WEBVTT - From the Vault: Dendera Lights and Ancient Egyptian Pseudohistory

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. It is

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>once more Saturday, so it is once more time to

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>go into the vault. This is going to be the

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>episode Dindara Lights and Ancient Egyptians Pseudohistory. This one originally

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>published eight seventeen, twenty twenty three. This was the third

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>part in our look at how low resolution images have

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>provoked paranormal and fringe explanations over time, despite convincing an

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>even conclusive expert analysis. And this is once more a

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>good excuse to dive into ancient Egyptian concepts. So without

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>further ado, here we go.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is Robert.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick. In the past to

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, we've been talking

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 3>about a couple of famous, supposedly anomalous underwater images, weird,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 3>spooky looking photographs and images produced by sonar of objects

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 3>on the ocean floor, which to observers with the right predisposition,

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 3>seemed like compelling evidence of alien visitation of Earth, or

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 3>ancient technology of lost civilizations, or something else. In that

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 3>narrative space, and in a way, I think it's kind

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>of telling that you look at an object and say, well,

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 3>this could be aliens, or it could be atlantis. It's

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 3>one of the two or both.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>You can have both sometimes, yeah, I.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Guess you could. But anyway, explanation referring to explanations that

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 3>are big, exciting, mind rending explanations that would change everything

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>we think we know about the world and about the

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 3>history of life on Earth. Today's episode is not a

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 3>strict like Part three or anything, but we are going

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>to be continuing the theme, so I thought it would

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>be good to start off with a recap of what

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about in the last couple of episodes, though

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>today we're going to be taking it in a different direction.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 3>So what's the theme. Well, to start with, I'll do

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>a brief review of the things we talked about in

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 3>the last two episodes. One object was something that was

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 3>photographed in the nineteen sixties and known in the UFO

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 3>literature as the Eltanan antenna. It looks to the untrained

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 3>observer like some kind of antenna, some kind of receiver,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 3>you know. They called it, I think a microwave, aerial

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 3>or something in some of the early articles on it,

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 3>but actually once people with the right background of marine

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 3>biology knowledge looked at this photo, they identified it with

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 3>near certainty as a species of carnivorous sponge that lives

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 3>on the bottom of the ocean. The other object that

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>we talked about in the second of those two episodes

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 3>was captured on fuzzy sonar images by treasure hunters and

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 3>salvage divers in two thousand and eleven, and it has

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 3>been referred to in the media as the Baltic Sea

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 3>anomaly because it was supposedly somewhere on the floor of

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the Northern Baltic Sea, and hidden knowledge enthusiasts called it

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 3>everything from a crashed flying saucer to a monument built

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 3>by the civilization of Atlantis, and in this case a

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>positive idea is slightly more difficult than it is in

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 3>the case of the Eltanan antenna, which is almost definitely

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the sponge. But numerous experts have commented that this is

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 3>most likely just an interesting looking geologic formation, in other words,

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 3>a big mass of rock that may be a result

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 3>of the freezing and thawing of glaciers, but ultimately we

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 3>don't know for sure, and so it's kind of interesting

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>that in both cases, the story goes that someone captured

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 3>a fuzzy or low resolution image of something that looked

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 3>weird and to some extent looked intuitively unnatural or out

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 3>of place. That image was then published to a lay

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 3>audience that had no background knowledge to help them understand

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>what they were looking at, and then some observers concluded

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 3>that since the object looked unusual, unnatural, or out of place,

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 3>it must be a piece of anomalist technology deposited by

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 3>aliens or time travelers, or a past human civilization about

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 3>which all knowledge has been erased. However, in both cases,

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>the more information entered into the picture, the more it

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 3>seemed like these anomalies were probably just weird looking natural

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 3>phenomena like animals or rocks. And so, while it's always

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>important to keep an open mind, you want to keep

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 3>your mind open to good evidence if it were to

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 3>emerge of big and worldview changing discoveries, it is at

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 3>the same time important not to let emotional excitement guide

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 3>your reasoning. And one reason to be skeptical about putting

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 3>something that looks weird and out of place into the

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 3>aliens or atlantis column is that If you've if all

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 3>of these kinds of stories long enough, you really start

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to see a trend. And that trend is the more

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>information we have to inform our judgment, the less it

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 3>seems like aliens. So the cases where a piece of evidence,

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 3>like a photograph or a video, remains unexplainable and thus

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 3>still possibly aliens, those tend to be the cases where

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 3>there are notable deficits of information, and these could be

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 3>deficits within the evidence itself, like the picture or the

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 3>video is very grainy and low resolution, so it's hard

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 3>to tell exactly what you're looking at, and you kind

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 3>of just have to shrug and say, I don't know,

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 3>it looks weird, hard to say what it is. Or

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the information deficit could be in the person or community

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 3>that is assessing the evidence. It could be in us.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>For example, most of us have a lack of background

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 3>knowledge about what sponges on the ocean floor look like,

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 3>or about what kinds of patterns can be found in

0:05:55.200 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 3>natural rock formations, and so information deficits kind of keep

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>the mystery alive. Meanwhile, the converse also seems true. The

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 3>more information there is, the more likely it becomes that

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 3>the object gets pinned down to an explanation from within

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>the range of known causes. So you get a higher

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 3>resolution video, or you get new videos of the same thing,

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 3>maybe an additional angle, better light conditions, more experience or

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 3>background knowledge with which to judge the video or photo,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>and oh, okay, in these cases it's a milar balloon

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 3>or oh I see that's a star, or that's an airplane.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Rob Actually, another excellent example that you brought up in

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the last episode was the so called face on Mars.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, this was it's a wonderful photo, Like I

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 3>love the face on Mars, but this was done in

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 3>by higher resolution photography.

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Done in to a certain extent. But like some of

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>these other images, the face of Mars still remains this

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>image that's kind of an article of faith to sign,

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, or at least this kind of totem of

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the paranormal and the potentially cosmic. And I guess it

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is still certainly a testament to our ability to see

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in anything well exactly.

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 3>And I wouldn't wish, by the way, that we could

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 3>not read beauty and meaning into I don't know, things

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 3>that might on their own merits not necessarily shout out

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>to be meaningful, like a rock doesn't necessarily say that

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 3>it has meaning, but you can see faces in it,

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 3>and it can make you feel all kinds of things.

