:47:32.100
<v Speaker 2>around the world. And if you build a politics of

3:47:32.140 --> 3:47:35.840
<v Speaker 2>vengeance against the people who are actually destroying life itself,

3:47:36.730 --> 3:47:39.550
<v Speaker 2>I think that's good politics. And it's also, again, just

3:47:39.590 --> 3:47:40.550
<v Speaker 2>basic self-defense.

3:47:41.470 --> 3:47:43.450
<v Speaker 8>I think in terms of what the potential of this

3:47:43.490 --> 3:47:48.340
<v Speaker 8>kind of politics is going forward– So one of the

3:47:48.400 --> 3:47:51.260
<v Speaker 8>fascinating things about this election is that the Republicans were

3:47:51.300 --> 3:47:55.940
<v Speaker 8>dealt this world historic ass kicking and the economy hasn't.

3:47:55.740 --> 3:47:58.010
<v Speaker 1>Even collapsed yet. That's the thing.

3:47:58.629 --> 3:48:02.250
<v Speaker 8>We have not seen the bottom of the support for

3:48:02.290 --> 3:48:02.750
<v Speaker 8>these guys.

3:48:02.990 --> 3:48:03.209
<v Speaker 1>Nope.

3:48:03.510 --> 3:48:07.769
<v Speaker 8>We still haven't seen that yet because they haven't had

3:48:07.980 --> 3:48:11.300
<v Speaker 8>their 2008 yet. And that is coming. The day in

3:48:11.340 --> 3:48:14.370
<v Speaker 8>which the AI bubble bursts. is a thing that we

3:48:14.410 --> 3:48:16.890
<v Speaker 8>are going to see. And if you are already set

3:48:16.930 --> 3:48:19.800
<v Speaker 8>up and positioning yourselves as the people who are going

3:48:20.060 --> 3:48:23.140
<v Speaker 8>after all of these Silicon Valley fascist freaks who have

3:48:23.160 --> 3:48:26.040
<v Speaker 8>been immiserating every single person in this country except for

3:48:26.060 --> 3:48:30.520
<v Speaker 8>themselves and their narrow cadre of allies, and you are

3:48:30.580 --> 3:48:35.610
<v Speaker 8>already doing that when everything blows up, That is an

3:48:35.750 --> 3:48:39.070
<v Speaker 8>actual path to like fundamentally changing the material balance of

3:48:39.110 --> 3:48:42.080
<v Speaker 8>political forces in the US because those people are going

3:48:42.120 --> 3:48:45.280
<v Speaker 8>to be– that is going to be the most vulnerable

3:48:45.340 --> 3:48:48.560
<v Speaker 8>they have ever been like since they came to power

3:48:49.100 --> 3:48:50.879
<v Speaker 8>is going to be them in the position of, oh

3:48:50.920 --> 3:48:53.020
<v Speaker 8>my god, we just blew up the entire global economy.

3:48:53.390 --> 3:48:53.500
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

3:48:53.700 --> 3:48:56.490
<v Speaker 8>And if you don't do the thing that Obama did, right,

3:48:56.550 --> 3:48:58.630
<v Speaker 8>which was Obama went to the bankers after 2008 and

3:48:58.930 --> 3:49:00.690
<v Speaker 8>told them I'm the only thing standing between you and

3:49:00.709 --> 3:49:01.150
<v Speaker 8>a guillotine.

3:49:01.600 --> 3:49:04.690
<v Speaker 1>Don't stand between them and a guillotine. Yeah.

3:49:05.270 --> 3:49:05.530
<v Speaker 3>Right.

3:49:06.630 --> 3:49:09.030
<v Speaker 8>If you don't do that, and if you go after

3:49:09.070 --> 3:49:13.690
<v Speaker 8>these people and destroy them, actually destroy them as a class,

3:49:14.290 --> 3:49:21.010
<v Speaker 8>just completely annihilate their ability to materially affect politics, materially

3:49:21.050 --> 3:49:24.770
<v Speaker 8>affect society, we can make this not happen again.

3:49:25.650 --> 3:49:25.830
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

3:49:26.350 --> 3:49:27.130
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

3:49:27.490 --> 3:49:29.870
<v Speaker 2>There's a way to stop this, and part of it,

3:49:30.870 --> 3:49:33.740
<v Speaker 2>is you have to fucking stomp these people out like

3:49:33.880 --> 3:49:35.940
<v Speaker 2>embers on a fucking carpet, right?

3:49:36.400 --> 3:49:37.380
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:49:38.140 --> 3:49:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, so that's what I'll be looking for. If I

3:49:40.260 --> 3:49:43.460
<v Speaker 2>see any signs at all that the Democrats are, and

3:49:43.480 --> 3:49:45.090
<v Speaker 2>I have seen some signs, at least in terms of

3:49:45.230 --> 3:49:47.910
<v Speaker 2>what people who have been elected and reelected have been

3:49:47.950 --> 3:49:52.250
<v Speaker 2>stating recently, there are Democrats who want to do this, right? Now-

3:49:52.870 --> 3:49:55.590
<v Speaker 2>There's probably going to be a conflict within the Democratic

3:49:55.630 --> 3:49:56.970
<v Speaker 2>Party about that. Oh, yeah.

3:49:57.030 --> 3:49:57.210
<v Speaker 4>Right?

3:49:57.290 --> 3:49:59.030
<v Speaker 2>Like, there's definitely going to be a conflict about, like,

3:49:59.090 --> 3:50:00.710
<v Speaker 2>should we do? You can see that in what Hakeem

3:50:00.750 --> 3:50:03.930
<v Speaker 2>Jeffries have said and how that sort of counters what,

3:50:04.130 --> 3:50:05.490
<v Speaker 2>you know, people like Merkley have said.

3:50:06.150 --> 3:50:08.750
<v Speaker 1>There is definitely a debate between someone like Jeffries or

3:50:08.770 --> 3:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>even some things like Tallarico has been saying.

