WEBVTT - Dame To The Bucks, Dolphins @ Bills & Nick’s Picks

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. Cibo index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>xsp can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot Com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Cebo life is better with options, Your investments could be too.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with Cibo company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at cbo dot com slash us Underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one eighty one, What's Right with Nick Wright?

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 2>In this episode of What's Right with Nick Wright is

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>brought to you by the McDonald's App. I love the

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.279
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's app because I can order my favorites anytime I

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>want and to have them delivered to me whenever and wherever.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Ordering on the app is so easy. I'm gonna do

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>what I've done a few shows. I'm gonna place an

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 2>order right now to be delivered to me before this

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 2>show is over. So let me open up the McDonald's app.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>There it is. Let me go to my favorite breakfast meal,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>which is the two burritos, hash browns and orange juice.

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 2>It knows where I'm at because this is why I

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>delivered last time boot boop, a little Apple pay option.

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Done and done. All right? See that easy? Now I

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 2>can focus on the show. McDonald's gonna bring us that

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 2>food right before, well, at some point during the show,

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>before the show ends. So now into the show. Demonse, was,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, working hard last night? Texted the group chat guys,

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll take care of the rundown tomorrow. Dame Lillard traded,

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that's the A block. That's all my work for the day. Demonse,

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 2>your look right there was like a look of fear

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.279
<v Speaker 2>like you were supposed to do something you hadn't done

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>that you thought I was being that I was about

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>to say something there. I could just see the deer

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>in the headlights, look like you were like, what was

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 2>he going to say that I did? Because I didn't

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>do anything. What is he talking about? And did I

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>read your facial expression correctly? Is that right?

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Sort of? Sort of?

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 4>I just when I thought my face is more so

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 4>when you were talking about I said that I had

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 4>it taken care of in the a's because these guys

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 4>obviously know how to do these rundowns better than me,

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 4>I was being sarcastic in the group chat.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 2>No, of course, no, but your instinct was right that

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 2>even for our regular gambling show, we are going to

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>start with Dame. So here's the way I think today's

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 2>show is going to go. We'll do like fifteen ish

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>minutes on Dame. We'll then run through the other stories

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 2>in the A block and then have a nice, meaty

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 2>gambling segment, which up to this point in this year,

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.559
<v Speaker 2>the segment of been good, the picks of been mediocre.

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm a game under five hundred on the picks, Demante's

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 2>a game under five hundred on his teasers. We're us

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 2>a middling team right now. We're like, let me find

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a good example. Yeah, I mean, I'm trying to find

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 2>an NFL team where it fits right now. We're kind

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 2>of like the Chargers Jaguars, you know what. I like

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 2>that one better. We're like the Jaguars, amazing potential, really

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 2>high hopes, but you know, substandard performances thus far. Unlike

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 2>the Jaguars, we are not going across the pond to

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>England to try to break the streak. However, we think

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna be okay, all right, here is what missed

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the cut on today's show. Taylor Swift is gonna attend

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the Jets Packers game. I'm sorry, the Jets Chiefs game

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>here in New York. Aaron Rodgers saying the Jets need

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 2>to grow up, and JJ Watt reacting to the tush

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 2>push or what they now want to call the Brotherly Shove,

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>also reacting to that is the end. The Brotherly shaw

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 2>is actually a cool name for it, but I think Peter,

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Peter Schrager came up with it. Here's I

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you saw our little clip on the

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 2>that the Philly quarterback sneak is one of our most

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 2>shared viral clips ever because Eagles fans are so mad

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 2>at me and hate my opinion on it so much,

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.799
<v Speaker 2>and you even Demonse caught a fair amount of strays

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 2>from people who, uh don't typically watch the show, aren't

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>familiar with it, and don't know who you are. And

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 2>a few of the comments are like, and who's this

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 2>guy just laughing about it? Why doesn't he speak up?

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Never even seen this guy before? It doesn't Nick just

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 2>got a yes man to work with him on his pod,

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>So none of that's great, Philly fans really upset. All right, Demonse,

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to the A block and what we're starting with.

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 4>All right, so we're obviously in think of the NFL season,

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 4>but Damian Lillard just got traded to the Bucks, so

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 4>he's obviously teaming up with the Honest. Now, is this

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 4>more about Dame finally going to a contender or is

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 4>this more about the Bucks trying to please Giannis?

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean this happened because the Jannis put real

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 2>pressure on Milwaukee, and I give credit to you. Listen,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 2>it is very in vogue for NBA stars at different

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 2>points of their career to criticize or take shots at

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 2>how Lebron has conducted as business, and then when the

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Rubber meets the road to conduct their business in the

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>exact same manner. There's a great tweet from Kevin Durant

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 2>a few days after Lebron signed with Miami where he's like,

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 2>what's up with everyone wanting to team up? You know

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 2>what happened to competition? Let's go at each other. And

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>then five years later, when things are going a little tougher,

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 2>j Ran of course goes to Golden State. Honest, in

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the worst fashion possible. Giannis was, you know, mister loyalty,

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 2>mister Milwaukee, mister you know, I don't want, you know,

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 2>a super team, and then all of a sudden, you

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>get the taste of the sweet nectar of a championship.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 2>You have a couple disappointing postseason runs, and you're out

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 2>here telling the New York Times. I don't know what

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna do. I'm you know, Let's see how committed

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 2>they are. Let's see if everybody cares as much of

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>a championship as much as I do, which is a

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 2>very lebron move of I'm going to put my boot

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 2>on the organization's neck and say I don't give a

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 2>damn about a ninth grader to be named later in

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the form of a twenty twenty nine draft pick. I

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 2>want stars around me. I watched other people hoist the title.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I watch someone who I believe I'm better than, Anikola

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Jokic be universally, nearly universally regarded now as the best

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 2>player in basketball. This is bullshit. Get me better players,

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and they did. And I know there is some instant

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>demand's galaxy brain. Does this actually hurt Milwaukee? No, it doesn't.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I am first team member of card Caring member of

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Drew Hollidays underrated. Drew Holliday contributes more to winning than

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Kyrie Irving. I've been saying that for years that Drew

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Holliday's two way impact is almost second to none if

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:58.559
<v Speaker 2>you consider offensive defense equal parts of what he does

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>on the you know, at the guard position. One of

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>the greatest plays in NBA Finals history was I think

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>it was Game four against Phoenix. It might have been

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Game five, I'm not sure, the Drew Holiday steeal with

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>less than thirty seconds left. Yeah, the stealing the lob

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Drew Holliday. If you remember the year they won, that

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 2>year when they won the title, the game three against Brooklyn,

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 2>when they're down two oh to Brooklyn and that game

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 2>is coming down to the final moments, Drew Holliday had

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the game saving defensive play. They go on to win

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>that series. Drew Holliday has been a great player. Okay,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 2>he also is not as quite as impactful defensively as

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 2>he once was. It's fourteen years into the league. I

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 2>mean he's he's only in his mid thirties, but he

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>came in so young. He just got baptized in the

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>playoffs by Jimmy Butler, who was just mother fing him

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>up and down the court while doing it, and offensively

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 2>in the postseason, he at times has been a lesser

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 2>version of himself. So I love Drew and will get

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>to Drew in a bit because I still think he

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 2>can help a contender in a major way. I'm not

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>denigrating him, but Damian Lillard averaged thirty two points per

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:37.119
<v Speaker 2>game last year, and other than Steph Curry, who obviously

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 2>not available, I would argue this, Demons, tell me if

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 2>you agree.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 3>What was that last time?