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 3>This is like the basis of all art. Yeah, But

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to looking for explanations of things in

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the world, this pattern just pops up again and again

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 3>and again. If the picture stays fuzzy, it still might

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 3>be aliens, or it still might be atlantis. But if

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 3>you're able to sharpen the focus or to have more

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>background knowledge when you're assessing it, it's almost definitely not aliens,

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 3>then that's when you realize it's a balloon. And this

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:03.239
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean we will never discover good evidence of alien

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 3>visitation of Earth or anything, or of you know, maybe

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 3>some big discovery about something previously unknown about the ancient world.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 3>That's always possible. But I think if you follow these stories,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 3>it's sort of impossible not to notice the trend, and

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 3>awareness of the trend should put us on guard when

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 3>new pieces of evidence bubble up from the low information

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 3>or low resolution zone. So today we wanted to look

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>at some similar trends, not in underwater imagery, but in

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 3>imagery related to another domain that can often appear in

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 3>degraded or low resolution form and be kind of put

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 3>cold in front of people who don't have contextual background

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 3>knowledge to understand what we're looking at, and this is

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>artifacts from ancient history.

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think examples like this can be at times

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a little harder for us to wrap our heads around,

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>especially if we are more we're inclined to sort of

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>rally behind an outside idea about what we're looking at,

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>because in some of these other examples of anomalist data,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>anomalist photography, et cetera, there's there's often maybe a sense

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of kind of like a a rabbit duck illusion scenario,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, or or one of these, you know, one

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of these optical illusions where someone shows it to you

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and they say, hey, do you see a duck or

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a rabbit? And you say, well, I see a rabbit.

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a duck at all. And then someone says, well, look,

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>i'll show you, and you show show them the parts

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of the duck and they're like, okay, now I can

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>see it both ways. It can maybe be a little

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>bit harder if in order to truly see it both ways,

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to say, understand ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics. So like

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the examples I'm gonna I'm gonna touch on

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>here is one where we absolutely know what it is,

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and we absolutely know what it's not. And yet even

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, reading the explanation, you know, hearing from experts,

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it can still be difficult. It's difficult for

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>me to see exactly what we're talking about there, and

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's actually easier for me to sort of lean in

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to the ridiculous explanation for what appears to be in

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>front of us. So we'll get to this in a second,

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>but first I just want to talk in general about

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the overarching theme of Egyptomania. Now, Egyptomania is more often

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>used to refer specifically to nineteenth century European fascination with

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>all things Egypt during Napoleon's Egyptian campaign, but it can

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>also generally be leveled at various points in time when

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>various cultures have pursued an interest in ancient Egyptian civilization

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and culture. And of course this general interest is irresistible

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>because we've touched on many times in the show. I'm

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egyptian civilization, ancient Egyptian culture, and mythology. These are fascinating.

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Topics, absolutely, yeah, a beautiful entrancing and not just to

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 3>people in the mind. I mean, something I've read before

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 3>is that people in the world that still appears as

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the ancient world to us looked back to the even

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 3>more ancient Egyptian civilization and they were fascinated by it.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 3>There were ancient Greco Romans who had a kind of Egyptomania.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, I think we've we've mentioned the sort of

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>mind blowing fact before. You know that the ancient Romans

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>were greatly intrigued by ancient Egypt, which was already as

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>ancient to them as the Romans are to us.

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, So at the time of Caesar Augustus, ancient Egyptian

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 3>civilization was thousands of years old.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. And of course we've touched before on the

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>ancient wonders of the world. You know, the Pyramids, the

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Great Pyramids were certainly on that list, and those still

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>remain some of the most enigmatic man made structures on

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the planet, and we still don't know everything there is

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to know about them. So Egyptology remains a living field

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of study.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at a really really good book about

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>this that I highly recommend. It's from Ronald H. Fritz,

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>titled Egyptomania, and in the book, the author discusses various

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>forms of Egyptomania over the ages, from the ancient Hebrews,

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>from Greeks and Romans to European models. There's a whole

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>section on like fiction and gets into movies. He also

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>has a great chapter on Afrocentrist movements that engage in Egyptomania,

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and he drives home that just many different peoples across

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>different times have attempted to imagine and even remake the

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egyptians in their own image to enhance their own worldview,

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>their own interests, their own ideology, etc. And the energy

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:48.239
<v Speaker 1>of this exercise ranges from just merely attempting to understand

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating time in people. I mean, that's one of

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>our main tools is to think about even people from

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the distant past in different lands, to try and imagine

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>what it would be like to be them. But on

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the spectrum you get into just

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>outright pseudohistory, pseudoscience, and just everything else you might expect

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to encounter on the fringes.

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, there's an interesting duality that comes from trying

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 3>to see yourself and imagine people like you and other

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 3>times and other civilizations, because of course, there probably is

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 3>something that all people at all times kind of have

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 3>in common. There is a common human experience, and you

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 3>can try to imagine what it would have been like

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 3>to live in ancient Egypt. But there's a possibility that

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 3>in doing so, you kind of lull yourself into the

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 3>false belief that you can say, look at ancient Egyptian

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 3>art or look at ancient Egyptian artifacts and just intuitively

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 3>identify what you're looking at, when in fact, you would

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 3>probably need some very specific cultural knowledge to understand what

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>you're looking at.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and a lot of this imagery getting right into

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about here is the kind of stuff

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that can be mysterious enough, that can seem cryptic enough

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to folks who don't know what they're looking at that

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you can apply other ideas, modern ideas to them. You know,

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 1>like you just read a book about UFOs, Well, go

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>look at these these images without any context, and you

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>may see UFO related ideas there. Read a book about

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the bicameral mind and start looking at at some of

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>these images, Well, you might have some alarming ideas and

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>some interesting interpretations of what you see as well.

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, we read the world through the lenses that are

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 3>available to us, and very often the lenses that are

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 3>available to us sort of, what's the top lens on

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the stack is whatever you've recently been thinking about.

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and not to say that, you know, fresh eyes

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and fresh perspectives are not potentially important in reevaluating what

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we know and what we think we know. But oftentimes

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>when there is a particular preconceived notion in mind, you're

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily checking back in with the experts to see

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>if this radical new theory matches up with the old

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>school interpretation. Certainly when we get into fringe ideas. So anyway,

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a long history of Gyptomania in Western magic and

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>occultism continues to play into modern ideas of magic and ocultism,

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but also modern branches of fringe ideas concerning UFOs, ancient

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>alien discourse, which of course we've discussed on the show

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and other paranormal concepts and Yeah, so

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprise that various examples of iconography, archaeological remnants,

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and so forth that are not located on the bottom

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of the sea still end up speaking to us across

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>time and culture in a way that too inexpert eyes

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or eyes seeking only confirmation of the paranormal examples of

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>ancient technology and so forth. You know they're going to

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>see that in these images. So in just a few

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>minutes we'll get to a couple I think of interesting

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>samples of this. But going back to the book Egyptomania,

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Fritz points out that there are other not necessarily alien

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>fringe ideas that pre exists UFO fascination that already insisted

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that ancient Egypt was, for instance, much older than mainstream

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>historians believe today. Some of these push back to like

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand BC or earlier, as opposed to the accepted

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>view that the Archaic Age stretches five thousand to three

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand BC, with the Old Kingdom coming in at around

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>three thousand BC. And then you have a number of

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fringe ideas that don't again don't concern aliens or anything

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like that, but they get into this idea that like,

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>surely there is some ancient advanced civilization at the heart

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of all of this, And so Fritz discusses a few

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of these. There's this idea one ideas that the ancient

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egyptian civilization extends from civilization X or the Ice

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Age super civil.