3:50:10.480 --> 3:50:10.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:50:10.740 --> 3:50:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Tallarico said that he's, quote, not interested in retribution, is

3:50:13.920 --> 3:50:18.420
<v Speaker 1>more interested on delivering economically for Texans, but has also

3:50:18.440 --> 3:50:21.300
<v Speaker 1>talked about, quote, rooting out corruption. Yep. And I think

3:50:21.340 --> 3:50:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the corruption angle is really the the thing that can

3:50:24.180 --> 3:50:28.650
<v Speaker 1>thread the affordability, cost of living stuff with the genuine

3:50:28.680 --> 3:50:31.710
<v Speaker 1>need to punish the Trump administration and Trump himself for

3:50:31.910 --> 3:50:34.650
<v Speaker 1>all of the stuff they've done the past two years.

3:50:36.070 --> 3:50:37.650
<v Speaker 1>And this has been something we've been talking about a

3:50:37.970 --> 3:50:43.730
<v Speaker 1>lot privately in our own reactions to the results. Because

3:50:44.130 --> 3:50:46.950
<v Speaker 1>one of my first reactions after seeing the scale of

3:50:46.970 --> 3:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats' victory, the worst case scenario for me was

3:50:49.500 --> 3:50:53.700
<v Speaker 1>that if Democrats get this huge mandate... And then don't

3:50:53.720 --> 3:50:56.290
<v Speaker 1>really do anything material with it. If they just kind

3:50:56.310 --> 3:51:03.210
<v Speaker 1>of coast on bullshit, performative anti-Trumpism, doing endless hearings or

3:51:03.230 --> 3:51:06.830
<v Speaker 1>kind of impeachments that go nowhere. Because Democrats do really

3:51:06.870 --> 3:51:08.910
<v Speaker 1>need to go after Trump, right? And they do need

3:51:08.970 --> 3:51:11.950
<v Speaker 1>to shatter the mega movement. And they need to go

3:51:12.010 --> 3:51:15.780
<v Speaker 1>after this federal administration, DHS, ICE, Department of War, right?

3:51:15.820 --> 3:51:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And they need to do that while setting things up

3:51:19.060 --> 3:51:21.620
<v Speaker 1>to take power in 2028 to then send even more

3:51:21.640 --> 3:51:24.630
<v Speaker 1>of these fucks to prison. But I think this does

3:51:24.670 --> 3:51:29.050
<v Speaker 1>have to be, I think, in tandem with also doing

3:51:29.070 --> 3:51:32.310
<v Speaker 1>the things they campaigned on, which is mostly on cost

3:51:32.330 --> 3:51:35.650
<v Speaker 1>of living and affordability. Because I think if they don't

3:51:36.010 --> 3:51:39.780
<v Speaker 1>at least put a focus on that, especially in their messaging,

3:51:39.800 --> 3:51:42.020
<v Speaker 1>but also that needs to be built on them actually

3:51:42.040 --> 3:51:45.340
<v Speaker 1>doing real things. If that is not their focus, then

3:51:45.360 --> 3:51:48.420
<v Speaker 1>I think anything they do to hurt Trump could be

3:51:48.460 --> 3:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>seen as just like posturing. It could be seen as

3:51:51.600 --> 3:51:54.930
<v Speaker 1>just trying to please liberal elites rather than focusing on

3:51:54.950 --> 3:51:56.910
<v Speaker 1>the concerns of people who cannot pay rent next month

3:51:56.950 --> 3:51:59.910
<v Speaker 1>or can't afford groceries. So it is something that needs to,

3:51:59.950 --> 3:52:04.490
<v Speaker 1>I think, be done carefully. And the anti-corruption aspect is,

3:52:04.950 --> 3:52:06.980
<v Speaker 1>I think, the perfect way to tie these things together.

3:52:08.020 --> 3:52:10.020
<v Speaker 1>Because the anti-corruption angle is a really easy way to

3:52:10.080 --> 3:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about these economic and class issues, which is directly

3:52:14.200 --> 3:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>connected to all of the ways that Trump has been

3:52:16.020 --> 3:52:18.810
<v Speaker 1>engaging in corruption to help his billionaire friends, all the

3:52:18.830 --> 3:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>ways that the Trump sons have been doing insane, like

3:52:23.080 --> 3:52:26.720
<v Speaker 1>insane corruption, right? Stuff that puts the Hunter Biden shit

3:52:26.800 --> 3:52:30.410
<v Speaker 1>to like absolute shame. Jared Kushner, all the ways that

3:52:30.930 --> 3:52:34.170
<v Speaker 1>companies have been siphoning tons of money sent into DHS

3:52:34.190 --> 3:52:36.870
<v Speaker 1>to set up these like private prisons. Like there's the

3:52:36.930 --> 3:52:39.590
<v Speaker 1>level of corruption. We haven't even reported on it enough, frankly,

3:52:40.050 --> 3:52:41.890
<v Speaker 1>on this show. But the level of corruption in the

3:52:41.910 --> 3:52:45.010
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration is absolutely wild. And that's a very easy

3:52:45.050 --> 3:52:47.610
<v Speaker 1>way to tie affordability and cost of living to the

3:52:47.670 --> 3:52:50.180
<v Speaker 1>need to hold. Yeah. Trump accountable.

3:52:50.360 --> 3:52:53.430
<v Speaker 2>And I think beyond that, you also tie in the

3:52:53.490 --> 3:52:57.970
<v Speaker 2>fact that fraud and scams have gotten so much massively worse.

3:52:58.150 --> 3:53:02.490
<v Speaker 2>And Silicon Valley is deeply tied. Every AI company is

3:53:02.530 --> 3:53:05.380
<v Speaker 2>complicit in massive fraud simply by making these models that

3:53:05.430 --> 3:53:09.080
<v Speaker 2>are used to commit fraud on a massive scale. Beyond that,

3:53:09.140 --> 3:53:12.679
<v Speaker 2>every social media company is complicit in massive fraud, particularly Meta.

3:53:13.260 --> 3:53:15.650
<v Speaker 2>And then just beyond that, MLMs are the backbone in

3:53:15.670 --> 3:53:18.130
<v Speaker 2>a lot of ways of Republican fundraising, or one of

3:53:18.170 --> 3:53:19.910
<v Speaker 2>the major backbones of Republican fundraising.

3:53:19.950 --> 3:53:22.050
<v Speaker 1>Well, Democratic fundraising too, unfortunately.