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, Well, I'm gonna I said. Other than Steph,

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I would argue the following. There is not a superstar

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>in the league that better fits with Giannis. There is

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>not another guy whose game they complement each other better

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 2>than Yeah, than Jannis and Dame. Because what's Dame's biggest

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>weakness as a player, Demonse?

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Who is the defense?

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the defensive side of the ball and where yeah?

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 2>And where will you where? What is Giannis arguably the

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 2>best in the league at Yeah, Giannis will cover that

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 2>up there. When teams play Giannis, what do they try

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 2>to do? Pack the paint takeaway spacing. Well, when you've

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>got a guy who can hit from forty feet out

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 2>with relative ease, you have instant spacing. So it is

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 2>a hand and glove fit that instantly makes the Bucks

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the Bucks. The last few years have been great defense,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 2>average offense. They take a slight or they take a

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 2>hit defensively, but now they can be a very good offense.

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 2>And I would argue for Yannis now, his biggest utility

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 2>for Milwaukee is not necessarily to try to win League MVP,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>to try to win Defensive Player of the Year is

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to have the lion's share of his energy be on

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 2>that end. Yanni's Pruss Blook Pruss Pruss plus Brook will

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 2>give you a good defense baseline no matter what, and

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Dame can be bombs away. So I for Milwaukee, I

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 2>think basketball wise it's great. I also think there is

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>this element of it. I don't think this guarantees Yannis

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>signed some an extension. I think it raises the likelihood.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 2>But you know, Dame is under contract for four more years,

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Yiannis under contract for two more years. I think Gianni's

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 2>is gonna see how these couple of years go and

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 2>make sure Dame's he's healthy and that Dame ages the

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 2>way people hope he ages, and if not, he could bounce.

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 2>But still Milwaukee is doing everything they can do to

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 2>keep their generational player happy. That is exactly what they're

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 2>supposed to do. And for Yannis, Yannis gets it that.

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 2>There was discussions two years ago after he won the title.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>How high can Yannis climb on the pyramid? Can he

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 2>jump Durant? Can he jumps Steph? Can he jump Shack?

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Can he jump? A team that then stalled out for him.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>He then saw Steph win another title, and then all

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, folks are wondering, hold on a second,

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>what if Jokic wins this year? Does Jokic then jump

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 2>yanis the answer that's probably yes, And so there's it is.

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>So Yannis felt real pro sure put that pressure then

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 2>on Milwaukee. They responded, And I think they're the favorites now.

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I just think they're the clear favorite. They're plus three

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>to fifty to win the title right now. Yeah, And

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 2>as far as a gambling perspective, I there's not going

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 2>to be good value betting the favorite almost ever, So

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think i'd bet them at plus three fifty,

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 2>but I do think they should be the favorite. All right,

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 2>what other follow ups do we have? Jimmy Butler claimed

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 2>that there was some tampering. Uh, does anything seem fishy

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 2>with this to you? Okay, so I don't think there

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 2>was tampering, but there are a few things that are

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 2>at least worth noting. One is shout out to Rob Burrez,

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>my pal worldwide wob on Twitter, great Twitter follow for

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 2>immediately tweeting out this video that I had forgotten of

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 2>this past year's All Star Draft? Did you see this

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 2>floating around the internet yesterday? To Monsey, it's great. So

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 2>in the All Star Draft, oh, Lebron and Yannis are

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the team captains, and Yannis has the first pick, and

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Lebron and for the reserves, and Lebron says, oh, I

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 2>know who you're picking here, Yannis, Like we all know

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 2>because Drew Holidays on there, and Yannis picks Dame Withdrew

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 2>on the board, and Lebron says, Ley has a rise,

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 2>smiles like, oh, I see what you're doing there, And

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 2>this is something we had seen Lebron do in the past,

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>picking Anthony Davis for the All Star Draft. And then

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 2>there were real signals being put out there Chris Haynes

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 2>reported that Jannis and Dame have talked about teaming up

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>for a couple of years. Both wanted the other person

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>to come to their city. Okay, that's not tampering, so

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 2>that I don't find fishy. Here's what I do find fishy.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I While I think Dames should be thrilled from a

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 2>basketball perspective, we all know he wanted to go to Miami,

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and everyone's like, oh, Miami's offer stinks. You Windworst reported

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that the eight Nurkice trade was that they got the

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 2>parameters of it a week ago. So you have to

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>look at the Blazers getting eighton as a separate transaction almost,

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>which means for Dame what they got was Drew Holiday,

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a second round pick this past year, and a first

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 2>round pick in two swaps. I don't think that's a

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 2>great return. Now you're gonna get something for Drew, and

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I know. Dan Levitard reported this morning that the Heat

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 2>believe Portland was simply going to take the best offer

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 2>that was not from the Miami Heat, that they were

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 2>pissed that Dame tried to force their hand. Didn't like

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the way the Heat and Dame were doing business on

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 2>this and that they were simply not trading him to Miami. Flatly,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 2>if I were Damed, that would piss me off, not

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>because they sent me to a bad situation, but this

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>is less than ideal for Dame in this regard. For

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the first one is obviously lifestyle. Whether Miami versus Milwaukee

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 2>are pretty significant differences. But set that aside. If your

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Dame as a basketball player, if you believe you can

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>win a title in Miami and you can win one

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 2>in Milwaukee, I would understand why Dame the basketball player

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>would say I'd rather do it in Miami, where a

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of people will say I was the best guy.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Nobody's gonna say you're the best guy. When you're on

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Gianniss's team. It's like a different former Blazer. Clyde Drexler,

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the best Blazer in franchise history, went to two finals,

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>lost one to Detroit, lost one to Jordan, and the

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Bulls couldn't quite get over the hump. Went to Houston,

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 2>teamed up with the Keem who had already won a

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 2>title without him, and won the championship. And he was

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the second best guy and was awesome. But everybody knows

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that was a Keems team. I get why Dame would

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 2>have preferred Miami, and I'd be a little pissed if

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 2>Levittar's correct that the Blazers simply were not going to

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 2>trade him to Miami. I'd be a little pissed about

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>that personally. Go ahead.