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh, there are similar analogs to this that are still

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 3>kicking around today.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And of course a big, big one is Atlantis,

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea that that like refugees from sunken Atlantis founded

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egypt that sort of thing. And then you also

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have the ancient alien discourse coming in ancient alien aliens

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>teaching the ancient Egyptians how to do things, or ancient

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>aliens interbreeding with the ancient Egyptians, supercharging human DNA, and

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>basically anything else you want to happen. I don't know.

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 3>I feel like a lot of alien discourses like wrong

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 3>but fun. But like the alien supercharging DNA thing goes

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 3>is not wrong and fun, it's like wrong and gross.

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you get it. You, I mean so much of this.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It can these ideas they can start in a place

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that feels just fun and escapist, but you follow them

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>long enough, they can get into perhaps creepier territory. But

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>there is still a lot of variety here to choose from.

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And Fritz writes the following quote, the outpouring and accumulation

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>of the many theories that alternative historians advanced about ancient

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Egypt could be considered a cornucopia. But since so many

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>of the theories clash with and contradict each other, a

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>better description might be a cacophony. And I think we

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>saw this in some of the discussion of our previous

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>underwater examples as well, you know what is the anomaly? Well,

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>there's never like this single paranormal explanation, but a whole

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>host of them. Certainly the deeper you go into a

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>theme like, Okay, it's an antenna, but is that is

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it the secret world government that built it, or is

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it the ancient lass civilization that built it? Or is

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>it current UFO, current alien visitors that built it. And

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>within a given person's body of work, they might have

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a specific idea, but it's going to be different from

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the next book on the shelf.

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Or as we mentioned directly earlier, if you look at

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 3>an object on the ocean floor and you think, well,

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 3>this could be a UFO, or it could be a

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 3>temple built by the people of Atlantis, or it could

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 3>be an Nazi bunker. In that case, like could it

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 3>really possibly even suggest any of those like that? Those

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>are so different. It sounds like you're just kind of

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 3>like reaching around for whatever, not like saying, oh, it

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 3>really has attributes that would make us conclude it is x.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. Now. The Atlantis connection to ancient Egypt goes

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>way back. Apparently goes back to the writings of Plato

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>concerning the idea that the ancient Egyptians coexisted with Atlantis

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand years earlier. Fritz writes that while Plato was

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>likely stating all this purely to make a philosophical point,

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Egypt was already a nine thousand year

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>old civilization was probably what contemporary Greeks believed in the

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>fourth and fifth centuries BCE, and to be clear, other

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>civilizations of the day were cited with bloated timelines as well.

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. One big difference between like an ancient Greek historian

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 3>and a modern historian is that modern historians have a

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 3>wealth of physical scienceientific evidence that they can draw on

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 3>to help inform, you know, how they should process the

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 3>received stories told about the past. You know, you can,

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 3>like you can do digs, and you can do radiometric dating,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 3>and you can do all kinds of things that give

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 3>you physical clues to help you either confirm or disconfirm

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 3>things that have been written down about what happened in

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 3>the past.

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Now, of course, one of the things about Atlantis

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>is that the concept never completely goes away, certainly in

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the West, but it comes and it goes. It's heightened

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>by the discovery of an inhabited America's and then again

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, with modern pseudohistory of

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Egypt and Atlantis emerging largely from the writings apparently of

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>American politician Ignacious Donnelley in eighteen eighty two. Donnelly, if

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you're not familiar with him, represented Minnesota and the US

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives from eighteen sixty three through eighteen sixty nine.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.479
<v Speaker 1>He pushed a number of ideas concerning pseudoscience and pseudo history.

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, definitely one of the many characters that Fritz

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>writes about in this section.

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy, Now.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Another figure that Fritz touches on here and credits largely

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>with this sort of modern idea that Egypt had advanced technology.

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Ancient Egypt had advanced technology. This goes back to the

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>psychic readings of when Edgar Casey, who lived eighteen seventy

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>seven through nineteen forty five, a self professed clairvoyant who

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>carried out quote unquote life readings for people and revealed

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>their past lives in ancient Atlantis, as well as the

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>advanced technology that the Atlanteans supposedly had, such as advanced

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>crystal laser weapons that they ultimately used to destroy Atlantis,

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>with the survivors fleeing to Egypt.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Crystal laser weapons.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it sounds remarkably like that old Atari

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty six hundred game Atlantis. I don't know if anyone

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 1>out there actually played this, but I remember as a

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>kid seeing the commercials for it online and it was

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of a scary commercial with a whole narrative structure

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>going on how to do with that. I believe memory

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>serves an ongoing war between the Gorgons and the people

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of Atlantis, and it was a great commercial. Look it

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>up if you haven't seen.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 3>It, you know. I kind of can't help but think

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 3>though all these ideas about ancient Egypt having advanced technology.

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 3>In a way, they did have advanced technology, but they

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 3>had advanced technology for the time in which they lived.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 3>Like you do not have to turn to bad standards

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 3>of evidence. For examples of amazing technological achievements. In ancient Egypt,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 3>they built the Pyramids, among you million tons of other things.

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 3>That was not ancient aliens. That was extremely smart and

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 3>industrious people creating amazing technological achievements with a very limited

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 3>set of tools compared to what's available to people today.

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 3>That is an amazing technological feat. It was just an

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 3>amazing technological feat for the time.

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, absolutely. I mean that's one of the tragedies

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>about all of this is like when you when you

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>get wrapped up in say ancient alien discourse, you end

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>up reducing the importance of of of what people were

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>actually doing if you just attribute it to the gifts

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of the gods, the gifts of the alien visitors and

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Now, I want to stress that in this chapter,

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Fritz touches on a number of different names, and I'm

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to get into everybody here, but you know

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's there. There are various writers and occasional outright con

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>men that are engaged in the sort of work, and

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>their work kind of feeds off each other. One of

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the big ones, one of the big names, certainly an

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>ancient alien discourse is the work of Eric von Donakin,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>who we've talked about on the show before because he

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>was the author of Chariots of the Gods in nineteen

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight. I say it that way because the title

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>does have a question mark at the end. Always pronounce

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the question mark.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 3>Like he's like kind of getting you with the elbow

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 3>and winking while he says yeah.