3:53:22.950 --> 3:53:25.190
<v Speaker 2>And Democratic fundraising, unfortunately too, which is why it's going

3:53:25.210 --> 3:53:27.390
<v Speaker 2>to be hard to fucking go after them. But we

3:53:27.430 --> 3:53:30.210
<v Speaker 2>need to, that's one of the fucking reservoirs of fascism

3:53:30.250 --> 3:53:32.500
<v Speaker 2>in our goddamn society, and we need to burn them out.

3:53:33.620 --> 3:53:35.660
<v Speaker 1>No, I think there's a way to do all that

3:53:36.120 --> 3:53:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't get caught in this sort of like, these

3:53:38.420 --> 3:53:41.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas of like revenge or retribution, but just justice and accountability,

3:53:41.500 --> 3:53:44.070
<v Speaker 1>which I think people will be able to buy into more,

3:53:44.390 --> 3:53:48.110
<v Speaker 1>especially if it's coupled with delivering on economic issues. And

3:53:48.140 --> 3:53:51.060
<v Speaker 1>this is something I think out of everyone, El-Sayed has

3:53:51.120 --> 3:53:54.340
<v Speaker 1>kind of expressed this the most clearly in response to

3:53:54.380 --> 3:53:56.620
<v Speaker 1>a question on Morning Joe. He laid out how to

3:53:56.660 --> 3:54:00.620
<v Speaker 1>pursue efforts to hold the Trump admin accountable from investigations

3:54:00.670 --> 3:54:04.030
<v Speaker 1>into what led to the war in Iran. And how

3:54:04.430 --> 3:54:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Doge totally destroyed the FDA.

3:54:07.120 --> 3:54:10.080
<v Speaker 12>We need to align everything we're doing with the goal

3:54:10.250 --> 3:54:12.910
<v Speaker 12>of addressing the immediate pain that people are feeling at

3:54:12.950 --> 3:54:16.980
<v Speaker 12>the pump. at the grocery store in their lives. So

3:54:17.200 --> 3:54:19.360
<v Speaker 12>there are investigations that are worth having. I want to

3:54:19.380 --> 3:54:22.550
<v Speaker 12>understand exactly what led into the war in Iran. I

3:54:22.590 --> 3:54:24.210
<v Speaker 12>think we need to understand exactly what that was.

3:54:24.270 --> 3:54:24.490
<v Speaker 1>Why?

3:54:24.630 --> 3:54:27.610
<v Speaker 12>Because it's costing us dearly in terms of the lives

3:54:27.650 --> 3:54:30.030
<v Speaker 12>of our service men and women, in terms of the

3:54:30.050 --> 3:54:32.690
<v Speaker 12>price of gas, in terms of the price of groceries. Similarly,

3:54:32.850 --> 3:54:34.990
<v Speaker 12>you know, more niche story, but one that I've been

3:54:35.030 --> 3:54:37.560
<v Speaker 12>paying attention to for a lot of reasons. In Michigan,

3:54:37.580 --> 3:54:38.900
<v Speaker 12>we were dodging lettuce all summer.

3:54:39.560 --> 3:54:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Why?

3:54:39.900 --> 3:54:43.360
<v Speaker 12>Because of a cyclosporiasis outbreak. And you think about that

3:54:43.580 --> 3:54:45.940
<v Speaker 12>and you're like, OK, so what decisions were made to

3:54:46.020 --> 3:54:48.360
<v Speaker 12>doge away the part of the FDA that is supposed

3:54:48.380 --> 3:54:49.259
<v Speaker 12>to be the FDA?

3:54:49.340 --> 3:54:49.540
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:54:49.600 --> 3:54:52.420
<v Speaker 12>Like make sure you're not eating lettuce that someone has defiled.

3:54:52.920 --> 3:54:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Right.

3:54:53.310 --> 3:54:55.070
<v Speaker 12>And then we ate, you know, people were eating that

3:54:55.070 --> 3:55:00.210
<v Speaker 12>8000 illnesses and the CDC's count was 2000 cases behind

3:55:00.270 --> 3:55:02.750
<v Speaker 12>the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services count. I

3:55:02.790 --> 3:55:05.430
<v Speaker 12>want to understand exactly what happened there so we can

3:55:05.470 --> 3:55:08.410
<v Speaker 12>set up legislation to solve the problem. So long as

3:55:08.450 --> 3:55:11.070
<v Speaker 12>people see our politics as being about this red versus

3:55:11.110 --> 3:55:14.780
<v Speaker 12>blue retribution game, all of us collectively lose. If you

3:55:14.860 --> 3:55:18.320
<v Speaker 12>are focused on addressing the ways that bad decisions were

3:55:18.360 --> 3:55:20.460
<v Speaker 12>made so that you can solve them and then you

3:55:20.520 --> 3:55:23.700
<v Speaker 12>solve them, that's where I think accountability has to stand.

3:55:23.880 --> 3:55:27.020
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because my kind of worst case scenario reaction

3:55:27.560 --> 3:55:31.580
<v Speaker 1>was that, you know, Dems will just coast on performative anti-anti-Trumpism.

3:55:32.040 --> 3:55:34.820
<v Speaker 1>And if anything, I think pressure needs to be applied

3:55:34.920 --> 3:55:37.100
<v Speaker 1>now maybe a bit more in the other direction. Now

3:55:37.120 --> 3:55:42.230
<v Speaker 1>that I'm seeing more statements come out from senators-elect, there's

3:55:42.270 --> 3:55:45.250
<v Speaker 1>a lot of focus on really trying to deliver on

3:55:45.270 --> 3:55:47.890
<v Speaker 1>the affordability thing. And frankly, there might actually need to

3:55:47.930 --> 3:55:53.190
<v Speaker 1>be some more outside pressure on really, really, really sticking

3:55:53.250 --> 3:55:57.330
<v Speaker 1>it to Trump, DHS, Department of War. But I think

3:55:58.070 --> 3:55:59.450
<v Speaker 1>there is a way to do both these things at

3:55:59.490 --> 3:56:02.910
<v Speaker 1>the same time. I think my other really big concern

3:56:03.170 --> 3:56:06.090
<v Speaker 1>is that one of the structural problems of the Democratic

3:56:06.130 --> 3:56:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Party is that in a similar way to.

3:56:10.560 --> 3:56:13.780
<v Speaker 8>The old nationalist party of China, the Kuomintang, the KMT,

3:56:14.400 --> 3:56:18.190
<v Speaker 8>which was a party that had both Mao in it

3:56:18.710 --> 3:56:22.990
<v Speaker 8>and also a huge block of China's landlords at the

3:56:23.030 --> 3:56:23.570
<v Speaker 8>same time.