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 4>How devastating is I mean, how devastating is this for

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 4>the Heat fans?

0:17:55.480 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, let alone, doubly devastating. It's not just they

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 2>didn't get Dames that the Bucks did so, it's that.

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the reasons the Heat we're not

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 2>putting all their chips on the table for Dame was

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 2>their belief was just made the finals without him, Like,

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 2>if we don't get him, were still okay. But then

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>when the team with the best player in the conference,

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 2>in the conference, maybe the league gets him. Now you're

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 2>now you're in real trouble, you know what I mean.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 2>It's the It's right. It's it's one thing to be

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 2>like we don't need Dame necessarily. It's another thing to

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 2>be like, we're not gonna get him, and our single

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.959
<v Speaker 2>biggest competition in the East is gonna get him. I

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 2>don't think they thought, well, you know, Toronto was in this.

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 2>If Toronto had gotten Dame. I don't think the heat

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 2>or panicking. They're like, all right, it's a bomber, but whatever,

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 2>but Milwaukee gets him, You're in real dire straits. All right.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Now to the part of this go ahead.

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Just kind of seems like these days that like these

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 4>these teams on paper, they look crazy, but they don't

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 4>work out, is what I've been seeing more often than

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 4>not these days.

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 2>But so let's stay there. Wait, wait, wait, let's stay

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>there for a second. Teams created out of thin air

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 2>have not worked well over the last fifteen years, unless

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Lebron's been involved. Okay, the heatles were created out of

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 2>thin air, but you have Apex Lebron as the focal point.

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 2>The calves were created out of thin air. You have

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 2>near Apex Lebron as the focal point. Those worked. The

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>clippers created out of thin air to disaster, the nets

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 2>created out of thin air disaster. This is not a

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>team created out of thin air. This is the Milwaukee

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Bucks trading out Drew Holiday for Damian Lillard, much like

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the Golden State Warriors traded out Harrison Barnes for Kevin Durant.

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 2>The Los Angeles Lakers traded out Lonzo and Kuzma for

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Davis. You see what I mean. It's a different

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 2>situation than all of a sudden, this is the the

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 2>created out of thin air super teams worked for the

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 2>eight Celtics and for Lebron's teams. Everyone else it does not.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 2>But I don't look at this as that. I also

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>want to look at this as super team. I look

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 2>at this as two awesome players. Like I think you've

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 2>got to have three awesome players for it to be

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a super team. I look at this as two awesome players.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 2>And so, but go ahead, I know you want to

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 2>talk about Drew.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 4>So which contender should trade it, should trade for Drew Holiday?

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'll tell you, but you go ahead.

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think I think if the Celtics trade for

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 4>whoever and end up getting Drew Holiday, I don't think

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 4>there's a game that the Celtics will play the Bucks

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 4>and loose.

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the Celtics would be really good with Holiday.

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.479
<v Speaker 2>I think you would trade Broadden, who they've been wanting

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:25.479
<v Speaker 2>to trade. You trade some picks, and you listen, the

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Celtics are gonna be involved. The Knicks are gonna be involved, Okay,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the nick I don't know that. I mean, maybe he does,

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe he doesn't. I the Lakers are gonna call and

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 2>say in December we can give you. We gotta wait

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 2>because we signed these guys. We can give you a

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 2>pick d Loo who's not that useful, and Ruey, who

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 2>would fit well. The Lakers will call. I'm not saying

0:21:55.440 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 2>they'll get him. There's other there's Windy talked about. And

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I really don't want this to happen. A three team

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 2>trade demonse involving the Warriors, Blazers and Team X, where

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Chris Paul goes to Team X, assets go to the

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 2>Blazers and Drew Holliday goes to the Warriors. Now that

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 2>would be scary. Drew Holliday on that Warriors team would

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 2>be a scary situation. And so I hope that doesn't happen.

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you another thing that I would monitor, just

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 2>a monitor, A three team trade involving the MAVs, Blazers,

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>and Team X, maybe the Lakers, where Kyrie goes to

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Team X. Call it the Lakers, assets go to the

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Blazers and Drew goes to the MAVs. Drew is a

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 2>better fit with Luca than Kyrie by a mile. Phils,

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. That's another one of those

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 2>things that fits really well. My buddy that used to

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 2>run the MAVs, horalbos Vulgaris, who made I don't know

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe a billion dollars by being my guy heard Let me,

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 2>did you know anything about Horalbo's Vulgars. I would tell

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 2>the audience a quick story. Horalbos Vulgaris basically has lived

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 2>out my life stream like my alternate life. He was

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the world's greatest NBA better. He fifteen years or twenty

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 2>years ago, developed his own proprietary algo on NBA totals

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>for over unders and NBA sides, and was the most

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 2>successful NBA better ever by a decent margin. Made millions

0:23:53.920 --> 0:24:01.479
<v Speaker 2>and millions of dollars betting. The NBA famously had the

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 2>eight seed Warriors beating the one seed MAVs before the

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 2>series has it just had made millions of dollars doing it.

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Also as his hobby, Demanse was what I would call

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a semi professional poker player, so living living good. He

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 2>doubled I don't even want to say double down in

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the midst of that was a early and I mean

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 2>early adopter of bitcoin and held so got you know,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 2>started buying bitcoin when it was less than one thousand

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 2>dollars a coin, some less than one hundred dollars a coin,

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 2>and bitcoin at one point was sixty five thousand a coin.

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>So he had all this money from gambling invested in crypto,

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and I think has held a lot of the crypto.

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 2>And then in the midst of it ran the Dallas

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 2>Mavericks briefly or kind of associate ran the Dallas Mavericks.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 2>He wanted them to trade for Drew Holliday, they ended

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 2>up going all in for Chris STAPs instead. He then

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 2>left the MAVs, cashed out some of his crypto, and

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 2>God bless him, bought a yacht and a soccer team

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 2>in Spain and owns this soccer team, CD castlon is

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 2>using his same like algorithms you know tweaked obviously to

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 2>evaluate players that he used in the NBA. On soccer

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 2>is it had an amazing first season. Hangs out on

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>his boat with his awesome dog, occasionally stops by LA

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 2>for big time poker games, and goes to every major

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 2>NBA game best seat in the house. Like if you

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 2>look at the picture of the uh okay, well, I

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 2>don't care I'm telling a story, So go to hell

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and so uh and so. The reason I even thought

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 2>of it was because Drew Holliday was the guy he

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 2>pinpointed that the MAVs should go after Paranacks Toluca years ago.

