WEBVTT - Thinking is Critical

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Text Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio,

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech and a lot of

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you out there who have been listening to this show

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for a while, I know that I like to get

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>on a soapbox about critical thinking, and I also talk

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot about compassion and how I believe we really

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>need to employ both critical thinking and compassion together if

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we are to be good human beings. In many places

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>around the world, including here in the United States, we

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>are seeing a play by play of what happens when

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we ignore critical thinking and compassion when we do not

0:00:55.560 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>incorporate those qualities into our systems. When we do that,

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>then there are people who are specifically left out of

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>those systems who suffer because of those systems, from pandemic

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>responses to people on the sidelines who are judging the

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>actions and motivations of protesters who, let's face it, are

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>actually just asking that they be treated like human beings.

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a problem that has a real world negative

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>impact on countless lives. We need to examine ideas and

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>claims carefully and make sure that those ideas and those

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>claims have merit. But we also need to remember that

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>other people are you know people. Some of them might

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>be knowingly engaged in creating or perpetrating falsehoods for whatever reasons,

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's obviously bad. You know, if their motivations are

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>bad and they're acting on those bad motivations, they are

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not good people. But others might be doing this without

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>realizing it or noing that the information that they're spreading

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is wrong, which is also bad, but that is potentially

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>reparable with the right approach. So today's episode is going

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to be another one about critical thinking and probably a

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of compassion thrown in there too, and I'll frame

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it within the context of technology for the most part.

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do a rundown of you know,

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>current events. But please keep in mind that we should

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>be employing these qualities everywhere, not just when it comes

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to should I buy this gadget or is it too

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>good to be true? Critical thinking really is about digging

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>beneath the surface level of a topic or an issue

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to understand what's really going on. And it's related to

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff like the scientific method, and it's a skill that,

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like most skills, gets better the more you use it.

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same thing as outright denial. I'm not

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>telling you to go out and just deny stuff. It's

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>really more about asking questions and looking for the answers

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and evaluaiting those answers, and if the answers hold up,

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>then accepting those answers, even if the answer doesn't align

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>with what you had already guessed was going to be

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the answer You've you've got to be willing to accept

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it if it holds up under evaluation. And one other

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to get out of the way is

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that I don't mean to come across as being on

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a high horse here. I want to tell you guys

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>something that I am not very proud of. It took

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>me an embarrassingly long time to really embrace critical thinking.

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even hear the term until I was in college,

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and my professors talked about it as though it had

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>been part of my education the entire time, and it wasn't.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And while I learned about critical thinking in college, I

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>was not good at it. I'd say it wasn't until

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I was in my mid thirties that I started really

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>understanding it and employing it, and to this day I

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>still slip up. It's not unusual for me to realize

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that something I had previously just accepted really required more

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny and understanding. So you can think of this episode

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>as being inspired by my own slow journey toward critical thinking,

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a journey that's still going on today. But let's start

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>with the obvious. We've all seen countless advertisements of variable

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>messaging and quality, and we all understand that ads are

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>intended to motivate us to spend money on goods or services.

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>That includes stuff like political ads too. By the way,

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in those cases, you can think of the transaction as

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a vote rather than an exchange of money, unless we're

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about ads that are asking for campaign contributions, in

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>which case, yeah, that's similar to an ad trying to

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>sell you a new car or pair of sneakers or whatever.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's think about this from the perspective of someone

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>who designs ads. Their job ultimately is to create something

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that motivates the audience to take action. Moreover, that action

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>typically means motivating them to spend some of their own

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>money on a product or service, and that could be

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>a tough hill to climb right, So someone who is

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>good at creating ads has to think about how to

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>frame their subject in a way that speaks to the

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>intended audience. Typically, these ads need to convince that audience

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that whatever is being sold is something that the audience

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>actually needs. Now, if whatever is being sold is already

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>an established thing, that's not as difficult, right. I mean,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'm trying to sell microwave ovens, I don't have

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to explain what a microwave oven is because those have

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>existed for decades. Moreover, folks tend to understand the use

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>case for a microwave oven and how they can really

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>be convenient and fast compared to other methods of food preparation.

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So all of that groundwork has already been done for me.