3:56:23.590 --> 3:56:23.910
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:56:24.730 --> 3:56:28.520
<v Speaker 8>Where like you have like the most, like you have,

3:56:28.560 --> 3:56:30.000
<v Speaker 8>you have the guy who is going to kill all

3:56:30.020 --> 3:56:32.560
<v Speaker 8>the landlords and the landlords in the same party. And

3:56:32.580 --> 3:56:35.460
<v Speaker 8>this is sort of the problem with, like with, with, with,

3:56:35.480 --> 3:56:37.750
<v Speaker 8>you know, they're saying like delivering on affordability and the

3:56:37.770 --> 3:56:40.010
<v Speaker 8>Republicans are saying this now, but like, OK, how are

3:56:40.030 --> 3:56:43.490
<v Speaker 8>you actually doing that? Because the thing is, right, the

3:56:43.570 --> 3:56:46.670
<v Speaker 8>people who the people who are making everything expensive and

3:56:46.690 --> 3:56:48.030
<v Speaker 8>the people who are making it so you can't pay

3:56:48.070 --> 3:56:50.720
<v Speaker 8>your rent in the grocery stores, like all the people

3:56:50.740 --> 3:56:53.860
<v Speaker 8>who own those businesses, all of the people who like,

3:56:53.880 --> 3:56:56.140
<v Speaker 8>you know, people who are driving rents up like they

3:56:56.180 --> 3:56:58.840
<v Speaker 8>all make money and they're all friends of a bunch

3:56:58.880 --> 3:57:01.620
<v Speaker 8>of people in the Democratic Party. And so I think

3:57:01.680 --> 3:57:03.120
<v Speaker 8>I think this is the other thing we're going to hit,

3:57:03.170 --> 3:57:06.550
<v Speaker 8>which is there's going to be a battle over like okay,

3:57:06.570 --> 3:57:08.410
<v Speaker 8>so we've all agreed we want price to go down,

3:57:08.430 --> 3:57:11.250
<v Speaker 8>but how do you actually do that? What are the

3:57:11.350 --> 3:57:14.710
<v Speaker 8>actual balance of class forces here? Because you're dealing with

3:57:14.770 --> 3:57:17.180
<v Speaker 8>a situation where you have a movement that is based

3:57:17.300 --> 3:57:22.380
<v Speaker 8>on working class anger that has delivered this victory, but

3:57:22.400 --> 3:57:26.300
<v Speaker 8>then you have a party that is also, to a really,

3:57:26.340 --> 3:57:30.510
<v Speaker 8>really significant extent, a representation of the people who are

3:57:30.650 --> 3:57:33.650
<v Speaker 8>fucking over all of these workers, right? And that is,

3:57:34.310 --> 3:57:38.000
<v Speaker 8>welcome to like the new terrain of class struggle, the

3:57:38.120 --> 3:57:38.679
<v Speaker 8>21st century.

3:57:39.260 --> 3:57:41.300
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, it's exciting that we're even having these

3:57:41.360 --> 3:57:44.600
<v Speaker 1>conversations more openly in a way that maybe we weren't

3:57:44.600 --> 3:57:47.420
<v Speaker 1>10 years ago. Something that like, you know, a lot

3:57:47.440 --> 3:57:50.090
<v Speaker 1>of candidates did, or at least Tallarico did campaign on

3:57:50.150 --> 3:57:53.730
<v Speaker 1>things like universal pre-K. Lots of candidates campaigned on ending,

3:57:54.110 --> 3:57:57.050
<v Speaker 1>you know, wars, data center moratoriums. There's these sort of

3:57:57.070 --> 3:57:59.590
<v Speaker 1>like reforms, right? Which will kind of chip away at

3:57:59.660 --> 3:58:03.500
<v Speaker 1>certain things. But there are these like much larger... issues

3:58:04.260 --> 3:58:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and tackling corporate power is going to be, you know,

3:58:06.300 --> 3:58:09.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger than just delivering universal childcare. Right. And that's something,

3:58:09.640 --> 3:58:12.340
<v Speaker 1>both those things are things that the Tallarico campaign was,

3:58:13.200 --> 3:58:14.880
<v Speaker 1>was based on. That was kind of his, like his

3:58:14.980 --> 3:58:18.660
<v Speaker 1>initial kind of core plank was just like anti-corporatism. And

3:58:18.780 --> 3:58:20.480
<v Speaker 1>once you're in office, you get hit with a lot

3:58:20.500 --> 3:58:23.540
<v Speaker 1>of pressures that you don't get when you're just, you're

3:58:23.560 --> 3:58:26.020
<v Speaker 1>just campaigning. And that type of stuff usually slides away.

3:58:26.070 --> 3:58:29.190
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Bernie is still kicking after, uh, 10

3:58:29.190 --> 3:58:31.610
<v Speaker 1>billion years is, uh, It's kind of shocking in a

3:58:31.630 --> 3:58:35.070
<v Speaker 1>certain way. Obama ran on getting rid of NAFTA.

3:58:35.090 --> 3:58:35.530
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

3:58:35.650 --> 3:58:38.190
<v Speaker 8>And then spent his entire time in office, like trying

3:58:38.210 --> 3:58:41.430
<v Speaker 8>to pass war-free trade deals. And then his solution to

3:58:41.430 --> 3:58:44.060
<v Speaker 8>2008 was to do robo-signing and just have the banks

3:58:44.160 --> 3:58:47.160
<v Speaker 8>literally steal people's houses. Like, yeah, this is the next fight.

3:58:47.680 --> 3:58:49.580
<v Speaker 1>This is the next scripted episode I am like working on.

3:58:49.620 --> 3:58:52.100
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of is on this question because this doesn't

3:58:52.140 --> 3:58:54.320
<v Speaker 1>mean that we just have to, you know, pray and

3:58:54.470 --> 3:58:57.270
<v Speaker 1>hope and, you know, tweet blue sky post hard enough.