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 2>So I wonder if they'll be involved. But the question

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 2>for the Blazers is gonna be are they gonna hold

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 2>him until December when everyone who signed this offseason is available?

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Are they gonna trade him immediately?

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead?

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 4>Do you think there's any chance that he's playing for

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 4>the Blazers in like the thick of the season.

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 2>No, not in the thick of the season, but maybe

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the very beginning, because anyone that signed this offseason can't

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 2>be traded till like the middle of December. So if

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 2>you there will be more players available and more trades available,

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 2>then all right, now we can get the football. Go ahead,

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 2>let's do it, all right.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 4>The Dolphins are coming off a seventy point offensive performance,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 4>but they are underdogs in Buffalo who just lost to

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 4>the Jets a couple of weeks ago.

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Is the right team favored here? James favored? This is

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 2>I knew we could go a little longer in the

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 2>pre on the Dame stuff because I don't This is

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>a confusing game. I don't yet have a pick for

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 2>this game. I'm just telling you these two teams. The

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 2>Bills defense looks unbelievable, but pardon me, that's been against

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wilson, Jimmy Garoppolo, and Sam Howell. The offense looks unstoppable.

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>The Dolphins' offense looked unstoppable against the Chargers and the Broncos,

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>but was kind of held in check a bit by

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots. The Dolphins obviously aren't gonna look as good

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 2>as they looked last week. And here's the other kind

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of interesting factor for this game. Josh Allen is going

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>to go in this game feeling like I've got to

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>be Superman because of the team we're up against. Right,

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 2>he might be able to be the problem for Josh

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 2>is he's in games he doesn't have to be Superman.

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 2>He can't turn it off. The problem for Josh is

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 2>not when he needs to be Superman. He can't get

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 2>to that level. So this is a really tricky one.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 2>What I'll tell you is this for Miami's super Bowl chances,

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 2>sneaky huge game. Because Miami's super Bowl chances, I believe involved,

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 2>as we've talked about not having to play multiple, maybe

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 2>any playoff games in freezing cold outdoor conditions, and they

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>would have certainly the inside track to winning the AFC

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 2>East and maybe the one seed overall by winning this game.

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 2>But this is not gonna be one of knicks picks,

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 2>And I don't have like this is the best game

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 2>of the weekend, but I don't have a good feel

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 2>for it at the moment. All right, next, all right.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 4>So the Chiefs have yet to beat a team with

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 4>a winning record this year. Between this week when they

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 4>play the Jets in November, Kansas City's opponents have a

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 4>combined two wins. If Zach Wilson beats your Chiefs, will

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 4>you get your tattoo lasered off?

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>If Zach Wilson beats my Chiefs, guys, stop it. This

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be a massacre. It's gonna be I didn't

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>promise a masker against the Bears. I'm promising a massacre

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 2>in this game. Then here's it, and here's okay, we'll

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 2>get you know what we're gonna do, Chiefs, Jets. It's

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna be one of my picks. The Chiefs have to cover,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 2>have to win by ten? How many points do they

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 2>have to score to win by ten? Fourteen, thirteen, twenty one,

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty one. Yeah, twenty one guarantees they win by ten.

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I see the Jets going thirteen in this game.

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, then twenty one wouldn't win by ten. I know,

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 2>like we gotta twenty one would not. They'll do it nice.

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 4>I predicted the score yesterday. I feel like it's gonna

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 4>be thirteen, like thirty five.

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I mean.

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a massacre. That's and it's not a massacre

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>of it. Thirty five to thirteen is not a massacre.

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Win by twenty two points. Okay, listen, we're gonna talk more.

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna talk more Chiefs Jets in the gambling segment next.

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:40.719
<v Speaker 4>Uh So, the battle between the oh and three Brocos

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 4>and the OH and three Bears might be a pretty

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 4>bad game, a snoozer.

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 3>If you will.

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Whichever team falls OH and four would have the potential

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 4>pick for the first pick. Meanwhile, in college football, Kaleb

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Williams and the Trojans are gonna go to Boulder and

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 4>face coach Prime, which has the potential to impact williams

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 4>legacy more USC versus collar or Denver at Chicago.

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Denver at Chicago, listen the and hit listen here is

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 2>because I think Chicago's got a really good chance of

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 2>having the number one overall pick. This is this is

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 2>the path forward for Chicago with the number one overall pick.

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 2>You take Caleb. With the number three overall pick, which

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 2>you might have thanks to the trade with the Panthers,

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 2>you draft Marvin Harrison from Ohio State, and this offseason

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 2>you fire your coaching staff. You hire Ben Johnson from Detroit,

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 2>their offensive coordinator, have him him come in and work

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 2>hand in glove with Caleb Williams. I will tell you this,

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>if Chicago wins this game, I'm going to start to

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 2>become quietly nervous that Caleb is going to be coming

0:31:56.280 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to the AFC West. If Chicago wins this game, Denver

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.959
<v Speaker 2>might turn the entire ship in the tanking direction. And

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't want that. I do not want I thought

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders were the team in the AFC West we

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 2>were gonna have to worry about getting the number one pick.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>But if Denverse, you know, if their season goes, you

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 2>lose to Jimmy g and the Raiders. You then blow

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 2>a three score lead to Sam Howell at home. You

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 2>then lose, you allow seventy points and then you lose

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>to Chicago that has won one time in the last

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and seventy days. That's a big problem. And

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 2>so everyone's like, oh, Caleb should want to go to Chicago. Well,

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll see, Like if they get a new coaching staff

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 2>and they all already have the Panthers pick, you have

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Marvin Harrison, that goes a long way to remaking your team.

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go to Thursday Night football.

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:00.959
<v Speaker 4>All right, the Lions face the past todight in an

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 4>early NFC North showdown. Chicago and Minnesota's season already seem over,

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 4>So you got a fifty to fifty chance of your

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 4>Packers Division winner bet being right at plus three fifty.

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 4>The Lions embarrassed Kansas City, So if green Bay beats them, it.

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Would definitely mean something.

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Would all win versus Detroit proved green Bay is ahead

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 4>of the schedule or if they just had easy games?

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I mean if they win there one thousand

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 2>percent ahead of schedule, and I you know, the producers

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 2>wrote the Lions embarrassed Kansas City. They won by one point.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 2>The game the Chiefs didn't have their second to third

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 2>best players. Like, I understand you guys are just trying

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 2>to irritate me, but you there should be some accuracy.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Might as well say, really said that he was embarrassed.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 2>He was embarrassed because he's embarrassed every time he loses.