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's say I come out with a new product,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or a product that hasn't really established a firm foothold

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Now I have to convince my audience

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>that the thing I have created or that I am

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>tasked to sell is actually useful. I will have to

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>demonstrate how it solves a problem or and these ads

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>are particularly clever, I have to convince my audience that

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they have a problem. They were previously unaware of, you know,

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the problem they never knew they had, and that my

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>product solves that problem. I'm sure you've seen examples of

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>ads or critiques of ads that have some variation of

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the phrase it solves a problem and you didn't even

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>know you had. That, by the way, is a red flag.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to get to red flags a little later.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of the responsibilities that add creators must meet.

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Another is to convince the audience that the specific variant

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.799
<v Speaker 1>of the goods or services that the ad is about

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>is superior to all others in that same category. Going

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>back to the microwave oven, if I were to try

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>and market a new oven, I would need to convince

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>people that the oven I was producing was better than

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the dozens of other variations that are already on the market,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>or else I'm not going to get a good return

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on my investment. I'm not gonna sell many ovens, so

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>I need to come people my microwave is the best

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in some way. Maybe it's less expensive, maybe it's more

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>energy efficient, maybe it heats more evenly, or maybe I

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>just claim some combination of these things and then try

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and go for that all of this needs to be

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>conveyed in an effective way to the audience, and that

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>means it needs to grab attention, It needs to be memorable,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and typically it needs to be short and really skilled

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>advertisers have become adept at sussing out some basic psychology

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to trigger our impulses. So let's talk about some of

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>those red flags I just mentioned. I already said that

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the concept of solving a problem you didn't know you

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>have should be a warning. In some cases, it may

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>very well be legitimate. The product or service might actually

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>take care of something that otherwise we had to do ourselves,

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and we never even thought twice about it because in

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>our experience there was no way to offload that task.

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>But there is no shortage of products, particularly in the

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as seen on TV category, that really don't solve anything.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>They might create an alternative way to do something, but

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't actually save any one time or effort. They

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>might not even work as well as the more established

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Speaker 1>methods they're supposed to replace, and they also cost you money.

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You have to buy these things, right, so that would

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>mean for you it would be a net loss if

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you bought one. As a rule, I assume any product

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that relies on videos of actors being comically incapable of

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>doing something simple like opening a carton of milk to

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>fall into this category. Another red flag falls in line

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>with the old saying if it looks too good to

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>be true, it probably is. I think that's saying can

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>be applied to about of all the ads I see

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>whenever I visit Facebook. I can't tell you, guys how

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>frequently I've seen ads for stuff like electric guitars that

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>really go whole hog on this one. Now. I've been

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of research on guitars because I'm thinking

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about finally learning to play one, but because I'm browsing

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>online to learn this stuff, and because I have not

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>taken better precautions to hide my browsing from Facebook, and

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that is totally on me, I now get flooded with

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>ads for guitars when I look at Facebook. These ads

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>frequently claimed to sell some brand named guitars, stuff like Fender,

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Fender Strato Caster or the Gibson Less Paul,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but for ludicrously low prices. A guitar that could cost

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>six dollars or more will list on one of these

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>ads for so talk about the temptation. If you're an

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>aspiring musician or someone who's been playing on an entry

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>level instrument, but you would love to own something more professional,

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>more high end, that sounds like an incredible offer. The

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>ads I saw typically said that whatever store was posting

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the ad was going out of business, or that they

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>had to make room for new stocks, They had to

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>do a clearance sale of all this old inventory, and

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the ad was creating a fiction to make it seem

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>as though there was some justification for those low prices,

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to give at least some sense that this possibly could

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>be on the up and up. Now did those ads

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>tempt me? Yeah, I'm human, But I also didn't believe them.

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Immediately I was suspicious. So I decided that I was

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>going to start opening up these ads into another browser

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and look at the landing page. And I immediately grew

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>suspicious of them because the language was very similar to

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>other ones I had seen before, the details about the

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>page were really sparse, and also as soon as I

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>opened up more than one of them, I saw that

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>these ads, which were supposedly all for different companies and

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>different guitar shops, they all had different names and different

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>U r L s They all landed on pages that

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>were identical except for the U r L address, So

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't getting redirected to the same website. No, there

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>were duplicates of this same web site. That's dead giveaway.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>It's an indication that someone is casting as wide a

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>net as they can to try and trick people into

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a transaction. So what is actually going on here? Well,

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>with many of these companies, most of which are running

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>places like China, the whole operation is a bait and switch.