3:58:58.110 --> 3:59:00.450
<v Speaker 1>to keep Democrats to their promises or get them to

3:59:00.510 --> 3:59:04.720
<v Speaker 1>fight capital. No, that requires real work and painful, painful

3:59:04.760 --> 3:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>work that we might not see the fruits of for

3:59:06.620 --> 3:59:09.020
<v Speaker 1>a while. But I think there is momentum here and

3:59:09.550 --> 3:59:12.870
<v Speaker 1>that momentum needs to continue. And there's even something, you know,

3:59:12.890 --> 3:59:15.270
<v Speaker 1>this is more of like a non-reformist reform, but something

3:59:15.310 --> 3:59:17.350
<v Speaker 1>like the Protect the Right to Organize Act, which is

3:59:17.390 --> 3:59:21.450
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate, is gaining support. Even if that passes, right,

3:59:21.470 --> 3:59:25.010
<v Speaker 1>that will strengthen the ability for workers to unionize in

3:59:25.090 --> 3:59:28.540
<v Speaker 1>so many ways. Yeah. Under tons of anti-union legislation from

3:59:28.560 --> 3:59:31.620
<v Speaker 1>the past 70 years. And I think there is, you know,

3:59:31.760 --> 3:59:35.220
<v Speaker 1>specific targeted things we can push for. to start kind

3:59:35.240 --> 3:59:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of rolling this boulder further and further. But no, it's

3:59:39.260 --> 3:59:41.220
<v Speaker 1>not going to be easy. It's not going to be quick.

3:59:41.540 --> 3:59:44.900
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to, I guess, close by talking about

3:59:45.120 --> 3:59:48.960
<v Speaker 1>some ways that people are doing things? Not in the

3:59:49.020 --> 3:59:50.780
<v Speaker 1>electoral sense.

3:59:50.820 --> 3:59:54.310
<v Speaker 8>So let's talk about alternate ways to remove a president

3:59:54.360 --> 3:59:55.050
<v Speaker 8>from office.

3:59:56.170 --> 3:59:56.500
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

3:59:56.520 --> 4:00:00.670
<v Speaker 8>Now, while the US was having a very nice election,

4:00:01.330 --> 4:00:03.110
<v Speaker 8>a bunch of other places in the world were doing

4:00:03.210 --> 4:00:07.730
<v Speaker 8>other things. So let's begin with Paraguay in our dispatches

4:00:07.750 --> 4:00:10.510
<v Speaker 8>from a world in revolt. So we have talked a

4:00:10.570 --> 4:00:15.050
<v Speaker 8>lot on this show about protests and the sort of

4:00:15.130 --> 4:00:18.330
<v Speaker 8>uprisings that we've been seeing, how they've been this accumulation

4:00:18.370 --> 4:00:21.410
<v Speaker 8>of economic grievances, right? There are these things where there

4:00:21.470 --> 4:00:27.030
<v Speaker 8>are people's anger over worsening economic conditions and decades-long neoliberal

4:00:27.050 --> 4:00:29.910
<v Speaker 8>dismantlement of the education system. Eventually, a single event happens

4:00:29.930 --> 4:00:33.500
<v Speaker 8>and it boils over into a mass protest. Now, While

4:00:33.540 --> 4:00:35.740
<v Speaker 8>we've been talking about this, I said a few weeks ago,

4:00:35.800 --> 4:00:38.390
<v Speaker 8>we have not seen the second kind of mass uprising yet,

4:00:38.860 --> 4:00:40.770
<v Speaker 8>which is the kind of mass uprising sparked by the

4:00:40.830 --> 4:00:43.970
<v Speaker 8>instant collapse of a national economy that either increases the

4:00:43.990 --> 4:00:46.330
<v Speaker 8>price of bread by 300% or makes everyone unable to

4:00:46.470 --> 4:00:50.090
<v Speaker 8>access their money. And folks, we have our first the

4:00:50.150 --> 4:00:56.590
<v Speaker 8>economy collapsed uprising that has very quickly removed the president

4:00:56.630 --> 4:01:00.370
<v Speaker 8>of Paraguay. So let's talk about what's actually happening in

4:01:00.450 --> 4:01:06.010
<v Speaker 8>Paraguay and how Right-wing President Santiago Pena is just gone.

4:01:07.090 --> 4:01:09.210
<v Speaker 8>This is actually a very recent update. As of Thursday,

4:01:09.250 --> 4:01:15.300
<v Speaker 8>November 5th, he just resigned. So massive, massive protests engulfed

4:01:15.360 --> 4:01:19.560
<v Speaker 8>Paraguay after a bank called Unil Bank, which is used

4:01:19.660 --> 4:01:24.300
<v Speaker 8>by 60% of the population of Paraguay, was taken over

4:01:24.360 --> 4:01:26.500
<v Speaker 8>by the central bank because they didn't have enough money

4:01:26.540 --> 4:01:29.200
<v Speaker 8>to cover their reserves. Which is to say they didn't

4:01:29.220 --> 4:01:32.780
<v Speaker 8>have enough money to cover the amount of money that

4:01:32.880 --> 4:01:36.610
<v Speaker 8>everyone had put into the bank. This means that the

4:01:36.830 --> 4:01:39.030
<v Speaker 8>bank is just sort of gone now, right? All the

4:01:39.070 --> 4:01:42.320
<v Speaker 8>branches are shuttered. Their phone trees are down. And this

4:01:42.380 --> 4:01:48.120
<v Speaker 8>means that an unfathomable percentage of Paraguay's population was left

4:01:48.260 --> 4:01:50.480
<v Speaker 8>simply unable to withdraw their money from a bank.

4:01:50.840 --> 4:01:54.450
<v Speaker 1>Famously, something that never leads to anything bad happening. Or

4:01:55.190 --> 4:01:58.210
<v Speaker 1>anything that leads to a general revolt. However bad you

4:01:58.250 --> 4:02:00.630
<v Speaker 1>think this is, it is so much worse than that. Like,

4:02:01.310 --> 4:02:03.650
<v Speaker 1>UNEO manages the state pension fund.

4:02:03.670 --> 4:02:07.410
<v Speaker 8>It manages the healthcare fund that, like, state workers and

4:02:07.450 --> 4:02:09.170
<v Speaker 8>I think other workers, too, pay into.

4:02:09.190 --> 4:02:09.270
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

4:02:10.430 --> 4:02:15.170
<v Speaker 8>And it also manages the fund that's paying for Portugal's

4:02:15.270 --> 4:02:16.170
<v Speaker 8>dam system.