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs were not embarrassed by the Lions. There's a

0:33:55.160 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 2>distinction there. There's a distinction thereship embarrassed. I'll getting this

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 2>is fine, So listen. I I think the Jordan love

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 2>He has not played quite as well as some of

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 2>the numbers suggest, but his fourth quarter comeback against the

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Saints was exemplary, and that Saint Stephen's is legit. This

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 2>is I think this is gonna be a great game,

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 2>a great game tonight. The winner of this game should

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 2>be the favorite to win the division. And in fact,

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 2>right now, let me I mean, I'm I know Detroit's

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.359
<v Speaker 2>the favorite to win the division, but I wonder how

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 2>big of a favorite they are. So I'm gonna look

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 2>real quick. Hold on, one second, I apologize, I had

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 2>it up and then I closed it out. So let

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 2>me just click here. Divisions right now, the NFC North,

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 2>it's plus one hundred to plus one fifty, so it's

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 2>pretty damn close. If Green Bay wins this, they become

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 2>the favorites to win the division. I obviously picked them

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 2>to win the division. Now there, they've been very banged up,

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 2>but they get some of those guys back today in

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, for at least limited snaps, and then hopefully

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 2>they're much more healthy when they play ten days from

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 2>now after the mini bye. I lean Green Bay in

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 2>this game. It's not gonna be one of my picks.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 2>And speaking of my picks, I want to get to them.

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 2>We've got it. We've got our gambling show. This is

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the heart. Listen, this is a hard week. Vegas. Vegas

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 2>did a did pretty well on these lines this week.

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess they do every week, but almost nothing just

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 2>jumped out to me. But I found five games I

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 2>feel really good about. We'll do those next. What's right.

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblasts, who defined every xb

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 5>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 5>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.959
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome back in in this episode of What's

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.439
<v Speaker 2>Right when mcgright is brought to you by the McDonald's App.

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>How many times you've been in that situation where you've

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 2>had a really long day, you're hungry. Last thing you

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 2>want to do is cook a meal or leave your

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 2>house to go pick something up. I don't want to

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 2>exaggerate here. I've been in that situation hundreds of times,

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.959
<v Speaker 2>and my saving grace often has been the McDelivery option.

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 2>In the McDonald's app, we're talking about getting McDonald's delivered

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 2>right to your door, just like this. During the first segment,

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.399
<v Speaker 2>orders the two breakfast burritos hash Brown's meal. My guy

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Jake answered it. When the delivery I came to the

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 2>door and boom, it's right here. The orange juice. I

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 2>like McDonald's coffee's great, but some I don't know. I've

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 2>said this before. The minute made McDonald's orange is the best,

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 2>and now every time you order McDelivery in the McDonald's

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.959
<v Speaker 2>app earned you points towards free food, and everybody likes

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 2>free food, so there's always a reason to order in

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the McDonald's app. Donald McDonald's app Today app participating McDonald's

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 2>delivery prices may be higher than a restaurant's delivery, and

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 2>other fees may play. Copyright twenty twenty three, McDonald's All Right, demons,

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 2>another less than an ideal week for you and I.

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 2>It was just like week one. You lost your teaser.

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I went two and three in the picks, so I'm

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 2>not dead, but it's not great game under five hundred.

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 2>I also had a team that lost by fifty in

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 2>my picks. That probably should count as two losses. I

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 2>had a team laying not eight and a half points

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 2>that lost by twenty outright, that probably should be two losses.

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 2>So however, the New England pick was money. The Steelers

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 2>pick was money. So we went two and three. What

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 2>are we starting with this week for picks?

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.879
<v Speaker 3>Uh, we're starting off with your picks with.

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Your What is my first pick? You've got Pittsburgh is

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 2>two and a half at Houston?

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Did you bet?

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Exactly. I got Pittsburg matter two and a half.

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I pick Pittsburgh every week. Here's the thing, I think

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 2>they're still undervalued. I think Houston right now slightly overvalued

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 2>because of how good they looked against Jacksonville. But Houston

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 2>in this game could be on a backup offensive lineman

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 2>and three third string offensive linemen. Their offensive line has

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 2>been decimated by injury. With that being the case, going

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 2>up against this Pittsburgh front, I think CJ. Stroud is

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 2>gonna have his first really bad game, and so Pickett

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 2>has not been favored a lot in his career, but

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.240
<v Speaker 2>he's four and one a straight up and against the spread.

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 2>As a favorite, He's ten and five in his career

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 2>against the spread. Now, Tomlin is a far better underdog

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 2>coach than favorite coach. But it's such a small number,

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 2>and I think Houston is right now maybe a little

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 2>overvalued because of the Jags win and those injuries on

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the old line. I just like Pittsburgh in the spot.

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 2>I think Pittsburgh's a good team. You guys know, I

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 2>picked them to win that division. They're still very alive

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 2>for that. So I like Pittsburgh minus two and a

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 2>half in this spot. Go ahead.

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay plus three and a half at New Orleans.

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Did it look like you wanted to say something about

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the Pittsburgh game? Did do you have any.

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Take the Pittsburgh You said it just looked it still

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 4>looked good for them to win the division.

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it really looks good.

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Why.

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean the record by show otherwise.

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 2>But I think, Oh the Ravens, Oh I forgot your

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 2>beloved Ravens. Just lost to a backup quarterback, lost to

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 2>a backup quarterback. Couldn't couldn't move the ball consistently. All

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, Lamar is just running again. There are

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of concerns about the Ravens. We'll get to

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:28.839
<v Speaker 2>them in a second. Tampa plus three and a half

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 2>at New Orleans. This is I mean, the concern here

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 2>is is Tampa going to be able to block New Orleans?

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 2>That is a legit concern. This New Orleans defense is awesome. However,

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting Jamis Winston and Dennis Allen as the quarterback

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 2>coach combo against what I believe to be a good defense.

0:40:56.200 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 2>You have Baker, I think, frustrated after the performance against Philadelphia,

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 2>and Mike Evans probably frustrated after he did have the

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 2>one amazing catch, but he had some drops where he

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 2>left some meat on the bone. And this just feels like,

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 2>in either direction a three point game, And so if

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting the three and a half, I really like it.

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 2>This feels like a twenty to seventeen game in one

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 2>direction or the other. All the trends seem to like

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 2>me on this. Winston is eight nineteen and one against

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the spread in his career, Dennis Allen is one of

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the worst covering coaches ever thirty nine percent against the spread,

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and Alan is five twelve and two against spreading divisional games.