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>The goal is to convince people that they are buying

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>something legitimate, like a Fender stratocaster, but it could be anything.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It could be a costume piece, it could be some

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>other gadget, it could be knives, you name it. But

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what the company will ship will be some sort of

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>cheap knockoff. And most companies won't even attempt to hide

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this fact. It's just apparent as soon as you receive

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the package. These companies are very slow to ship those products,

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and really the goal is to waste enough time so

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that by the time you finally get whatever that cheap

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>knockoff is, it's really hard for you to cancel that transaction.

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>The transaction is already gone through, and it's hard for

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you to get your money back. Many of them have

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>no return policy, or they do have a return policy,

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to cost you more to ship the

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>product back to the company then it cost you to

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>buy in the first place. So that one hundred dollar

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>cheap knockoff of a Fender stratocaster would end up costing

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>me two hundred dollars to ship back to the company

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for a refund. So it's a net loss. So you

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>don't get the thing you actually, you know, paid for,

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 1>and you're left with no real way to fix that situation.

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>And since the company is operating out of another country,

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have many options to seek justice. Now,

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in my case, I started marking these ads and reporting

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>them to Facebook as being misleading, and this would prompt

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to essentially block those ads from appearing on my page. Now,

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it didn't mean that Facebook removed the ad, It's just

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't see it anymore. But here's the thing.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>As soon as I would block one version of that ad,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I would see another one that was nearly identical to

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the first one, and it would go to a different

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you are l but it was on that exact same

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>style web page, the same layout, same pictures, everything, So

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it was the same scam. And then I would report

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that ad, and then I would see another, And I

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>must have gone through at least half a dozen of

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>these before I stopped seeing versions of that ad. So today,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>if I go to Facebook, I don't see that one anymore.

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But doesn't mean that there aren't other ads that are

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>following in this same pattern. And again, none of this

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>means that Facebook is actually not running those ads for

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>other people. Facebook's revenue is almost entirely dependent upon advertising.

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>It is not in Facebook's financial interests to come down

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>hard on advertisers and demand that they are transparent and honest.

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>If Facebook institute those rules, it would lose out on

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars of revenue every quarter. So Facebook has

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a financial incentive to run those ads and to serve

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>as a platform for advertising that's both good and bad.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Bad ads will only hurt Facebook if there's a large

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>enough response among users, and typically that would mean that

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>users would have to abandon the platform or or just

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>not use it at all, or somehow block ads across

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>all the Facebook. The company's standpoint is really more hands

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>off and essentially saying caveat intour or buyer, beware the

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>responsibility of figuring out which ads are legit would fall

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to you, the user, not to Facebook. This also applies

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook's stance on misinformation. Now, if you are in

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States, you've likely seen a lot of news

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about Mark Zuckerberg saying that he doesn't want Facebook to

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>be an arbiter of truth. He doesn't want Facebook to

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>declare to users which posts reflect honest messages and which

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>are misinformation, And he frames in a way that makes

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it sound like Facebook is trying to be an agnostic

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>platform upon which people can express themselves. Freedom of speech

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the first Amendment in the United States, and that to

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>act otherwise, we mean Facebook would have to replace this

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>with a company of proved expression of ideas. So, yeah,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>they're framing it is a very much a free speech

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of issue. But is that what's really going on?

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we'll consider some alternatives by applying

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>some critical thinking. But before that, and I know this

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to sound totally hypocritical, We're going to take

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a brief break to thank our sponsor, and by the

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>end of this episode I'll have more to say about sponsors.

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And ads in our podcasts in particular. But first, let's

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>take that quick break. Zuckerberg says he doesn't want his

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>company to dictate what is truth, and he frames it

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in a way that seems to say, who are we

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to decide what is truth and what is false? And

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a fairly compelling argument, right. I mean, I don't

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>know about you, but I don't love the idea of

0:15:55.440 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>some centralized authority deciding seemingly arbitrarily, which are true and

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>which ones are false. We've seen throughout Facebook's history that

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>whenever the company tweaks their algorithm, people get mad because

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they see only a selection of the posts their friends

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>are making. Every time it happens, I have to look

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>for the settings that allow me to view Facebook posts

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>by most recent rather than whatever factors Facebook thinks are

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>more important to me. And even then, I know I'm

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not actually seeing everything my friends are posting in reverse

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>chronological order. I'm just seeing some of it. So I

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>think that not wanting to be the arbiter of truth

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is part of the reasoning. I think that's a kernel

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of truth with Facebook. But I also think it's not

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the only, or perhaps not even the primary reason for

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that decision. So let's think critically about Facebook and how

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook makes money. So, as we already mentioned, Facebook makes

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>money through advertising, and it doesn't have a huge incentive

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that those ads that are running on

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the platform are for legitimate businesses and purposes, though the

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>company definitely does have an interest in preventing anything that

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>would be damaging to Facebook from running on that platform.