4:02:17.500 --> 4:02:18.600
<v Speaker 5>It is a nightmare.

4:02:19.500 --> 4:02:24.100
<v Speaker 8>And partially, so UNEO had been a bank before that,

4:02:24.120 --> 4:02:26.880
<v Speaker 8>but it had sort of rebranded around the time that

4:02:26.980 --> 4:02:30.300
<v Speaker 8>right-wing president Santiago Pena came to power. Pena himself is

4:02:30.360 --> 4:02:35.060
<v Speaker 8>a longtime baker and financier who came under fire last

4:02:35.100 --> 4:02:37.760
<v Speaker 8>year for holding a bunch of shares in this bank.

4:02:38.820 --> 4:02:42.960
<v Speaker 8>and then also appointing the head of UNEO to be

4:02:43.000 --> 4:02:45.180
<v Speaker 8>the head of the central bank, which is the bank

4:02:45.200 --> 4:02:47.280
<v Speaker 8>that's supposed to be regulating UNEO.

4:02:47.840 --> 4:02:51.010
<v Speaker 1>And they put the president in charge of the central bank.

4:02:52.530 --> 4:02:55.950
<v Speaker 8>This has gone exactly as well as you would expect

4:02:56.010 --> 4:02:57.430
<v Speaker 8>it to, and by as well as you would expect

4:02:57.490 --> 4:03:00.330
<v Speaker 8>it to. I mean, UNEO then turned around and loaned

4:03:00.390 --> 4:03:02.810
<v Speaker 8>tens of millions of dollars to businesses of friends of

4:03:02.830 --> 4:03:06.940
<v Speaker 8>the bank owners. And these loans just went belly up

4:03:07.000 --> 4:03:07.860
<v Speaker 8>because obviously they were not.

4:03:07.800 --> 4:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Getting paid back.

4:03:09.000 --> 4:03:13.240
<v Speaker 8>And so, you know, the bank, like really, really far

4:03:13.280 --> 4:03:15.400
<v Speaker 8>below the mandatory reserve limit, which is the amount of

4:03:15.480 --> 4:03:17.730
<v Speaker 8>money that you're just legally required to have on hand

4:03:18.210 --> 4:03:19.910
<v Speaker 8>so that you don't get into a situation where people

4:03:19.930 --> 4:03:20.630
<v Speaker 8>try to take their money out.

4:03:20.630 --> 4:03:21.290
<v Speaker 2>You can't pay them.

4:03:22.540 --> 4:03:25.280
<v Speaker 8>They were also lying about their debts and assets. And

4:03:25.310 --> 4:03:26.710
<v Speaker 8>there's a bunch of things that they were claiming were

4:03:26.830 --> 4:03:30.090
<v Speaker 8>assets that are actually just, they owe people money. So

4:03:30.410 --> 4:03:32.550
<v Speaker 8>the central bank of Paraguay seizes control of the bank

4:03:32.570 --> 4:03:34.350
<v Speaker 8>because they're like, oh my God, you're under the, you're

4:03:34.470 --> 4:03:36.650
<v Speaker 8>massively under the reserve limit. You're going underwater. They look

4:03:36.670 --> 4:03:38.410
<v Speaker 8>at the books and it's even worse than they thought

4:03:38.450 --> 4:03:41.970
<v Speaker 8>it was. And they basically liquidate the bank and are like,

4:03:42.150 --> 4:03:43.610
<v Speaker 8>oh my God, we have to sell off all this

4:03:43.650 --> 4:03:46.330
<v Speaker 8>bank's assets to try to like give people their money back.

4:03:47.030 --> 4:03:49.990
<v Speaker 8>But this has caused another crisis where the government was like, ah,

4:03:50.030 --> 4:03:51.250
<v Speaker 8>the bank system is going to be fine. We're going

4:03:51.270 --> 4:03:53.150
<v Speaker 8>to move all your people who only have your money

4:03:53.170 --> 4:03:56.060
<v Speaker 8>in this bank to other banks. But that meant that

4:03:56.080 --> 4:03:58.600
<v Speaker 8>like 250,000 people were trying to pull their money out

4:03:58.940 --> 4:04:02.520
<v Speaker 8>of other banks, which caused like some minor crises in

4:04:02.580 --> 4:04:06.300
<v Speaker 8>those banks. You know, this obviously resulted in massive protests,

4:04:06.860 --> 4:04:10.910
<v Speaker 8>a bunch of people lighting stuff on fire, etc. Pena

4:04:10.990 --> 4:04:13.290
<v Speaker 8>resigned before he could be impeached. There was an impeachment

4:04:13.310 --> 4:04:15.320
<v Speaker 8>vote coming. He also resigned before he could be hung

4:04:15.340 --> 4:04:18.860
<v Speaker 8>from a lamppost. It's real bad. This is, I think,

4:04:18.900 --> 4:04:21.220
<v Speaker 8>an interesting case of the kind of personalized corruption that

4:04:21.240 --> 4:04:24.240
<v Speaker 8>we've been talking about that, you know, with the Trump regime,

4:04:24.280 --> 4:04:26.890
<v Speaker 8>with their connections to big tech and with their connections to,

4:04:26.910 --> 4:04:30.330
<v Speaker 8>you know, like the Saudis and the UAE and all

4:04:30.350 --> 4:04:34.990
<v Speaker 8>of these kinds of different tech and finance monopolies where,

4:04:35.290 --> 4:04:37.090
<v Speaker 8>you know, you have these regimes that are deeply connected

4:04:37.150 --> 4:04:40.670
<v Speaker 8>to extremely risky loans in the finance sector. And then

4:04:40.690 --> 4:04:42.370
<v Speaker 8>it's just, you know, the entire situation blows up in

4:04:42.390 --> 4:04:44.570
<v Speaker 8>their faces. And I think we're going to see a

4:04:44.630 --> 4:04:46.950
<v Speaker 8>lot more of like this specific kind of uprising going

4:04:46.990 --> 4:04:50.690
<v Speaker 8>forward where Pena is out so fast, right? I think

4:04:50.710 --> 4:04:53.190
<v Speaker 8>he lasted like five days of protests before he just

4:04:53.330 --> 4:04:56.780
<v Speaker 8>had to resign because it was his guys who he