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 2>And the Bucks, who weren't that good last year, swept

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 2>New Orleans last year. Go ahead, de Monte looks.

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Like Bays Definitely.

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 4>I think Tampa Bay is gonna win that game, by

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the way, And also I think if New Orleans ends

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 4>up winning the game, the Jets are going to be

0:41:58.360 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 4>really sick.

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 3>That they didn't call Jamis Winston a couple of weeks ago.

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Well that listen, that is a great point on the

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Jameis Winston thing, because now with Carr hurt, Winston's not available,

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.320
<v Speaker 2>and if they had called him right when Aaron Rodgers

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 2>got hurt, they probably could have gotten him. I know,

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that is a really good point, and he

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 2>would have been one of if not my first phone call.

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, what's the next game?

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Cleveland minus two and a half versus Baltimore.

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:29.919
<v Speaker 2>All right, you hate this pick? I know you want

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to go ahead and tell me why you hate it.

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't. I don't. Necessarily I don't. I

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 3>don't hate it.

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, if you're gonna bet against Baltimore, I don't love it,

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 4>but it's it's that's fair. But I think this will be,

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 4>like I said a couple of days ago, I think

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.280
<v Speaker 4>this will be a very good test of our strength.

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 4>We've obviously got a few injuries going on, and Cleveland's

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 4>got that great defense, so it'll be.

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 2>This good template. Listen, I don't believe in Cleveland's offense

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 2>at all, but this defense has been unbelievable. They've allowed

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty one first downs all year, They've allowed one touchdown

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 2>all year. You have a banged up Ravens offensive line

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 2>and a Ravens running back room that's injured once again,

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 2>and I just think Cleveland at home is going to

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 2>be able to beat the hell out of Baltimore, a

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore team that's already beaten up. I only have to

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 2>lay two and a half, so a field goal wins enough. Now,

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 2>am I afraid of DeShawn Is screwing this up? I

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 2>absolutely am. But that defense thus far has been the

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 2>best defense in the NFL by far. Now, part of

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 2>that is who they've played. I get it. You play

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:03.320
<v Speaker 2>an injured Joe Burrow, you play Ryan Tannehill, you play oh, gosh,

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 2>what's the other Cleveland game? Oh, the Steelers and Kenny Pickett.

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:11.479
<v Speaker 2>I understand you're not playing great offenses, but Baltimore right now,

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 2>their offense is a work in progress. Again, I'm laying

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:19.800
<v Speaker 2>less than a field goal, and especially with the fact

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that Ronnie Stanley and Tyler Lindenbaum are either gonna miss

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 2>the game or not be one hundred percent, I like

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland minus the two and a half, all right.

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Next, we got Kansas City minus nine and a half

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 4>at the Jets.

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the Chiefs are not great at covering big numbers.

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 2>In the last six times they've been favored by a

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 2>touchdown or more than one in five against the spread.

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm pretty sure that the one was last week

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 2>against Chicago. This is a different type of situation though,

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 2>because the Jets are not going to be able to

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 2>score more than ten points. They're just not. So are

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs going to be able to score twenty plus? Obviously,

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 2>has the Jets defense up to this point been overrated,

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes it has. It is a league average defense or

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:20.800
<v Speaker 2>slightly right around league average or worse across the board,

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 2>rush defense, past defense, total defense, points, all of it.

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 2>You have a little strife within the team. You have

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:35.319
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Kansas City, I think right now what

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see is a great defense really putting

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the Jets in negative field position and in very difficult

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 2>spots throughout the football game, and the Chiefs being a

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 2>dominating time of possession, having the ball in Jets territory

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:02.320
<v Speaker 2>all night, and even if they don't have a dynamic

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 2>offensive performance, twenty four points will be more than enough,

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 2>pardon me, more than enough to cover this spread. And

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 2>they they scored thirty four points in the first half

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 2>last week. So I tend not to include the Chiefs

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 2>and Knicks picks, and I certainly there has not been

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 2>many times ever that I have included them as big

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 2>favorites because I know they tend not to cover big lines.

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 2>They play down to the level of their competition somewhat.

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 2>This is not one of those spots. It's national television,

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 2>it's it's Sunday night football, and it's against an opponent

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 2>that I think is ready to fall apart. So I

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:46.319
<v Speaker 2>like the Chiefs laying the nine and a half.

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Do you go with discussing this so like black and white,

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 4>like this, like this is happening, this is happening. This

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 4>is this is like a yes, no thing. There's like

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 4>a fact, not an opinion.

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:00.040
<v Speaker 2>You got a lot right aga Listen, the Jets. You

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 2>have the worst quarterback in the league. They have the

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 2>worst quarterback in the league, and their backup is the

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 2>worst quarterback to ever make the NFL. So I mean,

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 2>until Trevor Simion gets activated, they're not going to have

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.840
<v Speaker 2>a pulse at quarterback. The Chiefs can cover nine and

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 2>a half if they I honestly think the Jets will

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 2>not score more. I would the absolute maximum is thirteen.

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 2>I think they're the likely outcome is ten, and I

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 2>think there's a chance they don't crack seven. So covering

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs, they have it, there is a possibility that

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 2>they score. The Chiefs score seventeen points and cover this spread.

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, all right, you got Seattle plus one

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 4>and a half at the Giants.

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Daniel Jones obviously is a historically bad primetime

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in night games. He's five and eight against the spread,

0:47:56.520 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 2>one in twelve straight up, zero to five right up

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 2>in home night games. Now, I do actually think Daniel

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Jones gonna be able to move the ball. Seattle's defense

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:09.839
<v Speaker 2>has not been good. Now they've been banged up, they

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 2>should be getting healthier. I don't think he's gonna be

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 2>able to move the ball. But the problem is that

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Giants defense is not going to be able to slow

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 2>down what I think is a potent Seattle offense that

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 2>people just still refuse to believe in because they don't

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:28.360
<v Speaker 2>want to believe in Gino. So I'm getting what I

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 2>believe to be the better team, the far better quarterback,

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 2>and I'm getting a point and a half. So I mean,

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty one to twenty Giants. Somehow I win. I win

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:41.919
<v Speaker 2>with getting this point and a half, but I think

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:45.799
<v Speaker 2>Seattle wins outright. I understand that this is probably more

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 2>of a square bet. I think a lot of the

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 2>Sharper money's on the Giants, but I am I do

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 2>not think the Giants defense can stop Seattle. I've been

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 2>very unimpressed with the Giant defense all year. First game

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 2>against the Cowboys, second game against the Cardinals. In the

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 2>first half, they let Josh Dobbs roll all over him,

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 2>and obviously the Niners did whatever they wanted, even though

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Purdy was wildly inaccurate in the first half of that game.

