WEBVTT - A16Z's David George on How Private and Public Markets Fused Into One

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jill Wisenthal.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, it feels like twenty twenty six could be a

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>big year for some mega IPOs that have been private

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>for a while. There's talk about a SpaceX IPO possibly

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe some of the big AI labs, like some pretty

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>massive companies that might be hitting the market soon.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Someone recently gave me a Facebook ipo, yeah, from JP

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Mortgane and they worked on it. Like, I'm very proud.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 3>I need to start wearing it around the office. Yeah,

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>but that was like that was a mega Yeah, that

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 3>was a mega ipo at the time, and there was

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>so much hype about it and then like technical difficulty, Yes,

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 3>so many people eager to get in on that.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>It's so many funny people called that a flop, I

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 2>guess because the technical difficulties and it didn't do that

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>great for a little bit. That would have been a

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>great time to buy it.

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>And the interesting thing about the market, or one of

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the interesting things about the market is you have these

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 2>companies that are gonna IPO when they're already gigantic. So

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>like people point out that in earlier eras they might

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>have I piled when they're like billion dollar companies, and

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>now they're like Octacorons or whatever. And then you have

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>other companies that are also enormous, and there's no it's

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 2>not clear that they're going to ipo it up at

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>all at all.

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I saw a headline about Stripe perhaps raising more money

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>people they could have probably iPod years ago. And one

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of the questions I have is our companies choosing not

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>to IPO or delaying IPO because the public market is

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 2>not that fun, or because the private market has gotten

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 2>so much richer, so much more liquid, et cetera, that

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>that impulse to go public just isn't the same way

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 2>as it might have been in a different generation.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this has kind of been a long running question

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>in the market for a while now. But one thing

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I would just point out on the last point, it

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 3>feels to me like companies in the private market, even

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 3>though they're in the private market where presumably the pool

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 3>of capital is smaller, Yeah, it feels like they're always fundraising.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 2>This is the only thing too, that like it used

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>to be when I started covering tech companies is like

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 2>your Series A round and Series B round and c.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>And now it just seems like this permanent round, especially

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 2>with some of the AI can always be raising, always raising. Anyway,

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 2>we need to learn more about how giant companies are

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>thinking about capital markets, both public and private. And I'm

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>really excited to say we do, in fact, absolutely have

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the perfect guest. We're gonna be speaking with David George.

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>He is the head of the Growth Fund and in

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>dres and Horowitz, a sixteen Z someone perfectly situated to

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 2>explain of all these things that's going on. So, David,

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for coming on.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Odd lots, Hey, great to be with you all.

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>What is a growth fund?

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>What is that?

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 2>I thought all VC was growth. What does it mean

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about a growth fund or a growth

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>round when we're talking about private markets.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so our first of all, great to be with

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>you all, Thanks for having me, excited to have this conversation.

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 4>So our early stage funds invest in companies that are

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 4>growing fast too, So if that's not clear, that is

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.839
<v Speaker 4>what we seek to do across Allipole's capital for us.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 4>The Growth Fund is a fund that invest in companies

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 4>at the later stage of their life cycles, so typically

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 4>once they found product market fit, and our early stage

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 4>funds investing companies early stage when they're kind of trying

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 4>to find product market fit, we invest in companies once

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 4>they have found product market fit. So that's the delineation.

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 4>Right now. We're investing out of our fifth growth fund.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 4>It's about a seven billion dollar fund. If you combine

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 4>the committed capital of our five funds, it's about twenty

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 4>two billion dollars in overall committed capital.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>What percentage of the Growth fund is sort of directly

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 3>obtained from the early stage funds because I imagine that's like,

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 3>that's a good pipeline for you guys, right, Yeah, it's.

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 4>A great pipeline for us. We do both. So we

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 4>have examples of investments out of the early stage and

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.839
<v Speaker 4>in companies that, for whatever reason, we were not early

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 4>stage investors. So some of our largest investments in the

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 4>Growth fund are companies like Data Bricks and Stripe that

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 4>we were early stage investors in. And then some of

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 4>the largest investments are companies like SpaceX and open Ai

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 4>and Waimo and Roadblocks and Pigma that we were not

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 4>early stage investors in. And The first time that we

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 4>invested was in the growth fund, so it's about fifty

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 4>to fifty. We love to invest in companies where we

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 4>know the founders really well. One of the things we

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 4>talked about all the time is game film. This is

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 4>something that public market investors are very familiar with. They

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 4>look for game film. They want to back CEOs management

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 4>teams that have demonstrated continued success, and we seek to

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 4>do the same thing the private markets.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I like how Andrisian Horowitz is so influential and dominant

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 2>that if you just name a bunch of random, big

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 2>companies that are all sort of like the most important,

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 2>like growing tech companies, they're actually just going to all

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 2>be you know, like when I said SpaceX, Data, Bricks, Stripe, etc.

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I didn't purposely say they try to name a bunch

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>of by sixteen Ze family companies. They just incidentally happened

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>to me.

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>What are you like?

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's start big picture with this question of companies staying

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 2>private for longer, especially thriving companies, companies that are doing

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 2>very well, ipoling if at all, much later in their

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 2>life cycle. There are a lot of specific questions, but

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>big picture, what's the story, what's the main cause of this,

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the evolution of this trend.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, Well, first, I would love to just set

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 4>the stage with what the what the data actually is, like,

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 4>what's actually happened.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 2>If I'm totally wrong, that's also interesting.

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, you're not totally wrong. I have a

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 4>bunch of supporting facts to your statement. But the numbers

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 4>are pretty eye popping. So if you look at the

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 4>private market's highly value technology companies represent about five trillion

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.559
<v Speaker 4>dollars of market cap in the private markets, that's almost

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 4>a quarter of the S and P five hundred. Wow,

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 4>it's fifteen percent of Nasdaq. It's forty percent if you

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 4>exclude the MAG seven. So it's just staggering numbers. To

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 4>your point about some of the biggest and best companies

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 4>in the world being in the private markets, the ten

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 4>largest private companies represent forty percent of that five trillion

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 4>of market cap. So this is a massive power law game,

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 4>and the best of the best companies at that stage

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 4>of their life cycle just happened to be in the

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 4>private markets and not in the public markets. Right now,

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 4>that private market kind of five trillion of market cap,

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 4>that sector of the economy has grown ten x in

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 4>ten years. At the same time, the number of public companies.

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 4>You guys have probably covered this before. The number of

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 4>public companies has been cut in half over the last

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty years. So this is just a massive shift in

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 4>the composition of the public markets and the private markets,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 4>and the best of the best companies, as you said,

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 4>largely are sitting in the private markets today. The other

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 4>thing that we look for, you know, we're a growth fund,

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 4>but growth means a lot of things. We look for

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 4>companies that are growing, you know, sort of hyper growth.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 4>We call it hyper growth, growing very very fast. You know,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 4>the average investment in our growth fund has grown about

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent. If you look at the public markets today,

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 4>there's only three companies in our universe that are growing

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 4>over thirty percent. So if you actually want to invest

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 4>in the highest growth, most promising companies that could be

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 4>that next mag seven, chances are they're in the private market.

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 4>So this is this is just a big shift in

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 4>the dynamics. You know, certainly in the last twenty years,

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 4>but even the last ten or fifteen. So that's the

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 4>numbers behind the trend. The question is why, and you know,

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 4>there's there's lots of reasons why this is the case.

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you mentioned it right at the outset. There

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 4>are structural reasons in the public markets that make it

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 4>harder to be a public company now than it was

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 4>twenty years ago. I think the biggest thing is the

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 4>private capital markets are deeper and more liquid than before,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 4>so there's less of a need for a company to

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 4>go public until they need much, much, much much more

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 4>capital In the private markets. For the best of the

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 4>best companies, they kind of have the access to the

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 4>capital that they need. It's a pretty compelling pitch for

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 4>the founder to be able to stay in the private markets,

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 4>have liquidity over time, if you're one of a select

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 4>few can access capital, you know, in the private markets cheaply,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 4>you can kind of steadily control the stock price movements,

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 4>you can regularly run tender offers, and you know, for

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 4>a company, probably the hardest thing aside from access to

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 4>capital is employee management. And if you can get pretty

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 4>close to the dynamics that you get in the public

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 4>markets without volatility, it's pretty compelling to remain in the

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 4>private markets.

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>So I have a bunch of questions on just the

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 3>growth of private capital. But before we get to that,

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 3>you said there are structural challenges in going public, and

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess the one we always hear is like, oh,

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 3>you have to file quarterly paperwork. Like not the paperwork,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 3>which I actually sympathize with because I hate filling out

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 3>forms and things like that, but like, what are the

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 3>reasons that the public market is perceived to be so

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 3>much more difficult or so much more of an operational

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 3>headache I guess than private.

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, there is a cost. So you know, for a

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 4>company the size of SpaceX or Data Bricks or open

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 4>aer Strike, you know, it's not hugely meaningful, but for

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 4>a smaller company, you know, it could be ten to

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty million bucks. And you know, if you're a company

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 4>that would have gone public fifteen years ago, you know,

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 4>five years into your life doing one hundred million bucks

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 4>of revenue, that's pretty meaningful. Like that's a major change,

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:18.359
<v Speaker 4>and so you'll want to wait longer. Public markets, investors,

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 4>investment banks, research organizations are tilted much more toward large

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 4>cap companies or at least mid sized companies today and

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 4>less so towards small cap. So if you're a small

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 4>cap company, it's just very hard to get the attention

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 4>of investors. You know, they can't write very large checks

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 4>and build huge positions in you. You know, it may

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 4>not be worth the investment banks time or the research

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 4>analyst time to cover you. And so you know, if

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 4>that's the case, it's hard to get the attention of

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 4>good investors and make your stock price grow over time.

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 4>So those are a couple examples of the structural challenges.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 4>The other one is just volatility. You know, this generation

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 4>of founders has seen the twenty twenty one run up

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 4>and then the certainly in the technology market, and then

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 4>the falloff in twenty two twenty three, and some of

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 4>them have reset their stock prices in the private markets.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 4>But that was a volatile time. Like if you were

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 4>issuing stock to an employee at the peak and then

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 4>you know that employee was looking at their stock grants

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 4>and saying, oh my gosh, these are down seventy percent,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Like my comp just got cut by seventy percent. That's

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 4>a hard dynamic for a founder to have to deal with.

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 4>And if you can minimize some of that volatility in

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 4>the private markets as a founder, I understand why you

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 4>would do it.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about employee retention, employee management. Employees, you know,

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>they love an IPO, they love liquidity, and okay, now

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>you can have tender offers where they sell some of

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 2>their stock to new investors. And then there's other dynamics too,

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>like because there's all the SPVs out there, and maybe

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 2>like tokens where someone can hedge their holdings in a

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>private market on hyper liquid or something like that. Talk

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 2>to us a little bit about the sort of the

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>plethora of options that employees have now in private companies

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and getting that liquid and so they actually get some

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 2>real money.

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Let me start by just explaining the way it works

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 4>in the public markets, and you know, we can contrast

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the private markets with that. If you're a public market

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 4>employee and you have RSU grants, this is basically the

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 4>way it works. You get a quarterly deposit of net

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 4>stock net of taxes in your account every quarter. And

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 4>so if you're a highly paid employee at Meta or

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 4>Alphabet or Apple, it's like clockwork you can get these grants.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 4>They hit your account. You have for some of the

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 4>highest paid people, you know, hundreds of thousands or millions

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 4>of dollars that hit you hit your account every quarter,

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 4>and that's liquid. It's already netted of tax and so

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 4>you can turn around and sell it and it's like

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 4>cash comp or in the case of those companies, they've

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 4>appreciated tremendously in value over the last ten years, and

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 4>so the employees you know, who help the stock have

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 4>been handsomely rewarded. Then they get RSU grants stacked on

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 4>top of those, so you kind of have this like

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 4>waterfall of RSU grants over time and increasingly, you know,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 4>over time, your orderly net deposit can go up. And

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 4>so if you're a private CEO competing for talent, that's

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 4>what you're competing with. And those companies are flushed with cash,

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 4>and so they're able to pay a lot in stock

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 4>based comp to their employees, and so that's a difficult

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 4>dynamic to compete with. That's one of the strongest forms

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 4>of the argument for telling a private company CEO that

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 4>they should go public, because that is a very compelling

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 4>financial reward for your employees in that public market situation.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 4>In the private markets, the way it typically works is

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 4>you get you know, you get these RSU grants. Sometimes

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 4>they stock up over time, but generally they're ill liquid

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 4>until you go public. Now, what's happened over the last

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 4>I'd say six or eight years. Is companies will do

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 4>tender offers in the private markets where they offer to

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 4>buy a certain percentage of employees vested stock in the

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 4>private markets, so they'll set the price, they'll work with

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 4>somebody like us, and they'll say something like, hey, you

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 4>can sell twenty five percent of your vesteds doc that

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 4>you have in this tender offer, and you know, we'll

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 4>do it once a year. And so that's a decent

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 4>substitute for what I described in the public markets. It's

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 4>not a perfect substitute, but for you know, the employees

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 4>or potential new hires who are true believers, I think

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 4>it's enough to combat that RSU public market dynamic in

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 4>compensation scheme. And you know, it's worked pretty well. SpaceX has,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 4>you know, famously done a really good job running twice

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 4>a year tender offers for their employees, and you know

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 4>they've had tremendous employee satisfaction, ability to hire, retention, et cetera.

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 4>And some of the biggest tech companies have followed suit.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 4>And I would argue that there's a trade off that

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 4>the founders and the private markets are making, where often

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 4>if they were public, they probably would have a higher

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 4>stock price, so maybe they're taking a little bit more dilution,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 4>and so maybe employees would benefit a little bit more

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 4>in valuation in the public markets. But it's not a

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 4>massive gap, and it's a it's a pretty compelling.

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Alternative just culturally out in San Francisco. Do people still

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 3>expect like the default exit to be an IPO or

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 3>has that mindset kind of gone away?

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 4>The best of the best companies want to IPM and

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 4>I think you mentioned some of the big name companies

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 4>out there who may stay private for a really long time.

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think the ambition for most founders is still,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, to have an IPO and to be a large, established,

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 4>important public company. You know, we talked about the pools

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 4>of private capital and how they've grown over the last

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 4>ten years. The pools of capital and the public markets

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 4>are still much deeper. So if you need to raise

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 4>fifty one hundred, two hundred billion dollars like some of

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 4>the big big companies may want to do to pursue

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 4>some of their goals, chances are they'll end up in

0:14:58.520 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 4>the public markets.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 2>The reason we wanted to have this conversation a few

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>months ago, Tracy and I interviewed the Perplexity CEO, and

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 2>he was talking about the rise of SPVs and wanting

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>to say no to money. You know, people come to

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 2>him with investment opportunities and then it's clear that they

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 2>just want to package up that equity in some way

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and create a secondary instrument. And I know, you know,

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>someone messaged me recently and they're like, I could get

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 2>you some pre ipo anthropic shares and like that. I

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 2>don't do that, but like, I know that there's a

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of interest in there. And you mentioned that if

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you really want massive growth at this level, that it's

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the only ones that are growing super big are the

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 2>private companies. Talk to us about the emergence of SPVs

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>and these third party entities, and you don't even know

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>who's on your cap table and how founders are thinking

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 2>about this phenomenon.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 4>I think founders for the most part, really don't like it, okay,

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 4>because they want to know who is on their cap table.

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 4>And there are certain types of investors who will come

0:15:55.120 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 4>to the founders and misrepresent I think, what what vehicle

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 4>or where the capital is actually going to come from.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 4>In our case, we don't do those. What we do

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 4>is we invest directly out of our funds. You know,

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 4>we make that a point of pride with the founders

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 4>to say, hey, you know exactly what you're getting. We're

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 4>going to shoot you straight for the SPB industry, you know. Look,

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 4>it works when you know times are good, and it

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 4>can be horrendous and bad. You know when times are bad.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, Androl is one of our companies very close

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 4>with we're one of the largest investors, and they have famously,

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, gone to war with some of the SPV

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 4>hucksters who are trying to assemble capital to do a

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 4>deal through some obfuscated way around them, and they say, look,

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 4>we want to know exactly who's on our cap table.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, we want to make sure that we're doing

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 4>right by our shareholders. And so it's a risky maneuver.

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 4>You know. It's not to say that there's not some

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 4>that are good, but we try to avoid it and

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 4>we try to counsel our founders to stay away from

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 4>it as much as possible.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned Anderill, and can founders completely lock them

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 2>out or like, how how does it work such that

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the founder doesn't want to have these vehicles get access

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>to their equity and yet somehow they do. Anyway, what

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 2>is the path into the company that these entities are taking.

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 4>The example would be a fund shows up to the

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 4>founder and says, yeah, we're going to invest out of

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 4>this fund, and they have some legal entity name that

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 4>they have is the fund, and then it's not fully

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 4>clear to the founder that that legal entity actually will

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 4>just be an assembly of a bunch of new investors

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 4>that are only investing in that single vehicle. I would

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 4>say the SPV interests is one other you know, sort

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 4>of additional risk that comes with it. You know, our

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 4>large investors are LPs. There's some of the largest institutions

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 4>in the world. They trust us to make investments, and

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 4>they actually like the fact that they're investing in a

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 4>fund that has some degree of diversification. SPVs are inherently

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 4>risky because they're they're single company and so you know,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 4>if that company happens to not go well and you

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 4>invest in a sixteen ZES funds, you can live to

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 4>fight another day because we have a number of other

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 4>companies that are going to do really well at the

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 4>fun level of returns will be good in an SPV.

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 4>If that happens to not work for whatever reason, it

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 4>could be devastating if you put a large amount of

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 4>capital into it.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us a little bit about pricing, because something

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 3>you tend to hear is that, well, if you go

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 3>to the private market, there are some benefits to that,

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 3>but on the other hand, you're probably going to pay

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 3>you a little bit more in terms of cost of capital.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>And then the other thing you hear is that, well,

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 3>if everything is private, it's not necessarily being marked to

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 3>market as often as the public market. So maybe there's

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 3>some concern around pricing. You're not getting that wisdom of

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 3>the crowds effect. You're just getting a bunch of tech

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 3>bros investing in tech bros, and that can kind of

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 3>be a self reinforcing cycle.

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 4>Look, I can always speak to our own business that

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 4>we're in. I'd make two observations. One, I feel pretty

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 4>strongly that if you took our portfolio and put it

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 4>in the public markets, it would trade higher than the

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 4>private markets, and so that speaks to the cost of

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 4>capital trade off that the founders are making. It's benefited

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 4>us tremendously because we've been able to invest in companies

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 4>that we think are some of the best companies in

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 4>the world. Later into their life cycle, then you know,

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 4>we would have been able to ten years or so ago.

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 4>Interesting data point if you look at the returns generated

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 4>by dollars in the private markets historically over the last

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 4>call it like seven years of good IPOs. About fifty

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 4>percent of the dollars of gain in an IPO come

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 4>from the seed through series B, and then fifty percent

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 4>of the dollars of gain come from the series C

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 4>and later. As companies have stayed private longer, that will

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 4>massively shift to the series C and later, and the

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 4>seed through B will be you know, a smaller proportion

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 4>of the dollars of gain. Similarly, if you go back

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 4>ten years and you look at all the companies that

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 4>have gone public, there's a little bit of like time

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 4>lag in this. So just with me, the best companies

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 4>that were going public ten years ago generated eighty eight

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 4>percent of their overall dollars of return in the public markets.

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 4>So if you just took total market cap creation, only

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 4>twelve percent of it was happening in the private markets.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 4>If you look at the recent crop of IPOs in

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 4>the last five years, fifty five percent of their market

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 4>cap creation happened in the private markets. Forty five percent

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 4>happened in the public markets. So there is a massive

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 4>shift that's taken place in terms of where value creation happens.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 4>That's benefited us in terms of pricing. We've invested in

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.959
<v Speaker 4>a portfolio of great companies. I've listed all the some

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 4>of our investments of our biggest investments, our companies like

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 4>Data Bricks and SpaceX and Waymow and open Ai and Andoral,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, Strike and Flock Safety and companies like that.

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 4>If you take our portfolio on average, it's growing one

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent and we invested at twenty one times revenue.

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Now I've recognized their flaws with revenue multiples and all that,

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 4>but I would say, if you could let me have

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 4>a career, an entire career of investing in market leading,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 4>great technology companies where we could buy them at twenty

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 4>one times revenue and they're growing one hundred percent, that

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 4>would be an incredible trade or an incredible investment opportunity.

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 4>And so in terms of valuations, I feel like there

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 4>is a discount to being in the private markets, and

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, founders, I think understand that for the most

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 4>part and make that trade off. But it's definitely a

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 4>dynamic that we see. There's one more thing that I

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 4>would call out. You know, I mentioned earlier that only

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 4>three companies in our universe and the public markets are

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 4>actually growing greater than thirty percent. There is a dynamic

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 4>where I do think it's hard for public market investors

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 4>even to grock really really high growth rates. So if

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 4>you're growing like sixty percent, I think automatically a public

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 4>market investor is going to build a financial model that

0:21:55.840 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 4>says sixty fifty forty, thirty eight percent, and then they're

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 4>going to value you as such, and then they'll pick

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 4>an exit multiple at year five, and they'll apply it

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 4>to twenty percent growth, and they'll probably say at that

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 4>point you'll be twenty percent margins, and they'll be happy,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 4>and they'll call it a day, and they'll have your

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 4>stock price be that when in reality, you know, if

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 4>you're a great company, you know, like Data Bricks that's

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 4>still growing north of sixty percent, like you're worth probably

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 4>three to four x difference in value. If you grow

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 4>sixty percent, fifty five percent, fifty two percent, forty eight percent,

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 4>forty five percent, like it's it's probably like a three

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 4>x or four difference in how you're valued and so

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 4>I do think people like us with a longer time

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 4>horizon in the private markets may have an easier time

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 4>of actually grocking that very high growth rate. You know,

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Data Bricks is growing sixty five percent. If you look

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 4>at the public markets, you know, really only Palenteer is

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 4>you know a software company that's growing that fast. I

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 4>think they're growing seventy percent. They're about the same size

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 4>as Data Bricks, and their valuation multiple is thirty five

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 4>times or something like that. And so that's the one

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 4>example where maybe public market investors are attributing a really

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 4>high valuation to very high kind of hyper growth. But

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 4>for the most part, I think it's pretty hard for

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 4>them to grop that. And so again, you know, we

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 4>have conversations with the founders of these companies in the

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 4>private markets. You know, I think we understand it. I

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 4>think we understand multi product and you're less likely to find,

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, a full public market of folks who will

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 4>give you credit for that hyper growth.

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I find this to be a very interesting observation. I mean,

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>just generally public or private, it does seem like several

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 2>generations ago, you assume, Okay, here's a really big company.

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to be one of the fastest growing

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 2>companies in the world, and you apply that sort of

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 2>model mindset we marked on their growth expectations. I mean

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 2>even Alphabet I think in its latest quarter I actually

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 2>had faster top line growth than it had in the

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 2>quarter before, like on a year over year basis. So

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>sitting aside public or private, it does feel like there's

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 2>just this phenomenon where really gigantic companies grow at shocking,

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 2>shocking top line rates year after year in a way

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 2>that maybe even still investors might not appreciate. I have

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 2>a question for you something I've always wondered. Okay, let's

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 2>say one of your big portfolio companies goes public eventually,

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, Stripe or something like that. How does a

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 2>GP or how do how does the firm think about

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 2>selling at that point? Is it okay? You're you're private

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 2>market investors, so you get out fairly soon. You know,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 2>on a whole dead do they get distributed and then

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.719
<v Speaker 2>it's up to the LPs to think about it? What

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 2>is the cell decision like once a company is no

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 2>longer private.

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a great question. And by the way, to

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 4>your point on these large cast high growth companies, it's

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 4>a really good learning for all of us that the

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 4>very best companies can you know, sort of to fire

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 4>your expectations and still grow fast even though they're big.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Like it's sort of the breaking of the law of

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 4>the absolution. Yeah, eyes of a company like Meta accelerated

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 4>revenue growth to thirty percent last quarter, right, Like that's shocking.

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Like that company it's worth almost two trillion dollars going

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 4>to accelerate to thirty percent growth. Same with Google, north

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 4>of twenty percent growth. So if you can find those opportunities,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.239
<v Speaker 4>I would say Stripe is a good example of this.

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Previous generations of this would be like Visen MasterCard, Like

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 4>if you had a strong thesis that those would grow

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 4>at north of twenty percent for fifteen years, you would

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 4>value it a very different way than if you thought

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 4>that that growth would tail off over time. So, yeah,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 4>I think it's great that you brought up Google, and

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, we think about the large cap companies to

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 4>try and inform what could go right with the best

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 4>of the best of the companies and the private markets

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 4>for us to not just over five years, but over

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 4>ten plus years. So to your question about distributions are

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 4>selling when our companies go public, our LPs, our investors

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 4>tend to like to have distributions as opposed to us selling.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, many of them have public desks or public

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 4>operations on their own, and they would prefer to take

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 4>the stock and you know, manage tax consequences on their own,

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 4>or maybe they have a long book that wants to

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 4>hold it, and so, you know, we tend to distribute companies.

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 4>I would say, for the most part, when our companies

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 4>go public, I'll speak from the growth fund, you know,

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 4>where we're coming in at a more mature stage at

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 4>the company. Just because the company goes public doesn't mean

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 4>that we will exit. Now. We always seek to return

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 4>capital to our LPs, and we want to make sure

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 4>that we're doing that on appropriate time horizon. But often,

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, we'll find situations in the public markets where

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 4>we think our companies are massively undervalued. You know, I'll

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 4>give you an example. One of our best companies was

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 4>a company called Samsara, which does fleet management video tracking

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 4>for drivers. They're the market leader. Second time founders. They

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 4>were the founders of Moroki, which sold the Cisco So

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 4>they're an exceptional team doing great. They went public right

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 4>at the tail end of twenty twenty one, and the

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 4>IPO market was starting to freeze and they were the

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 4>last IPO and so we ended up being the largest

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 4>buyer in their IPO. So all of the public funds,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 4>you know, Fidelity, TROW, some of them invested, but we

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 4>ended up actually being the biggest buyer and then we

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 4>held that for a long period of time even though

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 4>it was in the public market. So we'd like to

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 4>think about, you know, what is the future of the

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 4>company even if they're in the public markets, and we

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 4>would buy us to hold it a little bit longer

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 4>if the founder's still running the company. We place a

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 4>tremendous amount of value in founders running companies, which I'm

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 4>happy to talk about. And if we think the growth

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 4>prospects are really bright, you know, will tend to sort

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 4>of buy us to hold a little bit longer.

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 3>What's the actual catalyst for going public then, because if

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 3>we think there's plenty of capital in the private markets,

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 3>employees are you know, generally pretty happy with their compensation.

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 3>People can live with the capital cost. Why would you

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 3>go public or like, what's the most common reason in

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 3>terms of timing.

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the biggest thing would be access to larger pools

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 4>of capital, and you know, you finally feel like you're

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 4>making that trade off where the cost of capital in

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 4>the public markets would just be much more attractive, and

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 4>so you want to go do it there. So in

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 4>the case of building, for example, data centers in space

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 4>that will require a tremendous amount of capital over time,

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, you can get a lot of that capital

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 4>in the private markets, and you know, maybe at some

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 4>point it makes sense to tap the public markets to

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 4>get that. You know, if you have huge ambitions, sometimes

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 4>it's easier to get debt and alternative forms of financing

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 4>in the public markets as well. And then lastly, you know,

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 4>if you feel like the competition is really fierce for

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 4>your employees, and you know, I described that dynamic of

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, quarterly RSUs and you know stock currency that

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 4>might be a little bit easier to manage in the

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 4>public markets. That would be another reason. It's not just employees,

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 4>it's also if you want to do meaningful m and A.

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's probably a little bit of a benefit

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 4>to being in the public markets and having a public

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 4>currency that you can use where you know, you don't

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 4>have to debate with the sellers what the value of

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 4>your equity is because it's in the public markets. You know,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.239
<v Speaker 4>there's a there's a daily stock price. So those are

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 4>a few of the dynamics.

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Does the private market trend does that hold? As we

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 3>see you know, more and more tech is just about AI, right,

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 3>And if there's one thing we know about AI, it's

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 3>that it requires quite a lot of capital investment. So

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 3>does that start to change the dynamics or the balance

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>of power between private and public? In your mind, it goes.

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Back to the same point, which is, at some point,

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, the amount of capital required, it probably makes sense,

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, to be in the public markets. You know,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 4>I do think for large scale consumer businesses, I think

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 4>there's some value in being in the public markets, you know,

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 4>letting retail take part in the ownership of your stock,

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, having greater brand recognition. You know, we saw

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 4>this recently on the B to B side as well

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.719
<v Speaker 4>with one of our public companies. And after going public,

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, sometimes there's sort of a brand benefit that

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 4>you get brand halo, you're better known, you know, an

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 4>IT buyer trusts a little bit more in your future.

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 4>So there are some of those dynamics that exist. You

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 4>know AI. First of all, I think these have the

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 4>potential to be some of the best businesses ever created.

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 4>They're run by exceptional founders. They're building products that have

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 4>grown at rates that we've never ever seen before. So

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, they're kind of speed running the process of

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 4>company growth in a way, getting to be bigger and

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 4>more consequential, much much faster than the previous generation of companies.

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 4>So you know, maybe that means they should be in

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 4>the public markets a little bit faster too.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe last year at some point open Ai had a

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 2>big tender and then suddenly no one could afford to

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>buy a house again in San Francisco because all that

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 2>money went into real estate. But there's a serious question, actually,

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and it's particularly cute at the AI companies. Is there

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 2>any stigma of being an employee who sells some of

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 2>their shares. It's like, all right, you could sell twenty

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 2>five percent of your shares, and then there's like I

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 2>want to sell. It's like, what, you don't believe in

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the simularity. You don't believe that we're on the path

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 2>to Adrian. You don't think you think we're done with

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:04.479
<v Speaker 2>our you think we're almost at the end of our

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 2>mission and that our value won't be ten Is that like?

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.959
<v Speaker 2>Is there any anxiety on the part of employees at

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 2>a real like mission driven fast growth companies of like

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I want to dip my too in the water. I

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 2>want to hedge a little bit. I want to hedge

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 2>my own company. I want to diversify away from my

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 2>own company.

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Suddenly, the factor isn't playing ping pong with you exactly exactly.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're not allowed to have lunch.

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 2>In a real phenomenon, I would be anxious about raising

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 2>my hand.

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think everything in moderation. Most of the time,

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 4>there's not like a stigma, and most of the time

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 4>it's not, you know, an opportunity to sell so much

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 4>stock that it would be a vote of lack of

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 4>confidence if you will right. You know, if it's twenty

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 4>five percent of your vested stock and you've been there

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 4>for two years, that means you probably have a ton

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 4>of unvested stock, and so you're talking about a small

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 4>proportion of your overall buildings. You know, we never really

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 4>see a chance for employees to send a design that

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 4>way where employees say, oh my gosh, I'm out, I

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 4>want to sell one hundred percent of my stock. In fact,

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, we don't have data on this, but I

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 4>would suspect that in the public markets, you know, employees

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 4>are probably selling out of their stock grants at a

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 4>higher rate than in the private markets. Yeah, and I

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 4>think you know, if you're if you're at one of

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 4>these companies in the private markets, you probably have a

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 4>greater degree of confidence. You know, if you're a good employee,

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 4>you could you could always go to Google or Facebook

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 4>or Meta and click coupons. But I think that most

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 4>of the time the good ones are are true believers.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 4>We do have companies where the founders. One of my

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 4>favorite things is when the founders just say I'm not

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 4>selling a share, and you know, that is like the

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 4>ultimate extreme point of confidence. We spend time with a

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 4>very high profile internet CEO of the previous generation. It's

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 4>now a public company, and one of the meetings we

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 4>were talking to him about secondary and he was so resolute.

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 4>He was like, I'm not selling a share, Like why

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 4>would I sell a single share? Like I'm so confident

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 4>it's going to go up. I don't want to do

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 4>that at all. And that's a pretty strong signal of

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 4>confidence in the future of the company. So we look

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 4>for some of those signals when we invest. You know,

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 4>my my partner, Exter Impel, wrote a good piece many

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 4>years ago to your point on real estate and buying

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 4>a house and affordability that showed Bay Area stock prices,

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, of like the megacap stocks index against home

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 4>values and it's like perfectly correlated. So you know, home

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 4>price appreciation is kind of tethered to the local economy

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 4>in a way, and so you know, it's not totally

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 4>surprising that you see you see it move in that direction.

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's fair to say there are a

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of people in San Francisco right now who are

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 3>excited about making money off of AI, and some of

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 3>them have been doing so already. But on that note,

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 3>how are you actually differentiating between AI models? I guess

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 3>like this is a way of asking, how are you

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 3>cutting through the hype? Because we see all these new

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 3>companies launching, a lot of them use similar language. We

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 3>see total available market TAM being thrown around quite a

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 3>lot nowadays. How do you decide this is actually like

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 3>a good business model versus this is just something that

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 3>has AI in the name and is getting some attention.

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So we're we're investors in We're probably the largest

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 4>investor in the AI industry as a firm. I think

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 4>we're investors in two thirds of the aggregate AI revenue.

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 4>So if you were to just sum together all of

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 4>the AI revenue of the companies in the private markets,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 4>we're investors in about two thirds of it. So I

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 4>think we have a front row seat to it. You know,

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 4>first of all, I'll just start with the demand side.

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 4>This is the biggest thing that we look to. There's

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 4>a billion people plus using this technology getting extremely large

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 4>surplus or value out of it. The companies are the

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 4>fastest growing that we've ever seen. You know, active users

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 4>spends something like thirty minutes a day on it, and

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 4>you know there's a tremendous amount of surplus that comes

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 4>with that, even if you're paying as a subscriber for

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 4>those So on the consumer side, you know, I think

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 4>the capabilities are extreme. They're very, very good, just now

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 4>starting to scratch the surface on the capabilities of you know,

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 4>sort of doing work on your behalf. And so I

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 4>think we're going to see a ton of progress on

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 4>that front over the next year. But the demand signals

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 4>that we see are probably not. Probably, they are definitively

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 4>the best that we've ever seen in my career, you know,

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 4>certainly much faster than you know, the Internet phase or

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:26.439
<v Speaker 4>mobile social, you know, cloud SaaS, e commerce, any of those,

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 4>so tremendous amount of value on the demand side, that's

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 4>the biggest thing we look for. On the supply side,

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, look the build out. There's there's there's a

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 4>ton written about the buildout of infrastructure that's required. It's

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's larger than you know, the US highway

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 4>system overall, you know, five trillion dollars over the next

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 4>five to seven years. The thing that I say about

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 4>the supply side is we don't need to make the

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 4>decision on investing every single one of those dollars. As

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 4>an industry today, the industry can monitor demand and we

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 4>can make decisions about capex as we go. Cycles are

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 4>not five years long. Cycle times are more like twelve months,

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 4>and so if we see a weakening of demand or

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 4>a lack of payback in some of this infrastructure build out,

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 4>then you know, that's fine, we can we can adjust course.

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.839
<v Speaker 4>The people who are I think there's probably a misconception

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:17.919
<v Speaker 4>about the people who are in charge of these these

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 4>companies and you know, at the center of all this

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 4>like us, like we, and they are all sort of

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 4>ROI C or return on capital minded people like We're

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 4>not gonna, you know, invest a bunch of capital if

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 4>we think there's not going to be a high return

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 4>from it. So, you know, to the extent that there

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 4>is some overbuild or you know, signs of a lack

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 4>of demand to meet the supply, I think the industry

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 4>will adjust. You know, we've written about this before. You know,

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 4>if you can trast this build out with the fiber

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 4>build out so far, if you put a GPU or

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 4>a TPU online, it immediately gets used. And this holds

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 4>for actually very old GPUs and TPUs. Google's disclose this

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 4>about their TPUs. They are ten years old. You can

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 4>pretty easily find pricing of two generations to go GPUs

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 4>on the market, and the price of these have all held.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 4>So there are no dark GPUs. No one is building

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 4>data centers that aren't being fully utilized right out of

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 4>the gate. You know, contrast that with the Internet build out.

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 4>The Internet build out was characterized by dark fiber, and

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 4>so you know, you had to lay all this groundwork

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 4>before you actually had any signs of demand, and so

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 4>obviously there was there's a mismatch in supplying demand. So

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 4>that's the sort of overall kind of view on supplied

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 4>demand dynamics. I'm very, very optimistic. I think we're in

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 4>the early days of figuring out really interesting applications to

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 4>build on top of this technology. And you know, in

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 4>terms of model capabilities, models are improving at a like

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 4>eye popping rate. You know, they can basically double their

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 4>ability to complete long form tasks over six to seven months.

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 4>And so you know, if you were to just arrest

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 4>model development today, I think we would have the chance

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 4>to build ten to twenty years of really interesting applications

0:37:58.280 --> 0:37:58.879
<v Speaker 4>on top of it.

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 2>The big thing that happened in public markets so far

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 2>this year is the absolute slaughtering of sort of non

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 2>AI companies and legacy software companies of various sorts and

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 2>so forth. How are you thinking about companies that don't

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 2>own a model, that maybe have to buy intelligence from

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 2>another company or so forth. Who in your view, and

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking about private or public companies who that's not

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 2>an AI lab, What types of businesses survive and which

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 2>ones are not going to survive if they don't own

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 2>intelligence in the raw.

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I will cover both of these topics because

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 4>I have pretty strong views on what's happening in the

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 4>software market, and then we can talk about what the

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 4>sort of future of companies that don't own a model is.

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 4>On the latter point, we can cover that one. First look,

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 4>companies buy solutions, right, and so you know, context is

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 4>still king in most industries. There will be companies that

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 4>compound their knowledge of industry specific workflows, industry specific data

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 4>that they attatched to, and so oftentimes that won't be

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 4>what the model companies choose to pursue. You know, customers

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 4>buy solutions, they don't buy some discrete workflow or just

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 4>a database or a system to take action. So the

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 4>most important thing is industry context. You also need a

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 4>throat to choke, right. I think that's going to be

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 4>increasingly important for customers. You know, So support, maintenance, integrations,

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 4>data partnerships, user community I think are all important things

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 4>for companies that are building applications that are not model owners.

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 4>And I think in most verticals and many of the

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 4>functions in an organization, there will be independent companies that

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 4>do that. Model companies are going to be an arms

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 4>dealer to most industries for some tasks or work that

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 4>are highly horizontal or general, so something like general knowledge

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 4>management inside of a corporation. The model companies are probably

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 4>pre well positioned for that. But you know, things like

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 4>legal work, medical work, customer support tasks, you know a

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of stuff that will happen in sales, accounting, finance

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 4>like those are. I think those are going to be

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 4>independent vendors, and the model companies are going to be

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 4>arms dealers to those. So that I think is the

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 4>future of applications for companies that do not own models.

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a very bright future. We've invested a

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 4>lot in some of these leading companies, but I think

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 4>both the model companies and those companies will be big

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 4>and successful. On the software side, yeah, I mean, look,

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 4>the software industry has been crushed in the public markets.

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 4>We could debate whether it's overblown or not, but I'll

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 4>give you my diagnosis of the situation. You know, not

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 4>particularly on valuations of specific companies, but here's what's going

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 4>to happen with the software companies and the public markets.

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 4>I think the issue is not that there's going to

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 4>be a ton of new software in the future, there

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 4>is going to be a ton of new software in

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 4>the future. The whole story of SaaS and cloud was

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 4>that the market grew seven x in size, and some

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 4>of that was captured by incumbents, some of it was

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 4>captured by startups. The issue is, are the incumbents that

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 4>are in the public market it's going to actually be

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 4>the ones that capture that And by the way, I

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.359
<v Speaker 4>think it'll be much bigger than seven x this time.

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 4>So why is it, you know, sort of a question

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 4>of whether those incumbents have the chance to do it.

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 4>First of all, it's probably going to be much harder

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 4>for them to grow right all the new budget Basically

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.839
<v Speaker 4>in any buyer organization is going toward AI initiatives right

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 4>now now. It doesn't mean that they're ripping out their

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 4>software systems. Gross dollar retention remains extremely high for these

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 4>incumbent software systems, and I think it will for a while.

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 4>But if you look since twenty twenty one, net dollar

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 4>retention of these companies has steadily declined. If you look

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 4>at the amount of revenue that the entire software industry

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 4>is adding in twenty twenty six, the amount of revenue

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 4>that open Ay Andthropic alone will add is going to

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:00.720
<v Speaker 4>be greater than the amount of the total revenue added

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 4>by all of the software market. Like that's SAP into

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 4>a salesforce workday service, now all those vendors, So the

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 4>growth is actually going toward AI initiatives, and so you know, yes,

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 4>they may not be getting ripped out, those incumbent vendors,

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 4>but it's going to be much harder for them to

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:22.439
<v Speaker 4>find growth. So you know, from a product standpoint, they're

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:24.359
<v Speaker 4>not going to get torn out, but they really run

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 4>the risk of value getting built on top of them.

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 4>So those are going to be systems of record, but

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 4>you just build new vendors, build new products that can

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 4>take action on top of those. And I think that's

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 4>a real risk for the software industry right now. If

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 4>building software, the process of building software becomes much faster,

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 4>there's another dynamic where every vendor can basically increase the

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 4>amount of skews they offer rapidly massively. And so if

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 4>you are a platform vendor of choice and you sell

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of software in this domain, are everyone in

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 4>the in the nearby domains will also have those products,

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 4>and they'll all try to sell those new products, and

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 4>it'll get more competitive, So I think that's a dynamic

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 4>that's that's really a risk for them. The most powerful

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:13.879
<v Speaker 4>change that I think is going to happen, which we're

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 4>only seeing early signals of, is a business model shift.

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 4>So when these technology shifts happen, you know, new user interface,

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 4>new workflows, new data that you access that favors you know, newcomers,

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 4>you know over incumbents. When you pair it with a

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 4>business model shift, that massively favors the newcomers, right because

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 4>it's so hard to react if you're one of the incumbents.

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 4>And so the big shift if you if you just

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 4>take a spectrum of business models that's happened. You know,

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 4>we used to sell license maintenance software. We move that

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 4>to you know, seat based subscription. Then with the clouds,

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of companies have become consumption based pricing models.

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 4>And in the future with AI and a lot of domains,

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 4>is going to be outcome based pricing. You can see

0:43:57.000 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 4>this first in the customer support industry because they're sort

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 4>of verifiable tasks that those companies have to complete. But

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 4>to the extent that we actually get to the point

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 4>where the predominant way that that enterprises want to buy

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 4>is via outcomes and they can measure those results. I

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 4>think it's gonna be really tough for.

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 2>The incoming David, George, Andrews, and Horwitz. Thank you so

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 2>much for coming on odd Laws. That was a fascinating

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 2>learned a ton and really appreciate you taking your time.

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much, David, great to be with you all.

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me.

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Tracy. I thought that was a fascinating conversation. So much there,

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:44.240
<v Speaker 2>and you know, it's fun to talk tech but also

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 2>have it be such a capital markets heavy conversation.

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I kind of the idea of software companies their

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.839
<v Speaker 3>value resting in the fact that they're like convenient scapegoats

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:57.959
<v Speaker 3>for management. Yeah, it's kind of funny in a dystopian way.

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.359
<v Speaker 2>But I remember Steve Bohmer said that yours go when

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 2>he was talking about why Linux wouldn't take off. Yeah,

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 2>because you're like, no, what are you going to just like,

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:05.720
<v Speaker 2>who are you going to get upset with your Linux

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 2>goes down? Other than companies? Did you know Redhead grew

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:12.320
<v Speaker 2>up to like professionally service. I thought that was really interesting,

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 2>the idea of like outcome based pricing, but just also

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:18.760
<v Speaker 2>some of the numbers are staggering, just like how big

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 2>you know this is. I've thought about this with like

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 2>when people look at the public markets and they say, well, yeah,

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 2>it's not that overvalued because you know, most of the

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 2>public companies are making a lot of money. If you

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 2>were to sort of like build one index of big

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 2>private and public companies, you'd have a lot of market

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 2>cap on companies that aren't making money yet, and that

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 2>would very much like sort of skew your view of

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 2>this sort of like total valuation of the universe of tech.

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Companies absolutely Well. The other thing I was thinking is

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 3>just that question of whether or not that kind of

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 3>the balance between private and public starts to reverse. But

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 3>because so much of the excitement right now is about AI,

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 3>which you know, is capital billions and billions and needs

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 3>huge polls of capital, I guess the counterpoint to that is,

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:06.720
<v Speaker 3>like there's a self reinforcing trend in the private market,

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 3>which is like, if that's where all the growth is,

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 3>if that's where people are making all the money, it

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 3>tends to attract even more capital. So I don't know,

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe maybe AI means that private capital grows even more

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 3>and so AI can keep tapping it.

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 2>There seems to just be an endless amount of money. Yeah,

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 2>in the middle least. I mean specifically, you know, it's

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 2>like raising more from the UAE or Saudi or whatever

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 2>that just keeps these companies private. If I were at

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 2>like Open Air, I would be really anxious about selling

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 2>it a tender. I would be like, I don't want to.

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I believe, I believe, I swear I believe that I

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 2>believe we're going to get there to ASI or whatever.

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I would be really uncomfortable about it. Tapping out hedging

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 2>my portfolio.

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Joe, You'd have to be very, very important for the

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 3>founder to actually care to care about what you're doing

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 3>with your shares. But I'm sure you would be all right.

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Shall we leave it there?

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:57.800
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the ad Thoughts podcast.

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Ty Alloway.

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 2>Follow our guest David George. He's at David George eighty three.

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand Dashel Bennett

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 2>at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks and for more odd

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 2>laws content. Go to Bloomberg dot com, slash odd lots

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:19.360
<v Speaker 2>or the daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:21.239
<v Speaker 2>you can chat about all of these topics twenty four

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:24.879
<v Speaker 2>to seven in our discord Discord dot gg slash.

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Od lots And if you enjoy odd lots, if you

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 3>like it when we talk about private versus public markets,

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 3>then please leave us a positive review on your favorite

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 3>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 3>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 3>All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 3>on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:11.440
<v Speaker 1>In an a