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we mentioned we went in and discussed this

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>idea at length and the various criticisms to it. But

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>even this idea like it was influenced by the writings

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of HP Lovecraft and other weird writers of the early

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century. Lovecraft and his contemporaries, by the way, also

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote about tales related to Egyptian motifs and Egyptian oriented

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>occultism and so forth, so you have a lot of

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>these sources feeding into each other.

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 3>It's been years since we did the Eric Vondanikin episode,

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 3>But am I remembering something about how he had like

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 3>created the Chariots of the Gods theme park? Is that?

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Am I losing my mind?

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>No? No, there was Slash is a theme park. I'm

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not sure off the top of my head, what's going

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on with it? Right? Now, but like, that's how big

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this guy.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 3>I want to flat earth six flags.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Now. Fritz points out, though that early ancient alien discourse folks,

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and even Vondnikin's original book don't actually reference Egypt all

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that much. So other individuals who kind of come in

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>with the Egyptology alternative Egyptology view of everything, and that

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>gets you know, sucked into the whole concept. He points

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>out one particular author, I believe this is a book

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen eighty four from one zechariash Si Chen who

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>lived nineteen twenty through twenty ten. This is apparently one

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>of the only serious competitors to von Danakan because the

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Vondanakin's books generated a lot of discussion, and you know,

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty popular for the time period. So a lot

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of other authors came in to try and cash in

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:39.479
<v Speaker 1>on ancient alien discourse. But this particular individual, Sich seems

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to have been one of the more successful of those

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to come in and try and get cash in on

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>everything here, and Fritz points out that he seems to

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have avoided a lot of the criticism that was reserved

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>for von Dannakin. So Vontanagan got big enough to where

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like when people like Carl Sagan entered the chat, Vonda

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Anakin's ideas are the one are the ones that Carl

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Sagan is going to respond to. Carl Sagan doesn't have

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 1>time to deal with everybody else in the genre.

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 3>And to be clear, Carl Sagan was not saying that

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 3>ancient aliens like were a viable explanation for the Pyramids

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 3>or anything. He as I recall, entered the discourse to

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of say, well, if we're going to entertain this possibility,

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 3>we should have some standards of evidence, right, Like we

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 3>should lay out in advance what would we be looking

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 3>for instead of just like looking at what's out there

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 3>and saying like, eh, that could be aliens.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I thought Sagan has some great responses to it.

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>They were not like one hundred percent shut it down,

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>dismissive of it as a concept, but we're but also

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>reiterated that there are high standards for this, and if

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you were looking for evidence, you would be looking for

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>very specific sorts of evidence and so forth. But again,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>when Sagan's entering the conversation, when other critics are coming

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in and dealing with what von Donigan's written about, especially

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>with that first book, they're not dealing with with the

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>themed content. Individuals like Sitchin apparently are ones who were

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the ones to initially drag Egypt and ancient Egypt into

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the scenario, and perhaps a lot of that Fritz Rights

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>seems to have maybe existed below the mainstream radar for

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>a while, you know, being just a part of the

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that is discussed in the fringe movements. And it's

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not until the nineteen nineties. He writes that we see

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>quote the penetration of highly speculative theories about ancient Egypt

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>into mainstream popular culture.

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe the designation as highly speculative is a

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 3>good one, because sometimes I'm looking for the right blanket

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 3>terminology to describe all these different types of explanations that

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about. They're not all necessarily like conspiracy theories.

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 3>They don't all necessarily have exactly the same content, But

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 3>what they do seem to have in common is that

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 3>they are highly speculative, meaning they are elaborating a lot

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 3>of explanatory narrative on on a very weak evidential basis.

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So to be clear here, what apparently is going on

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>at this time leading into the nineteen nineties, according to

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the author here of Fritz is that under the surface

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of all this other talk about ancient aliens and so

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>forth and other paranormal ideas, there's this kind of growing

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>swell of alternative Egyptology, and then during the nineteen nineties

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it begins to bubble up into the mainstream discourse. And

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Fritz cite's two main reasons for this. One is the

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>approaching millennium and various ideas concerning the new millennium that's

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>about to be here. The second reason he brings up

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is that there are just a number of new archaeological

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>discoveries that were taking place in Egypt that we're capturing

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>mainstream attention and inadvertently fueling the nonsense that again was

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>festering in the fringe.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I see so like because for totally legitimate reasons, ancient

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Egypt might be popping up on the news, like you're

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 3>seeing it on TV in ways that you probably didn't

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 3>see it as much before. It's just sort of in

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the air, and it is one more thing you could

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 3>attach highly speculative theories too.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then you have other individuals that are writing

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>more directly about it. It's popping up in the writings

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of Graham Hancock, for example, He also cites the X

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>files as being popular, though you have more expertise for

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the X files. I don't know the X files ever

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>actually had any ancient Egyptian themed content. I don't know

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>if they ever went up against a mummy or anything.

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 3>I recall very little about that except well, actually, now

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 3>that I think about it, I think there may have

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 3>been a mummy episode that is remembered as one of

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the worst episodes of the X Files ever. Unless that's

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 3>hold on, got to look it up now. Oh no,

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 3>I see why my memory was confused here. Yeah, one

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 3>of the worst X Files episodes ever does concern a mummy.

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 3>But it's not an Egyptian mummy. It's a South American mummy.

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Well, even if the X Files are not directly

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>contributing to alternative egyptology discourse, you can, I guess, look

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>at it as kind of like a sign that fringe

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>ideas were entering into the mainstream, at the very least

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>as entertainment. But then I guess sometimes entertainment has a

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>way of bleeding over into other things.

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Don't drag the X files into this. The x files.

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 3>The X files are pure and holy they didn't do

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 3>anything wrong. That's a fictional show. It's okay.

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>But I guess the bigger thing that's going on here

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that Fitz points out is that at the time academics

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>had largely ignored these trends, like academics in egyptology and

0:30:55.840 --> 0:31:00.959
<v Speaker 1>so forth, archaeologists and so forth. Yeah, they weren't venturing

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>into arguments against ancient alien discourse folks and so forth.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's sensible by and large because like, that's not

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>what their work is, that's not what they have set

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>out to do with their work and their careers to

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>just respond to various highly speculative ideas about why things

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>appear the way they are.