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 2>So I liked the Seattle a lot. Here Seattle plus

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 2>one and a half. So my five picks for the

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 2>week Pittsburgh minus two and a half, Tampa getting three

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 2>and a half, Cleveland minus two and a half, Kansidy

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 2>laying a big number of nine and a half, and

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Seattle plus one and a half. All right, now, demons,

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 2>let's go to your teaser. Last week, your teaser, Like

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:43.799
<v Speaker 2>my picks, two of them were just bad. I guess

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore wasn't Baltimore the only one that was. No, you're right,

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 2>you're right. So you had Baltimore Tea's down to minus

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 2>one and a half. They lost in overtime, so that

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:56.760
<v Speaker 2>one wasn't bad. You're correct. You have the Chargers plus six.

0:49:57.239 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 2>They won out right, that was good, and then the

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:01.479
<v Speaker 2>Jags might as well one and a half, which made

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:04.560
<v Speaker 2>you lash out at Trevor Lawrence unfairly. What are you

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:06.720
<v Speaker 2>doing for your teaser this week?

0:50:07.880 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 3>All right? Man?

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 4>This week we got a three team six point teaser

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 4>at plus one forty.

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what you guys's lines are looking like

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 4>at home, but mine was Houston plus three. We're teasing

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 4>them up to plus nine, Green Bay at plus one

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:26.319
<v Speaker 4>and a half to plus seven and a half, and

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 4>then Chicago getting nine and a half from on.

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 2>The screen it says Arizona. But in the dollar you

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:37.880
<v Speaker 2>had Chicago. Oh no, no, no, no, so Arizon.

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 4>It is Arizona. That's my mistake. Initially it was Chicago.

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:44.160
<v Speaker 4>We took Chicago out. It's Arizona from plus fourteen to twenty.

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 3>I could. I could not pass that one up.

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:50.399
<v Speaker 2>I had to take that getting a full twenty, yeah,

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 2>full twenty with Arizona against.

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:55.160
<v Speaker 4>The game, and if we get a touchdown somehow, we're

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 4>up twenty eight twenty seven.

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 3>So hey, I like it.

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, listen, this is as far as value goes.

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna give this a B plus Houston. The plus

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 2>three to plus nine is obviously oddly, it's like a

0:51:15.719 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 2>better teaser leg if it were plus two and a half,

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:21.240
<v Speaker 2>because then you're buying the three and but that's it's fine.

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay is a great teaser leg, a great teaser leg.

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:29.879
<v Speaker 2>And Arizona you're doing the sharper thing, which is most

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 2>people when there's a huge spread, they tease down the favorite.

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 2>You're teasing up the underdog, which I respect. I am

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 2>a little nervous for you. On the stomach punch loss

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 2>on Houston. Yeah, and by that I mean Houston is

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:58.919
<v Speaker 2>down six, there's twelve seconds left, they're on their own

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 2>thirty and all of a sudden, it's just Scott Van

0:52:02.120 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Pelt would say the pitchy pitchy woo woo lateral play

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 2>and you and now TJ. Watt is recovering a fumble

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 2>and walking it into the end zone. I could I

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:19.280
<v Speaker 2>could see that coming to screw you for some reason.

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 2>But I give this a B plus. I think there's

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 2>some real value there. I think it's sharp. You're not

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 2>teasing across any zeros. You're getting some key numbers. I

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 2>like it. I like this for you. By the way,

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 2>how are are you? How are you making these bets?

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Because you're not making them with me? And you know what,

0:52:40.920 --> 0:52:44.319
<v Speaker 2>don't answer this question because California, you can't do it.

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:46.799
<v Speaker 2>So don't even answer these questions. If I find out

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you're doing like late midnight runs to Vegas, I'm gonna

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 2>be partially proud and partially concerned. But I'm sure you've

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 2>got I'm sure you've got someone else. Okay, all right,

0:52:59.040 --> 0:52:59.640
<v Speaker 2>good for you.

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:01.760
<v Speaker 2>What are we doing this week? For the offer?

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.399
<v Speaker 4>So we're headed back to the casino this week. You've

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.240
<v Speaker 4>you've only went one for three on slots last week,

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 4>so let's hit the tah last week.

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 2>By the way, though, on the player prop, I initially said,

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy g to throw a pick. We couldn't find the

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 2>odds on it in time, so I didn't do it.

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:21.800
<v Speaker 2>He threw three and then I landed on Isaiah Pacheco

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 2>anytime touchdown and he scored the other ones. I did

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 2>not win, but I did very profitable thus far at

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 2>the casino for the offer. Go ahead.

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:35.759
<v Speaker 4>Uh, so we're gonna play parlay poker today. Your goal

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 4>is to pick a hand that you're going all in on.

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Also known as a parlay out of the cards, out

0:53:42.160 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 4>of the cards dealt. So I'm pretty sure I'm going

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:46.239
<v Speaker 4>to show a graphic up here for those watching on

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:46.879
<v Speaker 4>YouTube here.

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this's like video poker, all right. So my

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 2>hand that I have been dealt is the Chiefs money

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 2>line and the Niners money line at minus four ten

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and plus nine fifty. Okay, all right, go ahead, and

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.799
<v Speaker 2>now what do we have? The flop as they've put

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:08.920
<v Speaker 2>it up, there is Dak plus two and a half

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:15.800
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns at plus one forty, a Field's interception at minus

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 2>one thirty, Miami over twenty six and a half at

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 2>minus one ten. I gotta be honest, I don't like

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:29.360
<v Speaker 2>any of those Dak over two and a half touchdowns

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:33.239
<v Speaker 2>against the Patriots defense. I don't like Fields to throw

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:35.239
<v Speaker 2>a pick. I don't know how often he's gonna throw

0:54:35.239 --> 0:54:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the ball against Denver, and I'm laying negative juice and

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Miami over twenty six and a half feels like I

0:54:43.040 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 2>almost like the the under more in that spot, but

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 2>I would stay away, all right. The turn is the

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 2>prince that was promised over two hundred and forty two

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:56.040
<v Speaker 2>point five rushing yards or passing yards pardon me. I

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 2>really like that one, so we'll do that. And then

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:04.320
<v Speaker 2>because the Trevor Lawrence in London, back on his home turf,

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:07.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the Sunday morning game by the way

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 2>to Montay. Are you gonna get up at for six

0:55:09.800 --> 0:55:11.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty in the morning, la time to watch that Trevor

0:55:11.840 --> 0:55:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence game. Probably not.