4:04:56.840 --> 4:05:00.860
<v Speaker 8>put in power from his specific domain of expertise as

4:05:00.900 --> 4:05:03.420
<v Speaker 8>a banker who just blew up the entire economy. I

4:05:03.440 --> 4:05:04.880
<v Speaker 8>think we're going to see a lot more of like

4:05:04.960 --> 4:05:07.700
<v Speaker 8>this kind of uprising going forward. And yeah, you can

4:05:07.740 --> 4:05:11.480
<v Speaker 8>remove presidents through ways that aren't elections. And to sort

4:05:11.500 --> 4:05:13.680
<v Speaker 8>of close things out here, let's talk about another thing

4:05:13.700 --> 4:05:18.920
<v Speaker 8>that's not an election, and let's talk about, finally, that

4:05:19.240 --> 4:05:22.920
<v Speaker 8>one-million-person Wildcat general strike that I teased at the beginning

4:05:22.970 --> 4:05:28.030
<v Speaker 8>of the episode. And that strike is going on in Bangladesh.

4:05:28.810 --> 4:05:31.530
<v Speaker 8>Bangladesh is home to one of the world's largest and

4:05:31.590 --> 4:05:35.490
<v Speaker 8>most important textile sectors. This is also a very kind

4:05:35.550 --> 4:05:41.880
<v Speaker 8>of low-wage, high-labor textile industry. And it is, you know,

4:05:41.980 --> 4:05:45.000
<v Speaker 8>it has been one of the engines of the Bangladeshi economy,

4:05:45.040 --> 4:05:46.440
<v Speaker 8>which is to say that it is an engine of

4:05:46.520 --> 4:05:52.450
<v Speaker 8>absolutely heinous exploitation. People may be familiar with the horrifying

4:05:52.550 --> 4:05:57.170
<v Speaker 8>Rana Plaza collapse, which killed over a thousand people in 2013.

4:05:57.170 --> 4:05:59.190
<v Speaker 8>And a lot of people who were killed were garment

4:05:59.230 --> 4:06:01.280
<v Speaker 8>workers who were working at one of the five garment

4:06:01.320 --> 4:06:04.700
<v Speaker 8>factories that was contained in this giant skyscraper high-rise thing

4:06:04.720 --> 4:06:07.580
<v Speaker 8>that collapsed. You know, this is also a sector where

4:06:07.600 --> 4:06:10.580
<v Speaker 8>the buildings frequently light on fire and kill a hundred people.

4:06:10.600 --> 4:06:16.330
<v Speaker 8>It is brutal and devastating. And that has led to

4:06:16.470 --> 4:06:20.340
<v Speaker 8>a really quite militant labor movement, but not a labor

4:06:20.380 --> 4:06:23.680
<v Speaker 8>movement in the way that you see it in a

4:06:23.700 --> 4:06:25.860
<v Speaker 8>lot of other places. It is a lot of wildcat strikes.

4:06:25.960 --> 4:06:28.960
<v Speaker 8>It is a lot of like kind of old school,

4:06:29.040 --> 4:06:31.620
<v Speaker 8>like stuff you would say in like the 1800s in

4:06:31.650 --> 4:06:33.290
<v Speaker 8>the US of just like, fuck it, we're all walking

4:06:33.310 --> 4:06:34.450
<v Speaker 8>off the job and we're all going to go fight

4:06:34.470 --> 4:06:39.810
<v Speaker 8>our employers because they're killing us. So as of like Thursday,

4:06:39.870 --> 4:06:43.950
<v Speaker 8>November 5th, people seem to be going back to work

4:06:43.990 --> 4:06:47.570
<v Speaker 8>to some extent. But there was almost a million workers

4:06:48.210 --> 4:06:51.070
<v Speaker 8>either on strike or unable to go to work because

4:06:51.110 --> 4:06:55.690
<v Speaker 8>the strike had closed 500 of Bangladesh's 2,500 garment factories. Now,

4:06:55.850 --> 4:06:59.710
<v Speaker 8>the government has been forced to appoint a minimum wage board.

4:06:59.990 --> 4:07:03.800
<v Speaker 8>The specific demand here is they want to pay increase–

4:07:04.300 --> 4:07:06.320
<v Speaker 8>they want the minimum wage, which a lot of these

4:07:06.340 --> 4:07:09.940
<v Speaker 8>workers are minimum wage workers– to go from $ 100 a

4:07:10.380 --> 4:07:15.250
<v Speaker 8>month to $ 250 a month because of cost of living increases.

4:07:15.590 --> 4:07:19.470
<v Speaker 8>And like, this is a sector of 4 million people.

4:07:19.990 --> 4:07:21.790
<v Speaker 8>This is a sector that is the size of like

4:07:21.830 --> 4:07:25.610
<v Speaker 8>a small country. And these are people making $ 100 a month.

4:07:25.650 --> 4:07:29.060
<v Speaker 8>They are working 50 to 60 hour weeks. And if

4:07:29.300 --> 4:07:32.340
<v Speaker 8>you want to work out whether or not that's more

4:07:32.540 --> 4:07:35.920
<v Speaker 8>than the $ 2... And like 50 cents a day, that's

4:07:35.930 --> 4:07:39.040
<v Speaker 8>supposed to be the absolute poverty indicator. You can you

4:07:39.060 --> 4:07:45.120
<v Speaker 8>can work that out yourself. It's it's horrifically bleak. And

4:07:45.500 --> 4:07:50.040
<v Speaker 8>they're asking for something that's so far from the American

4:07:50.060 --> 4:07:53.520
<v Speaker 8>minimum wage that it breaks my fucking heart. Like they're

4:07:53.560 --> 4:07:56.300
<v Speaker 8>talking about like, you know, maybe like ten dollars a day,

4:07:56.760 --> 4:07:57.840
<v Speaker 8>like not an hour a day.

4:07:58.320 --> 4:07:58.480
<v Speaker 5>Right.

4:07:58.540 --> 4:08:00.260
<v Speaker 8>And obviously purchasing power is stronger there.

4:08:00.280 --> 4:08:01.230
<v Speaker 1>It's not that much stronger there.