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, and it's often difficult to respond to highly speculative

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 3>ideas from an informed point of view because a lot

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 3>of times all you can just say is, like, there's

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 3>no reason to think all that you know, Like, the

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 3>claims of highly speculative theories are often not like the

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 3>kinds of tight, specific focused claims about specific pieces of

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 3>evidence that you can that you would be used to addressing,

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 3>say in an academic archaeology journal or something like that.

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 3>They're like these elaborations. They spend these wild narratives that

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 3>are kind of too big to even know where to

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 3>get a toe hole if you're trying to criticize them,

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 3>other than to just kind of say, like, well that

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 3>just sounds all made.

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Up, yeah, Fritz Wright's quote, Academics generally avoid dealing with

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>alternative scholars. This attitude is justified by the excuse that

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>debating alternative or fringe scholarship only gives it a false credibility.

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Some consider debating speculative scholars as a dialogue of the death,

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>since the speculative ideas tend to be treated by their

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>adherents in a manner of religious faith rather than scientific inquiry,

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>while some academics just hold speculative ideas in contempt. Ignoring

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the alternative Egyptologists did not, however, serve the academic Egyptologists well.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>During the nineteen nineties, they found themselves marginalized in the

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>popular mind and put on the defense. So the argument

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>here is that perhaps they did wait too long to

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>respond to a lot of these ideas that were welling

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>up into the mainstream, and he points out that it

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>was apparently wasn't until a pair of BBC Horizon documentary

0:32:56.200 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>specials titled Atlantis uncovered in Atlantis. Reborn weighed in and

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>offered a scathing rebuke of these ideas in the mainstream,

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and this wasn't until nineteen ninety nine.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, I feel like this mirror is a pattern

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 3>that's still a problem with like highly speculative alternative ideas

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 3>of all sorts today because usually people who have real

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 3>expertise in the field are busy talking to each other

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 3>and they're kind of in a contained conversation space. Meanwhile,

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 3>people who are offering highly speculative ideas go straight to

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 3>the media into a popular audience.

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you can understand too why I mean, thinking

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that the pyramids were built by aliens? Does that necessarily

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>pose like a real threat to you know, at what

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>point do you do you actually make the call. It's like, Okay,

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>enough is enough. We need to say something about this.

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>We need to put together a documentary to dismiss this nonsense,

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>because it seems like for a long stretch of the

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>build up you can say like, well, this is dumb,

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>or this doesn't really match up with any actual work,

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but that it's been conducted, any actual research or evidence,

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's not hurting anybody.

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 3>You could say that and a lot of people do

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 3>say that, But I don't know. Sometimes I wonder if

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 3>these supposedly harmless I mean, probably they are somewhat harmless

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 3>in themselves. Highly speculative theories or conspiracy theories sort of

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 3>engender a pattern of thinking that can easily be used

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:31.720
<v Speaker 3>to foster incredibly destructive and dangerous ideas that are violent.

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I think I think at this point, certainly this

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>day and age, I think most of us realize that

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>like the realm of conspiracy thinking is not just a

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>domain of like escapist ideas that are not hurting anybody.

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of harmful ideologies that are woven throughout

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>many of these branches of conspiracy thought.

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 3>Then again, I mean, I want to be realistic and

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 3>say I don't I don't know if you can really

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 3>say that if we had done a better job of

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 3>convincing people that aliens didn't build the pyramids, that they

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't end up thinking, you know, some kind of violent

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy theory. But you do have to wonder if just

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 3>sort of like ignoring and letting it pass when people

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 3>are engaging in conspiracy thinking and these other domains just

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of like, let's that style of thought fester.

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, let's look at the evidence, And by

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the evidence, I mean let's look at a

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of examples. We are not setting out to look

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 1>at all the evidence or alleged evidence for ancient Egyptian

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>advanced technology and chariots of the gods and so forth.

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 1>They are just a couple of examples that I think

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 1>match up with what we've been discussing about information data, images, etc.

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That can be perplexing and that can certainly lead to

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>an interpretation that is again not based in expertise and

0:35:56.800 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>not based in like a wider body of evidence, but

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>are based in confirmation bias, and based in some sort

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of an alternative understanding of science and or history.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what you got?

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So, did the ancient Egyptians have Apache helicopters?

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Gotta be yes?

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Surely, No, We're we're gonna move forward with the spoilering

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>place that no, they did not. But there is an

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 1>image that you will find, and you've probably seen online.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>You see some hieroglyphics, and there is an image or

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a character towards the top that, if we're being generous,

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of looks like a modern helicopter and next to

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it is something that I guess kind of looks like

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a space tank.

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, while we're doing this, let's not go all

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 3>out under the helicopter. There is an R two D

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 3>two and I don't know what you're saying, is a

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 3>tank that looks to me kind of like a MiG

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:52.760
<v Speaker 3>fighter jet.

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right.

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 3>We also got a get we have keeping up with

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 3>the R two D two theme. We have of Luke

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Skywalker's land speeder.

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 1>You see that one, Yeah, yeah, Yeah, that's that's what

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of seeing as a tank. It does

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the speeder as well. Yeah. And then of

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>course we have a we have a bug of some

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>sort as well. That's clearly a bug. But is it

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a giant bug?

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, your your theory may vary.

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the things about this image is a lot

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>of the places where you see it, they're not going

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be approaching it from a skeptical point of view. Uh,

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and actually finding like good sources on this where someone's

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>just gonna come in and and tell you exactly what

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at, are actually a little harder to come across.

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is where you get into the

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the problem of like experts in ancient Egypt and hieroglyphics

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily wasting their time weighing in on whether

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>ancient hieroglyphics show as a helicopter.

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, I haven't checked, but I would guess that, like,

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 3>is this hieroglyphic a helicopter is not like the subject

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of many Egyptology Journal articles.

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Right right. But I was able to find, you know,

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a few different sources that discuss it in a way

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that I could I could get behind the image in question.

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen in a couple of places. It attributed to

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a nineteen eighty seven photo by an American who is

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Temple of Osiris in Abydos, Egypt. So it's

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a it's a real photo of a real object of

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>real you know, etchings, and it's pretty clear, like there's

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.879
<v Speaker 1>it's one of these things where the photo quality and

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the reality of the thing that is photographed these are

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>not in question. But it's this interpretation of what you're

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at that's where you see these enormous leaps taken

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>where people are seeing bits of advanced technology. But fortunately

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>there is a very straightforward explanation for what we see here.