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 3>It's got no reason to watch Trevor Lawrence at six in.

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:19.360
<v Speaker 2>The morning, Okay, all right? And then the last one

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore minus six and a half at plus two seventy five.

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm obviously not doing that because I took Cleveland minus

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:30.359
<v Speaker 2>two and a half. So here's the deal. There's only three.

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I like the Chief's money line, the Niners money line,

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 2>and the prints over two hundred and forty two hundred

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and forty two passing yards. That's it. That plays that

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 2>pays plus one point fifty seven. I like that. The

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Niners are not gonna lose, the Chiefs are not gonna lose.

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 2>So I'm really getting plus nearly one sixty odds on

0:55:57.160 --> 0:56:01.640
<v Speaker 2>is Trevor going to throw for you know, at least

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:06.840
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and forty five yards in the early Sunday

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:11.799
<v Speaker 2>morning game live from London against the Atlanta Falcons. I

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 2>like that. I like that a lot. We're gonna go

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 2>ahead and take that. We will answer your questions in

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:25.799
<v Speaker 2>the chat next. What's right? All right, welcome back in

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Demon's I gotta get to the TV show. So let's

0:56:30.000 --> 0:56:32.800
<v Speaker 2>just pick a couple of these questions. Start with Vincent's

0:56:32.880 --> 0:56:34.439
<v Speaker 2>question up top, Let's go there.

0:56:35.880 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Vincent Pennsylvan Pensyvan asked, what makes this team better than

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 4>the Brooklyn Big Three? Milwaukee just lost their best guard defender.

0:56:44.000 --> 0:56:46.239
<v Speaker 4>I understand the move, but I'm just not but it's

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 4>just not a home run as everyone else thinks it is.

0:56:49.480 --> 0:56:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so a million things different than the Brooklyn Big Three.

0:56:53.480 --> 0:56:56.399
<v Speaker 2>One is Milwaukee has proof of concept that they can

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:59.799
<v Speaker 2>win with a team built around Giannis. Brooklyn had no

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:03.439
<v Speaker 2>roof of concept. Durant had won, but Durant had only

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 2>won in Golden State, so that's first of all. Second

0:57:06.080 --> 0:57:12.399
<v Speaker 2>of all, Yiannis is better than any player Brooklyn had.

0:57:12.560 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Durant's awesome Giannis is better. Third of all, Dame is

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:22.360
<v Speaker 2>a far more reliable and dependable player than Kyrie Irving,

0:57:23.200 --> 0:57:28.440
<v Speaker 2>so it and the idea comparing the two to me

0:57:29.720 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 2>is ignores what Kyrie has been over the better part

0:57:34.160 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 2>of the last decade versus what Dame has been over

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 2>the better part of the last decade. And you're not

0:57:40.880 --> 0:57:45.960
<v Speaker 2>microwaving chemistry all of a sudden between all these different

0:57:46.120 --> 0:57:51.520
<v Speaker 2>hardened Kyrie Durant guys who had never been together. It's

0:57:51.640 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 2>just you're just adding one piece. And Damian Lillard. Now,

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 2>there is obviously question about the new head coach, Adrian Griffin,

0:58:00.200 --> 0:58:03.160
<v Speaker 2>like there were questions about Nash, but the odds are

0:58:03.200 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he would Nash was in over his head immediately.

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 2>That the hope is and the belief is Griffin won't

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 2>be And Terry Statts is there who coached Dame for

0:58:14.200 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 2>damn near a decade on the bench store that to

0:58:17.160 --> 0:58:22.400
<v Speaker 2>me is not concerned significantly. All right, let's do Herbie

0:58:22.440 --> 0:58:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Husker Demonsey Herbie Husker thirteen.

0:58:25.760 --> 0:58:28.760
<v Speaker 4>With all the talk about TUA, what sort of performance

0:58:28.800 --> 0:58:31.040
<v Speaker 4>will be needed from Mahomes this year to.

0:58:31.000 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Be respected as MVP? Oh repeat it as MVP, sir.

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's just very very early, guys. We're three weeks

0:58:40.440 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 2>in and I would just like to remind the audience

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and again, I think that the Dolphins have been awesome,

0:58:49.240 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and I think Twuoa has been awesome, but it does

0:58:52.400 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 2>weren't mentioning that last year. And this is what is

0:58:57.120 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 2>so surprising to me. Last year, TUA in Week two

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:07.840
<v Speaker 2>had a six touchdown game. TUA last year through three

0:59:07.920 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 2>weeks the team was three and zero with victories over

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:16.600
<v Speaker 2>New England, who was coming off the playoffs, Baltimore and Buffalo,

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and two add eight touchdowns, two picks in a one

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:22.560
<v Speaker 2>to eighteen rating, and people were like, I think two

0:59:22.680 --> 0:59:26.000
<v Speaker 2>is the MVB. And now last year obviously he got

0:59:26.080 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 2>hurt which derailed it, but there's just a long long

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:37.200
<v Speaker 2>ways to go. Also, be very ready for people if

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Miami loses this game, because there is nothing the media

0:59:42.800 --> 0:59:46.920
<v Speaker 2>likes more than just consistently putting the cart before the

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:50.240
<v Speaker 2>horse on Josh Allen, be ready for the Josh Allen

0:59:50.360 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 2>MVP talk to get going. And if the Niners annihilate

0:59:58.800 --> 1:00:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals, get ready for someone around Wednesday of next

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>week to say this, hey guys, why isn't brock Purty

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>getting more in the MVP discussion. But it's a long season,

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>so the I'm not that interested in the MVP stuff

1:00:16.280 --> 1:00:20.640
<v Speaker 2>right now. Mahomes will obviously be in it in the

1:00:20.680 --> 1:00:23.760
<v Speaker 2>discussion all year long, and I think on Sunday Night football,

1:00:23.760 --> 1:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>when he lights up the Jets, he'll be in He'll

1:00:27.320 --> 1:00:30.919
<v Speaker 2>be in really strong position. As the calendar gets ready

1:00:30.920 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 2>to turn to October. All right, we got a run.

1:00:33.160 --> 1:00:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Demon's say, great job. Enjoy this weekend. I'm gonna call

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 2>you repeatedly. I might even do that little thing where

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>I make your phone start pinging like you lost it

1:00:42.840 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>right when the Jags game kicks off to wake you

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:46.280
<v Speaker 2>up Sunday morning.

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:49.080
<v Speaker 3>You get that'd actually be really rude to you to do.

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna well, I guess we'll wait and see.

1:00:53.480 --> 1:00:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Talk to you guys on TV today at three o'clock.

1:00:55.920 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>What's right, cho