1
00:00:01,040 --> 00:00:04,040
Speaker 1: You're listening to Taking Stock with Kathleen Hayes and Pim

2
00:00:04,120 --> 00:00:08,560
Speaker 1: Fox on Bloomberg Radio. Home prices. They are on the

3
00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:13,200
Speaker 1: rise on average in the top twenty US cities tracked

4
00:00:13,200 --> 00:00:17,320
Speaker 1: by the SMP core Logic Case Shiller Home Price Index.

5
00:00:17,640 --> 00:00:21,520
Speaker 1: The twenty city Property Values index increased five point one

6
00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:25,239
Speaker 1: percent from June of last year. It matched the median forecast.

7
00:00:25,280 --> 00:00:28,319
Speaker 1: It's the smallest game since August, and that's probably no

8
00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:31,400
Speaker 1: small comfort to you if you're trying to buy a

9
00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:35,040
Speaker 1: home in a city like Seattle or San Francisco or

10
00:00:35,120 --> 00:00:38,360
Speaker 1: so many where the market is so very very hot.

11
00:00:38,800 --> 00:00:41,760
Speaker 1: Let's bring in Brendan Brown now he's chief economist and

12
00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:46,080
Speaker 1: head of economic research at Mitsubishi u f J Securities

13
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:48,800
Speaker 1: to talk about home prices, talking about the housing market,

14
00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:51,280
Speaker 1: the fed in the markets, and and a bit too

15
00:00:51,320 --> 00:00:54,880
Speaker 1: about what is driving and what has driven prices so

16
00:00:54,960 --> 00:00:59,080
Speaker 1: much higher in some cities. Brendan, welcome back to the show.

17
00:00:59,680 --> 00:01:02,880
Speaker 1: So let's start with what we're seeing in the latest

18
00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:06,440
Speaker 1: Caselar Home Price Index A rose just over five percent. Uh.

19
00:01:06,680 --> 00:01:09,280
Speaker 1: It is the smallest game since August. In it it

20
00:01:09,319 --> 00:01:11,200
Speaker 1: does seem to sort of look like it's leveled out

21
00:01:11,200 --> 00:01:14,720
Speaker 1: a bit. How do you analyze it? Yes, I would

22
00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:19,119
Speaker 1: say it's a very heterogeneous picture, and what we are

23
00:01:19,200 --> 00:01:24,080
Speaker 1: seeing is the most expensive part of the real estate

24
00:01:24,160 --> 00:01:28,360
Speaker 1: market is where the softening is occurring, and that may

25
00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:31,760
Speaker 1: very well be in Manhattan, and of course the Northeast

26
00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:35,080
Speaker 1: was one of the weaker areas in the case Shiller

27
00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:40,160
Speaker 1: report today. So it's very much um case by case,

28
00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:45,520
Speaker 1: but I think the overall frost um in some cases

29
00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:48,040
Speaker 1: has actually diminished with it. Why did think that's happened.

30
00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:54,640
Speaker 1: I think the overriding issue in Manhattan and Florida, for example,

31
00:01:54,800 --> 00:02:00,320
Speaker 1: has been the increased monitoring by the US Treasure Department

32
00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:05,120
Speaker 1: of foreign purchases, particularly through offshore companies, and that really

33
00:02:05,720 --> 00:02:10,560
Speaker 1: was a very important part of both the storytelling in

34
00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:15,640
Speaker 1: in those markets and also in terms of the biggest transactions.

35
00:02:16,480 --> 00:02:19,440
Speaker 1: You know, Brendon, you recently pooh pooed in National Mortgage

36
00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:23,040
Speaker 1: News the role that foreign money has played the last

37
00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:27,680
Speaker 1: few years over this extreme price appreciation. I have interviewed

38
00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:32,120
Speaker 1: many people in Boston real estate agent, UM in California

39
00:02:32,440 --> 00:02:35,560
Speaker 1: demographic expert, many people saying that in fact, there has

40
00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:37,520
Speaker 1: definitely been an influx of foreign money and at least

41
00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:40,680
Speaker 1: on the margin, it has contributed to some pretty outsized

42
00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:42,919
Speaker 1: games and home prices. You're blaming this on the media,

43
00:02:42,960 --> 00:02:45,200
Speaker 1: which strikes me as kind of odd because it seems

44
00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,040
Speaker 1: to me there's a lot of people who know this

45
00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:51,080
Speaker 1: market very well who would disagree with you. Absolutely. The

46
00:02:51,400 --> 00:02:55,840
Speaker 1: foreign demand has been a significant element in the flow,

47
00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:59,480
Speaker 1: and we see that in some of the hottest markets