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I found a couple of different discussions of this, but

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the one I'm going to lean on mostly is this

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was from an article that Asian historian Richard C. Carrier

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>wrote about back in nineteen ninety nine for The Skeptical

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Inquirer in an article titled flash Fox News reports that

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Aliens may have built the Pyramids of Egypt. As the

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>title suggests, this is about coverage at the time on

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Fox News. Again, this is nineteen ninety nine about alternative Egyptology,

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and the broadcast included images of the alleged helicopter and

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>comparison images to modern Apache attack helicopters. So Carrier spoke

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to some Egyptologists for the article, and it seems to

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>have seems to have been sort of new pseudohistory to

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>some of them at the time. Again, this was daring

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that the very end of the nineteen nineties, so it

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:44.879
<v Speaker 1>seems like, you know, the subculture was bubbling up into

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream quite a bit. He writes the following to

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>sum it all up, but what do the experts say

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>about this helicopter glyph? This will serve as an example

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for all the rest. The helicopter, in fact, is the

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Avados palimpsest. A palimpsest is what is created when new

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>writing is inscribed over old. In the case of papyri,

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>old inc is scraped off, but in the case of inscriptions,

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>plaster is added over the old inscription and a new

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>inscription is made. The image described as a helicopter is

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>well known to be the names of Rameses inscribed over

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the names of his father, something Rameses was known to

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.879
<v Speaker 1>do quite frequently. A little bit of damage from time

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and weathering has furthered the illusion of a helicopter. It

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>basically comes down to this basic fact, though, that a

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>previous image, a previous inscription, was plastered over and replaced

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>with another one, and then when stuff starts wearing away,

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a sort of hybrid image emerges that doesn't mean anything,

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but that looks like something from our modern age, you know,

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess it would be like it'd be like if

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>one billboard were plastered over another one, and then there's

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a fierce storm and it tears part of the billboard away,

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and then so you have a mix of the old

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 1>billboard and the new billboard, and what you're left with

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is just kind of confusing. But maybe it looks like

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>a monster. Maybe it looks like you know, what have you.

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>And by the way that the topic of palms is fascinating,

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a much older episode of Stuck to blow your

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>mind that goes into it. But yeah, you get into

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.959
<v Speaker 1>this whole realm of you know, erased books just under

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the surface of ancient tomes, and you know, sometimes they've

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>been on earthed. Sometimes you have to use you know,

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>modern technology to sort of see through the printed page

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and see what was originally there. And you see it

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in paintings and much more, and it can seem a

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>bit foreign to us, given how just disposable paper is.

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you can rewrite files, you know, as

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>many times as you want. You can just set around

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>creating new documents and deleting them all day. But there

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>was a time when in order to erase document and

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>create new document, well that meant grabbing the plaster.

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So this strikes me as a case that is

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 3>in the low information category you've been talking about in

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 3>multiple ways. So the original image is somewhat altered or

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 3>degraded in the way that it's been photographed like it

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 3>might be hard, especially if you're not familiar with ancient

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Egyptian inscriptions to understand that what you're looking at is

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 3>not even one single continuous drawing or piece of imagery,

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 3>but is instead a couple of things sort of bleeding

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 3>into each other. And then on top of that, there's

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the low information condition of us looking at it without

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 3>being familiar with, say the way the name Rameses is

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 3>depicted in hieroglyphics.

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Now, the second example we're going to look at

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>here is also really fascinating, and this one is a

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>lot in a way. In a way, this one is

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more clear, but is also even more cryptic

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and even harder to really understand. And you'll see what

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about as we roll into the discussion here.

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>But this concerns the so called Dindara Lights or the

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Dindara Light. So these are a series of stone release

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 1>in the hawt Or temple in Dindera, Egypt. Now you

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>can look up images of this, and I've included one

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the images here for you to look at, Joe,

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and they are quite captivating, and I mean, it's it's

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 1>almost unfair to throw people at this with sort of

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>alternative Egyptology in the back of their mind, because it's

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>going to make you lean into perhaps seeing things again

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>from not only a modern standboy point, which we can't

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>help but do, but also from a standpoint of looking

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for some sort of crazy advanced technology in the past.

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you were looking at these just kind of

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 1>out of context, but not with any specific expectations of

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the advanced technology, I think you might guess that we're

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at a couple of ancient Egyptian individuals who have

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:55.879
<v Speaker 1>giant eggplants, and those giant eggplants have giant snakes on them.

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Would this would of course be be incorrect. This is

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not exactly what we're looking at, but that's what it

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of looks like to me.

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I might have said, giant shields. I mean, they're holding

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 3>some of what looks like a really large flat object

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 3>on which a sort of slithering snake is depicted. But

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 3>of course the strange thing is that out of the

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:22.240
<v Speaker 3>bottoms of the shields there is coming some sort of line, which, again,

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 3>if you're playing into ancient technology thinking, you could say,

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 3>is that a power cord? Is that some kind of cable?

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, so there's this sense of plant to it. Yeah,

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a snake. There's no doubt about this snake.

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But then there's this this large sort of bulb or

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or eggplant like shape to the thing. And so the

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the alternative, the highly speculative hypothesis here that that once

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:52.720
<v Speaker 1>he's reflected in some of this you know, ancient alien

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>discourse and and and you know pseudohistories and pseudo scientific

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ideas concerning ancient e are that well, what they are

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:06.760
<v Speaker 1>holding here are filament light bulbs or representations of filament

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>light bulbs.

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, if you are familiar with incandescent light bulbs,

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:14.359
<v Speaker 3>you can absolutely see how somebody would make that comparison.

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 3>There is the shield or the eggplant shape looks like

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 3>it could be a you know, a transparent glass tube.

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 3>The snake depicted on it looks like it could be

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe looks like it could be the filament inside the bulb.

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 3>And then the sort of line there's like a sort

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 3>of flower looking thing at the base of the bulb,

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 3>and you could imagine that is the socket or not

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 3>the socket, what would you call it, the you know,

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the metal part at the base of an incandescent light bulb.

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 3>And then the line extending away from the bottom. You

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 3>could say, okay, that looks like a power line. It

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 3>looks like, you know, whatever the electricity is going in through.

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So the radical idea here would be that the

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:58.320
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egyptians had mastery over electricity. They made light bulbs

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:00.879
<v Speaker 1>or I guess receive light bulbs from someone, They got

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a monthly delivery from the aliens or something,

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and they wired up their various buildings with electric lights

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of one sort or the other.

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 3>The aliens gave them highly inefficient incandescent light bulbs.