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But another component to this is that Facebook makes more

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>money the longer people stay on Facebook actively. So if

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>you can convince people to actively stay on Facebook for longer,

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you can serve them more ads, and that means you

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>make more money. Therefore, it benefits Facebook to employee strategies

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that keep people glued to the website longer. One way

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that is to design algorithms that show posts

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that are proven to get more engagement than others. And

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>by engagement, we're talking about stuff like posts that get

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of comments or a lot of people are sharing

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it to their own pages or friends pages, and the

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>number of likes that those posts are getting, Posts that

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to participate and perpetuate essentially, and those are

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the posts that keep people on Facebook longer. Thus, those

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that mean more ads can be served

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>for longer amounts of time to those people. In the

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>business model for Facebook, all of this is a good thing.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's in Facebook's interests to design algorithms that can

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>identify the types of posts that are driving engagement and

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>then serve them to a larger spectrum of Facebook's users.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Remember I said earlier, I know I'm not seeing all

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff my friends are posting, even when I'm

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to view my Facebook in you know, chronological order. Well,

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that's because Facebook is kind of choosing which ones I

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>see in which ones I don't, And usually it's trying

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to pick the ones that are more likely to drive

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>high engagement, and those are the ones I'm seeing. Once

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you understand that that's how Facebook works, you can start

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to craft posts that take advantage of this property. You

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>can game the system. You can build stuff that by

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>its very nature, is designed to drive engagement. Now, it

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be true. In fact, if you restrict

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>yourself to posting stuff that's only true, you're not likely

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to drive that much engagement. But it does need to

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be really compelling. Things that are more outrageous or tap

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>into basic emotional responses, whether positive or negative, tend to

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>work really well. So it is with that understanding that

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>people can craft messages that contain misinformation and have those

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>messages perpetuate quickly across platforms like Facebook, and those messages

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>can be really harmful. And whether the person who made

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the message intended to push a specific agenda, or they

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to discredit some other point of view they don't

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>agree with, or they just wanted to find a way

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>to drive engagement for whatever reason, the motivations are immaterial.

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>They could range from irritating but mostly benign to downright

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>mean spirited, but the outcome ends up being the same.

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Misinformation spreads like wildfire across Facebook and beyond. And if

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you are encountering misinformation all the time, and it's popping

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>up like crazy in your feet and being re and

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>forced that way, you start to get the impression that

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that stuff is the real deal, even if it doesn't

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sound legit to you. The fact that Facebook can become

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a fire hose of misinformation helps reinforce those messages, even

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>if the messages themselves lack merit. I compared to living

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>in a place like China or North Korea, where nearly

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>all messaging requires state level approval, and that means the

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>government gets to dictate what information the citizens can access. Well,

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing is bound to shape thoughts and opinions.

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>If you never get to see anything outside the approved stuff,

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>then you have no idea that it even exists. We

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have this innate ability to know the truth from falsehood.

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Facebook meanwhile, has little incentive to change anything. Facebook isn't

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in the business of trying to make things better for

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the average person. That's not their business model. There in

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the business of making money, and that increased level of

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>engagement drives revenue, which means more money for Facebook. Acting

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>against that would go against the company's self interest. Moreover,

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a concept that's important to Facebook's operations called safe harbor. Now, basically,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this concept is that if a company is acting as

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>a means of communication, it cannot be held responsible for

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that's said using that company's services. So let's

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>say that if someone were to call up another person

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on the phone and then they threatened that person. So

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>person A calls person B and issues a threat over

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the phone, the phone company would not be responsible for

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that horrible act. The phone company just runs the infrastructure

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that was used to make the phone call. The same

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of concept generally applies to platforms like Facebook. The

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>idea is that if a user were to post something

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>illegal or disruptive on Facebook, the company wouldn't be held responsible,

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>particularly if the company could show that it had acted

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>promptly in response to complaints or reports about the transgression.