48
00:03:00,160 --> 00:03:03,480
Speaker 1: in Manhattan earlier. If you cross over to Canada, we

49
00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:07,480
Speaker 1: have the notorious bubble, if one wants to describe as

50
00:03:07,480 --> 00:03:12,160
Speaker 1: that in Vancouver, where Chinese billionaires buying there has has

51
00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:15,840
Speaker 1: been very much part of the story. But what I

52
00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:19,880
Speaker 1: what I do in that recent article you mentioned, is

53
00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:22,880
Speaker 1: one has to step back in any speculative market like

54
00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:27,440
Speaker 1: this and realize that there's huge stocks of these assets

55
00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:32,919
Speaker 1: being held UM which are many times greater than the flows.

56
00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:36,400
Speaker 1: And even in looking at the flows for Chinese buying

57
00:03:36,440 --> 00:03:40,000
Speaker 1: in Vancouver or the foreign buying in Manhattan, probably doesn't

58
00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:43,120
Speaker 1: account for more than ten or twenty central flows. So

59
00:03:43,640 --> 00:03:46,080
Speaker 1: what you have to ask is, when you get a

60
00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:51,160
Speaker 1: big price appreciation, why there isn't more UM indigestion or

61
00:03:51,160 --> 00:03:54,400
Speaker 1: selling of those who already hold stock can have made

62
00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:57,560
Speaker 1: the big price appreciation. And and that's where I make

63
00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:01,120
Speaker 1: the connection with this whole environment of zero interest rates

64
00:04:01,200 --> 00:04:06,960
Speaker 1: or very low interest rates. That creates a climate where investors,

65
00:04:07,320 --> 00:04:09,400
Speaker 1: even if they see a big gain and they realized

66
00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:13,320
Speaker 1: a big game, are reluctant to take them because the

67
00:04:13,360 --> 00:04:20,400
Speaker 1: alternative is so so I'm exciting, um, whether whether it's

68
00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:25,600
Speaker 1: cash or any or short term bonds. So so, the normal,

69
00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:29,480
Speaker 1: the normal mechanisms which tend to keep these stories in

70
00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:34,200
Speaker 1: check or the excess price fluctuations, doesn't work so well

71
00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:37,800
Speaker 1: in this environment of monetary distortion. So quick, I'm gonna

72
00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:39,560
Speaker 1: get a couple of quick questions in here. Number one

73
00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:42,719
Speaker 1: Stanley Fisher Advice. Here, the FED says that the negative

74
00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:44,920
Speaker 1: rates seem to be working in many countries. Do you

75
00:04:44,960 --> 00:04:47,760
Speaker 1: agree that zero or negative rates are a good idea

76
00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:53,080
Speaker 1: for central bankers? Absolutely not. Negative interest rates as practiced

77
00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:56,960
Speaker 1: in Europe and Japan have basically tools of currency depreciation,

78
00:04:57,320 --> 00:05:01,680
Speaker 1: and even there they haven't really been as effective as

79
00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:04,400
Speaker 1: we can see with the big rebound of them we've

80
00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:07,599
Speaker 1: had this year. Um, they create a lot of anxiety.

81
00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:11,760
Speaker 1: In Germany, you're probably getting more savings because desperation amongst

82
00:05:11,800 --> 00:05:14,360
Speaker 1: citizens about how they're going to say for their pensions.

83
00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:17,039
Speaker 1: And you've got a lot of distortions as as in

84
00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:22,320
Speaker 1: real estate markets and other asset markets, and in particularly

85
00:05:22,360 --> 00:05:26,360
Speaker 1: in private equity. So you get so much distortion, malinvestment

86
00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:30,800
Speaker 1: and potential bubbles which will subsequently burst. But it's a

87
00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:34,360
Speaker 1: very non optimal path to take. All right, Well, Brendan Brown,

88
00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:36,720
Speaker 1: my question too is about the Federal Reserve. Will say

89
00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:39,880
Speaker 1: that for your next appearance on taking Stocks. So nice

90
00:05:39,880 --> 00:05:43,080
Speaker 1: of you to join us today. Very interesting comments about

91
00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:45,480
Speaker 1: the housing market and what is driving up from Brendan Brown.

92
00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:48,800
Speaker 1: He's chief economist and head of economic research at Missubishi

93
00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:53,760
Speaker 1: UFJ Securities. Up next, Mr Wonderful from Shark Tank. You

94
00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:56,280
Speaker 1: know him right well, he's got a new company he's

95
00:05:56,320 --> 00:06:00,480
Speaker 1: involved in, Shark Reach. Very interesting. This is Bloomberg