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, or I mean, when you get into the

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:20.359
<v Speaker 1>various arguments, they also they draw comparisons to you know,

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of like early different variations of artificial lighting. So

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, the exact model may vary, but the idea, yeah,

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is that the ancient Egyptians had light bulbs. Now, actual

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 1>experts who weigh in on this will we'll say, well, there,

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>these are not light bulbs, obviously. What we're looking at

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is a symbolic motif. And another huge important fact here

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>is that these are not illustrations or engravings that are

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 1>occurring in isolation and out of context. Like, there's plenty

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of context, the most important being that this is a

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>temple of Hator. This is a god of ancient Egypt

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>who Geraldine Pinch in the book Egyptian Mythology describes as

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a golden goddess that aided in childbirth, the rebirth of

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the dead, and the renewal of the cosmos. She was

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>seemingly a complex deity with both destructive and beneficial attributes,

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 1>and she was commonly depicted as a beautiful woman with

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a red solar disc between a pair of cow horns. Now,

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 1>she could be worshiped in a few different forms, but

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the main roles she has here is a mother,

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and she is the mother of Horace, Uniter of the

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Two Lands. Horace, of course, is a very important god

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in Egyptian mythology, the celestial falcon and the god of kings.

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>So here Horace is Harsmatus Uniter of the two Lands,

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>and apparently in these images we're seeing representation of him

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the primeval form of a serpent. In rebirth, he

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>is depicted emerging in the form of this serpent from

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the lotus flower, which is in turn inside a boat,

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>lining up with the concept of the solar god rays

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>solar barge.

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, this is starting to make sense.

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Yeah, so like emerging from the lotus flower is

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the serpent that is horse. Now you're probably wondering, what

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 1>about that light bulb, what about that eggplant? Well, this

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is thought to be and I hope I'm pronouncing this

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>right a hen that's h n. And it may represent

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the womb of the sky goddess nut or note. And

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:35.399
<v Speaker 1>this is a goddess that was associated with the fig

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>tree and also with cosmic motherhood. The image in question

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:43.760
<v Speaker 1>also entails the symbolism of the jed pillar with added

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>arms coming out. So this is I mean, to my

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>eyes like, this is way weirder. This is the far

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:53.399
<v Speaker 1>weirder helmet is this strange pillar looking thing that's sort

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of holding up one of the eggplant shapes and has

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>arms coming out like some sort of like are psychedelic muppet.

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 1>But this is also grounded in ancient Egyptian symbolism. You know,

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's about stability and you know, and holding up the

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 1>cosmos and so forth.

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 3>You could argue that this looks like a baseball bat

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:19.279
<v Speaker 3>with several rings around it, and it has arms, it

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 3>has two arms, and it's pushing on the so called

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:22.320
<v Speaker 3>light bulb.

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so in the same way, that if we look

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>at hieroglyphics, we're looking at at language that we have

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 1>no frame of reference for. It's similar with with the

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 1>icons that we're seeing represented here. We have no unless

0:49:36.360 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 1>we are trained in it. We have no frame of

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 1>context for what these symbols are and what they represent.

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:45.239
<v Speaker 1>And all you can ultimately do is sort of like

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 1>try and take them at I guess, sort of base level,

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you can potentially lean into these elaborate explanations

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for what you're seeing, and you know, you can imagine

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the what would occur if you were to take any

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 1>form of highly some art from the modern world and

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 1>try and understand what you're looking at. So anyway, yeah,

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:11.279
<v Speaker 1>it's speaking of visual language that we probably are not

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:13.399
<v Speaker 1>going to pick up on in the modern age again

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>unless we have the expertise and we've you know, we

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:19.359
<v Speaker 1>are an egyptologist, et cetera, or it's been explained to us.

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Because at the end of the day, what we're likely

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at here is some representation of the rise of

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the sun and its journey through the night, though delivered

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>through religious ideas and symbolism of the time, and also

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the specific theology of this particular deity.

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 3>Right, and it looks like a light bulb to us

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 3>rather than this ancient Egyptian artistic motif because we're used

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 3>to seeing light bulbs, who were not used to seeing

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 3>this artistic motif. And if you happen to be familiar

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 3>with the right ancient Egyptian art you recognize it as Oh,

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 3>it's one of those.

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, I've looked at particular book by archaeologist and

0:50:57.760 --> 0:51:02.280
<v Speaker 1>author Kenneth L. Fetter on this matter. The book is Frauds,

0:51:02.280 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Myths and Mysteries, Science and Pseudoscience and Archaeology, and he

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:09.840
<v Speaker 1>points out that these quote unquote lights a factor into

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Eric von Donican's nineteen ninety six book The Eyes of

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the Sphinx, in which Vondnican argues that the only rational

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>way that the Egyptians, the ancient Egyptians could have worked

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in the dark confines of the Pyramids and other locations

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:30.520
<v Speaker 1>other structures without leaving telltale lamp black from burning lamps.

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>The only possible way this could be the case is

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>if they were using electric lights.

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Air tight.

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, Feeder points out that Egyptologists have a far less

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:47.319
<v Speaker 1>imaginative explanation backed up by actual evidence, and that is

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that the ancient Egyptians used linen soaked in oil or

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:54.319
<v Speaker 1>animal fat and twisted into wicks. These wicks would have

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>burned quite brightly, and then with salt applied, this would

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:04.359
<v Speaker 1>produce less smoke, which would produce less lampblack and they

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:06.279
<v Speaker 1>would have yeah, they would have burned pretty brightly, bright

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:09.399
<v Speaker 1>enough to conduct their work, and they would also burn

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:11.879
<v Speaker 1>for a set amount of time that would apparently mark

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the length of an artisan where a worker's shift. And again,

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:19.320
<v Speaker 1>this is something we have context for, we have physical

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 1>evidence for. It factors into our overall understanding of who

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the ancient Egyptians were and what their world was like.

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:29.919
<v Speaker 1>But if you go with a light bulb hypothesis, well

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you have no evidence because where are the examples of

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the other light bulbs, the spent bulbs, Where's evidence of

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the bulb production facilities, the power sources, the wiring, et cetera.

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it all just falls quickly apart. Instead, von

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Donikin apparently leaned on the thoroughly discredited hypothesis of the

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>bagdad battery as proof.

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:58.879
<v Speaker 3>This is yet another artifact that has been interpreted by

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 3>some as electrical technology in the ancient world, but probably

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:03.719
<v Speaker 3>was not.

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, and so the author here feter not von do Onic,

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and sums up quote because prehistoric pictorial depictions and even

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:19.520
<v Speaker 1>early written descriptions are sometimes indistinct or vague, and perhaps

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:22.280
<v Speaker 1>more important, because they are part of a different culture

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and have a context not immediately apparent to those who

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>do not explore further. You can see or read anything

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you want into them, just as you can with ink blots.

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 1>And so he refers to this elsewhere in the book

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 1>as the ink block principle, which I think is a

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>good way of thinking about evidence of this nature.

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Now, one way in which I would distinguish this example

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 3>from many of the others is that this example does

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 3>not seem as within the image itself as degraded in

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 3>quality or vague to me, at least in the like

0:53:57.160 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the illustrations I see from books. It looks like, you know,

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 3>we get a pretty clear picture of what the artwork,

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 3>whether at least the outlines and the artwork we're supposed

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 3>to be. But you're still, even though the picture is

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 3>fairly sharp, in the low information zone, because you don't

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 3>have the context, the background knowledge to place what you're

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:18.400
<v Speaker 3>looking at within its cultural milieu.

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, we just don't have the symbolic language

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>at our disposal to necessarily look at this and understand

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what's taking place. And again, I think this is this

0:54:28.600 --> 0:54:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is not something that's that that is unique to ancient

0:54:32.200 --> 0:54:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Egyptian religious imagery. I think you could apply this to

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to various other examples of even contemporary religious imagery, where

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:41.319
<v Speaker 1>if you if you don't know what you're looking at, you're, yeah,

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to understand the message of it, like

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:48.360
<v Speaker 1>what is being theologically relayed in this image, and you

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have to fall back on either just like again, a

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:54.480
<v Speaker 1>very literal interpretation of what you're looking at, or dragging

0:54:54.520 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in some sort of other belief system or some sort

0:54:57.080 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of other, you know, mode of understanding which may or

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 1>may not involve aliens.

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Another thing that I'm struck is sort of the general

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:11.879
<v Speaker 3>principle of thinking behind the Eric Vondanakan argument that Okay,

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:15.239
<v Speaker 3>they're working in the dark inside the pyramid chambers, and

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 3>they wouldn't have been able to see what they were

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:21.200
<v Speaker 3>working on without leaving lampblack unless they had light bulbs.

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 3>That seems to be a general style of argument used

0:55:24.040 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 3>by like ancient aliens people. I mean the same thing

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 3>is said about the construction of the pyramids. More generally,

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 3>it's like, I can't see how they could have done this,

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 3>Therefore it must have been aliens with advanced technology. That

0:55:34.960 --> 0:55:38.239
<v Speaker 3>is a really poor way to reason. Instead, you could

0:55:38.239 --> 0:55:41.359
<v Speaker 3>start by saying, like, well, what if instead of invoking

0:55:42.480 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 3>entities that would radically reshape our way of thinking about

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 3>the world, and there is no independent evidence of what if?

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Instead of that, we think that maybe they figured out

0:55:52.920 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 3>a solution that you haven't thought of or you don't

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:56.560
<v Speaker 3>have awareness of.

0:55:57.600 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like I mean you would It would be understand

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:02.920
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't know about this whole adding salt to

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:07.799
<v Speaker 1>torches or lights as a way to decrease lampblack There's

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>so many things like that in life that would have

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>been a parent or known to individuals who depended on

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 1>lamp technology or fire based illumination technology as opposed to

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the mode we're familiar with and the mode that we

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 1>then potentially read into these ancient images.

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would just say be careful about making the

0:56:28.360 --> 0:56:31.239
<v Speaker 3>move of I can't understand how someone could have done

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 3>X two. Therefore they must have relied upon powers that

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:38.880
<v Speaker 3>are extraordinary, and we have no other independent evidence.

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Of I'm reminded of various time travel movies that we've

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:46.880
<v Speaker 1>discussed or looked at on weird house cinema, where you

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of time traveler from the past going

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>into the future and they are and they may not

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 1>be time traveling, perhaps they're frozen, etc. You know. Well,

0:56:55.440 --> 0:56:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a man out of time wakes up and they're trying

0:56:58.160 --> 0:57:01.799
<v Speaker 1>to understand our advanced contemporary technology. They might look at

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a TV and they're like, they shrunk a person down

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:06.279
<v Speaker 1>and put him in a tiny box, and you know,

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is often played up for comedy, but it's

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 1>not that different from the sort of you know, you

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 1>know what you can consider ridiculous analysis of past technology

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:22.960
<v Speaker 1>where instead of you know, leaning on you know, the

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:25.920
<v Speaker 1>actual context of the thing and what they're capable of,

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you're going to this extreme model that you can't possibly

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>explain with any degree of accuracy.

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:36.000
<v Speaker 3>That's an amazing analogy. Actually, we are the unfrozen caveman

0:57:36.160 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 3>lawyer in reverse when we look at the ancient world.

0:57:39.440 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:41.640
<v Speaker 3>So he comes up and says, I am but a

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:44.400
<v Speaker 3>simple caveman. When I get into an airplane, I think,

0:57:44.520 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 3>is this some giant bird? But we are doing the

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 3>same thing. We look at an ancient inscription and say,

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:52.919
<v Speaker 3>when I look at an inscription of a bird, I think,

0:57:53.120 --> 0:57:54.600
<v Speaker 3>is this an attack helicopter?

0:57:55.360 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Exactly? All right, Well, that's perfect. I think we have

0:57:57.640 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to leave it at that. I think that that puts

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a nice cap on it. But you know, were perfectly

0:58:02.480 --> 0:58:06.400
<v Speaker 1>happy to continue talking about this particular topic or this

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing in general if nothing else in future

0:58:09.640 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>listener Mail episode. So write in let us know what

0:58:11.960 --> 0:58:16.680
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts are on egyptology, alternative egyptology and so forth,

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>or just in general, if there are other examples of

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this sort of data, this sort of imagery, etc. That

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you know is difficult for the average modern viewer to

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:32.480
<v Speaker 1>understand and then lends itself well to some sort of

0:58:33.080 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 1>paranormal or alternative or conspiracy explanation. Just a reminder that

0:58:39.080 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your minds Core episodes published on Tuesdays

0:58:41.920 --> 0:58:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and Thursdays, and the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed.

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 1>We have listener Mail on Monday, short Form Artifactor, Monster

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Effect on Wednesdays, and on Fridays, we set aside most

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>serious concerns to just talk about a weird film on

0:58:52.280 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Weird House Cinema.

0:58:53.440 --> 0:58:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If

0:58:56.800 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 3>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:58:58.440 --> 0:59:00.920
<v Speaker 3>feedback on this episode or any there, to suggest a

0:59:00.960 --> 0:59:03.440
<v Speaker 3>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

0:59:03.480 --> 0:59:06.160
<v Speaker 3>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

0:59:06.240 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:59:18.000 --> 0:59:20.760
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.