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If face book takes a stance on misinformation, there might

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>be a fear that it would be shifting in a

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>role of accountability, which might seem to undermine the safe

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>harbor argument. In addition to that, monitoring posts and labeling

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff that is spreading misinformation as such, or removing such

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>messages or whatever the plan is, would require an investment

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook's part. The company would have to spend time, energy,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and resources, and all that boils down to money to

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>create a method to identify and label or remove posts

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that are promoting misinformation. So not only would Facebook be

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>cutting back on the types of posts that drive engagement

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and thus generate revenue, the company would also have to

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>pour money into that effort. Asking a business to spend

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>money so that it can make less money is a

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough argument. It's no wonder Zuckerberg as opposed to it. Yes,

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it would be a huge responsibility to determine which messages

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>reflect reality and which do not. It would bring Facebook

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>under enormous scrutiny and criticism. Any person or group or

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever that saw messages being labeled or removed would raise

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>an enormous stink over it, and the company would have

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to deal with that. Right, So, let's say people who

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>are perpetrating misinformation see that their messages are being taken down,

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>then they can just make it an even bigger thing.

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But more than that, combating misinformation hurts the company's bottom line. Now,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>as I record this, news is breaking that dozens of

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Facebook employees have staged a walk out in protest of

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>how Zuckerberg and other high level management at Facebook have

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>refused to intervene when it comes to misinformation and inflammatory posts. Now,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the particular posts that are at the center of this

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>protest originated from the office of the President of the

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>United States. So the stakes are very high on this one,

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>and I'm definitely dogging on Facebook a lot here, but

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear that it's not the only

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>corporation and to do this kind of stuff. The stage

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>had been set long before Facebook was even a thing.

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Back in the nineteen sixties, financial analysts and big thinkers

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>started a gradual shift towards a focus on shareholder value,

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>pairing that idea with the idea that executives should receive

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>compensation that traded high salaries for stock options. The logic

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>was that if your leaders in your company have a

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>personal stake in the performance of the company, they will

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>make decisions that will be best for the company. But

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't necessarily played out that way, as time and

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>again executives have made decisions that were incredibly positive from

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a shareholder value and thus a personal finance perspective, but

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>had negative consequences for stuff like customer satisfaction or employee

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>conditions and more. In recent years, more leaders, including Jack Welch,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>who was seen as the champion of shareholder value back

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties. He was the CEO of General

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Electric back at that time. Even Jack Welch has come

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>out and said that this is a bad approach and

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that really the priorities should be customers first, then employees,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and then shareholders. They should be behind the focus on

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>customers and employees. But this is a view that's taking

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a very long time to precipitate throughout business as a whole,

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>and in the meantime we see a lot of leaders

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>making decisions the result in enormous increases in wealth at

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>others expense. Now, why did I bring all that up

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Well, I did it to show

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that by taking a particular stance or claim, in this

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>case Zuckerberg's explanation for why Facebook shouldn't weigh in on

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>whether or not something is accurate or true, we can

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>actually ask ourselves questions and look at the subject on

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a deeper level, and at the end of the day,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you might find yourself agreeing with Zuckerberg's decision, even if

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>his explanation for that decision is not the full truth. Now,

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I personally do not agree with his decision, but that's

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>my own point of view, and I don't wish to

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>argue that my point of view is the quote unquote

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 1>right one. It's just the one I happen to have.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's important to get as full and

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>understanding as possible before weighing in with opinions. Now, this

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is a skill, and like all skills, we all need

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to practice at it to get better and I include

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>myself in that, and you've likely encountered messages that reinforced

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a previously held belief. These are very easy to accept

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>as the messages we see fall in line with what

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>we already believe. We're more inclined to accept those kinds

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>of messages right, and we're more likely to dismiss a

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 1>message that conflicts with something we really believe. This is

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a natural human response, and that means it's also the

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>type of response other people can count on when they

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>craft messages. For example, i hold some pretty liberal beliefs,

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not asking any of you to subscribe to

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>my beliefs. Some of you might have very conservative beliefs,

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not going to tell you to change. Rather,

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm framing it this way so that we understand where

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm coming from. So, if I encounter a message that

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>indicates the President of the United States has said or