4:08:02.760 --> 4:08:04.940
<v Speaker 8>It's weird because they're largely described as protests, but if

4:08:04.980 --> 4:08:06.940
<v Speaker 8>you read the actual accounts of what's happening, it's like, no,

4:08:06.970 --> 4:08:08.790
<v Speaker 8>this is a general strike and people setting up roadblocks.

4:08:09.750 --> 4:08:12.190
<v Speaker 8>It's still in a situation where there's been very heavy

4:08:12.230 --> 4:08:15.410
<v Speaker 8>police repression. We're still in a situation where these could spark.

4:08:15.110 --> 4:08:15.870
<v Speaker 1>Up at any time.

4:08:16.210 --> 4:08:19.220
<v Speaker 8>So the government said it was going to do this

4:08:19.300 --> 4:08:21.780
<v Speaker 8>wage board thing to look at the minimum wage, but

4:08:21.800 --> 4:08:26.060
<v Speaker 8>they haven't committed to raising the wage. And they're trying

4:08:26.080 --> 4:08:28.360
<v Speaker 8>to set this for December when they're hoping that these

4:08:28.400 --> 4:08:30.820
<v Speaker 8>protests will have calmed down. and that the workers in

4:08:30.840 --> 4:08:32.700
<v Speaker 8>this strike will have gone back to work. We're going

4:08:32.740 --> 4:08:35.840
<v Speaker 8>to see how this goes. And finally, we're going to

4:08:35.880 --> 4:08:39.080
<v Speaker 8>talk about, briefly, I want to mention, this is probably

4:08:39.100 --> 4:08:40.540
<v Speaker 8>going to get covered more next week, which is that

4:08:40.560 --> 4:08:44.040
<v Speaker 8>there's one more general strike in France, which is an official,

4:08:44.160 --> 4:08:46.500
<v Speaker 8>I think it's a one-day general strike that was called

4:08:46.620 --> 4:08:50.550
<v Speaker 8>by a bunch of the sort of nominally left-wing unions.

4:08:50.670 --> 4:08:53.750
<v Speaker 8>I say nominally left-wing because you could do an entire

4:08:53.790 --> 4:08:56.630
<v Speaker 8>doctoral thesis on every single time that the UGC has

4:08:56.670 --> 4:09:01.580
<v Speaker 8>specifically prevented, like, the world from being a better place.

4:09:02.240 --> 4:09:04.960
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, the estimate, this is happening like as kind

4:09:05.000 --> 4:09:08.060
<v Speaker 8>of as we speak, the estimates I think are like

4:09:08.060 --> 4:09:11.280
<v Speaker 8>600,000 people in the streets. The unions are saying 1.3 million,

4:09:11.440 --> 4:09:15.250
<v Speaker 8>which is conceivable. This is obviously like, this is another

4:09:15.270 --> 4:09:17.750
<v Speaker 8>sort of like cost of living strike that's also being

4:09:17.830 --> 4:09:20.330
<v Speaker 8>done in sort of concert with the student movement. The

4:09:20.350 --> 4:09:23.220
<v Speaker 8>student movement has, you know, they're still in the streets fighting.

4:09:24.420 --> 4:09:28.450
<v Speaker 8>We're going to see to what extent this can be mobilized.

4:09:28.990 --> 4:09:32.210
<v Speaker 8>Somewhat counterintuitively, Macron has been trying to make sure that

4:09:32.290 --> 4:09:35.250
<v Speaker 8>protests are sponsored by unions, because the unions are people

4:09:35.290 --> 4:09:37.190
<v Speaker 8>he can negotiate with to get people out of the streets.

4:09:37.750 --> 4:09:39.500
<v Speaker 8>And so he's been attempting to pass measures to make

4:09:39.560 --> 4:09:42.000
<v Speaker 8>it illegal to have a protest that's not sponsored by

4:09:42.020 --> 4:09:44.840
<v Speaker 8>an NGO or a union. So there is an extent

4:09:44.880 --> 4:09:47.960
<v Speaker 8>to which this strike can function as a way to

4:09:48.000 --> 4:09:50.460
<v Speaker 8>contain the energy of these revolts and a way to

4:09:50.500 --> 4:09:53.260
<v Speaker 8>channel them into politics that doesn't do anything, which is

4:09:53.800 --> 4:09:56.440
<v Speaker 8>Kind of the UGC specialty is get everyone out of

4:09:56.460 --> 4:09:58.970
<v Speaker 8>the street and then lose the election. This is their

4:09:58.990 --> 4:10:03.430
<v Speaker 8>famous strategy in 1968. Yeah, but we're going to see

4:10:04.170 --> 4:10:07.670
<v Speaker 8>where this goes. And also, presumably, there's going to be

4:10:07.730 --> 4:10:09.670
<v Speaker 8>a bunch of more protests over the weekend. We don't

4:10:09.690 --> 4:10:12.200
<v Speaker 8>know yet. We're recording this on Thursday. But we will

4:10:14.060 --> 4:10:18.120
<v Speaker 8>update you on whether Macron is hiding in a bunker again.

4:10:19.400 --> 4:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>That does it for us today. It's time to stop

4:10:22.280 --> 4:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking about voting for at least the weekend, which will

4:10:26.060 --> 4:10:26.500
<v Speaker 1>be nice.

4:10:27.300 --> 4:10:29.900
<v Speaker 8>Put a trans girl on your couch and remember, only

4:10:30.000 --> 4:10:34.190
<v Speaker 8>six years ago, our president was also hiding in a

4:10:34.200 --> 4:10:35.150
<v Speaker 8>bunker from us.

4:10:35.670 --> 4:10:36.810
<v Speaker 1>We reported the news.

4:10:37.930 --> 4:10:38.730
<v Speaker 5>We reported the news.

4:10:44.640 --> 4:10:47.740
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week

4:10:47.820 --> 4:10:49.660
<v Speaker 2>from now until the heat death of the universe.

4:10:50.540 --> 4:10:52.970
<v Speaker 14>It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media.

4:10:53.180 --> 4:10:57.530
<v Speaker 14>For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com.

4:10:57.990 --> 4:11:00.790
<v Speaker 14>Or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

4:11:01.170 --> 4:11:03.970
<v Speaker 14>or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find

4:11:04.010 --> 4:11:06.950
<v Speaker 14>sources for It Could Happen Here listed directly in episode descriptions.

4:11:07.450 --> 4:11:08.130
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening.