WEBVTT - What is space?

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Some of the deepest mysteries of the universe are so big,

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>so imposing, so important that even asking questions about what

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they are and how they work it can leave us confused.

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>That's because we have to spend some time thinking about

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what exactly we're asking and what kind of answer we want.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But we shouldn't shy away from these kinds of questions

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>because they are the most important questions. Understanding the nature

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of our reality means understanding the context of our lives,

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>where we live, how we live, maybe even why we live.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>And what the universe has taught us is that it

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>always requires persistent, careful effort to unpack the deepest mysteries.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>We have been chiseling away at the rock face of

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>physics for thousands of years, mostly cluelessly, but occasionally a

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>great hunk of understanding will open up and will see

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>everything in a new light. So it's worth asking the

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest questions, the ones where the question itself can be confusing,

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>because looking for answers might eventually help us figure it

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>all out, or help us realize we're asking the wrong question.

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>So today on the podcast, we're going to dig deep

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>into what we know about maybe the most basic question

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>about the universe. We'll be asking what is space.

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe. Today we are

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>talking about what is space? And I am Kelly Wienersmith,

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 2>and I take up space. How about you?

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel Whitson. I'm a professor of physics, which means

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I probably should understand something about space.

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start with a confession. So, like when

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 2>I was in high school and college, I did really

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>well in physics. I was in the honors classes, I

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 2>got a's. I really liked the stuff about circuitry. But

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>whenever we would talk about what is space or what

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 2>is time? I would feel very frustrated because like you

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 2>were taking this thing that I felt like I could

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>work with in my day to day life, and it

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 2>felt like it was being made unnecessarily complicated. And I

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 2>think I also felt a little insecure because it's like

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 2>I can't even understand what is space, and I think

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 2>it just made me frustrated and I would kind of

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 2>shut down. And as an adult, I feel different about it.

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's interesting. I think thinking about it creates

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 2>like testable predictions that teach us about the universe and

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 2>then we can do practical things with that knowledge. But like,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 2>what was your journey along questions like this? And am

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I the only physics student in classes who isn't like, oh,

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>this is fun and is like, no, I knew this,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Why are you doing this to me?

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a whole spectrum of people in physics,

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a big tent, and I'm glad

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>there are people who are like, hey, look, this gives

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>us tools so that we can calculate how our cannonballs

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>fly over castle walls. That's really all we care about,

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's just do that and move on. And then

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>there's the folks on the sort of philosophical side of

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>things that really want to understand why balls fly over

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>castle walls because they have deeper questions about like why

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is there anything and how does it all work? And

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the amazing thing about physics is that it not only

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>lets you do practical stuff bill transistors and iPhones, but

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>then you get to turn around and ask like, well,

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>why does this work at all? And what does that

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the actual universe we live in? So yeah,

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>touches on like technological, fascinating, useful stuff all the way

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to philosophical stuff, and yeah, I always found myself sort

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of on the philosophical side of things, and I was

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the kind of kid who was like, whoa, what is

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>space anyway? Man? And this is before I smoked any

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>banana peels. I was wondering about what would it be

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like to live in space that was four dimensions or

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>two dimensions? And why is it that we can only

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.839
<v Speaker 1>think in three dimensions? So for me, these questions were

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>cat in it, even though I didn't understand anything about them.

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's only now as a professional physicist that I

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>understand why we don't understand anything about them.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I hope that we can get to that in the

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 2>show today so that the people like me who are

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>just like, well now you've just made me confused, have

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>a better sense of why we're asking these questions and

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>why they're fundamentally important and not just physicists making things complicated.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Like every once in a while, I'll be like, well,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 2>we haven't married relativity and quantum mechanics, and so what

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 2>if when people say like space bends and time is blow, Like,

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>what if none of that is true because we haven't

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 2>married these things, And so then why do I have

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to do this, and then I get super frustrated, and

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, maybe I shouldn't be so negative. At

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of our show. I'm not actually negative, like

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited about it, but I'm remembering Kelly from the

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>past feeling very frustrated about this stuff.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think we're going to be aiming today's episode

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at Kelly of the past, somebody who is curious about

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>how the world works but doesn't want like a wall

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of confusing language where words suddenly mean things that they

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean before. And let's remember that that's the whole

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>project of physical We take the world that we kind

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of understand we've been living in any way, and we

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>try to systematize it. We try to say, well, you know,

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>at what angle will your cannon ball fly over the

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>council walls? And do you have to factor in the

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>wind resistance? And then we get to turn around and

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, why does this work? What does that

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>tell us it? Lets us do something which I think

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is really awesome. We just peel back that layer of

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>intuitive reality and say, hey, we thought the universe was

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like this, Actually it turns out it works like that.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The universe is different from the way we thought it was,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's wonderful. That's the incredible experience we're going for

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in physics. We want to pull the veil from our

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>eyes and figure out how the universe actually is. I

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>think what we'll discover today is that, wow, we really

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.679
<v Speaker 1>just don't know that the universe works. But it's important

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>that everybody understand what we do know and what we

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know about these really basic questions about the nature.

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Of the universe, right And if you stop asking the questions,

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>then you never get to the answer. So it's important

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 2>to keep.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Going exactly and that thing. It might be helpful for

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>people when we're talking about something as fuzzy and difficult

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to grapple with a space to think about like what

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of question we're asking and what kind of answers

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>are satisfactory? You know, because when we ask a vague

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>question like what is space? What are we really asking

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>when we say that? Even so often in philosophy, I

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>replace a confusing word with something familiar, like replace the

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>confusing word with an elephant, and think, what does the

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>question mean if I'm talking about an elephant? You know,

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So if somebody asks you, hey, what is an elephant.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, what kind of question is that? What kind

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of answers do we expect to that kind of question?

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 2>When I was reading through our outline today, one of

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the things that got me excited was thinking back to

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 2>grad school and when we would talk about behavior and

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>we'd be like, well, what is the behavior? And there's

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>like at least four different ways to think about it,

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, like how did it evolve? What neurotransmitters make

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 2>this behavior happen? What things that happened beforehands initiate the behavior?

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 2>And so in the case of behavior, there's a lot

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 2>of different answers you could have for that question. Is

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 2>it the same for space? Are we looking for like

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>an equation? So yeah, like what would make a satisfying

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 2>answer for something like this? Or are there lots?

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>No, You're right, what we're looking for our answers to

0:06:57.920 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>questions like well what can space do?

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Like what is an elephant? Well, an elephant has big ears,

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it does this thing? Right, you can describe it, You

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>can describe what it does. You can also ask like, well,

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>why is there space? You know the same way you

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>can be like why do we have elephants? You know,

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a story there that tells us something about elephants

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the relationship to other living things. Right, we can also ask, well,

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what is space made out of? Is it itself the

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fundamental thing in the universe where like you just got

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to have it, you don't have universe without it? Or

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>somehow like elephants and ice cream, does it emerge from

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the workings of other little bits deeper inside it that

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>somehow weave themselves together to make this experience we call space.

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was referring to earlier, where in that scenario,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you're like pulling back a layer of reality understanding what's

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>going on underneath. So you discover that your experience is

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>not like fundamental, it's just sort of like one thing

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that the universe can do. It can make elephants, it

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>can make ice cream, it can also not. So those

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of questions I want to know the

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>answers to about space, like what can it do? Why

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>do we have it? Is it itself made us something smaller?

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Or is it fundamental? Is it a requirement for the universe.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things that I was worried about

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>when we started talking about this question was the word

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 2>space has been used by so many other fields that

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>now it's not confusing from a physics perspective, it's just

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>confusing because humans use that word for lots of different things.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 2>But I think I was definitely proved wrong there because

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>when you asked the audience to tell us what they

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 2>thought space was, nobody was like, well, space is the

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 2>literature on space, and like everyone got it. I guess

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>they know us well enough to know what we were

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>probably talking about. So let's hear what the listeners had

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 2>to say.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right, And if you would like to participate in

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the audience participation segments of this podcast, please write to

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>us to questions at Danielankelly dot org. We will set

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you up and you can hear your voice speculating basistly

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast. Here's a bunch of people answering the

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>question what is space.

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that space is a real thing.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that space is just an abstraction.

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 5>Perhaps space is a medium in which fields can exist,

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 5>that has shape and perhaps has density and can change

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 5>in its form. Space is like an invisible lattice, geometric framework.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Or other diffuse concept that is just a name we

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>give our experience.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>The composite of all energy fields, gravitational fields, and dimensions.

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 4>The medium that we are traveling through. It's like combining

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 4>the trajectory of the Earth of some galaxy.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Universe. Space is that which matter can move within.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Space is the background fabric of the entire universe.

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 4>I think to think of space as a huge collection

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 4>of spots that can have multiple states of excitement, and

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 4>the excitement of a spot interferes with its neighbors.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>The replacement or nothing.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 4>A physical meta that we can experience and move around

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 4>and in which events occur that we can observe and

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 4>try to understand.

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Space is this kind of thing in which everything happens,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 3>but we can't see or feel it. We can only

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 3>see the evidence of it.

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this is outdated now, but I still just

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>think of spice as a volume that we can put

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff into.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 4>I think space used to be seen as like a

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 4>substrate where everything happened on or within, But I believe

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 4>now space is kind of understood to be the thing

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 4>that is happening.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 2>So none of the people who answered the question were

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>like Daniel, I hate you, or like Daniel go away,

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 2>So it seems like everybody was, you know, enjoying thinking

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 2>it through and giving you an answer, and we got

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 2>some pretty good answers. So maybe the world is not

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>filled with angry young versions of Kelly, which is great,

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 2>would be better. I was also like a goth chick

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 2>covered in black all the time. I've cheered up a

0:10:58.760 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 2>bit too.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to see when those pictures at some point.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'll share one with you, but not with

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>everyone else. So, yeah, what did you think of these answers?

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was good. And I also love hearing

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>people grapple with a hard question.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the kind of thing, as you say, everybody's got

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>some intuition about what space is because we live in it, right,

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and yet it's difficult to say, like exactly what is

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it and where it comes from a lot of people

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>described what it can do, right, or it can hold,

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>you can have things in space. So I think those

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are all fine ways to approach this problem. But I

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>hope by the end of the podcast we give people

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a really comprehensive view of like what physics says about

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>space and all the different, confusing, contradictory things the physics

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>says about what space might be.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, So then what do you think is the

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 2>best place to start. So to me, I'm just like

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know space. It's like there's like stuff in

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 2>front of me. But if my table is there, it

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 2>still counts as space because my table's just like in

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the space. And to be honest, that I think is

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 2>most everything I've thought about this question. So where do

0:11:57.960 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>we go from here?

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the best place to start is to try to answer,

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like what is we're asking about? You know, when we

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>say space, what do we even mean by it before

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>we talk about like where it comes from and how

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it works and what the rules are and what physics

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>has learned, Like what is the thing we're asking about?

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's at least pinpoint the elephant here. And

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, in my mind, space is not about the

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the universe, It's about what's underneath it. It's

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about the underlying fabric. So like, take a chunk of

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>universe wherever it is, and remove everything you can remove,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>so it maybe there's a peanut in the universe, toss

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that out, Maybe there's a planet there, toss that out,

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's a galaxy whatever, pushed out all to the side.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Empty it as much as possible, right, because the thing

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about is like particles and matter and

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>photons and stuff. Let's talk about what's underneath it. That's

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>really what's exciting to me about this question is that

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we're like digging under the carpet of the universe, right,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And so to me, space is what's left when you

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>remove everything that you could remove from a portion of

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the universe.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 2>So, like in my office right now, and if we

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 2>were to try to figure out what space is in

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 2>terms of my office, we'd turn it into a vacuum.

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 2>So I should leave my office if we're going to

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 2>do this experiment, like we take everything out, and now

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>we're asking what are we left with?

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well we'd have to take you out because you're

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>not space right your stuff? Yeah, so yeah, remove all

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the stuff what is left? And that opens up immediately like,

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 1>well is there anything left? Does it mean anything to

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>have space there without stuff in it? Is space just

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>defined to be the place between stuff? Or is it

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a thing itself? Right? Is space a kind of stuff? Right?

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, I know we're getting like really banana pels

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>behind the gym over here, but these are the questions

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we're grappling with, and to me, this is what's exciting

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>about physics is that these questions are really fuzzy, and yeah,

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you could you know, smoke banana peels and talk about

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>them all afternoon and really make no progress, or for

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years and make no progress. But physics gives

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you a way forward. Physics gives you this method to

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>like understand your intuitive experience and make it make sense

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>by asking, like, can we build a model that describes

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what he can do? And then can we look at

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that model and say, like, what does that mean about

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>what it is? So to me, the reason I'm a

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>physicist and not a philosopher is that we can't actually

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>make some progress if we think about it like mathematically

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>and systematically.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we've now gotten to like you've removed everything,

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>so you've got a vacuum, and now I feel like

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>there's a vacuum in my brain and I'm like, well,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>where do you go from there? How does physics tackle

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 2>this question?

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Then?

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Physics thinks about space in terms of location and motion,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>because what do you have left once you've emptied your office?

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>There's just space there, which means the possibility to put

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>something in it. Right, you can put a proton in it,

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>But The interesting thing is you can choose where to

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>put the proton. You can put the proton where Kelly's

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>desk used to be, or you could put the proton

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>where Kelly's head used to be. Those in principle are different, right,

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And so space offers us these choices. You can be here,

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you can be there. Space seems to have inherent in

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it this like location, right, and and those locations can change. So, like,

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>very very early on, before we were doing science, the

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>way we think about it science, you know, the Greeks,

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking about space in terms of change, like

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>motion and change. So the way physics begins attacking this

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>problem is like why are there locations? And what are

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the rules about locations? Like how do things go from

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>here to there? And why is here different from there?

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And can you tell the difference between here and there?

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>In my head? Right now, I've got like a three

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 2>dimensional graph, and you identify space as like a point

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on that graph, and does it stay there forever? Or

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>does space move? Or have you just jumped to a

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 2>different point on the graph?

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Right, great questions right, like are we moving relative

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to space? Can you measure our motion relative to space?

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Or can we only measure our motion relative to like

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>other things in space. Right, that's an early basic question,

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is the kind of thing Aristotle was thinking about.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Aristotle was like, well, you know, why do things move

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>move at all? Wasn't everything just like stay the same

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>place you put a proton? Wasn't it just stay there forever?

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And of course he was working on the surface of

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the Earth, and so he noticed like, hey, things fall down, right,

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Why do things fall down? Why do things seem to

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>move through this space? And so you see that, like

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>very early on, the questions of space and motion were

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>tied together. And you know, Aristotle didn't have like a

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>mathematical picture of how the universe worked or how anything happened.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>He was sort of like words based, you know, it

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was like vibes based signs. And he just basically said, look,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>things fall down because things move according to their nature.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Matter tends to fall down. That's just it's sort of

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like a descriptive. It's not really explanatory. He's just like,

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff falls down because it's in the nature of things

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to fall down. Such a circular answer. I don't even

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>know why it was ever satisfactory.

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 2>So we were talking about the absence of stuff, and

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 2>now we're talking about the movement of stuff, and so

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>the connection to space is that space is standing still

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>while the stuff is moving, or just that this is

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 2>the first time people have thought about the relationship between

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>space and stuff.

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think all of that early on people trying

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what space is by understanding how things

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 1>move through space, like what does it mean to go

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>from here to there? What does it mean to fall down?

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And why do things fall down? Anyway, and it gives

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you a handle like what does speed mean? But you know,

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Aristotle's view of what this meant was basically the way

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>people thought about it for thousands of years until around Galileo.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And Galileo was the first person to think like, well,

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you really mean? Aristotle like, what are you

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about things fall down? Because down seems to kind

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>of depend on who you are. And he had this

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>famous thought experiment way before Einstein was thinking about stuff.

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>He was like, say you're on a boat and you're

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>inside the boat, so you can't see the outside. You're

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like below decks, and you drop a ball. What's going

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to happen? Well, Aristotle says, the ball's going to fall down.

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Anybody who dropped. Anything on a boat knows the ball

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>falls down. Cool, But now what happens if there's somebody

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and they're watching your experiment somehow does

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the ball fall down according to the person on the boat,

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>which means it's then moving with the boat, or does

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball fall down according to the person on the ground,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in which case it would be left behind. Right, there's

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>actually different predictions there. If the ball falls down according

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to the person on the dock, it falls like sort

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>of straight down, then as the boat keeps moving, the

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>ball gets left behind and the person on the boat

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>should see the ball like weirdly fall backwards. Whereas if

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the ball falls down according to the person on the

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>boat right, then it falls down for them, but the

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>person on the dock sees it moving forward with the boat,

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So you can't have it fall straight down for both people.

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>This is what Galleo realized.

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so my brain is now again trying to so

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 2>it feels like we're talking about stuff, but we're not

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about space. And so the connection is the stuff

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 2>is moving through space, and by understanding the movement of

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the stuff, we can understand the space better.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Exactly because galle is experiment helps us think about what

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>speed means. Right, what is velocity? Are you moving relative

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to space? Are you only moving relative to other things?

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And Galileo's experiment and what we call Galleyan relativity is

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the velocity is just relative. You're not moving relative to space.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Space is not something like grid that fills the universe

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.959
<v Speaker 1>and you could just move through space relative to that grid.

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You can only measure your velocity relative to other stuff because,

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like you're in the boat, there's no experiment that you

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>can do to measure your velocity relative to the ground. Right,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you can drop the ball, but the motion of the

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ball doesn't depend on your speed relative to the ground,

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't tell you how fast you're going. You

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>could be standing still, you could be going super fast.

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't tell the difference. And you're asking like, well, okay,

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but aren't we supposed to be talking about space? And

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>what this tells us is about motion through space, and

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it tells us something really deep and important that velocity

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is only relative to other stuff. Space is not a

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thing you can have a speed relative to. So Aristotles think,

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the universe is filled with space, and stuff

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>moves through space. According to it's like natural tendency. Galleo's like,

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>nu uh uh, space isn't a thing. You actually can

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>just move relative to other stuff in space. So that's

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>already like a big clue about what space might be.

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So is it fair to summarize by being like

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Galileo would say, there is no space. There's no grid

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 2>in the world, so no space. I'm guessing other people

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>have come to other conclusions. Otherwise that would be a

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 2>short episode. And so let's take a break and when

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 2>we come back, we'll find out if space exists. All right,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 2>So Galileo telling us space doesn't exist, who are we

0:20:58.840 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about next.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I love the way you say that because I imagine

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>like you saying that to Galleo, and he would probably

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>not agree with your phrasing of it, though I agree,

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that what Galileo tells us is

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>that maybe space exists, but it's just the distance between objects, right, So,

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like you can have space, it's just not absolute, like

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it can't exist without stuff in it. The thought experiment

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>we did, we were like, take everything out of Kelly's office.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It would be like, well, there's nothing in there. Space

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a thing. If there's nothing in there. If

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you evacuated the whole universe, right, got all rid of

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>all the particles and all the energy and everything, then

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>there would be no space. I think that's what Galileo

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>would say, not the space doesn't exist, but that it

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>only exists between stuff, not on its own. It's not

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like a thing on its own.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 2>So like if you had a vacuum and you cleared

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 2>out everything inside the vacuum, nothing exists in there, or

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 2>like you now have a space of non existence.

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's Galileo's view. But this was very

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>confusing to people, and folks like Newton who spent a

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of time thinking about motion. You know, he developed

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>physics basically and calculus, and he thought carefully about the

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>mathematical flow of things, and he unified our understanding of

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>gravity on the ground and in the sky. He agreed

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>with Galileo about how velocity works, right, obviously, he wrote

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>down the equations. You know, he was the first guy

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to really be able to predict these things. So he

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>agreed the velocity is relative, but he fundamentally disagreed about

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the nature of space. He was like, no, space is absolute,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it exists in and of itself and you can have

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a velocity relative to it. So Galileo's like, velocity is

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>purely relative, and Newton is like, I agree with you

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>about the equations and that you can only measure your

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>velocity relative to other stuff. But I still believe that

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>space is a thing underlying everything.

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 2>So does that suggest that the things that they were

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 2>measuring are not important for understanding space because they could

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 2>get the same information and come to different conclusions.

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it suggests that Newton was a little crazy, okay,

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because his conclusion is not supported. Like, the problem with

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Newton's idea that maybe space is absolute is that you

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>still can't ever measure your velocity relative to it. So

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>he believed in this thing that existed that you couldn't

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>ever measure, you know, Galleo says, velocity is purely relative.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>There's no like velocity relative to space itself, because space

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>itself on its own doesn't exist, right, only exists relative

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to stuff. Newton is like, yeah, I agree with you

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>about velocity. You can only measure with between things, but

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>still unobservable, unknowable to us, there is this absolute space.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Even though he could think of no way to measure

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>speed relative to it. So Newton believed that you could be,

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>for example, at rest with respect to space, and it

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>was some like special frame of reference there. Gallet was like, no, no,

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't exist, and plus you can't measure it. So

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Newton is just sort of going out in a limb

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking that it exists even if you can't measure it.

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, I think just about every scientist you

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 2>talk to has blind spots where they're like, no, it's true,

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 2>and I can't tell you why, but I'm sure that

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>it's true. We're all human. So we've been saying the

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 2>word relative a lot, which makes me feel like we're

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to get to Einstein eventually. Is he the

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>next person on your list?

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely the next person on the list. And Einstein

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gets a lot of credit for relativity. You think of relativity,

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you think of Einstein. But the truth is that Einstein's relativity,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>his concepts of space really just go back to Galileo.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's Galileyan relativity that Einstein took and just sort of

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>like said, hey, let's go back to this. This made

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense to me. Let's just like build

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this in at the foundations because Einstein was thinking about light.

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Only a few decades earlier, Maxwell had figured out that

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>light is a wiggle in the electromagnetic field. And the

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.239
<v Speaker 1>confusing thing about it was that Maxwell's equation said that

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>light should travel at a specific speed, the speed of light,

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and that it shouldn't depend on your velocity at all. Like,

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>no matter whether you're on the Earth that's going around

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>the Sun, or you're in a spaceship or you're just

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>floating in deep space, everybody should see light travel at

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the same speed, said Maxwell. And Einstein was like, hey,

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>well that's cool. That's actually what Galileo was saying, right.

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Gallea was saying that you shouldn't be able to measure

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>your velocity, that there's no absolute for life, the velocity

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is only relative. And so what Einstein did was apply

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Galleyan relativity to Maxwell's equations and say that means that

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>everybody measures the speed of light to be the speed

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of light, regardless of what else you're doing. That's the

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>foundation of Einstein's idea. But really it's taking Galileo's relativity

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and just being like, hey, let's take.

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>This seriously, okay, And so all of that. Whenever you're

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 2>talking about the history of something. I feel like I

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>get it in my head. I'm like, oh, that makes

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 2>sense that it's like, oh no, wait, but then that

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 2>got overturned and you're like, oh, but I just understood it, okay,

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 2>And so that so all of that we still believe in.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, We wait until you understand something, Klay, and then

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we overturn it. That's that's the whole plan there.

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 2>You know that I've suspected that for a long time.

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 2>But the whole world is about me and my understanding

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>of things. So light is always moving at the same speed,

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 2>no matter who was viewing it. That is still something

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 2>we believe.

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>That is still something we believe. And that is the

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>earthquake of Einstein's relativity. The concepts came from Galileo, but

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>because he applied it to light and had all sorts

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of consequences. Also because Einstein connected space and time and

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about what time means in another

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>episode and what it even is. But the fact that

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>light always moves at the same speed for all observers

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>connects space and time in these really unique ways. And

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the short version of the story is that it means

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that different people have different clocks. So like clocks tike

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>at different speeds at different parts of the universe, and

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a direct consequence of how light moves through space,

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>because everybody sees light move at the same speed no

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>matter what. Then you can't have clocks that all agree

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>all the way through the universe. And if you want

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to know more about how that works, check out the

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>companion episode about what time is. We'll explain all of that.

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Now we've talked about the movement of light through space.

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 2>What does that tell us about how we can define space?

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Einstein's relativity means something really important about what

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>space is because it connects space and time, which tells

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>us that time is relative also not just space. Time

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is relative and the same for everybody, and it has

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>an important meaning for what distances are between things. It

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>means that like I can measure the length of a ruler,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and you can measure the length of a ruler, which

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is like the distance between two points in space, and

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we can get different answers and we can both be correct.

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>This is something in special loyaltuty that goes by the

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>name length traction, and basically it just means, hey, you

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>assume that things have a length and have a length,

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and that length is their length, and it doesn't matter

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.479
<v Speaker 1>how fast you're going or where you are. Turns out

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. It turns out the distances between points

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>what we even mean by space, depends on where you're

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at them from and how fast you're going relative

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to them.

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So if we want to try to understand space,

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 2>does that mean we need to try to find ways

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 2>to hold constant how fast you're moving and the distance

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 2>between things, and then we can start to get a

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 2>handle on space.

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, we want to talk about space. Space is

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>about the distance between things. So now we have to

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>think about, well, how do you measure the distance between things?

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you can be pretty pedantic about it.

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You can be like, well, I'm gonna hold up a

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>ruler between two things. I'm going to measure where thing

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>one is and thing two are at the same time,

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna say, well, the difference between the marks

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and the ruler, that's how far apart they are. You know,

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I have my left hand and my right hand. I

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>put them on a ruler. There's ten centimeters long ticks

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>between them, So I say they're ten centimeters apart right.

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And the crucial thing that I've done there is I've

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>done it at the same time. I said, I'm gonna

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>look at where my left hand is right now and

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>where my right hand is right now, and measure their

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>distances at the same time, and then I'm going to

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>call that the distance between them. The problem is that

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Einstein's relativity and this whole speed of light business changes

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>what we mean by at the same time because time

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is not universal anymore. So I might say I'm measuring

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>where my left and my right hand are at the

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>same time. But you might think, actually, Daniel, you messed up.

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You measured where your left hand was and then a

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>second later where your right hand was, and if you're moving,

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>then now the whole measurement is messed up. So connecting

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>space and time changes how we think our clocks work,

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>which also upends how we measure distances, and in the end,

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what space is about. Right We're talked about where

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a proton is and where another proton is and how

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>far apart they are. Now it turns out, according to Einstein,

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't even agree about the distances. That's not even

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental thing about space. That everybody looks at a

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>distance and agrees about what the distance is, like how

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>many centimeters are there between the protons?

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it sounds like we've decided that a definition

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 2>of space has to include distance. Yeah, but people measure

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 2>distances differently depending on their conditions. Is there a way

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 2>to get around that or no, there's no way to

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>get two people? I need ice cream?

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, there's no way around that. That turns out

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to just be a feature of space that we never

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>noticed before because mostly we had basically no velocity relative

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to each other, mostly slow speeds on the surface of

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Earth, and we didn't look at very long distances.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So we have this intuition that things have a size,

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and that size is just what they are, and you

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>should measure that size no matter who you are and

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>how fast you're going. That just turns out to be wrong.

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Like sometimes people ask me, you know, why do things

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>get shorter if you see them at high speeds. You know,

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you have a ruler stick flying by you at nine

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>tenths of the speed of light, Why do you measure

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it to be less than a meter stick? If it

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was a meter when you're holding it and the answer

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is not that it's shrunk there. You're imposing your like intuition,

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.959
<v Speaker 1>you're prejudice that things have a size and that they

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have to shrink to get shorter. The answer is lengths

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>depends on velocity. Like, that's just the way space works.

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You can't escape it, Kelly, is no way around it.

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Space just is different from the way our intuition work.

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is why it's so important to explore it

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like systematically and mathematically, because it contradicts our intuition and

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it leads us, we hope, at least, to some true

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>insights about the nature of reality.

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 2>So why can't we just say that depending on conditions,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 2>you get different distances, but the only thing you're differing

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 2>in is how much space you're talking about. But you

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 2>can still talk about space, like why do we have

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 2>to be able to measure it to have a definition

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 2>of it?

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Why do we have to measure it to have a

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.239
<v Speaker 1>definition of it? Wow, awesome question. You know. I think

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that's probably because the way we do science is we

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>measure stuff, right, Like, you have to be able to

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>take measurements to have data so you can talk about

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>what that data means. Right, Otherwise, what are you doing.

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>You just smoking banana peels and having conversations, which is fine.

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 2>But so distance isn't the only way to measure things.

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Why is distance the measurement that we have to have

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 2>in order to understand space?

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I see a great question. Well, I think

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>because we imagine that space is about locations, right, Even

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>if you think about space as some three D grid,

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>those are all locations, and so distances are differences between locations, right,

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And either those are relative, like the only thing that

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>exists are distances between two points, two protons or two

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>ends of the ruler, or there's some absolute grid, and

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you can measure your distance relative to space itself. But

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in the end, distance is the thing that space is describing.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have space, you can't have distance, right,

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And so that's sort of like the way we get

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:08.719
<v Speaker 1>handle on space.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 2>This whole podcast is about Kelly understanding herself better. It's

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>like part Kelly Psychology, part what is space? And I

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 2>think part of why I enjoy this conversation more as

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 2>an adult is I'm way more comfortable now being like,

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 2>this is probably a really not smart question, but I

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 2>don't care. I'm asking it, and I think in its classes.

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I'd just be like, no, I can't say that, because

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 2>that would be anyway. Maybe our listeners are going to

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 2>write it and be like, you shouldn't ask those questions.

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 2>They're not good questions, but anyway.

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, they're perfect questions. They're perfect questions.

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, you have to have distance, but you cannot

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 2>measure distance. Where do we go from here?

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>You can measure distance, it's just that the distance is

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>not the same for everybody. Right, that's two people measuring

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the same quantities can get different answers. So distance is

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>not universal, but it can still exist, and then things

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>get crazier. Everything we're talking about so far is just

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Einstein's view of how things move in sort of Newton's

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of space. But Einstein then introduced another concept. So

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>now we go from special relativity to general relativity. He said,

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>space can do even more. We can change the relative

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>distances between things without those things moving. This is the

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of space itself curving. And there's a lot of

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>descriptions out there in popular science about what it means

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>for space to curve, and many of them are very misleading.

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's the famous one about the rubber sheet

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that most pop side folks go to. And I really

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>discourage you from thinking about space in terms of a

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>rubber sheet, because if you think about it carefully, it

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>leads to all sorts of misunderstandings, you know. And so

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to cover the rubber sheet analogy just to

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about why it's misleading. The general picture of the

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>rubber sheet is like you stretch out this rubber sheet

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you put a bowling ball in it. The

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>bowling ball bends the rubber sheet, and that's supposed to

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>represent like how space is curving. The problem with that

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>analogy is that it's showing you to D space the

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>rubber sheet in some third dimension, like it's bending outside

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the universe itself. The universe is supposed to be two D,

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and the rubber sheet is bending into some other dimension,

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>whereas in our space. The way Einstein thinks about space

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>bending is it's intrinsic. There's no additional dimension. We're not

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>bending our three D space into some fourth dimension like

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a rubber sheet bending into some new dimension we can't see.

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>That's not what space curvature is. It's just changing the

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>relative distances between things. So, like Kelly and I have

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of thousands of miles between us right now,

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what if while we both sit in our chair, you

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>could just change that distance, so now it's a thousand miles,

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or now it's ten thousand miles. We just change the

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of space between us.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 2>When I think about the curvature of space, I feel like,

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 2>but isn't there now space on either side of whatever

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 2>just curved? But I guess that area is supposed to

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 2>have no space, So there's places that have no space?

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that right?

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean on either side? You mean like

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.240
<v Speaker 1>are we getting pushed out in to other space or something?

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 2>So I guess maybe my brain is still stuck on

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the rubber sheet. So you've got the sheet, it like

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 2>goes in where the bowling ball is. But in my head,

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 2>there's space above where the bend is, Like you know,

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 2>the sheet was there and now it's down, but there's

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 2>still something where the sheet used to be, because there's

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 2>still space there. But is that not how to think

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 2>about it? Like when it bends, there's space and there's nothing,

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 2>there's like the absence.

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. That's why the rubber sheet is so confusing

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>because as soon as you dig into it. It leads

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to questions that don't have answers because the herb sheet

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is just not the way it works right. The two

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>D examples are useful because they are easier to think

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>about instead. Imagine like a map, right, so you have

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>your favorite country, US, Argentina or whatever, and think about

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of cities on that map, and they all

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>have distances between them, right, and old maps you could

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>like look up how far it was between New York

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and La or between Seattle and Miami, right, and those

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>are distances all right. Cool, And if you took a

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>ruler to the map, you could like measure those things

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and the map would lay flat on a table and

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you could measure those distances with rule. Cool. Now, what

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>if I came in and I had magic fingers, and

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I'm just going to change the distance between

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>LA and Seattle and I'm not going to change anything else,

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>or I'm gonna make it longer. I'm gonna make it

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 1>shorter that distance. Now, imagine like, does that map lie

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>flat on the table anymore? If I play with enough cities,

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>then a order accommodate having more or less space, I'm

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna end up with wrinkles in that map. There's gonna

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be no way to lay that map flat on the table.

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 1>And that's essentially what's happening in space. You put a

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>mass in space, and space shrinks, right. It changes the

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>relative distances between stuff in a way that it's no

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>longer conceptually flat in your mind, the way that a

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>sheet of paper would no longer be flat if you

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just like magically change the distances between two points on

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that sheet of paper.

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I'm thinking about the map, and you

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 2>shortened the distance between Seattle and LA. And maybe I'm

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 2>taking everything too literally, Like has San Francisco disappeared? Are

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 2>all the people in San Francisco shorter because everything has trunk?

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Or are you tunneling through the map to shorten the distance,

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 2>or do we not know what space is doing? It

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 2>could be like any of those things.

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>We're not tunneling through San Francisco, and we're not killing

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>anybody in San Francisco. I hope you all are safe

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>out there. We're just changing the distance between Seattle and LA.

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>We're just saying, hey, if you turn on a flashlight

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>in La, how long would it take for that light

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to get to Seattle? Because the speed of light is constant.

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a good way to measure how much space

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>there is. So we're saying, hey, these things are now closer.

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what it means to shrink space. And the idea

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of curvature is that it's local, right, Like you could

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>make everything further apart and everything closer together and keep

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the map flat. But if you only squeeze two different

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>cities to make them closer together or further apart, then

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>now space has weird bends in it, right, in order

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to make light take a certain amount of time to

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 1>go here and a certain amount of time to go there,

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and to make all the light times work out, space

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>has to have weird curves and it can no longer

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>be flat in the same way that like, if you

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>magically made the time from La to Seattle five times

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>as long, then there would have to be more space

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in there. You couldn't have a flat sheet of paper.

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You need to like add more space, more land, more

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>road for you to drive on.

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 2>We can move forward, but I have to admit I'm

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 2>having a little trouble, Like, does that mean we have

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 2>stretched out what already exists or made more? Are there

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 2>new cities in between now or did we just take

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 2>what existed and it's like taffy and wh'ere just it's

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 2>like like all the people in between are like twice

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 2>as wide.

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, great question, And this is something we actually

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to because we've done it. Like when

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>gravitational waves hit the Earth, they literally do this. They

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>stretch space and they shrink space. Right, So this actually happens.

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And what happens when a gravitational wave passes through the Earth,

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a wave in space itself again, which just

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>means you're changing their relative distances. What happens in reality

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is the stuff that's holding us together, the land, the

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 1>electrochemical bond, keeps us at the same distance. And so,

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, simplify things and say you and I were

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>out floating in space and we were holding a rod

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>that was one kilometer long, each holding one end, and

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>then a gravitational wave comes by and it stretches space. Well,

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you and I are holding the rod, and the rod

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>has bonds, and so it's going to keep us at

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>exactly one kilometer apart, even though space is stretching around us.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So if we show in a flashlight, we would still

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>measure one kilometer. But if we weren't holding onto the rod, right,

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing keeping us at one kilometer. Then when

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>space wiggles around us, we would use our flashlights and

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we would measure more than one kilometer distance because it

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>would take light longer. So your question is, like, is

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it making more space or is it stretching the space

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that's already there. Nobody knows the answer to that question

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>because we don't really know what space is. Like, what

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>is happening you're asking, like the underlying mechanisms of all this, Yeah,

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we have no idea what's really going on there. We

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>just have this mathematical theory that tells us how to

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>do these calculations. We don't know what's underlying going on.

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 2>But the car the way we understand these things, can

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:07.280
<v Speaker 2>it be used to like predict and understand things we've

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 2>actually seen. This isn't just smoking banana peels. We tested

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 2>these things. Our understanding is.

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Useful, absolutely, And we can measure this curvature, like if

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you shine light through this space, you can tell is

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>space curved or is it not? Like if you shine

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>two parallel lines through space that's not curved. They should

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>never touch two photon beams through flat space should never

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>touch if they're in parallel, but in curved space they

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>will either cross or they'll split apart. Right, And we

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have measured this, Like the famous proof of relativity from

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Einstein was seeing light bend around the moon during the eclipse, right,

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that was seeing light move through curved space and bending,

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And so this is definitely something we've seen. We have

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>very accurate models, and general relativity is amazingly precise. It

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>predicts all sorts of things that nobody else could predict.

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So it tells us what space does because not only

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is space curved and light moves through it in curved ways,

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but like other stuff moves through it in curved ways.

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>You have the Earth moving around the Sun because the

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Sun has curved space around it. So it's not just

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>smoking banana peels. It works really really really well. But

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, then we can ask like, well, all right,

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>so general relativity tells us that, like if you have

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>mass in space, it curves it, and that not only

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.399
<v Speaker 1>our distance is relative, but like distances between stuff can

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>change even without that stuff moving. So like what does

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that mean about what space is? Right?

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 2>And let's dig into that question after we go all

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 2>grab some more banana peels. Okay, so you just finished

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 2>saying that the distance between two objects can change even

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 2>if both of the objects like perceive that they have

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 2>stayed still. But what does that tell us about space?

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So we can measure our velocity relative to other stuff,

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and we can tell that space can sometimes expand and

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>shrink between it, and we have these amazing calculations from

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 1>general relativity, what does that tell us about what space

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>actually is? You know? Well, back to the conversation with

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Galileo and with Newton. Einstein agrees that velocity is relative, right,

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you can only measure your velocity relative to other stuff.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like he's saying that space is a

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 1>thing because space can do stuff like it can wiggle,

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it can bend, it can expand. So we went from

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like Galleo saying, now space is just the distance between stuff,

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to Newton saying, no, space is a thing, even though

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you can't measure your velocity to it, to Einstein being like, well,

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>space has interesting properties, so it's pretty hard to say

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a thing. Right. The weirdest part about Einstein's space, though,

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 1>is that you still can't measure your velocity relative to it, like,

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>even if you think it's out there and it has

0:42:57.160 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 1>curvature and has these properties, you can't measure your speed

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>relative to just space. It's something Matt Strassler calls emotional,

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like there's no way to measure your speed relative to space.

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So in one hand, Einstein agrees with Galleo like you

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>have velocities relative, but he also agrees with Newton like

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>space is a thing. But then back to Galleo, He's like, actually,

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but you can't measure your speed relative to it, So

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>like what is it?

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:22.399
<v Speaker 4>Man?

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so is this something that like when we understand

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 2>dark matter and dark energy, it could help us understand space.

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Are those like just completely different problems.

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>They could be completely different problems or they could be connected.

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 1>You never know what thread of investigation is it really

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>going to help you, like figure out what's going on

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and where the next breakthrough is going to come from.

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>What we do know is that general relativity is a

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>great description of space and motion, but we don't know

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what's going on underneath it. Like people often ask me,

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:55.399
<v Speaker 1>you put mass in space and space bends. Why does

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it bend? What is the mechanism for bending it? What

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is doing the bending? And we don't know the answer

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to those questions. Remember, general relativity is a description of

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen, and we can look at it and

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, what does that mean about space? And

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not a final answer. And part of the reason

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we know it's not a final answer is that we

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>have this completely separate idea about how the universe works

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and how space is that comes from the other branch

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of physics that we've been developing over the last one

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:23.919
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, which is quantum mechanics, and quantum mechanics tells

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>us a completely different story about space, what it is

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and how it works.

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 2>So quantum mechanics would not agree that space bends in

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:33.720
<v Speaker 2>the way that we've been talking about.

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Quantum mechanics has no answer to the question of what

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is bending light around the moon. Quantum mechanics can't explain

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>space bending. Quantum mechanics can explain gravity at all. Quantum

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:47.919
<v Speaker 1>mechanics can explain electromagnetism, it can explain the weak force,

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it can explain particles that it can explain all the

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 1>strange experiments we saw right one hundred years ago and

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the experiments we do at the particle collider, and it's

0:44:56.440 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinarily accurate description of everything basically particle related. But

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's built on a different assumption about space. It thinks

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of space the way Newton did, just like the backdrop

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on which things play out in the universe. You know,

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>general relativity is what we call background free. It's like

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 1>space itself is just the distances between stuff, and quantum

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 1>mechanics is like, no, there's a background there, Just lay

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>space out, roll it out like AstroTurf, and then particles

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:23.840
<v Speaker 1>do their dance in that space. And so it starts

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>from a very different place, and it can't explain how

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>space bends. In fact, the space bends too much, quantum

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>mechanics breaks down. We don't know how to do calculations

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 1>for quantum mechanics if space is super bendy. And it

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>also tells us something very different about empty space. Like

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the exercise we started out with where we said, take

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>your office, remove Kelly, remove all of her books, remove

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:48.880
<v Speaker 1>all of her weird samples of parasites and other gross

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff I can see in the background, and all the air.

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.280
<v Speaker 1>What's left. Well, Einstein says there's nothing there, but quantum

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>mechanics says that's not possible because quantum mechanics says, space

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 1>in itself is filled with fields, Like what is it

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that light is moving through? Anyway? It's moving through the

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic field. Well, you can't take that out of space.

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Quantum mechanics says, you can't like rip the field itself out.

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:14.479
<v Speaker 1>You can say, I'm going to take all the photons out,

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:18.359
<v Speaker 1>but the field itself is like the capacity for light

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to move through it. It's like a parking lot with

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 1>no cars in it, right, the field itself is always there.

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And quantum mechanics says that we have the electromagnetic field

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and the electron field and the muon fil in all

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>sorts of fields that they're a part of space itself.

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, but these fields can never be

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 1>totally zero. You can never pull all the energy out

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.359
<v Speaker 1>of them. They have a minimum quantum fuzziness, which means

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that there's always energy in space. So quantum mechanics view

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:47.799
<v Speaker 1>of space is really different. It's like you have this

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>absolute background on which you put these fields, and these

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>fields are always buzzing even if you do your best

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 1>job of pulling everything out of that space.

0:46:56.040 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 2>So are these the two main theories for space? So

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 2>there's no other like theories that physicists take seriously. I'm

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 2>sure there's plenty of people who have additional theories, but

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 2>there's no theories people take seriously.

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we have narrated down to at least two ideas

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about space, both of which we're pretty sure are wrong. Hey, no,

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's progress.

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 2>That is No, that is progress. So does anybody have

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 2>any promising experiments designed to follow up on this next

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 2>or what comes next? We're at a stalemate.

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It seems we are at a stalemate. And one issue

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is that we don't know whether the quantum mechanics version

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of space or the general relativity version of space is

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>correct because almost every experiment we can think of only

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 1>involves one of them. Like we can do experiments to

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>test general relativity, like photons bending around moons, but then

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 1>quantum effects are irrelevant because quantum effects get averaged out

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>when you have something as big as a moon, Or

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we can think of quantum mechanical experiments we have like

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 1>one particle bouncing off another particle, but then gravity is

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant because the gravity of a particle is basically zero

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>because gravity is super duper weak. So the only place

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you could do a test to say, like, well, whose

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of space is correct? Quantum mechanics or gravity are

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:08.760
<v Speaker 1>experiments that are particle sized but have the masses of moons.

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And so now we're talking about black holes, and so

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the answer to like what space really is and how

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 1>does it all work? Is hiding behind the event horizons

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>of black holes, like what's in there? General relativity says

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a singularity. Quantum mechanics says that's nonsense. They can't

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:27.919
<v Speaker 1>both be right. They could both be wrong. So, yeah,

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the answer to your question is build a spaceship, fly

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 1>into a black hole, get the answer, but never be

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:35.360
<v Speaker 1>able to tell anybody about it because you're chopped forever.

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Is there any reason to hope that we'll be able

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 2>to get the answer? Someday? Will our children be having

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:42.239
<v Speaker 2>the same conversation?

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we probably will figure it out. There are

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>other ways to explore this, like the hearts of neutron

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>stars are not quite dense enough to become black holes,

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but they are dense enough, or gravity and some quantum

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>mechanical effects are both important, So by studying the insides

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of neutron stars we might be able to get a clue.

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But there's also just a lot of like thinking that

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we need to do. You know, it's not like we

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:07.839
<v Speaker 1>have a great theory that predicts what's going to happen

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that we need to go test. So we have some

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:11.359
<v Speaker 1>more thinking to do about like how to bring these

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 1>things together, and there are definitely people working on it,

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. String theory is one effort to try to

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>describe things that incorporates gravity and quantum mechanics. This other

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>approaches loop quantum gravity. One of my favorite ideas is

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that space itself is made of chunks, right, like little

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:30.280
<v Speaker 1>pixels of space, and that what's happening when space increases

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:32.399
<v Speaker 1>is that you're like adding more pixels, and that when

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>space shrinks is that you're decreasing these pixels. The cool

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 1>thing about this is that it gives you a way

0:49:37.960 --> 0:49:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to think about a universe without space. Like imagine a

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:44.280
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of pixels in the beginning of the universe,

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and these pixels are not tied together in any way.

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:49.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like a pile of beads before you do your project.

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Then somebody comes along and they weave all these beads

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:55.760
<v Speaker 1>together into a sheet, right, or like a three D grid.

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what space is there's a bunch of these pixels

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>woven together with maybe quantum forces or something into this

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 1>three D grid that we live in and experience. But

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you could also imagine that there was a time before

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that happened, when space was like disorganized, where you couldn't

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>let go from one to the other because they weren't

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>connected the way they are now. So thinking about the

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>nature of space and thinking about how to bring these

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>ideas together is maybe a fruitful way to make progress

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:23.719
<v Speaker 1>because it forces you to think, like, well, what does

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:25.839
<v Speaker 1>this mean, and what else could it be? And could

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a universe without space? All this kind of stuff.

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 2>So for the pixel theory, like when you get more

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 2>pixels or lose pixels, where do they come from? And

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:34.879
<v Speaker 2>where do they go?

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Great question, And that question assumes that they have

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to come from somewhere, right you imagining like things like

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>energy in the universe are concerned. Right, you can't just

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like pop new pixels out of nothing. But you know,

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't actually know that. We don't know that energy

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:52.360
<v Speaker 1>has to be conserved in the universe. We know that,

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, when the universe expands, photons get red shifted,

0:50:56.200 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>they get stretched to longer wavelengths. That means they lose energy.

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Where's that energy go? Nowhere? It doesn't have to go anywhere,

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:06.040
<v Speaker 1>because maybe energy itself is not conserved in the universe.

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So these are great questions because it might be that

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:12.319
<v Speaker 1>they are the wrong questions, and the contradictions that come

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 1>up when we ask them lead us to asking the

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:17.280
<v Speaker 1>right questions, which we don't know what those questions are yet.

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's sort of like, you know, knowing the answer

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:21.279
<v Speaker 1>is forty two and then going back and realizing, hmm,

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe we asked the wrong question, or maybe we're thinking

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about this whole thing wrong, you know. I think the

0:51:26.239 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>takeaway message for listeners is like, what is space? Well,

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. We have two really nice descriptions of

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 1>what space might be, both of which work in different scenarios,

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but both of which raise a lot of questions and

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't agree with each other, and so we really

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>just don't know what space is. Even though we've made

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of progress and we can build iPhones and

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>launch rockets to Mars and all sorts of stuff. We

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:51.399
<v Speaker 1>can move through space, we can manipulate space, doesn't mean

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we yet know what it is, and it might be

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a century or a thousand years before we really figure

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it out.

0:51:57.920 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's exciting. I'm going to try to convince my

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 2>daughter to become a physicist. She's been wearing her Sern

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 2>outfits in her Stern hard hat since visiting CERN, so

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe she's on the path.

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I think about space the way I think about like

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a photon. People are often told, like a photon is

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a particle. No, it's a wave. Or sometimes it's a particle,

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's a wave. The way I think about it

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is like a photon. It's neither a particle or a wave.

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's particle like, sometimes it's a wave like. It's

0:52:21.280 --> 0:52:23.879
<v Speaker 1>something else we haven't yet figured out. And the same

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is true of space. We can describe space sometimes using

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 1>general relativity, we can describe it sometimes using quantum mechanics.

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But space is probably something else. We've never even imagined,

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:37.400
<v Speaker 1>something beyond yet our current thinking that maybe one of

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 1>our listeners is smart enough to.

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Figure out that would be awesome.

0:52:40.840 --> 0:52:42.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, thanks for going on this journey with

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 1>us into the philosophical underpinnings of physics. I hope I've

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 1>convinced you that physics is a way to think about

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>these big, deep questions without getting lost in the meaning

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of the words, because it lets us be mathematical to

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>try to be precise, and then to ask philosophical questions

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>about those mathematical models, be like, what does it mean

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>that I can calculate this, but I can't measure that?

0:53:02.040 --> 0:53:03.840
<v Speaker 1>What does it tell us about the nature of the universe?

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Even when those answers are or we really.

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 2>Just have no clue, my brain today hurt in a

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 2>good way. I really enjoyed thinking about this today. It

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 2>was nice to have us someone to ask silly questions

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 2>to well.

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for all the silly and wonderful questions, and

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.439
<v Speaker 1>thanks everybody else out there for thinking about the nature

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. If you have questions about how things work,

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:25.800
<v Speaker 1>don't be shy. Write to us if you have questions

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:27.359
<v Speaker 1>at Daniel and Kelly dot org.

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced by iHeartRadio. We

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 2>would love to hear from you.

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 1>We really would. We want to know what questions you

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:45.920
<v Speaker 1>have about this extraordinary Universe.

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:49.000
<v Speaker 2>You want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions

0:53:49.000 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 2>for future shows. If you contact us, we will get

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 2>back to you.

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 1>We really mean it. We answer every message, Email us

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at Questions at danieland Kelly.

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Dot org, or you can find us on some social media.

0:54:00.640 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 2>We have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 2>all of those platforms. You can find us at D

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 2>and K Universe.

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't be shy write to us