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>done something particularly upsetting to me, I am predisposed to

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>accept that that report is absolutely true. And partly that

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>has to do with history. The president does have a

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>very long record of saying and doing things that I

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>find upsetting, so precedent has conditioned me to expect such

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>things from him moving forward. But the rest is because

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I hold certain biases, and if a message reinforces those biases,

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm likely to buy into that message. And that's precisely

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 1>when I need to employ critical thinking. When I encounter

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>these messages, I actually do research to see if they're

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>true or relevant. Like I see a lot of messages

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>that contain quotes supposedly said by the President, and I

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>try to do research to make sure that those are

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>things that he actually said, to verify that somewhere the

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>President is recorded as saying that quote, and also to

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>see if there's more context around the quote and that

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that was pulled out that by itself

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is really awful, but within context isn't. And sometimes I

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>can't find any evidence of the quote outside of the

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 1>original message I saw, and then I'm just thinking, well,

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this could just be made up because it's it's playing

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to my expectations, and that's not enough. Likewise, I could

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>encounter a message that praises someone from the liberal side

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum, and once again, my bias means I'm

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>predisposed to accept that as fact because it falls in

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>line with my personal world view. But I also research

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>these messages to make sure they are real and within

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the proper context. I do not want to blindly accept

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that a message aligns that happens to align with my

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>personal worldview is true and then go on to perpetuate misinformation.

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Doing this is not always easy. I find that, especially

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>when I'm particularly emotional, it's really challenging to remember to

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>apply critical thinking. But I also think that's when we

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>need to rely on it the most. On the mild side,

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it might mean you're less likely to spread falsehoods, but

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on the heavier side, it could mean you helped diffuse

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous situation. When we come back, I'll go into

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>some more elements of critical thinking and compassion that are

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>applicable in the tech world and beyond. But first let's

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. In past episodes, you can hear

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>me get really emotional about instances in which opportunistic people

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>have used technology to take advantage of other in various ways.

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>The schemes all tend to fall back on the common

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>failures that we have as humans, and honestly, there is

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing really new about those schemes. There are tricks that

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>con artists have been relying upon for centuries. The tools

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of the trade are the same. What changes is whatever

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is being sold and whatever platform you're using in order

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to sell it. And it doesn't matter if we're talking

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>about a gadget or a philosophy. And I think all

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>scams are reprehensible, but I get particularly angry at those

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that are taking aim at already vulnerable targets. For example,

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>people who are looking for a job. This is a

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>population of people who are seeking a means to earn

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a living. They might be trying to land their first

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>steady job ever, or they might be trying to transition

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>from one job that's not so great into something that

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they hope is better. Anyway, they are putting themselves out

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there in search of opportunities, and that means they are

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a vulnerable population, and some people find that irresistible. There

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>are numerous individuals and shady companies that take advantage of

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>job seekers. A common tactic is to advertise a job online,

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.479
<v Speaker 1>but the advertised job is just bait. There is no

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>intent on offering that job to an applicant. In fact,

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the job might not even exist. The goal is to

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>lure people into a job interview and then pull the

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>bait and switch, saying oh, you know, we already filled

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that position, but we have a totally different job that

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we would love to offer you. And thus they offer

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>up a different job to the applicant, and typically the

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>offered job, the new one is less desirable than whatever

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>was originally being applied for. It might have lower pay

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and might have fewer benefits or both, but or it

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>may just be you know, less desirable in job duties.

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>But but the person doing the hiring knows that if

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>someone has taken the effort to go to a job interview,

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and if they are looking for a job, if they're

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in that place, they could be in need enough and

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>emotionally vulnerable enough to agree to this switch, even though

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't what they were told when they first applied. Yeah,

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that's one way to make me really angry, really fast.

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And it is hard out there. I've been in a

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>steady gig since two thousand eight, and even from this

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>cushioned position, I know it's hard out there, and people

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for a job fall into a category of people

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>who cannot afford to lose. They're looking for that chance

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to land something steady. They're hopeful, and unethical jerk faces

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>will pounce on that there are other groups that are

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>even shadier, that are really just trying to get as

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>much personal information as possible and they have no job

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to offer whatsoever. Or they are part of a pyramid

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>scheme that requires the job seeker to pour some of

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>their own limited money into that scheme, and the lure

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is that if they bring other folks into that organization,

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>they will get some of the money of the people

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that they they bring in. But those schemes are entirely

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon convincing more and more people to join further

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>down the chain, and typically only a few folks towards

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the very top ever really make anything, and it's at

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the expense of everyone below them. That's classic pyramids schemes.

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Now you've probably picked up on the fact that a

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of this all has to do with catering to

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what people want to believe is true, and that is

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge part of it. But another is relying upon

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>people interpreting information incorrectly. For example, Moore's law. This is

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a great one. Now let's begin by saying Moore's law

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>because came from an observation. It wasn't that Gordon Moore

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>declared this, you know, inherent law of the universe. Rather,

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>he was making an observation about how semiconductor companies were

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>able to fit more components on an inch square inch

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of silicon wafer UH, and that there was a market

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>demand for doing more of that, which allowed them to

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>invest in the process of making, you know, the chips

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that had even more transistors essentially on them. He was

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>he was looking at market trends that were supporting this

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>overall technological trend. But generally speaking, these days, we say

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that Moore's law means that computers today are twice as powerful,

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>meaning faster at processing information as computers from two years ago,

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and the computers from two years ago are twice as

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>powerful as the one from two years before that. So

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>every two years computer processing capabilities double. It's not a

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>hard and fast rule, but it's close enough to what

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we observe to kind of serve as shorthand. But that

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean other technologies keep up at that same speed.

0:34:56.840 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Battery technology, for example, doesn't. But because we've become accustomed

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to computers evolving so quickly, it is easy for us

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to make the mistake of extending that quality to other technologies.

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you're an unscrupulous person you can jump on

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that by making a spurious claim that sounds like it

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>could be possible and raking in the benefits. You guys

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>probably remember that I've done episodes on the company Thoroughness.

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a company that aimed to produce a machine capable

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of running hundreds of diagnostic tests on a single droplet

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of blood. The ambition of the company and its founder,

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Holmes was to create a device that would revolutionize medicine.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>With a machine the size of a desktop printer, it

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>could become a household appliance and would allow people to

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>run a test quickly, and then they could share that

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>information with their doctors. They could lead healthier lives. They

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>can micro manage their health. It's kind of in line

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>with that whole quantitative approach we were taking for a

0:35:57.840 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>very long time with all this stuff like fitness tracker

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that would give us detailed information about things like how

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>many hours sleep we got, how many times do we

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>toss in turn, it's in that same vein, and potentially

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>this would mean that a user would pick up warning

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 1>signs early enough to be able to take action before

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>things get really serious. It could save lives, and it

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>would make a crap ton of money. But there was

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>just one small problem. The technology didn't work, but a

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people believed it could work. I mean, we've

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 1>got some phenomenal technology at our disposal right now. Right

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>if you have a smartphone, you've got a computer that

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>fits in your pocket. It's got a ton of processing

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>power compared to even old mainframe computers, and it could

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>connect to the internet. It can give you amazing communication

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>abilities as well as access a truly enormous amount of

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>information that's been gathered around the world. It's a relatively

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:58.479
<v Speaker 1>mundane piece of technology at this point, right And when

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the amazing comes mundane, the impossible starts to sound plausible.

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>So why couldn't a machine use a tiny amount of

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>blood as a sample for hundreds of tests? I mean,

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.760
<v Speaker 1>why couldn't it return accurate results in a matter of hours.

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got technology that lets us shoot ultra high resolution

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>video using a phone. We've got tech that we can

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to and give commands too, and it responds to us.

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>It stands to reason that we should be able to

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>run these sorts of tests on that small at sample

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>of blood, And that leap of logic is the problem.

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Our capabilities in one area can lead us to believe

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>we are equally capable in unrelated areas. It would be

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like if I were a world class athlete in a

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>specific sport and I thought, just because of that, I'm

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>automatically equally as amazing and some other unrelated sport. Even

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>very intelligent people got caught up in this promise. Very

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>successful people were caught up by this lie, and the

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>promise was just so darn positive. It would be amazing

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if we could run that many tests on such a

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>small sample of blood. And it would be even more

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 1>amazing if we could come up with a consumer version

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of that technology that the average person could have in

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 1>their home. That kind of gadget could potentially save millions

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of lives. Of course, you want that tech to exist

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and to work, but wishes don't make things true. So

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got a technology that would be awesome if it existed.

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got a culture and business that revolves around risk.

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We've got a startup culture that glorifies the concept of

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>fake it until you make it, which means you come

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 1>up with a goal and then you raise a whole

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of money, and then you flail around trying to

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>achieve that goal and hopefully something you do sticks somewhere

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>along the line. You manage some level of success before

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>your money runs out, and while the money is rolling in,

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>you might as well live high on the hog. If

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work out, well, that's a bummer. But in

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the startup world, failure is common. Fail fast is the

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 1>name of the game. Now. I don't know if Paronisis

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>founder Elizabeth Holmes genuinely believed she was going to be

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 1>able to create the tech that she envisioned. If she did,

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't really surprise me. Like I said, the idea

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is really attractive, and our technology is already so incredible

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>that you could be swayed to think this could be possible.

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I also don't know if she's still believed in it

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>by the end of that whole story, when numerous investigations

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and leaks revealed the extent to which this technology definitely

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>did not work, and the extent to which the company

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>moved to hide that fact. But I do know this,

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>just because you believe in something super hard doesn't mean

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that thing is magically true. Holmes herself is currently in

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a legal battle over the entire Theonis

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>fallout with a new odd charge that was filed against

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>her recently, like as of the week of the recording

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of this, but for more than a decade her company

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was able to get significant investments from numerous wealthy individuals

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and organizations. The promise of a truly huge payout was

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>tempting because if the technology worked, this would be a

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>gold mine. Better than that, it would create a return

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 1>on investment that would be impossible to guess at. You

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 1>might be thinking, Wow, I'm gonna pour a hundred thousand

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars into this, and I'm gonna be breaking in ten

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in no time or more, and that was

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to shut down critical thinking. The message of Pharaonos

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>had multiple vectors of appeal. It appealed to your sense

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of innovation. It appealed to the idea of democratization of medicine,

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>so sort of an altruistic appeal. Simultaneously and somewhat uh conflictingly,

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it also appealed to greed, and lots of people allowed

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:00.760
<v Speaker 1>themselves to be swayed by this. Now need to wrap

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>up this episode, but I said earlier that I would

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>take some time to talk about sponsors and ads that

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I run on this show. Now. Most of the time,

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>our sales department here at I Heart runs potential ad

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>deals by me for my approval, and I take this seriously.

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I try to look into each company and product or

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>service before I give my approval. I don't want to

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 1>pass along something that's misleading if I can help it.

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I don't get a choice in ads, but that's

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a rare thing. So if I voice an AD for

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 1>something that's misleading or whatever, chances are the fault is mine.

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I try to avoid it. Sponsors and advertisements are a

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:45.439
<v Speaker 1>necessary part of what I do because without them, this

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>show would be an expense, but there would be no

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>way to generate money for it. We would just be

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>spending money to make the show and get nothing back,

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and that means this show would go away. So I

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>try to balance the financial responsibilities I have as an

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>employed ye with my responsibilities I have as someone communicating

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to you guys. And I wish I could share with

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you a list of some of the deals that I've

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>said no to, but that would be really unprofessional of me.

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say it's not a short list. But even

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>with all that said, I encourage people to think critically

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>about all messaging. You don't have to deny stuff right

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>out of hand, just question it, even if it aligns

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with your beliefs. Heck, especially if it aligns with your beliefs.

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>In the long run, it can help your case. If

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you're able to suss out the truth from the lies,

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you can build your argument for your side more effectively,

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and you don't leave yourself open to attacks on credibility. Moreover,

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:48.479
<v Speaker 1>we need to exercise those skills to make sure we're

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>just being good humans, that we are taking care of

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>ourselves and of each other. Using those two things, critical

0:42:56.520 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking and compassion, we can recognize when others are truely

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in need. Then we can also help identify the best

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ways to help them. If we think critically, we might

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 1>realize that changing a profile picture or tweeting a message

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>might not really be enough. It's more of a performance

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>than an action, and that we can and should do more,

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>even if that's just to shut our yaps and listen,

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and guys, I'm listening. I promise if you guys have

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>any suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff, whether it's

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a specific technology, maybe it's a company, maybe it's a

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>personality in tech, maybe it's just a trend in tech

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>in general. Reach out to me and let me know.

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You can get in touch on Facebook or Twitter. The

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>handle at both of those is text stuff H s

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Text

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.959
<v Speaker 1>from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 1>H